HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-07-15; City Council; 6281-1; 18 LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BIRTCHER PACIFICf--..l e- 6 m ' CITY OF CARLSBAI)
AGENDA BILL NO. 6281-Supplement 1 Initiz
Dept ,I DATE : July 15, 1980 C. Ati
C. Mgi DEPARTMENT City Attorney
Subject: 18-LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND PLANNED INDUSTRIAL D' CT 80-27, PUD-19 -- BIRTCHER PACIFIC --
Statement of the Matter
The city Council, at your meeting of July 1, 1980, direc
the city Attorney to prepare the necessary documents app
ing Tentative Subdivision Map (CT 80-27) and Planned Uni Development Permit (PUD-19). A resolution in that regar is attached.
Exhibit
Resolution No (~zLf0 approving CT 80-27 and PUD-19.
Recommendation
If the City Council concurs, your action is to adopt Resolution No. &Z~L/O , approving CT 80-27 and PUD-19.
Council Action:
7-15-80 Council adopted Resolution 6240, approving CT 80'27 and PUD-19.
f >’ %
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Y g 13 z f w 5 14 mo==
”& m, -I 15
u: I 56 Lu 0
$ggd 16
17
I-8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
0 6
Ma
6% 8
z $5
%$?% zp y
a6
- t
>!- a:
0
V
28
*e e
RESOLTJTION NO. 6240
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
WITH CONDITIONS TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION
MAP (CT 80-27) FOR AN 18-LOT PLANNED
INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION AND APPROVING
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPHENT PEWIT (PUD-19)
FOR SAID PROJECT ON APPROXIMATELY 7.23
ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF YARROW DRIVE AND CORTE DE LA Zi APPLICANT: BIRTCHER PACfFICe
WHEREAS, on June 11, 1980, the Carlsbad Planning Co
adopted Resolution No, 1648 and Resolution No. 1649 recc
to the City Council that Tentative Subdivision Map (CT F
Planned Unit Development (PUD-19) for Birtcher Pacific f
development of an 18-lot planned industrial subdivision
property generally located on the Northeast Corner of Yi
1 Drive and Corte De La Pina, more particularly described
Parcels A & B of Parcel Map No. 4713 being a resubc
of Lot 2 of Carlsbad Tract 73-49, Map No, 8054 j-n . of Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad,
I July 1, 1980, held a public hearing to consider the rec
and hear all persons interested in or opposed to Tentat
Subdivision Map (CT 80-27) and Plannea Unit Development
(PUD-19); and
I
WHEREAS, said Tentative Subdivision Map and Plannc
Development Permit have been declared to have a nonsigr
impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration h;
prepared and filed in compliance with the requirements
City of Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of
NOW, THEFXFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counci
< t'
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
D 12
2m
J 0 13
55 o,
OLW~ 002'z 14
g>:0 zp: 15 u: I3<
!2& E 6 16 Eg22 5p 5 >l- CT 17 aa
E 0 18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
.cc g
zc
uo
0
.e e
City of Carlsbad, California as follows:
A. That the above recitations are true and correct
B. That the findings of the Planning Commission ir
Resolution No. 1648 and Resolution No. 1649 constitute tl
findings of the City Council in this matter.
C. That said Tentative Subdivision Map, together i
provisions for its design and improvemefit and subject to
Conditions of Resolution No, 1648, is consistent wikh a1
applicable general and specific plans of the City of Car
D. That Tentative Subdivision Map (CT 80-27) and
Uni.'c Development Permit (CP-19) are hereby approved subj
all applicable requirements of the Carl-sbad Munici-pal Cc
the satisfaction of the conditions contained in Planninc
Resolution No, 1648, dated June 11, 1980, marked Exhibii
and Planning Commission Resolution No. 1649, dated June
marked Exhibit B, attaclzed hereko and made a part herec
subject to the following condition which has been added
Resolutions No. 1648 and No. 1649:
I
"This project, CT 80-27 and PUD-19, is approved up
express condition that building permits will not b issued for development of the subject property unl the City Engineer determines that such sewer facil are available at the time of application for such and will continue to be available until time of oc
If the City Engineer deternines that sewer facilit are not available, building permits will not be i:
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meetin:
city Council Of the City of Carfsbad, California, on tE
///
///
///
I
2.
t t’
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 n
m Q
9 g 1.3 a2 8 &. 14 oozg
z>yO -Ob<& 15 a6 -I u: I32c
5S;gd 16 “UZQm
17 izp y
9 l8 c
19
20
21
UJO
>$ a
0
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 -w
of July , 1980 by the following vote, to wit:
Council Members Packard, Casler, Anear, Lewis and KI AYES :
NOES : None
/,T /J/
(r‘J /?f &d;;’ &([: @&-&id
ABSENT; None
5ONALD C. PACKARD, Ma;
ATTEST 2
(SEAL)
4
I I
2.
: ' * -*: I* e. ._
3,
.2
3
4
5
6 c
.. .. .. .. .
'e
..
PLANNING CONi.IISSSON RESOLU'S'IION -__I__- NO. 1648
1..
A RFSOLUTION OF TIIE PLANNING CO!@IISSION OF TIjE
DEVEIJOppENT ON PROPERY'S: G5NEPALLY LOCATED ON
CITY OI> CAI'ILSRAD , CALIFORNIA, RECOi?ll."I~~::fJDING
APPROVAL OF ZiE 18 I,OT PLANXED INDUSr?RLAL
THE NORTEIEAS'J: CORNER OF YARROW I)RIVE AND CORTE
DE LA PINA. APTLICANT : BIRTCIIER PACIFIC CnSE NO: CT 80-27
-
7 I) 9
3.0
WEIERERS, a verified application for Certain pr0pc:rty
Parcels A 5: B of Parcel Map No. 4713 being a resuhdi
of Lot 2 of Carlsbad Tract 73-49, Map No, 8054 i.1-1 t-h of Carlsbad, County of San Diego
'ly~s bee11 filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred tc
LJ Planlling Comnission; and
WHERZAS I said verif icd application constitutes a re(
#
1
3-5
16 I June, 1380, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescr
to consider said request; and
.' ' . by 3.8 1 I
I 5r9
20
23.
22
23
.. 24
26
27
25
28
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upoa hearing and c
all tesi;inlony and argu-melltSI if anyr of all persons des.
ilzeard. r said commisSion considered all factors d-atj-ng
Tentative Tract Nap.
NOWr TISEREPOP?, BE IT IIERERY RESOLVED by the Plann
\mission as foll0Ws:
A) That the above rccikations arc true and correct.
That based on the cvidcncc yrcscntccl at the puhl-ir
t?ie Conimi.ssion rccornmcnc'ls AI'1'I:OVAI. -*--- of CT 80-27 , b following findings and sub-~cct to thc Folloiqing c
i(
i
r)
F'inili iicj.';:
1)
,
-_-I_____
~llc proposed tcntativc map is consjstcnt with thc yc~~c,--a~ p1 :in since t-l~ sj-~~c j.5 (IC:;:i.g)latcd by thc.
plnl1 for plannccI industri a1 and, as conclikionctl,
is consistent with all. othcr gcncra2 p1.m cl.crncnl
I
, , e,
2,
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3-0
e
c
.~ ..
e
2> The site is phys5cally suitable Xor the type of devcl
proposed since the propcrty can accomniodate the pro-je witliout impacting surrounding property or any environ
rcsourccsa
The design of the project wi3.3- riot cause any sj-cjnific
environmental impacts since based on an initial stuci:
project r including a field investigation OX the site
Planning Director has c'ieterrninec! that the project wi result in any adverse environxental impacts and thcr
has issued a declaration of negative environmental i
May 14, 1980, Log No. 700.
The design of the subdivision will not cause any sex
health problems since the project lNX?tS all public 1
requirements D
The project is consistent with all city public faci
Rdequate sewer connections have been allocated
3)
4)
5) 1 policies and ordinances since:
a)
13
l2
14
15
16
' 17
19
20
21
22
23
'- x81
the project, In addition, septic systems have
approved for the site,
Adequate water, gas and electric servj.cc will
ta serve the development,
All necessary public improvements will either
or required as conditions of: approval.
The applicant lias agreed and is required by t'
of an appropriake condition to pay a public f fee. PerLormance o€ that contract and paymen fee will enable this body to find that all ot
facilities will be available concurrent with
required by the general plan,
b) I 1
c)
d)
Conditions
1) Approval is granted for CT 80-27 as shown on Exhil
CT 80-27/PUD-19 dated June 5, 1380, on fi.lc in th Department and incorporatcd by reference.
2) All conditions o€ approval. of Rcsolutj.on No. 1649
and Resolution No, 6009 fpr CT 79-14 shall be met
24 3) This approval j-s expressly conditioncd 011 thc pal
applicant of a public facilities fee as required
26
27
20
2s Couricil ])olicy NO. 17, dated Aucjust 23, 1379, on
the city Clerk and incorporakcd herein by rcfcrei
according to thc aqrecmcnt t?xccutccl by the app1.it
payment of sni.d fee, A copy of that agrceiiicnt,
1380, is on file with the City Clcrl: and jncorpo by refei:cl~cc. lf said fee is riot pn:i cl a:; pronii:;
ap131 ;.cation will not Ix consi ;;lent with t:hc gcnc
the pro:jcct cannot piroccccl and tiiis appi-oval sh;:
I
, r ,+'.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
81
*
3.0 7
11
.12
13
14
l5
, 4
.&::
x?
- 38 /'
21
0
.. .. . . .. . .. *. .-
4) Corte del. Cedro shall be improved as requi.rcd by Res( No. 6009 prior to final occupancy of any units,
Corner radii at intersecting internal streets shall ' to the. approval- o€ the City Engineer prior to the is
building permits in order to insure adequate On-Site
circulation.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular mcctillg of
5)
Planning Coinmission of the City of CarXsbad, California,
the 11th day of June, 1980, by -the following voke, to wit
Schick, Larson, Friestedt, Leedsp Marcus and AYES:
NOES: None I
ABSENT: Rombotis
ABSTAIN : None
&(<,, EDWIN ie f,? , . S, l\J SCHICIC, JIL.:l\,b Ji?
CARTABAD PLANNIN -'q
ATTEST:
-,I7 m2-&p f 7 -. _e.- -,++/@/,/&
'~mms c. IizlGAw~~~< ,,//Secretary
\kARLSBAD PLAkNING. COYIISSION
I
/ \ J
1 i
22
23
24
25
26
I '
”*‘ -? $1
1 I
2
7 d
.
5
.G ..
7
8
9
10
3.1
12
23
l4
15
. 16
2.7
3.8
e EXHIBIT B T&SOI,T.JTION N(
PXAXNING COL’.Pi’LSSTON- RESOLUTION NO e 3.649
I - - -
A RxsowrIoN OF THE PI,ANNIPG COI~WISSION OF rrrm
CITY OF CARLSBAD , CALIFOR?lIA, RECOI\J>IE:NDING
APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNXT DCVELOl’I~lrJhTT FOR AN
GENERALLY L9CATXD ON THE lilORTIIEAS7‘ COX‘?EII OF
YARROT?J DRIVE AND COR’I’E DE LA PINA.
APPLIICliNT ; BIT!TC1lER PACIFIC
18 TjOT 1’LANNEf3 IP.:T>’JS‘I’RTAT~ DEVELOPMENT ON PROL’EF
4-
CASE NO: Pun-19 c__
I4HEREAS, a verified application for certain property
Parcels A 6 B of Parcel Map No. 4713 bej-ng a resuhdi of Lot 2 of Carlsbad ‘I’ract 73-43 Map No, 8054 j-11 t:hc
of Carlsbad, County of San Diego
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred tc
~I-anni ny Commission; and
1 WIEIEAS, said verified application constitutes a re:
I provided! by Title 21 of the ‘Carlshad Municipnl Code; and
WIIEREAS, thc; Planning Comn;\jssicn did, on the 11th d
1 I 1980, \old a dul~r noticed pub]-ic hearing as prescribed b
consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon heaiing and c
a11 testimony and arguments, if any of all persons desir 1
19
20
21
22
1 heard, said Commission considered all factors relating f ! Planned Unit Development; and
NOW, TI‘IEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY EESOLVED by the PLann.
Commission as follows:
23
24
25
2G
27
20
A)
13)
Tlmt the above recitations are true and correct.
That bnscci on thc cvidencc: prescl~tcd at the public
thc Colnmj ssion recommends; Al’,PROVAT, -_____ of PUD-13 , basc
following findings and suhicci; to thc followi.ncj cc
___ Findi.nqs:
2) ~11~ proposccl planncx’i inclustrj-;ll dcvcl-opmcnt st thc locatiorl is both. ncccssnry and c?lcsirabI c to. provic
coiiiprchc:ns-i vcl y and i.mncJ i n2.t.i vc1.y clc::; i cpc?cl fac ilii
will conI:~:ibutc to thc gcncral. well bcing of thc (
< j .@-
1
.. .. ,(I
2) The proposed dcvelopmcnt will nct bc detrimentaL to t safety or generql vrcliare of persons residing or work
the same vicinity, nor would the project be injurj-ous
property or improvements in this area, 3
4
5
3) AI1 design criteria set forth in Section 21e45a110, 2
mhimum devaloprnent standardk set forth in Section 2.
will be met,
6
7
8
9
4) The props& project will. be consistent with all elei
the General Plan including the land use clement whic designates the site for planned industrial developme
The applicant has agreed and is required by the incl
an appropriake condition to pay a public facilities Performance of that contract and payment of the fee
.enable this body to find! that public faciliti-es will
5)
3-0
11.
12
available concurrent with need as required by the Gc
6) Based on an initial study of the project, including
investigation of the site, The Planning Director 11;
cleterrnined that the project will not result in any ,
environmental impacts apd therefore has issued a de(
OE iiegative cnvironiaenhl- hpact on FIay 14 I a9 80 r IJ( 13
14
15
I
1 1 Conditions
1) Anproval is granted for PUD-19, as shown on Exhibit
E and F to CT 80-27/PUD-19 dated June 5, 1980, and
to CT 80-27/PUD-19, dated May 5, 1980, on file in t
' 16
37
Department and incorpozated by reference, . Developx
occur substantially as shown on these exhibits unlc
noted in these conditions.
18
. 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2o
12) j
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the app?
submit a final Planned Unit Development Plan, hcoi changes required herein, for the approval of the I?-
Director ,
3) The standards of the P-M (Planned Industrial) zone permitted uses, conditional uses I buil-din9 heiqht,
stolragc and industrial waste discharcjc shall qpp1.y suh-j cc t; property. No cncroachmcnk into any rcquir
othcr than is permitted by this appl-ication shall unl css a revised Planned Unit Dcvelopnicnt applicat
appproved .
A sign program for the entire dcvelopnicnt shall bc
the rcvicw and approval of thc Plnnni.nq Dircct-or 1
i ssuancc! of bui.1di.ncj pcrrni i:s. Said signs shall h
and well intcgrntcd into the dcvclopmcnt ,
4)
////
////
-3-
4.
5
-6
7 I
8
9
IO
13.
l2
33
14
15
16
17
18
c
tolerant plant species shall be utilized to the maxim extent Ieasible. Said lmdscapz plan shall emphasize of plant matefials wiii ch wj.Il screen the dcvelopnent
lot lines.
Al.1 roof top appurtenanccs shall hc effectively scrc~
vies67 and/or integrated into the design of the buil.dir
to the approval of the Planning Director prior to the
of building permits. 0
7) An all weather access road shall he maintai.ncd f.,hrov( construction as required by the Fire I..larshall+
6)
8) All fire al-arm syskcms,. fire hydrants, cxtinguj-shing
aukomatic sprinklers r and other sys terns pertinent to
location, shall be submitted to the Fire Department
approval prior to construction,
When any portion of a building is in excess of 150' wa-ker supply on a public street, there shall hc pro"
on-site hydrants and mains capable of supplying the
f iref low, whc? required by the ChieZ. -. -
Water far fire protect5on shall be available for usc before any combustibles art located on-site, as reqi
the Fire Marshall.
9)
10)
11) In order to provide for Sire protection, adquake f with required fire flow shall be installed on and o
required by the Pire Marshall,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2o
l12) Fixe retardent roofs shall be required on all struc I
13) All conditions of approval of Resolution Eo. 1648,
CT 80-27 and Resolution No. 6009 for CT 79-14, shal
Failure to do so shall void this Plaiined Unit Dcvel
approval.
This projcct is approved upon the express condttior
applicant shall pay a public facilities fee as ircq
City Council Policy No. 17, dated Aucjust 29, 1373,
with the City Ctcrk and incorporated hcrcin by ref(
according to thc agrcerncnk cxccu lccl by the applica
payriiciit of said fcc a copy of that ngrecrncntr. dated
1980, is on file with thc city Clcrk and is incorp hcrc3.n by rcicrcncc. If said fce is nut paid as p
thj s appIicnLion plil]. llot LX COIIS~S~C~~; ~ith thc G and appvoval far thi s project shall be void. 'This
rcqui.~-eil for all. fr'uture dcvclopmcnt of this propcz
Q bu.i.XcIin<j pcrni i t has not l~cn issued.
14)
L'C RES0 1tlG43 I -3-
... ,u
1
2
3
4
. .. .. . ..
15) The "picnj-c area" 3-ocated at the soutlwest corner of
the propcr-ty and also adjacent to thc south of Build L71 and the landscape area located at the, northeast
corner of the property, as shall bc improd as piCn
arcas for employees of the dcvclopment. This shall indicated on the final I.andscape and irrigation pl-an
required under Condition No, 5.
.I r 41
5
G
7
8
9
10
c
e
16) 1\11 I.ightiny Of buildings and parkings areas shal.1. k
away from adjacent properties in order to avoid any
desirable impacts to such propsrties.
Per the requirements of the P-2.1 zone, noise emaiiotir the project shall not exceed a level of 45 dBA at ar
property line Q
The applicznt shall establish a property owner's as:
and covenant, condieions and restriction for the de7
prior to the issuance of building permits subject tc Planning Director's approval. Said CC&R8 S shall en!
17)
18)
t
11 maintenance of all common areas and building exteric
that proper signing for traffic circulation is prov
13
' 15
16
37
- 18i
3-9
20
21
22
23
24
. 25, /'
26
27
20
v
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting o
Plan:ling CO~jssion Of the City of Carlsbad, Cal-ifornia,
the 11th day of JuneP 1980, by the fol.lowing votec to wi
Schick, Lzrson., Friestedt, Marcus p Leeds and
h
AYES:
NOES: None
AESENT : Eombotis
ABSTAIN : None
4 A 1 ,I, } -;,
(
1
\& 7-k -
SClrlCIC, LJ \
CARLSBAD PLANNING C(
ED1'1113
ATTEST :
CL5.a ;/7 P2&:/4/,/&/ - - ,
,.,I~W;S C. IIAGANAN,, Sccrctary
,,CARI,SBAD PLANNI G COfiDIISSION 2
PC I1E:SO 3f l+G4 9 -4-
*
7 I
.' c-7 I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 e
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1648
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TH'
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOLVIP."LENDING
APPROVAL OF AN 18 LOT PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF YARRO$I DRIVE AND CORT
DE LA PINA, APPLICANT: BIRTCEER PACIFIC CASE NO: CT 80-27
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property
Parcels A & B of Parcel Map No. 4713 being a resubdi 8l 9
10
11
12
l3
14
l5
l6
17
of Lot 2 of Carlsbad Tract 73-49, Map No. 8054 in th of Carlsbad, County of San Diego
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred tc
Planning Commission: and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a rec
provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 11th dz
June, 1980, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescrj
to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and c(
I
l9
2o
21
22
24
25
26
27
28
23
18Ial.1 testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desii I
lheard, said Commission considered all. factors relating tc
Tentative Tract Map.
NOW, THEREFOPS, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plannii
lmission as follows:
A)
IB)
That the above recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public the Cowmission recommends APPROVAL of CT 80-27, bas following findings and subject to the following con
i
I
I I
Iendings:
1) The proposed tentative nap is consistent with the c
general plan since the site is designated by the la
plan for planned industrial and, as conditioned, th is consistent with all other general plan elements.
,
-- f-h,
l.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
25
27
28
I 0 e
2) The site is physically suitable for the type of deve proposed since the property can accommodate the proj without impacting surrounding property or any enviro resources.
The design of the project will not cause any signifi
environmental impacts since based on an initial stud
project, including a field investigation of the site
Planning Director has determined that the project wi result in any adverse environmental impacts and ther
has issued a declaration of negative environmental i May 14, 1980, Log No. 700.
3)
4) The design of the subdivision will not cause any sex
health problems since the project meets all public F
requirements.
The project is consistent with all city public facil policies and ordinances since:
a)
5)
Adequate sewer connections have been allocated
the project. In addition, septic systems have
approved for the site.
b) Adequate water, gas and electric service will 'I:
to serve the development,
All necessary public improvements will either '3:
or required as conditions of approval.
The applicant has a.greed and is required by thc
of an appropriate condition to pay a public fac
fee, Performance of that contract and payment fee will enable this body to find that all othc
facilities will be available concurrent with nc
required by the general plan.
c)
d)
Conditions
1) Approval is granted for CT 80-27 as shown on Exhibi CT 80-27/PUD-19 dated June 5, 1980, on file in the
Department and incorporated by reference.
and Resolution No. 6009 for CT 79-14 shall be met,
2) All conditions of approval of Resolution No. 1649 f
3) This approval is expressly conditioned on the payme
applicant of a public facilities fee as required by
Council Policy No. 17, dated August 29, 1979, on fi
the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference according to the agreement executed by the applican
payment of said fee. A copy of that agreement, dat
1980, is on file with the City Clerk and incorporat by reference. If said fee is not paid as promised,
application will not be consistent with the general the project cannot proceed and this approval shall
i
-2- PC RES0 #1648
*r ,'X ,
1
2
3
4
5
6
'I
8
9
10
11
12
13
l5
96
17
~8
l4
'1.41 L/ 2o
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
4) Corte del Cedro shall be improved as required by Res
No. 6009 prior to final occupancy of any units.
5) Corner radii at intersecting internal streets shall
to the approval of the City Engineer prior to the is building permits in order to insure adequate on-site circulation.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
Planning Commission of the Ci-ty of Carlsbad, California,
the 11th day of June, 1980, by the following vote, to wit
AYES: Schick, Larson, Friestedt, Leeds, Marcus and
NOES: None
ABSENT: Rombotis
ABSTAIN : None
ATTEST:
fl 7
2
I
rg 7 ___.-.- .-*&&@&.o ,
1
.f&i%??%&AG,mN ,,p3ecreta:
,CARISBAD PLANNIN 'COMMISSION
I j
I I I I
PC RES0 # 1648
-3-
.‘ I
I- ’.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
3.9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1649
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COi’JIMISSION OF THE
APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR AN
18 LOT PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ON PROPER
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
YARROW DRIVE AND CORTE DE LA PINA,
APPLICANT: BIRTCHER PACIFIC
CASE NO: PUD-19
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property
Parcels A & B of Parcel Map No. 4713 being a resubdi
of Lot 2 of Carlsbad Tract 73-49 Map No. 8054 in the of Carlsbad, County of San Diego
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a reg
provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 11th da
1980, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed bq
consider said request; and
WKEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and cc
all testimony and arguments, if any of all persons desiri
1 heard, said Commission considered all factors relating tc
Planned Unit Development; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plannir
Commission as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
That based on the eviden.ce presented at the public 1 the Commission recommends APPROVAL of PUD-19, based following findings and subjcct to the following conc I B,
I 1
I
1
Findings:
11) The proposed planned industrial development at the : location is both necessary and desirable to provide
comprehensively and imaginatively designed facility
will contribute to the general well being of the COI
1
./ I
*"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
x0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e e
2) The proposed development will not be detrimental to safety or general welfare of persons residing or wor
the same vicinity, nor would the project be injuriou property or improvements in this area.
All design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.110,
minimum development standards set forth in Section 2 will be met.
3)
4) The proposed project will be consistent with all ele
the General Plan including the land use element whic designates the site for planned industrial developme
The applicant has agreed and is required by the incl
an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities
Performance of that contract and payment of the fee
enable this body to find that public facilities will available concurrent with need as required by the Ge
5)
6) Based on an initial study of the project, including investigation of the site. The Planning Director ha
determined that the project will not result in any a
environmental impacts and therefore has issued a dec of negative environmental impact on May 14, 1980, LC
Conditions
1) Approval is granted for PUD-19, as shown on Exhibits E and F to CT 80-27/PUD-19 dated June 5, 1980, and E
to CT 80-27/PUD-19, dated May 5, 1980, on file in t?
Department and incorpoyated by reference. Developme
occur substantially as shown on these exhibits unles noted in these conditions.
12) I
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applj submit a final Planned Unit Development Plan, incorr changes required herein, for the approval of the P12 Director.
3) The standards of the P-M (Planned Industrial) zone 1 permitted uses, conditional uses, building height, c
storage and industrial waste discharge shall apply I
subject property. No encroachment into any requirec
other than is permitted by this application shall bc
unless a revised Planned Unit Development applicatic
appproved.
A sign program for the entire development shall be 5
the review and approval of the Planning Director pr:
issuance of building permits. Said signs shall be :
14)
and well integrated into the development,
////
////
PC RES0 #1G49 -2-
9 ,rJ ,
‘1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 I
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
28
27
0 e
5) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the appli
submit a detailed landscape and irrigation plan, gen
consistent with Exhibits D and E dated June 5, 1980, to the approval of the Planning Director. Native dr tolerant plant species shall be utilized to the maxi extent feasible. Saic? landscape plan shall emphasiz
of plant materials which will screen the development lot lines.
6) All roof top appurtenances shall be effectively scre
view and/or integrated into the design of the buildi to the approval of the Planning Director prior to th of building permits.
7) An all weather access road shall be maintained throe
construction as required by the Fire Marshall,
8) All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishin? automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent tc location, shall be submitted to the Fire Department approval prior to construction,
9) When any portion of a building is in excess of 150’
water supply on a public street, there shall be prot
on-site hydrants and mains capable of supplying the
fireflow, when required by the Chief.
10) Water for fire protection shall be available for use before any combustibles are located on-site, as reqi
the Fire Marshall.
*.
11) In order to provide for fire protection, adequate f:
with required fire flow shall be installed on and oj required by the Fire Marshall.
12) Fire retardent roofs shall be required on all struc-l
13) All conditions of approval of Resolution No. 1648, : CT 80-27 and Resolution No. 6009 for CT 79-14, shal: Failure to do so shall void this Planned Unit Develc
approval.
This project is approved upon the express condition applicant shall pay a public facilities fee as requ
with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by refe according to the agreement executed by the applican payment of said fee a copy of that agreement dated.
1980, is on file with the City Clerk and is incorpo
herein by reference. If said fee is not paid as pr this application will not be consistent with the Ge and approval €or this project shall be void. This required for all future development of this propert
a building permit has not been issued.
I I
14)
City Council Policy No. 17, dated August 29, 1979, t
PC RES0 #1649
I
-3-
. .T .
3.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
I*
19
20
21
22
23
24
I, 2% /' b26
27
28
0 e
15) The "picnic area" located at the southwest corner ol the property and also adjacent to the south of Builc 17, and the landscape area located at the northeast
corner of the property, as shall be improved as pic]
areas for employees of the development. This shall
indicated on the final landscape and irrigation plai required under Condition No. 5.
All lighting of buildings and parkings areas shall I
away from adjacent properties in order to avoid any
desirable impacts to such properties.
16)
17) Per the requirements of the P-&I zone, noise emanati' the project shall not exceed a level of 45 dBA at a
property line.
18) The applicant shall establish a property owner's as
and covenant, conditions and restriction for the de
prior to the issuance of building permits subject t
Planning Director's approval. Said CC&R'S shall en
maintenance of all common areas and building exteril
that proper signing for traffic circulation is prov
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting 0
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California,
the 11th day of June, 1980, by the following vote, to wi
AYES: Schick, Larson, Friestedt, Marcus, Leeds and
NOES: None
ABSENT : Rombotis
ABSTAIN : None ib!,& ,,I-. [J . d,- . ) . ?!, .\ \/ t I I
CARLSBAD PLANNING C
EDWIN s. SCHICK, 3
ATTEST :
// kw2 c22? *, ./I &!!//W&f
S C? HAGAMiN ,?Secretary
',.CARLSBAD PLANNI .G COMMISSION
Y $7
PC RES0 #1649 -4-
i) 9- 1 ,’:
3*
STAFF REPORT
DATE : June 11, 1980
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Brian Milich, Planning Department
SUBJECT : CT 80-27/PUD-19; BIRTCHER PACIFIC
18 Lot Planned Industrial Development at Yarrow Drive and Corte de la Pina, Palomar
Airport Business Park
I) Project Description
The applicant is proposing an 18 lot planned industr development on 7.23 acres located in the Palornar Air Business Park. A total 105,995 square feet of build space is proposed in seventeen separate buildings.
‘quate sewer connections have been allocated for the ject. The buildings will be one-story (maximum heig 19 feet) containing a mixture of manufacturing, ware and office space,
Although portions of the property have been previous disturbed, most of the site remains in its natural E
Approximately 16,000 cubic yards of grading is propc
in conjunction with this project.
The applicant is requesting a planned unit developme
The lots will correspond to the building footprint, ing them to be sold individually, with an undivided in the common area. A planned unit development woul
allow the applicant to’the development standards of underlying P-14 Zone.
A cul-de-sac will be constructed, providing access 1 the subject property from Corte de la Tina. This pi
street was required as part of the resubdivision of property, CT 79-14.
in order to create individual lots for each buildin:
11) Analysis
Planning Issues
1) Has the project been comprehensively designed
and have adequate on-site amenities been provic
6 4- ' .>i ...
to justify modification to the underlying P-M standi
2) Does the circulation system provide safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular traffic mov
Discussion
The purpose of a Planned Unit Development is to fac tate the development of a comprehensively planned
project, emphasizing imaginative and innovative des
coupled with individual building ownership. The PI
Unit Development also allows some variance in the application of zoning and subdivision regulations t
the particular property, In this case, the P-P.1 zon would normally require one acre minimum lots, in addition to 50 foot front, 25 foot rear, and 20 foc
side yard setbacks, Also, in the P-M zone, parkinc
cannot be closer than ten feet to a rear or interic side property line, number of deviations from these standards in order provide individual building ownership and addition; on-site amenities,
More specifically, the "postage stamp lots" createc each building do not meet the one acre lot minimum, addition, the plans indicate parking within the frc
yard setback and to within five feet of the side a1
rear lot lines. Also, Building No. 17 encroaches i
feet into the required side yard.
As previously mentioned, the applicant is proposinc additional on-site amenities in order to justify tl
postage stamp lots and yard encroachments, amenities include ample landscaping throughout the development, attractively designed buildings, threc
open space/picnic areas, and a well designed entra:
into the development. These amenities are all con to be important aspects of the project in terms of justifying any modification to the P-14 standards.
Initially, the open space/picnic areas and the ent
landscaping were considerably smaller in size, Th
applicant agreed with staff that these areas were
ficant in terms of accommodating the needs of the employees and in providing an attractively designe
project, and therefore re-designed the plans. The
The applicant is proposing a
These
-2-
* :.f: i 6.
plans which are presently before the Commission sbw i comprehensively designed project, with sufficient on- site amenities to justify modifications to the under11 P-M zoning standards .
The proposed plans also represent a significant modifj
cation to the applicant's initial submittal in terms
of on-site traffic circulation, Specifically, the
entrance to the subject property has been re-designed
by extending the landscape islands and re-positioning the driveway opening. This provides additional room so that larger trucks can negotiate the turns at the
entrance, and it also reduces the potential for vehici
conflicts at this intersection point. A number of otl
on-site turn radii have also been modified to faciliti
truck circulation, and pedestrian pathways have been
developed throughout the project to reduce pedestrian
vehicular conflicts.
As proposed, the project is comprehensively designed,
providing adequate on-site circulation, off-street pa:
recreational facilities, and landscaping, in addition
well designed buildings. Also, the project meets all the development standards of the PUD ordinance as the:
relate to yards, coverage, height, refuse areas and 0:
space.
111. Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolutions Nos: 1648 and - 1649, recommending APPROVAL
of CT 80-27/PUD-19, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained herein.
Attachments
Background Data Sheet Location Map
Disclosure Form
PC Resolution Nos: 1648 and 1649
Exhibits A,B,D,E and F dated 6/5/80 Exhibit C dated 5/5/80
BM:ar
-3-
5 s -NO: ,CT 8,0-27/pd.19 Q -- -- __ - - - - - - €6- *’ *A;
,.
~~JJ~~J~ BIRTCHER PACIFIC
mmT Lm ~T~ON: 18 lot planned hdustsial developrent for 17 ind~
buildings at Yarrm Drive and Corte De La Pha in the Palomar Airport €31
m TEQA~~oN: Portions of Parcels A&B of Parcel Map No. 4713 in tl
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, filed May 7, 1976,
c
213 - 050 - 17&18 =*SST 2&-eel, Mnr$er:
7-23 No, d pa 2 (18 proposed.) Acres
m L Prn m ZOrnTG
Planned Industrial @=& 2- Iand use Z&qz-ian
Density Propoe
PropoSea Zone
K/A mity M.b&
Existing ZaE Existing Land Use: Vacant swll?2*cj zoning a.. -3-2 CSe:
P-M
mN?G Land Use
l<or”& L-c Animal Shelter
SuL\ P-tl Vacant
%t P-M Vacant
L -
west P-M vacant
w=rc mflm
c&.lc-.A7- Le>+L WA
wa”i;zr 2-Le Costa Real Municipal Water District
L.’ m +
seT&-y2 L’is”,r-ct City of Carlsbad mu’s 37.6
for tl March 4, 1980 3.3’ - _-.” : m 35~’ A-LL-S 7 z ti ,2 -__ 2- >~~E?2C, &+A
i 3.-?-zz :
DJXXNE3ii IEPACT ASSESSiWiT
X r;eqativ? ~zclza~on, issued 5/14/80 Ix>g PLO, P 700
E.I.R. CertZied, dated
Othm,
0 0
L. -1 $2
4. -.
If ..Iter the infomatior, you ~WC subittea hs ken revitucd, It IS dctcmined
that further infonutior, is required, you will be so advised. .
SPL~~T: Rirtchrr Rirsincss Center - Palomar I
he (individual, partncrshlp, joxnt venture, corporation, ryndlcatj
27611 La Pa= Road. 1.3gunn Nigwl, CA 92677
Business Address
(714) 531-5031
hlephone Number
.-Amur1 None
-42
&sines6 Adckess
Zelephune Nuber ( Birtcher Pacific
-Rs= ( (General Partnership - Ronald E, and Arthur B. Birtcher, 1
( scnture, corporation, syndication) ( ( 27611 La Paz Road, Laguna Niguel, CA 92677
( a-inesa wress ( [ (714) 831-SO31
. (be (ldivxiual, partner. joint acae Address
a partner
- Salephone Nunbsb . !&dephone Ember
( Carlsbad I, Lrd. (Limited Partnership) ( Honer Fiarvey, General Partner (- IIoDe Pddxess
( 9570 h‘ilshire Blvd., Suite 260, Bevsrly Hills, CA 90212 . I
t~~lrirnn~ address (
a partner
( (212) 278-5015
polophone Xualxc ! Talepbna Kuacmr
( Campbell Interests ( a California 0
{ 2 Morro Bay . . t Incorporated 6
[ Corona del Mar, CA 92625 ( Corporate RS41
( (- a partner
t obert PI. Campbell, Pres. . ( ”,,,, pore sbets if necenMly1
iipe declare under pe~lty OP perjury ehat the information contained in this d
closure is true ad correct and that it will remain trua & cotzect and may b
lalied upon as be- true and correct until amended.
&kbLP-- cz2L :, Applicant
BY
.r
c 0 0 --z
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CT 80-27/PUD-19
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Carlsbad City Council w
hold a public hearing on Tuesday, July I, 1980 at 6:OO P.M. in City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, to consider of an 18 unit Planned Industrial Development on property gener
located at Yarrow Drive and Corte de la Pina in Palomar Airpor Business Park and more particularly described as, "Portions of
Parcels A & B of Parcel Map No. 4713, in the City of Carlsbad, of San Diego, filed May 7, 1976."
APPLICANT; BIRTCHER PACIFIC
PUBLISH : June 21, 1980
CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
0 e . ‘7 e-
Public Hearing
July 1, 1980 CT 80-27/PUD-19
Leonard H, McRoskey 1915 Armacost Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90025
Hughes Aircraft Post Office Box 09515 Los Angeles, CA 90009
Mr. Robert Campbell Birtcher Pacific 27611 La Paz Laguna Niguel, CA 92625
- -- e KOTICE OF PUELIC HE-MING 4 .. 4 7-.l * .
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Car:
will hold z 'pblic hearing at the City Coi,lnciS, Chambers, 1200 Elm Ayeni
Carlsbad, 'Alifornia, at 7:OO P.M. on Wednesday, June 11, 1980, to Con:
approval of an 18 unit Planned Industrial Development on property gene]
located at Yarrow Drive and Corte de la Pina in Palomar Airport Eusine
and mors particularly described as : - rarrions of Parceis A 4 B of Parcel Nap No. 4713 in the City
of Carlsbad, Counry of San Diego filed Hay 7, 1976.
Thse persons wishing EO szeak on this proposal are cordially invited
the acreTA<; -7c. .-:-.. public heerizg. If you have any questions please call n'l at 43g-5531i.
CASE z.I;z; CT ~Q-~~~~~~-~~
AppLIf-A;>:;" : B 1 RTCEEZ- 2;L-I TJ IC PUBLfS? : PIay 2!!, LS.<?
CA2L-As3,m DT ,\T---->-'- 7-7 X*-- l. ---\-, -2. c .- .;-YisSION
--. ..-
!-
._
e.
-
P
Ct.SdPCqyp$2p l%%J --i”t;zs3c.
,,-
-11- w(m
L?
I
WH PVW? - T’fl”l
*
. md r/!H&
1. - WmzlrP??
PlflnHm)- S?’’ f3-z - -m2 cw pivw ~Pfyq-P
e C1-P- WLWUTWV,
- -
- Ie=&q&-.
\‘
ytq-futc-^p - w
m/mH- -
’ “n/PIWC
c
‘TrtL‘m0f-y 375%E .QP TPwVrilP cc;nm --
- - .. IF7 -e
I.
- =-----
\\
I ,--ii rT’ I
..
..
7
..
*
..
..
L
\
b -e