Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-08-05; City Council; 6328; North County Beach Erosion Study CommitteeCITY OF CARLSBAD AGENDA BILL NO. (jp 3 3 9 DATE: August 5, 1980 DEPARTMENT MAYOR Subject:NORTH COUNTY BEACH EROSION STUDY COMMITTEE Statement of the Matter At the April 15, 1980 meeting of the City Council, Mayor Packard reported on his meeting with Mayor Bagley of Oceanside and indicated he was in the process of organizing a group to study beach erosion problems from a North County perspective. The first meeting of the study group was held on May 19, 1980 and their review and report finalized on July 21, 1980. At that time the Chairman, Dave Minnich, presented the resolutions of recommendations. Exhibit Resolutions of Recommendations Study Group Participants -, A RESOLUTION OF THE NORTH COUNTY BEACH EROSION STUDY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDING A o POSITION TO BE TAKEN AFTER EVALUATING THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEER'S PROPOSED GROIN PROJECT FOR OCEANSIDE. The North County Beach Erosion Study Committee does hereby ' resolve as follows: 6 7 ' line properties. o0 2. That the beach sand system (littoral cell), beginning at ' Dana Point and ending at a submarine trench off of La Jolla, is 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. That a wide, sandy beach is the best protection for shore- not in balance and loses sand annually. 3. It appears that the major cause of San Diego North County coastal erosion, is sand deficiency^ in the littoral cell ranging from Dana Point to La Jolla. A regional solution would require sand replenishment or sand conservation at a number of locations. Expert testimony indicates that the net movement of sand is southerly, therefore the preferred area for sand replenishment measures would presumably be in the northerly portion of the littoral cell. With an annual regional effort we can restore and enjoy the beach at its present location for an indefinite period. However, as the ocean level in this area is rising, we must assume that over a very long term the mean high tide line will continue to move easterly. 4. That if action to replenish the beach is not taken shortly we can expect damage to more than the first row of structures in many areas. In our view a sea wall solution without sand re- plenishment will not suffice. 5. That the net movement of beach sand from North to South precludes either a local solution or a one shot replenishment 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 effort at any one location. 6. It is not clear whether any of the sand, directed into deep water by the Marine Corps Jetty, and off-shore currents at the Oceanside Harbor mouth, is permanently lost to downcoast beaches, however, the large jetty protecting the Marine Corps' Del Mar Boat Basin and the Oceanside Harbor has become a sand trap interrupting normal sand movement and accelerating coastal erosion downcoast. A sand bypass system and annual sand dredging would be beneficial to southerly beaches. Oceanside's current effort to fund a dredging operation, which will dredge 500,000 yards of sand from the harbor area and deposit it on Oceanside's beach, deserves vigorous support. It should be pointed out that the 500,000 cu. yd. proposal is concurred in by Dr. Inman of Scripps, who is in some disagreement with current Army Corps of Engineers remedies for Oceanside's beach and harbor. The Corps of Engineers proposal to erect 14 groins, 800 to 1,000' in length, perpendicular to the beach at Oceanside, appears to be controversial. The Scripps group has indicated that the groins may not be effective in protecting Oceanside and that downcoast damage may result from groin construction. The Corps representatives state that this is not the case. As a result of conflicting testimony, we are unable to make a constructive determination as to whether a groin system in Oceanside will be detrimental to the downcoast beaches. A risk/benefit study would no doubt indicate that sand bypass and replenishment measures, the results of which are reasonably predictable, would be desireable as a first step prior to groin installation. The condition of North San Diego County beaches after the erosion of the past winter leaves little room for error. -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 7. It is of the utmost importance that the coastal communities cooperate and unanimously press for a multi-phase annual regional sand stabilization program, rather than bog down in fraternal bickering. (See Resolution regarding political action committee). THEREFORE THIS COMMITTEE MAKES THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Should a groin system be constructed, it is imperative that it be accompanied or preceded by an effective sand bypass systen 2. Any attempt to build groins without an effective sand bypass should be opposed since any sand loss as a result of exist- ing or new construction is not acceptable to communities south of Oceanside. 3. Presuming that the groin field functions as designed, the sand within the groin field will be relatively stable. If the sand used to charge the groin field is removed from the sand supply normally available to downcoast beaches, the present serious erosion downcoast will be magnified. The sand for the groin field should be imported from a source which does not deprive that portion of the littoral cell lying downcoast, of needed sand replenishment. It is recommended that a per capita contribution from all concerned communities be made on an on-going annual basis for cost of lobby- ing to implement the recommendations of this resolution. 22 4. j\ political lobby would proclaim that the solution 23 to coastal erosion lies primarily in Washington, Sacramento, 24 and to some degree, San Diego County and local City governments. 25 j Immediate Goal Suggestions: 26 27 A. Support Oceanside in its effort to secure Federal, State 28 and County funding in order to place 500,000 cu. yds. of sand on -3- their beaches this year. B. Installation of a sand bypass system at Oceanside. Testimony by the Scripps Institute Marine Research Group indicates that a sand by-pass system without the proposed groin field would be quicker, cheaper, less controversial, more cost effective, reduce the need for harbor dredging, and if accompanied by sand replenishment measures upcoast, be beneficial not only to Oceanside, but to downcoast beaches as well. C. Annual mining and placement of adequate sandy material per year into our littoral cell over the next several years, or until other stabilization measures are successful. D. Funding of research grants for the purpose of investigating the Corps' Oceanside groin field proposal and other long term solutions, some of which are indicated below: Possible Long Term Solutions; 1. Sand bypass measure at Oceanside and at area check dams. 2. Construction of a submarine sand dam at the La Jolla trench and redeposit of the impounded sand into the littoral cell during periods of northerly drift. 3. Annual slow dredging of river and lagoon areas. 4. Deepwater dredging. 5. Offshore structures. 6. Passive or active hydraulic sand mining in an area of Camp Pendleton. Respectfully submitted, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 A RESOLUTION OF THE NORTH COUNTY BEACH EROSION STUDY COMMITTEE REOTMENDING FORMATION OF A POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE. WHEREAS, the North County Beach Erosion Study Committee has concluded that the rapid and continued depletion of beach sand and related erosion of coastal property in North San Diego County constitutes a regional socioeconomic problem of such magnitude as to demand immediate and extensive corrective measures; and WHEREAS, the massive damage that has occurred, in part as a result of government action, deprives not only all North County residents, but also American and foreign visitors of what was one of the finest and most popular year-round recreational attractions on the Pacific Coast, bringing hundreds of thousands of persons to the seashore annually; and WHEREAS, continued beach erosion threatens destruction of both public and privately owned property along the Coast: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a special, regional sea- shore improvement committee, consisting of representatives from both coastal and inland communities, be organized to agressively 20 seek from Congress and other appropriate agencies of government, 21 special aid and relief which would not only replenish lost sand, 22 but also prevent further deterioration of the North San Diego 23 County coastline through a continuing program for sand replenish- 24 ment. 25 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED unamiously at a meeting held 26 the 14th day of July, 1980 . 27 // 28 DAVE MINNICH, Chairman NORTH COUNTY BEACH EROSION STUDY COMMITTEE Mayor Ronald C. Packard Antoinette de Naie City of Carlsbad Leucadia Town Council Dave Minnich, Study Committee Chairman Harvey Herzberg Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce Del Mar Planning Commission Girard W. Anear, Councilman City of Carlsbad Mayor Larry Bagley City of Oceanside Melba Bishop, Council Member City of Oceanside John Casey, Council Member and Deputy Mayor City of Oceanside Ralph Browne Supv. Eckert's Office County of San Diego Jack Welch, Area Manager State Dept of Beaches Pat O'Day Dan Daniels Oceanside Chamber of Commerce Bill Stone Solana Beach Chamber of Commerce and Town Council Joe Cooper Warren Putnam Cardiff Town Council Representative Encinitas Chamber of Commerce