HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-08-19; City Council; 6320-1 & 6327-1; General Plan Amendments - Land Use ElementCITY OF CARLSBAD
AGENDA P^LL NO. fi^?n-Snpp1.1 and 6327-Suppl.1 . Initial;
Dept.Hd.
DATE: August 19. 1980 r A+-+-V^.^^•^••_*««Aai • i ••»•• _^__^_^_^_ i, .«__._.,,,!_! ,•,.,• ^ - • Jr\ L- l_. y i
DEPARTMENT city Attorney c- M9r-
Subject: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS — LAND USE ELEMENT
GPA-50(A) CARLSBAD PACIFIC BUSINESS PARK—KOLL COMPANY and
GPA-SO(B) ECKE
Statement of the Matter
The City Council, at your August 5, 1980 meeting, directed
the City Attorney to prepare a resolution amending the Land
Use Element of the General Plan in two respects. GPA-50(A)
removes approximately 558 acres from the Non-Residential
Reserve and places it in a Combination District comprised
of Planned Industrial (PI), Community Commercial (C),
Travel Service (TS) and Regional Service (RS). The Combin-
ation District also includes the location of a floating (U)
to accommodate the possibility that a satellite sewage
treatment plant may be located within the project.
GPA-50(B) removes a Non-Residential Reserve designation from
approximately 15 acres of land located on the northwest corner
of Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte and places it in
the Travel Service (TS) category.
Exhibit
Resolution No. 6«? 7 approving GPA-50 (A) and GPA-50(B).
Recommendation -
it
If the City Council desires to amend the Land Use Element
of the General Plan as outlined in the statement of the matter,
your action is to adopt Resolution No. b3 'ji-/
Council Action:
8-19-80 Council adopted Resolution 6274, approving GPA-50(A) and GPA-50(B).
o
I §
cf.. '-"
9 ° 2 r§> y. 6
|1 §
O to
I- cr
2 "
o
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 6274
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN
TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR
TWO AREAS OF THE CITY ON THE WEST SIDE
OF EL CAMINO REAL NORTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT
ROAD AND ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PASEO
DEL NORTE AND PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD.
APPLICANTS: KOLL COMPANY—GPA-50(A);
ECKE—GPA-50(B) .
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold duly noticed
public hearings as prescribed by law to consider amendments to
the Land Use Element of the General Plan on June 19, 1980
(GPA-50(A) and GPA-50(B)); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, by the adoption of
Resolutions No. 1651 and No. 1653, recommended to the City Council
that the General Plan amendments be approved; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Impact Report was certified for
GPA~50(A) and a Negative Declaration issued from the GPA-50(B)
all in satisfaction of the requirements of the City of Carlsbad
Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972 and the Califofnia
Environmental Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly advertised public
hearing on the two proposed amendments at their regular meeting
I
of August 5, 1980 to consider said amendments and to receive
'the recommendations, objections, protests and comments of all
individuals and parties who desired to be heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the findings of Planning Commission Resolution
No. 1651 for GPA-50(A) and Planning Commission Resolution No. 1653
o
m
CENT F. 3IONDO, JR.iRNEY - CITY OF CARLSi1200 ELM AVENUEBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008HO in
>t ^
> °1-
O
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
for GPA-50 (B) constitute the findings of the City Council.
3. That the Land Use Element of the General Plan is
amended as follows :
A. GPA-50 (A): That the Land Use Element of the
General Plan is amended to change the Land Use designation over
approximately 558.6 acres of land generally located on the west
side of El Camino Real, north of Palomar Airport Road from
Non-Residential Reserve (NRR) to a Combination District comprised
of the following Land Use designations: Planned Industrial (PI)
Community Commercial (C) , Travel Service (TS) and Regional
Service (RS) . Said Combination District to also include the
Public Utilities Land Use designation to be shown as a circular U,
the property within this Combination District, and the location
of the Public Utilities designation is as shown on the map
marked Exhibit A, GPA-50 (A), dated August 5, 1980, and more
specifically described in the legal description marked Exhibit B,
dated August 5, 1980.
B. GPA-50 (B): That the Land Use designation on
approximately 15.31 acres of land generally located on the
northwest corner of Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte,
adjacent to Interstate 5, is changed from the Non-Residential
Reserve (NRR) to Travel Service (TS) as shown on the map marked
Exhibit A, GPA-50 (B) , dated May 20, 1980f attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
— 2—
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12Q
I § 13K *5 aIL- rf Olj:?s* 14i°l|
i t < - 15-Is||OD 16
Ijf f 17
1 ° 18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Carlsbad City Council held on the 19th day of August , 1980
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Packard, Casler, Anear, Lewis and Kulchin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None - s^~2 / /^~2 / /?
i^^^X/ /r^^^C--'^^" V *^*"- •" "" ""' -^ ^^L^' &''(* ^^•^~f\<** '" - -' RONALD C. PACKARD, Mayor
ATTEST :
/I /^~)
ALETHA L. RAUTENKR\ANZ , City Clerk J
(SEAL)
-
\
3.
PAL. AIRPORT RD.
FFSOM
UOCAT10K MAP
TO CITYV:OUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 6274
EXHIBIT "A" TO CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.6274 AUGUST 5, 1980
COMBINATION DISTRICT GPA-50A
COMBINATION
DISTRICT
v^/\V>.-'^^-/'.rr^rrV^' -^ 4 ^''^l^^r tV" vr / >/P--,:>- •_=•-' '*Y-^£ 'P'-^" tLr^^v^^-^- S] / ^\-._ \ < (1-^-^r v.;..;3^>|v^; ^%±^-v o/J^:>." ^^-^^
^^^«.;5S^:7^-;I ,^>-^://R J^^^oVJN,;-^!
n v r- x ''/'•' -
^- ^/fv^1-'"^1
-^^&^5?^r^,, 'Yr\
EXHIBIT "B" TO CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.6274 AUGUST 5, 1980
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Those portions of lots "F" and "G" of Rancho Agua Hedionda, part in the
City of Carlsbad and part in the unincorporated area of the County of San
Diego, State of California, according to the partition map thereof No. 823,
filed in the office of the county recorder of such county, November 16, 1896,
described as follows:
Commencing at point 1 of said lot "F" as shown on said map; thence along
the boundary line of said lot "F" south 25°33'56" east, 229.00 feet to point
23 of said lot "F" and south 54°40'19" east, 1347.00 feet; thence leaving said
boundary line south 35°19'44" west, 41.28.feet to the true point of beginning,
Which point is the true point of beginning, of the land described in deed to
Japatul Corporation recorded December 8, 1975, at recorder's file/page No.
345107 of official records to said county; thence along the boundary line of
said land south 35°19'44" west, 2216.46 feet and north 53°02'49" west 1214.69
feet to the northeast corner of the land described in deed to Japatul Corpora-
tion recorded December 8, 1975, at recorder's file/page No. 345103 of said
official records; thence along the boundary lines of said land as follows:
West, 1550 feet, more or less, to the boundary of said lot "F"; south 00°12'
00" west, 550 feet, more or less, to point 5 of said lot "F"; south 10°25'10"
east along a straight line between said point 5 and point 14 of said lot "F",,
to point 14 of said lot "F": thence along the boundary of said lot "F" south
52°15'45" east (record south 51000'00" east) 1860.74 feet more of less to the
most westerly corner of the land conveyed to James L. Hieatt, et ux, by deed
recorded June 11, 1913, in Book 617 page 54 of deed, records of said county;
thence along the northwesterly and northeasterly boundary of Hieatt's land as
follows: North 25°00'00" east, 594.00 feet and south 52°15' 45" east (record
south 51°00'00" east per deed) 1348.61 feet to a point of intersection with
the northerly line of Palomar County Airport, said point being on the boundary
of the land conveyed to Japatul Corporation by deed recorded December 8, 1975,
at recorder's file/page No. 345107 of said official records; thence along said
boundary as follows: North 79°10'00" east, 4052.22 feet north 10°50'00I! west,
500.00 feet; north 79°10'00" east 262.00 feet, south 10°50'00" east, 500.00
feet; north 79°10'00" east, 1005 feet, more or less, to the westerly line of
the land conveyed to the County of San Diego by deed recorded May 28, 1970, at
recorder's file/page No. 93075 of said official records; thence continuing
along the boundary of last said Japatul Corporation's land north 38°42'44"
west, 2510.58 feet to the beginning of a tangent 1845.00 foot radius curve
concave northeasterly; along the arc of said curve through a central angle of
14°25'52" a distance of 464.70 feet to a point of the southerly boundary of
the land allotted to Thalia Kelly Considine, et al, by partial final judgment.
in partition, recorded January 18, 1963, at recorder's file/page No. 11643 of
said official records; thence continuing along last said Japatul Corporation's
land south 67°50'28" west, 1392.80 feet north 33°08'52" west, 915.12 feet and
north 00°30'53" west, 1290.37 feet to the southerly line of said land conveyed
to the County of San Diego, being also the northerly line of last said Japatul
Corporation's land; thence along said common line north 74°57'25" west, 427.67
feet to the beginning of a tangent 2045.00 foot radius curve concave norther-
ly; and westerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of
16°59'24", a distance of 606.41 feet to the true point of beginning.
c f.
DATE: September 2, 1980
TO": City Manager '
Council Memb'ers
Planning Commissioners
Planning Director
s
FROM: Gira'-rd W. .-Anear, Council Member
Government is continually accused of being responsible for the
high cost of today's housing. I personally believe this is
only partly true, but I won't go into it here. It is frequently
suggested that if we .allowed a higher density, it would reduce
the price. This I also disagree with. (I didn't notice any
appreciable price reduction in the houses built on the southern
end of Sierra Morena, but they certainly are congested!)
»
I know of no builder who is currently building any single family
residences that are under 1600 square feet in Carlsbad. Basically,
all we are getting today are 3 or 4 bedroom houses or 3 and a den,
each with a living room and a family room, nothing smaller or
under $100,000.
I've been pushing a pencil around on the idea that I'd.like to
introduce to you for your suggestions. Bear in mind it is only
a basic thought, and maybe with a lot more input and "massaging"
it might have merit. It is only applicable for a fairly large
development. I do think it has the possibilities of giving us
a better balanced community with a wider selection of prices
and house sizes.
Sq . footage
Percentage No . of Rooms of lot
7 *
12 *
12 *
23 **
20 **
14 * *
12 * *
1 bedroom, 1 bath
2 bedrooms, 1 bath
2 bedrooms, l-i-2 baths
3 bedrooms, 1% baths
(no family room)
3 bedrooms, 2 baths
A bedrooms, l*i baths
4 bedrooms, 2 or more baths
* Maximum/minimum percentage - (no deviation)
** Minimum number (may be increased)
•>': •!; it i] a x j_ m (, m p f. v cent a g c (may be: d e c r e. a s e. d )
(Total still must be 100%)
5000
6000
6500
7000
7500
7500
7500
September 2, 1980 Page 2
Personally, I would like to see a blending of these units. I
certainly wouldn't want to see all of the one or two bedroom
units grouped together. I do think the one bedroom units
should be restricted to adul-ts.
Consideration should be given to have some of the units grouped
ifi a townhouse conce'pt (such as the later sections of Alta Mira.)
One sugge'stion : made was to have the units located around a core
area of shopping or other service conveniences, with the smaller
units oriented toward the center.
L
Benefits of a plan of this type are the choices available for
all segments of the community and hopefully a price range that
they can afford. Obviously the builder would be concerned .
that the quality would be high with all of the units. A person
or family could start in a small unit and work their way up.
Conversely, when the kids have grown and left, the parents could
move into a smaller home, but still stay in the same neighbor-
hood.
.1 would appreciate your comments on th.e above, and if you think
'it has merit we could pursue the concept further.
GIRARD W. ANEAR
Council Member
•GWA: gb