Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-08-19; City Council; 6320-1 & 6327-1; General Plan Amendments - Land Use ElementCITY OF CARLSBAD AGENDA P^LL NO. fi^?n-Snpp1.1 and 6327-Suppl.1 . Initial; Dept.Hd. DATE: August 19. 1980 r A+-+-V^.^^•^••_*««Aai • i ••»•• _^__^_^_^_ i, .«__._.,,,!_! ,•,.,• ^ - • Jr\ L- l_. y i DEPARTMENT city Attorney c- M9r- Subject: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS — LAND USE ELEMENT GPA-50(A) CARLSBAD PACIFIC BUSINESS PARK—KOLL COMPANY and GPA-SO(B) ECKE Statement of the Matter The City Council, at your August 5, 1980 meeting, directed the City Attorney to prepare a resolution amending the Land Use Element of the General Plan in two respects. GPA-50(A) removes approximately 558 acres from the Non-Residential Reserve and places it in a Combination District comprised of Planned Industrial (PI), Community Commercial (C), Travel Service (TS) and Regional Service (RS). The Combin- ation District also includes the location of a floating (U) to accommodate the possibility that a satellite sewage treatment plant may be located within the project. GPA-50(B) removes a Non-Residential Reserve designation from approximately 15 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte and places it in the Travel Service (TS) category. Exhibit Resolution No. 6«? 7 approving GPA-50 (A) and GPA-50(B). Recommendation - it If the City Council desires to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan as outlined in the statement of the matter, your action is to adopt Resolution No. b3 'ji-/ Council Action: 8-19-80 Council adopted Resolution 6274, approving GPA-50(A) and GPA-50(B). o I § cf.. '-" 9 ° 2 r§> y. 6 |1 § O to I- cr 2 " o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 6274 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR TWO AREAS OF THE CITY ON THE WEST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL NORTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PASEO DEL NORTE AND PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD. APPLICANTS: KOLL COMPANY—GPA-50(A); ECKE—GPA-50(B) . WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law to consider amendments to the Land Use Element of the General Plan on June 19, 1980 (GPA-50(A) and GPA-50(B)); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, by the adoption of Resolutions No. 1651 and No. 1653, recommended to the City Council that the General Plan amendments be approved; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Impact Report was certified for GPA~50(A) and a Negative Declaration issued from the GPA-50(B) all in satisfaction of the requirements of the City of Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972 and the Califofnia Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing on the two proposed amendments at their regular meeting I of August 5, 1980 to consider said amendments and to receive 'the recommendations, objections, protests and comments of all individuals and parties who desired to be heard; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the findings of Planning Commission Resolution No. 1651 for GPA-50(A) and Planning Commission Resolution No. 1653 o m CENT F. 3IONDO, JR.iRNEY - CITY OF CARLSi1200 ELM AVENUEBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008HO in >t ^ > °1- O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 for GPA-50 (B) constitute the findings of the City Council. 3. That the Land Use Element of the General Plan is amended as follows : A. GPA-50 (A): That the Land Use Element of the General Plan is amended to change the Land Use designation over approximately 558.6 acres of land generally located on the west side of El Camino Real, north of Palomar Airport Road from Non-Residential Reserve (NRR) to a Combination District comprised of the following Land Use designations: Planned Industrial (PI) Community Commercial (C) , Travel Service (TS) and Regional Service (RS) . Said Combination District to also include the Public Utilities Land Use designation to be shown as a circular U, the property within this Combination District, and the location of the Public Utilities designation is as shown on the map marked Exhibit A, GPA-50 (A), dated August 5, 1980, and more specifically described in the legal description marked Exhibit B, dated August 5, 1980. B. GPA-50 (B): That the Land Use designation on approximately 15.31 acres of land generally located on the northwest corner of Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte, adjacent to Interstate 5, is changed from the Non-Residential Reserve (NRR) to Travel Service (TS) as shown on the map marked Exhibit A, GPA-50 (B) , dated May 20, 1980f attached hereto and made a part hereof. — 2— 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Q I § 13K *5 aIL- rf Olj:?s* 14i°l| i t < - 15-Is||OD 16 Ijf f 17 1 ° 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City Council held on the 19th day of August , 1980 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Packard, Casler, Anear, Lewis and Kulchin NOES: None ABSENT: None - s^~2 / /^~2 / /? i^^^X/ /r^^^C--'^^" V *^*"- •" "" ""' -^ ^^L^' &''(* ^^•^~f\<** '" - -' RONALD C. PACKARD, Mayor ATTEST : /I /^~) ALETHA L. RAUTENKR\ANZ , City Clerk J (SEAL) - \ 3. PAL. AIRPORT RD. FFSOM UOCAT10K MAP TO CITYV:OUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 6274 EXHIBIT "A" TO CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.6274 AUGUST 5, 1980 COMBINATION DISTRICT GPA-50A COMBINATION DISTRICT v^/\V>.-'^^-/'.rr^rrV^' -^ 4 ^''^l^^r tV" vr / >/P--,:>- •_=•-' '*Y-^£ 'P'-^" tLr^^v^^-^- S] / ^\-._ \ < (1-^-^r v.;..;3^>|v^; ^%±^-v o/J^:>." ^^-^^ ^^^«.;5S^:7^-;I ,^>-^://R J^^^oVJN,;-^! n v r- x ''/'•' - ^- ^/fv^1-'"^1 -^^&^5?^r^,, 'Yr\ EXHIBIT "B" TO CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.6274 AUGUST 5, 1980 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Those portions of lots "F" and "G" of Rancho Agua Hedionda, part in the City of Carlsbad and part in the unincorporated area of the County of San Diego, State of California, according to the partition map thereof No. 823, filed in the office of the county recorder of such county, November 16, 1896, described as follows: Commencing at point 1 of said lot "F" as shown on said map; thence along the boundary line of said lot "F" south 25°33'56" east, 229.00 feet to point 23 of said lot "F" and south 54°40'19" east, 1347.00 feet; thence leaving said boundary line south 35°19'44" west, 41.28.feet to the true point of beginning, Which point is the true point of beginning, of the land described in deed to Japatul Corporation recorded December 8, 1975, at recorder's file/page No. 345107 of official records to said county; thence along the boundary line of said land south 35°19'44" west, 2216.46 feet and north 53°02'49" west 1214.69 feet to the northeast corner of the land described in deed to Japatul Corpora- tion recorded December 8, 1975, at recorder's file/page No. 345103 of said official records; thence along the boundary lines of said land as follows: West, 1550 feet, more or less, to the boundary of said lot "F"; south 00°12' 00" west, 550 feet, more or less, to point 5 of said lot "F"; south 10°25'10" east along a straight line between said point 5 and point 14 of said lot "F",, to point 14 of said lot "F": thence along the boundary of said lot "F" south 52°15'45" east (record south 51000'00" east) 1860.74 feet more of less to the most westerly corner of the land conveyed to James L. Hieatt, et ux, by deed recorded June 11, 1913, in Book 617 page 54 of deed, records of said county; thence along the northwesterly and northeasterly boundary of Hieatt's land as follows: North 25°00'00" east, 594.00 feet and south 52°15' 45" east (record south 51°00'00" east per deed) 1348.61 feet to a point of intersection with the northerly line of Palomar County Airport, said point being on the boundary of the land conveyed to Japatul Corporation by deed recorded December 8, 1975, at recorder's file/page No. 345107 of said official records; thence along said boundary as follows: North 79°10'00" east, 4052.22 feet north 10°50'00I! west, 500.00 feet; north 79°10'00" east 262.00 feet, south 10°50'00" east, 500.00 feet; north 79°10'00" east, 1005 feet, more or less, to the westerly line of the land conveyed to the County of San Diego by deed recorded May 28, 1970, at recorder's file/page No. 93075 of said official records; thence continuing along the boundary of last said Japatul Corporation's land north 38°42'44" west, 2510.58 feet to the beginning of a tangent 1845.00 foot radius curve concave northeasterly; along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 14°25'52" a distance of 464.70 feet to a point of the southerly boundary of the land allotted to Thalia Kelly Considine, et al, by partial final judgment. in partition, recorded January 18, 1963, at recorder's file/page No. 11643 of said official records; thence continuing along last said Japatul Corporation's land south 67°50'28" west, 1392.80 feet north 33°08'52" west, 915.12 feet and north 00°30'53" west, 1290.37 feet to the southerly line of said land conveyed to the County of San Diego, being also the northerly line of last said Japatul Corporation's land; thence along said common line north 74°57'25" west, 427.67 feet to the beginning of a tangent 2045.00 foot radius curve concave norther- ly; and westerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 16°59'24", a distance of 606.41 feet to the true point of beginning. c f. DATE: September 2, 1980 TO": City Manager ' Council Memb'ers Planning Commissioners Planning Director s FROM: Gira'-rd W. .-Anear, Council Member Government is continually accused of being responsible for the high cost of today's housing. I personally believe this is only partly true, but I won't go into it here. It is frequently suggested that if we .allowed a higher density, it would reduce the price. This I also disagree with. (I didn't notice any appreciable price reduction in the houses built on the southern end of Sierra Morena, but they certainly are congested!) » I know of no builder who is currently building any single family residences that are under 1600 square feet in Carlsbad. Basically, all we are getting today are 3 or 4 bedroom houses or 3 and a den, each with a living room and a family room, nothing smaller or under $100,000. I've been pushing a pencil around on the idea that I'd.like to introduce to you for your suggestions. Bear in mind it is only a basic thought, and maybe with a lot more input and "massaging" it might have merit. It is only applicable for a fairly large development. I do think it has the possibilities of giving us a better balanced community with a wider selection of prices and house sizes. Sq . footage Percentage No . of Rooms of lot 7 * 12 * 12 * 23 ** 20 ** 14 * * 12 * * 1 bedroom, 1 bath 2 bedrooms, 1 bath 2 bedrooms, l-i-2 baths 3 bedrooms, 1% baths (no family room) 3 bedrooms, 2 baths A bedrooms, l*i baths 4 bedrooms, 2 or more baths * Maximum/minimum percentage - (no deviation) ** Minimum number (may be increased) •>': •!; it i] a x j_ m (, m p f. v cent a g c (may be: d e c r e. a s e. d ) (Total still must be 100%) 5000 6000 6500 7000 7500 7500 7500 September 2, 1980 Page 2 Personally, I would like to see a blending of these units. I certainly wouldn't want to see all of the one or two bedroom units grouped together. I do think the one bedroom units should be restricted to adul-ts. Consideration should be given to have some of the units grouped ifi a townhouse conce'pt (such as the later sections of Alta Mira.) One sugge'stion : made was to have the units located around a core area of shopping or other service conveniences, with the smaller units oriented toward the center. L Benefits of a plan of this type are the choices available for all segments of the community and hopefully a price range that they can afford. Obviously the builder would be concerned . that the quality would be high with all of the units. A person or family could start in a small unit and work their way up. Conversely, when the kids have grown and left, the parents could move into a smaller home, but still stay in the same neighbor- hood. .1 would appreciate your comments on th.e above, and if you think 'it has merit we could pursue the concept further. GIRARD W. ANEAR Council Member •GWA: gb