Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-11-18; City Council; 6428; 20 LOT INDUSTRIAL TENTATIVE MAP AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - BIRTCHER* b q v, . C I TY OF CARi-SBAi) -- I - -- b P. i 1 Niil Ai _Clept. Hd. MA Cty. Atfy ~ -.---- -- AGENDA 81LL NC). A q2 a . DATE : November 18, 1980 -- I DEPARTMENT : Planning Department I Cty. Mgr.j?_ 0 -- SUBJECT: 20 LOT INDUSTRIAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPME APPLICANT: BIRTCHER CASE NO: CT 80-38/PUD-22 II- STATEMENT OF TtlE MATTER: This item is a request for a 20 lot industrial subd4vision and Planned Unit in the P-M zone. The applicant is using the PUD process to allow a private and lot sizes less than the 1 acre minimum required by the P-M zone. The PlannSng Commission felt the design of the project and the substantial and landscape amenities provided by the project justified the modification . reduced P-M zoning standards. The Commission modified staff's recommendati right turn 'in and out only access onto Palomar Airport Road by allowing a s right and left turn three way intersection. Also, the Commission added a c to preserve existing live oaks on the property wherever possible. No public opposition was expressed during the public hearing. Director has determined this project will not have a significant effect on ment and therefore has issued a Negative Declaraction on October 1, 1980. Through staff review and Planning Commission hearing, all issues on this ma Further-, the been satisfactorily resolved. EXHIBITS 1. Resolution No. 1716, dated October 22, 1980 2. Resolution No. 1717, dated October 22, 1980 3. Staff Report, dated October 22, 1980 4. Exhibit "A", dated October 17, 1980 5. Exhibit B E C, dated October 18, 1980 RECOMMENDATION Both the planning staff and Planning Commission recommend that this applica APPROVED and that the City Attorney be directed to prepare documents APPROV CT 80-38/PUD-22, per Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 1716 and 1717. FtSCAL IMPACT Staff has no anticipation of fiscal impacts at this time. Council Action: 11 -1 8-80 Council directed the City Attorney to prepare documents approving C per Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 1716 and 1717. 1- . "I .% t 1 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 l2 13 x* I.5 16 I? 18 I' 20 21 22 to i PLANNING COMMTSSTON RESOLUTION NO, 1716 A RESOLUTION OF THE PIA"ING C0MMISSIO)Zi OF TI CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOTQGNDING APPROVAL FOR A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ON PROPER: GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PALOMZ AIRPORT ROAD, EAST OF YARROW DRIVE IN THE P-1 ZONE. APPLICANT: BIRTCHER CASE NO: CT 80-38 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain properi Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 1110 filed in the Offict County Recorder of San Diego, November 10, 1972 has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred 1 Planning Commission; and WHEmAS, said verified applicatkm constitutes a rt provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; an( WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 22nd ( ' October, 1980, hold a duly noticed public hearin7 as prt I by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing an&' ( all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons des: 1 be heard, said Coniission considered all factors relatii i Tentative Tract Map. I j Commission as follows: // A) That the above recitations are true and correct. I PU'OW, THEREFOW, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plann. 27 - 1) The proposed tentative map is consistent with the I General Plan since the site is designated by the 1 plan for planned industrial and, as conditioned, t 28 is consistent with all other general plan elements I I I 1 .- >. -. . 8. c 3 2 3 4 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 3.3. 12 13 3.4 15 16 17 l8 I’ 20 21 22 23 1. L il) 2) The site is physically suitable for the type of devc proposed since the applicant is utilizing the flatti of the terrain for development and leaving the othe in a natural state. The design of the project will not cause any signif project (including a field investigation of the sit archaeological survey, and agricultural feasibility the Planning Director has determined that the proje result in any adverse environmental impacts and the has issued a declaration of negative environmental October 1, 1980, Log No. 761. 3) environmental impacts since, based on an initial st 4) The design of the subdivision will not cause any se health problems since the project meets all public requirements. The project is consistent with all city public faci policies and ordinances since: a) Adequate water, gas and electric service will 5) to serve the development. All necessary public improvements will either or required as conditions of approval. The applicant has agreed and is required by th of an appropriate condition to pay a public fa fee. Performance of that contract and payment fee will enable this body to find that all o$h facilities will be available concurrent with n required by the general plan. b) c) i Conditions 11) Approval is granted for CT 80-38, as shown on Exhik dated October 17, 1980, on file in the Planning DeE and incorporated by reference, Development shall c substantially as shown on these exhibit unless othc noted in these conditions. This subdivision is approved upon the express condj that the final map shall not be approved unless thc Council finds as of the time of such approval that service is available to serve the subdivision. 2) j 24 ‘ 1 PC RES0 #1716 I i -2- I I 7, 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 b a 9 IO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 b e payment of said fee, A copy of that agreement datc herein by reference. If said fee is not paid as p this application will not be consistent with the G and the project cannot proceed and this approval s Approval of this request shall not excuse complian sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other app city ordinances in effect at the time of building issuance. In case of conflict between the design of the CC&R'S and the zoning ordinance, the requir the ordinance will prevail. The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior commencement of any clearing or grading of the sit The grading for this project is defined as "contrc by Section 11.06.170(a) of the City Code. Gradin< performed under the observation of a civil engine€ responsibility it shall be to coordinate site insg testing to insure compliance of the work with the grading plan, submit required reports and verify c with Chapter 11.06 of the city code. ' 8) Palomar Airport Road shall be dedicated on the fii based on the half street right-of-way width of 63 entire subdivision frontage. The minimum horizon1 line radius shall be 1450 feet unless otherwise ai the City Engineer. Palomar Airport Road shall be improved by the dev on a half street to city standards prior to the o of any builclings. The improvements shall inclu?.e width median except that landscaping and electric the Parks and Recreation Director for the full wi 2, 1980, is on file with the City Clerk and incorpi 5) 6) 7) 9) service for it shall be installed subject to tlne l8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 a B i e, median along the eastern half of the subdivision Landscaping and electric and water services need provided for the western half of the median. 10) Street trees of a variety approved by the Parks a Department shall be installed to city specificati the equivalent of forty foot intervals along all. frontages. 11) Streets A and B shall be improved based on the ty section shown on the tentative map. The design : subject to the approval of the City Engineer and plan check and inspection fees shall be paid. TI I section shall be based on R-value tests based on for an industrial street, //// //// //// PC RES0 #1716 -3- I 1 I! * c 1. )r .- .. 1 1 ( 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3.0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17' =8 19 20 21 22 P e 12) At its intersection with the public streets, the m( grade on Street A shall be 2% for a minimum distant 50 feet from the edge of pavement of the public st 13) Landscaping on the south side of Street A for a di approximately 250' on each side of Street B shall to a maximum height of 30 inches within an area su the approval of the City Engineer in order to prov sight distance. 14) The private streets shall be posted "no parking" t satisfaction of the City Engineer and Fire Departrn 15) The developer shall enter into a Traffic Signal Im Agreement to install a fully actuated signal at th section of Street A and Palomar Airport Road and s a bond prior to approval of the final map. The ag shall provide that the developer shall install the Engineer, upon receiving notification to do so fro, City Engineer. If the city adopts a policy and standards relating water reclamation prior to the issuance of a build for the first unit, the applicant shall install im to accomodate water reclamation on the property pu said policy and standards. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting at his sole coSt, subject to the approval of the C 16) Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California the 22nd day of October, 1980, by the following vote, t AYES : Commissioner Rombotis, Friestedt, Jose, L j Leeds . I NOES : Commissioner Schick - ABSENT: Commissioner Marcus. \ , ABSTAIN: None. \ A\ - l *"X 1 '1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3.3 14 15 16 l7 l8 19 2o 'I1 , m e PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1717 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TH' CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOPPIENDING APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR A 20 LOT PLANNED UNIT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, EAST OF YARROW DRIVE IN THE P-M ZONE. CASE NO: PUD-22 I APPLICANT: BIRTCHER WHEREAS, a verified application for certain propert Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 1110 filed in the Office the County Recorder of San Diego, November 10, 1972 has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred t Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a re as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 22nd t October, 1980, hold a duly noticed public hearing as pre by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and ( I I all testimony and arguments, if any of all persons desi 1 heard, said Commission considered all factors relating I I Planned Unit Development; and NO??, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plann 1 Cowmission as follows: 23 24 i B) : 1 That based on the evidence presented at the public the Commission recommends APPROVAL of YUD-22, base I fol-lowing findings and subject to the following cc 27 I 28 1 1) The proposed planned industrial development at the location is both necessary and desirable to provid comprehensively and imaginatively designed facilit brill contribute to the general well being of the c 't *' . ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 l9 20 21 22 23 25 24 26 e ". 2) The proposed development is not detrimental to the 1 safety or general welfare of persons residing or wo: the same vicinity, nor would the project be injuriol property or improvements in this area. All design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.110 minimum development standards set forth in Section are met by the proposed project as indicated in the report. The proposed project is consistent with all element General Plan. The applicant has agreed and is required by the inc an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities Performance of that contract and payment of the fee enable this body to find that public facilities wil available concurrent with need as required by the C 6) Based on an initial study of the project, includinc investigation of +he site r an archaeological survej agricultural feasibility report, the Planning Direc determined that the project will not result in any environmental impacts and therefore has issued a dc of negative environmental impact on October 1, 198( No. 761, 3) 4) 5) Conditions: 1) Approval is granted for PUD-22, as shown on Exhibi' dated October 17, 1980, and Exhibits "B" and "C" 3 dated September 18, 1980, on file in the Planning 1 and incorporated by reference. Development shall t substantially as shown on these exhibits unless otl noted in these conditions, Prior to the issuance of building permits, the app all changes required herein, for the approval of t Planning Director, 1 2) sutsmit a final Planned Unit Development Plan, inco 3) The standards of the P-M (Planned Industrial) zone permitted uses, conditional uses, building height, storage and industrial waste discharge shall apply subject property. 4) This project is approved upon the express conditic building permits shall not be issued for developmc subject property unless the City Engineer determir sewer facilities are available at the time of appl for such sewer permits and will continue to be avz I Ij 28 will not be issued. 1 PC RES0 $1717 -2- I ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 l2 13 I' 15 16 I? =8 19 < 20 @e m 5) A detailed landscaping plan which includes substant scaping on the slope along Palomar Airport Road sha submitted to and approved by the Planning Departmen approval of a final map, 6) All conditions of approval of Resolution No. 1716, CT 80-38 shall be met. Failure to do so shall void Planned Unit Development. This project is approved upon the express conditior applicant shall pay a public facilities fee as reql City Council Policy No. 17 dated August 29, 1980, c with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by refc according to the agreement executed by the applicai payment of said fee a copy of that agreement dated 2, 1980, is on file with the City Clerk and is incc herein by reference. If said fee is not paid as p this application will not be consistent with the G Plan and approval for this project shall be void. is required for all future development of this pro which a building permit has not been issued. Per the requirements of the P-M zone, noise emanat the project shall not exceed a level of 45 dBA at property line. The applicant shall establish an owner's associati corresponding covenants, conditions and restrictic Said CC&R'S shall be submitted to and approved by Department prior to final map approval. Said CC&I contain a provision prohibiting parking on the p.3: and ensuring enforcement of this prohibitian to tf satisfaction of the city. The CC&R'S shall also ( provision which specifically ensures that the own( continue to m.aintain all drainage improvements an( and allows the city to enforce said provision if I The city shall have the right to enter upon the p maintain the drainage facilities if the developer sequent owners fail to do so and charge the cost maintenance to developer or subsequent owners. T is included pursuant to Public Resource Code Sect 7) 8) 9) i I I/ 22 23 21/ lo} Whenever possible, the existing live oaks sn site preserved. 2a 25 26 j //// //// //// 27' //// PC RESO #1717 -3- 24 j 28 ! i PC RES0 #1717 -4- %< * I ’i -‘ a 0. \ STAFF REPORT DATE ; 0c”dber 22, 1980 TO : Planning Commission . FROM : . P lanniiig Department SUBJECT: CT 80-38/PU~-22 - BIRTCRER - Request for a 20 1 Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Developmer on property located on the south side of PalomE Airport Road in the P-M zone, I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is proposing to develop a 20 lot tentative and planned unit development on an irregularly shaped 80 parcei located as described above. dekelopment will have private roads, equestrian and jogg trails, and a picnic area. The proposed trails will be designed to connect with existing equestrian and jogging trails developed as part of Phase Ii of the Palomar Airp Business Park. The industrial lots created by this proj will vary in size from -75 - 4.82 acres. At the present -Lime the subject property is covered wit1 scrub oak woodlands on the hillsides and mature live-oak in thz ysl,Lzys. A large port’gn of the site will be lef in its natural state and whenever possible the existing live oaks on-site will be preserved. Approximately 200,000 cabic yards of grading will be required to create the buildable lots and private roads .to serve this project. This plar,ned unit 11. ANALYSIS Planning Issues 1. Does the project meet the design ’criteria and development standards for an industrial proje as stated in the P-M zone? Is the project comprehensively designed and F integrated with the previousiy approved phast the Palomar Airport Business Park? 2. ‘ 111, DISCUSS~ON As proposed staff fees that the project meets the desi criteria of the PUG Ordinance. The applicant proposes ,- utilize the flatter portions of the terrain and leave a large portion of tne subject property in its natural sta As a result, the applicant is varying the size of the lo so that a few of the lots will have less than the one ac minimum area required in the P-M zone. Such a reduction allowed Iq the PUD process, The lots created by this pr Will be served by private streets which will he maintain by the property owners. allowed on either side of the street. posted for no parking and staff is recommending t-- hat 2 provision be placed in the CC&R'S to prohibit parking or these streets and to insure enforcemefit of the prohibit: The Planning Commission will note that the applicant har not submitted site plans or elevations as normally requj by the PUD Ordinance. Instead the applicant has submit1 to the Planning Department a copy of the covenants, con2 and restrictions for the project along with a copy of tl- Palomar Oaks Design Guidelines. These guidelines set iq strict regulations concerning the type and design of the buildings on the subject property. The design guideline state that whenever there is a conflict between the desj guidelines and the city's Zoning Ordinance, the ordinanc wi-ll prevail. The applicant has also submitted a concept landscape plan for one of the parcels to give the city E idea of how each of the lots will be landscaped when del To support the modified standards to the P-M zone the applicant proposes to provide substantial landscaping pr recreational amenities. As shown on' the exhibits provic by the applicant, the present drainage will be modified that it will r'low through a couple of ponds and a small lake. This design will tend to reduce the velocity of tl water flow and act as sediment traps. As shown on Exhi1 C, all portions of the subject property that are not le: - their natural state or occupied by a building or parkinc area will be heavily landscaped. As shown on Exhibit B the applicant proposes to construc pedestrian and jogging trail with a series of exercise stations. Also an equestrian trail is proposed which wj designed to connect with a previously approved equestriz trail system. Overall, the project appears to be well integrated and compatible with the rest of the development in the Palor Airport Business Park. Also, the project will provide adequate open space, circulation and recreational facil as shown on the attached exhibits. Staff feels that thi project meets both the design criteria and the developmi standards of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance. , The private streets will be 30 ' wide curb-to-curb (50 ft. riqht-of-way) with no parking The streets will ' . -2- I e 4 ~. . I- .* Gne qoncerrL of staff involves the location of the inters proximity with the proposed, future intersection of Coll BLvd. and Palomar Airport Road, staff is recommending th this intersection be restricted to right turns in arid cu only. of Street A with Palomar Airport Road. Because of i'cs IV. RECOMMENDATION - - It is recommended that the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution No. 1716, recommending A?PROVAL of CT 80-38 a Resolution No. 1717, recommending APPROVAL of PUD-12, based on the findings and subject to the conditions. cont therein. ATTACHMENTS Background Data Sheet Location Map PC Resolution No. 1716 (CT 80-38) . PC Resolution No. 1717 (P.UD-22) Exhibit "A" dated October 17, 1980 Exhibits "B", and "C" date2 Septenber 18, 1980 Disclosure Form MH:ar 1 O/16/8 0 .. -3- ; .xt ,is determ; @ . .: nave su.!-&.t.ted has been xevi @ p If .aiter' the infcrnat:.i.or, I' ' tt..a; further iriformatiox; require?., you wi:il be sZ, &via-:, f3j rl;cher. ii:rsi ;less kr?ter - Corporate Paioin,;fr 27611 La Piz Rcad, Laguna NfgL!el , CA 92577' --- -.-- ____-____ _______ .--I-. - __I_-._- .--_ ---.-- . - AiipF2: C&!JT : Name (in5.vidm1, partnership, joir?t venture, corporation, sync -I- --- -- - -. -_ ,..- r . _. Business Ar2dress 714-831 -803; - --- 8 Telephone Number . Nolle - L - *. - P-WN'S : .. NarnP .- -- - .-.. . ,. Rusiriess Address Telephone Number .. Campbell :Pal Gmar 5 a general partnership .. - ~miY93ERs : Robert M. Carnpb211 , senera1 partner . . Narrte (individual, partxr, joint HcLne Address venture, corporation, syndication) *-- - 27611 La Paz R&d, taguna Niguel , CA 92677 i----- Bus4ness Address -- . .. 714-831 -8031 I_ Telephone NuiFx r Telephone N-mhsr Can;pbell :Palomar., a general partnershlp By: Birtcher Pacific (Ronaid E. and Arthur B. Birtcher, gener - --- __.. - I. Home Ad6rsss .Sane .. .. 27611 La. Faz Road, Laguna Niguel ; CA 92677 Business Address .. .- 71 4-831-8031 .. .. '. Telephone Number Telephone Number .. . .. .. -. . _. - Y .).a'. _. .i- - .. (Att.ach more sheets if necessary) . : We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in th closure is true and correct arid that-_ it will remain true and cior:reck and m relied upon as .Leifig true and correct.until amended. .. lii rtcher Business Center-Corpor -~ c e BXKCXOlJSD DATA SSl' -__L_--------- a ., .% CASE SCJ: CT 80-38/PCD-22 kwPLIcw: F-T .W LCCATION: BIRTCHER 20 TAX TENTATW fiW AND PPl2NED CNIT DmmPMEhT, OF Pmvm Mwom mm. p,@J-JL DVO OF PfErn~ EE' NO, 1119 FimD IN ,m OFFICE . T;M;AL D-ION: ------e- THl3 CSL7NTJ XCCRDER OF SAN DEa, ~~~"23~~ 10, 1972. 16 - 213 - 02 *. Assessors Parcel-iWW: Acres s 20 No. of mts 80 PIAN Am ZOI\JING GExExKL c-al plan Land us Rsiwtion , p-I (?lm* Industrial) - Density Proposed --- C. m.nsity Illla.Jed -- Existing Zone P-I4 Propsd Zone .s-om&g Zar?ing nd kmd Use: . zoning Land use ,?lorth p-14 Vaqant Vacant co P-M Vacant co 4 Vacant -4 .t ,dutsh- . . East West . mW;rC FACILITTES. 5chml District E/A Water District Costa P.1 Water District e .Sew& District City of Ca2lsbad mu's N/A Wlic Facili~es Fee Ac$eZWnt, dabd Smm 2, 1380 - (Other: * l?XVIIX%%Ti'fG IMPACT I?SSESSPE@E x Negative Declaration, issued October 1, 1980 Lg EO. 76' - E.I.R. Certifid, dated .. c_c_ OthCr, L a' L opj 0 I""".l)a B ,4 J, 1 Bp~~ .. .. AT; a, .; .- ' ,. 'i t L .. - .. 2. [TJ%.-gfp=Jg cma .. .. .. .. .