Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-03-17; City Council; 6538; 6 Lot industrial tentative mapCITY OF CARLSBAD • • ^ INITIAL BH:ar AGENDA BILL NO: &? S 3 0 ________________ DEPT. HD. DATE: MARCH 17, 1981 ' CTY. ATTY . DEPARTMENT: PLANNING CTY. MGR. SUBJECT: 6 LOT INDUSTRIAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CASE NO: CT 80-47/PUD-28 APPLICANT: ANDREX DEVELOPMENT CORP. STATETiENT OF THE MATTERT" The applicant is requesting approval of a 6 lot, 6 building industrial tentative tract map and planned unit development located on the south side of Corte de la Pina between Yarrow Dtive and El Camino Real in the P-M zone.. The Planning Commission found the project to meet all standards of the planned unit development and subdivision ordinances. The Commission allowed a 10" reduction of building setbacks in the front yard and the location of parking stalls within setback areas. They felt these reductions of the P-M ordinance were justified by the projects substantial landscape and recreational amenities. No opposition was expressed at the public hearing. Through staff review and Planning Commission hearing, all issues on this matter have been satisfactorily resolved. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that this project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and, therefore, has issued a Negative Declaration, dated January 14, 1981 which was approved by the Planning Commission on February 25, 1981. A copy of the environmental documents is on file in the Planning Department. FISCAL IMPACTS The applicant will be required to provide all necessary public improvements as a condition of approval. Also, the applicant has agreed to pay a public facility fee to offset the cost of providing public services to the project. RECOMMENDATION Both the planning staff and planning commission recommend that this application be APPROVED and that the City Attorney be directed to prepare documents APPROVING CT 80-47/PUD-28 per Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 1771 and 1772. ATTACHMENTS 1. PC Resolution 1771 2. PC Resolution 1772 3. Staff Report, dated February 25, 1981 Council Action; 3-17-81 — Council directed the City Attorney to prepare documents approving CT 80-47/PUD-28 per Planning Commission Resolutions 1771 and 1772. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1771 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP TO CREATE SIX INDUSTRIAL LOTS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CORTE DE LA PINA BETWEEN YARROW DRIVE AND EL CAMINO REAL. APPLICANT: ANDREX DEVELOPMENT COMPANY CASE NO: CT 80-47 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to, wit: Lot 8 of Tract 73-49 according to Map 8054 filed December 31, 1974 has been filed with the city of Carlsbad, and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 25th day of February 1981, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Tentative Tract Map. NOW, THEREFORE, BE .IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows: A) That the above recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends APPROVAL of CT 80-47, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions Findings: 1) The proposed tentative map is consistent with the city's general plan since the site is designated by the land use APN: 213-050-03 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 plan for planned industrial and, as conditioned, the project is consistent with all other general plan elements. 2) The site is physically suitable for the type of development since the site is adequate in size and topography to accommodate the project without creating any significant environmental impacts. 3) The design of the subdivision will not cause any serious health problems since the project meets all public health requirements. 4) The project is consistent with all city public facility policies and ordinances since: a. Adequate water, gas and electric service will be available to serve the development. b. All necessary public improvements will either be provided or required as conditions of approval. c. The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the fee will enable this body to find that all other public facilities will be available concurrent with need as required by the general plan. 5) The project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a negative declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on January 14, 1981, and approved by the Planning Commission on February 25, 1981. General Conditions; 1) Approval is granted for CT 80-47, as shown on Exhibit(s) A, dated January 20, 1981, B, C, E, F and G, dated December 29, 1980, and Exhibit D, dated January 30, 1981, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions. 2) All conditions of approval of Resolution No. 1772, for PUD-28, are hereby incorporated by reference and shall be complied with in their entirety. 3) This project is approved upon the express condition that the final map shall not be approved unless the City Council finds as of the time of such approval that sewer service is available to serve the subdivision. 4) This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the City Engineer determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for PC RESO #1771 -2- ~> I . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 such sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. This note shall be placed on the final map. 5) This project is approved upon the express condition that the applicant shall pay a public facilities fee as required by City Council Policy No. 17, dated August 29, 1979, on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, and according to the agreement executed by the applicant for payment of said fee a copy of that agreement dated December 23, 1980, is on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. If said fee is not paid as promised, this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project shall be void. 6) Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the zoning ordinance and all other applicable city ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance. 7) This subdivision is approved upon the express condition that the final map shall not be approved unless the City Council finds as of the time of such approval that sewer service is available to serve the subdivision. Engineering Conditions 8) The applicant shall install all the necessary drainage facilities to remove both the on-site storm flows and the off-site storm flows that drain onto the property and shall repair any existing on-site drainage facilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 9) The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing or grading of the site. 10) 11) 12) The grading for this project is defined as "controlled grading" by Section 11.06.170(a) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Grading shall be performed under the observation of a civil engineer whose responsibility it shall be to coordinate site inspection and testing to insure compliance of the work with the approved grading plan, submit required reports to the City Engineer and verify compliance with Chapter 11.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. No grading shall occur outside the limits of the subdivision unless a letter of permission is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. Additional drainage easements and drainage structures shall be provided or installed as may be required by the County Department of Sanitation and Flood Control or the City Engineer. PC RESO #1771 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 13) The developer shall pay the current local drainage area fee prior to approval of the final map or shall construct drainage systems, in conformance with the Master Drainage Plan and city of Carlsbad Standards as required by the City Engineer. 14) The design of all private streets and drainage systems shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to approval o.f the final map. The structural section of all private streets shall conform to city of Carlsbad Standards based on R-value tests. All private streets and drainage systems shall be inspected by the city and the standard improvement plan check and inspection fees shall be paid prior to approval of the final map. 15) All private streets and drainage systems shall be maintained by the homeowner's association in perpetuity. This responsibility shall be clearly stated in the CC&R'S. 16) The median island shall have a left turn pocket for traffic entering Lot 3, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 25th day of February, 1981, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: MARCUS, LARSON, LEEDS, JC3E, FRIESTEDT, L'HEUREUX NOES: NONE ABSENT: PQMBOTIS ABSTAIN: NONE / A-4-*sf^-*-^ MARY CARLS! US, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: C. HAGAMAN /X2ARLSBAD PLANNINp/COMMISSION PC RESO #1771 -4- StA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1772 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR SIX INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS, IN TWO PHASES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CORTE DE LA PINA BETWEEN YARROW DRIVE AND EL CAMINO" REAL. APPLICANT: ANDREX DEVELOPMENT COMPANY CASE NO; PUD-28 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to wit: Lot 8 of Tract 73-49 according to Map 8054 filed December 31, 1974 has been filed with the city of Carlsbad, and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 25th day of February, 1981, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Planned Unit Development; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission as follows: A) That the above recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing the Commission recommends APPROVAL of PUD-28, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings; 1) The proposed planned industrial development at the subject location is desirable to provide a comprehensively and imaginatively designed facility which will contribute to the general well being of the community. 1 2 - .* r «. ^r property or improvements in this area, 3 3) All design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.110 of the 6 General Plan.7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2) The proposed development is not detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the same vicinity, nor would the project be injurious to zoning code and all minimum development standards set forth in Section 21.34 are met by the proposed project as indicated in the staff report. 4) The proposed project is consistent with all elements of the 5) The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available concurrent with need as required by the General Plan 6) The project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a negative declaration has been issued by the Planning Director dated January 14, 1981, and approved by the Planning Commission on February 25, 1981. 3) That the decrease of setback requirements of the PM Zone can be justified by the large amount of landscaping provided by the project and the provision of passive recreation areas. General Conditions 1) Approval is granted for PUD-28, as shown on Exhibit(s) A, dated January 20, 1981, B, C, E, F & G, dated December 29, 1980, and Exhibit D, dated January 30, 1981, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in _ these conditions. 2) All conditions of approval of Resolution No. 1771, for CT 80-47, are hereby incorporated by reference and shall be complied with in their entirety. 3) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a final Planned Unit Development Plan, incorporating all changes required herein, for the approval of the Planning Director. 4) The standards of the P-M (Planned Industrial) zone regarding permitted uses, conditional uses, building height, outdoor storage and industrial waste discharge shall apply to the subject property.' PC RESO #1772 -2- 7 1 5) This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits shall not be issued for development of the 2 subject property -unless the City Engineer determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application 3 for such sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. If the City Engineer determines 4 that sewer facilities are not available, building'permits will not be issued. 5 6) This project is approved upon the express condition that the 6 applicant shall pay a public facilities fee as required by City Council Policy No. 17, dated August 29, 1979, on file 7 with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, and according to the agreement executed by the applicant for 8 payment of said fee a copy of that agreement dated December 23, 1980, is on file with the City Clerk and incorporated 9 herein by reference. If said fee is not paid as promised, this application will not be consistent with the General Plan 10 and approval for this project shall be void. 11 Planning Conditions 12 7) The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which shall be submitted to and approved by 13 the Planning Director prior to issuance of building permits. Said landscaping shall include mounding along all street 14 frontages. 15 8) Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size. 16 9) All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 17 10) Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed 18 in conformance with the city's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval of the Planning Department prior 19 to installation of such signs. 20 11) A uniform sign program for this development shall be sub- mitted to the Planning Department for their review and 21 approval prior to occupancy of any building. 22 12) Trash receptable areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with gates pursuant to city standards. Location 23 of said receptacles shall be approved by the Planning Director. 24 13) All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be 25 architecturally integrated and shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets 26 to the satisfaction of the Planning Department and Building Director. 27 //// 28 //// PC RESO #1772 -3- 4 8 17) Parking spaces 44 and 45 located adjacent to Building A shall be deleted. '• •-- - - - - "- - 10 18) Parking space 7 and parking space 73 adjacent to Building C 11 12 13 14 15 16 14) The applicant shall submit a street name list consistent with the city's street naming policy subject to the Planning Director's approval prior to final map approval. 15) The parking lot adjacent to Corte de-la Pina on Lot C shall be signed as "Executive Use Only" to the satisfaction of the Planning Director prior to occupancy of any buildings on Lot "C". Engineering.Conditions - - - 16) The loading docks for buildings A and D shall be modified so as to provide a minimum clear distance of "70 feet measured at:a right angle from the face of the dock to the nearest obstruction including parking stalls. jshalXLbe. deleted. Parks and'Recreation Conditions -_:-:— ,~r.-±-.-.-•- i:.. 19) Street trees shall"be planted 40*~on center along all street frontages. Variety and:placement of:trees'shall be~approved by Parks and Recreation Department prior to planting. 20) All slope-areas shall be landscaped" with7a minimum 1 gallon tree or shrub every 225 sq.ft. The remainder of slope area shall" be hydroseeded with an approved seed mix or-groundcover, and irrigated. 17 21) All irrigation lines adjacent to sidewalks or curbs must be 18 installed 12" back from concrete edge. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PC RESO #1772 _4_ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 22) The private street shall be posted "No Parking" and a provision shall be placed in the CC&R'S to prohibit parking on the street. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 25th day of February, 1981, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: MARCUS, IARSON, LEEDS, JOSE, FRIESTEDT, L'Heureux NOES: NONE ABSENT: RQMBQTIS ABSTAIN: NONE MARY MAR CARLSBA: ATTEST: , Chairman LANNING COMMISSION ES C. HAGAMAN^Secretary .RLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION PC RESO #1772 -5- . * STAFF REPORT DATE: February 25, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: CT 80-47/PUD-28 - ANDREX DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - Request for approval of a tentative subdivision map and Planned Unit Development to create and develop six industrial lots and buildings, in two phases, on the south side of Corte de la Pina between Yarrow Drive and El Camino Real in the P-M zone. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting approval of a tentative subdivision map and Planned Unit Development to create and develop six industrial lots and buildings on a 15.96 acre parcel, located, as described above. The proposed development would be constructed in two phases, comprised of three buildings each. The first phase would include an internal cul-de-sac and three industrial lots and buildings (see exhibit D). These buildings would total 139,200 sq.ft. Each of the three buildings would be 30 feet in height, consisting of a main floor and mezzanine. ** The second phase of the project would include three additional lots and buildings. Two of the proposed buildings would be 30 feet in height, constructed with a main floor and mezzanine, totaling 74,500 sq.ft. The third building would be 43,000 sq.ft. constructed in three stories. II. ANALYSIS • Planning Issues 1) Does the project satisfy the development standards and design criteria of the P-M zone and PUD Ordinance? 2) Is the overally circulation system well designed and capable of efficiently handling traffic generated by the project? -s III. DISCUSSION The purpose of a Planned Unit Development is to facilitate the development of comprehensively planned projects, emphasizing imaginative and innovative design, coupled with individual building ownership. A Planned Unit Development also allows some flexibility in the application of basic zoning and subdivision regulations to the particular property. Applying the standards of the P-M zone and PUD Ordinance to the entire property, the project would satisfy all basic development standards. As permitted by the PUD process, setbacks have been modified to reduce grading, preserve existing slopes and maximize landscaped areas. All lots created by this subdivision would exceed minimum lot'area requirements for this zone. . • The buildings themselves would appear to be well-integrated to the internal street system, parking and loading areas and landscaping. Minimum parking requirements, for the P-M zone, would be exceeded for each building. The project would be adequately served by an internal cul-de-sac. This street would include two, eighteen-foot wide travel lanes and twelve foot wide landscaped medians. No parking would be permitted on the private street and signs would be posted to this effect. Staff has added, as a condition of approval, that a provision be placed in the CC&R'S to prohibit parking on this street to ensure compliance with this prohibition. *• The applicant is proposing to modify the required setbacks of the P-M zone by reducing these setbacks up to 10 feet. To support these modifications of the P-M setback standards and satisfy the design criteria of the PUD Ordinance, the applicant is proposing extensive landscaping. The areas along the private street, at the entrances to each lot, would be mounded and landscaped to screen parking areas. Existing and proposed slopes would be landscaped, to enhance the appearance of the project and to aid in erosion control. The applicant is, additionally, proposing to provide three passive recreational areas for the convenience of the occupants on the complex. As shown on Exhibits "C" and "E", typical elevations of Building A, the buildings appear well-designed and compatible with other existing developments and future planned uses in the area. The buildings would relate well to recreational and open areas. -2- The internal street should safely serve the entire development. Staff had only one concern regarding the overall circulation system. Staff feels that no individual driveway access should be permitted from Corte de la Pina. Due to the large volume of traffic generated to the development, staff feels a second access point, other than the private street, would not only prove confusing to visitors to the project, but would also result in potential vehicle conflict, particularly when Hughes Aircraft develops to the north. Staff feels that the entire project can be adequately and more safely served by the private street. Therefore, staff is recommending, as a condition of approval that the individual driveway at the end of Corte de la Pina to Lot C be deleted. Overall, staff feels the project has been well-designed and satisfies all development standards and design criteria of the P-M zone and PUD Ordiance. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and therefore, has issued a Negative Declaration on January 14, 1981. V. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission APPROVE the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and ADOPT Resolution Nos: 1771 and 1772, recommending APPROVAL of CT 80-47/PUD-28, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. ATTACHMENTS 1) Resolution Nos: 1771 and 1772 2) Background Data Sheet 3) Location Map 4) Reduced Site Plan Elevations 5) Disclosure Form 6) Environmental Documents 7) .Exhibits: A, dated January 20, 1981, B,C,E & F, dated December 29, 1980 and Exhibit D, dated January 30, 1981 CDN:ar 2/17/81 -3- KO33M3IJND DATA SHEET N0: CT 80-47/PUD-28 APPLtCAl?T: ANDREX DEVELOPMENT CO*1PANY BEQUEST £M> LOCATION: Tentative Subdivision Map and Planned Unit Development to create 6 lots and buildings, in toro phases on the south side of Corte de la Pina between Yarrow Drive and El Camino Real. __ , LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 8 of Tract 73-49 according to Map 8054 fi Decerriber 31, 1974. _ _ Assessors Parcel Number: _ 213 _ - 05 - 03 Acres 16 No. of Lots 6 _ * \ ' GENERAI. PIAN MD ZOICTKG General Plan Land Use Designation pl _ Density M.la\7ad _ / __ . Density Proposed Existing Zone _ Proposed Sana Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: . Zoning Land Use \ •North PM • . South PM _ Industrial and Vacant PM Industrial West PM Industrial PUBLIC FACILITIES School District N/A • _ Water District CITY OF CARLSBAD Sewer District PAIflMAR AIRPORT (TEMP. ENCINA) EDU's _ Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated DECEMBER 23, 1980 (Other: EWIPDNMEMTKL IT-PACT ASSESSMENT X Negative Declaration, issued JL/14/81 Log No. E.I.R. Certified, dated . Other, ' CASE NO.CTd*>t7/PUD2£ APPLICANT ANDRE.X DLV CO. p1I? MAP_ g^Vf:T^i® '^S/yy~ '' Mit-SS^^jS^i^/fi SSa. ''' M'U uaH4 ^ «8h~i t£M?£B ^ptvp l%jfe^L^&-Efe ~ li^i^- V,&\A"3 ^^-^W-iWsP^—(v^>^XirtC+ WKV-V' -V^ * W^lffiP'^'^v.v.^ COPY co L.QT S XI^. Ciitt -a' ««fds^t-1»- t s vtrrtico «*ce ^ CAF1S3AD TRACT NO. :3CC --iicft^ep Vsrtfttr -......,., _ t ;•; \ ./AY'«-^~.—Cin^'aszwj^;;. -\|. -•""-•,~""™- \^'2^ -fV -^^M-jT^ALrlati? *-iK;ii\- - »^r» fcc^w -^TiUO.KTW->rrs H.y^t .. If^g^^ —VI ...v)£I EM^^-Trroi\.^.i>. il (V •^ i*«"r»»' V - "-i JJUO*'Jx.&~ Sc£ '.irt" SU;.'.MARY © . JT •A~. ^,,>v>*- ia&fcfe . \ V-r^llj^^rtrS-*!! J w? I ' .::-:::;.--r—" — -'L^^^^-.l •.---•" r'— -^ :j-^ T^^-^^^-^Jii'i^r^-fr^'.:-.>v-iSsw^-^M^Mft'yWWf:'^^ A !. TtTTT^TT''m!'!r'nTr1^''5^nV'ii!'Tr' .-^- £-r__-__^-; :-^(|) ® (5)__® ® ® -:,- ®©_®_-©J "^ CO! -1,1 i i -o i ! : \ h5 =?! ! Is "J »s i»* *•* II .; If after the information you have submitted has been reviewed, it is determined that further, information is required, you will be so advised. APPLICANT: Andrex Development Company . ; Name (j^^M**3?* partnership, 38k9dX3^8k«5S4xSft§BI»^i^)4X«X8^%S (before 1/12/81) P.O. Box 84361, Los Angeles, CA 90073 (after 1/12/81)3000 Ocean Park Blvd. #1004. Santa Monica. CA 90405 Business Address (213) 474-6000 (before 1/12/81) (213) 450-4220 (after 1/12/81) AGENT: Telephone Number CEP Associated Name 5466 Complex St. #208, San Diego, CA 92123 Business Address (714) 292-1353 Telephone Number MEMBERS: SEE ATTACHMENT FOR DETAILS Name (individual, partner, joint venture, corporation, syndication) Home Address Business Address Telephone Number Telephone Number Name Home Address Business Address Telephone Number Telephone Number (Attach more sheets if necessary) I/He declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this dis- closure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be relied upon as being true and correct until amended. Andrex Development Company Applicant BY Partner Howard Mann,& Associates ATTACHMENT Andrex Development Company is a partnership composed of the following: Howard Mann & Associates *c/o Andrex (213) 450-4220 3000 Ocean Park Blvd. #1004 Howard Mann Santa Monica, CA 90405 principal The Anden Group 16133 Ventura Blvd. (213) 990-9148 Suite 1270 Eugene Rosenfeld Encino, CA 91316 principal The Anden Group is a partnership composed of the following entities: Miden Corporation c/o The Anden Group 16133 Ventura Blvd. (213) 990-9148 Suite 1270 Eugene Rosenfeld Encino, CA 91316 principal The Klingbeil Group, Inc. (614* 228_6385 42 East Gay Street James D. Klingbeil Columbus, Ohio 43215 principal *.This address is effective as of January 12, 1981. Any contact before that date should be directed to: P.O. Box 84361 Los Angeles, CA 90073 (213) 474-6000