The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1981-06-02; City Council; 6618; General Plan Land Use Element AmendmentsAGENDA BILL e#INITIAL; CG:LS AGENDA BILL NO: &?O DEPT. HD. DATE: JUNE 2, 1981 CTY. ATTY. V DEPARTMENT: PLANNING CTY. MGR. y r^ SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENTS CASE NOS: GPA-58(A, B, D, E, I, J) STATEMENT OF THE MATTER: General Plan Amendment (GPA) 58 is comprised of six separate applications for six different locations in Carlsbad. All six amendments are to the Land Use Element. The requests are as follows: GPA-58 (A), Newport Shores; A request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Neighborhood Cottnercial (N) to Residential Medium Density (RM 4-10 du/ac) and to Residential Medium High Density (RMH 10-20 du/ac) en property located on the southwest comer of El Camino Real and Alga Road and the southwest corner of Alga Road and Manzanita. GPA-58(B), The Vfoodward Company; A request to amend the Land Use Element to change a Elementary School Designation to Residential Medium Density (RM) en property en the south side of Alga Road just west of Rancho Santa Fe Road. GPA-58(D), Frandsen; Request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Residential Medium Density (RM) to Ccrttttunity Commercial (C) en property located approximately 1,400 feet north of Alga Road on the west side of El Camino Real. GPA-58 (E), City of Carlsbad; Request for amendment to pages 31 and 42 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan regarding specific plans in the Airport Influence Area. GPA-58(I), La Costa Land Company; A request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Residential Low Medium Density (RLM) to Residential Medium High Density (RMH) for property located east of Alicante Road and en the north and south sides of Alfil Way. GPA-58 (J), Elm Properties; Request to amend the Land Use Element from Resi- dentialMediumDensity (RM) to a combination district comprised of Profes- sional and Related Ccmnercial (O) and Residential Medium Density (RM) for property located en the northeast comer of Elm Avenue and El Camino Real. GPA-58 was heard by the Planning Ccrimissicn on May 13, 1981. The Planning Can- mission reccmnended approval of GPAs-58(A)(B)(D)(E) and (J) and recommended ap- proval of GPA-58(l) in part. For more information, including location maps,' please see the staff reports to the Planning Commission, attached. p.l of 2 AGENDA BILL - GPA-58 A, B, D, E, I and J PLANNING DEPT JUNE 2, 1981 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that the proposed General Plan Amendments will have no significant effects on the environment and has issued Negative or Conditional Negative Declarations. FISCAL IMPACT There will be no direct fiscal impact to the city from the approval of GPA- 58. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recotmending that the City Council direct the Attorney1 s Office to pre- pare documents reccnmending approval of GPAs-58 A, B, D, E, J and I (in part). ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Ccmnission Staff Reports GPA-58 (A)(B) (D)(E)(l) (J) (includes loca- tion maps) 2. Planning Cotrtiission Resolution No. 1802 APPROVED p. 2 Of 2 STAFF REPORT DATE: May 1 3, 1981 TO: Planning Commission -v FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: GPA-58(A), NEWPORT SHORES - A request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Neighborhood Commercial (N) to Residential Medium Density (RM 0-4 du/ac) and to Residential Medium High Density (RMH 10 - 20 du/ac). I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The subject properties are located on the south side of Alga Road, between El Camino Real and Mimosa Drive (see location map). This area is split by Manzanita Street into 2 parcels of 4.76 acres on the west and 5.92 acres on the east. The applicant is requesting that the western parcel be changed from Neighborhood Commercial (N) to Residential Medium Density (RM) and that the eastern parcel be reclassifie.d from Neighborhood Commercial (N) to Residential Medium High Density (RMH). The "Seaport" Development, a single-family subdivision (0-4 du/ac), abuts the subject property to the south and the west. The property is separated from Seaport by an SDG&E powerline easement. The property to the north is vacant and designated Community Commercial. The property to the east, across El Camino Real, is developed and designated as Residential Medium High Density. If the proposed amendment is approved approximately 18 to 47 units may be approved on the western parcel and approximately 59 to 118 units on the eastern parcel. Alga Road is shown as a major arterial on the Carlsbad circulation map. II. ANALYSIS Planning Issues 1. Are the proposed land uses consistent with the Land Use Element and the other elements of the General Plan? 2. Are the proposed land uses appropriate for the site? 3. What effect would the proposed amendment have on surrounding properties? DISCUSSION The Carlsbad General Plan contains the following policies regarding multiple-family general plan classifications: 1) Limit medium and higher density residential developments to those areas where they are compatible with adjacent land uses, and where adequate and convenient commercial services and adequate public facilities exist to serve them. 2) . Locate multi-family uses near commercial centers. This would provide housing in close proximity to these facilities to the highest number of people possible. 3) Assure adequate and suitable sites for development of a variety of housing types and especially to asure affordability. It is the feeling of staff that the proposed designations are more appropriate for the subject properties than the existing commercial designation. The marketability of this property has been diminished as a commercial site because of the approval of a 12 acre commercial site immediately to the north (approved January 1981). The other site is larger and has a Community Commercial designation (C) which can provide for a wider range of uses than the Neighborhood (N) designation. Staff feels that the residential classifications will have less impact on the surrounding single-family residences than the commercial designation. Noise and traffic impacts should be less from a residential development and the higher density development would also act as a buffer from the commercial area to the north and from El Camino Real. The existing SDG&E powerline easement would offer some separation between the existing single-family development and any new residential development which may be located on the site. The applicant feels that the two subject parcels should have different density classifications. Staff agrees. The 5.92 acre site along El Camino Real is more appropriate for higher density as it is located on a transit route and is directly across Alga Road from a large commercial site. It would be a good location for affordable housing units. The higher density should not have a major impact on the Seaport development because it only abuts to the south where the SDG&E easement would act as a buffer. Similar property on the other side of El Camino Real is also designated medium-high density. The western parcel is proposed for a lesser density because it has a more direct impact on the Seaport development. This parcel abuts the existing subdivision to the south and to the west. A lesser density would provide less units, generally reducing impacts from noise, traffic and aesthetics. — 2— For the reasons stated above, staff is supporting approval of GPA-58(A). III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration was issued on April 13, 1981. IV. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission APPROVE the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and ADOPT Resolution No. 1802 recommending approval of GPA-58(A). ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Environmental Documents (at back of packet) 3. Resolution No. 1802 (at back of packet) CDG:ar 4/27/81 -3- LOCATIO MAP CASE NO. APPLICANT STAFF REPORT DATE: May 13, 1961 " . TO: Planning Commission ' -; PROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: GPA58(B) THE WOODWARD COMPANY: A Request to Amend the Land Use Element to Change a Elementary School Designation to Medium Den- sity Residential I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The appliciant is requesting that the Land Use Element of the General Plan "be amended to change the E (elementary school) designation off a site to RM (residential medium density). The property is located 0.5 miles east of the proposed intersection of Alga Road and El Fuerte Street and west of Rancho Santa Fe Road. A location map is attached. The RM designation permits 4-10 dwelling units per acre. Surrounding land is designated RM on the northern, southern and eastern sides. The General Plan shows a RL designation, low density, 0-1.5 du/acre, on the western side. The site contains approximately 15-2 acres. If this General Plan Amend- ment is approved, the applicant is proposing to construct 69 dwelling units. 66 units would be attached; 3 units would be detached. All would be grouped along an internal street system which would connect with the recently approved Hidden Meadows project to the south. Primary access will be via Alga Road. II. ANALYSIS Planning Issues; 1) Is the proposed designation appropriate for the site? 2) Is the proposed change compatible with surrounding land use? 3) Is the proposed General Plan Amendment consistent with the Land Use and other elements of the General Plan? DISCUSSION The San Marcos Unified School District Board of Trustees, at their May 12, 1980 meeting, accepted the offer of the La Costa Land Company to dedicate the El Fuerte Street elementary school site. This acceptance was contin- gent upon the removal of the Alga Road - Melrose Avenue school site from the General Plan of Carlsbad. The Board of Trustees stated that this was satisfactory to the school dis- trict. Student generation factors projected to the year 2000 clearly indi- cate that a second school site is not required for the La Costa Area. The Board of Trustees sent a letter to Mayor Packard on June 10, 1980 indicat- ing the amendment of the General Plan was acceptable. The land on all sides of the site is now vacant. However, several residen- tial developments in the area have been recently approved by the City Coun- cil. The Meadowbrook project is located irtmediately to the north and was approved for 450 units. Hidden Meadows, irtmediately to the south, was ap- proved for 300 units. The density approved for these projects is consis- tent with the proposed change. For these reasons staff feels that the change to RM is justified, appropri- ate and consistent with other elements of the General Plan. III. EWIRCE1MENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that approval of GPA58(B) will not have a significant effect on the environment and issued a Negative Declara- tion en March 31, 1981. IV. RECJOMMENDATION It is recomiended that the Planning Carmissicn APPROVE the Negative Decla- ration issued by the Planning Director and ADOPT Resolution No. 1802 ap- proving GPA 58(B). ATTACHMENTS 1. location Map 2. Environmental documents (at back of packet) 3. Resolution No. 1802 (at back of packet) JC:ls 4/15/81 -2- LOCATBO AP CASE NO. APPLICANT fiPA. 58 STAFF REPORT DATE: May 13, 1981 - TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: GPA-58(D) - FRANDSEN - Request to Amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Residential Medium Density (RM) to Community Commercial (C). I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The subject property is located on the west side of El Camino Real approxi- mately 1,400 feet north of Alga Road. The property is directly across El Camino Real from Dove Lane (see attached map). The applicant is proposing that the eastern half of the property be changed from Residential Medium Density (RM 4-10 du/ac) to Community Commercial and the western half remain as RM. The amendment area is approximately 4-5 acres in size and the en- tire parcel is currently in the unincorporated area of the County. In January of 1981 the City Council approved a General Plan Amendment which changed the land use from Residential Medium to Community Commercial imme- diately to the south of the subject property. The approval of 10 acres of Community Commercial was for the eastern portion of 2 parcels which have the same owner. II. ANALYSIS Planning Issues 1. Is the proposed amendment consistent with the General Plan? 2. Is the proposed use appropriate for the site? 3- Will the proposed land use create a "strip" commercial effect along El Camino Real? 4. Will the amendment create a detrimental effect on surrounding land uses? Discussion The General Plan states that "...the Community Commercial (C) designation should provide for a wide range of facilities for retail trade, convenience goods and professional services (uses would incude markets, banks, restau- rants, etc). Easy access for a relatively large area and population is necessary. The intersection of arterial streets is a common location for these establishments, and an area of six to twelve acres is usually needed." Staff feels that the subject property generally meets this criteria. If developed in conjunction with the two parcels to the south, the commercial area would total 14-5 acres, a little bit larger and longer than ordinarily approved. The commercial area is located on the intersection of a prime and major arterial, and there will be sufficient population to serve the site. Staff feels that either the existing EM designation or the proposed Commu- nity Commercial would be appropriate for the site. The applicants request for the C designation appears to be appropriate because of the existing C designation to the south and the future need for commercial uses in this area (the La Costa economic impact report indicated that more commercial use could be supported in La Costa than is shown on the General Plan). Probably the most important point in favor of Commercial use is that Dove Lane intersects with EL Camino Real directly in front of the subject pro- perty. Dove Lane is important because it is signalized and would help mit- igate the traffic problems created by a large commercial site. If the amendment is not approved, then the commercial area to the south will prob- ably have to utilize a right- turn-in right-turn-out driveway off EL Camino Real (in addition to Alga). This would slow traffic on EL Camino Real, even if a turn lane is provided. Since the proposed amendment would enlarge the commercial acreage and lengthen the amount of commercial along EL Camino Real, approval may appear to facilitate strip commercial northward along this arterial. The approval of GPA-58(A) just south of Alga (see map GPA-58(A)) would eliminate an ex- isting commercial site. This would help to mitigate the addition of com- mercial to the north. It is staffs feeling that access from Dove Lane would more than compensate for the strip appearance by alleviating possible . traffic congestion. Staff feels that this property should be the final extention of commercial property in the Alga/EL Camino Real area. Staff believes that if approved, the commercial area would have a minimal effect on surrounding properties. Currently, the site is surrounded by vacant property. Commercial property exists to the south with Medium Den- sity Residential to the west and north. Staff feels that the site would be compatible with these uses, although staff would recommend at the zoning level, that a Q-Overlay be placed on this property to ensure Harmonious development with the surrounding area. Because of the importance of Dove Lane to this commercial area, staff is supporting the proposed amendment. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that this project will not have a sig- nificant impact on the environment and a conditional Negative Declaration '.-.'as issued, on April 17, 1981. IV. RECOMMENDATION « It is recommended that the Planning Commission APPROVE the Negative Decla- ration issued by the Planning Director and ADOPT Resolution No. 1802 recom- mending approval of GPA-58(D). -2- ATTACHMENTS Location Map Environmental Documents (at rear of packet) Resolution No. 1802 (at rear of packet) CG:ls 4/24/81 -3- LOCATION CASE NO. APPLICANT STAFF REPORT DATE: May 13, 1981 TO: Planning Commission . ' • FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: GPA-58E - CITY OF CARLSBAD - Request for amendment to pages 31 and 42 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan regarding specific plans in the Airport Influence Area. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Currently, there are 2 sections in the Land Use Element of the General Plan which discuss the Airport Influence Area, Section 11 and Section J, at- tached. Section 11 defines the special treatment areas in the General Plan and defines the boundaries for the Airport Influence Area (as shown on the attached map). Section J, titled "Special Treatment Area Guidelines" pro- vides the criteria for development in this area. Section J indicates that a specific plan should be completed for the entire influence area and that development plans should be submitted to the County Airport Land Use Com- mission for review. Staff is proposing new language for Sections 11 and J (attached) which, will clarify the intent and implementing procedures of these two sections. II. ANALYSIS Planning Issues 1. Is the proposed amendment consistent with the entire Land Use Ele- ment and with the other elements of the General Plan? " 2. What effect will the proposed changes have on development in the Airport Influence Area? Discussion Staff feels that the proposed amendment is consistent with the Land Use Element and with the other elements of the General Plan because its intent is to clarify existing policy. The amendment will not alter any of the major goals and policies contained in the Land Use Element. The proposed amendment should clarify some of the problems and confusion associated with the existing text. Currently, Section J states that a spe- cific plan is necessary for the entire treatment area. Because of the large number of property owners, and the problems involved with bringing them together, staff has interpreted this section to mean that each devel- opment project in this area must have a specific plan. The proposed amendment to Section J would state clearly that a specific plan is neces- sary for each development in the influence area. It also states that pro- jects under 25 acres can process a site development plan rather than a com- plete specific plan. This will reduce the cost and processing time on the smaller projects. • ,. The new language for Section 11 will provide a direct reference (in Section 11) to the new Section J guidelines. This will clear up the vagueness in the relationship between the two sections and will leave no doubt as to the mandatory nature of the specific plan for this area. Finally, the amend- ment provides language (Section 11, line 8) which would enable the city to implement into local ordinances the provisions of Section 65500 of the State Planning Code regarding specific plans (processing, content, etc.). Because the amendment will qualify the existing city process regarding spe- cific plans and because it will reduce processing for smaller projects, staff is supporting approval of this amendment. Ill.ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that this project will not have a sig- nificant impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration was issued on April 13, 1981. IV. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission APPROVE the Negative Declar- ation issued by the Planning Director and ADOPT Resolution No. 1802 recom- mending approval of'GPA-58E. ATTACHMENTS 1. Existing Land Use text Section II and J 2. Proposed text Section II and J 3- Location map Airport Influence Area 4- Environmental Documents (at back of packet) 5. Resolution No. 1802 at back of packet CG:ls 4/8/81 -2- EXISTING TEXT 11. Special Treatment Area N The Land Use Plan designates particular areas that, because of existing conditions, warrant special treatment when considering future land uses. These areas include:( • (a) The "Inner City" area as defined by the two reports prepared by Duncan and Jones in 1971, titled "Preliminary Analysis of Problems and Issues - The Inner City" and "A Framework for Remedial Action - The .Inner City" and surrounding area. - • (b) The Palomar'Airport Influence Referral Area as defined by the Preliminary Plan prepared by Wilsey and Ham for the Comprehensive Planning Organization in 1974, titled "Comprehensive Land Use Plan - Palomar Airport". J. SPECIAL TREATMENT AREA GUIDELINES 1. A Specific Plan should be prepared for the downtown area. This Plan should be a joint effort of the City and downtown merchants and residents and should be directed at revitalizing the entire "Inner City" area. Until this Plan is completed, any proposed use that would be inconsistent with the uses designated on the Land Use Plan should be discouraged. Upon approval of a site development plan, density allocations as shov/n on the Land Use Plan for the "Inner City" and surrounding areas may be increased if the City finds that such an increase is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element and with an approved-Specific Plan for the "Inner City". . . -• « 2. ' Any proposed use within the Palomar Airport impact area should be 'referred to the County Airport Land Use Commission for' their review and comment. Any use proposed in the area designated as Non- Resident'ial Reserve on the Land Use Plan must justify its viability over the other possible uses. A Specific Plan for the entire influence area should be prepared by the City, County of San Diego and involved property owners. JT PROPOSED TEXT 11. SPECIAL TREATMENT AREA "The Land Use Plan designates particular areas that, because of existing conditions, warrant special treatment when considering future land uses. In some instances (see Guidelines, Page 42) special treatment may include the use of specific plans or site development plans to ensure that comprehensive planning and appropriate safeguards are included in the development. The city may develop an ordinance to help implement the specific plan process provided by the State Planning Code. Areas requiring the site development plan shall utilize the provisions in the existing Q-Overlay Zone, part of Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Special Treatment Areas Include: (a) The "Inner City" area as defined by the two reports prepared by Duncan and Jones in 1971, titled "Preliminary Analysis of Problems and Issues - The Inner City" and "A Framework for Remedial Action - The Inner City" and surrounding area. (b) The Palomar Airport Influence Referral Area as defined by the Preliminary Plan prepared by Wilsey and Ham for the Comprehensive Planning Organization in 1974, titled "Comprehensive Land Use Plan - Palomar Airport". J. SPECIAL TREATMENT AREA GUIDELINES 1. A Specific Plan should be prepared for the downtown area. This Plan should be a joint effort of the city and downtown merchants and residents should be directed at revitalizing the entire "Inner City" area. Until this Plan is completed, any proposed use that would be inconsistent with the uses designated on the Land Use Plan should be discouraged. Upon approval of a site development plan, density allocations as shown on the Land Use Plan for the "Inner City" and surrounding areas may be increased if the city finds that such an increase is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element and with an approved Specific Plan for the "Inner City". 2. Parcels located in the Palomar Airport Influence Area (designated on the General Plan Land Use Map as a series of parallel lines) must have an approved specific plan prior to their development. Parcels under 25 acres, which have no adjacent parcels under the same ownership, may be developed with a site development plan in lieu of a specific plan unless the Planning Director determines that a specific plan is warranted. Any plans for development in this area should also be submitted to the County Airport Land Use Commission for their review. PALOMAR AIRPORT INFLUENCE AREA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 13, 1981 TO: Planning Commission . FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: GPA-58(I) - LA COSTA LAND COMPANY - A Request to Amend the land Use Element of the General Plan from Residential Low Medium Den- sity (RLM) to Residential Medium High Density (RMH). I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Residential Low Medium Density (RLM 0-4 du/ac) to Resi- dential Medium High Density (RMH 10-20 du/ac) on property located on the east side of Alicante Road and on the north and south sides of Alfil Way (see attached location map). The northern side of the property is bounded by SDG&E transmission lines, which is the high point of the property. The property slopes toward the south with a sharp bank existing before the property flattens out at Alfil Way. From Alfil Way the property slopes southward toward the golf course. Surrounding land use includes single family (large lots) to the north, med- ium high density to the west, open space to the east and the golf course to the south. II. ANALYSIS Planning Issues 1. Is the proposed amendment consistent with the General Plan? 2. What effect would the proposed amendment have on surrounding pro- perties? Discussion The General Plan indicates that the city of Carlsbad should provide for a wide range of housing types, styles and prices-in a variety of locations. The city's Housing Element describes a need for more medium/high density land use. The Land Use Element states that the city should preserve the neighborhood atmosphere and identity of existing residential areas. Using the above criteria, the proposed amendment would be consistent with the General Plan unless there is an adverse affect on surrounding residential uses. The applicant is proposing that the SDG&E easement be the divider between the single family area (RLM) and the proposed multiple family area (RMH). The single family homes in this area are on large lots and several resi- Staff feels that if a multiple family development is located just south of the easement, it would have an adverse affect on the single family area. Views would be impacted and the single family character of this area would be disturbed. Staff believes that Alfil Way is a more natural divider be- tween the two land uses. The single family area drops off sharply just before Alfil Way, meaning that a multiple family uses would be situated low and far enough away so as not to effect the residences above it. Also, from a visual and aesthetic standpoint the street appears as a more natural divider. It is staff's feeling that the proposed amendment to RMH south of Alfil Way would be appropriate. Higher density along the golf course is consistent with the property immediately to the west and- with other properties abut- ting the golf course. As a result, staff would support the proposed change from RLM to RMH below Alfil Way. Staff believes that the area above Alfil Way should remain as RLM. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that approval of GPA-58U) will not have a significant effect on the environment and has issued a Negative Dec- laration on April 13, 1981. IV. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission APPROVE the Negative Decla- ration issued by the Planning Director and ADOPT Resolution No. 1802 recom- mending to the City Council that the area south of Alfil Way be reclassified from RLM to RMH and that the area north of Alfil Way be retained as RLM. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Environmental Documents (at rear of packet) 3. Resolution No. 1802 (at rear of packet) CG:ls 4/28/81 LOCATION MA CASE NO.5ft X APPLICANT LA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 13,. 1981 . TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: GPA-58(J) ELM PROPERTIES - Request to amend the Land Use Element fromResidentialMedium Density (RM) to a combination district comprised of Professional and Related Commercial (0) and Residen- tial Medium Density (RM). I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND_i_ -— -- — --, - — - - - — - * The subject property is approximately 7.9 acres in size and is located on the northeast corner of El Camino Real and Elm Avenue and is just south of Hosp Way, (see attached location map). The property is currently desig- nated Residential Medium Density (4-10 du/acre) by the General Plan and the applicant is requesting that the land use be redesignated to a combination district comprised of Professional and Related Commercial (0) and Residen- tial Medium Density (RM). A combination district allows two or more land use classifications to be applied to the same property, and its use re- quires a specific plan. The site is relatively flat along El Camino Real but begins to slope sharp- ly upward toward the south end of the property, creating 8 to 15 foot banks above Elm Avenue. The area to the east of the property is designated as open space and the property to the north, along Hosp Way, has an approved office development. El Camino Real is shown as a prime arterial and Elm Avenue as a secondary arterial on the General Plan Circulation Map. A General Plan Amendment for this property was heard by the Council in Jan- uary of 1981 and was denied on a 3 to 2 vote. The request was to change the land use from Residential Medium (RM) density to Professional and Rela- ted Commercial (0). The application was changed (RM added) to assure the Council that the applicant's intent-is to seek office zoning. If the pro- perty was designated as 0 alone, a good case could be made for commercial zoning on this site. II. ANALYSIS Planning Issues ' . 1. Is the proposed amendment consistent with the goals and policies presented in the General Plan? 2. Is a combination district appropriate for the site? 3. Are the proposed land uses appropriate for the site? Discussion The General Plan states that Professional and Related Commercial uses can be placed along arterials without creating adverse conditions which are associated with strip development, and can be used as a buffer between com- mercial and residential areas. The General Plan states that the medium (and higher) density residential classifications should be located on sites which are close to commercial areas and transportation facilities. Using the above criteria, the applicant's proposed uses would be consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan says very little about the combination district. Gener- ally it can be utilized if the Council feels that more than one land use classifications is desirable on a property. Staff has not had any problems with implementation of the combination district because a specific plan is required. The specific plan can regulate the location of the various uses on the site. Staff feels thsrt a combination district would be desirable because both the Medium Density classification and the Professional and Related Commercial category are appropriate for the site. Strong arguments can be made for both the Residential Medium Density and the Professional and Related Commercial categories as being the most appro- priate for the site. Professional and Related Commercial (primarily office type uses) is a good use category for the site because of the topography and surrounding land uses. The northern portion of the site is physically, oriented toward the large commercial area to the north and is separated from the residential uses to the east by a steep slope. Office uses would provide a good buffer between the commercial and residential uses. Office use, if properly planned, is also beneficial because it will not appear to be a continuation of the "strip" type commercial uses to the north. Residential use (RM) is also an appropriate use for the site because of its location. The property is very close to a major commercial area, to enter- tainment activities and to transportation facilities. As a result, the property could be suitable for an affordable or senior type housing devel- opment. Because two categories are appropriate for the site, it may be beneficial to utilize both of them. At the time a specific plan is submitted, the city can, based on the applicant's plan, determine whether office or resi- dential use, or a combination thereof, is most appropriate for the site. For example, the Council could limit office uses to the north and residen- tial uses to the south portion of the site. If the proposed amendment is approved, it is probable that the Residential Professional Zone (RP) will, be requested by the applicant on the site. This zone allows office and residential uses. The Residential Medium Den- sity designation would regulate the density for residential uses. There are some problems associated with access to the site. Staff feels that access issues should be resolved at the time that a specific plan is submitted. -2- Staff believes that the this property is the last logical extension of com- mercial/office use. It should be noted that staff would not recommend any further expansion of commercial/office uses in this area. Arguments can be made for commercial uses almost anywhere along El Camino Real. Future de- mand for these uses, especially at a major intersection like El Camino Real and Elm Avenue, will be great. The success of these demands will depend on future Council decisions. In Summary, staff is supporting approval of the proposed amendment because both office and residential uses are compatible with the site and because the zone change and the specific plan process will be utilized to control the location of uses on the site. III.ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that approval of GPA-58(J) will not have a significant effect on the environment and has issued a Negative Dec- laration on April 13, 1981. IV. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission APPROVE the Negative Decla- ration issued by the Planning Director and ADOPT Resolution No. 1802 recom- mending approval of GPA-58(J). ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Environemental Documents (at rear of packet) 3. Resolution No. 1802 (at rear of packet) CG:ls 4/27/81 -3- LOCATION MAP CASE NO. APPLICANT 1 2 3 4 5 6 1° 11 12 I8 20 21 22 23 26 2" 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1802 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CARLSBAD SPHERE OF INFLUENCE. _ _ WHEREAS, verified applications for amendments to the General Plan designations and requirements for certain property located as shown on Exhibits "A" - "F", dated May 13, 1981, attached and incorporated herein, have been filed with the Planning Commis- si on; and WHEREAS, said verified applications constitute requests for amendment as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 13th day of May, 1981, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by 1 aw to consider said requests; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing, and consider-i ing all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the General Plan Amendment and found the following facts and rea- .sons to exist regarding GPA-58(A), GPA-58(B), GPA- 58(D), GPA- 58(E), GPA-58U) (in part) and GPA-58(J), as shown on Exhibits "A", "B", "C", "D", "E",and "F" respectively. Findings 1) The sites are physically suitable in size and shape to accom- modate the proposed land use designations for reasons stated in the staff report. 2) Uses allowed in the proposed land use designations are com- patible with surrounding land uses for reasons stated in thestaff report. 1 3) That GPA-58(E) will clarify existing Land Use Element policy as stated in the staff report. 2 4) The projects are consistent with all city public facility 3 policies and ordinances since: 4 a) Sewer service is not required for these projects and subsequent development of the property will require the 5 availability of sewer service to serve such developments or construction cannot occur. 6 5) That approval of GPA-58(A, B, D, E, I and J) is consistent 7 with the State Housing Goal to facilitate the improvement and development of housing to make adequate provision for the 8 housing needs of all economic segments of the community because the result of these approvals will provide opportuni- 9 ties for increasing the number of housing units above exist- ing densities. 10 6) The proposed projects will not cause any significant adverse 11 environmental impacts since, based on the initial study the Planning Department has prepared conditional negative 12 declarations or negative declarations. Further environmental review will be required before development can 13 occur; and 14 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found the following facts 15 and reasons to exist regarding GPA-58(I) (in part) as shown on 16 Exhibit "E". 17 Findings 18 1) That increasing the density from Residential Low Medium Density to Residential Medium High Density north of Alfil 19 Way would be inconsistent with the goals and policies of the Land Use Element as stated in the staff report. 20 2) That increasing the deitsity north of Alfil Way would have an 21 adverse effect on single family residences in the area as described in the staff report. 22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of 23 the city of Carlsbad, as follows: 24 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// PC RESO #1802 -2- 1 A) That the above recitations are true and correct. 2 B) That in view of the findings made and considering the appli- cable law, the decision of the Planning Commission is to 3 recommend APPROVAL of GPA-58(A) as described on Exhibit "A", APPROVAL of GPA-58(B) as described on Exhibit "B", APPROVAL 4 of GPA-58(D) as described on Exhibit "C", APPROVAL of GPA- 58(E) as described on Exhibit "D", APPROVAL of GPA- 58(1) 5 (in part) as described on Exhibit "E", and APPROVAL of GPA- 58(J) as described on Exhibit "F". 6 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the 7 Planning Commission of the city of Carlsbad, California, held on 8 the 13th day of May, 1981, by the following vote, to wit: 9 AYES: Chairman Marcus, Commissioners L'Heureux, 10 17 18 19 20 21 22" (23^ 24 25 26 27 28 Friestedt, Jose, Schlehuber, Farrow, Rombotis i NOES: None 11 ABSENT: None 12 ABSTAIN: None 13 * Commissioner Jose voted against GPAs58(D)&(J) 14 15 16 MARY MACUS, Chairman CARLSBWD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: C. HAUAMAN; SecretaryOCARLSBAD PLANNING/COMMISSION / PC RESO #1802 -3- Exhibit "A" to P~ RESO #1802 Case No: GPA-l A) May 13, 1981 Applicant: Newport Shores Builders REQUEST: Request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Neighborhood Commercial to Residential Medium Density and Residential Medium High Density for property on and near the southwest corner of El Camino Real and Alga road (as shown on map below). . PC ACTION: The Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of GPA-58(A) as described above. Exhibit "B" j PC RESO #1802 Case No: GPA-58(B) May 13, 1981 Applicant: Woodward REQUEST: Request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from a school site (open space) to Residential Medium Density for property west of Mel rose Drive and south of Alga Road (as shown on the map below). tN PC ACTION: The Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of GPA-58(B) as described above. Exhibit "C -o PC RESO #1802 Case No: GPA-58(D) May 13, 1981 . Applicant: Frandsen REQUEST: Request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Residential Medium Density to Community Commercial for property located on the west side of El Camino Real approximately 1,500 feet north of Alga Road (as shown on the map below). . PC ACTION: The Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of GPA-58(D) as described above. Exhibit "D" o PC RESO #1802 Case No: Grrt-58(E) May 13, 1981 Applicant: City of Carlsbad REQUEST: Request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan Text (pages 31 and 42) for the Palomar Airport Influence Area (below) as shownon Exhibit "1" attached. PC ACTION: The Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of GPA-58(E) as shown on the map above. -I • 11.. SPECIAL TREATMENT AREA ' . . "The Land Use Plan designates particular areas that, because of existing conditions, warrant special treatment when considering future land uses. In some instances (see Guidelines, Page 42) special treatment may include the use of specific plans or site development plans to ensure that comprehensive planning and appropriate safeguards are included in the development. The city may develop an ordinance to help -implement the specific plan process provided by the State Planning Code. Areas requiring the site development plan shall utilize the provisions in the existing Q-Overlay Zone, part of Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. - - ' ' Special Treatment Areas Include: ••,"'. ' -.. . . (a) The "Inner City" area as defined by the Wo reports prepared by Duncan and Jones in 1971, - • ' titled "Preliminary Analysis, of Problems and Issues - The Inner City" and "A Framework for Remedial Action - The Inner City* and surrounding • • area. • * . • . . : , . ' ' .' -. ;. . •. -_. (b) The Palomar Airport Influence Referral Area as defined by the Preliminary Plan prepared by Wilsey and Ham for the Comprehensive Planning Organization in 1974, titled "Comprehensive Land Use Plan - Palomar Airport". J. SPECIAL TREATMENT AREA GUIDELINES •. 1. A Specific Plan should be prepared for the doxmtown area. This Plan should be a joint effort of the city 'and downtown merchants and residents should be directed . at revitalizing the entire "Inner City" area. Until this Plan is completed, any proposed use that would be inconsistent with the uses designated on the Land Use Plan should be discouraged. Upon approval of a site .development plan, density allocations as shown on the Land Use Plan for the "Inner City" and surrounding areas may be increased if the city finds that such an increase is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element and with an approved Specific Plan, for the "Inner City". 2. Parcels located in the Palomar Airport Influence Area (designated on the General Plan Land Use Map as a series of parallel lines) must have an approved specific plcin prior to their development. Parcels under 25 acres, which have no adjacent parcels under the same ownership, may be developed with a site development plan in.lieu of a specific plan unless the Planning Director determines that a specific plan is warranted- Any plans for development in this area should also be submitted to the. County Airport Land Use Commission for their review. Exhibit "E ,o PC RESO #1802 Case Mo: GPA-58U) May 13, 1981 Applicant: La Costa Land Co. REQUEST; Request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from "Residential Low Medium Density to Residential Medium High Density for property located on the north and south sides of Alfil Way (as shown on map below). PC ACTION: The Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL (in part) of GPA- •~58(I).Approval is recommended for the area south of Alfil Way as shown above. Exhibit "F ,o PC RESO #1802 Case No: GPA-58(J) May 13, 1981 . Applicant: Elm Properties REQUEST: Request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Residential Medium Density to a Combination District comprised of Residen- tial Medium Density and Professional and Related Commercial (as shown on map below). . PC ACTION: The Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of GPA-(J) as described above. SAN DIEGO ACOUSTICS, Inc. May 27 1981 Ref. 81-0070 Mr. John A. Bailey Lusardi Construction 1570 Linda Vista Drive San Marcos, CA 92069 Gentlemen: At your request, San Diego Acoustics has made a preliminary analysis of the traffic noise expected to occur adjacent to the northeast corner of El Camino Real at Elm Avenue in Carlsbad, California. The following describes the predic- tive model employed, the source of input data and the impact of the noise values on different types of land development. As approval of land development plans depends on future expectation, as well as current conditions, a predictive noise model was employed to determine future noise levels. The Federal Highway Administrative Noise Prediction Model FHWA-RD-77-108 was used. This model is accepted and used by CALTRANS and the County of San Diego for noise predic- tive purposes. Two factors primarily influence the pro- duction of traffic noise; the number of average daily trips (ADT) along a road, and the speed of the vehicles making these trips. The latest traffic count made in this area (11.25.80) shows an ADT of 20,000 (source - Carlsbad Traffic Engineering Department). SANDAG (formerly Comprehensive Planning Organization, CPO) predicts a value of 35,000 to 40,000 ADT will occur on this portion of El Camino Real in the year 2000. A conservative distribution of 97% autos, 1.8% medium trucks, and 0.74% heavy trucks was used to cal- culate the noise. This distribution is typical for a major arterial street in a non-industrial area. The posted speed of 55 mph and an assumption of a hard surface over which the 600 B STREET • SUITE 1130 • SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 • (714)231-8986 noise would be transmitted were other input factors used, results of these calculations are contained in table 1. The TABLE 1 Prediction of Noise Levels Resulting From Traffic on El Camino Real between Elm Avenue & Narron Road (Noise Prediction Model FHWA-RD-77-108) Year 1981 2000 Traffic ADT 20,000 37,500 Noise Level (1001 from centerl 70 73 - CNEL* ine of road) *Community Noise Equivalent Level Noise limits which restrict the type of land development al- lowed are enacted on a local basis. Many communities, in- cluding the City of San Diego, have followed the U.S.Depart- ment of Housing and Urban Development land use compatability guidelines. These guidelines have four categories - "Clearly acceptable", "Normally acceptable", "Normally un- acceptable", and "Clearly unacceptable". The range of noise between 65 and 75 CNEL is stated as "normally unacceptable" for all types of residence (single and multiple family), and schools, libraries and hospitals. Categories of development which are "normally acceptable" for this range of noise are office buildings and related uses. On the basis of the present and future noise levels expected along this portion of El Camino Real and the HUD guidelines for land development, it appears that the construction of offices or professional buildings on your property will be more com- patible with general land development practices than any form of residential development. In addition, a development of this type could provide an effective noise buffer between the road noise and future residences constructed behind the office buildings, thus ensuring a better noise environment for the residential community. Yours very truly, E. C. Kamps, Acoustician. San Diego Acoustics has been in business for six years. The principals, E. Kamps and J. Berry each have over 25 years experience in the field of acoustical engineering. The com- pany has successfully submitted numerous acoustical environ- mental impact reports to the City and County of San Diego, and many of the adjacent communities. The National City noise ordinance was formulated by a principal of San Diego Acoustics, Inc. Our clients have included the Cities of San Diego, Chula Vista and Oceanside, as well as many promi- nent environmental impact companies such as Westec Services, Toups and Recon. FIGURE 1 LAND USE AND AVERAGE NOISE LEVEL COMPATIBILITY as AVERAGE NOIS£/LEV€L (CNEL OR L. INKDECJBELS)on '',*--' 55 60 65 70 75 80 Trans lent Lodglng Schools, Libraries, Churches Hospi tals, Nursing Homes Music Shells Auditoriums, Concert Halls Sports Arenas, Outdoor Spectator Sports Parks, Playgrounds Natural Recreation Areas Golf Courses, Riding Stables Water Recreation, Cemeteries Offfce Buildings, Personal, Business and Professional Commerical, Retail, Movie Theatres, Restaurants Commercial-Wholesale, Some Retail, Ind., Mfg. Livestock Farming, Animal Breeding Agriculture (Except Livestock), Mining INTERPRETATION CLEARLY COMPATIBLE The average noise level Is such that Indoor & outdoor activities associated with the land use may be carried out with essentially no interference from nofse. NORMALLY COMPATIBLE The average noise level is great enough to be of some concern, but common building construction should make the Indoor envir- onment compatible with the usual indoor activities, including sleeping. The average noise level is significantly more severe so that unusual and costly building construction may be necessary to Insure an adequate environment for indoor activities. Barriers must be erected between the site and prominent noise sources to make the outdoor environment tolerable. CLEARLY INCOMPATIBLE The average noise level is so severe that construction costs to make the Indoor environment acceptable for performance of activities would probably be prohibitive. The outdoor environment would be intolerable for outdoor activities associated with the land use. SOURCE: Wllsey C Ham and Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Aircraft Noise Impact Planning Guidelines for Local Agencies. U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Report TE/NA-472 , November 1972. Adapted with modifications from Figure 2-15. IIMSLEE, SEIMEFELO S ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE D PLANNING May 26, 1981 To Whom It May Concern: Reference: PROPERTY (El Camino Real and Elm) - Carlsbad Gentlemen: We have been requested to inspect the referenced property relative to its suitability for being developed as an "Elderly Housing" complex. The U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development in their report #TE/NA-472 dated November 1972 have stated that housing projects are not normally compatible adjacent to a street having a decibel rating as high as 60-75. It is our understanding that El Camino Real has a rating of 65 decibels. It is also highly desirable that an "Elderly Housing" complex be lo- cated near a Senior Citizen Center, Library, Churches etc. Very truly yours, INSLEE, SENEFELD & ASSOCIATES C. L. Senefeld/A.I.A. CLS:m ROBERT R. INSLEE. AIA.. IFRAA. CLAUDE L. SENEFELD. AIA. GERALD PUCHLIK. AIA. 3142 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD D LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA D 9OO1O D [S13] 3B7-3S71 pbnning°architecture 28 May 1981 Mr. John A. Bailey Executive Vice President Lusardi Construction Company 1570 W. Linda Vista Dr. San Marcos, CA 92069 Re: Elm Garden Offices Elm Avenue and El Camino Real Carlsbad, California Job No. 8109 Dear Mr. Bailey: As the former Planning Director for the City of Carlsbad, I am very familiar with the site, the topography, and the area sur- rounding this project. The proposed General Plan Amendment from RM to 0/RM will allow garden type offices to be designed within a controlled plan as provided under an RP zone. This will be an excellent use for the site. The permanent open space and the 40-foot to 60-foot change in elevation between the site and the land to the east forms a natural separation between the residential zoning and the RP zoning. El Camino Real on the west and Elm Avenue on the south also provide a natural separation between the site and surround- ing uses. On the north, where there is no natural separation, the RP zoning is consistent with the proposed use of the adjoin- ing land. We have prepared conceptual studies for the site and propose to use a unified architectural and landscape theme. The build- ing will be one and two stories in height, with clay tile roofs, heavy wood trim, and roughly textured plaster walls. Colors will be in the warm hues. The site will be abundantly land- scaped in the areas surrounding the buildings and also in the courtyards and patios of the buildings. Sincerely, Donald Schoell, AIA SCHOELL & PAUL INCORPORATED Planning and Architecture DONALD SCHOELL AIA ROBERT PAUL AIA / ASSOCIATES JOHN D DREW LESTER H BAGG 755 UNION STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101 PH 714-232-3181 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, June 2, 1981, to consider approval of the following Amendments to the Land Use Element of the General Plan: GPA-58(A) Newport Shores - Neighborhood Commercial to Residential Medium and Residential Medium High Density. GPA-58(B) Woodward - School Site (OS) to Residential Medium Density. GPA-58(D) Frandsen - Residential Medium Density to Community Commercial. GPA-58(E) City of Carlsbad - Amendment to Land Use Element text clarifying the sections regarding specific plans in the airport influence area. GPA-58(I) Alicante Hills - Residential Low Medium Density to Residential Medium High Density. GPA-58(J) Elm Properties - Residential Medium Density to a combination district comprised of Residential Medium Density and Professional and Related Commercial and more particularly located as shown on the maps below: PUBLISH: May 20, 1981 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL gl or* riv5'; \ /" • .•KI vi°^*x \ \ I H ' AIWOW IIIFLIIENCB 5s frj Kl ' V,, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING GPA-58(A) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, June 2, 1981, to consider the approval of the following amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan: GPA-58(A) - Newport Shores - Neighborhood Commercial to Residential Medium and Residential Medium High Density. and more particularly located as shown on the map below: APPLICANT: Newport Shores PUBLISH: May 20, 1981 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL A-P. GPA i r\ 7 T:*" "*""" "** * Genera • Jment and Zono Change February 2/, 1981 #215-170-03-19 M.M.T. Sales Inc. 7^7 3rd Ave. New York, N.Y. \OQ\7 #215-170-03-53 M/M G. Friedman, Lisa Friedman, M/M R. Olson '8V< Norway Lane Lo's Angeles, CA 900^9 #215-170-03-55 Occupant 1929 A Alga Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-03-52 Sharon- Mendenhal I 1921. A Alga Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 #2 15-170-03-5** Occupant 1921 C Alga Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-03-55 M/M A. Johnson 131 i»th Ave. Two Habors, MN 55616 #215-170-03-53 Occupant 1921 B Alga Road Car.lsbad, CA 92003 #215-170-03-5*+ M/M Biener 10522 Greenbrier Road Santa Ana, CA 92705 #215-170-03-56 Occupant 1929 B Alga Road Carlsbad, CA 92003 #215-170-03-56 M/M Sine lai r '7113 Al icante Road Rancho La Costa, CA 92008 #215-170-03-57 Occupant 1929 C Alga Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-03-57 M/M L. Robb 522^ Los Adornos Way Los Angeles, CA 90027 '/•" -'-•2.15-503-19 Mr. and Mrs. Ted Sonborn 702*4. Fern h lace Coi'lbbfld.CA 92008 ••'/2J5-503-20 Ms. Villa Dudley 7026 Fern Place CarIsbad.CA 92008 1/2 15-503- 21 Mr. and Mrs. Robert Loom is 7028 Fern Place Carlsbad.CA 92008 '/? 15-503-22 Mr. and Mrs. Ed Kish 7030 Fern Pi ace Carlsbad.CA 92008 -'/2I5-503-23 Mr. and Mrs. Charles Knowlton 7032 Fern Place Carlsbad.CA 92008 ,7215-503-2*4 Mr, and Mrs. Majeskc 703*4 Fern Place Carlsbad.CA 92008 ;;215-503- 2*4 Mr. and Mrs. Dasaro 703*4 Fern Place Carl'sbad.CA 92008 4215-503-25 Mr. and Mrs. Jerry Perkins 7036 Fern Place Carlsbad.CA 92008 • #215-503-26 Mr. and Mrs. Leroy Johnson 7038 Fern Place Carlsbad.CA 92003 .-••215-503-27 . Mr. and Mrs. Patrick Van Hoose 7102 Columbine Drive "Carlsbad.CA 92008 ft 215-503-32 > Mr. and Mrs, Wayne Behnke 7035 Manzani ta St. Carlsbad.CA 92008 /2 15-503-31* Mr. and Mr. Kirk Dunning 7031 Manzani ta Street Carlsbad.CA 92008 #215-503-31 Mr. and Mrs, Frank Spiegelberg 7101 Manzani ta Street Carlsbad.CA 92008 /'215-503-33 Mr. and Mrs. E. Pinpin 7033 Manzani ta Street Carlsbad.CA 92008 .-215-50*4-01 Mr.'and.Mrs. M. Hager 1850 Tule Court Carlsbad,CA 92008 1/2 15-50*4-01 Mr. and Mrs. John Edmonds 1850 Tule,Court Carlsbad.CA 92008 4215-50*4-02 Mr. Bradley Wojci k 1852 Tule Cou rt Carlsbad.CA 92008 },2 15-50A-03 Mr. and Mrs. Robert Larson 185*4 Tule Court Carlsbad.CA 92008 //215-50*4-10 Mr. and Mrs. Ron Derowski 1851 Tule Court Carlsbad.CA 92008 - ,//2li-050-52 Pau I Dunn 5loi Mt. Al jfan Drive San Dieqo.CA'92 I f I #215-050-52 P.atrick Sweeney 5181 Mt. AIi fan Drive San Dieqo.CA 921 I I #215-050-05 Hugo Hanson 210 Round tree Way San Rafael , CA 94903 #215-501-35 Newport Shores Builders 137 West D Street Enc i ni tas.CA 92024 "2 \ 5-50*4- 1 1 Donald B. Ay res, Jr. Drawer A HUnTIN6nN- Huntington Beach, CA 92640 #215-501-34 Mr. and Mrs. Glen Seibert 7003 wifjtosa Privo- Carlsbad.CA 9,2qp8 .^215050-52 Donald Dunn 5131 Mt. Al i. fan D i i ve San Diego.CA 921 I I #2 15-501-33 Mr. and Mrs. Henry Matson 7005 Mimosa Drive Co i-1 shad, CA 92003 #215-501-33 Mr. and Mrs. Peter Martini 7005 Mimosa Drive Car)sbad,CA 92008 ''215-501-32 Mr. and Mrs.- Larry Turner 7007 Mimosa Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 0215-501-31 • Mr. and Mrs. Paul Yezbak 7009 Mimosa Drive Carlsbad.CA 92008 #215-501-30 Gary Fai rbanks 701 I Mimosa DrIve Carlsbad.CA 92008 #215-501-23 Mr. and Mrs. Joe Gonyeau 1722 CannasCourt Carlsbad.CA 92008 #215-501-22 Mr. and Mrs. Vernon Allen 1720 Cannas Court Carlsbad.CA 92008 #215-501-24 Ms. E. Varne- 1721 Cannas Court Carlsbad?CA 92008 .«15-503-Of Ms. Mar Ily Avo1ese 7004 Mi/nosa Drive Carlsbad.CA 92008 #215-503-02 Mr. and Mrs. Randal Moersche 7006 Mimosa Drive Carlsbad.CA 92008 #215-503-03 Mr. and Mrs. Luis Asccncio 7008 Mimosa Drive Carlsbad.CA 920C3 1215-503-04 Mr. and Mrs. 'Harris Nelson 7010 Mi moba Dr i ve Carlsbad.CA 92008 #215-503-05 Mr. and Mrs. John B-lackburn 7012 Mimosa Dr ive Carlsbad.CA 52003 #215-503-07 Mr. and Mrs. Phil Kessler 7026, Columbine Drive Carlsbad.CA 92008 #215-503-08 Mr. and Mrs. Greg Nelson. Wes thaven D ri ve #215-503-08 Occupant 7028 Columbine Dr i ve (famYd.CA 92008 #215-503-09 Mr. and Mrs. Jerry Henson 7030 Columbine Drive Carlsbad.CA 92008 #215-503-10 Mr. and Mrs. Ed Means 7032 Colu.mbine Drive Carlsbad,CA 92008 #215-503-11 Mr. and Mrs. Steven Golden 7034 Columbine Drive Carlsbad.CA 92003 #215-503-13 Mr. and Mrs. Bret Ward 7033 Fern Place Carlsbad.CA 92008 #215-503- IA Mr, Gordon S<-wr I I 7031 Fern Place Carlsbad.CA 92008 #215-503-15 • Mr. John Gri f f i Ins" 7029 Fern Place Carlsbad.CA 92008 #215-503-16 Mr. and Mrs. Richard Page 1751 Kennington Road Luucndia.CA 92024 #215-503-16 Oc'cupanl '7027 Fern pl,i< <.. Mr. d>"^ drs. Keith Coffman 7025 Feat* Place "215-503-18 Mr. and Mrcs. Fred Rogers .7022 Fern Place ,,'' t-xlft At- *l rf .> tf* t\ Ji"£'i?_ //i'i$- i;G-C/-07 Occupant . 7087 #7 Estrella De Mar Rd, Carlsbad, ' f.A 92008 M/M K. Jan is ' 253^1 Terreno Drive Mi ss ion Viego.CA 9269! #215-170-07-03 Occupant 7087 f/Q Estre] la De Mar Rd 'Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-07-08 M/M R. Frank 11677 Valley Crest Rd. Studio Ci ty, CA 9160^ #215-170-07-09 Occupant 708.7 #9 Estrella De Mar Rd. Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-07-09 Henry Lichtenstein 9653 Oak Pass Road Beverly Hills, CA 90210 #215-170-07-10 Occupant 7087 //10 Estre! la De Mar Rd. Carlsbad.CA 92008 #215-170-07-10 Wi 1 I iam Salle ^952 Iroquoi s Ave. San Diego,CA 92117 #215-170-07-11 Occupan t 7087 #11 Estre!la De Mar R Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-07-11 M/M WiIber Lee 1225 S. Eastern Ave. Los Angeles.CA 90022 #21^5-170-07-12 Occupant 7087 #12 Estrella De Mar Rd, Carlsbad, CA 92008 #2)5-170-07-12 M/M John Whi te '^00 E. Palos Verdes Drive Rancho Palow Verde, CA 902 #215-170-07-13 Occupant 7087 #13 Estrella Carlsbad.CA 92008 De Mar Rd, ^215-170-07-13 M/M M. Glousman 169 Thurston Ave; Los Angeles.CA 900^9 #215-170-07-1*+ Occupant 7087 #1** Estrel la De Carlsbad, CA 92008 Mar #2!5-170~07-l'+ M/M Lazarou 9*412 Tierra Blanch Drive Whi t:tier, CA 90605 #215-050-52 Mo 1 a Development Corp. ^41 7 Main St. ' Huntingdon Beach; CA 926/i8 #215-52-06 Beverly Hills Federal S & L Assoc c/o Robt. Newberry 9*401 Wi 1 shi re Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90212 #215-503-35 Donald B. Ayres, Jr. P.O. Drawer A Huntington Beach,CA 926^8 #215-503-35 Newport Shores Bui Iders P.O. Drawer A Huntrngton Beach,CA 926^3 #215-503-35 Newport Shores Builders 1970 North El Camino Real Encini tas, CA 92024 M/M K. Hager 1850 Tule"Court Carlsbad, CA 92008 ,</215-504-0'-" (lot M/M Mike Sabol 1856 Tule Court Carlsbad, CA92008 hr. Br'c.cl)ey Woji.ik 1852 Tule Court' Carlsbad,. CA 92008 #215-3n/: r: (!ci i M/M M. Pieratt 1858'"Yule Court Carlsbad, CA. $2008 >--iji."1;-03 (lot •-.} .„ ... Robert Larson 1854 Tule Court Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-504-06 (lot 7) M/M Bruce Tu1 lock 1859 Tule. Court Carlsbad, CA 92008 #2 15-504-07 (iot 8) M/M Lynn Maud 1i n 1857 Tule Court Carlsbad, CA 92008 u o \ r *~ r. 11 ^ O / ^ ^ . "• >rri . i-^vi-wo v lU i ;<> Wayne Downs 1855 Tule Court Carlsbad, CA 92008 y (lot 10) Occupant 1853 Tule Court Carlsbad.CA 92008 ^215-50^-09 (lot 10) M/M Robt. Menefee 2^901 Luton Circle Laguna Hi 1Is.CA 92653 M/M Ron Derowski 1851" Tule Court Carlsbad,CA 92008 (tot #2l;i-521-0l (lot 12) M/M Robt. Greenwell 1850 Pentas Court Carlsbad.CA 92008 /215-521-02 (lot 13) .VM Bruce Nelson 1852 Pentas Court Carlsbad.CA 920.08 #215-521-03 (lot 14) M/M/ R. Grady 185^ Pentas Court Carlsbad.CA 92008' #215-521-0*4 (lot 15) M/M Alan Dunn 1856 Pentas Court Carlsbad, CA 92008 /2i5-503-3i* (lot 1*3) VM Ki rk Dunn ing 7031 Kanzani ta Street Carlsbad.CA 92008 #215-503-33 (iot 42) ..M/M. E. Pinpin 7033 Manzani ta Street Carlsbad,CA 92008 #215-503-32 (lot 4!) M/M Matrons 7035 Manzanits Street Carlsbad.CA 92008 /215-503-3I (lot VM Frank Spiegelberg 7101 Manzani ta Street Carlsbad.CA 92008 #21-5-503-30 (lot 39) M/M Terry Brown 7103 Manzanita Street Carlsbad.CA 92008 #215-503-26 (lot 70) M/M Leroy Johnson 7038 Fern Place Carlsbad.CA 92008 '215-503-25 (lot 69) M/M Jerry Perkins 7036 Fern Place Carlsbad.CA 92008 #215-503-24 (lot 68) Occupant 7034 Fern Place Carlsbad,CA92008 //2 15-503-23 (lot 67) M/M Charles Know 1 ton 7032 Fern Place Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-503-24 (lot 68) M/M Geo. Dasaro 7507 Cowan Ave. Los Angeles.CA 90045 VCC Jpcil"' L . 1903 A Estrella De Har Court Carlsbad, CA '92008, M/M J. Powijrs 5729 C Indian School Road Phoenix, AZ 35018 £2-1$-170-02-21 Occupant 1903 B Estrella De Mar Cour Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-02-21 Will!am Bryce ,'4021 Onding Ci rcle Huntington Se.ach,CA 92649 H") 15..! 70-02- 19 John Sharmahd 1907 A EstrelI a De Mar Court Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-02-20 Occupant • - . 1903 C'EstreMa De Mar Court Carlsbad, CA 92008 #2!5-170-02-!8 Occupant !907 B Estrelia Oe Mar Court Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-02-20 Frank Mol1 10270 Riverside Drive Toluca Lake, CA 91602 #215-170-02-18 M/M George Papas 7933 Prospect St. //I La Jolla, CA 92037 f ; i. I r i •? r • r. o IJ - I / \j ~ u i. ~ I Occupant 1907 C Estrel la De Mar Court" Carslbad, CA 92008 El iz« Nathan 888 Stonegate Dri ve Highland Park, ILL 60035 #215-170-02-16 Occupant 1907 D Estrella De Mar Cour' Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-02-16 -K. Hunter 3703 Rainier Tower Seattle, WA 981.01 */•***- \-ft-. on } l-H t. i ,5 — i / u - u i -• l"t Occupant • .. 1911 H Estrella De Mar Court Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-02-15 Occupant 1911 I Estrella De Mar Court Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-173-02-11* -.M/M--S. Kaplan 1^36 Waverly Road Highland Park, ILL 60035 #215-170-02-15 M/M L. Geer 19209 Star Lane South Field, Ml ^8075 #215-170-02-13 Occupant 19)1 G Estrella De Mar Court Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-02-13 Ruan Inc. P.O. Sox 855 Des Moines, IA'5030*4 #2!:?- i /U-OZ-I 1 Dr. and Mrs. Chiascione 18 Shelley Ave. Yonkers, N.Y. 10701 #215-170-02-12 B i 1 1 ie Jenki ns IS11 F Estrella De Mar Court Carlsbad, CA 92008 Occupant 1911 D Estrella De Mar Court Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-02-11 Occupant 1911 E Estrella De Mar Court Carlsbad, -CA 92008 #215-1/0-02-10 M/M R. Forrest 20if9 E. Century Park #1100 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Georgette Eisenberg 1915 C Estrella De Mar Court Carlsbad, CA 92008 f;2 5- i -t-o M/M H. Rieger 1915 B Estrella De Mar Court Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-02-39 Occupant 1915 A Estrella De Mar Courl Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-02-39 Charles Go Id smi th 52*4 Walnut St. 700 Atlas Bonk Blvd. Cincinnati, Ohio ^5202 Marshall Fisher 1919 B Estrella De Mar Court 'Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-02-0 Occupant 1919 C Es.trella De Mar Court Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-02-23 Occupant 1919 A Estrella Oe Mar Court Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-02-25 M/M J. Kholos 2625 Acuna Court Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-02-23 M/M E, Goldenberg 165 8th St. San. Francisco, CA 9'* 103 130-1 A Alga Road arlMjiui, CA. 920,08 •M/M Herb D->de! 1 1033 Gayley Ave. #200 Los Angeles, CA 9002^4 #215-170-03-02 Li 11 i an Rosener 1901-B Alga' Road Carlsbad CA 92008 #215-170-03-03 Occupant 1901 C Alga Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 #2-15-170-03-03 M/M M. Rosenstock 35 B i rchaFI Dri ve Scarsdale, N.Y. 10583. #2l5-170-03-0i» Occupant 1901 0 Alga Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 R.S. 0 Inc. P.O. Box 395 Laramie WY 820/0 #215-170-03-5 M/M Robert Mui r 1901 E Alga Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-03-06 Occupant 1905 A Alga Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-03-06 M/M Roy Abr.ims . ^310 Tarn O'Shanter Lane Tarzana, CA 91356 #215-170-03-07. Occupant 1905 B Alga Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-03-07 M/M A. Stone 3^1 W. Grand Ave. Chicago, ill. 6065 #215-170-03-08 Occupan t 1905 C Alga Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-03-08 M/M Robt. Katz 18 West 785 Ave. La Tours Oak Brook, I 11 60521 #215-170-03-09 Occupant 1905 D Alga Road Carlsbad, CA 92003 #215-170-03-09 ' - T. Sanders \k\ West Jackson Blvd.#1636 Chicago, I 11 6060U #215-170-03-10 Occupant 1909 A Alga Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-03-10 M/M M. Cukier 2688 Casiano Road Bel Aire, CA 9002^ #2.15-170-03-11 " Occupant 1909 B Alga Road Carlsbad, CA.92008 #215-170-03-11 M/M C. Herman 211 Bick Sldg. Fargo, N.D. 58102 #215-170-03-12 Occupant 1909 C Alga Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-03-12 M/M Bri tt i ngham c/o Brittingham Leasing Corp, 56?0AWi IshirpLOS Angeles,LA #215-170-03-13 Occupant 1909 D Alga Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-03-13 M./M B. Crown 300 W. Washington Blvd. Chicago, ILL 60606 #215-170-03-1'+ M/M C. Luria 1909 E Alga Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-03-15 Occupant 1909 F Alga Road ' Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-03-15 Lincoln Enterprises, Inc, 91^7 Leander Place BeverTy Hills, CA 90210 #215-170-03-16 Occupant 1913 A Alga Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 #215-170-03-16 K/M Ettleson 7923 Beckwi th Street Morton G.rove, ILL 60053 #215-170-03-17 M/M. A.' Fazekci 1913 B Alga Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 //215-I70-03-I8 Occupant 1913 C Alga Road h;iH rA #215-170-03-18 M/M S. Schrieber 6922 Hoilywood Blvd. ornoa #215-170-03-19 Occupant 1913 D- Alga Road NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING GPA-58(B) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, June 2, 1981, to consider the approval of a General Plan Amendment to change the designation of an elementary school site (E) to Residential MediumDensity (RDM) on property generally located on 0.5 miles east of the intersection of Alga Road and El Fuerte Street, and more particularly described as: A portion of Parcel 4 of Parcel Map No. 10179 of the County of San Diego. APPLICANT: PUBLISH: WOODWARD May 20, 19 31 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL P CASE NO. A P P LIC A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING GPA-58(D) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, Calfornia, at 6:00 P.M. on Tuesday, June 2, 1981, to consider approval of the following amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan; GPA-58(D)Frandsen - Residential Medium Density to Ccmnunity Commercial. and more particularly located as shown on the map below: APPLICANT: Frandsen PUBLISH: May 20, 1981 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL LOCATION MAP- Owners Name and Audress Parcel No. Beverly N. Griffiths 215-050-04 c/o Henry S. Row en 2 Wisteria Way Atherton, California 94025 Hugo J. Hanson - 215-050-05 210 Roundtree Way San Rafael, California 94903 Alice M Lamplugh 215-050-18 6869 El Camino Real Carlsbad, California 92008 Mola Development . 215-050-51 417 Main Street -215-050-52 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Walter J. and Wanda Frandsen 215-050-61 500 Camino de Orchida Encinitas, California 92024 Joseph V and Noreen Levatino - 215-050-60 22121 Malibu Lane Huntington Beach , Ca. 92646 Mola Development Corp . -215-052-07 417 Main St. „ - Huntington Beach , Cal. 92648 Downey Savings and Loan 3200 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, California 92626 215-052-09 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING GPA-58(I) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers , 1200 Elm Avenue, CArlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, June 2, 1981, to consider approval of the following amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan: GPA-58(I)Alicante Hills - Residential Low Medium Density to Residential Medium High Density. and more particularly located as shown on the map below: APPLICANT: Alicante Hills PUBLISH: May 20, 1981 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL 0£cupa\it 7356 Altiva Place Carlsbad, CA 92008 Occupant '352 El Fuerte'Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 Occupant 7348 El Fuerte Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 Occupant 7360 El Fuerte Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 Occupant 7356 El Fuerte Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 Occupant 7343 Bolero Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 Occupant 7347 Bolero Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 Occupant 7340 Bolero Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 Occupant 2917 Managua Place Carlsbad, CA 92008 Occupant 2919 Managua Place Carlsbad, CA 92008 Occupant 2921 Managua Place Carlsbad, CA 92008 Occupant 2922 Managua Place Carlsbad, CA 92008 David & Lenora Levine 7690 El Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008 Peter and Kay Hobson 3145 Seville Street San Diego, CA 92110 Chris and Donna Bushard 3659 Cactus Ridge Court San Diego, CA 92105 La Costa Land Company Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, CA 92008 Wilford and Janice .Becker 2891 Caminito Marion La Jolla, CA 92037 - Henry and Karen Ingorvate 105 Rodney Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Michael Fiorito 7650 Galleon Carlsbad, CA 92008 Wendzel and Sandra Wabiszewski 2014 Calle Anita Ventura Oceanside, CA 92154 James and Jenny Marks 3929 Texas Street San Diego, CA 92104 Margaret Johnson c/o Thomas Mass 221 North La Sally Street Suite 1260 Chicago, 111 60601 Vahik and Edward Sarkissian Richard and Josefa Grossi 16551 Park Lane 2112 Placido Court Los Angeles, CA 90049 . Carlsbad, CA 92008 ,Robin and Mary McMullan 1660 Olmerda Street Encinitas, CA 92024 Aleksander Lewicki 13614 Boquita Drive Del Mar, CA 92014 Gloria and Robert Harding W.R. and Je,wel Fowler 5301 Appian Way Long Beach, CA 90805 ' Twelve Trees Court c/o John Stanley 7682 El Camino Real, 204 Carlsbad, CA 92008 KQTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING GPA-58(J) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Cornell of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, June 2, 1981, to consider approval of the following amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan: GPA-58(J)Elm Properties - Residential Medium Density to a combination district comprised of Residential Medium Density and Professional and Related Commercial. and more particularly located as shown on the map below: APPLICANT: ELM PROPERTIES PUBLISH: May 20, 1981 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL (l)*0tis E. & Christine Vanderburg C/o Waken & Co. 747 E. Green, Ste. 100 Pasadena, CA. 91101 (4) Horace Felkins, Jr. & Dolphine Felkins P.O. Box 431 Oceanside, CA. 92054 (7) Helix Associates P.O. Box 985 El Cajon, CA. 92022 (8-2) W.F. Strong P.O. Box 2068 Rancho Santa Fe, CA. 92068 (8-17) The Highland Co. C/o Strong P.O. Box 2068 Rancho Santa Fe, CA. 92068 (2) Grove Apartments Invest. 10738 W. Tico Blvd. Los Angeles, CA. 90064 I (3) I. Robbins/E. Lachman S.B. Lachman/M.B. Lachman 71-111 Tamarish Lane Rancho Mirage, CA. 92270 (5) Larwin-Southern Calif. Inc. 16255 Ventura Blvd. Encino, CA. 91436 (8-5) V. Sirtmons P.O. Box 1307 Rancho Santa Fe, CA. 92067 (8-15) Robert N. Quade J.E. Quade 5473 Avenida Fiesta La Jolla, CA. 92037 (8-18) Patricia Perkins 2508 Via Sorbete Carlsbad, CA. 92008 (8-21) Ken & Barbara Brannick 2514 Via Sorbete Carlsbad, CA. 92008 (8-1) E.L. & L.L. Fogal 1340 La Mirada Escondido, CA. 92026 (8-16) Michael & Barb Buggy 4703 Birchwood Cir. Carlsbad, CA. 92008 (8-19) Donald & Thomas Nicolis 2510 Via Sorbete j Carlsbad, CA. 92008 ' (8-24) Paul & Edith Linden 2519 Via Sorbete Carlsbad, CA. 92008 (8-27) Will & Cleo Degher 2513 Via Sorbete Carlsbad, CA. 92008 (8-32rRobert & Wanda : Wilkerson 2503 Via Sorbete Carlsbad, CA. 92008 (8-25) Robert & Hilda Watson P.O. Box 1790 Zephyr Cove, NV 98448 (8-33) Jerry & Hollace Hanson 2501 Via Sorbete Carlsbad, CA. 92008 (8-26) Margaret S. Price 4705 Antoerwood Ct. Carlsbad, CA. 92008 (8-29) M. & G. Gandall 2509 Via Sorbete Carlsbad, CA. 92008 (8-34) Tiburon/Carlsbad " Homeowners P.O. Box 1246 Carlsbad, CA. 92008 8-30 ir 8-20 «rv. 8-28 8-28 8-31 8-31 9-10 8-12 8-12 8-15 8-15 8-17 Abramovitz, Albert 2507 Via Sorbete Carlsljad, Ca. 92008 Idith Hausman, Douglas, Florence, Bernard, & Cathy 2511 Avenda De Anita Carlsbad, Ca 92008 Resident 2511 Via Sorbette Carlsbad, CA. 92008 Chino Hidenhiko 1304 N Santa Fe Vista, Ca. 92083 Resident 2505 Avenida De Anita Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Rouse, Charles 2501 Via Astuto Carlsbad, CA. 92008 Simmons, Vern P.O. Box 1307 Rancho Santa Fe Ca. 92067 Resident 3108 Avenida De Anita Carlsbad, Ca 92008 Quade, Robert & Joyce 5473 Avenida Fiesta La Jolla, Ca. 92037 Resident 2502 Via Sorbete Carlsbad, Ca 92008 Mudd, Brian & Marilyn 2506 Via Sorbete Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 ij 8-20 i . j 8-23 8-22 8-46 8-46 8-24 8-19 Velichkr~*ski, Slobadane 2512 Vi -orbete, Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Resident 2512 Avenida De Anita Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Como, Michael & Carol 2516 Via Sorbete Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Genstar Development 3911 Sorrento Valley Blvd. San Diego, Ca 92122 Helix Associates P.O. BOX 985 El Cajon, Ca. 92022 Resident 2701 Avenida De Anita Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Felkins, Horrace P.O. BOX 431 Oceanside, Ca. 92054 Pavloff Louis & Birthe 2510 Via Sorbete, Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Robbins, Irvine; Baskin, Shirley Lachman, Elaine; Lachman, Morto; 71-111 Tamarish Lane i: Rancho Mirage, Ca 92270 0 JACK H. SPRAGUt 4800 Williamsburg Lane fr U Mesa, Ca. 92041