The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1981-06-09; City Council; 6340-3; Status Report Macario Parks and Recreation ElementCITY OF CARLSBAD Initial:V M* * H A ^^» ,1-AAJL. l*.L.U.a. • AGENDA BILL NO. (4 3 *jQ "_^<L' jfr-7,Vm W^ 3£ Dept. Head City Atty , City Mgr. DATE: June 9, 1981 ____ City Atty. \) DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation Subject: Status Report - Macario/Parks and Recreation Element Statement of the Matter Iwanaga Associates, the park revision and design consultants, will make a preliminary presentation on the' status of Phase I and II of the Parks and Recreation Element and the Macario Park program. Phase I and II of the four-phase project have been reviewed by City staff and the Task Force. The citizen survey has been completed and all City, County, and State documents have been reviewed to identify any constraints relative to the studies. Exhibits 1. Macario Canyon Development Plan - Phase I and 2 report. 2. Revised Parks and Recreation Element Phase I and 2 report. 3. Results of Analysis of Parks and Recreation survey. Recommendation That City Council review the documents and.the consultant presentation. Representatives from Iwanaga Associates, Planning and Parks and Recrea- tion will be available to answer questions and address any concerns of Council members. MO ACTION ?iM'%?iiy BACKGROUND DATA and DESIGN PROGRAM 1ECONOMICS RESEARCH ASSOCIATES DANIELIAN and ASSOCIATES CITY of CARLSBAD CALIFORMIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PREFACE Intent of Study 1 INTRODUCTION Site Description 2 . ' PLANNING PROCESS Planning Process Program BACKGROUND INFORMATION Overview 4 •Existing Documents City of Carlsbad General Plan 4 Local Coastal Program 5 Local Coastal Act 1976 5 Resource Protection and Development 5 Policies Implementation of the LCP 7 City Staff Comments 10 Agua Hedionda Specific Plan 11 Land Use 11 Open Space and Conservation 11 Circulation 12 Department of Fish and Game 13 Parks and Recreation Element 14 Site Resource Inventory 14 Slope 15 Geology 15 Wildlife 16 -". Soils 18 Hydrology 21 Vegetation 21 Existing City Needs and Desires 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) ANALYSIS Critical Issues 24 Preservation of Wildlife and Vegetation 24 Preservation and Restoration of Wetlands 24 Control of Erosion arid Sedimentation 24 Provision for Public Access and Recreation 25 Provision for Adequate Circulation and 25 Parking Preservation and Restoration of Macario 25 Canyon Drainage Site Constraints and Opportunities 25 Recreation Land Use Feasibility 28 Plan Conceptual Approach 29 Basic Parameters 29 Planning Guidelines 31 Design Program 39 Recreation Activity Suitability 39 Recreational Activities Matrix 41 Proposed Program for Macario Park to Date 42 ILLUSTRATIONS Exhibit A Total Project Area Exhibit B Planning Process Program Exhibit C Geology Exhibit D Soils Exhibit E Vegetation Exhibit F Constraints and Opportunities Exhibit G Recreation Land Use Feasibility INTENT OF STUDY The intent of this report is to determine the best possible land use for the Macario Canyon Park Property. Consideration is given to all documents and existing environmental site factors which effect the Macario Project area and governing issues and policies that, coupled with current city desires, shall establish the foundation for constraints and opportunities of the site. To assure consistency with the General Plan, "recreation" as defined by the Revised Parks and Recreation Element, will be utilized in this.report. A separate report will be prepared addressing the user survey information. This report is a composite of information gathered from numerous people, and agencies and it is our hope that the proposals generated will be interpreted and utilized to achieve what we believe progressive land planning is: Man living in harmony with the environment. The process of review, inventory, analysis and conclusions is employed to prepare the Macario Park Development Plan, a planning tool for the City for the next 10 to 15 year period. The project area lies in the coastal zone and a number of jurisdictions have established issues and policies for portions of the project area. The City has envisioned Macario Canyon and related areas as a general city park and has established a list of activities which shall be recognized and considered for the project. These existing documents and desires shall be examined along with the physical conditions to establish the best uses to meet public needs, and that will yet be environmentally sensitive to site and surroundings. SITE DESCRIPTION The proposed Macario Park plan area consists of approximately 490 undevel- oped acres, south and east of Agua Hedionda Lagoon. At present, the pro- posed park area consists of five parcels of land as follows: . Macario - 274 acres - Koll Company . HUB Park - 92 acres - City of Carlsbad . SDG&E - 40 acres - SDG&E . SDG&E - 32 acres - SDG&E . Wetlands - 50 acres - Kelly SEE EXHIBIT-A The city is presently negotiating for the acquisition of some of these properties, but for this study it shall be assumed that the project includes all the above areas. The park land lies partially in the City of Carlsbad and in the county of San Diego. All 490 acres are within the coastal zone as established by the California State Coastal Commission. Macario Park is located approximately 30 miles north of the City of San Diego and less than 1 mile east of the coastline. The site is composed of primarily untouched, gentle to steep sloping terrain ranging from sea level to an approximate elevation of 235 feet. A major portion of the site is presently zoned by the Local Coastal Plan, as low to medium re- sidential density (0-4 du/ac) 2 units/acre. Another portion of land covered under the Agua Hedionda specific plan designates the area south of the lagoon as nonresidential reserve and the area northeast of the lagoon as a wild life preserve protected area. Land to the south of the park site is currently used for agriculture, with flowers and tomatoes as the major crop. Agua Hedionda Lagoon comprises a portion of the site's north boundary. To the east of the site lies land to be developed as industrial, and to the southeast lies the Palomar Airport. North of Macario Park lie residential developments with yet undeveloped portions of land zoned by the LCP as residential low to high density. West of Macario Park lies Agua Hedionda Lagoon and the Encina Power Plant owned by the San Diego Gas and Electric Company and further west, the Pacific Ocean. Natural vegetation on the site m 2 is abundant, consisting of native grasses and stands of coastal sage and chaparral. The climate of the area is Mediterranean, with summer temperatures reaching a high of 97 degrees and winter lows dropping to 40 or 30 degrees. The annual rainfall averages 12 inches a year and is typically in January (2 to 3 inches); the driest is July (less than 0.04 inches). The coastal area is fairly humid, varying from 77% in summer to 68% in winter. Fog is occassionally experienced in Carlsbad in the later afternoon and evenings of winter months. In the summer, overcast conditions are frequent in the morning hours. Overall, the environmental setting of the Macario.Park area appears suitable for recreation development, however detailed exam- ination of governing agencys1 policies and specific physical conditions have yet to be considered. Adjacent land, specifically Agua Hedionda Lagoon and Palomar Airport, have effected major environmental impact on the Macario site. Agua Hedionda Lagoon is a sensitive habitat where only minimal disturbance can be permit- ted if it's healthy ecosystem is to be sustained. Agua Hedionda, because of year-round tidal flushing and minimal amount of contaminating chemicals, is one of the cleanest lagoons in San Diego county. San Diego Gas and Electric Company opened the lagoon to the ocean's tidal flushing by dredging, to provide condenser-cooling water for it's Encina Power Plant. The Lagoon ecosystem supports a wide variety of marine and terrestial life, and is a valuable wildlife habitat. At extreme high tide the Lagoon, which has approximately 388 surface acres, is presently being used for water skiing, fishing, sailing and other water-related sports. Any proposed development for Macario must not distrub or disrupt the Agua Hedionda Lagoon ecosystem. The Palomar Airport generates noise and air pollution which currently disrupts the otherwise quiet, protected canyon site. 3 HO o (D "O S T3 33 £j DOo 2 o-0 O c_m > m 30 H O ^5H^ o c/>i^sS 33 mz rnrn v>33 m (/) Z 5 H•o «7 CO< qm n! o (ny w •< O 3Om 7. "SIII 111m o0 XIc/> m ?3hi 0< z [J ;r oin qs-4co f> > 3:1-r m O rnrn >co -H ii O Co '•"* "9 «ls So S*J o a-a o Oct c: <}= :C moi? £ ni ^ 5-co m5 A CT O fCj TI— \ U 0 X § > 5' CD •o•nOo (D COCO Xmco omz—i NEEDSamz 3 gis pi 3 r^2 nm z TIFICA10 2 0Tl 0mco oz T>33 O Q33> T3 P COr* > ni> = r-z a rn co rnm a I Dm<m6T) o > r !§iS5Srn m °ol •< > ^ co s- > COrnco ooco » ICDCO«' = rn 1 p*a o H ain PO rnz-t =n •o coo rna. o < OVERVEW A number of existing documents and/or agency policies regarding the Macario area were reviewed; the documents/ agencies include: The Carlsbad General Plan, Carlsbad Local Coastal Program, Agua Hedionda Specific Plan, Depart- ment of Fish and Game and the existing Parks and Recreation Element 1975. Together the policies of these documents/agencies establish the ground rules and/or conditions for consideration in land planning the Macario area. EXISTING DOCUMENTS City of Carlsbad General Plan The General Plan designates the Macario area as an open space and special treatment area and provides for the expansion of recreational land and conservation and preservation. All or part of Macario, under the special use treatment area guidelines, had been considered for a regional park. Since the Agua Hedionda Specific Plan and Local Coastal Plan both effect Macario upon their final certification by the California Coastal Com- mission, the General Plan will be amended to be consistent with them. 4 LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Local Coastal Act 1976 The Act states that: "The California Coastal Zone is a distinct and vital resource; permanent protection is a paramount concern; the policy of the state is to promote public safety, health, and welfare to protect public and private property, wildlife, marine fisheries, and other ocean resources, the natural environment, and to protect the ecological balance of the coast- al zone and prevent it's deterioration and destruction. Seven issues contained under the resource protection and development policies, directly or indirectly, effect that portion of Macario located within the LCP. Resource Protection and Development Policies 1. Agriculture, though not a significant part of Macario, dips into the park boundary along the south shore of the lagoon. Because this land will be cut off by the extension of Cannon Raod, con- tinued or renewed agricultural use may not be feasible. Conversion may be considered to recreation and be compatible with continued agricultural use on surrounding lands. 2. Environmentally sensitive habitat areas, lands where even minimum adverse impacts may alter and/or destroy valuable natural re- sources, exist in Macario. These areas have been designated as Resource Conservation Areas and lie in the designated wetland area and continues along the flood plain into Macario Canyon. The LCP limits the development of slopes that have gradients of 25% or greater, except for minor encroachment for the provision of road- way or additional utility access. Coastal act policies call for the protection of these habitats rby establishing guidelines for maintaining, enhancing and, where "feasible, restoring marine and land resources. 3. Geologic hazards found in Macario can be grouped into 2 basic categories: ' Landslides and slope instability . Soil erosion and flood hazards Development shall "Minimize risks to life and property in areas of high geologic, flood, and fire hazard. To curb these hazards the LCP established onsite soil erosion practices, sediment control practices, and that increased volumes of storm run-off shall be mitigated. A portion of Macario Canyon is a flood plain. The LCP policy states that development shall be restricted in floodplain areas. The policy states that floodplains are to be zoned as open space, permitting natural drainage to 'occur without the need for flood control channels. No permanent structures or fill shall be permitted in the floodplain and only uses with periodic flooding shall be allowed. 4. The public works section of the LCP is significant to Macario with the extension of Cannon Road. Alternative IB, was deter- mined the preferred alignment with least damage to the site. 5. The recreation and visitor serving facilities section of the LCP, while addressing primarily the coast line, does contain policy that pertains to Macario. These policies seek to establish a wide variety of recreational facilities which are affordable and coastal-dependent. The LCP states, that in order to meet the needs in future years in accordance with CPO's projected population forecasts, Carlsbad must develop a new regional park of 200 to 300 acres. Consideration should be given to a facility within the "Agua Hedionda Specific Plan Area, or on adjacent lands. 6 6. Shoreline access applies to Macario along the Lagoon south shore- line. The LCP states compliance with "Section 2 of Article XV of California Constitution" which addresses access. The LCP further states that distribution of access points shall be considered to mitigate impact. Access from Macario to the Lagoon's shore will be difficult due to a combination of conflicting agricultural land use and the steep topography along Agua Hedionda Lagoon. 7. Visual resources and special communities, and historical preservation policies will play a significant role in the development of Macario. For visual resources, the LCP states "Scenic and visual qualities of coastal areas shall be considered and protected as a resource of public importance." For historical preservation the LCP states "Where development would adversely impact archeological and paleontological resources as identified by the State Historic Preservation Office, reasonable mitigation measures shall be required". Archeological sites may exist in the Macario area. Whether any will be determined significant will not be known until the E.I.R. survey is completed. Implementation of the LCP The LCP states the following implementation actions in support of it's policies as they relate to the Macario area. 1. Environmentally Sensitive Habitats a. Protection of environmentally-sensitive habitats will be primarily implemented through use of the City of Carlsbad's open space zone (0-S). b. Incorporation of major provisions of the statewide interpretive guidelines for'environmentally sensitive habitat areas shall 7 be incorporated into the city's General Plan. c. Model policies shall be established for major and minor im- pacts of the environmentally-sensitive habitat areas. 2. Major Impacts Adverse impacts on wetlands and estuaries include diking, filling, dredging, pedestrian and vehicle traffic, and mosquito abatement. Policies to control these are as follows: a. Diking and filling shall be prohibited. b. Dredging for channels or sandbars for restoration or enhancement in conjunction with flood control projects or other public works shall be permitted. Maintenance dredging shall be min- imized by establishing effective erosion and runoff control programs for watersheds. c. Pedestrian and vehicle traffic shall be regulated in and around wetland areas. d. Mosquito abatement practices shall be limited to the minimum necessary to protect public welfare. e. Protective measures: A Wetland Buffer Strip shall be designated for each wetland and estuary. It shall be maintained in a natural, undisturbed state. No structures other than those necessary to protect or enhance the habitat or to support light recreational, scientific, or educational uses related to these habitats shall be constructed in the buffer strip. B 3. Indirect Impacts from Adjacent. Lands Incompatible uses of land adjacent to wetlands may be subtle and cumulatively damaging. a. Development in the floodplain and immediate wetland area shall be limited. Permanent structures, except for those designed to enhance the natural resource values, shall not be constructed. Light recreational use, birdwatching or nature study, scientific and educational uses shall be per- mitted. b. Developments adjacent to wetland areas shall not disrupt wildlife or result in adverse impacts due to additional sediment, runoff, hydrologic changes, noise, and other disturbances. c. Off-road vehicles are prohibited in buffer strips on adjacent land. d. Protective Measures: A Critical Wetland Protection Area shall be established to maintain the natural ecological functioning of the habitats. 4. Sediment Control Sediment shall be retained on the site. Sediment basins, sediment traps, or similar sediment control measures shall be installed before extensive clearing and grading operations begin. 5. Na t iye Vegetation Native vegetation shall be retained, protected and supplemented. Exposure of soil by removing vegetation shall be limited to the area required for immediate construction operations. 6. Slope Construction Cut and fill shall not be steeper than 2:1 unless geological and engineering analysis indicates that steeper slopes are safe, and erosion control measures are approved. 7. Protection of Watercourses Fills shall not encroach on natural watercourses or constructed channels. Fills placed against watercourses shall have suitable protection against erosion during flooding. Grading equipment shall not cross or disturb live stream channels. City Staff Comments The PRC Toups Proposal for the Carlsbad Local Coastal Plan is not yet certified by the State of California Coastal Commission. Presently, that Plan with conditions has been accepted by the Regional Coastal Commission and is before the State for their review and approval. That plan with conditions effects the Macario area as follows: 1. The land is presently zoned as loi/.' density residential and shall be re-zoned as open space. 2. The Carlsbad Local Coastal Planpresently prohibits development on slopes 25% or greater. Although, the City has reservations regarding steep slope development, it does not feel that all such slopes are inappropriate for development. 10 3. The City supports the Cannon Road alignment as proposed in the PRC Toups Plan, but feels that road construction may be necessary at an earlier date than specified. Although this road will provide needed access to the Macario area, special care must be taken in the existing wetlands and other habitats to mitigate impact. AQUA HEDIONDA SPECIFIC PLAN The Specific Plan for the Agua Hedionda Lagoon was a joint effort between property owners, the California Coastal Commission, and the Planning De- partment of the City of Carlsbad. The basic purpose was to create a Plan for the development of the Lagoon and surrounding area, to preserve and enhance and ensure compatibility of the natural, and man-made aspects of the Lagoon environment. Land Use The land use objective for the Specific Plan is: "To provide for an or- derly balance of private and public land uses in a manner which preserves and enhances the ecological, visual, recreation, social, and economic quality of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon - Study Area". Open Space and Conservation The easterly portion preserves the most valuable wetland areas and open spaces; the southerly shore and view shed reserves additional open space for transmission corridors, agriculture and recreation. The Open Space and Conservation section coordinates open space uses and conservation techniques for the mutual enhancement and utility of the environment. 11 Guidelines that address the floodplain and the wetlands portion of Macario prohibit significant adverse alteration of water ways. Domestic discharges, industrial waste, agricultural runoff, and all other forms of pollution shall be controlled as defined by state, federal, city and county laws. All . development or uses within the floodplain zone shall adhere to provisions of the existing floodplain ordinance. Agua Hedionda shall serve as a buffer between urban and agricultural lands. Conversion of agricultural lands may take place only to meet specific needs of the city and county and shall respect the integrity of the site. Policy for a park recognizes a portion of the Macario area as the recreation center for the City. It's centralized location, combined with it's extensive utility easements and canyons, makes it possible to connect it with other park sites in the city. As the principal park, it is proposed that it be developed with a wide variety of activities not found in other city parks. The Macario site offers several level areas; and the extension of Cannon Road will provide a major access point. Locations for activities will be explored further in the Phase III Report. Archaelogical policy states that any sites containing evidence of cultural value shall be preserved and/or excavated by certified experts in this field. The Lagoon ecosystem is directly effected by the Macario area which surrounds a large portion of the Lagoon and it's hydrological routes flow to the Lagoon where it adversely effects the ecological balance. Circulation The circulation objective for the Agua Hedionda Specific Plan states that Agua Hedionda Lagoon be made accessible to the public, within the con- straints of maintaining the environmental quality and respecting it's carrying capacity for vehicles and persons. The extension of Cannon Raod will provide major vehicle access. Specific points of access must be controlled to prevent any adverse impact. Bicycle and bicycle/pedestrian routes shall be provided. Extensive grading would be necessary to achieve continuous access along the south shore which would create potential detrimental impacts, therefore, public access to the south 12 shore of the lagoon will be limited. Public transit shall be encouraged. Scenic roadways, which includes the proposed Cannon Road extension, shall receive a minimum 20 foot wide landscape strip that shall separate street right-of-way from parking areas. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME The California Department of Fish and Game is devoted to minimizing the impact of land, water, and mineral developments of fish and wildlife re- sources. Approximately 60 percent of the wetlands along the California Coast have been degraded or destroyed by the adverse impact of development. In 1974 the California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife issued a joint report entitled "Acquisition Priorities For The Coastal Wetlands Of California". Agua Hedionda Lagoon and it's wetlands was one of twenty-five wetland habitats rated as vital due to their fish and wildlife resources. Geographically, the Lagoon is in the path of the Pacific flyway, and migratory birds use it's waters as a sanctuary. The California Least Tern and White-Tailed Kite, protected under the Fish and Game Code as an endangered sub-species, occur in significant numbers at Agua Hedionda Lagoon. The Least Tern regularly nests on the mudflats at the east end of the lagoon. The White-Tailed Kite forages in the brushlands and nests in local woodland sites. The salt marsh at the eastern-end of the Lagoon provides habitat for a small population of Beldings Savannah Sparrows, also an endangered sub-species. Preservation of their habitats is a high priority. Many other wildlife species utilize the wetlands for food and shelter. A rare and highly nutritive cordgrass is found on the outer edge of the mudflat, the Department of Fish and Game is interested in preserving this valuable resource. When acquisition plans are completed, the entire tidal mudflat and wetland area extending up the floodplain of Agua Hedionda Creek will be declared a wildlife preserve. It will total approximately 85 acres of Lagoon and 100 acres of surrounding land. c 13 PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT 1975 A Macario Park did not exist prior to this document but the possibility of a hub park was addressed as "The future center of major city-wide recreation activities" whereby such a park would serve as the core of the park district system. HUB Park was proposed, and is now included.as part of Macario. It was to be a major activity center of 100 acres or more and function as a community-regional facility. The recommended development for HUB Park concept has now changed due to the current issues and policies of the Local Coastal Program and the Agua Hedionda Specific Plan which require that the area remain in agriculture with only passive non-conflicting recreation uses. The Element also states that the Agua Hedionda Lagoon and adjacent areas be considered as a regional park. SITE RESOURCES INVENTORY A complete site resource inventory was conducted to evaluate the site's potential for accommodating recreation uses. The inventory included th2 following physical items: Slope Geology Wildlife Soils Hydrology Vegetation No water surface is included iwthin the 488 acre space. This information was used as an environmental data base to identify sen- sitive and hazardous areas. The pertinent information from these inventories is summarized into a composite Constraints and Opportunities map. See the 14 Analysis section of this report. Slope Slope directly influences potential erosion problems, hydrologic patterns, and aspect. Slope will be a determining factor in construction on the site. The Local Coastal Program and Agua Hedionda Specific Plan both recommend that devel- opment on slopes 25% or greater not be permitted. An analysis of the site slopes within certain degrees gradient indicates the limitations imposed by the topography. Percent of Total Gradient 488.Acre Site 0 - 5% 16% Wetlands 11% Floodplain 6 - 24% 43% Gentle to Moderate Slopes 25% + 30% Moderate to Steep Slopes Geology The project site is in the coastal portion of the peninsular range pro- vince of California, which is a well defined geologic and physiographic unit, extending from the Los Angeles basin to Baja, California. The area is underlain by bedrock of Jurassic and tertiary age, and by sediments of quaternary age. The Jurassic is characterized as hard volcanic rock except for it's generally jointed and fractured condition. Tertiary sandstones and mudstones form to make sedimentary rocks. Most of the Macario area is underlain by tertiary age sediments, also recognized as the La Oolla Group, which are susceptible to erosion and slumping. The LCP shows four sites within the Macario boundaries as landslide-prone areas. Alluvium SEE EXHIBIT-C 15 •ac Q)D)o> _J< 0. Ill Q o.r)occo O < LU CCQ CC O ~ CC •SO -o<D >i O X which is clay sand and sandy clay are present in canyon and ravine areas of the Macario site. No major faults cross the site. To the north-east of Agua Hedionda Lagoon, major fault zones such as the Elsinore, San Jacinto, and San Andreas, lie 26, 50, and 73 miles away respectively. Located approximately 7 miles off the coast from the project site lies the Rose Canyon Fault. According to a seismic report, (Envicom 1974) "There is no evidence to indicate or suggest the presence of active faulting at the site either in published reports or the results of the engineering geologic investigations of the site. Fault rupture is, therefore, not a hazard requireing consideration in planning development of the area. Liquefication does not appear to be a problem requiring consideration in planning development of the site." Wildlife The wildlife that inhabits the Macario and surrounding area is diverse and comples, ranging from a higher order of mammals such as the bobcat and coyote to the lower order of phytoplankton and other minute organisms. Certain relationships are typical between vegetative associations and wildlife habitat that are essential in creating an ecological balance. The effects of the individual plant associations on their constituent wildlife populations are as follows: Chaparral occurs in many areas of the site and is distributed in general on dry slopes and ridges with rocky,gravelly, or heavy soils. When chaparral exists in a mass situation, wildlife occupancy is limited. The density of this vegetation, makes wildlife penetration difficult. When openings occur, ani'mals find that the chaparral provides a suitable shelter with dense vetetative protection. Often coastal 16 sage-scrub species will co-exist with chaparral by occupy ing--the open areas. Together, they are able to support greater numbers of wildlife than they could on an individual basis. Riparian association is an extremely valuable wildlife habitat, pos- essing a variety of plant species and as a result, supporting a variety of wildlife species. Amphibian and reptillian species are found in these areas while small and large mammals use the habitat for food and shelter. Bird species, found in other vegetative as- sociations requiring moisture and tall trees, are attracted to this habitat. Coastal sage-scrub association supports small, medium and large mammals ranging from small rodents to hares to the bobcat. The coastal sage- scrub is characterized by a relatively open plant density and a random species. Again, when found with the chaparral a more suitable wildlife habitat occurs. Many small birds are common in the winter. Predatory birds may be seen overhead but tend to nest in the tall trees char- acteristic of the riparian association. Estuarine environment affords the unique opportunity of a highly diverse and productive habitat area. The tidal mudflats and wetland habitats possess a variety of primary producers capable of year round photosynthesis. The Department of Fish and Game is devoted to the preservation of this valuable resource. The regular tidal cycle of the lagoon removes wast and distributes nutrients. This unique condition provides a food source for a large number of organisms. One plant species, cord grass is very high in nutrient content and produces above average amounts of oxygen. The tidal mudflats are critical links in the food chain of many wildlife species. Herbivores consume decayed cord grass while snails and shrimp feed on eel grass. 17 During low tides, many birds feed on worms, mollusk, and shrimp. The mudflats of Agua Hedionda Lagoon are utilized for nesting by the California Least Tern and Savannah Belding Sparrow. Soils Soil data contained herein has been extracted from the San Diego Area Soils Survey, compiled by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service. The data collected includes the local soils mapped for the study area and an assessment of these soils. (1973) SEE EXHIBIT-D The characteristics determined most essential in the planning process for this area are permeability, erodibility, and engineering properties. Permeability refers to those qualities of a particular soil that enable water or air to move through it. Erodability is closely linked to the permeability of the soil. Water erosion is a critical issue within this study area since the entire site drains directly into the lagoon. The shrink-swell behavior of the soil is an important characteristic that effects the stability of buildings and roads. Soils having a high shrink- swell potential occur predominantly on the coastal plains, while soils along the major alluvail plains have a moderate or low shrink-swell potential. Identification of soils having a high shrink-swell potential is important in planning potential land uses and determining appropriate construction practices. The Diable-Las Flores association represents the predominant association within the boundaries of the study area. Diablo soils make up about 45% of the association and Las Fhores soils about 45%. Gaviota, Huerhuero, 18 Linne and Olivenhain soils make up the remaining 10%. The Diablo Series consists of well drained, moderately deep to deep clays. These soils are found on uplands with elevation ranging from 100 to 600 feet and slopes varying from 2 to 50%. These soils are characterized by: slow permeability, severe credibility, and high shrink-swell behavior. DaE - Diable clay, 15 - 30% slopes DaE2 - Diablo clay, 15 - 30% slopes, eroded The Las Flores Series consists of moderately well drained loamy, fine sands that have a sandy subsoil. They are found on uplands of 100 to 500 feet in elevation and have slopes of 2 to 30%. These soils are characterized by: slow permeability, severe credibility and high shrink-swell behavior. LeC - Las Flores loamy, fine sand, 2 - 9% slopes. LeD - Las Flores loamy, fine sand, 9 - 15% slopes. LeE - Las Flores loamy, fine sand, 15 - 30% slopes. LeE2 - Las Flores loamy, fine sand, 15 - 30% slopes, eroded. The Salinas Series consists of well drained and moderately well drained clay loams. Salinas soils are fo'ind on floodplains and alluvial fans and have slopes of 0 - 9%. Their elevation ranges from 25 to 300 feet. These soils are characterized by: .moderately slow permeability, moderate erod- ibility and moderate shrink-swell behavior. Sbc - Salinas clay loam, 2-9% slopes. The Tidal Flast (Tf) occur as level areas that are periodically covered by tidal waters. Tidal flats are characterized by: very slow permeability, severe credibility and high shrink-swell behavior. 19 The Terrace Escarpment (Tef) consists of steep to very steep escarpments. The Terrace Escarpments occur on the nearly even fronts of terraces or alluvial fans. In most places there are 4 to 10 inches of loamy or gravelly soil over soft marine sandstone, shale or gravel sediments. Terrace Escarpments are characterized by: very slow permeability, severe credibility, and variable shrink-swell behavior. Additional local soils shown in the inventory include the following: Fxe - Friant rocky fine, sandy loam, 9 - 30% slopes. HrC - Huerhuero loam, 2-9% slopes LvF - Loamy, alluvial land, Huerhuero complex, severly eroded, 9 - 50% slopes VaB - Visalia sandy loam, 2 - 5% slopes VaC - Visalia sandy loam, 2 - 9% slopes Marina Series consists of well drained, loamy, coarse sand. They are old beach ridges with slopes 2 to 30% and elevation from near sea level to 300 feet. These soils are characterized by: rapid permeability, severe erod- ibility on steep slopes, low shrink-swell behavior. MiC - Marina loamy, course sand, 2 - 9% slopes Carlsbad Series consists of moderately well to well drained gravelly, loamy sands that are deep over a hardpan. They are found on ridges and in swales having slopes of 2 to 30% and at elevations of 50 to 500 feet. These soils are characterized by: slow permeability, severe credibility, low shrink- swell bahavior. CbE - Carlsbad gravelly, loam sand, 2 - 5% slopes. 20 /.Tr."""""'*7<,r-">Trv,mf Hydrology The Macario area is located within the Carlsbad hydrologic unit, an area of approximately 210 square miles. It is part of the Agua Hedionda drainage basin which is 28 square miles (17,900 acres) with an average slope of 35 feet per mile. The major hydrologic swale within the Macario site traverses through the Macario Canyon westward where it spreads entering the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Several smaller swales drain into the Macario Canyon from ravines. This swale is not the major contributor of fresh water and sediment to the Agua Hedionda Lagoon, it appears that its contribution is significant and alteration of this drainage pattern may create adverse impacts in the sensitive wetland and tidal mud flat area. SEE EXHIBIT-C Vegetation The vegetation in this study is mapped according to plant association zones. For the purpose of land use planning this approach will be more effective and useful than listing individual communities. Seven plant association exist with the Macario area: Riparian, Chaparral, Coastal Sage-Scrub, Tidal Mudflat, Wetland, Grassland, and Agriculture. The Riparian association along the intermittent streams is characterized by the largest vegetative species on the site in willows, elderberry, and mulefat. Other plants associated with the Riparian association are poison oak and giant wild rye. The Riparian association is typically located along hydrologic routes. Surface water from precipitation is the main supply of water while agriculture funoffs contributes relatively small amounts. 21 Visually, the most dominant plant association on the site is the Chaparral association. This association contains such vegetative species as Toyon, Laurel, Sumac, and Lemonadeberry. These plants are taller than Coastal Sage-Scrub and are typically broad leaf with fleshy seeds that depend on wildlife for their dispersal. The Chaparral association does well and can be found, for the most part, on steeper slopes. Chaparral typically favors heavier soils and east and north facing slopes. The Coastal Sage-Scrub association is dominated by vegetation such as California Sagebrush, and California Buckwheat. This association occurs on hilltops and on dry, gentle slopes. The Coastal Sage-Scrub favors south and west exposures. The wetland association occurs from the eastern end of the salt marsh at about the upper limit of tidal influence to the grassland association. Typical vegetation of this association include: pools of cattails, brass buttons, bull rush, tree tobacco, saltbush, and annual grasses toward the grassland association. A strong characteristic of this association is the salt content in the soil. The tidal mudflat is the most sensitive association on the site. Occurring above the upper limit of the tidal system and extending to the wetland association, the tidal mudflat contains a diverse cross-section of vegetation and organic matter. Eel grass, cord grass, perenneal pickle week, sea blite, and salt grass are a few of the tidal-flat vegetative covers. Portions of the mudflat appear barren but are teaming with shrimp and worms. The grassland association is typically in the alluvial fan that stretches the length of Macario Canyon. Comprised of mustards, storks bill, small shrubs, and other species, these annuals and perennials display a sea of color and greenery during the spring months, but are dry and brown follow- ing the summer months. SEE EXHIBIT-E aa J,iS^ i.'-'t-j——— / —;§ **%&>1- *--1-^-*—i -J-— <, . -i—i« ^4t--* CQa mo o' 3D J;'a rn 33 r~ 1 §Z 0 O enCOr zoCO 0n: ^ARRALO O CO H r~ CO 0m Ocr*"i IVATED•nm j—a.CO H O r- 2co "n H [-•' CDCDa> 3Q. n in EXISTING CITY NEEDS AND DESIRES The city is in the process of acquiring an area of land at it's center or "Hub". It envisions developing this property into a cultural, recreational, and governmental center park for the entire city that connects to other facilities via open space roads and trails. The concept has merit for it will tie the city together while creating a symmetrical balance. Based on the city's concept, a list of needs and desires has been assembled that outlines specific facilities and activities that may be contained in the Park. The list is a composite of records gathered from the city departments, and officials and includes the following facilities: Amphitheatre Archery Botanical Garden Central Library Cultural Arts Center . City Hall Police Station Gymnasium Play Courts Performing Arts Theatre Equestrian Center Trail Systems Fire Station Playfields Golf Course Lawn Bowl ing Ponds/Lakes/Recl aimed Water Shooting Range Wild Animal Santuary Marina/Beach access Parks Service Center Parking/Roads Passive picnic/park Passive sitting Play apparatus Recreation Center Swimming Pool Y.M.C.A. Facility 23 CRITICAL ISSUES Upon review of the background documents which include the city General Plan, Local Coastal Plan with recommended amendments, Agua Hedionda Specific Plan and the E.I.R., regulations from the Department of Fish and Game, a number of critical issues have been recorded as they specifically relate to the Macario area. Preservation of Wildlife and Vegetation The wildlife and vegetation of Macario is of significance in retaining the existing character of the site. Wildlife exists throughout the site but primary habitats are located in the wetlands and inland coastal sage- scrub and chaparral. The wildlife includes some endangered species. Consid- eration shall be given to land improvement practices that will minimize adverse impact on both wildlife and vegetation. Preservation and Restoration of Wetlands The Local Coastal Program identifies the wetlands as an environmentally sensitive habitat critical to the nesting of endangered birds and other wildlife. It is important as one of the few remaining estuarine environments on the Southern California coast. Restoration measures may be appropriate to prevent the degradation of this resource area. Currently, lack of fresh water input is resulting in salt build up in the soil and is destroying vegetation,forcing wildlife to move to more desirable habitats. Control of Erosion and Sedimentation New land development has accelerated erosion and sedimentation. The Carls- bad Local Coastal Program has established guidelines to protect the water- ways and lagoons. 24 Provision for Public Access and Recreation The Carlsbad Local Coastal Program advocates public recreation in the coastal zone. Careful planning and management are necessary to protect the character and natural assets of the site while developing education and physical re- creation facilities. Special consideration must be given to the compatibility of proposed recreation land uses with the Lagoon and' wetland ecosystems. Provision for Adequate Circulation and Parking The Agua Hedionda Specific Plan and Carlsbad Local Coastal Program both' endorse the extension of the Cannon Road alignment across the mouth of Macario Canyon east, up Agua Hedionda Creek to El Camino Real. This road will provide access to Macario Canyon. Additional access to Macario off of Palomar Airport Road and provisions for parking will be required. Preservation and Restoration of Macario Canyon Drainage The Local Coastal Program identifies existing drainage ways as important to the Lagoon ecosystem and consideration must be given to retaining these drainage ways. SITE CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES In an area characterized by rolling hills with broad curving canyon opening into a wetland and mudflat area, the Macario site presents a number of physical and environmental constraints and opportunities. The major constraints include landslide areas, steep slopes, Santa Ana Winds, major utility easements, airport and freeway noise, agriculture, and sensitive habitats. . Landslide areas are characterized by unstable soil and geology that can be left untouched or engineered to accomodate improvements. A 25 major limitation is the cost of engineering required to achieve a stable site. . Steep slopes are defined in the LCP as slopes 25% and greater. . The Santa Ana winds impact the area to a lesser degree because their direction is across the width of the valley as opposed to it's length and the north facing slopes thereby receive the greatest impact. . Major overhead utility easements traverse the slopes of the site and wetlands. The land under these lines shall be limited to short term uses minimizing any hazards to park users. The towers have high visual impact and are potential safety hazards. . The area is impacted on the west by the freeway and on the east by the airport. Such noise levels do limit parts of the site to uses that do not require low noise levels. Indoor or outdoor auditoriums and concert facilities would experience undue stress. . Agriculture presents limitations of access and, according to the LCP, re- quires a buffer area to separate it from incompatible uses. . The sensitive habitats only present limitations if in an area desirable for development. The E.I.R. shall address this matter. The opportunities include park access, ocean breezes, sensitive habitats, beaches and lagoon, riparrian areas, vista points, coastal sage-scrub and chaparral. . Park access opportunities exist off of the extension of Cannon Road from east and west and off Palomar Airport Drive along the southwest project boundary, and possibly at the southeast corner through the 26 proposed Koll industrial development. . The ocean breezes bring fresh air year-round into the canyon. . Sensitive habitats provide an opportunity to create an educational recreation experience. . The Lagoon and it's beach present a potential for water-oriented recreation. . The riparian area can be enhanced as an educational recreation study area. . Vista points are abundant on the site and offer inland and coastal views. . The native coastal sage-scrub and chaparral offer site stabilization and low maintenance background for the site. . Beach access is possible at several points along the Lagoon's south shore. Trails to these beaches can be established along Cannon Road. . Lagoon access for water oriented sports can be established with the SDG&E property as dedicated required recreation land. This access will benefit both commercial and public recreation users. The summation of constraints and opportunities designates the major site limitations and advantages which will be used to establish a map showing land feasible for development. SEE EXHiBIT-F 27 en r o \ (*>OASTAL SAGE SCICHAPARRALANNON ROADAGOON ACCESSEACH ACCESS30c CO 33 <ISTA POINTSIPAR1AN HABITAT< cn TI OTENTIAL PARK EtEA BREEZE1EW ONTO SITEn )PPORTUN!TiESH •£• en en -a <; tn en > > o r"rnr~o>>Co=:r^ ft)I §s 1 1 g|| i S3S}?-al>T»2gco (DT3 \il &. r-i Y» /"^ *—•"*' 1 MB ^rom§z3^Hi ^s 1 s n s § 1 1 -3 SS g | jS£s 5 5 | S S S rNCO § H o gom ^ o g zom rn RECREATION LAND USE FEASIBILITY To develop the land use feasibility map, the site resources inventory maps were used to determine the areas of land with the least number of con- straints. Upon identification of these areas and the review of coastal zone policies that govern them, areas were rated for recreational development from highly feasible to feasible and unfeasible. The area considered as the most feasible for recreational development is the floodplain area and portions of gentle slopes that extend from the wetlands up into Macario Canyon. Impcat to vegetation and wildlife will be minimum in these areas. A major development consideration would be flood damage due to major storms. Buildings will not be located in the floodplain. The area will be limited to open space recreation uses (i.e. multi-use athletic fields). Feasible land for development lies primarily on the south and west facing slopes within the canyon. The slopes are clear of the floodplain and do not exceed 25% in grade. Some vegetation and wildlife will be effected. Some slopes do have erosion potential, but mitigating measures can effectively control and solve these problems. These slopes are to be considered most feasible for building construction. The portion of feasible land, presently zoned agricultural in the SDG&E - HUB areas, will not be allowed to be built upon at this time due to existing policies. However, the land may eventually be considered for recreational use if it is found infeasible to be maintained as agriculture with the introduction of Cannon Road and related passive recreation uses. The unfeasible land for recreational development includes those areas with slopes over 25% in grade, sensitive habitats, or areas of geologic hazards. Some of this land may be utilized for passive trails and possible picnic areas. SEE EXHIBIT-G 28 0)O) Li S3CO § LU a <w w< u- C/*X 0) to T3 0)n «3 _-'--S&*' ••.'.»• ..•.#^'/«i,; CONCEPTUAL APPROACH Basic Parameters Macario Canyon Park is an undeveloped vacant ecological space governed by public policy issues and constraints: 1. The entire space is landlocked. Cannon Road would provide accessibility. .2. The Coastal Commission has restricted use/access in favor of existing agricultural operations. The California Department of Fish and Game has designated large areas as fragile wetlands. 3. Utilities servicing ("off sites") will be expensive for virtually any alternative recreational program. There are none "stubbed out" for Macario Canyon at this time. 4. Agua Hedionda Lagoon has high quality salt water at this time, allowing nondetrimental water activity recreational uses. 5. Roughly 150-170 acres are effectively available for recreational facilities development if all slopes and hillsides of 25%+ grades are withdrawn from consideration. Provision must be made for adequate protection against silt and pollutant run-off into the Lagoon. 6. The site is virtually unknown to the general residential public, and entirely unknow.n to the visitor public. 7. Palomar Airport noise contours obviate some potential uses of Macario Canyon—probably negating outdoor art/dance/music per- formances. 8. Selection of public/private facilities development in the canyon will be made not to duplicate, and to maximize facilities and recreational experiences not now provided or planned elsewhere in Carlsbad. 29 9. Any new facilities to be built in Macario Canyon Park should be considered "marginal costs" inasmuch as all urban space around the park has yet to be built out but for which future development must be provided. 10. Therefore,economic planning for Macario Canyon Park shall high- light: A mix of privately developed and operated recreational facilities for those'activities capable of drawing market rate user fees in order to generate some park revenues, as well as publicly built and operated facilities which are not able to operate on a fee basis. The entire park should be considered as a unique economic enterprise by the City. If the City requests private investment and public service j recreational operations by leaseholders or concessionaires, it does not appear that land costs will be recovered in the immediate future. 11. The site is a unique canyon site secluded yet centrally located geographically in the city. 12. Cannon Road provides the only access to the park site without requiring additional land purchases or easements. 13. Major park uses should be group or individual fee based to assist the park to become self-supporting. 30 Planning Guidelines The development of Macario Canyon Park requires a deliberate strategy of phased-in facilities and support systems. The consultants frame the following ideas for City and Task Force consideration: 1 1. Only 3 or 4 major facilities and recreation user concentrations can be located in the canyon on buildable space. 2. Major utility systems shall be brought in (underground) along a spine corridor. This may require such costly items as a sewage line lift-station and underground or at-grade electrical vaults. 3. Wherever possible, the integrity of ridge tops shall be maintained. 4. The smaller arroyos and gullies shall be used to site low density activities. 5. Any trail system shall be defined (bicycling, jogging, hiking, par course) so that small maintenance vehicles can traverse the primary trails for both security and clean-up purposes. 6. Overall, Macario Canyon Park shall contain "quiet" non-motorized recreational uses. 7. The agricultural land of'HUB and related SDG&E properties shall be converted to open space for passive recreation to eliminate conflicting land use between recreation and agriculture. 8. SDG&E commercial property between 1-5, proposed Macario Park, and Cannon Road and Agua Hedionda Lagoon shall provide a public access area to the Lagoon for boat launching and parking. 9. In spite of physical and governmental limitations Macario Park 31 can provide for a diverse program of recreation experiences offering interpretive nature study, passive recreation, active land and water recreation facilities. '10. Park facilities must be of the highest quality, capable of 10 to 15 years of operations without major rehabilitation. 11. Macario shall act as an active athletic facility for the adjacent industrial park area. Support funds shall be sought from these industries. 12. Macario may be considered as a spring training camp for a major professional athletic organization (team). 13. It is recommended that water/irrigation be pledged to those uses which can accomodate the greatest number of recreation activity participants. This, therefore, may strike out golf course use because of the limited service capacity. j 14. In order to enhance the City's "draw" of visitors, the park shall emphasize competition-sized facilities which can be marketed to visitors beyond the City. 15. It may be difficult.to justify location of police and fire facilities within the buildable park space, for such siting may not serve the City best in terms of response-time or insurance ratings. 16. There are several facilities packages open to the City. a. Lease of the entire canyon space for a fee-based recreational 32 facilities development on a "limited gate" basis (number of daily users). b. A combination of public and private-investment recreational facilities, with fee-based facilities provided and operated by private entrepreneurs/concessionaires on an unrestricted public basis. c. A development designed to capture a new spa-type private in- vestment which maximizes visitor draw and revenue return to the City (another La Costa). The concept would almost cer- tainly include substantial visitor accommodations and an emphasis on outdoor recreational experiences. It should be different than the golf-based La Costa attraction. d. Creation of a public corporation—as an arm-of-convenience to the City, which maximizes the natural state of the canyon-lands and Lagoon, and provides a high waulity interpretive nature,, experience on a fee basis. e. A mix of the several uses noted in a) through d) above-- with the understanding that the canyon area has very limited capacity to support several enterprise packages. 17. The Macario Canyon Park space is subject to a complex approvals process for virtually any use program. 18. The separation of Macario Canyon i.e. Cannon Road, wetlands, as city-owned land, from the Agua Hedionda portions, creates a block- age to the integration of what the user public seeks—essentially the coastal waters experience. 33 19. The realities concerning a performing arts facility in Macario Canyon Park are as follows: a) Evening performances are normally the main time for such attractions but coastal fog and lower temperatures year-round make outdoor evening performances difficult and uncomfortable. b) Overflight from Palomar Airport may cause noise intrusion for an outdoor facility. c) Lack of an identified revenue-producing user group of per- formance entities make recommendation of an enclosed, exterior sound-proofed facility a poor risk of public funds. A performing arts facility is, therefore, somewhat questionable. The consultant team seeks direction from the City concerning the appropriate stance we should recommend to best enhance the City'^ negotiating position with the Coastal Commission and the property owners (San Diego Gas and Electric). 20. The City must aggressively maintain it's interest in the retention of Agua Hedionda Lagoon as a recreational resource. There are several policy issues which require determination at this point: a. Shall the Macario Canyon Park boundaries be extended to in- clude the Agua Hedionda Lagoon surface waters so that City intent to develop responsible recreational uses is clearly stated? b. Shall the City maintain it's current lease position over the 34 Lagoon waters in order to demonstrate it's public use access continuity and retain the presence of it's legal position? c. Shall the City clearly signal to SDG&E that it proposes to gain vehicle access to the Lagoon on the south side through the SDG&E 20-acre commercial parcel? 21. The threshold costs of development of Macario Canyon Park will be substantial. The residents of Carlsbad should be informed in a positive manner that Cannon Road is a requirement and will cost $2.5 to $3.4 million to develop (this range should be con- firmed in the near future). Further, underground spine corridor of utilities at perhaps $25 per linear foot will be needed to "open up" the park to major facilities development. Thus, it is possible that overall preparation costs, including land purchase, may amount to $6 million before a major recreational facility can first be built. M 22. The consultant team has determined that roughly 150 acres of land, is buildable/available for park and recreation purposes. A golf course facility would have a major impact on the Macario site: a. Golf course sizes vary: 1. Pitch and Putt @ 2,500 yards requires 40-45 acres. 2. Executive course @ 4,000 yards requires 60-70 acres. 3. Regulation course @ 7,000 yards requires 120-125 acres. b. The public recreation service is somewhat limited. Popular courses carry 180 to 250 rounds per day, for totals of 50,000 to 60,000 rounds per year. 35 c. A well-run golf course (exclusive of bar, grill, pro. shop, etc.) may generate $600,000 per year in greens fees, with operating costs from $400,000 up. d. Most club house revenues are minor. The concessionaire pays relatively minimal lease or percent-of-gross fees to the municipality. e. The key trade-off in San Diego County is the cost of water for a golf course. Oncoming MWD rate increases for bulk water to the water distribution agencies are making golf course operations extremely thin. f. Policy issues regarding either a public or a private golf course for Macario Canyon Park are as follows: . Commitment of major portions of available land. j . Commitment of major water supplies to golf rather than other recreational uses. . Limited public participation service capacity of golf courses as compared with other recreation types. g. Club house development may range 5,000 square feet to 8,000 square feet at $70 per square foot, plus covered storage for golf carts. A public course would have fewer carts to be stored and a smaller club house. h. Roughly one-ha'lf of current golf courses are money losers on the greens, with roughly 25 percent operating at break-even, and 25 percent doing modestly well--based upon good design and efficient resource conservation. 36 23. YMCA Facility - Upon examination of the North Coast Family YMCA letter which proposes to establish a full service YMCA facility . on 20 acres of leased Macario Park land—by means of agreement with the City of Carlsbad, the following observations are made: a. A 43,000-square foot facility (turnkey) will cost roughly $70 per square foot to construct—based upon prior ERA studies for Southern California YMCAs. b. This will result in $3,000,000 cost to design and construct. Annual debt service by the UMCA may range as follows, ex- clusive of land lease payments: . If 100% financed for 15 years @ 12%: $432,079 . If 80% financed for 15 years @ 12%: $345,663 . If 50% financed for 15 years @ 12%: $216,040 jt These are fairly large numbers for any YMCA to perform to in terms of cash flow requirements. c. If a swimming pool is added, the cost may double. The City of Barstow has just completed an indoor-outdoor enclosed pool for $3.0 mill ion. d. Determination to allow development of a YMCA facility within Macario Park has the following policy issues: . A YMCA facility (full-service) could meet the potential need for a recreation center/gymnasium in Macario Park. . A YMCA facility would need to be financially self- supporting; i.e., fee collecting. This means the facility 37 would offer public services to the public at large within a public park space without restriction to membership only. It is unlikely that the City would recognize any substantial lease revenue incomes; the YMCA would essentially be servicing a public purpose at virtually no cost to the City. 38 DESIGN PROGRAM Recreation Activity Suitability Those proposed land uses which have minimum or mitigable environmental impacts, positive economic impact and feasible physical requirements within the limitations of the project area shall comprise the program of facilities for which alternate land use diagrams and a final development plan shall be prepared. The design program matrix is a planning tool used to determine the degree to which the site and it's surroundings are impacted with regards to a proposed activity. Three major factors are to be considered in determining the overall impact of a recreation activity—Economic, Physical Requirements, and Environmental. Economic impact based on the cost of construction using the following criteria: Low Impact - Activity Cost per acre - 0-$20,OOD Medium Impact - Activity Cost per acre - $20,000-$60,000 High Impact - Activity Cost per acre - $60,000 and over j The physical needs of an activity based on spatial requirements was used to determine how much land would be needed to accomodate the activity. (Building and appurtenant landscape or outdoor activity area excluding parking.) The following criteria was used to determine the amount of impact: Low Impact- - 0-10,000 square feet Medium Impact - 10,000 to 30,000 square feet High Impact - 30,000 square feet and over Environmental impact is the primary consideration in the matrix, but because of the many policies and regulations that govern the development of the site it was difficult to determine exact criteria that separated the degree of impact. All policies and environmental limitations were studied as they related to an individual activity together with the many variables effecting the site, and an assessment made. With the ratings of the three major impacts a single rating was averaged to determine the overall impact to the site and it's surroundings. These ratings while general in nature do begin to provide us with a feasibility of what will work on the Macario site. Recreational Activities Matrix RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES YMCA facility Amphitheatre conference center Archery Botanical garden Central libraty arts center Circulation network of roads and trails City hall Equestrian center Equestrian, jogging, hiking trails Fire station Football, soccer fields Golf course, clubhouse, and driving range Lawn bowling Marina/beach access Parks service center Parking Passive picnic/park areas Passive sitting areas Play apparatus areas Police station Ponds or lakes utilizing reclaimed water Recreation center/gymnasium Softball, little league, baseball fields Shooting range Swimming pool Tennis, handball, basketball courts Wild animal sanctuary m A A A m m m m ® A © m © ® ® A ® © 9 • © m A ® 0 © © m m A A A m m m © j & m m © © @ E3 © © A m m @ m Q @ m 0 A ' ®- m & A A A A C5 A © A © @ A A © © © A m A A Q © ra © Ll A ® A SI ES LI © ® ® m @j © o A © €) © 0 A A A 0 ® A © LEGEND © LOW IMPACT A IMPACT 41 P K^H F?-"PACT Proposed Program for Macario Park to Date The proposed design program for Macario is based on the City pursuing a mix of public and private-investment recreational facilities. The recreation program presented in this report illustrates potential uses for Macario with respect for the Agua Hedionda Lagoon and consideration for the Airport. These potential uses correlate directly with the revised parks and Recreation Element. The Faci1i t i es and Act1viti es Archery Botanical Garden Circulation Network of Roads Equestrian, Jogging and Hiking Trails Football and Soccer Fields Lawn Bowling Marina/Beach Access • Parks Service Center Parking * Passive Picnic Areas Passive Sitting Areas Play Apparatus Areas Recreation Center/Gymnasium/YMCA Softball, Little-league Baseball Shooting Range Swimming Pool (Competition) Tennis, Handball and Basketball Courts Wildlife Preserve - Interpretive Center with Trail System. The consultants recommend selection of those uses which provide the most unique opportunities for Carlsbad residents and visitors, based upon the land/water resources, and based upon the need to create an economically self- sustaining regional scale park. Results of Analysis of City of Carlsbad Parks and Recreation Survey May 19, 1981 CONTENTS I. Introduction II. Overall results of survey III. Primary responses to open-ended questions IV. Summary V. Recommendations VI. Appendix A. Sample questionnaire B. Response percentages ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Consultant Team would sincerely like to thank the Parks and Recreation Com- mission, the Parks and Recreation Department, other City of Carlsbad Departments and all those groups and individuals who distributed the survey and took the time to respond. The involvement made the process successful and meaningful. INTRODUCTION The City of Carlsbad Parks and Recreation Survey was designed to serve as a planning tool in developing a revised Park and Recreation Element to the City of Carlsbad General Plan, at the same time providing criteria for the develop- ment plan for Kacario Canyon. The survey will also serve as a tool for estab- lishing additional parks within the City of Carlsbad at the same time providing guidance for the continued operation and maintenace of facilities at existing parks. In addition, the survey will assist in formulating Carlsbad's response to utilization of the lagoons, particularly Agua Hedionda, and the wetland areas. In association with the State of California and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Carlsbad will undoubtedly participate in a program to stabilize beach erosion, a particular concern realized from the survey. The questionnaire was structured to obtain as much informational material as possible regarding residents of Carlsbad recreational needs with the specific intention of learning of attitudes on the City's Park and Recreation Program. The survey was designed in such a manner that the respondent remains anonymous. As a planning tool, the City of Carlsbad Parks and Recreation Survey will not provide all the answers to all questions or concerns, but coupled with other tools and other criteria the survey will allow the consultant team in conjunction with the City of Carlsbad to develop comprehensive and implementable park fac- ilities and desirable, imaginery recreation programs for the future enjoyment of all Carlsbad residents. SURVEY RESULTS Distribution One thousand two hundred twenty-five (1,225) surveys were printed and distributed by hand utilizing volunteers. The survey was distributed and returns were re- ceived from the following representative groups: Parks and Recreation Commission Senior Citizen Association Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce City of Carlsbad Employees St. Patrick's Church Kiwanis Optimists Carlsbad Women's Club Carlsbad Boys Club Carlsbad Girls Club Carlsbad by the Sea Retirement Home La Costa Youth Organization Rancho Carlsbad Mobile Home Park St. Elizabeth Seton Church In addition, the survey was distributed at various parks, at the Carlsbad State Beach, recreation department instructional classes, various local schools, local stores and markets and door-to-door in several locations around Carlsbad. Of the 1,225 surveys distributed, 557 surveys were returned; the rate of return was 45,46 percent. SURVEY RESULTS Results Following an analysis or the survey responses, significant results were found. Some of the results were not unexpected but a substantial number of responses indicated; a much higher response precentage rate than was anticipated. Because of multiple response possibilites on many questions, raw counts are not indicated in the results that follow but for ease in understanding and utilization as a tool, percentages of responses are used. The following elements comprise the significant results. 1. Over 70% of the respondents are at least moderately aware that the City of Carlsbad has an organized recreation program. j 2. Thirty percent of the residents either do not know or bar.ely are aware of the Carlsbad recreation programs. 3. Holiday Park, Laguna Riviera Park, Chase/Pine Fields and the Harding Com- munity Center are the most intensively utilized recreation facilities. 4. Approximately 85% of the respondents use the Carlsbad State Beaches. 5. Sixty-eight percent of the respondents utilized the parks at least once a month. 6. Almost 50% of the park usage occurs on weekends, primarily in the afternoons and evenings. 7. Over 30% indicated they use the parks at all times of the day; they did not select a particular time of the day for usage. 8. Respondents indicate they travel, for the most part (70%), two miles or less to reach the parks they use. !. 9. Over 90% of those responding travel less than five miles to reach the parks. 10. Of those traveling to visit a park, 70% did so by automobile. 11. Almost 56% of the respondents also use walking or bicycling as an alternate method to the automobile for reaching the parks.- 12. Respondents (85%) believe the parks are easy to find and get .to. 13. Forty-two (42) percent indicated that they would like to see additional or better signage programs for the parks. 14. Almost 24% noted that provisions should be made for additional parking at park site;;. 15. The greatest majority of respondents believe that the under thirty (30) years of age group is best served by the Carlsbad parks system. 16. Twenty-five (25) percent of those responding feel that the parks more than adequately serve those over fifty-five (55) years of age. 17. Seventy percent of those responding to the survey were under forty years of age. Responses were given by a balanced percentage of the total. 18. With the exception of the 20 - 25 age group, responses were given by a balanced percentage of the total. 19. Over 75% of the respondents rate the City of Carlsbad parks and recreation facilities as good or excellent. 20. Over 85% of the respondents have visited or would visit Holiday Park. 21. Of the parks or facilities in Carlsbad, over 60% of the respondents have not visited more than three of them. 22. Approximately 45% of the respondents do not visit Levante or La Costa Canyon Parks, presumably because of the distance they are located from the major popu- lation center. 23. Over 80% of the respondents visit private commercial recreation facilities at least once a month. 24. Over 40% of respondents utilize commercial recreation facilities once a week or more frequently. 25. Of the private/commercial recreation facilities visited in the Carlsbad area, the following received the greatest percentages of visits: Movie Theater 79% Swimming Pools 30% Skating Facilities 30% Bowling Lanes 30% Boys/Girls Club 26% Racquetball/Handball 24% YMCA/YWCA 24% • • Concerts 23% 26. Twenty-one and five-tenths percent of the respondents visit a private golf course. An additional 21.7% visit a miniature golf course for recreation. 27. Of the activities that respondents participate in at either public or private facilities, the following received the highest percentage responses: Movies 67% Swimming 52% Jogging/Running 52% Picnicing 49% Bicycle Riding 49% Football/Soccer 31% . Roller Skating 30% Fishing 30% Tennis 28% Basketball 25% Concerts 25% 28. In response to the question, "which five (5) facilities/activities would the respondent like most to be included in the City of Carlsbad parks," the following received the greatest percentage response: (a) Swimming Pools/Facilities 42% (b) Lighted Play Fields 32% (c) Teen Center 29% (d) Gymnasium 28% (e) Outdoor Theater 24% 29. In response to the same question, camping and bike trails both received 23% of the responses. 30. There was a strong response from all age groups for both two (2) major swimming facilities and a teen center; response levels were approximately 22% and 19% . respectively. 31. Approximately 51% of the respondents do not believe that the City of Carlsbad should provide a public golf course. 32. Of the approximately 49% that would like a public golf facility, only 26% would be willing to pay fees and/or additional taxes to utilize and support such a facility. 33. Over 90% of all respondents believe that improving the parks system and recre- ation facilities is important. Forty-nine (49) percent of those believe it to be very important. 34. Fifty-eight percent of the respondents would be willing to pay a fee (user fee) to utilize the City of Carlsbad parks, facilities and program activities. 35. Although fifty-seven percent would not be willing to volunteer their time to help with programs or to assist in park maintenance, a significant 43% would be willing to voluntarily assist in a support program. 36. A very high percentage of residents are anxious to see more cultural activities such as concerts, plays, stage presentations, art showings, etc. included in the recreation programs. Response was 85.2%. 37. Sixty-nine (69) percent of the respondents believe that boating activities in the lagoons,which are presently City subsidized, should become self-supporting by creating new fees or restructuring existing fees. 38. Nine-two (92) percent of the residents responding visit the Carlsbad State Beaches several times per year. 39. Nearly 45% of the respondents visit the Carlsbad State Beaches at least once a week. 40. Twenty-six (26) percent of the respondents visit the beaches at least twice weekly. 41. Fifty-eight (58) percent would like to see the lagoons and wetlands utilized as they presently are - as a joint use facility for sviuming, boating, water- skiing and wildlife habitat/refuge. 42. Approximately 40% of these would rather have the lagoons/wetlands utilized as wildlife habitat/refuge areas. 43. If some development were to occur, 36% of respondents would approve a com- bination of wildlife habitat and water-oriented public recreation. 44. Only 6% of respondents desire to see a marina constructed in the lagoon area. 45. Eleven percent of respondents indicated members of their household having a handicap or disability requiring special needs. 46. Seventy-four percent of all respondents would appreciate having more pro- grams or activities for the handicapped included in the recreation program. 47. Sixty-five and four tenths (65.4) percent of the respondents indicated a desire for a facility that would allow for public meeting areas and/or indoor entertainment capabilities. 48. Fifteen percent would appreciate the inclusion of an art facility with studio areas and gallery in the City system. 49. Thirty-four percent desire to see additional tennis, racquetball and hand- ball facilities in the City. 50. Twenty-two percent responding indicated desire for an expansion in boating- oriented opportunites. 51. Twenty-four percent have utilized a YWCA/YMCA during the past year. 52. Of the respondents, fifty-five percent indicated an interest in having a gymnasium/multi-purpose athletic facility available. 53. Fifty percent indicated participation in more passive recreational activities such as hiking, bird watching, nature walks and picnicing. !» • 54. Almost 95% indicated continuing participation in water-oriented activities (including boating) such as surfing, skin/scuba diving, or water skiing. 55. There was a strong feeling that present swimming facilities and those under construction either would not be adequate to service public needs or would not be available for use by the general public enough of the time. 56. Of the respondents, 65.4% live in the "Encina" area of Carlsbad; 11.3% in the Rancho La Costa area; 15.7% in the Lake Calavera Hills area and 7.6% in the Palomar Airport area. 57. Thirty-nine percent of the households are between the ages of 13 to 35 years of age. 58. Forty-five percent of the households are in the 20 to 55 age range. 59. Of those responding, 62.5% were white/Caucasian in ethnic or racial back- ground. 60. Twenty-nine and three-tenths (29.3) percent of the respondents indicated a Hispanic background. RESPONSES TO OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS Questions 30, 31 and 32 of the survey were addressed open-ended without pre- selected response options to allow a more candid level of response from those completing the questionnaire. The responses were varied and vhile introducing additional attitudes and ideas, supported the responses in the more structural portion of the survey. Question 30 received the greatest number of comments for a total of one thousand ninety-one (1,091), while Question 31 received the least number of responses, only thirty-one (31). While not all responses from Question 30 are indicated, those shown potentially could have a significant impact on the development of the Macario Canyon De- velopment Plan from the standpoint of criteria. The comments included for Question 31 are the most significant of those received. The responses included from Question 32 are basically as received and can be utilized as an additional planning tool. This question received the most candid responses. Responses from Questions 30, 31, and 32 of the survey follow: Question 30. Because this survey will be used to aid in the determination of the future direction of park and recreation facilities and activities in Carlsbad, what would you consider to be the three most important facilities, activities or areas the City of Carlsbad sholud continue or add? RESPONSES '_ NUMBER Pay Telephones 7 Better Policing of Parks 1 Fishing - Fresh Water 1 ••• • More Tot Play Areas 14 More Picnic Facilities 18 Community Swimming/Diving Facilities 100 Lighted Playing Fields 61 Outdoor Theater 27 Camping Areas 19 More Adult Programs 2 . Additional Instructional Classes 15 Teen Center with Teen Programs 56 More Horseshoe Pits 3 Marina 17 YMCA/YWCA ' 3 Boys Club/Girls Club 5 Basketball Courts 11 Public Golf Course 42 Wildlife Habitat 29 Water Skiing 10 Beach Improvements 69 Hiking Trails 7 More Parks 37 Lighted Tennis Courts 53 Cleaner Restrooms 4 Better Public Transportation 2 More Trash Receptacles 1 Larger Parks • 12 Gymnasium 74 Horseback Riding 21 Racquetball/Handball Courts 13 Volleyball Courts 5 More Bike Trails 21 Skating Facilities 16 Beach Boardwalks 2 Better Signs (from freeways) 1 Jogging Paths 4 Motocross Track 3 Weight-Lifting Facilities 4 Swim Team 1 Bowling 4 Surfing 5 Beach Locker and Change Room Facilities 2 Public Boat Ramps on Lagoons 1 Retention of Lagoons 28 Museum . 9 Cultural, Music, Fine Arts Center 40 More Open Spaces 5 Programs for Handicapped 8 Snack Bars in Parks and Beach 1 Skin/Scuba Diving 1 Hang Gliding 1 Summer Activities Programs 20 Quality of Holiday Park 29 Meeting Rooms 7 Senior Citizen Center 10 Expansion of Chase Field II Flea Market/Swap Meet 1 Convention Center 2 Improvement of Harding St. Community Center 7 Better Park Lighting 5 Botanical Garden 4 Miniature Golf Facility 18 More Parking Areas 6 Development of Macario Canyon Park A Library 1 Question 31. Are there any facilities, park locations or activities that the City of Carlsbad should discontinue or close? RESPONSES Stop Using the Same Fields for Bobby Sox and Little League Baseball Close Fox's Landing Until a Safe Marina is Built Eliminate or Revamp Holiday Park Question 32. Do you have any additional comments you wish to make? RESPONSES NUMBER Keep Lagoons Natural 17 "Save the Ducks" Existing Parks are Well Maintained Need Finn Plans for Ocean Front More Attention to Adult Recreation Facilities Expand Holiday Park Horseshoe Pits to Four Parks Are Good Places for Family Outings Portable Tables for Large Groups Dogs Are A Problem in Holiday Park Swimming Pool Would Be Appreciated 7 Fix Up Boys and Girls Club More Swings at Holiday Park Keep New Pool for Public not Used Exclusively by Organized Groups - Public First More Activities for Younger Kids Need Telephones at Holiday and Laguna Riviera 8 •'• •. Have a Card System to Check Out Equipment Get More Bathrooms Improve the Lagoon for Water Skiing More Publicity on the Parks and Programs 10 More Dances Improve Public Transportation to Parks and Beaches More Activities in La Costa Area Include a Fresh Water Lake for Fishing Slow Down on Building Industrial Spaces Dredge Lagoons and Pump Sand to Coast SUMMARY The Survey was formulated to serve as a tool in preparing the City of Carlsbad Parks and Recreation Element Update and the Macario Canyon Development Plan. The response to the distribution of the Survey was much higher than anticipated and as such, indicates a keen interest of Carlsbad residents in their parks and recreation system as veil as a profound desire to keep it healthy and improve it. Responses received vere substantially positive indicating a general approval of current facilities and programs. However, there was also a positive indication that the citizens desire additional facilities either not now available in the City or available on a limited basis only. The facilities and services that are demonstrated as a result of the survey for inclusion in future park and recreation planning for the City of Carlsbad are included in the recommendations. Keep Recreation Programs Free Build a Mall Between Elm and Grand Have Bicycle Racing in Town Develop a Summer Program for Teenagers 17 Put Up Duck Crossing Signs on Jefferson Near Lagoon Improve the State Beaches Carlsbad Parks Are Beautiful and Well Maintained 13 Keep Up the Good Work RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are made as a result of analysis of the questionnaire. These can be utilized in preparing the Macario Canyon Development Plan and in future expansion of other park sites and recreation services. 1. A continuing educational/publicity program should be established informing resi- dents of park facilities and recreation programs. 2. Access to the parks should be made available without dependence on the auto- mobile. 3. The City of Carlsbad should formulate, in conjunction with the State of Cali- fornia and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, a program to stabilize and re- juvenate the beaches. A. The City of Carlsbad should utilize a user-fee program for the use of selected facilities and activities. 5. The City should not develop a publicly-owned golf course. . 6. A development program for utilization of the lagoons/wetlands should be formu- lated immediately weighing alternatives and impacts carefully. 7. A marina should not be constructed within the lagoon area. 8. The City should develop a major aqua tic/swimming facility as part of the park facilities system. 9. Lighted play fields capable of supporting a variety of athletic activities should be developed. 10. A teen center and recreational programs for teenage users should be developed. Summer programs are especially important. 11. A multi-purpose facility incorporating gymnasium capabilities along with rac- quetball/handball/basketball courts, meeting areas and stage facilities should be constructed. 12. A cultural facility such as an art gallery, museum or little theater should be located in Carlsbad. 13. There should be ample opportunities for passive activities such as hiking, bird watching, nature outings, etc. included in recreation programs. 14. Facilities should be accessible to the handicapped and specific programs established for them. 15. The bicycle trail/route system should be expanded as diligently as possible. 16. Commercial recreation facilities should be encouraged to augment publicly-ov-ned facilities. 17. The City of Carlsbad should not develop new YMCA/YWCA or Boys Club/Girls Club facilities. These should be developed if needed by the private sector. 18. The Parks and Recreation Department should develop a volunteer organization for assisting with recreation programs and maintenance. 19. The City should encourage the expansion of private cultural activities in the community. 20. Access to parks should be clearly signed and adequate parking developed vhere possible. 21. Public facilities such as telephones and restrooss should be included at all parks vhere practical. 22. Recreation programs should be expanded as funds and personnel permit. APPENDIX CITY OF CARLSBAD PARKS AND RECREATION SURVEY This survey Is to gather Information from Carlsbad residents regarding their views on city parks and recreation facilities and programs which are existing and which are desired most. Your response Is confidential. Your cooperation In completing and returning this short questionnaire will be sincerely appreciated. 1. Did you know that the City of Carlsbad hat an organized recreation program for Its residents? Well a-are Moderately aware Slightly a-are Not a~are 2. Which of the recreation facilities have you visited or used? Cannon Park Levante Park Harding Comunlty Center ~^_ HaSee House and Park [^ Holiday Park ^H Chase/Pine Fleldi La Costa Canyon Park Laguna Riviera Park . State Eeaches None of the above 3. How frequently do you visit or uie one or more of the public parks In Carlsbad? Dally 1-2 times per week 3-*i times par weak 1 tine per month 1 times per month 3"1! times per year Other l|. When do you generally use the public parks? weekday* weekends morning* afternoons __^ evenings anytime 5. About how far do you travel to use the Carlsbad parks and/or recreation facilities? less than a mile 1-2 ml let 3"5 ml lei 6+ ml les 6. How do you get to the park(s) you use? walk bicycle motorcycle car bus friend drives car other 7. Are the parks easy to find and get to? yes no If no, which of the following Is needed? better signs more walkways/sidewalks public transit blkcways more parking 6. In your opinion, which of the following age groups do Carlsbad parks and recreation facilities serve best? 0-5 years 6-12 yean 13-lB yeart 19-30 year* 31"5Q years ~ 51-65 yean 65 and over 9. What Is the approximate age of the perion answering this questionnaire? 0-12 yean 13-19 yean 20-25 yean 2b-liO years M-55 y«ar* over 55 years 10. Overall, how would you rate Carlibad parks and recreation facilities you have visited? ___ excellent ____ good fair ___ poor 11. Which of th> following parks/recreation facilities In Carlsbad will you not vlilt or uie? (More than one r\ay be checked) ___ Cannon Park . hagee House and Perk, Harding Community Canter Chase/Pine Fields Holiday Park Tennis Courts La Com Canyon Park Laguna Riviera Park Levante Park 12. Why will you not use the park(s)/recreatIon facilities you checked above? (Hore than one may b« checked) •- too far to travel too expensive not attractive not have what looking for safety other no activities Inloreited In participating not open when want to 8°" 13. Which of the following private/commercial recreation facilities have you or mer.bers of your household visited In the Carlsbad area during the last 12 months? YMCA/TWCA racquetball/handbaH boy's club/girl's club swimming health club horseback/equestrian tennis club skating bowling lanes golf course miniature golf boating TOvIes concert* other H. How ir.»ny tli"<s do you visit t^ete private recreation facilities? once a week mor« than once a week ronthly twice a year yearly 15. What activities have you Jnd/or other persons In your rox: participated In the Ian 12 ronths In the Carlsbad area? Jogging/running >wl«r*l ng t<^\ ing plcntclng yOlf hiking hormhoes roller skating bicycle riding other volleyball b«ikett*l 1 f «^c it~! S/kCK.c-«r t »nrtl • Koncback riding skateboarding bird watching plays/lecturei water ski 1 ng surfing r*cc.uctt-«l 1 iK^f f Ub^rd toi pi»r •C»ttl fUhlnj nature walk* concerts sktn/icuta dlvlng If. Of lh« follo-lng f acl 1 1 1 le I/act I vl 1 1 es . which five (5) wojld you Ilk. to >•• Included th* •oil In the City of Carltbad parks? _ lljMcd play fleldi _ outdoor IK*atre _ w« t latvdi/ _ _ to»t Inj/pfcirlna _ volleyball _ «-J t«r »k I Irvfl tlatl"9 _ Sunbathing _ Blnlature polf »-l~-lng pools _ botanical garden _ ha-x-fc^ | |/r acqu«l bat | i^jnu«/ari g>ll«ry/»tud!o _ plcntclnf _ bike trails t«r»nls »»«•-• «=«s*r _ ti_^_... i . _ KcvdUap fact I It Us/projr*— « other 17. Should a public golf course be Included In the City of Carlsbad? yes no If yes. would you be willing to pay a fee or additional taxes to support It? yes no 18. Compared to other city services (excluding Police/Fire protection) how Important do you think Improving the parks/recreatIon facilities systems Is? very Important somewhat Important not very Important not Important at all 19. Would you be willing to pay a fee to use the Carlsbad park facilities and activities programs? yet no 20. Would you be willing to volunteer your time In helping with the recreation programs or park maintenance? yei no 21. Would you like to see more cultural activities; such as, concerts, plays, dance, etc. In the recreation program? yei no 22. Boating In the lagoons Is now subsidized by the City of Carlsbad. Should fees be Increased to make this activity pay for Itself? yes no 23. How often do you visit the Carlsbad State \each? dally twice weekly weekly monthly several times yearly never 2k. How would you like to see the lagooons and wetlands In Carlsbad used? keep as they are use only for wlIdlIfe habitat use for boating, water skiing, swimming, etc. develop a marina develop as combination of wildlife habitat and public recreation 25. How many persons of each of the following ages live In your home? 0-5 year* 6-12 years 13-19 years 20-35 years 36-55 years over 55 26. (OPTIONAL) Which of the following best describes your ethnic or racial background? Hispanic Black White Asian Other 27. Do you or members of your household have any handicap or disability requiring special needs? yes no If yes, what kind? , 28. Would you like to see more programi/actIvItles for the handicapped Included In the parks and recreation program? yes no If yes, what kind? 29. What area of the City of Carlsbad do you live In? A B C D 30. Because this survey will be used to aid In the delernlnilton of the future direction of park and recreation facilities and activities In Carlsbad, what would you consider to be th« three most l'9or[jnt facilities, actlvltlei or areas the City of Carlsbad should continue or add? I. 2. 3- 31. Are there any facilities, p»rl- loctllons or activities lK*t the City of Cirlitxl should dis- continue or cloie? 32. Do you have any additional co-r-«:nt» you with to **k MTUM THIS 0/j[iTIC*HAI»t 1HAMH COOM *Jkl 1C*iurfO»T CITY OF CARLSBAD PARKS AND RECREATION SURVEY This survey is to gather information from Carlsbad residents regarding their views on city parks and recreation facilities and programs which are existing and which are desired most. Your response is confidential. Your cooperation in completing and returning this short questionnaire will be sincerely appreciated. 1. Did you know that the City of Carlsbad has an organized recreation program for its residents? 50^ Well aware 20_.j_ Moderately aware 15.7 Slightly aware 1^0 Not aware 2. Which of the recreation facilities have you visited or used? 19.0 Cannon Park 8.8 Levante Park 36.8 Harding Community Center 20_13_ Magee House and Park 84TT Holiday Park 44^ Chase/Pine Fields _9.7T La Costa Canyon Park 34. 8 Laguna Riviera Park 84 . 9 State Beaches 2.5 None of the above 3. How frequently do you visit or use one or more of the public parks in Carlsbad? 4 • 6 Daily 21.3 j-2 times per week ^J.?_ 3~*» times per week 1 time per mom 16.2 2 times per month 17.6 3-4 times per year 14.6 Other k. When do you generally use the public parks? 18.9 weekdays 48.7 weekends ^--* mornings 21.5 afternoons 8.3 evenings 30.3 anytime 5- About how far do you travel to use the Carlsbad parks and/or recreation facilities? 3JL§. less than a mile 37.3 1-2 miles 26_.<4 3-5 mi ]es 8-* 6+ miles 6. How do you get to the park(s) you use? 34.* walk 21 -5 bicycle 2-° motorcycle 60'7 car 1.6 bus 9.0 friend drives car 1 .4 other 7- Are the parks easy to find and get to? 85 . 0 yes 15 . 0 no If no, which of the following is needed? 42.0 better signs 10.5 more walkways/sidewalks 11.0 publ ic transit 12. 8 bikeways 23.7 more parkinc 8. In your opinion, which of the following age groups do Carlsbad parks and recreation faciliti serve best? 70 " IS 4 22-1 0-5 years 55'7 6-12 years 3_ 13-18 years 19-30 years 31-50 years 13.3 51-65 years fT77 65 and over 9. What is the approximate age of the person answering this questionnaire? 1_K6 0-12 years 22^4 13-19 years J^J 20-25 years 29.4 26-fr.O years 13'3 41-55 years 16.6 over 55* years 10. Overall, how would you rate Carlsbad parks and recreation facilities you have visited? 23.5 excellent 53.0 good 20.3 fair 3.2 poor 11. Which of the following parks/recreation facilities in Carlsbad will you not visit or use? (More than one may be checked) 37.3 Cannon Park " 33.6 Ha gee House and Park 22.6 Harding Community Center 20.8Chase/Pine Fields lOTT Holiday Park 28.4 Tennis Courts a Costa Canyon Park 26Tg Laguna Riviera Park 45.4 Levante Park 12. Why will you not use the park(s)/recreat Ion facilities you checked above? (More than one may be checked) 40.0too far to travel 2.7 too expensive 4 . 7 not attractive 21 .7 not have what looking for 2^3 safety 19.4 other 2 3. 3 no activities Interested in participating TTT not open when want -" 13- Which of the following private/commercial recreation facilities have you or members of your . . household visited in the Carlsbad area during the last 12 months? 23.9 YHCA/YWCA 30.3 swimming 12.9 tennis club 21.5 golf course 79.4 movies 24.1 racquetbalI/handball 2T73 health club 29.8 skating 21.7 miniature golf 23.3 concerts 26-0 boy's club/girl's club 7.7 horseback/equestrian 29.6 bowl ing lanes 13.5 boating 15.4 other How many times do you visit these private recreation facilities? 20.6 once a week 19. 6 more than once a week 39. 9 monthly 14.2 twice a year yearly 15- What activities have you and/or other persons in your home participated in the last 12 rnontf in the Carlsbad area? 16. 51.5 jogging/running 52.1 swimming 16.5 boat ing 48.7 picnic ing 22.1 golf 22.4h?king 8.6 horseshoes 30.2 roller skating 48.7 bicycle riding 9.3 other I6.9voi]eyball 2478 basketball 30.5 footbalI/soccer 28.2 tennis 9.0horseback riding 18.9 skateboarding 9.7 bird watching 16.7 plays/lectures 11.7water skiing 22-6 surfing 21.9 racquetball "379 shuffleboard 10.2 tot play 66.6 movies 29.6 fishing 18.0 nature walks 24.8 concerts 7.0 skin/scuba diving Of the following facilities/activities, which five (5) would you like to see included the most in the City of Carlsbad parks? 32_J) lighted play fields 18. 9movies 12.7 boat ing/marina 16.5 skating 42. 2swimming pools 15.3museum/art gallery/studio 17.4 tennis 23.7outdoor theatre 23.2 camp i ng llTlvolleyball 9.0 sunbathing 11.3botanical garden 17.2pten icing camping 29.1 teen center 19.0handicap facilities/programs 14.9 wet lands/lagoons 20.1 horseback/equestrian 9.3watersk? ing 19.7min?ature golf 16.Qhandbal1/racquetball 23.2bike trails 28.0gymnasium 12.6community meeting room 8 3other 17- Should a public golf course be included in the City of Carlsbad? 48.5 yes 51.5 no If yes, would you be willing to pay a fee or additional taxes to support it? 54.1 yes45.9 no 18. Compared to other city services (excluding Police/Fire protection) how important do you thin improving the parks/recreation facilities systems is? 48.5very important 42.9 somewhat important ^-^not very important **^ not important at all 19. Would you be willing to pay a fee to use the Carlsbad park facilities and activities program 57.7 yes 42.3 no 20. Would you be willing to volunteer your time in helping with the recreation programs or park maintenance? 42.9 yes 57.1 no • 21. Would you like to see more cultural activities; such as, concerts, plays, dance, etc. In the recreation program? 85.2 yes 14.8 no 22. Boating In the lagoons is now subsidized by the City of Carlsbad. Should fees be Increased to make this activity pay for Itself? 68.7 yes 31.3 no ?3. How often do you visit the Carlsbad State Beach? 10-8 dally J^_^ twice weekly 19'° weekly J_5^2monthly 33.2 several times yearly 7.2 never 2k. How would you like to see the lagooons and wetlands in Carlsbad used? 20.6 keep as they are \?_L^. use on'y ^°r wildlife habitat * 17-9 use for boating, water ski ing,; swimming, etc. 6.3 develop a marina 35.6 develop as combination of wi Idl ife habitat and public recreation 7 925. How many persons of each of the following ages live in your home? 0-5 years 1JU3 6-12 years 19-* 13-19 years 19_^_ 20-35 years 2^]_ 36-55 years JM) over 55 26. (OPTIONAL) Which of the following best describes your ethnic or racial background? 29.3 Hispanic l^o Black J32_.5White J2.5 Asian A.I Other ' *"" " / 27- Do you or members of your household have any handicap or disability requiring special need; KKj) yes 89.1 no If yes, what kind? _ ___ 28. Would you like to see more programs/activities for the handicapped included in the parks ai recreation program? 7A.4 yes 25.6 no If yes, what kind? _ •_ 29. What area of the City of Carlsbad do you live in? 15.7 A 65. A B 7.6 c *1.3 p 30. Because this survey will be used to aid in the determination of the future direction of pai and recreation facilities and activities in Carlsbad, what would you consider to be the three most important facilities, activities or areas the City of Carlsbad should continue c add? 1. _ \ _ ___ 2. _ \ _ _ 3. _ 31. Are there any facilities, park locations or activities that the City of Carlsbad should dis continue or close? _ _ _ ___ _ _ __ 32. Do you have any additional comments you wish to make? _ PLEASE RETURN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE IMMEDIATELY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION AND SUPPORT