Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-11-03; City Council; 6791; 6 Unit CT/CP - Trabert/PerrierCIV <)F CARLSBAD — AGEND/^ILL AR* 6 711 MTG. 11/3/81 DEPT. PL CT 81-34/CP-181, TRABERT /PERKIER - 6 unit tentative tract map and condo minium permit; south side of Navarra Drive, west of Viejo Castilla Way. DEPT HDfltlk k/kfetV\ CITY ATTYV/T^) CITY MGR.pe?*_ ccc CL CL O oO RECOMMENDED ACTION: Both the Planning Staff and Planning Commission recommend that this application be APPROVED and that the City Attorney be direc- ted to prepare documents APPROVING CT 81-34/CP-181, per Planning Commission Resolution No. 1872. ITEM EXPLANATION This item is a 6 unit tentative tract map and condominium permit on a .42 acre parcel located as described above. The project will result in a density of 13.3 dwelling units per acre which is less than the general plan density range of 20-30 dwelling units per acre. The Planning Commission found this project to meet all develop- ment standards and design criteria of the Condominium Ordinance. Also, the Commission found that all other requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance are met by this pro- ject. The Commission found that the reduced density was justi- fied since the applicant desires to provide larger, luxury units near the golf course. Through staff review and Planning Commission hearing, all issues on this matter have been satisfactorily resolved. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that this project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and, therefore, has issued a Negative Declaration, dated September 15, 1981, which was approved by the Planning Commission on October 14, 1981. A copy of the environmental documents is on file in the Planning Department. FISCAL IMPACT The applicant will provide all required public improvements to the project. Also, the applicant has agreed to pay a public facilities fee to offset the costs of providing all other public services. EXHIBITS A. PC Resolution No. 1872 B. Staff Report, dated October 14, 1981 w/attachments C. Reduced Site Plan and Elevations 2) The site is physically suitabl^e for the type and density of T the development since the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the density 2 proposed and still meet all of the requirements of the Condominium Ordinance. 3 3) The project is consistent with all city public facility 4 policies and ordinances since: 5 a) The applicant has received 6 edu's from the Leucadia County Water District. 6 b) The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an 7 appropriate condition to this condominium permit and tentative subdivision map, insured that the final map Q will not be approved unless the City Council finds that sewer service is available to serve the project. In g addition, the Planning Commission has added a condition that a note shall be placed on the final map that 10 building permits may not be issued for the condominium project unless the City Engineer determines that sewer 11 service is available, and building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, the 12 Planning Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the public facilities element of the General Plan 13 have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this tentative map and condominium permit approval. 14 c) School facilities will be provided by the San Dieguito 15 High School District and Encinitas Union School District. 16 d) Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of 17 approval. • , 18 e) All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as conditions of approval. 19 f) The applicant has agreed and is required by the 20 inclusion of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and 21 payment of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available concurrent with 22 need as required by the General Plan. 23 4) The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding land use since all of the surrounding properties have been or are 24 being developed with condominium projects. 25 5) This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration has been issued by the 26 Planning Director, dated September 15, 1981, and approved by the Planning Commission on October 14, 1981. 27 //// 28 //// PC RESO # 1872 -2- EXHIBIT A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1872 ' A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY g OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A 6 UNIT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT ON , PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NAVARRA DRIVE, LA COSTA. / APPLICANT: TRABERT/PERRIER CASE NO;• - CT-81-34/GP-181 5 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property 6 to, wit: 7 Lot 41 of La Costa Unit No. 1 according to Map Thereof 8 No. 6117 filed June 3, 1968. 9 has been filed with the city of Carlsbad, and referred to the 10 Planning Commission; and 11 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a 12 request as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; 13 and 14 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 14th day 15 of October, 1981, hold a duly noticed public hearing as 16 prescribed by law to consider said request; and 17 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and * i 18 considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons 19 desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors 20 relating to the Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit. 21 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning 22 Commission as follows: 23 A) That the above recitations are true and correct. 24 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends APPROVAL of CT 81-34/CP-181, based 25 on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: 26 Findings; 27 1) The project is consistent with the city's General Plan since 28 tne proposed density of 13.3 du's/acre is less than the density range of 20-30 du's/acre specified .for the site as indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan. , Conditions; 2 General Conditions; 3 1) Approval is granted for CT 81-34/CP-181, as shown on Exhibit(s) "A"-"K", dated August 31, 1981, incorporated by / reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless K otherwise noted in these conditions. Q 2) This project is approved upon the express condition that the final map shall not be approved unless the City Council finds rj as of the time of such approval that sewer service is available to serve the subdivision. 8 3) This project is approved upon the .express condition that g building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the City Engineer determines that 10 sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such sewer permits and will continue to be available until 11 time of occupancy. This note shall be placed on the final map. 12 4) This project is approved upon the express condition that the 13 applicant shall pay a public facilities fee as required by City Council Policy No. 17, dated August 29, 1979, on file 14 with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, and according to the agreement executed by the applicant for 15 payment of said fee a copy of that agreement dated August 3, 1981, is on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein 16 by reference. If said fee is not paid as promised, this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and 17 approval for this project shall be void. 18 5) The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees to the city, prior to the approval of the final map as required by Chapter 20.44 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 20 6) The applicant shall provide school fees to mitigate conditions of overcrowding as part of building permit 21 application. These fees shall be based on the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit application. 22 7) Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all 23 sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable city ordinances in effect at time of building permit 24 issuance. 25 Planning Department Conditions; 26 8) The applicant shall prepare a reproducible mylar of the final site plan incorporating the conditions contained herein. 27 Said site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. 28 //// PC RESO #1872 -3- . 9) The applicant shall establish a homeowner's association and corresponding covenants, conditions and restrictions. Said CC&R's shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department prior to final map approval. 10) The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. . • 11) All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 7 1?.) Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the city's Sign Ordinance and shall require 8 review and approval of the Planning Department prior to installation of such signs. 9 13) Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high 10 masonry wall with gates pursuant to city standards. Location of said receptacles shall be approved by the 11 Planning Director. 12 14) All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and shielded from view and the 13 sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets to the satisfaction of the Planning Department and Building 14 Director. 15 15) Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire eighteen months from the date of City Council approval unless a final 16 map is recorded. An extension may be requested by the applicant. Said extension shall be approved or denied at 17 the discretion of the City Council. In approving an extension, the City Council may impose new conditions and 18 may revise existing conditions. 19 16) Prior to occupancy of any units, the visitor parking spaces shall be signed and labeled to the satisfaction of the 20 Planning Director. 21 Engineering: 22 17) The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing or grading of the site. 23 18) The grading for this project is defined as "regular grading1 24 by Section 11.06.170(a) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The developer shall submit a grading plan for approval which 25 shall include all required drainage structures and any re- quired erosion control measures. The developer shall also 26 . submit soils, geologic or compaction reports if required and shall comply with all provisions of Chapter 11.06 of the 27 Carlsbad Municipal Code. 28 //// PC RESO #1872 -4- /•"""V 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Parks and Recreation 19) Any street trees removed or damaged for any reason shall be replaced by an "approved" species of equal size prior to final occupancy of-any units. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the .Planning Commission of the city of Carlsbad, California, held on the 14th day of October, 1981, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairman Marcus, Commissioners Farrow, Schlehuber, Jose, Friestedt, and L'Heureux. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Rombotis. ABSTAIN: None. MARY MARCUS, Chairman CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: JAMES C. HAGAMAN, Secretary CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION PC RESO #1872 -5- STAFF REPORT EXHIBIT B DATE: October 14, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: CT 81-34/CP-181 , TRABERT/PERRIER - Request for a 6 unit Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit on property located on the south side of Navarra Drive, west of Viejo Castilla Way in the RD-M zone. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant proposes to construct two buildings which will provide a total of 6 dwelling units on a .42 acre, previously graded parcel, located as described above. The project will result in a net density of 13.3 dwelling units per acre which is less than the General Plan range of 20-30 du/acre.designated for this site. The reason for the reduced density is that the applicant desires to provide large, luxury units adjacent to the golf course. Staff sees no problem with this. The units will range in size from 1600-2000 square feet. The recreation area will be located at the southerly end of the project, adjacent to the golf course. As proposedf the units will not exceed 28 feet in height at the highest point of their roofs. The properties to the north and the east are vacant at the present time, but both have approved tentative maps for condominium projects. Condominiums are located on the property to the west, while the La Costa Golf Course is south of the project. II. ANALYSIS Planning Issues 1. Does the project conform with the development standards of the Condominium Ordinance? 2. Does the project conform with the design criteria of the Condominium Ordinance? HI» Discussion Development Standards The common recreation area for this project will consist of a swimming pool and spa surrounded by a large deck area. Each of the units will have a patio and a second floor deck. As proposed, this project will have approximately 483 square feet of _ recreational area per unit, exceeding the 200 sq.ft. per unit required by the ordinance. All of the resident parking for the project will be located in two car garages on the first floor of the units. Two of the three required guest parking spaces will be located in covered parking stalls adjacent to the garages, as shown on Exhibit "A". These spaces will have a sign denoting that they are for visitor parking only. The one remaining visitor parking space will be located on Navarra Drive in front of the proposed project. Staff feels that the lone on-street visitor parking space will not cause any on-street parking problems. Storage for the units will be located within the over-sized garages, as shown on Exhibit "B" and "D". The trash enclosure would be centrally located at the end of the driveway adjacent to the recreation area. This area would be landscaped to screen the trash enclosure. Staff feeels that this project meets all of the development standards of the Condominium Ordinance. Design Criteria As designed, staff feels that the proposed project meets all of the design criteria of the Condominium Ordinance. The proposed project will be compatible with the existing condominiums along Navarra Drive. Although the site is adjacent to the golf course, the property slopes down away from the golf course and only the two end units will have a golf course view. The large size of the units and the relatively small size and irregular shape of the lot has necessitated a central driveway. Textured and colored concrete paving will be added to the driveway to breakup its dominance. Although the recreation area is not centrally located, it is only approximately 100 feet from the most distant dwelling unit and is integrated with the design of the project. Overall, staff has found that the project meets both the development standards and design criteria of the Condominium Ordinance and, therefore, recommends approval of CT 81-34/ CP-181. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment and, therefore, has issued a Negative Declaration, dated September 15, 1981. V. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission APPROVE the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and ADOPT Resolution No. 1872, recommending APPROVAL of CT 81-34/CP-181 to the City Council based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. — 2— ATTACHMENTS 1) PC Resolution No. 1872 2) Location Map 3) Background Data Sheet 4) Disclosure Form 5) Environmental Documents 6) Exhibits "A" - "K", dated August 31, 1981 MHrar 9/30/81 -3- 2517 La Costa Fair view LA COSTA GOLF COURSE PC CASE MO-CT81-34/CP181 A P P18 C A N T JRABERT/PERR1JER.VICINITY MAP W BACKGR017ND DATA SHEET CASE NO: CT 81-34/CP-181 APPLICANT: Trabert/Perrier REQUEST AND LOCATION: Tentative tract map and Condo permit to construct 6 units on the south side of Navarra Drive, La Costa LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 41 of La Costa Unit 1, according to Map 6117, Filed June 3, 1968. Assessors Parcel Number: 216 - 170 - 20 Acres «42 No. of Lots GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING General Plan Land Use Designation EH Density Allowed 20-30 Density Proposed 13.3 Existing Zone ^^ . Proposed Zone N/A Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: . Zoning Land Use • North RD*-M Vacant South P-C . Golf Course East RD-M Vacant • , West RD-M Condos PUBLIC FACILITIES School District San Dieguito/Encinitas Water'District Costa Real Sewer District Leucadia ^ EDU's Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated August 3, 1981 (Other: ' ENVIRONMENTAL -IMPACT ASSESSMENT •x. Negative Declaration, issued Septenfaer 15f 1981 Log No. E.I.R. Certified, dated Other, ' * <7' it"Ts~3etermine<l that further inforraatir - is required, you will be so ad- 'sed.• "* Greg Trabert and Richard Perrier (individuals)APPLICANT: ^ Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication) P. O. Box 2106, Leucadia, CA 92024 Business Address 436-0489 Telephone Number AGENT:-ENGINEER: E. Brian Smith @ BRIAN SMITH ENGINEERS,INC. Name 2656 State Street, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Business Address 729-8981 Telephone Number MEMBERS: Name -(individual, partner, joint Home Address venture, corporation, syndication) Business Address Telephone Number Telephone Number Name Home Address Business Address Telephone Number Telephone Number (Attach more sheets if necessary) I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this dis- closure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be1 relied upon as being true and correct until amended. BY Agent, Owner, Partner 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92008 438-5591 Cttp of Carls&ab NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: South side of Navarra Drive, La Costa PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Six (6) unit tentative tract map and condo- minium permit on a .42 acre previously graded parcel. Construction of the proposed project will require approximately 450 cubic yards of grading. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA. 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. /-*"""") /, •) ^c //^ srr-^rp _-. DATED: October 1, 1981 CASE NO: CT 81-34/CP-181 APPLICANT: TRABEKT/PERRIER PUBLISH DATE: October 7, 1981 JAMES C. HAGAMAN Planning Director ND-4 5/81 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92008 433-5591 PUBLIC NOTICE OF PREPARATION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: The Planning Department of the City of Carlsbad intends to prepare a Negative Declaration for ths following project? Project Description: Six (6) unit tentative map and condominium project on a .42 acre previously'graded parcel. Project address/Location: South side of Navarra Drive, La Costa Anticipated significant impacts: None We need to know your ideas about the effect this project might have on the environment and your suggestions for ways the project could be revised to reduce or avoid any significant environmental damage; Your ideas will help us decide what issues to analyze in tha environ- mental review of this project. Your comments on the environmental impact of the proposed project may be submitted in writing to the Planning Department, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008, no later than 21 days frojK-i^suance. DATED: September 4, 1981 CASE NO: CT-81-34/CP-131 JAMES C. HAGAMRN APPLICANT: Trabert-Perrler V ' Planning Director PUBLISH DATE: September 12^981 0 o 1ZY1CJUITY MAP_ COPY mug »*t* uMtr *ltan ««IIT7 4.11 44* .4.1 41* < UUIT <4 tun «»UUIT <» . «f. 4*f tft l»»t »r.i of. 4tv «n nt>- «r »K 4** OH Ifff t-r. _rp*«ui*h»m ZZrt / X. ' !••" 1 ^ ,r/ N—^canhu^ -5:rxH::::::-Rii>x-Ki::: COPY c E.UEVA.TIOUM O g T l-l .«.¥ •COPY { ' ,IK. . |f.'-v' I-'.';ll I'-t-r E'U E V A. T I WE.&T V" "A. S T" ~ E L E V- A T I O kJ ' C COPY E L. E. V xX T I illft! I m m (ol f O]