HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-11-17; City Council; 6812; CP 36A - LA COSTA VALE LTD - 336 UNIT AMENDMENT TO AN APPROVED CONDOMINIUM PERMIT=--
.. z 0 ~
..J
0 z ::,
0 0
CIT'4 CARLSBAD -AGEND::t.LL @.l
AB# t,P I?..
MTG.11/17 /81
TITLE: CP-36(A), LA COSTA VALE, LTD -
336 UNIT AMENDMENT TO AN APPROVED
CONDOMINIUM PERMIT; PIRAGUA AND
VENADO STREETS, WEST OF CADENCIA
IN THE P-C ZONE.
t
DEPT. HD.~~ -4"4-~
CITY A TTY~) t=· J?) '
DE.PT _P_L ___ _ CITY MG _,, :::}~ f l<... . .
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Both the Planning Staff and Planning Commission recommend that
this application be APPROVED and that the City Attorney be di-
rected to prepare documents APPROVING CP-36(A), per Planning Com-
mission Resolution No: 1882.
ITEM EXPLANATION
This item is an amendment to an approved condominium permit lo-
cated as described above. The project consists of 336 units
which is greater than the 243 units originally approved. The
·project's density is 8.2 dwelling units per acre which is greater
than the 5.9 du's/ac originally approved, however, is still less
than the general plan density range of 10-20 du's/ac designated
for this site.
The project ''s design differs from that originally approved in
that it consists of entirely attached units whereas the original
project contained a combination of both attached and detached
units. Staff believes the amended project is better designed
than that originally approved.
Through staff review and Planning Commission hearing, all issues
on this matter have been satisfactori.ly resolved.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Planning Director has determined that the environmental ef-
fects of this project have been considered as part of a previous-
ly certified Negative Declaration and, therefore, has issued a
Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance on October 5, 1981 which
was approved by the Planning Commission on October 28, 1981. The
environmental documents are on file in the Planning Department.
FISCAL IMPACT
The applicant will provide all required public improvements to
the project. Also, the applicant has agreed to pay ·a public fac-
ilities fee to offset the costs of providing all other public
services.
EXHIBITS
t A. PC Resolution No. 1882 ·.,,.
B. Staff Report, dated October 28, 1981, w/attachme-nts
I
I
f i I 1 i f I i
f i
t: ' ' ' ~ i
fi
i·
!1
F f ~ t: !• >'I ,.
!I
!
;I )•
"
1
r:
~ .. 1 ti
ii fl
~I
•• LI !•
t! " l
I
I
I
f
11 II II !! 1, .
.,..
• •
1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1882
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBADr CALIFORt.~IA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
3 A 336 UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED ON PIRAQUA AND VENADO STREETS,
4 LA COSTA
APPLICANT: LA COSTA VALE, LTD.
5 CASE NO: CP-36 (A)
6 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to
7 wi.t:
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Lots 274 through 289 and 291 through 295 of Carlsbad Tract
72-20 (La Costa Vale Unit No. 2) according to Map No. 7779
filed in the office of the San Diego County Recorder on
October 26, 1973
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as
provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 28th day of
October, 1981, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed
by law, to consider said request; and
WHEREASr at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering
all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to
be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the
Condominium Pennit; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commis-
sion as follows:
(A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
{B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing,
the Commission recommends APPROVAL of CP-36(A), based on the
following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1) The proposed project is consistent with the City's current
General Plan and with the Specific_ Plan which has been
EXHIBIT A
J.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 ,.,..
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2)
3)
4)
• •
applied to this property, since the.proposed density of 8.22
du 1 s/ac does not exceed the density limit of 10-20. du's/ac
established for this site and previous grading activities and
the topography of the site precludes a higher density. Also,
as conditioned, the project conforms to the requirements of
all other. applicable General Plan Elements.
A Subdiv.ision Map for the site (CT 72-20), designating all
lots as 11 Condominium Lots", has been finaled and approved by
the City council and a condition has been included which re-
quires the applicant to file for an adjustment plat in order
to remove all lot lines which would intersect a proposed
dwelling unit.
The site is physically suitable for the type and density of
the development since the site is adequate in size and shape
to accommodate residential development at the proposed den-
sity and still meet all the requirements of the City's Condo-
minium Ordinance.
The project is consistent with all City public facility poli-
cies and ordinances since:
a) One hundred fifty sewer connections have been reserved
for the first two phases of devei'opment by the Leucadia
County Water District.
b) A condition has been added that building permits cannot
be issued unless sewer service is available and building
cannot occur within the project unless sewer service re-
mains available. Therefore, the Planning Commission is
satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities
Element of the General Plan have been met insofar as they
apply to sewer service for this project.
c) An agreement exists between the La Costa Land Company and
the Encinitas School Distr~ct whereby a school site has
been made available ta this district covering the subject
project.
Also, a condition of approval requires that certain
school fees must be paid to the San Dieguito Union School
District prior to the issuance of building permits.
d) Adequate water and gas and electric service will be
available to serve the development.
e) All necessary public improvements have been either pro-
vided or will be required as conditions of approval.
f) The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion
of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities
fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the fee
will enable this body to find that public facilities will
be available concurrent with need as required by the
General Plan.
PC RESO 1882 -2-
, ...
J_ 5)
2
3
4
5 6)
6
7
8
9
10
11
• •
Based on an initial study of the project, including a field
investigation of the site, the Planning Director has deter-
mined that the project will not result in any adverse envi-
ronmental impacts and has issued a Negative Declaration on
December 19, 1979 (log No. 626) and a Notice of Prior Envi-
ronmental Compliance on October 5, 1981 which was approved by
the Planning Commission on October 28, 1981.
The proposed condominium project meets the criteria of Chap-
ter 21.47 (condominiums) since:
a) The condominium meets the design criteria of Chapter
21.47.110 since the overall plan is comprehensive, em-
bracing land, buildings 1 landscaping and their relation-
ships, the driveways are not dominant features and suffi-
cient circulation and on-site amenities are provided.
b) Storage space, laundry faciiities, open recreation areas,
parking facilities, refuse areas, separate utilities and
all other requirements of Section 21.47.130 have been met
. or will be made conditions of approval.
12 Conditions
13 General Conditions:
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1)
2)
3)
4)
Ill
Ill
Approval is granted for CP 36(A), as shown on Exhibit(s) 11 A"
-11 F 11
, dated September 17, 1981, incorporated by reference and
on file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur
substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these condi-
tions.
The conditions contained herein shall supercede all condi-
tions of CP 36 (Resolution No. 1629). ·
This project is approved upon the express.condition that
building permits will not be issued for development of the
subject property unless the City Engineer determines that
sewer facilities are available at the time of application for
such sewer permits and.will continue to be available until
time of occupancy.
This project is approved upon the express condition that the
applicant shall pay a public facilities fee as required by
City Council Policy No. 17, dated August 29, 1979, on file
with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, and
according to the agreement executed by the applicant for pay-
ment of said fee a copy of that agreement dated October 5,
1981, is on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein
by reference. If said fee is not paid as promised, this ap-
plication will not be consistent with the General Plan and
approval for this project shall-be void.
PC RESO 1882 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
5)
6)
• •
The applicant shall provide school fees to San Dieguito Union
District to mitigate conditions of overcrowding as part of
building permit application. These fees shall be based on
the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit
application.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all
sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable
city ordinances in effect at time of building permit issu-
ance.
7 Planning-Department:
8 7) The applicant shall prepare a reproducible mylar of the final
site plan incorporating the conditions contained herein.
9 Said site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the
10
11
12
13
8)
. Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permitso
The applicant shall establish a homeowner's association and
one master set of corresponding covenants, conditions and
re£trictions for the entire project. Said CC&R's shall be
submitted to and approved by the Planning Department prior to
issuance of building permits in any phase.
9) The followng provisions shall be included in the CC&R's
14 required pursuant to condition No. 8:
15
16
17
18
19
20
a) No individual lots may be sold separately unless they
are sold in groups of at least two lots and are
contiguous.
b) All lots shall be subject to the CC&R's in perpetuity~
c) A common architectural theme shall be maintained for all
lots.
d) All lots shall share common· recreation amenities.
10) All parking lot trees shall be a minimum of 15 gallons in
21 size.
22 11) All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and
thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris.
23
12) Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high
24 masonry wall with gates pursuant to city standards. Location
of said receptacles shall be approved by the Planning Direc-
25 tor prior to the issuance of building permits and shall be
shown on the final site plans required pursuant to condition
26 No~ 7.
27 13) The recreation facility located on Lot 291 shall be installed
prior to occupancy of any units in Phase 1.
28
Ill
PC.RESO 1882 -4-
,,.,
• •
1 14) The barbeque facility within lot 274 shall be relocated to
the satisfaction of the Planning Director. The new location
2 shall be shown on the final site plan required pursuant to
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15·
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
15)
16)
17)
18)
19)
20)
21)
22)
condition No. 7.
An additional recreation facility, including a jacuzzi and
barbeque, shall be provided at a location subject to the ap-
proval of the Planning Director. The location shall be shown
on the final site plan required pursuant to condition No. 7.
A minimum of 24 feet of backup shall be provided for all
parking spaces within this development.
The applicant has agreed to provide improvements on behalf of
the city for lot 290. Said lot shall be improved by the ap-
plicant concurrent with the construction of the units in
Phase I, subject to the approval of the Parks and Recreation
Commission and Planning Director.
No individu.al lots as shown on CT 72-20 may be sold separate-
ly and all lots are to remain in common ownership. A condi-
tion requiring this shall be placed in the CC&R's.
Prior to the issuance of any building permits within a speci-
fic phase, the applicant shall submit.an application for an
adjustment plat and have a certificate of compliance record-
ed, removing any lot line which intersects proposed dwelling
units. A separate adjustment plat is required £or each lot
line to be removed.
Unless otherwise approved herein, the subject property shall
be subject to the RD-M zoning standards as they relate to
permitted and conditional uses, building height, setbacks and
yards.
Prior to the issuance of building permits for Phase I, the
applicant shall submit a detailed landscape, lighting and
irrigation plan for the entire project subject to the approv-
al of the Planning Director. Said plan shall utilize drought
and salt tolerant plant species to the maximum feasible and
indicate methods of low intensity lighting of common recrea-
tion areas and pedestrian walkways. Fprther, said plan
shall include a 6' high decorative block wall separating and
screening lot 290 from the adjacent ·parcel to the west.
The proposed pathway connecting the proposed development (lot
279) with the existing La Costa Canyon Park shall be improved
by the applicant and maintained by the homeowners' associa-
tion. This requirement shall be noted_ in the CC&R's.
23) The specific location and design of the community identity
signs shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Direc-
tor prior to the issuance of building permits for Phase I.
Ill
PC RESO 1882 -5-
....
• •
1 24) All parking structures having individual garages shall be
equipped with garage door openers.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Environmental Conditions:
25) The applicant shall grade in substantial conformance with
the approved grading and drainage plan.
26) All grading and land clearance operations shall be subject to
the review and approval of the City Engineer. The applicant
shall obtain and strictly abide by an approved grading per-
mit.
27) In order to reduce human and domestic animal impacts on the
San Marcos Canyon, the applicant shall erect a minimum 42
inch high, dark black chainlink fence for the length of the
project along the San Marcos Canyon rim. This fence shall be
placed near the top of the Canyori, posted with 11 Danger/Keep
Out11 signs, and the fence shall not be visible from the
bottom of the Canyon. Access to the San Marcos Canyon shall
be limited to lot 290.
12 Engineering Conditions:
13 28) No grading-shall occur outside the limits of the subdivi-
sion.
·14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29)
30)
31)
32)
33)
Concrete terrace drains shall be installed at the top of all
major slopes where required by the City Engineer.
All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by the home-
owners' association (if on commonly owned property) or the
individual property owner (if on an individually owned lot)
in perpetuity. An appropriately worded statement clearly
identifying the responsibility shall be placed in the CC&R-
' s.
Additional drainage easements and 'drainage structures shall
be provided or installed as may be required by the County
Department of Sanitation and Flood Control or the City Engi-
neer.
All buildings shall conform to minimum~ slope setback stan-
dards as specified in city of Carlsbad standard GS-14.
The design of all private streets and drainage shall be ap-
proved by the City Engineer. The structural section of all
private streets and drive\vays shall conform to th~ city of
Carlsbad street standards based on R-value tests. The mini-
mum width of the private streets sha11· be 24 feet and, where
determined necessary by the City Engineer and Planning
Director, each shall have a sidewalk along at least one side
with a minimum width of four fee~. All private streets,
driveways and drainage shall be inspected by the city and the
standard improvement plan check and inspection fees shall be
paid prior to the_issuance of a building permit.
PC RESO 1882 -6-
+
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
· 10
11
12
13
14
34)
35)
36)
37)
38)
39)
• •
Lighting along the private streets shall be installed prior
to occupancy of each phase and shall be subject to the
approval of the City Engineer.
Sidewalks, street light heads and any other public street
improvements not.presently existing shall be installed to
city of Carlsbad standards by the developer along all public
streets adjacent to the subdivision prior to occupancy of any
units which abut said frontage.
A report of a soils investigation of the site and a grading
plan shall be submitted by the applicant to the City Engineer
prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
All cut and fill slopes shall be no steeper than two horizon-
tal to one vertical unless otherwise approved by the City
Engineer. No fill slopes shall extend outside the subdivi-
sion boundary adjacent to San Marcos Canyon. Care shall be
taken in grading to ensure that no debris crosses the subdi-
vision boundary and goes into the Canyon.
All exposed slopes shall be hydroseeded or otherwise stabil-
ized iTILmediately upon completion of grading activities.
All previously manufactured slopes which are to remain essen-
tially intact shall be smoothed, stabilized and hydroseeded
as may be required by the City Engineer.
15 Fire Departrnent Conditions:
16 40) Street addresses for each cluster of buildings shall be
posted at the driveway entrance to each cluster subject to
17 the approval of the Fire Marshall.
18 41) An all weatner access road shall be maintained throughout
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
construction.
42) All required fire hydrants, wat~r mains and appurtenances
shall be operational prior to combustible building materials
being located on the project site.
43) Brush clearance shall be maintained within a minimum distance
of 30 feet to each residence.
44) All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems,
automatic sprinklers and other systems-pertinent to the pro-
ject shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval
prior to construction.
45) Buildings exceeding 10,000 square feet aggregate floor area
shall be sprinklered or have four-hour fire walls with no
openings therein which shall split the building into 10,000
square feet (or less) areas.
46) Fire retardant roofs shall be required on all structures.
PC RESO 1882 -7-
• •
1 Parks and Recreation Department Conditions:
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
47)
48)
49)
The applicant shall provide a 30 foot landscape strip along
the perimeter of the project creating a transition from the
project to the natural vegetation of San Marcos Canyon. Said
planting shall include a minimum of 80% drought tolerant
plant species and established by an appropriate temporary
irrigation system subject to the approval of the Parks and
Recreation Director. The developer shall be responsible for
the maintenance of this landscape area adjacent to each phase
up until the time of the sale of the last unit in each phaser
at which time the homeowners' association shall be respon-
sible for this maintenance.
~
Any existing street trees presently missing or subsequently
damaged or removed shall be replaced with a tree equal in
size subject to the approval of the Parks and Recreation
Director.
Approval of this permit shall expire 18 months from the date
of.City Council approval unless building permits are issued.
An extension may be requested by the applicant. Said exten-
sion shall be approved or denied at the discretion of the
City Council. In approving an extension the City Council may
impose new conditions and may revise existing conditions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
15 Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on
16 the 28th day of October, 1981, by the following vote, to wit:
17 AYES: . Marcus, Rombotis, Farrow, Jose, Friestadt, L'Heureux
18 NOES:
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ABSENT: Schlebuber
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
JAMES C. HAGAMAN, Secretary
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
PC RESO 1882 -8-
MJl~RY MARCUS, Chairman
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
• •
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 28, 1981
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: CP 36{A) -VALE III -An amendment to an approved con-
dominium permit for a 336 unit condominium project
located on Piragua and Venado Streets, west of Cadencia
in the P-C zone.
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
This item is an amendment to a previously approved 243 unit con-
dominium permit located as described above. Since the original
approval, the ownership has changed and the new applicant now
requests to increase the number of units by 93, totalling 336 for
the project. The Planning Commission may recall the original
project which consisted of a combination of 107 detached units
and 136 attached units. A colored exhibit of the original plan
will be on display at the Planning Commission meeting.
The project as now proposed is substantially different than the
original. Besides the increase in the number of units, the pro-
posed project consists of entirely attached units. The project's
proposed density is now 8.2 dwelling units per acre which is
greater than the 5.9 dwelling units per acre approved for the
original project. The proposed density is still less than the
10-20 du's/ac range designated for this site on the Land Use Ele-
ment of the General Plan.
As shown on Exhibit "C", five unit types are proposed, ranging in
size from a 2 bedroom, 1160 square foot unit to a 3 bedroom, 1880
square foot unit. Of the 336 units, 56 would be one and two-
story townhouse units. The units are arranged in clusters cor-
responding with the existing graded pads on the site.
II. ANALYSIS
Planning Issues
1. Does the project meet all development standards of the
Condominium Ordinance?
2. Does the project meet all design criteria of the Condo-
minium Ordinance?
... -~--·-·· --. • •
III. DISCUSSION
Development Standards
As proposed; the project meets all development standards of the
Condominium Ordinance. Two parking spaces per unit will be pro-
vided in carports located adjacent to each building cluster tor
280 of the~ units. A two car garage will provide the required
parking for each of the remaining 56 units.
The 87 required visitor parking spaces will be provided along
Venado Street and Piraqua Street. Staff can support the location
of the visitor parking spaces on the two streets becc1.use they are
conveniently located to the units they serve and, since the
streets are entirely within the project, there would be no demand
for visitor parking on this street by other projects in the vi-
cinity. Also, visitor parking on Venado and Piraqua Streets was
approved on the original plan and no concerns were expressed by
either the Planning Commission or City Council at that time.
The recreational requirements for the project-would be met by a
combination of common and private recreation facilities. Two
large common recreation facilities will be located on either end
of the project. The first, adjacent to Cadencia Street, consists
of a swimming pool, jacuzzi, tot lot and two tennis courts. The
second, located on the opposite end of the project, consists of a
swimming pool, jacuzzi and multi-purpose court. In aqdition, two
jacuzzis and several barbeque and bench areas would be inter-
spersed throughout the development.
Along with the common facilities, each unit would have a balcony
and/or patio. Overall, the required 200 square feet of recrea-
tion area per unit is met by this project. In addition, all
other development standards are met by the proposed project.
Since the project is in the P-C zone, no specific setbacks or
other zoning standards have been established for this site.
Staff is recommending that the standards of the RD-M zone be ap-
plied to the project. The applicant has been made aware of this
recommendation early in the process and has designed the project
to conform to these zoning standards.
Additionally, all applicable conditions of the original condomin-.
ium permit relating to grading, access to La Costa Canyon Park
and fencing around the perimeter of the project are incorporated
into the new resolution of approval.
Design Criteria
Staff believes that all design criteria of the -Condominium Ordi-
nance have been met by this project. Specifically, the units,
recreation areas and parking areas are well integrated and tied
-2-
.,.
• •
together by a pedestrian circulation system. Also, the common
recreation areas are interspersed throughout the site so that
they are accessible to all the units.
Each cluster of units shares an access driveway to Venado and
Piraqua Streets with only three units on lot 289 having indi-
vidual access to a public street. Staff believes that traffic
conflicts will be minimal since no through traffic will exist on
f these stre'ets.
As designed, the units are oriented to take advantage of the view
of San Marcos Canyon which wraps around the site to the north and
·west. The majority of units will have a view to either the Can-
yon or the open space created by the SDG&E easement adjacent to
the south. This particular site provides some of the best views
in La Costa.
Overall, staff is satisfied that the project meets all design
criteria and development standards of the Condominium Ordinance
and, therefore, is recommending approval.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVI~~
The Planning Director has determined that the environmental ef-
fects of this project have be.en considered as part of a previous-
ly certified Negative Declaration (log No. 626, dated December
19, 1979) and, therefore, has issued a Notice of Prior Environ-
mental Compliance on October 5, 1981. The environmental docu-
ments are on file in the Planning Department.
V. RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve the Notice
of Prior of Environmental Com11liance an.d ADOPT Resolution No.
1882; recommending APPROVAL of CP 36 (A) to the City Council
·based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained
therein .
Attachments
Planning Commission Resolution No. 1882
Location Map
Background Data Sheet
Exhibit "Xn -Proposed Phasing Plan
Reduced Site Plans and Elevations
Environmental Documents
Exhibits "A" -11 F 11 , dated September 17, 1981
BH/wl
10/15/81
..,.3_
..... , .... :-
. .. ~ . .
.. . · .. -. : . . . .. ·:. ... . ·-· .. · .
. . .. . .
. . . . . ....
CASIE NO. CP 36{A)
Af?fPllll·CANi LA COSTA VALE VICJNJTY MAP
. . ..
\
·-·· ., ·-~ .. ,------.-·----...... ___ ,.,.._,...,"'_ ----:--·-----
...
.. .
. . .
... ·-· . . . --.
. .
-·
-...
_,...
• ..
. .. • . ·1-•
.. . :' .. ... .. . .. .. ---..
. . -.·.· .. . ·. .. .
✓• •• -·:. ••
-. .. ..... ' '
.. '. . : . ' .
: ... ·. ~
-. .
CASE L\110 .. _CP 36{A)
.. . . . -. -...
. . .
--.: ·-------~ ... ---
Irv~ lP.·
..
·,-
P. C -_
Easement· .'
----. ---------· .
. .. .. ,
. -
. . . :. .
. .. . . . . -
. " "
--·• . ~ . ~ . . -1 . .. ~-: -._ . '
: -~ ,1' . -.
-.. . .
\' .. 1:
. -.. .. _..,,._-__ -· .. . . ·-...
-· .
. . . .
-... ... .
. . ·-.
. . '
. . .
' • i
----
0 -C:
0
ti)
l\ t0ron n ir ~ t\'il LA ___ COST A VALE VIC1N1iY MAP
• BACKGROUND DATA SHEEI' • CASE. NO: CP 36(.8,)
APPLICANT: La Costa Vale Ltd.
REQUEST AND LCCATION: An amendment to a tentative tract inap and condominium
permit for a 336 unit residential proJect located on Piragua and Venado Streets in La·costa
LEGAL DESCRIPI'ION: Lots 274 through 289 and lots 221 through 295 of
CT 72-20, Unit No. 2, County of Sap Diego, filed October 26, 1973
Assessors Parcel Nurrber: ----223 190 02 through 22
Acres · 40. 8 No. of Lots 336 airspace units ·and 20 lanq .lot,s
GENERAL PIAN AND ZONING
~eral Plan Land Use Designation __ RM_H _____ _
Density Allowed 10-20 du/ac
Existing Zone ---~P~--c~--------
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Density-Proposed 8. 22 du' s/ac
Proposed Zone ------------
Zoning Land Use
·Nor& _ _.p""'"-..... C--San Marcos Canyon
·:snG&E easement
-vacant
South P-C . ;: ~
-----
P-C Fast
West P-C San Marcos Canyon.
PUBLIC FACILI1TES
School District Encinitas Union ·Elementary and San Die•gui to High School· ·oist
Water District Olivenhain ___:;.;...:;~~=='-------------
Sewer District Leucadia Coun~y Water District .EDU's·_-=5~0'-------
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated __________________ _
(Other: -------~-------------------:-----'}
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
x Negative Declaration, issued 12/19/79 _ __;;a:_ _ Log No. 626 ..;;...;;;;..;;_.. ____ _
____ E.I.R. Cer.tified, dated _________ _
Other, Prior compliance, issued 10/5/81
-----:----------..... _ ............... .._ .. _,. .. , ~......-~::i;..-...... ..._, '""'"""'' -~
l. Applicant and CWner/De'veloper
IA COSTA VALE LTD.
DISCT.OSURE STATEMENT
MAJOR 00.'IDOMINiu-1 PERL'ilT APPLICATION
File:l September 10, 1981
~--.. -... .. .,.
Pagel of 2
La COsta Vale Ltd. (a Ca1i~omia Limited Partnership) Address: c/o Dart:nnor Developnent co. /con Am Properties, Ltd.
1764 San Diego Avenue, San Diego, CA 92110
Attention: Kenneth A. Lipinski or John Cooper ..
2. Parties with Beneficial Interest in Applicant:
Name/Address/Phone Numrer
Continental La Costa Properties, Inc.
Co-V.anaging General Partner
1764 San Diego Avenue
San Diego, CA 92110 714/297-6771
Dartm::or Develoµrent CO.,
Cc-Managing General Partner
1764 San Diego Avenue, Suite 217B
San Diego, CA 92110 714/297-6771
Continei.tal la Costa Equities, Inc. •
Ge.'1eral Partner
17 64 San Diego Avenue
San Diego, CA 92110 714/297-6771
% of
ewnership
Interest
37½%
25% .
15%
15%
Telephone: 714/297-6771 714/295-5201
State of
Incorporation
California
California
Ca1ifomia
California
Date of
Inco-92.
3/17/81
12/5/80
3/17/81
3/17 /81'
corporate
Number.
95-3589823
95-3596073
95-3589821
95-3589827
Shareholder(s) Information
Daniel J. Epstein 100%
c/o ConAm Properties Ltd.
1764 San Diego Avenue, San Diego, CA 92110
714/297-6771
Kenneth A. Lipinski 100%
c/o Dartrroor Developrent Co.
1764 San Diego Avenue, San Diego, CA 92110
714/295-5201
Lester B. Kam 100%
1764 San Diego Avenue, San Diego, CA 92110
714/297-6771
Richard M. Ferry 100%
•
continental La Costa Invesbnents, Inc.
GA...neral Partner
17 64 San Diego Avenue
San Diego, CA 92110 714/297-6771
1764 San Diego Avenue, San Diego, CA 92110
714/297-6771 • continental American Y.ianageroent Co:rp.
Limited Partner
1764 San Diego Avenue
San Diego, CA 92110 714/297-6771
-·-,. -~ ~ ----... __ ,cc
3/4%
--------·-------~ --------· -~ --~ --""' --~--~ ~-
california 8/1/75 95-2949467
1· ----~~ --~ -----~ --
Kam/Ferry International, a California cxi:q:oration
·1900 Avenue of the Stars
21st Floor Century City 100%
Ios Angeles, CA 90067
213/879-1834
·----· -·----. -·· .. '"'•··'-··
.r·
' L ' i
i !
! i
-·--~ ••• ~"7"·
2. Parties with Beneficial Interest :in Applicant (continued):
Name/Address/Phone Nunber
Con A-n Investors Ltd., Limited Partner
, 1764 San Diego Avenue
San Diego, CA 92110
714/297-6771
% of
OWnership
Interest
6 3/4%
State of
Incorporation
califo:rnia
Da:te of
Incorporation
12/29/75
Corporate
Number
95-3005655
I declare ~er penalty of perjury· that the infonnation contained :in this disclosure is true and
correct, and that it will remain true and correct and may be relied upon as being true and correct
\mtil amended. .
La Costa Vale Ltd. , Applicant
By: Dartm::Jor Develo:i;:rrent Co., Co-Managing General Partner
~L~, M-
Page 2 of 2
Shareholder(s} Infonnation
Continental American Management Corp. 1% ...__
1764 San Diego Avenue '
San Diego, CA 92110 714/297-6771
Paul Putney 44%
1764 San Diego Avenue
San Diego, CA 92110 714/297-6771
Bernard Schulte . 22%
1764 San Diego Avenue
San Diego, CA 92110 714/297-6771
John E. Lohnes 11%
1764 San Diego Avenue
San Diego, CA 92110 714/297-6771
Daniel Axlerod 11%
1764 San Diego Avenue
San Diego, CA 92110 714/297-6771
J. T. Warring 11%
1764 San Diego Avenue
San Diego, CA 92110
·,
•
•
• • €)(,~tB('r I~ •
It>{ t"-/Bl
Proposed Construction Phasing & Sequencing
l.
lo, '5, 4. t
St1-e.; ~o ... 't\,
lto, 11, IS, I"!), 'Z.o, 2. l.
Phase Site No.
I 1 thru 5
II 6 thru 7
III 9 thru 12
IV 13 thru 16
V 17 thru 21
Phase Proposed Start of Construction
I January 1982
II January 1983
III January 1984
IV January 1985
V June 1985
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
County of San Diego
220 west Broadway
San Diego, CA 92101
•
<tCitp of <tCarl.sbab
NOrICE OF DETERMINATION
•
438-5591
This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad on November 17, 1981, approved
the following project:
Project Description: An amendment to a previously approved condominium
permit to build 336 condominium units on 40.8 acres located as previously
described.
Project Address/Location: Piragua Street and Venado Street, west of
Cadencia Street.
The City made the following determinations regarding the environmental
irrpact of the above described project:
1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
2. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of this
project.
3. A statement of Overriding Considerations was not adopted for this
project.
4. 'Ihe project went through prior environmental review of was part of a
larger project which went through prior environmental review.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supporting document is available
for public review at the Planning Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue,
Carlsbad, CA 92008.
DATE: November 18, 1981
CASE NO: CP-36(A)
APPLICANT: IA COSTA VALE,
• • . . . . . • VICINITY MAP ' NO SCALE
SCALE, I
LEGEND
GID
~
-290-
221
--
rrm
-.
\
PQOPOSED BUILDtfl.G ELE:V.
r:,r:;;oJ:OSED aJNTOUR · I
f;XISTING CDNTOLJQ
04YLJGUT LINE
~D SPOT f!l.J!V.
PQOPOSED STOPM DRAIN Q CL.EAWCUT
Pf<OPOSE.0 STOl2M DQAIN ~ INLET
EX1STING, STOJ.'M DQAIN
PROP::>SED FIIlE UYD/U,.NT
B:ISTING ARE HYDl?ANT
t'i£TA.JNING WALL
WT LINE
tD'T LINE 70 BE ELIMINATED
WTS PE.t:< MllP NO. 777~
SI TE 00.WOtl RY
-·---------·----· ------------
---···---------------------------------
~ .r ( ., ,. _ ••
f ; ;'_/ ', -
1/ (NJ)
,r __ •• -.,_.,
' -------·· ·----. ------··----·
'•
,oa.
,02
CT. 7'5-f7
MAP ,5,;;9 (CANYON ~QK)
<./:,
...1:,: .-.-
rl'\\1·1 '·.·,·, '.·\1 1 ', jl!!i/P-',_
1 " · \ ,.·.\ \ \\ · '. l_i_l __ : \ ~ l'.!-s·J ',' \'1•' :: l ,...._.
·1 ' ' ' \ \ \ ·, ,.,· \ \ \ \', \ •1,: \ --.. '
\ \ ·, \ '\, \ '.l' 1 ' r\
' . \ I\' 0 '• 1 •~ )./U ', I '. ,, ..,-' 1, 1 i .: l: ( ...;I ~•., '
'1 ', ' ' 1' Ii: ' I :,, I i t ,, I'
j 1 ' ! 'I ! i/ i ', 11 l ii 1,',
i '' ' I , ' '
: i I , 1 !' •
' I Ji: \'ii II, l, I, I , l · 1;: !i': ·, ;1 \ I ii: q \ I ' I
'i ]l ',I
' .· w-.....-✓:~4• '",,
I "a.. .,,
( .i.·R:C. SIDEWALK ' 0,10NOLITl-flC CJ.JR6 lil GUTTEQ g_ SIDEWALK ooru SJ DES>
/N.'SECnCJNS PfQCITYCF~8AD sms.
TYPICAL STREET SECTION (EXISTING)
FOR CADENC/A ST., VENADO ST
$r P,RA,GUA $L
... j ~-,2· ,_
MW. secnON'S
·rrPE·G·cu !3-CAQLSSAO
? (iGIRTER.BD71-JSIOE5 .,,,_~-
Vdl;t ~4 I ,,
V. M'll:'3
PEQC/TYOF
,~ ,~E
"'
' II II I I I{ I I
Tr'PICAL DRIVEWAY SECTION
Pfi'CJl:OSEO
NO """-"
L.----...!Me,,N,<.,!4S,:_· __ · ___ -ll n-r->e ·G· cu~ r r"GuTTE.R: -
_MIN. AdVl'NG SECTION \ t,t-~~-
PEP CITY STQS. · 1-·,\ A IES
--~ol!!' PER s:JILS RE.PORT
1YPICAL PAQl(ING SECTION
proroseo
"'"""-"
GENEJ:?AL NOTES
1.srr::;EET Q/GWTCJF W4YWTDn.JS AS SJ.IOWN.
2.ALL 5ml=E!T 'ii-OQIVEWAY DESIGN 70 CON-RJQM TCCITYOFCAOLSBAD STlJ.NOA,109
Uf\ll.ESS Q'TlJERWISE SHOWN. 3.EXISTING CONTOLJl1 INTERV431... IS 2 FT.
(MEAN SEA LEVEL).
4, pt;il(JPOSED CONTOUrl l~AL I~ SFT.
~i
5 RNISH GQADE-5 SI-IOWN HEREON .tJ.Ql: PQE-
UMIN/lRY ONLY ~ AQE SUBJECT 10 MOOIFI-
CATTON IN Tl-IE FINAL DESIGN.
G..atrQ-RLL SUJPE. RATIOS 2=1 UNESS OTUER·
WISE" SJ.OWN, "'r-~ 1
<1 C. ,-<1 s-:.
~
7. EASEMENTS AS QEQI.JIOED 8'Y TUE CITY"
EJ./GfNEER.
dGPADl"6'i QUJ1NTITIES •45.000~CY.
9.SOll.S INFURMA.TICJN WAS OBTJ:JINED /:ROM
T1-IE s::,tLS REPORT PQEPAQEO BY BENTON
e,.GINEErJING INC CUlTED NOVEMSl:R Z7. l!J74
pQQJECT NO. n-12-so. ~ uCJD.tJ.TED MAY 13 ·
'9B1. PQOJE.CT W-: Bhi-3F. ' ll OQd.JN.AGE SYSTEM lO CONFOQM ID CITY
OF C.dQLSBAD ST,tJNDA.r:20S.
fl.RQE UYDQANT LOCATIONS PER CITYOF C.,H?LSBAD ~QE OEPT. APP,l;t)VAL.
\'--.ll-,r\ I ,,.# ----~_, -
oarE 9-3-81. 12. Ml5CEU-ANEOUS EXIST. Ol<AtNll.GE FAQLJTfES
10 SE REM:NED .ANO/QR REPl..ACED. . ____ , '"'------,. _,
rA/~f ,107 11 100.11/~~
SEA POINTE VILLAGE AT
•"
OWNER I DEVELOPER
LA COSTA VALE. LTD.
17G4 SAN OlliGa AVENUE:
SAN DIEGO. CA. 92101
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
l.!1TS 274 • 289. 291-295 CF MAP NO. 7779
IN TJ.IE CrTYOFC4Qt.SSAD. CA.
ENGINEER OF IMJQK
_,,p
--·---
LA COSTA
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
CONDOMINIUM PERMIT EXHIBIT
PREPARED BY: RICK. ENGINEERING COMPANY
SAN MARCOS/CARLSBAD
DATE: SEPT. 10, 1981 FOR: LA COST A VALE
SAN DIEGO
Ci+y <"'f Carlsbad
L f • Plaoo;,,g Co,•,mission
I ./A ~f'.,, A;
·····-·----------·-·
Dato ........ ~--::17._~J_
,· .
'
; ~·,x:'·);ll Kiyotoki Associates .,.~~\~· .. ~ ~? ,, ~}
,· Architects and Land Planners --·->:,:~:j.'i-;:;;
17748 Skypark Blvd. Suite 165 Irvine.Calif 92714 714 751-8185
----------------~---------------
~--------
~-----77C.C ~ --~· e== re:~
LA COSTA VALB 9 LTD@
117?®~ ~£~ lli)Jl~@@ &Wm~lQJ~
~£~ m)Ir~@@9 (g£ [711141] ~®~= ®717111
VY~T /,'<:o'V ~c.,,
' ! \ ' I ', I
' '
,, '
'' '
/1.
-----_ _..
' f ' i \ \._ -
I -.-.._-
C
Plam,:
.kf}_{b:sf_A ~
Case tlo, 9:l-.:M&)_
.. '·I_;,~· E ' '~.,, ---'=CC---
,, ,+. . '7 fl-vi_
'·
a v ab a.J Costa.J
\. •,
----·
I
' . I I • I ! .
'~/
.: :·:7..J~ Kiyotoki Associates ' ""' , .,
Planners y· '·" Architects and Land ~~
17748 Skypark Blvd. Suite 165 lrvine,Calif 92714 714 751-8185
.
fu
m~l ~
-., ,.
~
.
I
11
I I
WETIJ
BAR. I
fu 0
GARDEN
FATIO
W.1. GATE
1508 SQ.FT.
2Ji Du@~~ .. &:;®~ ..
~ lb~-~&
o,r=-EN
~kYLIGHT
I
-1----
/
BALCONY
ABOVE''.) +---X---1
I I
I I
I
,,
/ ,1
/ '
/ -.....-..
~=r=\''"'r_J
: WET BAR.
up-
1. _J
1880 SQ. FT.
® 13@cf\,8~ " d1@@ "
~ll,/Zb U:l~IBr
LANDING
+-____ ABa.:::_e7 ____ -t
-....--4'===t-a,.,..:;-.....
0
( J
LA COSTA VALE f LTD&
117?®~ ~£~ IDTI~@@ £WrnW&~
~£~ WITIB@@~ Cg£ cr~n41J)~®~=®7?]711
I
t------~!3ALCONY ABOVE
B/ILCONY ABOVE . _______ Jl __ .c. ---,:r---. ----J:t_
. l
I
I
o .;;;,o....1p===-1-r==~~r==-'ltt
I
I
i'f __ J:t
I LANDING ! ABOV.E,
I
f lGO SQ. FT.
00
~ ~@@1wtw. .. ~ Tu:i~~ra
r--
LA.tv'D(NG Al30VE
' .
!
145G
/V07c='
8'c:n' CNTT 7c=> #"'vB
~CVElCl"'T a/'=. w/ ~ e:::,;:;:; ~L:::e:7 ,.-v
8-trl C,PV/75 /'CSSl::SVEc:>
~ . ~/Y-3, t"=r',..-,c:::E
~ ??-IE ~~_ES. e 7rfe
~ c,P ~ =.c:>"-/= W'V/T
>--
>--
C .2-b ,.,.
-. -~--·-·------
Ci!y of C-"~1sbad
Pf.ar.n;:rg Co,~imiss.ion
L/J~ 1/4££
c.,. No. .C(?...~1
fal,:S,t No. ,=-············--····---
o,, • ... 9-17--.3, ·-
J
,;Z.-f"
av ab _a.J Costv
'
,.