The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1981-12-08; City Council; 6841-1; 1982-86 Capital Improvement ProgramCl , OF CARLSBAD — AGENDA BILL © AB* 6841, S.#l MTG. 127 8 781 DEPT. DS TITLE: 1982-86 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DEPT. HD.K P.ITY ATTY CITY MGR.<^?£> DLU oCC 0-O. O§ _J o oo RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council adopt Resolution No. 6739, approving the 1982 Capital Budget, appropriating funds for the 1982 Capital Improvement Program; and approving the 1982-86 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). ITEM EXPLANATION: During the past six months, staff has worked to develop a five-year Capital Improvement Program which meets identified community needs within the con- straint of available funds. On December 1, 1981, the City Council held a public hearing on the program. After public input and Council discussion, the Council moved that items number 37 and 54 be deleted from the funded projects and that the balance of the program be approved. To complete action in the adoption of the Capital Improvement Program, City Council should adopt Resolution 6739. The attachments to the Resolution have been modified to reflect Council action of December 1, 1981. Environmental issues will be addressed for each project at a time prior to project development. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed 1982 CIP amounts to $6,079,550. The proposed 1982-86 CIP amounts to $33,453,543. Revenue sources and recommended expenditures for each project are shown in the attached exhibits. EXHIBITS: A. Resolution No. 6739 with CIP as attachment. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 6739 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE 1982-86 CAPITAL 3 IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, ADOPTING THE 1982 CAPITAL BUDGET, AND APPROVING VARIOUS FUND TRANSFERS. 4 5 WHEREAS, THE City Council has reviewed the proposed 1982-86 Capital 6 Improvement Program; and, 7 WHEREAS, this five-year program includes a proposed Capital Budget 8 for 1982; and, 9 WHEREAS, funds are available for the support of the proposed 1982 10 Capital Budget; and, 11 WHEREAS, the Council desires to approve the 1982-86 Capital 12 Improvement Program; and, 13 WHEREAS, the Council desires to adopt the 1982 Capital Budget and 14 to appropriate the funds and make necessary transfer to properly support 15 this Capital Budget; 16 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: 17 1. The City Council does hereby adopt the 1982 Capital Budget as 18 described in Attachment I. 19 2. Funds are appropriated to support those capital projects as 20 shown in Attachment II. 21 3. The City Council does hereby adopt the 1982-86 Capital 22 Improvement Program as described in Attachment III. 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / ' 27 / / /, 28 / / / 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 8th day of December , 1981, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Marchers Packard, Casler, Anear, Lewis and Rulchin NOES: None ABSENT: None RONALD C. PACKARD, MAYOR I- . . ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, CITY CLERK 0 (SEAL) Jt 1982 CAPITAL BUDGET PROJECT ACTION SUMMARY C.I.P. PROJECT NO.TITLE COST ACTION 1 *5 10 19 34 35 41 44 46 48 55 56 57 Addition to Children's Library $ 114,000 Fire Station #4 150,000 Police, Fire, Utility Service Center 2,736,045 Jefferson-Buena Vista Schools 121,000 Agua Hedionda Bridge 1,337,300 Bicycle Lanes 40,300 Tamarack Avenue (Birch) 140,000 Warning Lights 26,400 Encina Phase III (cont'd) 949,425 San Marcos Interceptor 10,000 Water Pipeline Replacement 50,000 Tri-Agency Pipeline Intertie 215,080 Water!ine Additions 190,000 13 PROJECT TOTALS $6,079,550 Design, Construct and Equip. Land Land, Planning Construct Construct Construct Construct Construct Construct Design Construct Design & Construct Construct Attachment I d 1982 CAPITAL BUDGET PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS, FUNDING AND COSTS 1. ADDITION TO LIBRARY - CHILDREN'S ROOM (CIVIC FACILITY) - $114,000 Public Facilities Fees (1982 Design - $10,000; 1982 Construction - $84,000; 1982 Appurtenances - $20,000). • Demolish the existing children's patio (48x25); build addition of same size extending present children's room by 1,200 sq. ft. Beginning FY 1980-81 it was necessary for the library to move certain mate- rials to the City storage facility to partially alleviate the over-crowded conditions. The expansion of the children's area would add 1,200 sq. ft. of usable floor space and would be the most economical short-term solution to obtain badly needed room. 5. FIRE STATION - 1-5 AT PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD (CIVIC FACILITY) - $150.000 Public Facilities Fees (1982 - Land Acquisition - $150,000) This project requires approximately one acre with a fire station of 4,500 sq. f t. The Station is a part of the Master Plan for fire station locations. It is located to reduce the response time to within five minutes to all indus- trial, commercial, and residential buildings in the area south of Cannon Road to the southern City boundary. The specific site location has not been determined. 10. POLICE, FIRE, UTILITY SERVICES CENTER (CIVIC FACILITY) - $9,954,180 ($1,876,045 - General Capital Construction; $1,500,000 - Federal Revenue Sharing; $5,048,135 - Public Facilities Fees; $1,500,000 - Water Enter- prise) (1982 Land Acquisition and Planning - $2,736,045; 1983 Construction and Appurtenances - $3,250,045; 1984 Construction and Appurtenances - $2,006,045; 1985 Construction and Appurtenances - $1,962,045). This project consists of the development of a site to house the Law Enforce- ment Services Facility, Law Enforcement Firearms Training Facility, the Headquarters Fire Station and Training Center, and the City Services Center. The Law Enforcement Services Facility will consist of approx- imately 37,500 sq. ft. At present, the Police Department is operating from a physical structure that has become inadequate. The occupant/space is far below acceptable levels and the logistics incurred by these constraints are affecting operations. This project will be such that it can respond to technological advances in the police services, changes in the concept of the police role, and the changing needs of the growing community. ? Attachment I Page 2 The law enforcement firearms training facility consists of two acres of land and a secure range located in an undeveloped rural area within easy access of the proposed law enforcement services facility. This project is expected to meet the needs of the Police Department for the near future. The necessity of the project is predicated on the fact that the present site is "tentative" and there are no other sites available. The need to maintain an appropriate firearms facility is critical. Firearms training and the proficiency of officers is the object of increased public scrutiny and liability actions. Due to the relatively low design and engineering' costs associated with this type of facility, planning and funding could be accomplished within a reasonable time period. Surrounding communities and agencies are experiencing similar problems since North San Diego County lacks both public and private facilites that could be utilized to resolve the problem. As a result, several North County agencies are using the present Carlsbad facility. This project is being reviewed to determine the feasibility of developing a regional firearms facility through a joint powers agreement with other governmental agencies. This alternative could offset development and operating costs of a new facility. The Headquarters Fire Station and Training Center will require a 10,000 sq. ft. station which would have two fire engines, airport crash unit, inten- sive care unit, and a tanker. This station would also serve as the Admin- istrative Headquarters. The training facilities include a drill tower, drill area for multi-company operations, test pit, and classroom facilities. The effectiveness of any Fire Department depends a great deal on the train- ing a firefighter receives. This facility would allow us to simulate fire problems and bring several fire companies together to drill and teach basic manipulative skills. This facility will help us to insure that each fire- fighter has the necessary knowledge, skills and abilities to do the job. The City Services Center will replace the existing yard facilities on Oak Street and would include 5,000 sq. ft. of office space, 23,500 sq. ft. of warehouses and shops, and 34,000 sq. ft. of outdoor storage. The present Public Works yard cannot be expanded, and the Mechanical Main- tenance Shop and activities create severe traffic circulation problems. Additionally, the present Parks and Recreation yard is a non-conforming use at its present location. Both operations are not ideally located to opti- mize travel and response to the South Carlsbad area, thus aggravating the apparent isolation of that area. A central service yard is needed near the geographical center of the City to provide adequate storage and work facilities. Attachment I Page 3 19. JEFFERSON/BUENA VISTA SCHOOL PARKS (PARKS & RECREATION) - $121,000 ($25,000 Park Development Fees; $96,000 - Grants) (1982 Construction - $121,000) This project will provide two multi-purpose turfed athletic fields on existing school sites. Included is grading, soil preparation, irrigation, landscape screenings, backstops, benches, bleachers, and fencing. Both sites are approximately 2.5 acres. 'The School District wi~l provide the land for development, City and volunteers will be responsible for materials and labor. These projects meet the need for active play areas in the northwest quadrant of the City. 34. AGUA HEDIONDA BRIDGE (STREETS) - $1,337,300 ($267,460 - SDG&E; $1,069,840 - HBRR Grant)(1982 Construction - $1,337,300) (Design in progress, EIR being prepared). Reconstruction of the Agua Hedionda Bridge and widening of Carlsbad Boulevard from south of Tamarack to Cannon Road. Carlsbad Boulevard is recognized as one of two major north/south arterials in the City and as a congested street during peak seasons. The bridge has long been in need of replacement. This project will replace the deteriorating bridge and provide four lanes to alleviate congestion. 35. BICYCLE LANES (STREETS) - $207,960 - Grants (1982 Construction - $40,300; 1984 Construction - $38,200; 1985 Construc- tion - $115,260; 1986 Construction - $14,200). This project provides for construction of bicycle lanes on Elm from Monroe to El Camino Real; Monroe/Park from Marron to Kelly; Chestnut from Monroe to El Camino Real; Tamarack/Chinquapin from Carlsbad Boulevard to El Camino Real; Adams Street from Chinquapin to Park; Grand from Jefferson to Carlsbad Boulevard; Paseo Del Norte from Cannon to Palomar Airport Road; and Alga from El Camino Real to El Fuerte. General Plan specifies that bikeways should be provided for school routes, commuter routes and commercial routes. Construction schedule as follows: Chestnut from Monroe to El Camino Real, 1982; Monroe/Park from Marron to Kelly, 1984; Elm from Monroe to El Camino Real, 1985; Tamarack/Chinquapin from Carlsbad Boulevard to El Camino Real, 1985; Adams Street from Chinquapin to Park, 1985; Paseo Del Norte from Cannon Road to Palomar Airport Road, 1986; Alga from El Camino Real to El Fuerte, 1986. Attachment I Page 4 7 41. TAMARACK AVENUE (STREETS) - $140,000 - Public Facilities Fees (1982 Construction - $140,000). Construct 500 feet of Tamarack in the old Birch Avenue right-of-way to make Tamarack a through street. This project will complete a major element of the City's circulation. 44. TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECT - WARNING LIGHT (STREETS) - $26,400. » General Capital Construction (1982 Construction/Installation - $26,400) Install flashing warning lights on Carlsbad Boulevard at Army and Navy Academy. Installation is a safety factor recommended by the Traffic Safety Commission. 46. ENCINA PLANT (SEWERS) - $1,653,532 - Sewer Construction (1Q82 Construction - $949,425; 1983 Construction - $704,107) This project is the construction of a major regional sewer treatment plant under the auspices of the Joint Advisory Committee per a Joint Powers Agreement between Carlsbad, Vista, San Marcos, Encinitas, Buena and Leucadia. Carlsbad's share of the Encina Treatment Plant expansion. 48. SAN MARCOS INTERCEPTOR (SEWER) - $760.000 - Sewer Construction (1982 Design - $10,000; 1983 Construction - $750,000) Participation in the construction of an outfall sewer to be constructed by the San Marcos County Water District. The line would serve the Palomar Airport Sewer Service Area of the City. This line would provide additional capacity to the City at considerably less cost than could be obtained by building equivalent capacity without joint participation. This project is consistent with City policy. 55. PIPELINE REPLACEMENT (WATER) - $224,200 - Water Enterprise - (1982 Construction - $50,000; 1983 Construction - $56,000; 1984 Construction - $40,000; 1985 Construction - $22,000; 1986 Construction - $56,200) Replace deteriorating 4-inch, 6-inch, 8-inch, 10-inch and 12-inch cast iron and steel lines with 4-inch, 6-inch, 8-inch, 10-inch, and 12-inch asbestos concrete pipe. Attachment I Page 5 1982 - Replace deteriorating 4-inch, 6-inch, 8-inch, 10-inch, and 12-inch steel and cast iron lines with asbestos concrete pipe. Locations: Walnut, Sycamore, Cherry, Juniper, Hemlock, and Redwood—all from Carlsbad Boulevard to Garfield. Chestnut from Highland to Adams; alleys from railroad to Roosevelt; Roosevelt from Elm to Grand; Grand from Madison to Jefferson; Jefferson from Grand to Laguna; Chinquapin from Garfield to Sequoia; Locust from Adams to Harrison; Arland from Buena Vista to Highland; Highland from Chestnut to Pine. t 1983 - Replace deteriorating 12-inch steel and cast iron pipe with 12-inch asbestos concrete pipe at various locations: Pio Pico from Las Flores to easement; Highland from Pine to Basswood. 1984 - Replace deteriorating 12-inch steel pipe with 12-inch asbestos concrete pipe at various locations: Jefferson from Laguna to Grand; alley between State and Roosevelt from Oak to Grand. 1985 - Replace deteriorating 10-inch steel and cast iron pipe with 10-inch asbestos concrete pipe at various locations: Hillside from Highland to Park; Highland from Basswood to Chestnut. 1986 - Replace deteriorating 4-inch and 6-inch steel and cast iron pipe with asbestos concrete pipe at various locations: Elmwood from Laguna to Highland; Jefferson from Grand to Elm; Arland from Buena Vista to Highland; Jefferson from Las Flores to Buena Vista; alley from Grand to Elm; Pine from Tyler to Roosevelt; Davis from Buena Vista to Knowles; Palm from 1-5 to Harding. 56. TRI-AGENCY PIPELINE INTERTIES (WATER) - $215,080 - Water Enterprise (1982 Design - $19,500; 1982 Construction - $195,580) This project will consist of the connection of the westward extension of the Tri-agency pipeline to Ellery Reservoir. Project will bring high pressure (200 psi) water to Ellery Reservoir at pressure level such that Ellery water pumps will no longer be required to maintain pressure in the Ellery pump zone. This project will provide high pressure water, provide additional source of water to City service area and increase the quantity of water that can be taken at any time. Attachment Page 6 57, WATERLINE ADDITIONS (WATER) - $232,500 - Water Enterprise 1982 (Construction - $190,000; 1983 Construction - $17,000; 1984 Construction - $25,500) To increase fire flows and capability to developing sections of the City. 1982 - To connect the westward extension of the Tri-Agency Pipeline to the Ellery Reservoir and bring high pressure water to the reservoir at a level whereby the pumps will no longer be required to maintain pressure in the . Ellery zone. 1983 - To increase fire flows from Skyline to the downtown service area 1800 feet of 16-inch asbestos concrete pipe will be installed and also to serve this area 1700 feet of 8-inch asbestos concrete pipe will be installed between Janis Way and El Camino Real. 1984 - Complete project of installing 16-inch and 8-inch asbestos concrete pipe on Skyline and Janis Way and El Camino Real. Attachment I Page 7 /o 1982 CAPITAL APPROPRIATIONS Fund Amount G.C.C. General Capital Construction $1,902,445 F.R.S. Federal Revenue Sharing 860,000 P.F.F. Public Facilities Fee 404,000 P.d.f. Park Development Fee (Park-in-Lieu) 25,000 P.L.d. Planned Local Drainage -0- W.E. Water Enterprise 455,080 S.C. Sewer Construction 959,425 Grants 1,206,140 Other 267,460 TOTAL $6,079,550 Attachment II /I ag CM 8& 1 § £M _j H 1O NOoo1 CM ONi -[ 9eto j|3 t><o BM , , ^< g f-l tOCO ""* • IA 00 *"* Ed SM -»H COON 3EJ COH IdfH UQ PSZ 0ix1 oCX CO XId CJ55 P9 O55 O Cx «n t-l CO t-4 Q ON O xi3 ^fCxMtoCO d CMOO ON •H ' • M w aEg CO SKu u1 (C § Erx % o o m o ^ ->o o r- oo o n o o- o ON o m .*»~< in »J m f-* m*-< CM r-t *-t -J- ON in ON ft"rx t 1 1 1 O |o o o o o oi i T i o i oooCM V £ o £ (t £ I o o i o m?0 0 0 0 sfO 0 1 0 0 o o m CMm o -a1 NO -* uoO .C Cx toCJ tJ Cx «U O (x tx 1 o o i I in oo o o o o -a- oi o o I 100 O O NO Oin o NO ^O CO —I •a- -1 O U Cx tx COO O Cx Cx a£ 14U U Cx Cx Cx ;£ I o m i o m o oOOt^OO-JOOt O CO 1 OOOO O ON OOOOin <r in m o o-a- 1-1 CM in m „ U to tx fa 0 «Cx Cx tj Ex 01 1 O 1 in oO O O O O -3" OO 1 1 O 1 0 0 .» O NO O•i m r- NO •1 —( CO CO 01 B"v >, b 0)"0 B t>ll 01 -H •HO) rl*3 !»N 0)to to CO• O XC IW 4-1tj C C -H »J t-» 0 r-1 •O >H •!-( W •- 3 »-< A-» AJ (X*C C <1 •"* to nj Cx O t fO *J *J ••- — « 0) PC CO to 0) CJ U 0 u t-t .-1 .r4 >, ft) ft) .H l-t T3 - O •* -^ -H O .-i CM ^- in r- o ^-4 inmin CM ON O NOf-t ooo oCOCM m o,*r inCO CM in o NOmo• •» NO OCM-a- ON ON CO n in o oo.0 to M 2 0 0 *2r M OJ HOH OOOO O OOOOO O O OOOO O O o in — • <r o nr» CM CM CM in CO*-l •-* *H CM IN. CM" oTn a c eO Cx Cx to O Cx 4o Cx -a ii o -a bo ex tx o o P« o I | 1 O O O O O O O 1OOO OOOOOOOO1 1 1 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 1 O CM in o o m ino o NO r% o i^ ^*-l CO *~t •"*' • ^U O tu Cx IDu u cx -aw U O Pi Pi U 1 O 1 0 O 1 O O?o o o o o o oO 1 O O 1 O O in o m m oCM o m o coCM CM NO i-l a tou u ua BO)OO CxCxtO tx tx « XOO Cx*0li Cx*gij4jOO CxCxO CxPiUO OOI OOO 1 OOOOOOO OOO O OOOOOOI OOO 1 OOOO oo omr^ oooor*«m O^NO omom CM r-l O •*•1 f>^ "'•-.'-.' . B 0)O Cx Cx tx Cx d) .CO Cx *o tx *CJ rl UO Pi Cx PM Pi O O 1 O 1 00 1 OOOOOOO OO O OOOO1 O 1 O O 1 O O O O^ o m m co o o oin r- -a- !-• m m CMtt) . V Isfa <025 I 1 O O 1 t 1 M?o o o o o o o1 0 0 1 1 1 1» ft V* VOCM cr« I-lo -Jg0 (O COB d0 « • o a "4 4J "rl >-< 4) 4) -J h -HH I s: > td a > < CXtu c ca cn) ra i « -o x Q tJ U C O r-l I)yr, t-i 1-1 o tu to< c n O >H O co eg t) 'vi o>M; -H >SIM «j o> toS M 4J HJ O B •><: m -H n) to .H uex < o •-) X ex to rH NO ON CM ^ inr-l •-> -H CM CM CM ooo <n•^•** in ooo f^CO CO ""* oo0 in^o CM rt 0 0 0 cs a«CM Ooo cc NO NO ooc ••H CM - OMH<beb U p«tx r 1-C ' i •! 1. I r- !• i |- i i j. i- 11 . i j . I i i i Attachment III . J CM < V O« H NO 2 1 COON COON Ov CO1§u gMQ p& 1 e i M gHP«KW to K Su1-1 th to CO u 0. u NOCO CMCOON COON B_I t? PS W W O 5305 ^> «••« 1 ^* SE O NO O1 O ON OCM CO ON uCirTr-T CM CM m-* r-t CM 1 1 ^ "•o p. 1 1 0??§ 1^, 10N •o12 isi 1 CO 1 tn CM •O 0 i 10 0 OCM 1 1 a"o- 1 1 1 1 I 1 • " S •H 9) « V-^ O si E. -sss U 4J 10co o toe uM B 01 >SE 3 •-o c v.O 4J (11 Dw > K U. oo w e E H H *-" •»to < w ••» O CM mf> «O C^ NO ON ON NtT0 CO 1oI oo r-iri CM NOON CO r"l CM oo CM CM 1 1 to M O 0Hto. gH O O O <~- ^*-l O O NO O t NO CO O* O f ON r^ r- o o NOCO O -* CO CM fN, CM -^•k fH« « u 1 O 1 1 1p o o o o T CM 1 1 1•t 106 1 0 1 I 1 O NO O O O in1 •-H t> 2 8o w 1 O 1 O 1o o o o o 1 CM 1 CO 1 s" s 1 1 1 1 1O O O 0 01 1 1 1 1 • B B to AJ 4Jweex «a te u< o S b to tn oO O A< o O O 0 0 1 ONO -it O O O O-* co in o i -* r~ ON o o NO NO NO •* .* CM CM O —1 « •*-i ao eh Wpi, -Hto -1 i 01 <9 U«l CO «to v^•o o o •H -i-l VIw NH a, CO V U3 C8 >,a) a c to u•a a) m H «c c > «M O "0 < 0) 10-1 _3 > 10•o ^: -^in a> «> u vi u H IE <-> W O -HId . 0 to <WSflJ >% to n *w3 o B 1-1 nH f -n a a Mto < CQ H C^ H «^ m **4 fro ^f<*> n •* *J ^ ^, ON Oocs o NO CM in 1-1 oo CO o1 00o ^. .^in COHIdSHto O H Attachment III Page 2 en «MaP-. CO8oig CO t-tagp^ o IdPL, g OSE w«, CO 1 H3OMb.IHCOen<3 cuM x-> xOCO1CMCOOx*-l , , ^J -<SH O xO COOx ' mCOejx•— « CO ""* enCO Ox CMCOOX """* £4 t-1 M*-> to Sgex z CMOOOOOOOOencoOOO^yooomoo<tocMooo eneMOm-»-»ooo xo c^ f** ^"< in in *—* o xo >-i «-t en 1 1 I I I I I I 0 T T T i i i i I i o oco co • - 1 O 1 1 III 1 Oooooooooo 1 XO 1 1 1,1 1 1 O in o <f 0— 1 XO 0 CO CO CO CO CO I O 1 O 0 O 1 O 1O-»OOO.*OOO 1 CM 1 .» O CM 1 O 1 co «n <t -a- oin »•*• o en ot~* m m o •"• o o o t>CO CO CO CO 1— O O I I 1 O 1 1O<fOOOOOOO r-l CM O 1 1 1 O 1 1 •* CO O OO m in en - g g m 1 O I i I I i ICMOOOOOOOO<± 1 O 1 1 I 1 1 1 Ox o Ox * S SJ) p B eu j.!E O B CO C o a. wi « ueg «) o -o H < MVC.I >r4CQ»-t{x3^ MCtl4J<>0*OX>f-( *-<c c a> » ee V CM-f-tX'"* v ^ xUeo O tj l* ifl ft) 01 XUO.U 3 O j: TO J= f> , CO (J O OQ p, •— 1 p,4u k> s: < i nCO to to P3 eg u .0]02 c scuxac c U C -H «0 CJ O -H C « C xDr-oo^o — ooer-o•it -3" '•I *a~ m m in m xo _ !~, XD co oi 00xD in«^ f^en oCOCO crTxOCxi CM ^•* CM.4-XD ^ inCM•*_ tTX*in Ox COB: S tA ^st-1 o o oO CO OCM 0 m -9 in CMCM — « nes CM CM g O | 1000 CM 1 1•t w. g O 1 1O 0 0 0 1 1 CM CM - u u O 1 Oo o oo 1 in O insr CM g g O 1 Oo o o 0 1 0^ xo* 1^>m »-i ggg 0 O OO CO O000 o m oin — i osCM rt C <l) <0eu ••< cE «J Oia ai u —in u e>i .u r-l CO JJ *Wo; •-< c 13 2 cj < H o 0)Z «J C CW C t' -i-i 1C CJ \ u> H 0.-^ u< -H U «EC &. H S in xo t-m in %n OCOf^ ^xO 0oCM in ooo CMCM 00in mxO oo0 <nf*. oCOo inin -* CO d. U. H- l*X t£ H * H OH en-a-in enin«^ enen o0 •* en mo CO CxTxOCM CO ^^e>4 00 mxOXD f-l ^xO °1r-Oi"^ xO Oinin crt^^ O xO 0W 1 E COBId OK PM ^H8 gS 0 i Attachment I'll t Page 3 !> pv .oomovoocMOO, t J t B» H £ VD00 *"*. i m COON CO ON ""* PICO ON COg 1CO HM 00 O ON p "~l C g <8 Id Esg 1-4O b) fcq ^4& fa0 H O S o) CO ^d C-M CO G PC1 U WCM "> (0co o S °f-i CL, SB ^fin piin•a^ PI 0o•3- ^PIr- mo CM VO co" CM CO invO S \D-ON r-.Or- oinin ON o vO »jgi^ cp\ H Cdip.,? H B €SOfOOC*00»/>O»O«-*O»~'OOxr^.C'^oo^' p-. Or*-O\D«— ir^.u^»r^r«4O«— t*ooris.^-'^^<*>i— «u^oO<^OOi-H\D*41O PI 'H 00 CM 00 C-* «% O 1 O O | O 1 O |oooooooopo 1 o o 1 e>i 1 CM T O CM O <0 OSO eo ** «"» u^MO*™* cs O 1 iTiOOOOOOOO>3-OOOOvOO4'O 1 OO^O«X>CMO 8 M in r* CM tft in o^H O in CS <t ON O CM -^ \O CM r* CM f» CM" . c^T OO»AO*OOOOOoo-^too>ooooo COOOOoOmooCMO O O vO *O **^ *^ ^ */^ Oa<J-v£>CTsCM\£>\oO"^ •-* O »H CM vO O CO N ' •* momooot-*Oof'-O'^'OOO^OOmooocMonoo CT^Or^iAiAcOCMO O•^•OmONCNr^^tncMi/S irv co «4" u"v \o mooo i omoo•a o o o o oo c*J *a^ ^o<fOOO 1 O«tf~H-* cMO<Tin ir^c^vor^O^OOCM mmo^oo\ co <f -^ o\ c-i CN *H* *4* • - - 5 1-C VO O b-« Dui *O flJ £OpfiU4*O^JUO t- *JO^f^^iP-t^tflUO 8OS ' - ._- S • 'o '•J1 A*.•2 « o9 M 1 u .rf «) a Ma w w o> ojc m 1*4 v co .e i»< -H e .o «o n « o «> u b 0) -Ht-i « -t4 e -o « ua o u «-< p- <0 CX VI Q. > -H O U Vi Uco e> u «--i o v at3 i^ nj ft) ( ^ ^j g fcc > CO_ _i o -0 M O« a o o *>U H ..-1 C VI 14 fl) 0) r-l Jd C « Wc -a .0 b « *j »D « 3 O — i TO Cfj> IK Cti p* p* ^ M U VIC VU to b tu -a a JGO«(».T)JWt> VliJUl^pHpuputXCOUO »• El Attachment III Page 4 V60 enw oco £i Ct £E> p «i w H se»H O K PJ III £* p;O ^4 OHt Itl (/) CO d c.s 1 CO •-I oooooooo i oooomoooooooo CO to O O <""> O O to 1 INOOCCLOCN'OCNC^Jt/'VCOCOO >o e^ cT <t" o o o exi <nocn<fcocr,\ovooi'x)Or-4^- 1 — »O i/1 i/*t CO O O '•i3 C^u~\csJ«~-COCTS'-ir^C>u1oOCOcs r^-c^p-ic^cH co >-< m c-J i — ci cr» <N cr\ o •-< r-i (jC r-T— T r+ t£ 1— rH'rt' - sra•H•o0K "S •O r-l I* FP G) T-H i) C t— * «— < O P3 O *O O O CO Ui• eg nj ••-< cj c: c •a i* « c w o -H ^: W K5 ^i CXi OAJWUVtV^ijCTt-* ^ }4 C W »-H l-l U fi 4J CJ •'•I | il *~) ttj i-^ O' ,\i p ! ffl i>\ td ^ O CJ C Vi | o u CJ «M Po ii y fx^ vj o p* t- P- o H4 *-* u to ^> > — 'Ci ,n *\^ IU Q) r-4 ,*^ r3 V T3 | 10 &« (1J i — 1 «-^ t- - , ^ ^J jj O .^4 to > rJ nj o O O f C" "33 O 1 til t~4 >, O *l V4 VI U fl *r-l *r4 (1) W V4 O CO (0 Oo « ti ^ cj r «i 'J u « i: o n r; r=' > i^ n) m r; c ^ —'£, t*t3 I>OCJ^J O *••* 13 u* O n) »£ o i"; !_i «^4 owno jj 14 rt (i t: ^ c. o ti •-< -H r: cj u-* o rJ x c r-« cU« t- rto to •— i t^ O 1) u} Vi (J 4-> U f: U4 r-i U m C 1* r^' » u>j<ouijiLn:rj»jonuluio>-](v<HUuuto riON«S215r^2«sMcNr')riKSr?-t<r-?ir![n<n in COcc LO 0 CV1 1C CXJ CO CJ »-)oCS A^ o{-•Jo '^p I'l *"J ^3*-"! H H oomOvoo rjooc^omocricomo^o t-lO'HOO>f--CSCO<f r— or^Ovo— (r^tnr*- C4O— tvi>Ol — •— i — ^ CO»-tmcGCr»co.-ivo<j-o O «-* 00 CS CX3 C^ «A - ^^3 (U•H 1CSc •* O I"*j tio ni 3 bO IX u) 1.1 C <Q f Q> 0AJ -^ CJ CO GO CJ C3 rfl f*4 OJ *J U tU •«-< >Z V-« W -rJ C O W 1-1 O U G -H H r-« H p V^ *H lU « — 1 tX ffl (X M T-J C* > «H O O M i-it*-« fl tt> y i— < O 0 tnO tui n CJ ^.q u cto ^- > ci o[--•• r-4 r*4 CJ *O ti) CJ C.5 C3 rJ O O 1" W til lJ V' •<•( t- U V-i iJ Vj •~J (U O *-* *'^ Ct G) QJ C tUO i; *u »n iu nj .i-* I? to »c£ 5fi2^SS»oo fl-J m CO"^<r cCn to 0f^j o cUJ * J (J4 ^'1 -^(-<l^ COCM «3- oTIT) U> Ol10 CO (»t CO o UJ <. ^ HoH o \r'f s o Attachment III Page 5 CITY OF CARLSBAD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1982-86 CITY COUNCIL RONALD C. PACKARD, MAYOR MARY H. CASLER CLAUDE A. LEWIS GIRARD W. ANEAR ANN J. KULCHIN CITY MANAGER FRANK ALESHIRE CIP COMMITTEE COORDINATOR Ron Beckman Assistant City Manager/Developmental Services CIP COMMITTEE MEMBERS Jim Elliott Finance Director and Committee Chairman Tom Hageman Principal Planner Larry Dossey Principal Civil Engineer ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT Frank Rowlen, Assistant Finance Director Joe Eggleston, Admin. Asst./Developmental Services Charlotte Evans, Secretary/Developmental Services Elizabeth Fairchild, Publications Specialist DECEMBER 1981 1 EXHIBIT B MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Manager/Developmental Services/ CIP Coordinator DATE: November 18, 1981 SUBJECT: 1982-1986 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM It is recommended that Council adopt the 1982-1986 Capital Improvement Program and the 1982 Capital Improvement Budget. Commencing in June 1981, the 1982-86 CIP has progressively developed. A CIP Committee, consisting of myself, as Coordinator, Jim Elliott (Finance Director), Tom Hageman (Principal Planner), and Larry Dossey (Principal Civil Engineer), was designated to assist in preparing the program. The program was divided into sections that were coordinated by specific departments: Streets, traffic signals, storm drains, sewers, and civic facilities - Engineering; Parks - Parks and Recreation; Water - Utilities; and Redevelopment - initially Housing and Redevelopment, now Building, Housing and Redevelopment. Guidance on proposed project submissions was prepared and distributed to all City Departments. Those Departments with potential projects pre- pared and submitted project request forms. The forms, which contained project descriptions as well as proposed expenditures and potential fund- ing sources, were reviewed by the Committee and a plan for presentation of the program to the public was prepared. This plan was discussed with, and, with modifications, approved by the City Council. A newsletter, "Carlsbad Report" was mailed and widely distributed throughout the community. On September 30, 1981, a public meeting was conducted at Kelly School. There were 69 citizens, 3 council members, and 24 staff members present—a total of 96 persons. Evaluations of the meeting were received from 35 persons. A summary of the evaluations and a copy of the minutes of the meeting are contained in the CIP Appendix. On October 28, 1981, the Planning Commission made a determination of consistency with the General Plan on all proposed projects, except: 1 - Central Library, 26 - Housing Property Acquisition, 27 - Parking Structure, 28 - Redevelopment Property Acquisition, 29 - Streetscape Project Construction, Transit Transfer Point. These five projects lacked specific location information and, therefore, could not be eval- uated for consistency. After the public meeting on September 30th, detailed project costs and potential funding sources were allocated to specific projects. This pro- cess of review and modification has included discussions with the various department heads and continues up to the last minute. November 18, 1981 1982-1986 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PAGE 2 LATE CHANGES The. fiolLowing o/f.e p-f.0poied ckang<i& to the. Cl? wi'uch OJKL not &kom. in the. on _ , ject S, fiSLWim* FctcxXOtr/, hcu, been combined coct Rf.o7e.ct 10, PbLui.e.-UtJ.J&tij Service Center. PA.o/ec/£ 6, Fite Statwn Mo. 5 n&6 fae en com fanned wt££h P^ojeet JO. Coanc-lt ctc&ion on mon-LcA, and at, a JioAuJLt o^ fsta.^ fitLv.iiyti (memo x',n appe.ndU.xlj 26f 27, 2S and 29 /mve b&e.n sie.qii(L&te.d to b SH'JERS - Arfd Lafee Ca£ave/ia H^tt* E^fuznt Vi&po&dl Line., §1,000,000 hi 14', add Enc-cna. P/ia6e ITT-A, $?30,(3L'!'1 in J9£3 end, add Etxuna. in 1985. TRAFFIC SIGNALS - PKojeat 54, SJLQnaf. o,t Elm a^d tionto&, move ahmd fcicirt 1983 to 1982. The proposed 1982 CIP, including late changess consists of 15 projects totaling $6,461,235. The proposed 1982-85~CIP consists of 34 projects totaling $34,676,068. A total of 60 projects (57 departmental submittals and 3 late additions) with a total estimated value of $62,218,328 were considered. Thirty-four were recommended for funding, two were combined with another project, four were withdrawn ($2,559~520G) and. twenty were unfunded. ($24,983,360). It should be noted that although appropriations are being made at this time, no funds will be expended without specific City Council action. Although the commitment to these capital projects should not be viewed lightlyj the 5-Year Capital Improvement Program is only a plan for future actions and can be modified as the Council determines at any time. RAB/cle CITY OF CARLSBAD 1982-86 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS, FUNDING AND COSTS 1. ADDITION TO LIBRARY - CHILDREN'S ROOM (CIVIC FACILITY) - $114,000. Public Facilities Fees (1982 Design - $10,000; 1982 Construction - $84,000; 1982 Appurtenances - $20,000). Demolish the existing children's patio (48x25); build addition of same size extending present children's room by 1,200 sq. ft. Beginning FY 1980-81 it was necessary for the library to move certain materials to the City storage facility to partially alleviate the overcrowded conditions. The expansion of the children's area would add 1,200 sq. ft. of usable floor space and would be the most economical short-term solution to obtain badly needed room. 2. AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEM (CIVIC FACILITY) - $250,000 - ($100,000 - General Capital Construction;$150,000 - Public Facilities Fees) (1983 - Design - $50,000; 1984 - Acquisition and Installation - $50,000; 1985 - Acquisition and Installation $150,000.) A comprehensive automated information system will provide for accurate records management, computer aided dispatch, statistical analysis and crime trend capability, property inventory and a HVAC environmental control system. Computer systems are becoming the most cost effective means of providing accurate record maintenance, statistical analysis, property control, and are promoting the most efficient utilization of manpower and equipment. A coordinated effort to integrate the development of an automated information system into the construction phase of the new police facility will be cost beneficial. All departmental records can be stored and easily retrieved. Additionally, training and personnel records will be recorded, ensuring compliance with POST regulations. The security of this system reduces the potential for civil liability. Computation of the required criminal statistics will save many man hours. Crime and traffic trend analysis provides for the selective deployment of personnel increasing operational efficiency; while the computer aided dispatch system decreases response time to calls and raises service levels without increasing manpower. 3. CENTRAL LIBRARY (CIVIC FACILITY) - UNFUNDED - $9,275,840. The project consists of a central library of 60,000 sq. ft. constructed on a minimum of a five acre parcel of land with parking to accommodate 140-150 cars. The facility will be modular in design to allow for expansion to an ultimate 81,000 sq. ft. building with additional parking. The Central Library space reouirements of 81,000 sq. ft. will be needed when the growth potential has been reached, according to Technical Memorandum #2 as prepared by Sedway/Cooke. A building of this size would offer approximately 55,000 sq. ft. of public space using the ratio of 2/3 public space to 1/3 administrative, work area and storage. The five-year CIP, as submitted, utilizes the space requirements outlined in the Holt report of August, 1978. The recommendation of modular design would allow for the necessary expansion as population increases. Should the central library be built in Macario Canyon land costs would not be a consideration and the overall project could be reduced by th is amount. 4. CITY HALL EXPANSION (CIVIC FACILITY) - $5,149,375. ($449,375 - General Capital Construction; $4,700,000 - Revenue Bonds) 1983 Design - $449,375; 1984 Construction - $4,000,000; 1985 Appurtenances - $700,000. Design, construct, and furnish a 24,000 sq. ft. expansion of City Hall. The project, located west of existing buildings, will contain two levels of parking with 160+ spaces and one-half street improvements on south side of Laguna Drive from Pio Pico to Elmwood Street (curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lights and paving.) The SUA Report (1978), numerous staff reports, temporary space addition programs and adopted City Council programs all demonstrate that additional City Hall office space is required. Present space provides 60% of normal requirements with no room to expand. This has a significant negative impact on efficiency and productivity. The civic center lacks curbs, gutters, and sidewalks even though these improvements are required of private developers. If the City is to be consistent, it should construct these amenities concurrent with expansion program. Completion of this project would allow for sale of the present Parks & Recreation Department office site and sale of the proposed parking lot site north of the Police Department. The project is proposed to be financed by the sale of revenue bonds. Revenues would be annual payments from the public facilities fee plus income from leasing space built for future needs. Revenues from sale of land made available (see paragraph above ) . 5. FIRE STATION - 1-5 AT PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD (CIVIC FACILITY) - $150,000 Public Facilities Fees (1982 - Land Acquisition - $150,000) This project requires approximately one acre with a fire station of 4,500 sq. ft. The Station is a part of the Master Plan for fire station locations. It is located to reduce the response time to within five minutes to all industrial, commercial, and residential buildings in the area south of Cannon Road to the southern City boundary. The specific site location has not been determined. 6- HEADQUARTERS TIRE STATION AND TRAINING CENTER (CIVIC FACILITY) - Combined with 10.Police, Fire, Utility Service Center. 7. FIRE STATION -RANCHO SANTA FE & LEVANTE (CIVIC FACILITY) - $475,000 Public Facilities Fees (1983 Land Acquisition - $150,000; 1985 Design - $45,000; 1986 Construction - $280,000). This project requires 3/4 of an acre with a fire station of approximately 4,000 sq. ft. This station is part of the master plan for fire station locations and will provide a level of service within the maximum five minutes running time to the southern limits of the City. This would meet the needs of residential or light commercial property, and would be a two stall sta- tion. Design of building would be kept in line with surrounding resi- dential area. The exact site has not been located for this station. We have had pre- liminary discussion with Daon Corporation for a site within their develop- ment. 8- LAW ENFORCEMENT FIREARMS TRAINING FACILITY (CIVIC FACILITY) - Combined with 10.Police, Fire, Utility Service Center. 9- LIBRARY MODULAR BUILDING (CIVIC FACILITY) - UNFUNDED - $69.600. Purchase a mobile modular building for location on City property. Unit would be 30' x 60', outfitted with stairs and a ramp, and fully carpeted. Beginning FY 1980-81, it was necessary for the library to move certain materials to the City storage facility to partially alleviate the over- crowded conditions. The addition of a modular building would provide an additional 1,800 sq. ft. of space. Conceivably an entire library opera- tion, such as audio visual, could be relocated to the unit. 10. POLICE, FIRE. UTILITY SERVICES CENTER (CIVIC_FACILITY) - $9,954.180 ($1,876,045 - General Capital Construction; $1,500,000 - Federal Revenue Sharing; $5,078,135 - Public Facilities Fees; $1,500,000 - Water Enterprise) (1982 Land Acquisition and Planning - $2,736,045; 1983 Design, Construction and Appurtenances - $3,250,045; 1984 Construction and Appurtenances - $2,006,045; 1985 Construction and Appurtenances - $1,962,045) This project consists of the development of a site to house the Law Enforcement Services Facility, Law Enforcement Firearms Training Facility, the Headquarters Fire Station and Training Center, and the City Services Center. The Law Enforcement Services Facility will consist of approximately 37,500 sq. ft. At present, the Police Depart- ment is operating from a physical structure that has become inadequate. The occupant/space is far below acceptable levels and the logistics incurred by these constraints are affecting operations. This project will be such that it can respond to technological advances in the police services, changes in the concept of the police role and the changing needs of the growing community. The Law Enforcement Firearms Training Facility consists of two acres of land and a secure range located in an undeveloped rural area within easy access of the proposed Law Enforcement Services Facility. This project is expected to meet the needs of the Police Department through the year 2000. This facility is considered to be the Number One Priority of the Police Department staff. This is due to the "tentative" location pre- sently being utilized, and the lack of alternative training sites. The need for Firearms Training is particularly acute at present, and will be for the future, in view of increased public scrutiny and liability con- siderations. The need to provide adequate facilities cannot wait for the processes and planning for a new Police Facility. By providing a Firearms Training Facility within two years, future needs can be met, and the need to integrate a Firearms Facility within a new Police Facility will not be necessary. Because of relatively low design and engineering costs associated with this type of facility, planning and funding could be initiated within a reasonable time period. Presently, there appears to be no easily attainable solution. Surrounding communities and agencies have similar problems. North San Diego County lacks both public and private facilities that the City could utilize to resolve this condition. Presently, the U.S. Border Patrol and the California Highway Patrol use this grossly inadequate Carlsbad facility. To further compound the problem, the ability to continue to use the present site is restricted due to the tentative nature of the site owner- ship. Carlsbad will need to construct its own facility or develop a regional facility through a joint powers arrangement with other govern- mental agencies. The Headquarters Fire Station and Training Center will require a 10,000 sq. ft. station which would have two fire engines, airport crash unit, intensive care unit and a tanker. This station would also serve as the Administrative Headquarters. The training facilities include a drill tower, drill area for multi-company operations, test pit and classroom 10- POLICE. FIRE, UTILITY SERVICES CENTER (CIVIC FACILITY) - Continued facilities. The effectiveness of any Fire Department depends a great deal on the training a firefighter receives. This facility would allow us to simulate fire problems and bring several fire companies together to drill and teach basic manipulative skills. This facility will help us to insure that each firefighter has the necessary knowledge, skills and abilities to do the job. The City Services Center will replace the existing yard facilities on Oak Street and would include 5,000 sq. ft. of office space, 23,500 sq. ft. of warehouses and shops and 34,000 sq. ft. of outdoor storage. The present Public Works yard cannot be expanded and the Mechanical Maintenance shop and activities create severe traffic circulation problems. Additionally, the present Parks and Recreation yard is a non-conforming use at its present location. Both operations are not ideally located to optimize travel and response to the South Carlsbad area, thus aggravating the apparent isolation of that area. A central service yard is needed near the geographical center of the City to provide adequate storage and work facilities. 11- AERIAL BUCKET TRUCK (PARKS & RECEREATION) - $70,000 General Capital Construction (1984 Acquisition - $70,000). This project would be to purchase a new tree trimming aerial bucket truck. This project is needed to continue the street tree maintenance program. The existing truck is 11 years old, does not have the reach to adequately service many of the taller trees, is in need of major repair and requires continued minor repairs. 12. ALGA NORTE PARK (PARKS & RECREATION) - UNFUNDED -$i..75o, OOP; This project provides for a phase development of a 21 acre community park in South Carlsbad. It is to include lighted multi-purpose fields, tot lot, tennis/racquetbal1 courts, swim complex, bathroom, picnic area and gymnasium. This project would develop a community park on a phase basis. This park would be located in south central Carlsbad serving that section of the City. This project would continue on the future capital improvement project calendar until all phases are comple te. 13. CALAVERA PARK (PARKS & RECREATION ) - UNFUNDED - $1,254,000. This project provides for 10-15 acres of phased development. Included in this site are multi-use lighted athletic fields, tennis/racquetbal1 complex, community center, parking area, hard- surface courts and picnic facilities. This project would provide the only community type park in north Carlsbad. It is especially needed for the population in northwest Carlsbad. It will provide activities for all phases of the community. 14. CANNON LAKE PARK (PARKS & RECREATION) - UNFUNDED - $180,320. Th is project provides a six acre park to include a picnic area, boating dock, parking and restrooms. Design will be accomplished in-house. This project is a part of an overall five-year parks program that includes use of Park-In-Lieu fees and other funding strategies. It also helps meet the Council's goal of providing parks facilities and open space to all segments of the Carlsbad population. The facilities would fulfill the needs for an active neighborhood park in the area. Grant funds are expected to come from a Roberti-Z'Berg Urban Open Space Block Grant. 15. CARRILLO RANCH PARK (PARKS & RECREATION) - UNFUNDED - $900,000. Provide for a 17 acre park site. This project will include restoration of main buildings, access roads, parking area landscaping, grading and promotion of private enterprise leases. The development of this park area would be to encourage private enterprises to lease out the facilities. Funds would be spent to preserve and rehabilitate existing structures, improve utilities to the area. Street access, parking lot and land- scaping would also be included. 16. CITY ENTRANCES AND MEDIAN LANDSCAPING (PARKS & RECREATION)- $125,000. Park Development Fees(1983 Design and Construction - $50,000; 1984 Construction $50,000; 1985 Construction - $25,000). Construction and planting of new median on El Camino Real from end of Chestnut south of Kelly; upgrading existing median on El Camino Real from Chestnut to Hosp and at Haymar; landscaping of key entries into the City. Traffic safety is jeopardized on El Camino Real as the present surfacing will not support truck traffic and the roadway is deteriorating in those areas where truck traffic is crossing. Construction of medians will prohibit trucks from crossing. This project will provide definition of entry points into the City of Carlsbad. It will create a positive City image by defining entry points and other focal nodes and statements denoting City pride. Entry points are to be located at:: 1. The Home Plant Site (1983). 2. El Camino Real, north.of La Costa Avenue (1983). 3. Carlsbad Boulevard at south entry (1984). 4. Carlsbad Boulevard at north entry (1985). In 1984, installation of trees and lighted sign is planned for Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte median as well as installation of a lighted sign on the median (to be constructed as part of the streetscape) on Elm at Harding. Construction of a new median on El Camino Real from end of Chestnut South to Kelly is planned for 1981-82 and upgrading existing median on El Camino Real from Chestnut to Hosp is planned for 1981-82. 17. FUERTE PARK (PARKS & RECREATION) - UNFUNDED - $200,000. Provides for development of 3.6 acre park adjoining school site, This park located in south Carlsbad. Site will include turfed, multi-purpose athletic fields, backstops, fencing and a small landscaped picnic area. This project would help fulfill the needs for active park areas in south Carlsbad. The grading of this site is planned to be done jointly with the San Marcos School District. The San Marcos School District has requested that the City jointly install irrigation and turf on the school property. A use agreement will be necessary for joint use of this site. 18. HOSP GROVE PARK (PARKS & RECREATION) - UNFUNDED - $62,500. Provides for seven acres of developed park area and 20 acres of undeveloped or natural areas with a trail. This project to include hiking trails, rest stops, picnic areas and small tot lot. This project is part of the five-year expenditure plan, to meet the park-in-lieu ordinance. The 20 acres of open space will leave a long strip of Hosp Grove in its natural state. The park area will have only minimal development. 19. JEFFERSON /BUENA VISTA SCHOOL PARKS (PARKS & RECREATION) - $121 ,000. ^,UUU - nark Development tees; $96,000 - Grants; 1982 Construction - $121,000). This project will provide two multi-purpose turfed athletic fields on existing school sites. Included is grading, soil preparation, irrigation, landscape screenings, backstops, benches, bleachers, and fencing. Both sites are approximately 2.5 acres . The School District will provide the land for development, City and volunteers will be responsible for materials and labor. These projects meet the need for active play areas in the north- west quadrant of the City. 20. LA COSTA CANYON PARK PHASE II (PARKS & RECREATION) - UNFUNDED - $0. The development of an additional 6.75 acres of the nine acre park including two lighted concrete tennis courts, two picnic and view areas, hiking trails, rest stops, planting and irrigat ion. This project is part of an overall five—year parks program that includes use of park-in-lieu fees and other funding strategies. It also helps meet the Council's goal of providing parks facilities and open space to all segments of the Carlsbad population. The facilities would fulfill the needs for an active neighborhood park in the area. 21. LARWIN PARK (PARKS & RECREATION) - UNFUNDED - $898,240. Provides 18 acres to include a picnic and passive area, four tennis courts, recreation center and basketball courts. The facilities would fulfill the needs for an active neighborhood park in the area. 22. MACARIO CANYON PARK (PARKS & RECREATION) - $2.124,000 ($1 ,332,000 - Public Facilities Fees; $155,000 - Park Development Fees; $337,000 - Grants; $300,000 - General Capital Construction) (1983 Construction - $120,000; 1984 Construction - $412,000; 1985 Design and Construction - $455,000; 1986 Construction - $1,137,000) This project calls for multi-faceted, multi-phased development of 480 acres of park land. The first five years covers the following items: Secure leases, secure perimeter, gates and fences, access roads (minimum), lagoon access road (rough), lagoon launch, lagoon hiking trails and markers, wetlands and canyon trail markers, design, parking lots for hikers, picnic areas, water line, sewer line and lift station, restrooms/cab in, grading for athletic clubs, cross country trails. This project is planned as a long-range, on-going development. The final phase may take up to 30 years to complete. It will provide recreational opportunities for all ages of the community. The unique setting and large area will provide a central park area and open space for the future build-out of Carlsbad. Additionally, with private enterprise assisting with the development, the overall maintenance impact and operating costs would be minimized. 23. OCCIDENTAL PARK (PARKS & RECREATION) - UNFUNDED - $1,150,000. Provides for the first phase of a community park in the southwest section of the City. Project will include grading, landscaping, and land acquisition. This project provides for grading and minimal landscaping for a future community park site to be located in southwest Carlsbad. 24. PINE FIELD ACQUISITION (PARKS & RECREATION) - $250,000 ($75,000 - Grants; $100,000 - General Capital Construction; $75,000 - Park Development Fees) (1986 Land Acquisition - $25,000). This project provides for acquisition of the previous school play area. It will cover approximately two acres. This project will assure active recreational space in the central old Carlsbad area. Currently the land is used jointly by the City but if the school district were to sell the land, the City would lose its only lighted Adult fields, which are a major source of recreation income. This acquisition should only be made if and when the school district deems the land is no longer necessary. 25. STAGE COACH PARK (PARKS & RECREATION) - $2,783,000 ($1,378,000 - Public Facilities Fees; $705,000 - Park Development Fees; $630,000 - Grants; $70,000 - Other) (1983 - Construction - $498,000; 1984 - Construction - $1,500,000; 1985 - Construction - $785,000). This project provides for a 28 acre community park in south Carlsbad. It is to include lighted multi-use athletic fields, restrooms, basketball courts, an historical site, two tennis courts, picnic and passive area and an 8,000 sq. ft. community center. This park will be the first community size park in Carlsbad. It will provide much needed lighted ball fields, an active multi- use area, as well as a community center. *26. HOUSING PROPERTY ACQUISITION (REDEVELOPMENT) - $762,560 . ($150,000 - Land Sale; $612,560 - HCD Grants; $250,000 - UNFUNDED) (1982 Land Acquisition $50,000; 1983 Land Acquisition - $287,520; 1984 Land Acquisition - $237,520; 1985 Land Acquisition - $187,520; UNFUNDED - $250,000). Where appropriate, housing development funds will be utilized in a program of land write-down site improvements, assumption of pre-development costs, and other methods to stimulate private development of housing for low-income persons. This may necessitate the acquisition of property for resale subject to an agreement with a participating developer. It appears to be in the best interest of the Village Area Revitalization Program to expend capital improvement funds in those areas of the City where an infrastructure already exists and is being utilized. Furthermore, expenditure of CIP funds in the redevelopment area should provide a better return on investment than in other areas of the City. *(Cannot go to City Council until Planning Commission makes General Plan consistency determination.) a *27. PARKING STRUCTURE (REDEVELOPMENT) - $720,600 ($200,000 - Bonds;$520,600 - Grants)(1984 Land Acquisition, Design and Relocation - $245,600; 1985 Construction - $475,000; UNFUNDED - $125,000). Construction of an underground parking structure for 100 spaces within the Redevelopment area. It appears to be in the best interest of the Village Area Revitalization program to expend capital improvement funds in those areas of the City where an infrastructure already exists and is being utilized. Furthermore, expenditure of funds in the Redevelopment Area should provide a better return on investment than in other areas of the City. *(Cannot go to City Council until Planning Commission makes a General Plan consistency determination.) *28. REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY ACQUISITION (REDEVELOPMENT) - $463,240 ($168,000 - Bonds; $295,240 - HCD Grants) (1982 Land Acquisition and Relocation - $58,500; 1983 Land Acquisition and Relocation - $146,000; 1984 Land Acquisition and Relocation - $100,240; 1985 Land Acquisition and Relocation $158,500). In order to open interior block areas it vill be necessary to acquire one mid-block access point on each of the following streets: State Street, Madison Street and Roosevelt Street. Estimate includes acquisition, relocation and costs. Acquisition of property is planned for each year in the five- year program. Eligible activity under Community Development Block Program: Title I, Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. It appears to be in the best interest of the Village Area Revitalization Program to expend funds in those areas of the City where an infrastructure already exists and is being utilized. Furthermore, expenditures in the redevelopment area should provide a better return on investment than in other areas of the City. *(Cannot go to City Council until the Planning Commission makes a General Plan consistency determination.) *29. STREETSCAPE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION, TRANSIT TRANSFER POINT (REDEVELOPMENT) - $612, HfOO" ($200,000 - Bonds;$412,800 - Grants) (1982 Design and Construction - $112,800; 1983 Design and Construction - $250,000; 1984 Design and Construction - $250,000). Installation of landscaping, enhanced paving, curb, gutter, sidewalks, and street furniture as outlined in the Village Streetscape Master Plan. Includes development of a transit transfer point, construction of pass through areas, new accent lighting kiosk construction. It appears to be in best interest of the Village Area Revitalization Program to expend capital improvement funds in those areas of the City where an infrastructure already exists and is being utilized. Furthermore, expenditure of CIP funds in the redevelopment area should provide a better return on investment than in other areas of the City. *(Cannot go to City Council until Planning Commission makes a General Plan consistency determination.) 30. ATCHINSON TOPEKA & SANTA FE STORM DRAIN (STORM DRAIN) - $425,200 Planned Local Drainage (1983 Design and Construction - $425,200) Construction of this storm drain would eliminate an open channel along the railroad tracks and provide a needed link in the southerly portion of the City from Oak to Tamarack. This project is contained in the City's Master Plan of Drainage and would provide the missing link in the southern area of the central area. It would aid the City by replacement of an unsightly earth channel with a very flat gradient. This area lies along the Atchinson, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad tracks where water draining from the east tends to collect. Railroad permission will be needed to construct this project. 31. BATIQUITOS LANE CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS (STORM DRAIN) - UNFUNDED - $523,000. This project would be a joint project with the San Diego County Flood Control District to provide a channel and erosion control measures along Batiquitos Lane. The San Diego County Flood Control District has indicated an interest during preliminary discussion in participating in such a joint project. The project is needed as the uncontrolled channel in the area is gradually widening and affecting the adjacent roadway. Further detailed negotiations are required with San Diego County Flood Control District. The project would require environmental and Coastal Commission clearance. 32. ELM AVENUE STORM DRAIN (STORM DRAINS) - $123,896 P1a nned Local Drainage. (1984 Des ign and Cons truct ion - $123,896) . This project will provide a connection from the existing storm drain on Elm at Jefferson which discharges to the street and brings it to the State Street Storm Drain. This project, which is connected with the State Street Storm Drain, will provide a major link in the control of flooding in the downtown area. This project is contingent on the routing of the central business storm drain. 33. JAMES DRIVE STORM DRAIN (STORM DRAINS) - $247.900 Planned Local Drainage (1985 Land Acqu is it ion,Des ign and Construction - $257,900). This project consists of the construction of a 42 inch storm drain from Tamarack to Chestnut in the northerly extension of James Drive. This storm drain, which was identified by the Master Plan of Drainage, will complete the link up of the system for which the Bristol Cove storm drain provided the initial downstream section. We may solicit the joint participation of the Carlsbad School District in construction of this project. 34. AGUA HEDIONDA BRIDGE (STREETS) - $1,337,300 ($267,460 - SDG&E; $1,069,840 - HBRR Grant)(1982 Construction - $1,337,300). (Design in progress, EIR being prepared). Reconstruction of the Agua Hedionda Bridge and widening of Carlsbad Boulevard from south of Tamarack to Cannon Road. Carlsbad Boulevard is recognized as one of two major north/south arterials in the City and as a congested street during peak seasons. The bridge has long been in need of replacement. This project will replace the deteriorating bridge and provide four lanes to alleviate congestion. 35. BICYCLE LANES (STREETS) - $207,960 - Grants (1982 Construction - $40,300; 1984 Construction - $38,200; 1985 Construction - $115,260; 1986 Construction - $14,200). This project provides for construction of bicycle lanes on Elm from Monroe to El Camino Real; Monroe/Park from Marron to Kelly; Chestnut from Monroe to El Camino Real; Tamarack/Chinquapin from Carlsbad Boulevard to El Camino Real; Adams Street from Chinquapin to Park; Grand from Jefferson to Carlsbad Boulevard; Paseo Del Norte from Cannon to Palomar Airport Road; and Alga from El Camino Real to El Fuerte. General Plan specifies that bikeways should be provided for school routes, commuter routes and commercial routes. Construction schedule as follows: Chestnut from Monroe to El Camino Real, 1982; Monroe/Park from Marron to Kelly, 1984; Elm from Monroe to El Camino Real, 1985; Tamarack/Chinquapin from Carlsbad Boulevard to El Camino Real, 1985; Adams Street from Chinquapin to Park, 1985; Paseo Del Norte from Cannon Road to Palomar Airport Road, 1986; Alga from El Camino Real to El Fuerte, 1986. 36. CANNON ROAD CONSTRUCTION (STREETS) - UNFUNDED - $3,274,800. Construction of Cannon Road from Paseo Del Norte to El Camino Real. This project will be needed if Macario Canyon and the south bank of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon are developed into Hub Park. The City will be a principal owner in the area; thus substantial portions of the cost may fall to the City; however, there is a possibility of developer funding. 37. EL CAMINO REAL AND CARLSBAD BOULEVARD MEDIANS (STREETS) - $1,138,525. Public Facilities Fees (1982 - Design and Construction - $297,685; 1983 Construction - $647,225; 1984 Construction - $193,615). This project consists of constructing and planting new medians on El Camino Real from the end of Chestnut south to Kelly; upgrading existing planted median from Chestnut to Hosp; planting medians in front of Palomar Airport Business Park and Mola Development. Traffic Safety is jeopardized on El Camino Real as the present surfacing will not support truck traffic and the roadway is deteriorating in those areas where truck traffic is crossing. Construction of medians will prohibit trucks from crossing. This project would provide medians with color textured concrete areas with bands of landscaped areas in accordance with City standards. Construction of medians will help prevent further destruction of the striped median pavement. Design and upgrading of the section of El Camino Real from Chestnut to Hosp Way is planned for 1982. Construction of medians on El Camino Real from Chestnut south to Kelly and planting of existing medians in front of the Palomar Airport Business Park and Mola Development is scheduled for 1983. 38. ELM AVENUE INTERCONNECT (TRAFFIC SIGNALS) - UNFUNDED - $399,250. Minor alterations of existing pretiraed control equipment; upgrading of signals on Elm Avenue at Carlsbad Boulevard, State Street and Harding Street; installation of new signals on Elm Avenue at Jefferson Street and Roosevelt Street; replacement of equipment at Harding Street, State Street, Jefferson Street, Roosevelt Street; Addition of master controller and either telephone or direct interconnect between all signals. Elm Avenue is one of the major east/west arterials in the City. Traffic is increasing and will continue to increase, particularly as the result of the extension of Monroe from off of Elm to Marron Road. The upgrading, new signals and additional equipment is recommended as a result of the "Elm Avenue Signal System Feasibility Study" commissioned by City Council in 1980-81 in order to provide a smooth flow of traffic and an acceptable level of service along Elm Avenue. This project should be considered for Redevelopment funding. 1982 - Improvements include minor alterations of existing pretimed control equipment. 1983 - Improvements include the installation of new fully actuated timebase coordinated signals at Jefferson Street and at Roosevelt Street (when redevelopment project occurs). 1984 - Improvements include upgrading of existing pretimed control intersections to fully actuated with flow-demand coordinated operation at Harding, Jefferson, Roosevelt, State and Carlsbad Boulevard and providing arterial master controller and either telephone or direct interconnect between all signals. 39. JEFFERSON STREET (STREETS) - UNFUNDED - $916,680. This project would provide for the widening and realignment of Jefferson Street to eliminate dangerous curves between Marron Road and 1-5 and would include bicycle lanes. This project will be expensive and may not be feasible due to the fact that the roadway widening would either have to encroach on the ecological area of the lagoon or into the toe of the slope area overlooking the lagoon. A detailed engineering and environmental investigation would be required to assure that widening would be feasible. 40. PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD - CARLSBAD BOULEVARD INTERSECTION (STREETS) - UNFUNDED - $1,276,250. Construction of a "T" intersection and realignment of dangerous curve at Palomar Airport Road and Carlsbad Boulevard. To safely and adequately facilitate traffic to and from the beach area the existing approach to Carlsbad Boulevard from Palomar Airport Road should be converted to an at-grade "T" intersection. Increasing traffic along Palomar Airport Road as a result of development will be adding to the problems created by this dangerous intersection. This project may intertie with proposals for beach parking and State participation may be a possibility. 41. TAMARACK AVENUE (STREETS) - $140,000 - Public Facilities Fees (1982 Construction - $140,000). Construct 500 feet of Tamarack in the old Birch Avenue right-of- way to make Tamarack a through street. This project will complete a major element of the City's circulation. 42. TAMARACK RECONSTRUCTION (STREETS) - UNFUNDED - $1,992,200. Reconstruction of Tamarack will be accomplished in two phases. Stage one will involve widening and reconstruction of pavement from Carlsbad Boulevard to 1-5 to include installation of traffic signals at the 1-5 ramps. Stage two will involve widening and upgrading from 1-5 to Highland. The existing two-way narrow roadway will not adequately handle future traffic demands. This will become increasingly apparent when Tamarack is connected to El Camino Real and becomes a major east/west arterial. Additional beach traffic will also cause increased demand on this street. 43. PARK DRIVE WIDENING & ALIGNMENT (STREETS) - $80,300 General Capital Construction(1984 Construction - $80,300) Widen and align Park Drive in vicinity of Bristol Cove Marina. Design funded - 1980-81 CIP being completed. 44. TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECT - WARNING LIGHT (STREETS) - $26,400. Genera 1 Capital Cons truct ion (1982 Construction/Installation -~ $26,400) Install flashing warning lights on Carlsbad Boulevard at Army and Navy Academy. Installation is a safety factor recommended by the Traffic Safety Commission. 45. WASHINGTON STREET (STREETS) - UNFUNDED - $658,500 Construction of Washington Street from Elm Avenue to Chestnut Avenue. This project will become necessary if Chestnut Avenue is ever constructed through. Pavement of the street could be advanced if it is desired to proceed with development. 46. ENCINA PLANT (SEWERS) - $1,653,532 - Sewer Construction (1982 Construction - $949,425; 1983 Construction - $704,107) This project is the construction of a major regional sewer treatment plant under the auspices of the Joint Advisory Committee per a Joint Powers Agreement between Carlsbad, Vista, San Marcos, Encinitas, Buena and Leucadia. Carlsbad's share of the Encina Treatment Plant expansion. 47. LIFT STATION REPLACEMENTS/UPGRADES (SEWERS) - $262,080 - Sewer Construction(1983 Construction - $58,240;T984 Construction - $58,240; 1985 Construction - $145,600) Multi-Year project to up-grade existing Lift Stations to meet future needs: 1983 - A third pump will be added to Fox's Lift Station plus a stand-by generator to prevent sewerage overflows to the lagoon in the event of a power outage. 1984 - The Chinquapin Lift Station will be relocated further to the east to allow for the widening of Carlsbad Boulevard. 1985 - Home Plant Pump Station will be up-graded to handle increased flows from development in the Ocean/Carlsbad Boulevard area . 48. SAN MARCOS INTERCEPTOR (SEWER) - $760,000 - Sewer Construction (1982 Design - $10,000; 1983 Construction - $750,000) Participation in the construction of an outfall sewer to be constructed by the San Marcos County Water District. The line would serve the Palomar Airport Sewer Service Area of the City. This line would provide additional capacity to the City at considerably less cost than could be obtained by building equivalent capacity without joint participation. This project is consistent with City policy. 49. SEWER METERING PROGRAM (SEWERS) - $173,400 - Sewer Cons truct ion (1984 Design and Construction - $173,400) This project provides for the installation of four meters throughout the Carlsbad Sewer System to meter flows into the Enc ina Plant. This project should be coordinated with Encina Water Pollution Control Facility. 50. SOUTH AGUA HEDIONDA SEWER LINE, MACARIO CANYON (SEWERS) - $504,000 - Sewer Construction(1984 Construction - $504,000) This project would take sewage flows from the low point of Macario Canyon and pump them uphill to allow gravity flow to the Vista/Carlsbad trunk line. 51. VISTA/CARLSBAD TRUNK LINE (SEWERS) - $534,240 - Sewer Construction(1984 Construction - $534,240) This project involves the enlargement of the gravity portion of the Vista/Carlsbad trunk line. This is a project in conjunction with the Encina Plant enlargement. This project was identified as a need in the Brown & Caldwell Report. In order to insure sufficient capacity to accommodate future development opportunities, infrastructures will have to be enlarged along with the expanding Encina Treatment Facility. 52. CANNON ROAD AND EL CAMINO REAL (TRAFFIC SIGNAL) - UNFUNDED - $100,800. This project consists of installation of traffic signals at the future junction of Cannon Road and El Camino Real. El Camino Real is recognized as one of two major north/south arterials serving the City. Installation of a signal at this location, when Cannon Road is extended through to El Camino Real will become a necessity to safely move traffic through this intersection. Traffic is expected to increase sufficiently along Cannon Road, a soon to be major east/west arterial, after it it constructed, further necessitating the need for the s igna1. 5 3 • R '• v ^ D (TRAFFIC SIGNAL). . UNFUNDED - $ 10 1 ,"30~6 .' This project consists of the installation of a f u 1 ly-ac tua t ed traffic signal at Carlsbad Boulevard and Cannon Road. Carlsbad Boulevard is one of the major thoroughfares in the City. With the extension of Cannon Road through to El Camino Real, this intersection will become increasingly busy. A traffic signal should be installed to allow orderly assignment of righ t-of^-way and increase traffic safety. The timing of the installation of this signal will be dependent, of course, on the status of the extension of Cannon Road. 54 • LR^!ZI_L_f_LGlIAL_. ^J^^L^ZJ^IL-^LJlErlL0!.- < TRAFFIC SIGNALS) - $84,00 0 - P u b 1 Fc ™F a c i 1 i t Fel F e e's "( 19 82 Cons tr"u c t i o n - $"84,000) This project consists of installation of traffic signals at Elm Avenue and Monroe Stree.t.. Traffic continues to increase in the area and will do so in the future, especia-1'ly with the additional development in Hosp Grove and the extension of Monroe Street from Avenue of the Trees to Marron Road. The traffic signal will allow safe and orderly exit and entrance to cind from the intersection. Elm Avenue is the major east/west street in the central business district. Projected warrants indicate an additional traffic signal will be needed to allow traffic to move unhampered. .Project design funded in 1980-81 GIF; design complete. 55. PIPELINE REPLACEMENT (WATER) - $224,200 - Water Enterprise • (1982 Construction - $50,000;1983 Construction - $56,000; 1984 Construction - $40,000; 1985 Construction - $22,000; 1986 Construction - $56,200) Replace deteriorating 4-inch, 6-inch, 8-inch, 10-inch and 12- inch cast iron and steel lines with 4-inch, 6-inch, 8-inch, 10- inch, and 12-inch asbestos concrete pipe. 1982 - Replace deteriorating 4-inch, 6-inch, 8-inch, 10-inch, and 12-inch steel and cast iron lines with asbestos concrete pipe. Locations: Walnut, Sycamore, Cherry, Juniper, Hemlock, and Redwood—all from Carlsbad Boulevard to Garfield. Chestnut from Highland to Adams; alleys from railroad to Roosevelt; Roosevelt from Elm to Grand; Grand from Madison to Jefferson; Jefferson from Grand to Laguna; Chinquapin from Garfield to Sequoia; Locust from Adams to Harrison; Arland from Buena Vista to Highland; Highland from Chestnut to Pine. 1983 - Replace deteriorating 12-inch steel and cast iron pipe with 12-inch asbestos concrete pipe at various locations: Pio Pico from Las Flores to easement; Highland from Pine to Basswood. 1984 - Replace deteriorating 12-inch steel pipe with 12-inch asbestos concrete pipe at various locations: Jefferson from Laguna to Grand; alley between State and Roosevelt from Oak to Grand. 1985 - Replace deteriorating 10-inch steel and cast iron pipe with 10-inch asbestos concrete pipe at various locations: Hillside from Highland to Park; Highland from Basswood to Ches tnut. 1986 - Replace deteriorating 4-inch and 6-inch steel and cast iron pipe with asbestos concrete pipe at various locations: Elmwood from Laguna to Highland; Jefferson from Grand to Elm; Arland from Buena Vista to Highland; Jefferson from Las Flores to Buena Vista; alley from Grand to Elm; Pine from Tyler to Roosevelt; Davis from Buena Vista to Knowles; Palm from 1-5 to Hard ing. 56. TRI-AGENCY PIPELINE INTERTIES (WATER) - $215,080 - Water Enteprise (1982 Design - $19,500; 1982 Construction - $195,580) This project will consist of the connection of the westward extension of the Tri-agency pipeline to Ellery Reservoir. Project will bring high pressure (200 psi) water to Ellery Reservoir at pressure level such that Ellery water pumps will no longer be required to maintain pressure in the Ellery pump zone. This project will provide high pressure water, provide additional source of water to City service area and increase the quantity of water that can be taken at any time. 57. WATERLINE ADDITIONS (WATER) - $232,500 - Water Enterprise (1982 Construction - $190,000; 1983 Construction - $17,000; 1984 Construction - $25,500) To increase fire flows and capability to developing sections of the City. 1982 - To connect the westward extension of the Tri-Agency Pipeline to the Ellery Reservoir and bring high pressure water to the reservoir at a level whereby the pumps will no longer be required to maintain pressure in the Ellery zone. 1983 - To increase fire flows from Skyline to the downtown service area 1800 feet of 16-inch asbestos concrete pipe will be installed and also to serve this area 1700 feet of 8-inch asbestos concrete pipe will be installed between Janis Way and El Camino Real. 1984 - Complete project of installing 16-inch and 8-inch asbestos concrete pipe on Skyline and Janis Way and El Camino Real. 58. ENCINA, PHASE III-A (SEWER)'- $130,000 - Sewer Construction (1933 Construction. - $130,0001" This project is Carlsbad's share for the increased capacity at Encina Water Pollution Control Facility (EWPCF). Project design and manage- ment furnished by the EWPCF staff. The project is justified by the City decision, to participate in the project. 59- LAKE-CAywiERA EFT LUOT__DISPOSAL LJ_NE_JSEWER] - $1,000,000 - Sewer Con- struction Tt~9W Construct i^rT^Tl ,000,0001 This project is the construction of a pipeline and pump station(s) to transport treated effluent from the Calavera Hills Treatment Facility to the ocean outfall. The construction area will be from Tamarack Avenue and El Camino Real to Palomar Airport Road and Laurel Tree Lane. The project is justified by the obligation assumed in the revised Lake Calavera Hills agreement. 60- ENCINA, PHASE IV (SEWER) - $3,600,000 - Sewer Construction (1985 Con- struction - $3,600,000}" This project will provide an additional 11 MGD of advanced primary treatment capacity at the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility. This includes modification of the existing ocean outfall. Failure to obtain a waiver of the secondary treatment requirement could signifi- cantly increase project costs. The amount is Carlsbad's estimated share of the joint multiple agencies expansion project. vOC.O 0%«H COcr, r-i »^j- co CT-iH ^CO C7l iH CO rl O 0 p, K.I 1.0-U(0n U 5 o O p ^j ^*J Ou M'i) o u o C/1I-J t'loo n I'O0) o o ,-J </>iJ(0oo KO Vll ^j o o CJ _• iJ (.'1o rj c :••< 1 1 1 o o o 1 1 1 X X 11 1 1o o i i m o CM OA .H__ X 11 1 10 0 I i ^f(~j IS v£J O O X X•1 1 1o _ o 1 I m<fon OinCM CO X 1 X X ! 1 X 1 1 1 X X o o ino o -.to o o -t o vOi- i m f> r-l r-l T-. CM _ — . - — — ^- C) 'J •Ht> 1 X 11 1 1o o . 1 1 oor-j" rH 1 X 11 1 1o o 1 1 0 CM m 7-1 , X 11 1 1o o i I oo n CO' en 1 II o o o 1 1 1 1 1 1 X X X I I I 1 I I o o oo o oO f") ro rH r-- Oc- j en <i- i-l 01 rH 1 X 11 1 1 1 1 1 II1o o o o o o o o 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIooCM_•• in I X iI t I I I 1 II o o o o o o o o 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIooo CM c% 1 1 1 X XX 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 1o o o o o o 1 1 1 1 1 1m o o rH O O'£> o m en o m tj\ --t CM. H V II '1 1 X X X X X 1 1 1 1 1II II1 1 1 1 1o o o o • II 1 ' '1«n r~ o o o fM O O O OCM »- t O O OA n f, f, n -* o m m r-l I I i i I I I I i X X X X 1 X X X X XI 1 1. X 1 1 X 1 I II I I I : I I iA O O i/l O O O O Oco o «.} CM o o o m oMJ o ---j ^r o o o o o i-» o >o m o vr o in oC^ vt" CM - 1" t-H CO U1 iH O'iCM i — 1 C"* CM * - 1 t <n<y •CJ -rlr; 41 41.i 1 S~! '-t O •H U) U •rl 10 f.1 -rlr. a Cl 'J' r-l O 11 0 0t: -r<CO U £ fj cJ 'C 0 ^| -r •U r-H 4 J-l Cj t 2 iJ ^ P-. Ulp- rJ < MCU 'iJo. 1 C 0 ni"~i iNI 1 -t|oi -r ] '. ' tj •.-H B01 O•H vH •J U«' tj Oo OIJ l.U•r) -r! f/1 C. W ni) a fi f-\ f I C_) II I i-l Ci O 0 m o4J i / ;- o £ ' • ','• ^* iCt - ,' r- t 1 r 1 <!' ir> O 1 0 X fli 11 1H-) 10 0 n i i'J OU) Oo ooo t-j CNO '•*' 0 X X I CJ X I I C I I X >-' III '•/)J.i O O O o o o oo „o o vr*H m o --t C ! r-l r-- .. 1 -.. ._._... O X 1 O . X X n i i 1,J 1 1 0 m Iu o oCO O OO CJ Oo -o o M Or-. *• >J ^3- O III CJ III 0 X X 1 >- 1 1 X ;,;i-i o m om cj >. CJ 0 0 i'-' 0 o o o1-4 m <f ma -a r-icu's~* O CJ 1 1 1 o o o f. ' ' ' o <••] ^t V0 CJ - >< vO £!•'j u-i O '. * -H C, 41:o o >'• (U (Jri -.-4. m ••> r< IM1 4 .-i •- -> ; : ni * ' ;r; uii'i -i ;:'^ •••; o : -. cJ c.-; ,- J .t .! i .r.{ I • I H . ,; <j [ _, O 0 O O O O O --0•;i -.' (3 r.i <-o n "j o r--I c 1 CO C ! \!J 'O ' i •- '"-IrH ri r- -r n r| ,-t c-l CN 1 11 1 1 1 1 II1o o o o o o o 1 1 1 1 1 IIooo Ar-* r-l Isf-l III 1 X X X X 1 X 1 11 1 IIIII 10 O O 0 1 1 IIo o o o O O O vO in m m mw m co ~t ••t t". r-l 111 1 XI xxx x ix III 1 IX1 1III 1 IIo • o 1 1o o o o o voooo -j- ' o o>o o o r-i o co' r. V, * t no O CN o CO O enin r-t o vn r-- IN „, j 1 1 1 1 1 1 X X X XX X XI 1 X 1 1 i ii i i i i i O 0 1 1O O O O O O (Mo o o o <? o cr. O O O CS C-t O r-l C~> O CO 1/1 CO O «"lin c-i o> c-i 1/1 c^i 1/1r — i *</ i -cj- t — 1 fi r~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 II O O O O O O O O 1 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 TiP3 4J r-l J |1IDn nrj 0 ri•H ,'J U X M-u K o i; u '-j(!) i') C r-t i ;l n J-* rj a' r i H« t.i c J Vi f ••'. 14 1 1 ^J O t-14 O U V4t.i r^ i ! cj 0 o i-j 10 j~; ^4 vi id c'l 'o 'jj V-' r. ,J CJ O 41 ti ; tO "i :J o o 1/1 ' *i r-i ="j t '.! -.1 r ; (.0 (-J t - 1 ;.- ;--. -.. f! "u ', u •,! -.; .,-1 •• 4 4 r; <-j ; -H :', <~> •:> U I X, "1 - r-l : I i •", H o n o o oo o ': j ---r f :i'•;, CO i-i, O -1- o 0-4 o --r n o K r> rj cj O en -.T -:r Ol C Oco r^ o c" o " . -I r-{ Ln "(1 Ol CX 1 tO 4-J-j ci -H r-l r -H CO r-l fl -1-1 _ Ci 3«1 cr,-H O P-i -^ II 1 1 1 o o o o o in & CJ1 1 1 1 1 0 Ot-! -H ti ul OO r-l 44 r-l ' -10 ^4 d U•J U -=Ci-. ui(X r; o < r-l ^ V4CJ 1 1 1 1 1 73 ' C> 1o o o o o 1 01 1 1 1 1 O 1 - r.o•rf r! i) O <y) .-1 -H •rl (4 CJ 3 UI-H j ri iv o-1 ^ -1-1 cj ^ :i ^> fj vi ' '' ':a 4Jt-, .« -C -1 '/)t-o c-o cj M f, <n r:ti o t; :i u -« o •I) 'rl t4 IIIM bo -o T)•. i i: '•' cj ...) ,j r.i u 1 1 (,) r'J ilj HI <1 ,-H > ^-1- vi *y (u ,ij , i m ; -1;i >; -i; o • u ri oD - CJ i-l V '':i M ,.i 'i H- -j fj o -H Vj cv> ;-u "j oj ;.- ,..! [-< ;i I >•: CO o i o I I o I o I o I I o I I o I I o I I o I oo o CO vO 03 vOCO m CO oH r-l m -Hn rt p« CO<a c!o o£ •>-!pj ]-ifl •-«O iH O* cj) C. C C3 I O <z> I M o m H O vo"! L>o tU (U Ot^l U C.) I I I hi O O M H I'I 5 i £ H W W 1 g M < hH CO 1<NOO »-4 § ™ <O fc,o g o l 1<i ot_( • vo 00ON *"* in00ON "* Wft. ^ SON Ico M OQ (3d W O W Oz « Q z §O fci CO r-l 00H* O ^* 0 5 "*t-4fciM CO d CM 00ON -1 M U»J]Dau gen 0 a! U u § S PH 2 o o m o o oo o r- o o too o <o o o «H <)• O ON O in *H;•-H in <r m r* m »-4 CM »-H »-4 >H; ON in ON - Cofc. PH 1 1 1 1 O Io o p o o o1 ' °« 'o 00 »H Q) I o o i o m?o o o o -a*0 O 1 0 O o" o in CM"in o <t NO •— i VI o .c fcJ co- O VI fci aAO O PH fci looi i m oo o o o o <r o 1 O O 1 lOO ocT NO'Om o NO <j- O 00 -* •3; r-l O O fc. fc. COo o fc.fc.oiuO U PH PH E g i o m i o in o ooor-oo-d-oo1 O CO 1 OOOO O ON OOOOin <t in in o o-41 —i CM in in^ *i 0 COfc. fc. 0 psfc. fci U fci o i i o i m oo o o o o <f o O 1 1 0 1 O 0 <fr O NO Of-t m ^ NO r~4 *-l OO 00 •" utl «o VH U<tf Q o IJ 4) -r4 fO VI ^ •rl (Q (H CO CO CO- o • >.£ *vi vt (U C C -H HMO —1 CO r-H (J 0) VIfc] -i-l -rt C <t NO & M X VI W "£=•»=H • o «o n.w s x e c <u•J O O W O O H 0 3 .-i vi vi fc, fc. O CQ VI 4-> •• H (U X CO CO CUo vi u u > TJ r-l VI M Vl >-H M -O O -rH -H .H OO < PH O fc, fc, ft. r-i CM -a" in r- o'-I inin CM ON 0 Np o0o . o00CM in 0 t~Tin00 cT in-ct0 NOmo NO oCM <f ONON 00 •-' in S o 0o CO CO IdM H >J I-l fc. O >h-<o rJ SH O 0 O O O Oo o o o o oo o o o o o o m — i <fr o cor^ CM <M CM m oo•-4 r-4 rH CM r* '<M CM" VI VJc aO fci fc. « O fc, 01 O Cu T3 VH O 13 *H O PH PH O CJ PH O I | | O O O O O O O | ?oo ooooooocb1 1 oooooooT o CM m o o m *no o NO (*» o ^ ^**-H 00 r-4 1-1 U 8 O fc. fc, R) O fci "O iHU O PH PH O 1 O 1 O O 1 O Oooooo o oo in O in in oCM o m o oo CM CM NO — 1 vt at 2 £ HC CO) OO PuPnO pHpnOO OOI OOO 1 OOOOOOO OOO O OOOOOOI OOO 1 OOOO oo omr~ oooop^ m o *^ NO ' o m o inCM i"* O -f r-l "-'103 so fci ct, fc.fc.nj:O fc. TJ fc. -O H VIO PH PH • PH PH O O 1 O 1 O O 1 OOOO OOO OO O OOOO1 O 1 O O 1 OOOO o m in co o o oin f* st r^ in m CM CO ^fci <«•a uPH U 1 1 0 O 1 1 1 1oooooo o o1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1«i Mas , 1 v ., " * r-lgXoa coc eno) o S3 -rl VI -rt O VI -O CO .M VIr-l 111 « _» fc] -r< | « '3 JI2 K c c o- uO H CO U O O °»§U 3 >N -< PHa) c M c CO 03 1 10 TJ ^SP IH VH C O r-l UZ H vi O V net< C on O — 0r-l [i] VI -H fc. Ocn a a VH o>^ .H >>vu ta % MIS V. vi UH u G « flj CU -r4 V nl *r4 VI PH •< O >-5 JC ft, CO r-4 VO ON CM •* in rH — i rH {M CM <M O O O COf*» <t in oo0 r-oo COA rH Ooo m NOCNl rH Ooo CMCOo <N 0OO 00NO NO " ooo r-4 CMr-4 OM H W PMu S *^j en IXJi rV jj S CM VCKCOPi COWoen DS gM Pe a § Ha. ao £H M bl t^w M OM *3j OM MCOCO«lj rJ OM M O vO OO CM 00 2 ^<HOH VO00OV rH mooOv rH ^00 *""* COoo 00Ov CH bi ia>-> M £ i O >0 Oo o> oCM OO Ov A * Mm <o r-.CM CM m<f *H CN ??? •O OH 1 1 O0 0 O1 1 OVi*rin CM •e E 1 vO 1O Ov o 1 00 1 CO*CM •Od 0 1 10 O OCM 1 1 in*CM 1 1 tO 0 O1 1 1 a e(3 "r< •H CO r< O »°Bc e M •rl M 0 CO O 4J U U CO CO O CO M S <l> > •< H 3 -r<53 o c! ua *j ID o CO >£ <; coS b. 41O co 0 EH H r-l «CO <: b) -o O CM CO VOo>Ov <O O 00 Io ooOVi>rin CM vo oo CO*CM rH OoCM in CM "* 1O1 COZM PQa §o CO TOTALo o in o o oO vo CM O O Oco ov in o co ^ r^ f^ co o o 10CO O CO -4" 00 CN CO CM rH rH» fl rH - rH UaCO « 1 0 1 1 1 1o o o o o o 1 CM 1 1 1 1 u CCJ « t O 1 | | 1O vO O O O O1 CM 1 1 1 1 in : t5co b U r4 r^ OU PLl CJ 1 O in I O 1 O 0 rH 0 0 01 CM VO 1 CO 1 00 CO OCO OV OO b Pi i i in I 1 170 CM 0 0 01 CM_ 1 1 1 ^sfvO a a V« 4J 4J4) «3 C J3 CO CO fa t* O . 4J H rl r« Cx <JO O CJ Pi pi u o o o in o I ovO -* O OO O O O<r oo co vo o I -* r^ ov o r^ o vo\O VO <}" OV -^ CM CM O CM rH rH CCO CO •r* . rH•O "-> CO 4) O C r? r< 60 Pi -r4 • CO •O X> u 1 rH 4)m •« u0) cj4) *O CO 0>00 q -o•a .0 u o• r« « -r< K rl rH U-l Pi CO 3 CO (r, CO co U C V4 u•o CD ai H a>e c i > «-iO « <! 4) CO•H fj O > CO•O C X -Hco a> to >H u (-» o H JC rH E C8 Q -rlbl o ca t-i **•«SCO >^ O cfl ^ iw3 u 6 v« coH O* •*-! rH CO CO ^| CO < (Q W EH pi fH <f in rv rH co «^CO CO CO <t Sf •»! inCO<f oCOOV• CM oo rH ovO CM in rH rH inrH CMrH CO mCMCM |sT *^vO m00 vO rH 00fl rH COHwaEH CO H CO 01W)HIA. COIdO gCO g M g g O u0, §1a55td Id ^4m s=o EH <_J MtuMCO CO^Jjj tJ CKM0 vO001 00ONp-< ^3HO VD00 ON —• in00 p— i CO *H . COCOC7N CMCOON C_j Id (d•-> « P-« 5C CMOOOOOOOOcocooOO<J-OOOmooo-ocMooO COCMOrO<f-tOOO vocMr-p-iminp— IQVO • MM •* —1 CO 1 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 o I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • o oCO CO 1 O 1 1 1 1 1 1 Oooooooooo 1 vO 0 m o «* 0f-C NO CO to co co to to 1 O 1 O O O 1 O 1 1 CM 1 <f O CM 1 0 1 CO CO <t <fr Oin »-• o co ot-H m m o p-H CO CO CO CO r- o o I i i o i Io-*ooooooo-I CM 0 1 1 101 1 <r oo o oo m m co MM in 1 o I I I I I 1CMOOOOOOOO<r I o I I i I I I ON O •^ t3 9 fl) i4 S 0) &6 O to CO CO u Vi 3 W <!) O -O EH «<•-> 0 VJ C 1 ,JM CLWiCtn OT3MT3MO>0) >r^fgMtd> C C fl) M fQ no \* p-i co QJ in fN , 1T3 O Q) W] p , I— 1 pij t ^j y ^j | qjCO B tO « « U «O! C EVJJ=«C C 3 uuclt^auJfo co id>Jtocnco>id_![d SO l*» 00 CTN O •— * OO ON O•^<j^<fininininvo CMmCM r^ NO •>oo 0i 00 m ^r^ CO o00CO ON VOM CM r- CO . CM ^O p-H inCM •*_ ONm ON • COtx. 1en •-J^&HOH O0O ^f" CO o1 1o1 1o1 101 ,*• P-. ooo £ •' 0oHca 13 CCO CO •< G U IdMCO | CJ ID M ,-1to* « <. 5) H CO ^m ooo ^CO 1o1 roi io1 10 oo0 s vs g C5t-t CO u fc,iH dSoH O O OO 00 OCM o m <j"m" <M"CM *-< roC-l CM CM g 0 1 1o o oCM 1 1 vOin .8 O 1 1000 0. 1 1 CMCM g g 0 1 0o o oo I m o m -» CM g g 0 1 O0000 1 0 vO* f*-*m PH ggg o o oo oo oo o o o m om I-H CTNCM P-I uc «> «4> •- 1 CE u otd 0) Vi ••-«CO O 4) 4J I-H « 4J •-< Ci P-I C -O fx* Ou M nooi <s> •<Id PS !>,H O 4)Z 41 C c[d C O -pH ce; P-I •<; IHId Old) H CX •-» AJ » 0, H .5 m vo r^in m m oCOr- pH VO O0CM VOm 00o CMCM O0in invO ooo COr- oCOo inin tdtoMBi 2IdHZId a:Id1 J HOH COvO0 vO NO« CO 0o -^r- COr-. pH moCO CMVO CM oo" vOCOsf ONm00 o CMON p-H min CO in COCM p-t vO M vO au gE CO Bu owPL. 1 H p3 o 4)60 2 tnuo ICO Pcu w&I £ § <? ooON CJ OSU U4•-> « oooo^oonoo O O I O O I O I Oo oooooooo<t O I O O I CM I CM |oT a a ino00 oimooooooOO-d-OOOOvOO O I OOONOvOCMO •* vO CM CM r- CM r» «o OOOOvOOOOOOOVDO^OOOOOcoOMJOOOinoOCNO oo•o CM ON CM —I CM CO CM VO O C-T ^ inooooor^oo COCCMOCMOCOOO oNOOinincocMOo m m in CM •* in vo CO CM o m o o CM o in in o> oo r^m in o *o•Jt ON CM CM C 41 uct ionU*jtoCo r-4 JJ >P4a.raCJ i— t 144> C o o •ftOC•I-l14 14.eto 4)3e(U ^4) »-* ^441•0<U to 41 CO41 4J r«| • l-( O f». U r-l,Q 3(X, tn - Park-in-LieuCO4141 a418a.o 41 41 ^fa 0) Cti 4)60aa '<tH73 1^1auo *o41BC O. T3 41 •HVIo.V.4)UC! H VI4)Ua 0.3 u ^4ua{30o u0 *41CO nu ViC 414 J3go viCO O §to V682 enId § os wCM § S g OOOOOOOO I OOOOOOOOOOO.d-oooc-Joooo-*oocomcoinoooo en B oai Ou fc.K 60•O >-, MM rt r-l>^Ol-4 13P.. u oOJ >,CM C •O .0 « O CJ •o o o E OOOOvfiOCMOO CM 00 CM in 0)•H fe 00vO OM vO vOA st 00es ti.2uoS 60w. c V.aCM a 60 r-l 0) « 3u C• H a) <uH O O H iJo r-i o o> arri nl . T j i f tn > CO01 -a w oo O 0) en Bwi HO H Sen (d & S APPENDIX CITY OF CARLSBAD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1982-86 A. PREFACE PAGES Discussion of Capital Improvement Program 1 B. 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM-ANNUAL UPDATE PROCESS (CHARTT4 C. FISCAL 1. Description of Major City Funds 5 2. Project Funding 7 3. Project Classification by Expenditure Type 11 4. Graphs of Projected Expenditures By Fund 15 5. Status of Previously Approved Capital Projects 17 D. REPORTS AND CORRESPONDENCE 1. Summary of Evaluations from September 30, 1981 Public Meeting 21 2. Minutes of September 30, 1981 Public Meeting 26 3. Miscellaneous Correspondence 35 E. PROJECT REQUESTS AND SUPPORTING DATA (ON FILE IN ENGINEERING DEPT.) Page 1 THE 1982-86 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A. PREFACE In setting up the Capital Improvement Program for Council review, the following basic definition of a Capital Improvement is used: A Capital Improvement Project is defined as those projects involving the construction of public facilities, including streets, traffic signals, storm drains, public buildings, parks and utility improvements with a total cost of $50,000 or more and a useful life of at least five years. The purchase of land or property should also be included. To meet City Council's objectives of maximum staff and public input and prepare a realistic and usable document, the following procedures were used: A Capital Improvement Program Committee was formed to coordinate and assemble the capital improvement document. The following were the members of this committee. CIP Committee Department Larry Dossey Engineering Tom Hageman Planning Jim Elliott Finance In order to obtain departmental coordination and input, responsi- bility for CIP sections was designated as follows: CIP Section Department Streets & Traffic Signals Engineering Storm Drains, Sewers & Civic Facilities 0) Parks Parks & Recreation Water Utilities Redevelopment Initially Housing and Re- development, now Building, Community Development & Housing (1) Civic facilities include City Hall, libraries, public works structures, police buildings, fire stations, etc. Each department head prepared project request forms updating past projects of continuing interest and proposing new projects. Each project request form described the project, outlined proposed funding sources and analyzed the impact of the project for conform- ance with the appropriate goals and objectives approved by the City Council for FY 1981-82. Page 2 The CIP Committee reviewed the project request forms and clarified the information. After assembling the data, a fiscal analysis based on information obtained from the Finance Department and project data was prepared. This information was used in conformance with the following criteria to establish the proposed Capital Improvement Program. 1. Funding for the most important community benefit projects. 2. Identifiable prior commitment and long term commitments were used to establish allocation of funding and priority. 3. The feasibility of funding the project as well as the funding availability was considered. In addition, one public meeting was held to receive public input and their input was considered in making the final funding analysis. After preliminary review by the CIP Committee and City Administration to check funding and allocation priority, a proposed program was prepared. The Council is thus in a position to consider this program, revise, alter or amend it according to their discretionary powers. Once a five-year program is prepared, it is proposed that each year staff update the plan by reviewing the existing projects, pulling the current year into the capital budget and adding one year to the re- maining plan and having the revised program reviewed and adopted by the City Council. Current Year CIP Budget Year 5 Year 4 Year 3 Year 2 Year 1 FIVE YEAR CIP New 5th Year Page 3 The preparation of the CIP and the operating budgets will run in alternating cycles: Operating budget from January to June and the CIP budget from July to December. January December CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PREPARATION CYCLE OPERATING BUDGET PREPARATION CYCLE June Page 4 WT OO Qi00 UU UJz >- z uj co — i z oo o oo I-H <;>-i I-H oo oo 2: 2: >-Z Z2: LU E! O >-H- r? 0:2: 3:2:0 i— i--i O _1 O h- O i— iOO CX O O O oO O a:oH- •z. Qo:Q- 0 i— i Oo o — , _. . »^ — LUUJ 1— OOl_ ex a: co1— UJ 0 1—HH It 1 Q ^« 2; >-s: LU =t uj a:2: 1— o3 Z S ZO \- I-H h- LUo I-H u- a a: ME: u. o; >- =£ I-Hex a.2:<:o i— ex i— h-l l-HOh-O I-HLU I-Ho ooooo oo o ia •=£ LULU 1— 1 UJ=3 C£. 00 r— i— i o ooI— a: zui o ex I-HO » t 1a -a: LULU i— i UJro a: oo oz a. i ,—I-H O 001- a: z LUz ex o h- O Q- 1— 1 O 0<H-Z Zo 5 00 o COi — io en LU LU 00 O-O /LU I-H Z £0 H-O • — 1 LUa: ce LUCX O 00 00 ex1 I-H LULU UJ O LU J 00 O"O 1— h-* LU I-H z S— 00 i—i CJ h- I-H 2:O I-H LU OO 21a: OL LU oo oa. c_> oo <£ o /Jt. T- -V" 00 0000 00 LU O LU Ors o =3 oera crce.I-i CL, I-H CX 1-1 Q- I-H O.DC I-H a: I-Ho o o o UJ fV U- LU 1 — 1I— CMooen *r— LUz ""O >. CQ CM COen „ Lf> ^* >- 03 100 OOCM i— UJZ 013 LU 1 CO OCXI CO ZT > rj z 00 I oo r^ CM i— «3 r-. in i— <— CM CM CM . • > O3 UJ O O O O UJ•-3 oo o z z z: Q o: 03o o CO I-H O COE: ot: LU oouj ex a: iH- O t-i CMi— o: QCOexex ex LU z I—1 *X O HH °0§ZLU Z OZD i—1 I—I Z U_ OO I— O -JZ I— O C£. C_> OO I—i LUo z coex a: o a: oLU o I-H o 3ex: u. i— u_ CQ 00z.o1 — 11— oo1—zLUs:h-OL =Cex o >-h- CJ <( rK CX0a:o eC OLU Z h-^o 002:LU 1—1 — i CL, h-a:oexUJ 1 LUet CO I-H Oce. :r>ex ca § 2: DCex oo oex o t—<C <ro zQ CO>-HLU 1 Or> CM o:zco o I-H Oh- Z 0 o cxO 00 I-H•z. oOf. 0O I-H O • UJ UJ LU 5£ 52; 52;_IO -JCJ -10 s 1 '1 CD 1 O I-H a:cc LU a. LU I-H CJ=c oo z Z LU Oo o o I-H•-4 f. ;> i — „„ .__1 Z CUCQ a o o=3 z I-H a / s CU 1 1— CJ i-H CJ i-HLUE: o LU• LU CO O — 1 1—CC •=> 1— I-H H- 1—i <: oo cj I/ co I-H' CU Z Z N I-H 211 LU a: O 3 00 2: C£ O 1— 1 O CO Oa. u. oo o -a: cj ' oo o 1 CJ00 LU >- LU --D 1— CJ 0 !-• ZLU a: E: <Z Cu 0£ _J 0 CUCt: 0- Lu UJ I-H Z —I 0 0 O -a:•-i cj o: OO >- LUz ct: oi zO «I C LUO OO LU CD z:z ^ o ^o cu O IS •— ' I-H UJI-H - LULU 00 LU CJ Uloo r — -> I-H i— I-H i— i—OO! >• O j. w > O 1 — 1 — CJ '',. Oi DC S, I-H 21OO K LU LU OO 21I-H i T3 LU T3 LU OO OO j CM 00 CM 00 eC O T *!* •" /"* /•• XT* i— CD oo ca I— cs•=£ 1— 1 z: 1— 1— "=C h- 0,21 • LUO2I «t- D-2:*— i h— CD Ct: I-H C3 i— i ^ocu cj(— cu i— a. 1— h- ocu ^ —I-H i— . rD2l <t KH OOE: I-H I-H1 — CJQ LU1 — CJ 1— i 1 — CJtx. zcu ^z oocu ceefZOi-iOlLUl— CO KH cC Z: cu i— i o cj 2: oo CJ ^— ^ LU o r* 21 I-H LU»— I r>LU ZD LU CJ LUoo ^ "'t °° t h~ o uJ^loo1* 1-12: OO £— • fc-H LU I— 1 LU OO 21 I-H 3>LU > LU OOOa U!OO LU 00 <t CJ T I 1 CNTooen 1 - Z CJ «=C LU 00LU CJ Z LU0 Q 0 oz QCO 'LU CM ZCJ0 0 0CM1 1 — :=-0z CD STAFF MEETINOVEMBER 13t">•- S ' , CO "i OORDINATOR -cu1 — 1o LU LU!= o CO LU OORDINATOR - REVICUI— 1 CJ p- LU 1 — 1 LUa: LULU1—f— 0CJ cu CJ CO LU 1— 2t2:o CJ cu CJ in _u -Ort §a. Jj ce CJ 00oo11 CJ OL z LUa: azoCJ LUoo oO eCa:a cc:=1i_2: on > E O' a c OO Uloo ct: LULU LU I—CJ CD 1—O «=C 1-1a: z s LUcu < S h-So<CU CJ I-H•-H •>- C£. O H- CU CU LU I-H I-H OLU ra cj cj ce •-H 1-H LU LU O.LU 1 — LU LU <C O 1-H 1— 1 I-HLU a: ct: c£. ooCC CJ CQ CO «t i— CM CO z , cu a cd cj o0 Oa. LU CJUJ OC£. CU LU ZD 00 CJix. crooeC I-H UJ U- CC CU 1— CJ LU O LU I-H O 1-H 1—rv- r** rv p^ ^fcu cj cu ca z — ^~. •ZLo " 1— Cu E: i— i a: LU cja: cj LU 2: 0 CD Z3 OLU 21 <C 0 I— I-H a: «e a oo LU SI 1—a. cu zI-H CD >- *— i LUCJ Z Lu t— O 21 LUi— i LU I-H s: LU LU Lu 1— CJ LU O t—> LLH— a cj t— 1 — 1 1—4 H-H LU 1— 1 V-HLU a: 2: LU => ac El CJ CQ 21 I-H O 1— El r— CM PI 1oo a. • 1— 1 ) 1-H O O Z CJ CD • CO ra z '<=B E: 2: I-H . I-Hcu i— i ro o z: CD oz a. ^ cj cc z z:I-HCU1-H U.OLU etCt:i-Hi— I CJ 1— 1 Q — 1 O Ll-CU cj Q z: cu LU cao I-H>I— . 1-10:0000 LU^ OiLUCQLUCiSSOO OOh— C£OCJi-<l— OCt:E:2; OOl— lOOLUCCLuOOOO r- CM CO CMCM of oo a:1 1 CC 1 LU 1 LU Z3 1 I-H O >• 00 LU I-H t—cj o a: LU t— I-H 1— o:>-!— •oo: i — 1—12:1 — >-i — t— LU a. i-ioo O2IZI-HU3: CJ 00 oBO-CC »CJi-4oBCO Lu 1 — U- 1 — OOOCJLu I—* 5 0 Z I-H O H^ cu § O Q 3 h-CQ; i^sssss^iigcu 3 r- CM 00 «* ID CO1 CM COCT> i —PARTICIPATE &L5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - ANNUAL UPDATE PROCESS (Revised November 17, 1931)/I* /p* x^ — ^OO oO I ^ LU £; LU £; LU ZD iJ fh LU °- LU °- " 2= ^2:5 °, So °,£i x~ <cx~ <£~ Is A A A A •z.o CO CO CO1—4 Q •z.o CO01 CJ 01 o i "T" -T~ "T~ A^~ 1 PARTICIPATET M TT D TMDI IT,/ v i—D LU ^i- I— CU^ «C z:-1 CX i-<1—1 l_ O Cu J (— 0 H CX 1— 1 -1 /v. - •s. CO ceCO UJ LUz . >- z: LU CD0 \- Oh- <CD 1-1 »-i »-i h- z:_j z: 01 cj co i— i <:i—i 1—1 01 co s: E:cj z: i— i o: 1-1 E:>- z z E: LU E: o >-i— ID ec E: oi E: o i— i-i O — 1 O h- O •—CJO CX O OCJoO O E: ex .a- O O LU 3 LU Ouj iu z: LU i-i LUce E: co cx 01 H-1 CO CX CO i-< L<o £1 3 CUHH L.J ocx Qt; 1 1 ^C UJ 11, LUCX LU /••• f <*. 3 01 LU1-1 UJ UJ Oa: z: J— CU LU 1—1 UJ CJ 01 •^ CO}— co ce iex z: LU E:LU O > O 0 i-i 1-1 0CO _J 3 CO UJ O. LU 1UJ i— i Q 1 — I LU1-1 E; o H-> CO O 1—ui ID z o i— ian co<: i— s: 01 i— LUz: LUCO i— i !— LU uj z: O i-i UlCe 0 LU Cu CD CO CO h-CXLU LU O1o o: o 0 LUUJ 1— UJco r3 zI— I LU > CX O U- i-i«: oo CIP •COORDINATORLU CO CO 1— LU LUra o z: cocoo •-• i-•> >-• en _j exCt: CX LU LU I— C3 OCO CX i-H t-H I-" =D Oa cj CD I— „_ >-i LUCJ LUh-tCO i-i »— i Elco E:CO O CX1—1 UJ O LU H-t co s:CO O CU CO CM Oet LU CX CO LULU rD LU O CO CO UJ LU I— COt— O, C£. CO 1— LU O 1—i-i LU o t— z: >-E: LU <t LU ceE: H- <>o z: E: z:0 P I-i 1- LUcj >-i LU a ce ivj CX CXSTeCO 1— CX 1— f-i I— i O 1 — O I— iLU K- 1O CJOCOO OO O iS —\ o. 1 CMCO CMCM ci. a.ID LU•a: co CO CM1 CM CM1 C3 <c CO H-CO>- :=> _1 CD •-3 <e CO oCM 1 •-J 1 OOCO CM UJ >-•z. —i ^D ^ CM1 COCM UJ•z. UJ LU UJ 1— O h- I-•z z coeC LU LUco E: o ui• i— rao-ujce z: o LU i—CD LU o a: i—E: E:O i-i I— OI-H >-CD CJ I— ID I-H O I— Oi-i CX O LU •-!3 cj z: > z: o ex1—I LU 1—I C3C I—I t—«UJ IU 13 -J CJCQ CC 1-1 O 1— CQ cecxu-cacececxh- r— CVJ _j coeC LUcj ce01 rD ex 01LU I i—i LU_i ±£ cj ;Dca ce o-ceco s: CD u- LUO- LU 3ce coCD co cei— -a: o I— co 1-1e£ U. O >- Oz: 03 ex o i— ce1-1 >- z: LU i-i oO LU I— i-l Q O Oce t— z i-i z i-i oO >=£ O O CL. UJ _looi-ii-ii-iE:cacu o -a: co o ex o1—11— ex s: ID ce cjLu I—i i—i «*CeCXOLU "LUo cj co o u. ce i—LULU Z I— Lu LU ZI-<(LU 3z:zceoai— Lucei—i Cu LU UJ i—I eC i—i El COcxxz:i-is: cxcxs:r3 El CX LU O CQ O O i— CM . 01 co Q «a: z: o ID ce «tct o z LU a E: CO1cC 1 CO1—z:UJE; ce<c CuUJQ >_ 1— CJ 1—h- 2:ca CO CXi— io CO CXUJ 0 s: I-H ex co LU ce ce Cu 1— LU O O O1— I O Z CX>Z Lul— CJ UJ O i— i I-i UJ Z «to cj co cj i— s: I-HZLO z: z cj S i-iCOUJ CMOCMUJO LUQis: co i— i co •-D o >o:r- s: i (— i ca LU o ocoooir— <:r— ocecxcaocj z: co i— i co i— i < oLU LU o ce oej LU ococei-<3cxLu ce H-cu >- 1— UJOh- 01cC«Di-IM _JLU<Ci-iceeC— ICXCOSZO•=CiiO>CXQeIUJ 1 COz-ari-iuJcxcuoceLniDO =CE;Luce<IDCDCuCOCOI— i — CM CO *3" CO COCOLUoCO1 01— z aQCooCJ CX1 — 1CJ LUz — 1LUo IDCD COCOUJCJoceCX oceCU CX CJ LUce CULU uj ce coCD O -•< o cez: z co<c i— i E: o >-CO >- Z 1—LU 1 — d. !— iZ « 01-1 O LU_! S- LULU Lu 1— 1 1 —O LU LU <:i— i >-i cj cece ID ce LU oex CD ca ce cu r—CM CO LULU1—1— ^ S2 o S1—CL.1-1 o; O f-HLU01 LU 3:eJLU h—LU i-lo ce z >-iCQ O ^J- Page 5 DESCRIPTION OF MAJOR CITY FUNDS GENERAL FUND The City General Fund is the largest and most active fund within the City's financial structure. The General Fund depends primarily upon sales tax, property tax and various City fees as its source of revenue. These revenues are used to support such operations as libraries, police, fire, parks, general administration, streets, engi- neering, planning and some public works activities. There are no restrictions on the use of General Fund monies other than any expendi- ture must be a legal expense of the City of Carlsbad. GENERAL CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND This fund supports many general purpose capital projects during the five years of the CIP. The balance available in this fund represents years of accumulated funds transferred from the general fund for capital project construction. During the next few years, it is anti- cipated that there will be very little additional revenue available to this fund due to the demands placed on the general operating revenue. GAS TAX Gasoline taxes are collected by the State and distributed to local governments on a per capita basis. These funds are restricted by State law to use on various types of street projects, including maintenance of streets, design and construction of street improvements and signalization of intersections. SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUNDS The Sewer Construction Fund is dedicated to the construction of major sewer system improvements. The fund is supported entirely by the collec- tion of sewer connection fees (presently $1,000 per connection). These fees are restricted by the stipulations included in a 1959 ordinance to sanitation purposes. FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING The City participates in the Federal revenue sharing program which entitles Carlsbad, under present law, to an annual distribution of funds from the Federal Government. Although the future of the revenue sharing law is uncertain at this time, for CIP purposes it has been assumed that the Federal Government will continue to allocate these funds. There are very few restrictions on these funds other than various non-discrimination controls, requirements for handicapped access to structures, etc. Any project within the CIP could legally be funded from this source. PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE In August, 1979, the City Council adopted Council Policy No. 17 regarding public facilities fees. This is a fee of 2% based on the building permit Page 6 valuation of all zoning, rezoning, development or redevelopment projects within the City. Also, a fee of $1,150 is assessed for each mobile home space developed. The proceeds of this fee are collected into the Public Facilities Fund and may be used for the purpose of acquiring, building, improving, expanding and equipping public property, improvements and facilities. These expenditures must be approved by the City Council. PARK-IN-LIEU FUND The Park-In-Lieu Fund was established for the purpose of collecting monies for park purposes based on a formula derived from desired park acreage and density of development. Under the current code, Section 20.44, a developer may donate land or deposit fees with the City to satisfy the park's require- ments. (The value of the land or the amount of fees paid can be deducted from the Public Facilities Fee the developer may be required to pay.) All fees so collected must be used for park acquisition or park development within the general area of the City from which those fees were collected. WATER FUND The Water Fund is an "enterprise" fund operated by the City for the purpose of accounting for the operations of the Water Department. An enterprise is an operation that provides a service for a fee where the fee is the sole support of the operation. Water Department income is dependent primarily on the water sales. The rates charged for water sales provide the cash for the payment of salaries, maintenance costs and bond repayment. All Water funds are restricted to water purposes. -Page 7 gs 8OSd. Hj2W W ^oOS EM ^ M 51u vO00i CM 00 00 ^J FK0 BM U •d•< oH tO00o\ in00ert •H 00 UEZ fOM 00 25 ^4 g HOW 303OH CM00otp-4 CMCJ ^ P 0 OS5-. W W OH OS PH CC O< PM Z o ommooooooO Of---^OOOOOO O OCOOOOOOCO-* o oottoooinoo'O CM •-! -3 00 CO --H --I «n" 1 1 1 1 0 | 0 1ooooooo oI I T I o I o I A *0 0o of— 1 f— 1 . ^JT " 1 t 1 1 O O I I 1ooooooooo1 1 1 1 O O 1 1 1 o ino CMCM 1 «p - " O 1 1 O 1 O 1 O 1oooooooooO 1 1 O 1 O 1 CO 1 o o o om r* in oo I ' . o m i i i o i i Ior~oooooooo co i i i o i i I o oC o *& | (^| I I m i i i i i ooo-*oooooo1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 <f M M to to 00 •-4 0oo *o 8 C*> 14t)uC 4J 0) 0 0 p-lej 41 ra"-i e4) 0 60g B o f "> M *J > H CO Vi ' XI 3 CO W OT 01 01 Of C C KJ UH o x w o « ow i4j w -1-4 -H to a)z ce-Hjijt-au -i-i u M -H ."H 3 a s '» -H ° O CQ 4J Vl P* »H »4-l PL, pj -rl C S H 1 3 "WHO*H K O O IB M 14-1 W -H X'r4 .H CO X ty ^ l*-l U] O 'rt O OJ CO -H .H CO VI fj OnOP4-<XOPHpHH CMO-0-«CMtO-*tO<l- ^4 ~4 CM ^H CM <f <fr O r-t f^CM — '_ . " O Oo o0CM Ooo m CM CM O0 CO 0mCM m CO Sm m ^ CM O •-I < OH O O O O0m ^ i I I oo o •H Ooo ooTin ooo o 00 » g Mcc ^a: 1j3 U Wf«4 o00 oom "* oi i i 0oo o" oo0 oo oo0 o 00 'VI > 014J a)o (Uu• HK jj 5 ^ >r4 ^4 • rl 4J - • rH Acru oOH O 0oo oom rH 01 10 ooo o r-H ooo 8m §o oto00 < oH ooo o CO CM 0Oo 0*o CO oo o"o •CM ooo oo CM OO OOOO i-4j ooo o 00 *H tn W fe cn MH M M [*•> u P3 PH oooomoomoo OOOOcOOOCMOOoooo— 4OomoO -3-oomoocMoooooo-v-4 m m f^ f** **i r^ co «,f oo .-« f-, -H <t O__ fO_ CO^ -^ — ' in-.--. I I 1 0 | 0 | | | 1?ooooooooo1 1 0_ 1 0^ 1 1 1 1 O CM00 OCM 00 I o i o m o i i i 10000-3-00000 1 O 1 O O O 1 1 1 1 o in CM mm ^ to mi-l O> CM t-t I i i i m o o m I 1oooo<foo— 100I i I 1000*01 I to O O COtO O O Ot 00 CM O — < •—I p-4 1 i i o m o o m 1 IOOOO<-OOOIOO1 1 1 O O O O CM 1 1 o o in oo r~m m ^ r~ <fr — 1 CM CO to pH o i o i i i i m o oOOOOOOOOOOOO 1 O t 1 1 1 to O O •* O f^ O *d"•H in ON -3- OO i-H »H CM •-! Vi«lsu au e<oa> -HS o •«X « -r4 (U Vi V> > £to « VI Vn X o> -o J3 W <O t) Vl •H > C ,J O X -1 0•« •-> « asad •*> JbOO U «r-* «H .r-l Cfl X *^ •< T43uj.iu.CJuO t/>c <: « <o o e ^O 4J4U "OO-HOIJ•^ ft) t/) CO 0) «H O 0 (0 '»-l >r4 *H Q) fl> 'H tC 60 O CO <4-l •O O'H'H O C04-lr-l Ctf Vl <pHpMpCnpHS;t/3WHH -nNinr^ocMinr.^<f1-4 CM CM CO <!• in ototo oCCOo o"1-1 o0 0 CM 00o ""* m 3 CM •M •3" CM O VO tO oCm CM CO ot-. CM O Om CM >n00to inoo t .sH Page 8 CM <U 4 00 Hcct O vO00s inCOON»H 00 -< CO COCJv *"* CM COON?— * g M O BW5 p5PM M U vO HIco o P4 1 W W 5 OSCTV Ctt t?i-l C. Z Oo o p- CO oo 0*o••H oo oo FH ooo oof— 1 oo oo ooo o CO CO u <j £2 0 O O 0o o oo oo c-j o m o <t m CMO CM ^ COm CM CM CM 1-1 1 O 1 1O 0 0 0 1 CM 1 1 vOm io i i000IOIIA CM CM 1 0 1 O 00001 o 1 m §in CM S O 1 0 O O O O O 1 O o vo P-o in *—im 1 0 O Oo o co o 1 O O O o m oin •-! ON •CM — 1 « <ttU 01u• H > V ^u u•i-l C 01 W •-* Ol -r4 C •H E 4-* O U 01 U *r4C3 O 0) 4JCO AJ »H« *-4 C T30) P- H TJ14 1) *£ [u U (Ua C c 03 -H bO rHO r-4 <C V4• i-l IV 1 DJ O -H r4 nj PH PM H S O irt vO P**•t* ir\ m in O 00f- •-t •— i «s 0oc<4 vOin ooo CM CM O Om in VO o 00 CO in OCO O mm ^Q H 0o 0 o vO C» ooo om CM CM OO O 0*mCM CM Ooo^ omCM CM OOO Oof-t ooo o"o00 ~ . jj. OM STRUCT• zoo 03 IdCO CMOOOOOOOO roooOOO-tfOOOmoo*>fOcMooo rocMOro»t-.tOOO vocMr^rHinin'-iovo rH »-H CO i r i i i i i i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 0 I 1 I I I I Oooooooooo 1 VO 1 1 1 1 1 1 O in o -* 0»-l vO CO . 1 0 1 O O O 1 0 1 1 CM 1 sl^O CM 1 0 1 00 CO <t tt Oin r^. O co o*H m m o -T (-. O 0 1 1 101 1o-*ooooooo •H CM O 1 1 1 O 1 1 ~» 00 O Oo m m coi-~ i- -i ff in 1 0 1 | l l I 1 CMOOOOOOOO •st 1 O 1 1 1 1 1 1 o\ o 0V ^, ' t. SI0) H 0 0)H o co en O O- 60 « C« ft) O T3 3 < M ^-i 0 to 0 M | iJ M O c c u) r; jj O *J 3 Vt .jC W .ftPU m o *H UM~lCiI3tOO*^UC *^ CO QJ o *H c CO C [>]>JCOCOCO>[x]i-![i] vO r^ 00 vTv O >~4 00 O*v O-3*<t-sT'*ininininvo CMinCM rC vO CO 1o1 oo VO•imst CO O CO00 vO CM oT • co CM VO in CM C7vm ^H0H o o o o oo o o o oo o o o o in m in in inp* CM m P* o *"* 1 O 0 1o o o o IOOI in invo r- oo ooCM 1 1 1 Oo o o o1 1 1 O movO ooo o"oCM 1010 0 O O O1010 in o<t m ooo ooCM 1 0 1 Oo o o o1 0 1 O m o-* m ooo ooCM 0 1 1 1o o o oO 1 1 1 mCM ooo m vO r-<oo u CO eCO CO O {O U «HSCO ^ U•r4 14 *r4 ^ CO 10 H Pu •*•Z. —* « 3 & U 3 C C cr V4y£ o> ol O o co PJ T4 3 >-,<• Ck, O ,J « Cj i i a •& j:we c o r-i o> -H o cu raW 1 co o —l O O ^ 14 .r4 [i, 0 t4 ft) t4 13b/ CO u-l CO Ol 00 CC CU M-l o C to <C s^ 0) tl) -H 4JPLI »-> ;c pu co ON CM ~* in« CM CM CM OOo o vO ooo o,5; 0oo m0 vo 0oo m o 0.0 m ooo in CM 3H 0 H I O vO O O O O> O1 CM CO ON in co P*CM CM in st p-l CM iio III , 7 . 1 1 00001 1 0V p^m CM 1oI 0 iS o 1 00 1 CMr-< 1 ?' ' 0 1 1 0 0 OCM 1 1 a•* , o1 ??? , . Q 1 cta c •*O -H CO< anZ U Q < ° sc2 cat. O ••-! U 0ttj O 4JrJ U U CO< a co O QJO B 0) >J V4 3 .H0 C lJo u oi aU CO >z <: » Z [X4 O>•< co g E13 H ^ nPU «< W •-} O CM COro co co 0 F\rv 33a 3 } >\ ^•1 arv0 i •i 32si n si * 9 ^•^3 CO 4)M Pi O5=MQ £3 & BH 3OScu PuMo NO CO1 COON »-H 53 SH NOCOON in00 ON 1-1 00ON CO00ON •-* CM 00ON i-H f_| ta tai-t ta P-i °Zi 000O O NOo o >» o o r~o r~ NOr. CM "* 1 I 1o o o1 1 1 O 1 10000 1 1 o"0 O O 1o o oO O 1 o* o*o m * 1 0 10 O O1 0^ 1 o" 1 1 OO O NO 1 1 *^ r«« NO CM CO •O » "w•a> H0) CO PH N^ oC 000 -0 •H >|H C it toCO 14CX co co X PM -0 W CJC 0rH O -H i-< CO T) CO O 0)_. a u tcOS OU >% M coEC *j co 3H -H 4J 00O O CO < ^ in <tCM CO O NO-3- jvT CO O >n Io o00 oor* OOO O o -*" o0o oCM o NO 1^ NO CM 1H 1 0 0 0 0 O O ?o o o o <t NOO O O O CO ON NO r^ in o ON r*.ON co r^ co NO oCO NO O CM pH I O O I I O ?o o o o o0 0 1 1 CM o m ^r-» PH •-» 1 1 1 O 1 OO O O O O NO1 1 I 0 1 CM o m CO *+ 01 1 O 1 O 1 Oo o o o o o1 O 1 O 1 CM r~ O co\O O CO -H •* 4 : 1 1 1 O 1 10 O O 0 O 01 1 1 0 1 1 om 1 O 1 1 IOO0 O 0 0 <f 001 1 1 00 CO NO ON O ON NO •* 0 1 o ^>0 OS O (Oco cec «-•a ou -H a) CO Jd 4J 00•H li .H T)> CO CA -rlP. -H M (1 9 .* Mc e o- n0) O U CO CO CO3 >, •< PH T3 <Ume c c1 co T3 X -O co C O .-1 0 -rJ rJO 0) « -Oco O *^ O w CO 4) 60 « >i < UJ 0 C co 3 oCd CD CO *H AJ CT<r4 U ^ K PH CO n 0 I-l NOoCM 1H ~Page 9 Pag& 10 4)00n OOOOOOOO I OOOOOOOOOOO OO\OOOf")OOm I fNOOOOCNxOCSICNtnCOfO Ho o Ou •£>00Ies00 CO BIdi 50, "O >> U Ji ^i cfl ^ C t-l 3 h PLI O Pi C iJ E U CO .H Q > C 1-1 1-1 •-i o c u t« 60 O •!-<3 O W J-> O» a) -^ &. c ta ta3 C < o 00 o VO -*to juu3 O.tdO «o*! •*-* <0I n bo) HI CO . til C 8 !-«a. mo ot-< O O >J HI T)Q Oo: £M 3HM 0 vOCO1CNCO CTN rH g ta CO I o Eo 1 j5 H oo »H IA CO MP4& 1aoHt-lQ i >4£ 55O COM 00H ONdM(K COCO 3 CNCOON ^H Q X g u as W l£w >-> «p* OXOH o£ i*"*i Pi ^ o o in o o oo o r- o o ooo o co o o -* <)• o ON o m -*~« m <t m r- m •H CN rH i-H <t CTN m ON 1 1 1 1 O Io o o o o o1 1 1 1 0_ I oa i o o i o m?0 0 0 0 •*o o i o o o o m CNmo <t vo•-4 r*» ON l-H 1 o o i i mo o o o o •*1 0 O 1 10 O O vOmo o •* CN I o m i o mO O r^ o o •*I o co i o oA IS l« n O CT\ O Oin "^ m m•* -H CN M o i i o i mo o o o o -*O1 1 O 1 0 sj- 0*0i— i m co^ -H r» 4) d (H B 4)« 01 uK U -fHXI » >•rl >» Ijj CO ' VCOto •- 0 », f5 VW 4_l0) C C •-<tl M O i-<•O -H -iH CO i-H o W U [x4 -H -H C <J vO CDM .C 4J tq ^ ^ H CJ <0 CuM e x e e 01j o c w o o u KH U U *-4 *i-t *HCJ 3 — i u u h,<; c «£ 1-4 tc tota o to u u « «r-l 4) JC CO CO Q>CJ 4J O u M *o O *r-l «H -cH o CJ <I Cl4 CJ Cci [±4 CU •H c-i <f m r^ o ininm CN o 2 ooo oCO m o ^mCO CN m o mo *o oCN ON 00 "CO m ^0 ooo COtaM HM MCJ . O ^)_HO ,1 H8 o o o o o oo o o o o oo o o o o o o m r~t <t o co1"* CN CN CN m CO••H i-H —t CN f-" - __. .- " *" 1 1 1001???§§? r^ oco in •-H <N 1 O 1 O 1 OO O O O O O1 0 1 O 1 0 m m mCN m cosj- r^ o o i o i oo o o o o oO O 1 O 1 O O 0 CN 0r^ m I*H o•3- m 1-4 1 O 1 O 1 Oo o o o o o1 O 1 O 1 O 0 0 COm CN o> s 1 1 O I 1 1o o o o o o1 1 O 1 1 1 r-f«s ^H ., rH O0 oa coB Gto to o O V> -O <l) ^ uM O 4) -iH 14 .J H g X > to « < g P. -rHw -H i a s x2 vj c e cr nCJ H 01 (U O O <tSo 3 >><! ft.a) C (O Co) to i « -a .cQ »j U C CJ i-J O!Z H 4J O O to< C to o •rl o•-I W W «H Ct. oW tO 0) V. Q>W .rl Ir, UJ to -i X pj CO 1-4 vo ON CN ^ mrH — 1 — • CM CN CN Ooo R ^m 0oo r- CO CO ooo mvOCN "* ooo CN COO CN 0 OO oovO O00•1 i-H CN l-H zoM H olo 2 to s ^0* pi s Page 11 sJH41 ODO Hiden NO00 ON pH mCOON t-H 00ON toCO CM 00 ON HPi £ aBg ZH0, S r*1* ZO H-l So 1H tt, Mto CO o p<MO 00 O 031 H W CM »") P3 <£ « S~i P- e O NO OO ON OCM 00 ON in <o r*CM CM in <t -• CM ?o o1 1 1 1 0?o o1 ON r*T inCM 1 NO I ?ON O 00 1 CO CMPH O 1 10 O 0 CM 1 1 a ?o• <tt (3 C -H•H cd t" QO«> ec e G •rl Vl O « O 4-1 to o tn g _ <» < M 3 -5<x o c v.Q u 33 < «S tu 0) O tn B EH H •-< wtn < w •-> O CM <OCO CO CO NO 0\ o00 1o oo f*TinCM NO 00 ro CM "> Oo CM inCM oI to Ma jg g 3HOH O O uS O O O O vD CM O O O r*. r^. oo O o ^oro o fi <t oO c*JCO CN f-H »H « M 101 1 1 1 .-* 1 0 I 1 1 1?NO o o o oCM_ 1 1 1 1 m 1-1 1 o in I o 1 O O -H O O O 1 CM NO 1 CO 1 00 CO OCO ON 00—> 1 1 in 1 1 1O O CM O O O1 1 CM 1 1 1 NO o o m o i oo o oo o o o CO CO NO O 1 •* r*« o r^ o NO CO -* ON <f CM CO CM •-* a i •O -A i» ID O C Pu *»^• to T3 >N t-1 11P5 in |j CO 0 4) -O CO <U00 « "->•o js o o.rl M -H ni VJ r-l IW OHpa M o» <*-<a a « >, « «> O C W AJ •^ a> 4) H 4)c c i > iw O *lr *^ O (Q•^ n3 o . > tn•0 C ^ *HCO 01 4) >H <J r-i OH =c —« B vj n -r4W U OJ cfl -U-iW « XO H J^ «-<PS 3 O E *•* *0H CT*«H t*-t (0 <0 V*W •< FQ U H F^ H ^ ^ rs, ^ co <rn n ro -tf <j- 3" >Aoo O O\•» § CM ~ O CM in •-< in -CM •-H CO in CM CM i moovO ^ oS .. - enH!H g O CMOOOOOOOOcoooooo<rooo R2°KoM°oovOCSr^«MlAtA«*-«OvO» » *t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O 1 I 1 I 1 1 O?ooooooooNO 1 1 1 II 1 O in o 3 S CO I O 1 O O O 1 O 1 1 CM 1 -4- O CM 1 O 1 00 CO -3" <}• Om r- O co o—i in m o r~ o o i i i o |. Io~*ooooooo -1 CM O 1 1 lOt I •tf CO O O• o m m cor^ r* •-* u-i 1 O 1 1 1 1 1 I CMOOOOOOOO "*. ' °* ''''I' ON O HU 0)c »4) Vi S 0) ^e o « tn c0 u tj 30 0. 60 « Wco Q) o *X3 H **!"-< 0 lJ (3 | i-5 •M CXUP^ OT3t-t'OM(U(U -H « 1-1 [i] >M Pd JJ 00 T3 ^Q M 1-1C c o) °> ") 0) O U >-l W w,-iu Nor~cooNO-HooosO*j<t-^**mmtninNO CMin CM r- NO f 00 1o oo NO m<j-r^ CO 00000 ON NO CM CM CO CM <t NO t— t mCM •^ONm ON top£ 1 3 OH -Page.12 co 5 4) Ctf H vOCO S 00 ON *•" 00s CO 00s oo ON w SM SBM gw Mw ^4 § M OM to d o VO 091CM COOx "•• U CISw u>-> PQ0 g ft. 2 OO0 < 00 1o 1o1 - c1 1o1 ooo a 4)O c IE T3c0) CO1 J. o w TRAFFIC SISignals -IA 0o0 <CO 1 1 01 101 1o1 0oo CO to 5 ot-H CO u MIK(K2Hgs 0 O 0O 00 O N O "1<t".XV(S -H CO CS CS CM O 1 1s?? vO* 000 O 1 1 CM CM O 1 0o o o 0 1 1A O *A St fs O 1 00000 1 0 vO l» iA ^« O O O0 00 0O 0 O O IA 0IA -^ O> ' c 4) n B u ola 41 b -H(O O 41 UM flj JJ •*-(Cti ,-( C T)ftj a M T3 U 05 >.H 0 41V. 4) C Cu; c 41 -H •H 60 -^ Oi r-l < WlW 41 1 41 H O...-I 4J< -H n 10S ft. H S * IA *A IA 0CO ^_r- VD O0 CM vC O0o ^CM 0OIA ir< vO OO 0 CO ^ o00o IA M PS S!uHZH K:wHg1 CO c ^ v( p 0osi i^! CO IAOa CvvC co" vO<*1st^ ONIAce ot-t CM ON —^IA 1A CO CO CM 2 VO o (dQZB <o wSOS PL. ! 0 Page-13 1•$ «Jj H0) OS? H NO00ON in 00 ON f-4 V. ^.00 •H CO00 ON CM00 OS 1— 1 IV, sBM w X M ^4pq zo§t-4&4 Mwen•<d CM M CJ NO H00 O OS1 W WCM *~t PI00 O g2 £ -i oo NOo NO •^CO oo *r- COr* A mo00 CM NO M00 NO 0\ 00 o f-4 ON PH CO IA CM _J" NO NO sS5' 5 en B 1CL, 1H g § O ' • — '• - ' •' '-. - _ f " *- J OOOOOOOO | OOOOOOOOOOO<3-OOOeNOOOo-^-oooomooinoOoo t oovooonooin i CNioooocs\op^c^u^oon »Aa»O<J-OOOCM OOOcn<r"^\OvC>eMcOO^r^ \D ».o ^f*l oo O O *^ O> 1,0 CM r^ CT^ *— * p1^ o^ u*i o OCM^ r-cMr-HONcM eo-HintMcnONCMCTsvo^H.--! ON »H r^ ^^ <O ^H ^H »»• >' PQ U C p-4 t-1 • ; 0) (0 "•« Q) CM M e & u & M •O U C M O -H H Jt H Cwkijjnu<u--<lu ^ u ji! k<n Ma ^ec<ua>u«<u6 O U3PnV4 O PktC (V,CJ MAJ OCO > Uj r— <>^OV4 Wl P-I4J C'H VCO^CJbO C4 § 2nZ>ou2Uo-S-So-o<4)e2-So'Sp utjmnc KI a. u ^ -^ .H c u->o<«jc:c^i £3 o>4<ucj>j[».a:j^jO(oow^)0<HI2otj M<*22:32£283cMro'ro?oco°3!3S£ o NO CO ooON ^.CM o NOCO CO00 ON ^"CM COHow 3 d. o UN FUND. § oH 00cs<f ON NO ONin 00CMsfr ONin NO ONm COf-lCOu S3 s1 § u Page 14 City of Carlsbad Page 15 1982-86 Capital Improvement Program Projects Classification by Expenditure Type Ci -~- of Carlsbad 1982-86 Capi^l Improvement Program Project Funding Sources Page 16 10 -- COHrd oQ raCO •rH H i-H •Hs M» CO •H § M 4-1 CO C O U * Hrd4J•H rdU rH rd^_i * 0)Ccuo CO CU CO •H CU 4-> CU •rH fa •H CU 0rd -H fa 4-1 U U 3•H ^ rH CO 4-1 XI CU CO 3 CU CCU CM O tn C-H ^1rd t/j CU C 0) cu OH H rO CU•acufa1 u cuen -^cu-Hl_3 1 C-H| ^S_l rdCM*— * CU Q) CO CT> COcu rd -H CU C H pL| -H Djrd !-i 4-> M CU C Q 4-> CU C E rH H & rdO O M rH O CU CU J -P> rdcu fd !2 Q CUC II' fi § • rd >H • ft CU • 1 1 1 $-1 <P rC -P O CO 4-) C rd^i U Page 17 STATUS OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CAPITAL PROJECTS (As of November 19, 1981) CIVIC FACILITIES 1. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER (3103) - Purchase of modular units authorized November 3, 1981. Parking lot designed but on hold. 2. POLICE (3026) & UTILITY SERVICES CENTER (3006) - Council subcom- mittee negotiating with County for purchase of land south of County transfer station. Tentative agreement reached on acquisi- tion. RFP for architectural services being prepared. 3. LIBRARY LAND SOUTH SECTION (3090) - Task force exploring costs of three sites.No capital project activity until site selected and acquired. 4. BEACH PARKING LOTS (3097) - This project proposed the construction of two parking lots on Carlsbad Boulevard near Palomar Airport Road. Project on hold pending State study of beach parking possibly lead- ing to alternate project. 5. LIBRARY GLASS CASES (1-140) - Funding not carried over into this fiscal year.Library anticipates going to Council with request to reappropriate funding. STREETS, SIGNALS. LIGHTS 1. TAMARACK EXTENSION FROM SKYLINE TO SUNNYHILL - Design complete; construction funding proposed in 82-86 CIP. 2. PASEO DEL MORTE SUBDRAINS (3034) - Project complete. Accepted by Council, November 17, 1981. 3. EL CAMINO REAL INTERCONNECT (3073) - Design 98% complete. 4. POINSETTIA BRIDGE (3079) - City funding of this project has been deleted. Application being made for grade separation funds through State Public Utilities Commission. 5. AGUA HEDIONDA BRIDGE (3098) - Consultant working on EIR corrections recommended by State. 6. TAMARACK RECONSTRUCTION (3108) - Consultant given go-ahead to proceed with final design; consultant has five months to complete (April, 1982). 7. TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECTS J3109) - This design-only project is complete. Funding proposed in 82-86 CIP. 8. ELM AVENUE INTERCONNECT (.3110) - This is a design-only project. A report on this project was prepared and its recommendations submitted for consideration of capital funding in the current CIP process. Page 18 STREETS. SIGNALS, LIGHTS 9. TRAFFIC SIGNAL ELM & MONROE (3111) - This design-only project is complete. Funding proposed in 82-86 CIP. 1.0. BICYCLE LANES (3113) - A design-only project. Chestnut design awaiting coordination with adjacent developer. 11. EL CAMINO REAL MEDIAN PROJECT (3115) - This project is complete. 12. STREET LIGHT CONVERSIONS (3117) - Conversion of street lights is complete. Tentative completion date is December. 13. LEVANTE SIGNAL AT EL CAMINO REAL (3123) - County anticipates completion of signal by December 1st. PARKS & RECREATION 1. CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL SWIM COMPLEX (3030) - Construction essentially complete. Opened for recreational swimming November 14th. 2. HOSP GROVE (3065) - Design-only project - design complete - con- struction unfunded. 3. LA COSTA CANYON PARK PHASE II (3101) - This project is under con- struction; completion by early December. 4. JEFFERSON/BUENA VISTA SCHOOL PARKS (3102) - Funding for Jefferson from block grant money; funding for Buena Vista proposed through CIP. Agreement signed with School District for use of land. 5. NACARIO CANYON PARK (3107) - Consultant working on EIR. Environ- mental review process should be complete in early 1982. WATER. SEWERS. STORM DRAINS 1. WALNUT/SYCAMORE STORM DRAINS (3037) - Project complete; Council accepted October 6, 1981. 2. ENCINA PLANT PHASE III CONSTRUCTION (3059) - Under construction; completion scheduled for 1983. 3. HOME PLANT (3064) - Project completed April, 1981. This project provided a detention basin for sewage in the event of a pump outage. 4. CENTRAL BUSINESS RELIEF STORM DRAIN/aka STATE STREET STORM DRAIN (3085) - Preliminary design is being modified to accommodate ATSF desires. The problem on this project is with rights-of-way. Re- design should be complete in November. 5. MAY STORES SEWER (3086) - Project completed February 10, 1981. 6. BUENA VISTA SEWER PLANT (3092) - Buena Vista Pump Station is complete, Page 19 WATER, SEWERS. STORM DRAINS (Continued) 7. OCEAN STREET/CEDAR STREET STORM DRAINS (3095) - Project complete; Council accepted October 6, 1981. 8. HIGHLAND/BUENA VISTA STORM DRAIN/SEWER (3099) - Project plans are complete and ready to advertise. 9. MISCELLANEOUS DRAINAGES SIDEWALK (3100) - This unspecified project is to provide seed money to promote assessment district activity. Current interest rates make such projects unattractive to property owners hence no local interest. 10. TRI-AGENCY PIPELINE (3112) - This is a design-only project. Awaiting word to proceed from Utilities Department. 11. CALAVERA HILLS SEWER PLANT (3114) - Funds to audit developer's expenses prior to City assuming pi ant. MISCELLANEOUS 1. ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS SOUTH OF CHESTNUT, MADISON TO ROOSEVELT (3709) - Construction complete; Council accepted November 3rd.~~" 2. HOUSING PROPERTY ACQUISITION (3106) - "Funds earmarked for Sr. Housing project." 3. COMPUTER UPGRADE (3045) - Complete. 4. VAPOR RECOVERY SYSTEM (3091) - Project has been on hold pending deci- sion by A.P.C.D. that system is required. 5. REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY ACQUISITION (3104) - Funds are being reallocated to downtown streetscape project. 6. COMMUNITY BLOCK_GRANT (3105) - Funds are being reallocated to downtown streetscape project.~ PROJECTS NOT REPORTED ON 1. FIRE STATION NO. 5 TRAINING FACILITIES (3012) - Funds for land purchase only. 2. CITY TENNIS COURTS (3040) - Not funded. 3. RAIL ON LIBRARY STEPS (3084) - Project complete. 4. ENCINA PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, PHASE IIIA (3119) - Project administered by EWPCF Manager. 5. ENCINA TECHNICAL STUDY, SECONDARY TREATMENT (3120) - Project administered by EWPCF Manager. 6. ENCINA ENGINEERING STUDY, NEW SOLID DISPOSAL SYSTEM (3121) - Project being administered by EWPCF Manager. -.1^cI—o Ulto nor^ •— en to «*>CT^CJOCO irtni — OCNJr— otoo c<* to c:» to o* cj o cj o c> -5 r-.coco*rooir>o^» V r-> tr» csi tr> 10 \& cji «>• <T> ro . r> c> o oo ooooto cj co o c> cj c> o ej o c> oco o en e> u-> o co o ej cj to. o r^. ro crt ro ^— co co to en CM cocj -a- to ^r ro •— •— c\j•»• r-~ CJ r— Cvl °^f cad f toSB CM•—« "fcIaiZ3cr: uj«:•-;Ck._l *~t u> O cu •IUc6u. c> ro oo co oCJ en o co en co"•sr ui co OOU> o oo oo o t> o oo toCO c»r- u? s s re vJ C5 u_o •-. =E: Q. •<CCUCJ >• a" LiJ _J to X^~ 4O«co <»•o tn o r—r^- o r^ *coocn toCO CO en 0O int->.en. CO o o oo o oo o o o o in o VOcxr oOtfl oOCO OC3 to CO cototvi O Oo oO CO oCO P.20 tooo a cocoo» o•j- Cvl O0 ooo toCOto tnCO t-tin toCO COtoto COcr> oto U>to O c: "c I 1 o oXI CnC. ej i—<x oa. r- I_ <-•o o c:O ^ Q.IO- I:r— O CT1 fl) > COO — >-O O Oc, t=••- tft •—tZ ryto a. . Sei: 0rj »-> l/l C. *> Clc > o n> O t_> r— UC. O — crfo oc a: e CJ Oc. +-•c to i.o t. O or: *•cr- n^^ AJto v\ •a -v-r. c •o•— cj c:a. en -r-«n x> rat- -u ^- i.o o t- Q3 —l coo eto o> <o i_c: TD o«a ••— c *->*-•_•< o to</> »- —•^-oxi-o> a. ci crac or> jc •—c: o ra jr:o o is enn o en -r-C3 ' CQ «C 3C Drainage - Sidewaco co a PerOe*-» crc: oo ^ ^ 5-c - i.O OJK exex oo t-<— ex,ci>• 4*ci cre=> > c5.<J o cr "o=> >ti «Jf! ijo oCJ <:£ »- cro oS- -r- U> W-»cr ••—«o i/v I— "3 ~ LJ"•^ «s;IA i- »- cr>— o o« ex >,c> o c:CX I- rjo ex cjut/i 01 o•*-• c •»- CJ -r- >.o */» /oi- r> u<-• o <ou> re =c **CICJ cr o oo *-» o•»- o ».*» O ClCJ •»-> 4-» 3 O CU L. «~i*-» ex.Ul r— C 5s Oo -^> c;O O C71O U- v-ce a A/Ito^f .ci o ej£ C £r: v- g- 2 Ji I— »— Ul oeco to v.-• oj cien cr >-•-- >> <3 o.to o »j ciC CJu cj o a:•— en «—•*- <: o >_•— >, o0 -j- CJ Ci•- v. •»- »a»— I—. eo :=- to on:c«. tv c> «*••— t»> ne» o on «') co COOO- co ojc> ca tft o> o •—rncitOC3 CM r-» •»»••OOCl OOO OO^-r— *-— »— * — r— «— •coron mron 10/14/81 (UPDATED) Page 21 SUMMARY OF EVALUATIONS FROM SEPTEMBER 30, 1981 CIP PUBLIC MEETING: (35 Total Received) (See Below) ITEM NUMBER YES NO OTHER 1. Was the workshop useful and informative? 35 0 0 2. Was the information presented easy to understand? 28 1 4 3. Our goal was to provide an opportunity for an information exchange. Do you feel this was accomplished. 32 0 3 4. Did the newsletter sent to you provide advanced information? 30 1 2 COMMENTS INCLUDED IN QUESTIONS 1 THROUGH 4: (Other) - Outstanding presentations. - Adequate answers were provided to questions. - Very well done. - Could have been more background on some of the items—how they fit general plan, etc. Insufficient justification of large proposed expenditures (but available elsewhere no doubt?) - City Manager's contradictory summary unnecessary. - Information from public often misleading in this type of forum, e.g., vocal minorities don't always express accurately the true public sentiment. - A complicated subject incorporated with humor and family situation. Very good advanced information. - More precise comments from City Officials (i.e. Fire Chief—where was the Building and Planning spokesperson?) • - The flow chart was super and easy to read and understand. - No one who has a complaint or suggestion to make could say they haven't had a chance to give input. - No on City Hall expansion. No Tamarack thoroughfare. - Very well prepared. Map (coded) was great. - What newsletter? - The advanced mailing was most helpful in informing citizens of the number and size of budget categories. Your flow chart and flip charts were very good. - You had good citizen participation with a wide variety of relevant questions and even some possibly irrelevant (humorous) comments by one citizen! - Good format - easy to understand and follow. - Good use of visual aids. - Charts could have been more clear. - Better participation by citizens than has sometimes been the case. Possibly . more of them are beginning to realize the city is sincere in this effort. Page 22 COMMENTS INCLUDED IN QUESTIONS 1 THROUGH 4: (Other) (Continued) - Some residences evidently were missed in the mailing. - Somewhat too technical initially. - Newsletter good, also graphics at meeting. - The source of funds and what funds apply to what projects are not clear. It was difficult for me to figure out what projects were competing for the same funds. - Why newsletter not mailed to P.O. boxes? - The information presented was easy to understand, but I felt there was too much repetition for the time available. - Suggestion: Could you ask the public to indicate by hand or voice if they agreed with the various speakers, or did not. This would also have been useful when the Council's priority for the police facility was men- tioned. The informal vote should be taken after each speaker's presenta- tion. 5. How could the meeting have been improved? - Slightly larger visual aids would be improvement. - Some way of stimulating more public interest. - Short speech from appropriate City officials. -Start on time and not wait for latecomers, so we would have had more time. - More comfortable seats or an intermission/stretch time. - The use of the outside moderator was a great improvement over last year. - League of Women Voters added prestige to the meeting. - Map blow-up on stage. - More public input; more visual aids. - More input from both sides. - Cooler temperature inside. - Limit time to each citizen making presentation or asking questions. - Anticipate asnwers to questions. You -cannot respond that quickly. - I don't" know, you did well. - Better public address system. Require speaker to use the PA system. - Mr. Aleshire could have spoken first. He clarified the issues a great deal. - Begin promptly, at announced time. Graphs/flip charts too small. Why not use overhead projector? - We had a little outside distracting noise from building maintenance (janitorial?) employees. - Do you think a more central location would bring out more people from south of Palomar Airport Road? - By more people attending. It takes a lot of courage to get up to speak. If a mail-in list could be put in the paper and/or mailed so citizens could indi' cate priorities, there may be more input. - I am in favor of reasonable fees for park and recreation facilities such as tennis courts, etc. --if the fee collection does not cost more than the fees bring in. Page 23 5. How could the meeting have been improved? (Continued) - I think it was confusing to include the Sewer Construction money and Park development fees in the table at the top of page (7) and not include the Block Grant funds. If Block Grants could have been discussed at this meet- ing, the other (poorly attended)-block grant meetings and their cost might have been eliminated unless there is a special regulation about them. - I am against free parking for paid City officials and employees, except those who work nights. The employee fees should pay for the parking lots and upkeep. As a former employee of the City of Los Angeles and entitled to a covered (garage) parking space, I felt it was fair when we were all required to pay. It made more of us use public transportation or share. We did not take our cars to go dashing out at noon to shop, bank, etc. and arrive back to work late and tired. Unless it is part of a union contract, free parking should not be provided. 6. Do you have comments that you did not have the opportunity to express at the meeting? - Charge a fee for the use of the pool. It would help pay some of the expense of operation! It would keep out free loaders! Tell homeowners to keep their trees trimmed and off the sidewalks. - Staff very polished—Frank should be proud of all. They are almost as good as private sector folks! - There's the rutty alley next to the nice new parking lot at State and Grand. Please don't forget Jefferson around the lagoon. Walking is hazardous and difficult. - Glad people problems plan to come first—fire, police; libraries are desired but not a necessity. - Recycling pick-up by city? Aluminum cans/paper. Conservation of water/more aggressive approach by the City. Need more lights on Pio Pico by Holiday Park. - Very well organized. Opportunity for citizen input was outstanding. Ron B's answers complete and effective. Moderator provided proper amount of inter- ference. All the department heads present very impressive in convincing public of interest and concern. Effective props. - A quick summary by the moderator of projects mentioned and the feeling of the group about them might be a good way to close such a meeting. - Please thank the League of Women Voters and others for the program. - Good meeting -I'm happy that I cancelled attendance at another meeting to attend yours. - Would like to see Jefferson closed to thru traffic except for bikes and pedestrians when Marron Road goes thru. - Could you possibly rent space for new police station in the industrial com- plex at Palomar Airport Road until land and money is available. - An implementation chart should be available for citizens to see at anytime. Whenever Council takes action that must be implemented, it should be put on display chart with date. Then progress, or lack of, can be noted. Page 24 6. Do you have comments that you did not have the opportunity to express at the meeting? (Continued) - Yes. That we do not have a workable pedestrian safety and circulation policy is disgraceful and lacking in human concern. I had the opportunity to say it but I did not want to reflect such a negative assessment before the citizens present. - Since I am personally affected by the opening up of Tamarack, I hesitate to say too much but I am deeply concerned about the dangerous conditions that I fear will exist, especially between Sunnyhill and Park. The comment was made to me that the city ought to borrow money to put Elm through and charge it to the developer as development occurs. - Everything should be done that is possible to keep traffic down on Tamarack. Lots of school children use this street, and even now it is dangerous as cars have to back out into traffic. - An idea for the future - maybe we could make it more "action oriented" help- ing a citizen to find an answer to, "--how can I continue to work construc- tively with the City in solving some of the problems we face and in settling some of the issues which arise?" (M. Brownley) - Agua Hedionda Bridge $11,337,300 Cannon Road Construction 3,274,880 Traffic Signal, Clsbd/Cannon 101,300 $1.6 million you can save by eliminating undesired, unneeded traffic routing. - Make each one pay to use pool. - Consideration of assistance for library. We have one of the best in the country and we need to keep it growing. It does help our children to read plus keeping them off the streets. - Couldn't the League of Women Voters send a woman who is a resident of the City of Carlsbad? Also, she should have limited amount of time of each individual. (Send a more aggressive female!) - This open, constructive sort of public meeting is great for keeping Carlsbad a close, yet expanding community. - I, too, have tried to walk in downtown Carlsbad. Some routes are a real "adventure" and I'm not elderly. I just hope the redevelopment area and any new construction areas are required to have sidewalks. - I have concern over earlier citizen involvement in May-June but will approach this through the League of Women Voters. You are to be commended. - The best ever! - It would seem if Item 18, Hosp Grove Park, is to be developed in 1982, then Monroe will have to be paved from Elm to Marron. Parks & Recreation is projected to receive an inordinate amount of money. - Thanks for asking public. Meeting was #40 - Seems people should slow down (tickets help the City) rather than spend $1,276,250 for new road. #34 - Per discussion—I agree, should be kept as is. - More public input, more visual aids. Page 25 6. Do you have comments that you did not have the opportunity to express at the meeting? (Continued) - Would like to see Fire and Police as well as Parks beefed up in and around South Carlsbad. #7, #28, & #10 - $25. - Four Way stop at Valley & Elm is-needed. I'd like to see the library expan- sion given top priority. - I would again like to urge the funding and inclusion in the CIP of project #19 the Jefferson/Buena Vista School Park. - Yes, we need a golf course. - Funding for civic facilities is too generous considering the urgent needs of older areas in the City which have been denigrated for too long; i.e., the Village Area could produce tax income. Building Code and safety short comings. What funding is proposed to rehabilitate the older area public improvement. - Very comprehensive report and presentation. A credit to the staff. I haven't totaled the aggregate projected cost, but it must approximate the National debt! Obviously, only a small amount of capital projects will be implemented in the next few years, so it boils down to a question of priorities. When will these be established and will there be a public meeting to resolve and set priorities? Page 26 CITY OF CARLSBAD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PUBLIC MEETING September 30, 1981 7:00 P.M. Kelly School - Media Center INTRODUCTION Joyce Joseph from the League of Women Voters gave the introduction. She explained the purpose of the meeting, and indicated that the League is neither in support or opposition of the program; however, does support active participation in the Government process. Mrs. Joseph urged the citizens to call the Department of Developmental Services at City Hall, in the event that time runs short. She also indicated that the newsletter was mailed to all Carlsbad residents, and contains background information on the CIP program. Mrs. Joseph added that the green agenda sheet was provided for any public comments or suggestions.• Mrs. Joseph then introduced Mr. Ron Beckman, Assistant City Manager/Development; Mr. Frank Rowien, Assistant Finance Director; Mr. Joe Eggleston, Administrative Assistant; as the CIP Committee. Mr. Beckman introduced Larry Dossey, Principal Civil Engineer; Tom Hagaman, Principal Planner; Elizabeth Fairchild, who put together the graphics and the newsletter; and City Council Members Girard Anear, Ann Kulchin, and Claude Lewis. In addition, Mr. Beckman introduced Frank Aleshire, City Manager; James Hagaman, Planning Director; Bobbie Hoder, from the Library; Jerome Pieti, Personnel Director; Roger Greer, Director of Utilities; Les Evans, City Engineer; David Bradstreet, Director of Parks and Recreation;. Vince Jimno, Chief of Police; Marty Orenyak, Building Official; and Tony Mata, Building Inspector. Purpose of Public Meeting With the aid of a flip chart, Mr. Ron Beckman gave some background on the Capital Improvement Budget, and indicated that the Committee reviews all projects and makes recommendations to the City Council with regard to which projects should be funded. He explained that the CIP program focuses attention on the upcoming five years, with particular attention paid to the first year. He added that the meeting allows the public to participate in an information exchange with City Staff, as well as citizen input. In addition, Mr. Beckman explained that following input from the public and Staff, the Committee will make considerations with regard to projected needs, fulfilled needs, changed needs, cost of operation, available funds, spending limits, prioritization, and public input. The summary will then be presented to the City Council. Page 27 Mr. Beckman encouraged those who do not wish to speak to contact him at City Hall, and he indicated that all comments are valid. General Plan 'Mr. Beckman briefly explained the General Plan, and indicated that same includes goals and objectives which are general guidelines. Capital Improvement Program Preparation With the aid of a flow chart, Mr. Beckman outlined the CIP Program preparation. Fiscal Review Mir. Beckman introduced Mr. Frank Rowlen, who continued the presentation. With the aid of a flip chart, Mr. Rowlen explained the role of the Finance Department in the CIP Program. Mr. Rowlen continued to outline the summary of funds available for Capital Improvements, indicating that over the next five years, the City will receive 29.9.05 million dollars to finance Capital Improvements. He also covered the project expenditure requests by category, and stated that decisions will have to be made as to how to bring the program into balance. Mr. Rowlen briefly explained revenue resources, with regard to the General Capital Construction Fund, Sewer Construction, Revenue Sharing, Public Facilities Fees, Park Development Fees, and the Water Enterprise Fund. Mr. Beckman explained that the problem the City faces is that there are $30 million dollars in projected revenues, and $60 million dollars in requests and/or needs. Ground Rules Mrs. Joyce Joseph then explained the rules to be observed during the meeting. Questions and Answers Mrs. Rita Johnson addressed the Committee, and commended City Staff on their newsletter, indicating that same was very well written and understandable. Mr. Wayne Lingenfelter addressed the Committee and indicated he was representing the Carlsbad Soccer Club. He urged the adoption of Project 19, the Jefferson/Buena Vista School Park. He stated that the Club currently has 43 teams, with approximately 600 children participating. By 1984, they project 1000 children will have interest in the Club; and feel that and this growth justifies the need for the tw-o extra fields in this project. He stated they would also like to add soccer goals to go along with the backstops, benches, and bleachers. . Page 28 Mr. Hugh Singleton addressed the Committee, and suggested that the City place high priority on housing itself. He added that Staff should recommend placing highest priority on the Police and Utility Services Center to the City Council, and reiterated the crowded conditions at the current Police facility. Mr. Singleton further suggested that Staff recommend equal priority to the request for City Hall expansion. Mr. Singleton stated his opinion that if the City is growing by 2500 persons per year, City Hall expansion should be a number one priority, if they are to handle other projected needs. He added that Staff should recommend to the City Council that the City purchase land of adequate acreage for a new location for City Hall; which he suggests should be in the geographical center of the City, in the area of Palomar Airport Road. In conclusion, Mr. Singleton stated that if the City Council could implement the above, the City would not have to impact on residential neighborhoods for expansion. Laurie Nelson-Boone addressed the Committee, and referred to Item 38, the Elra Avenue Interconnect, in which she stated does not correspond to the map. Mr. Beckman explained that it was a typographical error. Mrs. Boone also inquired if an Elm Avenue extension to El Camino Real was projected within the next five years. Mr. Beckman explained that .the existing policy is if there is development on the land through which the Elm Avenue extension would be located, the responsibility of that development is to provide the street construction. With regard to Item 41, Tamarack Avenue, Mrs. Boone inquired if this construction project included widening Tamarack Avenue from Skyline to Sunnyhill. Mr. Beckman explained that the old designation of that stretch of right- of-way is Birch, which coincides with Tamarack Avenue; therefore, it is intended to be that stretch of roadway between Sunnyhill and Skyline that will be widened at the same time the developer north of Skyline builds that section of road. Mrs. Boone referred to the map of the City, and explained that Calavera Hills is currently being developed on Tamarack, and the center of the City is going to be moving from its current location, to a more southerly direction, specifically the east side of El Camino Real. She continued that Tamarack Avenue will be the only through street that will run from the east side, all the way to the ocean; and her concern is that Tamarack Avenue was never designed to be the major thoroughfare of the City, as it is a residential area, Mrs. Roone suggested that the City encourage other development, so that Elm Avenue can go through, and/or improvement of Chestnut Avenue, to make them safer streets that can be utilized as thoroughfares. _o — Page 29 Mr. Don Brown, Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce, addressed the Committee. With regard to Item 35, he inquired if the $207,000 is a mandatory requirement from a State or Federal agency for bike lanes. Mr. Beckman explained that same will come from grant money. With regard to Item 37, the El Cainino Real and Carlsbad Boulevard medians, Mr. Brown indicated that there might be some dollars saved here in the area of future maintenance costs, if the City would consider not developing medians and/or not planting, versus solid pavement, which is low in maintenance. Mr. Brown stated he had a concern that was not listed in the newsletter, and inquired as to the possibility of development to save and/or maintain the beaches. He suggested the City consider putting money in that area to pick up the costs that will be involved as far as City property is concerned. He suggested $50,000 as the City's share toward a Longard Tube, Ms. Alice Beach addressed the Committee, and inquired how the citizens will be protected if the economy worsens. She stated her opinion that there is an imbalance in park development fees, and improvement projects, and expressed concern that the City plans to build such developments as Macario Canyon Park, when there are people who cannot even enter the housing raarket due to soaring interest rates. Mr. Rowlen reiterated that the CIP Program is a five year plan, and each year the City is continually monitoring and projecting revenue sources and availability. He added that when the Program is finalized, same will be in balance. Ms. Beach expressed concern over the cost of maintenance of the new swim complex and the shortage of water, and stated she does not understand the justification of same and the requests for use of reclaimed water. Mr. Beckman explained that the City is concerned with the economic projections, the issue of water, and the operational expense of the swimming pool; however, he indicated that he could not answer her concerns at this meeting due to time contraints, and invited her to meet with him during City Hall hours. In conclusion, Ms. Beach stated she was in opposition to the Swim Complex and Macario Canyon Park, and indicated she was concerned if the citizens of Carlsbad were aware of the costs of these projects. Mr. Beckman responded that the City does consider the balance of revenues and the balance of expenditures when programs are adopted. He added that both Staff, in its recommendations to Council, and the City Council, in programs that it adopts, considers the operational expenses, so that the City does not burden itself with programs it cannot afford. Mr. John Conti addressed the Committee, and stated his opinion that it seems the largest portion of the budget seems to deal with civil facilities. Mr. Conti suggested that it would be very informative to the citizens to find out how the projects were approved, without having to go to City Hall to check the records. He also inquired why there is such an inconsistency with square footage prices for certain buildings. -A- Page 30 Mr. Conti added that he is concerned that some of the money may go errant, and he would like to know who it goes to. Mr. Beckman explained that that discrepancy has been pointed out by City Staff, and part of the problem is that some of the projects may simply be the cost of construction of a building, and others may include the cost of land, while others may include the cost of equipping a facility. He stated they are not all in the same context. Les Evans, the City Engineer, explained that the City Council, at public meetings, approves all plans and specifications, approves the award of bids, and approves the itemized costs. Vincent Jimno, Chief of Police, indicated that certain facilities are extremely expensive today. If the City were to build a police facility today under current market values, it would run $110 per square foot, for the facility itself. This does not include any land. He added that inflation will run that figure up to approximately $140-$150 per square foot, and police stations are twice as expensive as a standard office building. Chief Jimno'concluded that you have to look at the type of facility that is being built, and the service level that it is going to provide. David Bradstreet, Director of Parks and Recreation, explained that you have to look at the year the facility is going to be built, and add cost appreciation, which is 25% per year. Roger Greer, Utilities and Maintenance Director, indicated that the newsletter is a summary of information provided on each project. There is a breakdown of costs on specific projects, which will be published on the CIP and available in all City Departments. In response to Chief Jimno's comments, Mr. Conti stated his opinion that the value of construction is only what people are willing to pay. He added that if you continually pay $130 per foot, that is what the construction is going to be. For clarification purposes, Council Member Anear explained that if the City Council does not like the bids they will reject them, and scale the project down, or go back to bid again. He added that they attempt to go to bid at the most favorable time. Mr. Pete Garcia addressed the Committee, and inquired if the restricted sewer construction fund has enough leeway to use some of the funds for related items such as storm drains. Mr. Beckman explained that the funds must be spent on construction directly related to providing sewage treatment or transmission. He added that the City has a separate fund, and a storm drain master plan, and are accumulating funds under same. Mr. Garcia added that his other concern was the large deficit on parks, and inquired if the City has analyzed the possibility of selling some of the land they receive from developers under current market values, and utilizing the revenue for the deficit in that area. -5- Page 31 David Bradstreet, the Parks and Recreation Director, responded that he felt same is a good suggestion; however, by the restrictions of AB 1150 (the Quimby Act,) which is where the City collects land or fees from developers, the City cannot sell the land unless it goes back to the vote of the public. He added that same may be a recommendation that Staff will make in some of those areas. Director Bradstreet continued that they are in the process of revising the Master Plan, and looking at a number of different areas they hope can be exchanged, sold, or traded. They are also looking at larger facilities, and fewer of them; and not so many smaller facilities. He added that they are also looking at efficient maintenance, and the long range costs, as to no over-burden the City. Mr. Beckraan explained that there is a new Parks and Recreation Element in preparation right now that will be going to Council within the next several months. He added that if land is dedicated to the City as parks land, there is a very precise State Law that governs how the City can get it out of being park land. Ms. Julie Nygaard addressed the Committee, and inquired if the $2.00 sewer surcharge will be removed by 1982. Mr. Beckman responded that it would be removed in December, 1982; as the City's current revenue projections indicate that it will be paid off. Mr. Richard O'Plesham (?) addressed the Committee, and expressed concern over the traffic congestion in the area of La Costa and the Mall. He also stated he hopes the City Council will consider maintaining downtown Carlsbad and the beach area as it is now. He feels widening of any streets in those areas will create additional traffic congestion. Mr. Beckman explained that one of the elements of the Downtown Streetscape Plan includes maintaining a tolerable level of congestion, and keeping with a village atmosphere. Mrs. Thelma Hayes addressed the Committee, and stressed that provisions be made for pedestrians. Mrs. Hayes stated her feeling that the downtown area is not a safe place for pedestrians. She referred to Item 44, which provides for a flashing traffic light at the Army and Navy Academy, and suggested that same should be approved. In conclusion, Mrs. Hayes requested the City give priority to providing safe conditions where people can walk. Council Member Anear inquired as to the status of the Sidewalk Improvement Program. Mr. Beckman explained that, in their current Capital Program, Council did allocate funds to be used as City contribution money to sidewalk projects, or other related projects that could be done by assessment district proceedings. He added that the City has not forgotten the issue; however, is not there yet. -6- Page 32 Mr. John Gray addressed the Committee, and requested clarification on Item 4, the location of the City Hall expansion. Mr. Beckman explained that it would be west of the building where the parking lot is. With regard to Item 3, the Central Library, Mr. Gray stated he interpreted that it will replace the current Library, and inquired regarding same. Mr. Beckman explained that the Central library is not intended to replace the the current library. Council has indicated that they should consider a plan to build a library in southern Carlsbad, and there is a task force that is conducting site searches at the present time. Mr. Beckman continued that at a joint meeting of the City Council and library Board of Trustees, discussion included concerns of the designation of "central" and "branch" libraries. Mr. Harold Clarke addressed the Committee, and commended City Staff on the information presented to the public on the CIP Program. Mr. Clarke addressed several items in the proposed CI? Program, and expressed concern regarding the funding of same, with the phasing out of grant funds from the Federal Government, and the impact of Federal taxes. Mr. Charlie D. Green (?) addressed the Committee. He referred to Item 23, Occidental Park, and stated his opinion that the City does not need same. Director Bradstreet from Parks, and Recreation responded that the City agrees with Mr. Green (?), and the present location of the 3.66 acre park is not conducive to the City's park development program. He added that they are attempting to trade the land for fees, and as development commences, they are looking at a community park in the flat area that would be a multi-use park, both passive and active to serve the needs of the community. For clarification purposes, Mr. Beckman explained that many of the projects are from the second, third, and fourth years of last years CIP Program; which are under old and/or existing parks policy. He added that the Parks and Recreation Element is being totally revised. Mr. Beckman continued that all of the existing projects in prior five year CIP Programs are considered, and they have to consider same. Mr. George Mason addressed the Committee, and spoke in favor of Item 54, the traffic signals proposed at Elm Avenue and Monroe. Mr. Mason also inquired as to the status of the northern extension of Monroe Street, from Elm Avenue to Marron. Mr. Beckman explained that Council has approved some tract maps which have a condition of a two lane road through to Marron Road. He added that he cannot give a projection on same. -7- Page 33 Mrs. Margaret Brownley addressed the Committee, and referred to Item 36, the Cannon Road Construction. Mrs. Brownley expressed concern regarding the traffic that will be generated on Tamarack Avenue. She stated that the former City Engineer indicated that if Cannon Road could go through, it would take 50% of the projected traffic from Tamarack Avenue. In conclusion, Mrs. Brownley stated her opinion that same would be a great benefit for other through traffic streets. James Hagaman, the Planning Director, indicated that the City is still debating with the Coastal Commission on the matter. Discussion then reflected the issue of storm drains. 'Ms. Alice Beach addressed the Committee, and stated she understood there were provisions for the repair of storm drains. Larry Dossey, Principal Civil Engineer, explained that same is the responsibility of the State, and the City occasionally assists with the equipment, Mr. Pete Garcia addressed Items 3, 4, and 10; and stated his opinion that it seems very ambitious for a City the size of Carlsbad. He inquired if the City has plans for a study as an alternative to spending that money, such as better utilization of the present facilities. Mr. Beckman explained that the City has engaged several professional consultants who have done studies in this area. He added that studies have also been done as to space needs, and the City is underspaced for its present needs. Mr. Beckman continued that the City is trying everything possible by modular facilities that can be used now for City Hall purposes, and at a later time might be used for a park program. He explained that the problem is obtaining a specific piece of land. Mr. Hugh Singleton questioned where the problem lies in acquiring the land. Mr. Beckman explained that one of the sites they are looking at is property that is currently owne'd by the County, and the City has been attempting to negotiate with the County to acquire that land. He further explained that the County purchased the land with money from a Federal Grant, as opan space; therefore, the County has constraints on what they can do with that land. Frank Aleshire, the City Manager, indicated that the City is making progress, and is close to an agreement with the County. He added that the City Council has indicated that same is top priority. With regard to the Program, Mr. Aleshire explained that the City must operate on a balanced budget, and cannot have deficit spending. He continued to give some background on how the City and City Council operates, with regard to the budget and CI? Program. -8- Page 34 Mr. Aleshire continued to explain the Public Facilities Fee, and discussion reflected same. In conclusion, Mr. Aleshire indicated that the Council has designated the new police facility as top priority. If looked at over a long period of time, he explained that there will be enough money from new development to pay for the necessary projects. He added that all the projects can be phased. Conclusion Mrs. Joyce Joseph encouraged public input, and indicated that any comments submitted on the green evaluation forms would be taken into consideration as part of this public meeting. Respectfully Submitted, Ann.R. Alleman Minutes Clerk — 9— Page 35 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager CIP Coordinator C November 19, 1981 PRIORITIZATION OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) PROJECTS The City Manager and Department Heads have submitted their prioritization of projects: City Manager Utilities Library Fire PRIORITY # PROJECT # 1 10 a) Design b) Utilities, fence, grade, pave 2 4 a) Design For 1982: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 19 22 29 * 34 37 38 39 41 43 46 48 56 55 57 56 1 9 3 6 ** 7 5 . * Withdrawn ** Combined with #10 Page 36 November 19, 1981 PRIORITIZATION OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) PROJECTS Page 2 Police Engineering Parks & Recreation PRIORITY # 1 2 3 (Projects #2 & #8 tie 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 opment 1 2 3 4 n 1 2 3 4 5 6 PROJECT # 10 8 ** 2 in with Project #10.) 41 or 42? 43 or 44? 46 38 35 34 Palomar Airport & 1-5 Bridge? 37 54 48 39 30 40 33 32 53 49 45 29 * 28 * 26 * 27 * 19 16 18 22 n 25 * Withdrawn ** Combined with Project #10 Page 37 November 19, 1981 PRIORITIZATION OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) PROJECTS Page 3 PRIORITY # PROJECT # Parks & Recreation (Continued)7 8 9 10 11 12 17 12 15 13 24 23 ACM/Operations has recommended that money for land acquisition be retained. Copies of documents recommending department priorities were previously pro- vided to the CIP Committee Members. Projects not prioritized: 14, 20, 21, 31, 36, 47, 50, 51 & 52 RAB/JNE/cle Attachment Page 38 PROJECT PRIORITIZATION PROJECT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 n 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 PRIORITY 1 - Library 3 - Police 3 - Library 2 - City Manager 3 - Fire 1 - Fire ** 2 - Fire 2 - Police ** 2 - Library 1 - CM/1 - Police 5 - P&R 8 - P&R 10 - P&R Deleted by P&R Dir. Sept. 8, '81 9 - P&R 2 - P&R 7 - P&R 3 - P&R '82, 1 -CM/1 -P&R Deleted by P&R Dir. Sept. 8, '81 '82, 2-CM/4-P&R 12 - P&R 11 - P&R 6 - P&R PROJECT 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 PRIORITY 3 - H&R * 4 - H&R * '82, 3-CM/2-H&R * 1 - H&R * 12 - Engr. 15 - Engr. 14 - Engr. '82, 4-CM/6-Engr. 5 - Engr. '82, 5-CM/8-Engr. '82, 6-CM/4-Engr. '82, 7-CM/ll-Engr. 13 - Engr. '82, 8-CM/l-Engr.(or 42?) 1 - Engr.(or 41?) '82, 9-CM/2-Engr.(or 44?) 2 - Engr.(or 43?) 18 - Engr. '82, 10-CM/3-Engr. '82, 11-CM/lO-Engr. 17 - Engr. * Withdrawn ** Combined with Project #10 Page 39 PROJECT PRIORITIZATION (Continued) PROJECT PRIORITY 51 52 53 16 - Engr. 54 9 - Engr. 55 1 - Utilities 56 '82, 12-CM/3-Utilities 57 2 - Utilities Page 40 JULY 27, 1981 TO: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT - Joe Eggleston FROM: City Manager CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Projects I would like to see on CIP: 1. Police Building land design 2. City Yard land design 3. City Hall Expansion design 4. Medians - construct to city standard - El Camino 5. Fire station locations (3) site acquisition FRANK ALESHIRE City Manager FA:ldg DECEIVED JUL2C1981 " OF CARLSBAD •-iopmentaj Services Page 41 August 21, 1381 Memorandum Board ol Irusloes of CorKbod Ciiij f iliari; RECEIVED A||f>o j -joqi / . ^VirJi •*- l>»v) ! ,:/ OF CARLSBAD veioprnental Services* TO: Ron Beekman, Assistant City Managsr/Dsveloprnental Services FROM: Library Board of Trustees . .( SUBJECT: 1981-86 CIP The Library Board of Trustees has voted, to recommend that the fol lowing statement serve as a certification of necessity for both the addition to 'the "children's room and the modular unit since they do not meet specific Council goals and objectives. In September 1976, the Carlsbad City Council acknowledged the space needs of the Library by approving an agreement for archi- tectural services to develop a preliminary plan for a children's library. Subsequently, with the passage of Proposition 13, the plans for a children's facility were shelved. Space needs have continued to be a problem for the Library as well as for other City departments. The rental of the storage facility has provided very little relief to the crowded shelving and has done nothing to provide the additionally needed floor space. All Civic Center facilities were built prior to the annexation of La Costa and surrounding areas. The population of Carlsbad was small and fairly stable and the civic facilities were, in theory, of a size to last well into the future. With the doubling of the size of the City and more than doubling of the population, measures must be taken to provide some small immed|ate relief to the over- crowded conditions. •'••-:•'•• The Board recommends that both items be included in the 1981-86 CfP.',..'. V Thank you for your consideration. " - 0 "- < Seena Trigas, President Library Board of Trustees STrch IZ?0 C!.:fl AVENUE CADLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 9?.00»(714) 7Z9-793J • Page 42 MEMORAND U M TO : Ron Beckynan, Asst. City Manager, Developmental Services VIA.: David Bradstrect, Parks £ Recreation Director""jj^> FROM: Doug Duncanson 5 Parks Superintendent' ^.^i SUI3J: 1982 Capital Improvement Program // DATE: September 8, 1981 The Parks and Recreation Department has reviewed the project descriptions for the 1982 C.I.P. The following comments are submitted. 1. It is recommended that Cannon Lake Park and Larwin Park be deleted from the 1982-86 proposed 5 year expenditure, plan, 2. We request the. above mentioned parks still be considered for possible future development but not during the 19'82-86 C.I.P. period. . In addition to the above deletions 5 the following comments or words should be added to the project description. 1. #11. v"..'.- -bucket truck, to meet street tree maintenance demands. Existing 'truck is 11 years old and requires continued repair. 2. #18. . . . Hosp Grove ~ Provides for seven acres of minimally developed. . . . ; 3. #22. . . . Macario Canyon Park - The word, "temporary" should be placed in front of access roads. This will not confuse people who may think it refers to completely developed streets. DD/jb r/\fJ'.SBAD c e. .*-, ^ t-t P ~ v Page 43 E. L. McC'andiess 2416 La Hluma Lane Carlsbad, CA 921)03 23 September 81 Mr. Prank Aleshire Carlsbad City Manager Dear Mr. Aleshire: Savings of #100,000 to #200,000 should bo possible by converting GIF Project 38, "Elra Avenue Interconnect", to the plan used successfully for the last 50 years on Manhattan avenues: Just arrange to show "Elm green" simultaneously at every signal for about two minutes, then red for 15 or 20 seconds. At 25 mph, most cars could travel frosi Monroe to State with only one red light, or none. Ko computers, no sensors. Elm Avenue is almost ideal for the Manhattan plan, and would be perfect if all cross streets were made one-way and left-turn lanes painted on Elm Avenue at each signal. Congratulations on your September "Carlsbad Report." Sincerely, - '^ C • DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES CX Assistant City Manager (714) 433-5500 D Building Department (714) 433 0025 D Ennln3«!ring Department (714) 453-5541 D Housing 6 Rso'ovoJopmant Dspartmsnl (714)433-5011 D Planning Department (714) 433-5531 September 29, 1381 C Cttp of Czu-lsbsb Page 44 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92003 Mr. E. L. McCandless 2416 La Pluma Lane Carlsbad, CA 92003 REFERENCE: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM RESPONSE Dear Mr. McCandless: Thank you very much for your letter of September 23rd and its suggestions concerning potential savings in our Capital Improvement Program. We are always looking for any way we can to save our limited capital resources. As you point out, the suitability of your suggestion will be determined by the traffic circulation patterns that will be developed for the down- town area. Copies of your letter will be furnished to the City Engineer and to the Traffic Engineer. Thank you for your comments on our newsletter. We hope it proved informa- tive to you and to the rest of the Carlsbad citizens. Thanks again for your response too. Truly yours, RONALD A. BECKMAN Assistant City Manager/ Developmental Services RAB/cle cc: City Manager City Engineer Traffic Engineer Page 45 355 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 October 5, 1981 To: Frank Aleshire, City Manager From: F. Runzo RE: CIP Public Meeting, September 30, I98I 1. I found the workshop useful and informative. ^b\(^~ _• 2. The information presented was easy to understand, but ! '• : felt there was too much repetition for the time available. 3. Your goal was accomplished.J-* • * Ati t .i our yoai was oc corn pi isneu. Suggestion: Could you ask the public to indicate by hand or voice vote if they agreed with the various speakers, or did not. This would also have been useful when the Counci priority for the police facility was mentioned. The infor vote should be token after each speaker's presentation. or Is forma 4. Newsletter good, also graphics et meeting. <5. Suggestions for improvement and comment. I think it was confusing to include the Sewer Construction money and Park Development Fees in the tebvle at the top of page (7) and not include the Block Grant funds. If Block Grants could have been disc.u.ssed at this meeting, the other (poorly attended) block grant meetings end their cost-might hove been eliminated unless there is a special regulation about them. I em in favor of reasona^&e fees for pork and recreation .facilities such as tennis courts, etc. if the fee collection does not cost more than the fees bring in. I am aqa i nsj free parking for paid City officials end employees, except those who work nights. The employee fees should the parking lots and upkeep. As a former employee of the City of Los Angeles and entitled to a covered (.garage) parking space I felt it was fair when we were all required to pay. It madeynore of use public transportation or share. We did not take our cars to ?o dashing out at noon to shop, bank, etc. and arrive bock to work ate and tired. Unless it is part of a union contract, free parking should not be provided. Please thank the League of Women Voters and others for the program. Yours truly, pay for us Frank i e Runzo • (Mrs. James Runzo) Page 46 MEMORANDUM DATE: October 22, 1981 TO: Drew Aitken, Housing and Redevelopment FROM: James C. Hagaman, Planning Director >.!/"-/ SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAL-7 CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION Housinq and Redevelopment has four projects in the 1932-86 Capit^il Improvement Prograra. None o£ these projects can be given a -General Plan consistency determination due to the lack of spec- ific locations. When. specific locations are available, each one must have a consistency determination. This is required by Sec- tion 65401 of the Government Code. The Planning Department staff will schedule each item for the Planning Cormnisson when you can provide complete information. cc: Joa Eggleston S Jim Elliott . - , Larry Dossey Ton Hageman JCH:JC:wl RECEIVED OC72G1SS1 CITY OF CARLSBAD Developmental Services .lgage-48- V-.M&r'.-'.- JS ^ j&U /mau&H£ (I /' ^_^^^_/2^^yi^x/ ^fUu 4c4t0 U^ _*<xj /^u^ C^&o) SK^UZJL ^u^f ^ Page 47 M^^ &jtd! &*i£t&0 '^Ji^4^1^r£^c^ '_(te&u^L^ \ \ . '• I:- i \'-f'".C'\ ': '• I 1 •' ': '' ''I- ........ ... ..._._._.__.. .. W^JtiL^ AULUJtULL \ •^ "^i*t&uL -^ ^^ ^ Page 51 RECEIVED November 17, 1981 NOV1SI981 Mem°randum CITY OF CARLSBAD TO: CIP Coordinator Developmental Services: FROM: Library Director SUBJECT: 1982 CIP Funding Justification — ADDITION TO CHILDREN'S LIBRARY In accordance with your instructions, we offer the following information on the need to increase the size of the Children's Room: As an indicator of the numbers of children with whom we deal on a regular basis, the statistics shown below have been developed. The information for the year 1975 was taken from data furnished by CPO on the Special Census. 1975 1981 Total City Population 19,207 35,550 Residents 0-14 years of age ^,05^ 6,285 The 1981 information on residents aged 0-1 k was obtained by contacting the public and private schools in Carlsbad for the number of students in K-8; Flora Vista, Capri and Oak Crest Schools in Encinitas, and the San Marcos School District, for numbers of Carlsbad students. Projections used by Carlsbad for incoming K students each year, were used to estimate the number of pre-school children in the city. The statistics shown below attest to the volume of increase in library usage. Children's Department Only Total Circulation I Reference Children's Programs I Adult 6 Children Questions Programs Attended FY 197V75 213,5^5 3,961 170 10,232 FY 1980/81 * 37^,843 **9,456 ** 223 ** 20,577 I 75% increase | | 139% increase)J31% increase! |100% increase! * Does not include circulation of films, video tapes or AV equipment. ** Includes December 13-23, 1980 when children's department was closed for re-carpeting. The library program is being carried on in the same total number of square feet as when the building was completed and occupied in 1968. The Children's Department program is conducted in an area of 1,200 square feet — the same as when it started. Page 52 To CIP Coordinator page two November 17, 1981 We reiterate a statement in the memo to you from the Library Board of Trustees, dated August 21, 1981: "All Civic Center facilities were built prior to the annexation of La Costa and surrounding areas. The population of Carlsbad was small and fairly stable and the civic facilities were, in theory, of a size to last well into the future. With the doubling of the size of the city and more than doubling of the population, measures must be taken to provide some small immediate relief to the overcrowded conditions." The 1,200 square foot addition to the Children's Room of the existing library is the most logical, economical and expedient way to provide some immediate relief. A building program for a new library facility will take years to develop and complete, and will do little to solve the space needs in this building. The reasons which create the need for City Hall enlargement and the new Fire Stations are the same as those which create the Library's needs. c/ Georgiria D. Cole Library Director GDC/ch cc: City Manager Page 53 MEMORANDUM DATE: November 19, 1981 TO: Ron Beckman, Assitant City Manager/Developmental Services VIA: Marty Orenyak, Building Official FROM: Andrew J. Aitken, Community Development SUBJECT: CIP PROJECTS/ REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING The Redevelopment Section of the Building Department has reviewed the Housing and Redevelopment Projects in the current Capital Improvements budget. These proejcts include, the Village Redevelopment and Housing Property Acquisition, Parking structure, and Streetscape Construction for Transit Transfer Points. These projects have been discussed with the Finance Director and the Assistant City Manager/Development Services. Following these discussions, it appears to be appropriate to re-evaluate their continued existence under the Capital Improvements Program. It appears more appropriate for these projects to be funded under other sources. Other funding sources that are appropriate for these activities are the Community Development Block Grant Program, the ability under Redevleopment Law to issue tax increment bonds, and to issue mortgage revenue bonds (SB 99). These other funding sources are more responsive to the speculative nature of the projects proposed for funding under the Captial Improvements Program. The other funding sources will give the Council the opportunity to fund these projects as they become a reality. Therefore, we would request that the Council eliminate the Redevelopment Property Acquisition, the Housing Project Acquisition, the Streetscape Project Construction, Transit Transfer and the Parking Structure Projects from the current Capital Improvements Program. cc: Jim Elliott Frank Mannen