HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-04-20; City Council; 6858-2; MINOR REVISION TO 19 UNIT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CONDOMINIUM PERMIT, EAST SIDE OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD BETWEEN TAMARACK AND SEQUOIA - AMERICAN WEST#
TITLE:MINoR REVISION TO A 19 UNIT TENTATIVE DEP' 9
MTG-+~-
RECOM M EN DED ACTION:
AB# 6 859-
TRAC'T YAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT; EAST CITY SIDE OF CARLSRAD SOULEVARD BETWEEN
DEPT.~ TAMARACK AND SEQUOIA - AMERICAN WEST CITY
Approve the minor revision of CT 81-44/CP-190 requested by t!
applicant.
e & ly: CL 2
.. z 0 i= 0
i 0 z 3 0 0
a
ITEM EXPLANATION:
This item is a request for a minor revision to a previously
approved Condominium Permit. Specifically, the applicant
requests a reduction of the number of units from 19 to 18 by
eliminating the northernmost unit on the third floor. This result in a density of 26.4 du/ac, within the General Plan r o€ 20-30 du/ac designated on this site.
This request is being made because the originally approved
for this project indicated an incorrect site acerage of .8 a
The actual acreage of this site is .68 acres. Based on the correct acreage, the actual approved density is 27.9 du/ac,
units per acre higher than the density of 23.7 du/ac which h
incorrectly represented at the City Council meeting.
This error was discovered at the Coastal Commission hearing as a result, a condition was placed requiring the applicant secure a letter from the city verifying that the project doc exceed a density of 23.7 du/ac. Since the project does excc
this density, the applicant will be subject to further Coas? Commission review.
Staff believes that the proposed changes are minor in naturt should be approved. In effect, the project will be reduced unit; no other development standards will be affected. The
represented density will increase from the incorrect 23.7 dt to 26.4 du/ac. Staff believes this increase is not signific
and recommends agproval.
EXHI BITS
1. Staff Report dated, April 20, 1982
2, PC Resolution No. 1896
3. Staff Report dated, December 9, 1981 w/attachments
4. Coastal Development Permit 6-82-007
9 e
STAFF REPORT
DATE : April 20, 1982
TO : City Council
FROM : Planning Department
SUBJECT: CT 81-44/CP-190, AMERICAN WEST - Request for a minor
revision to a 19 unit tentative tract map and condo-
minium permit on property located on the east side of
Carlsbad Boulevard between Tamarack Avenue and Sequoi Avenue in the RD-M zone.
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to reduce the number of units from
to 18 by eliminating the northernmost unit an the third floor.
This will result in a density of 26.4 du/ac. The applicant is
requesting that the City Council find this change to be a minc revision to the previously approved tentative tract map and condominium permit.
This amendment is being processed because the oriqinal plans f
this project indicated an incorrect acreage which affected thc
project's overall density. On the submitted exhibits, the applicant represented the acreage of the site as .8 acres whil in reality, it is .68 acres. As a result, the City Council approved a project which they thought had a density of 23.7 dL when in reality it had a density of 27.9 du/ac.
This error was discovered at the Coastal Commission hearing ar
the Coastal Commission placed a special condition on the apprc
of the project which stated:
Prior to transmittal of the coastal development perm
the applicant shall submit to the District Director i letter from the city of Carlsbad Planning Department verifying that the density of the project does not exceed 23.7 dwelling units per acre based on the acrc
for the project site that the city allows for determ ing density (see attached Coastal Permit).
Since the project exceeds this density, the city cannot write letter. The applicant is unwilling to reduce the project by units to comply with a density of 23.7 du/ac.
EXHIBIT 1
9 0
Background
The City Council originally denied a 21 unit project for this site, on September 1, 1981. The Council was concerned with tk density of the project and directed the applicant to redesign
project to reduce its massiveness and lower its height. On
October 21, 1981 the applicant submitted a revised plan for l!
units, which slightly reduced the height and massiveness of tl
project. According to the information supplied by the applic( this redesign would have reduced the density to 23.7 du/ac.
Despite strong oppostion from the surrounding residents, this
project was approved by both the Planning Commission and City
Council. As mentioned previously, the discrepancy in the
acreage of the site was discovered when this project was submitted to the Coastal Commission.
11. ANALYSIS
1. Are the proposed revisions minor in nature and substantially in conformance with the previously approved tentative tract map and condominium permit
Discussion
As mentioned previously, the applicant is proposing to reduce
the number of units from 19 down to 18 by eliminating the northernmost unit on the third floor. This will result in a
density of 26.4 du/ac. The original plan for this project,
du/ac. When denying this project the City Council expressed concerns about the density and massiveness of the project. T
second plan for this project, which was approved by the city, represented the density as being 23.7 du/ac when in reality i was 27.9 du/ac. As shown by these figures, the proposed revisions will result in a density almost identical to the fi
pro j ect .
The Council should be aware that staff has concerns about the size of this project in relation to the existing structures i
the vicinity. Staff feels that the massive design of this project is out of character with the existing buildings in th area. However, staff feels that the proposed reduction in density makes the project more acceptable. The elimination o
the northernmost unit on the third floor will help to reduce
massive appearance of the building. As shown on the elevatio
the revised project will step-up from both the north and sout
which provided for 21 units, represented the density as 26.25
ends *
In summary, the proposed revisions will result in less dwelli units, but a greater density due to the acreage error on the previously submitted plans. Overall, the revised project wil have less effect on the neighborhood than the previously
approved pro] ect .
-2-
e 0
Recommend at ion
Staff has reviewed the proposed revisions and recommends that
the City Council find them minor in nature and substantially :
conformance with the previously approved tentative tract map i condominium permit.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Staff Report dated, December 9, 1981
2. Location Map
3. Background Data Sheet
4. Disclosure Form
5. Coastal Development Permit 6-82-007
6. Reduced Exhibits
7. Exhibits ''A" - "I" dated, April 7, 1982
MH : ar
4/7/82
-3-
I. i
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
21
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
b
w 0
PLANNING COMMISS,ION RESOLUTION NO. 9896
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A 19
UNIT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE
OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD BETWEEN TAMARACK AVENUE
AND SEQUOIA AVENUE,
APPLICANT: AMERICAN WEST
CASE NO: CT 81 -44/cp-i 9a,
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property,
wit:
Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 20 in Block H of Palisades in t
of Carlsbad according to map thereof 1747 filed Februa
1923
has been filed with the city of Carlsbad, and referred to
Planning Commission: and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a reque
provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREASo the Planning Commission did, on the 9th day c
December, 9981, hold a duly noticed public hearing as pres
by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and cons
all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desirj
be heardp said Commission considered all factors relating
Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
sion as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct,
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hei
the Commission APPROVES sf CT 81-44/CP-190, based on 1 following findings and subject to the following condil
////
///(
////
EXHIBIT 3
I
#*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
a7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
c
e 0
Findinqs:
1) The project is consistent with the city's General Plan
the proposed density of 23-7 du's/acre is within the d
range of 20-30 du's/acre specified for the site as ind on the Land Use Element of the General Plan and can be
fied for the reasons stated in the staff report.
The site is physically suitable for the (ype and densi
to accommodate residential development at the density
posed.
cies and ordinances since:
a) The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an ai
ate condition to this condominium permit and tent:
subdivision map, insured that the final map will I approved unless the City Council finds that sewer
is available to serve the project. In addition, 1
Planning Commission has added a condition that a I
shall be placed on the final map that building pel may not be issued for the condominium project unlt
City Engineer determines that sewer service is av; *and building cannot occur within the project unle: service remains available, the Planning Commissior
satisfied that the requirements of the public fac:
element of the General Plan have been met insofar
--apply to sewer service for this tentative map and
minium permit approval.
b) School facilities will be available to this projec
indicated by the Carlsbad Unified School District letter dated December 3, 1981.
2) the development since the site is adequate in size ani
3) The project is consistent with all city public facilit
c) Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of ,
d) All necessary public improvements have been provi
will be required as conditions of approval.
e) The applicant has agreed and is required by the i of an appropriate condition to pay a public facil
fee. Performance of that contract and payment of
will enable this body to find that public facilit
be available concurrent with need as required by
General Plan,
Val.
4) The proposed project will be compatible with future 1
in the area since all of the surrounding properties h
designated for high density residential development.
5) This project has already been considered in conjuncti a previously certified environmental document and a N
PC RES0 1896 -2-
I
.!
I.
a
;5
4
C 5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
2.6
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(. il)
of Prior Environmental Compliance was issued November
1981, which was approved by the Planning Commission on
December !3 r 1981 e
Conditions of Approval
General Conditions: .
1) Approval is granted for CT 81-44/CP-f90, as shown on E bit(s) "A" - X", dated October '23, 19811 incorporated
reference and on file in the Planning Department. Dev
rnent shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwi
noted in these conditions,
2) This project is approved upon the express condition th final map shall not be approved unless the City Counci as of the time of such approval that sewer service is
able to serve the subdivision.
3) This project is approved upon the express condition tk building permits will not be issued for development of subject property unless the City Engineer determines t sewer facilities are available at the time of applicat
such sewer permits and will continue to be available L time of olccupancy. This note shall be placed on the f
map .
4) This project is approved upon the express condition tt
appiicant shall pay a public lacilities fee as requirc
City Council Policy No. 17, dated August 29, 1979, or with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by referer
accordinq to the agreement executed by the applicant 1 ment of said fee a copy of that agreement dated Decemt 1981, is on file with the City Clerk and incorporated
by reference. If said fee is not paid as promised, tl plication will not be consistent with the General Plai
approval for this project: shall be void,
The applj,cant shall pay park-in-lieu fees to the city to the approval of the final map as required by Chaptl
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
51
6) Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applic
city ordinances in effect at time of building permit ance .
7) The applicant shall prepare a reproducible mylar of t
site plan incorporating the conditions contained here Said site plan shall be submitted to and approved by
Planning Director prior to the issuance of building p
8) . The applicant shall establish a horneownerss associati
corresponding covenants, conditions and restrictions. CC&R's slhall be submitted to and approved by the Plan
Department prior to final map approval.
PC RESO 1R96 -3-
I
2
3
4
b 5
6
7
8
9
10
I1
12
13
14
15
16'
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e c
9) The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and iri
tion plan which shall be submitted to and approved by tl Planning Director prior to the issuance of building per
10) All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris
11) Any signs proposed for this development shall be desig conformance with the city's Sign Ordinance and shall r
review and approval of the Planning Department prior t stallation of such signs.
12) Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot k masonry wall with gates pursuant to city standards. I tion of said receptacles shall be approved by the Plar Director ,,
13) All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, SI
architecturally integrated and shielded from view and sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets tc satisfaction of the Planning Department and Building 1 tor.
14) The open parking area shall be redesigned to provide
backup space for cars located at the end of the stall
Engineering Department :
15) The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to
commencement of any clearing or grading of the site.
16) The grading for this project is defined as "regular c by Section 11.06.170(a) of the Carlsbad Municipal Coc
developer shall submit a grading plan for approval. wf
shall include all required drainage structures and ar quired erosion control measures. The developer shall
submit soils, geologic or compaction reports if requ-
shall co-mply with all provisions of Chapter 11.06 of
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
17) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the haul rout1
be submitted for review and shall be approved by the
Engineer. A separate grading plan shall be submitte
approved and a separate grading perinit issued for th or disposal site if located within the city limits.
18) Additional drainage easements and drainage structure be provided or installed as may be required by the C
Department of Sanitation and Flood Control or the Ci
neer.
19) Land for all public streets and easemerits shown on t
tative map shall be dedicated on the final map and I granted to city free and clear of all liens and encl
ances.
PC RES0 1890 -4-
1
2
3
4
c 5
6
7
8
9
10
2.1
12
33
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Y @
20) Direct access rights for a11 lots abutting Carlsbad B vard shall be waived on the final map.
21) All public streets shall be improved by the developer on the typical sections shown on the tentative map ar;
conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards prior to
pancy of any buildings unless otherwise modified pur: to Condition No. 23.
The devkloper shall install. a wheelchair ramp at the street corner abutting the subdivision in conformance
City of Carlsbad Standards prior to occupancy of any ings .
23) The improvements to Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack 7
required by these conditions and as shown on the ten1 map may be revised or delayed by the posting of an a:
Engineer. These revisions may include increasing th
to curb width to 68' and constructing a 4' wide rais median island on Tamarack Avenue.
22)
priate bond if found necessary and is approved by th
24) The developer shall comply with all the rules, regul and design requirements of the respective sewer and
agencies regarding services to the project.
25) No slopes shall be steeper than a ratio of two horiz one vertical.
Fire Department:
26) A local fire alarm system shall be installed in the
ings.
All proposed security gate systems shall be provided
"knox" key operated override switch, as specified by
Fire Department.
28) All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishin! terns, automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertir
the project shall be submitted.to the Fire Departmer
approval prior to construction.
27)
Parks and Recreation:
29) All landscape material shall be rated "1st sea coas sure'' e
30) A minimum of twelve (12) specimen trees of the same
shall-be planted prior to occupancy of any units at
tions approved by the Parks and Recreation Director
A third retaining wall shall be added between the ti 31) talning walls shown on Exhibit "A" if required by t'
and Recreation Director. The areas between the wal
PC RES0 1896 -5-
+ (I)
be level and landscaped to the satisfaction of the Di
of Parks and Recreation -
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at 'a regular meeting of t
Carlsbad, California, h
the 9th day of December, 1981, by the following vote, to w
Chairman Marcus, Commis'sioners Farrow, Schlehi
Jose and Friestedt.
b
NOES: Commissioners Rombotis and L'Heureux,
ABSENT: None.
ABSTA1N:None.
L
-I _--- e#.,.,* C
0 0 . I.
STAFF REPOQT
DATE: December 9, 1981
TO: P 1 ann i ng Comn i s s ion
FROM : Planning Department
SVBJECT: CY 81-44/CP-I90,-A~~ERLCA~-~~~S'r - Request for a 19 uni.1
located on the east side of Carlsbad Boulevard betweel
Tamarack Avenue and Sequoia Avenue in the RD-M zone.
---a\-- -uI_uJ-- -...--, tent:amract map and concioininium. permit on propmt!
I e PROJECT-DESCRIPTION- AND- BACKGRCUND --
The applicant' proposes to construct a 13 unit condominium pro](
on a .8 acre parcel located. as described above. The project s consists of a number of parcels with a single family dwellinq (
the southerrmost parcel. The subject property gently slopes tc
the west until it get;; close to the surrounding streets, then slopes dcwn steeply froin a few feet to nearly fourteen feet ;zt the southwesterly corner of the property.
The proposed pmject ??ill result in a density of 23.7 dweli.iny
units per acre vhich is within the General Plan designation of
29-30 dwel,J.j.nc; units per acre for this sj.te. Th.e property to
north is occupied by a restaurant while the propertiec to the
dences and apartnents.
The project itself will consist of a three story building over
underground parki.ng gars-ge. All of the units will be oriented
tak.e advantage of the ocean viem offered by this site. the common recreation area has also been orj-ented to take adva
tage of the views.
On June 4, 1980, the Floir Devco Company submitted a similar pr
ject to the Pianning Department. At that time, the project cc sisted of 21 units and the building height was slightly higher
than this project. The Plmninq Commission recommended appro\
of the proposed project at their meeting of August 12, 1981.
The proposed development was considered by the City Council at:
people who lived in the vicinity protested the project. Many
these people were concerned about the present lack of parking
the vicinity. Also, a number of the citizens complained about
the massive appearance of the proposed structure. Rased on tf
project's design and the public test:iinoiiy, the Council denied
so~g?~h a-;l,-J e ciaL - .- '- arc occu?icd by a mixture of single fasnily res:
Most
ti1ei.r meeting of Septeemher 1, 1981, At that time, a nunber of
EXHIBIT 2
0 0 .,
project because they felt that it was incompatible with the sur
rounding development.
The Council suggested that the applicant redesign the project t
mini.mize its massiveness f lower its height f and redesign the parking areas.
I I . ANliZY S I S
Major Planning-Issues
1. Does the project conform with the development standards an(
- -
-".-.------UIu-
design criteria of the condominium ordinance?
Discussion
Development- Standards
All of .the reuuired resident and guest parking for this projec
will be provic7ied on site. All of the resident parking as well
two guest parking spaces will be provided in an undergrcund pa
ing ga.ragc entered fron Sequoia Avenue. Additional quest park
will. be provided in an open parking area entered fron Tamarack
Avenue. When this project was pr'eviously considered by the CO
mission there ~3.6 a concern about che lack of available on-str
parkj-ng. In respc;nse to these concerns, the applicant has pro
vided three ext.rzb on-si.t$ guest parking spaces lxyond the eigh
required by the condoninium ordinance. At least 480 cubic fee
of storage per unit will be provided in the underground parkir garage -
Approximately 250 square feet of recreation area will be provj
for each dwelling unit. As shown on Exhibit "C", the majorit]
the common recreation area will be located i.n the northwest PC tion of the project. The recreation area includes a sundeck E
rounding a jacuzzi and an adjacent grassy area for picnics anc barbeques. Also, a set of horseshoe pits will be located in t flat area in front of the units. As shown on Exhibit "C", thf
applicant proposes to locate a wet bar and sink in the passag1
between unit "CR" and uni.t '*AR". An additional deck area wil
ing. Each of the units will have at least one patio or balco! oriented to take advantage of the ocean views,
Design Criteria
As previously menti.oned, this is essentially the same project
that was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their August
1981 meeting, In an attempt to make the project more accepta
to the surroundinq residents and the City Co:incil, the applic
has reduced the number of dwelling units from 21 to 19. As s
by Exhibit 'IG", the southernmost part of the building has bee
-2-
--
-+-..-.a-- -__)-
1o~a.tcd on top of the roof of the southernmost part of the bu
--
a 0 .:
reduced from three stories 'io two stories, while the height of
feet. As shown on Exhibit "G" and "H'', the applicant has at- tempted to "stair step" back each story of the bui.lding to redi
its massive appearance from Carlsbad Roulevard. The redesiqnec
project will be 33 feet above grade level, 39 feet above Carlsl
Boulevard and 32 feet above Sequoia Avenue.
Staff stil.1 has concerns about the size of the project in rela.
tion to the existing structures in the vicinity. As mentioned
the previous report, there are no other buildings in the neigh.
borhood that are as high or massive as the proposed project.
of the surrounding property, however, has been designated for high density residential development by the Land Use Elernent o
the Carlshad General Plan. i."an_v of the surrounding properties
have older single family dwellings and apartments located on
them. As these properties start to redevelop, there is a stro
possibility that they will develop at a density similar to the
to the beach, is served by public tra.nsportation and represent.
an infi1.l type project that will be constructed on a 17acant lo
relatively close to the center of town.
As redesigned, wit]? a lower density, additional parking, overa lower l-?uildj.ng elevations and a stair-step design, this projec
has a less rr,assive appearance than that previously subnni'cted.
Since the project corplies with all of thi! development standar and design criteria of the condominium ordinance and, as rede-
signed, i.s more compztible with the existing surrounding devel mt3nt, sl-iaEE is recorit?teri8ing approval Uf CT 81-44/CP-l40.
the northcrri pcrtlon of the building has been reduced by four
subject property. In add it ion, the proposed pro] ect is ad j ace
111. ENVIRO>JMEKTAL' F.EVIEW
_1--1_ --
The Planning Director has determined that this project has al-
ready been consi.derzd in conjunction with a previously ceztif:
environmental document and, therefore, has issued a notice of
Prior Environmental Compliance dated November 16, 198 1. A CO] of the environmental. docunent is on file in the Planning Dcpai ment .
I v .
It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolutic
No. 1896, recommending APPROVAL, of CT 81-44/CP-140 to the Cit Council based on the findings gnd subject to the conditions c tained therein.
A'TTAC 13 MEN T S
1. Planning Commission .Resolution No. 1896.
2. Location Map
3 I Backgrotind nata Sheet
4 Disclosure Form
5 , Er,v i r onw n t-. a 1 riocumen t s
7. Exhi.hj.ts "A'! - "Kf' dated October 23, 1980
MI1 : a r:
RE C OMM E N 0 AT I ON -------.-
6. Reduced 1::xl-iihits
-- 3 -
/\ rr3 i; f7s La.*& h
.
- -- --__-
I # I* *-: &@Jj E - *
-
..-
-.
c4 0
CTJ
< u
r”
FEQJ-Jf q 11% . ti
6
I- -..
rfi TOT c pA s K [?g w* CLL.?!!
A p p ;!- 6 (2 ;?I &‘19 ‘T- ds. :?\!&2 SL.--.-. VTCINITP’ MAP
kXHI6
0 EAcKGRou?;iDD~S~
CASE NO: CT 81-441CP-190
APPLICANT: AMERICAN WEST
REQUEST AND LCCATIOFi: Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit
construct 18 units on the east side of Carlsbad Boulevard, betw
Tamarack and Sequoia Avenue.
LEGAL DEscRTJ?TION: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 20 in Block H of Palisa
according to Map No. 1747, filed February 5, 1923.
~sessQrsp~~l~: 206 - 011 - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 20.
Acres .68 No. of Lots 18 units
GENERAL PLTYU AW ZONIXG
General Plan Land Use Designation R-H ~
-+ Density Prop& 26.5 Density ~lloweti 20-30
RD-M Proposed Zo~e N/A Existing zone
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
ZOnin9 Land use
North c-2 Restaurant
south RD-M SFD fj Apartments
z&c RD-M SFD 6 Apartments
b,-est Ocean Beach
PUBLIC FAClLITIES
Carlsbad
Carlsbad
School District
Water District
Sewer Dis"dict Carl sb ad EDG'S
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated October 239 1981
(Other:
mmm- IMPACT ASSESSXEET
Xsgative Declaration, issued Log so.
E.1.R- Certified, dated
other, Prior Compliance dated, March 26, 1982
EXHIB
~ ,that further inzormatlo i xeylrea, you wiA& uc bu duw a,
1. ' b *
APPLICANT :
*dividual, pm:oint venture, corporation, syn WPCT nPvPi \I
309 18th Street, Santa Monica, CA 90402
ausiness Address
(213) 274-0953
Telephone Number
Howard Anderson & Assoc.
Name
-
AGENT :
2194 Carmel Valley Rd. , Del Mar, CA 92014
Business Address
(714) 276-8790
Telephone Number
mmms : Preston F. Thurtle, Pres.
Name ,(individual, partner, joint Home Address
venture, corporation, syndication)
see above
Business Address
(213) 274-0953 - Telephone Number Telephone Humber
Jeffrey Palmer
:;axe Home Address
see above
3usiness Address
(213) 274-0953
Talephone Nunber Telephone Suoiber
(Attach more sheets if necessary)
I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in th
closure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and rn
relied upo;? as being true and correct until amended.
Appl i.ca n t
DY
E) -
e. (I,
1200 ELM AVE DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES CARLSSAD, CALIF0
0 Assistant Glty Manager (714) 438.5596
0 Building (711) 433-5525 Department aitp of Csar18’ba
0 Engineering Cepartment
0 Housing & Redevelopment Department
(714) 438-5541
3096 Hsrding St. (714) 439-561 1
0 Plannlny Department
(714) 438-5591
PUBLIC NOTICE OF PPJOR EhWIW~E?AC COXX’LIANCE --
Please Take Notice:
The Planning Department has determined that the environmental effects of tkic project de&.’Ed belov have already ken considered in
conjui-ickion with previolinly ertif ied environmental Zocmaents ad,
thereforer no additional erwircnwntal review will ke required and a
notice of deterxination will bz E iled.
Project Title: Imsrican West
Project Locations
Tmarack Avenue.
Ilro’ject- Description:
Permit.
Justification for this detennination is on file in the Planning Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA.
the public are invited.
Planning Department within ten (10) days Gf date of pblication.
Southeast carner of Carlsbad Wulevard and
19 unit Tentative Tract Map and Condominium
Coments from Please sub?,it coimwnts in writing to the
Planning Director
Dated: Marcl? 26, 1982
Case No: CT 81-44(A}/CP-l90(A)
Applicant: Awrican West
Publish Date: March 31, 1982
PC1
i a is \ l 1
:!I”,! 1,-
x:g 5 2 11 @lki 1 iAiQ 1 ~ ,I I;, 1; Ea ;; 6E D :d nu
# gil
€68 Bo% #ah 2:
.a QIE3 o. I.?
3.
$3 21: ii
En 8 E$%!:
Il 822: go *i ’;+ ;all 1 ~~~~ 5 Ka %e E% BO3
E
2.2 i =I .-
0 €3 2%: l, EF €64 i
! :
IC! . Fi 1
+&',,,I i I!:: 1:: i lli bf! d I! I-0 q B 1% 833
P 5
8'-
E$" a9 i. z:E g m. k-0 ij t;d k1
f 8 d
t;; E
I
i
I I
~
I
I
I I
E: -
,I
i gl s' '1 88 €q y. *:E oE #$ 5 8 I! D q 0 y.:i 1 f8d\ ;I 4
; 6 1 k: li k 3ps ;! l% d 813
$
!3
8 d
B
I
I
I I
I
E XH
I
6
*
3:E c a t If I,[ 1 gg3 5i $1 :\I\3 8 1 la- 'ir I; j/;.' '5 B, Ea @a pi? rK @j (073 11h ;i I/!:? 1
I I
3, 8
!'
d
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
,
'E -
I-
' :
$3 &
;+> -si.. -I! 9 i! .- 5
pi pa! t iigi
E!. 19 i 5.: 8
11 !:: 1::
Ck Fa? taa,i12 1 \[I I;SB i! g
_- t {E -
-
*
E
2.c a 0 ES CUo; B ti blI [L 1 se i-u E uol a Is'. Y $5 i 3 .- 11: g:
5-g ; ii* $1 1
i t 1 \ i!c* I* la iE -%m
"
5
rl If A: I d 1: {El i: E *:E Fo5 OE g$ E$ g [$l[I 1 Y La' 1 ii/ll- t 1 f 1;; i 144 rrt,,~ I
00 00
EX - k
I
m *
%A COASTAL EVELOPI"1Efl PERMIT NO, 6-82-007
Page 2 o
STANDARD CON DIT I ONS :
1. Notice of Receipc and Acknowledgement. development shall not comence until a copy of the permit, signed by the permittee or authorized agent, acknowledging receipt of the permit and acceptance of the terms and conditions, is returned to the Comrnissi
office.
2. Expiration. two years from the date on which the Commission voted on the applicatic Development shall be pursued in a diligent manner and cornplebe +dina
reasonable period of tire. Application for extension of the permit mu:
be made prior to the expiration date.
proposal as set forth below. Any deviation from the approved pians mu5
be reviewed and approved by the staff and may require Commission appro\
Interpretation. finy questions of intent or interpretation of any cond.
will be resolved by the Executive Director or the Commission.
Inspections. The Commission staff shall be allowed to inspect the sitr the development during construction, subject to 24-hour advance voti ce
Assignment. The permit may be assigned to any qualified person, provi assignee files with the Commission an affidavit accepting all terms an condi tfons ot tne permit.
Terms and Conditions Run with the Land:' These terms and conditions sh
be perpetual , and it is the intention of the Cornmission and the permit to bind all future owners and possessors of the subject property to th terms and conditions.
The permit is not valid and
If development has not comnenced, the permit will expire
3. Compliance. fill dewlopment must occur in strict compliance with the
4.
5.
6.
7.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
1. Prior to transmittal oE the coastal development permit, the LpiJli
shall submit to the' District Director a letter from the City of Car15
Planning Department verifying that the density of the project does nc
exceed 23.7 dwelling units per acre based on the acreage for the pro:
site that the City allows for determining density.
-__^ -.----- Id---_ _."__-_-I^_ _I " -_-____-_ ___- r-- <I
1 Q.7
1
!
4,- * J. I > ; .. . ~ -- . L j I
1
I i
!-. " _- -. -- I--, ----.. -~ .
i 1
i
I I ,. , , Si",
1 i . .-.' t 1 1
- ____ - - _-.__ "_ - - ~ -.. ___
,
1200 ELM AVEh
CARLSBAD, CALIFOR’
* 0
DEVELOPMENTAL
SERVICES
Ll Assistant City Manager
U Building Department
0 Engineering Department
(714) 438-5596
Citp of CarZ~Eta’s (71 4) 430-5525
(714) 43a554i
0 Housing 8. Redevelopment Department 3096 Harding St.
(71 4) 438-581 1
,p+$y;;;t;yrtment
April 12, 4982
Dear Citizen:
RE: MINOR REVISIONS TO CT 81-44/CP-l9Op AMERICAN WEST
The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the City Cou will be considering a minor revision to a previously approved condominium project located on the east side of Carlsbad
revision will be considered at the City Council meeting of AE
20, 1982.
The proposed revision will reduce the number of dwelling unit
from 19 to 48 and result in a density of 26.4 du/ac, This it
is being taken to the City Council as an information item, w? is not a formal public hearing, however we are notifying you
because of your past interest in this project,
If you have any questions regarding this matter please feel
to contact Mike Howes or me of the Carlsbad Planning Departmi
Sincerely,
MICHAEL HOLZMILLER
Principal Planner
Boulevard between Tamarack Avenue and Sequoia Avenue, This II
BY AM hf&L7- BILL HOFMAN 0 Associate Planner
MJH:BH: ar