HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-05-04; City Council; 6995; El camino real & Chestnut ave Zone Changen 4 ' 2 + 5: d 0 z 3 0 0
.. FISCAL IMPACT
The applicant will provide all required public improvements to
the project. Also, the applicant has agreed to pay a public facilities fee to offset the costs of providing all other pub1 services.
EXHIBITS
1. PC Resolution Nos. 1916 and 1917
2. Staff Report dated, March 24, 1982 w/attachments
I **.
.G
,*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lo
11
12
23
14
15
16
17
18
39
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
23
28
9 v
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1916
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE CHANGE FROM R-A-10,OOO
TO RD-14, RESIDENTIAL DENSITY MULTIPLE ON 4.15
ACRES OF PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH- WEST CORNER OF EL CAMINO REAL AND CHESTNUT AVENUE.
APPLICANT: SHEFFLER
CALE NO: ZC-255
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain properti
to wit:
A portion of Lot "J" of the Rancho Agua Hedionda according to partion map thereof No. 823 filed Noven
16, 4896
has been filed with the city of Carlsbad, and referred to the
P1 ann ing Commission ; and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as
provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 27th da:
January, 1982, the 24th day of February, 1982 and on the 24tl
of March, 1982, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescr:
by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persc
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Zone Change; anh
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plannil
Commission as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public heari the Commission recommends APPROVAL of 2C-255, based on t
following findings and subject to the following conditio
///I
////
ri .-
c
.c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2.1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
w
2) That the subject lots are adequate in size and shape to accommodate uses permitted in the zone, as discussed in tl
staff report.
properties, as discussed in the staff report.
That the street system serving the project is adequate to accom.modate any increase in traffic generated by these zones, 7s discussed in the staff report.
5) The project is cocsistent with all city public facility p~
3) That the zoning would not adversely impact surrounding
4)
icies and ordinances since:
a) The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appro ate condition to this project, insured that developme
sewer service is available to serve the project. In ition, the Planning Commission has added a condition
that building permits may not be issued for the proye
unless the City Engineer determines that sewer servic
available, an6 building cannot occur within the pro-je
unless sewer service remains available, the Planning Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the public facilities element of the General Plan have be
met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this pro j eot .
b) An existing school agreement between the developer an Carlsbad Unified School District will ensure adequa.cy school facilities, per letter dated December 10, 1981
c) The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclu of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilitie
fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the
will enable this body to find that public facilities be available concurrent with need as required by the era1 Plan.
will not be approved unless the City Council finds th
6) This project as conditioned will not cause any significa environmental impacts and a Conditional Negative Declara has been issued by the Planning Director on March 3, 198 and approved by the Planning Commission on March 24, 198
General Conditions
1) Approval is granted for 2C-255, as shown on Exhibit(s) A
dated March 24, 1982, and C, and D dated, January 15, 198 incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as SI
unless otherwise noted in these conditions, ///I
////
PC RES0 #I916 -2-
I
<* 1
'i .T ,
.+ 3.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
l3 I 14
15
16
I.7 I
e e
2) This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for development of thl subject property unless the City Engineer determines that
sewer facilities are available at the time of application such sewer permits and will continue to be available unti
time of occupancy.
applicant shall pay a public facilities fee as required b! city Council Policy No, 17f dated August 29, 197Yf on fi:
with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, according to the agreement executed by the applicant €or I
ment of said fee a copy of that agreement dated February ' 1982, is on file with the City Clerk and incorporated hert
by reference. If said fee is not paid as promised, this application will not be consistent with the General Plan i approval for this project shall be void.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
Planning Commission cf the city of Carlsbad, California, held
the 14th day of April, 1982, by the following vote, to wit:
3) This project is approved upon the express condition that
PAY ES :
NOES :
ABSENT :
ABSTAIN :
VERNON J. FARROW, JR., Chairma
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
I-8 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTEST : I
- JAMES C. BAGAMAN, Secretary
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
PC RES0 NO. 1916 -3-
/I
L
L
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
JO
13.
12
13
14
15
l6
97
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1917
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CIW? OE' CARISBAD, CALI FOKNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP TO CREATE 50 SINGLE FAPIILY LOTS AND 1 CONDOMINIUM LOT AND
A CONDOMINIUf4 PERMIT FOR 33 UNITS ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF EL
CAMINO REAL AND CHESTNUT AVENUE.
CASE NO: CT 81-19/CP-199
APPLICANT: SHEFFLER
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property
wit:
A portion of Lot "J" of the Rancho Agua Hedionda acc
to partion map thereof No. 823 filed November 16,
1896
has been filed with the city of Carlsbad, and referred to the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a req
provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WBEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 27th da
January, 1982, the 24th day of February, 1982, and on the 241:
of March, 1982, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescri
law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persc
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plannir
Commission as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearir Commission recommends APFROVAL of CT 81-19/CP-199, based
following findings and subject to the following conditior
////
I
I
L
c
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
36
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
~ 26
27
28
e 1)
Findings:
1) The project is consistent with the city's General Plan si proposed density of 2.6 du/ac, for the single family port
the project is within the density range of 0-4 duPs/acre specified for the site and the proposed density of 7.9 du is within the density range of 4-10 du/ac specified for t as indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan.
The site is physically suitable for the type and density
development since the site is adequate in size and shape
accommodate residential development at the density propos
3) The project is consistent with a11 city public facility p
2)
and ordinances since:
a) The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appro condition to this project, insured that the final map not be approved unless the City Council finds tha.t se
service is available to serve the project. In additi
Planning Commission has added a condition that a not
be placed on the final map that building permits may
issued for the project unless the City Engineer deter that sewer service is available, and building cannot within the project unless sewer service remains avail
the Planning Commission is satisfied that the require of the public facilities element of the General Plan
been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for t project.
b) An existing school agreement between the developer an Carlsbad Unified School District will ensure adequacy school facilities per letter dated December 10, 1981.
c) Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of appr
d) All necessary public improvements have been provided
be required as conditions of approval.
e) The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclL an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities f Performance of that contract and payment of the fee k enable this body to find that public facilities will available concurrent with need as required by the Ger
Plan.
f) Assurances have been given that adequate sewer for tk project will be provided by the city of Carlsbad.
g) Adequate water service for the project will be proviC the city of Carlsbad.
4) The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding land uses since surrounding properties are designated fc
residential development on the General Plan.
PC RES0 NO. 1917 - 2- 1
I
c
c
3.
.2
3 '
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
@ *
5) This project as conditioned will not cause any significa environmental impacts and a Conditional Negative Declara has been issued by the Planning Director on March 3, 198 and approved by the Planning Commission on March 24, 198
General Conditions:
1) Approval is granted for CT 81-19/CP-199, as shown on Exhi A and Bf dated March 24f 1982f and C and Df dated January
1982, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planni Department. Development shall occur substantially as sho
unless otherwise noted in these conditions.
2) This project is approved upon the express condition that
final map shall not be approved unless the City Council f
of the time of such approval that sewer service is availa serve the subdivision.
3) This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for development of th subject property unless the City Engineer determines that facilities are available at the time of application for s
sewer permits and will continue to be available until tirr occupancy. This note shall be placed on the final nap.
4) This project is approved upon the express condition that
applicant shall pay a public facilities fee as required b Council Policy No. 17, dated August 29, 1979, on file wi City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, and accc
to the agreement executed by the applicant for payment of
fee a copy of that agreement dated February 17, 1982, is with the City Clerk snd incorporated herein by reference. said fee is not paid as promised, this application will r consistent with the General- Plan and approval for this pr shall be void.
5) The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees to the city, pm
the approval of the final map as required by Chapter 20.1
the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6) Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance wit!: sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicablc ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance, *20L Planning:
7) The applicant shall prepare a reproducible mylar of the 1
site plan incorporating the conditions contained herein.
site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Plan1 Director prior to the issuance of building permits.
8j The applicant shall establish two homeowner's associatioi corresponding covenants, conditions and restrictions, ont
the condominium and one for the single family developmenl CCGaR's shall be submitted to and approved by the Planninc
Department prior to final map approval.
PC HESO NO. 1917 -3-
+
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
13.
12
13
14
15
16
1'7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24,
25
26
27
28
e *
9) The applicant shall. prepare a detailed landscape and irri
plan which shall be submitted to and approvsd by the Plan Director prior to the issuance of building permits.
10) All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy an thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris.
11) Any signs proposed for this development shall be designe conformance with the city's Sign Ordinance and shall req review and approval of the Planning Department prior to
stallaLion of such signs.
12) Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot hig masonry wall with gates pursuant to city standards. Loc
of said receptacles shall be approved by the Planning Director.
13) All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shal architecturally integrated and shielded from view and th
buffered from adjacent properties and streets to the
sakisfaction of the Planning Department and Building Dir
14) The applicant shall submit a street name list consistent the city's street name policy subject to the Planning Director's approval prior to final map approval.
15) Tne project shall provide bus stop facilities at locatic subject to the satisfaction of the North County Transit trict. Said facilities shall at a minimum include a ben free from advertising and a pole for the bus stop sign. bench and pole shall be designed in a manner so as to nc detract from the basic architectural theme of the projec said design shall be subject to the approval of the Plar Director and North County Transit District.
?9/CP-199 is granted subject to approval of Zone Change 16) Approval of Tentative Tract and Condominium Permit No. C
17) Approval of this tentative Crack map shall expire eight4 months from the date of City Council approval unless a f
map is recorded. An extension may be requested by the E plicant. Said extension shall be approved or denied at discretion of the City Council. In approving an ext.ensj City Council may impose new conditions and may revise er
conditions.
18) No grading, development or tree removal shall occur on 3
containing a tree preservation area as shown on Exhibit except tc provide access to the buildable portion of inc
lots. The Exhibit shall be modified to indicate that tk preservation plan shall apply to all trees with a diamet
3" or greater.
//// PC RES0 NO. 1917 -4-
. *. . t
J,
.2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
l3
14
e 0
Minor exceptioris, to these restrictions, including those
relating to fire safety which do not subvert the intentic this condition, may be approved by the Planning Director
note stating the tree preservation restriction shall be I on the final map.
to prohibit development within 30' of the property line
abutting Chestnut Avenue.
19) The applicant shall place a deed restriction on Lots 41 i
20) The developer shall design and construct a noise attenuai wall along El Camino Real prior to the issuance of any
building permit. Design and materials for the wall shal
attenuated to comply with the HUD Noise Suitability Crit
contained in the negative declaration for this project.
Landscape treatment shall be provided to screen the wall
approved by the Plannj.ng Director and the noise level sh
21) The developer shall place a deed restriction on lots 5,
and 8 to prohibit development on or future alteration of slope area adjacent to El Camino Real. An exhibit indic
those areas where this deed restriction shall apply shal
submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior final map approval.
22) The developer shall landscape and maintain all slope are a period of one year beyond the termination of grading o
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
21
25
- 26
27
28
until 50% of the lots are sold, whichever occurs later.
23) The developer shall incorporate a condition in the CC&R'
the single-family homeowners association to maintain all
portion of the project. An exhibit indicating those arc be maintained by the homeowners association shall be sui to and approved by the Planning Director, prior to final approval .
24) The developer shall landscape the area immediately arour Ellery Reservoir for screening. A landscape plan shall
approved by the Planning Director and improvements compl prior to the sale of any lot or issuance of any buildins permits for the lots adjacent to the reservoir. The
landscaping shall be maintained by the developer until + lots are sold.
slopes along El Camino Real and Chestnut Avenue for that
25) The condominium portion of the project shall be develop1
conjunction with or subsequent to the development of thl single family portion of the development.
1/11
////
//// PC RES0 NO. 1917 -5- I
. *\ .
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lo
11
l2
13
14
15
16
17
38
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
* e
26) No grading shall occur outside the limits of the subdivis unless a letter of permission is obtained from the owners the affected properties.
27) The developer shall pay the current local drainage area f prior to approval of the final map or shall construct dri
systems in conformance with the Master Drainage Plan and of Carlsbad Standards as required by the City Engineer,
28) Land for all public streets and easements shown on the tc tative map shall be dedicated on the final map and shall granted to city free and clear of all liens and encumber:
29) All public streets shall be improved by the developer bas the typical sections shown on the tentative map and in conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards prior to OCCI of any buildings.
30) All private streets and drainage systems located in the condominium portion of the project shall be maintained b
condominium homeowner's association in perpetuity, This
responsibility shall be clearly stated in the CC&R's.
31) Additional drainage easements and structures shall be pr or installed as may be required by the City Engineer.
way for Chestnut Avenue along the subdivision frontage. half street improvements shall be installed on Chestnut based on a curb to curb width of 48 feet. Plans for
construction shall be approved by the city and bonds and agreements submitted prior to the approval of the final
As part of the improvements on Chestnut Avenue, the deve
shall widen the pavement on the south side opposite "A" from 4' to 9' for a total length of 350 feet to provide
overall pavement width of 44 feet.
32) The subdivider shall dedicate an additional 6 feet of ri
33) Direct access rights for all lots abutting Chestnut Aver
El Camino Real shall be waived and relinquished on the f
map
34) The subdivider shall install full half street improvemen
El Camino Real including one half of the raised median i
accordance with city standards and to the approval- of th Engineer. The median landscaping and irrigation shall k constructed in accordance with city standards and shall subject to the approval of the Parks and Recreation Dire
35) The proposed water mains in streets '€3' and IC' shall be
looped to other city water mains to the satisfaction of City Water Department. All the necessary easements to accomplish these loopings shall be dedicated on the finz
-6- //// PC RESO NO. 1917
, . >-<, *
1
2
3 *
5 '
7
8 '
20
11
l2
13
14
l5
16
17
l8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
-26
27
28
e 0
36) The developer shall reconstruct the northwest corner of Camino Real and Chestnut Avenue intersection in accordan
with a design as approved by the City Engineer. Plans fl
this reconstruction and a secured agreement shall be sub to the city and approved by the City Engineer prior to t approval of the final map.
37) The developer shall provide an overflow drainline from E Reservoir into the storm drain at the end of Janis Way t satisfaction of the City Engineer.
38) The proposed domestic water mains in streets 'A' and 'C'
shown on the tentative map are specifically not approved
developer shall redesign these mains in accordance with
requirements of the City of Carlsbad Water Department an City Engineer.
39) The developer shall conduct the sike grading in such a m so as to salvage as much of the existing 48 inch trunk 1
which presently serve Ellery Reservoir. The salvaged pi
shall be neatly stockpiled to one side of the site for
removal by city forces.
40) The developer shall provide a 15 foot wide waterline eas
from Ellery Reservoir to El Camino Real- on an alignment, approved by the City Engineer for a proposed waterline t built by the city in the future. This easement shall be dedicated on the final map.
41) A temporary cul-de-sac per Engineering Standards shall b
constructed at the end or" Street C at the time of constr of this street.
Fire
42) An all weather access road shall be maintained throughoL
43) All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenance
be operational prior to combustible building materials IC located on the project sit-e.
construction.
44) Adequate emergency vehicle turn-arounds shall be provi.de cul-de-sac or a hammerhead wher. a driveway is more than feet deep from a property line at the street.
45) All private streets shall be kept clear of parked vehicl all times, and shall have posted "NO Parking/Fire Lane '1
Zone" pursuant to Section 17.04.040, Carlsbad Municipal
46) Fire retardant roofs are required on all structures.
47) All fire alarm Systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing sy: automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent to the project shall he submitted to the Fire Department for aE prior to construction.
PC RES0 NO. 1917 -7-
$1 ..
? ' '2 * -:
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
X0
11
12
13
14
Is
3.6
l7 l8
19
20
21.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e e
Parks and Recreation
48) Landscaping along El Carnino Real and Chestnut shall comp:
with the Parks and Recreation Department's streetscape tr
policy.
49) All graded building pads not under construction shall be treated with a temporary seed mix cover approved Sy the : and Recreation Department.
1-
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
Planning Commission of the city of Carlsbad, California, held
14th day of April, 1982, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES : Commissioners Rombotis, Schlehuber md L * €le
NOES : None .
ABSENT: Chairmar, Farrow and Commissioner Jose.
ABSTAIN: Commissioners Marcus and Friestedt.
VERNON J. FAEIROW, JA., Chairn:
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMXISSIGN
ATTEST;
JAMES C. HAGAMAN, Secretary t------ CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION I
I
PC RES0 NO. 1917 -a-
t i. (. ' c. i, > (li *) @
e.
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DATE:
DECEMBER 10, 1981
STAFF REPORT
DATE: March 24, 1982
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: ZC-255/CT 81-19/CP-199 - SHEFFLER - Request for approval
of a Zone Change for a portion of the property from R-A-10,000 to RD-M, a Tentative Subdivision Map to create 50 single-family lots and 7 condominiurn lot and E condominium permit to develop 33 units on the northwest
corner of El Camino Real and Chestnut Avenue in the
R-A-10,000 zofie.
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
This project was first heard at the Planning Commission meeting of January 27, 1982, Considerable public testimony was given
expressing concern regarding the proposed subdivision connection to Janis Nsy- The Commission continued the item to February 24th to allow staff and the applicant to evaluate other designs elix-
inating this connection and to allow for further traffic anal-
ysis. The applicant in redesigning the project to eliminate the through access, was able to gain an additional single-family lot,
The project was given a second continuance, to this date, to allow adequate time for staff and public review of the environ-
mentai impacts associated with the new design.
Staff had previously recommended approval of all three prcject
requests, as originally designed. The revised plan incor?orates only two substantial changes:
single family lot and the elimination of through access to Janis
Way. Staff does not believe that the additional lot would sig- nificantly alter the overall plan or previous considerations or
recommendations. Therefore, this report will solely address .traffic issues related to the revised plan. (For a more complete description and discussion of the overall plan, please see the
attached staff report).
11. DISCUSSION
Staff has analyzed the revised plan with respect to potential traffic impacts relaked to providing only one point of access to
the proposed subdivision and the resulting cul-de-sac of Janis
Way, Attached, please find a memo from the Principal Civil
Engineer detailing the traffic analysis.
-II_
The creation of an additional
*P t. : d 0)
4
\
As discussed in this memo, the proposed project cul-de-sac
exceeds the Engineering Department policy standards for cul-de- sacs in terms of length, traffic volumes and numbers of dwelling
units. The Engineering Department concludes, however, and the Planning staff concurs, that approval of the revised plan would
not cause significant adverse traffic impacts on the project.
The resulting cul-de-sac of Janis Way would also exceed Engineer-
ing Department policy with respect to length, Due to the limited number of dwelling units, on the overall cul-de-sac, staff does not anticipate any significant adverse impacts on the neighbor-
hood -
Finally, staff analyzed the impacts associated with a11 traffic entering and exiting on Chestnut Avenue. As discussed in pre- vious reports, Chestnut Avenue is currently a substandard street
the improvements proposed as part of this project will mitigate
any additional traffic generated. The applicant has submitted a
graphic realignment study which shows these improvements. This is also attached for Commission review.
Overall, staff believes that the original submittal, showing through access to Janis Way, constitutes a preferable plan from all planning perspectives for the reasons discussed in the pre- vious staff report. However, staff does not anticipate signif- icant impacts from apprcval of the revised plan.
111. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Planning Director has determined that this project, subject to conditiDns, will not have a significant impact on the environ- ment, and therefore, has issued a conditional Negative Decla- ration on March 3, 1982,
carrying excess traffic voluines. However, it is anticipated that
TV. RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve the Con- ditional Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopt Resolutions Nos. 1916 and 1917, recommending APPROVAL of
ZC-255/CT 81-19/CP-199, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
-
ATTACHMENTS
1. PC Resolution Nos. 1916 and 1917 2. Memo from Principal Civil Engineer, dated 2/16/82
3. Realignment Study 4. Staff Report dated 1/27/82 5. Pet it ion 6, Reduced Tentative Tilap
7. Environmental Documents
8. Exhibits "A" & "B" dated March 24, 1982 and "C" and "D"
dated January 15, 1982.
CDN : ar 3/18/82 -2-
1. f 0 e)
I'
'.
MEMORANDWI - FEBRUARY 16, 1982
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FRQM : PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER
SUBJECT: TRAFFIC ANALYSIS - CT 81-19 (SHEFFLER)
BACKGROUND:
January 27, 1982. Major concerns were possible traffic increase on Jartis Way and the effect of project traffic on Chestnut Avenue. indicated their desire to eliminate the thru street to Janis Way and directed that a traffic analysis be prepared.
DISCUSSION: This report will discuss: 1. Traffic with Street A connected to Janis Way; 2. traffic with Street A ending in a cul-de-sac; 3. the conse- quences of a cul-de-sac subdivision; and 4. the effects of the project traffic on Chestnut Avenue.
1. Thru-street to Janis Way: The subdivision will oenerate 754 trips. It is estimated that 614 of these will be via Chestnut Avenue and 140 will be via Janis Way. Existing trips on Janis Way just east of Donna Drive are estimted at 230. However, it is expected that about 140 trips from the existina Jais
Way and Bedford Circle will exit throuph the subdivision to Chestnut Avenue.
trips while those on Janis Way east of Donna Drive will remain the same 2.t 23
trips. No additioRai trips are expected to use these streets while passing through the area. The reason for this is that to be an attractive shortcut th route should be 1. shorter in length, 2. more convenient to use or 3. (mst important) shorter in time. This route with its numerous bends, driveways and intersections, parked cars and narrow width is none of these.
2. The subdivision will generate 764 trips (10 mor than before due to the addition of 1 unit). However, eleven of the dwellfng uni ts--representin@ 110 trips--are on Janis Way. The remaining subdivision will generate 654 trips all of which will be via Chestnut Avenue. Traffic on Janis Way east of Donna Drive will be 340 trips (230 existin9 f 110 project).
Thus, it is anticipated that this design will result in fewer trips exitinq on Chestnut Avenue than the previous one.
3. Cul -de-sac subdivision: The Enaineerinq Department has just completed a Subdivisions that have only one entrance point
have the potential to be cut off if an accident, earthquake or flood block the entry point and also have operational problems in providinq adequate police an1 fire service. The cul-de-sac policy establishes a set of conditions under whil it is acceptable to have only one entrance while providinq adequate traffic
circulation and fire access. The followinq chart shows the policy maximum fo a residential street and the proposed subdivision comparisons:
This 82-unit project was before the Plannina Commission on
The Planninq Commission
Thus, the total exiting the subdivision from Street A at Chestnut Avenue is 75
Street A is a cul-de-sac:
. cul-de-sac subdivision policy.
.I a .I
-2- Traffic Analysis - CT 81-19 (Sheffler) '
Pol icy CT 81-19
a. length of street 120@ 1350
b. traffic volume 500 654
c. number of dwelling units 50 72
As can be seen, the subdivision exceeds all the maximum conditions and does not meet the policy requirements to be a cul-de-sac subdivision. of the reasons why a street connection to Janis Way was originally recommended However, there are two mitigatitq circumstances: First, the condition is
expected to be temporary as Street C will eventually qo through to another street. Second, if the entrance street were a collector street (no driveways) the subdivision would easily meet all criteria for that condition (see cul-de- sac policy attached). No driveways exist on the east side of this street to hamper traffic inbound from Chestnut Avenue.
- 4. street capacity and the interruption of flow due to the added intersection.
This is one
Chestnut Avenue traffic: There are two important factors to consider here
Capacity: Chestnut Avenue is a collector street which is substandard in three areas: a. it is narrow (24 feet of pavement), b. the existing traffic volume
of 9109 daily trips significantly exceeds the design maximum of 5000 c. a horizontal curve with a radius of only 200 feet exists just east of Cameo
Drive (a collector should be 300 feet minimum).
As a part of the proposed subdivision, the road will be rebuilt to nearly secondary arterial standards. A mininitim of 12 feet of widening will be accm-
plished (ultimate will be 48 feet curb-to-curb), the horizontal curve will be flattened to a radius of 547 feet and the vertical curve just east of Cameo Drive will be lengthened somewhat. The new intersection will be 500 feet from El Camino Real and 600 feet from Cameo Drive (600 feet is secondary arterial standard). The new intersection is on a straight section of road and visibilil will exceed the standards for a secondary arterial. The street will be stripec for a left Turn pocket into Street A and possibly Cameo Drive, if there is
adequate width at that point.
A secondary arterial can handle 5000 - 20,000 trips, meaning that the street
traffic from the project. experiencing peak traffic flows now. El Camino Real additional streets will open up (Elm Avenue and Tamarack Avenue) to handle this traffic.
Camino Real and Monroe Street and Monroe Street is expected to open throuqh to Marron Road in March. That intersection will have a traffic signal installed by late summer.
and,
improvements will provide for improved circulation even with the additional Chestnut Avenue is unique in that it is probably
In this regard, Hosp Way has just opened between El
As future development occurs east of
.. 2 .t a m
-3-
Traffic Analysis - CT 81-19 (Sheffler)
- Interruption of flow: A total of 6.54 trias are exaected to enter and exit the project daily from Chestnut Avenue. traffic or 328 trips are estimated to be left turns. It is primarily the left turns out of the project that will cause the interruption of flow. Generally, a volume of 1100 vehicles per day from the minor street-either throuah traffic or left turns--are required to meet the traffic sianal warrant for interrupti0
of flow. As there are no through trips across Chestnut Avenue, the 328 left turns represents only 30% of the warrant amount, Therefore, the interruptions wi 11 be re7 ati vely mi nor.
CONCLUSIONS:
1.
Of these, two-thirds of the outbound
The subdivision does not meet the policy for a cul-de-sac subdivision. However, as the condition will probably he temp0rar.y and as there are
may wish to find this subdivision acceptable as a cul-de-sac.
The street improvements to be constructed will bring Chestnut Avenue nearly up to the standards of a secondary arterial. ments, Chestnut Avenue will adequately handle both the project and
existing traffic from both a volume and interruption standpoint.
relatively few driveways on the entrance road, the Planning Commission
2. With these improve-
#e&*
RICHARD H. ALLEN, JR.
Principal Civil Engineer
RHA: mnt Attachment:
C: Catherine Nicholas, Planning Dept.
Engineering Department Cul-de-sac Pol icy
Kim Howfeit, RECON
@ s If! @ E:q-iX,r\p.!CE (CUL-CE-SAC) SUED !v I 3 o?<j
February 5, 1582
E?!G I I.!EER I FIG DEPAXTMENT PGL 1 CY
I,
.I 2”
PURPOSE :
IO establish a set of conditions tinder which it is acceptable for a subdivision to i
only one entrance while ensuring adequate traffic circulation and fire access.
POL )CY;
Single entry point (cul-de-sac) subdivisions shall be permitted - only under the fol I(
conditions:
1. !>hen servo_d by a 36-foot or bo-foot curb-to-curb residential street and - ail of .
following ccnditions are met:
a.
b.
c.
I
Length of street does not exceed 690 feet.+:
Traffic volune does not exceed 500 ADT.
8unber of c‘wel’ing units does not exceed 50.
2 Length nay be increased to a Fnaximun of 1200 feet with special permisslcn
the City Engineer.
!.!hen served by a 40-foot curb-to-curb collector street ani - all cf the following
ditions are cet:
a. Driveiey ai- street intersections are spaced 30G feet or wore apart.
b. The ’length along streets from entrance to most remote point does not exceed
c. Traffic valune st entrance does not exceed 1230 A!X.
6. Kumber sf dwei : ing mT ts does not exceed 120.
%hen serv-d by a Li-isne secondary or major arterial and cc a71 of the following cc
are met:
a. The !e>gt4 along streets from entrance to most renote point does n3,t exceed
b, Traffic voluxs at entrance does not exceed 300.3 AD7.
c. t4umber cf 6weliing units does not exceed 330.
d. Condizicn is temporary, consisting of a first phase of laiser developiient.
-2.
half mi?=.
3.
mi ie,
secofid access nust be part of the approved deve:opm.tnt pians.
1;. !Jhen serve2 bv a 52-foot wide curb-to-curb industria? street and all of the fol - conditions arz met:
a. ihe 1ai~:h of street does not exceed 1200 feet.
b. iraffic \;oiune at entrancz does not exceed 3500 AST.
c. ihe R~T 5xildabie lot area served by the street does not exceed 25 acres.
- -
I
3E F i f: i T j @*\Is : - - Xesilential Strez:: A street with frequent driveways having direct access onto tht
!!here ‘parking is only occasional or scattered, maybe 35 feet curh-to-curb, where p:
is narc sr less continusus, must be $0 fe5t curb-to-curb.
Coliector Streot: A stre5t with few or no driveways having direct access onto it.
is bo feet curbto-curb and maybe ri8 feet if it is a bicycle route.
- ADT: Average daily traffic volwrcz. The total volume of traffic using the strzet
typical 24-ho:!; period.
WR: 1 s
_-_.... . _... -.. - . . * . . .- - . \--. --. . -. ' '
. - - _- _.- - -.
_._.. .
... ...
__ . . -.-^----.
. - .. .. . . . . .
. - I. .. . . . .
. - _. . . .
.. I
Q) __- -
.. . . .$ ..- . . 4
21
0 .*. . . rn __ - . - . ..
, ., ... ... w
..A .......,
V>! 1) 0 .! I 'I 8
STAFF REPORT
DATE : January 27, 1982
TO: P1 anning Commis s ion
FROM : Planning Department
SUBJECT: ZC-255/CT 81-19/CP-199 - SHEFFLER - Request for approval
of a Zone Change of a portion of the property from
create 49 single-family lots and 1 condominium lot and a condominiurn permit to develop 33 units on the northwest
corner of El Camino Real and Chestnut Avenue in the R-A-10,000 zone,
R-A-10,000 to RD-M, a Tentative Subdivision Map to
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting approval of three actions. The first is a zone change frorn R-A-10,000 to RD-M, for 4.15 acres located on the northwest corner of El Camino Real and Chestnut. The
second action is a request for approval of a tentative sub- division map, over the entire 22.8 acre project site, to create 49 single-family lots and one condominium lot. Finally, the
applicant is requesting approval of a condominium permit, on the
proposed 4.15 acre condominium lot, for development of 33 units. Approval of the requested subdivision map and condominium permit
would be contingent upon approval of the zone change to accom- modate condominium development.
The subject property is comprised of three lots surrounding the Ellery Reservoir. One single family home presently exists on the
site and would remain. All other structures would be removed.
The project site is elevated approximately 10-15 feet above El Camino Real and 5-10 feet above Chestnut Avenue, The property slopes upward from El Camino Real and is populated by significant
stands OE mature eucalyptus trees and an olive grove.
In reviewing original development proposals, staff believed that
the unique aesthetic resources of the project site, stands of mature trees and some views, combined with design constraints of rolling topography and noise impacts from El Camino Real war-
ranted special consideration in site design. Working with the objectives of preserving trees, views and natural topography, and
the applicant's desire to create large single-family homesikes,
the present development plan was conceived. Larger single-famill lots were designed and a small condominium development proposed in a disturbed area where the General Plan designated such den-
sity,
v <!
TI, ci
' Utilizing this approach, larger lots could be created where
groupings of trees occur and to allow special setbacks to miti- gate noise impacts. Within these lots, special building
"envelopes" were created, Development would take place within
the envelopes and all other areas, marked for preservation, would remain undisturbed.
Two archaeological sites have been ident'ified on the subject property. One site is located in the southwestern portion of the
project. The other site, within the southern portion of the pro- ject, occurs near the property line and extends off-site. Miti- gation measures, including surface and micro-surface mapping,
placement of test units and preparation of an archaeological re- port for both sites, were made conditions of the negative decla- rat ion e
The proposed density for the single-family portion of the development would be 2.6 du/acre. The Land Use Element of the
General Plan designates this site €or residential development at a low-medium density corresponding to 0-4 du/acre. This portion of the project would be towards the low end of this density range. The proposed density for the condominium portion of the project would have a density of 7.9 du/acre. This proposed den- sity would be towards the high end of the medium density range,
4-10 du/ac, established for this portion of the property by the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The overall density of the
entire project would be 3.6 du/acre. Staff believes that given
the considerations of preservation of the trees and minimizing
grading, the proposed development would be consistent with the General Plan.
11. ANALYSIS - ZONE CHANGE
PLANNING ISSUES
I) Is the requested zone consistent with the Land Use Ele-
ment of the General Plan?
2) Is the property suitable in size and shape to accom-
modate development permitted in the proposed zone?
3) Would the requested zoning adversely impact surrounding
properties?
4) Is the street system serving the project adequate to
handle any increase in traffic generated by this zone?
Discussion
The applicant is requesting RD-M zoning on the 4.15 acre area at
the immediate northwest corner of El Camino Real and Chestnut
Avenue. The requested zone would be consistent with and implement the RMf (Residential Medium Density, 4-10 du/ac),
-
-2-
I
.I 1, . 6:
i
*. designation of the Land Use Elenent of the General Plan for this property.
The 4.15 acre site would be suitable in size and shape to accom- modate development permitted in the RD-M zone. Typical RD-M
development would include multiple-family condominiums, as pro-
posed by the applicant. The site, proposed for rezoning, would be adequate for design and development of condominiums.
Staff believes that the proposed zoning would be compatible with Surrounding and anticipated zoning and development. The property
to be rezoned is bordered to the east by El Camino Real and to
the south by Chestnut Avenue. Property to the north and west would be the balance of the overall project and would consist of large single family lots. Consideration was given in design
preparation to provide separation between the two housing types
while creating a comprehensive and compatible project. As the proposed RD-M site Fiould implement a relatively low multiple den-
sity, 4-10 du/acre, staff does not anticipate any adverse impact on surrounding properties as a result of the proposed zoning.
The project site is bounded by El Camino Real, a prime arterial, and Chestnut Avenue, a collector street. Access to the site would be provided by a public street to be dedicated as a part of
the single-family subdivision. Staff believes that the street
system should be adeqlclate to accommodate all development result-
ing from the rezoning.
Overall, staff believes that the proposed zone would be approp- riate, consistent with the General Plan and not adversely impact
surrounding properties or street systems.
111. ANALYSIS - SINGLE FAMILY
PLANNING ISSUES
I) Does the proposed tentative map satisfy all require- ments of the Carlsbad Zoning Ordinance?
2) Does the proposed tentative map satisfy all require- ments of the Carlabad Subdivision Ordinance and the
State Map Act?
3) Does the design of the proposed subdivision address the
environmental sensitivities of the project site? ,
Discuss ion
The proposed subdivision would create 49 single family lots and 1 condominium lot. 48 of the lots would be sold for custom home construction. The 49th lot would serve the existing single family home on the site,, Each of the lots would exceed 10,000
-3-
r, 6 J
I . square feet and satisfy requirements of lot frontage on the pro- posed public streets, The lots would be adequate in size and
shape to accommodate future single family development.
Staff believes that the design of the proposed subdivision and improvements will not adversely impact surrounding properties or
boring property owners expressing concern regarding the proposed extension of Janis Way, (Please see attached letters).
The proposed exbension would serve 10 lots and create through access, by street "A", to Chestnut Avenue. Staff believes that this would be an inportant link to provide access not only to th
proposed subdivision, but also to existing residents on and in the vicinity of Janis inJay. As outlined in the attached menioran- dum from the Engineering Department, the connection to Janis Waq
would improve fire response time to this area, provide a second access to the subdivision and provide a cul-de-sac to facilitate
turning around,
Staff believes that the design of the proposed subdivision
addresses the environmental sensitivities of the site while pro.
viding desirable home sites. The environmental objectives in tl design of this subdivision where to preserve as many trees as
possible, minimize grading and mitigate noise iinpacts from El
Camino Real.
Lots with large stands of trees would be left ungraded wherever possible. These lots were designed to be larger with a buildin envelope defined within. A tree preservation area was placed o
30 of the lots, as shown on Exhibit B. Within this area, no trees over 2" diameter are to be removed except to provide accf to the buildable portion of the lots. Each building envelope
would provide a minimum of 4,000 square feet of developable arc Staff is recommending a deed restriction to protect the tree preservation areas.
Larger lots were also created along El Camino Real.. The exist slope along El Camino Real would be regraded to a more gentle
slope resulting in an increased setback for mitigation of noisc
impacts on residences and a more stable slope. Staff is recom
Rending that a noise attenuation wall be constructed along ~l Camin0 Real to further mitigate noise impacts. ~lso, staff is recommending the establishment of a homeowners association for
the single family lots to provide for consistent maintenance o the slopes along El Camino Real and Chestnut Avenue.
In order to accommodate reduced grading and tree preservation,
access to some of the lots would be by relatively steep drive-
ways, up to 20% as opposed to the preferred maximum of 14%- 1: Engineering Department has indicated that the driveways would
acceptable due to the design constraints of the lot. Please s
attached memorandum from the Engineering Department.
public welfare. Several letters have been received from neigh-
-4-
.' > 0, 6 7 %.
.* Overall, staff believes that the proposed subdivision is con- sistent with the General Plan, satisfies all requirements of the Carlsbad Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and State Map Act while addressing the environmental resources of the project site.
IV. ANALYSIS - CONDO DEVELOPMENT
PLANNING ISSUES
1) Does the project fulfill all development standards of
2)
the Condominium Ordinance?
Does the project satisfy all aspects of the design cri- teria of the Condominium Ordinance?
Discussion
The applicant is proposing to develop 33 condominium units on 4.15 acres, The units would consist of two-story duplexes and triplexes ranging in size from 1420-1740 square feet. The two
and three bedroom units would each have a private two car garage,
Laundry facilities and 530-555 cubic feet of storage would be
provided in this area. Twelve guest parking spaces and trash enclosures would be distributed throughout the site.
Open recreation requirements would be satisfied by a combination of private and cormon areas. Each unit would have a private bal- cony and one common recreation a.rea would be provided. The com- mon facility will include a jacuzzi, bathhouse, volleyball court,
horseshoe area and barbeque. These facilities would provide approximately 300 square feet of open recreation area per unit.
The proposed development would satisfy all development standards
as well as design criteria of the Condominium Ordinance. The
imize views and create open areas. The recreation area is cen- tralized and integrated with the buildings, The condominium
development and street system was designed to be compatible with
the overall project being considered.
Staff believes that all aspects of the development standards and
design criteria of the Condominiurn Ordinance have been satisfied, as shown on the attached exhibits.
v. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Planning Director has determined that this project, subject to conditions, will not have a significant impact on the environ- ment, and therefore, has issued a conditional negative decla-
ration on December 29, 1981.
project appears well-designed, Buildings have been sited to max-
-5-
I ,I 'I I 19 7-1
-e
VI . RECOMMENDATION
It is recomended that the Planning Commission APPROVE the con-
ditional negative declaration issued by the Planning Director am
ADOPT Resolution Nos. 1916 and 1917, recommending APPROVAL to tht
City Council of ZC-255/CT 81-19/CP-199, based on the findings an:
subject to the conditions contained therein.
ATTACHMENTS
1. PC Resolution Nos. 1916 and 1917
2. Location Nap
4. Disclosure Form
5.
6.
7. Letters from public
8. Environmental Documents
9. Reduced Exhibits
10.
--
3, Background Data Sheet
Memo from Engineering Department, dated January 6, 1982 Memo from Engineering Department, dated January 7, 1982
Exhibits "A", "B", "C", and "D" dated January 15, 1982
CDN : ar
1/22282
-6-
__
rn
I ,= ts
A~~~~~~~~ VIClNITY MAP
!
~UUWUL\IU u,xu-i StWl
'a' C,A$E NO: CT 81119/@-199
1 . wpj;~~: SHEFFLER -
-ST w =TION: Request for approval of a zone change of a portion of
Lu CLtklLt: m family lots and 1 condcxniniwn lot and a condoininium permit to develop 33 units
the northwest corner of El Camino Real and Chestnut Avenue. LEGAL DE~IO~J: That portion of Lot "J" of the Rancho Agua Hedionda accordi
to partion map thereof No. 823 filed Novenvber 16, 1896.
Assessors parcel IL~: 167 - 070 -8 16, 18 &. 20
property from R-A-lO,OOU to WM, a tentative s - - -
aes 23 No. of Iots . # :-.. - *
GENERiU PLAN AX3 Z0NIX-G
Rlx?mil General Plan Land Use Designation ..
*. Density Allcmed 0-4/4-10 Rmsity Proposed
R-A-10,000 - RDI Proposed Zone R-A-10,000 Existicg Zone
surKom5 zoning and mid use:
ZOninFj .. 3A-d use
D
North L_ RLM .
SUEh R? '
East luM
Wl
c West
PUBLIC FAC-
School District, Carlsbad
\ '* x. *
3 --.
I - -q .A,
Waker District + Lo - Carlsbad .
mu's Sewer District Carlsbad
Public FziciLities Fee Agreement, dated Jmuw 3, 1982
(other:
*
'I ENVIRO- SlyPAcT ASSESSmT &
Gonditiona? Negative ,kdaration, issced 'December 29, 1981 Log IJo.
E.I.R. Certified, dated
x .
.? Other ,
0 ',
e-.
L, - * ..I ': 5 .:
' If: aftcr-'the information you have submitted has hcen reviewed, it is determince
tbat+furthci information is required, you will be so advised.
APPLICANT: (See Exhibit "A'" Attached).
Name (individual, partnership, joint vcnture, corporation, syndic;
Business Address ..
.- c
Telephone Number
AGENT : N/A
Name
Bus i ne s s Add r e s s
i
Te3 ephone Number
c
MEMUEFG :
Home Address - Name (individual, partner, joint
venture, corporation, syndication)
Bus i.ne ss Address
C.
Telephone Nurnber Telephone N-mber
. Name - Home Address
Business Address 0-
Telephone Number Telephone Nuher
.-
e
' - C.
- _._I_ - - (Attach 'more sheets if necessary)
a
Ifige declare under penalty of perjury that the infomiation contained in this
c:losure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct ane nay
relied upon as being true and correct unt.il amended. e
-. a
-. (See Exhibit "B" Attached)
c_______ __
hr\ril i r,>nt. *I
, . .,
> e a- 7.
EXHIBIT "B"
.i
-*
7 PAUL SHEFFLER TRUST
909-D Trianon Square Piest
Gretna, LA 70053
(504) 394-4789
s f
Dated: 3, [ \7 1% 1 BY W.mSl I Lrn
WILLIAM J, (HJF'FLEd\ I11
1 O-y--- - Dated: 4 I4 / SI By : --- ;---- 7. >>
GEORGE J, SHEFFLER
c- ..
JOHN J. SHEFFLER TRUST
909-D Trianon Square West Gretna, LA 70053
(504) 394-4789
Dated: 3li?lfl %,LC r!
QSDrn!., r
WILLIAM J. fAJFFLER. [TI
_- -, ,
,
Dated: d/4/81 By: A-/-- - .f'> / -'/ - L. * -
- \ ..
GEORGE J. SHEFFLER c+ I c
WILLIAM J. SBEF LER,
Individually
909-~ Triano Square We t
Gretna, LA 70053
Dated: 3( (2 [Kl UK
(504) 394-4789
-/ c
,. /3 ; -_ Dated: c'/4/qr , ,- * .- /.- ' ~ J . GEORGE J, SHEFFLER Individually
2300 Chestnut
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(714) 729-7443
t. 0 \ e
'& MEIIOR4hTnUFI
DATE : January 6, 1982
To : Catherine Nicholas, Planning Department
FROM : Richard Allen, Engineering Department@,-k'
SUBJECT:
The Engineering Department recommends that a second access point
(Janis Way) be provided to the subdivision for the following
reasons :
1. Kithout a second access, the subdivision, in effect, is a
cul-de-sac and exceeds Engineering Standards for the maximum
length (GOO') and ma.ximum traffic volume (300 vehicles per day).
2. It is desirable to provide a second entrance to subdivisior to provide an alternate route'in the event one access is blocked by an accident, landslide, flooding, or other diszster.
3. Th6 connection will improve fire response time to houses along the-existing Janis Way and vicinity by providing a shorter route from Station 80, 3 (Catalina Drive and Chestnut Avenue).
4. The subdivision would construct a cul-de-sac bulb at the end of the extended Janis Nay. No bulb exists now making turnin around at the end cf the street difficult.
5. The connection of Janis Way is not expected to significant increase traffic on Janis Way as the route is circuitous and >!on roe Street will remain more convenient for traffic going fron
Chestnut =?venue to Elm Avenue.
6.
occur if land to thz north develops and extends Stree't C. Hovev
that s%ts 1ii1? be difi--icult to develoD and extension of the stre is uncertain at this time.
SECOND ACCESS TO CT81-19 (SCHEFFLER)
Ar, additional route from the subdivision may eventualll-
I?- dCEIVq.7J-J -eJd
' " tr J. -3, t ]982 RHA : Is
C: Dave Hauser CITY nF: CAR: '3#q'J Phnr 7 rSQ
J hp:' 7t
* ." e ,, 0 a.
PET1 TI ON -. --
TO: Planning Commission City of Carlsbad
We, the undersigned, all being owners of homes in the area known
as Ocean View Estztes, comprised of the 2200 block of Janis Nay anE the streets of Bedford Circle and Avondaie Circle, object to direct
access to Janis Way fron Chestnut Avenue through the proposed S5effler
development. We understand that the reason for the proposed direct access is to provide the best possible response time for erergency
vehicles. However, cons2dering the current response tirne (approxi- mately 2% minutes from Fire Station #J) and considering the facz that the proposed direct access would greatly increase the traffic
on Janis Way, we believe that the likelihood of injury or death re- sulting from the increased traffic far outweighs the benefits to be
gained from a quicker response time.
Date: jl---&q(fz Signature:
Print Name: & Es \
x
Address : z/aa T%w/> hw
.u
Date: J4./ 2J;, &2
-22-
Signature: $'&x. h, & 4
print Name: f!?<Y/e4 /h! CLhA-d
Address: z-/2a Th/; 047
Date: & A- 'fa Signature: %&' AT &?+
Print Name: fl/L Tb'N 4 f?d dp&'?
Address : 350/ AidNDBLE 6&,
n Date: a?pdk> L-0
Print Name: E\/ fi I(. QGG~~R
Address : ,?<To / Al/ DpOflLE 6f-
Signature: ,a &LLm-dd - Date: ~j7~57 BZ
P r in t Name : z?k%&A 7fiDk'DZJ
address:
Date: Signature :
Print Name:
Address :
*@ 7 81- /?ye/- /yy - &LGFFL"4 - P 4 .' %I
ECEHVE ,
PET1 T J ON -8
M?,R 2 1982
CITY OF CARLSBAD Piannirlg Depas o,nt
TO: Planning Commission
City of Carlsbad
We, the undersigned, all beinq owners of homes in the area known
as Ocean View Estates, comprised of the 2100 block of Janis Way and the streets of Beclford Circle and Avondale Circle, object to direct
access to Janis Way from Chestnut Avenue throuqh the proposed Shef flex development. We understand that the reason for the proposed direct access is to provide the best possible response time for emerqency
vehicles. However , cons2dering the current response time (approxi- mately 2% minutes from Fire Station 43) and considering the fact , that the proposed direct access woulcl qreatly increase the traffic '
on Janis Way, we believe that the likelihood of injury or death re-
sulting from the increased traffic far outweighs the benel"its to be
gained from a quicker response t?mc.
Date: 1 '3 Fb Signature
print Name:
Address; &/ ' 2 & -- u 115 , tC/">/: .
L
Date: i /a c/gi Signature: 9k-Q. 9&+,
Print Name:' 3iO-V\% -
Address: 3150 JO-..A.& A@ ~,
M. ~SJd
Date: * /-&sf& Signature: u ,a &FA/
"", Print'Name: 3am7&/ A&.
Address :
--- \-2$- 49 Signature : *I Date:
Print Mame: __ 35rS ~-6DFom cu?-
Signature : $$&@&$& - g. A$&??; -
Address : 35-j~ B~FM~ - eL.
..
.-
address :
Date: - //26 Bz/
Print Name: fl&&///fkAT -- -I D/4djs -
Date: Si qna turc : -
I .. I
I--- - Print Name: __
Address:
! \! I ---7
s
> 0 -'ew
.L PET 1 TI ON
TO: Planninq Commission City of Carlsbad
We, the undersigned, all beinq owners of homes in the area kmkn
as Ocean View Estates, comprised of the 2100 block of Janis Way ar5 the streets of Bedford Circle and Avondale Circle, object to direcr access to Janis Way frorn Chestnut Avenue throuqh the propos.ed Shefiler development. We understand that the reaSon for the proposed direcr
access is to provide the best possible response tine for emergency
vehicles. However, considering the current respocse time lapproxr- mately 2% minates from Fire Station #a) and considering the fact
that the proposed direct access would qrcatly increase the tra2fic
sulting from the increased traffic far outweighs the benefits to bs ,
gained from a quicker response time. I
on Janis Way, wg bdieve that the likelihood of injury or death re-
Date: *%8;4 Signature: Ci!hdr*-
Print Name: JANET 7 CflJAmk-FS-
Address; 35/06EDFa6D ck! ' - ..
Date: a/!. xql%f-v Signature:
Print Name: . 3r70 &am=& @a
A
Address; /@A@?& R/ b@ehn6g
n
Date: && 1 ,7S!I981 Signature: %--d-w cv-
c qr-3
Address : 35 "so ~<6f~~fcf, --
-d Date: -pq \ fi . a<! Bft Signature :
fRCS .. Print Name: &hRC,\CL n. E@
+ Address : 3 c 3.0 U<O A <&C
Signature: A' A - HA*
Print Name: d& D. Ldpk/
Address: 3s& &%?k!&
33242-w-
Date:)& a5y-g2
..
Da t e : .fA-hj ,g -c- @- Siqnature: 2pjf2u/L&. -- 7
Print Name: AM,F+Z-~ 15'. /b-& /I-
Address: ~J-U 0' /$gfi pb,t /) f[k C C& ___t
!
.-
I e * . ,"
,A 4- 2
1 -* PETIT 10N
To: Planning Commission City of Carlsbad
We, the undersigned, all being owners of homes in the area known as Ocean View Estates, comprised of the 2100 block of Janis Way and
the streets of Redford Circle and Avondsle Circle, object to direct access to Janis Way fron Chestnut Avenue throuqh the propos.ed Shefglex
developnent. We understand that the reason for the proposed direct
access is to provide the hest possible t-esnonsc time for emergency
vehicles. Hc 'ever, considering the currcqt response time (approxi- mately 2% minutes from Fire Station 433 and considerinq the fact
that the proposed direct access would qrcatly increase the traffic , on Janis Way, we believe that the likelihood of injury or death re-
sulting from the increased traffic far outweighs the benefi'ts to be,
gained from a quicker response time.
i
Date: -)&h zy,, /sb c Signature :
~
Print Name: &aL+S\ -6- &~YY=-(( L
Date: Jh %s, 13 ,fv -
Address; ?r3>-&-&% p/kZC&?-,
Date: I1.r J%L Signature : )n LlLitw&<L ,
Print'Namc: 353~- w c&
-a Date: y$p-
Print Name: jdbL/d.. P", &-lfAAL(Lp;r_
Address : 3q~ S- ~PF~A~G~F~E- - -.
.. li
Date: 1 ,tf gL Signature: Wa/gA
Address: - 3F23- *A& _I -_-I-_ I___-
Print Name: fir&L//"JL3 /4! fiEcff&ueK
//
!
Date : -~~~~~z Signature : & /-e&&- P L Print Namc: Jflfl~S rt. e ~~&<BEZ'Z
Address: -?JTo' gEp mK9 c$ &c&.g
! 13) :. fi
..
-1
.I
\I
*4 PETITION
TO: Planning Commission City of Carlsbad
We, the undersigned, all beinq ownsrs o€ hones in the area known as Ocean View Estates, comprised of the 2100 block of Janis Way and the streets of Beclford Circle and Avondalc Circle, object to direct access to Janis Way from Chestnut Avenue throuqh the proposed Shcffler
development. We undcrstand that the reason for the proposed direct access is to provide the best possible response time for emergency vehicles. However, considering the current response time (approxi-
mately 2% minutes from Fire Station ii3) and considering the fact that the proposed direct access would greatly increase the trqffic
on Janis Way, we believe that the likelihood of injury or death re- j sultinq from the increased traffic far outweighs the benefits to be
gained from a quicker response time. I I
Date: //.(/bL
Prht Name: -!?Tcp &e.d ' c- -!?e dAFc&
Address; 2\40 xhMiJ dky .> .
Date: (/A .;/8.- Signature : L! -
Print Namei C&tt?'o/! A. z
Address: d/+!o JAn/,; Ivlph;, I
Date: - Signature :
Print Narne:
Address : -
-k Date: Sjgnaturc : -.\ x\
print Name: ..
~ . 1
Address :
- Signature : - Date:
---_I__
Print Name:
I Address: -
Signature: - _I_-
Date:
- I
Print N;mc; ' --
i - Address:
I
i
ZD 9 -- -. ! e e
.L
> .
'\ PETITION
To: Planning Commission
City of Carlsbad
We, the undersiTned, all being owners of horns in the area kriown as Ocean View E:states, comprised of the 2100 block of Janis Kay and
the streets of Bedforc! Circle and Avoi~lale Circle, object to direct access to Janis Way fron Chestnut Avenue throuqh the propos.ed Sheffler
development. We understand that the reason for the proposed direct
access is to provide the best possible response time for emergency vehiclzs. However, considering the current response time (apFroxi-
mately 24 minutes from Pirr Station 73) and considering the fact that. the proposed direct access woulci greatly increase the traffic
on Janis Way, we believe that the ljkelihood of injury or death re-
gained from a quicker response time. I sulting from the increased traffic far outweighs the bene€itT to be
I
Date: -23 L 3% Signature; Q % :& A+&? - .-
print Name: K;T&IA&-~, /,/c/~? 'c
liddress; > [ 30 AA& L A!
Date: /-2.3- F2 Signature: &202&g
10.2 d
Address; 3 ,.7ag&.&bd
L
Date: ( 2.3 rv Signa turc : ?7+2 7JfJw/-L +-
s
Signature : 2?5i.d .. &x?? @ i
Address : y&b &i, & . C&Lc
Pript Name: ?a+\ L c;k Y+ -yLt\\+
-%- Address: I,
Print'Name: /'TIA<J~~(K 7 />tj~'gcC &
3 o/ B ) MA, gc.;< Address :
Ea te : !JT~/~L ..)I
prjnt Name:,.!&!LG& rd A. Z-lLc~ &,
>rlq Z&/dI5- LJ4Yi
., Date: Signature: .
,bo savli4 d0L
Pr int Name: &/t,/&rd /?;/... ---- I-h/?
2/a s,o;a LAS
Date: '/-1/3u Signature. & ' 9LL- _--
--/r I
Address: __
'I -