HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-05-18; City Council; 7011; SPECIFIC PLAN AND ZONE CHANGE PASEO DEL NORTEb
r3
!$ t3 E CL <<
. ,I g
4
u t;
-1 5 z 3 8 0
1 CITeF CARLSBAD - AGENDeILL
SPECIFIC PLAN AND ZONE CHANGE 1,
PASEO DEL NORTE
AB# "9Il TITLE
MTG. 5/18/82
PL DEPT.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Planning Commission and the Planning Staff are recommend
that the City Council direct the Attorney's Office to prepar documents APPROVING SP-184 and ZC-256.
-ITEM EXPLANATION
In December of 1981 the City Council approved a General Plan
Amendment (GPA-59(H) - City Council Resolution No. 6733) whi designated an area of Paseo del Norte, south (of Palomar Air€ Road (map attached), as a Combination District comprised of
Professional and Related Commercial (0) and Travel Service ( designations. The change was a result of Council concern
regarding the potential for increased truck traffic in the F
Mira area from the industrial designation formerly on the si
The proposed actions would implement zoning which is consist with the Combination District and would also satisfy the Combination District requirement for a specific plan. The proposed zoning for this area is the Residential Profession; Zone (R-P) which will allow primarily office type uses.
Residential uses are prohibited through the specific plan.
Development of individual lots in this area would require a development plan. For further information please see the
attached staff report to the Planning Commission.
FISCAL IMPACTS
Approval of SP-184 and ZC-256 will have no direct fiscal imI on the city. Some staff time was utilized in the drafting c
SP- 184.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
The Planning Director has determined that this project will have a significant impact on the environment and has issued negative declaration which was approved by the Planning Com- mission on April 28, 1982.
EXHIBITS
1. PC Staff Report dated, April 28, 1982
2. PC Resolution Nos. 1925 & 1926
3. Location Map 4. SP-184
z 0 APPLICATION a BMITTAL DATE:
January 15, 1982
& STAFF REPORT
DATE : April 28, 1982
TO : Planning Commission
FROM : Planning Department
SUBJECT: ZC-256/SP-184 - CITY OF CARLSBAD - Request to
change the zone from Industrial (M) to Residentia
Professional (RP) and approval of a Specific Plan
for property located on both sides of Paseo del
Nortel. south of Palomar Airport Road.
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
In December of 1981 the City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA 59(H) - Resolution 6733) €or the Paseo del Norte area south of Palomar Airport Road (see attached map). This General Plan Amendrnent changed the land use from Planned Indus- trial (PI) to a Combination District comprised of Travel Servic
(TS) and Professional and Related Commercial (0"office"). A Specific Plan is required with the utilization of the Combinatj
District, The proposed actions being considered at this tine
will provide zonlng which is consistent with the General Plan z
satisfy the Land Use Element requirement for a Specific Plan.
Surrounding land use consists of Commercial Tourist uses to thd
north (California 6 Motel, Hadley's, Denny's, 2 service sta- tions), Interstate 5 to the west, undeveloped industrial land '
the east, open space and Alta Mira to the south. Current land use on the project site consists of liqht industry (Calmil Pla, tics and Orco), commercial (Tip Top Meats Et Deli), a new offict
complex as well as three vacant undeveloped parcels.
11, ANALYSIS
A. Zone Change - ZC-256
Planning Issues
1. Is the proposed RP (Residential Professional) zon
consistent with the Combination District and Gene
Plan designations (TS and O)?
2. Are uses allowed in the RP zone consistent with
existing and surrounding land uses and zoning?
Discussion
The Combination District provides for Travel Service (TS) and Professional and Related Commercial (0-"off ice") land uses on
7. 0 0
subject property. The "0" designation provides for office typt
uses and related retail uses. The RP zone permits these and
other similar type uses. As a result, it can be found that tht
RP zone is consistent with the "0" land use. The residential permitted in the RP zone will be eliminated by the Specific P1, and will be discussed under that section of this) report.
Existing land uses within the proposed Zone Change area includf
CalNil Plastics, Haedrich's Tip Top Meat Restaurant; Orco, a
small manufacturing company, and a new office development. Thc
other parcels are vacant (see attached map). The ne~7 office
complex is in conformance with the proposed RP zone as are the
vacant parcels. Tip Top Meats, CalKil and Orco would become
legal non-conforming uses.
Surrounding land use includes existing commercial tourist uses (California 6 Motel, Hadley's, Denny's, services stations, etc to the north. Approval of the proposed zone would provide for uses which would be compatible with these uses. The proposed area is also compatible with the Open Space area to the south
with the Planned Industrial (PI) area to the east. Compatibil with the PI area can be assured by orienting the industrial ar away from the Paseo del Norte properties. Staff also feels th the proposed zone change will be compatible with Alta Mira,
approximately 1/2 mile to the south. Traffic will be Drimaril
oriented toward Palomar Airport F.oad and permitted uses could provide the residents with medical and dental offices within walking distance. Finally a Site Development Plan is required for individual development which will provide for adquate
development standards to ensure compatibility with surrounding
uses.
Specific Plan-184 (attached)
Planning Issues
1) Should the Specific Flan be utilized to implement the
designation of the General Plan?
2) Should a Site Development Plan be required for indivi dual developments?
3) Should industrial properties to the east be limited f
having access to Paseo del Norte by the Specific Plar
Discussion
A Specific Plan is required for this area because of the use (
the General Plan Combination District. Standarld zoning is no1 designed tc; implement more than one land use, making the Spec: Plan a necessity in dual land use category (TS/O) situations. Unfortunately, at this time, only one zone can be utilized to
implement the Travel Service (TS) and Professional and Relate(
-2-
0 0
Commercial (0) categories approved by Council. Staff has
recommended that the RP zone be the underlying zone for this arc
because it permits the uses most in demand, offices, although commercial tourist (CT) type uses are also compatible with
existing land uses.
Staff is currently working on a Zone Code Amendment which would allow two zones- on the same piece of property. If this ordinan1
is implemented, the City could also utilize the CT zone for thi: area,
The recommended Residential Professional (RP) zone is the implementing zone for the "0" desiqnation. In addition to
offices, it also permitsresidential uses by right. Because of the close proximity of the Encina Treatment Plant, residential units are considered an undiserable use. Staff is recommendin that residential uses be eliminated through the Specific Plan.
Staff has drafted into the Specific Plan (~-4), a section whict
requires a Site DeveloDment Plan for each project developed wit in the plan boundaries. There are two reasons for this approac
'If a Site Development Plan is required later, when project spe-
cifics are known, the Specific Plan can be kept less restrictii
and is therefore more flexible. It also gives the Planning Cor mission a role in approving new projects in this area ensuring comprehensive design for the entire Specific Plan area.
Under the circulation section of the Specific Plan (p.2), it id
recommended that the industrial properties to the east be proh
ited access onto Paseo del Norte throuqh the subject propertie Staff feels this is an important feature of the Specific Plan.
One of the major reasons the Council advocated a land use chan from industrial use for this area was to reduce the amount of truck traffic through the Alta Mira project. If access is prc
vided to Paseo del Norte for the industrial area to the east t objective will not have been accomplished.
111. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Planning Director has determined that this project will nc have a significant impact on the environment and has issued a
Negative Declaration on February 23; 1982.
IV. RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planninq Commission aDprove the Ne1 Declaration issued by the Planninq Director and adopt Plannin
Commission Resolution No. 1925 and Yo. 1926, recomm2ndinq m
ZC-256 and SP-184 based on the findings contained therein.
ATTAC HM EMTS
1. Resolutions No. 1925 and No. 1926
2. Land 1Jse Ma?
3. Specific Plan-184
4. Background Data Sheet 5. Environmental Documents
..-_ L
.1
2
0 -0
I
PLANNING COKMXSSION XESOL!UTXON NO o 1925
A KESOLUTION'OF THE PLFJJNSNG CCMivIISSION OF THE CI
OF CARLSBAD p CALI FORNLA p RECOPX4ZKDING APPROVAL TO
12
3.3
14
15
96
17
18
19
20
21
22 .
23
24
25
26
' .
27
28
1
Planning Commission; and .
I. WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as p~c
Title 21 of the Carlsbad Muni.cipal Code; and
. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on 'the 28th day (
9982, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by 1
consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public heairing, upon hearing and con;
all testimony and argurwnts, if any, of all persons desirir
heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to t
Change; and
1
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows::
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
€3) That based on the evidence presented at the public hea
the Commission reeonmends APPROVAL of ZC-256 , based on
following findings: - .-
Findings:
1.) That the RP (Residential Professicnalj x.;one is consist the 0 (Professional and Rel.ak.ed Cc,..;merc%al} land use designation of the General Plan.
1.
22
3
4
5
e;
7
8
9
lo
11,
22
E3
l I e. .a.
2) Th2.t uses allowed in the XP zone are compatible and CI
with surround.ing land: use designations arid zones e
3) That the development staildards of the RF zone will en
4) That khj.s project will not cause any sj..gnificant envi
impacts and a Negative Decimation has been issued by
Planning Director 8 dated Febrmry 23 , 1982, and appro
the PL;ming Commission on April 28, 1982,
That the R-P zone will be consistent with the Specifi
for this area which was adopted pursuant to Sections
65452 of. the Government pde.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
Planning Commission of the city of Carlsbad, California, h
'the 28th day of April, 4982, by the following vote, to wit
AYES: Chairman Farrcw, Commissioners Rombotis p L'
compatibility with surrounding uses,
5)
Jose and Friestedt,
NOES: Commissioners Marcus and Schlehuber,
ABSENT: None, I-4 I1 15
3- 6
l?
3.8
3_9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ABSTAIN: Nolie, . . .
I_ VERNON J. FARROW, JR, p
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMP
ATTEST:
-- - - JAMES C e HAGAMAN F Secretary
CARLSSAD PLANNING CoMm s s I ON
..
PC RES0 #I925 -2-
I
Ij
3 2i
I I PLANKING COPiMISSION RESOLUrliION NO e 1926 - .-_I_
a RESOLUTION OF THE PLA.WNING cormussIm OF THE
CITY OF CARLSRA3 r CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING AP?zC
OF SP-184, FOR A 12 ACRE COMMERCIRC/OFFICE ARE%
- 6) 51
7
- CAS3 NO: SP-184
. WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property,
A porkion of Parcel A of Parcel Map 2943; Parcels 4, . and G of Parcel Nzp 6022, a11 being po~tionS of Lot H
Agua Hedionda., in the County of Sam Diego, filed in t
bx I
12
13
14
Planning Commission: and
vmF.REAS, said veriEied application constitutes a reqgt
as provided by Title 2'1 of the CarPsbad Municipal. Code; am
VJJEREAS, the Planning Cornniission did on the 28th da~7 (
l5
16
3.7
18
19
2o
22 2k .
23
24
25
26
27
28
April, 1382, hold a duly noticed piib1i.c hearing as presczil
law to consider said request; and 1
WHEREA.S, at said public hearing, tipon hearing and
cqnsidering all testimony and arguments, if anyr of all- pel
1 desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factor
I relating to the Specific Plan; and
11
i
1
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESCLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
A)' That the above recitations are true and correct.
3) That based on the evidence'presented at the pu.Slic hea
the Pl.annincj Commission. recommends that the City Counc
an Ordinance approving SP-184 based on the following f
I
Find ina.; -
1) The site is physically suitable in size and shape to
. accommodate the proposed QS~S because the SpeciEic Fla
provides standards for: developnent which aecofi-iixodate f
project with the site.
_-_--&~LL.?-
I
a
2
3
4
5
-6
7
8
9
1o
XI
13
l2
a4
2- 5
16
17
a a
2) The proposed uses wi.l.l not be detrimental to ad5oininc
properties for tne reasons cotlined ,in the staff rep21
his project will not cause any significant adverse ir
the environment because the Planning Director issued z Negative Declaration on February 23, 1952, and it was by the Planning Ccmaission on April 28, 1982.
The Specific Plan is consist.ent with the Carlsbad Gent and with Sections 65451 and 65452 of the Governxent C;
3)
4)
. regulate the use of Specific Plafis,
5) The Specific Plan implem,ents the TS (Travel Service) q
. (Professional and Related Commercial) land use design<
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting
IPlanning Cornmission of the city of Carlsbad, California, k
AYES: Chairman Farrowp Commissioners Ftom5otPs L'Heureu~~ Jose and Friestedti
approved for the property.
28th day of April, 1982, by the following vote, to wit: I I NOES: Commissioners Marcus and Schlehuber,
ABSEPUT : None o
ABSTAXP-7: None o
_l___l . VERNON J o FARROWr JR. r Cha
CARESBAD PrmxmG COI~JIISS I I
2o
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
I
JAKES C = HAGAMAN I Secretary
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMIYlISSIOH
I
11
;PC RES0 % 1926 -2-
1
I
e e i
L
4 4
__ - -. I I
-
CASE MQ.
A p p It n c J?$ N 'd ads b-ad-
0 m
SPECIFIC PLAN - 184
I. PURPOSE AND LOCATION
The purpose of this Specific Plan is to provide a compre- hensive development plan for the area along Paseo del Nor south of Palomar Airport Road as shown on Eigure 1. This plan is to ensure that development of this area takes intl consideration adjacent and neighboring properties, existi
developments, and future development.
This Specific Plan is intended to be a tool to implement
goals and policies of the Carlsbad General Plan. This pl is primarily intended to provide a set of development sta
dards and does not provide a guarantee of approval for an
future discretionary acts or projects within its bound-
aries.
This Specific Plan is adopted pursuant to the provisions California Government Code Sections 65450 et.seq. and of Land Use Element of the city of Carlsbad General Plan. P
Specific Plan is required for this area pursuant to page 32(12) of the Land Use Element which requires the use of specific plan in conjunction with the Combination Distric
11. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS
The site is designated in the Land Use Element of the cit General Plan as a combination district which includes the
Travel Service Commercial (TS) and Professional and Relat
Commercial (0) categories. The intent of the Travel Serb
(TS) category is to provide uses which are oriented towar
the traveling public (i.e., hotels, motels, restaurants, service stations, etc). The intent of the Professional a
Related Commercial (0) category in this area is to provic office type uses and to reduce the overall impact of a straight commercial designation.
This specific plan determines land use for the site and
serves to implement the combination general plan designation of ''0" and TS, This specific plan is pursuai to Sections 65451 and 65452 of the governmient code.
Therefore, the provisions of this plan shall take precedence over the provisions of any underlying zones.
The provisions of underlying zoning shall apply to subjec
not addressed in this plan,
0 0
This particular specific plan does not provide for specif
land uses at specific locations within it's boundaries.
However, the Planning Commission and City Council should look at the appropriateness of a use (travel or office) a specific location as a criteria for approval. The specif plan area is zoned Residential Professional (RP) which i designed to implement the Professional and Related Commercial general plan designation, the major land use category.
111. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
The specific plan area will be a comprehensively planned
office/travel oriented commercial and type development. area will feature extensive landscaping, including
streetside berming and garden-type offices; sign controls
and flexible development standards.
IV. CIRCULATION
It is anticipated that access to the specific plan
properties will be from Paseo del Norte, a secondary arterial, and that industrial property to the east will b served from Palomar Airport Road. It may Ibe found howeve that if all of parcel 211-040-12 (as shown on figure one)
is developed under one plan, access to Paseo del Norte
could be provided if necessary.
V. PERMITTED USES
Category 1 - Office oriented uses. These uses are permit
anywhere in the specific plan boundaries.
(1) Administrative and executive offices;
(2) Accountants and attorneys;
(3) Clinic, medical and dental, including incidental lat
(4) Engineers, architects and planners;
(5) Insurance agencies and services;
(6) Investment agencies and services, including financiz
(7) Labor union offices;
(8) Libraries;
(9) Medical offices and clinics, including incidental
(10) Offices, business and professional, including inci-
atories and pharmacies;
institutions;
mortuaries;
dental commercial facilities such as blueprint and
photocopy shops, business machine sales, computer ar data processing centers, news stores, duplicating ar
mimeographing services and tobacco shops;
-2-
* @
(11) Public building other than schools;
(12) Administrative offices for publishing houses and new
(13) Real estate and related services;
(14) Schools, business, vocational and professional, incl
ing art, barber, beauty, dance, drama, music and swi
ming;
papers;
(15) Subdivision sales complex;
(16) Other similar uses which the Planning Commission may
determine fall within the intent and purposes of thi area, are of a comparable nature to the uses enumera in this chapter, and will not be detrimental to prop erty in the vicinity.
Permitted accessory uses and structures. Accessory uses a
buildings customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, such
incidental storage facilities, are permitted in this area
approved under Section IV,
Uses and structures permitted by conditional use permit.
following uses and structures are permitted by conditional
use permit approved and issued by the Planning Department:
(1) Drive-thru financial institutions;
(2) Circuses and carnivals and private clubs;
(3) Health facilities, long-term;
Category 2 - Travel oriented uses. At some time in the
future it may be desireable to include the CT Zone for th
area to implement the TS General Plan designation on this
property. In such instances the permitted use would
correspond to the uses permitted in Section 21-29 of the
Municipal Code. Development of these uses would occur
through the Site Development Plan process as specified ir
this plan.
Residential Uses. The subject property has a General P1c
Combination District which includes the Travel Service (7
and the Professional and Related Commercial (0) categoric Residential uses are permitted on the property by both tl-
General Plan and by the Residential Professional (R-P) zc This specific plan, as approved, does not provide for residential uses on the subject property, Any proposed
development of residential uses on this property shall
necessitate a major amendment to this specific plan,
-3-
0 0
VI. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. Site Development Plan
(1) No building permit or other entitlement shall be is
for any use in this specific plan area unless a sit1
development plan (processed pursuant to Chapter 21.1
of the Municipal Code) has been approved for the prc erty by the Planning Commission.
(2) The Planning Commission or City Council on appeal, : approving a site development plan may impose specia: conditions or requirements that include, but are not limited to the following:
o Special setbacks, yards, open space;
o Special height and bulk of building regulations;
o Fences and walls;
o Regulation of signs;
o Additional landscaping;
o Special grading restrictions;
o Requiring street dedication and improvements (or
posting of bonds);
o Requiring public improvements either on or off tl subject site that are needed to service the propc development;
o Time period within which the project or any phase of the project shall be completed;
o Regulation of points of ingress and egress;
o Such other conditions as deemed necessary to insL conformity with the general plan and other adopt€
policies, qoals or objectives of the city.
(3) In reviewing the site development plan, the Planning
Commission or Council on appeal, may also use compat-
ibility (use) with other properties and proposed buil ing location as criteria in making a determination tc
approve or deny the plan.
(E) Standards
The following minimum standards shall be utilized in the approval of the site development plan:
(1) Setbacks: Actual setbacks shall be determined by th site development plan, however, the following setbac
shall be used as a minimum. All setbacks shall be
measured from the property line. For the purpose of
this ordinance, a streetside property line is that 1
created by the ultimate right-of-way of the frontage
street.
-4-
0 0
a) Streetside setback: All permitted uses shall
b) Side yard: Side yards shall be a minimum of 5
c) Rear yard: Rear yards shall be a minimum of 10
observe a 10 foot streetside setback.
feet
feet.
(2) Coverage: Maximum building coverage (including park ing) shall not exceed 65% of gross lot area.
(3) Building Height: Building height shall not exceed 3
feet from finished grade.
(4) Parking: Parking shall comply with Chapter 21.44 of
the Municipal Code. Additional parkiing may be requi through the site development plan process, There sh
be no parking permitted in the first ten feet of the streetside setback.
(5) Landscaping:
a) Minimum: A miniumum of 15% of each building sit shall be landscaped. All landscaped areas shall provided with irrigation systems and shall be ma
tained in a a neat and orderly fashion.
streetside setback (except for approved drivewaq shall be landscaped with a combination of trees,
shrubs, and groundcover. Berming, not to exceed
inches, should also be utilized in this area. I
parking is not utilized in the remaining 10 feet
streetside setback, it should also be landscaped
b) Streetside Setback: The first ten feet of the
c) Parking Areas: Landscaping for parking areas
shall be determined by the site development plar
d) All other unused areas shall be landscaped as determined by the site development plan.
(6) Signs: Signing will be determined by the site devel
ment plan. A consistent theme should be maintained
throughout the specific plan area.
(7) Storage: No outdoor storage is permitted.
(8) Roof Equipment: All roof equipment (and similar
equipment air conditioners, ducts, tanks piping, etc
shall be screened so as not to be visible from a hej
of five feet above any ground or groud floor elevatj
at a distance closer than 500 feet from the closest building on any lot.
-5-
0 a
(9) Refuse Collector Areas: All outdoor refuse collect areas shall be completely enclosed and screened fro]
the street and adjacent property by a wall construc,
of durable material. Location and material shall bc
shown on the site development plan.
(10) Motels/Hotels: In reviewing a Site Development Plai for hotels and motels the decision making body shal determine that adequate parking and turn-around are' is provided for large trucks (18 wheel).
C. Interpretation:
If it is determined that some difficulty exists in interpreting this plan, the Planning Director may
schedule a Planning Commission Determination. Such interpretation may also occur at the time a site development plan is heard by the Planning Commissio In either event, it should be found that the final interpretation can be used consistently in reviewin future site development plans.
-6-
e, m ..-
a.
FIG. I
!*C q4AD a I 4' $"g fi pJj La iL &-dB
.. 8 $7 \\,:
LIa
.-
-.
. \. ... . ... : , ,; .,
I' 'I -
, ,' , .' R
..
VtClNlTY I'dIAP
'* v W
I3ACKWW DATA SHEET
CASE NO: _. zC-256/SP-184
APPLICAWT: CITY OF cF_RLSl3AD
REQUEST AND XCATION:
Paseo del Norte, south of Palomar Airport Road.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
!Zone Change M to CT and approval of SP-184 text on
Portion of lot H map 823 Rancho Agua Hedionda
- - APN :
Acres 12.3 proposed No, of Lotsflnits
GENERAL PLAN mJD ZONING
Land Use Designation C.D. (TS/O)
Density Allowed N/A Density proposed N/A
Existing Zone M Proposed Zone RP
Surrounding ZoniRg and Land Use:
Zoning Land IJse
Site
hbrth CT TS
South PC os
M PI East
West 1-5 1-5
PUBLIC FACILITIES -
School District N/A Water* Carlsbad Sewer Carlsbad EDU' s
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated
(* The city of Carlsbad will provide water service to all projects in Carlsba(
except those located in the Oliverhain and San Marcos Sewer Districts)
N/A
ENvIm?mmAL IMPACT ESESSW
-- X Negative Declaration, issued February 23, 1982 -
E,I ,R, Certified, dated --
Other ,
Q 0
All exis;i.:ing uses presently located within the boundaries of
specific plan are expressly permitted by this specific plan. future expansion, enlargement or redevelopment shall be govei
by the provisions of Chapter 21.48 of the Zoning Ordinance (I
nonconforming uses and buildings).
D\ST RtbuTED
sClqS((Et.fc0 f
LJ0fLQ\r*l6
I 9 0
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ZC-256/SP-184
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that .the City Council of the City of Carl: hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avei Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO P.M., on Tuesday, May 18, 1982,to 1
approval of a Zone Change from M to CT and RP, and a Specific P1< property generally located on both sides of Paseo Del Norte, app.
-25 miles south of Palomar Airport Road and more particularly de;
A portion of Parcel A of Parcel Map 2949, Parcels 4, 5,
6, of Parcel Map 6022, all being portions of Lot H of Agua Hedionda, in the County of San Diego, according to Map 823, filed in the County of San Diego, November 16, 1896, as shown on the map below.
. as:
APPLICANT: City of Carlsbad PUBLISH : May 8, 1982 CARLSBAD CITY COUNC
...
i . .-
PALCIri7AFI .Q.XRP~FIT -RQAD:
LOCATION MAP
ZC-256 & S-P-184
ant: City ..
(I/ JJ- 7 - h LCE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad
will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue,
Carlsbad, California, at 7:OO p.m. on Wednesday, April 28, 1982, to consider approval of a Zone Change from M to Cl? and W, and a Specific Plan on property generally located on both sides of Paseo del Norte approximately .25 miles south of Palomar Airport Road and imre particularly
described as:
A portion of Parcel A of Parcel Map 2949, Parcels 4, 5 and 6, of
Parcel Map 6022, all being portions of Lot H of Agua Hdionda, in the County of San Diego, according to Map 823, filed in the County of San Diego, November 16, 1896, as shown on the map below.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to
attend the public hearing. Planning Department at 438-5591.
If you have any questions please call the
CASE FILE: APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD zC-256/SP- 1 8 4
PUBLISH: April 17, 1982
CITY OF CARLSW PLANNING COMMISSION
"__ - -.-_ - - - : 0 1 e u 1Ju;LJLlAy Le LlawL.A*u'-LIL- wu* u* u 1 LyyJ "U"""1
>e c, mx 708 v.143 we EIGif-er ;m D;iYego, a 92if2 Pamifig, C1: 92220 ,2135 Wellington wto & Carol. Rase
Sarrt.2 Ana, CA 92701
uldrew & Christ2 McReynol.d.5 u7arres o! rmokhy Gaiser , c~L--M~s 1~las"Lic Prc
?3?6 Calk Chiquita 3344 Ridgecrest Drive 6400 Pasea del Nort
a Jolla, CY, 9203'9 CarPsiszd, CA 92024 Carisbad, CA 92008
t
) >
.( :arI.tx co. t : State ~oad ~aint, Station Sea Gate asmciates
2e 0. BGX 488 CEiltK3.RS ' 8950 Villa La J01-l:
kcinitas, CA 92024 6050 Paseo del Earte Suite 2100
CarEsbad, CA 92005 Ea Jolla, CA 92307
I
TI
{oblen'cz r Fieycrs r Maber
40 i?arine Viei Ste, 204 P, 0. BOX 488
dam Beach, CA 92075
Paul fi Magdatlena Ecke
Encinitas, CA 92024
--
\
y+ .xJ+ .A,$' 5P-
.9 L. .
I.
-< j
d -
.. '1 L
3.6
I
I-
I
i
*