HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-11-02; City Council; 6913-1; Macario Canyon Park AnnexationCITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA
AR# /c 9/3 -**/
MTG 11/2/82
DFPT LUP
TITLE:
MACARIO CANYON PARK ANNEXATION
nPPT HD. IV^H
CITY ATTY V^3^
CITY MGR. *&*-~
OUl5ena.
Sc
O5
O
OO
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Planning Staff recommends that this application be APPROVED
and that the City Council ADOPT Resolution No.
ITEM EXPLANATION;
This item is a request for City Council approval of an annexation
of 280.64 acres of land owned by the City of Carlsbad, referred
to as Macario Canyon Park. The property is generally located
east of Agua Hedionda Lagoon, south and west of El Camino Real,
and has a prezone of L-C (Limited Control). On the 4th day of
October, 1982, the Local Agency Formation Co mm ission adopted a
Resolution of Annexation for this property. A copy of this
resolution is attached for your review. The last remaining
discretionary action to complete the annexation is the adoption
of a Resolution of Annexation by the City Council. Approval of
this annexation would be consistent with the City Council's
annexation policy.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The City Council, on February 9, 1982, certified the
Environmental Impact Report for the Macario Canyon Park Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No taxes or revenues will be generated by this property at this
time. However, the services necessary to this property will be
minimal at this time. Future services will be provided for by
taxes and revenues from developers if certain portions of the
area are privately developed.
EXHIBITS:
A. City Council Resolution No.
B. LAFCO Resolution of Annexation.
RESOLUTION NO. 705i
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED
AND DESIGNATED AS THE MACARIO CANYON PARK ANNEXATION
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act of 1977,
commencing with Section 35000 of the Government Code, the Council
rj
of the City of Carlsbad on March 2, 1982, adopted its resolution
8 of application number 6805 to the Local Agency Formation
9 ...Commission, making a proposal for an annexation; and
WHEREAS, on October 4, 1981, the Local Agency Formation
•^ Commission by Resolution, approved the proposed annexation and
1 P
•i •*
•*-6
17
1 ft
19
r»/-v
^°
21
23
r>7
28
authorized the Council of the City of Carlsbad to initiate and
conduct proceedings for the proposed annexation in compliance
with the Local Agency Formation Commission Resolution, and
pursuant to Government Code Section 35000 et seq.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Carlsbad, California as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the City Council hereby adopts this resolution
approving the proposed annexation as provided in Government Code
Section 35220.
3. That the territory proposed to be annexed to the City
is uninhabited territory as defined by Section 35038 of the
Government Code and is continguous to the boundaries of the
City'
4. That upon completion of said annexation all of the
property included therein shall be taxed accordingly with the
other property within the City of Carlsbad to pay the bonded
indebtedness and any and all general indebtedness of the City of
Carlsbad contracted prior to, or existing or outstanding at the
time of, the aforesaid proposed annexation of said described
property.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
12
13
14
15
17
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5. That all requirements of law necessary to the adoption
of this resolution approving the annexation of certain
uninhabited territory pursuant to the provisions of the
Municipal Organization Act of 1977 have been complied with.
6. That it does hereby approve the annexation to the City
of Carlsbad of that certain real property located in the
County of San Diego, State of California, designated as the
Macario Canyon Park Annexation and more particularly described
on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
City Council of th(2 City of Carlsbad on the 2nd day °f
November , 1982, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Anear
NOES: NQne
ABSENT: None
^ // fi/ I, L--si^-\^t~~f *-/ • ^ *?-£?
MARY H.jCASLER, Mayor
ATTEST:
/£
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerti
(SEAL)
CAS2-4 "MACARIO CANYON PARK ANNEXATION"
City of Carlsbad
All that portion of Lots F and G of Rancho Agua Hedionda, in the
County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof
no. 823, filed in the County Recorder's Office of San Diego County,
lying within the following described boundaries:
Beginning at point 9 of said Lot F;
1. thence north 0°29'11" west (record, north 0°32' west) along
the westerly line of said Lot F to point 8 of said Lot;
2. thence north 6°47'51" east, 1219.60 feet (record, north 6°48'36"
east, 1218.96 feet) to a point on the northerly line of said
Lot F, distant thereon south 87°23'24" east, 2025.08 feet from
point 6 of said Lot;
3. thence south 87023'24" east, 2417.19 feet along said north
line to the northwest corner of land described in deed to
Howard G. Kirgis, et ux., recorded September 24, 1957 in
Book 6761, Page 197 of Official Records of said county;
4. thence south 2036'36" west (record, south 2°34'59" west),
740.00 feet along the westerly line of said land to the
southwest corner thereof;
5. thence south 87°23'24" east, 1378.84 feet (record-south 87°25'01")
east, 1400.00 feet, more or less) along the southerly
line of said land to the southeasterly corner thereof;
6. thence south 10°58'35" east, 1394.10 feet to point 14 of said
Lot F, being the most northerly corner of land described in
deed to S. L. Kelly, by File Page 20293, recorded on February 3,
1961, records of said county;
7. thence along the northeasterly line of said land, south 5l°01'58"
east, 1042.27 feet (record, south 51° east);
8. thence south 38°58'02" west, 288.57 feet (record, south 37°44'15"
west) ;
9. thence north 51°01'58" west, 152.00 feet;
10. thence south 38°58'02" west, 152.00 feet;
11. thence north 51°01'58" west, 1089.27 feet to a point on the
lot line common to Lots F & G between point 13 and point 14
of said Lot F;
12. thence south 63°14'04" west along said lot line to said
point 13;
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 1 of 2
CA82-4
13. thence continuing along said common lot line the following
courses:
South 40°42'08" west to point 12 of said Lot F;
North 89°46'41" west to point 11 of said Lot;
North 59°47'49" west to point 10 of said Lot F;
14. thence south 70°54'27" west to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
iw:kt
LAFCO
10/7/82
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 2 of 2 '^'^ by'ho Local A^ncy Formationl«3i;-,ni.ss!on of Ssn Di^o
Executive Officer of said Commismission
RHO. AGUA HEDIONDA
MAP 823
R\of S.
i L 0 T ^'•" :_;;rov/O'v 'ho I: •'•! A<;«r,cy_Formatierr''
ten Disgp' .' V. ::
Executive Officer of said Commission
DATE:
SCALE:
T.R.A.PAGE:
DRAWN
MAPPING DIVISION
SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
MftCAtflO CAAJY&fiJ TO
LAFCO:
AREA:AC.
B/L:212-010$ 030
THOMAS BROS'.19 -P/
Item 5CA82-4
RESOLUTION OF LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
APPROVING A PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD
"MACARIO CANYON PARK ANNEXATION "
, A' • ' .
On motion of Commissioner Mahr , seconded by Commissioner
Bennett ^ tke following resolution is adopted:
WHEREAS, the governing body of the City of Carlsbad
(hereinafter referred to as the City) filed with this Commission a
certified copy of a resolution of application for the annexation of
territory to said City adopted by the Legislative Body of said
City of Carlsbad _ t as Resolution No. 6805 _ _ _ ,
pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 (Gov. .Code
Section 35000 et seq.); and
WHEREAS, the executive officer of this Commission has filed his
report on said proposed annexation, which report has been considered
by this Commission, NOW THEREFORE
BE IT RESOLVED THAT THIS COMMISSION HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES
AND ORDERS, as follows:
1. The territory proposed to be annexed (hereinafter .referred ..to.
as the Territory) is as described in the res9lution of. application on
file with the Local Agency Formation Commission.
2. The description of the boundaries of the Territory as described
in Exhibit A attached hereto is definite and certain.
3. The description of the boundaries of the Territory does
conform to lines of assessment and ownership.
A. All owners of land within the Territory have consented in
writing to the proposed annexation.
5. The Territory includes 280.64 acres and is un inhabited.
6. The Territory proposed to be annexed is hereby designated
"Macario Canyon Park Annexation"
7. The Commission certifies that it has reviewed and considered
the information contained in the EIR prepared by the City of Carlsbad.
The Commission adopts the Environmental Findings required by
Section 15088 of the'State CEQA Guidelines for each significant impact
identified by the EIR, as stated on Exhibit C attached hereto.
8. The Commission hereby approves the proposed annexation subject
Lo^Che proposed conditions, if any as stated on Exhibit _B attached
hereto.
9. The Commission hereby designates the City as the conducting
authority and authorizes the Legislative Body of said City to
initiate annexation proceedings in compliance with this resolution,
without notice and hearing and without an election.
10. The Executive Officer of this Commission is directed to
mail and file certified copies of this resolution in accordance
with Government Code Section 35159.
-2-
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the
County if San Diego this 4th day of October ,
19_82, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Bennett, Chapman, Lake, and
. A' Mahr
NOES: None
k;
ABSENT: Commissioners Eckert, Hedgecock, and Hostler
ABSTAINING: None
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO)
I, WILLIAM D. DAVIS, Executive Officer of the Local Agency
Formation Commission of the County of San Diego, State of California,
hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy with the
original resolution adopted by said Commission at its regular meeting
on October 4, 1982 , which original resolution is now
on file in my office; and that same contains a full, true, and
correct transcript therefrom and of the whole thereof.
Witness my hand this 7th day of October __>
D. DAVIS, Executive Officer
San Diego County Local Agency
Formation Commission
Ref:CA82-4
CONDITION(S)
1. The boundaries shall be modified to conform to
Exhibit A attached hereto.
/..";;;'ovvy:) by ffvo Lccsl /l^ency Formation
Cwiiriissio.'] cf Si):? D^-
:i;i A p"— »*_/.-
««~ ,Q. ^^j.
Exec««ve Officer of raw CbrEXHIBIT "B"
CA82-4
ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARY AND FINDINGS
FOR SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS OF
MACARIO CANYON PARK ANNEXATION
LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF CARLSBAD
9
SUMMARY
Impacts
1) Geology/Soils: High potential for severe soil erodibility and
considerable shrink/swell behavior within most of the onsite soils
could pose significant constraints to development. There may be a
potential for liquefaction in the alluvial soils onsite which may
pose constraints on road development. Onsite seismic risk is not
considered to be significantly greater than elsewhere in the Southern
California area. However, the presence of onsite inactive faults does
pose a need for future study and design consideration.
2) Hydrology/Siltation/Water Quality; Development of the park will
slightly increase the amount of runoff due to an increase in impervious
paved area. Development within Macario Canyon could potentially increase
the level of sedimentation and siltation adversely impacting the down-
stream wetland habitats and Agua Hedionda Lagoon. This potential
could occur both during grading and constuction and during operation
of the ultimate facilities. Development could also increase the
potential for water pollutants not now present onsite (i.e., oil and
heavy metal associated with automobile use, fertilizers, etc.). These
could have significant impacts on downstream habitats.
3) Biological Resources: There will be a minor net decrease in
estuarine habitat that, although small in area, is still an unavoid-
able significant adverse impact. Indirect impacts include temporary
harassment of wildlife populations and potential displacement of some
wildlife in the lagoon beach area which would temporarily crowd local
populations in adjacent habitats. Any increase in sedimentation would
have a significant adverse impact on the wetland and riparian habitat.
4) Archaeological Resources: The project will directly impact portions
of four archaeological sites. Four other sites will not be directly
impacted by the proposed park development, but are expected to be
impacted by the future extension of Cannon Road through the study area.
5) Paleontological Resources: No known significant paleontological
resources will be impacted as a result of peak development. However,
the potential for significant resources in the study area is high.
6) Agriculture: Slight potential for intrusion by trail users into
the adjacent agricultural preserve area is possible.
7) Traffic Circulation: The project will generate 10,200 average
daily trips. This will not have an adverse impact on external street
systems. The internal street system (as yet not specifically designed)
will be adequate to handle park traffic if specific design features
described in mitigation are implemented.
EXHIBIT "C"
Mitigation
1) Geology/Soils: Site-specific geotechnical studies will be
conducted prior to submittal of final site plans of all major
structures and roads identified by the City Engineer. All grading
will conform to City ordinances. Grading plans will be reviewed by
the City for conformance to recommendations make in the geotechnical
studies. All structures will conform to the Uniform Building Code.
As designed, all development will occur where slopes are at a gradient
less than or equal to 20%. Site-specific geotechnical studies will be
conducted prior to submittal of final site plans for all major
structures and roads identified by the City Engineer. These studies
will assess soil suitability, slope gradients, soil erodibility, and
potential liquefaction. Based on this assessment, recommendations
for foundation and soil preparation will be made. A geotechnical
seismic study will be conducted on the assumed inactive fault near the
proposed conference center site prior to final design. Results of the
study will be incorporated into the final design of the center.
2) Hydrology/SiItation/Water Quality: At the time of specific site
planning, a detailed hydrology analysis shall be conducted to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer to determine specific parameters for
placement of the desiltation basins in the Macario Canyon stream
course. The necessity of additional basins serving flow from tributary
side canyons shall also be explored. All desiltation basins onsite
will be regularly maintained and cleaned to ensure their adequacy.
Desiltation basins will be constructed in conjunction with flood
control improvement and riparian enhancement program. The system
will be implemented in conjunction with development of ballfields and
the backbone park road system. A complete erosion control program
shall be approved by the City prior to commencement of grading, and
shall be implemented throughout all grading phases. Temporary sed-
iment traps will be required, if necessary, as part of the erosion
control program implemented during grading. A streetsweeping program
for both streets and paved parking areas shall be instituted in
phase with development and shall be regularly practiced on all road-
ways and parking areas onsite. The irrigation program for the park
will be designed so as to regulate the use of organophosphates and
fertilizers.
3) Biological Resources: Pursuant to Section 1601 of the California
Fish and Game Code, the Department of Fish and Game will review all
proposals for development or fill within wetland areas. Picnic areas
and shade structures along the boardwalk will be provided at the foot
of bluffs in cove or inlet areas and access into salt marsh areas will
be controlled by a program designed in 'cooperation with the California
Department of Fish and Game. Mitigation provided under Water Quality
will assure a net decrease in sedimentation and siltation levels. Any
desilting ponds or park ponds will be located outside of existing
riparian areas.
4) Archaeological Resources: An archaeologist will attend all
pregrade meetings to determine at what phases of grading an
archaeologist should monitor operations. The archaeologist will be
present at locations and periods of grading when archaeological
materials are expected to be uncovered. Test-level investigations
EXHIBIT "C"
Page 2 of 3
will be conducted and resource recovery programs will be implemented
for all portions of the sites to be adversely impacted by development.
The proposed interpretive center will be used to display archaeological,
historical, and paleontological artifacts and other cultural information
which relate to the history of the study area. Also, the feasibility
of a cultural resource interpretive trail system will be investigated.
5) Paleontological Resources: A qualified paleontologist will
monitor necessary grading activity. The paleontologist will monitor
the sites at specific locations and during periods of grading where
and when paleontological material is expected to be found.
n.
6) Agriculture: The City will design a system to prevent uncontrolled
access into the agricultural preserve from the lagoon area.
7) Traffic Circulation: Design of the primary park road as it exits
the park to its connection with College Boulevard will be coordinated
with planned adjacent development to ensure adequate capacity and
safety features for both park traffic and other traffic associated
with development in the area. The primary park road will have a four-
lane section at ultimate development. A two-lane facility will be
adequate until 1990 under the current phasing plan. After 1990, a
four-lane facility will be constructed. At the time of detailed
engineering design for the internal road system, the City traffic
engineer will review the plans for adequate and safe design features.
The primary park road should be designed to minimize non-park
through traffic while maintaining adequate traffic operational and
safety standards.
FINDINGS
Pursuant to Section 15088(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines, find that
the mitigation measures listed above for the identified impacts have
been adopted by the City of Carlsbad, and that the mitigation is
within the jurisdiction of the City of Carlsbad and not LAFCO because
the affected resources will be within the City boundaries upon
annexation.
EXHIBIT "C"
Page 3 of 3
__ HV**Lli -, ,- - ~~'p»ofc»-JL-- mSm
A •
TJ =5 13
33 n 3o23•O O «-m > m
Cfl
ni33
C 0>-o cO a
=« fsa o•< H
°5S 5
z m eo f* H
°- sS 3C «
Z M Om z ^» -* «
z -i5 o
S