Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-11-02; City Council; 6913-1; Macario Canyon Park AnnexationCITY OF CARLSBAD - AGENDA AR# /c 9/3 -**/ MTG 11/2/82 DFPT LUP TITLE: MACARIO CANYON PARK ANNEXATION nPPT HD. IV^H CITY ATTY V^3^ CITY MGR. *&*-~ OUl5ena. Sc O5 O OO RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Planning Staff recommends that this application be APPROVED and that the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. ITEM EXPLANATION; This item is a request for City Council approval of an annexation of 280.64 acres of land owned by the City of Carlsbad, referred to as Macario Canyon Park. The property is generally located east of Agua Hedionda Lagoon, south and west of El Camino Real, and has a prezone of L-C (Limited Control). On the 4th day of October, 1982, the Local Agency Formation Co mm ission adopted a Resolution of Annexation for this property. A copy of this resolution is attached for your review. The last remaining discretionary action to complete the annexation is the adoption of a Resolution of Annexation by the City Council. Approval of this annexation would be consistent with the City Council's annexation policy. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The City Council, on February 9, 1982, certified the Environmental Impact Report for the Macario Canyon Park Plan. FISCAL IMPACT: No taxes or revenues will be generated by this property at this time. However, the services necessary to this property will be minimal at this time. Future services will be provided for by taxes and revenues from developers if certain portions of the area are privately developed. EXHIBITS: A. City Council Resolution No. B. LAFCO Resolution of Annexation. RESOLUTION NO. 705i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AND DESIGNATED AS THE MACARIO CANYON PARK ANNEXATION WHEREAS, pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act of 1977, commencing with Section 35000 of the Government Code, the Council rj of the City of Carlsbad on March 2, 1982, adopted its resolution 8 of application number 6805 to the Local Agency Formation 9 ...Commission, making a proposal for an annexation; and WHEREAS, on October 4, 1981, the Local Agency Formation •^ Commission by Resolution, approved the proposed annexation and 1 P •i •* •*-6 17 1 ft 19 r»/-v ^° 21 23 r>7 28 authorized the Council of the City of Carlsbad to initiate and conduct proceedings for the proposed annexation in compliance with the Local Agency Formation Commission Resolution, and pursuant to Government Code Section 35000 et seq.; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the City Council hereby adopts this resolution approving the proposed annexation as provided in Government Code Section 35220. 3. That the territory proposed to be annexed to the City is uninhabited territory as defined by Section 35038 of the Government Code and is continguous to the boundaries of the City' 4. That upon completion of said annexation all of the property included therein shall be taxed accordingly with the other property within the City of Carlsbad to pay the bonded indebtedness and any and all general indebtedness of the City of Carlsbad contracted prior to, or existing or outstanding at the time of, the aforesaid proposed annexation of said described property. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 15 17 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5. That all requirements of law necessary to the adoption of this resolution approving the annexation of certain uninhabited territory pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 have been complied with. 6. That it does hereby approve the annexation to the City of Carlsbad of that certain real property located in the County of San Diego, State of California, designated as the Macario Canyon Park Annexation and more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of th(2 City of Carlsbad on the 2nd day °f November , 1982, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Anear NOES: NQne ABSENT: None ^ // fi/ I, L--si^-\^t~~f *-/ • ^ *?-£? MARY H.jCASLER, Mayor ATTEST: /£ ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerti (SEAL) CAS2-4 "MACARIO CANYON PARK ANNEXATION" City of Carlsbad All that portion of Lots F and G of Rancho Agua Hedionda, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof no. 823, filed in the County Recorder's Office of San Diego County, lying within the following described boundaries: Beginning at point 9 of said Lot F; 1. thence north 0°29'11" west (record, north 0°32' west) along the westerly line of said Lot F to point 8 of said Lot; 2. thence north 6°47'51" east, 1219.60 feet (record, north 6°48'36" east, 1218.96 feet) to a point on the northerly line of said Lot F, distant thereon south 87°23'24" east, 2025.08 feet from point 6 of said Lot; 3. thence south 87023'24" east, 2417.19 feet along said north line to the northwest corner of land described in deed to Howard G. Kirgis, et ux., recorded September 24, 1957 in Book 6761, Page 197 of Official Records of said county; 4. thence south 2036'36" west (record, south 2°34'59" west), 740.00 feet along the westerly line of said land to the southwest corner thereof; 5. thence south 87°23'24" east, 1378.84 feet (record-south 87°25'01") east, 1400.00 feet, more or less) along the southerly line of said land to the southeasterly corner thereof; 6. thence south 10°58'35" east, 1394.10 feet to point 14 of said Lot F, being the most northerly corner of land described in deed to S. L. Kelly, by File Page 20293, recorded on February 3, 1961, records of said county; 7. thence along the northeasterly line of said land, south 5l°01'58" east, 1042.27 feet (record, south 51° east); 8. thence south 38°58'02" west, 288.57 feet (record, south 37°44'15" west) ; 9. thence north 51°01'58" west, 152.00 feet; 10. thence south 38°58'02" west, 152.00 feet; 11. thence north 51°01'58" west, 1089.27 feet to a point on the lot line common to Lots F & G between point 13 and point 14 of said Lot F; 12. thence south 63°14'04" west along said lot line to said point 13; EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 2 CA82-4 13. thence continuing along said common lot line the following courses: South 40°42'08" west to point 12 of said Lot F; North 89°46'41" west to point 11 of said Lot; North 59°47'49" west to point 10 of said Lot F; 14. thence south 70°54'27" west to the POINT OF BEGINNING. iw:kt LAFCO 10/7/82 EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 2 '^'^ by'ho Local A^ncy Formationl«3i;-,ni.ss!on of Ssn Di^o Executive Officer of said Commismission RHO. AGUA HEDIONDA MAP 823 R\of S. i L 0 T ^'•" :_;;rov/O'v 'ho I: •'•! A<;«r,cy_Formatierr'' ten Disgp' .' V. :: Executive Officer of said Commission DATE: SCALE: T.R.A.PAGE: DRAWN MAPPING DIVISION SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE MftCAtflO CAAJY&fiJ TO LAFCO: AREA:AC. B/L:212-010$ 030 THOMAS BROS'.19 -P/ Item 5CA82-4 RESOLUTION OF LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION APPROVING A PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD "MACARIO CANYON PARK ANNEXATION " , A' • ' . On motion of Commissioner Mahr , seconded by Commissioner Bennett ^ tke following resolution is adopted: WHEREAS, the governing body of the City of Carlsbad (hereinafter referred to as the City) filed with this Commission a certified copy of a resolution of application for the annexation of territory to said City adopted by the Legislative Body of said City of Carlsbad _ t as Resolution No. 6805 _ _ _ , pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 (Gov. .Code Section 35000 et seq.); and WHEREAS, the executive officer of this Commission has filed his report on said proposed annexation, which report has been considered by this Commission, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THIS COMMISSION HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES AND ORDERS, as follows: 1. The territory proposed to be annexed (hereinafter .referred ..to. as the Territory) is as described in the res9lution of. application on file with the Local Agency Formation Commission. 2. The description of the boundaries of the Territory as described in Exhibit A attached hereto is definite and certain. 3. The description of the boundaries of the Territory does conform to lines of assessment and ownership. A. All owners of land within the Territory have consented in writing to the proposed annexation. 5. The Territory includes 280.64 acres and is un inhabited. 6. The Territory proposed to be annexed is hereby designated "Macario Canyon Park Annexation" 7. The Commission certifies that it has reviewed and considered the information contained in the EIR prepared by the City of Carlsbad. The Commission adopts the Environmental Findings required by Section 15088 of the'State CEQA Guidelines for each significant impact identified by the EIR, as stated on Exhibit C attached hereto. 8. The Commission hereby approves the proposed annexation subject Lo^Che proposed conditions, if any as stated on Exhibit _B attached hereto. 9. The Commission hereby designates the City as the conducting authority and authorizes the Legislative Body of said City to initiate annexation proceedings in compliance with this resolution, without notice and hearing and without an election. 10. The Executive Officer of this Commission is directed to mail and file certified copies of this resolution in accordance with Government Code Section 35159. -2- PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County if San Diego this 4th day of October , 19_82, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Bennett, Chapman, Lake, and . A' Mahr NOES: None k; ABSENT: Commissioners Eckert, Hedgecock, and Hostler ABSTAINING: None STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) I, WILLIAM D. DAVIS, Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of San Diego, State of California, hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy with the original resolution adopted by said Commission at its regular meeting on October 4, 1982 , which original resolution is now on file in my office; and that same contains a full, true, and correct transcript therefrom and of the whole thereof. Witness my hand this 7th day of October __> D. DAVIS, Executive Officer San Diego County Local Agency Formation Commission Ref:CA82-4 CONDITION(S) 1. The boundaries shall be modified to conform to Exhibit A attached hereto. /..";;;'ovvy:) by ffvo Lccsl /l^ency Formation Cwiiriissio.'] cf Si):? D^- :i;i A p"— »*_/.- ««~ ,Q. ^^j. Exec««ve Officer of raw CbrEXHIBIT "B" CA82-4 ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARY AND FINDINGS FOR SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS OF MACARIO CANYON PARK ANNEXATION LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF CARLSBAD 9 SUMMARY Impacts 1) Geology/Soils: High potential for severe soil erodibility and considerable shrink/swell behavior within most of the onsite soils could pose significant constraints to development. There may be a potential for liquefaction in the alluvial soils onsite which may pose constraints on road development. Onsite seismic risk is not considered to be significantly greater than elsewhere in the Southern California area. However, the presence of onsite inactive faults does pose a need for future study and design consideration. 2) Hydrology/Siltation/Water Quality; Development of the park will slightly increase the amount of runoff due to an increase in impervious paved area. Development within Macario Canyon could potentially increase the level of sedimentation and siltation adversely impacting the down- stream wetland habitats and Agua Hedionda Lagoon. This potential could occur both during grading and constuction and during operation of the ultimate facilities. Development could also increase the potential for water pollutants not now present onsite (i.e., oil and heavy metal associated with automobile use, fertilizers, etc.). These could have significant impacts on downstream habitats. 3) Biological Resources: There will be a minor net decrease in estuarine habitat that, although small in area, is still an unavoid- able significant adverse impact. Indirect impacts include temporary harassment of wildlife populations and potential displacement of some wildlife in the lagoon beach area which would temporarily crowd local populations in adjacent habitats. Any increase in sedimentation would have a significant adverse impact on the wetland and riparian habitat. 4) Archaeological Resources: The project will directly impact portions of four archaeological sites. Four other sites will not be directly impacted by the proposed park development, but are expected to be impacted by the future extension of Cannon Road through the study area. 5) Paleontological Resources: No known significant paleontological resources will be impacted as a result of peak development. However, the potential for significant resources in the study area is high. 6) Agriculture: Slight potential for intrusion by trail users into the adjacent agricultural preserve area is possible. 7) Traffic Circulation: The project will generate 10,200 average daily trips. This will not have an adverse impact on external street systems. The internal street system (as yet not specifically designed) will be adequate to handle park traffic if specific design features described in mitigation are implemented. EXHIBIT "C" Mitigation 1) Geology/Soils: Site-specific geotechnical studies will be conducted prior to submittal of final site plans of all major structures and roads identified by the City Engineer. All grading will conform to City ordinances. Grading plans will be reviewed by the City for conformance to recommendations make in the geotechnical studies. All structures will conform to the Uniform Building Code. As designed, all development will occur where slopes are at a gradient less than or equal to 20%. Site-specific geotechnical studies will be conducted prior to submittal of final site plans for all major structures and roads identified by the City Engineer. These studies will assess soil suitability, slope gradients, soil erodibility, and potential liquefaction. Based on this assessment, recommendations for foundation and soil preparation will be made. A geotechnical seismic study will be conducted on the assumed inactive fault near the proposed conference center site prior to final design. Results of the study will be incorporated into the final design of the center. 2) Hydrology/SiItation/Water Quality: At the time of specific site planning, a detailed hydrology analysis shall be conducted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer to determine specific parameters for placement of the desiltation basins in the Macario Canyon stream course. The necessity of additional basins serving flow from tributary side canyons shall also be explored. All desiltation basins onsite will be regularly maintained and cleaned to ensure their adequacy. Desiltation basins will be constructed in conjunction with flood control improvement and riparian enhancement program. The system will be implemented in conjunction with development of ballfields and the backbone park road system. A complete erosion control program shall be approved by the City prior to commencement of grading, and shall be implemented throughout all grading phases. Temporary sed- iment traps will be required, if necessary, as part of the erosion control program implemented during grading. A streetsweeping program for both streets and paved parking areas shall be instituted in phase with development and shall be regularly practiced on all road- ways and parking areas onsite. The irrigation program for the park will be designed so as to regulate the use of organophosphates and fertilizers. 3) Biological Resources: Pursuant to Section 1601 of the California Fish and Game Code, the Department of Fish and Game will review all proposals for development or fill within wetland areas. Picnic areas and shade structures along the boardwalk will be provided at the foot of bluffs in cove or inlet areas and access into salt marsh areas will be controlled by a program designed in 'cooperation with the California Department of Fish and Game. Mitigation provided under Water Quality will assure a net decrease in sedimentation and siltation levels. Any desilting ponds or park ponds will be located outside of existing riparian areas. 4) Archaeological Resources: An archaeologist will attend all pregrade meetings to determine at what phases of grading an archaeologist should monitor operations. The archaeologist will be present at locations and periods of grading when archaeological materials are expected to be uncovered. Test-level investigations EXHIBIT "C" Page 2 of 3 will be conducted and resource recovery programs will be implemented for all portions of the sites to be adversely impacted by development. The proposed interpretive center will be used to display archaeological, historical, and paleontological artifacts and other cultural information which relate to the history of the study area. Also, the feasibility of a cultural resource interpretive trail system will be investigated. 5) Paleontological Resources: A qualified paleontologist will monitor necessary grading activity. The paleontologist will monitor the sites at specific locations and during periods of grading where and when paleontological material is expected to be found. n. 6) Agriculture: The City will design a system to prevent uncontrolled access into the agricultural preserve from the lagoon area. 7) Traffic Circulation: Design of the primary park road as it exits the park to its connection with College Boulevard will be coordinated with planned adjacent development to ensure adequate capacity and safety features for both park traffic and other traffic associated with development in the area. The primary park road will have a four- lane section at ultimate development. A two-lane facility will be adequate until 1990 under the current phasing plan. After 1990, a four-lane facility will be constructed. At the time of detailed engineering design for the internal road system, the City traffic engineer will review the plans for adequate and safe design features. The primary park road should be designed to minimize non-park through traffic while maintaining adequate traffic operational and safety standards. FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 15088(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines, find that the mitigation measures listed above for the identified impacts have been adopted by the City of Carlsbad, and that the mitigation is within the jurisdiction of the City of Carlsbad and not LAFCO because the affected resources will be within the City boundaries upon annexation. EXHIBIT "C" Page 3 of 3 __ HV**Lli -, ,- - ~~'p»ofc»-JL-- mSm A • TJ =5 13 33 n 3o23•O O «-m > m Cfl ni33 C 0>-o cO a =« fsa o•< H °5S 5 z m eo f* H °- sS 3C « Z M Om z ^» -* « z -i5 o S