HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-07-05; City Council; 7434; MASTER PLAN AND SPECIFIC PLAN DELETION AND 288 UNIT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND SUBDIVISION MP 107A SP 161A CT 82-24 PUD 49 SEAGATE.
rl L1
g
.$
c 0 u a
?l
k
#
E, la 5
F
2 a
w 8
8 c,
k
tr
-i
3 3 -I
-4 2 .
c3 w > 0 e fl a. e
2 0 F 0 U d 5 0 0
cinmF CARLSBAD - AGENDI~ILL
MASTER PLAN AND SPECIFIC PLAN DELETION DE
AND A 288 UNIT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP- TITLE: *AB# 7y3 LQ
MTG. 7/5/83 MEN" AND SUBDIVISION - MP-107(A)/ c11
SP-IGl(A)/CT 82-24/PUn-49 - SEAGATE cr DEPT. PLN
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Both the Planning Staff and Planning Commission recommend 1 this application be APPROVED and that the City Attorney be
directed to prepare documents APPROVING MP-107(A)/SP-l61(A 82-24/PUD-49 per Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2132,
and 2134.
ITEM EXPLANATION
This item consists of the deletion of an existing master p
specific plan and a 288 unit Planned Unit Development and
Tentative Tract Map located or! the east side of Paseo del E south of Palomar Airport Road. The property is zoned P-C
(Planned Community) and is directly across the street from Altamira development. The existing master plan did not cor
any development standards and only indicated that the projc
area should be developed with residential use. The existir
specific plan was for an old subdivision map on the subject
property which has since expired. Staff and the Planning
Commission had no problem with deleting the existinq mastei
and specific plan on the property.
The Planning Commission's only concern with the project is
lack of a recreational vehicle parking area. Under the P1;
Development Ordinance, RV parking is not. required of a Plar
Unit Development unless deemed necessary by the Planning
Commission and City Council. The Commission believes this
project will create a demand for RV parking and, therefore,
directed the applicant to work with staff to provide for a
parking area. The applicant opposes this requirement and \
The Planning Commission has no other concerns with the proj
appeal it at the City Council meeting.
and, with the addition of RV parking, is recommending apprc
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Land Use Planning Manager has determined that this proj will not cause any significant environmental impacts and,
therefore, has issued a Negative Declaration, dated May 20,
1983, which was approved by the Planning Commission on June
1983. A copy of the environmental documents is on file in Land Use Planning Office.
I
* e
base Two of Agenda Bill No. ‘7‘-; Tk/
.c
FISCAL IP.”IPACT
The applicant will provide all required public improvenents
the project. Also, the applicant has agreed to pay a pub1
facilities fee to offset the costs of providing all other pi
services.
EXRI BI TS
1) Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2132, 2133 and 2134
3) Vicinity Map
4) Staff Report, dated June 8, 1983, w/attachments
2) Location Map
.\
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
PLANNING COMMISSIOtJ RESOLUTION ?30. 2132
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C
PLAN ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST A
SIDE OF PASEO DEL NORTE, SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPOR
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMf*IEEJDING THE REPEAL OF
APPLICANT: SEAGATE
CASE NO. : MP-107 (A)
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain pro5
wit:
A portion of Lot H of the Rancho Agua Hedionda,
to Hap thereof No. 823, filed in the office of t
8!
g
10
11
Recorder
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred tc
Planning Commission; and
kiHEREAS, said verified application constitutes cl
12
l3
as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; z
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 8tE
I
14
15
16
June, 1953, hold a duly noticed puSlic hearing 2s prescr:
law, to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing ai
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all 1
I
19
20
21
22
23
25
24
relating to the Master Plan; and
NOW, TI-IEREFORE, EE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the P1 1
I
Commission as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct
That based on the evidence presented at the public
the Commission recommends the REPEAL of E,:P-lC7, bas
following findings: IT)
,Findings: I---- That the existing Master Plan is outdated, as discu
28 design and development guidelines, consistent with
Plan and Z0nir.g Ordinance, pursuant to the Planned Ordinance. 1 I
I
ii !PC RES0 NO. 2132 2.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
23
w w
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2133
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,, RECOMMENDING THE
REPEAL OF AX EXISTING SPECIFIC PLAN ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST AND NORTH SIDE OF
PASEO DEL NORTE SOUTH OF PALOPIAR AIRPORT ROAD.
APPLICANT: SEAGATE
CASE NO: SP-161 (A)
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain pro
wit:
A portion of Lot H of the Rancho Agua Hedionda,
according to Map thereof No. 823, filed in the
Office of the County Recorder,
has been filed with the City of CarlsSad, and referred t
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a
provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Copmission did, on the 8th
June, 1953, holZ a duly noticed public hearing as prescr
law, to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing an
ing all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
be heard, said Commission considered all factors relatir
ISpecific Plan; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plannir
sion a5 follows:
(A) That the foregoing recitations are true ani! correct.
(B) That based on the evidence presented at the public k
Commission recommends the REPEAL of of SP-161, based I i following findings:
Findings;
1) That the specific plan is outdated, as discussed ir
staff report.
I
a
n map, for which the spi
plan was designed, has expired.
That repeal of the specific plan would allow more fl design and development guidelines, consistent with t'
General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, pursuant to the P
Development Ordinance.
)
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meetin
Carllsbad, California,
following vote, to wit:
AYES : Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners Marc
NOES : None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Farrow.
ABSTAIN: None.
Rombotis, Jose, Friestedt and Rawlins.
CLAF.EKCE SCZLEHTJBER, Chc
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMI:
PC RES0 NO. 2133 2.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
l9
20
21
22
23
24
25
27
26
28
w
PLANNING CObiPIISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2134
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSEAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP AND
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR 288 UNITS ON
NORTH SIDE OF PASEO DEL NORTE, SOUTH OF PALOMAR
AIRPORT ROAD.
APPLICANT : SEAGATE
CASE NO: CT 82-24/PUD-49
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST AND
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain pro1
wit:
A portion of Lot H of the Rancho Agua Hedionda,
according to Map thereof No. 823, filed in the
Office of the County Recorder,
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred tc
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes z
as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; z
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 8tf
June, 1983, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescr:
law, to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing ai 1
‘considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all 1
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all fac
I
relating to the Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Devl
and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the PL
Commission as follows:
,(A)
(13)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct
‘That based on evidence presented at the public hear
Commission recommends APPROVAL of CT 82-24/PUD-49, 1
the following findings and subject to the following
conditions:
I
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
l5
17
18
19
20
0 W
Findings:
1) The project is consistent with the City's general p:
the proposed density of 8 du's/acre is within the (
range of 4-10 du's/acre specified for the site as ii
the land use eleiient of the general plan.
2) The site is physically suitable for the type and del
development since the site is adequate in size and :
accommodate residential development at the density j
3) The project is consistent with all City public faci
icies and ordinances since:
a) The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an condition to this project, insured that the fin
not be approved unless the City Council finds t'
service is available to serve the project. In
the Planning Commission has added a condition t'
shall be placed on Che final map that building not be issued for the project. unless the City E deternines that sewer service is available, and
cannot occur within the project unless sewer se
remains available, and the Planning Commission
that the requirements of the public facilities
the general plan have been met insofar as they
sewer service for this project.
b)2 The Carlsbad School District has written a lett
November 4, 1982, stating that school facilitie
available to this project.
c) Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition o
d) All necessary public improvements have been pro
will be required as conditions of approval.
e) The applicant has agreed and is required by the
of an appropriate condition to pay a public fac
Performance of that contract and payment of the
I
I
23
24
25 26
27
28
I 4) The proposed project is consistent with the City's
Development Ordinance and also complies with the DE
Guidelines Manual.
The proposed project is compatible with the surrour
land uses since surrounding properties are designat i 5, residential development on the general plan.
////
PC RES0 NO. 2134 2.
I
l6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
"13)
11
13
I-z
la
15
16
17
318
19
m
) This project will not cause any significant environme
impacts and a Negative Declaration has been issued by
Use Planning Manager on May 20, 1983 and approved by
Planning Commission on June 8, 1983.
-2onditions:
1) Approval is granted for CT 82-24/PlJD-49, as shown on
11 AI8 - I'M", dated April 18, 1983 and Exhibits "N" - 'IF
November 4, 1982, incorporated by reference and on fi
Land Use Planning Office. Development shall occur
substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in the:
conditions.
2) This project is approved upon the express condition t final map shall not be approved unless the City Counc
as of the time of such approval th<at sewer service is
to serve the subdivision.
This project is approved upon the express condition t building permits will not be issued for development c
subject property unless the City Engineer determines
facilities are available at the time of application f
sewer permits and will continue to be available until occupancy. This note shall be placed on the final mz
This project is approved upon the express condition t
applicant shall pay a public facilities fee as requir
Council Policy No. 17, dated April 2, 1982, on file P
City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, and
fee, a copy of that agreement, dated October 29, 198;
file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by I
If said fee is not paid as promised, this applicatior
be consistent with the General Plan and approval for project shall be void.
i
4)
to the agreement executed by the applicant for paymer 1 I 1 ' ) The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees to the Cit:
the approval of the final map as required by Chapter
I
" 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
l4
15
16
17
18
19
20
0 c
9) The applicant shall establish a homeowner's associa
corresponding covenants, conditions and restriction
CC&R's shall be submitted to and approved by the La
Planning Manager prior to final map approval.
10) The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape an
plan which shall be submitted to and approved by th
Planning Manager prior to the issuance of building 1
11) A 500' scale map of the subdivision shall be submit
Land Use Planning Manager and a 4100' scale map to t Chief prior to the recordation of the final map. S shall show all lots and streets within and adjacent
project.
12) All parking lot trees shall be a minimum of 15 gall
13) All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healtl thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and deb]
14) Any signs proposed €or this development shall be de:
conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shal:
review and approval of the Land Use Planning Manage!
installation of such signs.
Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a six-fc
of said receptacles shall ,be approved by the Land Ut
Manager.
size.
I j5) masonry wall with gates pursuant to City standards.
16) All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners,
architecturally integrated and shielded from view a1
buffered froin adjacent properties and streets, pursi Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfac
I Land Use Planning Manager and Building and Planning
17) The applicant shall submit a street name list consi!
the City's street name policy subject to the Land Uk Manager's approval prior to final map approval.
I I
22
23
24
25
26
28
27
1 approval of Specific Plan deletion, SP-lGl(A) and Mi
deletion, MP-l07(A).
A recreational vehicle storage area shall be provide ratio of 20 square feet per dwelling unit at a :Loeat
approved by the Land Use Planning Manager,
I I I 19)
Engineering Department
120) The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior tc
commencement of any clearing or grading of the site.
//// 4.
I
il?C HESO NO. 2134
I ! I II
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
l5
16
0
21) The grading for this project is defined as "control
by Section 11.06.170(a) of the Carlsbad Municipal Cc
Grading shall be performed under the observation of
engineer whose responsibility it shall be to coordi
inspection and testing to insure compliance of the
the approved grading plan, submit required reports
Carlsbad Municipal Code,
1
Engineer and verify compliance with Chapter 11.06 o
22) Upon completion of grading, the developer shall ins
"as-graded" geologic plan shall be submitted to the Engineer. The plan shall clearly show all the geol exposed by the grading operation, all geologic corr measures as actually constructed and must be based
map which represents both the pre and post site gra
plan shall be signed by both the soils engineer and
engineering geologist. The plan shall be prepared or similar drafting film and shall become a permane
23) No grading shall occur outside the limits of the su unless a letter of permission is obtained from the the affected properties.
24) The limits of grading, as shown on Exhibit rrAlr, dat
18, 1983, shall be strictly enforced. No grading s
beyond this delineated boundary.
I 25) All slopes within this project shall be no steeper 1 26) Additional drainage easeinents and drainage structur
provided or installed as may be required by the Cou
Department of Sanitation and Flood Control or the C
neer.
I-y I
19
l8
20
21
22
23
24
25
27
28
26
The developer shall pay the current local drainage prior to approval of the final map or shall constrL
age systems in conformance with the Master Drainage
City of Carlsbad Standards as required by the City
This project is in Drainage Area No. 11.
I 27)
1 I
128) The drainage system shall be designed to ensure thz
duration under developed conditions, is equal to 01
the runoff from a storm of the same frequency and c
under existing developed conditions. Both 6 hour z
storm durations shall be analyzed to determine the
basin capacities necessary to accomplish the desire
resulting from a 10-year frequency storm of 6 hour:
I !29) Land for all public streets and easements shown on
tative map shall be dedicated on the final map and 1 granted to city free and clear of all liens and en(
brances.
//// iPC RES0 NO. 2134 5.
i
, L
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
0 m
30) Paseo Del Norte shall be dedicated by the developer
subdivision frontage based on a centerline to right
width of 42 feet and in Conformance with City of Ca
Standards prior to occupancy of any buildings,
31) All public streets shall be improved by the develop
the typical sections shown on the tentative map and
conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards prior t of any buildings.
32) Paseo Del Norte shall be improved by the developer subdivision frontage based on a centerline to curb
of 32 feet and in conformance with City of Carlsbad prior to occupancy of any buildings.
33) The developer shall install street lights along all
private street frontages in conformance with City o
Standards.
34) The developer shall install street trees at the equ
do-foot intervals along all public street frontages conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards. The t 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
be of a variety selected from the approved Street T.
35) The developer shall install sidewalks along all pub frontages in conformance with City of Carlsbad Stan1 to occupancy of any buildings.
36) The developer shall install a wheelchair ramp at th
street corner abutting ths subdivision in confornan
of Carlsbad Standards prior to occupancy of any bui
37) The developer shall comply with all the rules, regu
design requirements of the respective sewer and wat
regarding services to the project.
38) The design of all private streets and drainage systl
map, The structural section of all private streets
conform to City of Carlsbad Standards based on R-va
All private streets and drainage systems shall be i
the city, and the standard improvement plan check a
inspection fees shall be paid prior to approval of map.
approved by the City Engineer prior to approval of
'
39) All private streets and drainage systems shall be m the homeowner's association in perpetuity. This re
shall be clearly stated in the CC&R's.
40) All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by 1 homeowner's association (if on commonly owned propel individual property owner (if on an individually ow1
An appropriately worded statement clearly identifyii
responsibility shall be placed in the CCbR's.
PC RESO NO, 2134 6,
1
I/
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
I?'
I8
19
20
21
22
0 0
41) All private streets shall be kept clear of parked VE
all times, and shall have posted "NO Parking/Fire Lz
Zone" pursuant to Section 17.04.040, Carlsbad Municj
42) Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire t\
months from the date of City Council approval unles:
map is recorded. An extension may be requested by 1
applicant. Said extension shall be approved or den.
discretion of the City Council, In approving an ex\ City Council nay impose new conditions and may revi:
conditions.
Fire Department
43) Additional public and/or on site fire hydrants shal!
quired if deemed necessary by the Fire Maxihall,
44) The applicant shall submit two (2) copies of a site showing locations of existing and proposed fire hydi
site roads and drives subject to the approval of the Marshall.
45) An all weather access road shall be maintained throL construction.
46) All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurter be operational prior to combustible building materi;
located on the project site.
47) Proposed security gate systems shall be provided wit
key operated override switch, as specified by the Fj
partment .
(48) All private driveways shall be kept clear of parked all times, and shall have posted "NO Parking/Fixe L; Zone" pursuant to Section 17.04.040, Carlsbad Plunici
Brush clearance shall be maintained within a minimun
\I 1 j4g) of 30 feet to each residence.
I 50) All fire alarm systemsI fire hydrants, extinguishin? automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent tc
25
26
2rl
28
therein which shall split the building into 10,000 L less) areas. '
52) Since the emergency fire response time to the projec exceeds five minutes, all structures must be protect
automatic fire sprinkler systems, built and install€
specifications approved by the Fire Marshall.
7.
I
1PC RES0 NO. 2134
I
.1
2
3
4
5
6
7
€3
9
10
11
12
0 W
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeti
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California,
the 8th day of June, 1983, by the following vote, to wit
AYES : Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners Marc
Rombotis, Jose, Friestedt and Rawlins,
NOES : None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Farrow.
ABSTAIN : None ,
CLARENCE SCBLEHUBER,
CARLSBAD PLANNING cor4
ATTEST:
8 \
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LAND USE PLANNING MANAGER
I
"
a. PC RES0 NO. 2134
u LW M Y?3 &Jw rn r
iIJ"'s- Ll
LiXc-3 emaiw ttxw
~~
'PEA SOUP
--
----__
-u_-
SP-S61(A)
'ALTA MtRA
~- --a- -- .mn---- oU.a*JH--klY p;isGpiTE p&5
8, - . . ...
W
I
I
I
I
I I
. Prnr.,”
I A.. - -2.- *.L ,v-u*2.*- -**...-. , b
I e NOVENBER-, 1982
STAFF REPORT
( Gi --
\*d DATE : June 8, 1983
TO : Planning Commission
FROM : Land Use Planning Office
SUBJECT: MP-lO7(A)/SP-l6l(A>/CT 82-24/PUD-49 - SEAGATE - Requ
for deletion of a Master Plan and a Specific Plan an
approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map and Planned
Unit Development for 288 units on the east and north
in the P-C zone. side of Paseo Del Norte, South of Palomar Airport RO
I. RECOMMENDATION
It is recomiended that the Planning Commission approve the Negative Declaration issued by the Land Use Planning Manager
ADOPT Resolution Nos. 2132, 2133 and 2134, recormending apprc
of MP-l07(A)/SP-l61(A>/CT 82-24/PUD-49, based on the finding: and subject to the conditions contained therein.
11. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting the deletion of a portion of an
existing Master Plan, MP-107 and the approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map and Planned Unit Development for 258 units o
35.4 acres, located as described above. The City of Carlsbal
initiating the deletion lof an existing Specific Plan, SP-161 and the deletion of the remainder of MP-107, affecting
approximately 34 acres contiguous to the east of the project
site.
In May 1973 the City Council approved EIP-107 establishing a
density of 7 du/ac for the 79.4 total acreage. Subsequent t
this action the City Council, in November 1374, approved
Specific Plan, SP-161 and Carlsbad Tract, CT 74-17, for condominium development on the 35.4 acre subject parcel.
The project site is roughly triangular in shape with Paseo r Norte on the southern boundary, a drainage course on the ea2 boundary and another drainage, Canyon De Las Encinas along t
northern boundary. The property is characterized by a large
plateau area, elevated above Paseo Del Norte, and: steep slog and riparian areas corresponding to the drainages. Access t the site would be derived from two driveways off Paseo Del
Norte.
i)
111. ANALY S I S
Discussion - MP-107(A)
The existing Master Plan covers approximately 79.4 acres, as
shown on Exhibit ''X". The Master Plan established a density 1
7 du/ac for the properties. The plan provided no development
guidelines and no conditions of approval were applied. The
density, would be the most logical way for this property to
develop with residential uses".
The P-C zone provides that properties of less than one hunder
acres shall be developed by means of a planned development
permit. Staff believes that the existing master plan is
outdated and that utilizing the Planned Development Ordinance
would be the most logical way to develop residential uses.
Staff believes that the PD Ordinance would provide for suitab
development standards while allowing maximum design flexibili
The applicant has requested that that portion of the master p
affecting the 35.4 acres be deleted. Staff recommends that t
entire Master Plan be deleted and that development occur
pursuant to the Planned Development Ordinance.
fdaster Plan stated only that, "proper P-C development, at thi
Discussion - SP-161 (A)
Specific Plan, SP-161, was adopted by the City Council in
PJovember 1974, to accompany Tentative Subdivision Nap, CT 74-
for the 35.4 project site, as shown on Exhibit "X". The Tentative Map has since expired and staff believes that the
existing Specific Plan is no longer pertinent.
Staff recommends that the Specific Plan be deleted and that
development occur pursuant to the Planned Development Ordinan
Staff believes that the use of the Planned Development Permit
process will provide suitable development standards and adequ
review opportunities.
ANALYSIS - CT 82-24/PUD-49
Planning Issue
1) Does the proposed project sakisfy all design criteri
and development standards of the Planned Developnent
Ordinance?
Discussion
Staff believes that the proposed project would satisfy all bz
development standards and design criteria of the Planned
Development Ordinance. The applicant is proposing 288 units,
constructed in three different product types. The applicant
I
-2-
0 0
proposes 152 units developed in fourplexes and 58 units developed in eightplexes. The final product type is a U-sh
structure accomodating 10 to 14 townhouse units; 78 units wol be developed utilizing this product type. The project would
result in an overall density of 8 du/ac.
A total of 653 parking spaces would be provided, 330 covered 323 open. Each unit of the fourplexes is designed with a on
garage. The second assigned space would be uncovered. Each
eightplex would have six one car garages. The balance of required parking would be made up in carports and open parki
The townhouse units of the U-shaped buildlings are designed w
combination of one and two car garases. The remaining space would be open.
proximity to each group of units.
Storage requirements would be satisfied within individual
garages or separate enclosures accessible to the outdoors.
Storage areas range ir! size from 392 to 1050 cubic feet.
Recreation area requirements are exceeded in a combination o
privake and common areas, Each unit in the project would ha private deck ranging in size from 76 to 240 sq. ft. Three common recreation areas would be provided, One area would contain two tennis courts; the other two would each include pool, spa and cabana. Total recreation area provided would
approximate 102,000 sq. ft. for an overall ratio of 350 sa.
per unit,
Finally, staff believes that the proposed project would sati
all design criteria of the Planned Development Ordinance. 'I project appears well-designed. Buildings have been cited tc
maximize views and create open areas. Careful consideratior
been given in site planning to leave sensitive biol-ogical sl
areas largely undisturbed. Recreation areas are convenient]
located and linked to pedestrian walkways.
Overall, staff believes that the proposed project satisfies
Develapment Ordinance.
Guest parking would-be provided in close
development standards and design criteria of the Planned
IV- ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Land Use Planning Manager determined that this project r not cause a significant impact on the environment and therel
has issued a Negative Declaration on May 20, 1983.
-3-
e e
ATTACHMENTS
1) Planning Commission Resolutions 2132, 2133 and 2134
2) Location Map
3) Background Data Sheet
4) Disclosure Form
5) Environmental Documents
6) Reduced Exhibits
7) Exhibits "A" - "M", dated April 18, 1983
8) Exhibits "N" - ''R'', dated November 4, 1982
CDN : bw 5/25/83
-4-
c e
ESICKWW DATA SHEET
CASE hQ: MP-107 (A) /SP-161 (A) /CT 82-24/P-49
APPLICANT: Sea Gate Associates -
REQUEST AND LCCATION: Deletion of a master plan and specific plan and appr
of a tentative subdivision map and planned unit development for 288 units
the east and north side of Paseo Del Norte, South of Palomr Airport Road.
LEG?& DESCRL~IOPJ: A portion of Lot H of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, accordi
Map thereof Eo. 823, filed in the Office of the County Recorder.
LPN: 211-040-13 and 14
Acres 79.4 Proposed M. of I;ots/Units 288
WEXATL PLPN AND ZONIEG
Land Use Designation R-M
Oensity Allmd 4-10 du/ac Density Proposed 8 du/ac
Existing Zone P-c Props& Zone P-c
Surrcmding Zoning and Land Use:
zoning Land Use
Site P-C Vacant
p\brth P-M Vacant
south P-c Altamira
East P-c Vacant
\Jest P-c Vacant/AltMra
PUELIC FACIZITIES
Schml District Carlsbad Water Carlsbad Smer Carlsbad EDU's
Public Facilities Fee Agrement, dated October 29, 1982
Et~VIF!O?!3EETAL IPPACT ASSESSmT
X Negative Declaration, issued Nay 20, 1983
E.I.R. Certified, dated
Other ,
--e -- . e ,&hdt further ?-n:omatlon = -5iu~~=-# YUU -~a& -- -- ox. *.
~D~LT~~JT: Sea Gate Associates
Nme (individual,-partnershipI joint venture, corpration, sync
Suite 2100,. 8950 Villa La Joll'a Dr., La Jolla, CA 9203'
Business Address
(714) 455-9440
Telephons Nunber .-
AGENT : The Agatep Corporation
Name
.- 3 %Q
-- P,O, Box 590, Carlsbad, CA 92008
B9s.inas.3 ;icls%csr ..
-. (714) -434-1056
Telephone Nuaber
. - ..
. mr-mas.. --1_------ %e Attached lQ@j&it __ ....e .- f:me *( irdividcal, partner p j oixt . Eaae 3dAress
venture, coqoration, syndication)
trilsiness Address
-I_ r- - ~e 1 c$cj ?,e N VcAxr Ael ep3o;le SLl-?er
2izze Eoxe Ld~!=el;s
'3'xiness Aii&ress
T151F3$?OE4 NGJber Telepbne ':;u+zr
- .. - ---
- 1_--
(Ateach more sheets if necessary)
we d-elzze c:r.&r px??alty of ,3erjur' txat ~?I?D inforration contaized IT^ tl
clo:;ure is true 2nd cozrect a~.?. that it will remain true and correct ap.d x
r-tici uaoa as '32Lf19 tru3 and COKr-?C'c until zmended,
-- SY ..
r- -I___________
BY
Agent, C.:s~er, i'c:r F~I~C
1200 ELM AVEN1
CARLSBAD, CALI FORN 1 A
(619) 438-5591
e= DEYEC(X+IENTAL L
SERVICES
LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE
@Lit? 09 CasLibti
ECATIVE DXI&?ATIOIY
PROJECT ADDRESS/mTION:
South of Palmar Airport Mac?
Wrth and east side of Pas- Del Parte,
PROJECT DESCRIPTICN:
specific plan and approval of a tentative sub&Lvision map and plannd
unit development for 286 units.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an envirormental review of the
ahve describd project pursuant to the Guidelines for kplementation of the California EnvirOmefital Quality Act and the Enviromatal
Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad.
reviw, a Nqative Cclaration (declaration that the projet will nQt
have a siijnificant jqact on the environment) is here5y issued for the
subject project.
Land Use Planning Office.
A copy of &e Nqative Declaration wifh supprtive documents is on
file in tlze.Tand Use Planning Office, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue,
Carls’oad, CA. 92008. Comnents from the public are invited. Please
subrnit carunents in writing to the Land Use Plannirig Office within ten
(10) days of date of issuance.
Request for deletion of a master plan and
--
As a result of said
Justification for this action is on file in the
EATED: t4ay 20, 1983
CASE No: W-lO7(A) /SP-161 (A)/
4N;P!wrw Q4;d!(2?? 1I1ICWL% tIOJXU1UL’R
hnd. Use Planning EJlanager
C1132-24 /PW9
’ ATPLICIWT: Seagate
PUBLISH DATE: Eihy 28 1983
ID-4
5/81
. prrrull.rrru
.e. .. 0. . .
-===e+=
/-
0
., .
'.
- -,
1
0 e*
I
.,
z
a d f
0 ,.
..
-..
)