Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-08-02; City Council; 7430-1; Huntington Palomar AnnexationGIT )F CARLSBAD — AGENDA JILL AR* 7430-#1 MTG 8/2/83 DEPT. CLK TITLE: HUN 1 IJNCjlUN FAJjUruAK ANJNhjXAl 1(JM ni=PT HO aLj CITY ATTY QS/r CITY MGR. ~3*~ o LU O as og oo RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. *7-3 /O > initiating proceedings for the Huntington Palomar Annexation, and directing staff to set the matter to public hearing at 6:00 P.M., on September 6, 1983. ITEM EXPLANATION; An application has been filed with LAFCO for the annexation of 137.92 acres of uninhabited land into the City of Carlsbad. The property is generally located on the north side of Palomar Airport Road between Interstate 5 and Palomar Airport Road, and is known as the "Huntington Palomar Annexation. The Local Agency Formation Commission adopted a Resolution of Annexation for this property on June 6, 1983. In accordance with the requirements contained in LAFCO's resolution, the City must initiate proceedings and hold a public hearing on this annexation. At their meeting of July 5, 1983, the Council adopted Resolution No. 7273 approving the annexation. That action, however, should have followed a noticed public hearing in accordance with LAFCO requirements. The attached resolution will initiate the proceedings in accordance with the requirement to process the annexation and directs staff to notice and set the matter to public hearing on September 6, 1983. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW; The Environmental Impact Report for the property EIR 81-9 was certified by Council on September 21, 1982. A copy of the environmental documents are on file in the City Clerk's Office. FISCAL IMPACT: This action will incur administrative costs for noticing the matter for public hearing. EXHIBITS; 1. City Council Resolution No. //j / O . £**««• ?! ill y PROPOSED MACARIO CANYON PARK HUNTINGTON PALOMAR HUNINGTON PALOMAR ANNEXATION 1 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 3 •jo 20 22. 22 23 RESOLUTION NO. 7310 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR AN ANNEXATION. (HUNTINGTON PALONIAR) _ WHEREAS, pursuant to the District Reorganization Act of 1965, commencing with Section 56000 of the Government Code, a petition of application was submitted to the Local Agency Formation Commission and certified sufficient by the Executive Officer on December 20, 1982; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 1983, the Local Agency Formation Commission by Resolution (attached hereto as Exhibit 1), approved the proposed annexation and authorized the Council of the City of Carlsbad to initiate and conduct proceedings for the proposed annexation in compliance with said resolution and pursuant to Government Code Section 56000, et seq.; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the City Council hereby adopts this resolution initiating proceedings for the proposed annexation as provided in Government Code Section 56310 as follows: a« The name of the areas for which any change of organization if proposed is entitled Huntingdon Palomar Annexation. The annexation consists of the territory described in Exhibit "A" to the Local Agency Formation Commission Resolution. b. The particular change of organization proposed for the subject area is the: 24 (1) Annexation of the territory described in the 25 application on file with the Local Agency Formation Commission to the City of Carlsbad. 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 c. Said change of organization shall be subject to the terms and conditions specified and contained in the Resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission and the following cond it ion: (1) All nonconfarming uses, including subdivision directional signs and billboards shall be removed from the property within thirty days from the adoption of the resolution approving the annexation. d. Preliminary proceedings were commenced when the petition by the landowners was submitted to the Local Agency Formation Commission making a proposal for this annexation. uninhabited The territory includes 137.92 acres and is f. The reasons for the proposed annexation are: (1) Applicant is proposing development on the property and the City of Carlsbad is the appropriate agency for providing public services. (2) annexation would be of Influence . The territory is a county island and the consistent with the City of Carlsbad Sphere (3) The annexation is consistent with the City of Carlsbad and Local Agency Formation Commission policies on annexation of county islands. g. The Clerk of the City of Carlsbad is hereby directed to advertise the proposed annexation for public hearing on September 6, 1983, at 6:00 P.M., in the Council Chambers. h. Any interested person desiring to make written protest against said annexation shall do so by written communication filed with the Clerk of the City of Carlsbad not later than the hour above stated for the public hearing. A written protest by a landowner shall contain a description sufficient to identify the land owned by him; a protest by a voter shall contain the residential address of such voter. i. The Clerk of the City of Carlsbad is authorized and instructed to publish the notice of hearing according to Sections 56087 - 56089 of the California Government Code. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, this 2nd , 1983, by the following vote:day of August AYES: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Prescott NOES: None ABSENT: None MARY H. CASLER, Mayor ATTEST: ALETH'A L. RAUTiflKRANE, Ci-., ~.R. KUNDTZ, Deputy City Clerk (SEAL ) Minute EXHIBIT 1 to Resolution No. 7310 Item: 18 ~ Ref.: CA82-6 RESOLUTION OF THE SAN DIEGO LOCAL 'AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION APPROVING A PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD "HUNTINGTON PALOMAR ANNEXATION" On motion of Commissioner Fordem, seconded by Commissioner Bennett, the following resolution is adopted; WHEREAS, a petition of application was submitted to this Commission for annexation of territory to the City of Carlsbad, which petition was certified sufficient by the Executive Officer on December 20, 1982; and WHEREAS, the territory proposed for annexation is as described in the application on file with the Local-Agency Formation Commission; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 56262, the Executive Officer of this Commission set a public hearing on the proposed annexation for June 6, 1983, and gave notice of the date, time, and place of said hearing in accordance with Government Code Sections 56264 and 56265; and WHEREAS, the Executive Officer of the Commission has filed his report on said annexation, which report was received and considered by the Commission; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Commission hereby finds, determines, and orders as follows: (1) The hearing was held on the date set therefor, and due notice of said hearing was given in the manner required by law. (2) At that hearing the Commission called for, heard, and considered all interested parties and read and considered the report of the Executive Officer. (3) The Commission certifies, in accordance with the Negative Declaration dated'January 10, 1983, that this proposal will have no significant effect on the environment. •f (4) The Commission certifies that it has reviewed and considered the information contained in the EIR prepared by the City of Carlsbad. (5) The Commission adopts the Environmental Findings required by Section 15088 of the State CEQA Guidelines for each significant impact identified by the EIR, as stated on Exhibit "B" attached hereto. • 6? :\ - (6) The Commission hereby approves the annexation with modified boundaries, as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, subject to the following conditions: None (7) The boundaries of the territory as described in Exhibit "A" are definite and certain. (8) The boundaries of the territory do conform to lines of assessment and ownership. (9) The change of organization does not constitute a minor boundary change. (10) The territory includes 137.92 acres and is uninhabited. (11) The territory .proposed to be annexed is hereby designated the "Huntington Palomar Annexation" to the City of Carlsbad. (12) The Commission hereby designates the City of Carlsbad as the conducting authority and authorizes the City Council to initiate proceedings in compliance with this resolution. (13) The Executive Officer of this Commission is directed to file and mail certified copies of this resolution as required by law. - 2 - 7 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of San Diego this 6th day of June ___» 19JB3, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Fordem, Bennett, Oravec, Adams ' (acting in place of Mahr) ,' Hersom, and Hostler NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Eckert and Mahr ABSTAINING: None STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) - • I, WILLIAM D. DAVIS, Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of San Diego, State of California, hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy with the original resolution adopted by said Commission at its regular meeting on June 6, 1983 , which original resolution is now on file in my office; and that same contains a full, true, and correct transcript therefrom and of the whole thereof. Witness my hand this 14th day of june , 1983. &AU sJ* <h^^ WILLIAM D. DAVIS, Executive Officer San Diego County Local Agency Formation Commission CA82-6 "Huntington Palomar Annexation" to the City of Carlsbad A parcel of land being a portion of Lot G of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 823, filed in the office of the County Recorder, of San Diego County, November 16, 1896, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at point 9 of Lot F of•said Map No. 823; 1. Thence North 71°27M9" East, 546.48 feet (record North 70C54'27" East) along the lot line common to Lots F and G to point 10 of said Lot F; . 2. Thence continuing along said common Lot line the following courses: South 59015'20" East, 1176.06 feet (record South 59047149" East) to point 11 of said Lot F; South 89046'41" East to point 12 of'said Lot F, being also point 9 of said Lot G; 3. Thence North 41°14'47" East, 21.15 feet (record North 40°41'22" East, 21.51 feet) along the boundary of said Lot G to the most Westerly corner of record of survey map no 6493, filed in the County Recorder's office of said County, December 15, 1964, being a point in the center line of that certain easement granted to San Diego Gas and Electric Company by Document No. 49242, recorded on April 15, 1954, records of said County; 4. Thence South 47°28'18" East, 2748.32 feet (record South 48°01'52" East, 2748.36 feet) along the Southwesterly boundary of said record of survey to an angle point therein; 5. Thence continuing along said boundary, South 39°01I39" East (record South 39°34'56" East) to the Southerly line of road survey no. 1534 (Palomar Airport Road) map on file in the County Engineer's office of said County, being also the boundary of the City of Carlsbad; 6.' Thence generally Northwesterly, Westerly and Southwesterly along said Southerly line to the Westerly line of said Lot G; .'V 7. Thence North 0°29'11" West (record North 0°32' West) along said Westerly line to the Point of Beginning. dh:na 2/4/83 Approved by the Local A?oncy Formation Commission of San Diego » 'JUN 61903EXHIBIT "A" Executive Officer o( said Commission „ CA82-6 SUMMARY ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARY AND FINDINGS FOR SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS OF PROPOSED "HUNTItfGTON-PALOMAR ANNEXATION" TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD Lead Agency: City of Carlsbad Potential Impacts Recommended Mitigation Cultural Resources No significant resources exist on the site. Biological Resources No significant impacts are ex- pected to occur to any sensitive biological resources. However, development would result in the loss of grassland habitat, a cumulative impact to raptor species. Topography and Visual Aesthetics Significant impacts to landform will result through grading of the site into manufactured pads and slopes. Consequently, sig- nificant impacts to the visual character of the property will occur which will affect the vi- sual corridor of Palomar Airport Road, an eligible scenic highway. Community Services Minima! impacts will result to fire and police protection and other public services. Utilities and Energy The industrial project proposed for the property will result in an incremental increase in energy and water usage. No mitigation measures are recommended, The cumulative Joss of grassland does not approach a level of significance requiring specific mitigation. Grading plans should be designed to retain a natural hillside appearance through contour grading. A landscape plan should be implemented. Manufac- tured slopes adjacent to Palomar Air- port Road should be of minimal height, and building setbacks should be suffi- cient to reduce visual intrusion into the road view corridor. No measures are required as a direct result of the proposed project. Energy- and water-saving measures, are recommended to minimize consumption. Approved by the Local AEoncy Formation Commission of .San Diego Exhibit "B" JUN 6 1983 JQ , Executive Officer of said Commissiion CA82-6 Page Two Potential Impacts Recommended Mitigation Traffic Circulation The project, by itself, will not result in significant impacts to the traffic circulation system. However, traffic generated by approved and planned projects In the area will result in cumu- lative significant impacts to the circulation system. As part of a future development on the subject property. College Boulevard should be constructed across the prop- erty as well as the northerly half of Palomar .Airport Road adjacent to the project. Other mitigation measures include the construction of the follow- ing circulation element proposals: improved intersection geometries at the intersections of Palomar Airport Road • at College Boulevard and at El Camino Real; construction of Cannon Road. Los Monos Canyon Drive, and Carillo Way; and a connection between the Poin- settia/l-5 interchange and El Camino Real. Impacts to Macario Canyon Park and the scenic highway corridor can be mini- mized through design, considerations when a tentative map and specific plan are prepared. Crash hazard arid noise impacts can be mitigated to a less than significant level by placement of buildings out of the crash hazard zones and soundproofing of buildings. No mitigation measures are recommended. Land Use Adverse impacts to land use in- clude incompatibility with the proposed Macario Canyon Park and the eligible scenic highway cor- 'ridor. . Potentially significant crash hazard and noise impacts associated with Pa'.omar Airport exist on the project site. Agricultural Resources No significant impacts to agri- cultural resources are antici- pated because of poor-quality soils and 35 percent of the site is composed of steep slopes. • • Air Quality Industrial development of the property will result in an incremental addition to the regional emission of air pollu- tants which currently exceed • • standards. Since the project .does not conform with the re- vised RAQ5, a significant impact to air quality will occur. from Huntinqton Palomar Project Final EIR, City of: Carlsbad, May 1982 Carpools, mass transit, and industrial energy conservation measures as stated In RAQS can minimize air pollution emissions. II CA82-6 Page Three Potential Impacts Recommended Mitigation Hydrology and Water Quality Industrial development will re- sult in increased runoff, sedi- ment load, and altered chemical content of runoff. Geology and Soils An industrial development will be impacted by potential hazards resulting from unstable soils, secondary seismic effects, and erosion. Control of grading activities, land- scaping, energy dissipaters, siltation and retention basins, and control of chemical discharges will reduce ad- verse effects of development Detailed geotechnical studies should be completed during development of the tentative map to determine what engi- neering measures will be required. FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 15088(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines, find that the mitigation measures listed above for the identified impacts have been adopted by the City of Carlsbad or can and should be adopted by the City of Carlsbad, and that the mitigation is within the jurisdiction of the City of Carlsbad and not LAFCO because the affected resources and services will be within the City boundaries upon annexation.