HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-09-06; City Council; 7430-2; Huntington Palomar Annexation4B# 743&+ TITLE: HUNTINGTON PALOMAR ANNEXATION HTG. 9/6/83
)Em. PLN
a w > 0
Q
< e
2
a
0 E
i 0 2 3 0 0
DEPT.HD.
CITY AHY v?%
CITY MGRQ~!?
RECO'MMENDED ACTION:
The Planning Staff recommends that this application be approved
and that the City Council ADOPT Resolution No. 734 .
ITEM EXPLANATION
This item is a request for City Council approval of an
annexation of approximately 138 acres of uninhabited land, generally located on the north side of Palomar Airport Road between Interstate 5 and' Palomar Airport.
The Local Agency Formation Commission adopted a Resolution of
Annexation for this property on June 6, 1983. The reason a public hearing is now being held by the City Council is because
when the item was considered by LAFCO the boundaries of the
annexation were modified to include the Kelly parcel (refer to location map) to avoid leaving a small unincorporated island that would have been. surrounded by the City. Since the owner of this smaller parcel had not signed the original app,lication for annexation, a public hearing is required before the City can approve the annexation. Staff is not aware of any opposition to this annexation and approval would be consistent with the City's annexation policies.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Environmental Impact Report for the property, EIR 81-9, was
certified by the Council on September 21, 1982. A copy of the
environmental documents are on file in the City Clerk's Office.
FISCAL IMPACT
Theannexat ion of this property will generate additional revenue
from property taxes which should offset the cost of providing public services to the site.
EXHIBITS
1) City Council Resolution No. 7d4
2) Location Map
3) LAFCO Resolution of Annexation
d
7
E
9
3.C
11
12
33
14
3-5
3.6
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 7346
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
UNINHABITED TERRITORY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AND DESIGNATE1
AS THE HUNTINGTON PALOMAR ANNEXATION,
WHEREAS, an application for approval of a proposal for the
initiation of proceedings for the annexation of territory
hereinafter indentified and described as Huntington Palomar
Annexation to the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California, was filed with the Local Agency Formation Commission
Reference No. CA 82-6; and
WHEREAS, a resolution of the said Local Agency Formation
Commission, after a hearing held in the manner required by law, waF
duly passed and adopted on the 6th day of June 1983, approving the
application for annexation of the territory hereinafter described
by metes and bounds to the City of Carlsbad; and
WI3EREAS, said resolution provided that said annexation was
approved and that the City of Carlsbad was designated as the
conducting authority to hold a public hearing to initiate
proceedings in complicance 1-ith the resolution; and
WHEREAS, a written petition and a description of the
uninhabited territory hereinafter described has been presented to
the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, requesting annexation
under the Municipal Organization Act of 1977; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public
hearing to consider any protest to the request for annexation;
NOWI THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
4
E
13
12
1:
14
3.5
1E
17
le
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2. That said petition contains a description of certain
uninhabited terri-ory sought to be included and annexed to the Cit]
of Carlsbad and that said petition is signed by the owners of not
less than 25% of the land in the territory by area and by assessed
value as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll of the
County of San Diego, in which county the City of Carlsbad is
s i tuat ed .
3. That the territory proposed to be annexed to the City
is uninhabited territory as defined by Section 35038 of the
Government Code and is contiguous to the boundaries of the City.
4 . That the aforementioned uninhabited territory includec
in the proposed annexation is hereby designated and shall hereafter
be known as the Huntington Palomar Annexation.
5. That upon completion of said annexation all of the
property included therein shall be taxed accordingly with the other
property within the City of Carlsbad to pay the bonded indebtedness
and any and a11 general indebtedness o€ the City of Carlsbad
contracted prior to, or existing or outstanding at the time of, the
aforesaid proposed annexation of said described property.
6. That all requirements of law necessary to the adoption:
of this resolution approving the annexation of certain uninhabited
territory pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Organization
Rct of' 1977 have been complied with.
2.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
34
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7. That it does hereby approve the annexation to the Cit3
of Carlsbac' of that certain real property located in the County of
San Diego, State of California, designated as the Huntington
Palomar Annexat ion and more particularly described on Exhibit "A" :
attached hereto and made a part hereof, subject to the following
condition:
a. All nonconforming uses, including subdivision
directional signs and billboards shall be removed from the property
within thirty days from the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
City Council on the 6th day of SeP- , 1983, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES : Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kflchin, Chick and Prescott
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
MARY H. fASLER, Mayor
ATTEST :
,(SEAL)
3.
\
MUNTOINGTOM PALOMAR
.. __ s HUNINGTON . -- PALOMAR ANNEXATION -h
.r' .. ' 1.1.inu te
Item: 18
Ref.: CA82-6
RESOLUTION OF TEiE SPA DIEGO LOCAL 'AGENCY
FORMATION COi~PlX3SION APPROVING A PROPOSED
. ANNEXATION TO TIiE CITY OF CARLSBAD
HUNTINGTON PALOMAR ANNEXATION"
On rnotion of Comissioner Fordem, seconded by CoLmissioner
Bennett, the following rFesolution is adopted:
WHEREAS, a petition of application was submitted to this
Commission for annexation of territory to the City of Carlsbad,
which petition was certified sufficient by the Executive Officer on December 20, 1982; and
WHEREAS, the territory propo.sed for annexation' is as described in the zpplication on file with the Local-Agency Formation
Comiiission; and
IT'rfEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 56262, the
Executive Officer o€ this Coinmission set a public hearicg on the
proposed annexation for Sune 6, 1983, and gav3 notice of the
date, time, and place of said hearing in acccrdznre with_CDt-e?.rnment
Code Sections 56264 a26 56255; and
WHEREAS, the Xxecutive Officer of the Comiission has filed
his report on said annexation, which report was receiv&d and
considered by the Coinmission;
' NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Commission hereby
finds, determines, and orders as follows:
(1) The hearing was held on the date set therefor, and due
notice of said hearing was given in the manner required by law.
. (2) At that hearing the Conmission called for, heard, and
cofisiciere6 all interested parties and read and considered the
report of the Executive Officer.
(3) 'The Comission certifies, in accordance with the Negative
Declaration dated' January 10, 1983, that this proposal \;ill have
no significant effect on the environment,
(4) The Commission certifies that it has- reviewed and
considered the inEormation contained in the EIR prepare6 by the
City ~f Carlsbzd. .
(5) The Co:vJi!issiou adopts the Environmental Findings required
by Scctiori 15088 of the State CEGA Guidelines for each sicj::i.iica;it
impact j-dctitificd by the EIR, as Stat& cn Exhibit attached
here to.
i f- fi .. .
(6) The Commission hereby approves the annexation with
modified boundaries, as described in Exhibit "Aii attached hereto, subject to the following conditions: -
None
(7) The boundaries of the tek-ritory as described in Exhibit
"All .- are definite and certain.
(8) The boundaries of the territory do conform to lines of
assessrnent and ownership.
(9) The change of 6rganFzation does not constitute a minor
boundary change.
(10) The territory includes 137.92 acres and is uninhabited.
(11) The territory-proposed to be annexed is hereby designated
.. the "Huntington Palomar Annexatior," to the City of Carlsbzd.
(12) The Conxission 'hereby designates the City of Carlsbad as - the conducting authority and authorizes the City Council to
initiate proceedings in compliance with this resolution.
. (13) The Executive Officer of this Corm5sslon is directed to
file and mail certified copies of this resolstion as required by
law.
.
c
8.1 . PASSED AFID ACOETED by the Local Agency Formation Comisshon of the
County of San Diego this 6th day Of June s
--
1983, - by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Fordern, Bennett, Oravec, Adams .
(zcting in place of Mahr); Hersom, and Hostler
NOES: None
ABSEW: Commissioners Eckert and Mahr
ABSTAINING; None
._ .
I, i?ILLIA?f E. DAVIS, 'Executive Officer of the Local Ager:cy
F'olrm2tion Conmission of the County of San'Diego, Statd of California,
hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy ~~7ith the
original resolution dopted by said Conmission at its regulzr meeting
on June 6, 1983 , which original resolution is now
on file ir?_ my office; and that same conkins a full, true, and
correct transcript therefroni and of the whole thereof.
Witness ny hand this 14th day of JL~~c. , 19G.
San Diego County I,ocal Agency
Format ion Comm Lss ion
f ' c-
A . CA82-6 ''Huntington Palornar Annexation" to the
City of Carlshad
A parcel of land being a portion of Lot G of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according
to Map thereof No. 823, filed in the office of the County Recorder,
of San Diego County, November 16, 1896, more particularly described
as follo.ds:
Beginning at point 9 of Lot F of. said Map No. 823;
.-
1.
2-
L 3.
4.
5.
Thence Korth 71"27'49" East, 546.48 feet (record North 70O54'27"
East) along the 1ot.line common to Lots F and G to point 10 of
said Lot F;
Thence continuing along said common Lot line the following
courses: South 59"i5'20" East, 1176.06 feet (record South
59*47'49" East) to point 11'of said Lot E'; South 89*46'41"
East to point 12 of-said Lot F, being also point 9 of said
Lot G;
Thence North 41u14'47" East, 21.15 feet (record Nrth 40O41'22"
East, 21.51 feet) along the boundary of said Lot G to the most
Westerly cornpr of record of survey map no 6493; filed in the
County Recorder's office of said County, December 15, 1964,
being a point in the center line of that certain easexeat
grznted to Sam Diego Gas and Electric Cozpszny by Docuinent
No+ 43242, re.corded on April 15, 3954, records of said County;
Thence South 47O28'18" East, 2748.32 feet (record South 45°01'52"
East, 2748.36 feet) along the Southwesterly boundary of said
record of survey to an angle point therein;
Thence continuing dong said boundary, South 39"01'39" East
(record South 39O34'56" East) to the Southerly line of road
survey no. 1534 (Palomar Airport Road) map on file in the County Engineer's office of said County, being also the
boundary of the City of Carlsbad;
Thence cpne'rally Korthwesterly, Westerly and Southwesterly along said Southerly line to the Westerly line of said Lot G;
Thence North O"29'11" West (record North O"32' Vest) along
said fcesterly line to the Point of Beginning.
dh: na
2/4/63 fipproved by the iosal Ayw~cy Formtion
c Chinmission of San Dipgo
..
Lead Agency: City of Carlsbad
Potent it! f rnpacts . Recommended h!itig3tion -
Cultural Resources
r!o significant resources exist
oil the site.
No mitigatim measures arc recommended.
6 iologicsl &sources
No significant impacts 2i-e ex-
pected to occur to any sensitive
biologics; res3urces. Howver,
deveIo;3mer,t woilld resuit in the
Ioss of grassland habitat, a
cumulative impact ti3 raptor
species.
The cumulative loss of grasslmd does
not approach a !ewe! of significance
requiring specific rn i t i gat ion.
fopogrtphy and' Visual Aesthetics
Significaill impacts ts Taaeforn
will resuit throucjh 5.rac'i:iic~ of
fhs site into vanufsclurx! pads
and slops. Consequently, sicj-
nificant impacts to the visual
char-ackr of the property will
occur vthich wit1 affect the vi-
sual corridor of Palorrar Airswt
Rozd, an eligibie scsnjc highway.
Corn rn u n i t Se rv i c e s
Grading plslns should be desicjzec! to
retain a natural hiiiside appearance
through contour sradins. A landscape
plan should be iziplernmtec!. !.imufac-
tured slopes adjacent to Pzloxar Air-
port Road should be of lnihirnai heisht.
and building setbacks shoufd be suffi-
cient to reduce visuzl intrusion into
the road view corridor..
tdinirnal impscts wiIi result to No measures are requ,ired as a direct
fire and police protection and
other public ssr-vices.
result of the props& project. -
The industrial project proposed
for the property wiii r2sult in
an incremental inceas? in energy 2nd water usage. L
Energy- and water-saving. measures-'are
recommended to minimize consumption.
''PWJV~~ by th~ ~oc.11 ,q>?nng F,,rmafkn Comrnissioo 0: san [);i.;:J *
JU N
(...
(-
Potential Impacts Hecornm ended Mi tig a t ion
Traffic Circulation
The project, by itself, wifl not
result in significant iinpacts to
the traffic circulation systern.
However, traffic generated by
approved and planned projects
in the area will result in curnu-
lative significant impacts to
the circu:&ion system,
L
Land Use
I Aciverse impscts to land use in-
cludc incDrnpai!bili:y with the
proposd h"lcarIo Canyon ?ark and
the eligible scenic highway tor-
crash hazard and naise impacts
associated with Pa!onar Airport
exist on the project site.
'ridor, . Pa;enliaIIy siqnificzrit
A gricuItcr-21 Resources
As part of 2 future development cn the
subject p ropcrt y, Coffege €3 ou Isv ard
should be constructed across the prop-
erty as well as the northerly half of
Palomar .kirpor-"i Road adjacent to the
projec'r. Other mitiption measures
include the construction of the follow-
ing circulation element proposals;:
improved intersection geomslrics at the
intersections of Palomar Airport Road -
at Collegz Boulevwcf and at El Camino
Reaf; corlsfrucfion of Cannon Road, Los
Monos Canyon' Drive, and CarIllo Way;
and a connaction between the Pain-
settialj-5 interchansz and El Camino
Reaf.
lnpacis to Mzcar-3 Canyon Park an6 the
scenic hi5:Jhv::ay corridor can b2. mini-
mimed throush design. considerations
when 2 tentative map and specific p!an
are prepared. Crash harar-cf and noise
impacts ciin be mitigated to a iess than
significant level by placemsnt of
buildings cut of the crash hazard zones
and soundproofing of buildings =
No significant impacts to agri-
cultural resources are antlci-
pated beccuse of p~or-quality
soits and 35 percent cf ?he site
is cornposcc! af steep slopes. - -
E;o mitigation measures are recommended.
L.
Air Quality .-
Industrial developmeni of the Car-pools, mass transit, and indtrs:rizf
property will t-es,.i!t in an energy conservation measures as stated
incremental addiiion to the
regional erntcsion of air poilu-
standzrds- Sincc the projcct
.~!Q:Ls not cor,forn: ivith the rc-
vised R.:tQ5, a slgniticsnt impact
to air quality will occur.
in RA@S can minimize air pollution
emissions.
hots whish currently exceed ..
<f
8
.-
p oter! ti a I I rnp act s Reconmended Mitigation
-
t-lpdroiogy and Water Qua!ity
industrial development will re- Control of grading activities, land-
sult in increased runoff, sedj- scaping, energy dissipaters. siltation .
ment load, and altered chemical and ret6niian basins, and control of
cont arit of r ~lnoZ. chemical discharges wiii redace ad- verse effects of deveroprn en t
- . Geology and Soi!s
An industrial development will be Detailed gnotechnicaf studies should be
impacted by potentia! hazards
resulting from unstable sails,
secondary seismic effects, and neering rn3asures will be required.
erosion.
completed during dwefopnent of the
tentative Gap to de:ern;ine what engi-
pcrsuant to Section 1508s (a) of the State CEQA' GuidelFnss, find
that the mitiyatior? ri?easures listed above for the identiEFed iiipacts
Zlave Seen adopted by the City of Carlsbad or can and should be
adopted by the City of Carlsbad, and that the mitigation is within
the jurisdiction of the City of Carlsbad 2nd not LAFCO because thz affected resources arid services will be within the City boundaries upon annixation.
.
I ..
!
MAP 823 -RHO AGUA HEDiONDA- POR LOT G