Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-11-15; City Council; 7567-3; Environmental Impact Reports cooo<TI CM CM 8DJ mIH •y •$iH*O Cfi CO CM & H1 3 S d direcrovingB^*_* ' w T) CO -i->S CO C g «•H H•P H O -O 'O <U•H T3cn m e g'-d13 CM oo . CO Si -H D CoGPCO CO TTin CMiH CM±± •H rH I U OO CH DF CARLSBAD - AGEND BILL AR* 7^-<&-*3 MTfi 11/15/83 DEPT PLN EjNV.L.KUINr'lEJNlftlj KCjt\JKl , A IjEJNCiKAb TITLE: PLAN AMENDMENT AND A ZONE CHANGE ON 36 ACRES LOCATED IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK, 1500 FEET WEST OF EL CAMINO REAL. EIR 83-7/GPA/LU 83-2/ZC-281 - ROBERTS RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council CERTIFY EIR 83-7 and direct the City Attorney's Office to prepare documents APPROVING GPA/LU 83-2 and ZC-281 per Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2210, 2211 & 2212. ITEM EXPLANATION This item is a request for 1) the certification of an environmental impact report, 2) a general plan amendment on a portion of the property from RM (4-10 du's/acre) to RH (20-30 du's/acre) and open space; and 3) a preannexational zone change from an existing county agricultural zone to RDM(Q) and 0-S. The applicant would like to place the RH designation on the northern portion of the property adjacent to the industrial park. The open space designation would be placed over the existing SDG&E easement and property east of this easement (see Exhibit 'A'). The RDM(Q) zone would be placed over the entire property except for the open space areas which would be zoned 0-S. Staff recommended denial of this request to the Planning Commission. This recommendation was based on the location of the property with respect to Palomar Airport and input from both Palomar Airport officials and the County's Noise Control Hearing Board which indicated that this site would be subject to noise from both general aircraft and from Hughes helicopters (please see attached letter). Although the site is located in close proximity to the industrial park, its proximity to the airport makes it unsuitable for higher density development. The site is one of the closest residentially designated properties to the airport. The Planning Commission felt that the site may be more suitable for an apartment project and that a density of 10-20 du's/acre would be appropriate. The Commission acknowledged that it could not guarantee that an apartment project would be built, however, it believed the placement of the Q overlay zone would provide adequate development controls on the property. The Planning Commission is, therefore, recommending approval of RMH (10-20 du's/acre) and 0-S on the northern portion of the site as shown on Exhibit A. FISCAL IMPACT The applicant will be required to provide all necessary public improvements at the time of development of the property. Also, the applicant has agreed to pay a public facilities fee to offset the cost of providing other public services to the property. EXHIBITS 1. Location Map 2. Exhibit A, dated October 14, 1983 3. PC Resolution Nos. 2210, 2211 & 2212 4. Staff Report, dated October 26, 1983 w/attachments 5. Letter fromm County Noise Control Hearing Board, dated October 21, 1983 VOCATION SVT.P PALO MAR AIRPORT S5TE ROBERTS GROUP EIR 83-7 GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT A OCTOBER 14, 1983 L ROBERTS GROUP GPA/LU 83-2 ZONING MAP EXHIBIT B OCTOBER 14, 1983 PM P-C E-l-A(Co.) to RDM-Q E-l-A(Co.) ROBERTS GROUP ZC-281 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2210 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CERTIFICATION 3 OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EIR 83-7 FOR A PROJECT GENERALLY INCLUDING: 1) A GENERAL PLAN AMEND- 4 MENT FROM RM TO RMH AND OS AND A ZONE CHANGE FROM COUNTY E-1-A TO CITY OF CARLSBAD RD-M(Q) AND 0-S ON A 5 36 ACRE PARCEL SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK AND 1500 FEET WEST OF EL CAMINO REAL. 6 APPLICANT: ROBERT'S GROUP CASE NO; EIR 83-7 7 • WHEREAS, on October 26, 1983, the Planning Commission of 8 the City of Carlsbad, held a public hearing on EIR 83-7 pursuant to 9 the provisions of Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 10 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the comments and documents of all those persons testifying at the 12 public hearing; and 13 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has received EIR 83-7 14 according to the requirements of Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal J.O Code; 16 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission 17 of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 18 1) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 19 2) That the Environmental Impact Report EIR 83-7 will be amended to 20 include the comments and documents of those testifying at the public hearing and responses thereto hereby found to be in good 21 faith and reason by incorporating a copy of the minutes of said public hearings into the report. &(*» 3) That the Planning Commission finds and determines that the 23 Environmental Impact Report EIR 83-7 has been completed in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the 24 state guidelines implementing said Act, and the provisions of Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and that the Planning 25 Commission has reviewed, considered and evaluated the information contained in the report.26 4) That the Environmental Impact Report EIR 83-7 as so amended and 27 evaluated, is recommended for acceptance and certification as the final Environmental Impact Report and that the final 28 Environmental Impact Report as recommended is adequate and provides reasonable information on the project and all reasonable and feasible alternatives thereto, including no project. r"" 1 2 S 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5) That each and every significant environmental impact identified in the Environmental Impact Report would be overruled or counterbalanced by changes or alteration in the project which would mitigate against said adverse impacts or, in certain circumstances, that mitigation of such adverse impacts would no be feasible under the circumstances and under the economic and social needs objectives and concerns in providing the improvements if the project were to be approved, would be included as conditions of approval of the project. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on th 26th day of October, 1983, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners Rombotis, Marcus, Lyttleton, Farrow and Rawlins. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Friestedt. ABSTAIN: None. CLARENCE SCHLEHUBER, Chairman CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: riCHAEL J. TJDLZMItLER LAND USE PLANNING MANAGER PC RESO NO. 2210 -2- ptf 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2211 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN 3 AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FROM RM TO RMH AND OS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED 4 IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK, 1500 FEET WEST OF EL CAMINO REAL. 5 APPLICANT: ROBERT'S GROUP CASE NO; GPA/LU 83-2 6 WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment to the 7 General Plan designation for certain property located, as shown on 8 Exhibit "A", dated October 14, 1983, attached and incorporated 9 herein, have been filed with the Planning Commission; and 10 WHEREAS, said verified applications constitute a request for amendment as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 13 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 26th day of 14 October, 1983, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by 15 law to consider said request; and16 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and 17 considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons 18 desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the General Plan Amendment. 20 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning fcj- Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:22 A) That the above recitations are true and correct.23 B) That in view of the findings made and considering the applicable 24 law, the decision of the Planning Commission is to recommend APPROVAL of GPA/LU 83-2, as shown on Exhibit "A", dated October 25 14, 1983. 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Findings; 1) The site is located in close proximity to the industrial core of the city and as such will allow for a higher density in close proximity to a major employment center. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad/ California, held on th< 26th day of October, 1983, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Commissioner Friestedt. ABSTAIN: None. Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners Rombotis, Marcus, Farrow and Rawlins. Commissioner Lyttleton. CLARENCE SCHLEHUBER, Chairman CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: MICHAEL J. "ROLZM3&/LER LAND USE PLANNING MANAGER PC RESO NO. 2211 -2- 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2212 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A 3 ZONE CHANGE FROM COUNTY E-1-A ZONE TO CITY OF CARLSBAD RD-M(Q) AND 0-S ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED 4 IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK, 1500 FEET WEST OF EL CAMINO REAL. 5 APPLICANT: ROBERT'S GROUP CASE NO; ZC-281 6 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to 7 - wit: 8 The northwest corner of the southwest corner of Section 23, township 12 south, range 4 west, San Bernardino 9 meridian, in San Diego County 10 has_been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the 11 Planning Commission; and 12 WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as 13 provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 14 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 26th day of 15 October, 1983, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by 16 law to consider said request; and 17 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and 18 considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons 19 desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors 20 relating to the Zone Change; and 21 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning 22 Commission as follows: 23 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 24 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends APPROVAL of ZC-281, based on the 25 following findings and subject to the following conditions: 26 Findings; 27 1) The RD-M zone is suitable for the western portion of this site since the land uses associated with this zone are compatible 28 with the RM & RMH general plan designation and are compatible with surrounding existing and future land uses. 2) The subject property is suitable in size and shape to accommodate development permitted in the RD-M(Q) zone as discussed in the staff report. 3) All significant environmental issues have been mitigated, or the project has been changed so as to mitigate these impacts, 4 or social or economic factors exist which override these impacts as described below: 5 A) Grading 6 Impacts; Development per the requested general plan 7 amendment could result in extensive grading with large cut and fill slopes. 8 Mitigation; Project has been changed to lower density 9 uses requiring smaller pads and step-down buildings at time of development. 10 B) Archaeology 11 Impacts; Potential impacts may be created if significant 12 archaeological resources are present on the site 13 Mitigation; Prior to grading, an archaeological survey will be conducted and salvaging procedures will be 14 implemented if it is found that archaeological resources are on the site. 15 C) Noise 16 Impacts; The site will be subject to low-level aircraft 17 overflight from Palomar Airport. 18 Mitigation; Project has been changed to lower density uses to subject less population to this impact. Conditions 20 1) Approval is granted for ZC-281, as shown on Exhibit "B" , dated October 14, 1983, incorporated by reference and on file in the Land Use Planning Office. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions. 23 2) This project is approved upon the express condition that the 24 applicant shall pay a public facilities fee as required by Cit Council Policy No. 17, dated April 2, 1982, on file with the 25 City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, and according to the agreement executed by the applicant for payment of said 26 fee, a copy of that agreement, dated May 31, 1983, is on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. If 27 said fee is not paid as promised, this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project 28 shall be void PC RESO NO. 2212 -2- 1M PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the 2 Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on 3 the 26th day of October, 1983, by the following vote, to wit: 4 AYES: Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners Rombotis, 5 Marcus, Lyttleton, Farrow, and Rawlins. NOES: None. 6 ABSENT: Commissioner Friestedt. 7 ABSTAIN: None. 8 9 10 CLARENCE SCHLEHUBER, Chairman 11 CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION 12 | ATTEST: 13 14 MICHAEL J. H5LZMITILER, 15 LAND USE PLANNING MANAGER 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 pc RESO NO. 2212 -3- APPLIC ION SUBMITTAL DATE JUNE 1, 1983 STAFF REPORT DATE: October 26, 1983 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Land Use Planning Office SUBJECT: EIR 83-7/GPA/LU 83-2/ZC-281 - ROBERT'S GROUP - Request for 1)certification of an environmentalimpact report for a 36 acre parcel located immediately south of Palomar Airport Business Park, 1500 feet west of El Camino Real, 2) a general plan amendment from RM to RH and OS, and 3) preannexational zone change from a county agriculture zone to RD-M and OS. I. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission: 1) ADOPT Resolution No. 2210 recommending CERTIFICATION of EIR 83-7 to the City Council based on the findings contained therein; 2) ADOPT Resolution No. 2211 recommending DENIAL of GPA/LU 83-2 to the City Council based on the findings contained therein; 3) ADOPT Resolution No. 2212 recommending APPROVAL of ZC- 281, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This application is a request for the certification of an environmental impact report, general plan amendment and zone change as described above. The entire 36 acre site is presently designated for medium-density residential uses (4-10 du/ac) in the City's General Plan. It is presently situated in a county island with county agriculture zoning. The applicant proposes to change the land use designation on the northwest quadrant of the site to RH (20-30 du/ac). The designation on the northeast quadrant would be changed to 0-S to accommodate a possible-future tennis/health club facility (through conditional use permit). All residential area zoning would be changed to RD-M, and the open space area to 0-S. Please see attached Exhibit 'A1 and 'B1. The site is presently vacant, with no improved or dedicated public frontage or access. Part of the site is presently used for agricultural purposes. A 200-foot wide SDG&E easement for electrical transmission lines crosses much of the property in a north-to-south-east direction. Development would be severely constrained within this easement. The property is directly adjacent to the southern boundary of Palomar Airport Business Park, and conceptual development plans include an access point through the park. Other access is proposed indirectly from El Camino Real and future Poinsettia Lane. The general plan designates medium density residential land uses on all surrounding properties except the planned industrial to the north. The site slopes moderately to steeply up from the business park to a ridge which bisects the property in an east-west direction. Southerly of the ridge, the terrain slopes moderately down to the south. This southerly half of the site is presently used for the production of tomatoes. III. SIR 83-7 - MAJOR IMPACTS 1. Grading The EIR points out that ultimate development of the site could result in large amounts of earthwork and the creation of large cut and fill slopes. The potential exists that a higher density development could require a greater amount of grading. As a result, staff is recommending that high density development not be allowed on this site, and further, that any development on site be clustered on the flatter portions of the property. This will mitigate any significant grading impacts. 2. Archaeology The possibility exists that significant archaeological resources may be found on the site. Mitigation measures include further study prior to grading, and salvage if determined necessary by a qualified archaeologist. 3. Noise Palomar Airport Management has indicated that this site will be subject to frequent low-level aircraft overflight. An increase in density on the site would increase the magnitude of the problem. Staff recommends no increase in allowable density so as to minimize the number of persons subjected to the impact. 4. Visual Large manufactured slopes and bulky, dense, buildings could create an unappealing visual impact. Mitigation measures include requirements at time of development for contour grading, low-profile, clustered buildings, and extensive landscape treatment. (2) IV. ANALYSIS - GENERAL PLAN AND ZONE CHANGE Planning Issues 1) Would the proposed land use/zone change be compatible with existing and future land uses? 2) Is the proposed land use a more appropriate use for the site? Discussion When conducting an analysis of the Carlsbad General Plan, one quickly notes the vast industrial and non-residential land use belt running generally parallel to Palomar Airport Road through the middle of the city. This belt is intended to follow the approach and take-off patterns for aircraft using Palomar Airport. Industrial uses are considered much more tolerant of the noise generated by aircraft than are residential uses, which are designated in areas outside this belt. Traditional planning theory suggests that large employment centers such as Carlsbad's industrial belt should be surrounded by a concentric circle of workforce residential centers, providing high density, moderate cost housing in close proximity to the employment area. The idea is to minimize commuting distances from home to work. While staff believes this to be a sound premise under most urban conditions, Carlsbad's circumstances are somewhat different. Palomar Airport sits at the heart of the industrial center. The noise and crash hazards associated with an airport make it incompatible with high density residential uses. Staff does not believe it appropriate to increase residential densities on the periphery of this industrial area, in the belief that this would only increase the number of families inconvenienced by airport impacts. In addition, it is felt that the existing general plan provides a good range of residential densities in all four quadrants of the city, with adequate arterials to transport commuters to the industrial workplace. Further, Carlsbad's size is not so great as to conclude that travel distances are extreme. As a result, with respect to this project, staff cannot recommend approval of the requested land use change to RH (20-30 du/ac). Staff recommends that the general plan be maintained as presently designated (RM over the entire site), and, as such, development based on the gross acreage would be allowed on the less constrained portions of the site. Staff does recommend approval of preannexational zoning to RD-M over the entire site since this zone is consistent with the existing underlying general plan. (3) Attachments 1. PC Resolutions Nos. 2210, 2211 & 2212 2. Location Map 3. Background Data Sheet 4. Disclosure Statement 5. Exhibit "A" and "B", dated October 14, 1983 PJK/ar (4) BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: SIR 83-7/GPA/m 83-2/ZC-281 APPLICANT: ROBERTS GROUP REQUEST AND LOCATION: General Plan Amendment from RM to RH and OS; Zone Change from County E-1-A to RD-M and OS. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Northwest corner of southwest corner of Section 23, Township 12 south, range 4 west, in San Diego County. APN; 215-020-01 Acres 36.2 Proposed No. of Lots/Units N/A GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation RM Density Allowed 4-10 du/ac Density Proposed 20-30 du/ac Existing Zone E-1-A-County Proposed Zone RD-Mf OS Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: Zoning Land Use Site E-1-A (County) Vacant North P-1 Industrial Buildings South E-1-A (County) Vacant East E-1-A (County) Vacant West P-C Vacant PUBLIC FACILITIES School District Carlsbad Water Carlsbad Sewer Carlsbad EDU's N/A Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated May 31, 1983 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Negative Declaration, issued _JC E.I.R. Certified, dated October 28, 1983 Other, If after the information you have submitted has been reviewed, it is determined Vnat further informatics required, you will be so "d^ised. APPLICANT: AGENT: MEMBERS: The Roberts Group, a California Corporation Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication) 16168 Beach Blvd., Ste. 265. Huntincrton Beach, CA 92647 Business Address (714) 848-6667 ' Telephone Number Vic Edge Name 222 W. Aurora, Santa Ana, CA 92707 Business Address (714) 54-6-0581 Telephone Number Bruce Tripp Name -(individual, partner, joint venture, corporation, syndication) Same As Above 9745 Shamrock, Fountain Valley, CA 92708 - Home Address Business Address Same as Above Telephone Number Robert Levenstein Narae Same As Above (714) 839-9364 Telephone Mumber Linda Flora Dr. , Los Angeles Borne Address (213) 472-0844 Business Address Telephone Nustber Telephone lumber (Attach more sheets if necessary) I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this dis- closure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be' relied upon as being true and correct until amended. ZONING MAP EXHIBIT B OCTOBER 14, 1983 E-l-A(Co-) E-l-A(Co.) ROBERTS GROUP PROPOSED ZC-281 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO NOISE CONTROL HEARING BOARD MRS. PORTER D. CREMANS SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 • (619) 236-2321 CLERK October 21, 1983 Mr. Paul Klukas Land Use Planning Office 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Mr. Klukas: The County Noise Control Hearing Board has reviewed available documentation and interviewed Palomar Airport personnel with regard to 1. General Plan Amendment #83-2, and 2. Carlsbad Land Investors Project's future. A sub- committee of the Board undertook an aerial inspection of the two sites. Following are our observations and recommendations with regard to these two projects: 1. General Plan Amendment #83-2: This proposed project involves the rezoning of 36 acres of vacant land to permit medium to high-density residential development at a site less than one-half mile south of the airport runway. The draft EIR which was provided to us gives a brief description of various environmental impacts. However, the portion of the EIR which deals with aircraft noise is totally inadequate and in many respects, erroneous. It is our understanding that in the development of the EIR, no Palomar Airport staff was ever contacted. The report states that "aircraft typically approaching or departing the airport will not pass over the project site." It fails to mention, however, that the site is directly under the downwind leg of aircraft in the flight pattern and that the east boundary of the site is at the location of the helicopter approach pattern. It need not be stressed that both of these are noise producing operations. The EIR uses data in the form of the obsolete CNR scales, attributing it to "Comprehensive Land Use Plan for Palomar Airport." The CNR is converted to the scale (CNEL) presently used in California, by subtracting 32 dB. This is inherently a very inaccurate method which can easily lead to substantial errors in CNEL. It should be pointed out that there was no need to resort to this since the "Comprehensive Land Use Plan - Palomar Airport" by CPO of the San Diego Region, May 1974, gives data directly in CNEL. Accurate predictions for the noise at the site are much needed. These should be projected to expected future jet noise impact and include the downwind leg and heliport operations. Even if the site conforms to the State CNEL 65 limit (which is unlikely) it is still certain to be above CNEL 60 which has been found to generate extensive complaints from large segments of residents near various other airports. -2- It is this Board's belief that residential development at this site is extremely unwise and strongly recommends against it. 2. Carlsbad Land Investors Project; This is a proposed General Plan amendment and zoning change to allow increased residential density on an 85-acre site in Carlsbad. This site is less than a quarter of a mile south of the west runway centerline extension and includes hilltop terrain. It is highly exposed to noise of aircraft taking off to the west and is under the downwind leg of aircraft. Although there is no EIR available at this time, experience abundantly suggests that the development demonstrates serious erosion of the buffer zones which are presently in effect. This Board strongly recommends that no increase in residential density be allowed in this parcel. It is abundantly clear that Palomar is the airport with major aviation capacity between Lindbergh Field and Orange County. It is located in the heart of the fastest growing region of San Diego and possibly Southern California. A steady increase in air traffic at Palomar is inevitable. Fortunately, Palomar Airport presently has reasonably good noise buffer zones around it due to forward-looking and enlightened zoning. The present plans and proposed zoning amendments would seriously erode the noise buffer that presently exists. It would indeed be a shame if, as a result of shortsighted opportunism, essential safeguards were removed and Palomar Airport and the surrounding communities inherited the same noise problems which are so abundant at Lindbergh, Miramar and elsewhere. Very truly yours, ._ X R. Frank, PhD./* Chairman Noise Control Hearing Board PRF:et cc: Board of Supervisors City Council of Carlsbad Noise Control Board ELFEND ASSOCIATES PROJECT PLANNING AND PROCESSING November 10, 1983 Mr. Bill Hofman Land Use Planning Office City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Dear Bill: As requested, enclosed for your use is the response from our acoustical engineer regarding the comment made on DEIR 83-2 by the County of San Diego Noise Control Hearing Board. The response provided by Mr. Dunholter of Mestre Greve Assoc- iates, indicates that the CNEL (community noise equivalent level) on the project site was calculated to be less than 55. This noise level is defined in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for Palomar Airport as being clearly acceptable for multiple family residential dwellings. I hope this information will satisfactorily respond to the com- ment provided by the County. Please accept my apologies for not providing this response to your office earlier this week. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, ELFEND 365? Btrc* St . Su»te436 • Newport Beach, California 92660 • (714) 495-2399 Carlsbad Journal Decreed a Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County 3138 ROOSEVELT ST. • P.O. BOX 248 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • 729-2345 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation, published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established and published at regular intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING EIR 83-7/GPA/LU 83-2/ZC-281 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carls- bad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M. op Tuesday, November 15, 1983; to consider certification of an Environmental Impact Report, an application for a General Plan Amendment from RM to RH and OS, and a Zone Change from County E- 1-A to RD-M and OS on property generally located on 36.2 acres southerly of Palomar Airport Road and westerly of El Camino Real and more particularly described as: The Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of San Diego, State of Cali- fornia, according to the Official Plat thereof. Applicant: Roberts Group CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL November 5 LOCATION MAP 'ALOMAR AIRFODT SITE ROCEHTS GROUP I EIR 83-7 " 19 19. 19 19 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California on the 5th day of November 198i Clerk of the Printer CJ S396: November 5, 1983 WRITE IT—DON'T SAY IT INTER DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO DATE - 19 i i '-SS A.A1 e REPLY ON THIS SHEET w i L M F. R "SERVICE" IJ.NE r G P A FROM STANDARD INTER DEPT. MEMO FORM 11-24-PD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING EIR 83-7/GPA/LU 83-2/ZC-281 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, November 15, 1983, to consider certification of an Environmental Impact Report, an application for a General Plan Amendment from RM to RH and OS, and a Zone Change from County E-l-A to RD-M and OS on property generally located on 36.2 acres southerly of Palomar Airport Road and westerly of El Camino Real and more particularly described as: The Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to the Official Plat thereof. APPLICANT: PUBLISH: Roberts Group November 5, 1983 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL LOCATION MAP PALOMAR AIRPORT ROBERTS GROUP EIR 83-7 CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE COMPANY 1 010 NORTH MAIN STREET • S A N T A A N A . C A LI FO R N I A 9 2 7 0 1 TELEPHONE (714) 835-5575 Property Owners Within 300 Foot Radius of Subject Property (215-020-01-00) Are: 1. 215-080-02-00 W.H. Hunt etal c/o David Kimbell 2500 First National Bank Bldg. Dallas, Texas 75202 2. 215-020-06-01 Terry & Margaret Reiter 4738 156th St. Lawndale, Ca. 90260 2. 215-020-06-03 Dominick Sfregola 1052 Hyde Park Drive Santa Ana, Ca. 92705 2. 215-020-06-04 Betty McCowan 1024 Glenmore Drive Kelowna, British Columbia Canada 2. 215-020-06-05 5. 215-020-15-00 Mary E. Bressi P.O. Box 1666 Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 6. 213-050-33-00 Palomar Industrial Properties, Ltd. Attn: Kurt Kornreich 1801 Avenue of the Stars Suite 936 Los Angeles, Ca. 90067 7 through 11 are all owned by: MFD San Diego, Inc. 611 W. Sixth Street Los Angeles, Ca. 90017 (Parcel Nos. 213-061-16-00 thru 213-061-20-00) 12 and 13 are owned by: Met-Birtcher-Palomar Oaks 27611 La Paz Laguna Niguel, Ca. 92677 (Parcel Nos. 213-092-24-00 & 213-092-19-00) William P. & Marjorie Bowen 14088 E. Kamm Ave. Kingsburg, Ca. 93631 3. 215-020-13-00 W.H. Hunt etal c/o David Kimbell 2500 First National Bank Bldg. Dallas, Texas 75207 4. 215-020-12-00 Anthony & Dicky K. Bons 1124 Blue Sage San Marcos, Ca. 92069 NOTE: NUMBERS ASSIGNED TO THE TAX PARCELS ON THIS LIST CORRESPOND WITH NUMBERS MARKED ON ACCOMPANYING MAP.