HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-12-20; City Council; 7595; Bullet Train Environmental Impact ReportCIT "OF CARLSBAD - AGEND - BILL 10"
AB # 7s9�TITLE: PREPARATION OF THE BULLET TRAIN DEPT. HD.
MTG. 12/2,0/83 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CITY A
DEPT. CM I CITY MGR.�
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve Resolution No. 7q'-15-S requesting the State Department
of Transportation to directly contract the preparation of the
Bullet Train environmental impact report.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
Council Member Bob Prescott requested that this item be placed
on the agenda for Council action. The City of Del Mar has
adopted a similar resolution anO forwarded the attached letter
urging similar action by our Council.
EXHIBITS:
1.✓ Resolution No.
2.v Letter frcm Mayor of Del Mar dated December /, 1983.
3.: Draft of proposed letter to Earl C. Shirley, High Speed
Rail Project Manager.
C..
O
Cl
0-
CL
4
1 RESOLUTION NO. 7455
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE STATE
3 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO DIRECTLY CONTRACT
THE PREPARATION OF THE BULLET TRAIN ENVIRONMENTAL
4 IMPACT REPORT.
5 WHEREAS, the California Department of Transportation has been
6 selected as "Lead Agency" for preparation of environmental docu-
7 mentation leading to the possible construction of a bullet train
8 from San Diego to Los Angeles; and.
9 WHEREAS, said bullet train will have, or is perceived to have,
10 significant impacts upon the environment; and
11 WHEREAS, said impacts are required by law to be objectively
12 and fully assessed in an environmental impact report; and
13 WHEREAS, the objectivity of the environmental documentation
14 could be severely compromised if prepared by the project propo-
15 nents, or by consultants under contract to the project proponents;
16 and
17 WHEREAS, an objective environmental impact report, and which
18 is perceived by the public as being an objective environmental
19 impact report, is critical to the environmental review process as
20 set forth by California statute, as well as to the various
21 responsible agencies having discretion over project implementation.
22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
23 City of Carlsbad, California, that we request that the State of
24 California Department of Transportation prepare an environmental
25 impact report for the bullet train, with the utilization of
26 consultants under direct contract to the Department. This
27 Resolution does not preclude the Department from full recovery of
28 expenses for said report preparation and administrative costs from
1
2
3
4
5
6
7'
8
9
10
11
12I
13
14I
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2411
25
26
27
281
the project proponent.
PASSED, APPROVED A"7D ADOPTED by the City Council of the City
of Carlsbad, California, at a regular meeting held on the 20th
day of December , 1983.
AYES: Council Manbers Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Prescott
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
MARY H. C SLER, Mayor
IATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City C erk
(SEAL)
3
ra
co
T
to
N
s
E�
e�
ca
0
city
December 7, 1983
Mayor
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm .^,venue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
At its Regular Meeting of December 5, 1983, the City
Council of the City of Del Mar adopted Resolution 83-64,
requesting the State Department of Transportation to
directly contract the preparation of the Bullet Train
Environmental Impact iceport.
As this important issue affects all of us, the City of
Del Mar urges your respective Council to --onsider adopting
a resolution requesting that the State of California
Department of Transportation utilize consultants under
direct contract to the Department.
Attached please find a Resolution to that effect to be
used by your Council if desired.
Sincerely,
d"
ROSALIND L ORWIN
Mayor
RAL:DL:kb
Enclosure
EXHIBIT 2
r
NOTE: Council Member Bob Prescott
requested that this item be
placed on the agenda.
a
RESOLUTION 83-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Del Mar ,
CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TO DIRECTLY CONTRACT THE PREPARATION OF THE BULLET TRAIN
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT.
WHEREAS, the California Department of Trar tation has been
selected as "Lead Agency" for preparation of enviror,.ental documentation
leading to the possible construction of a bullet train from San Diego to
Los Angeles; and
WHEREAS, said bullet train will have, or is perceived to have,
significant impacts upon the environment; and
WHEREAS, said impacts are required by law to be objectively and
fully assessed in an environmental impact report; and
WHEREAS, the objectivity of the environmental documentation
could be severely compromised if prepared by the project proponents, or
by consultants under contract to the project proponents; and
WHEREAS, an.objective environmental impact report, and which
is perceived by the public as being an objective environmental impact
report, is critical to the environmental review process as set forth
by California statute, as well as to the various responsible agencies
having discretion over project implementation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Del Mar , California, requests that the State of
California Department of Transportation prepare the environmental impact `
report for the bullet train, with the utilization of consultants under
direct contract to the Department. This Resolution does not preclude
the Department from full recovery of expenses for said report preparation
and administrative costs from the project proponent.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of
by the following vote:
ATTEST:
December
AYES: Councilmembers Terrell, Shapiro; Mayor Lorwin
NOES. None
ABSENT: Councilmembers Carsten and Tetrault
ABSTAIN: None
/s/ Diane Lennert
Diane Lennert' ,CITY CLERK
, 1983,
/s/ Rosalind A. Lorvjin
Rosalind Lorwin ,MAYOR
• l
rtl �
i 1
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989
Office of the Mayor
December 14, 1983
Wift-
DF GAA<
� � B
C P
�l�Fp4.d�
Citp of Carl0ab
Earl C. Shirley
High Speed Rail Project Manager
California Department of Transportation
1120 N. Street, Room 4400
Sacramento, California 95814
SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO NOP - CALIFORNIA HIGH SPEED TRAIN
The following comments are submitted by the City of Carlsbad in
response to the Notice of Preparation (NOP) of an Environmental
Impact Report for the proposed California High Speed Train
Project (Bullet Train),
1. Preparation of EIR - It is our understanding that you intend
to have the technical information needed for the preparation
of the report supplied by the private consulting firm that is
currently under contract with the project proponent. We do
not believe this is appropriate. If a private consultant is
needed to work on the preparation of the report, you should
request proposals and select an independent firm that does
not hold or intend to hold a contract with the applicants for
the proposed project.
2. Format of EIR - The EIR will address impacts associated with
The entire alignment of the proposed bullet train, and
therefore, will be rather lengthy and complex. Perhaps the
report should be arranged so that impacts along segments of
the alignment can be reviewed individually i.e., San Diego
City, North San Diego County, North Orange County. In this
way, the reviewer can focus in on those impacts which are
specific to a certain geographical area of concern rather
than having to review the entire report to ascertain impacts,
mitigating measures and alternatives.
3. Impacts on Future Conditions - Most of the discussions so far
have focused on mitigating impacts on existing development
and conditions. The report should also look at an area's
general plan to determine what impacts the project will have
on the area at ultimate buildout. For example, most of the
discussion on the proposed right-of-way in Carlsbad has
focused on the older downtown area of the city. However,
Earl C. Shirley
December 14, 1983
Page Two
there will be future development along the alignment in the
southerly portion of the city per the city's general plan.
The report should address future projected land use and
circulation patterns and what mitigation measures will be
incorporated to reduce future impacts.
4. Specific Concerns/Impacts - The report should address in
detail the following impacts as well as mitigating measures:
A. Noise - The report should take into consideration that
the i pact of noise varies by the time of day. What
types of insulation of residences and businesses will be
provided?
B. Vibration - The report should provide technical
measurement of vibration impacts and whether any seismic -
related problems or soil movement problems will result
because of the project.
C. Aesthetics - What can be done to mitigate the visual
appearance of the project? Will the bullet train block
any existing or future views? Will it disrupt any
existing visual resources?
D. Disruption of Traffic/Circulation Patterns - The report
should address whether the proposed alignment will hinder
access to coastal resources. Will circulation on
existing and proposed streets be disrupted? Pedestrian
as well as vehicular access should be addressed.
E. Impact on Lagoons - There are three lagoons in the city
of Carlsbad which will be crossed by the proposed high
speed train. The report should address any impacts this
will cause to the lagoons including impacts on wildlife,
vegetation and visual resources.
F. Population - The report should indicate whether the
proposed project will induce additional or accelerated
growth in the city.
G. Grading - The report should address any grading impacts
associated with the project. How much grading will be
required for the portion of the project in Carlsbad? If
substantial excavation is anticipated, where would the
excess dirt go?
Earl C. Shirley
December 14, 1983
Page Three
H. Financial Viability - A detailed analysis of the economic
impacts associated with the project, both present and
future, should be provided in the report.
5. Alternatives to the Pro_lect_ - The EIR should address
alternative alignments for the proposed high speed train such
as moving the alignment to an easterly corridor rather than
directly along the coast.
6. Additional Mitigating Measures - The EIR should address
whether any financial relocation assistance would be
available to existing residences and businesses where adverse
impacts cannot be mitigated to an acceptable level.
Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment on the items
which we believe need to be addressed in the EIR for this
project.
Sincerely,
CITY OF CARLSBAD
MARY CAS ER
Mayor
MC/MJH/ar