HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-06-05; City Council; 7769-3; General Plan AmendmentCIT> JF CARLSBAD - AGENDA ILL
AR« W?-^-3
MTG. 6/5/84
DEPT. PLN
TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, ZONE CHANGE
SUBDIVISION AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
GPA/LU 84-3/ZC-304/CT 83-20 - ALANDA
DEPT. HD.J^Jd-
CITY ATTYU//3
CITY MGR.^^n
O
o
o
oo
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Planning Coimission and the staff are recommending that the City Council
direct the Attorney's Office to prepare documents APPROVING GPA/LU 84-3;
introduce Ordinance No. <?7/ °\ , APPROVING ZC-304, and direct the Attorney's
Office to prepare documents APPROVING CT 83-20.
ITEM EXPLANATION
This item consists of three requests:
1) A general plan amendment from RM (4-10 du's/acre) to RMH (10-20
du's acre) on 9 acres of land;
2) A corresponding zone change from R-A-10,000 to RDM(Q) and R-A-
10,000 to R-A-10,000(Q); and
3) A 73 lot tentative tract map on the southern 36 acre parcel.
The property is located at the northwest and southwest corners of Elm Avenue and
El Camino Real. The Planning Commission has also approved a 195 unit apartment
project on the 9 acre parcel" north of Elm Avenue which is contingent on the
approval of the general plan amendment and zone change by the City Council.
The Council previously denied a request for a general plan amendment and a zone
change on the property because, at that time, the applicant did not have a
development plan for the site.
General Plan Amendment and Zone Change
The general plan amendment to RMH and the corresponding zone change to RDM would
be on the 9 acre parcel north of Elm Avenue. The Planning Commission found that
these designations were compatible with the general plan and zoning designations
immediately to the north and would be buffered from lower density to the south
by Elm Avenue. Also, the connection of Elm Avenue to the west, which would be
facilitated by this project, was given consideration in the Planning Commission
decision.
Although the applicant is not requesting to change the existing single family
zoning on any of the property to the south of the Elm Avenue connection, staff
and the Planning Commission are recommending that the (Q) Overlay Zone be
applied to the existing R-A-10,000 zoning on this portion of the property.
Single Family Subdivision
The proposed single family subdivision is located on the 36 acre parcel south of
Elm Avenue and would consist of 73 lots having a minimum area of 10,000 square
feet. The Planning Commission found that this subdivision was consistent with
the city's general plan, zoning ordinance and subdivision ordinance. Also, the
Commission found the project to be compatible with the adjacent single family
subdivision to the west.
n
Page 2 of Agenda Bill |
The Engineering Department has requested to add one additional condition to
Resolution No. 2284 that was not included in the approved resolution:
"The developer shall execute an agreement which satisfies condition 26,
article 3. The agreement shall be of a form and content satisfactory
to the City Council. City Council approval of said agreement shall be
obtained prior to filing the final map."
At the Planning Commission public hearing, no public opposition to this project
was expressed.
Environmental Review
The Land Use Planning Manager has determined that the environmental impacts of
the proposed project have been analyzed by a previously certified Environmental
Impact Report and a Notice of Prior Compliance was issued on April 4, 1984.
Fiscal Impact
The applicant will provide all required public improvements to the project.
Also, the applicant has agreed to pay a public facilities fee to offset the
costs of providing all other public services.
The applicant is responsible for the connection of Elm Avenue to the west,
however, the city has been asked to contribute to the cost of providing this
street. If the Council desires to financially participate, the city would incur
costs for the Elm Avenue connection. The exact costs would be indicated to the
Council at the time a formal proposal is reviewed.
EXHIBITS
1. location Map
2. Area Map - Elm Avenue Connection
3. City Council Ordinance No. #7/9 , w/attached Exhibit "A"
4. PC Resolution Nos. 2282, 2283 & 2284
5. Staff Report, dated April 25, 1984 w/attachments
LOCATION MAP
SITE
SDP 84-3'
GPA/LU 84-3
ZC-304
ZC-304
SDP 84-3
GPA/LU 84-3
ALANDA CT 83-20
CITY OF
CARLSBAD
(WATER
EXISTING
EUM 'AVE.
ALANDA
EXTENTION
ELM AVENUE EXTENTION
1
ORDINANCE NO. 9719
2
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
3 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 21 OF THE
CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP
4 FROM R-A-10,000 TO RDM-Q ON NINE ACRES LOCATED
ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF EL CAMINO REAL AND
5 THE FUTURE ALIGNMENT OF ELM AVENUE AND FROM
R-A-10,000 TO R-A-10,000(Q) ON 36 ACRES LOCATED
6 ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EL CAMINO REAL AND
THE FUTURE ALIGNMENT OF ELM AVENUE
7 APPLICANT: ALANDA
CASE NO; ZC-304
8
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California,
9
does ordain as follows:
10
SECTION 1: Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code is
11
amended by the amendment of a zoning map from R-A-10,000 to RDM-Q
12
and from R-A-10,000 to R-A-10,000(Q) on property as shown on the
13
map marked ZC-304, Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part
14
hereof.
15
SECTION 2: This project is approved upon the express
16
condition that the applicant shall pay a public facilities fee as
17
required by City Council Policy No. 17, dated August 29, 1979, and
18
amended on April 2, 1982, on file with the City Clerk and
19
incorporated herein by reference, and according to the agreement
20
executed by the applicant for payment of said fee a copy of that
21
agreement dated March 30, 1983, is on file with the City Clerk and
22
incorporated herein by reference. If said fee is not paid as
23
promised, this application will not be consistent with the General
24
Plan and approval for this project shall be void. Said fees shall25 ;
be paid based on the April 2, 1982 version of Policy No. 17.
26
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty
27
days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the
28
1
2 adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published at least
3 once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after its
4 adoption.
5 INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the
6 Carlsbad City Council on the day of , 1984
7 and thereafter
8 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City
9 Council held on the day of , 1984, by the
10 following vote, to wit:
11 AYES:
12 NOES:
13 ABSENT:
14
15
MARY H. CASLER, Mayor
16
ATTEST:
17"
18
19 I ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk
20 (SEAL)
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 |
i
-2-
EXHIBIT*
APRIL 26, 1904
RMH
PC
SITE
LAND USE- KM to RMH
ZONING-R-A-10,000
to RD-M-Q
R-A-10,000
to R-A-1CHQ)
GPA/LU 84-3
ALANDA ZC-304
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2282
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN
AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FROM1
RM, 4-10 DU'S/ACRE TO RMH, 10-20 DU'S/ACRE ON NINE
ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
EL CAMINO REAL AND THE FUTURE ALIGNMENT OF ELM AVENUE.
APPLICANT: ALANDA
CASE NO.; GPA/LU 84-3
WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment to the
General Plan designation for certain property located, as shown on
Exhibit "A", dated April 25, 1984, attached and incorporated
herein, have been filed with the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified applications constitute a request
for amendment as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 25th day of
April, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law to consider said request;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the General Plan Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That in view of the findings made and considering the
applicable law, the decision of the Planning Commission is to
recommend APPROVAL of GPA/LU 84-3, as shown on Exhibit "A",
dated April 25, 1984.
Findings;
1) The RMH designation is suitable for this site since the land
uses associated with this designation are compatible with
surrounding existing and future land uses as stated in thestaff report.
1
2
5
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2) The subject property is suitable in size and shape for
development permitted in the respective land use designations,
as discussed in the staff report.
3) All significant environmental issues as identified in EIR 83-5
are mitigated by the proposed project and a Notice of Prior
Environmental Compliance was issued by the Land Use Planning
Manager on April 4, 1984 and approved by the Planning
Commission on April 25, 1984.
4) The project is consistent with all City public facility
policies and ordinances since:
a) The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion
of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities
fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the fee
will enable this body to find that public facilities will
be available concurrent with need as required by the
general plan.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on
the 25th day of April, 1984, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Chairman Rombotis, Commissioners Rawlins,
Schlehuber, Marcus, Lyttleton and Smith.
None.
Commissioner Farrow.
None.
.Y>ROMBOTIS, Chairman
L£BAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J.
LAND USE PLANNING MANAGER
PC RESO NO. 2282 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2283
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A ZONE
CHANGE FROM R-A-10,000 to RD-M-Q ON NINE ACRES LOCATED ON
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF EL CAMINO REAL AND THE FUTURE
ALIGNMENT OF ELM AVENUE AND A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-A-10,000
TO R-A-10,000(0) ON 36 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF EL CAMINO REAL AND THE FUTURE ALIGNMENT OF ELM
AVENUE.
APPLICANT: ALANDA
CASE NO.; ZC-304
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to
wit:
All that portion of Lot "J" of Rancho Agua Hedionda, in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California, according to Partition Map thereof No. 823,
filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego
County, November 16, 1896,
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as
provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 25th day of
April, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Zone Change; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing,
the Commission recommends APPROVAL of ZC-304, based on the
following findings and subject to the following conditions:
2
3
4
5
6
7 3) The project is consistent with all City public facility
policies and ordinances since:8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findings;
1) The RD-M-Q AND R-A-10,000(Q) zoning designations are suitable
for these sites since this zone is compatible with the land use
designation of RMH and RLM respectively.
2) All significant environmental issues as identified in EIR 83-5
are mitigated by the proposed project and a Notice of Prior
Environmental Compliance was issued by the Land Use Planning
Manager on April 4, 1984 and approved by the Planning
Commission on April 25, 1984.
a) The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion
of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities
fee. Performance of that contract and payment of the fee
will enable this body to find that public facilities will
be available concurrent with need as required by the
general plan.
4) The Q overlay will ensure that the projects are comprehensively
graded protecting the sensitive environmental features of the
site.
Conditions:
1) Approval is granted for ZC-304, as shown on Exhibit "A", dated
April 25, 1984, incorporated by reference and on file in the
•^ Land Use Planning Office. Development shall occur
substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these
conditions.
2) This project is approved upon the express condition that the
applicant shall pay a public facilities fee as required by
City Council Policy No. 17, dated April 2, 1982, on file with
the City Clerk and incorporatd herein by reference, and
according to the agreement executed by the applicant for
payment of said fee, a copy of that agreement, dated March 30,
1983, is on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein
by reference. If said fee is not paid as promised, this
application will not be consistent with the General Plan and
approval for this project shall be void.
3) Approval of Zone Change No. 304 is granted subject to approval
of GPA/LU 84-3.
PC RESO NO. 2283 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on
the 25th day of April, 1984, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairman Rombotis, Commissioners Rawlins,
Schlehuber, Marcus, Lyttleton and Smith.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Farrow.
ABSTAIN: None.
RRY .ROMBOTIS, Chairman
RLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J.
LAND USE PLANNING MANAGER
PC RESO NO. 2283 -3-
PI*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2284
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A 75-LOT
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON
THE NORTHWEST AND SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EL CAMINO REAL AND
FUTURE ELM AVENUE.
APPLICANT: ALANDA
CASE NO. ; CT 83-20 .
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to,
wit:
All that portionn of Lot "J" of Rancho Agua Hedionda, in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California, according to Partition Map thereof No. 823,
filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego
County, November 16, 1896,
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request
as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 25th day of
April, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Tentative Tract Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing,
the Commission recommends APPROVAL of CT 83-20, based on the
following findings and subject to the following conditions:
2
3
4
5
6
7
Q0 2) As conditioned to mitigate the environmental concerns regarding
grading, the site is physically suitable for the type and
9 density of the development since the site is adequate in size
and shape to accommodate residential development at the density
proposed.
3) The project is consistent with all City public facility pol-
icies and ordinances since:
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findings;
1) The project is consistent with the City's general plan since
the proposed density of 19.7 du/ac on the north side of Elm
Avenue and 2.0 du/ac on the south side of Elm Avenue are within
the density ranges of 10-20 du/ac and 0-4 du/ac respectively
specified for the site as indicated on the land use element of
the general plan. The proposed densities on both the north and
south sides of Elm Avenue can be justified because the projects
will provide a needed link to the City's circulation system,
are compatible with surrounding land use densities and the
apartment project to the north is well designed with on-site
amenities that exceed the requirements of the underlying zone.
a) The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate
condition to this project, insured that the final map will
not be approved unless the City Council finds that sewer
service is available to serve the project. In addition,
the Planning Commission has added a condition that a note
shall be placed on the final map that building permits may
not be issued for the project unless the City Engineer
determines that sewer service is available, and building
cannot occur within the project unless sewer service
remains available, and the Planning Commission is satisfied
that the requirements of the public facilities element of
the general plan have been met insofar as they apply to
sewer service for this project.
b) The Carlsbad School District has written a letter, dated
March 15, 1984, stating that school facilities will be
available to this project.
c) Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
d) All necessary public improvements have been provided or
will be required as conditions of approval.
e) The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion
of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee.
Performance of that contract and payment of the fee will
enable this body to find that public facilities will be
available concurrent with need as required by the general
plan.
4) The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future
land uses since surrounding properties have the same or similar
density and are designated for residential development on the
general plan.
PC RESO NO. 2284 -2- ~ c3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5)
6)
This project will not cause any significant environmental
impacts and a Notice of Prior Compliance has been issued by
the Land Use Planning Manager on April 4, 1984 and approved by
the Planning Commission on April 25, 1984.
This project is approved on the basis that the applicant has
agreed to provide variety in roof lines on the single family
portion of the site and will totally integrate one and two
story units so as to not provide monotonous structural heights
from the local street or El Camino Real.
7)This project is consistent with the
Development Standards" plan.
"El Camino Real
Conditions:
1) Approval is granted for CT 83-20, as shown on Exhibits "B" -
"H", dated April 25, 1984, incorporated by reference and on
file in the Land Use Planning Office. Development shall occur
substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these
conditions.
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
This project is approved upon the express condition that the
final map shall not be approved unless the City Council finds
as of the time of such approval that sewer service is available
to serve the subdivision.
This project is approved upon the express condition that
building permits will not be issued for development of the
subject property unless the City Engineer determines that sewer
facilities are available at the time of application for such
sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of
occupancy. This note shall be placed on the final map.
This project is approved upon the express condition that the
applicant shall pay a public facilities fee as required by Citj
Council Policy No. 17, dated April 2, 1982, on file with the
City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, and according
to the agreement executed by the applicant for payment of said
fee, a copy of that agreement, dated March 30, 1983, is on filt
with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. If
said fee is not paid as promised, this application will not be
consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project
shall be. void.
The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees to the City, prior tc
the approval of the final map as required by Chapter 20.44 of
the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all
sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City
ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance.
PC RESO NO. 2284 -3-
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7) Water shall be provided to this project pursuant to the Water
Service agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the Costa
Real Water District, dated May 25, 1983.
8) The applicant shall prepare a reproducible mylar of the final
site plan incorporating the conditions contained herein. Said
site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Land Use
Planning Manager prior to the issuance of building permits.
Land Use Planning Office
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
The applicant shall establish a homeowner's association and
corresponding covenants, conditions and restrictions. Said
CC&R's shall be submitted to and approved by the Land Use
Planning Manager prior to final map approval.
The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation
plan which shall be submitted to and approved by the Land Use
Planning Manager prior to the issuance of building permits.
Such plan shall include landscaping and irrigation within the
area between the El Camino Real paving and the property lines
along the frontage of the project. The desiltation basin
shall be shielded by a decorative screening wall and shall be
heavily landscaped. This area shall be maintained by the
owner of the apartment project north off Elm Avenue and the
Homeowners Association south of Elm Avenue.
A 500' scale map of the subdivision shall be submitted to the
Land Use Planning Manager prior to the recordation of the fina]
map. Said map shall show all lots and streets within and
adjacent to the project.
A master plan of the existing on site trees shall be provided
to the Land Use Planning Manager as part of the final grading
plan to determine which trees shall be required to be preserved
prior to the issuance of a grading permit or a building permit,
whichever occurs first.
All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and
thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris.
Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in
conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall require
review and approval of the Land Use Planning Manager prior to
installation of such signs.
Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a six-foot high
masonry wall with gates pursuant to City standards. Location
of said receptacles shall be approved by the Land Use Planning
Manager.
PC RESO NO. 2284 -4-
o ^
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
16) All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be
architecturally integrated and shielded from view and the sounjd
buffered from adjacent properties and streets, pursuant to
Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of th
Land Use Planning Manager and Building and Planning Director.
17) The applicant shall submit a street name list consistent with
the City's street name policy subject to the Land Use Planning
Manager's approval prior to final map approval.
18) Approval of Tentative Tract No. 83-20 is granted subject to
approval of GPA/LU 84-3, ZC-304 and SDP 84-3.
19) The applicant shall perform archaeological studies on the
property as suggested in the archaeological testing report
performed by Westec Services, dated September 1, 1983.
20) The mitigation measures indicated in EIR 83-5 shall be complie|3
with and are incorporated herein by reference.
Engineering
21) The developer shall place the following notes on the final
map:
Geotechnical Caution;
T)"The possible existence of ancient landslides and/or
mudflows within the boundaries of this subdivision has
been noted in the Environmental Impact Report for this
subdivision."
"Mitigation measures to alleviate the hazards associated
with the possible landslides and/or mudflows have been
required as a condition of approval for the tentative map
for this subdivision."
"The owner of this property on behalf of itself and all of
its successors in interest has agreed to hold harmless and
indemnify the City of Carlsbad from any action that may
arise through any geological failure and subsequent damage
that may occur on, or adjacent to, this subdivision due to
it's construction, operation or maintenance."
The developer shall execute a hold harmless agreement
regarding any damage and/or claims that may arise through
any ^geological failure and subsequent damage that may occu
on, or adjacent to, this subdivision due to it's
construction operation or maintenance.
22) The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the
commencement of any clearing or grading of the site.
23) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the developer shall
submit a detailed geologic investigation in accordance with
the policies, guidelines and action programs of the Geologic
and Seismic Safety Element of the General Plan. The developer
shall submit such additional data as may be required by the
City Engineer.
2)
3)
PC RESO NO. 2284 -5-
1
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
16
18
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
24) The grading for this project is defined as "controlled grading1
by-Section 11.06.170(a) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Grading shall be performed under the observation of a civil
engineer whose responsibility it shall be to coordinate site
inspection and testing to insure compliance of the work with
the approved grading plan, submit required reports to the City
Engineer and verify compliance with Chapter 11.06 of the
25) Upon completion of grading, the developer shall insure that an
"as-graded" geologic plan shall be submitted to the City
Engineer. The plan shall clearly show all the geology as
exposed by the grading operation, all geologic corrective
measures as actually constructed and must be based on a contour
map which represents both the pre and post site grading. This
plan shall be signed by both the soils engineer and the
engineering geologist. The plan shall be prepared on a mylar
or similar drafting film and shall become a permanent record.
26) No grading shall occur outside the limits of the subdivision
unless a letter of permission is obtained from the owners of
the affected properties.
27) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the haul route shall
be submitted for review and approved by the City Engineer. A
separate grading plan shall be submitted and approved and a
separate grading permit issued for the borrow or disposal site
if located within the city limits.
J.O
28) All slopes within this project shall be no steeper than 2:1.
Terrace drains and benches shall not be included when
measuring the degree of any slope.
29) For areas below the 200 foot contour line the developer shall
perform remedial grading that consolidates and stabilizes any
saturated and/or poorly compacted collovium/alluvium soils.
The remedial grading shall, as a minimum, include removal,
moisture adjustment replacing and recompaction of said soils
and the installation of a subdrain system.
30) Additional drainage easements and drainage structures shall be
provided or installed as may be required by the County
Department of Sanitation and Flood Control or the City Engi-
neer.
31) The developer shall pay the current local drainage area fee
prior to approval of the final map or shall construct drainage
systems in conformance with the Master Drainage Plan and City
of Carlsbad Standards as required by the City Engineer.
PC RESO NO. 2284 -6-
11
12
13
14
32) The developer shall exercise special care during the
construction phase of this project to prevent any off-site
siltation. The developer shall provide erosion control
measures and shall construct temporary desiltation/detention
basins of type, size and location as approved by the City
Engineer. The basins and erosion control measures shall be
shown and specified on the grading plan and shall be
constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to
the start of any other grading operations. Prior to the
removal of any basins or facilities so constructed the area
served shall be protected by additional drainage facilities,
slope erosion control measures and other methods required or
approved by the City Engineer. The developer shall maintain
the temporary basins and erosion control measures for a period
of time satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall guarantee
their maintainance and satisfactory performance through cash
deposit and bonding in amounts and types suitable to the City
33) The developer shall construct desiltation/detention basins of a
type and size and at locations as approved by the City
Engineer. The developer shall enter into a desiltation basin
maintenance agreement and submit a maintenance bond
satisfactory to the City Engineer prior to the approval of the
final map for this project. The provisions of this agreement
shall apply to any off-site borrow sites which may be utilized
in the construction of this project as required by the City
__ Engineer.15
34) Land for all public streets and easements shown on the ten-
tative map shall be dedicated on the final map and shall be
granted to city free and clear of all liens and encumbrances
-*-° tative map shall be dedicated on the final map and shall be
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 PC RESO NO. 2284 -7-
1..
35) Improvements including, but not limited to, the following itens
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
26
27
28
shall be installed by the developer and approved by the City
Engineer prior to filing the final map. Alternately, the
installation of said improvements shall be guaranteed by a
security agreement obtained by the developer in an amount and
of a type required by the Carlsbad Municipal Code. To wit:
a) One-half street improvements to prime arterial standards
for the portion of El Camino Real that fronts the project,
including median and median landscaping to the City's
satisfaction;
b) All improvements shown on the tentative map;
c) all storm drain system components shall be sized and
located to accomodate the ultimate level of development
anticipated for the locale. Additional storm drain
facilities:
i) An enclosed storm drain from the southerly boundary
of the project to the northerly side of Elm Avenue
along the westerly side of El Camino Real or an
alternative acceptable to the City Engineer.
ii) Additional storm drains and curb inlet at the
intersection of Rising Glen Drive and Ridgecrest
Drive;
iii) Providing a connection between the existing storm
drain and the proposed storm drain at the north-
easterly corner of the project;
d) Removal of the existing curb returns on the easterly side
of the street at the intersection of Rising Glen Drive and
Ridgecrest Drive and construction of curb and gutter on
the easterly side of Ridgecrest Drive across the opening
of Rising Glen Drive;
e) Street trees;
f) Street lights;
g) Landscaping and protective and visual barriers around the
desiltation/detention basin;
h) Temporary turn-around (standard drawing GS-5) and
continuous barricade (standard drawing M-9.1) at the end
of "A" Street;
i) A water main providing a loop connection between the
proposed water main at the southerly end of "A" street anc
the existing water main in El Camino Real.
22
36) Full street grading, 28 foot paved section, storm drains and
appurtenances thereto, full right-of-way and slope easements
secondary arterial standards for Elm Avenue from it's existing
terminus east of Donna Drive to the westerly line of the
development shall be bonded for prior to approval of the final
map and installed at a time as deemed necessary by the City
Engineer, however, these improvements must be installed prior
to occupancy of the 121st unit.
37) Unless otherwise stated herein, all improvements shall be
completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to th
occupancy of any unit in this development.
PC RESO NO. 2284 -8-
38) Excepting only the driveway serving the multi-family
structures north of Elm Avenue that is shown on the Tentative
Map direct access rights for all lots abutting Elm Avenue and
El Camino Real shall be waived on the final map.3
39) The developer shall install a wheelchair ramp at the public4
of Carlsbad Standards prior to occupancy of any buildings.5
40) The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and
" design requirements of the respective sewer and water agencies
regarding services to the project.
8
10
11
12
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
street corner abutting the subdivision in conformance with City
41) All private streets and drainage systems shall be maintained by
the homeowner's association in perpetuity. This responsibility
shall be clearly stated in the CC&R's.
42) All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by the
homeowner's association (if on commonly owned property) or the
individual property owner (if on an individually owned lot).
An appropriately worded statement clearly identifying the
responsibility shall be placed in the CC&R's.
43) Prior to recordation of any final map for this development, the
owner shall give written consent to the annexation of the area
shown within the boundaries of the Tentative Map into the14 existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping
_ _ District No. 1.ID
44) Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four
•*•" months from the date of City Council approval unless a final
map is recorded. An extension may be requested by the
applicant. Said extension shall be approved or denied at the17
conditions.
discretion of the City Council. In approving an extension, the
-1-8 City Council may impose new conditions and may revise existing
19 i Fire Department
45) Additional public and/or on site fire hydrants shall be re-
quired if deemed necessary by the Fire Marshall.
46) The applicant shall submit two (2) copies of a site plan
showing locations of existing and proposed fire hydrants and on
site roads and drives subject to the approval of the Fire
Marshall.
47) An all weather access road shall be maintained throughout
construction.
48) All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall^
be operational prior to combustible building materials being
located on the project site.
PC RESO NO. 2284 -9-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
49) Ail fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems,
automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent to the
project shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval
prior to construction.
Parks and Recreation
50) The El Camino Real median shall be landscaped and provided wit
an irrigation system in accordance with the standards
identified in the City of Carlsbad "Landscape Guidelines
Manual".
51) The developer shall submit an "Open Space Maintenance Program"
in accordance with the criteria identified in the "Landscape
Guidelines Manual" to the satisfaction of the Parks and
Recreation Director prior to issuance of Building
Permits.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on
the 25th day of April, 1984, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Chairman Rombotis, Commissioners Rawlins,
Marcus, Lyttleton, Schlehuber and Smith.
None.
Commissioner Farrow.
None.
Chairman
PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J.
LAND USE PLANNING MANAGER
PC RESO NO. 2284 -10-
APPLICATI^ SUBMITTAL DATE:
FEBRUARY , 1984
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 25, 1984
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Land Use Planning Office
SUBJECT: GPA/LU 84-3/ZC-304/CT 83-20/SDP 84-3 - ALANDA - Request
to allow development of a mixed-use residential project
on 47 acres located at the northwest and southwest
corners of Elm Avenue and El Camino Real.
I. RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution
Nos. 2282, 2283, 2284 and 2285 recommending APPROVAL of GPA/LU
84-3/ZC-304/CT 83-20 and SDP 84-3, to the City Council based on
the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project involves the development of a 47 acre
parcel into a mixed-use residential project. The property is
roughly rectangular in shape, bounded by El Camino Real on the
east and Seacrest Estates on the west. The proposed extension of
Elm Avenue will bisect the property, separating a 9 acre parcel
(north of Elm Avenue) from the remainder of the site. An EIR for
a similar, more intense project on the site was certified by the
City Council in November, 1983. A requested General Plan
Amendment and Zone Change was denied without prejudice at that
time.
Slopes on the site are relatively steep, sloping up from El
Camino Real. The majority of the site is presently vacant,
vegetated primarily with native brush. A horse ranch exists on
the upper-central portion of the site.
The site is designated for residential development on the General
Plan. The area north of proposed Elm Avenue, about 9 acres, is
designated for medium density development (4-10 du/ac). The
southern portion is designated RLM (0-4 du/ac). The entire site
is currently zoned R-A-10, a Residential-Agricultural zone which
allows single-family residences with 10,000 square foot lots.
The project proposes an amendment to the General Plan on the
northern portion of the site to RMH, which allows densities in
the 10-20 du/ac range. Corresponding zoning of RD-M-Q is also
requested in this area. No change in land use designation or
zoning is requested south of the extension of Elm Avenue.
A proposed tentative tract map for 75 lots breaks down as
follows:
A) 73 single-family lots on the south side of Elm Avenue,
conforming to R-A-10 zoning standards;
B) An approximately 9 acre lot north of Elm Avenue, to
accomodate 195 apartment units, and;
C) An approximately 9 acre open space lot on the steep El
Camino Real frontage area, south of Elm Avenue.
In addition, the applicant requests approval of a site
development plan for the 195 apartment units to be constructed
north of Elm Avenue.
II. ANALYSIS
Planning Issues
1) Is there sufficient justification to approve a General
Plan Amendment to allow an increase in density on the
north side of Elm Avenue? Will this increase create
additional traffic congestion?
2) Does the apartment project, at the density proposed,
meet all requirements of the Carlsbad Zoning Ordinance?
3) Is the proposed single family subdivision designed to
be compatible with surrounding land uses, integrated
with the existing topography and sensitive to views
from El Camino Real?
4) Is the overall project compatible with surrounding
existing and future land uses in the area?
5) Does the proposed project address the environmental
constraints of the site?
Discussion - General Plan Amendment/Zone Change
The project proposes a General Plan Amendment to intensify the
allowable land uses on the 9 acres north of Elm Avenue from RM
(4-10 du/ac) to RMH (10-20 du/ac). The RMH designation
corresponds directly with adjacent property to the north, where
the recently constructed CRC apartment project was developed at
a density of just under 20 du/ac. Also, the applicant is
proposing to rezone this 9 acres from R-A-10,000 to RDM(Q).
When the applicant initially discussed the feasibility of
constructing low/moderate income apartment units, staff was
supportive, since virtually none had been provided in Carlsbad in
several years. Over the last few months, however, numerous
apartment projects have been approved for development throughout
the City. As a result, the proposed construction of 195
low/moderate income apartment units would help provide an
increased percentage of such housing, but is not now considered
the benefit to the City that once was envisioned.
The change in land use intensity, however, can provide a trade-
off for the construction of a very important link in the City's
circulation system, the Elm Avenue extension. This extension is
considered necessary in that it would provide a major east-west
connection in the City. The Citizen's Circulation Advisory
Committee recently recommended that construction of this
connection be considered a high priority of the City.
Approximately half of this connection is situated on the Alanda
property.
The property, however, is greatly encumbered by a large mudflow
which includes most of the path Elm Avenue will take through the
project. As a result, extensive grading will be required to
construct this connection. The applicant has indicated that the
grading expense for Elm Avenue and the development is such that
195 apartment units are necessary for the project to be
economically feasible. It should be noted that the overall
project intensity has been revised downward several times over
the course of project review.
The EIR traffic study concludes that two roadways in the vicinity
of the project are experiencing congestion. They are El Camino
Real, in front of Plaza Camino Real, and Chestnut Avenue, west of
El Camino Real. It is anticipated that the completion of the Elm
Avenue connection would relieve congestion on both of thes«
roadways. In addition, the rate of growth in Calavera Hills and
surrounding properties is such that additional traffic is
constantly being added to the area.
As such, staff concludes that the prompt completion of the Elm
Avenue connection will provide a very important link in the
city's Circulation Plan, and that this factor supplies sufficient
justification to change the General Plan from RM to RMH and to
rezone the property from R-A-10,000 to RDM(Q).
Staff has an additional concern with the zoning of the property
south of Elm Avenue. This property is currently zoned R-A-
10,000. Because of the site's sensitive environmental features,
staff believes this property should be graded concurrently with
the property north of Elm Avenue. This would ensure a
comprehensive grading scheme to accomodate the two projects and
the construction of Elm Avenue. To ensure that the grading of
the total site is comprehensive, staff is recommending that a Q
overlay be placed on the property south of Elm Avenue. Also,
staff is adding a condition to the tentative map requiring that
both the north and south sides of Elm Avenue be graded
concurrently. With this change, staff is comfortable with the
General Plan Amendment and Zone Change requests.
Discussion - SDP 84-3
As shown on Exhibit "D", the proposed apartment development
consists of nine buildings. Six of the buildings will contain 20
units, and three buildings will contain 25 units. All are
\
V,
proposed at three stories (maximum 35 feet) high. Since the
existing topography of the site is relatively steep, the
apartments are proposed at five different pad levels, which
should lessen grading amounts and provide interest to the
landscape. A setback from El Camino Real varying between 77
feet and 100 feet would be provided. The project meets all
criteria of the "El Camino Real Development Standards". The
buildings contain some interest, with large open areas separating
them. A centralized active recreation area, including pool,
Jacuzzi, and patio recreation center is provided.
The project's proposed density of 19.7 du/acre can be justified
for a number of reasons. First, as previously mentioned, the
project will provide the much needed link of Elm Avenue to El
Camino Real. Staff has included a condition requiring the
construction of Elm Avenue in conjunction with the development of
the project. This recommended condition leaves open the
possibility of different methods of financing the off-site
improvements of this link. Staff is willing to work closely with
the developer to arrive at an equitable solution to this expense
burden. Some alternative methods of financing may be an
assessment district, reimbursement agreements etc. Second, the
density is compatible with the apartment project located
immediately to the north. Finally, the project provides on-site
amenities over and above that required by the Zoning Ordinance.
Discussion - Single Family Subdivision
As previously mentioned, the site is topographically and
geologically constrained by steep slopes, mudflows, and
landslides. As shown on Exhibit "B", the steepest portions of
the site, along the El Camino Real frontage south of Elm Avenue,
will be maintained in natural and manufactured open space. The
eucalyptus stand at the south-east corner of the site will
remain. The 73 single-family lots are designed to follow the
ridge prevailing north-south through the property. Proposed "A"
street will act as a residential frontage road to El Camino Real,
connecting up with the alignment approved for the Sheffler
project to the south. "A" street follows the ridge line
closely.
As a result of staff concern with the potential for numerous
identical, highly visible single-family homes, the applicant has
agreed to vary the roof lines substantially, including a total
integration of one and two-story structures.
The construction of Elm Avenue and/or any development of the site
would require extensive remedial grading to remove the large
mudflow area. Since extensive grading is required on this north
end of the site, this is the area where the greatest alteration
to the existing landform is proposed. To mitigate the grading
impact, the applicant is proposing to reconstruct the site to
conform to the pre-existing natural terrain. The applicant will
also utilized contour grading to help give the site a more
natural appearance.
-4-
Land Use Compatibility
Staff considers the project compatible with surrounding existing
and future land uses in the area. Immediately north of the
apartments is the recently constructed CRC apartment complex,
built at a density of just under 20 du/ac. Property across El
Camino Real from this site is being developed as a small office
park. The 10,000 sq. ft. single-family lots are compatible with
the existing Seacrest Estates and the lots in the proposed
Sheffler project to the south.
Overall, staff recommends approval of the General Plan Amendment,
Zone Change, and Site Development Plan on the north side of Elm
Avenue, the application of the Q overlay on the southern property
and approval of the Tentative Tract Map for the entire property.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The EIR points out that the site drains fairly directly into
Buena Vista Creek and into Buena Vista Lagoon. Since soils on
the site are highly erodible, staff is recommending several
grading conditions which include the provision of an on-site
desiltation basin. A list of mitigation measures regarding the
geologic constraints of the site are indicated in the
Environmental Impact Report prepared for this project. These
mitigation measures relate to the on-site mudflow and other
geologic features. These measures have been incorporated into
the conditions of approval for this project.
Archaeological studies have indicated that the potential for
encountering artifacts, including human remains, on the site are
very good, and that the archaeological resources must be
considered significant. The applicant has agreed to have
archaeological excavations performed to the satisfaction of the
City prior to grading of the site.
The Land Use Planning Manager has determined that the
environmental impacts of the proposed project have been analyzed
by previous environmental documents and a Notice of Prior
Compliance was issued on April 4, 1984.
ATTACHMENTS
1) Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2282, 2283, 2284 and
2285
2) Location Map
3} Background Data Sheet
4) Disclosure Form
5) Environmental Documents
6) Exhibit "A", General Plan Amendment and Zoning, dated April
25, 1984
7) Exhibits "B" - "H", dated April 25, 1984
PJK:bw
4/12/84
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: GPA/LU 84-3/ZC-304/SDP 84-3/CT 83-20
APPLICANT: ALANDA
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request to develop mixed use residential
~ All the portion of Lot "J" of RANCHO AGUA HEDIONDA, in the
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: City of Carlsbad/ County of SD, State of CA, according to
Partition Map thereof No. 823, filed in the office of the County Recorder of~
San Diego County, November 16, 1896 APN; 167-060-10,13
Acres 47 Proposed No. of Lots/Units 73 SFD, 195 apartments
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation RM/RLM
4-10 du/ac
Density Allowed 4-10 du/ac/0-4 du/ac Density Proposed to 10-20 du/ac
Existing Zone R-A-10 Proposed Zone RD-M-Q
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoning Land Use
Site R-A-10 Vacant
North P-C Apartments
South R-A-10 Vacant
East R-P/R-1-10 Office/Vacant
West R-A-10 SFD's
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District Carlsbad Water Carlsbad Sewer Carlsbad EDU's 268
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated March 30, 1983
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Negative Declaration, issued
E.I.R. Certified, dated
Other, Notice of Prior Compliance, Dated, April 4, 1984
If after the informatir ^ou have submitted has been re »wed, it is determined
that further informatio. .s required, you will be so ad sed.
APPLICANT:
AGENT:
MEMBERS:
x £T AC .
Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication)
71-/I/
Business Address
Telephone Number
A
Name
• CA .
Business Address
Telephone Number
L-
Name -(individual, partner, joint
venture, corporation, syndication)
Home Address
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
Same Home Address
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
(Attach more sheets if necessary)
I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this dis
closure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be
relied upon as being true and correct until amended.
Applicant
BY J 0,J>
DIST Council 6/6/84:. Sarah Todd presented this letter to the City Clerk
. at 'the meeting "of 6 X84. It is in opposition ; GPA84-2, which was
continued to November. I told Mrs. Todd that I ,wQuld. distribute the letter
to Council for future reference. LEE R. ~ /-£•- $"'
To I'he Carlsbad City Council Members
,. ,- i, ..
Oppsition to any higher density
than R 1 '(single family) as
requested "at ^460, 3470, 3476 and
3480 Monroe Street
My name is Sarah F. Todd
reside at 3365 Donna Drive ------- ..... "
Carlsbad, Ca. , which is a block from the property in question.
I have a grandson that attends Carlsbad High, -so -I -am well .aware -of ihe
traffic congestion in the area.
For safety reasons the jbraffic congestion must "be 'controlled and
lessened'! if possible on Monroe in the school zone;
1. Monroe is the outlet going south for residents on Donna and other
streets. Donna is not cut through to Chestnut,
2. Monroe is a heavily traveled street going north to the Carlsbad "
ElCamino Mall.
3. On Monroe there are 2 churches, the Art Center, Swimming Pool,
Women's Club as well as the high school. Monroe must handle the
traffic of all these, as well as the bus stop situation at
the corner of Chestnut for loading of mostly school children.
4. Because of the heavy congestion there is a necessary crossing
guard to hejLp the children coming from the gramrner school a
block and half away.
5. The apartments on Monroe on the e&st side of the street have
garages that open onto an alley in back, but the cars from
these apartments as a rule ar& parked on Monroe.
6. Monroe is a residential width street and with parked cars on
both sides, the heavy through traffic is congested. This
congestion should be lessened, not enhanced with more units.
7. All the streets surrounding the High School have private
single homes except on this eastern aide of Monroe.
8. After all, this is a echool zone and the surrcui&ding property
should be Rl (single Tfamilyy).
9. I agree with the staff recommendation.
10. In the past when "the owners kept this property in question In
good repair and condition they were desirable rentals.
11. As long as the apartments are there now, it would be a
welcome improvement to the community if the owners would
_ take cride in ownership and cleanup the landscape and
paint -the buildings.-- - -
12.~ Centals a^e greatly "desired in Carlsbad.
13. I am opposed to allowing a greater number of units on any
property facing the school.
14. I request limited parking of the atast side on Monroe the
.length of the High school property.
Carlsbad Journal
Decreed a Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
3138 ROOSEVELT ST. • P.O. BOX 248 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • 729-2345
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation,
published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which
newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and
which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established and published at regular intervals in the said
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year
next preceding the date of publication of the
Airport Road and east of Laurel
Tree Lane on 85 acres and more
particularly described as:
Alt that portion of land as deline-
ated on Survey Map No. 5175 filed
in the Office of the County Record-
er of San Diego County, December
19, 1960, being a portion of Lot "G"of the Rancho Agua Hedionda inthe County of San Diego, State of
California, according to Map there-
of No. 823, filed in the Office of the
County Recorder of San Diego
NOTICE OF PUBLIC
HEARING
APPEAL
EIR 83-8/GPA'LU 83-14/ZC-278
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that
the City Council of the City of Carls-
bad will hold a public hearing at
the City Council Chambers, 1200
Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California,
at 6:00 P.M. on Tuesday, June 5,1984, to consider an appeal of aPlanning Commission denial of anapplication for a general planamendment to allow increased
acreages of RLM land uses and to
allow commercial land uses, and a
preannexation zone change to R-l-
10 and C-2 zones on property gener-
ally located on the south of Palomar
notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice
of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
County, November 16, 1896;
And to consider certification ofan Environmental Impact Report
for said property.
Applicant: Carlsbad Land Inves-
tors
CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
SITE
1M CARLSBAD INVESTORS
EIR 83-8
ZC278
GPA/LU 83-14
May 19 1984
19
19
19
19
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct. Executed at Carlsbad. County of San Diego,
State of California on the 19th
of May 19R4;
—-^
day
Clerk of the Printer
CJ S160: May 19. 1984
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
Office of the City Clerk
Cttp of Cartebab
APPEAL FORM
XS"
I (We) appeal the following decision of the
PLANNING COMMISSION to the City Council:
Project name and number (or subject of appeal):
CARLSBAD LAND INVESTORS- EIR 83-8/GPA-LU 83-14/ ZC-278
TELEPHONE:
(714) 438-5535
Date of decision;^ Planning Commission decision of APRIL 25f1984
Reason for appeal; THE FINDINGS OF_ THE EIR RELATIVE TO LAND USES IN
THE VICINITY OF THE MeCLELLAN-PALOMAR AIRPORT WARRANT OUR REQUESTED
NON-RESIDENTIAL LAND USES. THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE LAND USE
PLANNING STAFF ARE, CONTRARY TO THE EIR, RECOMMENDING RESIDENTIAL USES.
MAY ?. 1Qff4
Date
Name (Please print)
17332 Irvine Blvd Suite T
Address
TUSTIN, CA 92680
(714) 838-3350
Telephone Number
Cm JF CARLSBAD
1200 ELM AVENUE • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92006
438-5551
RECEIVED FRO
ADDRESS
. DATE
A/C. NO.DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
Ha /75
f S
38938 TOTAL 115
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL
EIR 83-8/GPA/LU 83-14/ZC-278
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad
will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm
Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, June 5, 1984,
to consider an appeal of a Planning Commission denial of an application
for a general plan amendment to allow increased acreages of RLM land
uses and to allow commercial land uses, and a preannexation zone
change to R-l-10 and C-2 zones on property generally located on the
south of Palomar Airport Road and east of Laurel Tree Lane on 85 acres
and more particularly described as:
All that portion of land as delineated on Suvey Map No. 5175
filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego
County, December 19, 1960, being a portion of Lot "G"
of the Rancho Agua Hedionda in the County of San Diego,
State of California, according to Map thereof No. 823,
filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego
County, November 16, 1896;
And to consider certification of an Environmental Impact
Report for said property.
APPLICANT:
PUBLISH:
Carlsbad Land Investors
May 19, 1984 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
SITE
CARLSBAD INVESTORS
EIR 83-8
ZC 278
GPA/LU 83-14
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
Office of the City Clerk
775" 7*
TELEPHONE:
(714) 438-5535
City of Cartefrab
APPEAL FORM
I (We) appeal the following decision of the
PLANNING COMMISSION to the City Council:
Project name and number (or subject of appeal):
CARLSBAD LAND INVESTORS- EIR 83-8/GPA-LU 83-14/ ZC-278
Date of decision: Planning Commission decision of APRIL 25,1984
Reason for appeal; THE FINDINGS OF THE EIR RELATIVE TO LAND USES IN
THE VICINITY OF THE McCLELLAN-PALOMAR AIRPORT WARRANT OUR REQUESTED
NON-RESIDENTIAL LAND USES. THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE LAND USE
PLANNING STAFF ARE, CONTRARY TO THE EIR, RECOMMENDING RESIDENTIAL USES,
tA Y ") . 1 Q ff ADate
Name (Please print)
17332 Irvine Blvd Suite T
Address
TUSTIN, CA 92680
(714) 838-3350
Telephone Number