HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-06-05; City Council; 7770; APPEAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION DENYING A 48 UNIT TENTANTIVE TRACT MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT. CT 84-2 | CP-270 LA COSTA POINTE3
8 u 5:
2-2
rla 1% 8
85
a, '5 5c, u a0 a, -n ?ik &I
ma 3
6m -d G c, -4 ai rla
*3
.5 4 %
za
1%
$8
8s
@
$4 $E 3a e
a% ui 23 2 8 3 852
q
I Ln I
00
u3
.. Z 2 I- o 4 d 0 z 3 0 0
\> rl ('7 CIT-F CARLSBAD - AGENDqlLL L) Lj
DEPT. H
DECISION DENYING A 48 UNIT TENTATIVE CITY AT
CITY M( TRACT W AND CXlNDOMINIUM PERMIT. CT 84-2/CP-270 - LA OXTA POINTE.
AB# 777 a TITLE; APPEAL OF A PLANNING CIlMMISSION
MTG. 6/5/84
DEPT. Pm
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
It is recommended that the City Council UPHOLD the Planning Commis decision to DENY CT 84-2/CP-270, and direct the City Attorney to prepare tl
appropriate do cur
ITEM EXPLANATION
This item is an appeal of a Planning Cmission denial of a 48 unit ten1
tract map and condominium permit. The Foject is located on the nod
corner of Alga Road and El E'uerte Street. The site is designated a (Residential-Medium High; 10-20 du's/acre) and the project's density WL
16.9 dwelling units per acre which is towards the high end of this range.
The Planning Commission denied this request because they believed the pro. proposed density of 16.9 du's/acre could not be justified. Their rr included, first, the project was not imaginatively designed and was not integrated with the site's constraints. Second, the project did not pr significant on-site amenities over and above the minimum standards o Planned Development Ordinance to warrant an increase in the density. Thirc
project's density and design was not compatible with surrounding land Finally, the Planning Comnission felt the orientation of the buildinc relation to the 1 1/2:1 slope from Alga Road and El Fuerte was pr and impede the free flow of light and air.
ENVIRONMENTAI, REVIEW
-
The Planning Comnission did not approve a Negative Declaration for
project. to adopt a Negative Declaration.
FISCAL IMPACT
If the project is denied, no fiscal impacts wxld occur. If the projed approved, the applicant wuld be required to provide all public improvement serve the project. Also, the applicant has agreed to pay a public facili fee to offset the cost of providing other public services.
EXHIBITS
1. bcation Map 2. PC Resolution No. 2265
3. Staff Report, dated April 11 , 1984 w/attachments
4.
If the City Council approves the project, the Council muld also
Exhibit A & B dated, March 14, 1984 (large site plan)
I
m 0 ;
< \ B #
- - - - ZONE BOUNDARY LINE
t CP-2
LA COSTA POINTE CT 84
4
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
I v 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2265
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A 48 UNIT
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF ALGA ROAD AND EL FUERTE STREET
APPLICANT: LA COSTA POINTE
CASE NO: CT 84-2/CP-270
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain propert
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
wit:
Lots 413-416 of La Costa Meadows, Unit 3 per Map 7( filed October 6, 1971
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to tk
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a rt
as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 28th d
March, 1984 and on the 11th day of April, 1984, hold a duly
noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said
request: and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all pers
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
relating to the Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit.
NOW, .THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planni
Commission as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearii the Commission hereby DENIES CT 84-2/CP-270, based on thc following findings:
Find ing s :
1) The project's density of 16.9 dwelling units per acre, bc towards the high end of the density range of 10-20 qwel; units per acre designated for this site, cannot be just1 for the following reasons:
+
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
l a e
a) The project's design is unimaginative and is not WI
integrated with the site constraints; and
b) The project does not provide significant on-site
amenities over and above the minimum standards of 1
Planned Development Ordinance.
c) The project as designed and at the density proposec not compatible with the surrounding residential development in the vicinity.
2) The units in the southern portion of the project are located 10' from the 10' high crib wall and a 1 1/2:1
slope. As such, these units are impeded from the free of light and air.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting c
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, he1
the 9th day of May, 1984, by the following vote, to wit:
Schlehuber, Marcus, Farrow and Smith. AYES: Chairman Rombotis, Commissioners Rawlins,
NOES : None.
ABSENT : None .
ABSTAIN: None.
JERRY ROMBOTIS, Chairman I CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMIS
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Land Use Planning Manager
PC RES0 NO. 2265 -2-
, W * APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DATE JANUARY 101 1984
STAFF REPORT (3
DATE : April 11, 1984
TO : Planning Commission
FROM: Land Use Planning Office
SUBJECT: CT 84-2/CP-270 - LA COSTA POINTE - A request for a 48
unit tentative tract map and condominium permit on property located on the northwest corner of Alga Road and El Fuerte Street.
I. RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission APPROVE the
Negative Declaration issued by the Land Use Planning Manager an ADOPT Resolution No. 2265 APPROVING CT 84-2/CP-270 based on the
findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
11. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting approval of a 48 unit tentative tra
map and condominium permit located as described above. The
project will be located on a 2.84 acre site and have a density
76.9 du/acre. This density is consistent with the general plar
designation of 10-20 du/ac for this site. The subject properti
consists of four previously graded parcels that are presently
with condominiums. The properties to the north and west are vacant, but have been designated for development at a similar density .
The project would consist of six two story buildings, none of which will exceed 35' in height. Each of the proposed buildins would have eight two bedroom units. The units would have a flc area of 1000 square feet.
111. ANALY S IS
Planning Issues
1) Does the project conform with the development standards an(
covered with weeds. The property to the east is being develope
design criteria of the Planned Development Ordinance?
? e e
Discussion
Development Standards
As proposed this project conforms with all the development
standards of the Planned Development Ordinance. Each unit woul have a one car garage and one uncovered parking space located within 150 feet of the unit. The required storage would be
provided in storage closets located adjacent to the decks and patios. All of the guest parking would be provided adjacent tc
the entrance to the project.
The common recreation area is proposed as a swimming pool, dech
spa, barbeque area, and cabana with restroom facilities. In
addition, each unit would have either a private patio or privat
deck .
All other development standards of the Planned Development Ordinance are met by this project.
Design Criteria
As proposed, this project also conforms with the design criterj of the Planned Development Ordinance. A pedestrian system woul
link the units to the garages and common recreation area. The common recreation area would be centrally located and readily accessible to all of the units.
Stamped concrete and landscape islands would be used to breakuE the appearance of the driveway. Trellis structures would be
constructed over pedestrian walkways adjacent to garages. All the crib walls proposed to maintain the existing slopes would k heavily landscaped to soften their appearance. Special attentj would be given to the landscaping of the slope adjacent to Algz Road.
The Commission should also be aware that the applicant is
requesting a variance to the City of Carlsbad's Engineering Design Criteria. The City's criteria for Alga Road requires a
10 foot right-of-way behind the face of curb. The applicant i: requesting a variance to reduce the right-of-way width to 5.5
feet from the face of the curb. This would allow for the construction of a wrought iron fence with wood posts at the bac of the sidewalk.
After discussing this request with the Engineering Department i the Utilities and Maintenance Department staff believes that tk can support this request. Utilities and Maintenance has inforr
underground behind the edge of the sidewalk. If at some futurc date it did become necessary to locate public facilities in th:
area the proposed fence will be constructed in sections that could be easily removed to facilitate access.
staff that few if any public facilities would have to be placec
-2-
W e
In addition, the requested variance will have no adverse visual
impacts on Alga Road.
In conclusion staff believes the proposed project is compatible
with the development standards and design criteria of the Planned Development Ordinanace and that the requested variance will have no adverse impacts. Therefore, staff recommends approval of CT 84-2/CP-270.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS
The Land Use Planning Manager has determined that this project
will not have a significant effect on the environment and,
therefore, has issued a Negative Declaration on March 12, 1984.
Attachments
1) Planning Commission Resolution No. 2265
2) Location Map
3) Background Data Sheet
4) Disclosure Form
5) Letter dated April 4, 1984
6) Environmental Documents 7) Reduced Exhibits 8) Exhibits "A" - "I", dated March 14, 1984
MH : bw
4/6/84
-3-
0 0 .,
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE N3: CT 84-2/8-270
APPLICANT: LA COSTA pO?3EE
REQUEST AND LKATION: 48 unit tentative tract map and condaninium permit on the
northwest corner of Alga €bad and El Fuerte Street.
LEGAL ~ESCRIpTION: Lots 413-416 of La Costa Meadows, Unit 3 per Map 3036 filed
October 6, 1971. APN: 215-360-12-15
Acres 2.84 Proposed No. of Lots/Units 48
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONIFG
Land Use Designation €84-H
Density Allowed 10-20 Density proposed 16.9
Existing Zone RD-M Proposed Zone -
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoning Land Use
Site RD-M Vacant
North RD-M Vacant
South C-1 Alga Ftxd
East Fd3-M Condaminiums
West RD-M Vacant
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District San Marcos Water Carlsbad Sewer Leucadia IDU's
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated January 16, 1984
ENVIRCEPEFEAL IMPACT ASS-
- x Negative Declaration, issued
E.I.R. Certified, dated
March 12, 1984
-
Other I
'0 * 0 ,? ..
APPL'IG;L;Tr National Properties and Syndications, Inc; a California Corp. incorp
~m,t: (individuai, partncrship, joint venture, corporation, syn
July 1982. 1010 Turquoise' St., Suite 302, San Diego, CA 92109 -.
-
-*
Business Address
1619) 488-1031 u
.. .. Te 1 ephon c Xa-her
. AGEliT: GRABHORN ENGINEERING CORP., a California Corporation indorpor
NaDe 1974
..
-. 123 9mCheheapeake Drive. S&.]Ol.o. a 92 *. - Business Adcress -. . . ..
.. . -. . ..
% (6wj 565'722T - . ..
1.
.-
.. ', Telep!Xne i;uzjar .
.. .. .
&E1.5:?3 : -- .. Nme *(in~iviCc=l, psrtner, j9ir.t Eoae xfr3ress . ' venture t co,~o,-a tion, syr.5ication)
--
.. Xisiness Mcress
_I_---.__- ..~
Tcle,>hmi E*.=er . Z'eleyk?=ne :kbr
- - r .. Eome hdciress
- -- =.-Ti &-La- p1cs ._d AEk-sss
-- - Tclepkone ::u*er . .. T=ie2,;:oso \-.--*-= L> -.... -- f
Shareholders of the 'above corporationg are :
n CPI~ -- 5QLUmAAau ariol.San Dieqo CA, 921109
Ronald Bachrach 6205 Cypress Point Rd. S.'D. CA, 92120
' 6852 Paseo Loredo, La Jolla, CA, 92037 Richard Gabriel
Richard G. Grabhorn
----
-- -
10990 Montego Dr. San Diego, CA, 921.24,
Attach more sheets if necessary)
, f/We d3tlz-e cr.c?-~ FrzaitY Of perjur] kht t:?e iriEo~.~~i~p contai;=ed in titi
closure is tT;2? 232 C3rZeCt ;]Ed that it Will rzrnain true and correct and 13;
relic?. upo;r 2; 52iri3 true ar.6 correct until ;I:nended. .
.. National Properties and Syndication
Applicant
BYdR;(;;7J>
DY
Philip J. Giacinti, Jr.
2855 Cacatua Street
Carlsbad, California 92008
April 4, 1984
Planning Commission
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008
Re: Case File CT 84-2/CP-270 La Costa Pointe Hearing April 11, 1984 at 7:OO p.m.
Ladies/Gentlemen:
My wife, children and I reside at 2855 Cacatua Street, Carlsbad, California. We have lived at that address
since approximately April, 1979. Our home is one block west
of the building site which is the subject matter of the
above referenced hearing.
My family and I, like my neighbors, have become
increasingly alarmed by the number of units being crammed
onto lots in the area, with no apparent thought to feasi-
bility and future planning for the area.
Numerous single family residences are presently
vacant in the area and in various stages of dilapidation.
Despite the large number of vacant units, real estate owners
(and, I suspect, speculators) are filling the lots south of
Saint Elizabeth Seton Church on El Fuerte with condominiums.
The neighborhood concerns, as you have now surmised, are that our elected officials, without our input, may allow the immediate area to be saturated with so many units per lot
that visitors and vacationers from the East Coast, on their
way to the Far East, will mistake our community on the hill
for Hong Kong.
>
Planning Commission Re: La Costa Pointe
April 4, 1984
Page Two
I am not anti-growth. I do not believe my
neighbors are anti-growth.
aware there were a large number of lots on Unicornio Street
that were zoned for multi-family residences. I am pleased
that they are being developed. I am aware the developers are not developing for any philanthropic purpose. They embarked on a venture to make a profit.
When I moved into the area I was
The fact still remains that the "California Gold Rush" of the early 1970s ended with the recession of the late 1970s. Existing homeowners felt and continue to feel the effects of that in the form of: (a) high interest pay-
ments on loans taken out to purchase their property, (b)
much slower appreciation in real property values, (c) de-
preciation of their property by the inability to fill
existing units and the unwillingness of those owners of vacant existing structures (many of whom are real estate owning lenders by virtue of nonjudicial foreclosure sale) to keep the units repaired and presentable, and (d) setbacks of months, possibly years, in the non-residential development of the area, such as schools and parks.
The bottom line is that existing owners have suffered the same as the faceless general and limited part- nerships who have made and continue to make the land loan payments while they hold the vacant lots on Unicornio Street waiting for the economic environment to change. Many of the speculators may have needed the losses for tax purposes
due to their early successful developments of the 1970s.
Such is not the case with the residents. This is our home
and, in many instances, our only economic investment of
significance.
The last thing I and my neighbors want you to
approve is the cramming of as many units as possible on
Unicornio Street, so the partnerships and/or corporate
developers can recoup lost profits in order for their principals to afford their dream houses in Rancho Santa Fe
and La Jolla.
Planning Commission
Re: La Costa Pointe
April 4, 1984 Page Three
We do not need the boats, RVs and second autos
parked in the streets, nor the commensurate safety problems they cause for our children.
To date, the units being built at the south and west end of Unicornio Street have been relatively reasonable in size and number per lot. The eyesore and problem child
has been the units on the north and west end of Unicornio
Street and Cacatua Street. We want no more like it.
Forty-eight units for this applicant is twenty- eight more than there should be. We urge you not to approve forty-eight units for the above referenced La Costa Pointe site. I encourage you, prior to the hearing on April 11, 1984, to come talk to my neighbors and see the number of condominium units being placed per lot in the area.
We encourage La Costa Pointe, whomever they are, to build something they are willing to live next to.
P JG/mp , 4
la
1
r
-c
A
.-
I
4
m
Philip J. Giacinti, Jr. 2855 Cacatua Street Carlsbad, California 92008
June 4, 1984
City Council
City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008
Re: La Costa Pointe; Appeal CT84-2/CP-270 Tuesday - June 5, 1984
Ladies/Gentlemen:
I will be unable to attend tuesday's meeting which will contain the above appeal.
I have attached the two letters I wrote in con- nection with the Planning Commission hearings.
Following hearing and rejection by the Planning Commission, I met with a principal of La Costa Pointe. They had refused to meet with us prior to the Commision hearings sure that their project would be crammed-down our throats.
At my meeting with Mr. Gabriel, he emphasized that
La Costa Pointe would be a quality project. When I addressed
the homeowners concerns about filling the lots with so many
units his response was that they could not build larger
units and "compete". He threatened to resort to apartments
if La Costa Pointe did not get what they wanted.
They are back again, this time with counsel who
will attempt to point out the errors in the Commissions findings; I will not be available to offer rebuttal. Unlike counsel for La Costa Pointe, I do not appear to advocate a position for a fee. I, like the rest of the homeowners on Cacatua Street, have a vested interest in seeing who our immediate neighbors are. La Costa Pointe, on the other
hand, has an interest only in maximizing their profit and moving on to the next community.
,. _-
City Council, City of Carlsbad ' Re: La Costa Pointe June 4, 1984 Page Two
Regardless of the arguments of La Costa Pointe,
the Appeal should be denied:
1. The Planning Commission exercises broad
discretion when it rules on the number of dwelling units within a range. That discretion should
not be overturned except upon a clear showing of abuse. Orinda Homeowners Committee v. Board
of Supervisors (1970) 11 Cal.App. 3d 768,776. La Costa Pointe offered a project (a) at the upper range of density, (b) on a block immediately
adjacent to single family residences and (c) much smaller than those units already existing on the same side of the street. The Commission had every right to say no.
-
2. Most, if not all, of the homeowners opposing
this project haved owned their property for a considerably longer period of time then La Costa
Pointe. We lived and continue to live with high interest rates. La Coasta Pointe, regardless of the long range effects on our property values and the safety of our children, will build their "rental units" and take their money bacK to La Jolla and the community to live with the risks of the boats, R.V.'s and motorcycles in the streets and the absent landlords, who have little or no interest in a homeowners association.
3. We are not saying to this Council that La Costa Pointe does not belong in the area. We are saying that 48 units on four lots do not belong on the street closest to large single family residences. The density change should be gradual. The residents on Cacatua Street are entitled to have as much assurance as possible that they will have permanent neighbors who have the same pride of ownership. La Costa Point so much as admitted in filling out the Enviromental Impact Assessment Form, dated December 22, 1983, and signed by Richard G. Grabhorn that they could care less who we get as neighbors:
'I 4 . . . The units are expected to rent at a rate of $650.00 per month . . .I1
City Council, City of Carlsbad '
Re: La Costa Pointe June 4, 1984 Page Three
After all the rhetoric from both sides the bottom line is that the Planning Commission's decision not to
approve La Costa Pointe is entitled to be upheld. They listened to the voice of the community and their decision
supported our view. The Council should not treat that
decision lightly. La Costa Pointe is perfectly capable of redesigning their project so as to provide assurance that we
will have permanent neighbors who care.
Their argument that they cannot do so and compete
in the market place is a risk they ran as we did when we
bought our homes.
P JG/mp
, -. CITYOFCAR 8AD
1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
438-5551
RECEIVED FROM DATE
ADDRESS
.- A
LAW OFFICES OF c. SAMUEL BLICK
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
P. 0. BOX 8025
FAIRBANKS RANCH PLAZA. SUITE J
RANCHO SANM FE. CALIFORNIA 92067
(619) 756-5994
April 30, 1984
Office of the City Clerk City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Re: La Costa Pointe-CT84-2/CP-270
Dear Ms. Routenkranz:
LOS ANCELES (213) 587-4755
ORANGE (7141 857-0464
RIVERSIDE 1714) 359-5489
Please accept this letter and the attached "APPEAL FORM" as
the full and complete appeal from the April 25, 1984 decision
of the Planning Commission, relating to the abovementioned
project, to the City Council.
The appeal is based on the Planning Commission's failure to
consider all relevant facts pertaining to the proposed tentative
tract map and condominium permit request. Although legally valid findings do exist as prepared by the Planning staff for
approval of the subdivision map and condominium permit, no
findings are present or were made known at the Planning
Commission hearing which would justify the recommendation
for denial.
For these and other valid reasons, please accept this appellate
application as timely and valid and set a hearing date before
the City of Carlsbad City Council as soon as is practicable.
CSB: lr
cc: Colin Seid
Mary Casler
1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
Office of the City Clerk
*
TELEPHONE: (71 4) 438-5535
APPEAL FORM
I (We) appeal the following decision of the
PLANNING C OMMI S S ION to the City Council:
Project name and number (or subject of appeal): P
LA COSTA POINTE-CT84-2/CP-270
Date of decision: Wednesday, April 25, 1984
-_- Reason for appeal: See Attached Statement
April 30, 1984 Date Signht ur e
C. SAMUEL BLICK
Faribanks Ranch Plaza . P.O. Box 8025
Name (Please print)
Address
Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067
(619) 756-5994
Telephone Number
CbAFU3CTED NOTICE OF PUBLIC HhriRING
APPEAL ,
CT 84-2/CP-270
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will
hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue,
Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO P.M., on Tuesday, June 5, 1984, to consider
an appeal of a Planning Commission denial of a 48 unit tentative tract map
and condominium permit along with a variance to the City's Engineering
Standards for right-of-way width on property generally located on the
northwest corner of Alga Road and El Fuerte Street and more particularly
described as:
Lots 413-416 of La Costa Meadows, Unit 3, per Map 7076
filed October 6, 1971.
APPELLANT:
Pub1 ish ;
. . . .
La Costa Pointe
May 26, 1984 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
I CP-270
LA COSTA POINTE CT 84-2 I
APPEAL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CT 84-2/CP-270
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will
hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers 1200 C Avenue,
Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO P.M., on Tuesday, May -s& to consider
an appeal of the Planning Commission denial of a 48 unit tentative tract
map and condominium permit along with a variance to the City's Engineering
Standards for right-of-way width on property generally located on the
northwest corner of Alga Road and El Fuerte Street and more particularly
described as :
Lots 413-416 of La Costa Meadows, Unit 3 per Map 7076
filed October 6, 1971.
APPLICANT: La Costa Pointe
Publish: CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
NYrIcE OF PUBLIC "G
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Carmission
hold a public hearing at the City Council Charhers,
of the City of Carlsbad will
1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad,
~alifornia, at 7:OO p.m. on Wednesday, pgril 11 8 1984, m mnsider mrwd of a 48 unit tentative tract mp and mndminium permit along with a variance to the City's Engineering Standards for right-of-way width on property generally
located on mrthwest mrner of Alga Ftoad and El Fuerte Street and mre
particularly described as:
Lots 413-416 of La Costa Meadows, Unit 3 per Map 7076 filed October 6,
1971
Those persons wishing to speak on this praposal are axdially invited k~ attend
the public hearing. Office at 438-5591.
If you have any questions please call the Land Use Plannirq
CASE FILE: CT 84-2/CP-270
APPLICANT: La Costa Fointe
PUBLISH: March 31, 1984
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
I
I
8.
_-
. J LIST OF PROPERTY OWNER'S -
7 - - - From S. D. County Assessment kolls.
.. - .-.. .
215-370-16
Nicosia Joseph N. Jr & Eloise
2861 Cacatua St. -/
Carlsbad, CA 92008
2 15- 370- 17
Transamerica Financial Service
San Diego, CA 92111
8322 Clairemont Mesa BI. /
2 15- 370-1 8
Checker Auto Parts Inc. ; P. 0. Box 6597
Phoenix, A2 85005
/
215-370-19 J Giacinti Philip & Janice
2855 Cacatua St.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
215-390-01
Adams Kenneth R & Delores D
u' 3002 Unicornio St
Carlsbad, CA 92008
2 15- 390-04
Rosch Paul J. & Marguerite A.
124 Park Ave.
Yonkers, NY 10703 i/
J 2 15- 390-02
Double Vee Investments P. 0. Box 1343
Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067
2 22- 470- 1 4,22 3-0 10- 10
Daon Corp. P. 0. Box 1710
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
10. 215-330-01
Roman Catholic Bishop of
San Diego
San Diego, CA 92138
Carlsbad Realty Investments
LTD
c/o Amir Enterprises Inc.
18552 Mac Art ur BI
P. 0. Box 80428 V/"
11. 215-330-03
w
-!dL%*lr &L", $6 527/J-
12. 215-330-27
Hamsayeh Coshtasb M E
Baghe Colestan
2245 La Amatista Road.
Del May, CA 92014
L
.-
13. 215-360-05- G R Capital Inc.
C/O Mr. James L. Resne
359 San Miguel Bldg St.
7&/?,-/ &+., cb 9~kO
La Cost Investment Propertie-
eta1 d 22952 Alcalde Dr. Ste 140
149 215-360-06,07, 08, 09, If
- Laguna Hills, CA - - --
15. 215-360-10, 12, 13
Tung Ker-Kong L// 7739 Anillo Way I
Carlsbad, CA 92008
- ___- - __
16. 215-360-14, 15
Pierre Kenneth J. /
7739 Anillo Way
Carlsbad, CA 92008
.__ __ - - - -
I// 17- 215-360-16, 17
Golf Properties Inc.
6464 Sunset Blvd. Ste 935
Hollywood, CA 90028
. T -- - __ -_
9. 222-470-21 18- 215-360-18
Daon Group
c/o E S Rosenfeld
16133 Ventura Blvd. Ste 127 L/
~fi,o%%sf%%$& & Assoc, 1801 Avenue of the Stars
1XlO ELM AVENUE
RLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989
Citp of QCatrl$fiab
Ker Kong Tung
7739 Annilla Way Carlsbad, CA 92008
1200 ELM AVENUE ILSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989
C. Samuel Blick Fairbanks Ranch Plaza, Suite J Rancho Santa Fe. CA 92067
National properties
1010 Turquoise St., Ste. 302
San Diego, CA 92109
Ca rlsba d. Jo urn a I
Decreed a Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
31 38 ROOSEVELT ST. 0 P.O. BOX 248 0 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 729-2345
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss,
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
m4
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation,
published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which
newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and
which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established and published at regular intervals in the said
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year
next preceding the date of publication of the
CORRECTED NOTICE OF PUBLiC HEARING APPEAL CF 8+?rCP-270
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City olCarls- bad will hold a public heanng at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad. California. at 640 PM , on Tuesday, June 5. 1084, to consider an appeal of a Planning Commission denial of a48 unit tentatiqe tract map and con- dominium permit along with a variance to the City's Engineering Standards for right-OF-way width on
1871 APPELLANT La Coda Pointe
CT SlW. May 26,1984
/S/ CARESBAD CITY COUNCIL
1M-10/81
notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice
of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the
..
following dates, to-wit:
May 26 ..................... ** I /
....... 19 ....
................................. 19 ....
................................. 19 ....
............................. 19 ....
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Carl b d County of San Diego, State of California on the 58th day of a~ iq~a 1
I Clerk of the Printer
Carlsbad Journal
Decreed a Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of Sun Diego County
3 138 ROOSEVELT ST. P.O. BOX 248 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 729-2345
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss,
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation,
published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of Sun Diego, State of California, and which
newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and
which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established and published at regular intervals in the said
City of Carlsbad, County of Sun Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year
next preceding the date of publication of the
notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice
of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
APPEAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC
CT HEARING 84-2iCP-270
NOTEE ISREREBY GWEN that the City Council of thecity of Carls- bad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers. 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California at 6 00 P M on Tuesday, May 19. 1984, to consider an appeal of the Planning Commission denialofa 48 unit tentative tract map and condo- minium permit along with a variance to the City's Engineering Standards for right-of-way width on property generally located on the
EL Fuerte Street and more particu larly described as Lots413416ofLa Costa Meadows, Unit 3 per Map 7076 filed October6.
Applicant La Costa Pointe
CI SI53 May 19, 1984
184.. May 19 ................................. .
................................. 19 ....
northwest corner of Alga Road and ................................. 19 ....
1971 ................................. 19 ....
CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
................................. 19 ....
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed &~rl~~~,hCounty of San Diego,
State of California on day of May 1984 &d
Clerk of the Printer 1 M-10/81
'. ~
~. .' ..
a, .~
.~ ..
.~
,
.. ~. .
.~
~.
..
.. ~. - -I ..
.. ~. . ~.
..
~~.
,-
~~
~.
+.
..
.. .. .. ..
. ~.~ .. . .~'
.~ ~ I
. ~~ .~
- .~
-
~. .. ~.
.. ~~
~~ ... .
.. . ., .~ .
.. ..
~. .-
~. -
.. .
.. .. ..
v
..
~.. ~ .. ..
..
:~ . !
u
, .! ..
..
..
.~
.~ .. .~
.. .
..
.. ~ .- .. .-. . .. . .. .- .. . : ..
!.- -. C.~
..
- 13 .. .
~.~~ I
.. . ., ~~ . ...: ..
~. ..