HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-07-17; City Council; 7818; General Plan AmendmentOF CARLSBAD - AGEND, MIL
AR* vp/r
MTfi 7/17/84
DFPT.PLN
1 " " ^^" GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT HFPT HO WJ^R
CITY ATTY\)F3
P.ITY MGR ^J*X
o§
uz
i
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Direct the City Attorney's Office to prepare documents APPROVING
GPA/LU 83-14 and refer ZC-278 to staff for additional
consideration.
2. Direct the City Attorney's Office to prepare documents DENYING
GPA/LU 84-1, ZC-301, SP-192, CT 84-5 and SDP 84-1.
3. Direct the City Attorney's Office to prepare documents APPROVING
GPA/LU 84-4 and introduce Ordinance No. ? 74^ , APPROVING
ZC-305.
4. Direct the City Attorney's Office to prepare documents DENYING
GPA/LU 84-5, MP-149(M), ZC-306 and CT 84-8.
ITEM EXPLANATION
This is the second scheduled general plan amendment hearing for 1984. Four
proposals for amendment to the land use element of the general plan have been
requested. The Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the City
Council approve two (GPA/LU 83-14 (Carlsbad Land Investors) and GPA/LU 84-4/ZC-
305 (Robertson)). The other two are recommended for denial and are coming to
the Council on appeal (GPA/LU 84-1/ZC-301/SP-192/CT 84-5/SDP 84-1 (Buena Vista
Park Plaza) and GPA/LU 84-5/MP-149(M)/ZC-306/CT 84-8 (Daon)). A summary of the
four requests is as follows:
1. GPA/LU 83-14/ZC-278 - CARLSBAD LAND INVESTORS - A request to change the
general plan land use designation from RL (0-1.5 du's/acre) and RLM (0-4
du's acre) to RLM on property located south of Palomar Airport Road and east
of Laurel Tree Lane. This general plan amendment was previously considered
by the City Council in April but was referred back to the Planning
Commission for a report. The Planning Commission recommended that this
project be approved.
2. GPA/LU 84-1/ZC-301/SP-192/CT 84-5/SDP 84-1 - BUENA VISTA PARK PLAZA - A
request to change the general plan land use designation from a combination
district of 0 (Office), TS (Travel Service) and OS (Open Space) to a
combination district of RM (4-10 du's/acre) and OS (Open Space) on property
located south of Highway 78 and east of El Camino Real. The applicant is
also requesting a corresponding zone change, specific plan, tentative tract
map and site development plan. The Planning Commission denied this request
and the applicant is appealing the denial to the City Council.
3. GPA/LU 84-4/ZC-305 - ROBERTSON - A request to change the general plan land
use designation from RM (4-10 du's/acre) and RLM (0-4 du's/acre) to C
(Community Commercial) on property located at the southeast corner of El
Camino Real and Tamarack Avenue. The applicant is also requesting a
corresponding preannexational zone change to C-1(Q). The Planning
Commission recommended that this project be approved.
Page Two of Agenda Bill No. 7 f/ f
4) GPA/LU 84-5/MP-149(M)/ZC-306/CT 84-8 - DAON - A request to modify the
general plan land use designations for the southwest La Costa Master Plan
area. The applicant is also requesting a corresponding master plan
amendment, a zone change and a tentative tract map. The Planning Commission
denied this request and the applicant is appealing the denial to the City
Council.
Separate agenda bills for each request are attached.
CITr OF CARLSBAD - AGEND/r-f /
/
MTG 7/17/84
DEPT. PLN
_. _ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE
TITL£: SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD EAST OF
LAUREL TREE lANE.
GPA/LU 83-14/ZC-278 -
CARLSBAD LAND INVESTORS.
O
I_j
O
i
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Planning Ccaimission and the staff are recommending that the City Council
direct the Attorney's Office to prepare documents APPROVING GPA/LU 83-14 and
refer ZC-278 back to staff for additional consideration in order to have it
appropriately implement the general plan amendment.
ITEM EXPLANATION
In April of this year the Planning Commission considered a general plan
amendment to change 85 acres of residential low (RL 0-1.5 du's/ac) and
residential low-medium density (RLM 0-4 du's/ac) to RLM and commercial (C), 6
acres. Staff and the Planning Commission recommended denial of this request
based on traffic, land use compatibility and noise. The City Council heard the
appeal on June 5 and suggested an alternative land use which included RLM on the
southerly portion of the property and 20 acres of office (0) on the northerly,
portion. They returned the item to the Planning Commission for a report.
At the Planning Commission meeting of June 27, the applicant proposed another
alternative. This alternative would change the entire 85 acre site to RLM (0-4)
on the general plan. The zoning would be residential for the southern 65 acres
and the Open Space Zone on the northern 20 acres (refer to Exhibit "A"). Under
this configuration the applicant could use the density for the entire 85 acres
but would cluster it on the southern 65 acres. The planned development
ordinance could be utilized to build attached units if the applicant desired.
The Planning Commission recommended that ZC-278 be referred back to staff to
propose zoning which would appropriately implement this new proposal.
The Planning Commission felt that the applicant's proposal is a good land use
for the site. Staff still feels that the existing general plan is the best use
for the site. Staff does feel however, that this new alternative is workable
because it does provide for development on the southern portion of the site away
from the portion of the property most impacted by the airport. The northern
portion of the site could be used to fulfill the open space requirements for the
future residential project. It also leaves the bluff area as the logical break
between residential use on the mesa and non-residential uses along Palomar
Airport Road.
For further information please see the attached staff reports to the Planning
Commission.
FISCAL IMPACT
There will be no direct fiscal impact on the city from the proposed project.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
An Environmental Impact Report was certified for this project by the City
Council on June 5, 1984.
EXHIBITS
1. Location Map
2. Exhibit "A"
3. PC Resolution No. 2316
4. PC Staff Report dated, June 27, 1984
5. PC Staff Report dated, April 25, 1984
I OCATION MAP
SITE
ZC278
CARLSBAD INVESTORS GPA/LU 83-14
EXISTING
GENERA
PLAN
\
PROPOSED PLAN
CARLSBAD LAND INVESTORS (GPA/LU 83-14
1
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2316
2"
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMEND-
MENT TO THE USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FROM RL (0-1.5
DU/AC) AND RLM (0-4 DU/AC) TO RLM ON 85 ACRES OF
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT
ROAD AND EAST OF LAUREL TREE LANE.
APPLICANT: CARLSBAD LAND INVESTORS
CASE NO.; GPA/LU 83-14
WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment to the
General Plan designation for certain property located generally
south of Palomar Airport Road and east of Laurel Tree Lane have
been filed with the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified applications constitute a request
for amendment as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 27th day of
June, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law
to consider said request;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered al factors
relating to the General Plan Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That in view of the findings made and considering the
applicable law, the decision of the Planning Commission is to
recommend APPROVAL of GPA/LU 83-14 changing the land use
designation from RL to RLM to RLM (0-4 du/ac).
1
Findings:
2 1) The proposed land use amendment preserves an important land use
3 buffer by using the bluff area to separate residential from non-
residential uses.
4
2) The proposed land use amendment is in conformance with the land
7
8
9
10
11
12
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
27
28
use policy stated in the comprehensive land use plan for
Palomar Airport to provide restricted development in crash
hazard zones.
3) The proposed land use amendment preserves as undevelopable,
slopes which are highly visible from Palomar Airport Road, an
eligible scenic highway.
4) The proposed land use amendment will not increase traffic
congestion on public streets beyond acceptable levels of
service.
5) The proposed land use amendment restricts residential
structures to the southern portion of the site, away from noise
generating factors such as Palomar Airport and Palomar Airport
Road.
13
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
14
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the
15
27th day of June, 1984, by the following vote, to wit:
16
AYES: Chairman Rombotis, Commissioners Marcus, Farrow,
Smith and Rawlins.
NOES: Commissioner Schlehuber.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: Commissioner McFadden.
JERRY ROMBOTIS, Chairman
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
24
ATTEST:
25
26
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
LAND USE PLANNING MANAGER
PC RESO NO. 2316 -2-
7
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DATE:
APRIL-13, 1983
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 27, 1984
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Land Use Planning Office
SUBJECT: GPA/LU 83-14/ZC-278 - CARLSBAD LAND INVESTORS - General
Plan Amendment and zoning to change 56 acres of RL (0-
1.5 du/ac) designated property to 36 acres of RLM (0-4
du/ac) and 20 acres of O (Office).
I. RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution
Nos. 2316 and 2317, DENYING GPA/LU 83-14/ZC-278 based on the
findings contained therein.
II. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION
On April 25, 1984, the Planning Commission considered a General
Plan Amendment to allow increased acreages of RLM (29 to 79
acres) and 6 acres of commercial land uses, on 85 acres of
property located south of Palomar Airport Road and east of
Laurel Tree Lane. Staff and the Planning Commission recommended
denial of this request based on compatibility, traffic, and
noise issues. On June 5, the City Council indicated that they
could approve an alternative land use for the site. This
alternative is being sent to the Planning Commission for a
report and is demonstrated in Exhibit "A". It includes the
following changes:
Land Use Existing Proposed
RL (0-1.5 du/ac) 56 ac. 0 ac.
RLM (0-4 du/ac) 29 ac. 65 ac.
0 (Office) 0 ac. 20 ac.
Total 85 ac. 85 ac.
III. ANALYSIS
Planning Issue
1) Is the proposed land use compatible with the site and
with the surrounding land use?
Discussion
Staff has closely analyzed both the existing general plan land
uses and the revised uses suggested by the City Council, and
continues to have planning concerns with the revised plan.
These concerns are as follows:
A) Land Use Compatibility
Land uses in the Carlsbad Land Investors area/ as delineated on
the City's General Plan, closely follow the natural topographical
layout of the land. The site is situated on a ridgetop. It is
along this ridgetop area (including adjacent properties south and
west of the site) that viewshed, circulation patterns, and
overall community environment is interdependent upon neighboring
properties. Staff finds the existing residential land uses in
this area very compatible.
To the north and east, the subject site is separated from the
Planned Industrial uses (along the south side of Palomar Airport
Road) by an existing 60-foot slope which firmly defines the
ridgetop from the non-residential uses in the valley below. This
slope provides an ideal land use buffer. Staff has repeatedly
advocated the concept of preserving this slope/ which runs for
two miles, to provide a buffer between the primarily industrial
uses in the Palomar Airport Road corridor, and residential uses
atop the ridge. A transitional land use (such as office) atop
the ridge is unnecessary, and will, in fact, provide an intrusion
of such use into a residential area, without a well-defined land
use boundary. As stated in the previous staff report, staff
concludes that the site "is most appropriate for residential land
uses" which should be clustered on the south end of the property.
Because of the proximity of the airport, the north end of the
property should be used only as vacant acreage for density
computation. Density computed from the entire site (224 units)
would then be restricted to its southern half. Such would be in
conformance with the intent of the Palomar Airport special
treatment area guidelines.
B) Traffic
The revised project, as presented to the City Council, would
greatly increase the number of vehicular trips into and out of
the site. Assuming 9 of the 20 acres of office property is
buildable (the remainder is slope), the revised land uses will
generate an additional 3300 ADT (average daily trips). These
trips will further congest College Boulevard and Palomar Airport
Road, particularly at the intersection of the two. Even under
the existing general plan, the BIR identifies this intersection
as operating at level of service D, which is considered to be
"tolerable" and "close to capacity". The recent SANDAG traffic
model alternatives all project College Boulevard to operate near
capacity (under existing general plan circumstances) even if it
is upgraded from a secondary (as presently designated) to a major
arterial. If this roadway is not upgraded, projections indicate
almost double the capacity.
It should be noted that this GPA does not involve a 16-acre
parcel isolated in the northwest corner of the subject area,
(see Exhibit "A") atop the ridge, and adjacent to the proposed
office acreage..., Assuming this property (approximately 9 acres
buildable) is eventually also redesignated to office uses, the
traffic generation factor increases to 6240 ADT over the existing
plan. Overall, staff is very concerned about future circulation
problems in this area, and recommends that land use
intensification not occur in areas that will generate traffic at
intersections or roadways identified as problem areas unless
overriding considerations exist. Since this property can
adequately be developed without land use intensification, staff
does not find such considerations.
C) Noise
While staff is concerned about allowing office uses on the site
for compatibility and traffic reasons, staff is also concerned
about increasing the higher density (RLM) acreage on the site.
Higher density results in additional residential units subjected
to airport and helicopter noise impacts. It is apparent that the
existing low-density land use designations were placed on the
site for the specific purpose that such land uses would subject
less residents to aircraft noise and crash hazards. Staff
concludes that a low number of residential units (as allowed by
the existing plan), clustered on the southern portion of the site
(a greater distance from the airport), is, from an overall
planning perspective, the most desirable development pattern for
the site. This is what would be allowed under the existing
general plan.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Environmental Impact Report was certified for this project by
the City Council on April 25, 1984.
ATTACHMENTS
1) Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2316 and 2317
2) Location Map
3) Background Data Sheet
4) Disclosure Form
5) Exhibit "A", dated June 27, 1984
PJK:bw
6/19/84
-3-
BACKGROUND DMA SHEET
CASE NO: EIR 83-8/GPA/LU 83-14/ZC-278
APPLICANT: CARLSBAD LAND INVESTORS
REQUEST AND LOCATION: GPA to allow RLM and 0 land uses,
with corresponding zoning, south of Palomar Airport Road, E/of Laurel Tree Ln.
A portion of lot "G" of the Rancho Agua Hedionda in the Cty
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: of San Diego,State of CA, according to map thereof No. 823,
filed in the Office of County Recorder of San Diego County, Nov. 16, 1896
APN: 212-04—30
Acres 85 Proposed No. of Lots/Units
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation RL and RLM
Density Allowed 0-1.5 and 0-4 Density Proposed 0-4 and commercial
Existing Zone E-l-A(co) Proposed Zone R-l-10 and C-2
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoning Land Use
Site E-l-A(oo) . Vacant
North P-M-Q Vacant
South E-l-A(co) Vacant
East P-M-Q Industrial
West E-l-A(co) Vacant
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District Carlsbad Water Carlsbad Sewer Carlsbad EDU's
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated October 16, 1981
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Negative Declaration, issued
X E.I.R. Certified, dated April 25, 1984
Other,
not further information ' required, you will be so adv
/Ml/.APPLICANT:
AGENT:
MEMBERS:
Nase (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication)
' Business Address -r
Telephone Number
Name
Business Address
Telephone Nuc±>er
Name -(individual, partner, joint
venture, corporation, syndication)
Home Address
Business Address
Telephone Nunber Telephone iiu.Tib«r
Horn* Address
Business Address
Telephone Ntsaber Telephone i<unb«
; (Attach more sheets if necessary)
I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this dis
closure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and nay be*
relied upon as being true and correct until amended.
Applicant
oe*r^
Agent, O./ner, Partner
CliNKKAl. I'AHINI.K: EXHIBIT "B'
.SECUKK PKOIM'KTIES
I.IM1TU) PAKTNtRS: '
Boyd & Collen
Holliman 1
Mark & Nelli
Zwichorowski 1
John & Jean
Zylstra 1
"A" ;
John Zylstra, Jean
Zylstra, Boyd Holliman,
Colleen llolliuan, Mark
Zwichorowski, Nelli
Zwichorowski, each as
to an undivided l/6th
interest.
"B" ;
John Zylstra, Jean
Zylstra, Boyd Holliman,
Colleen Holliman, Mark
Zwichorowski, Nelli
Zwichorowski, each as
to an undivided 1/bth
interest.
"C" ;
John ZyJscra, Jean •
Zylstra, Boyd llolliman,
Colleen Holliman, Mark
Zwichorowski, Nelli
Zwichorowski, each as
to an undivided l/6th
interest.
"D" ;
John Zylstra, Jean
Zylstra, Boyd Holliioan,
Colleen Holliman, Mark
Zwichorowski, Nelli
Zwichorowski, each as
to an undIvied l/6th
interest.
13
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 25, 1984
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Land Use Planning Office
SUBJECT: EIR 83-8/GPA/LU 83-14/ZC-278 - CARLSBAD LAND INVESTORS
Request for:(1) Certification of an Environmental
Impact Report, (2) A general plan amendment to allow
increased acreages of RLM land uses and to allow
commercial land uses, and (3) a preannexational zone
change to R-l-10 and C-2 zones. The property is
located on 85 acres, south of Palomar Airport Road,
and east of Laurel Tree Lane.
I. RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission:
1) Adopt Resolution No. 2279 recommending CERTIFICATION of
EIR 83-8 to the City Council based on the findings
contained therein.
2) Adopt Resolution Nos. 2280 and 2281 recommending DENIAL
of GPA/LU 83-14 and ZC-278 to the City Council based on
the findings contained therein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting approval for: 1)the certification of
an Environmental Impact Report on 101 acres (an 85-acre parcel
and a 16-acre parcel) located south of Palomar Airport Road and
east of Laurel Tree Lane, and 2) a general plan amendment and
preannexational zone change on the 85-acre parcel to increase
residential densities and to allow some commercial development.
The subject property consists of a ridgetop and steep slopes
located just south of the planned industrial corridor that
parallels Palomar Airport Road. The slopes on the northern and
eastern boundaries of the site presently form the land use
buffer between industrial and residential development as shown
on the general plan. The entire site is presently designated
for low (0-1.5 du/ac) and low-medium (0-4 du/ac) residential
densities. While the 16-acre parcel located in the northwest
corner of the site has been reviewed for purposes of the EIR,
the owner does not wish to apply for any discretionary actions
at this time. The requested general plan amendment and zone
changes affect only the remaining 85 acres of the site. The
entire property lies within the airport influence area.
As shown on Exhibit "A", the proposed general plan amendment
would eliminate all RL designated acreage on the 85-acre site,
in its place, the RLM acreage would be increased from 29 to 79
acres. Six acres of community commercial acreage would be
created on the north-central portion of the site. This land use
pattern is slightly different than that described in the EIR.
It is so similar, however, that the identified impacts would be
cosidered closely comparable.
The applicant's intent is to develop a comprehensive planned
residential development for approximately 300 attached dwelling
units and 6 commercial acres, to be located on the flatter
portion of the ridgetop. Residential units are proposed toward
the southerly end of the site to reduce the impact of airport
noise. Most of the slope areas are proposed to remain in open
space, utilizing these areas for density credit only. Since the
project is loated within the "airport influence area", a
specific plan or site development plan is required.
III. EIR 83-8 MAJOR IMPACTS
1) Traffic Circulation
The Environmental Impact Report points out that the
proposed land uses exceeds the ADT generated by the
existing general plan by about 10,000. Palomar Airport
road will be operating at or near capacity, and the future
intersection of Palomar Airport Road and College Avenue
will operate at an undesirable level of service even
without the proposed intensification of land use.
2) Land Use
The Environmental Impact Report states that the siting of a
large commercial site, with access off a local residential
street, is not consistent with city policy for the siting
of such centers. The Land Use Element suggests that such
centers be developed at the intersection of arterial
streets. In addition, the project site is located beneath
the Hughes Helicopter test flight pattern and would be
subject to potential crash hazards from these testing
operations.
3) Noise
The northern portion of the project area is within the 1990
65 CNEL noise contour from Palomar Airport. There is the
additional likelihood that the residential area of the
project would be within the 65 CNEL contour for helicopter-
generated noise, given the topography of the site and the
relationship of the flight patterns to the property. In
general, approval of the density increase would increase
the number of residences that could be exposed to annoying
single-event noise levels generated by aircraft and
helicopters and, therefore, could result in increased noise
complaints.
-2-
4) Topography and Visual Aesthetics
An increase in intensity of land use would likely result in
an increase in grading for additional streets and pad areas,
Mitigation includes incorporation of design criteria such
as restricting development to areas with less than 25
percent slope and setting commercial structures back from
slope areas to minimize visibility from outside the project
area.
5) Biological Resources
The Environmental Impact Report identifies two sensitive
plant species on the site. An increase in land use
intensity may result in additional hazards to these plant
populations. Mitigation would include provision of an
effective preservation plan for these plants.
IV. ANALYSIS - GPA/LU 83-14/ZC-278
Planning Issues
1) Can the identified environmental impacts be mitigated
to a level of insignificance?
2) Is there sufficient land use justification that the
proposed land uses are superior to those presently
allowed by the general plan?
Discussion
Staff's concern with the applicant's request revolves primarily
around three major issues; a) land use compatibility, b) traffic
circulation, and c) airport impacts.
The Environmental Impact Report addressed the possibility of 14
acres of commercial use resulting from the proposed general plan
amendment. This includes a six acre area owned by the applicant
which would be changed from the RL designation. The
Environmental Impact Report also discussed a 16 acre parcel
adjacent to the northwest where the owner is also interested in
commercial use. (Due to the slope constraints on the 16-acre
parcel, it is likely that a maximum of 14 acres, including the
proposed 6 acres, of general commercial acreage could result).
The appropriateness of placing such a commercial area off a
local residential street is questionable. The location of the
proposed commercial use, as well as the impacts associated with
high intensity uses, could increase the potential for land use
incompatibilities. The natural slopes to the north and east
provide a useful and attractive land use buffer to the approved
planned industrial uses along the south side of Palomar Airport
Road. In staff's opinion, the ridgetop, and property to the
south, is most appropriate for. residential land uses. This is
consistent with staff and City Council action to date.
-3-
In addition,_the Environmental Impact Report traffic study has
identified anticipated traffic capacity problems (with uses
presently allowed by the general plan) on Palomar Airport Road,
particularly at its intersection with College Avenue. Staff
concludes that land use intensification should not occur in
areas that will generate traffic at intersections already
identified as problem areas, unless overriding considerations
exist. Staff is unable to find these considerations.
The proposed project is located 2700 feet from the take-off end
of the Palomar Airport runway. As such, there are presently
hundreds of take-offs per day, at full-engine speed, travelling
close to the subject property.
The entire site is within the airport influence area. Although
only a small (northern) portion of the site is encumbered by the
official crash impact zone for general aircraft, significant
numbers of Hughes Helicopters transverse the site daily. The
Hughes Company has written a letter to the City asking the City
not to increase residential density on this property.
It is apparent that the existing low-density land use
designations were placed on the site for the specific purpose
that such land uses would subject less residents to aircraft
noise and crash hazards. Staff concludes that this is sound
reasoning and does not recommend any increase in residential
intensity on the site. Finally, staff feels that the subject
property should be developed through the Planned Development
Ordinance. This is the perfect vehicle to use to transfer
residential density from the entire property and cluster it on
the south side of the property away from the noise impacts.
Attachments
1. Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2279, 2280 and 2281
2. Location map
3. Background Data Sheet
4. Disclosure Form
5. Exhibit "A", dated April 25, 1984
PJK:ad
4/11/84
-4-
7
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: EIR 83-8/GPA/LU 83-14/ZO278
APPLICANT: CARLSBAD LAND INVESTORS
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Certification of EIR, GPA to allow RIM and C land uses,
with corresponding zoning, south of Palomar Airport Road, E/of Laurel Tree Ln.
A portion of lot "G" of the Rancho Aqua Hedionda in the Cty
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: of San Diego,State of CA, according to map thereof No. 823,
filed in the Office of County Recorder of San Diego County, Nov. 16, 1896
APN; 212-04—30
Acres 85 Proposed No. of Lots/Units
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation RL and RLM
Density Allowed 0-1.5 and 0-4 Density Proposed 0-4 and commercial
Existing Zone E-l-A(co) Proposed Zone R-l-10 and C-2
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoning Land Use
Site E-l-A(co) Vacant
North P-M-Q Vacant
South E-l-A(co) Vacant
East P-M-Q Industrial
West E-l-A(co) Vacant
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District Carlsbad Water Carlsbad Sewer Carlsbad EDU's
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated October 16, 1981
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Negative Declaration, issued
X E.I.R. Certified, dated April 25, 1984
Other,
/*'
EXISTING EXHIBIT A
4-26-84
PROPOSED
3PA/LU 83-14
CARLSBAD LAND INVESTORS ZC-278
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
GPA/LU 83-14/ZC-278
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will
hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue,
Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on Tuesday, July 17, 1984, to consider
an application for a General Plan Amendment and Zoning to change 56 acres
of RL (0-1.5 du/ac) designated property to 36 acres of RLM (0-4 du/ac)and
20 acres of O (Office). There are no changes on remaining property,
generally located on 85 acres of property located south of Palomar
Airport Road and east of Laurel Tree Lane and more particularly described
as:
All that portion of land as delineated on Survey Map
No. 5715, filed in the Office of the County Recorder
of San Diego County, December 19, 1960, being a portion
of Lot "G" of the Rancho Agua Hedionda in the County
of San Diego, State of California, according to Map
thereof, No. 823, filed in the Office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County, November 16, 1896.
APPLICANT:
PUBLISH:
Carlsbad Land Investors
July 7, 1984 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
SITE
1
CARLSBAD INVESTORS
ZC278
GPA/LU 83-14
Cit? ot Cartebafc
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSSAD, CAUFORNIA 92008
CARLSBAD LAND INVESTORS
17332 Irvine Blvd, Ste 245
Tustin, CA 92680
212-041-04
EUNTJNGTON BCH COMP CORF
c/0 CKEVPON USA INC, PROP TAX
P.O. BOX 7611
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120
5. 215-070-16
BACHMANN, EMANUEL 0.
9430 CRESTA DRIVE
LOS ANGELES, CA 90035
212-040-23
SUDAN INTERIOR MISSION,
P.O. BOX 1398
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
>.. 212-040-26
LAND JUDY, TAHNEE CORP
916 BEGONIA COURT
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
6. 215-070-15
ROESCH, RONALD L.
17250 SUNSET BLVD. APT 105
PACIFIC PALISADES, CA 90272
10. 212-040-34 :
FRAZEE, EDWIN M. & MABEu G.
P.O. BOX 1091
RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 9i>1o7
212-040-19
KELLY, ROBERT B.
1603 TUSTIN AVE
COSTA MESA, CA S2627
213-020-16
BIRTCHER BUSINESS CENTER-
CORPORATE PALOMAR
27611 LA PAZ
LACUNA NIGUEL, CA 92677
7. 214-140-07
NIPPON, KTS INC.
C/O HAJIME KATO
17 HORSESHOE-LANE
ROLLING HILLS ESTATES, CA
3Q2ZA....
8. 212-040-22
VISTA LOMA INVESTMENTS
P.O. BOX 175
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
11. 212-0^0-34
KELLY, RICHARD C. & EOrSOT F
P.O. BOX 175
CARLSBAD, CA 92003
13. 212-040-25
UKEGAWA, HIROSHI & MIWAKO,
UKEGAWA, JOE & IRENE
4218 SKYLINE ROAD
CARLSBAD, CA 92008