HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-07-17; City Council; 7818-2; REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, A SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, ZONE CHANGE, A TENTATIVE MAP AND A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 78 AND NORTHEAST OF EXISTING MARRON ROAD5
%
-4 3
3 1 I$
8
w 03 rn 4
b 4
h
8 b
2 o
a
d 0 z 3 8
6
for the site because of noise from Highway 78 and from the asphalt plant. T
was also concern that there are already enough apartments in this area of city and the additional number of apartment units being requested by applicant at this location could create problems for the city. Impact on
adjacent riparian habitat was also a concern. The Environmental Impact &I indicated that non-residential uses mdd have mch less of an impact bec;
there would be no kids, dogs or cats to disturb this area.
A final reason for denying this project is that the Council changed the land on this property about a 18 months ago frm residential use to office and tra service conanercial. The Council found at that the that the property
inappropriate for residential use.
For further information please see the attached exhibits and the report to i
FISCAL IMPACT
The applicant will provide all required public improvements to the projec
Also, the applicant has agreed to pay a public facilities fee to offset t
costs of providing all other public services.
Planning Commission.
ENVI:RONMENTALREVIEW
An Environmental Impact Report was certified by the City Council in Decembei
1982.
EXHIBITS
. 1 . Location Map 2. 3. 4. Exhibits "A , "X" and Y
PC Resolution Nos. 2308, 2309, 2310, 2311 & 2312
PC Staff Reprt dated,,,Jpe 27, 1984
, C
SITE
BUENA VISTA PARK PLAZA
CT 84-5
SDP 84-1
L SP- 192
ZC-30 1
GPA~LU 84-
b
$
a \'
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Q WJ /
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2308
%'RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
MENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FROM O/TS/OS TO RM/OS ON APPROXIMATELY
96.8 ACRES OF PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 78, APPROXIMATELY .5 MILES EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL
APPLICANT: G & G ENTERPRISES
CASE NO.: GPA/LU 84-1
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN AMEND-
WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment tc
General Plan designation for certain property located, as st
Exhibit "X", dated June 27, 1984, attached and incorporated
have been filed with the Planning Commission: and
WHEREAS, said verified applications constitute a r
for amendment as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Munic
Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 27th
June, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribe
to consider said request;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all pel I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
' desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all facto]
relating to the General Plan Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plan
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That in view of the findings made and considering the applicable law, the decision of the Planning Commissi DENIAL of GPA/LU 84-1, as shown on Exhibit "X" , dateC
1984 .
////
////
i
1
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
a w i 4 -
Findings:
1) The pkoposed RM land use designation is not appropriate
the subject property for the following reasons, as disci the staff report:
a) Potential environmental impacts associated with the
project, including impacts on the riparian habitat
noise impacts on future residents, have not been mitigated .
The project would not be compatible with surroundin uses including the riparian habitat, Highway 78, th
b)
Coast Asphalt Plant and existing and future residen
developments.
2) Substantial justification, to support the requested ame has not been presented, as discussed in the staff repor
3) The Land Use Planning Manager has determined that the
environmental impacts of this project have already been considered in conjunction with previously certified environmental documents and, therefore, issued a Notice Prior Compliance, June 11, 1984.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting c
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, he1
27th day of June, 1984, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN : I -
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JERRY ROMBOTIS, Chairman CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSI(
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER LAND USE PLANNING MANAGER
PC RES0 NO. 2308 -2-
<
*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e e J
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2309
A-RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING
A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-P-Q/C-T-Q/O-S TO
RD-M-Q/OS ON APPROXIMATELY 96.8 ACRES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
HIGHWAY 78 APPROXIMATELY .5 MILES EAST OF EL
CAMINO REAL.
APPLICANT: G & G ENTERPRISES
CASE NO: ZC-301
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain propert
wit:
A portion of Rancho Agua Hedionda, as delineated on
record of survey Map No. 5342, filed in the Office
County Recorder on January 26, 1960,
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to th
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said application mnStituteS a request as
provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 27th dz
June, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribec
to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
1 considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all per!
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factor:
relating to the Zone Change; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plann:
Commission as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hear
Commission DENIES 2'2-301, based on the following findin
////
////
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
IO
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
I.8
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e w 1
Findings:
1)
2) The Land Use Planning Manager has determined that the
The proposed zone change is not consistent with the Gen Plan.
environmental impacts of this project have already been considered in conjunction with previously certified
environmental documents and, therefore, issued a Notice Prior Compliance, June 11, 1984.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting o
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, he1
the 27th day of June, 1984, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES :
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN :
JERRY ROMBOTIS, Chairman CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSI(
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER 1 ' LAND USE PLANNING MANAGER
PC RES0 NO. 2309 -2-
I
1 I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
m w
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2310
A- RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING SPECIFIC PLAN 192, FOR A RESIDENTIAL SPECIFIC PLAN FOR 96.8 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 78, APPROXIMATELY .5
MILES EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL. APPLICANT: G & G ENTERPRISES
CASE NO: SP-192
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain proper
wit:
A portion of Rancho Agua Hedionda, as delineated c
record of Survey Map No. 5342, filed in the Office County Recorder on January 26, 1960,
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to t
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a re
provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 27th c
June, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribe
law, to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and c
ing all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons des
be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating 1
Specific Plan; and
I
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning C
sion as follows:
(A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
(B) That based on the evidence presented at the public heal
Commission DENIES SP-192, based on the following findir
////
////
////
c
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
W l?
Findings:
1) The Residential Specific Plan is not consistent with t
General Plan.
2) The Land Use Planning Manager has determined that the
environmental impacts of this project have already bee
environmental documents and, therefore, issued a Notic
Prior Compliance, June 11, 1984.
considered in conjunction with previously certified
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, hc
the 27th day of June, 1984, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES :
NOES :
ABSENT :
ABSTAIN :
7 JERRY ROMBOTIS, Chairman CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISS:
ATTEST:
1 MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER ' LAND USE PLANNING MANAGER
PC RES0 NO. 2310 -2-
L
*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Q W
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2311
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY
96.8 ACRES OF PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON
THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 78, APPROXIMATELY ,.5 MILES EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL. APPLICANT: G b G ENTERPRISES CASE NO: CT 84-5
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain proper1
wit:
A portion of Rancho Agua Hedionda, as delineated 01
record of Survey Map No. 5342, filed in the Office County Recorder on January 26, 1960,
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to t
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a r
as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 27th
June, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribe
law, to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if anyf of all pe: I_
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all facto1
relating to the Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plan
Commission as follows:
(A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
(B) That based on the evidence presented at the public he the Commission DENIES CT-84-5, based on the followinc findings:
////
////
L
>
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Q W
Findings:
1) The proposed tentative map is not consistent with the General Plan.
The Land Use Planning Manager has determined that the
environmental impacts of this project have already bee considered in conjunction with previously certified environmental documents and, therefore, issued a Notic Prior Compliance, June 11, 1984.
-
2)
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, he
the 27th day of June, 1984, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES :
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN :
JERRY ROMBOTIS, Chairman CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISS
ATTEST:
1 MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
LAND USE PLANNING MANAGER
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PC RES0 NO. 2311 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
m W
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2312
A-RESOLUTION
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 84-18 FOR 329 APARTMENT UNITS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 78, APPROXIMATELY .5
MILES EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL.
CASE NO: SDP - 84-1
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
APPLICANT: G 6, G ENTERPRISES
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed wj
City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; i
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a 1
as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; anc
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the MuniciI
the Planning Commission did, on the 27th day of June, 1984
consider said request on property described as:
A portion of Rancho Agua Hedionda, as delineated d
record of Survey Map No. 5342, filed in the Officc
County Recorder on January 26, 1960:
WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and consid
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring t
heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to
Development Plan No. 84-1.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plan
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
(A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
(B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hc
the Commission DENIES SDP 84-1, based on the followir findings:
Findings:
1) The proposed Site Development Plan is not consistent
General Plan.
////
T
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
.I 0
2) The Land Use Planning Manager has determined that the envirgnmental impacts of this project have already beer considered in conjunction with previously certified
environmental documents and, therefore, issued a Noticc
Prior Compliance, June 11, 1984,
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, he
the 27th day of June, 1984, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES :
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN :
JERRY ROMBOTIS, Chairman CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISS
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
LAND USE PLANNING MANAGER
PC RES0 NO. 2312 -2-
1 e C
1
-. 8 STAFF REPORT
DATE : June 27, 1984
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Land Use Planning Office
-
SUBJECT: GPA/LU 84-l/ZC-30l/SP-l92/CT 84-5/SDP 84-1 - BUENA VISTA PARK PLAZA - Request for approval of a general
plan amendment changing the land use designation from O/TS/OS to RM/OS; a zone change from R-P-Q/C-T-Q and
0-S to RD-M-Q and 0-S; a specific plan; a tentative
subdivision map to create nine lots; and a site development plan for the first 329 apartment units generally located on the south side of Highway 78,
approximately .5 miles east of El Camina Real.
I. RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution Nos. 2308, 2309, 2310, 2311 and 2312, DENYING GPA/LU 84-1, ZC-301, SP-192, CT 84-5 and SDP 84-1, based on the findings contained therein.
I1 . PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting approval of five discretionary
actions for 96.8 acres, located as described above. The actio]
being requested are as follows:
1) An amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan
from a combination district of Office (0) Travel Service (TS) and Open Space (OS) to a combination
Residential Medium Density (RM) and Open Space (OS),
2) A zone change from Residential Professional with a Q
overlay (R-P-Q)/Commercial Tourist with a Q overlay (CT-C
to Residential Multiple Density RD-M-Q/Open Space (OS).
district of
3) A Specific Plan;
4) A tentative subdivision map to create six developable 101 and three open space lots;
5) A site development plan for Phase I construction, to dew
3 29 apartment units .
The project site is currently vacant and covered by natural vegetation. As shown on attached Exhibit "A", the northern
portion of the site contains the Buena Vista Creek, associate
f laadplain and riparian woodland. the South Coast Asphalt Plant approximately 314 of a mile k0
east and the Tanglewood condominium project to the southwest which is just beyond an open space easement, Highway 78 and
City of Oceanside border the site to the north.
Adjoining land uses includ
W w
5
f
In December 1982, the City Council certified an Environmental
Impact Report -and approved a general plan amendment for the subject property from RLM (Residential Low-Medium Density, 0-4 du's/ac) to a combination district comprised of 0 (Professiona:
and Related Commercial), TS (Travel Service) and 0-S (Open
Space) . In March 1983, a zone change and specific plan were approved implementing the land use designations 8
Access to the site would be derived from the easterly extensioi of Marron Road. Additional access possibilities include the
extension of Rancho Del Oro to connect with Marron Road creati
an interchange with Highway 78 or an overpass from Oceanside.
Currently, Rancho Del Oro terminates in Oceanside, north of Highway 78. Another possibility is the extension of Marron Ro east to College Boulevard, Marron Road currently terminates in Avenida De Anita.
I11 . ANALYSIS - GPA/LU 84-1
Planning Issues
1) Is the proposed land use the most appropriate for the sit
Discussion
Staff believes that the proposed RM designation is not the bes
land use for the subject property and sufficient justification to support the amendment, has not been presented. It is staff
environmentally sensitive to the resources and constraints of the site, nor compatible with surrounding land uses.
The current general plan designations were just recently found
to be appropriate for the site. In approving the general plan amendment, rezoning and specific plan, the City Council found that all environmental impacts, associated with professional a tourist commercial uses, had been or could be mitigated.
Finally, staff does not believe that substantial justification for the amendment has been presented. The applicant's primary
justification for the change is that it would generate less traffic. While this is true, the recently completed SANDAG traffic model indicates that projected traffic volumes, from either the existing general plan or the proposed amendment wit
or without Rancho Del Oro, are well within design capacity.
Staff believes that any proposed amendment must stand the test of substantial justification of benefit to the community. The state of California General Plan Guidelines indicate in reviewing proposals for general plan amendments, local officials should remember that the general plan is a policy document for the entire community and that it may only be amen in the public interest. In other words, the plan should only amended when the city, with the support of a broad consensus,
determines a change is necessary, not merely because a propert
owner desires the amendment .
opinion that residential medium density, 4-10 du/ac, is not
-2-
W - t
s
The general plan is the City's most important tool in shaping
the future and-attaining the goals of the community. The plan should only be amended when substantial evidence has been
presented to support the change as a benefit to the community.
The City Council recently determined that the highest and best
and travel service commercial. These uses were found to be
appropriate, compatible and that all environmental concerns ha been or would be mitigated. Staff finds no justification to
support the amendment.
An Environmental Impact Report, was prepared and certified in conjunction with the preceding general plan amendment to Professional and Travel Service commercial. The Environmental Impact Report identifies the riparian woodland habitat onsite one of the best stands of habitat in the lowlands of San Diego
County. In evaluating residential development as an alternative, the Environmental Impact Report also states that ... "would pose impacts on the riparian areas. Use of recreational vehicles, presence of household pets, increased possibility of set fires, all combine as a different but potentially intense impact on this area" .
land use €or the subject property was office and professional
Staff believes that residential development, as proposed by th applicant, would not be compatible with surrounding land uses.
As noted above, residential development would result in potentially significant impacts on riparian habitat. Projecte noise impacts from Marron Road would require dwellings to be setback 80-100 feet from the roadway. Portions of the site ar impacted by noise from Highway 78. Additional noise and visua impacts are present on portions of the site from the South Coa Asphalt Plant. During the last general plan amendment hearing for this site, both the Planning Commission and the City Counc felt that noise impacts prevented this site from being suitabl for residential use.
The applicant is proposing to designate 37.25 acres RM 4-10
du's/ac and 59.43 acres open space, as indicated on Exhibit "X Zoning of RD-M-Q and 0-S would correspond to these areas and acreages. The proposed ratio of developable land to open spac is consistent with existing general planning and zoning. The
specific plan, however, indicates the applicant's intent to develop up to 966 units or up to 1207 units utilizing a 25 percent density bonus based on reserving those additional unit
for affordable housing. The applicant is proposing such a density bonus in the first phase.
The resulting potential density would be a maximum of 25.9
du's/ac or up to 32.4 du's/ac with density bonuses. Land that has been designated on the general plan and by zoning as open space may not be included in calculating density. Property tk is zoned open space would have no development rights to be transferred or clustered, as provided in the Planned Developmt Ordinance. The property would need the RH, Residential High
Density (20-30 duls/ac), designation to achieve the density
requested by the applicant in the specific plan. The requestf RM designation would provide for a maximum of 372 dwelling units, or 465 units with a 25 percent density bonus.'
-3-
* w
1
<
It is staff's opinion that neither the RM or RH residential
designations are appropriate for the reasons stated above. HI
density residential development, however, would heighten the
potential impacts associated with residential development.
Further, residential units, developed at a high density, may F an additional area of incompatibility with adjoining residenti units. Tanglewood, adjacent to the southeast is developed at du's/ac; property to the east is designated RLM, 0-4 du's/ac.
ZC-301, SP-192/CT 84-5/SDP 84-1
Staff is also recommending denial of the requested zone change specific plan, tentative map and site development plan as they are not consistent with the existing general plan, and not
appropriate for the site.
IV ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Land Use Planning Manager has determined that the environmental effects of this project, have already been considered in conjunction with previously certified environmental documents and, therefore, issued a notice of pric
compliance on June 11, 1984.
Attachments
1. Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2308, 2309, 2310, 2311
2. Location Map 3. Background Data Sheet
4. Disclosure Form 5. Environmental Document 6. Exhibits "A", "X", and nYn, dated June 27, 1984
7. Exhibit "Z", Specific Plan
and 2312.
CDN : ad
6/13/34
-4-
e
'
mcKm DATA SHEGT -
CASE N[): am 84-1/ZC-301/SP-l92/CP 84-5/SDP 84-1
AppLICAW: G b G aJTERpRISES
REQUEST AND XICATI~N: GPA fnm o/lrs/os to FM/~; a zone change from R-P-Q/C~
Q/+S to FO-M+O-S; a specific plan, a tentative subdivision map and a site developmnt plan tor 329 apartment units
of Survey Map NO. 5342, filed in the Office of the
Acres 96.8 Praposed No. of mtsnnits 9
LEGAL RIPT TI ON: A portion of Randx, Qua Hedianda, as delineated on record
County Recorder on January 26, 1960 APN: 167-040-24
GENERAL PIAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation (requested)m
Density Allowed 4-10 dugs/ac Density Proposed 28 dugs/ac
Existing Zone R-P-Q/C-T-Q/O-S proposed Zone RD++/O-S
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoniq Land Use
site R-P+/C-T~O-S Vacant
North Hwy 78 ELEL
South R-1-1OfOOO/Pc Multi/SFRS
East R-1-10 Vacant/South Coast Asph alt
West R-1-10 Vacantmulti
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District Carlsbad Water Carlsbad Sewer Carlsbad EW's
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated October 16, 1982
ENVI- IMPACT AssEssMEm - Negative Declaration, issued
- E.I.R. Certified, dated
Other, Notice of prior camp liane, June 11, 1984
W"' .+aat ~~~ner: uuwrcuacao '3 reyuAL=un YuU WLAA UC 3u a .. 8. w .<
-APPLICANT : T c rD tion :=e, coz-pration, syd -
22Q4 Garnet Avenue. Sm nieao CA 92109
BWhclSS Address
(6191 483-6252
Telephose Nunrbar
AGENT : DWLOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM
Name
P.O. Box 2143, Carlsbad CA 92008 ..
Business Address
(619J' 434-3135
Telephone Nupber
EEbrBZS : D. Greenbers mme *(individual, partner, joint .
venture, coqozation, syndication)
Eome Mdress
2204 Garnet &venue, San Diego CA 92109
Bilsiness Ad-ess
- - n
Teleshone NVar Telephone Xumber
C. Burstin
:It32 Eome Wdress
2204 Garnet Avenue, San Diego, CA 92109 -.- 3-siness Aeesss
- n.
Tt1ep'nor.o N&er Te lepiha ne ?;unber
(Attach more sheets if necessary)
I/?re doclce r;&er pnalty of perjury that tk infomation contained in thi
closure is trid and correct and that it will remain true and correct and na
relic2 ugon as 5eiq true and correct until aaended.
cbc llRVF!T,OP~NT Ap_ol'ican t
BY I/ AgXt,' Cmer, Partngr- b
11 EXHIBIT
I 6-27-84
e c- 0
-
- OCIAN8#)€
------
A
L CT 84-5
SDP 84-
SP-192
ZC-30 1
4 BUENA VISTA PARK PLAZA GPA/,LU 84
t
L EXHIBI' 0 E X I STING 6-27-
-
COMB1NATION DISTRICT
(TS/O/OS)
OS-OPEN SPACE
TS-TRAVEL SERVICES
0- PROFESSIONAL
I
PROPOSED
COMBINATION DISTRICT
RM-RESIDENTIAL-MED
GENERAL PLAN
' E&IStlWO 6-27-1
(Q)-QUALIFIED OVERLAY ZONE
Rp-RESIDENTIAL PROFESSIONAL
CT-CO M M E R C I A L T 0 UR I ST
OS-OPEN SPACE
PROPOSED
RD-M-RESIDENTIAL DENSITY MULTIPLE
CARLSBAD-WOODRIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 2889 Woodridge CA 92008
ly 14, 1984
TO: CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
FROM : BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Carlsbad-Woodridge Homeowners Association
SUBJECT: OBJECTION TO BUENA VISTA PARK PLAZA PROJECT
We support the Tanglewood Homeowners Association in its
appeal to the Carlsbad City Council to deny a request
for variance so that property situated east of Avenida
de Anita at Marron Road already designated as suitable
for office, business, and professional use be changed to
permit high density housing.
Carlsbad does not need another 1200 apartments in an
area already being overwhelmed by vehicles, traffic
jams, and overuse of existing facilities.
In the interest of Carlsbad's future, and in the preser-
vation of community members' property values, please be
firm in denying this request once and for all time.
Your careful consideration in this matter will be great-
ly appreciated.
Association Presiden
First Vice President
Second Vice Presiden
Secretary
f-
EHW/ .
i
1 PETITION -> We are strongly opposed to the high density residential proposed for the
developernent called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road just
east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business,
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
PRINTED NAME
/J
PETITION
We are strongly opposed to the high density residential proposed for the
developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road just
east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business,
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE - CITY WKERE YOU LIVE
%
% PETITION We are strongly opposed to the high density residential proposed for the
developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road just
east of Avenida de Anita.
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
We believe that the office, business,
PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE CITY WHERE YOU LIVE
c
1
I
! I
1 I
PETITION de are strongly opposed to the high density residential proposed for the
developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road just
east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business,
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE CITY WHERE YOU LIVE
PETITION
We are strongly opposed to the high density residenti sed for the
developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road just
east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business,
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE CITY WHERE YOU LIVE
1
&
G E G Enterprises Inc.
July 12, 1984
Mayor Casler and City Council
City of Carlsbad
Carlsbad City Hall
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Re: Appeal of Planning Commission Decision
GPA/LU 84-l/ZC-30l/SP-l92/CT 84-5/SDP 84-1
Honorable Mayor Casler and City Council:
We have filed an appeal of a Planning Commission action
of June 27, 1984 denying our application for a General
Plan Amendment, zone change, specific plan, tentative
tract map, and site development plan.
We hereby respectfully request that, at the City Council
meeting on July 17, 1984 when our appeal is scheduled to
be heard, you continue our appeal until the next sched-
uled General Plan Amendment hearing (November 1984); and refer the matter back to the staff and Planning Commission
for consideration as a residential project. We strongly
believe that residential use of the site is far superior
to the current designation of office, tourist, and com- mercial; and believe that we can properly address and
resolve the issues raised by the commission and staff
provided we have the time between now and the next sched-
uled series of GPA hearings.
Respec ull sub itted,
-^ k?W
Mark H. Cohen
President
MHC/nmv
Attachment
2204 Garnet Avenue, San Diego, California 92109 (619) 483-6252
@
G EG Enterprises Inc.
July 17, 1984
Mayor Casler and City Council
City of Carlsbad
Carlsbad City Hall
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Re: Appeal of Planning Commission Decision
GPA/LU 84-l/ZC-30l/SP-l92/CT 84-5/SDP 84-1
Honorable Mayor Casler and City Council:
We wish to withdraw our appeal regarding the Planning
Commission's decision on the above stated property.
6rk H. -Cohen
President
MHC/nmv
~~
2204 Garnet Avenue, San Diego, California 92109 (619) 483-6252
PETITION /.P, LLAJ 91 I$ I
We are strongly opposed to the high density residential proposed for the
developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road just east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business,
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
I
PRINTED NAME CITY WHERE YOU LIVE
PETITION \-
We are strongly opposed to the high density residential proposed for the
developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road just
east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business,
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
PETITION
We are strongly opposed to the .Agh density resiLzntLal proposed for the
developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road just
east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business,
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
PRINTED NAME CITY WHERE YOU LIVE
I
, PETITION
We are strongly opposed to the high density residential proposed for the
developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road just east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business,
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
', ,
PETITION
We are strongly opposed to the high density residential proposed for the
developernent called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road just
east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business,
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE CITY WHERE YOU LIVE
1
i .,
PETITION
We are strongly opposed to the high density residential proposed for the
developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road just
east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business,
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
PRINTED NAME
, PETITION
We are strongly opposed to the high density residential proposed for the
developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road just
east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business,
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
-
PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE CITY WHERE YOU LIVE
t j
7 PETITION We are strongly opposed to the high density residential proposed for the
developement call-ed Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road just
east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business,
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE CITY WHERE YOU LIVE
\ . PETITION We are strongly opposed to the high density residential proposed for the
developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situa,ted on Marron Road just
east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business,
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
L
!
i t
PETITION
We are strongly opposed to the high density residential proposed for the
developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situa.ted on Marron Road just east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business,
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
c PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE CITY WHERE YOU LIVE
h
J PETITION
We are strongly opposed to the high density residential proposed for the
developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situa.ted on Marron Road just
east of Avenida de Anita.
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
We believe that the office, business,
PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE CITY WHpqOU LIVE
PETITION We are strongly opposed to the high density residential proposed for the
developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road just east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business,
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
PRINTED NAME
P T
rc-
_A PETITION
We are strongly opposed to the high density residential units proposed for
the developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road
just east of Avenida de Anita.
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
We believe that the office, business,
PRINTED NAME TI WHERE YOU LIVE
PETITION
We are strongly opposed to the high density residential units proposed for
the developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road
just east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business,
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE CITY WHERE YOU LIVE
. PETITION
We are strongly opposed to the high density residential units proposed for
the developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road
just east of Avenida de Anita.
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
We believe that the office, business,
PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE CITY WHERE YOU LIVE
i
, PETITION
We are strongly opposed to the high density residential proposed for the
developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road just
east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business,
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
_-
PETITION
We are strongly opposed to the high density residential proposed for the
developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road just
east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business,
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE CITY WHERE YOU LIVE
_-
PETITION
We are strongly opposed to the high density residential proposed for the
developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road just
east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business,
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
PRINTED NAME CITY WHERE YOU LIVE
..
.. .
L -/
PETITION
We are strongly opposed to the high density residential proposed for the
developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road just
east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business,
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
V I
PETITION *
.< We are strongly opposed to the high density residential proposed for the
developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road just
east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business, professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE CITY WHERE You LIVE
PETITION We are strongly opposed to the high density residential proposed for the
developement called Buena Vista Park Plaza situated on Marron Road just east of Avenida de Anita. We believe that the office, business,
professional and open space should remain the designated use of that
area. We are all adults who live, work or own property in the area.
PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE CITY WHERE YOU LIVE
. 1200 ELM AVENUE
% CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
Office of the City Clerk
APPEAL FORM
TELEPHONE: (71 4) 438-5535
I (we) appeal the following decision of the Planninq,
Commission to the City Council:
Project name and number (or subject of appeal):.
Buena Vista Park Plaza - GPA/LU 84-1 / ZC-301/SP-l92/CT 84-5/SDP 84-1
Date of decision: 6 /27/8 4
Reason for appeal: To request council direction regarding land
_I
use denied by Planning Commission
7/3/84 Date
Mark Cohen, President Name (Please print)
G&G EnterDrises Inc. ~_~___~__~ Address
2204 Garnet, San Diego 92109
483-6500 Telephone Number
I .- WOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL
GPA/LU 84-1/ZC-3Ol/SP-l92/CT 84-5/SDP 84-1
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will
hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue,
Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO P.M., on Tuesday, July 17, 1984, to consider
an appeal of a general plan amendment changing the land use designation
from O/TS/OS to RM/OS: a zone change from R-P-Q/C-T-Q and 0-S to RD-M-Q; a
specific plan; a tentative subdivision map to create nine lots: and a site development plan for the first 329 apartment units generally located on
the south side of Highway 78, approximately .5 miles east of El Camino
Real on property generally located on and more particularly described as:
A portion of Rancho Agua Hedionda, as delineated on record of
survey map no. 5342, filed in the Office of the County Recorder
on January 26, 1960.
APPELLANT: G&G Enterprises, Inc.
PUBLISH : uly 7, 1984 CARLSBAD CITY C(
LOCATION MAP
SITE
I CT 84-5
I SDP84-1 I SP-192 I ZC-301
RLENA VISTAPARK PLAZA I GPAILU 84-1
UNCIL
1236 ELM AVENUE . CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
.I'
Office of the City Clerk
APPEAL FORM
TELEPHONE:
(714) 438-5535
I (We) appeal the following decision of the Planninq
Commission to the City Council:
Project name and number (or subject of appeal):
Buena Vista Park Plaza - GPA/LU 84-1 / ZC-301/SP-l92/CT 84-5/SDP 84-1
Date of decision: 5/77/a4
Reason for appeal: To request council direction regarding land
use denied by Planning Commission
7/3/04 Date
.
Mark Cohen, President Name (Please print)
G&G Enterprises Inc.
Address
2204 Garnet, San Diego 92109
- 0 Telephone Number
,
.
NOTICE IS HEREBY Gm that the Planning Cdssion of the City of Carlsbad will
hold a public hearing at the City Council Chadxrs, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 7:OO p.m. on Wednesday, June 27, 1984, to oonsider approval of a
general plan ame-nt changing the land use designation fran O/Ts/os to RM/~; a zone change fran R-P-Q/C-T-Q and 0-S to RD-M-Q and 0-S; a specific plan; a tentative subdivision map to create nine lots; and a site development plan for
the first 329 apartment units generally located on the south side of Highway 78,
approximately .5 miles east of El Camino Real on property generally located on and mre particularly described as:
A portion of Rancho Agua Hedionda Hedionda, as delineated an record of survey map m. 5342, filed in the Office Of the County Recorder on January 26, 1960.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are oordially invited to attend the public hearing. Office at 438-5591.
If you have any questions please call the Land Use Plannitq
CASE FILE:
APPLICANT: BUENA VISTA PARK PLAZA
PUBLISH : JUNE 16, 1984
GPA/LU 84-l/ZC-30l/SP-l92/CT 84-5/SDP 84-1
CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING a3IwIssIoN
1. 036-54 F h
J&zi-'y L. Edler 2. 167-441-38
h.0. .Epx 308 Cons Standard Pacific of
7298%&&mt ?lesa Blvd
swl Dj.9, CA 92111
s :' &a Jolla, CA 92008
4.
_. 167-040-32 5. 167-040-31
shelly caron P.O. Bcrx 1502 Carlsbad, CA 92008
--
7. 165-360-39 8. 165-360-38 Autaxhle ' Cllh of s. ca vista Way Villa- m: General Accamt5ng 2601 Figuerw S-t ' P.O. Box 628
Zrw mgeles, CA 90007
c/o John Steiger
Oceanside, CA 92054
lo* 167-030-14 11. 167-030-12 A.J. Land 00. A. J. Land 00, 11454 San VWte Blvd. . 11454 San Vincente Blvd. Ios Angeles CA 90049 LrOs Angeles Ca 90049
167-030-46 14= 167-040-35
P.0. Bax 985 P.O. Bax 1502 El Cajan, CA 92002
Helix & Associates Shelley carun
Carlsbad, C& 92008
--
16. 165-360-41 17. 167-040-30 Vista wzy Village
c/o John SWger 164 Tenraclna ' WY? Fgt.c
Alex & Christine -2
Vista, CA 92083 P.0, BOX 628 Oceanside, QI 92054
3. 167-040-11 so. Coast Asphalt . P.O.%3W
CarlsBad, CA 92008
165-360-40
vista Way Village c/o John Sm~er P.0. Box 628 Oceansi.de, CA 92054
-
6.
90 165-361-05 Jms Dawns & Ruth.Rarmos 1303 Crestridge Drive Oceansid, CA 92054
c/o Bartman, Braun, & mP= 1880 cent\ny ParE 6
CA 90067
167-040-34 Shelley caran P.0. Bax 1502 Carlsbad, CA 92008
I
18.16.7-040-23 vista way Villa-, Ltd. -- John Sdger P.0, Bax 628 I
Ocewside, CA 92054 - i .
.
I
-.
.,
*
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING 03MMIssION AGENDA
JUNE 27, 1984 7:OO P.M. ...............................................................................
CALL To ORDER
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING
1) GPWLLJ 84-5/MP-149(M)/ZC-306/Cr 84-8 - -
LA COGTA DEZ SUR - Request to anend th e Land
Use Element of the General Plan and La Costa Master Plan to change land use designations in the southwestern portion of the La Costa Master Plan area. Change and Master Tentative Tract Map. Also requested are a Zone
rn PUBLIC HEARINGS
AasENT: Schlehuber arrived at 8:30 P.M.
RESO m:
ACTION: Fv:
2276, 2277, 2278
DENIED and 2313
5-1 (Marcus)
(Schlehuber did not vote)
Q?A/LU 84-l/ZC-30l/SP-l92/Cr 84-5/SDP 84-1 - BUENA VISTA PARK PIAZA - Request for approval
of a general plan amendment changing the land use designation *an O/TS/OS td RM/OS; a zone change fran R-P-Q/C-'ILQ and 0-S to DM-Q and
0-S; a specific plan; a tentative subdivision map to create nine lots; and a site developnent plan for the first 329 apartment units generally located on the south side of Highway 78, approximately .5 miles east of El Cdno Real .
GPA/W 84-4/ZC-305 - RDBElU" - Request for approval of a general plan anendment fran RM and RLM to C and a preannexational zone change to C-2-Q on the southeast mrner of Tamarack Avenue and El Camino Real.
GPVW 83-14/2C-278 - -BAD LAtW INvEsroRs General Plan Amendment and zoning M change 56 acres of RL (0-1.5 du/ac) designated property to 36 acres of RLM (0-4 du/ac) and 20 acres of
0 (Office).
RES0 No: 2308, 2309,2310,
RES0 Nl.
ACTION: vcm: -€e- mm:
RES0 No. ACTION:
UYrE:
cc wm:
2314 ti 2315
APPFOVED __~ ~-
7-0 July 17, 1984
2316 & 2317
APPROVED
5-1-1 -. . Schlehuber & McFadden July - 17, 1984
(Alternative presented by the applicant.)
Minutes of June 13, 1984
mclm"T
ACTION:. APPROVED Wm: 5-0-2 (Rmbotis
& McFadden)
TIME : 11:lO P.M.