HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-03-12; City Council; 8089; Consultant Agreement for Engineering ServicesCIT JF CARLSBAD - AGEND. JILL
*6* frffi
MTG 3/12/85
DEPT. FIMK
TITLE:
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR
ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES
DEPT. HD.
CITYATTY
CITY MGR..J
1C\
2*~
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt Resolution No.
O
I
O
1
_i
O
OO
approving a consultant agreement
for assessment engineering services with Neste, Brudin & Stone,
Inc. and authorizing the Mayor to execute the agreement.
ITEM EXPLANATION;
Because the City has received a number of requests for assessment
districts using 1915 Act bonds and because most of these
districts will be both large and complex, the services of a
consultant assessment engineer are required.
Proposals were received from seven firms and were evaluated
independently by three staff members. The firm of Neste, Brudin
& Stone, Inc. was recommended as being the best qualified. Mr.
Norman Neste will be the individual actually performing the
duties and his experience and qualifications are outstanding.
The contract with Neste, Brudin 4 Stone, Inc. is to serve as the
City's assessment engineer for all large districts - particularly
involving 1915 Act bonds - and is not tied to any Specific
district. The firm will be paid on an hourly rate for general
advice given to staff in evaluating requests for districts. Once
a district gets to the point where Council authorizes that
procedures toward forming a district begin, a supplemental
agreement with Neste, Brudin & Stone, Inc. will be signed with a
specific scope of work and a fixed fee. Although the primary
purpose for this agreement is assessment engineering, preparation
of plans and specifications or other work could be included in
the agreement on a specific project if staff felt that was
preferable to a separate contract with another engineer.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City may be required to spend a small amount of money on an
hourly basis for advice from time to time on general assessment
engineering procedures. Funds are available in the amount of
$7,000.00 in the Assessment District Revolving Fund account
number 330-1840-3100 which may be used for this purpose.
Page No. 2 of Agenda Bill
FISCAL IMPACT; (continued)
Once Council authorizes work on a district, the developers or
proponents of the district must deposit funds with the City in
advance sufficient to cover all costs. If the assessment
district is successful, these deposits will be reimbursed from
the sale of bonds for the district.
EXHIBITS:
1. Memo from City Engineer dated July 26, 1984 recommending
Neste, Brudin i Stone, Inc.
2. Assessment District Status Report dated March 7, 1985.
3. Resolution No. "7^^ approving a consultant agreement
with Neste, Brudin & Stone, Inc. and authorizing the Mayor to
execute it.
4. Agreement with Neste, Brudin & Stone, Inc. (on file in the
Engineering Department).
NOTE FROM CITY MANAGER:
Council has authorized three assessment district projects
which are currently being worked on by Neste:
College Avenue $70,000
Cannon Road $80,000
James Drive $48,000
The James Drive engineering cost was advanced by the
city. The Cannon and College project funds were
contributed by developers.
JULY 26. 1984
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: CUy Engineer
SELECTION OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
Recommendation:
Select Neste, Brudin & Stone, Incorporated as the City's Assessment
Engineer.
Background;
Statements and qualifications were received from seven firms:
1. Neste, Brudin and Stone, Incorporated.
2. Bement, Dalnwood, Sturgeon.
3. Berryman & Stephenson, Incorporated.
4. Willdan Associates.
5. Jaykim Engineers.
6. Nasland Engineering.
7. Fraser and Associates.
Selection;
Each statement of qualifications was read and evaluated by Richard
Allen, Capital Projects Manager, the City Engineer and the Finance
Director. The firms are listed above in order of rank. Each of
the first four firms 1s well qualified and has considerable experience
with 1913/1915 Act Assessment Districts and each has at least one
well qualified Individual. The remaining three firms have neither the
qualifications nor experience adequate for the large assessment
districts with developer Involvement as contemplated by the City.
This decision was reached independently by all three individuals
who rated the firms.
Neste, Brudin and Stone Is recommended for selection because Norman
Neste, their assessment expert, will be project manager, the firm
scored highest In the evaluation, their workload permits handling large
assessment districts in a timely manner and their estimated price for
a large district Is competitive.
EXHIBIT 1
MARCH 7, 1985
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: City Engineer
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT STATUS REPORT
A. LARGE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
Note: All these proposed districts involve arterial streets,
1915 Act bonds which involve the City and must conform to
Council Policy 33.
1. College Boulevard
Status: Preparation of assessment district and contract
plans underway.
Limits: Palomar Airport Road to El Camino Real
Major Properties: Koll Co., Signal Landmark, Huntington
Beach
City Council authorized the assessment district on
November 27, 1984. Developer has deposited $70,000 to
cover staff and consultant costs. Plans are being
prepared by Rick Engineering. Neste, Brudin and Stone
are performing assessment engineering.
Public hearing to form district and award construction
contract tentatively scheduled for June 18th.
2. Cannon/College
Status: Preparation of Debt Limit Report underway.
Limits: Cannon from 1-5 to east City limits, College
from El Camino Real to Cannon Road.
Major Properties: Barnes Corp., Mandana Corp., A. 0.
Kelly, Robertson, Western Land,
Cantarini, O'Hara.
City Council authorized the assessment district on
November 27, 1984. Developers deposited $80,000 to
cover staff and consultant costs. Neste, Brudin and
Stone are performing assessment engineering.
Public hearing for the Debt Limit Report tentatively
scheduled for June 4, 1985. Preparation of contract
plans and assessment hearing will follow Debt Limit
Report and require additional deposit.
EXHIBIT 2
MARCH 7, 1985
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Page 2
STATUS REPORT
Palomar Airport Road
Status: Staff level discussions.
Limits: Bridge over railroad to El Camino Real
Major Properties:Palomar Airport Business Park, Signal
Landmark, Huntington Beach, Palomar
Oaks, Koll Company, Paul Ecke,
Palomar and Co., San Diego County.
Oaks, ..
Palomar
Since no property owners have submitted petitions, staff
decided that the City should initiate the district.
Preliminary boundary and estimate have been prepared. A
request for $80,000 to prepare a debt limit report is in
the proposed 1985-86 C.I.P. budget. A letter was sent to
property owners asking them to express their interest. A
report will follow in two weeks. This project must go to
Project Review Committee before further work can be done
or assessment engineering authorized.
Rancho Santa Fe Road
Status: Staff level discussions.
Limits: Olivenhain Road to Melrose Drive.
Major Properties: Daon Corporation
Staff has decided to initiate this district also.
Preliminary boundary and very rough estimate have been
prepared. A request for $50,000 to prepare debt limit
the proposed 1985-86 C.I.P. budget. Daon
a petition and requested to sign. This
go to Project Review Committee before
is authorized.
report is in
will be sent
project must
further work
Melrose Drive
Status: Requested by developer
Limits: Alga Road to Palomar Airport Road.
Major Properties: Woodward Co., Daon.
Initial staff consensus is that this is premature and
should not be considered until Palomar Airport Road is
widened. Final decision and response to developer needs
to be done.
MARCH 7, 1985
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT STATUS REPORT
Page 3
B. SMALL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
Note: These districts are for local streets requested by
property owners with City fronting initial money.
1. James Drive
Status: Debt Limit Report filed; hearing continued to
March 12, 1985.
Limits: North of Basswood Drive.
Major Properties: O'Gara, Shimamoto, Maldonado.
Hearing originally held on December 11, 1984, but
continued due to several protests over high cost estimate
and discussion of whether street should continue to Oak
Avenue. Continued to March 12, 1985. Council will be
asked which alternative (cul-de-sac or through) should
proceed; costs have been reduced. City has spent $48,000
to date. Public hearing scheduled for March 19, 1985.
2. Cynthia Lane
Status: On hold.
Limits: Between Knowles Avenue and Buena Vista Way.
Major Properties: Wickham and others.
Request for an extension of a cul-de-sac street. Due to
workload, given low priority. Council authorized
spending $30,000 in 1984-85 C.I.P.
C. BLOCK ACT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
Note: These are initiated by City to complete a gap in
improvements in an area where the majority of
improvements are already in.
MARCH 7, 1985
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT STATUS REPORT
Page 4
Appian Road
Status: Under design
Limits: In front of Frazee property just south of Elm
Avenue.
Property: Frazee.
This is the only segment of Appian Road not completed.
Pavement is half-width. Need remaining pavement, curb
and sidewalk. Also need additional right-of-way.
Park Drive
Status: Design to start about April 1, 1985.
Limits: North side Cove Drive to Marina Drive.
Properties: Wilson, Dickerson, Spangler.
All owners required to put in improvements as condition
of parcel maps, but have not done so. Preliminary work
has started, assessment map and estimate are completed.
Design will start shortly; this project will follow
about 30 days behind Appian Road.
RONALD A. BECKMAN
RAB:RHA:rlh
c: City Attorney
1
2
3
FOR CONSULTING ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES
4
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 7929
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH€
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD
AND THE FIRM OF NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE, INC.
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California
does hereby resolve as follows:
1. The agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the
firm of Neste, Brudin & Stone, Inc. for consulting assessment
engineering services, a copy of which is on file in the
Engineering Department, is hereby approved.
2. The Mayor of the City of Carlsbad is hereby
authorized and directed to execute such agreement for and on
behalf of the City of Carlsbad.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
the City Council of the City of Carlsbad held on the 12th day of
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
MARY H. CA0IER, Mayor
ATTEST:
22'
23
March , 1985, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Coucnil Neuters Casler, Lewis, Chick and Pettine
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Kulchin
AL/THA L. 1fl(lJPetfKRAN% City Clerk
KAREN R. KUNDTZ, Deputy City Clerk
(SEAL)
25
AGREENENT FOR ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES
(MASTER AGREEMENT)
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the
of Aj/S^er/ > 19^5""*, by and between the CITY OF CARLSBAD, a
municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City," and
NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE, INC., hereinafter referred to as
"Consultant."
RECITALS
City requires the services of Consultant to provide th"e
necessary assessment, design and related engineering services to
assist in processing requests for assessment districts and
assessment district procedures authorized by the City Council;
and
Consultant possesses the necessary skills and qualifi-
cations to provide the services required by City;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and
the mutual covenants contained herein, City and a Consultant
agree as follows:
1. CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS
The principal of Consultant for the assessment engineer-
ing services shall be Norman A. Neste unless otherwise approved
by the City Engineer. Consultant shall perform all work
necessary to assist the City Engineer in processing or initiating
assessment districts. The work shall be performed at the
direction of the City Engineer. The work shall include but not
be limited to the following tasks as directed by the City
Engineer:
a. Preparation of feasibility studies and advice to
City on proposed assessment districts and their
probability of success.
b. Making presentations before City's Project Review
Committee.
c. Performing preliminary engineering studies.
d. Preparing cost estimates.
e. Preparing 1931 Act Debt Limit Report (when used).
f. Preparing 1913 Act Engineer's Report.
g. Meetings with property owners,
h. Coordinating with bond counsel.
i. Making presentations to City Council.
j. Performing design surveys.
k. Prepration of plans, specifications and contract
documents for bidding and construction.
1. Administering construction bidding and bid review.
Any work performed on an hourly basis as described in
this section shall be only as directed by the City Engineer. Any
work performed under a supplemental agreement shall be pursuant
to the detailed scope of work for each authorized project,
attached to and made a part of the supplemental agreement.
- 2 -
2. CITY OBLIGATIONS
City shall:
a. Provide one copy of the City of Carlsbad Standards.
b. Provide blank mylar sheets with City title block
when needed for engineering drawings.
c. Receive all requests for assessment districts and
determine the action to be taken.
d. Set agenda and schedule for the Project Review
Committee.
e. Prepare all agenda bills for City Council.
f. Assist Consultant by placing at its disposal al'l
available information pertinent to the site of the
project including previous reports and any other
data relative to design and construction of the
project.
g. Examine all studies, reports, sketches, estimates,
specifications, drawings, proposals, and other
documents presented by Consultant and render
necessary decisions pertaining thereto within a
reasonable time so as not to delay the work of
Consultant.
h. Provide legal accounting and insurance counseling
services as may be reasonably required for the
project.
i. Designate, in writing, a person or persons to act as
re-presenttive of City with respect to the work to be
performed under this Agreement; such person shall
transmit instructions, receive information,
interpret and define policies and decisions of City
with respect to materials, equipment elements, and
systems pertinent to the work covered by this
Agreement.
j. Give prompt notice to Consultant whenever City
observes or otherwise becomes aware of any defect in
the project.
k. Obtain, with Consultant's assistance, approval oT
all governmenal authorities having jurisdiction over
the project and such approvals and consents from
such other individuals or bodies as may be necessary
for completion of the project.
3. PROGRESS AND COMPLETION
Consultations on an hourly basis shall commence immedi-
ately when authorized in writing by City's designated
representative. The work under the supplemental agreement will
begin within ten (10) days after receipt of notification to
proceed by City and be completed within the time period specified
in the supplemental agreement. Extensions of time may be granted
if requested by Consultant and agree to in writing by City
Engineer, In consideration of such requests, City Engineer will
give allowance-for documented and substantiated unforeseeable and
unavoidable delays not caused by a lack of foresight on the part
of Consultant, or delay caused by City inaction or other
agencies' lack of timely action.
4. FEES TO BE PAID TO CONSULTANT
Fees for consultations or other work on an hourly basis
shall be based on the hourly rates listed in Exhibit A. Fees
for work on a specifically authorized district shall be in
accordance with the supplemental agreement for that project. No
other compensation for services will be allowed except those
items covered by supplemental agreements per Paragraph 7%
"Changes in Work".
5. PAYMENT OF FEES
a. Consultant shall submit itemized billings on a
monthly basis indicating services performed and/or
hours worked. Payments may be made based on
monthly billings submitted by Consultant and
approved by the City Engineer.
b. Consultant shall be reimbursed for out-of-pocket
expense as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto
or as set forth in any supplemental agreement.
c. Consultant shall maintain time records, accounting
records, and vouchers with regard to all services
performed on an hourly billing rate basis, an City
shall have the right to examine such records and
Consultant's records of all cost items incurred or
charged in connection with the project.
d. Exhibit "A", Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates, is
subject to revision on or about August 1 of each
year to reflect salary and wage increases.
e. Interest will be charged and shall be applied to any
unpaid balance commencing thirty (30) days after the
date of the original invoice (the delinquency date)
at a rate of twelve (12) percent per annum.
6. FINAL SUBMISSIONS
Consultant shall prepare and submit the work as set
forth in Section 1 hereof in a timely manner and to conform to a
calendar of proceedings as jointly established and agreed to by
City, Bond Counsel, major property owners and Consultant except
for delays beyond Consultant's control.
7. CHANGES IN WORK
If, in the course of this Contract and design, changes
seem merited by the Consultant or the City, and informal consul-
tations with the other party indicate that a change in the
conditions of the Contract is warranted, Consultant or City may
request a change in Contract. Such changes shall be processed by
City in the following manner: A letter outlining the required
changes shall be forwarded to City or Consultant to inform them
of the proposed changes along with a statement of estimated
- 6 -
changes in charges or time schedule. After reaching mutual
agreement on -the proposal, a supplemental agreement shall be
prepared by City and approved by the City Council. Such
supplemental agreement shall not render ineffective or invalidate
unaffected portions of the agreement. Changes requiring
immediate action by Consultant or City shall be ordered by the
City Engineer who will inform a principal of Consultant's firm of
the necessity of such action and follow up with a supplemental
agreement covering such work.
8. DESIGN STANDARDS
Consultant shall prepare the plans and specifications in
accordance with the design standards of the City of Carlsbad aricf
recognized current design practices. Applicable City of Carlsbad
Standards and Regional Standards shall be used where appropriate.
Copies of such standards shall be obtained from the City of
Carlsbad.
9. COVENANTS AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES
Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained
any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working
for Consultant, to solicit or secure this agreement, and that
Consultant has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person,
other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage,
brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration contingent upon,
or resulting from, the award or making this agreement. For
breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the
- 7 -
right to annul this agreement without liability, or, in its
discretion, to deduct from the agreement price or consideration,
or otherwise recover, the Full amount of such fee, commission,
percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
10. NONDISCRIMINATION CLAUSE
Consultant shall comply with the State and Federal
Ordinances regarding nondiscrimination.
11. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT
In the event of Consultant's failure to prosecute,
deliver, or perform the work as provided for in this Contract,
City may terminate this Contract for nonperformance by notifying
Consultant by certified mail of the termination of the contract".
Consultant, thereupon, has five (5) working days to deliver said
documents owned by City and all work in progress to the City
Engineer. The City Engineer shall make a determination of fact
based upon the documents delivered to City of the percentage of
work which Consultant has performed which is usable and of worth
to City in having the Contract completed. Based upon that
finding as reported to the City Council, the Council shall
determine the final payment of the Contract.
12. DISPUTES
If a dispute should arise regarding the performance of
work under this agreement, the following procedure shall be used
to resolve any question of fact or interpretation not otherwise
settled by agreement between parties. Such questions, if they
- 8 -
become identified as a part of a dispute among persons operating
under the provisions of this Contract, shall be reduced to
writing by the principal of Consultant or the City Engineer. A
copy of such documented dispute shall be forwarded to both
parties involved along with recommended methods of resolution
which would be of benefit to both parties. The City Engineer or
principal receiving the letter shall reply to the letter along
with a recommended method of resolution within ten (10) days. If
the resolution thus obtained is unsatisfactory to the aggrieved
party, a letter outlining the dispute shall be forwarded to the
City Council for their resolution through the Office of the City
Manager. The City Council may then opt to consider the directe'd
solution to the problem. In such cases, the action of the City
Council shall be binding upon the parties involved, although
nothing in this procedure shall prohibit the parties seeking
remedies available to them at law.
13. RESPONSIBILITY OF CONSULTANT
Consultant is hired to render professional services of
providing assessment, design and other related engineering
services and any payments made to Consultant are compensation
solely for such services. Consultant shall certify as to the
correctness of all designs and sign all plans, specifications,
and estimates furnished with Registered Civil Engineer's number.
- 9 -
1*. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF SERVICES
This -agreement may be terminated by either party upon
tendering thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. In
the event of such suspension or termination, upon request of
City, Consultant shall assemble the work product and put same in
order for proper filing and closing and deliver said product to
City. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid for
work performed to the termination date; however, the total shall
not exceed the guaranteed total maximum. The City shall make the
final determination as to the portions of tasks completed and the
compensation to be made.
15. STATUS OF THE CONSULTANT
Consultant shall perform the services provided for
herein in Consultant's own way as an independent contractor and
in pursuit of Consultant's independent calling, and not as an
employee of City. Consultant shall be under control of City only
as to the result to be accomplished and the personnel assigned to
the project. However Consultant shall confer with City as
provided for in this agreement.
16. CONFORMITY TO LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
Consultant shall cause all drawings and specifications
to conform to all applicable requirements of law: Federal,
State, and local. Consultant shall provide all necessary
supporting documents, to be filed with any agencies whose
approval is necessary.
- 10 -
The City will provide copies of the approved plans to
any other agencies.
17. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
All plans, studies, sketches, drawings, reports, and
specifications as herein required are the property of City,
whether the work for which they are made be executed or not. In
the event this contract is terminated, all documents, plans,
specifications, drawings, reports, and studies shall be delivered
forthwith to City. Consultant shall have the right to make one
(1) copy of the plans for its records.
18. HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT
City, its agents, officers, and employees shall not b"e
liable for any claims, liabilities, penalties, fines, or any
damage to goods, properties, or effects of any person whatever,
nor for personal injuries or death caused by, or resulting from,
or claimed to have been caused by, or resulting from, any act or
omission of Consultant or Consultant's agents, employees, or
representatives. Consultant agrees to indemnify and save free
and harmless City and its authorized agents, officers, and
employees against any of the foregoing liabilities or claims of
any kind and any cost and expense that is incurred by City on
account of any of the foregoing liabilities, including
liabilities or claims by reason of alleged defects in any plans
and specifications, unless the liability or claim is due, or
arises out of, solely to the City's active negligence.
- 11 -
19. ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT
Consultant shall not assign this Contract or any part
thereof or any monies due thereunder without the prior written
consent of the City.
20. SUBCONTRACTING
If Consultant shall subcontract any of the work to be
performed under this Contract by Consultant, Consultant shall be
fully responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of
Consultant's subcontractor and of the persons either directly or
indirectly employed by the subcontractor, as Consultant is for
the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by
Consultant. Nothing contained in this Contract shall create arfy
contractual relationship between any subcontractor of Consultant
and City. Consultant shall bind every subcontractor and every
subcontractor of a subcontractor by the terms of this Contract
applicable to Consultant's work unless specifically noted to the
contrary in the subcontract in question approved in writing by
City.
21. PROHIBITED INTEREST
No official of the City who is authorized in such
capacity on behalf of City to negotiate, make, accept, or
approve, or take part in negotiating, making, accepting, or
approving of any architectural, engineering, inspection,
construction or material supply Contractor, or any subcontractor
in connection with the construction of the project, shall become
- 12 -
directly or indirectly interested personally in this Contract or
in any part thereof. No officer, employee, architect, attorney,
engineer, or inspector of or for City who is authorized in such
capacity and on behalf of City to exercise any executive,
supervisory, or other similar functions in connection with the
performance of this Contract shall become directly or indirectly
interested personally in this Contract or any part thereof.
22. VERBAL AGREEMENT OR CONVERSATION
No verbal agreement or conversation with any officer,
agent, or employee of City, either before, during, or after the
execution of this Contract, shall affect or modify any of the
terms or obligations herein contained nor such verbal agreement
or conversation entitle Consultant to any additional payment
whatsoever under the terms of this Contract.
23. ESTIMATES
Since Consultant has no control over the cost of labor
and materials, or over competitive bidding and market conditions,
the estimates of construction costs provided for herein are to be
made on the basis of Consultant's experience and qualifications,
but Consultant does not guarantee the accuracy of such estimtes
as compare to Contractor's bids or the project construction
cost.
24. SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS
Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 18, "Hold
Harmless Agreement", all terms, conditions, and provisions hereof
- 13 -
shall insure to and shall bind each of the parties hereto, and
each of their respective heirs, executors, administrators,
successors, and assigns.
25. EFFECTIVE DATE
This agreement shall be effective on and from the day
and year first above written.
26. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Consultant shall file a Conflict of Interest Statement
with the City Clerk of the City of Carlsbad. Consultant shall
report investments or interests in real property.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and
seals.
NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE,
INCORPORATED
CITY OP CARLSBAD:
Mayor /
APPROVED AS
C—Ti t-y v-fflTo r n e y
JttZa&j
- 14 -
m II AllEXHIBIT "A
NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE Engineers • Planners
I NCORPORATED
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES
Effective August 1, 1984
OFFICE:
ENGINEERING
Principal Consultant $82.00
Project Director 65.00
Senior Principal Engineer 65.00
Principal Engineer 62.00
Assistant Principal Engineer 58.00
Senior Engineer 56.00
Engineer 49.00
Geologist 49.00
Associate Engineer 45.00
Assistant Engineer 39.00
PLANNING
Principal Planner 62.00
Assistant Principal Planner 58.00
Senior Planner 56.00
Planner 49.00
Associate Planner • 47.00
Assistant Planner 39.00
DESIGN AND DRAFTING
Senior Designer 47.00
Designer 45.00
Senior Drafter 41.00 .
Drafter 39.00 •
Delineator 32.00
Engineering Aide 23.00
FIELD:
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Principal Engineer 62.00
Senior Resident Engineer 56.00
Senior Project Representative 56.00
Resident Engineer 49.00
Project Representative 49.00
Associate Project Representative 47.00
Senior inspector 2.75 x Direct Salary
Inspector 2.75 x Direct Salary
SURVEYING
Principal Surveyor 62.00
Assistant Principal Surveyor 58.00
Supervising Surveyor 56.00
3-man Survey Crew 155.00
2-man Survey Crew 109.00
1-man Survey Crew 54.00
Travel Time — (when in excess of eight hours work time per day)
3-man Survey Crew 72.00
2-man Survey Crew 50.00
SERVICES AND EXPENSES:
Computer. Central Processing Unit (CPU) 15c/second
Connect Time, per Hour 7.00
Printing 1.50/100-lines
Minimum 25.00
Computer Analyst 56.00
Programmer 45.00
Technician 39.00
Researcher/Processor 32.00
Executive and Administrative Secretary 32.00
Data Entry '. 23.00
Secretary/Clerk 23.00
In-house Reproduction Cost
Mileage 28c/Milc
Subsistence Cost
Other Expenses — including Special Consultants
and Purchased Services through Subcontracts Cost + 10%
Billing rates include twrriiead. equipment, space rental, etc These billing rales are subject lo increiu* August 1 at each year due lo union agreements and salary increases
A late pai-nifnr H/V/W( 'f: CHAW if- u-ill be applied lo any unpaid balance, commencing thirtv i30> day* after the date ol the original invoice at the maximum interest rate
-illoutrd K 'Jit
ACTION TAKEN AT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' MEETING
NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE INCORPORATED
November 9, 1984
"On motion duly made, seconded, and unanimously carried, the
following were named as officers of Neste, Brudin & Stone
Incorporated with the respective titles until the next annual
meeting of the shareholders:
Norman A. Neste, Chairman of the Board
John B. Brudin, President
Charles F. Crandall, Chief Financial Officer
Eugene L. Diepholz, Regional Vice President
Jerry M. Dunlap, Regional Vice President
William Koptionak, Regional Vice President
Galen N. Peterson, Vice President
Merle G. Schulze, Vice President & Secretary
John F. Tanner, Vice President
Norman L. Thomas, Vice President
Beverly A. Vandruff, Assistant Secretary"
I, Beverly A. Vandruff, Assistant Secretary of Neste,
Brudin & Stone Incorporated, hereby certify that the fore-
going is a true and correct copy of action legally taken by
the Board of Directors of said Corporation, at a legal meeting
of said Board duly and regularly held November 9, 1984, and
that said action has not been modified or rescinded.
Dated: March 5, 1985
BEVERLY A. VANDRUF.F
Assistant Secretary
ACTION TAKEN AT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' MEETING
NESTE, BRUr>IN & STONE INCORPORATED
February 22, 1985
"On motion duly made, seconded, and unanimously carried, the
Board of Directors took action to ratify the intent of the
procedures of the Standard Practice Manual as set forth in
Table I of said Manual as follows:
All Agreements for professional services shall be
signed by a Corporate officer having the title of
Chairman, President, Chief Financial Officer,
Regional Vice President, or Vice President. Only
one signature of any of the above will be required.
Agreements or Contracts which exceed $100,000 in
contract value shall only be signed with a single
signature of the Chairman, President, or a Regional
Vice President. The above signature requirement
shall remain in effect until further modified or
changed by action of the Board of Directors."
I, Beverly A. Vandruff, Assistant Secretary of Neste,
Brudin & Stone Incorporated, hereby certify that the fore-
going is a true and correct copy of action legally taken by
the Board of Directors of said Corporation, at a legal meeting
of said Board duly and regularly held February 22, 1985, and
that said action has not been modified or rescinded.
Dated: March 12, 1985
^BEVERLY A. VANDRUJ
Assistant Secretary