HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-09-10; City Council; 8323; REQUEST FOR TENTATIVE MAP, PUD AND A SPECIFIC PLAN FOR 225 UNITS| CT 84-32/PUD 73/ SP 195 (CARLSBAD LAND INVESTORS)c r323 TITLE: REQUEST FOR TENTATIVE MAP, PUL) AND
~ A SPECIFIC PLAN FOR 225 UNITS. AB#
MTG.*L CARLSBAD LAND INVESTORS -
rl DEPT. PLN CT 84-32/PUD-73/SP-195.
DE
CI
CI 2 -9 -!J -4 3
k 0 w
Ln 03 0 4
Tr cv
.
.
cl
m
w 0
F -4 cl
1
8
B 3
0 cr
3 2
8
2 3d
-4 %
k0 $3
0 -E 8-2
Ln 03 I 0 4 I a
.- z G G a
$ Z 3 0 0
CI~OF CARLSBAD - AGEN~BILL
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Both the Planning Commission and the staff are recommend:
the City Council introduce Ordinance No. 977& , APPROVI
SP-195 and direct the City Attorney's Office to prepare dl
APPROVING CT 84-32/PUD-73.
ITEM EXPLANATION
The applicant is requesting a tentative map and planned uni
opment, and a specific plan for a 225 unit detached sing1
project on 85 acres, located approximately .3 miles E
Palomar Airport Road just east of future College Boulev
specific plan is required because this project is locate(
Airport Influence Area as designated on the General Plan.
In 1984, the City Council approved a General Plan Amendme
slightly increased the density potential. Densities over
portion of the site were changed from RL (0-1.5) to RLM (
acre). As a trade-off the developer agreed to cluster dev
on the southern two-thirds of the site since the north
constrained by airport noise. The density of the project
posed is 2.65 du/acre in the 0-4 range.
The project is well designed from a planning standpoint
vides many amenities and open areas. The major issue regar
project is its proximity to the airport. With developme
concentrated toward the south the project is out of the
noise levels established by the Comprehensive Land Use Plar by the Airport Land Use Committee (SANDAG) in 1974. It rc
current, existing criteria provided by other involved agenc
one exception. Recently, the Airport Advisory Commit
recorxnended that 60 CfSEL with a 5% jet factor be uti1
residential boundaries. Although no official maps h;
would extend into the central area of the project. The pr
conditioned to reduce interior noise levels to 45 deci
avigation easements are being required as part of the deed:
The Planning Commission voted to approve the project (4-
Planning Commission added additional conditions to inc
parking from 20 to 40 spaces and required that the I
purchase the units include recognition of the avigation
required on the deeds. The Planning Commission also minute motion requesting that Council direct staff to tak
at the General Plan land use near the airport. For
information please see the attached report to the
Commission.
provided showing this contour it is likely that the 60 C
0 0
Page Two of Agenda Bill- No. 832-3
ELWIRONMENTAL IMPACT
An environmental impact report was certified by the City
for this project on June 4, 1984. Mitigation measures
environmental impact report were incorporated in the projec
FISCAL IMPACT
The increased need for city capital facilities resulting f development will be offset by the payment of the public fa fee. Any capital facilities related directly to this dev
will be constructed and paid for by the developer.
Increased operating expenses related to this development
offset to some extent from increased tax or fee revenue g
by the development. No detailed economic impact analysis development has been conducted at this time so prediction
portion of operating expenses covered by additional c
revenue created as a result of this project cannot be made.
EXHIBITS
1. Location Map
2. Ordinance No. y772 w/SP-195
3. Planning Commission Xesolution No. 2425 & 2426
4. Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 14, 1985
6
I
@LOCATION MAP
/I
8 '/ p" !/ // $4
LAUREL TREE LN
SITE
L PUD-
SP- 1
CARLSBAD LAND INVESTORS CT 84
I
1
2
3
4
5
61
7
81
0 0
ORDINANCE NO. 9772
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SPECIFIC PLAN
(SP-195) FOR A 225 UNIT RESIDENTIAL PROJECT IN
THE AIRPORT INFLUENCE AREA LOCATED APPROXIMATELY
.3 MILES SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST
OF FUTURE COLLEGE BOULEVARDi
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbac
California has reviewed and considered a Specific Plan foi
development of the site; and
9i
10
11
12
WHEREAS, after procedures and hearings held in a(
with the requirements of law the City. Council has determii
the public interest indicates that said plan be approved.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of (
ordain as follows: l3
15
16
I?
18
l4 SECTION 1: That Specific Plan (SP-195) is hereb:
subject to the conditions contained in the Planning Commi
Resolution No. 2426 attached hereto and made a part hereo I
further that the text of the Specific Plan is hereby appri
read as shown on Exhibit "X" attached hereto and incorpor
roe!$
i
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify
adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published a
once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after it
adoption.
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting o
Carlsbad City Council held on the day of
1985, and thereafter
1
2
3
4
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said (
Council held on the day of , 1985 by 1
fo1:Lowing vote, to wit:
AYES:
51 6
7
a
9
NOES :
ABSENT :
MARY H. CASLER, Ma
11 '
12
13
14
15
l6
17
l8
19
20
21
22
I/
23
24
25
26
27
I- ~ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City CiSrk
~EAL)
I
11
1
I
1 I
I 1
~
I
I
//
I
0 EmIBIT X 8/1
SPECIFIC PLAN
SP-195
I. PURPOSE
The purpose of this specific plan is to implement the special
treatment area section (P. 44, J.l) of the Land Use Element c
the General Plan which requires the submittal of a specific F for projects located in the airport influence area over 25 ac in size. The intent of the General Plan and of the specific is to ensure compatibility, to the extent possible, of land I designated on the General Plan with Palomar Airport.
11, LOCAT I OR
The subject property is located approximately .3 miles south Palomar: Airport Road, just east of the future extension of
College Boulevard as shown on Exhibit "A".
111. LEGAL DESCRIPTION
All that parcel of land designated as "description No. 5, 10
acres" as shown and delineated on record of Survey Map No. 5
filed in the Office of County Recorder of San Diego County,
December 19, 1960, being a portion of Lot "G" of the Rancho Hedionda in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 823, filed in the Office of Coc Recorder of San Diego County, November 16, 1896.
EXCEPTING therefrom that portion thereof beginning at the
Northwesterly corner of said description No. 5, said point 1
the intersection of Laurel Tree Road and the Northerly line said description No. 5; thence along said Northerly line, Nc
83" 40' 44" East 584.96 feet; thence South 45" 31' 49" East
1,129.51 feet; thence South 70" 09' 50" West 17.26 feet to 1 beginning of a tangent curve concave Southeasterly having a
radius of 300.00 feet; thence Southwesterly along said curv 51.13 feet through a central angle of 9" 45' 55"; thence ta to said curve, South 60" 23' 55" West 115.58 feet; thence S
57" 18' 45" West; 328.50 feet to the besinning of a tangent
concave Southwesterly having a radius of 500.00 feet, a rad line from said point bears South 57" 03' 32" West thence Northwesterly along said curve 334.65 feet through a centra
angle of 38" 20' 54"; thence tangent to said curve North 71 22" West 336.40 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve cc Northeasterly having a radius of 570.00 feet; thence Northwesterly along said curve 844.63 feet through a centri anRle of 84" 54' 05"; thence tangent to said curve North If 43 East 5.13 feet to the point of beginning.
a e
IV. GERERAL PLAN AND ZONING
The General Plan for the site is Residential LOW Medium Dens
(RLM) 0-4 du/ac, There are two zoning designations on the
property, The zoning is Open Space (OS) on approximately thc
northern one-third of the property. The remainder of the propert:y is zoned R-1-10000.
The intent of the General Plan and zoning designated for the
property is to allow full density credit from the General P1 (RLM) but through the zoning make development of the propert
occur on the southern two-thirds of the property south of th 65db noise level created by the airport. This is to help
minimize impacts from the existing airport.
V, LAND USE
A) Permitted Uses: R-1-7500
(1) Residential - attached or detached units
to exceed 3 dulac for the entire site
B) Permitted Uses: OS
(1) Recreation facilities for the private us(
future residents of the subject property
(2) Recreation facilities for public use if
agreed to by both the property owner(s) the City
Recreation uses will be of a non-commercial or
public use nature as this property is being ut for development in terms of density credit bei
transferred to the southern two-thirds of the
VI. SPECIAL DEVELOPHEHI STAHDARDS
A) No development shall occur where exterior noi:
levels exceed 65db as determined by the SANDA( "Airport Development Plan", June 1985.
B) Interior noise levels for any development sha-
mitigated to 45db.
C) No development shall occur on slopes in exces 25% except minimal intrusion may be specifica approved by the City Engineer and Land Use PI
Manager.
-2-
e a
D) No grading, clearing or grubhinp may occur on tt
property without a grading permit issued by the
of Carlsbad.
E) A detailed soils report shall be prepared to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any building permit.
F) Any development of this property with lots less 7,500 square feet shall be processed pursuant tc
Section 21.L5 (Planned Development Ordinance) o Municipal Code.
G) Projects not requiring discretionary actions SUI the installation of large recreation facilities shall be approved by the Land Use Planning Mana,
Mitigation measures as determined by the Land I1
Planning Manager shall be applied to developmen this property.
I) Deeds for all parcels created as part of 'this
project shall contain flight easements and provisions for exempting the City from liabilit from airport impacts. These provisions shall 1 the satisfaction of the City Attorney.
H) An EIR (EIR 83-9) was prepared for this site.
VII. VESTING OF RIGHTS
Approval of this specific plan does not constitute a vesting
development rights on the property. Any future development require compliance with all applicable City codes and ordin;
effective at the time development is proposed.
-3-
1'
2
3
4
51
6
7
8
PLANNIRG COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2425
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFOWIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST OF FUTIJRE
COLLEGE BOULEVARD.
APPLICANT: CARLSBAD LAND INVESTORS CASE NO: CT 84-32/PUD-73
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain propr
wit:
All that parcel of land designated as "descriptic 11
22
23
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all fac
relating to the Tentative Tract Map and Planned IJnit Dev
24
25 1 icommission as follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the P1
28 based on the following findings and conditions: I
1
2
%,
6
7
5i
9j
a
10
11
12
13
(I) e
Findings:
1) The project is consistent with the City's General Plai
the proposed density of 2.65 du's/acre is within the
range of 0-4 du's/acre specified for the site as indi,
the Land Use Element of the General Plan.
) The site is physically suitable for the type and dens
the development since the site is adequate in size an
to accommodate residential development at the density
posed.
The project is consistent with all City public facili icies and ordinances since:
a) The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an
1-
appropriate condition to this project, ensured tt
final map will not be approved unless the City CC finds that sewer service is available to serve tk project. In addition, the Planning Commission h:
condition that a note shall be placed on the fin: that building permits may not be issued for the r unless the City Engineer determines that sewer sc available, and building cannot occur within the
unless sewer service remains available, and the j Commission is satisfied that the requirements of Public Facilities Element of the General Plan ha'
1)
16
I.7
18
19
1 b) The Carlsbad School District has written a lette
August 30, 1984, stating that school facilities
available to this project.
c) Park-in-lieu fees or parks dedication is require1 I
1 condition of approval.
'
lI
~
20
21
22
24
25
23
26
27
d) The applicant has agreed and is required by the I of an appropriate condition to pay a public faci
fee. Performance of that contract and payment c
will enable this body to find that public facili be available concurrent with need as required by Gener a1 Plan.
The proposed project is consistent with the City's E
Development Ordinance and also complies with the Des Guidelines Manual. 1) This project will not cause any significant environr
impacts as the applicable mitigation measures ident EIR 83-8 and certified by the City Council on June 1
I
1)
I have been incorporated into the project. I
2
3
4
5
6
7
konditions:
1) Approval is granted for CT 84-32/PUD-73, as shown on 11
"A" - "C", dated June 7, 1985, incorporated by refere on file in the Land Use Planning Office. Development
occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted i
conditions. Building elevation exhibits shall be sub
for approval by the Land IJse Planning Manager prior t issuance of any building permits,
!2) This project is approved upon the express condition t
final map shall not be approved unless the City Counc
as of the time of such approval that sewer service is
available to serve the subdivision.
1
12
131
4) This project is approved upon the express condition applicant shall pay a public facilities fee as reqfli City Council Policy No. 17, dated April 2, 1982, on
I
23
24
25
7) Approval of this request shall not excuse complianc sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other appl
ordinances in effect at time of building permit iss
8) Water shall be provided to this project pursuant to
i Service agreement between the City of Carlsbad and Real Water District, dated May 25, 1983.
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
l8
19
a @
10) The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and
tion plan which shall be submitted to and approved by
Use Planning Manager prior to the issuance of buildin
permits.
A 500' scale map of the subdivision shall be submitte
Land Use Planning Manager prior to the recordation of
final map. Said map shall show all lots and streets
and adjacent to the project.
11)
12) All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a health]
thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debrj
13) Any signs proposed for this development shall be desj
conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall
review and approval of the Land Use Planning Manager
installation of such signs.
14) Trash receptacle areas, for the recreation lots shal: enclosed by a six-foot high masonry wall with gates j
to City standards. Location of said receptacles sha:
approved by the Land Use Planning Manager.
15) All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, architecturally integrated and concealed from view a
sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets,
to Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satis
the Land Use Planning Manager and Building and Plann Director.
16) The applicant shall submit a street name list consis
the City's street name policy subject to the Land Us
llanager ' s approval prior to final nap approval.
17) The project shall provide bus stop facilities at the
intersection of College Boulevard and Cobblestone W?
satisfaction of the Morth County Transit District. I1 I/ facilities shall at a minimum include a bench, free
I
2o
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
advertising, and a pole for the bus stop sign. The
pole shall be designed in a manner so as to not deti
the basic architectural theme of the project and sa:
~ shall be subject to the approval of the Land Use P1;
Manager and North County Transit District.
i
18:l Approval of Tentative Tract No. 84-32 is granted sul
approval of Specific Plan 195.
19) The CC&R's shall prohibit the storage of recreationa
in the required front yard setback. A parking area ' recreational vehicles/boats located in the unused ar
1 at the north end of the property shall be paved, f
landscaped to the satisfaction of the Land Use Plann
Manager. Said parking area shall be for the sole us
residents of this project and shall be maintained by
homeowners association. The homeowners association
residents a small fee for the use of this facility t
recover naintenance costs. This shall be reflected
CC&R' s.
PC RES0 NO. 2425 -4-
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
l2
e @
20) The developer shall display a current Zoning and Lanc in the sales office at all tirnes, and/or suitable all
to the satisfaction of the Land Use Planning Nanacjer
21) All sales maps that are distributed or made availahlc
public shall include but not be limited to trails, fi
existing schools, parks , and streets.
22) Building identification and/or addresses shall be pl<
all new and existing buildings so as to be plainly v
from the street or access road; color of identificat
addresses shall contrast to their background color.
23) If any condition for construction of any public imprc
or facilities, or the payment of any fees in lieu thl
imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this p
challenged, this approval shall be suspended as prov
Government Code Section 65913.5. If any such condit determined to be invalid this approval shall be inva
the City Council determines that the project without
condition complies with all requirements of law.
Driveway locations on the cul-de-sacs shall be posit
there is a minimum of 22 feet for guest parking to c 24)
13 i of each driveway.
16
Flanayer for approval prior to the issuance of buildi permits.
17 All standards contained in Specific Plan 195 shall I:
included herein as conditions of approval of CT 84-2 /26''
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ncjineering Conditions : E) The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior t
commencement of any clearing or yrading of the site
29) The grading for this project is defined as "control
iny" by Section 11.06.170(a) of the Carlsbad Munici
engineer whose responsibility it shall be to coordi inspection and testing to ensure compliance of the
the approved grading plan, submit required reports
Engineer and verify compliance with Chapter 11.06 o
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Grading shall be performed under the observation of
~
!,/// I PC! RES0 NO. 2425 -5-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
30) upon completion of grading, the developer shall ensur
"as-graded'' geologic plan shall be submitted to the c
Engineer. The plan shall clearly show all the geoloc
exposed by the grading operation, all geologic correc
measures as actually constructed and must be based or
tour map which represents both the pre and post site
This plan shall be signed by both the soils engineer
engineering geologist. The plan shall be prepared 01 or similar drafting film and shall become a permanen
31) No grading shall occur outside the limits of the sub( unless a letter of permission is obtained from the 01
the affected properties.
32) A separate grading plan shall be submitted and appro
separate grading permit issued for the borrow or dis *I 9l 10
11
12
13,
if located within the city limits.
33) All slopes within this project shall be no steeper t
34) Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to a
proposed construction site within this project the c
shall submit to and receive approval from the City E
for the 2roposea haul route. The developer shall cc
all conditions and requirements the City Engineer m?
with regards to the hauling operation.
I
l5 I construction phase of this project to prevent any oJ
siltation. The developer shall provide erosion con'
nieasures and shall construct temporary desiltation/l
basins of type, size and location ds approved by th
Engineer. The basins and erosion control measures
21
23
22
24
25
26
27
the temporary basins and erosion control measures f
of time satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall
their maintenance and satisfactory performance thrc
aeposit and bonding in amounts and types suitable t
Engineer.
(1
36) Additional drainage easements and drainage structui provided or installed as may be required by the Coi
Department of Sanitation and Flood Control or the (
neer.
The developer shall pay the current local drainage
construct drainage systems in conformance with the
Urainage Plan and City of Carlsbad Standards as re
the City Engineer.
I
I i3") prior to approval of the final map for this projec
I
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
0 0
38) The developer shall construct desiltation/detention .
a type and size and at locations as approved by the I
Engineer. The developer shall enter into a desiltat
maintenance agreement and submit a maintenance bond
satisfactory to the City Engineer prior to the appro final map for this project.
serviced by an all-weather access/rnaintenance road. provisions of this agreement shall apply to any offs
sites which may be utilized in the construction of t
project as required by the City Engineer.
Each desiltation basin
39) The owner of the subject property shall execute a ho
harmless agreement regarding drainage across the ad]
property prior to approval of the final map for this
40) The drainage system shall be designed to ensure that
resulting from a 10-year frequency storm of 6 hours
hours duration under developed conditions, is equal
than the runoff from a storin of the same frequency E duration under existing developed conditions. Both
24 hour storm durations shall be analyzed to determi
detention basin capacities necessary to accomplish t
results. Detention basins may not be required provj
applicant can demonstrate that downstream facilitie:
adequately handle runoff to the satisfaction of the Engineer.
15
16
for all public streets and easements required by tlit
conditions or shown on the Tentative Map. The offc
made Prior to issuarice of any permit by a Certifical
18
l7 Final Map for this project. All land so offered sh:
granted to the City free and clear of all liens and
encumbrances and without cost to the City. Streets
already public are not required to be rededicated. i
20
21
22
33
College Boulevard.
42) Direct access rights for all lots abutting Cobblest
Way shall be waived on the final map except for acc
RV storage area.
43) Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for
I I
improvements shall be prepared to the satisfaction
Engineer. Prior to approval of the final map, the I
26 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer:
27
28
//// I////
;(//// PC: RES0 NO. 2425 -7-
l
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
0 0
a) Sidewalks
b) Curbs, Gutters
c) Street striping
d) Street Median Improvements
e) Street Lights f) Street Trees
4) Water
h) Storm Drainage
i) Sewer
k) Street improvements on College Boulevard from the
centerline of Palomar Airport Road to the southei
return of Cobblestone Way.
Improvements shall be to full-width major arteri
standards.
j ) Wheelchair Ranips
1) Street taper on College Boulevard from the south
return of cobblestone Way full width improvement
feet south of the southerly curb return of Cobbl
east half street improvements , (per Exhibit "B" )
arterial street standard.
m) Street improvements on College Boulevard from 6C 13
14
15
16
17
l8
south of the southerly curb return of Cobblestor
the southerly curb return of public street I'P",
street improvements (per Exhibit "B") to major E
street standards.
I
n) Street improvements on Cobblestone Way from the centerline of College Boulevard to the westerly
intersection of Cobblestone Way with the northwe
boundary line bearing north 45'31'49". Improver
shall be to full-width collector street standarc
68 foot right-of-way. 1
23
24
25
26
27
p) Street improvements on public street "Q" from t'
centerline of public street "P" to the cul-de-s
terminus approximately 300 feet northerly, full
collector street standards with a 68 foot right
per Exhibit "B".
q) Street improvements on College Boulevard and Pub
I'P" from the end of paved sections to the center
future Poinsettia Avenue shall consist of full h
grading to top of subgrade and drainage improverf
required by the City Engineer, per Exhibit "B".
28 /I// iJ?C RES0 NO. 2425 -8-
1
e 0
r) Street barricades at the end of paved improvement 2l
3
4
College Boulevard and public street "P" . Barricz
shall be well lighted by permanent street lights.
44) Unless a standard variance has been issued, no variai
City Standards is authorized by virtue of approval o
tentative nap.
5 6 i
7
8
9
10
11
Sidewalks (4.5 feet wide) shall be designed and cons'
to City standards on all drives and streets within tl
subdivision.
45)
46) The developer shall construct private street accesse
private streets are not a portion of the public stre
The developer shall place a plaque-type sign with th
"PRIVATE STFEET BEYOND THIS POINT, at the access poi
private streets from public streets. The script on
shown above shall be capital letters of a size and c
such as to be readable for a normally sighted person
distance of 20 feet. The provisions of this conditi
be met to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prio
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any porti
public streets in such a way as to clearly designate
13
l2
project.
The developer shall comply with all the rules, regul !
15
16
17
48) Should the developer decide to final map and develor
out of numerical sequence with the approved phasing
phases shall be completed unless otherwise approved on the tentative map all conditions required of the
22
23
by the City, and the standard improvement plan checl
inspection fees shall be paid prior to approval of
map for this project.
26
25
27
28
sibility shall be clearly stated in the CC&R's.
51) All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by
homeowner's association (if on commonly owned prope
individual property owner (if on an individually ob
An appro riately worded statement clearly identifyi responsigility shall be placed in the CC&R' s.
I
I i PC RES0 NO. 2425 -9-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0
10
52) Street improvements shall be installed to the satisfi
the City Engineer prior to occupancy of any units wii
phased development as follows:
A) Phase One and Phase Two:
1) College Avenue full width from Palomar
Road to Cobblestone Way including drainage, wate: sewer facilities to serve this subdivision.
2) Cobblestone Way full width from Collegl
to the northwesterly boundary line of this subdi.
bearing north 45O31'49".
B) Phase Three:
Street A, all-weather access with a mi
two inch A.C. pavement from the boundary of Phas
easterly through Phase 5 to public street "Y", a remaining offsite improvements as shown on Exhik
C) All Subsequent Phases, Items A and B as mentioned above, and
frontage improvements for that phase.
The Subdivider shall provide separate sewer, water,
I!
12
l1
13
14!
16
l5
l7
0 e
electric services with meters to each of the units.
54) Some improvements shown on the Tentative Map and/or
by these conditions are located offsite on property
neither the City nor the subdivider has sufficient t
interest to permit the improvements to be made withc
acquistion of title or interest. The subdivider shc
to Section 20.16.095 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code
55) All plans, specifications, and supporting documents
improvements of this project shall be signed and set
Engineer in responsible charge of the work. Each s'
signed and sealed on their first page. Additionall
r3) I
I I be signed and sealed, except that bound documents rn
20
21
22
24
23
25
26
27
28
'
I I hereby declare that I am the Engineer of Work for i project, that I have exercised responsible charge o
design of the project as defined in Section 6703 of
Business and Professions Code, and that the design
consistent witn current standards.
I understand that the check of project drawings and
specifications by the City of Carlsbad is confined
only and does not relieve me, as Engineer of Work,
responsibilities for project design.
(Name, Address and Telephone of Engineering firm)
I' DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE 'I
I I
'//'I/
PC RES0 NO. 2425 -10-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I1
12
0 9
Firm:
Address:
City, St.:
Telephone :
BY Date: - (Name of Engineer)
R.C.E. NO. #
S6) The developer shall provide the City with a reproduci
copy of the tentative map as approved by the Planninq
approval by the City. The map shall be submitted to
dngineer prior to improvement plan submittal and shal
x 36" in size and of a quality and material satisfact
the City Engineer.
Commission. The tentative map shall reflect the conc
57) Prior to recordation of any final map for this develc
this project, the owner shall give written consent tc
annexation of the area shown within the boundaries oj
l3
l4
15
16
l7
18
19
2o
22
23
21
24
26
27
25
28
Tentative Map into the existing City of Carlsbad Str I Lighting and Landscaping District No. 1.
18) This subdivision contains a remainder parcel. No bu
permit shall be issued for the remainder parcel unti
further subdivided pursuant to the provisions of Tit
the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This note shall be pla final map.
9) Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire kb
months from the date of City Council approval unless
map is recorded. An extension may be requested by t
applicant. Said extension shall be approved or deni
discretion of the City Council. In approving an ext
the City Council may impose new conditions and may I
1
I I existing conditions.
Streets A and B shall be 36 feet wide to face of CUI
1) Streets A, B, and Cobblestone Way shall have a minil
centerline radius of 300 feet. Radius shown on the
map which are less than 300 feet are specifically nc
approved. An alternate alignment may be approved b
Engineer.
lo)
21 Minimum width of street frontage shall be 15 feet o
and on Lot 70.
ire Conditions:
3) Additional public and/or onsite fire hydrants shall
F I
provided if deemed necessary by the Fire Marshal.
C RESO NO. 2425 -11-
P I 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
lo
11
l2
13
I*
15
16
17
e 0
64) The applicant shall submit two (2) copies of a site E
showing locations of existing and proposed fire hydra
onsite roads and drives to the Fire Marshal for apprc
65) An all-weather access road shall be maintained throus
construction.
66) All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurteni
shall be operational prior to combustible building m-
being located on the project site.
67) All private driveways shall be kept clear of parked
at all times, and shall have posted "NO Parking/Fire
Away Zone" pursuant to Section 17.04.040, Carlsbad M
Code.
68) Fire retardant roofs shall be required on all struct
69) Brush clearance shall be maintained according to the
specifications contained in the City of Carlsbad Lan
Guidelines Manual.
70) All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing
automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent tc
project shall be submitted to the Fire Department fc
prior to construction. i
Planning Coinmission of the City of Carlsbad, California,
the 14th day of August, 1985, by the following vote, to \
AYES: Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners: M<
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meetir
Smith and Hall.
19 ,
20
21 I
22
23
24
25 I
26
27
28
NOES : Commissioners McFadden & Xombotis.
ABSENT: Commissioner L'Heureux.
CLARENCE SCHLEHUBER, Ch
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMI
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
LAND USE PLANNING MANAGER
PC RES0 NO. 2425 -12-
1
2
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2426
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIOM OF THE CI
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SP
ESTABLISHING PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT STAND
4 3~
5!
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED .3 MILES SOUTH OF PALP
AIRPORT ROAD JUST EAST OF FUTURE COLLEGE BOULEVAF
APPLICANT: CARLSBAD LAND INVESTORS
CASE NO: SP-195 --
25
'(A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
28 following findings: I ' I /I//
~
1
2
3
Findings:
1) The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the Gc
Plan since it implements the RLM (Low-Medium) land ut: designation specified for the site by the Land Use El
4
51 '
7/
9
8
10
11
I.2 13
the General Plan.
12) The site is physically suitable in size and shape to
accommodate existing uses and those permitted by the
plan, as discussed in the staff report.
The Specific Plan will help mitigate impacts on this
from Palomar Airport as discussed in the staff repor
Proposed uses would not be detrimental to adjoining
circulation system, as discussed in the staff report
The specific plan is consistent with the Carlsbad GE
and with Sections 65451 and 65452 of the Government
regulate the use of specific plans.
5) This project will not cause a sisnificant environmer
impact as any applicable mitigation measures identif
EIR 83-8 and certified by the City Council on June C I have been incorporated into the project.
13)
(4) i5)
'
21
22 '3) 1 Approval of this request shall not excuse complianc
sections of the Zoninq Ordinance and all other appl
ordinances in effect at time of buildins permit is:
28 -2- //'/I 'PC I RES0 NO. 2426
I
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
I
8,
9
10
11
12
l3
14
15
16
I?
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meetinc
~laizning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California,
the 14th day of August, 1985, by the following vote, to w
AYES : Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners: Ma
Smith and Hall.
NOES: Commissioners McFadden & Rombotis.
ABSEXT: Commissioner L'Heureux.
CLARENCE SCHLEHUBER, Cha
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMIS
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZLJlILLER
LAND USE PLALJEING MANAGER
1 I_
I
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IPC RES0 NO. 2426 -3-
0 -
,g-- -.. \
(I 7 '',\
I, m
DATE : AUGUST 14, 1985 'w
I STAFF REPORT
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM : LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE
SlJBJEC'I: CT 84-32/PUD-73/SP-195 - CARLSBAD LAND INVESTORS -
Request for approval of a tentative subdivision map for a planned development for 225 detached single-f residential units. The site is located on a ridget
south of Palomar Airport Road and just east of the
future alignment of College Boulevard.
I. RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolut
Nos. 2425 and 2426 Recommending APPROVAL of CT 84-32/PUD-73
SP-195 to the City Council, based on the findings and condit contained therein.
11. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION
The proposed project is situated on 85 acres, in a virtually
undeveloped area of the City. This area was recently pre-zo
from a county agriculture zone to the City's R-1-7500 and Or Space Zones.
Over half the site is considered topographically Constrained
western portions of the property. The southern and central portions of the site consist of a relatively flat plateau.
is on this plateau area that the development is proposed. 1 site is presently covered with native scrub brush.
In mid-1984, the property was the subject of a General Plan
amendment which increased its density potential. Densities much cif the site were changed from RL (0-1.5 du/ac) to RLM (0-4 dulac). As a trade-off, the developer agreed to clustc development on the southern portion of the property, since 1 northern portion is considered constrained for residential development due to its close proximity to the airport. The property was subsequently zoned 0-S on the north and R-1-75
on the south.
As shown on Exhibit "A", the project proposes two points of access off future College Boulevard. College Boulevard is
antici-pated as a major arterial roadway, providing an impor
link between Palomar Airport Road and Poinsettia Lane. Fut
traffic projections are high for each of these three roadwa
to the presence of steep slopes on the northern, eastern, ar
0 0
The suhject development Droposes 225 units resulting in a grc
density of 2.65 du/ac. square feet and would contain sinale-family detached housing.
The project is proposed as a private, qated community (incluc
private! streets). recreat.ion lots proposed on the site, (includinq a recreatior
clubhouse, tennis courts, and pools). An approximately five- graded pad, near the north end of the property, is restrictec open space uses. The developer has not indicated specific
improvements to this area.
A specj.fic plan is required for this site because it is locat
in the Airport Influence Area. The specific plan is short
because one was not submitted by the applicant for neqotiatic
Staff drafted the attached document and feels that it adequat
addresses the issues associated with design problems created
by the proximity of the airport. The specific plan calls fo- special, mitigation measures to help reduce noise impacts.
The lots would averaqe around 4,100
There are a number of well dispersed
111. ANALYSIS
Planning Issues
1) Does the project justify the proposed density?
2) Is the property suitable for residential use due to its
proximity to Palomar Airport?
3) Does the proposed project meet the requirements of the
Planned Development Ordinance?
DISC USIS I ON
The subject project is proposed at a density of 2.65 du/ac. figure is based upon gross acreaae, which includes all areas (buildable and unbuildable) of the property. Based on the General Plan adopted criteria for determining density of spe projects within the allowable range, the project would tend
justify this place in the range (0-4 du/ac) for this area.
analysis of the criteria as it relates to this project is as follows:
A) Site Constraints and Design - Topography is a substantj
constraint to development of the property. The site consists of a north-south trending ridge with steep nal
hillsides descend steeply to the west, north, and east Proximity to the take-off flight pattern from Palomar Airport (restricting units to the southern portion of property) further constrains design. The applicant ha:
done a good job keeping development away from the slop a.nd south of the 65 CNEL noise line.
slopes, up to 200 feet high. From the ridqetop, the
-2-
e e
B) - Onsite Amenities - The overall design concept appears qc
with many units situated to take advantage of the panor:
vi.ew. Although it is unclear as to what recreational features are proposed at the vacant north end of the
property, the project is providinu a number of recreatic
areas and view corridors throuqhout the project.
- Location/Offsite Amenities - The proposed project is
siituated in the south-central portion of the City, surrounded by industrial property down the hillside to I north and east, and residential property to the west an(
south. This close proximity to the industrial (employmi corridor is considered a locational plus. The 1-1/2 mi distance to commercial facilities (1-5 and Poinsettia L
is considered average. The City anticipates a future
regional park/educational complex (far which the exact location has not been determined) in close proximity to property.
- Land Use Compatibility - The property abuts a vacant RL
(0-1.5 du/ac) site to the northwest. Other surrounding residential property (also vacant) is designated 0-4 du (similar to the subject site). The site's proximity to airport (2,700 feet from runway) must be considered a compatibility issue. Mitigation is reflected in the clustering of residential units toward the southern end the property. Also, conditions of approval include the recognition of flight easements on the deeds, and a reduction of interior noise levels to 45 decibels. Mitigation, however, does not eliminate the issue of cl
proximity to the airport. The proposed project meets t criteria provided by SANDAG for use around the airport.
was evaluated in 1974 and was considered when this prop
was rezoned in 1984. The lines established by these ac
still do not guarantee that there will be no noise impa to the project area. A change in land use would also F new problems in that it will be difficult to determine
another appropriate designation. Besides the airport,
traffic and compatibility with residential uses to the
are also a consideration. Since the land use for this
was reaffirmed by Council last year, staff would recomn
no change.
E) Public Facilities - Since few public facilities are on- in the area, the developer will be responsible for the]
construction. It should be noted that traffic congest:
presently exists on Palomar Airport Road, and is anticipated, at buildout (even with all proposed
improvements in place) at its intersection with Collegt Boulevard. Traffic impacts are discussed in more deta
later in this report.
Based on this analysis of the proposed plan, staff conclude:
that the project does justify the density as proposed at 2.1
du/ac.
C)
D)
airport was taken into consideration when the General P
-r
-3-
0 0
Traffic Impacts
Although relatively little development has occurred in the
vicinity of the proposed project at this time, roadways in
area are already experiencing congestion. Palomar Airport '
is operating near capacity and its intersection with El Cam Real is operating at a low level of service, and the I-5/Pa
Airport Road interchange is severely conqested. The propost project would add incrementally to these problems.
In the long range, however , extensive improvements are plan to the circulation network in the area. Palomar Airport Ra
will be widened to six lanes, the Palomar Airport Road/El C Real intersection will be upgraded, and the 1-5/Palomar Air
Road bridge will be widened. In addition, College Boulevar
will be constructed as a four-lane divided highway, providi
link to Poinsettia Lane.
The Carlsbad Land Investors Environmental Impact Report Tr2
Study and SANDAG Traffic Model Estimates indicate, however, that, even with these improvements, traffic service levels be low. congested roadway in the City at buildout. The Palomar Air
Road/College Boulevard intersection (directly impacted by t proposed project) will operate (at best) at level of servic (tolerable but not desirable). The 1-5/Palomar Airport ROE
. 1-5/Poinsettia Lane interchanges are also projected to excc
capacity. These studies are generally based upon mid-poin' density range estimates.
The proposed project is below the mid-point of the density
At 2,,65 du/ac, the project will create slightly less impac traffiic than anticipated by the SANDAG study.
Planned Development Ordinance
As proposed, the project meets or exceeds all the requirem
I' of the Planned Development Ordinance. All residential lot have a minimum usable area of I5 feet, guest parkinq will
provided an-street and in several bays distributed through
project.
In summary, staff feels that the project is designed
appropriately for the site, meets the standards of the Pla
Development Ordinance and justifies the density proposed.
these reasons, staff is recommending approval of CT 84-321 and SP-195.
Palomar Airport Road is projected to be the most
-4-
0 0
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An environmental impact report has been completed and certif on this site. This report identified sianificant impacts an(
proposed mitigation measures. The Land Use Plannina Manager determined that the proposed project with added mitisation
measures sufficiently resolves these impacts. As a result,
is recommending approval of the proposed project.
At tachivent s
1. Planninq Commission Resolution Nos. 2425 and 2426
2. Location Map 3. Background Data Sheet
4. Disclosure Statement
5. Exhibits "A" - "F", dated February 13, 1985
CG:ad
7/29/85
-5-
I * -.. thaf - fur+her information i r) required, you Will !J~ 50 adv a.
Ccirl sbad ~,~?.d rr.ves:ors, A CallEornla !,:mired "arrn.ersiiD
Name CindLvLcual, 2at'--?crshi2, Joist venture, cor--ration, gym
Secure Properties Tnc, Ceneral Parcner i7332 Irvine Blvd., Sui
plusinass Address 'TustLn, CA 92680
.. APPLTfgLNT 2
-
17!4? 83Y-3359
l:elephcz?e Xuzhr
AGENT: e :Lx!la
2956 Roosevelt Street Carlsbad, CA 92008' .- 13usinars ,Xdress ,.
(619) '43411056 - 'Telephone Nutber
Limited Parte-er 6
1 i President !I? 52 Srurswick Way, SanL . MEMBERS: - Mark Z. Zwichorqw. rrame (individual, paz LTer, j aint acme Ac?aress
venture, coqoyzizion, synclication)
17332 T' ,rvu Fi'vd.. $1 1- . TP 245 * TustL?, CA 92680 - - Bisiness A2cLres.s; I c (714) 838-3350 (offLce) (7lb) 544-1390 (residenci
Telephone ?:?JtlSer Telephone Yumber
John W. Zylstra, Secretary ?.O.Zox 4342 San Cleaen
litr;le '
i -
ti li-ited Partner
E~me Adckess -
17332 Irvine Ellvd., Suite 2115 Tustin, C,\ 91'jRO
5isiness Aikkess
(7'4) 838-3350 (office) 17141 rn "V-!654 (resldenc
?ele?b.io Y-&L* I ele2.lor.e !iim.ber
NOTE: Secure Dropertles Tncorporated is R Califorcia Cor?orat-on, lncorF
The above two parties and tfieLr wives are tb.e OP'V Drcncipals of Secure-
Inc., and the only Limited Partners
(Attach more sbtts if necessary?
. I/WC decle-et under penalty of perjury that th infomation cgn',ained in t closure is t,-ru% tnd correct and that it will remain true and correct and 1
relied upozl as being true and correct until e~eded.
/
/-7 ..
1
- --
GJ ..
0 @
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: - (2 84-32/PUD-73/SP-195
APPLICANT: CARLSBAD LAND INVESTORS
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Subdivision map, planned development and specific Dll
for 225 units on 85 acres south of PAR and east of College Boulevard
LEGAL, DESCRIPTION: All that parcel of land designated as "description No.5 103.54 acres" as shown and delineated on record of: Survey Map No. 5/15 7 i.1
in the Oh:. of Cty Recorder of SD Cty, kc. 19, 1960 , being a portion of: LC of: the M-I in the Cty of SD, St. of: (?A, accord. to Map No. 823 , filed in 0
of County Recorder of San Diego County, November 16, 1896 APN: 212-040-30
Acres 85 Proposed No. of LotslUnits 225 -
GWERAL UL PM' AND ZONING
Land Use Designation LY
Density Allowed 0-4 du/ac Censity Proposed 2.65 du/ac
Existing Zone R-1-7500 and OS Proposed Zone no change
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoning Land Use
Site R-1-7500/0S Vacant
North PI Vacant
South County
East PI Vacant
West County Agriculture
Agr i cul t ur e
PCBL I C FAC I LI T IES
School Di.s tr ict Carlsbad Water Carlsbad Sewer Carlsbad EDU's 225
Public Facilities Fee Agrement, dated
ENVIRONMEPITAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
- Negative Declaration, issued
- E.I.R. Certified, dated
August 30, 1954
None Other, -