HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-11-05; City Council; 8367-1; Rancho Santa Fe RD closure updatej H
hB#g3 L-7 -"!
MTG. 11/5/85
Q) 3
TITLE: RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD CLOSURE - UPDATE
u (d C & aJ
a 0) 3 0 & a a (d
a El cd
C 0 .d u u cd
a 01 a C
u
v) aJ &
rl -4
1 0 V
6"
u) 03 I u) I rl rl
..
2 0 F= 0 U
=i 0 ;e 3 0 0
CIT OF CARLSBAD - AGENL- BILL
DEPT._ENG I ICITY MGR.--
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
This is an information item only. There is no action
necessary.
ITEM EXPLANATION
As a condition of approval of certain developments, the City
Council required the improvement of Rancho Santa Fe Road
between Olivenhain Road and La Costa Avenue. We have received
a request from Daon Corporation to close Rancho Santa Fe Road
between Olivenhain Road and La Costa Avenue for a period of
nine (9) months during the reconstruction of the road. Upon
consideration of traffic safety and the affirmative recom-
mendations of the Traffic Safety Coordinating Committee, the
Traffic Safety Commission, the Chief of Police, and the City
Engineer, the Council approved the closure request for a five
(5) month period provided that the westerly one-half be
improved first, and traffic allowed on that one-half while the
easterly one-half of the street was improved. Traffic was to
be detoured via Olivenhain Road, El Camino Real and La Costa
Avenue with certain improvements to be accomplished in critical
areas.
Staff has continued to work on the inconveniences created by
closure of Rancho Santa Fe Road. Council members have met with
citizens that reside in the immediate area of the road
closure.
Several alternatives have been discussed. They are as
follows:
I. Allow traffic to pass throuqh the construction zone at
all times.
Advantaqes:
A. No detour route necessary.
Disadvantages:
A. Longest required construction time (one year).
B. Anticipated increase of major type of accidents.
C. Anticipated travel delays due to heavy equipment
working in construction area.
Page 2 of Agenda Bill No. 634 7-
11. Close Rancho Santa Fe Road for five months while the
westerly one-half of the road is constructed, then
open this westerly one-half to traffic while the
easterly one-half is closed. Traffic would utilize
an Olivenhain Road, El Camino Real, and La Costa
Avenue detour. (Council previously approved this.)
Advantaqes:
A. The period of time during which all drivers
will be inconvenienced will be reduced from
twelve to eight months, the last three of which
will have a fully improved roadway section.
B. The potential for accidents and tort liability
claims increases significantly in construction
zones. The road closure would eliminate this
to a large extent though access must still be
provided for Calle Barcelona.
Disadvantages:
A. The diverted traffic will increase volumes
along the detour. This may result in
undesirable congestion.
B. The residents along La Costa Avenue may
perceive an impact due to the increase of
congestion and noise.
C. Levante Street, which is not part of the
detour, may experience more traffic.
111. Close Rancho Santa Fe Road between the hou,rs of 9:OO
A.M. and 3:OO P.M. thereby allowing traffic to pass
through the construction zone during peak traffic
hours, morning and night. Theoretically, traffic
would only utilize the Olivenhain Road, El Camino
Real, and La Costa Avenue detour during the hours of
9:OO A.M. and 3:OO P.M.
Advantaqes:
A. Allow traffic shorter route to Melrose Avenue
and Rancho Santa Fe Road into Vista during peak
hours of traffic.
Page 3 of Agenda Bill No. 836 7-
Disadvantaqes:
A. Require use of detour via Olivenhain Road, El
Camino Real and La Costa Avenue during off peak
hours.
B. Anticipated increase in major type of acci-
dents.
C. Anticipated travel delays due to heavy equip-
ment working on construction area.
It is anticipated that no mitigating measures along the
detour route would be necessary.
Daon Corporation representatives have informally indicated
strong opposition to this alternative.
IV. Close Rancho Santa Fe Road between Mision Estancia
and La Costa Avenue. Allow traffic to pass throuqh
the construction zone between Olivenhain Road and
Mision Estancia at all times. Mision Estancia would
be utilized as a detour between Rancho Santa Fe Road
and La Costa Avenue. Mision Estancia would be paved
by Daon Corporation prior to closing any portion of
Rancho Santa Fe Road. This option would delay the
commencement of construction of Rancho Santa Fe Road
until the first week in January.
Advantages:
A. Short detour route around part of construction
area.
B. Traffic through construction area on Rancho
Santa Fe Road, between Olivenhain Road and
Mision Estancia, allows shortest route.
C. Detour route has no existing development
adjacent thereto.
Disadvantaqes:
A. Anticipated increase in major type of accidents
in area where traffic passes through
construction area.
8. Anticipated travel delays due to heavy
equipment working in construction area.
-..
Page 4 of Agenda Bill No. F3b7-+1
This alternative is dependent upon Daon Corporation having
Mision Estancia completed prior to closure of Rancho Santa
Fe Road between Mision Estancia and La Costa Avenue.
V. Construct a temporary road approximately between
Olivenhain Road and Mision Estancia.
A. Close Rancho Santa Fe Road between Olivenhain
Road and Mision Estancia. Allow traffic to
pass through the construction zone on Rancho
Santa Fe Road between Mision Estancia and La
Costa Avenue,
Advantaqes:
1. Short detour around construction area.
2. No detour traffic passing through existing
neighborhoods.
Disadvantaqes:
1. Anticipated increase in major type of
accidents in area where traffic passes
through construction zone (between Mision
Estancia and La Costa Avenue).
2. Anticipated travel delays due to heavy
equipment working in construction zone.
8. Close Rancho Santa Fe Road between Olivenhain
Road and La Costa Avenue. Detour traffic along
Mision Estancia. Mision Estancia would be
paved by Daon Corporation prior to closing any
portion of Rancho Santa Fe Road. This option
would delay the commencement of construction of
Rancho Santa Fe Road until the first week in
January.
Advantages:
1, The period of time during which motorists
would be inconvenienced would be shortened
to approximately nine months.
2. Anticipate fewer major type of accidents.
.--
Page 5 of Agenda Bill No. 83b7-*/
3. No detour traffic passing through existing
neighborhoods.
These alternatives require the cooperation of the
developer in constructing a by-pass road and
completing construction of Mision Estancia prior to
commencing work on Rancho Santa Fe Road and would
delay commencement of construction of Rancho Santa
Fe Road at least until the first week in January.
Other issues which have been brought up are discussed as
follows:
A. It has been suggested that stop signs be placed at
several intersections on Levante Street to discourage
through traffic. The purpose of stop signs is to
assign right-of-way. To install them to slow or deter
traffic will lead to increases in accidents, conges-
tion, delay, noise and pollution. No intersections on
Levante Street now warrant stopping Levante Street
traffic. For this reason, staff recommends against
this measure.
B. Concern has been expressed by the school districts
about student activity and the bus routes. Staff has
spoken with representatives of the schools and with
the Director of Bus Transportation, Mr. Stanley Ross. Mr ROSS' letter to Councilman Chick is attached for
your review (Exhibit 3).
The concern is with bus routing and student safety.
With the closure of the roadway, the buses must use a
circuitous route. This will increase time and money
for the district. Mr Ross is also of the opinion that
a major portion of diverted traffic will use Levante
Street rather than the marked route. Because children
are required to cross Levante Street to get to buses, Mr. Ross envisions safety problems.
It is unknown how much traffic will use Levante
Street. The street will be signed to prohibit trucks
and to inform drivers of the proper route. Police
presence will be increased and the speed limit
strictly enforced.
It is expected that even without complete closure of
Rancho Santa Fe Road the same impacts will occur. The
buses would not be required to re-route but due to
construction activity will likely incur significant
delays. Levante Street traffic will undoubtedly
increase to an unknown degree.
Page 6 of Agenda Bill No. 8367-*l
Staff agrees that maintaining Rancho Santa Fe Road for
through traffic will lessen the possibility of the
impacts expected by Mr. Ross. Staff's recommendation
to close the roadway was in consideration of the
welfare of the general public. Though the school
children's safety is important, the bus traffic
acocunts for only a small portion of total traffic
using the roadway. Staff does not wish to weigh such intangibles, but will defer to the Council's
discretion.
The Council previously approved alternative number two above.
Alternatives number three and four have been recently discussed
with Daon Corporation representatives. We are awaiting their
comments.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
EXHIBITS
1. Location Map of Alternative No. 4.
2. Agenda Bill No. 8367, previously approved at the Council
meeting of October 15, 1985.
3. Letter from Stanley H. Ross to Councilman Richard Chick
dated October 21, 1985.
I LOCATION MAP I
I 1 RANCHO SANTA FE RD. ALTERNATIVE 4 I