HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-12-03; City Council; 8365-1; Award of Agreement for Street Sweeping Services•
z
0
~
..I
c3 z ::,
0
0
en.OF CARLSBAD -AGEN~BILL
MTG. 12-3-85
DEPT._U-"-/_M __
AWARD OF AGREEMENT FOR
STREET SWEEPING SERVICES CITY ATTY----'-~
CITYMGR~
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends that City Council adopt Resolution No. I[~ 71 accepting
bids and awarding agreement for Street Sweeping Services.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
On October 15, 1985, City Council, by minute motion, approved and directed the
distribution of Requests for Proposal for Street Sweeping Services for three
years. Requests for Proposal were mailed to 28 potential bidders. Proposal
packets were requested and received by four potential bi~ders. Two responses
were received, opened, witnessed and recorded on November 18, 1985. The bids
were reviewed by the staffs of the Utilities & Maintenance and Purchasing
Departments. Oceanside Disposal, Inc., dba North County Contract Sweeping,
Oceanside, CA, who is the city's current street sweeping contractor, is the
lowest responsive bidder in the amount of $115,632.00.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Current agreement specifies an annual cost of $119,604, proposed agreement is
for $115,632. Funds are available in account no. 001-820-5110-2493 in the
amount of $129,500.00 for street sweeping.
EXHIBITS:
1. Memorandum to City Manager from U&M Director dated 11/22/85.
2. Resolution No. f-< 'l?
3. Bid Summary.
4. Agreement Documents and Specifications
for Street Sweeping Services (on file
at Utilities & Maintenance Department)
I
November 22, 1985
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: Director, Utilities & Maintenance
STREET SWEEPING CONTRACT
Two bids for street sweepjng services for the next three years were
received -from North County Contract Sweeping (our current contractor) and
R. F. Dickson Co. The basic price quoted by the two contractors was
$115,632 per year and $115,800 per year, respectively. North County's
base quote was $168 per year less than Dickson's.
There were two secondary price considerations included in the bid. The
first relates to special sweeps to be bid on an hourly basis; the second
concerns th1 cost of adding streets during the life of the contract. The
results appt:•ar as follows:
Additional Time
Added Streets
North County
$45.10/hr. -4 hr. min.
$12 per mile
Dickson
$65/hr. -1 hr. min.
$9 per mile
We required 32 hours of additional sweeping last year. Given that such
would be required in future years, the price would compute out as:
North County
Dickson
32 X $45.10 -$1,443.20
32 X $65.00 = $2,080,QQ
It can be argued that the one-hour minimum (Dickson) would be more
convenient and provide a higher level of response, however, we would be
able to have gotten 22 hours of extra sweeping from Dickson as compared
to 32 hours from North County. We have, in the past, bundled trouble
areas into a four-hour block, however, I don't believe, nor have we e~er
intended, to call North County out for less than four hours' work and had
to pay the full minimum for less than four hours' service.
The staff has estimated that we will add six curb miles in 1986, eight
curb miles in 1987 and eight curb miles in 1988. The cost increase per
year will compute out as follows:
I
,I
...
i
I .
_l
~
City Manager
November 22, l.985
Page 2
1986
1987
1988
North County
($12 ~ .§_ x 24) = 864 avg.
2
1986 add on -$1,728
( $12x8x24) = 1,152
2 $2,880
86-87 add on= $4,032
( $12x8x24) = 1, 15£
2 $5,184
The following is a summary:
Basic Price
Extra Sweep
Added Miles
1986 Totals
1987 Buse Price
Extra Sweep
Added Miles
North County
$115,632
1,443
864
$117,939
$115,632
1,443
2,880
$119,955
Dickson
($9 x .§. x 24) = 648 avg.
2
1986 add on= $1,296
($9x8x24) = 864
2 $2,160
86-86 add on= $3,024
($9x8x24) = 864
2 $3,888
Dickson
$115,800
2,080
648
$118,528
$115,800
2,080
2,160
$120,040
-------------------·------------------------------
1988 Base Price
Extra Sweep
Added Miles
Three Year Total
$115,632
1,443
5,184
$122,259
$360,153
$115,800
2,080
3,888
$121,768
$360,336
As can be seen oy the above calculations, there appears to be less than $200
difference over the three-year life of the contract. I have inquired as to
levels of satisfaction of the service from both organizations and can find
nothing of significance. An Oceanside representative, who recently changed
from North County to Dickson was equally sat:i.sfied with the service from
either contractor. I am satisfied by the ser.vice we have received from
North County in the past and have no basis for recommending change.
I th~refore recommend the contract be aword~d to North County Contract
Sweeping. I must say this has been a most difficult decision. Both companies
have been straight forward; both provide the highest level of service and
I find no basis other than price anq recognizing that to be very slight, in
making this recommendation.
~_,/4)./~
,-ROGE~-GREER C/
RWG:jlc
3
-------.JilLL...__
i
,I
)
"' 91'!' p 'I' -·~· . ...... • .. . ~-.-------r-... ' ...
SID SIJMllARY
TITLE, STREET S!\'EEPING SER\ ,.CES LOCATION OF BID Citt of Carlsbad •
DATE OF 8/D November 15, 1985
TIME OF 8/0 __ 4_:_oo_P~_i ------
ESTIMATE $122JS00.00 BIDS CHECKED BY. JNE DATE, 11/18/85 .
. Oceanside Disposa .
CURRENT R. F. Dickson Inc.,dba North . CONTRACT Company . Countv r.nnt:ract-~. lo~n; no
NO. ITEM -AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUMr UNIT AUOUNT UNIT AMOUNT -
Annual Cost . 119.604.00 115.800.00 115.632 01 . . • Cost Per Hour Extra 45.10 65.00 45 11
,j
'I
. 4 hour min mum 'hour mi, mum 4 hn11r. n,-:, ;mum .
Cost oer additional
mile 11 50 o nn 1? .rn
:
. .
.
. J-. . •
. i .
.
•
~
. ~ •
-.t::.
\
!
~
I
I
i
l
2
3
4
RESOLUTION NO. .8-2 7,_9.._ __
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING AGREEMENT FOR
STREET SWEEPING SERVICES
WHEREAS; bids have been received by the City of Carlsbad for Street
5 Sweeping Services; and
6 WHEREAS, the low bid received for the service was submitted by Oceanside
7 Disposal, Inc., dba North County Contract Sweeping of Oceanside, CA, in the
8 amount of $115,632; and
9 WHEREAS, funds are available in the Streets Division budget, account
10 number 001-840-,5110-2493 for this service;
11 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad
12 as follows:
13
14
1. The above recitations are true and correct.
2. The bid of $115,632.00 by Oceanside Disposal, Inc., dba North County
15 Contract Sweeping for street sweeping services is hereby accepted, and the
16 Mayor and the City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute an agreement
17 thereafter.
18 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad at
19 a regular meeting held the 3rd day of December , 1985, by the following vote,
20 to wit:
21
22
23
24
25
AYES; Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Pettine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
26 ATI'EST
27
28
------..a....:..: