HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-03-04; City Council; 8538; Agreement Birtcher Business Center Condemnation Along Palomar Airport Road CT 82-04L
I ' *
..
n
a
w =. 0
a 2
I. 2 0 F 0
i
a
0 z 3 0 0
ClPOF CARLSBAD - AGENQBILL
DE
BUSINESS CENTEH FOR CONDEMNATION OF cI1
(CAR\ CI'
"#- TITLE.
MTG. 3/4/86
DEPT.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY AND BIRTCHER
ENG PROPERTY ALONG PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD
SRAD TRACT 82-4)
By motion, adopt Resolution No. fd& approving an ai
ment between the City of Carlsbad and Birtcher Business CI
regarding the acquisition of drainage easements alo southerly portion of Palomar Airport Road.
ITEM EXPLANATION
As a condition to the approval of Carlsbad Tract 82-L
owner is required to improve the existing drainage
adjacent to the southerly right-of-way of Palomar Airport
along the project boundary.
Council has approved tentative maps on both sides (
subject property with the requirement to improve the dr
way adjacent to the right-of-way of Palomar Airpor
(Carlsbad Tract 82-4, Birtcher Business Center and Ca
Tract 82-25, Ukegawa).
The owner of the subject property has been contact1
attempts have been made to purchase easements fo
extension of the drainage way.
The agreement provides that the developer will pay a
necessary costs incurred with the condemnation procee
Upon approval of the agreement, the City will work wi
developer to retain an attorney, order the title rep01
retain an appraiser.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
EXHIBITS
1. Location Map
2. Resolution No. f& approving an agreement betw
City of Carlsbad and Birtcher Business Center re
the acquisition of drainage easements along a so
portion of Palomar Airport Road,
-_I--
3. Letter of Intent dated November 5, 1985
attachments.
4. Letter of Attempt to Purchase Property dated Decei
1985
Jt
I
\ . I
- LOCATION MAP
mWS# CONDEW
UKEGAWA PARCEL
ALADRAY PARCEL
WEST OAKS WAY
PALOMAR OAKS WAY
VlClNfl
N.l
PRO,
NO,
~~82.
PROJECT NAME
PA LOMAR AIRPORT ROAD CONDEMNATfON
4
F
c I
'1
"I .1
i
2
3
4
5'
6
7
81 9
10
11
12
13
a e
RESOLUTION NO. - 8423
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AND BIRTCHER
BUSINESS CENTER REGARDING THE ACQUISITION OF
DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ADJACENT TO THE SOUTHERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD.
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, Califorr
hereby resolve as follows:
1. That certain agreement between the City of
and Birtcher Business Center regarding acquisition of
easements adjacent to the southerly right-of-way o
Airport Road, marked Exhibit "A" and made a part h
hereby approved.
2. That the Mayor of the City of Carlsbad
I
141
l5
authorized and directed to execute said agreement 1
behalf of the City of Carlsbad.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meet. I
l6 i l7 I
1 Carlsbad City Council held on the 4th day of -
23 MARY H. CASLER, Maya
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor
1
0 r' a *-.
'r' ..
AGREEMENT
AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CARLSRAD AND B I RTCHER REGARDING
THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN EASEMENTS FOR
STREET AND OTHER PURPOSES AS REQrJIRED FOR
SUBDIVISION CT 82-4APUD38, PALOI4AR OAKS I I
day of AU This Agreement is made this - 20th -
1985 by and between the City of Carlsbad, California, a
municipal corportion (hereinafter called "City") and BIRTCHE
CENTER -CORPORATE PALOMAR Phase II (hereinafter called llSubdividc
RECITALS
A. Developer is required as a condition of Resol
No. 1995 of the [City Council] [Planning Commission]
City of Carlsbad, approving with conditions Tentative Map
82-4/PUD 38 , to dedicate and provide certain improvements t
ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE PROVIDE
I NSTALLED
B. The acquisition and development of DRAINAGE EA
DRAINAGE STRUCTURES as an off-site improvement for the sub(
is essential to provide needed public facilities for the
subdivision and to mitigate the public facilities burdens
by the subdivision.
C. It is necessary that Subdivider secure said
and install improvements thereon and in accordance with
specifications of the City of Carlsbad.
D. Subdivider has been unable to acquire by a
negotiated purchase the required easements for street anc
Exhi
0 I,. e .I
7
purposes for the subdivision, and requests that the City a
in the acquisition by exercise of the City's power of emin
domain.
E. This Agreement is authorized by and is enterec
pursuant to Section 20.16.095 of the Carlsbad Municipal COC
Section 66462.5 of the state Government Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual co
contained herein and of the recitals, it is mutually agree
and between the parties as follows:
1. Subdivider agrees to retain on behalf of the
qualified attorney or attorneys to prepare and file on beh
the City all documents, pleadings and process necessary tc
the required easenents through an action in eminent domair
attorney or attorneys will either be associated with the C
Attorney in the eminent domain proceeding, or will indeper
pursue the eminent domain action on behalf of the City, as
City in its discretion determines. The attorney or attorr
shall be approved by the City Attorney and subdivider agrc
to replace the attorney or attorneys without the City Attr
consent. The City Attorney's approval or consent shall nc
unreasonably withheld.
2. Subdivider agrees to bear all expenses, cost
and charges, including attorneys ' r engineers, appraisers
professional service fees incurred or charged in connecti
the acquisition of the various property interests and the
preparation and prosecution of the eminent domain proceed
-2-
8
0 0 .I
City shall assume no responsibility for said mounts. There
be no charge for City staff time associated with this projec
3. It is understood and agreed that even though tl
is party olaintiff, it shall assume no financial responsibi
said eminent domain action and that as further proceedings l
required, outside counsel shall assume primary responsibilii
direction of any actions subject to any necessary approvals
City. The City agrees to cooperate and assist in commencin
prosecuting said condemnation action in an expeditious mann
the purpose of completing same as soon as reasonably possib
accordance with applicable laws.
4. Subdivider shall retain at its sole expense ar
appraiser, engineer or other expert witness, as mutually a?
upon by Developer and City, to provide any necessary apprai
engineering or other information in a form suitable for US(
connection with said condemnation proceedings. Any appraii
engineer and other expert witness required shall be paid d
by Subdivider. City shall assume no responsibility for su
payment.
5. Subdivider shall pay all amounts, plus intere
required as a result of any judgment or settlement in payr
easements to be acquired. City shall assume no responsibi
said payments.
6. The parties hereby aqrees to seek an order o!
immediate possession €or the real property necessary for
improvements and facilities and related easements and corn]
the legal procedures necessary therefor. The subdivider
-3-
0 0 . . I*.
responsible for the deposit of funds, Dosting of Security,
payment of any costs associated with the order of immediat
possession.
7. City retains the right to assume primary
responsibility for the subject ligitation at any time and
prosecute it to completion with all costs, including attor
fees, to be borne by the Subdivider.
8. It is understood that prior to the initiation
any eminent domain proceedings, it will be necessary for t
City in its sole discretion to adopt a resolution of neces
for the acquisition of the property and to make the necess
findinqs as required by law. The adoption of a resolution
necessity shall be a condition precedent to any obligation
the Subdivider herein. City agrees to use due diligence i
processing the matter to hearing before the City Council j
order to ensure compliance with the time limits establish€
Section 20.16.095 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and Sectj
66462.5 of the state Government Code. Subdivider agrees I
any failure by the City to comply with the time limits, hc
shall not cause an invalidation of any condition of the
tentative map or relieve the subdivider of any obligation
hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have exec1
this Agreement on the day and year first above written.
...
...
4.
c a (. 1 ,
t e
DATED: Z??&uU 7 /9/?6 CITY OF CARLSBAD
A Municipal Corporation of
the State 08- California
I
4) ./ L
by : ;$dy/~m- -I / -I d-
M RY H. CASLER, Mayor
F.TT E S T : CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor Pro-Tern
&,zZ 4REN R. KUNDTZ, Deputy City Clerk
SUBDIVIDER
BIRTCHER BUSINESS CENTER-CORPORATE a California limited partnership
By : CAMPBELL-PALOMAR I I , a Cal i fou
general partnership, General F
By: BIRTCHER PACIFIC 11, a La
By :
/
5.
, 0 e
&
ACKNOWLEDGMENT c
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF
1 ss 1
,-- /,
, before me, the undersigne State, personally appear , personally known to me ( isfactory evidence) to be t
person who executed the within instrument and who is known me to be a partner of BIRTCHER PACIFIC 11, a California gener partnership, which partnership is known to me to be a partr
of CAMPBELL-PALOMAR 11, a California general partnership, whS
partnership is known to me to be the general partner
California limited partnership, the limited partnership t1 executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that executed the within instrument on behalf of BIRTCHER PACII
11, that said partnership executed the within instrument
behalf of CAMPBELL-PALOMAR 11, and that said partners1 executed the within instrument on behalf of BIRTCHER BUSINI
CENTER-CORPORATE PALOMAR PHASE 11, and that BIRTCHER BUSINI
CENTER-CORPORATE PALOMAR PHASE I1 executed the same.
BIRTCHER BUSINESS CENTER-CORPORATE PALOMAR PHASE 11,
WITNESS my hand and official seal, c
RITA L. CUMMINGS
,, - .,-+:/2-, '/L ' Name (Typed or Printed) / I
(SEAL)
BBC-CP/CPII. 1
i,
T il) I) *. *.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT C'
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
r' 1 ss
COUNTY OF 1
I
, 19 >->-, before me, the undersigne
a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appear
ROBERT M. CAMPBELL, personally known to me (or proved to me
the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person w
executed the within instrument and who is known to me to be
partner of CAMPBELL-PALOMAR 11, a California general partne
ship, which partnership is known to me to be the gener
partner of BIRTCHER BUSINESS CENTER-CORPORATE PALOMAR PHASE I
a California limited partnership, the limited partnership th
executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that
executed the within instrument on behalf of CAMPBELL-PALOM
11, that said partnership executed the within instrument
and that BIRTCHER BUSINESS CENTER-CORPORATE PALOMAR PHASE
executed the same.
behalf of BIRTCHER BUSINESS CENTER-CORPORATE PALOMAR PHASE I
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
I_Cy -A- J /' /' 7; i ,<,L-7-/-/-+z'- - I -1; - ,cy,-
c
NOTARY PUBLIC <
RITA L. CUii4MINGS ,
NOTARY P!JY?lC C;i.lcr!i NIA 1 Pii'INClPAL OFFICE IN I ,-----7
Hz"; / h ! F,? /, -2 \- ~ ' !%* I_-- ORANGE COLIN fY
Name (Typed or Printed)
(SEAL)
BBC-CP/CPII .2
<.
* ,’ I,
HENRY WORLEY ASSOCIATES
ClVlLENGlNEERlNG 0 SURVEYING 0 PLANNING
R EC EIV ED. NOV. 5,
NOV 61s
CITY OF CARLSBN,
D€v€LQ?. PROC, wQp&
CITY OF CARLSBAD
ENGl NEERI NG DEPARTMENT
1200 ELM AVE
CARLSBAD, CAL. 92008 -
GENTLEMEN :
ON BEHALF OF MY CLIENT, BIRTCHER, I HEREBY REQUEST THAT YOU INITIATE A
CONDEMNATION PROCEED1 NGS FOR STORM DRAl NAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND THE REQUl I
EASEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 20.16.095 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNlClPA
CODE.
THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE REQUIRED AS A CONDITION OF THE TENTATIVE
APPROVAL FOR CT 82-4/PUD-38, AND CANNOT BE COMPLETED WITHOUT AN EASEMEI
FOR OFFSITE CONSTRUCTION. THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER HAS REJECTED ALL
FAITH EFFORTS TO ACQUIRE THE NECESSARY EASEMENT AND HAS REJECTED ALL
REASONABLE OFFERS TO PURCHASE HIS PROPERTY.
ATTACHED TO THIS LETTER ARE THE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED FOR YOU TO PROCEED
THE CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS WHICH CONSIST OF:
1. A SIGNED AGREEMENT
2. A LITIGATION GUARANTEE
3, AN M.A. I . APPRAISAL
4. A PLAT E LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUIRED EASEMENT
IF ANY FURTHER INFORMATION OR DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED, PLEASE ADVISE
IMMEDIATELY.
EXHIBIT
7875 Convoy Court 0 Suite A-2 San Diego, California 921 11 0 (71 4)
a e
0 ‘L
HENRY WORLEV ASSOCIATES
CIVILENGINEERING 0 SURVEYING PLANNING
DEC. 11,
JOB NO.
CITY OF CARLSBAD
1200 ELM STREET
CARLSBAD, CAL. 92008
ENG I NEERl NG DEPARTMENT
GENTLEMEN :
THE ATTACHED CORRESPONDENCE IS BEING SUBMITTED AS EVIDENCE OF A GOOD F
EFFORT TO ACQUIRE THE NECESSARY RIGHT OF WAY NEEDED FOR OFFSITE DRAINA
IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO PALOMAR OAKS II, CT 82-4 AS REQUIRED BY THE PR
FOR ACQUISITION OF OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE SECT1
20.16.095.
IT IS EVIDENT THAT MY CLIENT, BIRTCHER, HAS OFFERED TO PURCHASE THE PR
FOR AN AMOUNT WHICH IS IN EXCESS OF THE MIA APPRAISED VALUE, AND HAS B
UNSUCCESSFUL. WE THEREFORE HAVE NO ALTERNATIVE OTHER THAN TO ACQUIRE 1
NECESSARY RIGHT OF WAY THROUGH CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS.
THE ATTORNEY REPRESENTING BIRTCHER IN THIS ACTION WILL BE MR. JEFF ODE
OF THE FIRM OF RUTAN & TUCKER (714) 64173441,
SINCERE? fi*r t!& & J$
HENRY L. ORLEY, PRESID T
HENRY W RLEY ASSOCIATE INC.
EXHIBIT 4
7875 Convoy Court 0 Suite A-2 cl San Diego, California 921 11 0 (71 4)
0 0 I.
'1
HENRY WORLEY ASSOCIATES
CIVILENGINEERING 0 SURVEYING 0 PLANNING
JAN. 21 , 1
I/( MR, DAVID EDEN JL (2 7
2505 CAMINO DEL RIO SOUTH
SUITE 108
D SAN DIEGO, CAL. 92108
DEAR MR. EDEN,
I HAVE RELAYED TO MR. ROBERT M. CAMPBELL OF BIRTCHER PACIFIL THE RESUL
OUR CONVERSATION ON FRIDAY JAN. 18th, AND HAVE OUTLINED WHAT I BELIEVE
THE PRESENT POSITION WHICH YOU AND YOUR CLIENT MR. ALADRAY HAVE TAKEN
RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF ANY IMPROVEMENTS ON MR. ALADRAYS PROPERTY. I
ADVISED MR. CAMPBELL THAT IT WAS YOUR FEELING THAT THE BEST RESOLUTION
THE SITUATION WOULD BE TO PURCHASE MR. ALADRAY'S PROPERTY AND THAT, TO
KNOWLEDGE, NO ONE HAD MADE A FIRM OFFER FOR MR. j2LADRAY TO CONSIDER.
IN RESPONSE, MR. CAMPBELL HAS AUTHORIZED ME TO MAKE A FIRM OFFER ON YE
OF BIRTCHER PACIFIC OF $60,000 TO ACQUIRE THE PARCEL OWkED BY MR. ALAC
SINCE WE ARE CURRENTLY IN THE PERMIT PROCESS WITH THE CITY OF CARLSBX
IS OF THE ESSENCE, AND WE WILL REQUIRE A RESPONSE TO THIS OFFER WITHIb
DAYS.
SI NCERELY , by? i l34 HENRY L. WORLEY, PRE'SIDENT
HENRY WORLEY ASSOC I ATES , I NC.
1 1
p
I I &lJ
j '.
:>
7875Convoy A +nc Court 0 Suite A-2 San Diego] Califo
92 e I.
11
DAVID EDEN
I-y
/- ATTORNEY AT LAW
2605 CAMINO DEL RIO SOU I H
SUITE I08
SAN 0,EGO CALIFORNIA 92108 37e4
PHONt (619) 260 1656
~Januarli 22, 1~65
HENRY L, N~JKLEY Henry Nor ley Associates, lnc I 7875 Convoy Court Suite "A2" San Dieyo, California 921 I1
RE: ALAI~~AY/t~!li7i_H~K - ''I\[ ibl(
Dear iW, Norley:
I am receipt of your coiiiiiiur\icatiOn dated Januarv 21, 1%: wnerein you informed me thdt iW RUGEi4T Pl, LAPIPHELL of B PHLIFIC has authorized you tu otkf Sixty TiiousanU Dollai
( $ 613,UOO,uO 1 for the purctidse of tile parct'l mned by I c 1 i ent MK I ALADKA'U' .
I have contac d MR. ALADKAP ~d llil ot rlid IIII~I dl wr dl
PIK, ALADRAY has authorized me to torwdrcl to you til5 coun offer in the! amount of One Hundred Fitty-lVlne Triousdnd Dollars ( $ lY3,OOO,X L
This counter offer diil be ettectlde until Jdiiudry 28, 1 at which time if not accepted by BIRrCHER PACIFIC, in wr received in this office, it is rescinded,
lhank you for your cooperation in thispatref.
Ve r y 1 r II 1 y y 0 L1 r
ll/\? 11) 1 1Jtiu c DE:ss
6
0 m U
't,
HENRY WORLEY ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING CI SURVEYING 0 PLANNING
JAN 24, 1985
' ' /]iE 1- MR. DAVID EDEN
2605 CAMINO DEL RIO SOUTH
SUITE 108
' SAN DIEGO, CAL. 92108
DEAR MR. EDEN,
IN RESPONSE TO YOUR LETTER OF JAN. 22, 1985 IN WHICH YOU FORWARDED THE
COUNTER OFFER OF YOUR CLIENT MR. ALADRAY IN THE AMOUNT OF $159,000 FOR
THE PURCHASE OF HIS PROPERTY, 1 HAVE BEEN INSTRUCTED BY MY CLIENT MR.
ROBERT M. CAMPBELL OF EIRTCHER PACIFIC TO PRESENT HIS COUNTER OFFER OF
MR. CAMPBELL WISHES ME TO FURTHER ADVISE YOU THAT THIS IS HIS FINAL OF
AND THAT NO ADDITIONAL COUNTER OFFERS WILL BE ENTERTAINED.
AS PREVIOUSLY STATED, TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE AND WE WOULD APPRECIATE 'i
RESPONSE NO LATER THAN JAN. 30, 1985 SO THAT WE MAY TAKE APPROPRIATE F
THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION AND PROMPT ATTENTION TO THIS PlATTER.
$90,000.
SlNC RELY,
HENRY &lm* L. WORLEY, PRESID NT
HENRY WORLEY ASSOCI ATES , I NC.
,/? tcsp
1 I [J pQ e".
1
, *t . .,
\a I 1% ',,, ,:$ -+-;{,a 1
7q75 ,convoy court
I, I) , 1
r 0 e 9 **
,*I
I
9 DAVID k_UEl\i <
6 1 ATTOHNL Y nr LAW
cLO5 LAhIINO DkL HI0 BOLiTi
SUITE 1OL;
LAP. UICGO CA~~kCl~lllf, ydlOc /I .
PHOY'lt (619, 1tO It3F
Jdnuar 1' L5, lY3L,
HEW L, WUHLt'f
/875 Convay Lourt Suite A-2 San Ui?yo, Cai irurnid 321 I 1
Ht'nry WOfi?Y kSSOCldle5, IIIC.
RE : ALAU kA'7 / b 1 ii I CH t K _-____ tJ AL 1 k 1 L
Dear Pir, workyy:
I ain in recwt ut gi,ur lett8 11 1 '~Jl'JJ3' ?L I A)LJ I
I nave contacizd YIK, HLHUHAY diiii iriToi 1 i'll'i d1 lLJii' d"?'
iLiti. HLADKAY atter due deliDeratii,il t1-1~ :iclttixiied 112 t:, tor to jocl nis FliUkL WijltRUtFtK ii? tiw i~ioiiiit OI !ili l timih ~1 t ive lllousdncl LiOl lar s t b 'I 49, kid0 .dii i I
He rurtiilsr intorins iie tnat tnis countzrdttzr dl ~12 \:Ttisct until January 30, I%, at whici1 tiin2 ir not dccclkitzg UY bI PAilFlC in writmg rtceived in tiiis otfic?, it is resc,lriilzd
unce again, tnanK you tor your coowrdtioll iri ti113 liidtt2r8
'v'er) truly ydu13,
-I i 'C . I, _I
IN\/ 1 D k lJk\i
0 uE : ss
CC: AL ALAiIKAY
OQ