Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-03-18; City Council; 8549; CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR CITY HALL | MAIN LIBRARY ARCHITECTURAL STUDYI e s E a 4: 2 0 i= 0 a 5 A z 3 0 0 CIT~ CARLSBAD - AGEND*LL -x - - rc m AB#- TITLE: CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR CITY HALL/MAIN MTG. 3/18/86 LIBRARY ARCHITECTURAL STUDY CITY ATTj DEPT. HD DEPT. (34 CITY MGR, RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. rfli , approving the attached consultant agreement with Michael Feerer/Rob Quigley and Associates to perform a City Hall/Main Library Site Eva1 uation Study. ITEM EXPLANATION: In the 1985-86 C. I.P. budget, the City Council appropriated $25,000 to complete an architectural study of the City Hall/Main Library complex. The objectives of the study are: (1) Review and update the City's existing City Hall space requirements data (2) Analyze the existing City site with respect to current and future with recommendations for current and future space needs; surrounding land use compatibility, traffic impacts and circulation patterns, parking requirements, accessibility for the general public given growth trends, locations, and demographics, and other relevant fac (3) Analyze and determine the adequacy of the existing site and expansion capabilities of the current City Hall structures with respect to the abo considerations; and, (4) Analyze and determine the adequacy of the Main Library building and site for future expansion. A five (5) member Staff Selection Committee was formed to interview the firms qualifications statements and support information from ten (10) architectural firms specializing in space programming and site analysis studies. reviewed the submitted materials of seven (7) firms responding to the project and selected three (3) finalists: and recommend a selection to the City Council. The Staff Committee solicited The Committ 1. Michael Feerer/Rob Quigley and Associates 2. Bradshaw, Bundy and Associates 3. Wheeler, Wimer and Associates The three (3) finalists were required to submit a detailed scope of work propos to accomplish the project. The Staff Committee interviewed the three (3) firins on February 27, 1986 and unanimously recommends the firm of Michael Feerer/Rob Quigley and Associates for this study. The consultants will begin their work immediately following receipt of authoriz to proceed and will conclude the study within ninety (90) calendar days. Staff will be prepared to return to the City Council approximately July 1, 1986 with a final report for Council consideration. I w e t PAGE 2 of AB#gS''/? FISCAL IMPACT: Revenue sharing funds in the amount of $25,000 exist in the current C.I.P., account 140-820-1810-3196, for this study. The attached consultant's agreemen incorporates the Detailed Proposal which contains the maximum number of hours and hourly rates necessary to complete the project, not to exceed the budgeted $25,000. EXHIBITS : 1. 2. Consultant agreement. 3. Resolution No. 844/ approving the consultant agreement. Memo to the City Manager from the Staff Selection Committee. 4. Consultant's Qualifications and Background Statement, (On file in the City Clerk's Office). Consul tant ' s Detai 1 ed Proposal . 5. k. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 w 0 RESOLUTION NO. 8441 A-RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR AN ARCHITECTURAL SITE EVALUATION STUDY OF THE CITY HALL/ MAIlJ LIBRARY COMPLEX. MHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad has solicited proposals for an architectural site eval uation study; and LJHEREAS, all prospective firms were required to submit qualificat statements and support information; and WHEREAS, all firms selected as finalists were required to submit a detailed scope of work proposal; and WHEREAS ¶ the recommended firm of Michael Ferrer/Rob Qui g1 ey and Associates possesses the skills, background, and expertise necessary to accomplish the study; and WHEREAS, the City Council has previously appropriated funds in the amount of $25,000 in the 1985-86 C.I.P. budget for the study. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California: 1. 2. That the above recitations are true and correct. That the agreement with the firm of Michael Feerer/Rob Quig’ley ana Associates attached hereto as Exhibit A is hereby approved. I 3. That the Mayor is authorized and directed to enter into an agreement with the firm of Michael Feerer/Rob Quigley and Associates on behall of the City. // // // i/ // 3 \. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 w 0 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of March Carlsbad, California, at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of 1986, by the following vote, to wit: - AYES: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Pettine NOES: None ABSENT: None LL- d- &d- MARY H. CaLER, Mayor ATTEST: ALE&"dKm%* (SEAL) I + e 0 \ AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the 18th day of March, 1986, by and between the CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City," and Michael Feerer/Rob Willington Quigley and Associates hereinafter ref erred to as "Consult ant .I1 RECITALS - City requires the services of an architectural consultant to provide the necessary architectural services for evaluation of current and future municipal facilities; and Consultant possesses The necessary skills and qualifications to provide the services required by City; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and the mutual covenants contained herein, City and a Consultant agree as follows: ( 1 ) CONSULTANT '5 OBLIGATIONS The Consultant shall provide architectural consultant services to the City in accordance with the "Detailed Proposal" attached hereto Hhich is incorporated by reference and made a part of this agreement. performed diligently, in a professional manner, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of this agreement under the direction of the City Manqer or his aut ho rired representative . ( 2 ) CITY OBLIGATIONS Said services shall be The City shall pay the Consultant in accordance with paragraphs (4) ard (5) of this agreement upon receipt of invoices submitted by the Consultant and approved by the City, 0 -2- e ( 3 ) PROGRESS .AND COMPLETION The work under this contract will begin immediately upon receipt of notification to proceed by the City and be completed within ninety (90) calendar days of that date. Extensions of the may be granted if requested by the Consultant and agreed to in writing by the City Manager, such requests, the City Manager will give allowance for documented and substantiated unforeseeable and unavoidable delays not caused by a lack of foresight on the part of the Consultant, or delays caused by City inaction or other agencies' lack of timely action. (4) In consideration of FEES TO BE PAID TO CONSULTANT The fee payable to the Consultant by the City shall be calculated by the hours and rates in a=cordance with the section of the attahed IfDetaiLed Proposal" entitled "Compensationf1. No other capensation for services will be allowed except those items covered by supplemental agreements per paragraph (61, CHANGES IN WORK. (5) PAYMENT OF- FEES Payment of fees shall be made within fifteen (15) days after receipt and approval of invoices submitted by Consultant to City. All invoices shall be detailed and include a written description of the work performed in accordance with the "Detailed Proposal", dates, hours worked, hourly rate, and total amount of requested payment. The Consultant may submit an itemized invoice at the conclusion of forty- five (45) days after initiation of this agreement up to but not to exceed fifty percent (50%) ($12,500) of the total. maximum fee allowed mder the agreement ($25,000). completion of the scope of work. The balance of the fee payable to the Consultant shall be made upon w a b -3- Xt is understood that if the project is resumed after being suspended for more than sixty (60) days, the Consultant's canpensation shall be subject to renegotiation based upon adjustments to billing rates that have occ~~rd in the interim . (6) CHANGES IN WORK If, in the course of this contract, changes seem merited by the Consultant or the City, and informal consultations with the other party indicate that a change in the conditions of the contract is warranted, the Consultant or the City may request a change in contract. City in the following manner: forwarded to the City or Consultant to inform them of the proposed changes along with d statement of estimated changes in charges or time schedule. reaching mutual agreement on the proposal, a supplemental agreement shall be prepared by the City and approved by the City Council. agreement shall not render ineffective or invalidate unaffected portions of the agreement. Changes requiring immediate action by the Consultant or City shall be ordered by the City Manager vho will inform a principal of the Consultant's firm of the necessity of such action and follow up with a supplemental agreement covering such work. Such changes shall be processed by the A letter outlining the required changes shall be After Such supplemental (7 ) NON-COLLUSION CLAUSE The Consultant warrants that their firm has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this agreement, and that Consultant has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration contingent upon, or resulting from, the award or making this agrement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul a -4- 0 this aOref3lent without liability, or, in its discretion, to deduct frm the agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full mount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee. (a ) NON-OISCRIMINATION CLAUSE The Consultant shall caply with applicable State and Federal laws regard ing non- discrimination . (9) TERMINATION OF CONTRACT In the event of the Consultant's failure to prosecute, deliver, or perform the work as provided for in this contract, the City may terminate this contract for nonperformance by notifying the Consultant by certified mail of the termination of the contract. days to deliver said documents owned by the City and all work in progress to the City Manager. the documents delivered to City of the percentage of work which the Consultant has performed which is usable and of worth to the City in having the contract completed. shall determine the final payment of the contract. ( IO) DISPUTES The Consultant, thereupon, has five (5) working The City MatIdcJer shall make a determination of fact based upon Based upon that finding as reported to the City Council, the Council If a dispute should arise regarding the performance of work under this agreement, the following procedure shall be used to resolve any question of fact or interpretation not otherwise settled by agrement between parties. Such questions, if they become identified as a part of a dispute anong persons operating under the provisions of this contract, shall be reduced to writing by the Consultant or the City Manager. A copy of such documented dispute shall be forwarded to both parties involved along with recanmended methods of resolution which would be of benefit to both parties. , The City Manager or the Consultant receiving the letter shall reply to the letter along with a recanmended method e -5- 0 .- of resolution within ten days. If the resolution thus obtained is unsatisfactory to the aggrieved party, a letter outlining the dispute shall be forwarded to the City Council for their resolution through the office of the City Attorney. to the problem. The City Council may then opt to consider the directed solution In such cases, the action of the City Council shall be binding upon the parties involved, although nothing in this procedure shall prohibit the parties seeking remedies available to them at law. (11) SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF SERVICES This agreement may be terminated by either party upon tendering thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. termination, upon request of the City, the Consultant shall assemble the work product and put same in order for proper filing and closing and deliver said product'to City. In the event of termination, the Consultant shall be paid for work performed to the termination date; however, the total shall not exceed the guaranteed total maximum. The City shall make the final determination as to the portions of tasks completed and the canpensation to be made. Compensation to be made in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations. ( 12) In the event of such suspension or STATUS OF THE CONSULTANT The Consultant shall perform the services provided for herein in < Consultant's own way as an independent contractor and in pursuit of Consultant's independent calling, and not as an employee of the City. Consultant shall be under control of the City only as to the result to be accanplished and the personnel assigned to the project, but shall consult with the City as provided for in the request for proposal. (13) ROLE OF THE CONSULTANT , The Consultant will provide planning and programming to the City for this project. For this scope of work, the Consultant will not practice architecture, e I -6- 0 engineering, nor any building trades, and assumes no liability normally associated with such professions and trades. (14) OWNERSHIP OF. DOCUMENTS All plans, studies, sketches, drawings, reports and specifications as herein produced as a result of this agreement are the property of the City, whether the work for nhich they are made be executed or not. In the event this contract is terminated, all documents, plans, specifications, drawings, reports and studies shall be delivered forthwith to the City. right to make copies of all documents for his/her records,. show to others selected items from reports and documents as part of business development. Consultant shall have the The Consultant may The Consultant warrants that display of this information will not cause harm to the City. (15) HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT The City, its agents, officers and employees shall not be liable for any claims, liabilities, penalties, fines, or any damage to goods, properties, or effects of any person vrhatever, nor for personal injuries or death caused by, or resulting from, or claimed to have been caused by, or resulting from, any act or omission of Consultant or Consultant's agents, employees or representatives. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify and save free and harmless the City and its authorized agents, officers, an3 employees against any of the foregoing liabilities or claims of any kind and any cost and expense that is incurred by the City on account of any of the foregoing liabilities, unless the liability or claim is due, or arises out of, solely to the City's negligence. ( 16 ) ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT The Consultant shall not assign this contract or any part thereof or any monies due thereunder without the prior written consent of the City. 0 -7- 0 1 ( 17 ) SUBCONTRACTING If the Consultant shall subcontract any of the work to be performed under this contract by the Consultant, Consultant shall be fully responsible to the City for the acts and missions of Consultant's subcontractor and of the persons either directly or indirectly employed by the subcontractor, as Consultant is for the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by Consultant. contained in this contract shall create any contractual relationship between any subcontractor of Consultant and the City. subcontractor and €Wry Subcontractor of a subcontractor by the terms of this contract applicable to Consultant's work unless specifically noted to the contrary in the subcontract in question approved in writing by the City. (18) PROHIBITED INTEREST Nothing The Consultant shall bind every No official of the City 4-10 is authorized in such capacity on behalf of the City to negotiate, make, accept, or approve, or take part in negotiatiq, making, accepting, or approving of any architectural, eqineering inspection, construction or material supply contractor, or any subcontractor in connection with the construction of the project, shall becane directly or indirectly interested personally in this contract or in any part thereof. employee, architect, attorney, engineer, or inspector of or for the City vvho is authorized in such capacity and on behalf of the City to exercise any executive, supervisory, or other similar functions in connection with the performance of this contract shall become directly or indirectly interested personally in this contract or any part thereof. (19) VERBAL AGREEMENT OR CONVERSATION NO offices, No verbal agreement or conversation with any officer, agent, or employee of the City, either before, during, or after the execution of this contract, shall affect or modsfy any of the terms or obligations herein contained nor such 0 -8- e verbal agreement or conversation entitle the Consultant to any additional payment *atsoever under the terns of this contract. (20) SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS Subject to the provisions of paragraph (IS), Hold Harmless Agrement, all terms, conditions, and provisions hereof shall insure to and shall bind each of the parties hereto, and each of their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. ( 2 1 ) BUSINESS LICENSE REQUIRED Prior to beginning work, the Consultant shall secure a City of Carlsbad business license and pay the appropriate fee for said license in accordance with Section 5.04.020 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. (22) EFFECTIVE DATE This agreement shall bs effective on and frm the day and year first above writ ten. (23) CONFLICT OF INTEREST The Consultant shall file a conflict of interest statement with the City Clerk of the City of Carlsbad. interests in real property. The Consultant shall report investments or IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals. CITY OF CARLSBAD L- A- L 8 Mayor 1 %d-c Title \ 'APPROVED AS T FOR^^/' "- ATTEST: --- Assi ar) ty Attorney 4 City & Clerk A?& e a9 March 5, 1986 TO : City Manager FROM: Staff Selection Committee SUBJECT: City Hall/Main Library Site Evaluation Study The Staff Selection Committee unanimously recommends the architectural firm of Michael Feerer/Rob Quigley and Associates to perform the City Hall/Main Library site evaluation study. The Staff Committee solicited qualifications statements and support informa- tion from ten (10) architectural firms specializing in space programming and site analysis studies. Seven (7) firms responded to the project. The Staff Committee selected and interviewed the following three (3) finalists for the project following submission of a detailed scope of work: 1. Michael Feerer/Rob Quigley and Associates 2. Bradshaw, Bundy and Associates 3. Wheeler, Wimer and Associates The three (3) finalists were interviewed by the Staff Committee on February 27, 1986 with subsequent deliberations resulting in this recommendation. JoM J. Ca’hill Administrative Assistant I1 Staff Committee Chairman 3 Assistant City Manager P1 anni ng Director 5) f-l -.AL-- L< JefFre L. Bunnell Gwdte Civil Engineer JJC:ch * 0 Space Needs Study & Site Evaluation Of The Existing Carlsbad City Hall & Libraries A Joint Venture Of Michael Feeier & Associates 1 Rob Wellington Quigley, AIA Architects e Our Roles Michael Feerer, Michael Feerer & Associates Wiil Direct Tbis Study & Will Be The City's Prime Contact Person Finn Specializes Exclusively In Facility Programming Has Completed Similar Space Need Studies For Many Cities Award-Winning Expertise In Planning City Halls & Civic Centers Strong Reputation With Cities In Facility Planning Projects Rob ~k!//'ngtOn Quigley, AIA Architects Wili Lead The Site Evaluation Tasks During This Project Award-Winning Architect With Experience In Many Municipal Projects Has Completed Many Master Planning / Site Planning Projects Internationally & Nationally Recognized As A Leader In Architecture Has Teamed With Michael Feerer & Associates On Many Prior Projects Richard Wafers, ng W Associates, Inc. Will Be Heavily Involved In The Library Space Needs Study Tasks Extensive, Nationally-Recognized Library Planning Expertise Has Developed Space Needs Studies For Many Library Systems Broad Knowledge Of Library Operations & CosVBenefit Trade-offs HBW/MFA Are Currently Working On San Diego's New Central Library Robert Sergeant, P.E., Willdan Associates Have Served Many Municipalities In Traffic, Access & Parking Planning Is Familiar And Has Previously Worked With The City Of Carlsbad e Space Needs Stu 8 & Site Evaluation Of The Existing Carlsbad City Hall & Libraries A Joint Venture of Michael Feerer & Associates / Rob Wellington Quiglley, A IA Architects .. Our Contribution Dual Strengths Of Facility Programming & Architecture Long, Consistently Successful Track Record Familiar With City Hall & Library Issues Consistently Recognized For Our Past Efforts Comfortable & Familiar With Council Presentations Our Commitment Dedicated To A Strong On-Site Presence Dedicated To Heavy Principal-Level Involvement Good Listeners With A Responsive Process Will Avoid A "Boilerplate" Or "Formula" Approach We Respect & Will Respond To Your Unique Goals ,- k Summary Of Scope Of Work & Schedule d e @ e. .- Proposed Scope of Work Carlsbad City Hall & Libraries: Space Needs Study & Existing Site Evaluation Assess The Space Needs Of Carlsbad City Hal/ 1 Assess The Exlstma c itv - Hall Fac ilitieS (MFAlRWQl .. 1 .I 4.2 1.3 1.4 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 Review Existing Space Program, Plans & Other Data Of City Hall, Trailers, And Interim Facilities Inventory Existing Spaces As Needed To Update Floor Plans & Furniture Diagrams Assess The General Physical Condition Of The Existing City Hall And Its Furnishings & Equipment Review Facility Condiiion & Existing Data Wah Project Committee Analvze Cu rrentlfuture Citv Hall SDace Needs (MFAL Conduct Detailed Individual Interviews With Each Department Director And/or Key Personnel Review Expected Short and Long-Term Organizational GrowtNChanges To Departments Finalize With City Manager Staff The Current & Future Staffing/Service Projections Of Each Dept. Extensively Visit Each Department To Observe Staff Work Tasks And Public Interaction Summarize Existing Space Problems And Their Impact On City Operational Goals & Costs Review & Confirm Planning Assumptions Regarding Degree Of Future Use Of Office Technologies Develop Space Standards For All City Hall Individual Workspaces, Shared Spaces & Public Spaces Review & Refine Space Standards As Needed With Project Committee And Department Directors Summarize ExistinglFuture Space Needs & Review With Project Committee And Department Directors Assess The Space Needs Of Carlsbad Libraries 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 Assess The Existina Carlsbad Libraries IMFAIRWQIHBW~ Review Prior Space Program, Floor Plans & Other Existing Data On Carlsbad Main Library & Branch Inventory Existing Library Spaces As Needed To Update Floor Plans & Furniture Diagrams Assess The General Physical Condition Of The Existing Main Library And Its Furnishings & Equipment Review Facility Condition & Existing Data With Library Management Staff Analvze Current/Future %ace Needs Of Libraries (MFA/HBWI Develop Demographic Data On The Carlsbad Library System Target Population Conduct Detailed Group Discussions With Library Director And Other Key Library Personnel Review & Confirm Libraries' Existing Data (Programs, Service Levels, Collections, Staffing, Etc.) Develop Future Operational Projections Of Programs, Service Levels, Collections, Staffing, Etc. Identify Technological Advances Affecting Library Space Needs Now And In The Future Summarize Space Projections For Both Libraries & Review With Committee & Key Library Staff , Evaluate The Expansion Potentia/ Of The Existing Site 5 Analvze Site PlanninalLocation Issues (RWQIMFAIHBWIWA) 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 Review Existing InformatiodPlans Of Current Site & Nearby Parcels To Be Considered For Expansion Assess Site Constraints Affecting Expansion Of The City Hall & Library Summarize Land Use, Demographic, Traffic And Other Community Trends Affecting Existing Site Evaluate The Long-Term Viability Of Existing Sie Location For City Hall And/or Library Review/Refine Site Analysis With Project committee & Library Management Staff 0 @ Detailed Description Of Tasks 4 _. a 0 Detailed Description Of Tasks Carisbad City Hall -& Libraries: Space Needs Study & Existing Site Evaluation Assess The Space Needs Of Carlsbad City Hall 1 ssess The Existina Citv Hall Facilities rMFAIRWQ) 1.1 Review Existing Space Program, Plans & Other Existing Data Regarding City Hall, Trailers, And Interim Facilities Existing City documents related to the City Hall, trailers and other interim facilities used far City offices will be reviewed. The review will particularly focus on the prior City Hall space program as well as the existing site and floor plans of the facilities. We will also review other relevant prior information that may exist, such as prior studies on the facilities, department policy statements, currentlfuture employee projections, and existing work loadkervice level statistics. Cify's Responsibility During This Task: The City will need to provide two copies of the plans and one copy of the other documents within the first week of the project. 1.2 inventory Exisfing Spaces As Needed To Upd8te Floor Plans & Furniture Diagrams Interior areas will be inventoried as needed to update the floor plans and furnishing information (to the degree needed to create an accurate, updated information base for space needs projections). Michael ceerer will personally investigate each area as an important step towards understanding the adequacy or deficiency of each space. Special problem areas will receive extra attention. Cify's Responsibility During This Task: The City will need to send a memo to all City Hall Committee, Michael Feerer will attend a City department director meeting to p~SOfliilly introduce the study process. departments indicating that an inventory process will be occuring. If desired by the Project 1.3 Assess The General Physical Condition Of The Existing City Hall And Its Furnishings & Equipment Rob Quigley and Michael Feerer will assess the general condition and remaining useful life of the existing City Hall structure. Special emphasis will be placed on the building's interior and exterior finishes as well as its mechanical and structural systems. Prior major maintenance and repair histories will be reviewed. Notes will be made on particular features or elements that constrain expansion capabilities. In addition, part of this task will be to assess the general condition of existing furniture at City Hall facilities. The extent of potential use of existing furnishings will affect the space need projections and budget for an expansion or new project. City's Responsibility During This Task: None. Review Facilify Condifion & Existing Data With Prglecf Committee All work completed during this series of tasks will be presented to the Project Committee for review and refinement. Any issues needing further investigation will be identified and completed. City's Responsibilify During This Task: The City will need to form a "Project Committee" for this project that will review our work as it progresses. Timely scheduling of reviews by the Committee will be needed in order to finish this project within the desired 60day time frame. . 1.4 , m 0 Page Two 2 2.7 Conduct Detailed Individual Interviews With Each Department Director And/or We will develop a structured interview format for the Department Director interviews. It will be based on successful interview formats used in our other City Hall projects and will be reviewed with the Project Committee prior to commencing the sessions. The interviews will focus on current spatial problems, activities that affect each department's space needs, space-saving potentials, current adjacency problems, future needs for space, and other unmet facility needs. We will also reach a clear understanding of how the existing facilities are constraining the daily working success of the department as well as the public's interaction with the department. Interview notes will be prepared by MFA and sent to each director (and City Management staff) for their review, clarification and further comment. In addition, we will discuss with the Project Committee issues regarding all publidshared spaces in the City Hall, such as the Council Chambers and major lobby areas. Cay's Responsibility During This Task: The Project Committee will need to review and approve the interview format. A list of department directors and any other key personnel to be interviewed will need to be furnished. Up to 10 interviews are budgeted for this task. The Project Committee will need to participate with the team in discussing various issues and criteria for the publidshared spaces within City Hall. The City Manager's office will need to review interview session notes to ensure that each departmera is correctly representing their current and future needs within the completed in later tasks, the City Manager's office will need to resolve any disagreements it may have with departments regarding stated needs. Ana lvte Cu rrentlfuture Citv Hall Space Needs ( MFAl Key Personnel overall context of Cay goals, objectives and budget constraints. Before space projections can be 2.2 Review Expected Short and Long-Term Organizational Growth/Changes To Departments Related to the interview process, we will review with the City Manager's office each department's expected staffing and service growth (at dates corresponding to future population milestones for Carlsbad). Demographic data will be attained from SANDAG as well as Carisbad's Planning Department. In addition, we will review with the City Manager's office potential further levels of computerization, other technological changes, potential re-organization of any department, and any other factors that will influence future space needs. Cify's Responsibility During This Task: The City Manager's office will need to be available for the above discussions. The Planning Department will need to provide all of its available demographic data regarding the City of Carlsbad. 2.3 Finalize With city Manager Staff The Current & Future Staffing/Service Projections Of Each Department Based on Tasks 2.1 and 2.2, a finalized list will be developed indicating the current and future staffing and service projections of each City Hall department. Current and future population milestones for Carisbad are suggested to serve as target dates for the staffing projections. This will form a key information base to the upcoming space projections. Cify's Responsibility During This Task: The City Manager's Office and/or Project Committee will need to confirm and approve these staffing and service projections. c P( e 0 Page Three 2.4 Exfensivuly Visit €ach Department TO Observe Stat! Work Tasks And Public Interaction . Based on the information attained from the detailed interviews, Michael Feerer will further visit key areas of certain departments as needed to observe daily activities and get a better understanding of key issues. Although the earlier interview sessions will provide a detailed walk-through opportunity, this task will allow areas of special importance to be researched further. The visits will also be an opportunity to ask any followvp questions to the structured interviews, City's Responsibility During This Task: None. Summarize Existing Space Problems And TheCr Impact On City Operational Goals & costs Based on-the above tasks, each major existing space problem will be analyzed and summarized. Its impact on the Ci's operational goals and costs will also be clearly stated. Particular attention will be placed on problems that impact service to the public. Lack of space for new employees, inadequate privacy/communication levels, lack of spatial flexibility, limitations in employee produaivfiy and comfort, and unnecessary staff in0 costs are expected ta be Same at the majar impacts. The goal of this task is to clearly summarize in our report to the City Council the operational impact of the space problem. City's Responsibility During 7313 Task: None. 2.5 2.6 Review & Confirm Planning Assumptions Regarding Degree Of Future Use Of Office fechnologies The degree of current and future City use of various office technologies will influence space needs. The level of commitment to computerization, records management & microforming, off ice furniture systems vs. traditional furnishings, electronic mail, etc. will need to be determined. Michael Feerer will illustrate the costs and benefits of any technologies the City is not familiar with. This will lead to a set of planning assumptions influencing the space needs of an expanded or new City HaU. City's Responsibility During This Task: A discussion will need to be held with the City Manager's office and/or the Project Committee regarding future use of off ice technologies. A consensus for planning purposes should be reached regarding these issues. Develop Space Standards For AI1 City Hall Individual Workspaces, Shared Spaces & Public Spaces Accurate space standards will be developed for all City Hall individual workspaces, shared spaces and public spaces. The standards will be based on all of the findings of prior tasks. An efficient and effective allocation of spaces will be the goal. We will insure that the standards are sized to provide flexibility and adaptability for future needs. For the individual workspaces, three-dimensional diagrams of each workspace will be generated on computer for review by the Project Committee and Department Directors. The diagrams will accurately indicate the size and nature of each individual workspace. City's Responsibility During This Task; None. 2.7 I a e 0 Page Four 2.8 Review & Refine Space Standards As Needed With Project Committee And Department Directors The Project Committee and Department Directors will need to review the space standards to ensure that they are in agreement with the space allocations. MFAs computerized three- dimensional workspace diagrams will assist in this review effort. If needed, we will coordinate visits to other local facilities to illustrate space standards issues to the City. It will not be important (for the purposes of this study) to have every detail within each individual workspace correctly shown as long as the general size and nature of the space is confirmed. City’s Respansibili~ During This Task: The Project Committee and Department Directors will need to review and approve the space standards. Summarize ExistingIFuture Space Needs & Review With Project Commjtfee And Using the space standards, total space projections will be determined for each department and related City Hall area. One set of projections will be based on what would be required in a City Hall expansion project. A second set of projections will be based on what would be required in a new City Hall project. Current and future population milestones for Carlsbad are suggested to serve as target dates for the space needs. Parking needs will also be forecast. All work completed during this series of tasks will be presented to the Project Committee for review and refinement. Any issues needing further investigation will be identified and completed. Ci&!s Responsibility During This Task: Timely review and approval by the Project Committee and Department Directors will be needed. 3.9 Department omtors Assess The Space Needs Of Carlsbad Libraries 3 Assess The Existina Carlsbad Libraries IMFAIRWQIHBW~ 3.1 Review Prior Space Progmm, Floor Plans & Other Existing Data On Carlsbad Main Library & Branch We will review existing documents that are relevant to this project. The emphasis will be on important statistical informatian that will be useful for later stages of our work. The documents to be reviewed include any prior space programs, master plans or internal staff reports regarding the library facilities. Exiting floor plans and furnishing diagrams for both facilities and the site plan for the Main Library will be assessed. We will also need to review the Main and Branch Library collection counts, usage statistics, staffing list, salary schedule/history and organizational chart as well as the Library System’s service plan, collection development policy, program statements and data on its target population. City’s Responsibility During This Task: The City will need to provide us with two copies of the above documents within the first week of the project. 2LY * a Page Five 3.2 Inventory Existing Library Spaces As Needed To Update Floor Pians & Furniture Diagrams Interior areas will be inventoried as needed to update the floor plans and furnishing information (to the degree needed to create an accurate, updated information base for upcoming tasks). Michael Feerer and Richard Waters will personally investigate each area as an important step towards understanding the adequacy or deficiency of each space. Special problem areas will receive extra attention. City's Responsibilify During This Task: None. Assess The General Physical Condition Of The Existing Main Library And Its Furnishings & Equipment Rob Quigley and Michael Feerer will assess the general condition and remaining useful life of the existing Main Library structure. Special emphasis will be placed on the building's interior and exterior finishes as well as its mechanical and structural systems. Prior major maintenance and repair histories will be reviewed. Notes will be made on particular features or elements that constrain expansion capabilities. In addition, part of this task will be to assess the general condition of the existing Library furniture at both facilities. The extent of potential use of existing furnishings will affect the budget for an expansion or new project. Cify's Responsibilily During Y3is Task: None. Review Facility Condition & Existing Data With Library Management Staff All work completed during this series of tasks will be presented to the Project Committee for review Cifys Respansibi/ity During This Task: Timely review and approval by the Project Committee and Library management staff will be needed. 3.3 3.4 and refinment. Any issues needing funher investigation will be identified and completed. 4 4.7 Analvze Cu rrentlFuture %ace Needs Of Libraries (MFA/HBWI Develop Demographic Data For The Carlsbad Library System Target Population Prior to the group discussions, we will have developed demographic statistics regarding the service population for the Libraries. We recognize that the target population extends beyond the City boundaries of Carlsbad. Therefore, we will review the Library's existing data regarding service population and supplement it as needed with SANDAG or Planning Department statistics. Ci?y's Responsibility During This Task: None. Conduct Detailed Group Discussions With Library Director And Other Key Library Personnel Michael Feerer and Richard Waters will meet with the Library Director and other key library management personnel in one or more group discussions to review the overall direction of the 4.2 c o( 0 e Page Six 4.2 (Contlnued) Library system, current problems, current and future needs and other issues that will influence the space need projections. Each library program component will be reviewed and discussed in detail. Criieria used in determining space needs for each area will be reviewed. Cify's ReSflOflSibi\i& f)Ufhg This 7aSk.l The city will need to determine what library management personnel, if any other than the Director, should participate in the group discussions. 4.3 Review & Confirm Libraries' Existing Data (Programs, Service Levels, Collections, Staffing, Etc.) Concurrent with the group discussions, we will review the Libraries' existing operational data. We have found in other library projects it is useful to recheck and discuss the existing data in order to ensure its validity and fully understand its implications. Cify's Responsibility During This Task: None. 4.4 Develop Future Operational Projections Of Programs, Service Levels, Collections, staffing, Efc. Prior to the group discussions, we will develop operational projections of programs, service levels, collections and staffing based on the target population data and other Library existing data- The apefatisnal projections will be reviewed and refined during the group discussions as needed. Cify's Responsibility During This Task: None. Identify Technological Advances Affecting Library Space Needs Now And In The Future During the group discussions, we will discuss various Library information technologies and storage technologies available now or in the future. The current state of the Library's automation and use of these technologies will be reviewed. We will review what other "leading edge" main libraries have achieved technologically. Assumptions will be discussed and resolved (for the purposes of space need projections) regarding the expected degree of future committment by the Carlsbad Library system to each of these technologies. City's Responsibility During This Task: None. Summarize Space Projections For Dual Libraries & Review With Committee & Key Based on the results of the group discussions and our research, we will calculate, fine-tune and refine the space projections for dual Library facilities for the City of Carlsbad. Current and future service population miiestones for the Carlsbad Library system are suggested to serve as target dates for the space need projections. Parking needs wit1 also be forecast. For informational purposes, the projections will be compared to accepted "rule of thumb" overall space need 4.5 4.6 library Staff ;LC a 4B Page Seven 4.6 (Continued) formulas for libraries. All work completed during this series of Library planning tasks will be presented to the Project Committee and Library management staff for review and refinement. Any issues needing further investigation will be identified and completed. Cws Respnsibij*y During This Task: Timely review and apptbval by the Project Committee and Library management staff will be needed. Evaluate The Expansion Potential Of Existing Site 5 Analwe Site Planning/Loca tion Issues l RWQ/M FA/H B WN A) 5.1 ~eview Existing Information/Plans Of Current Site & Nearby Parcels To Be Considered Fur Expansion Site plans, parcel diagrams, utility locations and topography plans of the existing City Hall & Library site will be reviewed. Other adjacent or nearby parcels that are to be considered for expansion options will also be assessed. Changes in grade and slope condaions on the site will be noted. In addition, we will review demgmphic data of Carfsbad as well as surrounding land use designations and for use during later tasks. Cify's Responsibility During This Task: The City will need to provide two copies of the site plans, parcel diagrams, utility location plans, topography plans and demographic data within the first two weeks of the project. Assess Site Constraints Affecting Expansion Of The City Hall & Library The team will assess the various constraints affecting expansion on the site. Site dimensions, topography, traffic and parking access, view vistas, relationships to the street and surrounding neighborhood and other factors will be evaluated. This will set the framework for developing expansion options during later tasks. cjfyk R8spons;b;lty DurhQ this T': None. 5.2 5.3 Summarize Land Use, Demogr%phic, Traffic And Other Community Trends Affecting Existing Site There are several factors (besides on-site technical constraints) that influence the long term viability of the existing site for the City Hall and/or Library. These factors include land use trends surrounding the site and along its access roadways, location convenience for the community, the evolving distribution of population within Carfsbad, and other factors. Traffic and access will be especially important considerations. We will summarize each of these factors as a basis for recommending whether the existing site will remain a viable site for either the City Hall and/or Library. Cay's Responsibility During This Task: None. 2: @ II) Page Eight 5.4 Evaluate The Long-Term Viability Of Existing Site Location For City Hall And/or Library Based on the above summaries, we will make a clear recommendation to the City regarding the long-term viability of the existing site. This ‘we will be especially important for the City Hall. Cify’s Uespans;bil;ty burhg This Task: None. Review/Refine Site Analysis With Project Committee 4 Library Management Staff All work completed during this series of tasks will be presented to the Project Committee and Library management Staff for review and refinement. ~ny issues needing further investigation will be identified and completed. City!! Responsibility During This Task: Timely review and approval by the Project Committee and Library management staff will be needed. 5.5 6 Develop Expansion Options For Existina Site (RWQ/M FNHB WNA) 6.1 Review Space Need Increase Of Cffy Hall it Library Developed During Earlier Project Tasks The Cornmittee-approved space need projections will be reviewed by the project team as the starting point to conceptualizing possible expansion options. Citys R8Sponsibi/ity During This Task: Project Committee approval of the space need projections for the CQ Hall and Library will be needed priir to beginning this task. Develop Diagrams Indicating Site Expansion Conceptual Design Options Rob Quigley and Michael Feerer will hold an intense halfday inter-office workshop as a way to brainstorm and evaluate many expansion possibilities. From the wide range of options discussed, the most feasible options will be refined in simple diagrammatic form that will be easily understandable by City staff and the Council. City’s Responsibility During This Task: None. Develop Phasing Approach For Each Option To Minimize Disruptions During Consfructjon A phasing approach that minimizes operational distuptions during construction will be cnrcial to the success of each potential option. Therefore, for the feasible options, we will ensure that there is a successful, cost-effective phasing approach to implementing the proposed project. This will also be represented in diagrammatic form. C#y-’s Responsibiily During This Task: None. 6.2 6.3 2. 0 0 Page Nine 6.4 Develop Summary Of Traffic, Access & Parking Impacts Of Each Option Willdan Associates will perform a traffic, access and parking study of each option. We will review the existing site with Willdan prior to developing the expansion options, however, this task will also enable Willdan to review the specific impacts of each option. Their suggestions will be used to refine the options as needed. They will prepare a summary of the general traffic planning tact06 regarding the existing site as well as a written summary of the ttaff ic and parking impacts of each option (for inclusion into the Space Study Report). City's Responsibilitj' During This Task: City personnel may need to be available to Willdan as needed regarding traffic and parking issues. A copy of any prior traffic or parking reports that relate to the existing site will need to be provided to Willdan Associates. 6.5 Develop Conceptual Cost Estimate & Schedule Required To Implement Each Option For each option, we will develop a conceptual cost estimate and an implementation schedule. The cost estimate will be based on square footage costing of the building shell plus allocations for site development work, furnishings, fixtures and equipment, landscaping, professional fees and other costs. A certified cost estimating service will be used to supplement the costing experiences of Michael Feerer and Rob Quigley from simitar projects in this area. City's Responsibility During This Task: None. Suggest New Uses For Existing F8cilifies If Not Used By City Hall And/or Library If any of the expansion options do not use some of the existing permanent buildings on the site, we will suggest other civic or community uses for the facilities. These recommendations will be developed jointly with the Project Committee and will be incorporated as part of the Space Study/ Site Evaluation Report. City's Responsibility During This Task: Participation by the Project Committee will be needed to suggest other uses for the existing permanent facilities. Summarize The Advantages & Disadvantages Of Each Option Based on the above tasks, the advantages and disadvantages of each expansion option will be summarized. This will be compared to the advantages and disadvantages of creating a new facility (such as the City Hail) at another site. The goal of this task is to clearly summarize (for Project Committee review as well as City Council review) the pros and cons of each option, both in regards to qualitative and quantitative issues. There will be special emphasis on initial project costs as well Cify's Responsibility During This Task: None. Review/Refine Options With Project Committee & Library Management Staff All work completed during this series of tasks will be presented to the Project Committee and Library management staff for review and refinement. Any issues needing further investigation will be identified and completed. Ciys ResponsibiMy During This Task: Timely review and approval by the Project Committee and Library management staff will be needed. 6.6 6.7 as long-term operational costs. 6.8 a 0 a Page Ten Develop The Final Prajeet Report 7 Develop Final Space Needs/S ite Evaluation Report !MFA/RWQ/HB \rl 7.f Produce Draft Report & Review Wifh Project Participants Based on all of the prior work to date (including submittal and review of draft summaries on specific topics in the above tasks), we will develop a clear Draft Report that summarizes and ties together our entire work. Michael Feerer will be in charge of writing the entire report and tying it together into a cohesive and concise product. The Draft Report will be submitted to the Project Committee as well as other project participants (as desired by the City) for review. Comments and final refinements will need to be received in writing, leading to the development of a Final Report. City's Responsibility During Thb Task: Timely review of the Draft Report will be needed. 7.2 produce mal Report 6 Submit To CIty Fur Cuuflcil Policy Action Based on the review comments regarding the Draft Report, we will produce and submit a Final Report to the City. Emphasis will be placed on producing a clear report that is easily "digestable" and understandable to the Ci!y Council. The presentation quality and clarity of this proposal is a good indicator of the production quality of the final report. City's Responsibility During This Task: Distribution of the report. Present To City Council And Library Board Of Trustees To Establish Approved Project Direction We will be available as needed for presentations of our findings to the City Council as well as the Library Board of Trustees. Slides and other graphic presentation techniques will supplement our report. Michael Feerer, Rob Quigley and Richard Waters will be at both of these presentations. Cify's Responsibility During This Task: Adequate notification to us prior to presentation dates. Two presentations are budgeted within this scope of work. 7.3 3 e Q < Corn pensat ion I 9 * U Corn pensation Revised: March 5,1986 The folfowing compensation request is based on our detailed scope of work contained within this proposal. The number of hours and fee required to successfully complete the scope of work are indicated below, Assess The Space Needs Of Carlsbad City Hall Phases 1 and 2 Principal Time (M. Feerer, R. Qugley) 126 hours @ $70/hour = $ 8,820 Associate Time (MaryAnne Chase) 10 hours @ $40/hour = $ 400 Clerical Support Time 10 hours @ $24/hOUr = $ 240 Phases I and 2 Subtotal: $ 9,460 Assess The Space Needs Of Carlsbad Libraries Phases 3 and 4 Principal Time (M. Feerer, R. Qugley, D. Waters) 92 hours @ $70/hour = $ 6,440 Associate Time (MaryAnne Chase) 8 hours@$40/hour = $ 320 Cleikal Support Time 10 hours @ $24/hour = $ 240 Phases 3 and 4 Subtotal: $ 7,000 Evaluate The Expansion Potential Of The Existing Sife Phases 5 and 6 Principal Time (M. Feerer, R. Quigley, D. Waters) 32 hours @ $70hour = $ 2,240 Associate Time (Mary Ann Chase) 22 hours@$40/hour = $ 880 Clerical Support Time 10 hours @ $24/hour = $ 240 Phases 5 and 6 Subtotal: $ 3,360 Develop The Final Project Report Phase 7 Principal Time (M. Feerer, R. Quigley, D. Waters) 64 hours @ $70/hour = $ 4,480 Associate Time (Mary Ann Chase) 8 hours@$40/hour = $ 320 Clerical Support Time 16 hours @ $24/hour = $ 380 Phase 7 Subtotal: $ 5,180 --_----------_--------------------------------------*-----__ ------------_ Total Project Compensation: $ 25,000 ---------- The above fee structure is a "not to exceed" cost to accomplish the entire scope of work. For this fee, up to ten copies of the draft and final reports will be provided to the City , including a "camera ready" report from which the City can make additional copies for its use on this project. Due to the relatively brief nature of this project, payment of this fee is requested up to 50% of the total fee ($12,500) upon submission of an itemized invoice 45 days fallowin initiation of the contract with the balance of the fee payable at the conclusion of this scope of wo 8 . I 32 I. I I I I I 1 1 E 1 I I I D 1 Michael Feerer & Associates a? February 14, 1986 Mr. John J. Cahill Administrative Assistant II City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 1 Dear Mr. Cahill: As requested by the City of Carlsbad, Michael Feerer & Associates with Rob Quigley, AIA Architects are pleased to present background information for your consideration regarding your space needs study and site evaluation of the existing City Hall and Library. This information packet presents our qualifications, experience, approach and team organization. Several sample pages from similar studies are attached from our related prior projects. In addition, client references from other civic projects are listed that we strongly encourage you to contact as testimony to our successful track record. Qualifications & Experience Michael Feerer & Associafes (MFA) is the only firm in San Diego County that specializes exclusively in facility programming. A three-person, seven-year firm that has programmed over forty major civic, corporate and medical projects, MFA particularly bas a strong track record of planning city administrative facilities as well as public libraries. It is also important to note that MFA has worked successfully with many local municipalities, including the City of San Diego, City of Escondido and City of La Mesa, and has had a long, ongoing working relationship with each over several civic projects. Rob Wellingfon Quigley, AlA Archifecfs (RWQ) is a 12-person, twelve-year San Diego architecture firm that has received an unprecedented number of local, state and national design awards (29). The firm has also been featured regularly in numerous major publications, including a recent forty-page retrospective by the international journal, Global Architecture. Rob Quigley was selected in 1984 by Esquire Magazine as one of "The Best of the New Generation: Men and Women Under Forty Who Are Changing America". Together or as individual firms, we have completed the following civic and related projects: Escondido City Hall & Civic Center, Escondido, California [MFA] MFA was instrumental in the winning of the National Endowment of the Arts sponsored internaticnal design competition for this project and has been in charge of the detailed faciiities programming and spaceplanning for the Escondido City Hall, which is the first phase of the project. This project has already received an AIA Honor Award as well as an Orchid from the local AIA and has been extensively published nationally. The entire complex includes: -- Escondido City Hall ($8 million, 105,000 SF---under construction) -- Regional Government Facility ($6 million, 80,000 SF---in progress) - Conference/Meeting Center ($2 million, 25,000 SF---in progress) - Civic Auditorium ($1 4 million, 2,500 seats---upcoming) -- Communky Theatre ($3.5 million, 500 seats-upcoming) -- Fine Arts Museum ($2 million, 25,000 SF---upcoming) - City Parking Structures ($6 million, 200,000 SF---upcoming) I Trolley Plaza Suite 204 605 C Street San Diego, CA 92101 Research, Planning & Programming of I Facilities and Related Technologies I 619 235-9889 Nu I 1 s 1 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 E 1 8 1 I f I. Page Two La Mesa Cify Hall 8; Civic Center, la Mesa, California [MFA] detailed facilities programming for the new City Hall as the first phase of the development. The Civic Center includes a 20,000 SF new City Hall, 8,000 SF Fire Station, 25,000 SF Governmental Office Center and a new 12,000 SF County Library. City of San Diego Linda Vista Branch Library, San Diego, California [MFNRWQ] Beginning construction in April, this 10,000 SF branch library was planned by MFA and designed by Rob Quigley. The unique facility includes several innovative planning, design and energy conservation features that respond to the needs of the City as well as project users and staff. The project will provide an identifiable gateway into Linda Vista as well as a cultural focus for the community. City of San Diego Generic Branch Library Program, San Diego, California [MFA] MFA recently produced the detailed generic facilities program for all future new libraries to be developed by the City of San Diego. Cify of San Diego New Central Library, San Diego, California [MFA/HB@7 MFA and HBW Associates, Inc. are currently programming the 400,000 New Central Library for the City of San Diego. Organizational changes, new library technologies and new sewice areas areas are among many issues that are being closely examined in this project. Counfy of San Luis Obispa Government Cenfer, San Luis Obispa, California [MFAJ Completed in 1982, the Center provides 158,000 SF of County offices and court facilities. MFA was its master planner, programmer and spaceplanner. The project received an AIA Award. Counfy of Sanfa Clara Multi-Services Center, San Jose, California [MFA] Completed during 1983, this 40,000 SF County facility houses various social service offices. There are special public counter and conference cubicle features for many of the divisions that have a high degree of public contact. The project received a local AIA Award in 1983. Betam Centre Public/Civic Facilifies, Betam Island, Indonesia [MFA] MFA provided strategic programming and space needs projections for all of the public facilities envisioned for this Indonesian new town development for 1 million people. The facilities included a new city hall, central IibraFy and several police/fire stations. The town is currently under development by the Indonesian government on Betam Island, Indonesia. Imperial Beach Masfer Plan, lmperial Beach, California [R WQ] This project included the planning and design of a phased 32 acre oceanfront development including civic buildings, parks, traffic engineering, parking, and mixed use projects. The master plan was developed during a series of public workshops to ensure community support development is under construction now. Site master planning and design is currently underway of this $2.1 million multi-modal (bus and future light rail) transportation center for the County of San Diego. The project involves the planning and design of several public buildings as well as traffic circulation, utility relocation, and signage. Construction is scheduled to be completed in 1987. Coronado Downfown Design Study, Coronado, California [R WQ] The master planning and conceptual design for Orange Avenue in Coronado resulted in Design Guidelinq to be used for new private and public development projects. A series of public workshops were held to reach a community consensus regarding design, traffic circulation, parking and imagery. The study was completed in 1985 and is now being implemented by the City of Coronado. MFA Completed the long-range strategic planning for this project and is now working on the - for the project. The first phase of the public improvements portion of the project and private - Escondido Transit Cenfer, Escondido, California [R WQ] I I. I 1 3 II 1 I 3 l 8 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 f 1; Pibe Three Del Mar 2000 Design Study, Del Mar, California [R WQ] Rob Quigley developed a design for the downtown area of Del Mar in a series of community workshops that resulted in a solution that preserved the village character of the area. Issues resolved included the location of the new civic center, traffic circulation, parking, and new retail and hotel facilities. The project resulted in a design document for the City of Del Mar. Escondido Surgery Center, Escondido, California [MFNRQ W] MFA and RQW together planned and designed this state-of-the-art 15,000 SF outpatient surgery center. The effort involved pioneering work in the programming and design of this relatively new building type. Completed this month, the $2.2 million project is recognized by many physicians as one of the most advanced free-standing surgery centers in Southern California. We also have as consultants to us the following firms: HSW Associates fnc., Library Planners And Consulfants is based in Dallas, Texas and is one of the leading library planning firms in the nation. Formed in 1979, HBW offers an extensive range of library planning services. The firm's three principals have over 60 years of combined library administrative, management and planning expertise. David Henington is the Director of the Houston Public Library, Lee Brawner is Executive Director of the Metropolitan Library System (Oklahoma City), and Richard Waters was the Associate Director for Public Services of the Dallas Public Library. Richard Waters is currently consulting with Michael Feerer on the programming of the New Central Library for the City of San Diego. He will be actively involved with Michael on the library component of this Space Needs Study. Examples of past HBW projects include: Dallas Public Library, Dallas, Texas This 646,000 SF, $43 million facility is one of the most notable library facilities in the world. Richard Waters was in charge of the project as Associate Director of the Dallas Public Library System and directed the planning and implementation of this project. HSWs programming of this new 54,500 SF structure fallowed an extensive analysis of existing library sewices and proposed future changes. California State University System Library Space Study HBW was contracted by the California State University System to conduct an in-depth study of the space needs of nine of the 19 libraries within the system. Public Library of Charlotte & Mecklenburg County, Florida HBWs involvement included programming and related consultation for the $8.8 million expansion and renovation of the Main Library. The project included planning for approximately 70,000 SF of new space as well as re-planning of the existing Main Library facility. Tucson Public Library, Tucson, Arizona HBW programmed this new 94,000 SF, $15 million Central Library building to be located in downtown Tucson. The project will be part of a joint public and private sector downtown redevelopment pioject. The complex will be a mixed-use project involving library space, commercial space, shared parking facilities and an urban plaza. Pikes Peak Regional Library, Pikes Peak, Colorado HBW programmed this 63,000 SF, $10 million regional library in Colorado Springs, Colorado that is Currently under construction. The facility has been designed for the latest technology in the storage and transfer of library information. Oxnard Public Library, Oxnard, California 0 * 1 I 1. 3. I I 1 1 I I J 1. 1 3 li. Page Five This team represents a proven working relationship. Michael Feerer and Rob Quigley have had a Associates, Inc. is currently working with Michael Feerer on the programming of San Diego's New Central Library. We have found our combination of expertise to be especially useful in solving the With our team, the City can have the potential of professional continuity in your City building effort. Our team has special strengths and experience in facility programming, site master planning, architecture, interior spaceplanning and the other project disciplines needed to successfully implement the resultsfrom this study. We have a proven team of engineering and other specialty consultants we have worked with in the past that would be added to the team as needed during each phase. Therefore, if the City desires, we will be able to continue to meet the City's needs during each stage of your civic building program. long and successful relationship on many prior projects over the last four years. In addition, HBW B complexities of civic projects. 1 Understandinu & Apwoach To Your Project Although a proposed scope of work is not requested at this early stage of the selection process, we present below six key points about our general approach to your project. We are very familiar with the process of updating earlier space needs studies. This occurred as part of MFA's scope of work during the Escondido City Hall, La Mesa City Hall, San Diego Central Library and Generic Branch Library Program projects. The process requires careful analysis of each department's organization, staffing, budgeting and other factors that may have changed since the prior space study. It is important to recognize how each department is unique and how that influences their current and future space needs. It is also crucial to have a proven process of resolving any conflicting needs or requirements between different City departments. Strategies will be developed to make sure that our space needs study does not lead to new space shortages in a few years. Several departments in your City Hall, such as Planning, Building and Engineering, have had inadequate space over the last few years due to unexpectedly high staff growth. We will make sure that our new space study incorporates a cost- effective strategy for meeting unexpected future growth (as well as expectedfuture growth) so that a future expanded or new City Hall and Library will not repeat the current situation. Phasing of your development will also be closely studied. We recognize how planning and design decisions can often create long-term will consider several factors, including their impact on long-term operational costs (employee costs, for example) and long-term flexibility as your high-growth community evolves. Michael Feerer's expertise in operational analyses and facilities planning will especially bring a strong emphasis on these issues. And Rob Quigley's extensive experience in energy conservation design will also contribute to examining cost issues. We will be constantly looking for cost-saving We do not have a "formula" or "boilerplate" approach to our projects. This is true for both our programming and design services. We pride ourselves on responding to local concerns that make each project unique. We do stress a rigorous process of looking at options (and their advantaged and disadvantages) at each stage of a project. We will spend an intensive amount of time at your existing facilities (as well as at all surrounding areas and within Carlsbad in general) in order to understand the surrounding context of your project. operational cost impacts for a city, Our analyses of space needs and existing site options I opportunities for the City. I fi 8 t B= 1 1 1 I 1 I b I I I I 8 I I I J t 0. Page Six We are experienced with the special presentation needs of a City project. This Space Study will present recommendations regarding your City Hall and Library---both of which are high-profile public projects that may involve major expenditures. We know from our prior municipal projects how crucial it is to present especially clear, highly-graphic, well-structured information at staff and Council presentations. In addition, our Study Report must "ddigestably' present several interrelated issues and recommendations. This proposal packet is a good example of the level of presentation quality and clarity we bring to our reports. Also refer to the back section of this proposal for sample pages from prior space need and site evaluation reports. Our team has always been committed to a principal-level day-to-day detailed working involvement in our projects. We will make that committment to you in writing. Michael Feerer and Rob Quigley will be actively involved in all details of your project (except clerical work), not just project management and client contact. Our team is local and will respond immediately to your needs throughout the project. We know from our other civic center projects how intense and daily the interaction can become with the City Council, various department staff, and the public. We have had long-term relationships with other municipalities and we look forward in establishing this kind of relationship with the City of Carlsbad. Please call any of our references to verify the principal-level committment, immediate responsiveness and special attention we have for our public projects. Client References From Similar Projects We strongly encourage that you contact our prior clients in order to hear directly how others have benefited from our planning services. We will be happy to provide additional references at the City's request. With an emphasis on local projects, our sample references include: . Escondido City Hall and Civic Center (MFA) Contact Person: Mr. Rod Wood Assistant City Manager 100 Valley Boulevard Escondido, CA 92025 City of Escondido (61 9) 741 -4631 La Mesa City Hall and Civic Center (MFA) Contact Person: Mr. Dave Wear Planning Director City of La Mesa 8130 Allison Avenue La Mesa, CA 92041 (61 9) 462-01 71 . Linda Vista Branch Library (MFA/RWQ) New Central Library Program (MFNHBW) Generic Branch Library Program (MFA) Contact Person: Mr. William W. Sannwald Library Director, City of San Diego 202 C Street, Mail Station 9B \ San Diego, California 921 01 (61 9) 236-5870 I t Id I 1 I 1 I 1 0 I 1 I 1 1 I I 1. Page Seven Imperial Beach Master Plan (RWQ) Contact Person: Mr. Jim Sandoval Planning Director, City of Imperial Beach Imperial Beach, California 92024 825 Imperial Beach Boulevard (61 9) 423-8300 . Coronado Downtown Design Study (RWQ) Contact Person: Ms. Lisa Stangaard (formerly with the City of Coronado) Director of Planning, City of Del Mar 1050 Camino del Mar Del Mar, California 9201 4 (619) 755-9337 . Del Mar 2000 Design Study (RWQ) Contact Person: Mary E. Hale Project Director, Del Mar 2000 1943 Pariva Cardiff-by-the-Sea, CA 92007 I (61 9) 436-281 4 . Other General References For Rob Quigley, AIA Architects Contact Person: Mr. Mike Stepner Assistant Planning Director, City of San Diego 202 C Street San Diego, California 921 01 (61 9) 236-6460 or: Mr. Gerald Trimble Executive Vice-president, Centre City Development Corporation 121 Broadway, Suite 601 San Diego, California 921 01 (61 9) 236-71 01 Surnmarv Of Team Advantaues In summary, we feel that the combined experience and technical capabilities of our offices offer the following major advantages to you for your project: Our team offers the dual strengths of specializing in facilities programming as well as With our extensive civic project experience, we are intimately familiar with the issues involved in planning city halls as well as public libraries. Our team has been consistently recognized for its planning and design excellence, as exhibited by the numerous local, state and national awards for RWQ and MFA. We are located dithin a 20 minute drive from Carlsbad and will emphasize a strong on-site presence throughout the project process. We are experienced in high-profile public projects and the need to present especially dear, highly-graphic, well-structured information at staff and Council presentations. architecture, both of which are crucial to this project. I a t I I. I I I 5 I 8 I 8 I T R I I li 1. Page Eight We have a long, consistently successful track record in serving other municipalities, as will be indicated by your discussions with our client references. Above all, we have a respect for your unique goals and we will emphasize a process that creates the most appropriate response to your goals---we will not use a "boilerplate" approach to your project. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this information for your consideration. We look forward to discussing this further with you and other representatives of the City of Carlsbad. Please call us if you desire additional information or have any questions. e I Sincerely, Michael Feerer, President # Feerer & Associates Rob Wellington Quigley, AIA Architects (619) 457-2770 m I ? \ I. I 1 I I I I 1 8 i 1 I I I Letters Of Recommendation From Past Clients I. flu I I I 1 8 1 1 1 I I I 8 I VEFINON HAZEN QITE OY q$QsnDrDo CITY MANAGER IC0 VALLEY BLVD.. ESCONDIDO. CALIFORNIA 92025 (619) 741-4631 m October 28, 1985 To Whom It Concerns: Michael Feerer & Associates has provided the detailed architectural programming and spaceplanning for our new City Hall project. also provided the facility planning knowledge ar-d strength behind the architects' design work that won our international design com- petition for the Escondido Civic Center. It has been a pleasure to work with Mike. systematic and complete in his analyses and has come up with what we consider to be several conceptcal planning advances for our City Hall. Planning issues caize up throughout the course of the He was able to significantly refine the space needs projections, functional analyses, and other early work that we initially did to start the project. Michael literally worked with every City staff member in a highly participatory progrming and spaceplannir process. 1Ve feel our City Hall will be a very productive and appropriate working environment for our staff -- this is the direct result of Michael's involvenent with us and the rest of the project teaia. We strongly recomend him for your project. He He has been very project that he successfully resolved together with our staff. I 1 Sincerely, y&Jrnt tit. * Roderick J. Wood Assistant City Manager \ m I 8 ~ci-q; C3v.';,h: ':~~'32 -:',I "cay !.:A ICR ?SO FEbl CrJUcl REST jE3iRY k+4?q.'"JU DOPIE THURSTON I. 5- 9 P. 0. BOX 2749 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 921 12 11 I Y ll 1 a I July 10, 1980 m To Whom It Concerns: Michael Feerer & Associates is currently determining the present and future space needs of our corporation. The project involves an analysis of office and warehouse facilities, ranging irom an overall feasibility study to a detailed assessment of design concepts. This will help our company enhance its effectiveness and will enable us to maximize our €uture capital investments. Michael Feerer has been very systematic and comprehensive. project has been well documented as it progresses, and he has worked very closely with all of us. undertaken has provided our company with valuable information. Concepts are being developed that we never anticipated before, but that advance our goals tremendously. He is helping us reduce our new space needs, increase our productivity, and reduce our operating costs. flexibility to our facilities by anticipating future changes and trends that will affect our operation. The work of Michael Feerer and his firm is having a great impact on the successful operation of our business. Seaman, and myself all recommend him for your project. Yours truly, The Each task that has been At the same time, he is adding Ed Streicher, Don m 3klGA Samuel Schwartz Corporate Comptroller Project Liaison (714) 233-7657 8 I I 1 11 I SS/cd \ m I I f I 8 4 1 I 1 c I I San Diego, Early last year, the hospital organization undertook a complete review of its facilitles that resulted in a Space Needs Assessment Report prepared by Michael Feerer. a key ingredient towards developing a successful program for the improvement and expansion of Sharp Hospital. We have over 40 departments within the hospital and Michael Feerer worked in detail with all of them, establishing recommendations to meet current and future needs for space. m&es the process complex, time-consuming and difficult, but Michael Feerer energetically spearheaded the effort. We are very satisfied with his firm's work; in fact, we now retain him on a continuing basis to help us solve new space problems as they arise and to update the Space Needs Assessment Report as health care changes rapidly occur. recommend Michael Feerer & Associates for your project. His efforts have been The size of our organization It is my pleasure to have the opportunity to Sincerely, c54Ltk Sal Roman Managing Director of Facilities Project Coordinator Insb \ I 7901 FROST STREET, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123 (714) 2s +HE CITY OF (61 9) 423-83C I' g lItdPEFalAL 825 IMPERIAL BEACH BOULEVARD 4 IMPERIAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA 9203 November 12, 1985 To whom it may concern: I 8 I 8 I I 1 I I 8 I I 8 It is my pleasure to have this opportunity to comment in regards to the capabilities of the firm of Rob Ulillington Quigley, AIA, a Architects The City of Imperial Beach approximately two in a half (25) years ago began work on the Seacoast District Specific Plan, a plan to rejuvenate the communities blighted and underutilized beachfront area The City Council appointed a fifteen (15) member Citizens Beachfront Task Force to act as the policy arm to monitor the development of the beachfront plan. One of the first jobs facing the Task Force was a selection of a firm to do the basic design work reviewed materials from several highly regarded architectural f irins and they held a meeting in which each finalist was allowed to verbally and graphically display hidher proposal. The Beachf ront Task Force selected the design team headed by Rob Quigley because of their demonstrated graphic abilities, previous experience, and most importantly their expressed willingness to listen to the desires of the community. City staff worked closely with Mr. Quigley and his group throughout the process, a relationship which still exists was developed from an integrated team approach between staff and the consultant. The design team heId a series of four (4) community workshops both in the beachfront area and in the city's Fire Station. These workshops were designed so that the community could express their wants and desires for their beachfront. The input received at these citizens were very much concerned that the beachfront not become a Disneyland at the beach or even a "Seaport Village". Rob Quigley and his team set up guidelines which consist of eight (8) very simpie rules which achieve a certain degree of actual or perceive conformity while alpwing a great deal of creativity to each individual project designer. These guidelines are intended to create an atmosphere which reflects the southern California lifestyle and Imperial Beach's unique identity. necessary to begin beachfront development. The Task Force 1 workshops was the corner stone upon which the plan was built. The t I. 8' 1 I 8 I I I I 1 8 1 8- s 1 I I I 1 I found Rob Quigley and his associates to be a very talented, energetic and fun group of individuals to work with, and I am very proud of the plan that together we produced. Sincerely, James . Sandoval Planning and Community Development Director 1 JDS:ig PP City of Imperial Beach \ -",--.-.." . "I". w YVIU FSmDENl Carol Randolph Caplc Howard A Wby Janay Kruger William Hiltyer Jon Richard Anton RmYJFER sprecrels Building Development 121 Broadway San Diego. California 92101-5074 Gil R. Ontai Gerald M. Trimble Corporation ~PRESIDEM 619/236-7101 SECRFlpRl II. I' I I 1 I I 8 I I I 1 8 1 I 1 I I EXECUTM LlCE PRESiMM LLCLC LCCCC LLLLb LLLLL LLLLL I November 15, 1985 Rob Wellington Quigley, AIA San Diego, CA 92121 Dear Rob: Now that Marina Palms Apartments are nearing the construction phase, I wanted to compliment you for responding so completely to our concerns. You met the challenge of relating the project to its urban environment in a unique way that respects the scale of the surrounding buildings while also continuing the rhythm of the changing face of the city. The lively design, human scale detailing, and celebration of the outdoors will contribute to the vitality and excitement that will attract new residents to San Diego's downtown. working with you on this redevelopment project and our new downtown can become. 11575 Sorrento Valley Road, Bay 217 I have personally enjoyed want to thank you for sharing CCDC's vision Of what ,,--.., GE --- .LD,M. < TR EXE % IVE VICE PRESIDENT \ I I. 8- I I I 1 I E CITY OF CORONADO 1825 STRAND WAY CITY HALL CORONADO, CA 92118 (619) 522-7320 November 12, 1985 Rob Quigley Architects 11575 Sorrento Valley Road, Suite 217 San Diego, CA 92121 Dear Rob: With the recent completion of a refurbishment project on Orange Avenue that is consistent with our new "Downtown Guidelines", I am prompted to thank you and your Associates, once again, for your very competent assistance in creating the document. Your interpretation of comnents received at our comunity work- shops, your expertise in conflict resolution, and your patient attention to our concern for detail, produced a workable and com- prehensive package for use as a development tool. We are proud to have the new guidelines which protect the character of our comunity, the concerns of the public and the reality of change. Sincerely, Mary x e,rron 1 ' I 4 hqlddmwL I Council Member 1 1 II 1 1 \ I I I 8 1 1 I 8 I U I I 1 1- 1 I I s c _- February 15, 1983 Rob Quigley, ail1 Behm and staff; Thank you again for your support of Project 2000. We've been very pleased with the attendance ar_d response to our series of public workshops and serninzrs. . It's been an education for all of us, working with- You have been very articulate and responsive to the citizen input, and it was a personal pleasure to me to see the atwzction to your plans. the many civic groups and inembers of the comunity, 1 The Fi.mncia1 Review Workshops have also been a fantastic learning experience with tremendous exchange of funding programs and possabilities. participation with the financial experts and city planners has been greatly appreciated. Your continued The final r2port is still in progress, again thank you for the quality of your participation. 1 *z{ 3..iBQe Xary E. zle Project Uirector, Del Nar 2000 \ e MARY HUE lk Pariva Mf-by-th&= California ~~ COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO I. 1. 1 I 1 1 I I I I I 1 8 8 I 1 PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 5201 RUFFIN ROAD, SUITE P SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123 (619) 565-3602 I ROBERT R, COPPER DIRECTOR August 4, 1983 Mr. Rob Quigley, A.I.A. 11575 Sorrento Valley Road Suite 217 San Diego, CA 92121 Dear Mr. Quigley: Subject: Eden Gardens (La Colonia) Park This 'tetter is in recognition of your firm's fine efforts which provided the design and construction documents for a neighborhood recreation build- ing at La Colonia Park in Solana Beach. In particular, your firm is to be commended for being sensitive to the social and recreational needs of the local residents and the way you provided for those needs in the building without sacrifice to a fresh and innovative design. acceptance by the public of the building design is also a reflection of your ability to relate design concepts in a fully understandable manner. The versatility of the building should provide recreational enjoyment to the public in a variety of activity situations. Thank you for a job well done. The enthusiastic ' Parks and Recreation Department RRC:vt \ I f I= I 1 8 I I I 1 I 1 I I 8 8 Team Bac kg rou nd I. I= I I II I I I I I I I t 8 1 8 I' 1 I An Introduction Michael Feerer & Associates is a small, unique consuiting firm. Formed in 1978, we specialize in three facility-related services: Pre-Design Services We help organizations assess the best way to solve their facility requ-irements--whether it requires minor changes or major projects. We use several techniques. Workshops, surveys and interviews, for example, identify important issues and options. International research uncovers conceptual insights and innova- tions. And our detailed project analyses test each possible solution. Together with our experiences from our other projects, these methods help to define the most appropriate nature, size and scope of each project. Our pre-design services include need assess- ments, feasibility studies, master plans and space need forecasts. Facility Planning Services We "program" facilities. Every factor that can determine a project's success is analyzed, resulting in detailed guidelines for the facility. We work closely with the design team to answer technical, social and psychological issues of the project. We also work closely with building users in the planning process to . understand how the project can best respond to their goals and activities. Our planning services include facility programs, concept studies, system evaluations, cost/ benefit analyses and the development of new facility prototypes. Special Consuiting Sen/ices We provide useful services for a wide variety of project situations. For example, we provide facility management services so organizations can link individual projects into a cohesive andbngoing planning effort. We assist lease decisions by developing tenant space need analyses and layouts. We also provide software, publications and seminars about facilities and related technologies. There are many reasons why our services arc in demand. Organizations are facing internal changes at an increasing rate. It is now more widely recognized that the built environment can dramatically influence the activities and interactions of people. Organizations are ais more strongly realizing that their facilities affect productivity, marketing and manage- ment. We therefore are in demand because we provide extra attention to such bottom-line issues. And we specialize in high-profile civic, health care, corporate and educational projects. By achieving the most "bang for the buck" for each project decision, our work becomes a valuable facility investment. We provide our services in three ways: 1. Consulting to architects, designers, developers. leasing agents and other professionals--adding extra programming emphasis when required by their projects. 2. Consulting directly to public or private organizations--advising them about their facility developments. 3. Initiating our own facility ventures--in special situations that provide a unique benefit to the community.. . We offer a broad range of experience in man) types'of projects. Yet each assignment is approached with an appreciation of its uniqueness. Very large international projects as well as small-scale consuiting efforts are frequent situations for us. You receive lots of personal attention because we limit the number of projects we undertake. Response is fast due to our ium of over one dozen talented professional associates in related fields are available as needed. With this approach we tailor our work to the precise needs of each situation. Our experience, our innovativeness and most importantly our record of satisfied clients illustrate our potential value to you. Look us over and see how we can be your partner in the facility planning process. sophisticated computerization. And a consort 1. I- I 1 Professional Services I Pre-Design Services Need Assessments Operational Analyses Feasibili Studies Strategic Gui ance Master Plans Develo ment Guidelines Space Need Forecasts StaffAVorkload Projections SpacePerfo rmance Evaluations CostBenefit Analyses Relocation Studies Site Selection Studies eedlProblern Special -2 urve cy s 8 I i I I g II t 8 I I 8 I I Space e tilization Studies Design and Construction Facility Planning Services Architectural Programs Interior Space Programs B Interior Space Plannin staffiY Rem eling/Expansion Programs Concept Studies Furniture Evaluations Equipment6 stem Evaluations Cosmenefit inalyses Phased Development Planning Prototype Planninflesting anagement rograms Special Consulting Services New Facility Venture Planning Project Management Services Post-Occupancy Fine-Tunin Facility Management Consu8ng Person-Environment Research Tenant Space Needs Analyses Certificate of Need Reports International Facility Research Special Facility Publications Facility Software/Databases \ Expert Witness Testimony New Town Facility Planning Educational Seminars Special Presentations I. Ia I 1 8 I I I 1 1 II 1 8 I 1 1 1 1 Results: What Our Clients Have Said "An appropriate direction became clear after they sorted out dozens of conflicting goals and objectives about our project." "They planned how !he facility could best 'fit' the organization." "Every department would have had an impossible project 'wish list' if it wasnY for MFAs approach." its organization chart."' Our investment in their services yielded a significant return. Their program became the cornerstone for the organization and the project." Absenteeism, errors and employee turnover haved dropped while productivity and "We could consider the total picture before making our decision to proceed." "He was very aware of the unique issues and complicated process required for the various public facilities that are in our civic center." "The analysis showed how the company ''. . really pperated, which was very different than "What we thought was an urgent need for more space was simply a need to use present space better." "Michael, in effect, became an advisor and partner in our organization for the duration of the project." "Their innovativeness added several revenueproducing elements to the project." "Our desks were turned into workspaces." "Information was put in a graphic, understandable form that became useful for everyone involved." "They fine-tuned the facility three months .after we moved in-and showed how the space could be used even more effectively." "Our potential tenant received a quick and accurate space needs estimate so they could understand their leasing needs." "They helped us develop the prototype by raising many issues and considerations that communication have been raised." "They were always up-to-date and in fact usually ahead of the latest advances." "Without their help, we would have failed to understand the potential for improved operations in the facility." "Political and economic realities of the project were well understood. They worked closely with us and were prompt, informed and responsive to our needs." "We used their planning to develop accurate project budgets and set priorities." "Our space is now capable of changing as rapidly as our organization changes." "Michael showed us how to deal with otherwise would have been missed," complex automated offices very simply and economically." "Their planning enabled us to reduce our staffing needs at the new facility--a bonus that\we did not expect." "Pros and cons of various systems were "Space was assigned by need and an evaluated organizational policy, rather than history or tradition. Expensive space was used to its best advantage." "Adding them to our project gave us a unique marketing advantage that other firms did not I compared without the manufacturer's hype." have." I. I- I I I I I 1 8 I 1 8 u I' 1 I Summary of Past & Current Projects Escondido City Hall, Escondido, California. La Mesa City Hall / Civic Center, La Mesa, California. City of San D.qo New Central Library. San Dego. California. City of San Diego Linda Vita Branch Library, San Diego, California. City of San Diego Generic Branch Library Program, San Diego. California. Florence Riford Community Library, La Jolla, California County of Sank Clara Multi-Services Center, San Jose, California Batam Centre New Tom Public Facilities. Betam Island. Indonesia. San Diego Hall of Champions, San Diego, California Civic/Public Facilities County of San Luis Obispo Government Center, San Luis Obispo. II Air National Guard Support Facility, Riverside, California. Streicher & Seaman Inc. Corporate Center, San Diego, California Megatek Corporate Headquarters. San Diego, California. Dunphy Corporate Headquarters Expansion, San Diego, California Zana International Corporate Headquarters, San Diego, California World Communications Inc. Headquarters, San Diego, California. Office Facilities I Ambulatory Escondido Surgery Center, Escondido. California. Walnut Creek Surgery Center, Walnut Creek, California. North Coast Surgery Center, Wanside, California Surgery Centers East Bay Surgery Center, Oakland, California. South Bay Ambulatory Surgery Center, Chub Vista, California Eye Physicians MedicaVSurgical Center, Chula Vista, California. Fullerton Surgery Center, Fullerton, California Anaheim Surgery Center, West Anaheim, California. Hemet Outpatient Surgery Center, Hemef California Donald Sharp Memorial Hospital, San Diego, California Cikara Perkasa Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia. County of San Luis Obispo General Hospital, San Luis Obispo, California Beckman Laser Institute Laser Centers, Irvine, California Northern California Shock Wave Lithotripsy Facility, Oakland, California Escondido Diagnostic Radiology Center, Escondido, California. San Diego Hospice Inpatient Facility, San Diego, California. Sub-Acute/Skilled Nursing Facility, San Diego, California. Batam Centre New Town Health Care Facilities. Batam Island, Indonesia County of San Luis Obispo Outpatient Medical Clinics, San Luis Obispo. County of San Diego Hillcrest Mental Health Center. San Diego, California Atascadero State Mental Hospital, Atascadero, California. Other Health Care Facilities I Los Verdes Montessori %hod Reaeational Facility, San Luis Obispo. Grossmont Center West Expansion, La Mesa. California Other Tukre County Correctional Center, Visalia Cdiomia Kings County Jail Facility, Hanford. California Facilities I- 1. I I 1 I I I 8 1 1 I 1 1 .......... - ......... .... ......- .......... .. -.....- ......... . -....- ........ .. -...- ...- .. Civic/ P u b 1 i c 1 Facil i ties MFA Projects 84,000 SF New City Hall within A $53 Million Civic Center Commission Received By Winning An NEA Sponsored Escondido Cit Hall hternational Planning/Design Competition Escondido, Cali Y ornia Comprehensive Planning During Cornpetition Process Strategic Guidance and Master Planning Architectural Programming and Concept Studies Interior Spaceplanning I EquipmenUSystern Evaluations La Mesa City Hall/ Civic Center La Mesa, California Planning For Proposed New Civic Center That Was First Initiated In The Community By MFA strategic Planning Includes Interim Fine-Tuning Of Existing City Hall Site Analysis and Selection Guidance Strategic Guidance and Master Planning Architectural Programming and Concept Studies Interior Spaceplanning I EquiprnenVSystem Evaluations County Of San Luis Obis o San Luis Obispo, California 150,000 SF New And Remodeled Government Offices Project Includes A Superior/Municipal Courts Component Site Analysis and Selection Guidance Strategic Guidance and Master Planning Person-Environment Research Architectural Programming and Concept Studies I . ' EquipmenVSystern Evaluations Government t enter City Of San Diego New Central Library San Diego, California Over 400,000 SF New Central Library Complex Includes Innovative Features & New Library Technologies Strategic GuidanceMaster Planning And Initial Architectural Programming In Progress For The City of San Diego I City Of San Diego Linda Vista Branch Libra San Diego, Cali ornia 10,000 SF library Wth Many Innovative Planning Features Project In Progress And Scheduled To Open In Mid-1986 Strategic Guidance and Master Planning Architectural Programming and Concept Studies Review & Critique Of Interior Spaceplanning . Y I- 8. I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I I li I I I Civi clP u b I i c 8 Faci I it ies Continued City Of San Diego Generic Branch Library Program San Diego, California Development of Generic Branch Library Program For All New C2y Library Branches Strategic Guidance and Master Planning Person-Environment Research Architectural Programming and Concept Studies Florence Riford Community Library La Mesa, California Consuifing Work Initiated A Four- Year Process Of Strategic Guidance and Master Planning Of Initial Proposal Establishing The Project By The City Of San Diego Initial Archilectural Programming and Concept Studies Coun Of Santa Clara Multi- % ervices Center San Jose, California 40,000 SF New offices for Various County Social Services Faci/iyOpened In 7983And Received LocalAIAAward Consuttant To Developer Performing Studies For County Strategic Guidance and Master Planning Architectural Programming and Concept Studies Betam Centre Public Facilities Betam Centre New Town, Betam Island, Indonesia Long-Range Facilities Planning For Government Approved Needs Assessment Of Long-Range Development Program Strategic Guidance Space Need Forecasts New TOWR In Southeast Asia .. .. Consutthg Work Provided Initid Direction To Sponsors San Hall Of Dier hampions San Diego, California of 80,000 SF Sports Museum Environment Strategic Guidance Early In Project Process Concept Studies For Interior Layout 1 \ I- 1 1 f 1 II I I I I 1 I I I I 1 n- I Michael Feerer: Curriculum Vitae Education School of Architecture and Environmental Design, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California. Graduate Wth Honors, Bachelor of Science in Architecture and Environmental Design, 1976. Facility Management Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Advanced Professional Seminars, 1981, ongoing. American Management Association, New York, New York. Advanced Professional Seminars, 1981, ongoing. Professional Progressive Architecture Magazine, 1977Award forApplied Research, in conjunction with Sullivan Farbstein & Associates. American Institute of Architects, San Diego Chapter, Award of Honor, Programming/Space Planning of the Escondido City Hall, 1985. American Institute of Architects, San Diego Chapter, Award of Honor, Programming/Space Planning of Cikara Perkasa Awards Hospital Complex, Jakarta, Indonesia, 1983, National Endowment of the Arts, International Design Competition for the Escondido Civic Center, Comptbn Team Winner, 1984. Herbert E. Collins Scholarship for Academic Achievement, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. Bank of America Academic Achievement Award, California Polytechnic State University, Sari Luis Obispo. Speaking Engagements California. Guest Speaker, Workspace 84 Conference, San Francisco, Guest Lecturer, Graduate Seminar, Repeated Occasibns, 7982-7985, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, California Polytechnic State University, Pomona. Guest Speaker, Repeated Occashns, Design Institute of San \ Diego. San Diego, California. Guest Speaker, Envirvnmental Design Research Association 1978 EDRA 8 Conference, Tucson, Arizona I I- I- I I I I I I I I I Michael Feerer: Continued Organizations American Institute of Architects (Affiliate). International Facility Management Association (IFMA). Environmental Design Research Association (EDRA). Association for the Study of Man-Environment Relations. Design Methods Group/Design Research Society. I Prior Experience Programming and Research Associate, Sullivan Farbstein & Associates, San Luis Obispo, California, 1975-1 978. Associate responsible for development and implementation of arcbitectural research and programming for the firm. Major projects included: Juvenile Services Center, San Luis Obispo, California. San Luis Obispo City Hall, San Luis Obispo, California. Airport Fire Station, San Luis Obispo, California. County Government Facilities Master Plan, San Luis Obispo San Luis Medical Clinic Expansion, Pismo Beach, California Phoenix Off ice/Cammercial Center, San Luis Obispo. Restaurant, Weilbacher Enterprises, Atascadero, California. Programming and Research Cansultant, San Luis Obispo, California, 1977-1978. Majorpmjects induded: Academic Library Evaluation, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California. University Student Union Evaluation, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California. Outdoor Recreational Facilities, Ralph E. Dunlap Elementary School, Orcutt, California. Integral Urban House Demonstration Project, Center for Community Ecology, San Luis Obispo, California. Professional I I Publications City Halls and County Government Centers: A Facility PIanning Guidebook, (In Progress), 19%. Family Services Ward: Architectural Programming, 1977. Environmental Programming Network. &Editor, 1977-78. "Formation of an Environmental Programming Network", Co-Author, Man-Environment Systems, May 1977. The Environmental Programming Network", Co-Author, EDRA 8 Conference Proceedings, 1977. I I 1 I I \ Rob Wellirgton QQey, AIA 11 575 (61 9) 457-27' Architect Sorrento Valley Road Bay 21 7 San Diego California 92121 I- I- I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I BACKGROUND MATERIAL ON FIRM The firm was founded by Rob Quigley in 1978 following four years as the principal in charge of design at Gluth and @gley Architecture, AIA. Our diverse experience includes commercial, office and civic buildings, custom residences and multi- family housing. The comprehensive services offered include programming, feasibility analysis, site selection, master planning and interior design. Our experience in energy conservation design results in substantial savings in building operating costs, as well as a more sensitive and comfortable living environment. The fm has developed a long-standing relationship with a select group of consultants whose services include civil, structural and mechanical engineering; color consultation; and landscape design. By the direct early involvement of our consultants, design and production is an efficient, cohesive process. Our fm is noted for its flexibility in design solving for the client. This is done by thorough research and programming of exact needs before commencing design. The satisfaction of OUT clients is due to close, personal contact throughout the project. In the last eight years we have completed projects in California, Oregon, and Japan. Our consistent track record for award-winning design is locally unprecedented. Our buildings are regularly featured in national and international publications, including a recent forty-page retrospective by the international joumal, Global Architecture. We were described by San Diezo Mazazine of being southern Californian and reaching out towards a unity flowing out of the culture, the climate, the people, the histo ry..." and by Esauire magazine as "alone in taking the youthful spirit of sunny southern California, and making it the basis for a new style of architecture ....I' SOIU~~OIIS and speciaLes ;1 cooperative problem as "..,moving towards a regional architecture, proud 11575 (61 9) 457-27- Rob Vllellington Quigley, AiA Archikc? Sorrento Valley Poacl Eay 21 7 San Diego Caiifoma 92121 I' - I- I I I I i 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I RESUME OF ROB WELLINGTON QUIGLEY EDUCATION: LICENSES: EXPERIENCE: Bachelor of Architecture, University of Utah, 1969 Registered Architect in California, Oregon Sixteen years of architectural experience with emphasis on energy conservation design. August 1978 to present - Rob Wellington Quigley, MA Principal. August 1974 to July 1978 - Gluth and Quigley Architecture, AIA. Partner in charge of design of commercial, office, and residential projects. April 1972 to August 1974 - Private developer of multi-family housing and designer of private residences. June 1971 to April 1972 - Innis-Tennebaum Architects, San Diego. Responsible for construction documents of large shopping center in Portland, Oregon. June 1969 to June 1971 - Peace Corps, Coquimbo, Chile. Responsible for design and construction of low cost residential and community projects. "The Best of the New Generation: Men and Women Under Forty Who Are Changing America," Esquire MaPazine. 1984 Register City of San Diego Public Arts Advisory Board New School of Architecture, Southwestern College Design Institute of San Diego Installation Gallery 3's Company and Dancers University of Southern California, Department of Architecture, Lecturer in Environmental Technology University of California San Diego, Extension Division, Instructor of Environmental Design University of California hs Angeles, Department of Architecture, Visiting Instructor, Design Studio Various University campuses and civic organizations throughout the U.S. Guest Lecture Tour, Japan, 1980 and 1982 Santa Clara AIA, July 1980 Sixth Annual Congress of the California Confederation of the Arts, October 1982 Monterey Design Conference, 1980, 1982, 1983, 1984 (Program Chairman), 1985 HONORS: t ADVISOR. FACULTY POSITIONS : LECTURER: Page 2 I,' . .* I. I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I Seattle MA, 1983 Santa Barbara MA, 1983 and 1985 Denver MA, 1984 I Arizona ATA, 1984 Sacramento AIA, 1985 Santa Ana AIA Design Awards Program, 1982 Sunset MagazinelAIA Western Home Awards, 1983 Los Angeles AIA, Honor Awards, 1983 Seattle MA, Honor Awards, 1983 Idaho MA, Honor Awards, 1985 INVITED JUROR: Nebraska AIA, Honor Awards, 1985 PAPER PRE- SENT ATIONS "Energy Conservation in Architecture," Helioscience Conference, Palm Springs, 1977. "Economics in Passive Energy Architecture," Solar Traid, San Diego, 1977. "The Third Overlay," Passive Solar Energy Conference, Philadelphia, March 1978. "The Art of Resource Conservation Design," ABC Development Conference, Tokyo, Japan, July 1980. "Spatial Cognition," Spatial Cognition Conference, University of California, Irvine, March 198 1. "New Trends in American Housing," Tokyo, Japan, July 1982. "Retrospective," Southern California Institute of Architecture, I MUSEUM/ GALLERY Santa Monica, April 1982. EXHIBITS: "Visual Communication Towards Architecture," Installation Gallery, San Diego, August 1982. "California Condition," La Jolla Museum of Contemporary Art, November 1982. One of twelve Architects chosen to represent the "cutting edge" of California design. Curated by Stanley Tigerman and Susan Lewin. "At Home With Architecture,'' Contemporary Views of the House, Mandeville Gallery, University of California, San Diego, February 1983. "Exhibit of Recent Work," University of California, Los Angeles, November 1984. "Beaumont Building," La Jolla Museum of Contemporary Art, February 1985. I. . ' Page3 I- 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 "G Street Mole," California Polytechnic Institute, February 1985. "Don Clos Pegase Competition," San Francisco Museum of Contemporary Art, July 1985. San Diego Chapter AIA, Honor Award, 1976 State of California, Award of Merit, 1977 Sunset Magazine/AIA Western Home Award, 1981 Sunset Magazine/AIA Western Home Award, 1981 San Diego Home/Garden Magazine/AIA, Award of AWARDS: Excellence, 198 1 SanDiego Chapter AIA, Award of Merit, 1981 San Diego Chapter AIA, Honor Award, 1981 Los Angeles Chapter AIA, Design Award, 19 8 1 San Diego Home/Garden MagazindAIA, Award of American Wood Council, Design for Better Living San Diego Chapter AIA, Citation, 1982 San Diego Chapter AIA, Citation, 1982 San Diego Chaper AIA, Award of Merit, 1982 San Diego Chaper AIA, Award of Merit, 1982 Housing Magazine, First Honor Award, 1982 Orchid, San Diego Chapter AIA, Interiors, 1982 San Diego Chapter AIA, Citation, 1983 San Diego Chapter AIA, Award of Merit, 1983 Port of San Diego, 1 st Runner-up, G Street Mole Urban Design Competition, 1983 Architectural Record, Record House, 1984 San Diego Chapter AIA, Honor Award, 1984 San Diego Chapter AIA, Honor Award, 1984 San Diego Chapter AIA, Honor Award, 1984 San Diego Chapter AIA, Citation, 1985 San Diego Chapter AIA, Award of Merit, 1985 San Diego Chapter AIA, Award of Merit, 1985 San Diego Chapter AIA, Honor Award, 1985 California Council AIA, Honor Award, 1985 California Council AIA, Honor Award, 1986 LIVING WITH ENERGY, Ronald Alves and Charles Milligan, Penguin Books Ltd., 1978, includes Seapy and Cohen houses. SOLAR HOUSES, a book by Lou Gropp includes Houlihan Production Houses, Barczewski, Greenstein and Cohen houses. SOLAR STATE OF THE ART, Proceedings of the 2nd National Passive Solar Conference, 1978. A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO SOLAR HOMES, a Bantamudson Excellence, 1982 Award, 1982 PUBLICATIONS BOOKS: Book, February 1978. HOMEOWNER'S GUIDE TO SOLAR HEATING, a 1978 Sunset Book with examples from the Seapy house. PRESENT VALUE, CONSTRUCTING A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE, Office of Appropriate Technology, State of California, 1979. BATHROOMS - PLANNING & REMODELING, a 1983 Sunset 1 1 book featuring Sayer residence. 1). "paged 1' I I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I ART IN ARCHITECTURE, HarcourVBrace/Javonovich textbook featuring Sterrett and Sayer residences, 1985. SAN DIEGO MAGAZINE, August 1974 SUNSET MAGAZINE, November 1976 HOME MAGAZINE, May 1,1977 HOME MAGAZINE, July 24,1977 LA ARCHlTECT, December 1977 HOUSE AND GARDEN BUILDING GUIDE, Spring 1978 VILLE GIARDINI, Italy, September 1978 ARCHITEKTUR UND WOHNEN, Germany, February 1979 HOUSE AND GARDEN BUILDING GUIDE, Spring 1979 SAN DEGO MAGAZINE, May 1979 SAN DIEGO MAGAZINE, August 1979 SAN DIEGO HOWGARDEN, September 1979 SUNSET MAGAZINE, October 1979 SUNSET MAGAZINE, November 1979 HOME AND GARDEN BUILDING GUIDE, January 1980 ABITARE, Italy, June 1980 ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM, Japan, August 1980 SAN DIEGO MAGAZINE, November 1980 PROCESS ARCHITECTURE No. 21, Japan, January 1981 HOME MAGAZINE, February 198 1 S AN DIEGO HOMEIGARDEN, February 1 9 8 1 HOUSE AND GWEN, July 1981 OUR HOUSE, Japan, July 1981 NEW HOUSE, Japan, June 1981 SAN DIEGO MAGAZINE, August 198 1 KENCHIKU BUNKA, Japan, August 1981 SINZYUTAKA, Japan, September 19 8 1 NEW HOUSE, Japan, September 1981 FAMILY CIRCLE, REMODELING MADE EASY, 1981 CALIFORNIA (NEW WEST) MAGAZINE, October 198 1 SUNSET MAGAZINE, October 1981 SEACOAST MAGAZJNE, October 198 1 ARTS AND ARCHITECTURE, Fall 1981 OUR HOUSE, Japan, October 1981 ARCHITECTURE CALIFORNIA, October 198 1 ABITARE, Italy, October 1981 SUNSET MAGAZINE, November 198 1 NIKKEI ARCHITECTURE, Japan, December 1981 SAN DIEGO MAGAZINE, January 1982 SAN DIEGO HOMEIGARDEN, February 1982 PROGRESSIVE ARCHITECm, March 1982 SAN DIEGO HOME/GARDEN, May 1982 LA ARCHITECT, April 1982 HOME MAGAZINE, May 9,1982 SUNSET MAGAZINE, May 1982 ABITARE, May 1982 ARCHITECTURE CALIFOFWIA, May 1982 SAN DIEGO MAGAZINE, June 1982 OUR HOUSE, Japan, July 1982 QUALIFIED REMODELER, August 1982 HOUSING MAGAZINE, August 1982 PROGRESSIVE ARCHITECTURE, August 1982 SUNSET MAGAZINE, September 1982 L'AMBJENTE CUCINA, Italy, September 1982 OUR HOUSE, Japan, October 1982 SAN DIEGO GOODLIFE, October 1982 ARCHITECTURE CALIFORNIA, November 1982 IL BAGNO, Italy, November 1982 HOUSE AND GARDEN, English Edition, November 1982 MAGAZINE PUBLICATIONS: HOME MAGAZINE, June 29,1975 a I:' 1 Page 5 MAGAZINE SAN DIEGO HOWGARDEN, January 1983 PUBLICATIONS: FAMILY CIRCLE, February 1983 PROGRESSIVE ARCl33ECTURE, April 1983 KENCHIKO BUNKA, Japan, April 1983 SUNSET MAGAZINE, May 1983 ARTS & ARCHITECTURE, June 1983 BUILDER MAGAZINE, July 1983 SAN DIEGO MAGAZINE, August 1983 SUNSET MAGAZINE, September 1983 ARCHITECTURE CALIFORNIA, October 1983 SAN DIEGO HOWGARDEN, October 1983 PROGRESSIVE ARCHITECTURE, Janauary 1984 OUR HOUSE, Japan, January 1984 SAN DIEGO MAGAZINE, March 1984 SAN DIEGO MAGAZINE, April 1984 ARCHITECTURAL DIGEST, May 1984 ARCHITEemTRAL RECORD, May 1984 SAN DIEGO MAGAZINE, May 1984 OUR HOUSE, Japan, June 1984 SAN DIEGO HOME/GARDEN, August 1984 GLOBAL ARCHITECTURE, Houses #16, September 1984 VILLE GIARDXNI, Italy, September 1984 ARTS & ARCHITECTURE, September 1984 SUNSET MAGAZINE, October 1984 ARCHITECTURE CALIFORNIA, November 1984 OUR HOUSE, November 1984 SAN DIEGO HOME/GARDEN, December 1984 SAN DIEGO HOME/GARDEN, January 1985 SAN DIEGO MAGAZINE, January 1985 OUR HOUSE, Japan, January 1985 SUNSET MAGAZINE, February 1985 OUR HOUSE, Japan, February 1985 ARCHITECTURAL DIGEST, Japan, March 1985 ARCHITECTURE CALIFORNIA, March 1985 OUR HOUSE, July 1985 ARTS & ARCHITECTURE, July 1985 INTERIORS, September 1985 I- 1 1 I I I I i I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 I CENTER - ARcHmEcTURE FOR THE EMERGING AMERICAN CITY, Januay 1985 Rob Wellington Ouigley, AIA 11575 (619) 457-27 Architect Sorrento Valley Road Bay 21 7 San Diego California 1- I 1 I 1 I II I 1 1 11 I 0 1 I 1 I I- 92121 REFERENCES Mike Stepner, Assistant Planning Director City of San Diego 202 C Street Surgery Center San Diego, CA 92101 236-6460 La Jolla, CA 92037 Gerald Trimble Executive Vice-President Richard Wodehouse, Contractor Centre City Development Corporation Wodehouse and Associates 121 Broadway, #601 5745 1/2 La Jolla Blvd. San Diego, CA 92101 La Jolla, CA 92037 Sanford Goodkin Janice Fillip, Editor The Goodkin Group Architecture California 3252 Holiday Court, #lo8 Mike Feerer Programmer for Escondido 9404 Genesee Avenue (619) 455-7775 I 236-7101 (619) 454-7997 1414 K Street, Suite 320 La Jolla, CA 92037 Sacramento, CA 95814 457-5331 (619) 448-9082 R.B. Claire Jim Burns, Planning Consultant Parks & Recreation Department 444 Brannon Street County of Sm Diego San Francisco, CA 94107 San Diego, CA 92123 (619) 455-7775 Barbara Goldstein, Editor 565-3602 Lise Strandgaard City of Del Mar 1050 Camino del Mar Del Mar, CA 92014 (619) 755-9337 P.O. Box 488 Rod Mead, Project Manager Birtcher Del Mar 1416 Via Encinos Drive Fallbrook, CA 92028 1943 Pariva (619) 723-1828 Cardiff, CA 92007 Jim Sandoval, Planning Director City of Imperial Beach 825 Imperial Beach Boulevard Imperial Beach, CA 92024 5201 Ruffin Road (415)543-5683 Arts and Architecture, LA Architect 1147 South Hoop Street Los Angeles, CA 90015 Planning Director (213) 651-3112 Fred Trull, Director of Planning San Diego Unified Port District San Diego, CA 921 12 Mary Hale, Director Del Mar 2000 (619) 291-3900 48 1 - 1459 (619) 423-8300 probed deeply into all regions of the nation, lookung ’ nd values. Coura e. Originality. Ingenuity. Vision. pliiess service. dominations were also solicited rom the public at large through advertisements and i ,. .. I ,... : 0, I. . ,. .. C&:rPte; ~, ,. .for, &e Stydy-'bf s .. A q&ican ~., ,Archi , ,I r ectb re a. . " Sckoal of Ar fecture University cif Texas bt Austin. . .. ':, .. /;;= 3' D ,' 'I I.. c .I . ...-- - .. . .. 9' .e. . i. .. .. r. ,. ~_ .. :* , . , .. _. 9,. . , .. G STREET MOLE E&MBARCADERO San Diego, California Rob Tt’ellington Quigley I. I. E 1 I I I I I 6 I c I 1 I 1 I 1 I The G Street Mole exemplifies a re- bold arched forms housing restaurants, uses, creating a rich variety of placc cent development in mixed-use com- a retail arcade, offices, cinemas, To the west of :he site is a funky lit1 plexes that use a theme or institution as museums, a ballroom, an aquarium alley lined by shanties housing sus a catalyst for drawing together arich va- and a market. These public-oriented bars and other fish specialty shor riety of urban activities. Art museums, activities would be cupped around a Looming above are the i6-story-hig theatre groups. historic sites, or even large urban plaza intended for use as vaguely industrial shapes ofthe aqu; longstanding commercial establlsh- a meeting place, a site for festlvals and ium, with its dramatic cantilevered fi ments have become springboards for special events, and a lunchtime magnet tank. The wind-sheltered, south-facii unified district developments incor- for downtown workers. plaza is open. sweeping and dramat porating a range of related or compati- The forms ofthis new urban enclave offeringviews ofboats in the harborai ble uses. In the case of the G Street match its juxtaposition of disparate the Coronado Bay Bridge beyon Mole, San Diego‘s working waterfront and its commercial fishing industry be- came the core of the lively urban cen- ter which celebrating fish, water, boats and seafood as well as the beauties and liveliness of San Diego harbor. Intended as a merger of San Diego’s longstanding rough-edged seaport character and its growing role as a tour- istirecreation center, the G Street Mole, as proposed, would leave existing facil- ities for the fishing industry on the north side of the site as thev are and allow them to continue to develop in their own ad hoc way. Above and to the south of the working pier would rise a series of m 80 \ frecedzng Page. (Top left) Open air ballroom. (Top nght) Specialtyjish shops (Bottom le$) Stazrway between w0rkin.g pier and plaza. Below: Levels I, 2, 3, 4joor plans, site plan, and sectzon. 'I I- :I \ -8 >' I I II ;I 0 D 0 Flanking arcades have a relaxed, inti- mate retail character, The G Street Mole promises a series of memorable experiences - dancing under the stars in the open-air ball- room, teetering on narrow pedestrian bridges, winding up dramatic dangling stairs, soaking in sun and wind and salt air on plazas and promentories. It is a visceral, tantalizing, sensory place. All of this heightens the jumble of smells and sounds inherent in a mixture of seacraft, fish-processingplants and food peddlers to produce, in the end, a dy- namic and magnetic node plugged into the city via the umbilical of its pier. As in so many of the richest instances of urbanism in emerging American cit- ies, the G Street Mole is a series of col- lisions. Large scale smacks up against small scale; a pool hall for dock workers adjoins a chic eatery, Bermuda shorts meet three-piece suits, which in turn greet soiled dungarees. Adults, chil- dren, visitors, residents, fishermen, retailers, employees and performers cross paths and share places. It is an un- tidy mix of activities set in an untidy but vibrant physical setting. It bespeaks American life, economics and urban- ism in the late twentieth century, and seems right at home in San Diego harbor. J ----7 -a- - r -- , IMPERIAL BEACH Although Imperial Beach is one of the sunniest beaches near San Diego, and only 20 minutes by car from the metropolitan downtown, Cali- iornia’s southern-most coastal town is run down and on the verge of insolvency. Most of the population is transient, attracted by low cost rental housing. The town has a minuscule commercial base, and a whale of an image problem. “The Seven-Eleven store is the nicest building in town,” jokes longtime resident Andrew John Orsen, AM. To rescue Imperial Beach from limbo, the city government launched an aggressive redevelopment campaign, directed by city planner James Sandoval. A Beachfront Task Force was formed, and Rob Quigley, AIA brought in to develop a master plan. Quigley solicited community participation in a series of local workshops. “The people really understood the complex issues facing the community, and specifically Imperial Beach’s unique sense of place. Being in Imperial Beach is like being m an outpost at the edge of &e world,” Quigley says. “Residents told us they wanted quier dignity and obvious unity, without losing the spontaneity of the corn- municy.” The master plan has four main components: a park, a hotel, a civlc plaza, and a specialty commercial zone. Dunes Park provides a large beachfront open space The park approximates a wild state, with islands of manicured recreation space. One highrise destmation hotel is slated for a specified site to serve as a visual, as well as economic, anchor to the development. A secondary park connects the hotel to the beach and to the Tijuana River estuary, the only estuary in southern California which retains its natural character. il civic plaza is intended to define the base of the existing pier. A specialty commercial zone links Dunes Park with the pier. The city enthusiastically approved the master plan, but the Coastal Conservancy, which mitially will fund the project, raised two objections. The Conservancy wants to dictate a design style, while the community opposes the idea of a set theme in favor of design guidelines with specific organizing elements. And the Conservancy advocates building an offshore breakwater to control flood damage from waves, a measure which a number of scient& groups say will contribute to beach erosion. While these issues can be resolved at a local level, the revival of Imperial Beach ultimately depends on international diplomacy. From time to time, sewage collection fac the Tijuana River. Untreated sewage is carried to the Pacific Ocean, where currents deposit the effluent on Imperial’s beach The federal government and the government of Mexico are negotiating a resolution to this problem. The future of Imperial Beach as a destination resort hangs in the balance. I- I- I 1 I I I I .I I I II 8 1 I I I 1 I es in Tijuana overflow into July/August 1985 Architecture California 27 , .-p$rrrht i9R5 The Trthm Sm Dispn T'EST'BUNE I- 1. 1 I I II I N 1 il R 1 I I I I 1 n Die,&< Puht7er Prize-winning Newpaper Thursday, July 4,2985 25 Cents 6 A Copiey New Bring Arcadia to the inner city HOW DO YOU get people living in paradise to blueprint looks like a rich Persian carpet with a move downtown? You move Arcadia to the inner four-story nap. The borders are all different, relat- city. ing to the streets around them. The corners of the That's the idea behind an award-winning design building will bring people into rotunda courtyards, for a downtown apartment house by architect Rob with shops and outdoor cafes. Quigley. The 180-unit building will occupy a block Quigley is a regionalist in the architectural tradi- bordered by Union, Market, Front and G streets, tion of Ining Gill, He's trying to create an architec- just across G street from the Meridian Condomini- ture that grows from the myths that Southern Cali- ums. It's a private project on land redeveloped by fornia invented for itself and the buildings it has the Centre City Development Corp. The market- inherited. Quigley recently won four awards at the rate apartments will be the fit non-subsidized local American Institute of Architects competition, rental units built downtown in decades. one for the design of this apartment building. Why on earth would anybody want to live down- There is a running battle between glassed-in sky- town when they can have a balcony and a garden in scrapers and people spaces downtown, and the sky- the suburbs? Because Quigley is bringing garden, scrapers are winning. This apartment complex will water and palm trees downtown, wedding them to have windows that open and outdoor corridors lead- the urban shapes of warehouses, with a little mis- ing to gardens and pools. sion romance thrown in. It looks like a place to catch some urban rays and Quigley says the apartments represent a concep get an urbane tan. We hope it helps downtown life tual formal garden before the Meridian tower. The catch OIL I AWARDWINNING DESIGN BY ARCHITECT ROBQUIQWFOR APARTlWN"H0USE 7 a. I. 1 1 I 1 I I I t 1 I 1 I I I I LOS ANGELES CHAPTER AIA Architect: Rob Wellington Quigley QBM Theme Building Barton Myers: Robert Harris: This small shopping center, This design stretches out to though not as controlled as enhance the street, indeed to Peter's Landing. attempts in a makea more memorable street similar medium to reinforce than most of the region enloys. and make a street as well as and to make parking-side a place. entrances as well. And despite Norman Pfeiffer: its auto-oriented directness, Nice use of the land with makes urbane entrances and particular sensitivity to the places-to-be for pedestrians. geography of the street. a I I- 8. 8 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I It 1 hbw ossmiates, IM. (914) 8966981 6359 lakemore dollas, terns 75914 1 library Planners and Consultants SERVICES PROVIDED BY HBW HSW Associates, Inc., Library Planners and Consul:ants, began in 1979. The principals, David 3. Henington, Lee B. Brawner. 2nd Richard L. k'aters ? have over 60 years of combined library administrative , manage- ment, and planning experience. Each of the principals, as well as the distinguished group of asso- ciates, is a practicing librarian or active in a related field. ~W'S clients receive consultation and advice based upon practical and tested solutions to the problems of today. ?BW Associates offers an extensive range of planning and consulting ser- vices. These include: Space Planning, Organization, and Utilization - KBW provides assis- tance with new construction; with remodellng or additions includizg site selection; space analysis; building program development and preparation; architectural selection counsel; consultation on sche- matic/development design/constructioc document review; and furni- ture and equipment layout and specifications. Serrice Development and Evaluation - HBW will review and evaluate current operations. This includes public, technical and support services, budget, personnel, public relations and promotions, capital improvements, collection development, and long-range planning. Administrative and Management Studies - HEW will study organiza- tional behavior, financial planning, forms and records control, automation, technology, and audio-visual capabilities. Community Analysis and Needs Assessment - HBW recognizes that the best planning results from a careful analysis of the community to be served, its needs, and ability to fund such needs. HBW will perform such analysis, or will train local library staff to perform these functions. Public Rklations, Promotion, and Fund Raising - HBW can develop for all libraries and library agencies a complete public relations pro- gram designed to enhance the library's image and educate the staff as to the importance of public relations and goodwill, including advice on fund raising for operational and capital needs. e For additional information please write or telephone. gation for a preliminary analysis of client needs. mailing address p.0. box 710789 There is no obli- 1 dallas. terns 75371 I- I- Curriculum Vitae I Richard L. Waters Experience Highlights Dallas Public Libraty Dallas, Texas 1974 to January 1985 1 I I I 0 8 I I 1 I 1 I d I 1 Associate Director. Public Services (a nd Actina Directcr. 1983-841. Administered all public service functions of Central Library, 18 community libraries, and library's grants program. Responsibie for setting public service goals, planning for expansion of services and facilities, automated catalog and circulation system for public services, and providing for the recruitment and development of the professional staff. Prepared budget request. Assisted in development of long-range plan (to the year 2000) for the 8 Library. Directed library planninglconstruction for new Central Library, a $42.7 million, 646,000 square foot facility that opened Spring 1982. Prepared service plans for Interlibrary Loan Center serving 61 member libraries in 33 counties for which the Dallas Public Library is the administrative headquarters. Chief of the Central Libraw. Directed operations of public service subject divisions of Central Library serving metropolitan Dallas. Operations include ten divisions employing 117 staff members, $420,000 materials budget, and 678,000 volume collection. Planned interim space needs and reorganization for 125,000 square foot Central Library, including acquiring additional 32,000 square foot of leased space in downtown Dallas. Chief of Branch Services. Directed operations of 14 branch libraries and 4 bookmobiles with 217 staff members, $3.1 million annual circulation, $375,000 materials budget, and 635,000 volume collection. Administered $2.5 million capital improvements bond program, involving site selection, preparation of building program, architectural supervision, furniture and equipment selection, color coordination, acquisition of book stock, hiring of professional staff for five new branch libraries. President of employees' staff association, 1967-68. Head. Sc ience & lndustrv DeDartme nt. Directed operations of Central Library unit serving business, technical, and scientific community. Supervised 11 staff members, $40,000 book budget, 112,000 volume collection, promotion and public relations. 1971 to 1974 1967 to 1971 \ 1966 to 1967 R- I I I 1 I I I I 8 1 1 1 I 8 U Curriculum Vitae D- Page Two Seattle Public Library Seattle, Washington 1964 to 1966 Professional Assistan?. Employed in several capacities in Central and branch libraries, Adult Education Division, and Budget Office. Experienced varied, due to being graduate student. Wichita Public Library Wicbifa, Kansas 1962 to 1964 Administrative Assistanl. Supervised five branch libraries. Coordinated all library budget requests. Assisted in planning of new $2.6 million Central Library. Public Libraries of Springfield & Greene County Springfield, Missouri 1960 to 1962 Head. Business & Technoloav Department. Organized and directed Central Library department which served business, technical, and scientific community. 1 Consulting Experience Building consultant for Alto, Athens, Bowie, Crockett, Carson County, Fort Worth, Gladewater, Graham, Marshall, Nacogdoches, Pittsburg, Sherman, Texarkana, and Tyler Public Libraries. Surveyed general library needs for Cleburne, Farmers Branch, Pampa, and Sherman Public Libraries; Model Cities area for Waco-McLennan County Public Library; and urban redevelopment area for New Castle, Pennsylvania Public Library. Consultant for Seminole, Brevard, Monroe, Palm Beach, and Pasco Counties, Florida regarding county-wide library service. Partner, HBW Associates, lnc.: Library Planners and Consultants. Formed 1978, company has completed work for Broward County (FL), (FL), Richland County (SC), Jefferson Parish (LA), Abilene (TX), and Northern Oklahoma College. Faidax County (VA), St. Paul (MN), Seminole and St. Johns Counties Education 1964 to 1966 University of Washington, School of Librarianship, Seattle Washington. M.S.. Librarv Sc ience. March 1966. Followed general program of study. Electives included Human Relations, Computer Science. Education financed with own funds. Southwest Missouri State College, Springfield, Missouri. B. S. ,. Rusiness Administration, Mav. 196Q. Majored in Organization and Management. Political Science and Sociology minors. Education 1957 to 1960 \ u financed with own funds. I. I 1 8 H 1 I I I 8 I I I ! B Curriculum Viae D* Page Three Professional Affiliations and Activities American Library Association I President. Library Administration Division, 1977-78. Chairman. Local Arrangements Committee, 1984 Annual Conference; Council Orientation Planning (co-chairman), 1976-77; Public Relations Section, Library Administration Division, 1973-74; Junior Members Round Table, 1970-71. Treasurer. Freedom To Read Foundation, 1972-73. Member. Library Administration and Management Association Fund Raising Discussion Group, 1981 -; Reference and Adult Services Division MARS online for Public Library Services Committee, 1981- 83; Conference Streamlining Committee, 1977-81 : President's Council Committee on Committees, 1974-75; Research Task Force, Public Library Association. 1972-74; Executive Commitee, Freedom To Read Foundation, 1970-73. Member. Board of Advisors, 1972-. Chairman. Nominating Committee, 1983-84. Secretaq. Board of Directors, 1975-77. Chairman. Junior Members Round Table, 1969-70; Public Libraries Division, 1968-69. Member. Public Information Committee, 1983-84; Continuing Education Committee, 1981 -83; Public Relations Committee, 1976-78; Executive Board, 1970-73. Commission on External Relations, 1976-78; Council, 1973-77; e Children's Book Review Service AMIGOS Bibliographic Council Texas Library Association Dallas County Library Association Program participant/speaker at library conferences/workshops of American Library Association, American Society of Information Science, Council for the Advancement of Experimental Learning, Mountain Plains Library Association, Southwestern Library Association, Arkansas Library Association, Nevada Library Association, South Carolina Library Association, Texas Library Association, and Ohio State Library. Participant in Library Facility Location Project for Public Technology Inc. Member, Beta Phi Mu. President. 1972-73. Honors \ Leadership Dallas, 1978-79. Listed, Who's Who in the South and Southwest, 7977-78, and a Biographical Directory of Librarians in the United States and Canada (Fifth Edition). Selected as an Outstanding Young Man of America, 1971. 1 u- Curriculum Vitae i- Page Four I Pub I i ca tio ns Editor, Public Librarv Quarte rlv, effective vol. 3, no. 4. Contributing editor, Library Buildings, Texas Librarv Journal, volume 59, 1983. "Automation at the Dallas Public Library," Librarv Jou rn& June 1, 1982 (joint author). "Local Sources of Funding." Facilities Fundina Finesse: Financinq and Promotion of Public Librarv Facilities, American Library Association, 1982. "Financing the Electronic Library: Models and Options," Drexel Librarv Quarte rlv, Fall, 1981 (joint author). "Legislative Support of Library Services in Texas." Libraries in the Political Process, Oryx Press, 1980. "Telefacsimile: An Effective Document Transfer Tool?" The Serials Libraria, Winter, 1979. "Research and Planning for SchooI/Community Libraries," Final Report, 1978 (joint author). "Tilting at the Windmill," Library Jou mal, June 15, 1978. "Understanding Federal Aid: What Good Is Washington Doing Libraries." American Libraries, November 1977. "New Learning Paths In Dallas." Manaaement World, September, 1977. "What's Up In Downtown Dallas," Southern Methodist University/Dallas Public Library, June 30, 1976, (editor, Proceedings). "Special Report: Siting the Public Library," Wilson Library Bulletin, December 1975. "Community Information Service: Should We? (Yes.) How? "Interface With Local Information Agencies: A Community Information Network," ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources, 1974. "Building a Library: A Consultant's View," Texas Libraries, Spring, 1971. "Reference Service Planned By Reference Librarians," m, Fall, 1969. I I 8 I I I I I II t I I I II I 1 (Carefully!)" Texas Librarv Journal, Spring, 1975. \ I. I. 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 8 1 I 1 e \ I- I- I 1 I I 1 I I 8 1 I I I I I 1 I RELATED EXPERIENCE Project Name E Location Description Traffic Analysis, City of Lemon Grove Traffic Analysis, Provided traffic forecasting, Scripps Ranch Area, San Diego using computer modeling for proposed major development in Detailed analysis of traffic acci- dent data, Miller's Dairy. I Scripps Ranch area. Camino Del Norte Associates, Provided traffic forecasting for Rancho Bernardo, Ca. major residential development in south Rancho Bernardo. Traffic Analysis, Evaluate traffic impacts resulting City of National City from extension of Tidelands Avenue and development of Chula Vista Bayfront. Update Circulation Element Using computer modeling City of San Marcos approach, update circulation element for entire city of San Marcos as part of overall general plan update. Establish Ci rcu la ti on Element Assisted City in preparing the City of Santee first Circulation Element for this recently incorporated City. Update Ci r culati on Element Assisted staff in revising and City of Carlsbad updating the existing Circulation Element. Traffic Fee Study Projected future travel demands City of Escondido and street improvement costs to develop a Traffic Impact Fee program, city wide. Traffic Analysis Neighborhood Six Analysis of a proposed modifica- North City West, San Diego tion to the precise plan to add approximately thirty acres of office uses and to increase the density of the residential portion. Traffic Analysis Rancho Cielo Analysis of specific plan Specific Plan, \ including 775 residential units Rancho Santa Fe plus 20 acres of commercial. Traffic Analysis Baywide Mooring Traffic Analysis of eight loca- and Anchorage Plan tions for moorings of anchorages San Diego Port District throughout San Diego Bay. I- I- I 1 I I 8 I 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I RELATED EXPERIENCE - Continued Traffic Analysis House of Ice La Mesa office and live entertainment Analysis of proposed commercial theater. Analysis of a 112-unit mobile Traffic Analysis Camino Hills Car lsbad home park. Traffic Analysis Mast BouIevardI Magnolia Avenue project. Analysis of 296-unit townhouse Santee Traffic Analysis Carlsbad Analysis of a preannexation and Land Investors General Plan Amendment to allow Car lsbad a combination of commercial and single family residential. Evaluation of 1,270 acre specific plan including commercial, office and residential land use. Traffic Analysis Eastlake I SPA Chula Vista Traffic Ana lysis Lemon Grove Analysis of a 188-unit apartment Apartments project. Lemon Grove Traffic Analysis Del Oro Hills Oceans ide project . City Traffic Engineer Santee Analysis of 1,200-unit residential Provide day to day traffic oper- ations and planning services to the City of Santee on a contract basis. Traffic Analysis "D" Street GPA Analysis of a general plan Enci nitas amendment to allow a 200-unit 1 apartment. Traffic Analysis Alvarado Parkway Institute psychiatric hospital. La Mesa Traffic Analysis UCSD Miramar Analysis of a proposed Complex, 200,000 square foot educational San Diego building. Analysis of an expansion of a \ I- f I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 U Examples From Past P roj ects - - - cl .- 1 F- n nv, a= 3 I .- .i! 1 y am I al c LE a:zFJ 2 2: u J ;;ry 2 "p OPCU 3 SBZ .3 a- 'E:; g;3 .$fa= sa a2 ;; zz z 3; aJf ""2. m a .= k$ ::2. u "L -* L = &;2 ==os; s3:. - g-- ; f 2g.z 22 3.- al 2; g.22.; al 2- ?Ti3 3' zT+g .- cjipzg as' fJl nu -;.=3 i3 .vrhzS uu upLL2 ab-.- U '- .- u f .- ID *al a== $3 ,.r ;j .f al alT2 i 32z ;z ZEi 3 22 3. - c- 9" c.n a-3 &T 52 m= 1' t- .- -. - ~ B II II I %s i= L 01- m: . x::, m=V)z al.S '- n agz: '"'2 -,ST E .; a 8 L-r B p al;i L r-J-JC 2: g;;y $533: -a 1 7 1 1 I I I I 1 El 1 ,g 18 e 1 ai l S?i 1 dl 121 LP i c - - wbal '0 - il @[-] r :- fgp) -: tE. ;j g3 0 a 32 i.: @ (-7 j; [9[jj =s 3, n $2 L1) C m= cz 0 .= .- -I > $=$ -* .-a 23 ik $5 c t- -z== :E - 72 CS :z z; z3 mR 2s ma := UL. g'- rz -9 35 u1 --c a- -- e$ Tn EC 5s: zal UY E=; Pk zkig. E" 2.5 : - 0.c .-a-c >=.-a - Em -.-3 2: ZL$g c'n ro al=E ' 2 E>$ a r '3 p f Z8 - $ E F - '= g - 7--2 C I- 3 r? 0. uz Cr_ '23 uu .- e -, T -3 - .- - - - - - aJ C >= Ca 4 9.2 -0'-3 G Liz .- .3 - . - =x= d. 71 -0-- ut> y3: 9 1= - z .m ?1 a '- a= 7 *a -= .2 5 .- .- a - " .- 2 - - - - " ;n 2 y .: 2 : 3 - 3Ed d >. 2 ?g " c"- 2 ?I= .n u .: 2 'K 35 Fo .- 1 ,uc, ?I e 1 - w L C H 1- 0 I I I I 8 t I 1 I L County Administrative Off ices 8 8az@ & mmf!gumtE@m I 1 h8 Qlrrcrt).TamNsF stamd 1 County Administrative Officer 1 255 ADMlN 40 Enclosed Deputy County Adrnin. Officer 1 130 ADMIN 16 Semi-private Principal Administrative Analyst 1 130 ADMl N 18 Semi-private Administrative Anaiysts (85SFl 5 425 PROF ZD Semi-private Central Transcriber 1 75 CLER 10A Semi-private Sr. Account Clert 1 65 CLER 1ZA Semi-private Sup. Adrntn. Clerk 1 60 CLER 90 Semi-Private Sr. Typist Clerk 1 60 CLER 9A Semi-private Typist ClerklReceptionist 1 90 CLER 138 Open Typist Clerk (55 SF) 2 110 CLER 8A Open LAFCO Officer 1 130 ADMIN 18 Semi-private Insurance Manager 1 130 ADMlN 16 Semi-private Safety & Claims Coordinator 1 85 PROF ZD Semi-private Emergency Services Coordinator 1 70 PROF 1D Semi-private Environmental Coordinator 1 130 ADMIN 16 Semi-private Environmental Specialists (65 SF: 2 130 TECH 7C Semi-private Multi-Purpose Workareasll00 SF: 2 200 MULTl 1 Open Reception Area 1 85 RECEP 2 Open iMeeting Room 1 175 CONF 1 Endosed Meeting Room 1 215 CONF 2 Enciosed Press Room 1 30 CLER 1 Semi-private Central FilelResource Storage 1 90 I Contingency - 150 I 4 I[ I Iyql I a a5 _j SampZe Page \ L e- m b Summary County Goverment Center I 0 I I I I I 8 I 1 i I Exlsrlnq Pbase I Analysis Phase I! Aecommendarions Ne1 SF Net SF Net SF Net Sf Oeoarrmenr ~t adocared I! Sam Location 5705 4560 5605 4465 3055 4465 3635 2405 2770 2890 2830 2890 531 0 41 75 5310 21 S5 2630 1710 24?0 2440 2440 11200 11260 9020 1 Court Admin.) 3330 3280 3330 4050 3620 6200 6000 6000 4960 4945 1880 2060 1245 1010 ices (Purcha;i:ig) 1285 1275 2540 2420 7645 7000 I910 2435 24ji Treasurer/Tax Collector 6500 361 5 6500 Shared Meeting Rooms 1200 500 - Shared Food Services 1500 800 1100 information Center 500 100 0 1 a75 10040 i ooao - - 8500 7010 a750 - - - - 460 455 495 - - 5153 4440 GI00 - - [4I New Facility: Gross 42585 SF r 1 Courthouse Gross SF: 65000 Annex Gross SF: 44250 Net SF = square footage of a department, including internal corridors and partitions within the department. Cross SF = Net SF and space for structural and mechanical components, corridors a outside of departments, public restrooms, and lobbies. i 14 . \ i I' c YB I II I i 1 I I I 8 1 I 1 I .a i rota Uni+wm 8kAof Action Plans lnreJtment Lata Ooerald rOYear Annual Corporate COSW case/ cosIS/ costs/ costs/ Pyrty Exiiing Other Facilities Facilities Saviwsl-I Savws-) Savnqsl-) Savnqsi-) Savingst-) (W ActJon) Improve rarehauw (a) 1,350 -70.200 200 -55.500 -5.500 550.30 Impmy. warehouw (b! 17, :OO -70.230 400 -52.800 -5.3CO iJO.5aO 1%omve offlce 300.300 0 194.200 i95.:00 49.500 335,500 Sell warenausa auy wareh~se 168.300 -70.200 135.500 239.500 23.500 771,aoo Build waremuse 266,900 -70.200 200.700 i97.100 39,:OO 311.30I Lea= warmouw -147,*00 -70,200 210,100 -3,330 -300 160.300 Sell wareh-auu C office Buy officerwarmouse i08.wo -iio.+oo 2i9.900 337.?00 13.800 ~9.3~ Buy ow%.Iautid warmouse 335,500 -70,200 342.700 608.000 60.aou 320.:00 3uild officei3uy rarrtvwn 3E8.600 -70,200 310,;OO ia9.30 59.900 315,:OO Build office,war-w 299.900 -190,iOO 312.100 1il.500 07,:OO 311.300 Build officeiLeaw waremuse 31.100 -:o.?oo m. 730 351,500 35,:ao j03,aco Build rarmouwluse oificc -1ou.600 .iO.iJO 117.~00 bZ1,!OO 6a.m lam0 auy officer~u.. rlr-uY -7a.3oo --o.:Jo 3~6.xo zoi,ioo 20,xo xxa.goo auy waren~ser~use office -m.:oo -io,:m :53,m aao.ioo ;a,m 31i,.oo Ceiw office/warenww -518.300 -!UO.aOO 726.500 ;7.:00 6.730 a. Z68.600 -70.2CO 331.300 729.720 i3.9CO $56.40 office Build warMOusc 567.200 -70.200 195.500 392,iOO 33.100 !.315.jOO lsln waren-- 152.900 -70.230 +09. :00 i91.300 13.200 645.300 Sell warehollsalLease 3uy offkeiwarchwse m,aoo -1ao.400 -919,:oo -m.:oo -39.m 1,!s9,3oa effica 9uy OfficeIBuxid 'racenouse 795.500 -7o.?ao -aaj.ioo -120.300 -:?.:PO I,:ZO.:OO Sudd offica13uy warenw$a 308.300 -7D.200 -377.100 -138.5ZlO -13.300 I.:75.:30 auda afhceirarmcuw 759.300 -100,,000 -375.300 -256.100 -3.500 1,17:,300 3utla officelbsr *arenoun 093, :OB -70.2Co -799.300 -375.~00 -3i.iJO 963.300 add warcixuseikase office 355.200 -70,200 -3:0.400 -35,:oo -3. 500, 8ai.ix 3uy office,Leaw rarenouse 381,:OO -70.200 -311.:00 -525,XO -52,:Oo 328.300 Buy warMouseiLeasa offics :56.?30 -70.2~~ -~x,ioo -na.iao -12.303 :~I.VJO Lean oificeiwaremuse -5a.900 -izo.o~ -&i,ioo -66.1. 730 -36. 100 &~.:oo Build warekaurc 0s7.400 -7O.iOO 51.730 152.?00 15.:10 :.33l.?oa LLan warenouse 03,100 -10,200 79,300 5i.30 5.200 6jP.IZ0 ius. warchollw & office 3uy office/rarenouse 358.900 -lW.400 -1.053, 100 -331,jOO -23.500 1.379.1CO auy offica,autid warcnwse 986,000 -70.200 -310,300 -4.1. 500 -4.500 :,593,2:9 Build ofticei3uy *arenouse 999.300 -70,200 -1,312.100 -a3.100 -3.300 l,a65.:Co aolld of!icelWarehoun 950,000 -1ao.aoo -1.o10.9m -?oo,zoo -20,tco :,i62.1oo 3uild 0ffiuiLe;rw warehouse 6a3.600 -70.1'10 -33a.100 -3zc.300 -32. :oo I, is;i,ioo aurid rarehcuu,Leaw office 525.900 -70.100 -505,400 -29.30 -3.030 !.331,300 Buy mc=i~-se *arehause 571.700 -70.200 -966,700 -455.:X -06.500 1,393.;00 Buy warenoureiLura affic. 1117.300 -70.200 -569.500 -192,500 -13.100 961.900 Leas affics;warencu%e 131.600 -iPo.roo -596.400 -ios.z30 -i.~.soo 653.saa Lease rarenouwilmpmvc 3uy warehour. 659.100 -70.200 196.300. :ar.:oa 78.500 1,:'16,900 office Build warehouse 757.700 -io.ioo 250.500 34a.000 99.300 I.Z!~.BOO Lean warMoyse 343.000 -1o.zoo 271.100 W.JOO ja.:oo s~s.5~0 Sell raremru~ilmpmvc Puy w.~r-usc Lean *arenouse Buy wartnouse 358,300 -70.200 1.500 i90.130 29.J00 951.901) , &sa I*arenousa/Sall 3uy officeiwareaoun 398.900 -11O.'iOO 139.900 393.100 39.300 319.300 office Buy officei3uiId warehwse 126.300 -10.2lO 207,:OO 563,500 66.400 I,JiO.~OO Budd officetauy warenoun 539,300 -70,200 175.900 641.300 54,jCO !,305,7JO Build officaiwartnoulr 490,rOO -140,400 1t2,lOO iiZ,!OO 56.100 1,302,iOO Sudd afticeILcau X~~MOUI. 223.650 -io.:ao 253.700 407. :a0 &a.:oa 63a.300 aUim w~ren~~~~~~~~ office as.soo -io.ioo 6a2.100 538,300 8.300 5iI.Joa Buy officelhw warehouse lll.700 -70,200 221.300 X2,SOO 26.300 5i9.rOO Buy raretxuser~w- offie. -iz.ioo -:o.:oa 618,ioo 535.500 53.5~0 sii.?ao Lean officelwrrmouu -328.UO -190,iOO 591,500 122.300 i2.300 190.500 Salt officc;Build inmme auy officalrarehww z.o8~.900 -lio,aoo -1.590.700 359.200 IS.^ 2.9oo.100 propany on war- UY new officelluild warehrc. t.588,aoO -70,200 -711.900 903,300 90.3EO 2.m. :30 hww sit. Uw new offlce:Suy *arenou* i,ja$,soo -:O.ZOO -779.100 :ao.sOo la, 100 2.i72.iOO Uu new OfficelLeaw warense. :,279.:00 -70.190 -701.300 502.500 , 50.300 2.:S0.300 Build officerrarmoun 2.181.400 -1ao.aoa -1,558.ioo 4%z.jao 49.300 3.072,ioQ Lmw officelrarrhouw i,~6z.600 -IPO.SOO -I. 139.~00 3~,200 3.300 2.:50.300 wuehuun s8te Lun warrclaru z,o~,aaoo -io.:oo -1,asi.soo 512.:oo 51.300 2.905.300 LU- offlu; Build auy office;vare-- ~.s~Y.~oo -19o.+~o -z.ns.:oo -369.~0 -36.?00 3.150.100 i- pmpeny on Un new OfficetBuiIa warer118. 2.116.900 -10.200 -1,902.900 171.300 17.500 3.102.100 wardm~n site un nu oftiCa,auy WI~WOUJ~ 2.0~9.300 -70.~00 -1,967.100 n,joo 1.100 3.032,:oo Uw new OfflcelLuw rarehu. 1.739,:oo -70.200 -1.389.300 -225,400 -22,500 1.:20.300 Build offsceinrmouw 2,541,300 -190,200 -2.736.500 -231.jJO -23.500 3.532.500 Leaw offlcwra-w 1.az2.sm -iao.:oo -2,322,000 -232.~00 -23,:co '?,r,o,aoo Build incorn. pmoerty Suy warehww 2.099.900 -70.200 -1.729. 100 255,500 2S.500 3.012.200 on war.hws8 sit. Build #acerwxIsa 2.198.100 -70,XO -1.653.900 418.300 11,300 3.102.iOO Luw 'warcncura 1.739.100 -70,:QO -1,595.XO ll.500 :,301 2.f20.300 Improve officdauild Buy WJ-S 2.350.100 -70,VO -1,329,300 750,jOO 75.100 1.:17,100 income pmptny on 3uild warmouse 2,148.700 -70,200 -1.165.100 913,100 91,400 3.:57,100 L 1-81 -~ . . .. .~ . .. L Sample Page \ I’ I I E I I C I 1 e 11 I tl I 1 .... . 500 EXZ L*< / a .. . - __. -. . .. .~ ~. .. . . - - .~ . .. . . . - ..--. ~ .-..-__...._.__.._._ \ I' I I I Lord 5- c) d L a, Es .- m g{ %% L -0.2 ocoo 2 L- 32s 0 gz E- c % 2: 2j m c3)m v) 00'" cs5 z7g 2 C 20-7 j, a ie c aU.2 a 52 €353 r m 0 "-2- --HOE g-qz E.2 $ o c cso 0 3 UI ESJW- m 0,. 00 n 0 m c J=cu 9 0 Q-F T- F c. ~=-e 0 a,QCl-g? -51 9 s=EZmSZ3 m x c~g,,~ x.2 a,= $5 $3 cp 5','5 -- 2j 08 -=am-& m.- c3)o c3)m *= LT) :+ .-+a0 u,.c >= ,o m a QQ,cQ,4d*=mxg x r ScO.E.93; gg$?s tjr Z.k? €3 :E 2 $ $ Q,xE Q, x 0 Q) 0 m.- Q,3= c 2 2 Q&G~ C-~~~-~-~= 0- Q) 0 4-4 L5 v) .- rn .- a< so os zo~~ sg Q,,,Y a, a 1, I. I I t 1 t I I r I I 1 t I I 1 m -.- , m c* I' I I I 1 8 1 I I- li I I- I i I I NW Ee-lb m4 -rl UiW ZW rG.N-ER d-G PAL.\. "'x= : Y -- ur.. =a 01-z a LNcE&?&4Lc-J;O LW c"cR 'CIIM-W m- m WIL31~ e VIEW OFTOWN C€NTER LOGKIN& NORTHW-T To'dN EN-9 -E- A tm cmzer IS propad are- the :nlel8ectiOP 0: 15th st=oet and 4. :ai. 1: be(1m "ltl *la *-k a% ;\e osem &,a exTed, uwll -1 sI$.fUg ,hop, - r~,,cencc, d tiox iorci~ orr at 15th street ai a si7is phu and Cum.-A~ca m a To<*=. ac tom Ern/CD mud CDn.l,t Of ell,il,g h'rllblng,. +A. eea7.t laM =I *I no-ost comar ?I *5* d .*. 101. ?E- t0.a 50.t.z acts an *. x-nA*lon OI *h SPL,. Uul I, arwrld LIOILrA a "torerlbrldgc.. 2-a. and DCDU rlar. taler %S Pkd 0" <.e "0,X ,lee or 101 and II co,",octtd rO *e . are locirca to enbrace a P~~~SPIUI pilu (nra mlrpm =ksx) rule EainLnPlnlmy er(.<inll and pr0.m- me" ocean .:a. Yb aec.,n. a hotel. shop,. CIt7 m1, ?,I or:*ce. '"i"' and Ic,ldcncLI on Ra awl is82 ~~~~~~~~~=~~~~~~~~~~~~~ y;y;:; =*&::::&, DEL MAR 2mo PILL '0EHUI.I NO - '*IE.LLINWCN mtbLf/14.1.4. \ e I- (. I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I. UQW mI~Iu*-au,*I L" - mll31~--IyIu iP ?O 57€z~mE,Ww- n% VIEW Gf TOWN =GftNE" kt(3Klbk NoPTH ~G-.+J*r'QE-'co=fl: a. tm .pia. is a. ax111- la8 axrip en.10m.nr along Evy. 101. 10 .-c. ih. 1-1, Chcter, :Ow sfor7 PUma WClql (one built l~~oii the ItICOt fX0 PI other) UE WWId at Onrhrlf to QII block =; .wa"d.=l:A2, 1PtUnlI along ?hi .Ahz:.~w<~yb~~tM 'IerpMtlnIBg' 101. ?bail bdl- in PI ?tar. %* Itn.t,ld. puking Lion' I. .pin. "OmYLd JULIE; 11% DEL MAR 2Lx313 &LL BEU~~ w W+ V&WIU~VA @-,A.IA. b. IlilfM ro1 ine1s-M Pd..Yun Yu liyt pL.nc-. \ I- I. .1; 1 I I Y 1’ 1 I I I I I I I I 1 M .I 1 1 1 i . fI i < x I - - - - - .. ” z < x -.. I < k ‘I: I > < C z .2 \ t. I. I 1 E 1 I I 1 i e I I I m 8 I I I l \