HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-03-25; City Council; 8249-4; Order Formation of College Blvd Assessment1
\B#-B?L/p-aJ'y
ATG. 03/25/86
IEPTF~G
.. z 0 6 a
=! 0 z 3 0 0
TITLE: ORDER FORMATION OF COLLEGE BOULEVARD
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND AWARD CONTRACT CITY MGRA
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion, adopt the following resolutions:
1. Resolution No. BySo ordering certain changes and modifications to the Engineer's "Report" in a Special Assessment District, Project No. 3188.
2. Resolution No. . pv</ overruling and denying protests and making certain findlngs in a Special Assessment District.
3. Resolution No. kVg2, approving and providing for
contribution to pay certain costs and expenses in an Assessment
District.
confirming the Assessment, ordering ?F- 4. Resolution No. the improvements ma e, together with appurtenances, and
approving the Engineer's "Report".
5. Resolution No. ry5f authorizing and providing for the issuance of bonds pursuant to the "Improvement Act of 1913".
6. Resolution No. g95g accepting bids and awarding the contract for the construction of College Boulevard to Construction Inc., and appropriating -- -
funds in the amount of
7. Resolution No. awarding sale of bonds and
providing for the of a redemption fund.
8. Resolution No. 8q<7 approving contracts for ownership of improvement.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
On January 21, 1986, Council authorized the advertisement for
the construction of College Boulevard and set March 4, 1986 for
a public hearing.
Line (EDL) were not available to the contractors, the bid opening of February 26, 1986 was postponed to March 19 and the
public hearing continued to March 25.
The Assessment District will construct South College Boulevard full width from El Camino Real to Palomar Airport Road. The Calavera Hills Effluent Disposal Line (EDL) will also be constructed concurrently with the College Boulevard improvements as a practical, cost effective method of
construction. This line is a separate CIP project.
Since the plans for the Effluent Disposal
I
,
Page 2 of Agenda Bill No. #249-#4!
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Engineer's estimate for the construction of South College
Boulevard is $9.2 million and for the EDL is $420,000. All the
Assessment District costs will be reimbursed through the sale of bonds. The construction cost of for Calavera
Hills Effluent Disposal Line (EDL) will be born by the City.
Funds in the amount of $1,000,000 were budgeted for the (EDL)
in the 1985-86 CIP.
There are no City funds being contributed to the Assessment
District. The only expenditure is for a portion of the EDL
which is an approved CIP project.
EXHIBITS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Location Map
Order of Procedure
Resolution No. ordering certain changes and
modifications "Report" in a Special
Assessment District, Project No. 3188.
Resolution No. ?4 5/ overruling and denying
protests and making certain findings in a Special
Assessment District.
Resolution No. mSa approving and providing for
contribution to pay certain costs and expenses in an Assessment District.
Resolution No. rqg3 confirming the Assessment, ordering the improvements made, together with
appurtenances, and approving the Engineer's "Report".
Resolution No. f'ysq authorizing and providing for the issuance of bonds pursuant to the "Improvement Act
of 1913".
Resolution No. fq!s' accepting bids and awarding
the contract for the construction of College Boulevard to
Construction Inc., and
appropriating funds in the amount of $
Resolution No. hgy"" awarding sale of bonds and
providing for t e establishment of a redemption fund.
Resolution No. 8457 approvinng contracts for ownership
of improvements .
I
LOCATION MAP
LEGEND
SI
.......a ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
BOUNDARY
'RoJECr SOUTH COLLEGE BLVD.
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
3
I 1
J
I.
ORDER OF PROCEDURE
CITY OF CARLSBAD
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION:
MAY OR :
CITY -CLERK:
STAFF :
STAFF :
STAFF :
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
'MARCH25,1985
HEARING REQUIRED PURSUANT TO THE "MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913".
Announce that this is the time and place fixed for the public hearing on protests or objections to the Resolution of Intention, Engineer's "Report" and all other matters re1 at i ng to ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2 (COLLEGE BOULEVARD).
Announce that notice of Hearing has been given in the manner and form as required by law, and that the following affidavits are on file:
- Certificate of Posting Streets - Certificate of Mailing Notice and Filing Boundary Map - Affidavit of Publication of Notice of Improvement - Affidavit of Publication of Notice Inviting Sealed Bids - Affidavit of Posting Notice Inviting Sealed Bids.
Explain purpose, scope and order of procedure for Public Hearings.
Explain general nature, location and extent of the proposed works of improvement and boundaries of the Assessment District. Present and surnarize ''Report" pursuant to the provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", consisting of the following: a. Plans; b. Specifications; c. Assessment Roll ;
d. Assessment Diagram; e. Description of the works of improvement. Explain method and formula of assessment spread; Make recornendat ion as to any modifications necessary in the assessments or proceedings Review construction bids received Make recommendation as to sale of bonds
Report on number (%) of protests received and announce that copies have been delivered to each member of the 1 egi sl at i ve body.
Y END OF STAFF REPORT - OPEN FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION
ORDER OF PROCEDURE CITY OF CARLSBAD -
' ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. -2 - ' (COLLEGE BOULEVARD) PAGE TWO
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCHA', 1986
zf
MAY OR :
STAFF :
STAFF:
CITY COUNCIL :
CITY COUNCIL:
CITY COUNCIL:
C ITY COUNCIL :
CITY COUNCIL:
CITY COUNCIL:
CITY COUNCIL :
CITY COUNC IL :
CITY COUNCIL :
CITY COUNCIL :
ASK EACH SPEAKER TO IDENTIFY THEMSELVES AND THEIR
PROPERTY.
First, ask to hear from anyone who wishes to speak against
themprovementi the Assessment District, or the method of
spread.
Then fie proceedings.
Report on final percentage (%) of protests received.
ask to hear from anyone who wishes to speak in favor
Presentation of any proposed changes or modifications to
the Engineer's "Report" and the Assessment District.
Discussion.
BJ Motion, declare Public Hearing CLOSED.
IF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY WISHES TO PROCEED:
Adopt RESOLUTION ORDERING CHANGES AND MODIFI 9TIONS: This
Resolution is appropriate for any changes or modifications
required from the first presentation of the Engineer's
"Report".
Adopt RESOLUTION OVERRULING AND DENYING PROTESTS: To be adopted if any protests, oral or written, have been received.
Adopt RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRIBUTION: This is the
formal action approving the contribution.
Adopt RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS: This Resolution
orders the work and confirms the assessments.
Adopt RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF BONDS: This
Resolution authorizes the issuance of bonds to finance the
improvements.
Adopt RESOLUTION AWARDING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT: The
adoption of this Resolution awards the construction con-
tract to the lowest responsible bidder.
Adopt RESOLUTION MAKING AWARD FOR THE SALE OF BONDS: This
Resolution accepts the proposal for the sale of bonds to
finance the improvements.
Adopt RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRACTS FOR OWNERSHIP OF
IMPROVEMENTS: Accepts and approves for execution various
Agreements between the City and other agencies for owner-
ship of water, telephone, electrical and gas improvements.
5- ***
9 I
I *a
1
2
3
4
fi "
6
7
e
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 8450
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
FICATIONS TO THE ENGINEER'S "REPORT"
IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
ORDERING CERTAIN CHANGES AND MODI-
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CARLSBAD, - CALIFORNIA
has previously adopted its Resolution of Intention prusuant to the
provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 191311, being
Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California, for the construction of certain works of improvement
in a special assessment district known and designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and,
WHEREAS, based upon the presentation and recommendat.ions of
staff and available documentation, it now appears that the changes
and modifications as set forth in the amended assessment roll, as
presented herein, should be approved and ordered to be done.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. That all changes and modifications as now set
forth in the submitted assessment roll and Enqineer's "Report" are
hereby ordered pursuant to the authority of in Section 10352 of
the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the
"Municipal Improvement Act of 1913").
SECTION 3. That the Engineer's "Report", the Assessment
Roll, and all related documentation, as modified, are for the best
interests of the property owners within the Assessment District,
and said assessment, as modified, is in accordance with the
r 1
1
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
22
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
22
24
2E
2c
27
2E
_A.
benefits received, and the "Report", as herein modified and
amended, shall stand as the "Report" for all subsequent
proceedings relating to this Assessment District.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
Council held on the 25th day of March . , 1986, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick, and Pettine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
(SEAL)
4 ,'
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 8451,
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
OVERRULING AND DENYING PROTESTS AND
MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN A SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
I WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
has, by Resolution, declared its intention to order the construc-
tion of certain public works of improvement, pursuant to the terms
and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being
Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California, in a special assessment district known and designated
as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and,
WHEREAS, certain owners of property liable to be assessed for
improvements have filed written protests or objections and deli-
vered the same to the City Council not later than the hour set for
hearing such objections; and,
WHEREAS, at the time set for said Public Hearing, all
protests and objections were duly heard and considered and all
matters as to the method and formula of the assessment spread and
the determination as to whether or not the property did receive a
benefit and whether the asesessments were apportioned in accor-
dance to benefit were heard and considered.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION ' 2. That the public hearing for the Assessment
District is hereby closed.
1
2
3
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
SECTION 3. That all protests and objections of every kind
and nature be, and the same hereby are, overruled and denied, and
it is further determined that said protests and objections are
made by the owners of less than one-half (1/2) of the area of
property to be assessed for said improvements within said
Assessment District.
SECTION 4. That it is hereby further determined that all
properties within the boundaries of the Assessment District
receive a local and direct benefit from the works of improvement
as proposed for said Assessment District, and it is hereby further
determined and declared that a1 1 assessable costs and expenses
have been apportioned and spread over the properties within the
Assessment District in direct proportion to the benefits received
thereby.
SECTION 5. That the Engineer's method of spread and appor-
tionment of all costs is hereby adopted and approved as being a
correct and proper apportionment and distribution of all assess-
able costs for these works of improvement.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
Council held on the 25th day of March , 1986, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Pettine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
Jk
H. VSLtR, Mayor
( SEAL 1
RESOLUTION NO. 8457
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
RIBUTION TO PAY CERTAIN COSTS AND
EXPENSES IN AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
APPROVING AND PROVIDING FOR CONT-
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
has, by Resolution, declared its intention to authorize the
construction of certain works of improvement pursuant to the terms
and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being
Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California, in a special assessment district designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and,
WHEREAS, this City Council is desirous of providing a contri-
bution as this time to pay a portion of the costs and expenses of
the work and proceedings; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 10205 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said City
Council may so provide for a contribution to pay a portion of the
costs and expenses at any time prior to the confirmation of the
proceedings on said Assessment District.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. That the City Council hereby approves and autho-
rizes the appropriation of the monies as set forth as a contribu-
tion in the Engineer's "Report" as herein presented relating to
the above referenced Assessment District.
lo
1 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
le
19
2c
21
22
2:
24
25
2E
27
2E
Said contribution shall be used to pay for the items of work as
jet forth in said Engineer's "Report", and the appropriation shall
De from the funds as indicated therein.
SECTION 3. That said contribution is authorized pursuant to
Section 10205 of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being
Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
Cal iforni a.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
Council held on the 25th day of March , 1986, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Pettine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
I b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 8453
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT, ORDERING
THE IMPROVEMENTS MADE, TOGETHER WITH
APPURTENANCES, AND APPROVING THE
ENGINEER'S "REPORT"
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
did previously adopt its Resolution of Intention for the construc-
tion of certain public works of improvement, together with appur-
tenances and appurtenant work, including acquisition where appro-
priate, in a special assessment district known and designated as
(SOUTH COLLEGE)
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution of Intention, a
"Report", as therein provided, was presented, considered and app-
roved; and,
WHEREAS, said "Report", as preliminarily approved, contained
all the matters and items called for by law and as pursuant to the
provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Divi-
sion 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Cali-
fornia, including the following:
1. Plans and specifications of the proposed improvements
2. Estimate of cost 3. Diagram of Assessment District
4. An assessment according to benefits
5. A description of the works of improvement; and,
WHEREAS, all protests and objections have been heard and
considered, and a full hearing has been given, all in the manner
provided by law; and,
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, notices of said hearing were duly and regularly
posted, mailed and published in the time, form and manner required
by law and as evidenced by affidavits on file with the transcript
of these proceedings; and,
WHEREAS, the owners of one-half (1/2) of the area assessed
for the costs of the project did not file written protests against
the proposed improvements and acquisition, where appropriate, and
the City Council did, after providing a full hearing, overrule and
deny all protests and objections; and,
WHEREAS, said City Council is now satisfied with the
assessment and all matters contained in the "Report", as now
updated and submitted.
NOW, 'THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. That the "Report", as updated and submitted,
consisting of the assessment and diagram for the improvements,
together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection
therewith, including acquisition where appropriate, is hereby
confirmed.
SECTION 3. That the public interest and convenience require
the proposed improvements to be made, and therefore said City
Council hereby orders the work to be done and improvements to be
made together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in connec-
tion therewith, including acquisition where appropriate, in said
Assessment District, as set forth in the Resolution of Intention
previously adopted and as set forth in the "Report" presented and
considered, and as now submitted.
I3
1 I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 I 17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECTION 4. That the assessment contained in said "Report" is
hereby levied upon the respective subdivisions of land in the
Assessment District as set forth in said "Report".
SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall forthwith deliver to
the Superintendent of Streets the said assessment, together with
the diagram attached thereto and made a part thereof, as con-
firmed, with his certificate of such confirmation attached and the
date thereof; and that said Superintendent of Streets shall then
immediately record said diagram and assessment in his Office in a
suitable book to be kept for that purpose and attach thereto his
certificate of the date of such recording.
SECTION 6. That said Superintendent of Streets, upon the
reco'rding of said diagram and assessment, shall mail to each owner
of real property within the Assessment District at his last known
address, as the same appears on the tax rolls of the County or on
file in the Office of the City Clerk, or to both addresses if said
address is not the same, or to General Delivery when no address so
appears, a statement containing a designation by street number or
other description of the property assessed sufficient to enable
the owner to identify the same, the amount of the assessment, the
time and place of payment thereof, the effect of failure to pay
within such time, and a statement of the fact that bonds will be
issued on unpaid assessments pursuant to the ''Improvement Bond Act
of 1915".
SECTION 7. That said Superintendent of Streets shall also
give notice by publishing a copy of a notice of recording of
assessment in the newspaper previously selected to publish all
I I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
notices as provided by law, giving notice that sa d assessment has
been recorded in his Office, and that all sums assessed thereon
are due and payable immediately, and that the payment of said
sums is to be made within thirty (30) days after the date of
recording the assessment, which date shall be so stated in said
notice, and of the fact that bonds will be issued upon unpaid
assessments.
SECTION 8. Upon confirmation of the assessments and recor-
dation of the assessment roll and diagram, a certified copy of the
assessment diagram shall be immediately filed in the Office of the
County Recorder. Immediately thereafter, a copy of the notice of
assessment shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder
in the manner and form as set forth by law and specifically
Section 3114 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
Cal iforni a.
SECTION 9. That the Treasurer is hereby authorized and
directed to establish a special fund account to be known as the
IMPROVEMENT FUND, and designated by the name of this Assessment
District, into which fund shall be paid all payments to be
received upon said assessment, and the proceeds of the sale of
bonds to be issued representing unpaid assessments.
SECTION 10. That the Treasurer is hereby further authorized
to establish a SPECIAL RESERVE FUND, into which the designated
amount shall be transferred and held in trust for the bondholders
and used to assist final discharge by any payment by property
owners within the boundaries of the Assessment District.
I I
#<
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IO
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
le
19
2c
21
22
2:
24
2:
2t
2';
2E
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
Council held on the 25th day of March , 1986, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES: None
Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Pettine
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
I .
1
2
7 c.
4
F
E
7
E
s
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. -.. $454 ~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE
ISSUANCE OF BONDS PURSUANT TO THE
IMPROVEMENT BOND ACT OF 1915"
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
has heretofore undertaken proceedinqs pursuant to the ttMunicipal
Improvement Act of 1913", beinq Division 12 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California, and has confirmed
assessments upon lands within a special assessment district
described in a Resolution of Intention previously adopted for said
improvements, said special assessment District known and desiq-
nated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
(hereinafter referred to as the #'Assessment District"); and,
WHEREAS, said proceedinqs provided for the issuance of bonds
pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", beinq Division 10
of the Streets and Hiqhways Code of the State of California, and
it is necessary to establish terms and provisions of such issu-
ance; and,
WHEREAS, the final unpaid balance to assessment, as well as
the denomination and amounts to mature each year, cannot be deter-
mined until followinq the 30-day cash collection period after the
recordation of said assessment.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. R-ecita-Is. That the above recitals are all true
and correct.
1
t L
L
r
E
1C
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECTION 2. Unpaid Assessments. The Treasurer shall , imme-
diately upon the completion of the 30-day cash collection period,
determine the assessments which are unpaid and the aqqreqate
amount thereof as authorized by Section 8621 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California.
SECTION 3. Reqist.ePed--Bonds. Said bonds shall be issuable
only as fully registered bonds in the denomination of $5,000, or
any inteqral multiple thereof, except for one bond maturinq in the
first year of maturity, which shall include the amount by which
the total issue exceeds the maximum inteqral multiDle of $5,000
contained therein. d
SECTION 4. Date of Bonds. All of said bonds shall be dated
the 5th day of April, 1986, and interest shall accrue from that
date.
SECTION 5. Ma-turity and- Denomi-nat-i-on. The bonds shall be
issued in serial form with annual maturities on September 2nd of
every year succeedinq the first twelve (12) months after their
date, until the whole is paid. The amount maturinq each year
shall be such as to result in approximately equal annual debt
service during the term of the issue as reflected by the interest
rate and/ or rates and principal amounts maturinq in the respec-
tive years of maturity, and the Treasurer or desiqnated Reqistrar
shall, immediately uDon completion of the cash collection period,
prescribe the denominations of the bonds, which shall be in
convenient amounts, not necessarily equal , and shall further
provide for their issuance and delivery.
11
1:
1;
1:
14
If
1t
1';
1€
15
2c
21
22
22
24
25
26
27
28
SECTION 6. Interest. Each bond shall be of a sinqle matu-
rity and shall bear interest at the rate as set forth in the
accepted bid proposal for said bonds from the interest payment
date next precedinq the date on which it is authenticated and
reqistered, unless said bond is authenticated and reqistered as of
an interest payment date, in which case it shall bear interest
from said interest payment date, or unless said bond is authenti-
cated and reqistered prior to the first interest pa.yment date, in
which case it shall bear interest from its date, until payment of
its principal sum has been discharqed.
SECTION 7. Place of -Payment. The principal and interest on
the bonds shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of
America at the office of the Treasurer, or such paying agent as
may he desiqnated by Resolution of the legislative body.
Principal and interest on said bonds shall be
paid by check or draft to the reqistered owner thereof at his add-
ress as it appears on the books of registration, or at such
address as may have been filed with the Treasurer for that
purpose, as of the 15th day immediately preceding said interest
payment date.
SECTION 8. Red-empt-i-on. This bond, or a portion thereof if
issued in a denomination qreater than $5,000, shall be subject to
redemption and payment in advance of maturity in increments of
$5,000 as provided in Section 8768 of the Streets and Hiqhways
Code, on the 2nd day of March or September in any year, b.y qivinq
the notice provided in said law to the reqistered owner thelreof at
his address as it appears on the books of reqistration and
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
payinq principal of and accrued interest on such redeemed amount,
toqether with a premium equal to five percent (5%) of the redeemed
principal amount. If less than the entire bond is redeemed, the
unredeemed portion shall be reissued to the reqistered owner
thereof.
SECTION 9. Transf,er ~~.~~~q.i-ster~-B~n-~s. Any fully reqis-
tered bond may, in accordance with its terms, be transferred upon
the books of registration required to be kept pursuant to the
provisions of Section 11 by the owner in whose name it is reqiste-
red, or by his duly authorized attorney or leqal representative,
upon surrender of such fully reqistered bond for reqistration of
such transfer, accompanied by delivery of a written instrument or
transfer in a form approved by the Treasurer and by the owner of
said bonds, duly executed.
The Treasurer shall require the payment by the
bondholder requesting such transfer of any tax or other qovern-
mental charqe required to be paid with respect to such transfer
and such charqes as provided for in the systerll of reqistration for
reqistered debt obligations.
No transfer of fully registered bonds shall be
required to be made durinq the fifteen (15) days next preceding
each interest payment date.
SECTION 10. Excbanqe- of^ Reg-is-t.ere,d- -Bon-ds. Fully reqistered
bonds may be exchanged at the office of the Treasurer, or
desiqnated transfer aqent/reqistrar, for a like aqqreqate princi-
pal amount of bonds of the same series, interest rate and matu-
rity, subject to the terms and conditions provided in the system
.
1
I C
c
4
F
t
r
f
E
1C
11
12
12
14
15
IC
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
of reqistration
payment of certa
for reqistered debt obliqations, includinq the
n charges, if any, upon surrender and cancella-
tion of this bond. UDon such transfer and exchange, a new reqis-
tered bond or bonds of any authorized denomination or denomina-
tions of the same maturity for the same aqqreqate principal amount
will be issued to the transferee in exchange therefor.
SECTION 11. Books--of -Reqistraf;-i-on. There shall be kept by
the Treasurer sufficient books for the reqistration and transfer
of the bonds and, upon presentation for such purpose, the
Treasurer shall, under such reasonable requlations as it may
prescribe, reqister or transfer or cause to be reqistered or
transferred, on .said register, bonds as hereinbefore provided.
SECTION 12, Ex-ecut-i-on - of -Bonds. The bonds shall be executed
~~ ~ ~~ ~~
in facsimile by the Treasurer and by the City Clerk, and the
corporate seal shall be imprinted in facsimile on the bonds. The
bonds shall then be delivered to the transfer aqent and registrar
for authentication and reqistration. In case an officer who shall
have signed or attested to any of the bonds by facsimile or other-
wise shall cease to be such officer before the authentication,
delivery and issuance of the bonds, such bonds nevertheless may be
authenticated, delivered and issued, and upon such authentication,
delivery and issue, shall be as binding as though those who siqned
and attested the same had remained in office.
SECTION 13. Au-thent-i-cat-!on. Only such of the bonds as
shall bear thereon a certificate of authentication substantially
in the form below, manually executed by the transfer aqent and
I .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
reqistrar, shall be valid or obliqatory for any purpose or
entitled to the benefits of this Resolution, and such certificate
of the transfer aqent and reqistrar shall be conclusive evidence
that the bonds so authenticated have been duly executed, authenti-
cated and delivered hereunder, and are entitled to the benefits of
this Resolution.
FORM OF CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION AND REGISTRATION
This bond has been authenticated and reqistered on
BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST
AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION
as Transfer Agent and Registrar
SECTION 14. Heqo-t-i.abi.l-)ty-.-- -Rea-i-stra-t-hn- --ancl---Trans-f-er- --of
Bdnds. The transfer of any bond may be reqistered only upon such
books of reqistration upon surrender thereof to the transfer aqent
-
and registrar, toqether with an assiqnment duly executed by the
owner or his attorney or legal representative, in satisfactory
form. Upon any such reqistration of transfer, a new bond or bonds
shall be authenticated and delivered in exchange for such bond, in
the name of the transferee, of any denomination or denominations
authorized by this Resolution, and in an aqgreqate Principal
amount equal to the principal amount of such bond or principal
amount of such bond or bonds so surrendered. In all cases in
which bonds shall be exchanged or transferred, the transfer aqent
and reqistrar shall authenticate at the earliest practical time,
bonds in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. All
bonds surrendered in such exchange or registration transfer shall
forthwith be cancelled. The legislative body may make a charge
I 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
for every such exchanqe or req
sufficient to reimburse it for
stration of transfer of bonds
any tax or other qovernmental
charge required to be paid with respect to such exchanqe or
registration of transfer. The transfer agent and registrar shall
not be required to make such exchanqe or reqistration of transfer
of bonds during the fifteen (15) days immediately preceding any
March 2nd or September 2nd.
SECTION 15. Qwner-s-hip--ef -Bonds. The person in whose name
any bond shall be registered shall be deemed and regarded as the
absolute owner thereof for all purpoFes, and payment of or on
account of the principal and redemption premium, if any, of any
such bond, and the interest on any such bond, shall be made only
to or upon the order of the registered owner thereof or his leqal
representative. All such payments shall be valid and effectual to
satisfy and discharge the liability upon such bond, includinq the
redemption premium, if any, and interest thereon, to the extent of
the sum or sums so paid.
SECTION 16. M,ut-i-lated, De4trt)-yed, -$toIen--or--tos-t- -Bonds. In
case any bond secured hereby shall become mutilated or be
destroyed, stolen or lost, the leqislative body shall cause to be
executed and authenticated a new bond of like date and tenor in
exchange and substitution for and upon the cancellation of such
mutilated bond or in lieu of and in substitution for such bond
destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the owner's paying the reasonable
expenses and charqes in connection therewith, and, in the case of
a bond destroyed, stolen or lost, his filing with the legislative
body of evidence satisfactory to it and to the Treasurer thereof
43
. I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
that such bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of his ownership
thereof, and furnishing the leqislative body with indemnity satis-
factory to it.
SECT ION 17. C anc-e 1 1 a-t-i on. . of - Bonds. All bonds paid or
redeemed, either at or before maturity, shall be cancelled upon
the payment or redemption of such bonds, and shall be delivered to
the transfer agent and reqistrar when such payment or redemption
is made. All bonds cancelled under any of the provisions of this
shall be destroyed by the transfer aqent and reqistrar, which
shall execute a certificate in duplicate describinq the bonds so
destroyed, and shall retain said executed certificate in its
permqnent files for the issue.
10
sha
des
the
f 01
SECTION 18. R-eserv-e-Fund. Pursuant to Part 16 of Division
f the California Streets and Highways Code, as amended, there
1 be created a special reserve fund for the bonds to be
qnated by the name of the Assessment District and specified as
special "Reserve Fund". The Reserve Fund shall be funded as
ows: The initial desiqnated amount shall be deposited in the
Reserve Fund out of the bond proceeds. Periodically, at such
times as may be determined by the leqislative body, monies
representing interest on funds on deposit in the Reserve Fund
shall be transferred to the Reserve Fund, but only to the extent
permitted herein and to the extent that the amount of interest
credited thereto shall not result in the bonds becorninq "arbitraqe
bonds" as defined in Section 103(c) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1954, as amended, and the requlations promulgated and proposed
thereunder. For these proceedings, it is hereby determined and
' ,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
declared that the special Reserve Fund shall be funded in the
following manner: EIGHT PERCENT (8%) OF THE PAR AMOUNT OF THE
BONDS TO BE ISSUED.
Monies in the Reserve Fund shall be applied as
f 01 1 ows:
A. Amounts in said Reserve Fund shall be
transferred to the Redemption Fund for the bonds if, as a result
of delinquencies in the payment of assessments, there are insuffi-
cient monies in said Redemption Fund to pay principal of and
interest on the bonds. Amounts so transferred shall be repaid to
the Reserve Fund from proceeds from the redemption or foreclosure
of property with respect to which an assessment is unpaid and from
payments of the delinquent assessments;
€3. Interest earned on monies in the Reserve
Fund shall accrue to the Reserve Fund only to the extent that the
amount of interest credited thereto shall not result in the bonds
becominq "arbitrage bonds" as defined in Section 103(c) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, and the requlations
promulgated thereunder;
C. Whenever monies in the Reserve Fund are
sufficient to retire all of the bonds outstandinq, plus accrued
interest thereon, such money shall be transferred to the Redemp-
tion Fund for the bonds and collection of the remaininq unpaid
assessments shall cease.
D. The amount of the annual Reserve Fund
disbursement of earned interest shall be credited toward install-
ments of unpaid assessments each year durinq which any part of the
1 I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
bonds remain outstanding. The Auditor's Record, prepared pursuant
to Section -8682 of the Streets and Highways Code, shall reflect
credits against each of the unpaid assessments in the manner
provided in Section 10427.1 of said Code, in amounts equal to each
parcel's proportionate share of the annual reserve fund
disbursement.
No portion of the annual Reserve Fund disburse-
ment shall be transferred in any year in excess of the amount
which would cause the Reserve Fund to fall below the original
amount of the Reserve Fund, minus adjustments to reflect the
discharge of assessments prior to maturity made to that point.
E. In the event that any annual Reserve Fund
disbursement was not fully made in any year because to have done
so would have caused the Reserve Fund to fall below the minimum
amount for that year, the Treasurer may thereafter transfer and
credit any amounts in excess of the minimum amount toward the
assessment installments due in subsequent years.
In the event assessments are paid in cash in
advance of their final maturity date, the Treasurer is authorized
to reduce the minimum amount of the Reserve Fund and increase the
annual Reserve Fund disbursements in the proportion in which the
assessments paid in cash bears to the total original unpaid
assessments.
SECTION 19. fmpr-ovemertt-fund. The proceeds from the sale of
the bonds, after deposit of required amounts in the Reserve Fund
and the Redemption Fund, shall be placed in the fund hereby
created, pursuant to Sections 10602 and 10424 of the California
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1c
11
12
12
14
15
1E
17
1E
15
2c
21
2;
21
21
2!
2(
2'
21
treets and Highways Code, as amended, which shall be called the
Improvement Fund", and the monies in said Fund shall be used only
or the purposes authorized in said assessment proceedings. Any
urplus in the Improvement Fund after completion of the improve-
lents shall remain in the Improvement Fund for a period not less
han two (2) years from the receipt of bond proceeds as provided
n Section 10427.1 of the California Streets and Highways Code,
Ind thereafter shall be uti 1 i zed or distributed as determined by
.he legislative body.
\
SECTION 20. Redqpt3o-n-Fwnd. Principal of and interest on
;aid bonds shall be paid out of the Redemption Fund created
lursuant to Section 8671 of the California Streets and Highways
:o'de. Accrued interest paid by the purchaser of the bonds, if
iny, shall be deposited in the Redemption Fund. In all respects
rot recited herein, said bonds shall be governed by the provisions
if the nImprovement Bond Act of 1915", Division 10 of the
Zalifornia Streets and Highways Code, as amended.
SECTION 21. €--oven-ant to--foreeAose. The legislative body
iereby covenants that upon default of any assessment payment due,
it will cause Superior Court foreclosure proceedings to be brought
lsithin one hundred fifty (150) days of such default and thereafter
diligently prosecute to completion such proceedings. Such fore-
:losure proceedings may be deferred if funds are advanced to the
special Reserve Fund to keep said Fund continually at the level
set forth in the Section entitled "Reserve Fund" set forth
hereinabove.
6 CI
c
L
5 .
t
r
E
z
1C
11
12
12
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
S E C T IO N 2 2. Order . .t 0. . P r i.n t - a n.d- . -Aut hen t i c-a-te - . B on-d s . The
Treasurer is hereby instructed to cause bonds, as set forth above,
to be printed, and to proceed to cause said bonds to be authenti-
cated and delivered to an authorized representative of the
purchaser, upon payment of the purchase price as set forth in the
accepted proposal for the sale of bonds.
SECTION 23. Ar-bitraue.-~er-t-i-fic-ate. On the basis of the
facts, estimates and circumstances now in existence and in exis-
tence on the date of issue of the bonds, as determined by the
Treasurer, said Treasurer is hereby authorized to certify that it
is not expected that the proceeds of the issue will be used in a
manner that would cause such obligations to be arbitraqe bonds.
Such certification shall be delivered to the purchaser toqether
with the bonds.
S E C T IO N 2 4. De s i gnat i 0-I?. . of- - fr ansf e r Agent - Pay i ng: - Agent . -a-nd a
Re-gistr-ar. The BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSO-
CIATION is hereby designated transfer aqent, payinq aqent and
registrar with respect to these proceedings and the bonds to be
i ssued.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a reqular meetinq of the City
Council held on the --25th-- day of --March”’- , 1986, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Pettine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
r .
1
2
7 c.
4
F:
€
3
E
5
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
&. -. -. .
SLtK, Mayor
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
I
..
I
(
I
I
$
1(
11
1:
1:
14
1f
16
13
1E
19
2c
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 8455
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
STRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC WORKS
MENT DISTRICT
AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR THE CON-
OF IMPROVEMENT IN A SPECIAL ASSESS-
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
did publicly open and examine all sealed proposals or bids for
doing the work and improvements described in its Resolution of
Intention, which Resolution and a "Report" subsequently approved,
are hereby expressly referred to for a description of said work
and improvements and for all particulars relative to the proceed-
ings for the works of improvement, in a special assessment
district known and designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
(hereinafter referred to as the nAssessment District").
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. That this City Council hereby rejects all of said
proposals or bids except that herein mentioned, and does hereby
award the construction contract for doing said work and making
improvements in the Assessment District to the lowest responsible
bidder, to-wi t:
at the prices named in the bid of said bidder on file with the
transcript of these proceedings and open for public inspection.
SECTION 3. That this award of contract is hereby conditioned
upon and made subject to the receipt of monies and proceeds from
'.
1
2
7 c,
4
E CI
€
7
e
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
r'
the issuance and sale of bonds. The Contractor shall not commence
construction or order equipment until he has received a Notice to
proceed. Any progress payment to the Contractor for work
completed may be delayed if monies have not been received from the
sale of bonds.
SECTION 4. That the works of improvement shall be con-
structed in the manner and form as set forth in the plans and
specifications for these proceedings, as previously approved as a
part of the "Report", as required by law, and specifically the
"Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
SECTION 5. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby autho-
rized to execute the Agreement for the works of improvement
relating to said Assessment District on behalf of the City, and a
copy of said Agreement shall be on file with the transcript of
these proceedings.
SECTION 6. That all monies to pay for the costs and expenses
of the above-referenced Assessment District shall be paid from the
funds as deposited in the Improvement Fund, including any interest
earned thereon.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
Council held on the day of , 1986, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABS E NT :
4 t
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NARY H. CASLtR, Mayor
ATTEST:
A L. RAUmNL, City Clerk
(SEAL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
has
I
I
RESOLUTION NO. 8456
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, MAKING AWARD FOR SALE OF BOND,S AND
PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
A REDEMPTION FUND
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
heretofore instituted and conducted proceedings under the
terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913",
being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California, for the construction of certain public works of
improvement, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work, in
a special assessment district known and designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and,
WHEREAS, in the Resolution of Intention it was determined and
declared that bonds should issue under the provisions of the
"Improvement Bond Act of 191518, being Division 10 of the Streets
and Highways Code of the State of California; and,
WHEREAS, there has now been received, in proper form, a
Purchase Agreement (hereinafter the "proposal ") for the purchase
of said bonds to issue under said proceedings, which is considered
to best serve the interests of owners of land included within the
Assessment District and should be accepted.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
YOUNGBERG SECTION 2. That the proposal received from STONE &
for the purchase of improvement bonds representing unpa
ments in said Assessment District is hereby accepted and
d assess-
approved.
33
’.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECTION 3. That said sale is subject to all the terms and
conditions as set forth in the Resolution of Issuance and the
accepted proposal.
SECTION 4. That the Treasurer is hereby directed to have the
bonds printed immediately upon the expiration of the cash collec-
tion period, and then said Treasurer shall have said bonds signed
and delivered upon receipt of the amount of monies due pursuant to
said bid, and upon the performance of all the conditions as set
forth in the proposal.
I
SECTION 5. That the interest rate or rates on said bonds be,
and the same hereby is fixed at the rate or rates as set forth in
said accepted proposal.
SECTION 6. That the Treasurer is hereby authorized and
directed to keep a REDEMPTION FUND, designated by the name of the
proceedings, into which he shall place all sums received for the
collection of the assessments and the interest thereon, together
with all penalties, if applicable, thereon and from which he shall
disburse such funds to the registered owner. Under no circum-
stances shall the said bonds or interest thereon be paid out of
any other fund except as provided by law.
SECTION 7. That the Treasurer shall transfer monies as
necessary from the SPECIAL RESERVE FUND in the manner and form as
authorized by law.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
Council held on the 25th day of March , 1986, by the
following vote, to wit:
3Lf
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AYES: - Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Pettine
NOES: None
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
I P
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 8457
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
CONTRACTS FOR OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, has, pursuant to the provisions of the "Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California, by adoption of its
Resolution of Intention, declared its intention to order the
construction and installation of certain works of improvement,
together with appurtenances, in a special assessment district
known and designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10110 of the Streets and High-
ways Code of the State of California, it is required that prior to
the time that any works of improvement are ordered pursuant to
said proceedings, the City may, by contract, provide that cef-tain
works shall be performed by other public agencies or regulated
public utilities who will have the legal title to the facilities,
and further that said improvements shall thereafter constitute a
part of their system; and,
WHEREAS, it is further provided that any such agreement shall
be made prior to the adoption of the Resolution Ordering Work
under the assessment proceedings; and,
WHEREAS, at this time, contracts have been reviewed and
submitted pursuant to the authorization of Section 10110 of said
Streets and Highways Code.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
22
24
2:
2. E
27
2E
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. That the agreements, herewith submitted, relating
to the construction and installation of certain improvement faci-
lities that will be under the ownership, management and control of
other public agencies or regulated public utilities, are hereby
submitted and herewith approved. The following listed agreements
are hereby authorized for execution by the Mayor and the City
Clerk. Said contracts relate to facilities to be owned by the
following listed public agencies or regulated public utilities:
WATER : COSTA REAL MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
TELEPHONE: PACIFIC BELL
ELECTRICAL/GAS: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC
SECTION 3. That immediately upon execution, conformed copies
of said contracts shall be transmitted to the offices of the
respective public agency or utility company, together with a copy
of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
Council held on the 25th day of March, , 1986, by the
following vote:
AYES: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Pettine
NOES: None
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
37
GrubbsEllis
March 6, 1986
Mr. Norman A. Neste Neste, Brudin and Stone
10920 Via Fontara
P.O. Box 28100 San Diego, CA 92128
RE: Proposed Assessment District - College Boulevard Pal omar Land Group/Hyatt Property
Dear Mr. Neste:
In reponse to your information forwarded to us on the proposed College Boulevard assessment district we have received and reviewed the material. In order to completely understand the methodolgy used, we requested our engineering firm, VTN, to review and comment on the process.
Their review synopsis is enclosed for your review. The conclusion is that we believe adjustments are necessary in order for this process to be equitable. a formal protest is appropriate please consider this letter to be that protest.
In any case, we would very much appreciate you looking at the enclosed and responding accordingly.
.19_-~IUY-PLIYII.--R.,I-*i_L - -. " -- I-"-- ~ .~--*-..-------" -------
JKS:jcn
Enclosure
RECEIVED
Grubb 6~ Ellis Company Commercial Brokerage Services 2299 Camino del Rio South, San Diego, CA 92108-3692 (619) 297-5500
P
WN SAN DIEGO vtn a subsidiary of CPE ENGINEERS, INC.
5355 Avenida Encinas, Suite 203 Carlsbad, California 92008 Carlsbad: (619) 921-1022 San Diego: (619) 292-1040
March 4, 1984 File (3) 3 .Ne 5459-004
Grubb & Ellis 2299 Camino Del Rio South San Diego, CA 92108-3692
Attn: Mr. Richard C. Kwasny
Re: Hiette Property in Carlsbad, California College Boulevard Assessment District Report No. 85-2
Gentlemen:
VTN has reviewed the above mentioned report for the College Boulevard Assess-
ment District. Included herein is a summary of the assessment fee determination
and a preliminary letter report of VTN findings and recommendations.
In general, it appears that sune attempt has been made to spread the assessment
cost equitably. ownerships: Huntington Beach Co., 11%; Community Resources Corporation, 26%;
and the Kol 1 Company, 60%.
The bulk of the assessment has gone to the three major
The assessment for the 13.92 acre ownership of the Palomar Land Group (PLG) ,
Assessor Parcel No. 212-020-03 is $255,845.00.
and 12% interest, the annual cost of this assessment would be about $34,750.00.
We checked the procedure and calculations from which your assessment was estab-
lished and found it to be reasonable. PLG owns about 2.5% of the assessed
acreage and has been assessed about 2.2% of the total cost.
Based on a 15-year bond maturity
There are special circumstances, however, which may not have been taken into
consideration by the Assessment Engineer. Consequently, we recommend that PLG
request a reduction of its assessment based on the following points:
1. The PLG property has no direct access to College Boulevard. In addition, intersection spacing on College would dictate that access to PLG property will have to be on secondary roads through other
developments. Consequently, the benefit to PLG is not as great and
the assessment should be less.
ENGINEERS PVVYNEFS SURVEYORS
_-. . ,- I-
4
Mr. Richard C. Kwasny Grubb & Ellis March 4, 1986 Page 2
2.
3.
4.
Being landlocked, PLG will be dependent on the future development of
adjacent parcels before it can develop.
ments is in the hands of competitive land holdings which may have a
negative impact on PLG. Therefore, the assessment for the construction
of College will not benefit PLG to the same degree that the fronting
property owners wi 11 be benefited.
The timing of adjacent develop-
The assessment to PLG is about $18,380.00 per acre.
under normal subdivision conditions, would never be required to improve
College Boulevard, we are concerned about the magnitude of the financial impact of this assessment on the economic viability of the property.
Since this land,
No data was provided in the Neste, Brudin & Stone report on the appraised
value after completion of the improvements. that the assessment may exceed the City preferred lien ratio of 4:l.
Also, we think the appraisal should take into consideration that this
property i s 1 and1 ocked by competitive holdi ngs and may not be developable for a long time.
.
We are concerned, however,
In conclusion, we recommend that PLG request the Assessment Engineer to re-
evaluate the assessment spread in light of the issues mentioned above. The
assessment report has some other property (Zone 5) which does not front on College Boulevard. This property has been assessed at $10,725.00 per acre.
PLG should request a similar per acre charge instead of the $18,380.00 per
acre.
If you have any questions about these findings, don't hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
VTN SAN DIEGO
Project Engineer
MWB/DR/l h
_-
I
March 24, 1986
THE CITY OOUNCIL
CITY of CARLSBAD
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008-1989
/-
P.O. BOX 87483 SAN DIEGO, CALlFOfi 92138 (619) 450-9800
9747 OLSON DRIVE SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121
PliOFOSED AWAFiD OF
coNsIlEucTION CONTRACT FOR
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
COLLEGE mmARD
Olson Construction Company has been infonned that a portion of
the project for the construction of impmvments on College Boulevard is subject to a local coastal mne permit. We understand the hearing for the issuance of this permit is now scheduled for April 8, 1986. We have been further advised that the likelihood of any problems occuring at the hearing are minimal and that a permit will be issued by the local
coastal mission for the construction of the entire length of College
2oulevard.
Ye further understand that if the pennit to construct as issued by the
coastal c<=lmnission is not available at the time the notice to proceed
is issued under our contract, that said notice to proceed will be conditioned upon the issuance of the coastal permit which will likely
be available within the 120 days we are required to hold our bid pricing.
We wish to further advise you that Olson Construction Canpany will
utilize the three fill areas adjacent to College Boulevard pursuant
to the plans as sent to our company by the City of Carlsbad.
Vice President
LGIsh
02: Donald G. Donovan, City Engineer
MARCH 25, 1986
TO : CITY MANAGER
FROM: Finance Director
SOUTH COLLEGE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - STONE & YOUNGBERG -
OFFER TO PURCHASE BONDS
I have reviewed the offer received from Stone and Youngberg's office to purchase the City's South College Assessment District bonds and find it to be competitive with the present market for unrated, uninsured 1915 Act bonds. The City should accept the offer of Stone and Youngberg to purchase the assessment district bonds.
Background
I have verified this by contacting the following sources for information on similar issues:
1. California Debt Advisory Commissian - The Commission provided a list of similar issues from California cities along with net interest costs for each issue. These net interest costs were compared to the City's issue.
8.595% to 9.5% during the month of February.
interest cost is 8.095%.
Net interest costs ranged from The City's net
2. Other underwriters - Two underwriters who regularly compete with Stone and Youngberg verified present market conditions and interest rates. Each confirmed that for an unrated, uninsured issue, the typical underwriter's spread would be 31 to 4 points.
The spread for this issue is 3 points, 1A 2 percentage point below
the bottom of this range. The coupon rates compared well with
other issues in Lincoln, Rancho Cucamonga, Fairfield and San Marcos. caused a minor increase in coupon rates. First, Senator Packwood's comments on the taxation of municipal bonds has moved the market
slightly higher.
concern which results in higher rates. Second, the recent military
activities in Libya have also unsettled the market.
writers contacted were Raucher Pierce Refsnes and Wolff Hansen
and Co., both of San Francisco.
Both also mentioned that two factors have just recently
The threat of taxation has caused some minor
The under-
3. Independent financial advisor - The firm of Fieldman Rolap, a
private financial advisor, was mtzwted to verify the validity of data provided by both Stone and Youngberg and the other underwriters. According to Mr. Rolap, the bond pricing is consistent with today's market. to 1993 seemed to be slightly high when compared to the Rancho Cucamonga issue. However, the two are not directly comparable because of dissimilarities in the maturity and purpose, so this is
not considered a major problem. The underwriters spread is
exactly what would be expected based on the sale of these bonds at par value. (Stone and Youngberg has confirmed that the bonds have been sold at par.)
The coupon rates quoted for 1989
JFE : mmt
7
, ’( I
-.< .-
STONE & YOUNGBERG
-MEMBERS: PACIFIC STOCK EXCHANGE
March 25, 1986
The Honorable Members of the City Council
of the City of Carlsbad
Carlsbad, California
RE: Offer to Purchase Bonds in the Amount of $9,570rZ50
City of Carlsbad Improvement Bonds
Assessment District No. 85-2 (Col lege Boulevard)
Members of the Council:
Pursuant to discussions with bond counsel and our investigation and analysis
of the captioned bond issue, Stone 8 Youngberg hereby offers to purchase all
of the abovereferenced bonds subject to the following conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
,
The bonds shall be issued pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of
1913 and the Improvement Bond Act of 1915.
The par value of the bonds shall be in the amount of $9,570,250, and
the bonds shall mature serially over a period of 20 years.
The bonds shall be issued in denominations of $5,000, or in integral
multiples thereof as may be requested by us. One bond, which shall
mature in 1987, may be issued in an odd amount.
All bonds shall be issued in registered form in accordance with
instructions to be determined by Stone 8 Youngberg prior to closing.
The City shall retain the Bank of America N.T. 8 S.A. as fiscal Agentr
Registrar and Paying Agent.
The bonds shall be dated on ApH44986, and be delivered on or
about their dated date but in no event later than May 15, 1986.
MkV 2,1496
The bonds shall mature in each of the years and in the amounts and at the rates of interest set forth on the attached maturity schedule marked Exhibit A.
The City shall covenant to commence judicial foreclosure of delinquent
assessments within 150 days after any delinquency. The City shall establish a bond reserve fund in the amount of 8% of the principal amount of the bond issue.
1127 WALL STREET * PO. BOX 1024 ’ LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA 92038 ’ (714) 454-9081
*-r
The Honorable Members of the City Council
of the City of Carlsbad
Page 2
8. The City shall award the sale of the bonds to us at their meeting on
March 25, 1986.
9. The purchase price shall be 97% of par (a discount of 3%), plus
accrued interest, 1 f appl icable.
10. The purchase price of the bonds shall be paid in full upon delivery to
us of the bonds, the unqualified approving legal opinion of F.
Mackenzie Brown, Rancho Santa Fer California, Bond Counsel, and a
no-litigation certificate of the City. The legal opinion shall be
printed on the Bonds at no charge to us.
11. Stone 8 Youngberg may terminate this agreement any time before
delivery of the bonds should legislation of the Congress of the United
States of America or the State of California be enacted, or a decision
by a court of the United States be rendered, or a ruling, regulation,
or official statement by or on behalf of the Treasury Department of
the United States, the Internal Revenue Service or other governmental
' agency, be made with respect to federal and/or state taxation upon
interest received on bonds, which in the opinion of Stone & Youngberg
materially and adversely affects the market price of the Assessment
District No. 85-2 Bonds.
12. This bid is conditioned upon the successful consummation of the
assessment district proceedings and should said proceedings for any
reason fail to be successfully consummated, there shall be no
obligation on the part of the City or the property owners.
STONE 8 YOUNGBERG
R6bert L. Anderson
RLW n j r
0002A
Attachment
EXHIBIT A
Delivery - 5/12/86
Date Principal
9/ 2/87 9/ 2/88 9/ 2/89 9/ 2/90 9/ 2/91 9/ 2/92 9/ 2/93
9/ 2/94
9/ 28/95 9/ 2/96 9/ 2/97 9/ 2/90 9/ 2/99 91 21 0 91 2/ 1
9/ 2/ 2 9/ 2/ 3
9/ 2/ 4 9/ 21 5 9/ 2/ 6
20,2s0.00 245,000.00 260,000.00 280,000.00
300,000.00 320,000.00 345,000.00 370,000.00 395,000.00 425,000.00
460,000.00
495,000.00
530,000.00
575,000.00
620,000.00
670,000.00 725,000.00 780,000.00 845,000.00
910,000.00
Total Accrued from 4/ 5/86
Net cost
9 , 570,250 . 00
Cougon
5.750
6.250
6.750 7.000 7. I00 7.250 7.400
7.500 7.600 7 . 700 7.750
7.800 7.900
7.900
8.000 8.000
8.000
8.000 8.000 8.000
Interest
1,041,753.86 738,542. SO 723,230.00
705,680.00 686,080.00 664,780.00 641,580.00 616,050.00 588,300.00
558,280.00 525,55 5.00 489,905.00
451,295.00
409,425.00 364,000 . 00
314,400.00
260,800.00
202,800.00
140,400.00
72,800.00
10,195,656.36
76,025 . 43
10,119,630.93
7.073 k T””r”-, Net effective -
Bond years - 129,498.102
wi&d&qa+-tSi=B*w5Tt=
Total
1 , 062,003 . 86 983,542.50 983,230.00 985,680.00 986,080.00 984,780.00 986,580.00 986,050.00 983,300.00 983,280.00 985,555.00
984,905.00 981,295 -00 984,425.00
984,000.00
984,400.00
985,800.00
982,800.. 00
985,400.00 982,800.00
19,76$, 906.36
76,025.43
19,689,080.93
--
(PUBLICATION)
NOTICE OF RECORDATION OF ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM
STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to all owners of real property liable to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses of the improvements described in the Resolution of Intention adopted by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CARLSBAD,'STATE OF CALIFORNIA, on the 28th day of January, 1986, for the works of improvement in a special assessment district
known and designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
(hereinafter referred to as "Assessment District").
You are hereby notified that on the 26th day of March, 1986, the Assessment and Diagram to pay the costs and expenses of said acquisitions and improvements were recorded in my Office.
Said assessments are now due and payable imediately at the Office of the Treasurer,
and must be paid within the period expiring on the 25th day of April, 1986. Said
assessments may be paid in whole or in part during said period.
OR
In the event of the failure -to pay before the expiration of said period, serial bonds
to represent the unpaid portions of assessments and bearing interest at a rate not to
exceed the current legal maximum rate of 12% per annum, will be issued pursuant to
the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways
Code of the State of California, and the last installment of such bonds shall mature
not to exceed NINETEEN (19) YEARS from the 2nd day of September next succeeding
twelve (12) months from their date.
NOTICE: After bonds have been issued, assessments may be paid and properties cleared
of the lien of the following sums: (a) any installment of principal and
interest which has been posted to the tax roll for the current fiscal year;
(b) the unpaid balance of principal plus 5% thereof; (c) the amount of any
delinquencies, including penalties, interest and costs; (d) the estimated
cost of calling bond; and, (e) interest to the date of call, unless included in (a) above.
NO ACTION OR PAYMENT BY THE PROPERTY OWNERS IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME, IF DESIRED THAT THE ASSESSMENT BE PAID OVER THE TWENTY YEAR PERIOD. The first installment on the
assessment will appear on the 1986-87 tax statement.
DATED: 2 6 , 1986.
CITY OF CARLSBAD STATE OF CALIFORNIA
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1969
Office of the City Clerk
TELEPHONE
(019) 438-5535
March 27, 1986
F. Mackenzie Brown
Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 8025
Fairbanks Ranch Plaza
Rancho Santa Fey CA 92067
Re: Assessment District No. 85-2 - College Blvd.
Enclosed are copies of the following documents for the above
referenced assessment district which were adopted by the Carlsbad
City Council, at its meeting of March 25, 1986:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
6.
If
Resolution No. 8450, ordering certain changes and modifications
to the Engineer's "Report"
Resolution No. 8451, overruling and denying protests and making
certain findings
Resolution No. 8452, approving and providing for contributions
to pay certain costs and expenses
Resolution No. 8453, confirming the assessment, ordering the
improvements made, together with appurtenances and approving
the Engineer ' s "Report"
Resolution No. 8454, authoring and providing for the issuance
of bonds pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915
Resolution No. 8456, making award for sale of bonds and providing
for the establishment of a redemption fund
Resolution No. 8457, approving contracts for ownership of
improvements
you have any questions, don't hesitate to contact this office. Y-YB EN R. KUNDTZ
Deputy City Clerk
Encs .
l- A SANBEWDINO SAN DIEGO
Enanems Planners
CITY OF CARLSBAD
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(College Boulevard)
HEARING BOOKLET
March 25, 1986
NESTE, BRUDIN C STONE INCORPORATED Engineers -- Planners
San Diego, California
ORDER OF PROCEDURE
CITY OF CARLSBAD
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2 (COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 25, 1986
PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION: ACT OF 1913". HEARING REQUIRED PURSUANT TO THE 'MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT
MAYOR:
CITY CLERK: c
c
STAFF :
STAFF :
STAFF :
Announce that this is the time and place fixed for the
public hearing on protests or objections to the Resolution of Intention, Engineer's "Report" and a1 1 other matters
re1 ating to ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2 (COLLEGE BOULEVARD).
Announce that notice of Hearing has been given in the manner and form as required by law, and that the following affidavits are on file:
- Certificate of Posting Streets - Certificate of Mailing Notice and Filing Boundary Map - Affidavit of Publication of Notice of Improvement - Affidavit of Publication of Notice Inviting Sealed Bids - Affidavit of Posting Notice Inviting Sealed Bids I
Explain purpose, scope and order of procedure for Public
Hearings.
- Explain general nature, location and extent of the '
proposeo works of improvement and boundaries of the
Assessment District. - Present and sumnarize "Report" pursuant to the
provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913".
consisting of the following:
a. Plans; b . Spec i f icat i ons ;
c. Assessment Roll ; d. Assessment Diagram; e. Description of the works of improvement. - Explain method and formula of assessment spread; - Make recommendation as to any modifications necessary in the assessments or proceedings - Review construction bids received - Make recommendation as to sale of bonds
Report on number (%) of protests received and announce
that copies have been delivered to each member of the
legislative body.
END OF STAFF REPORT - OPEN FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION
ORDER OF PROCEDURE CITY OF CARLSBAD
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
PAGE TWO
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 25, 1986
MAYOR :
STAFF :
STAFF :
CITY COUNCIL:
CITY COUNCIL:
CITY COUNCIL:
CITY COUNCIL :
CITY COUNC IL :
CITY COUNCIL:
CITY COUNCIL:
CITY COUNCIL :
CITY COUNCIL:
CITY CGUNC IL :
ASK EACH SPEAKER TO IDENTIFY THEMSELVES AND THEIR PROPERTY.
First, ask to hear from anyone who wishes to speak against themprovement, the Assessment District, or the method of spread.
Then ask to hear from anyone who wishes to speak in favot
Me proceedings.
Report on final percentage (%) of protests received.
Presentation of any proposed changes or modifications to the Engineer's "Report" and the Assessment District.
Discussion.
By Motion, declare Public Hearing CLOSED.
IF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY WISHES TO PROCEED:
Adopt RESOLUTION ORDERING CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS: This
Resolution is appropriate for any chanqes or modifications
required from the first presentation of the Engineer's
"Report".
Adopt RESOLUTION OVERRULING AND DENYING PROTESTS: To be adopted if any protests, oral or written, have been received.
Adopt RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRIBUTION: This is the formal action approving the contribution.
Adopt RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS: This Resolution
orders the work and confirms the assessments.
Adopt RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF BONDS: This
Resolution authorizes the issuance of bonds to finance the improvements.
Adopt RESOLUTION AWARDING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT: The
adoption of this Resolution awards the construction con-
tract to the lowest responsible bidder.
Adopt RESOLUTION MAKING AWARD FOR THE SALE OF BONDS: This
Resolution accepts the proposal for the sale of bonds to finance the improvements.
Adopt RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRACTS FOR OWNERSHiP OF
IMPROVEMENTS: Accepts and approves for execution various
Agreements between the City and other agencies for owner-
ship of water, telephone, electrical and qas improvements.
***
c
c
I
CITY OF CARLSBAD
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 85-2 (COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION BIDS
Five bids have been received, for the construction of the street improvements on College Boulevard in this assessment
district, and are summarized on the attached sheets. The low
bidder is Olson Construction Company of San Diego.
References have been checked with respect to performance of the work of this contractor and they include the Port District
of San Diego and the City of San Diego for public agencies,
and both have given a good recommendation to the Olson Con- struction Company. They have also performed work for the
telephone company and their work was very satisfactory.
Their contractor's license is in good standing and expires on December 31, 1987.
We have reviewed a financial statement of the company and find their net worth and assets to be adequate.
A communication from United Pacific Insurance Company, bonding company for Olson Construction Company, indicates that they have never Been declined on a requested bond, and that there is ample available bonding credit with that company.
In the opinion of the assessment engineer, the contractor is
qualified to do the work and should be awarded the construc-
tion contract.
City of Carlsbad
Assessment District No. 85-2
(College Boulevard)
Summary of Construction Bids
Contractor Schedule I Schedule I1 Total Bid
Engineer's Estimate $ 8,536,679.39 $300,050.00 $ 8,836,729.39
Olson Construction Company 6,826,836.31 255,200.00 7,082,036.31
W. R. Connelly Inc. 8,152,193.24 337,025.00 8,489,218.24
Griffith Company 8,284,560.09 308,640.00 8,593,200.09
Cameron Brothers
Construction Co. Inc. 8,303,025.14 307,268.00 8,610,293.14
Madonna Construction Co. 10,610,486.83 355,900.00 10,966,386.83
I.
11.
111,
IV .
City of Carlsbad Assessment District No. 85-2
(College Boulevard)
Cost Estimate
PUBLIC WORKS OF CONSTRUCTION
Construction Costs
Construction Contingency
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS OF CONSTRUCTION
RIGHT-OF-WAY
PAYMENTS
City of Carlsbad Costa Real Municipal Water District
San Diego Gas & Electric Company
TOTAL PAYMENTS
INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
Design and Construction Management Design and Design Surveys
Soils
Construction Management,
Bidding and Inspection Plan Printing Plan Check Fees
Assessment Engineering
Environmental Impact Report
Paleontology Study
Bond Council Other Legal Printing, Publishing and Posting Bond Registration and Paying Agent Land Market Value Appraisal Cost of Issuance City Administration
Contingency
TOTAL INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
-1-
Estimated Confirmed cost cost
$ 8,340,015 $ 7,079,036.31
834,000 744,200.00
$ 9,174,015 $ 7,832,236.31
$ O$ 0.00
$ 9,000 $ 9,000.00 6,000 6,000.00
270,000 270,000.00
$ 285,000 $
$ 210,500 $
141,000
272,500 27,000 81 800
45,000
0 35,000
65,000
8,000
6,000
8 000
80,000
49,900
285,000.00
210,500,OO
141,000.00
272,500.00 27,000.00 81,800.00
65,000.00
0.00
35,000.00
65,000.00
8,000.00
6,000.00 8,000.00 10,000.00 80,000.00
49,900.00
40,000 40,000.00
$ 1,069,700 $ 1,099,700.00
Estimated Confirmed cost cost
V- LESS CASH CONTRIBUTION
City of Carlsbad Traffic Signals
Effluent Disposal Line
Incidental Expense
TOTAL CASH CONTRIBUTION
VI. LESS INTEREST EARNED
DURING CONSTRUCTION
SUBTOTAL
VII. FINANCING COSTS
Bond Reserve and Discount
TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED
-2-
$ 150,370 $ 127,100.00
309,793 281,720.00
0.00
$ 466,163 $ 408,820.00
6 , 000
$ 320,000 281,600.00
$ 9,742,552 $8,517,516.31
$ 1,719,448 $1,052,733-69
$11,462,000 $9,570,250.00
c. -
A -I I I
c L Y c n A Y A n Q
C' ff (
0 m
9 *) N
0 0 rr
.I
0
In U m 0 In VI N
e
0 0 I 0 N 0 I N rl N
m 0 I 0 N 0 I N
r) N
9
r) 0
UI In 0
.+ n 0
r)
0
L
9 0 0
0 0 In
0 r- N
.,
0 d
4 E P
I
C ?
<
*
U
4
e
e . a
Y Y b
Y
I. ,, . . *I r) m a U
c
U
Y fl
0 1
0 P C . .I
Y C I
c c I n
n L
v C I c b 0 1 N
r) N
I
!
I
I I
I I
* In * OD 0 d
L * d
a 0 ., r- m L m r(
c 0 I D r- 0 I N d N
h D I
0 m
m N 0
0 rn
m
7 0
Q
c
n m
as
rn
0 H I 0 b 0 I N rl N
O 4 I
3 I r(
4 Y
a -
r) rr
0, SQ I-
m N
0
0 9
r(
0, m
N m
L
m d I 0 r. 0 I N d N
n
m N
0 0 .,
0 N
.I
4 a
a <
4 4
n
,
F
\c a
I h F - . 4 N
d - I
c
I N r, hi
a
a
r( 4
L
0, VI
0 r- e .o 0 d
d IQ
L
e D I D k D I U I4 Y
* 3 I a
a I Y 4 Y
c
03.4
II dd .,a
I1 NN r)H NN
oa
oa
r)
cn 0
0, ., 0
a
G 0 t 0 * 0 I (Y d N
-;. -.
.*
I
4Nm a00 It1 aoo -he aoo llt J " N
4*r) 4 w, N
aim 00 I1 c 1 00 cc 00 I ,I NN dr) NN
00 c-r- 00 If n(N Mr) -4N
N
i
I
! 1 I
. . - -.
c CA c - - P, 9 V"
I - - ,.: 0 .
N N
9
Q
0 N
m -
M 0
-8 f- N
m N
.+ ..I I 0 I- O I N 4 N
J 4 1 0 r- 0 I N 4 N
rg In
OD rn
L m In
OI rg
m m
.
0
W 9
-
N 0 I rl
(ID 0 I N H N
N 0 I 4
0) 0 I N rl N
0 m
..I *
L rl In
m
9 6 * In
L In r,
m
u9 6
.? 0 In
e u9
.I
m 0 I
r( (D 0 I N rl N
OD 0 1 rl m 0 I N I4 N
.? o m h 0 6
Q In
.
r, -8
N In 4
N r-
-
rl M I 4 W 0 I N rl N
4 4 I ..I m 0 I cy rl N
N 0)
J 0
.,
m 0 1 rl 0 0 I N 4 N
11
m/ mi
..I
0' 1
Ql
I d
I N 4 N ir ~r , I*
I
I
I
1
I
I
2 0 L: ii
c _. c - - N P) N"
c
)hCI
- $0.- )oL
I- 0
4
m
lo 9
m
0
m a
OD VI m * m
N 0 I N m 0 I N .4 N
N 0 I nl m 0 I N d N
4 r( e (n
.4 .o c 00 In
r, *
N N m
4 I-
.I
n 0 I N m 0 I N 4 N
In 0 I N m 0 I N .4 N
N N
0 4 rq
01 m
e
0
lo a
m cn .o
m .4 .4
.)
m 0 1 N m 0 I N d N
m 0 I N 00 0 I N
m
I- I- m
I- YI
m m
.I
m Y)
OD 0 ul
m I-
e
m
.4 0 t r(
(n 0 I N
4 N
.4 0 I d
(n 0 I N .4
h(
OD
(r e 0 N 10
r( 0 .4
.)
* a
m 4 m .,
OD N .4
* 0 I r( 0, 0 I N d N
4 0 I 4 m 0 I N d N
4 .4 m I- O OD
0 m
0
e
0, In 0
m m
m .
0
PI 0 I
r(
0, 0 I N
d N
I- O I 4
r), 0 I nl d
nl
UV
II ac
A; ma oc II NP dr NC d4.4
h(h((Y
I I
NN
I
.. NN
I
I i
Owner
City of Carlsbad
Assessment District No. 85-2
(College Boulevard)
Summary of Assessments by Owner
Community Resources Corporation
Huntington Beach Company
Kelly Property
Koll Company
Unsubdivided Parcels
Subdivided Lots
Total Koll Company
Palomar Land Group
Total Amount Assessed
Benefit Assessment Assessment
Zone As Estimated As Confirmed
2 3,048,305.00 2,404,240.60
1 1,270,500.00 1,054,355.01
3 10,350.00 8,363.28
4 6,356,910.00 5,450,798.38
5 520,090.00 462,246.37
6,877,000.00 5,913,044.75 .@?
6 255,845.00 190,246.36 z*18’
€7+@ 11,462,000.00 9,570,250.00 #
?
c
DIAGRAM
OF
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
CITY OF CARLISAD
SAM DIEOO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFOIIWIA
LOCATION 4 K€Y MAP
LIOT TO 6LUC
FILED IN WE OFFICE Of THE ClTl CLERK OF Ti€ CITl Of CARLISAD THlS - OA- Of , 1186.
ClTl CLERK Of THE CITT Of CARLSBW
RLCDROEO IN THE OFFICE OF TME SWERINTENDEMT or STREETS OF TME CITT of CULSBAD THIS - DAT or , 1116 I
c
SUPERINTENDENT Of STREETS Of THE ClTT Of CARLSBAD '
U ASSESSMEMT UAS LEVIED IT THE ClTl COUNCIL Of THE ClTT DF CARLSBAD 01 THE LOTS. PIECES AND PARCELS Of LAW SWWU OU TMIS ASSESS- MEYT DIALRU. SA10 ASSESSMENT YAS LLVIED ON THE - DAT Ot , I98bi SAID ASSESSMENT OIACUJI AND THE ASSESSMENT
ROLL WERE RECORDED IN THE OFFICE Of THE SUPEIINTENDfNT Of STREETS Df SAID CITT ON TnE OAT Of 1986. REfERENCE IS WE TO THE ASSESSMENT ROLL RECOIDED IN THE OfFlCL Of THE SUPERINTENOEHT Of STILET5 *OR TNL CXUT MOUNT & EACH
CITY CLERK Of TML CITT OF CARLIBAD
riLco inis - DAT Of , 1986, AT TMC HOU. Of - O'CLOCK -.m. IN DOQ - ot ucs O? AsscssMcNT DISTIICTS, CALL NDS. - THIOYLM -, AS INSTRULNT NO. , IN IME WflCE Of THE CRIIlT RECOIOEI Ot TML COWTl OF
SYI OIECO, STATL Of CALIFORNIA.
rtc:
RECMDER Or TMI COUNTT Or SLY OIL60
REFEnEYCE TWE SAN MfbO COUHTV ASSESSOR US FOR A mA.ILE0 OfSCllmOW OF PAREL LlyS AND -S SWEET I OF 9 SHEET6
LOO-0 1 I-oc
c
c DIAGRAM
'OF
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
CITT OF CARLSaAD
' SAN DlEOO COUNTV'. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
i
DIAGRAM
OF
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
CITT O? CARLSBAD
SAW DlLOO COUIITV. STATE OF CALICORWIA
Engineers Planners
A SANEERNARDINO SANDIEGO
CITY OF CARLSBAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD )
CONFIRMED
ENGINEER'S REPORT
March 25, 1986
Engineer of Work:
NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE INCORPORATED
Engineers -- Planners
Corona - Hemet - Palm Springs
Rancho California - San Bernardino - San Diego
California
NBS Project No. E68-015.009
AGENCY: CITY OF CARLSBAD
PROJECT: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
TO: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF CARLSBAD
ENGINEER'S REPORT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS
OF SECTION 10204 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
Pursuant to the provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913," being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code
of the State of California, and in accordance with the Resolution of Intention, being Resolution No. 8376, adopted by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CARLSBAD, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, in connection with the proceedings for
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"), I,
NORMAN A. NESTE, authorized representative of NESTE, BRUDIN &
STONE INCORPORATED the appointed ASSESSMENT ENGINEER, submit
herewith the Report for the Assessment District, consisting of five (5) parts as follows:
PART I
Plans and specifications for the proposed improvements are
filed herewith and made a part hereof. Said plans and speci- fications are on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
PART I1
An estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements, includ- ing incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith, is
as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
PART I11
A proposed assessment of the total amount of the costs and
expenses of the proposed improvements upon the several
subdivisions of land within the Assessment District, in
proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such
subdivisions, from said improvements, is set forth upon the
assessment roll filed herewith and made a part hereof.
Page 1 of 2
PART IV
A diagram showing the Assessment District, the boundaries and the dimensions of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District, as the same existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention, is filed herewith and made a part hereof, and part of the assessment.
PART V
Description of the work for the proposed improvements and description of all rights-of-way, easements and lands to be acquired, if necessary.
Dated this 17th day of January I 1986.
NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE INCORPORATED
i n G&
ASYSESSMENT ENGINEER
CITY OF CARLSBAD STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ON THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY , 1986.
/s/ Aletha L. Rautenkranz
CITY CLERK CITY OF CARLSBAD
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FINAL APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, ON THE Jd-sh DAY OF mahC/3 , 1986.
CITY CLERK I CITY OF CARLSBAD
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Page 2 of 2
c
r-
c
ENGINEER'S REPORT PART I
CITY OF CARLSBAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The plans and specifications for this Assessment District are
referenced herein and incorporated as if attached and a part
of this Report.
1-1
ENGINEER'S REPORT
PART I1
CITY OF CARLSBAD
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2 (COLLEGE BOULEVARD) c
COST ESTIMATE
Estimated Confirmed cost cost I. PUBLIC WORKS OF CONSTRUCTION
Construction Costs
Cost Estimate) (reference Exhibit "A" to $ 8,340,015 $ 7,079,036.3
$2-
Construction Contingency 834,000 744,200. 0Ow'
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS OF CONSTRUCTION $ 9,174,015 $ 7,823,236.31
11. RIGHT-OF-WAY $ O$ 0.00
111. PAYMENTS c
City of Carlsbad Costa Real Municipal Water District
San Diego Gas E, Electric Company
$ 9,000 $ 9,000.00
6,000 6,000 .OO
270,000 270,000.00
$ 285,000 $ 285,000.00 TOTAL PAYMENTS
IV. INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
Design and Construction Management Design and Design Surveys
Soils Construction Management, Bidding and Inspection
Plan Printing
Plan Check Fees
Assessment Engineering
Environmental Impact Report
Paleontology Study Bond Council Other Legal Printing, Publishing and Posting
Bond Registration and Paying Agent
Land Market Value Appraisal Cost of Issuance
City Administration Contingency
$ 210,500 $ 210,500.00
141,000 141,000.00
272,500
27,000
81,800
45,000
0
35,000
65,000 8,000 6,000
8,000
272,500.00
27,000.00
81,800.00
65,000.00
0.00 35,000.00
65,000.00
8,000.00 6,000.00
8,000.00
10,000.00
80,000.00
49,900.00
40,000.00
80,000
49,900
40,000
TOTAL INCIDENTAL EXPENSES $ 1,069,700 $ 1,099,700.00
11-1
c V. LESS CASH CONTRIBUTION
City of Carlsbad Traffic Signals
Effluent Disposal Line
Incidental Expense
TOTAL CASH CONTRIBUTION
VI. LESS INTEREST EARNED
DURING CONSTRUCTION
SUBTOTAL
VII. FINANCING COSTS
Bond Reserve and Discount
TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED
Estimated Confirmed
cost cost
$ 150,370 $ 127,100.00
309 , 793 281,720.00
6.000 0-00
$ 466,163 $ 408,820.00
$ 320,000 $ 281,600.00
$ 9,742,552 $8,517,516.31
$ 1,719,448 $1,052,733.69
$11,462,000 $9,570,250.00
11-2
4 4
cc
vl
vl
rr) ..
I
I 1
2 0 Y C u 3
(r c v) 2 0 u
u. 0
+*
AC Uv) CO ov c
tC Uv) tO av
** ++
A+ Uv) CO OU C
Ct nul 20 7V
99
I- u z 3
* c- H c 2 a 3 0
2 0 U t b U a W VI w a
SO UJO CZ U
._
o o ie o o 'o o o lo o 010 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'00 OIO 0 0!000~000~000~0 0.00 010 0 0'0 0 0 0 .I 0 *I 81 8 .I
!oodoo t3 4 '37 9
8,* .I. .I. .-a 0 *IO 0 010 0 0100 0 0 0 0 ow 9 wll- * w I** N 0%- u mio v) rtmm N o r(
0 *
..I qm-4 m * YIH c *
0 000 0 0 0Q0,000000~0 *I* 0 *I a -8 0 si N'O 0 N'O 0 0'0 0 0 0 I-I* em o o o ao m o *
u. a
000'00 000100 !. 8 .I.
0 or0 0 o!o 0 010 0 010 0 0010 ooio o ooo ooo 8 .I. 88. Si8 * *I8 . e 0 N,O, r-" I- N *I* Qlv) a v) 0 w a 0 0 * 9 0 0 m 0 **
IIu. -.I4 i* * c U 2 3
* c U c z U
¶ 0
2 0 U c
U
W
w 0
a
a
!oo,loo 010 0 010 *I ,I
VI I- N 9
NWlO o'w
0 010 0 010 *[e a N N10 * -1,
0'
v)
loll 00000 v)LnlnoLn mmmmm d.-I-+.-I4
.' a . . ..
>uuou
!u. 0
Y a
'* urxwu,
vowuur
Dc .I E
1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
MONS MAR ZSlr 1986~- 5:25 PH.--
,
- - _-__ ___ \I-- -
I I PuGrc UORK
SCHEDULE I -_
1 BID ITEMS 0
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT * COST COST * It COST ,
I _I
69
70
. 71 12
13 74 75 76
77
78 79
- I-
80 dl
82
. 83
a4
85
.-
a6 ~. a7
88
89
90
91 - 92
93 94
95
90 .- -
91
100
--- STORH DRAIN CLEANOUT T 0.
STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT T 0.
STDWH ORAIN.€LEANOUT.T 0, STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT 1 0.
STbRM DRAIN CLEANDUT TYPE 39 1.0 EA $59 300.00 S5r300- 00 S3r 900. cuza OUTLET TYPE A _______- 0 .-""-E OWt0 000,o OUTLET 033-3 OE 750.0 750.0 CONCRETE PIPE COLLAR (061 OE 225.0 225.0
CONCRETE PIPL COLLAR CO=r u 8SQ.O 4 89 -4 CONCRETE LUG 2.0 EA $710.00 tlr540.00 $450.
STRAIGHT HEADUALL TYPE B <D=18m) 3.0 EA $3.000.00 19r000.00 $1.300.
- - 0 00.
0 00 .
0 00. 00 s3r400. 00 $3.900. s1,300.0 $115.0 0
0 5150.0
0 $300_,9 00 $900.0
00 $39900.0
7
U TYPE tiEADUALL-<O=60"~
YING HEADUALL CD=18')
L TYPE hEADYALL CD=27*)
INLET APRON ABM APRON
RIP RAP ENERGY DLSSIPATOR 120.0 CY $75.00 S9r000.00 157.00
SLOPE ANCHOR (CCNCRETE-.ANCHORS 199,9 65030
PCC DITCH 500.0 $7.5 CONCRETE SPLASH YALL 600.0 115.0
._ PAVEHENT CUT OFF-WAL 380.0 ___I 225.0 Llr296.O BARRICADE TYPE M-9.1 48.0 LF $41.25 $19980.00 $27.00
CITY MONUMENTS 21.0 EA $230.00 $49830- 00 $430.00 $9.030.0 PRESSURE REDUCSNLJT
STREET LfGHTS PRESSURE REDUCING ST ?
TRENCH CTELCO) 1,945.0 LF $7.50 $37 o 87. so $4.00 119,780.0 T
_. MAIN TRENCH <EL?&&
TRENCH <GAS) 225.0 LF 17.50 $1 I 687 50 13.50
Ll5r600.00
2-5" ENCASED BURIEO ELECTRIC CONDUIT 3r520.0 LF $5.50 S19t360.00 $4.00 $1 49 080.00
1-2" 0 I R EC T BU RI ED_-ELE~REtO~D 1-3" DIRECT BURIED ELECTRIC CON0 1-4" DIRECT BURIED ELECTRIC CON0
- 1-5' DIRECT iiURIED~E~EC7~IC~OND
.z ,. - * -: .,-- .. .. .. . . .. , .. . _i -., . . ,. - ...,.
c
c
c
v) z IU t U
0 U m
*+
.Jl- Uv) CO
c ou
ct- HVI 20 3u
*+
1)+
Jl- *v) co DV b
-I-
..(- LO 3u
**
c U 2 a
b c L+ t z U 1 0
z 0 U c
U o u v) w 0
a
I. wo cz U
10 0 ,yo 0 0:o 0 0'0 0 m fo 0 of0 0 0 Ir- 0 0'0 0 0 '0 0 0 I
low 00 0 *~oooloo mw m*io 0 miwo OlO 0 00 0 01
0 00 0 0 0100 0.0 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 O(90 oio 0 0 0 0 01 e 9 VI e e 91 e 9 e 9 e** 9 e e 9 mi9 e eie e 9 e 9 vi
iammoooooooooml-oohlmhloooooooo Im rq 4- m oooo~oo YIC moI o 01 orno hm o NO 00
io 0 010 0 0 0 0 olo 0 m'o 0 P 0 0 Oi v\ 0'0 0 olo 0 0: IO 0 010 0 0 00 0'00 0 0 In w4 0 0 010 l- 0 0 0 ob 001
19 9 ala e 9 e e/* vi9 ai* el9 e eie e .:e 9 e ilr m a o o 0'00 010 o .* r( e Y o o m Y r) o o o No o 01 0 0 0 00 010 0 rq In e10 0 0.0 0
l-N LnN YY
e-
00- 0 0 m10 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 I e 9 *le 9 elm 9 ai. 9 e/* 9 era e 9 0 0 -80 0 0 0 VI YI Y) 0 m i0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 m.* 00 4 N mN 0 NplO 00 00
Q, Q do1 VI 01- e WIN 0 C,O Q, .C 4 0 0
0Oh9O-ia dOOj@OO'r(N PO0 m*m m a N.OI a e Y Y r(*Y n
e e e c -we e e,- e mi- LY+.L a
0 0 d 0 0 0 0 0 0'0 0 0 00- /(Vm 4llr 0 0 00 00 0 0'0 ON!O 0 0l-M 0 0 OOiQ 00' 9 9 .$e e. e el Id m *I* m 0'0 0 040 0 *I* rq Y,O m In e 4 m m 0 .* 0 0 01 e e 91. e ere e +le e eie e vie
jr(~)~~mwmooooo ~(LI ,a+m ~n~l-o*ooo~ w IYNv)of-amQ ,I lrqn)Y Ird* do01
io 0% lnj.0
jrqd Wj
r) m
m Q
.o hl m
r6 Y)
e
e
m
e
Q, t- rq
rq m m
Q Y
m
.
e
0 !: 10 I j
c. c
0 0
0 0 N
m
II) N *
-
0 0
0 H 0
D D *
*
D
m
4 4
U J
a U C > 1
e 3 L
1
1 3 >
3 4
2
c
3
J >
.A 4 t 0 c
f
L.. I 21
p!
vl N ..
In
.I -0
m r(
m . * N
Ly U E
2 0 X
-
i i
i
I
I
~
I
!
i , ..
u W id rn ia Q !
e?
Y
,-
.:.& ui :-.
.. c*
I - j aD mi
U
0 W m
I :i . .- ..i.." ., , 1 .. CA ;*>. .I ...... .* . . :
.- . &I
. o! . 3 I' c
. '_- r. c - __ . I I
P
..
A 4w
w -a ZA uo LV hW A U n
I
am
n
c c c-
omoooooooooooo ONOOOdIAOOO0000
*I* . .,a . . . . . . .
U
UI -I
0 u1 z u ul
a
a 0 u,
v) c u) 0 V
2 0 n c u 3
a. c m I ,
goo0
7 IAON
0 m
z 4 7
; j I c
2 -0 .Y c -0
L' 0
v) Y LT -0 3
V H A m .T3 a
H
ENGINEER'S REPORT PART I11
CITY OF CARLSBAD
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, on January 28, 1986, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, did, pursuant to the provisions of the
"Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and as
amended, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 8376, for the
construction of certain public improvements, together with
appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection therewith, in a special assessment district known and designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2 (COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and,
WHEREAS, said Resolution of Intention, as required by law, did direct the appointed Superintendent of Streets to make and file a "Report", consisting of the following:
a. Plans; b. Specifications;
c. Cost estimate;
d. Assessment Diagram showing the Assessment District and
the subdivisions of land contained therein;
e. A proposed assessment of the costs and expenses of the
works of improvement levied upon the parcels and lots of
land within the boundaries of the Assessment District.
For particulars, reference is made to the Resolution of
Intention as previously adopted.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, NOFWAN A. NESTE, authorized representative
of NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE INCORPORATED, the duly appointed
ASSESSMENT ENGINEER, pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement
Act of 1913", do hereby submit the following:
1. I, pursuant to the provisions of law and the Resolution of Intention, have assessed the costs and expenses of the works of improvement to be performed in the Assess- ment District upon the parcels of land in the Assessment
111-1
c
c
c
2.
District benefited thereby in direct proportion and
relation to the estimated benefits to be received by
each of said parcels. For particulars as to the identi-
fication of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is attached hereto.
As required by law, a Diagram is hereto attached, show- ing the Assessment District, as well as the boundaries of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said District as the same existed at the time of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots respectively have been given a separate number upon said
Diagram and in said Assessment Roll.
3. The subdivisions and parcels of land the numbers therein
as shown on the respective Assessment Diagram as
attached hereto correspond with the numbers as appearing
on the Assessment Roll as contained herein.
4. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that bonds will be issued in
accordance with Division 10 of the Streets and Highways
Code of the State of California (the "Improvement Bond
Act of 1915"), to represent all unpaid assessments, and
the last installment of said bonds shall mature a maxi-
mum of NINETEEN (19) YEARS from the 2nd day of September
next succeeding twelve (12) months from their date.
Said bonds shall bear interest at a rate not to exceed
the current legal maximum rate of 12% per annum.
5. By virtue of the authority contained in said "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", and by further direction and order of the legislative body, I hereby make the follow- ing Assessment to cover the costs and expenses of the
works of improvement for the Assessment District based
on the costs and expenses as set forth below:
111-2
Public Works of Construction:
Payments to Other Public
Agencies or Utilities:
Incidential Costs:
Cash Contributions:
Interest Earned During
Construction
Financing Costs:
Balance to Assessment:
AS
APPROVED PRELIMINARILY
$ 9,174,015.00
$ 285,000.00
$ 1,069,700.00
$ 466,163.00
$ 320,000.00
$ 1,719,448.00
$11,462,000.00
AS CONFIRMED
$7,823,236.31
$ 285,000.00
$1,099,700.00
$ 408,820.00
$ 281,600.00
$1,052,733.69
$9,750,250.00
For particulars as to the individual assessments and their descriptions, reference is made to the Exhibit attached
hereto.
6. The Method of Spread of Assessment is as set forth in
Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto, referenced and so
incorporated.
DATED: January 17, 1986
NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE INCORPORATED
-. NT ENGINEER CITY OF CARLSBAD
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
111-3
c E
I I
I I I
t L
4 C e
C
C
Y Y 0
Y
ne r)m II a 01 UN SO I1 UN 44 UN
CA < i m -
m 0 9 .+ N
0 .
0 a ul -8 m .r In In N
m 0 1 0 N 0 1 N d N
m 0 I 0 N 0 I N rl N
c
.
0, m
0 c a * 0 *
e e
m
e 0 I 0 c 0 I N d N
3 I
3 I Y
r( Y
a c
000 11 I I 000 hcC 00 I1 " dd
m ..' 0 d f * m OI' 4 I * N I a 4 L
z 0 L I
.I
I '-_
D I N 4
N N w 0 m . 0 N
rl m 0 4 Ir N e m N
* d I 0 + 0 I N rl N
* rl I 0 I- 0 I N rl ry
* In
0 011 m
Y)
In
e m
OI .a w m 011 0
m
Y)
L
N 0 I rl 011 0 I N d N
hl 0 I 4 m 0 I N d N
0
0
r(
d
rl In
m
m
e
0 - 0 0 N 0 * -4
.
m 0 I r( m 0 I N rl N
IJl 0 I r( m 0 I N
4 hl
.a 6
0 * In m e In r,
In 0,
0 IJl
r- In
e
a0 0 1 rl m 0 I N 4 N
011 0 I 4 m 0 I N rl N
'0 *
I- O m
a In
e
r, r,
N In rl
N b
e
rl rl I d m 0 I N d N
d 4 I r( OD 0 I N 4 N
m
m m
c- *
e
m J
L
IA 6
m N m
N e
.
e
* rl I d m 0 I N 4 N
4 r4 I r4 m 0 I N 4 N
(D 0
rl
I H 00 0 I N * N
dd NO I1
c
c
, U
2 0' =, i
N N * 0 .+ -a
o, 0
0
-a rg * m cn -a
m d *
.
OD 0 I N OD 0 I N * N
m 0 I N 0 0 I N
9-4 N
m m
f- I- o,
r- IC)
c
6 a
0 0 m
m f-
a .
d 0 I r4 o, 0 I N d N
m
* *
N N m
J r-
.,
IC) 0 I N OD 0 t N r4 N
m 0 1 N m 0 I N 4 N
_-
OD e
OD In m c -e OD
N 0 I N
(0 0 I N d N
N 0 I N m 0 I N * N
I
c .. . +ma ooc Ill d*.. em0 ooc I 'I I NY~ e*-
iN
ooc Ill *dC o,mo ooc I 'I I N In) e **- n( iN e
0 3 a 01 o, r4 J
c 0' c
I
I Y * N
* N
I a - E
I
c
- 2 0
=I ,
I
I, as CITY CLERK of the CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALI eby certify that the fore-
going Assessment, together with -the Diagram attached thereto, -
was filed in my office on the 2& +b day of IfAuuaf;!,o 1986.
CITY CLERK A
CITY OF CARLSBAD
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
v
I, , as CITY CLERK of the CITY OF 14reby certify that the fore-
going Assessment , together with’ the- Diagram -attached thereto,
was approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City
on the 2zsct* day of )Tmc~ , 1986.
CITY CLERK
CITY OF CARLSBAD STATE OF CALIFORNIA
I, &/v ~Of9A/~dMd , as SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS of the CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Assessment, together with the Dia r attached thereto, was recorded in my office on the day of -6 , 1986.
,$?E@
S~PERINTENDE~ STREETS CITY OF CARLSBAD STATE OF CALIFORNIA
111-4
ENGINEER'S REPORT
PART I11
CITY OF CARLSBAD
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD) EXHIBIT "A"
METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
The law requires and the statutes provide that assessments,
as levied pursuant to the provisions of the "Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913,'' must be based on the benefit that
the properties receive from the works of improvement. The
statute does not specify the method of formula that should be
used in any special assessment district proceedings. The
responsibility rests with the Assessment Engineer, who is
retained for the purpose of making an analysis of the facts
and determining the correct apportionment of the assessment
obligation. For these proceedings, the City has retained the
services of Neste, Brudin & Stone Incorporated. See
Attachment I for a statement of their qualifications and
experience.
The Assessment Engineer then makes his recommendation at the
public hearing on the Assessment District, and the final
authority and action rests with the City after hearing all
testimony and evidence presented at that public hearing.
Upon the conclusion of the public hearing, the City must make
the final decision in determining whether or not the assess-
ment spread has been made in direct proportion to the benefits received.
Analvs i s
City of Carlsbad policy Statement No. 33, effective May 29,
1984 sets the policy for use of Assessment Districts to
finance Public Improvements. The improvements include arterial streets identified on the circulation element of the
Carlsbad General Plan. It further permits certain improve-
ments within the arterial street right-of-ways to be financed
and to include, sewers, water lines, drainage and public
utilities.
The arterial street to be constructed and financed by this
assessment district is College Boulevard from El Camino Real to Palomar Airport Road. This street permits only limited access to adjoining property and in general point access is limited at 1300 feet intervals.
The City Council and Planning Commission have given approval to several final subdivision maps, tentative maps, general plan amendments within the boundaries of the Assessment
District. These approvals incorporate approximately 81.3% of
A- 1
c
c
c
c
I
c
c
c
c
the land area of the assessment district. Specific
conditions for approval of the above planned projects are
found to be similar for the total area. The similarities
are :
1. Full width right-of-way and full width improvement of
the arterial road through the subdivision in accordance with city standards, including median island is
required.
2. Full width right-of-way, full width grading and half
width improvement (excluding sidewalks and median
landscape treatment) of the arterial road from the
subdivision boundary to an existing arterial road is
required.
3. Drainage facilities for the protection of the arterial
roads are required.
A Public Facilities Fee is collected and a portion of said
fee is used to finance specifically designated traffic
signals.
The City will pay for the following improvements.
1. Traffic signal at the intersection of El Camino Real
with College Boulevard and Palomar Airport Road with College Boulevard (Public Facilities Fund).
2. Effluent disposal line in College Boulevard (Capital Improvement Program).
Benefits and Assessment Criteria
Where area is used to determine an assessment, the area of
any prime and major arterial right-of-way, either existing or proposed has been subtracted from gross area for any given
parcel of land. In addition, dedicated open space and land
anticipated to be used for public purposes has been
deducted from gross area.
Direct benefits will accrue to the lands within the
assessment district by the construction of improvements to
College Boulevard consisting of; grading, base material, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, landscaping, median improvements and appurtenant work; water,
sewer and drainage; and public utilities consisting of gas,
telephone and electrical.
College Boulevard traverses through the assessment district
and crosses the three major land ownerships of the Huntington Beach Company, Community Resources Corporation and the Koll
Company. Each of the major owners in the development of
their property are required as a condition of subdivision
A- 2
approval'to make the improvement to College Boulevard as it
passes through their property. As a part of the assessment
district financing each of the major owners have selected
certain improvements to be installed within College Boulevard
as it passes through their respective properties such as permanent landscaping versus erosion control measures. Therefore, since each owner is required to construct College Boulevard, the cost of those improvements to the street as said street passes through the individual properties, has been assessed to those individual properties adjacent thereto. There are certain improvements constructed within El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road that provide for the
transition of traffic lanes and minor street improvements to
facilitate the traffic flow from those two streets onto
College Boulevard. In addition, there is a relocation of a
major water line that crosses College Boulevard that provides
the main source of water supply to the lands in the
assessment district. The cost of the relocation of this
water line and the transitional facilities on El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road have been assessed to all three
major owners in proportion to the length of College Boulevard passing through their respective properties.
Payments to public agencies and utilities have been assessed to all three major owners in proportion to the length of
College Boulevard passing through their respective
properties.
Carlsbad Airport Centre, in the development of their property
and through the construction of College Boulevard also provide ingress and egress to two other smaller ownerships and these two ownerships receive direct benefit by the
construction of College Boulevard. Therefore, a portion of
the cost of those improvements which have been assessed to
the Carlsbad Airport Centre have further been distributed to
two additional properties in proportion to the benefits that
each property receives.
Carlsbad Pacific Business Center owns property within two areas which receive different direct benefits;
1) undeveloped area adjacent to College Boulevard
2) subdivided parcels which access College Boulevard for
ingress and egress
Therefore, a portion of the cost of those improvements which
have been assessed to the Carlsbad Pacific Business Center have been distributed to the two areas in proportion to the
benefits that each area receives.
Benefit zones have been established for properties with similar benefits and are as follows:
A- 3
c
c
c
Benefit Zones
6
Owner
Huntington Beach Company Carlsbad Airport Centre Robert P. Kelly Carlsbad Pacific Business Center Carlsbad Pacific Business Center
Palomar Land Group Limited
(subdivided parcels)
Incidental expenses and interest earned during construction
were prorated to each of the benefits in accordance with each benefit’s share of the total construction costs.
Financing costs were prorated to each of the benefits in
accordance with each benefit’s share of the total construc-
tion, utility payment and incidental costs.
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the assessments for the
above-referenced Assessment District have been spread in direct proportion with the benefits that each parcel receives
from the works of improvement.
DATED : January 17 , 1986
c
NESTE, BRUDIN & STONE INCORPORATED
QbL ‘“ASSESSMENT EN~NEER CITY OF CARLSBAD STATE OF CALIFORNIA
c
c A- 4
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
ATTACHMENT I TO EXHIBIT "A"
NESTE, BRUDIN 6 STONE INCORPORATED
STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
Construction Number Project Title
Project Contract of and
Client cost Date Parcels Design Features
BALDY MESA COUNTY WATER
DISTRICT
Eugene Alexander
General Manager
619/244-9111
BIG BEAR LAKE, CITY OF
Robert Van Nort
General Manager
714/866-5831
$ 3,000,000 1982 1,047 AD 1 Water System: 2 MG water storage
tank; 168,600 LF 6"-10" water lines;
fire hydrants.
3,000,000 1985
1,000,000 1984
1,000,000 1984
2,465,400 1982
3,460,500 1982
1,000 AD 18-84 and 18-85 Street Improvements,
Subareas 1 through 9: 20,000 LF
asphalt concrete paving, grading and
appurtenant drainage structures
35 AD 17 Public Works Improvements: 2,000
LF 8" sewer lines; 7,000 LF 8" water
main; 3/4-mile street and storm
drainage improvements; appurtenances.
75 AD 16 Public Works Improvements: 6,500
LF 8" sewer lines; 5,500 LF 6"-12"
water mains; hydropneumatic booster
station; 1.5 miles street and storm
drainage improvements; appurtenances.
652 AD 15 Sewer System: 21,400 LF 8"-10"
sewer lines; 4,650 LF 4"-6" laterals; 2
lift stations.
AD 14 Sewer System: 49,600 LF 8"-10"
sewer lines; 11,300 LF 4"-6" laterals; 345
lift station.
Construction Number Project Title
Project Contract of and
Client cost Date Parcels Design Features
BIG BEAR LAKE SANITATION
DISTRICT* $ 1,621,000 1975 2,040
466,000 1974 380
448,000 1974 363
357,000 1973 342
488,498 1966 656
167,231 1964 220
46,834 1963 45
197,000 1962 N/A
48,000 1962 N/A
*System conveyed to City of Big Bear Lake, upon incorporation, in 1981.
AD 10 Sewer System:
sewer lines; 22,400 LF 4" laterals.
103,700 LF 6"-15"
AD 13 Sewer System: 26,600 LF 6"-8"
sewer lines; 3,100 LF 4" laterals.
AD 12 Sewer System:
sewer lines; 4,300 LF 4" laterals.
25,000 LF 6"-8"
AD 11 Sewer System: 26,050 LF 6"-10"
sewer lines; 4,300 LF 4" laterals.
AD 9 Sewer System:
sewer lines; 10,796 LF 4"-6" laterals;
2 lift stations.
43,235 LF 8"-12"
AD 8 Sewer System: 14,112 LF 4"-18"
sewer lines; 1,237 LF 6" force main;
lift station.
AD 7 Sewer System:
sewer lines; 26,760 SF asphalt pavement
rep lacement.
4,965 LF 6"-8"
AD 5 Sewer System:
sewer lines; 9,000 SF asphalt pavement
12,875 LF 3"-10"
replacement; 1 sewage lift station.
AD-6 Sewer System: 12,378 LF 6"-12"
sewer lines; 1,456 LF 4"-6" sewer
laterals; 31,510 SF asphalt pavement
replacement; 1 sewage lift station.
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I --
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1
Construction Number Project Title
Project Contract of and
Client cost Date Parcels Design Features
CARLSBAD, CITY OF
Gene Donovan
City Engineer
6191438-5596
$ 5,120,000 Not 21 AD 86-1 Palomar Airport Road: Street
Applicable improvements to Palomar Airport Road
(126' wide), approximately 1.0 mile,
including water, drainage, telephone,
gas and electric (1931 Act only),
(assessment engineering only).
11,462,000 1986
15,772,400 Not
Applicable
65 AD 85-2 College Boulevard: Street
improvements to College Boulevard
(102' wide), approximately 1.9 miles,
including water, sewer, drainage,
telephone, gas, electric, and
cable TV, (assessment engineering
only).
126 AD 85-1 Cannon Road: Street improve-
ments to Cannon Road, (102' wide),
approximately 2.9 miles, including
water, drainage, telephone, gas and
electric, and sewerage system
improvements, including pump station,
force main and 43,355 LF of 8"-36"
sewer line (1931 Act only),
(assessment engineering only).
I
Construction Number Project Title
Project Contract of and
Client cost Date Parcels Design Features
CHINO, CITY OF
Ray Wellington
Director of
Pub 1 ic Works
7 141627-7577
COLTON, CITY OF
Phil Elliott
City Manager
714/370-5051
CORONA, CITY OF
Jim Wheaton
City Manager
714/736-2374
I I I
$36,850,000 Not Not Preliminary Assessment District
Applicable Applicable Study (Southerly Industrial Area):
Preliminary evaulation of the major
public facility needs (backbone street,
water, sewer, industrial waste, and
storm drain improvements), costs
associated with the provision of those
improvements and funding methodologies
available to secure implementation of
the improvements for the development of
approximately 2,500 acres for
industrial use (study only).
2,500,000
36,000
16,998,000
I I I
1980
1976
215 AD 1978-2 Public Works Improvements:
Wastewater collection; water trans-
mission; street improvements; flood
control and drainage; and other general
improvement facilities (assessment
engineering only).
48 AD 1975-1 Sewer System: 1,000 LF 8"
sewer lines; 320 LF 6" laterals
(assessment engineering only).
Not Not Sierra Del Oro Community Facilities
Ava ilab le Availab le District (Mello-Roos): 1,500-acre
residential and neighborhood commercial
development, including park site and
improvements; fire station; water
reservoir; water filtration plant; and
wastewater treatment capacity (assess-
ment engineering only).
I I I I I I T-A
I I I I I I
1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
Construction Number Project Title
Project Contract of and
Client cost Date Parcels Design Features
CORONA, CITY OF
(continued)
$ 570,000 1984-85 14,187 Maintenance District No. 84-1, Street
Lighting: Ordinary and usual mainte-
nance, operation, and servicing for
city-wide street lighting system and
conversion to high-pressure sodium
lighting (assessment engineering only).
5,000
297,000
54,700,000
1984-85
1985
1985
9 Maintenance District No. 84-2, Land-
scaping: Landscaping maintenance for
various subdivided tracts.
2 Assessment District No. 84-1, Public
Works Improvements: Buy-in in for two
excluded parcels of AD 79-2 for water,
sewer, flood control, street, and
other public works improvements.
121 AD 79-2 Public Works Improvements,
1.460-Acre Residential. Commercial. and
Industrial Land Development: 56,200 LF
12"-30" water lines, 3 MG and 4 MG
buried concrete reservoirs, and 2,000
gpm water booster station; 46,000 LF
6"-18" sewer lines, 800 LF 4"-6"
laterals, chimney laterals, and
wastewater pump stations (2 MGD, 264
gpm, 120 gpm); 21,900 LF 8'x5' box
culverts, 1500 LF 8'x4' box culverts, 5
storm drain and 2 pipeline connections
to Arlington Flood Control Channel,
transition structures, concrete-lined
channels, and graded (earth diversion
channels; 5 miles of major and
i
Construction Number Project Title
Project Contract of and
Client cost Date Parcels Design Features
CORONA, CITY OF
(continued)
$10,000,000
903,000
CRESTLINE SANITATION DISTRICT $ 381,000
Tom Sutton
General Manager
714/538-1751 328,000
369,000
442,000
623,000
557,000
I I I 1 i I
1981
1980
1976
1976
1976
1976
1975
1975
secondary streets, new bridges over
Riverside Freeway 91 and AT&SF
Railroad, 2 freeway access ramps,
widening 2 bridges over Arlington Flood
Control Channel, and widening an
existing railroad grade crossing; and
underground telephone, gas, and
electric facilities in all streets and
hookups to existing facilities.
108 AD 80-1 Sewer System: capacity rights
to Santa Ana Regional Interceptor
(assessment engineering only).
101 AD 79-1, Fire Station No. 4: Con-
struction of 4-bay fire station.
23 1 AD 12 Sewer System: 16,550 LF 6"-8"
sewer lines; 1,455 LF 4" laterals.
187 AD 11 Sewer System: 13,900 LF 6"-8"
sewer lines; 1,576 LF 4" laterals.
188 AD 10 Sewer System: 14,355 LF 6"-8"
sewer lines; 2,325 LF 4" laterals.
210 AD 9 Sewer System: 17,409 LF 6"-8"
sewer lines; 2,460 LF 4" laterals.
379 AD 8 Sewer System: 28,217 LF 6"-8"
sewer lines; 1,947 LF 4" laterals.
364 AD 6 Sewer System: 25,736 LF 6"-8"
sewer lines; 3,276 LF 4" laterals.
I I I I t 1 T-h
1 I I I I I
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1
Construction Number Project Title
Project Contract of and
Client cost Date Parcels Design Features
CRESTLINE SANITATION DISTRICT $ 1,203,867 1973
(continued)
572,000 1967
DESERT HOT SPRINGS COUNTY
WATER DISTRICT
Richard Dippner
General Manager
619/329-6498
604,512 1967
687,000 1967
800,000 1985
650,000 1984
460,000 1982
350,000 1982
1,639,000 1977
914,000 1972
480 AD 5 Sewer System: 86,290 LF 8"-12"
sewer lines; 12,840 LF 4"-6" laterals.
523 AD 4 Sewer System: 37,559 LF 8"-10"
sewer lines; 6,176 LF 4" laterals.
524 AD 3 Sewer System: 34,924 LF 6"-8"
sewer lines; 4,056 LF 4"-6" laterals.
551 AD 2 Sewer System: 42,543 LF sewer
lines; 5',289 LF 4"-6" laterals; pump
stat ion.
111 AD 8 Sewer System: Planning stage.
160 AD 7 Sewer System: 7,290 LF 8" sewer
lines; 5,240 LF 4" laterals.
165 AD 5 Water System: 11,410 LF 16" water
lines.
102 AD 4 Sewer System: 3,975 LF 8" sewer
lines; 3,375 LF 4" laterals.
2,103 AD 3 Sewer System: 43,000 LF 8"-10"
sewer lines; 51,821 LF 4"-6" laterals.
877 AD 1 Sewer System: 48,515 LF 8"-15"
sewer lines; 28,774 LF 4"-6" laterals.
Construction Number Project Title
Project Contract of and
Client cost Date Parcels Design Features
ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTRICT $ 373,900 1984
Jim Laughlin
General Manager
714/674-3146
ESCONDIDO, CITY OF
Dennis Wilson
Public Works Direct or
6 19/ 74 1-465 1
I I I 1 I I
102,300 1984-85
8,326,000 1983
116 AD 84-1 Sewer and Water Systems:
Capacity rights for conveyance,.
treatment, and disposal of wastewater
and storage of water for domestic use
and fire protection (assessment
engineering only).
20 Maintenance District No. 1, Reidy
Creek: irrigation system for 4,150 LF
environmental channel; 50,000 SF
aquatic landscaping; 470,000 SF
riparian landscaping; 340,000 SF upland
landscaping.
I I I I I 1 rn
45 AD 2-1980 Public Works Improvements,
145-Acre Land Development: 7,800-LF
8"-24" sewer lines; 12,800 LF 8"-12"
water lines, including 6 connections to
existing lines; 415O'x115'x15'
environmental channel, 3,800 LF 18"-48"
storm drainage pipelines, 900 LF
7'~6'-12'xlO' box culverts, and 2,000
LF 24"x12" concrete brow ditch; 2 miles
of streets and intersection
improvements; and underground
telephone, cable TV, gas and electric
facilities (assessment engineering
only).
1 I I I I I
1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '- '1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1
Construction Number Project Title
Project Contract of and
Client cost Date Parcels Design Features
ESCONDIDO, CITY OF
(continued)
HEMET, CITY OF
Lyle Alberg
City Manager
714/658-9411
$ 73,000 1973 13
70,000 1971
128,000 1970
209,000 1969
111,000 1969
149,150 1967
N/A
N /A
N /A
N/A
34
AD 1-1971 Street Improvements: 1.25
miles street improvements, 13,753 LF
curbs and gutters; 2,856 LF 8" sewer
lines; 3,637 LF 8" water lines; 2,808
LF 18"-48" storm drain; 18 fire
hydrants; sidewalks and driveways.
AD 4-1970 Street Improvements: 0.5
miles street improvements, 2,701 LF
curbs and gutters; fire hydrants.
AD 1-1964 Sewer System: 6,994 LF
8"-15" sewer lines.
AD 1-1968 Street Improvements: 1.9
miles street improvements, 10,218 LF
curbs and gutters; 83 LF 18" storm
drain; sidewalks.
AD 2-1968 Street Improvements: 0.8
miles street improvements, 4,310 LF
curbs and gutters; 862 LF 8" sewer
lines; 2,114 LF 6" water lines; water
lines; 143 LF storm drain.
AD 64-3 Public Works Improvements:
2,941 LF 4"-8" sewer lines; 4,518 4"-8"
water mains; fire hydrants, service
lines, meter boxes; 37,906 SF driveway
approaches, sidewalks, cross gutters;
7,528 LF curbs and gutters; 236 LF
drainage box culvert and asphalt lined
drainage ditch; street paving, street
name and warning signs; appurtenances.
Construction Number Project Title
Project Contract of and
Client cost Date Parcels Design Features
HEMET, CITY OF
(continued)
LAKE ARROWHEAD SANITATION
DISTRICT
Don Mauk
Manager, LACSD
714/337-6141
I I 1 I I I
$ 259,382 1966
253,860 1965
174,332 1965
1,119,000 1983
608,000 1975
864,000 1975
162 AD 64-2 Public Works Improvements:
6,934 LF 4"-10" sewer lines; 9,797 LF
6"-10" water mains; fire hydrants,
service lines, meter boxes; 126,325 SF
driveway and alley approaches,
sidewalks, cross gutters; 23,467 curbs,
gutters, and storm drains; street
paving; appurtenances.
125 AD 64-4 Public Works Improvements:
7,938 LF 4"-10" sewer lines; 45 LF 8"
water main; 61,676 SF driveway
approaches, sidewalks, cross gutters;
18,578 LF curbs and gutters; street
paving; appurtenances.
122 AD 64-1 Public Works Improvements:
10,300 LF 4"-8" sewer lines: 4.040 LF
54
456
568
I I I I I I - .^
,- 6"-10" water mains; 42,500 SF driveway
approaches, sidewalks, cross gutters;
8,420 LF curbs and gutters; street
paving, street name and warning signs;
appurtenances.
AD 8 Sewer System:
lines; 800 LF 6" force main; pump
stat ion.
27,000 LF 8" sewer
AD 6 Sewer System:
sewer lines; 2,950 LF 4" laterals.
28,834 LF 6"-8"
AD 3 Sewer System:
sewer lines; 5,200 LF 4" laterals; 2
35,370 LF 3"-8"
lift stations.
I I I I I I I
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - -1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1
Construction Number Project Title
Project Contract of and
Client cost Date Parcels Design Features
LAKE ARROWHEAD SANITATION $ 421,000 1974
DISTRICT (continued)
477,552 1967
400,000 1965
LAKE HEMET MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTRICT
Leonard Hale
General Manger
714/658-3241
300,000
153,000
201,000
197,000
234,000
149,000
1969
1969
1968
1967
1966
1965
349
435
205
38 1
230
456
501
571
404
AD 5 Sewer System: 19,472 LF 6"-8"
sewer lines; 2,640 LF 4" laterals.
AD 2 Sewer System: 34,787 LF 6"-8"
sewer lines; 3,451 LF 4"-6" laterals.
AD 65-1 Sewer System: 16,622 LF 8"
sewer lines; 20 LF 4"-6" laterals;
11,400 LF pavement replacement;
appurtenances.
AD 69-1 Sewer System:
sewer lines.
40,996 LF 4"-8"
AD 68-1 Sewer System: 23,468 LF 4"-8"
sewer lines.
AD 65-2 Sewer System:
sewer lines.
39,952 LF 4"-8"
AD 66-1 Sewer System: 38,222 LF 6"-8"
sewer lines.
AD 65-1 Sewer System: 44,473 LF 6"-8"
sewer lines.
AD 64-1 Sewer System:
sewer lines.
31,754 LF 6"-8"
Construction Number Project Title
Project Contract of and
Client cost Date Parcels Design Features
LOMA LINDA SANITATION
DISTRICT
City of Loma Linda
City Engineer
714/796-2531
PERRIS, CITY OF
Robert Briscoe
City Manager
714/657-5115
PLACER, COUNTY OF
Public Works Director
916/823-4515
RAMONA MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT
John Stratford
General Manager
6 19/789-1330
I I I
$ 170,000 1967 437 AD 67-1 Sewer System: 20,912 LF 8"-12"
sewer lines; 5,968 LF 4"-6" laterals.
N /A 1966
17,350
1,085,000
I I I
516,900
680,000
I
1984-85
1975
1984
1983
I
N/A AD 66-1 Sewer System: 6,526 LF 8"
sewer line; 155 LF 4"-6" laterals;
7,452 LF pavement replacement;
appurtenances.
403 Maintenance District 84-1, Street
Lighting: Ordinary and usual mainte-
nance, operation, and servicing of 79
street lights, 9,400-22,000 lumens;
fiscal year 1984-85 (cost estimating,
assessment engineering only).
240 AD A-83 Public Works Improvements:
13,453 LF 6"-8" sewer lines; 12,217 LF
4"-12" water lines; 791 LF 18"x40"~33"
drain pipe; 5,085 LF 6" subdrain pipe;
16 fire hydrants.
18 AD 83-1 Water System: 9,300 LF 10"
water line (assessment engineering
only).
163 AD 82-1 Sewer System: 11,599 LF 8"
sewer line; 138 laterals; payment
dwelling unit equivalent charges
(assessment engineering only).
I I I I I I I
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . '1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I
Construction Number Project Title
Project Contract of and
Client cost Date Parcels Design Features
RENO, CITY OF $ 3,860,700 1985
Robert Jackson
Public Works Director
702/785-2020
RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF
Ivan Tennant
Road Commissioner
714/787-2434
RUBIDOUX COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
Hank Snyder
General Manager
7141684-7580
930,065 1985
675,707 1969
186,000 1968
RUNNING SPRINGS WATER DISTRICT $ 1,030,000 1974
Jim Towns
General Manager
714/867-2766 667,000 1974
385,000 1972
619,000 1972
155 AD 1984-2 Street Improvements:
Downtown redevelopment project,
planning stage (assessment engineering
only).
24 AD 149 (San Sevaine Way) Street
Improvements: Extension, widening
and/or modifications to San Sevaine Way
(88' wide), approximately 1.0 mile,
and Bain Street (75' wide), approx-
imately 0.30 mile (assessment
engineering only).
2,937 AD 130 Gas Pipe, Mead Valley: 168,960
LF 2"-4" natural gas pipeline.
327 AD 5 Sewer System: 21,093 LF 4"-8"
sewer lines; 643 LF 4" force main; lift
stat ion.
540 AD 7 Sewer System: 65,200 LF 6"-8"
sewer lines; 11,700 LF 4" laterals.
625 AD 6 Sewer System: 47,200 LF 3"-8"
sewer lines; 7,000 LF 4" laterals.
56 1 AD 5 Sewer System: 26,600 LF 6"-8"
sewer lines; 6,350 LF 4"-6" laterals,
631 AD 4 Sewer System: 48,221 LF 6"-10"
sewer lines; 9,871 LF 4"-6" laterals.
Construction Number Project Title
Project Contract of and
Client Cost Date Parcels Design Features
RUNNING SPRINGS WATER DISTRICT $ 356,000 1971
(continued)
SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF
Roger Hardgrave
Public Works Director
714/383-5025
SAN BERNARDINO, COUNTY OF
Regional Manager
Dick Ricker, Chino Valley
714/988-1542
362,000 1970
378,000 1970
3,000,000 1980
30,000,000 1986
458 AD 3 Sewer System: 28,064 LF 6"-8"
sewer lines; 4,371 LF 4" laterals.
507 AD 2 Sewer System: 33,992 LF 4"-8"
sewer lines.
472 AD 1 Sewer System: 35,230 LF 4"-8"
sewer lines; 547 LF 4" force main.
200 AD 5861 Public Works Improvements,
200-Lot Low-Cost Housing Project:
sewer and water lines; flood control
and drainage; street improvements; and
underground utilities (assessment
engineering only).
I I I I 1 I I I I I I I
-F .I
1,233 AD 86-1 Public Works Improvements,
5,750-Acre Chino Hills Residential,
Commercial. and Industrial DeveloDment:
Wastewater collection, water,
transmission; flood control and
drainage; streets; and other general
and other general improvement
facilities. (The second in a series of
assessment districts, Mello-Roos
Community Services District, and
utility revenue districts to fund the
construction of over $220 million in
public works improvements).
I I 1 I I 1 I
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . -1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Construction Number Project Title
Project Contract of and
Client cost Date Parcels Design Features
SAN BERNARDINO, COUNTY OF $41,900,000 1985
(continued)
SAN JACINTO, CITY OF
Ross Namar
City Manager
714/654-7337
273,000
185,000
1966
1966
222 AD 85-1 Public Works Improvements,
6,700-Acre Chino Hills Residential,
Commercial, and Industrial Development:
Wastewater collection, treatment and
reclamation; water supply storage and
transmission; fire protection; flood
control and drainage; streets and
highways; parks and public buildings;
and other general improvement
facilities. (The first of a series of
assessment districts, Mello-Roos
Community Services Districts, and
utility revenue districts to fund the
construction of over $220 million in
public works improvements).
284 AD 65-3 Street Improvements: 2.0 miles
street improvements, 18,565 LF curbs
and gutters; 10,873 LF 4"-8" sewer
lines; 824 LF 4"-10" water lines; 8
fire hydrants.
247 AD 65-2 Street Improvements: 1.9 miles
street improvements, 14,786 LF curbs
and gutters; 10,183 LF 4"-8" sewer
lines; 4,785 LF 4"-6" water lines;
2,382 LF copper service lines, 2,313 LF
3/4"-1" polyethylene pipe; driveways,
alley aprons, sidewalks.
1-15
Construction Number Project Title
Project Contract of and
Client cost Date Parcels Design Features
SAN JACINTO, CITY OF
(continued)
SAN MARCOS COUNTY
WATER DISTRICT
Bill Rucker
General Manager
619/744-0460
I I I
$ 275,000 1965 454
7 1,000
3,400,000
2,212,582
644,700
2 , 300,000
1964
1981
1978
1978
1976
160
232
78
28
57
i I I I I I I 1 L T-1 h
AD 65-1 Street Improvements: 2.7 miles
street improvements, 21,511 LF curbs
and gutters; 14,452 LF 4"-10" sewer
lines; 2,390 LF 4"-6" water lines,
2,378 LF 3/4"-1" copper service lines; 5 fire hydrants; driveways, alley
aprons, sidewalks.
AD 64-1 Street Improvements: 1.25
miles street improvements, 8,392 LF
curbs and gutters; 7,096 LF sewer
lines.
AD 76-2 Water System:
51,000 LF 6"-12" water lines; pumping
and chlorination facilities; 33 fire
hydrants.
4 MG steel tank;
AD 76-3 Water System: 2.75 MG steel
tank; 17,677 LF 16"-30" water lines;
chlorination facility; pressure
reducing and metering stations.
AD 76-1 Water System:
tank; 3,740 LF 24" water lines;
metering and telemetry stations.
1.0 MG steel
AD 75-1 Water System: Two 1.25 MG
steel tanks; 48,031 LF 8"-18" water
lines; pump and cathodic test stations.
I I I I I I
I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 --.-- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
Construction Number Pro j ect Tit le
Project Contract of and
Client cost Date Parcels Design Features
SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
John Schulte
Manager-Engineer
714/676-2646
VALLEY CENTER MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTRICT
John Hennigar
General Manager
619/749-1600
YUCAIPA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
Ed Magyar
General Manager
714/797-5117
$ 1,848,700 1985 289
933,000 1978
3,000,100 1986
3 , 800,000 1986
2 800,000 1986
3,400,000 1986
4 050,000 1986
3,430 000 1986
11
508
779
399
698
1,209
757
AD 85-1 Street Improvements: 0.6 miles
of improvements to existing 22'.wide
paved road; 4.8 miles of new 22' wide
paved road; 1.4 miles of new 16' wide
paved road (assessment engineer,
design, survey and construction
management).
AD 78-1 Water System: 1.0 MG water
tank; 12,060 LF 8"-16" water lines;
pump station modifications.
AD 9 Sewer System:
lines; 12,500 LF 4"-6" laterals.
47,000 LF 8" sewer
AD 8 Sewer System: 60,000 LF 8" sewer
lines; 18,000 LF 4"-6" laterals.
AD 6 Sewer System: 45,300 LF 8" sewer
lines; 12,000 LF 4"-6" laterals.
AD 5 Sewer System: 53,000 LF 8" sewer
lines; 15,000 LF 4" laterals.
AD 3 Sewer System:
lines; 28,600 LF 4"-6" laterals.
55,500 LF 8"-10"
AD 11 Sewer System: 53,600 LF 8" sewer
lines; 18,500 4"-6" laterals.
Construct ion Number Project Tit le
Project Contract of and
Client cost Date Parcels Design Features
YUCAIPA VALLEY
WATER DISTRICT
(continued)
I I I
$ 2,205,000 1985 398
2,620,000 1985 547
2,530,000 1985 590
32,934,200 1984 11,000
1,521,000
1,437,300
882,500
1,739,300
1978
1978
1978
1977
I
693
428
414
700
AD 12 Sewer System: 36,400 LF 8" sewer
lines; 6,400 LF 4"-6" laterals.
AD 10 Sewer System:
lines; 13,500 LF 4"-6" laterals.
42,200 LF 8" sewer
AD 7 Sewer System: 37,200 LF 8" sewer
lines; 13,500 LF 4"-6" laterals
AD 20 Regional Sewage Treatment System:
3.0 MGD wastewater treatment plant;
septage disposal system; 4 pump
stations; 155,965 LF 4"-24" sewer
lines; 18,450 LF 4"-6" laterals.
AD 4 Sewer System: 48,709 LF 8" sewer
lines; 18,071 LF 4"-6" laterals,
AD 1 Sewer System: 54,813 LF 8" sewer
lines; 9,877 LF 4" laterals.
AD 13 Sewer System: 30,563 LF 8" sewer
lines; 12,230 LF 4" laterals.
AD 2 Sewer System: 53,929 LF 8"-15"
sewer lines; 16,392 LF 4"-6" laterals.
I I I 1 I
ENGINEER'S REPORT
PART IV
CITY OF CARLSBAD
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The following enclosure contains a full-size copy of the
Assessment Diagram for said Assessment District as
preliminarily approved.
e
IV- 1
c
c
c
DIAGRAM
OF
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
CITY OF CARLSBAD
SAY DIEGO COUNTY. STATE OF CALIFORWIA
LOCATION 4 KEY MAP
NOT TO 3CALC
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF TnE ClTT OF CARLSBAO THIS - DAY OF , 1906.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF CARLSBW
RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT or STREETS OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAO inis - OAT or , 1986.
SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS OF THE CITY OF uusnm ,
*II ASSESSMENT UAS LEvtEo BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY of CARLSBAD ou THE LOTS, PIECES AND PARCELS OF LINO SHOW MI THIS ASSESS-
REFERENCE ts WOE TO THE ASSESSUENT ROLL RECORDED IN THE OFFICE of THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS ron TnE EXACT MOUNT 6.~ EUH
MEN1 DIACRM. SAID ASSESSMENT WAS LEVIED ON THE - DAY OF 1986. SAID ASSESSMENT DtACLM AN0 THE ASSESSNENT
DAY OF 1986. ROCL WERE RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT Of STREETS Of SA10 CITY dN THE *
ASSESSMENT LEVIED ACAINST EACH PARCEL OF LAN0 SHOWN MI TMIS ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF CARLSMO
O'CLOCK -.PI. IN SoOK - or UPS or ASSCSSM.ICNT FILED THIS - OAT or , 1916, AT THE HOUR OF -
THROUGH -, AS INSTRUMENT NO. , IN THE OFFtCE OF THE COUNTV RECORDER Or THE COUNTT OF DISTRICTS, PACE NOS. -
SUI DIECO, STATE OF CALtfORNIA.
?El?:
CWTT RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
REFERENCE THE $AN DIE60 COUNTY ASSESSOR YUS FOR A DETAILED DESCRICTION OF PARCEL LlpES AND DIUENSONS SHEET I OF 4 SHEETS
Elm-0 16-009
e
c
e
c
c
c
f
i
DIAGRAM
'OF
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
CITV OF CAIILSBAD . 8AN DlEQO COUNTY. STATE OF CALIfOnNIA
BENEFIT ZONE 2
BENEFIT ZONE 1
ii
\
c
c
e
c
c
c
DIAGRAM
OF
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
am Diiao tounrv. STATE OF cALironwiA
CITV Of CARLSIAD
NO. 85-2
ENGINEER'S REPORT
PART V
CITY OF CARLSBAD
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
DESCRIPTION OF WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY TO BE ACQUIRED
DESCRIPTION OF WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT
Generally, the works of improvement consist of the construc-
tion of College Boulevard to a 64-foot fully improved paved
street within a 102-foot right-of-way which extends from El
Camino Real southwesterly to Palomar Airport Road. Street
construction shall consist of grading, including cut and fill
slopes with landscaping and irrigation; Portland Cement
concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, cross gutters, asphaltic
concrete pavement and untreated base and subbase of varying
thicknesses; raised medians with landscaping and irrigation;
traffic striping, sign control, signals; and minor drainage
structures, together with all appurtenances and appurtenant
work.
The furnishing and planting of street trees, shrubs and ground cover in the parkways and fill slopes will include preparation of soil, excavation, backfill, staking, guying, and the installation of an irrigation system.
The construction, planting, and installation of street median landscaping and planting of street trees, shrubs and ground
cover in the parkways and fill slopes will include prepara-
tion of soil, planting of trees, shrubs, and ground cover;
and the installation of an irrigation system to serve all landscaped areas including automatic controllers, piping, emitters, electrical wiring, pull boxes, and all piping and gate valves, together with all appurtenances and appurtenant work for the installation and maintenance of the landscape
and irrigation system in the street medians.
Traffic signals will be provided at the intersections of College Boulevard with El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road. Construction and installation of safety lighting along College Boulevard and said traffic signals shall include all
excavation and backfill; Portland Cement concrete footings;
the furnishing and installing of street lights including standards, luminaires, blasts, and lamps; installation of all
detector loops, signal arms, mastheads and controls and shall
v- 1
perform all work including installation of conduit, with pull
boxes, electrical service, and any interconnections between signals as may be required along with all appurtneances and appurtenant work needed for the complete installation of traffic signals and safety lighting.
In conjunction with the construction of surface improvements
in College Boulevard, water, sewer, drainage, telephone, gas,
electric and cable television improvements will also be provided. Street, sewer and drainage facilities will be owned and maintained by the City of Carlsbad; water facilities will be owned and maintained by Costa Real Water District; telephone facility will be owned and maintained by Pacific Bell; gas and electric facilities will be owned and maintained by San Diego Gas and Electric; and cable facilities will be owned and maintained by Carlsbad CATV.
The following describes subsurface improvements in more detail.
Construction and installation of a water system consisting of 8-inch, 10-inch, 12-inch, 14-inch, 16-inch, and 18-inch
diameter water lines, including excavation and backfill with
special bedding, thrust blocks, valves, blow-offs, vacuum and
air release valves, service connections, fire hydrant
assemblies, and two pressure reducing stations together with
the appurtenances and appurtenant work.
Construction and installation of a sewerage system consisting
of 6-inch, 8-inch and 12-inch diameter sewer lines and
10-inch and 14-inch force main and 10-inch effluent disposal
line with tees, manholes, trenching and backfilling, all
together with the appurtenances and appurtenant work.
Construction and installation of storm drain systems will
consist of 18-inch, 21-inch, 24-inch, 27-inch, 30-inch,
33-inch, 42-inch, 48-inch, 54-inch, 60-inch, and 84-inch
diameter reinforced concrete pipe, transition structures,
junction structures, curb inlets, manholes and head walls,
together with all the appurtenances and appurtenant work.
Construction and installation of underground utility systems (telephone, gas, electric and cable television) consisting of ducts, pipes, manholes, pull boxes, junction structures, laterals, risers, switching equipment, gas pipelines, valves, and services, and the trenching, backfilling, together with the appurtenances and appurtenant work including the
relocation and/or removal of existing overhead utility
systems.
v- 2
c .
RIGHT-OF-WAY CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
The undersigned, Donald E. Donovan, hereby CERTIFIES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY that the following is all true and
correct.
At all times herein mentioned, the undersigned was, and now
is, the duly appointed City Engineer and authorized repre-
sentative of the CITY OF CAF.LSBAD.
That there have now been instituted proceedings under the
provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ,I1 being
Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California, for the construction of certain public improve-
ments in a special assessment district known and designated
as:
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-2
(COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District").
THE UNDERSIGNED STATES AND CERTIFIES AS FOLLOFIS:
(check one)
(x) a. That all easements, rights-of-way, or land neces-
sary for the accomplishment of the works of
improvement for the above referenced Assessment
District have been obtained and are in the
possession of the City of Carlsbad.
( ) b. That all easements, rights-of-way or land necessary
for the accomplishment of the works of improvement
for the above referenced Assessment District have been obtained and are in the possession of the City of Carlsbad, EXCEPT FOR THOSE ATTACHED HERETO, showing legal descriptions and plats of rights-of-way and easements not yet obtained at this time.
It is further acknowledged that works of improvement as proposed to be constructed within said Assessment District must be constructed within public rights-of-way, land, or easements as owned by said City at the time of the construc-
tion of the works of improvement, and the undersigned hereby
c
c v- 3
further Certifies that all rights-of-way necessary for the
works of improvement will be obtained and in the possession of the City prior to the commencement of any construction.
t4 3+P Zb
EXECUTED this &'%lay of , 1986.
f-=BE&L&&z* CITY OF CARLSBAD
v- 4