Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-05-27; City Council; 8616-1; Growth Management13 1* : ••- "1 (6 . . • ' ' CIT OF CARLSBAD — AGEND BILL ! cu T3 'H•U' CD OI 01-0 .4J XI •13 4J O 4->01 Or-HH )-l •HMHvH 01 01 0 cdT3 XI X!C 4-> 4-1 4J 3 COT3o C o oiO *t3 cd 4-1 ^oi 3 4J •> 4-1 rH • CJ >> O Om oi 4-1 cu pi •CN (-1 -H •!-) MH 0) 1 -H M XI 0r~^ T3 o 3 O C •H CO 4-1 Cd COrH M C01 -H ft «><4H -HC o ftm T3o Cxi cd cd ritS3 3 60 g 4J OO-H CD 0 cd 13 CIH • cd c oi cu0 -H 4J gPi OI CO MH U OIcd 4-i cd oi 60I-H to cd >-i cd to cd oi 13 cd60 M > &C OI 60 cd 13 •H XI O XI C XICO 4J >-l Cd 4-1cd PM 4J |sXI >•, 0 •> 0CW-H 4-1 Pi OI !-l •H C CJ OCOrH CU O Ccu ftg T3 cd cu•H g o> c xi4J-H 60X1 vH 4J•H CO CS CJ T3rH C -H K PI•H O cd XI O -rt04-is isCO 4J CO>4H^XI CO C CCO 4-* 4-1 CD Oo oi £ o g -H •H 4-> O 0) OI 4J rH 3 >H •!-> 60 CdXt CO O cd 4-1 3-H ri C Cftg oi ft cd oixi s gCd 01 4-1 J-l CD OI OI X rH O CO O XI 4-1 ft O O -Ho co oi (-14J oi g 6oo M-I•H-H C 0 4J >-l 4-1 -rt 4-1CO co m cocd 60m co cd c4-1 oim oi M o i — 1 4-1 Cd CJ TJ T-l 3 cd 4-1 O to CO O CO $H OI -H PI ftXl > Oro 01 4-i O O rH 0) )-loi X) co C ftoixi cd cd -H V-l 4-1 1 — 1 Q) CU•H -H O CO 4Jxi oi cd pi cd4-> > O O -rlO Cd Cd 4-1 -rl 1-14-1 C 4J ft•H >->4H ft OP^grH MH OI IH4-1 -H ft Cd O ft•HrH ft 4-) X! ftu oi cd to 01 cd AB*^/^-**/ TITLEr DEPT. HD. MTC3. 5/27/86 GROWTH MANAGEMENT HITY ATTY DEPT. CM CITY Mf5R RECOMMENDED ACTION: That Council review and discuss: 1. Projects in the pipeline 2. Workload of staff 3. Growth management implementation program 4. Possible modifications to program BACKGROUND : Over the past year and a half, Council has taken various actions aimed at reducing the rate and amount of growth in the city and improving the quality of development. The Land Use Committee recommendations are being implemented and a growth management program is scheduled for adoption by July 22, 1986. At the same time, a large volume of projects is being processed by the Building, Planning and Engineering Departments. Complicating the problem is the growth limitation initiative which would create an entirely different growth control program if adopted. The purpose of this workhop is to review the program now underway and to consider what if any, changes and decisions need to be made . PROJECTS IN THE PIPELINE - It is important to understand the status of current projects "in the pipeline". Growth management must deal with projects in various stages of approval and Council must decide which projects will be allowed to continue to completion and which will have to be recycled to comply with new procedures and standards . The total number of residential projects in the pipeline is 80. The total number of dwelling units is 12,085. . •^--J Vfzftj**^ 00I Im A. Awaiting building permits - final map already approved. B. Processing final map - tentative map already approved. C. Processing tentative map or other discretionary permits, 0 OO Page 2 of Agenda Bill No. For simplicity we will designate the pipeline as - A - Building B - Engineering C - Planning The number of projects and dwelling units in each category is CATEGORY PROJECTS D/U A B C Total 29 30 21 80 3503 4609 3973 12,085 Ordinance No. 9791 - the current moratorium ordinance allows all of those projects to continue to be processed. Category A and B are exempt from new density requirements but are required to pay increased fees when building permits are issued. Category C projects will be conditioned to meet new standards as they are approved by Planning Commission and Council. WORKLOAD OF STAFF - Council has directed staff to carry out 26 tasks in connection with the Citizens Committee recommendation. These tasks were to be completed by July 1986. Some tasks will not be complete because the Council has added the new growth management plan as a higher priority. The 3503 dwelling units in Category A have completed all city requirements and are actively pursuing building permits. Unless Council action is taken, we expect most of those permits to be issued in 1986. The 8112 dwelling units in Category B and C are also pushing for approvals and many of those will be seeking building permits in 1986. Page 3 of Agenda Bill No. <f*6> /£ -«*/ The proposed growth management ordinance would require Council to approve public facility phasing programs before building permits could be issued. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY - One of the key elements of the growth management program is the traffic circulation plan. We have completed a traffic impact study for the southerly third of Carlsbad (south of Poinsettia - Carrillo Way). We now need to do a similar study for the northerly two-thirds of the City. This study will generate a list of projects, an impact fee and enable us to create a schedule for construction. It will take about six months to complete. Staff is reviewing proposals from consultants now. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM - Staff has worked out a schedule to have the growth management ordinance in place by July 20. This is detailed in the memorandum from Michael Holzmiller attached. MODIFICATIONS TO GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM - Staff requested a growth management consultant to review and comment on the proposed program. Mr. Robert Freilich is an experienced growth management consultant. He has worked with over 30 cities including San Diego. He was aksed to critique the staff's growth management proposal. His comments deal with the following key issues: 1. The staff plan is too complex and needs to be simplified. 2. The City should complete a city-wide public facility phasing program rather than requiring developers to do it. 3. The plan should consider some type of growth limitation or control mechanism such as an annual rate. Mr. Freilich was brought into the picture last week and he has not had time to give us any recommendations in writing. If Council wishes to consider any of Mr. Freilich's recommendations we will need to return with proposals on how to implement. 3 Page 4 of Agenda Bill No. It should be noted that Mr. Freilich's comments are shared by many of the citizens who came to the growth management hearing. Frequent comments were made that the plan is too complicated and does not limit growth directly. Others have said they think the City should do the facilities phasing plan rather than the developers. SUMMARY - The purpose of this workshop is to familiarize the Council with the problems involved in implementing the growth management program. We are ready to go ahead with the program previously approved in concept. However, we want Council to consider modifications suggested by Mr. Freilich. Does council wish to modify the plan? Under any case, it is imperative that we deal with projects in the pipeline. Staff cannot continue processing 80 projects and at the same time develop a totally new system. Staff is overloaded now and we need to clarify the objectives and work priorities for the rest of the year. EXHIBITS: 1. Memorandum from Michael Holzmiller dated 5/23/86. 2. Ordinance No. jft)^ establishing a Growth Management program for the City. MAY 23, 1986 TO: FRANK ALESHIRE, CITY MANAGER FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT WORK PROGRAM - MAY 27, 1986 - JULY 22, 1986 Over the last six months, the workload assigned to the Planning Department has continually increased. A number of projects have been identified by the City Council as priority items. These include, in order of priority, the following: I. Design and implementation of a growth management program, including the development of a pilot Facilities Management Program completion of a Facility Management Program, for six urbanized areas; II. The processing of Facilities Management Programs for any other areas of the City as submitted by developers; III. Completion of 26 separate programs recommended by the Land Use Citizen's Committee; IV. Completion of the various coastal projects including the ordinances permitting the City to attain coastal authority; V. The processing of development projects (there are currently about 60 applications submitted for processing, many of them major projects). VI. Several other large special projects as directed by the City Council including the review of the La Costa Master Plan and the preparation of an EIR and review of the Hosp Grove Master Plan. To ensure that City Council priorities are completed by the required time, and to ensure fairness to all parties concerned, the Planning Department has had to develop a work program to address the aforementioned constraints. The program contains seven major points as follows: 1) Michael Holzmiller and one additional planner will be removed from the department to be utilized full time on the growth management plan and on citizen's committee programs where immediate completion has been determined to be critical. Completion of this task will require a full time commitment and will require input from other departments and the use of consultants. More specifically, the work assignments for this task are as fol1ows: EXHIBIT A) Growth Management Ordinance - Holzmiller, Hentschke, Consultant. B) Preparation of Facilities Management Program for six urbanized areas - Hagaman, Carter. C) Review of Facilities Management Programs for other areas of City as submitted by developers - Consultant. D) Critical Citizens Committee Programs - Holzmiller, Schulte - These include incompatible land use inventory, hillside ordinance, zoning consistency, land use element rewrite. E) Appeal of zone boundaries and categories - Orenyak, Patchett, Mannen. F) Traffic impact fee study for remainder of City. 2) Each remaining staff planner will be devoting two days of work time a week to the other citizens committee assi gnments. 3) Each remaining planner will select one day a week to meet with developers or their representatives. 4) Planners will only be taking calls in the afternoon hours (1:00 P. M. - 5:00 P. M.) and will only be returning calls during these hours. 5) To save time, letters will be sent to applicants with projects that have many issues. The letter will list the issues and any possible solutions to resolve the issues. Staff will not meet again with the applicant unless it can be determined through a written response from the developer outlining any changes, that substantial progress has been made in solving project i ssues. 6) Development projects have been divided into two categories, as shown on Exhibit "A", attached. Processing will continue on projects in Category I. Projects in Category II will receive little or no review until the moratorium ends on July 22, 1986. Projects are placed in Category II because they fall into one of four categories: new applications, applicant delay, incomplete applications or because an environmental impact report is in process for the project. Exhibit "AA" shows projects which have been tentatively scheduled for Planning Commission. -2- In addition, because of the constant changing in development standards, projects will also be evaluated pursuant to pending General Plan or ordinance changes. A notice (Exhibit "B") advising of this procedure shall be signed by applicants prior to submittal, and by applicant's currently pending hearing. 7) The Planning Department will not be meeting immediately with developers who want review of preliminary plans where no application has been submitted. Developers who want to meet on preliminary plans will fill out a request form at the Development Processing Services counter. Development Processing Services personnel, however, will continue to answer questions regarding property where no application has been received. This program is designed to concentrate staff time on the items of greatest priority, while at the same time allowing development processing to occur on those projects which by fairness merit continued review. It is unfortunate that staff time does not permit the immediate completion of all projects and assignments. We feel that the above program provides the most equitable treatment of development projects while accomplishing the major goals of the City Council in completing the growth management program and the major citizen's committee recommendations by July 22, 1986. MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER MJH/ar -3- 7 EXHIBIT "A" PROJECT PRIORITY LIST Priority Category I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II Description AD AD IA EIR AD EIR AD AD EIR AD AD AD AD EIR NA NA NA/IA NA NA Submi ttal Date 1/4/85 1/22/85 3/14/85 5/3/85 8/9/85 8/21/85 8/21/85 9/10/85 10/24/85 11/6/85 12/11/85 1/7/86 1/10/86 1/13/86 1/14/86 1/14/86 2/4/86 2/4/86 3/14/86 8/5/85 3/27/86 4/2/86 4/15/86 PCD 4/28/86 5/6/86 3/23/84 1/9/85 2/13/85 5/10/85 9/19/84 10/17/85 11/13/85 11/21/85 12/12/85 1/13/86 1/14/86 1/14/86 5/10/84 1/14/86 4/2/86 3/13/86 4/23/86 5/2/86 5/5/86 Project ZC-344/GPA/LU 86-3/MP-181 (South Coast Park) GPA/LU 85-2/MP-177/CT 85-35/SDP 86-2 (Pacific Rim Resorts) (HPI) EIR 85-2/ZC-328/CT 85-25 (Rancho Del Cerro) CT 85-17/ZC-331/SP-199(College Business Park) GPA/LU 85-9/ZC-338 (Seapointe-Carlsbad) CT 85-27/PUD-92 (Kelly Ranch - Area E) CT 85-26/PUD-91 (Kelly Ranch - Area I) CT 85-34/ZC-341 (View Point) (Formerly Mola) ZC-340/SP-200 (Carlsbad Airport Business Center) CUP-279 (Chevron) RP 85-22 (Trautman) SP-201 (Ponto Drive Specific Plan) CUP-284 (7-Eleven) CT 86-2/PUD-98 (Carrillo Ranch I) MP-139(C) (Rancho Carrillo) GPA/LU 86-2 (Rancho Carrillo) CUP-286 (Texaco) SP-144(E) (SDG&E/Encina West) RP 86-6 (Chandler) GPA/LU 86- (City of Carlsbad - R/R ROW) PUD Ordinance PCD-88 (La Costa Village Apartments) RP/V 86-8 (Magtira) RP 86-9 (Willis) RP 86-10 (Robinson) Building Relocation Request RP 86-11 (Boys & Girls Club (Pool)) RP 86-12 (7-11/Pepi's Pizza) RP 84-7 (Town Square) CT 85-1/CP-307 (La Costa Townhomes) CT 85-12/SP-198 (County - Faraday Busines EIR 85-3/MP-179/ZC-332 (Evans Point) CUP-261 (Pacific Coast Hotel) MP-139(C)/CT 85-33/ZC-339/ SDP 85-14 (Scripps Memorial Hospital) CUP-205(A) (Crazy Burro) SP-180(C) (Carlsbad Research Center/City) CT 85-39/PUD-97 (Laurel Tree) SDP 86-1 (Crehan Condos) CUP-194(B) (Aquaculture Systems Intl.) CT 86-4/PUD-100/V-370 (Sea Gables Condos) PCD-62 (Navarra) ZC-343/CT 86-3/PUD-99 (Hillebrecht Property) SDP 86-3 (Rancho La Costa Plaza) CUP-289 (Lin) SDP 86-4 (Palomar Airport Plaza) V-374 (Atlantic/Richfield) CUP-292 (Palomar Deli) Description AD - Applicant Delay (Includes projects with a large -number of unresolved issues) IA - Incomplete -Application NA - New Application EIR - EIR in process - no review of specific projects until EIR complete * All redevelopment projects listed as priority 1 unless applicant wants delay EXHIBIT "AA" Tentatively Scheduled for Planning Commission Hay 28. 1986 Design Review Board RP/CUP 86-7 (Union Oil) RP 85-17 (Johnston) RP 86-5 (Pucci) Planning Commission ZCA-192 (Aquaculture) CUP-291 (Robert Hale) CT 85-28/CP-321 (La Costa Valley Terrace) Growth Management Program SDP 85-17/V-373 (Brodine) June 11. 1986 SDP 85-15/CT 85-37/PUD-95 (BLEP II) CT 85-38/PUD-96 (BLEP III) CT 85-16/PUD-85 (Lancaster Townhomes) June 25. 1986 CT 84-43/CP-302 (Casa Loma Condos) GPA Amendments/Citizen Committee /O EXHIBIT "B" NOTICE TO ALL APPLICANTS Carlsbad is presently in the process of reviewing its standards, ordinances, and policies concerning land use within the City. This review program is a City priority, to be completed as expeditiously as possible. During this review period many of the "Rules" which will affect your application may be subject to change. The following list identifies some of the land use standards, ordinances, policies or issues that are being addressed. City of Carlsbad Policy regarding: Agricultural use of land Coastal zone land use Economic impact of development General Plan consistency and compatibility Land Use Element of the General Plan Open Space requirements Phasing and amount of required pub.lic facilities The City's Zoning Ordinance Parking Standards Hillside Development Standards Planned Community Zone Planned Development Ordinance Architectural Review Scenic Corridors Standards Noise Standards To assure consistency and compatibility witn City Pol icy. Major Plans Under Review La Costa Master Plan Koll Specific Plan Carrillo Ranch Master Plan It is Carlsbad's concern that all proposed land use applications conform to tne requirements of land use standards, ordinances, and policies that have been adopted or are being considered for adoption. Therefore, it is important that your application be consistent with proposed revisions prior to your project being heard at a public hearing. As such, your application should be of such a nature to assure compliance with potential revised standards, ordinances and policies. -2- The City of Carlsbad's departments of Development Processing and Planning will-offer as much direction and assistance as is possible during this review period to identify potential issues of your application relative to Carlsbad's possible revision of land use and land development standards, ordinances and polici es. Please acknowledge the revisable status of Carlsbad's land use and land development standards, ordinances and policies with respect to your application, by signing the following statement. The City cannot accept or process your application without your acknowledgement and acceptance of potential changes in land use and land development standards, ordinances and policies. I, (please print or type) OWNER/APPLICANT understand that the City of Carlsbad is presently amending or revising its standards, ordinances and policies concerning land development and land use. I understand and accept that the standards, ordinance and policies affecting my application may be different by the time my application is decided on, than they are at present. I agree to assure my application is in conformance to City standards, ordinances and policies that are adopted or recommended for adoption by the time my application is decided on. OWNER/APPLICANT DATE -3- 13 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 21 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ADDITION OF CHAPTER 21.90 ESTABLISHING A GROWTH MANAGEMENT 'PROGRAM FOR THE CITY The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: That Title 21 is amended by the addition of Chapter 21.90 to read as follows: "Chapter 21.90 Growth Management Sections: 21.90.010 Purpose and intent. 21.90.020 Definitions. 21.90.030 General prohibition. 21.90.040 Requirements for provision of facilities. 21.90.050 Establishment of facilities management fee. 21.90.060 Special provisions for building permits issued during temporary moratorium. 21.90.070 Finding of health, safety and welfare necessary for the fees imposed by sections 21.90.040 and 21.90.030. 21.90.080 Special provisions for the approval of certain final maps. 21.90.090 Extensions of prior approvals prohibited. 21.90.100 Development status categories. 21.90.110 Facilities management fees. 21.90.120 Contents of facility management plans. 21.90.130 Performance standards. 21.90.140 Facilities management plan prepartion. 21.90.145 Facilities management plan processing. 21.90.150 Implementation of facilities management plans. 21.90.160 Obligation to pay fees or install . improvements required by any other law. 21.90.170 Implementing guidelines. 21.90.180 Exclusion for government facilities. 21.90.190 Exemption for redevelopment permits. 21.90.200 Exemption for single family lots and developing projects. 21.90.210 Exemption for City initiated zone changes and general plan amendments. 21.90.220 Council actions, fees, notice. 21.90.230 Severability. 1. EXHIBIT "2" H 21.90.010 Purpose and intent. (a) It is the policy of the City of Carlsbad to: (1) Provide quality housing opportunities for all economic sectors of the community; (2) Provide a balanced community with adequate commercial., industrial, recreational and open space areas to support the residential areas of the City. (3) Ensure that public facilities and services meeting City standards are available concurrent with the need created by new development. (4) Balance the housing needs of the region against the public service needs of Carlsbad residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. (5) Encourage infill development in urbanized areas before allowing extensions of public facilities and services to areas which have yet to be urbanized. (6) Ensure that all development is consistent with the Carlsbad general plan. (b) The City Council of the City of Carlsbad has determined despite previous City Council actions including but not limited to, amendments to the land use, housing and parks and recreation elements of the general plan, amendments to City Council Policy No. 17, adoption of traffic impact fees, and modification of park dedication and improvement requirements, that the demand for public services and facilities has outpaced the supply resulting in shortages in facilities including but not limited to streets, parks, open space, schools, libraries, drainage facilities and general governmental services. The City Council has further determined that these shortages are detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Carlsbad. (c) This chapter is adopted to ensure the implementation of the policies stated in subsection (a), to eliminate the shortages identified in subsection (b), to ensure that no development occurs without providing for adequate public services and facilities, to regulate the pace of development thereby ensuring a continued supply of housing over a period of years and to continue the quality of life for all economic sectors of the Carlsbad community. (d) This chapter will further the policies, goals and objectives established herein by requiring identification of all public facilities and services required for development, by prohibiting development until adequate provisions for the public facilities and services are made by developers of projects within the City, and by giving development priority to areas of the City where public facilities and services are already in place (infill areas). (e) This chapter replaces the temporary moratorium on processing and approval of development projects imposed by City Council Ordinance No. 9791. 21.90.020 Definitions. (a) Whenever the following terms are used in this chapter they shall have the meaning established by this section 2. unless from the context it is apparent that another meaning is intended: (1) "Development permit" means any permit, entitlement or approval whether discretionary or ministerial issued under Title 20 or 21 of this code and any legislative actions such as zone changes, general plan amendments, or master plan approval or amendment. (2) "Development" means any use to which land is put, building or other alteration of land and construction incident thereto. (3) "Facilities management plan" means a development and community facilities management plan defined by Section 21.90.120 of this chapter. (4) "Facilities" means any schools, parks, open space, or recreational areas or structures providing for fire, library, or governmental services, identified in a facilities management plan. (5) "Improvement" includes traffic controls, streets and highways, including curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, bridges, overcrossings, street interchanges, flood control or storm drain facilities, sewer facilities, water facilities and lighting facilities. 21.90.030 General prohibition. (a) Unless exempted by the provisions of this chapter no application for any building permit or development permit shall be accepted, processed or approved until a facilities management plan has been submitted and approved according to this chapter. (b) A development permit may be processed concurrently with a facilities management plan if the applicant first waives in writing any time limits which are imposed by law on the processing and approval of applications for development projects or subdivisions. (c) A facilities management plan shall be considered a project for the purposes of Title 19 of this code. Environmental documents for a facilities management plan should be processed concurrently with the plan. 21.90.040 Reguirement for provision of facilities. (a) No development permit shall be approved unless the approving authority finds that the permit is consistent with the facilities management plan. To ensure consistency the approving authority may impose any condition to the approval necessary or convenient to implementation of the facilities management plan. (b) No building permit shall be issued unless the fees reguired by this chapter, and any applicable facilities management plan fees are first paid, and the permit is consistent with the applicable facilities management plan. (c) The reguirements of this chapter are imposed as a condition of zoning on the property to ensure implementation of and consistency with the general plan and to protect the public health, safety and welfare by ensuring that public facilities and 3. improvements will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrently with need. 21.90.050 Establishment of facilities management fee. (a) A facilities management fee is hereby established to pay far improvements or facilities identified in a facilities management plan which are not otherwise financed by any other fee, charge or tax on development, or are not installed by a developer as a condition of a building permit or development permit. The facilities management fee shall be paid before the issuance of a building permit. The amount of the fee shall be determined based upon the estimated cost of the facility or improvement identified as needed in the facilities management plan for the facilities management zone applicable to the property for which the permit is issued. (b) The fee required by this section is in addition to any other means of financing facilities or improvements identified by a facilities management plan or any other tax, fee, charge or improvement requirement which may be imposed on the development of property under the provisions of state law, this code or City Council policy. (c) The amount of the fee for a facilities zone shall be set by City Council resolution after a public hearing, published notice of which shall be given according to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.54.060(2) and Government Code Section 54992. (d) As a condition of any development permit application submitted after the effective date of this chapter the applicant shall agree to pay the fee established by this section at the time a building permit is issued. (e) No building permit shall be issued unless the fee established by this section is first paid. This requirement shall be included as a conditon of any development permit issued after the effective date of this chapter. 21.90,060 Special provisions for building permits issued during temporary moratorium. (a) Applicants for projects for which building permits were issued after January 21, 1986 and before July 20, 1986 shall pay the fee established by Section 21.90.050 within 30 days after the amount of the fee is determined by the City Council. Payment shall be made according to the agreement executed by the applicant pursuant to Section 3 of Ordinance No. 9791. 21.90.070 Finding of health, safety and welfare necessary for the fees imposed by Section 21.90.050 and 21.90.060. Ta) The City Council hereby declares that payment of the fee established and imposed by Section 21.90.050 and 21.90.060 and installation of the facilities and improvements identified in a facilities management plan are necessary to achieve the policies established in Section 21.90.010 and to implement the City's general plan. If the fees are not paid or 4. II the facilities or improvements are not installed the public health, safety and welfare will suffer because there will be insufficient facilities and improvements to accommodate any new development. This finding is based upon City Council Policy No. 17, City Council Ordinance No. 9791, and the evidence presented at the public hearings on the ordinance adopting this chapter. (b) If any condition imposed as a conditon of a development permit or building permit pursuant to this chapter is protested then the permit shall be suspended during the period of the protest. (c) This section is adopted pursuant to Government Code Section 65913.5 JJ..90.080 Special provisions for the approval of certain final subdivision maps. (a) If a tentative map or tentative parcel map was approved for a project before January 21, 1986; or if a tentative map or tentative parcel map was approved for a project after January 21, 1986 and approval of a final map or parcel map was not prohibited by Ordinance No. 9791; then a final map or parcel map which substantially complies with the tentative map, and with all required zoning permits may be processed and approved prior to the adoption of a facilities management plan for the facilities management zone applicable to the property where the project is located. Building permits for the subdivision shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter. (b) If a tentative map for a project was approved after January 21, 1986 but approval of a final map was prohibited by Ordinance No. 9791, then approval of a final map shall be prohibited until a facilities management plan is adopted for the facilities management zone applicable to the property where the project is located. The time period for expiration of such tentative maps shall not include any time when approval of a final map is prohibited by this section. The period for expiration of any other development permit issued in conjunction with such a tentative map is likewise tolled. The period of the expiration date tolling shall not exceed five years. 21.90.090 Extensions of prior approvals prohibited. Ta)Exceptas providedin Section 21.90.080(b)an extension of the expiration date of any development permit which was approved prior to the effective date of this ordinance shall not be granted unless a facilities management plan has been approved and the extension of the development permit is found to be consistent with the facilities management plan. (b) No final map for any phased tentative map approved before the effective date of this chapter for which the subdivider is required to install public improvements of a value of $100,000 or more shall be approved unless the final map covers all remaining property included within the tentative map approval or unless the subdivider first in writing waives the automatic extension provisions of Section 66452.6(a) of the Government Code. 5. ir (c) If a development permit issued prior to the effective date of this chapter has an expiration period within which of building permits must be issued and building permits cannot be issued by operation of this chapter then the expiration period shall be tolled until the facilities management plan is approved,, .but in no event shall the time period of tolling exceed two years. 21.90.100 Development status categories. (a) To assist in the orderly provision of public facilities and to implement the urban land reserve policies of the general plan the City Council shall by resolution adopt general development status categories for all areas of the City. In order to encourage infill development, and to reduce the growth inducing impact of premature extension of public facilities to undeveloped areas, the priority for determining City involvement in providing facilities through its capital improvement budget, capital facilities preplanning, assessment district formation, and public facilities management shall be according to development status category. The development status categories shall also be used in establishing appropriate facilities management zones pursuant to Section 21.90.110. The development categories shall be ranked according to level of urbanization, the existing capacity of public facilities and services to accommodate additional development, the feasibility of reauiring additional services and facilities for new development within the category without depriving other areas of facilities or service capacity, on a determination of whether new development within the category will have a growth inducing impact on other development status categories and on prior investments in public facilities which have been approved by the City and made by property owner. (b) The development status categories are as follows: (1) Category I. This category has highest priority and generally includes already urbanized areas. (2) Category II. This category has second priority and generally includes areas which are undergoing urbanization. (3) Category III. This category has third priority and generally includes areas which may be urbanized in the future. (c) Facilities management zones shall be correlated to development status categories. As development occurs or facilities management plans are implemented, a facilities management zone may be assigned to a higher development status category. (d) Property shall be assigned to a development status category based upon a determination of whether the property predominantly has the characteristics identified for a category by subsection (e). If property is identified on the general plan for urban land reserve it shall be assigned to Category III unless prior development has occurred or unless the property has 6. t he characteristics of Category I or Category II in which event it may be assigned to a higher category. (e) The characteristics to be used as a guide for determining development status categories shall be as follows: (1) Category I (A) The public facilities intrastructure has been substantially installed. (B) New development is principally infill in nature because the developable area is immediately contiguous to or surrounded by already developed areas such that development may be served by existing public improvement facilities. (C) Public facilities and services are adeguate for anticipated new development although some upgrading may be reguired. (D) Public facilities infrastructure generally can be completed by upgrading existing facilities or installing minor additions to existing facilities. Improvements to be installed are generally infill in character. (2) Category II (A) Public facilities infrastructure has been partially installed, but the part not installed may be planned. (B) Some development in the area but planning has occurred in the form of development approvals or master plans. Adjacent to or a logical extension of Category I development. (C) New development will reguire new onsite improvements and may reguire the installation or major improvement of circulation network streets as shown on the circulation element, or the installation of major water or sewer lines. (D) Development could be accomplished without overburdening the facililties existing for Category I development if all services and facilities needed for Category II are provided and provided that certain Category I facilities are upgraded. (3) Category III (A) Generally no public facility infrastructure has been constructed. (B) Separated from existing development or not a logical extension of existing development. No tentative maps have been approved. (C) New development will reguire installation of major public improvements and facilities such as streets, water trunk lines, major effluent disposal or sewer lines, major drainage facilities and other improvement identified on the general plan. (D) No detailed public facilities planning has occurred. Development could not occur without providing facilities for Category II development. (f) The initial assignment of property and facilities management zones to development status shall be made by City Council. A Development Status Review Committee consisting of the Assistant City Managers and the Community Development Director is established. Reguests for reassignment of property for 7. facilities management zones to a different development status category shall be made in writing to the committee. The committee shall meet with the applicant and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the reassignment. After receiving a recommendation from the Committee, the City Council may reassign.-property or facilities zones without a hearing. 21.90.110 Facilities management zones. (a) The City Council shall divide the City into facilities management zones correlated to the development status categories. A facilities management plan shall be adopted for each facilities management zone. (b) The boundaries of the zones shall be established based upon logical facilities and improvements planning, construction and service relationships to ensure the economically efficient and timely installation of reguired facilities and improvements. In establishing zone boundaries the City Council shall also be guided by the following considerations: (1) Service areas or drainage basins. (2) Extent to which facilities or improvements are in place or available. (3) Ownership of property. (4) Development status category. (5) Boundaries of existing zoning master plans. (6) Boundaries of pending zoning master plans. (7) Boundaries of potential future zoning master plan areas. (8) Boundaries of approved tentative maps. (9) Public facilities relationships especially to the City's planned major circulation network. (10) Special district service territories. (11) Approved fire, drainage, sewer, or other facilities or improvement master plans. 21.90.120 Contents of Development and Community Facility Management Plans. (a) A facilities management plan shall be prepared for each facility zone and shall cover the entire zone. The plan shall consist of maps, graphs, tables, and narrative text and shall be based upon the general plan and zoning applicable to the project at the time of the approval of the plan. (b) The facilities management plan shall show how and when the following facilities and improvements will be installed or financed as specified in subsection (c). (1) Sewer systems and sewage treatment (2) Water (3) Drainage (4) Circulation (5) Fire facilities (6) Governmental administration facilities (7) Parks and other recreational facilities (8) Libraries (9) Schools (10) Open space 8. (c) The plan shall include the following information with regard to each public facility listed in subsection (b): (1) An inventory of present and future requirements for each facility based upon the performance standard established for each facility. Because improvement requirements for certain facilities and services may overlap zone boundaries a discussion of the need for coordination and a proposed coordination plan for facilities extending from one zone to another shall be included. Cost estimates shall be included. It must be shown that development in the zone will not reduce the public facilities capabilities or create facilities shortages in zones with a higher development status priority. With regard to fire facilities it must be shown that development will not reduce service capability in any zone below the performance standard which is established pursuant to subsection (e) The inventory shall be consistent with the general plan and zoning for the area. (2) A phasing schedule establishing the timing for installation or provisions of public facilities or services in relationship to the amount of development activity (e.g. number of dwelling units, number of square feet of commercial space, etc.) for the facilities management zone. The phasing schedule shall include a schedule of development within the zone and a market data and cash flow analysis for financing of facilities and improvements for the zone. The phasing schedule shall identify periods where the demand for facilities and services may exceed the capacity and provide a plan for eliminating the shortfall. In those situations when demand exceeds capacity and it is not feasible to increase the capacity prior to development, no development shall occur unless a time schedule for and a means of increasing the capacity is established in the plan. (3) A financing plan establishing various methods of funding the public facilities identified in the plan. The plan shall identify those facilities and services which would otherwise be provided as a requirement of processing a development project (i.e. requirements imposed as a condition of a development permit) or provided by the developer in order to establish consistency with the general plan or Titles 18, 20 or 21 of this Code, and those facilities for which new funding methods which shall be sufficient to ensure sufficient funds are available to construct or provide a public facility or service when required by the phasing schedule. Where facilities or services are required for more than one zone, the phasing plan shall identify those other zones and the plan for each zone shall be coordinated. Coordination, however, shall not require identical funding methods. If a facilities management plan identifies facilities which are needed to serve development within a zone but which will be located either entirely or partially within another zone which has a lower development status priority then the phasing plan shall also assess the growth inducing impact of the out of zone improvements. (4) A list or schedule of facilities reguirements correlated to individual development projects within the zone. 9. (d) The City Council may adopt a model facilities management plan. 21.90.130 Performance standard. The City Council shall adopt general performance standards.-for each public facility or service listed in Section 21.90.120(b). Specific performance standards for each zone shall be adopted as part of the facilities management plan. If at any time after preparation of a facilities management plan the performance standards established by a plan are not met then no development permits or building permits shall be issued until an amendment to the plan addressing the deficiency is approved and the performance standard is met. 21.90.140 Facilities management plan preparation. (a)A facilities management plan may be prepared by the City or by the property owners within the zone according to the procedures established by this section. (b) The City Council, upon its own initiative, may by resolution of intention direct the City Manager to prepare a facilities management plan for any zone. The City Council may assess the cost of preparing the plan to the owners within the zone after a hearing ten days written notice of which is given to the property owners within the zone. The cost shall be spread prorata according to acreage and development potential. (c) All owners within the zone may jointly submit a facilities management plan. (d) For zones in which joint submission of a facilities management plan is shown to be not feasible any owner or group of cooperating owners within the zone may petition the City Council to allow the owner or group of owners to prepare the plan. After a meeting for which ten days prior written notice has been given to the property owners within the zone, the City Council may permit the owner or group of owners to submit a plan. The cost of the plan shall be determined at the time of the hearing and shall be assessed prorata to all property within the phasing zone and reimbursed to the preparers. The cost shall be collected by the City at the time any application for a development project within the zone is submitted to the City and reimbursed to the owner or owners who prepared the plan. No assessment shall be made unless the planis approved. Cost of approval shall not include interest. (e) As an option to preparation by the owner or group of owners as provided in subsection (d) the City Council may decide to direct the City Manager to prepare the facilities management plan. The cost of preparation shall be advanced to the City by the requesting ownre or owners and assessed to the remaining owners as provided in subsection (d). 21.90.145 Facilities management plan processing. (a)Facilities management plans shall be reviewed according to the following procedure: (1) A completed facilities management plan may be submitted to the Planning Director for processing. If the 10. =23 Planning Director determines that the plan complies with the provisions of Section 21.90.130 the director shall set a facilities management plan for public hearing before the Planning Commission within sixty days of receipt of a complete application. (2) The hearing shall be noticed according to the provisions of Section 21.54.060(2). A staff report containing recommendation on the plan shall be prepared and furnished to the public, the applicant, and the Planning Commission prior to the hearing. (3) The Planning Commission shall hear and consider the application for a facilities management plan and shall by resolution prepare recommendations and findings for the City Council. The action of the Commission shall be filed with the City Clerk, and a copy shall be mailed to the owners within the facility zone. (4) When the Planning Commission action is filed with the City Clerk, the Clerk shall set the matter for public hearing before the City Council. The hearing shall be noticed according to the provisions of Section 21.54.060(2). (5) The City Council shall hear the matter, and after considering the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, may by ordinance approve a facilities management plan. The City Council may include in the ordinance adopting the facilities management plan any fees or facilities inprovement requirements which it deems necessary to impose on development projects and building permits within the zone in order to implement the facilities management plan. The adoption of a facilities management plan shall be an exercise of the legislative power of the City Council. (c) A facilities management plan may be amended following the same procedures for the original adoption. 21.90.150 Implementation of facilities managemant plans. (a) To insure that the provisions of this chapter and the general plan are met the following shall apply: (1) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter no development permit shall be approved unless the map or permit is consistent with the facilities management plan and unless provision for all facilities and services related to the development project are provided or funded. (2) No building permit shall be issued unless all applicable fees, including but not limited to, public facilities fees, bridge and thoroughfare fees, traffic impact fees, facilities management fees, school fees, park-in-lieu fees, sewer fees, water fees, or other development fees identified in the facilities management plan and adopted by the City Council have first been paid or provision for their payment has been made to the satisfaction of the City Council. (b) Facility management plan process is part of the City's ongoing planning effort. It is anticipated that amendments to a facilities management plan may be necessary. Adoption of a facilities management plan does not establish any 11. entitlement or right to any particular general plan or zoning designation or any particular development proposal. A facilities management plan is a guide to ensure that no development occurs unless adequate public facilities or services will be available to meet demands created by development. The City Council may initiate .an amendment to a facilities management plan at any time if in its discretion it determines that an amendment is necessary to ensure adequate facilities and services. (c) If at any time it appears to the satisfaction of the City Manager that public facilities or services within a facilities management zone or zones are inadequate to accommodate any further development within that zone or that the performance standards adopted pursuant to Section 21.90.130 are not being met he shall immediately report the deficiency to the Council. If the Council determines that a deficiency exists then no further building or development permits shall be issued within that zone or zones shall cease until an amendment to the facilities management plan which addresses the deficiency is approved by the City Council and the performance standard is met. (d) The Planning Director shall monitor the development activity for each facilities management zone and shall prepare an annual report to the City Council consisting of maps, graphs, charts, tables and text and which includes a developmental activity analysis, a facilities and services adequacy analysis, a facility revenue/expenditure analysis and recommendation for any amendments to the facilities management plan. The content of the annual report shall be established by the City Council. 21.90.160 Obligation to pay fees or install improvements required by any other law. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as relieving a builder, developer or subdivider from any public improvement requirement, dedication requirement or fee requirement which is imposed pursuant to Title 18, 20, or 21 of this code or pursuant to any City Council policy. 21.90.170 Implementing guidelines. The City Council may adopt any guidelines it deems necessary to implement this chapter. 21.90.180 Exclusion for Government facilities. Development proposals which consist of facilities, or structures constructed by a city, county, special district, state, or federal government or any agency, department, or subsidiary therof for governmental purposes are excluded from the provisions of this chapter. This exclusion shall not apply to development proposals to which a possessory interest tax would be applicable. 21.90.190 Exemption for redevelopment permits. Notwithstanding anything in this chapter to the contrary, redevelopment permits and building permits may be processed and approved prior to the preparation of a facilities management plan for the redevelopment area. Such permits shall 12. be conditioned upon approval of any fees established pursuant to the facilities management plan. 21.90.200 Exemption for single family lots and developing projects. .Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this chapter, building permits for projects identified in Section 2(F) of Ordinance No. 9791 (projects for which construction had commended and were designated on the map marked Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 9791 as developing) or for single family dwellings on lots owned by the person intending to occupy the dwelling may be issued before the preparation of a facilities management plan if the applicant agrees to pay the fee established by Section 21.90.050 and any additional fees established as a result of the plan. 21.90.210 Exemption for City initiated zone changes or general plan amendments. Notwithstanding anything in this chapter to the contrary, zone changes, or general plan amendments necessary to accomplish consistency between the general plan and zoning, to implement the provisions of the Local Coastal Plan or which the City Council finds will not increase the public facilities or services needs within a zone and which are initiated by the City Council may be processed before preparation of a facilities management plan. 21.90.220 Council actions, fees, notice. (a) Whenever this chapter requires or permits an action or decision of the City Council, that action or decision shall be accomplished by a resolution. (b) The City Council shall establish application and processing fees for the submission and processing of facililties management plans and for any other request made under Section 21.90.100, 21.90.120 or 21.90.140. (c) Whenever written notice is required to be given to property owners under this section the notice shall be mailed by first class mail to the owners shown on the last equalized assessment roll. 21.90.230 Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of the ordinance codified in this chapter is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance codified in this chapter. The City Council declares that it would have passed the ordinance codified in this chapter and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any part thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 2: The City Council makes the following findings: 13. 1. Since January 1985, the City of Carlsbad has been undertaking a comprehensive review of the Land Use Element of its General Plan. As part of that review a Council appointed Citizens Committee prepared a comprehensive report and recommendation to the City Council. That report was subject to public hearings by both the Planning Commission and City Council. Included "in the recommendations of the Citizens Committee were recommendations that no new development should occur unless adequate public facilities exist to serve the new development. 2. On August 6, 1985, the City Council adopted Interim Ordinance No. 9766, imposing certain temporary land use controls on property within the City, consistent with the recommendation of the Citizens Committee. On September 3, 1985, the City Council adopted Interim Ordinance No. 9771 which extended the restrictions of Ordinance No. 9766 until July 20, 1986. On December 10, 1985, the City Council approved in concept several land use proposals not contained in the Citizens Committee report. On January 21, 1986 the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 9791 imposing a temporary moratorium on development approvals based on the findings contained in that ordinance. On April 22, 1986 the City Council revised City Council Policy No. 17, based on the findings contained therein. On May 6, 1986 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 8107 establishing a traffic impact fee for the La Costa Area of the City. The City Council finds that all of these actions plus the adoption of Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code are necessary to ensure adequate public facilities are available to serve any new development in the City. Without Chapter No. 21.90 and the requirements imposed by it, adequate public facilities may not be available to serve new development or building. Development on building without public facilities is contrary to the City General Plan and would be dangerous to the public health and safety. 3. This action of the City Council is consistent with long standing policies and objectives of the City to ensure adequate public facilities within Carlsbad. This action will protect the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Carlsbad by ensuring safe streets, adequate water, sewer and drainage facilities, sufficient fire protection and recreation facilities. 4. This action is consistent with the City's policy to provide housing opportunities for all economic sectors of the community, because sufficient opportunities for new housing continue to exist within the City and Chapter 21.90 does not affect the number of houses which may be built. In addition, development of housing for low and moderate income persons and families would most likely occur in areas of the City which are designated for highest development priority. By encouraging development of infill areas first, where the infrastructure is already existing, the cost of housing may be reduced. 14. 5. Because any new development affects public facility availability it is necessary to impose the fees and charges which will be used to provide public facilities on any new building in the City. The Council finds that failure to impose the fees and charges on any new building in the City will adversely affect the public health and safety by reducing the safety of its City's streets, increasing the burden on water, sewer, drainage and fire facilities, and by overcrowding existing schools, parks and recreational facilities. 6. Adoption of Chapter 21.90 will enhance the regional welfare by ensuring that adequate and safe public facilities will exist in Carlsbad because many of these facilities are used by persons residing in neighboring areas and cities their safety and welfare is enhanced. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published at least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after its adoption. The fees created by Section 21.90.050 of this ordinance shall be effective as to building permits for single or multifamily residential projects 60 days after the adoption of this ordinance. INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City Council held on the day of , 1986 and thereafter 15, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of , 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY VINCENT F. BIONDO, JR., City Attorney MARY H. CASLER, Mayor ATTEST: ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk 16. JUNE 3, 1986 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: City Manager GROWTH MANAGEMENT The purpose of this memorandum is to clarify Council's intent on Growth Management. January 21, 1986 - Council adopted Ordinance 9791 which did the following: 1. - stopped acceptance of new applications 2. - stopped issuing building permits except for: a) final maps b) developing projects c) minor subdivisions d) redevelopment area e) northwest quadrant f) commercial/industrial 4-f O ^ Ordinance 9791 expires July 20, 1986. •H c May 27, 1986 - Council adopted the follwing motion - ou "Council directed staff to apply available staff time o to the Growth Management Program as a high priority, ^ and directed staff to cease processing other projects •5 which do not have a final map subject to the other § exceptions in the draft Growth Management Ordinance, < and directed staff to include the appropriate provisions <u of implementation in the Growth Management Ordinance." ao •H Staff's interpretation of that action is that all projects oo are stopped except : a) government b) single family dwelling• c) projects with final map June 3, 1986 City Council GROWTH MANAGEMENT Page 2 During Council discussion May 27, the staff presentation dealt with residential projects only. In order to provide staff time for finishing the Growth Management Plan, we proposed that processing be stopped on 8500 units in the pipeline and that 3500 units be allowed to build out. The 3500 were projects with final maps. We have further reviewed projects in the pipeline and recommend that Council exempt additional projects which have already cleared Planning Department and would not take staff time away from growth management. Those projects are listed on a June 2 report from Marty Orenyak (attached). Basically, we recommend exempting: 1. - approved commercial/industrial projects 2. - approved projects in the northwest quadrant This action would be more restrictive than Ordinance 9791, but not as tough as the May 27 action. If Council concurs, thses provisions would be incorporated in the new ordinance now before Planning Commission. It is further suggested that Council consider exempting: non-profit institutions (Scripps Hospital, Boys and Girls Club) Staff would not devote any time to the Scripps Hospital Plans until their EIR has been certified. Council might want to also consider including a special exemption procedure in the ordinance to allow processing of the Sammis and Hunt Master Plans. By stopping the processing of these two plans, the Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Plan may be jeopardized. Most of the staff work is completed on the Sammis project and allowing this to proceed would not impact the staff workload. A significant amount of staff work is still involved in processing of the Hunt project. Before a decision is made to continue processing the Hunt project, staff needs at least 30 days of uninterrupted time to develop the scope of work for the citywide Facilities Management Plan. At the end of this period, staff would be better prepared to address this project in conjunction with staffing requirements necessary to complete the Growth Management Plan. IANK ALE SHI RE Attachment > JUNE 2, 1986 TO: FRANK ALtSHJRE, CITY MANAGER FROM: MARTY MC&YAK, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR COUNCIL ACTION - MAY 27, 1986 At the meeting of May 27th, the City Council provided directions to staff which will critically affect the application of staff time to development projects. The Council also directed staff to make changes to the Draft Growth Management Ordinance affecting the Facility Management Plan. This memorandum provides a brief analysis regarding the results and implementation of this Council action. The first part of the Council's action was to stop the processing of development projects unless they had completed all City requirements and were actively pursuing building permits. This basically means that only projects with final maps can continue to process. In halting the processing of development projects, the Council did provide for several exemptions: 1) Projects with final maps (as mentioned) 2) Redevelopment Projects 3) Developing projects (listed as developing on Exhibit "A" to Ordinance 9791) 4) Government projects 5) Owner occupied single family residences In addition to these exemptions, staff feels that 3 additional exemptions would be appropriate: 6) Commercial/industrial projects where all discretionary permits have been granted. 7) Commercial/industrial projects tentatively scheduled for Planning Commission as of May 23, 1986 where all staff work has been completed. 8) Projects returned to staff for revision by the Planning Commission or City Council (the residential ones would not be allowed to obtain building permits until a City- wide facility management plan has been approved by the City Council ). 9) Projects in the northwest quadrant which had the right under existing Ordinance 9791 to get a final map before July 20, 1986. Staff believes that allowing these projects to get final maps will in no way effect staff's ability to continue working on the Growth Management Program. These projects were shown on Exhibit A to Ordinance 9791 and would account for a maximum of 748 units although only a portion of these would be able to final their maps before July 20, 1986. A list of all projects exempted under the above provisions are attached as Exhibit "X". The projects exempted account for 2,474 units. The second major aspect of the Council's action was to apply staff time no longer used for development processing to the implementation of the Growth Management Plan. This includes the development of a Facilities Management Plan for the entire City prior to the continuation of development processing. Staff is moving to implement this direction as soon as possible by taking the following steps: 1)Evaluate the remaining projects in Department, which still need to be i nclude: the Planning completed. These A) Growth Management Plan B) Citizen's Committee projects (most of which are nearing completion) C) Special Projects i) LCP/related coastal implementation ii) Review of Hosp Grove MP/EIR 111) Review of La Costa Master Plan D) Continuation of EIR and special projects processing where a consultant is already under contract with the City. 2)Analyze staff time be utilized on the Management Plan. in terms of development days-per-week which of the Facility can 3) Hold a workshop (Thursday, June 5) involving key staff personnel to provide task - identification for the City- wide Facilities Management Plan. 4) Hire Consultants - This would be based on staff time allocated to the Facilities Management Plan and on the tasks identified. Consultants would be hired for those portions of the plan which could not be completed by staff. In summary, the City Council has directed staff to cease the processing of development projects, with several exemptions, so that staff time can be utilized to develop a Facilities Management Plan for the entire City. Staff is currently analyzing available time so that decisions regarding the hiring of consultants may be made at our workshop on June 5. MO/CG/ar Attachment: Exhibit "X" -2- EXHIBIT "X1 CITY OF CARLSBAD I. EXEMPTIONS PR CT CT CT CT CT CT CT CT CT CT CT CT CT CT CT CT CT CT OJECT NO. 72-20 73-24 77-2 81-23 81-29 82-6 82-7 82-18 83-1 83-2 83-4 83-16 83-21 83-23 83-29 84-6 84-13 84-18 FINAL MAP ON ENTIRE PROJECT PROJECT NAME Sea Point Apartments Sea Cliff Los Arboles Yuki Limited Alicante Hills Laguna Del Mar Laguna Riviera Apartments Batiquitos Point Snapel 1 Vista Pacifica/Las Playas Wind Song Snores Santa Fe Ridge Pacific Scene - Knolls Trai 1 s Oak Tree Concepts Warmi ngton 3001 Carlsbad Boulevard Bearman Condos Sequoi a continued on PERMITS AVAILABLE 190 92 34 3 22 79 46 354 120 142 131 37 44 128 22 228 72 10 8 next page - 1 - PROJECT PROJECT PERMITS NO. NAME AVAILABLE CT 84-23 Brook Field 85 CT 84-42 . Von Packard 4 CT 85-5 Santa Fe Knol1s 70 CUP-239 Pacific Riveria 121 PCD-76 Jefferson 1_2_ Total Permits Available 2,054 FINAL MAP ON PORTION OF PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PERMITS NO. NAME AVAILABLE CT 84-7 La Costa Racquet Club 176 CT 84-14 Tamarack Pointe Phase III 244 420 APPROVED COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PROJECT PROJECT NO. NAME CT 74-21 Carlsbad Oaks CT 81-46 Signal Landmark CT 82-25 Granam International CT 83-10 Graham International CT 83-12 Soutners CT 83-36 Carlsbad Gateway CT 84-17 Carlsbad Office Center PUD-17(D) Meister SOP 83-11 Marie Calendar's & Hotel Restaurant CT 85-24 Koll Carlsbad Research Center COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS SCHEDULED AS OF MAY 23, 1986 PROJECT . PROJECT NO. NAME PCO-90/CUP-293 Jim Finney Pontiac CT 85-32/PUO-93 Koll Series 10,000 - 3 - II. STAFF WORKLOAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. PROJECT NAME RP 84-7 Town Square RP 85-22 Trautman RP 86-6 Chandler RP/V 86-8 Magtira RP 86-9 Willis RP 86-10 Robinson RP 86-11 Boys & Girls Club (Pool Cover) RP 86-12 7-Eleven/Pepi's Pizza PROJECTS RETURNED TO STAFF BY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR REDESIGN PROJECT NO. PROJECT NAME CUP-291 Hale SOP 85-17/V-373 Brodine CT 85-16/PUD-85 Lancaster Townhomes CT 85-43/CP-302 Casa Loma Condos CT 85-28/CP-321 La Costa Valley Terrace - 4 - SPECIAL PROJECTS Growth Management Program Revise Land Use Element Zoning Consistency City of Carlsbad R/R ROW Planned Development Ordinance Hillside Ordinance Noise Ordinance Architectural Review Scenic Corridors Standards Open Space Inventory General Plan Consistency and Compatibility Economic Impact Analysis of General Plan Agricultural Policy LCP Implementing Ordinance Facilities Adequacy Zones 1-6 Planning/Traffic Analysis - North Beach Area Traffic Impact Fee Ponto Drive Specific Plan Day Care Element EIR1s - Evan's Point Hosp Grove La Costa Master Pla P aci fi c Rim Rancho Del Cerro Scripp's Hospital South Coast Asphalt Master Plans under Review Hosp Grove La Costa - 5 -