HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-05-27; City Council; 8616-1; Growth Management13
1* : ••- "1 (6 . . • ' ' CIT OF CARLSBAD — AGEND BILL !
cu T3 'H•U' CD OI
01-0 .4J XI •13 4J O 4->01 Or-HH )-l
•HMHvH 01 01
0 cdT3 XI X!C 4-> 4-1 4J
3 COT3o C o oiO *t3 cd 4-1 ^oi 3
4J •> 4-1 rH
• CJ >> O Om oi 4-1 cu pi •CN (-1 -H •!-) MH 0)
1 -H M XI 0r~^ T3 o 3 O C
•H CO 4-1 Cd
COrH M C01 -H ft «><4H -HC o ftm T3o Cxi cd cd ritS3 3 60 g 4J OO-H CD
0 cd 13 CIH • cd c oi cu0 -H 4J gPi OI CO MH U OIcd 4-i cd oi 60I-H to cd >-i cd
to cd oi 13 cd60 M > &C OI 60 cd 13
•H XI O XI C XICO 4J >-l Cd 4-1cd PM 4J |sXI >•, 0 •> 0CW-H 4-1 Pi OI !-l
•H C CJ OCOrH CU O Ccu ftg T3 cd cu•H g o> c xi4J-H 60X1 vH 4J•H CO CS CJ T3rH C -H K PI•H O cd XI O -rt04-is isCO 4J CO>4H^XI CO C CCO 4-* 4-1 CD Oo oi £ o g -H
•H 4-> O 0) OI 4J
rH 3 >H •!-> 60 CdXt CO O cd 4-1
3-H ri C Cftg oi ft cd oixi s gCd 01 4-1 J-l CD
OI OI X rH
O CO O XI 4-1 ft
O O -Ho co oi (-14J oi g 6oo M-I•H-H C 0
4J >-l 4-1 -rt 4-1CO co m cocd 60m co cd c4-1 oim oi M o
i — 1 4-1 Cd CJ TJ T-l
3 cd 4-1 O to
CO O CO $H OI -H
PI ftXl >
Oro 01 4-i O
O rH 0) )-loi X) co C ftoixi cd cd -H
V-l 4-1 1 — 1 Q) CU•H -H O CO 4Jxi oi cd pi cd4-> > O O -rlO Cd Cd 4-1 -rl 1-14-1 C 4J ft•H >->4H ft OP^grH MH OI IH4-1 -H ft Cd O ft•HrH ft 4-) X! ftu oi cd to 01 cd
AB*^/^-**/ TITLEr DEPT. HD.
MTC3. 5/27/86 GROWTH MANAGEMENT HITY ATTY
DEPT. CM CITY Mf5R
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That Council review and discuss:
1. Projects in the pipeline
2. Workload of staff
3. Growth management implementation program
4. Possible modifications to program
BACKGROUND :
Over the past year and a half, Council has taken various actions
aimed at reducing the rate and amount of growth in the city
and improving the quality of development. The Land Use Committee
recommendations are being implemented and a growth management
program is scheduled for adoption by July 22, 1986. At the
same time, a large volume of projects is being processed by
the Building, Planning and Engineering Departments. Complicating
the problem is the growth limitation initiative which would
create an entirely different growth control program if adopted.
The purpose of this workhop is to review the program now underway
and to consider what if any, changes and decisions need to be
made .
PROJECTS IN THE PIPELINE -
It is important to understand the status of current projects
"in the pipeline". Growth management must deal with projects
in various stages of approval and Council must decide which
projects will be allowed to continue to completion and which
will have to be recycled to comply with new procedures and
standards .
The total number of residential projects in the pipeline is
80. The total number of dwelling units is 12,085.
.
•^--J
Vfzftj**^
00I
Im
A. Awaiting building permits - final map already approved.
B. Processing final map - tentative map already approved.
C. Processing tentative map or other discretionary permits,
0
OO
Page 2 of Agenda Bill No.
For simplicity we will designate the pipeline as -
A - Building
B - Engineering
C - Planning
The number of projects and dwelling units in each category is
CATEGORY PROJECTS D/U
A
B
C
Total
29
30
21
80
3503
4609
3973
12,085
Ordinance No. 9791 - the current moratorium ordinance allows
all of those projects to continue to be processed. Category
A and B are exempt from new density requirements but are required
to pay increased fees when building permits are issued. Category
C projects will be conditioned to meet new standards as they
are approved by Planning Commission and Council.
WORKLOAD OF STAFF -
Council has directed staff to carry out 26 tasks in connection
with the Citizens Committee recommendation. These tasks were
to be completed by July 1986. Some tasks will not be complete
because the Council has added the new growth management plan
as a higher priority.
The 3503 dwelling units in Category A have completed all city
requirements and are actively pursuing building permits. Unless
Council action is taken, we expect most of those permits to
be issued in 1986.
The 8112 dwelling units in Category B and C are also pushing
for approvals and many of those will be seeking building permits
in 1986.
Page 3 of Agenda Bill No. <f*6> /£ -«*/
The proposed growth management ordinance would require Council
to approve public facility phasing programs before building
permits could be issued.
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY -
One of the key elements of the growth management program is
the traffic circulation plan. We have completed a traffic impact
study for the southerly third of Carlsbad (south of Poinsettia -
Carrillo Way).
We now need to do a similar study for the northerly two-thirds
of the City. This study will generate a list of projects, an
impact fee and enable us to create a schedule for construction.
It will take about six months to complete. Staff is reviewing
proposals from consultants now.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM -
Staff has worked out a schedule to have the growth management
ordinance in place by July 20. This is detailed in the memorandum
from Michael Holzmiller attached.
MODIFICATIONS TO GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM -
Staff requested a growth management consultant to review and
comment on the proposed program.
Mr. Robert Freilich is an experienced growth management consultant.
He has worked with over 30 cities including San Diego. He was
aksed to critique the staff's growth management proposal.
His comments deal with the following key issues:
1. The staff plan is too complex and needs to be simplified.
2. The City should complete a city-wide public facility
phasing program rather than requiring developers to
do it.
3. The plan should consider some type of growth limitation
or control mechanism such as an annual rate.
Mr. Freilich was brought into the picture last week and he has
not had time to give us any recommendations in writing. If
Council wishes to consider any of Mr. Freilich's recommendations
we will need to return with proposals on how to implement.
3
Page 4 of Agenda Bill No.
It should be noted that Mr. Freilich's comments are shared by
many of the citizens who came to the growth management hearing.
Frequent comments were made that the plan is too complicated
and does not limit growth directly. Others have said they think
the City should do the facilities phasing plan rather than the
developers.
SUMMARY -
The purpose of this workshop is to familiarize the Council with
the problems involved in implementing the growth management
program.
We are ready to go ahead with the program previously approved
in concept. However, we want Council to consider modifications
suggested by Mr. Freilich. Does council wish to modify the
plan?
Under any case, it is imperative that we deal with projects
in the pipeline. Staff cannot continue processing 80 projects
and at the same time develop a totally new system. Staff is
overloaded now and we need to clarify the objectives and work
priorities for the rest of the year.
EXHIBITS:
1. Memorandum from Michael Holzmiller dated 5/23/86.
2. Ordinance No. jft)^ establishing a Growth Management
program for the City.
MAY 23, 1986
TO: FRANK ALESHIRE, CITY MANAGER
FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR
GROWTH MANAGEMENT WORK PROGRAM - MAY 27, 1986 - JULY 22, 1986
Over the last six months, the workload assigned to the Planning
Department has continually increased. A number of projects have
been identified by the City Council as priority items. These
include, in order of priority, the following:
I. Design and implementation of a growth management program,
including the development of a pilot Facilities Management
Program completion of a Facility Management Program, for six
urbanized areas;
II. The processing of Facilities Management Programs for any
other areas of the City as submitted by developers;
III. Completion of 26 separate programs recommended by the Land
Use Citizen's Committee;
IV. Completion of the various coastal projects including the
ordinances permitting the City to attain coastal
authority;
V. The processing of development projects (there are currently
about 60 applications submitted for processing, many of
them major projects).
VI. Several other large special projects as directed by the City
Council including the review of the La Costa Master Plan and
the preparation of an EIR and review of the Hosp Grove
Master Plan.
To ensure that City Council priorities are completed by the
required time, and to ensure fairness to all parties concerned,
the Planning Department has had to develop a work program to
address the aforementioned constraints. The program contains
seven major points as follows:
1) Michael Holzmiller and one additional planner will be
removed from the department to be utilized full time on
the growth management plan and on citizen's committee
programs where immediate completion has been determined
to be critical. Completion of this task will require a
full time commitment and will require input from other
departments and the use of consultants. More
specifically, the work assignments for this task are as
fol1ows:
EXHIBIT
A) Growth Management Ordinance - Holzmiller, Hentschke,
Consultant.
B) Preparation of Facilities Management Program for six
urbanized areas - Hagaman, Carter.
C) Review of Facilities Management Programs for other
areas of City as submitted by developers
- Consultant.
D) Critical Citizens Committee Programs - Holzmiller,
Schulte - These include incompatible land use
inventory, hillside ordinance, zoning consistency,
land use element rewrite.
E) Appeal of zone boundaries and categories - Orenyak,
Patchett, Mannen.
F) Traffic impact fee study for remainder of City.
2) Each remaining staff planner will be devoting two days
of work time a week to the other citizens committee
assi gnments.
3) Each remaining planner will select one day a week to
meet with developers or their representatives.
4) Planners will only be taking calls in the afternoon
hours (1:00 P. M. - 5:00 P. M.) and will only be
returning calls during these hours.
5) To save time, letters will be sent to applicants with
projects that have many issues. The letter will list
the issues and any possible solutions to resolve the
issues. Staff will not meet again with the applicant
unless it can be determined through a written response
from the developer outlining any changes, that
substantial progress has been made in solving project
i ssues.
6) Development projects have been divided into two
categories, as shown on Exhibit "A", attached.
Processing will continue on projects in Category I.
Projects in Category II will receive little or no
review until the moratorium ends on July 22, 1986.
Projects are placed in Category II because they fall
into one of four categories: new applications,
applicant delay, incomplete applications or because an
environmental impact report is in process for the
project. Exhibit "AA" shows projects which have been
tentatively scheduled for Planning Commission.
-2-
In addition, because of the constant changing in
development standards, projects will also be evaluated
pursuant to pending General Plan or ordinance changes.
A notice (Exhibit "B") advising of this procedure shall
be signed by applicants prior to submittal, and by
applicant's currently pending hearing.
7) The Planning Department will not be meeting immediately
with developers who want review of preliminary plans
where no application has been submitted. Developers
who want to meet on preliminary plans will fill out a
request form at the Development Processing Services
counter. Development Processing Services personnel,
however, will continue to answer questions regarding
property where no application has been received.
This program is designed to concentrate staff time on the items
of greatest priority, while at the same time allowing development
processing to occur on those projects which by fairness merit
continued review. It is unfortunate that staff time does not
permit the immediate completion of all projects and assignments.
We feel that the above program provides the most equitable
treatment of development projects while accomplishing the major
goals of the City Council in completing the growth management
program and the major citizen's committee recommendations by July
22, 1986.
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
MJH/ar
-3-
7
EXHIBIT "A"
PROJECT PRIORITY LIST
Priority
Category
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
Description
AD
AD
IA
EIR
AD
EIR
AD
AD
EIR
AD
AD
AD
AD
EIR
NA
NA
NA/IA
NA
NA
Submi ttal
Date
1/4/85
1/22/85
3/14/85
5/3/85
8/9/85
8/21/85
8/21/85
9/10/85
10/24/85
11/6/85
12/11/85
1/7/86
1/10/86
1/13/86
1/14/86
1/14/86
2/4/86
2/4/86
3/14/86
8/5/85
3/27/86
4/2/86
4/15/86
PCD
4/28/86
5/6/86
3/23/84
1/9/85
2/13/85
5/10/85
9/19/84
10/17/85
11/13/85
11/21/85
12/12/85
1/13/86
1/14/86
1/14/86
5/10/84
1/14/86
4/2/86
3/13/86
4/23/86
5/2/86
5/5/86
Project
ZC-344/GPA/LU 86-3/MP-181 (South Coast Park)
GPA/LU 85-2/MP-177/CT 85-35/SDP 86-2
(Pacific Rim Resorts) (HPI)
EIR 85-2/ZC-328/CT 85-25 (Rancho Del Cerro)
CT 85-17/ZC-331/SP-199(College Business Park)
GPA/LU 85-9/ZC-338 (Seapointe-Carlsbad)
CT 85-27/PUD-92 (Kelly Ranch - Area E)
CT 85-26/PUD-91 (Kelly Ranch - Area I)
CT 85-34/ZC-341 (View Point) (Formerly Mola)
ZC-340/SP-200 (Carlsbad Airport
Business Center)
CUP-279 (Chevron)
RP 85-22 (Trautman)
SP-201 (Ponto Drive Specific Plan)
CUP-284 (7-Eleven)
CT 86-2/PUD-98 (Carrillo Ranch I)
MP-139(C) (Rancho Carrillo)
GPA/LU 86-2 (Rancho Carrillo)
CUP-286 (Texaco)
SP-144(E) (SDG&E/Encina West)
RP 86-6 (Chandler)
GPA/LU 86- (City of Carlsbad - R/R ROW)
PUD Ordinance
PCD-88 (La Costa Village Apartments)
RP/V 86-8 (Magtira)
RP 86-9 (Willis)
RP 86-10 (Robinson)
Building Relocation Request
RP 86-11 (Boys & Girls Club (Pool))
RP 86-12 (7-11/Pepi's Pizza)
RP 84-7 (Town Square)
CT 85-1/CP-307 (La Costa Townhomes)
CT 85-12/SP-198 (County - Faraday Busines
EIR 85-3/MP-179/ZC-332 (Evans Point)
CUP-261 (Pacific Coast Hotel)
MP-139(C)/CT 85-33/ZC-339/
SDP 85-14 (Scripps Memorial Hospital)
CUP-205(A) (Crazy Burro)
SP-180(C) (Carlsbad Research Center/City)
CT 85-39/PUD-97 (Laurel Tree)
SDP 86-1 (Crehan Condos)
CUP-194(B) (Aquaculture Systems Intl.)
CT 86-4/PUD-100/V-370 (Sea Gables Condos)
PCD-62 (Navarra)
ZC-343/CT 86-3/PUD-99 (Hillebrecht Property)
SDP 86-3 (Rancho La Costa Plaza)
CUP-289 (Lin)
SDP 86-4 (Palomar Airport Plaza)
V-374 (Atlantic/Richfield)
CUP-292 (Palomar Deli)
Description
AD - Applicant Delay
(Includes projects
with a large -number
of unresolved issues)
IA - Incomplete -Application
NA - New Application
EIR - EIR in process - no review of specific
projects until EIR complete
* All redevelopment projects listed as
priority 1 unless applicant wants delay
EXHIBIT "AA"
Tentatively Scheduled for Planning Commission
Hay 28. 1986
Design Review Board
RP/CUP 86-7 (Union Oil)
RP 85-17 (Johnston)
RP 86-5 (Pucci)
Planning Commission
ZCA-192 (Aquaculture)
CUP-291 (Robert Hale)
CT 85-28/CP-321 (La Costa Valley Terrace)
Growth Management Program
SDP 85-17/V-373 (Brodine)
June 11. 1986
SDP 85-15/CT 85-37/PUD-95 (BLEP II)
CT 85-38/PUD-96 (BLEP III)
CT 85-16/PUD-85 (Lancaster Townhomes)
June 25. 1986
CT 84-43/CP-302 (Casa Loma Condos)
GPA Amendments/Citizen Committee
/O
EXHIBIT "B"
NOTICE TO ALL APPLICANTS
Carlsbad is presently in the process of reviewing its standards,
ordinances, and policies concerning land use within the City.
This review program is a City priority, to be completed as
expeditiously as possible.
During this review period many of the "Rules" which will affect
your application may be subject to change. The following list
identifies some of the land use standards, ordinances, policies
or issues that are being addressed.
City of Carlsbad Policy regarding:
Agricultural use of land
Coastal zone land use
Economic impact of development
General Plan consistency and compatibility
Land Use Element of the General Plan
Open Space requirements
Phasing and amount of required pub.lic facilities
The City's Zoning Ordinance
Parking Standards
Hillside Development Standards
Planned Community Zone
Planned Development Ordinance
Architectural Review
Scenic Corridors Standards
Noise Standards
To assure consistency and compatibility witn City
Pol icy.
Major Plans Under Review
La Costa Master Plan
Koll Specific Plan
Carrillo Ranch Master Plan
It is Carlsbad's concern that all proposed land use applications
conform to tne requirements of land use standards, ordinances,
and policies that have been adopted or are being considered for
adoption. Therefore, it is important that your application be
consistent with proposed revisions prior to your project being
heard at a public hearing. As such, your application should be
of such a nature to assure compliance with potential revised
standards, ordinances and policies.
-2-
The City of Carlsbad's departments of Development Processing and
Planning will-offer as much direction and assistance as is
possible during this review period to identify potential issues
of your application relative to Carlsbad's possible revision of
land use and land development standards, ordinances and
polici es.
Please acknowledge the revisable status of Carlsbad's land use
and land development standards, ordinances and policies with
respect to your application, by signing the following statement.
The City cannot accept or process your application without your
acknowledgement and acceptance of potential changes in land use
and land development standards, ordinances and policies.
I, (please print or type)
OWNER/APPLICANT
understand that the City of Carlsbad is presently amending or
revising its standards, ordinances and policies concerning land
development and land use. I understand and accept that the
standards, ordinance and policies affecting my application may
be different by the time my application is decided on, than they
are at present. I agree to assure my application is in
conformance to City standards, ordinances and policies that are
adopted or recommended for adoption by the time my application
is decided on.
OWNER/APPLICANT DATE
-3-
13
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 21 OF THE
CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ADDITION OF
CHAPTER 21.90 ESTABLISHING A GROWTH MANAGEMENT
'PROGRAM FOR THE CITY
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: That Title 21 is amended by the addition of
Chapter 21.90 to read as follows:
"Chapter 21.90
Growth Management
Sections:
21.90.010 Purpose and intent.
21.90.020 Definitions.
21.90.030 General prohibition.
21.90.040 Requirements for provision of facilities.
21.90.050 Establishment of facilities management fee.
21.90.060 Special provisions for building permits
issued during temporary moratorium.
21.90.070 Finding of health, safety and welfare
necessary for the fees imposed by sections
21.90.040 and 21.90.030.
21.90.080 Special provisions for the approval of
certain final maps.
21.90.090 Extensions of prior approvals prohibited.
21.90.100 Development status categories.
21.90.110 Facilities management fees.
21.90.120 Contents of facility management plans.
21.90.130 Performance standards.
21.90.140 Facilities management plan prepartion.
21.90.145 Facilities management plan processing.
21.90.150 Implementation of facilities management
plans.
21.90.160 Obligation to pay fees or install .
improvements required by any other law.
21.90.170 Implementing guidelines.
21.90.180 Exclusion for government facilities.
21.90.190 Exemption for redevelopment permits.
21.90.200 Exemption for single family lots and
developing projects.
21.90.210 Exemption for City initiated zone changes and
general plan amendments.
21.90.220 Council actions, fees, notice.
21.90.230 Severability.
1.
EXHIBIT "2"
H
21.90.010 Purpose and intent.
(a) It is the policy of the City of Carlsbad to:
(1) Provide quality housing opportunities for all
economic sectors of the community;
(2) Provide a balanced community with adequate
commercial., industrial, recreational and open space areas to
support the residential areas of the City.
(3) Ensure that public facilities and services
meeting City standards are available concurrent with the need
created by new development.
(4) Balance the housing needs of the region
against the public service needs of Carlsbad residents and
available fiscal and environmental resources.
(5) Encourage infill development in urbanized
areas before allowing extensions of public facilities and
services to areas which have yet to be urbanized.
(6) Ensure that all development is consistent with
the Carlsbad general plan.
(b) The City Council of the City of Carlsbad has
determined despite previous City Council actions including but
not limited to, amendments to the land use, housing and parks and
recreation elements of the general plan, amendments to City
Council Policy No. 17, adoption of traffic impact fees, and
modification of park dedication and improvement requirements,
that the demand for public services and facilities has outpaced
the supply resulting in shortages in facilities including but not
limited to streets, parks, open space, schools, libraries,
drainage facilities and general governmental services. The City
Council has further determined that these shortages are
detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare of the
citizens of Carlsbad.
(c) This chapter is adopted to ensure the
implementation of the policies stated in subsection (a), to
eliminate the shortages identified in subsection (b), to ensure
that no development occurs without providing for adequate public
services and facilities, to regulate the pace of development
thereby ensuring a continued supply of housing over a period of
years and to continue the quality of life for all economic
sectors of the Carlsbad community.
(d) This chapter will further the policies, goals and
objectives established herein by requiring identification of all
public facilities and services required for development, by
prohibiting development until adequate provisions for the public
facilities and services are made by developers of projects within
the City, and by giving development priority to areas of the City
where public facilities and services are already in place (infill
areas).
(e) This chapter replaces the temporary moratorium on
processing and approval of development projects imposed by City
Council Ordinance No. 9791.
21.90.020 Definitions.
(a) Whenever the following terms are used in this
chapter they shall have the meaning established by this section
2.
unless from the context it is apparent that another meaning is
intended:
(1) "Development permit" means any permit,
entitlement or approval whether discretionary or ministerial
issued under Title 20 or 21 of this code and any legislative
actions such as zone changes, general plan amendments, or master
plan approval or amendment.
(2) "Development" means any use to which land is
put, building or other alteration of land and construction
incident thereto.
(3) "Facilities management plan" means a
development and community facilities management plan defined by
Section 21.90.120 of this chapter.
(4) "Facilities" means any schools, parks, open
space, or recreational areas or structures providing for fire,
library, or governmental services, identified in a facilities
management plan.
(5) "Improvement" includes traffic controls,
streets and highways, including curbs, gutters, and sidewalks,
bridges, overcrossings, street interchanges, flood control or
storm drain facilities, sewer facilities, water facilities and
lighting facilities.
21.90.030 General prohibition.
(a) Unless exempted by the provisions of this chapter
no application for any building permit or development permit
shall be accepted, processed or approved until a facilities
management plan has been submitted and approved according to this
chapter.
(b) A development permit may be processed concurrently
with a facilities management plan if the applicant first waives
in writing any time limits which are imposed by law on the
processing and approval of applications for development projects
or subdivisions.
(c) A facilities management plan shall be considered a
project for the purposes of Title 19 of this code. Environmental
documents for a facilities management plan should be processed
concurrently with the plan.
21.90.040 Reguirement for provision of facilities.
(a) No development permit shall be approved unless the
approving authority finds that the permit is consistent with the
facilities management plan. To ensure consistency the approving
authority may impose any condition to the approval necessary or
convenient to implementation of the facilities management plan.
(b) No building permit shall be issued unless the fees
reguired by this chapter, and any applicable facilities
management plan fees are first paid, and the permit is consistent
with the applicable facilities management plan.
(c) The reguirements of this chapter are imposed as a
condition of zoning on the property to ensure implementation of
and consistency with the general plan and to protect the public
health, safety and welfare by ensuring that public facilities and
3.
improvements will be installed to serve new development prior to
or concurrently with need.
21.90.050 Establishment of facilities management fee.
(a) A facilities management fee is hereby established
to pay far improvements or facilities identified in a facilities
management plan which are not otherwise financed by any other
fee, charge or tax on development, or are not installed by a
developer as a condition of a building permit or development
permit. The facilities management fee shall be paid before the
issuance of a building permit. The amount of the fee shall be
determined based upon the estimated cost of the facility or
improvement identified as needed in the facilities management
plan for the facilities management zone applicable to the
property for which the permit is issued.
(b) The fee required by this section is in addition to
any other means of financing facilities or improvements
identified by a facilities management plan or any other tax, fee,
charge or improvement requirement which may be imposed on the
development of property under the provisions of state law, this
code or City Council policy.
(c) The amount of the fee for a facilities zone shall
be set by City Council resolution after a public hearing,
published notice of which shall be given according to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 21.54.060(2) and Government Code Section
54992.
(d) As a condition of any development permit
application submitted after the effective date of this chapter
the applicant shall agree to pay the fee established by this
section at the time a building permit is issued.
(e) No building permit shall be issued unless the fee
established by this section is first paid. This requirement
shall be included as a conditon of any development permit issued
after the effective date of this chapter.
21.90,060 Special provisions for building permits
issued during temporary moratorium.
(a) Applicants for projects for which building permits
were issued after January 21, 1986 and before July 20, 1986 shall
pay the fee established by Section 21.90.050 within 30 days after
the amount of the fee is determined by the City Council. Payment
shall be made according to the agreement executed by the
applicant pursuant to Section 3 of Ordinance No. 9791.
21.90.070 Finding of health, safety and welfare
necessary for the fees imposed by Section 21.90.050 and
21.90.060.
Ta) The City Council hereby declares that payment of
the fee established and imposed by Section 21.90.050 and
21.90.060 and installation of the facilities and improvements
identified in a facilities management plan are necessary to
achieve the policies established in Section 21.90.010 and to
implement the City's general plan. If the fees are not paid or
4.
II
the facilities or improvements are not installed the public
health, safety and welfare will suffer because there will be
insufficient facilities and improvements to accommodate any new
development. This finding is based upon City Council Policy No.
17, City Council Ordinance No. 9791, and the evidence presented
at the public hearings on the ordinance adopting this chapter.
(b) If any condition imposed as a conditon of a
development permit or building permit pursuant to this chapter is
protested then the permit shall be suspended during the period of
the protest.
(c) This section is adopted pursuant to Government Code
Section 65913.5
JJ..90.080 Special provisions for the approval of
certain final subdivision maps.
(a) If a tentative map or tentative parcel map was
approved for a project before January 21, 1986; or if a tentative
map or tentative parcel map was approved for a project after
January 21, 1986 and approval of a final map or parcel map was
not prohibited by Ordinance No. 9791; then a final map or parcel
map which substantially complies with the tentative map, and with
all required zoning permits may be processed and approved prior
to the adoption of a facilities management plan for the
facilities management zone applicable to the property where the
project is located. Building permits for the subdivision shall
be subject to the provisions of this chapter.
(b) If a tentative map for a project was approved after
January 21, 1986 but approval of a final map was prohibited by
Ordinance No. 9791, then approval of a final map shall be
prohibited until a facilities management plan is adopted for the
facilities management zone applicable to the property where the
project is located. The time period for expiration of such
tentative maps shall not include any time when approval of a
final map is prohibited by this section. The period for
expiration of any other development permit issued in conjunction
with such a tentative map is likewise tolled. The period of the
expiration date tolling shall not exceed five years.
21.90.090 Extensions of prior approvals prohibited.
Ta)Exceptas providedin Section 21.90.080(b)an
extension of the expiration date of any development permit which
was approved prior to the effective date of this ordinance shall
not be granted unless a facilities management plan has been
approved and the extension of the development permit is found to
be consistent with the facilities management plan.
(b) No final map for any phased tentative map approved
before the effective date of this chapter for which the
subdivider is required to install public improvements of a value
of $100,000 or more shall be approved unless the final map covers
all remaining property included within the tentative map approval
or unless the subdivider first in writing waives the automatic
extension provisions of Section 66452.6(a) of the Government
Code.
5.
ir
(c) If a development permit issued prior to the
effective date of this chapter has an expiration period within
which of building permits must be issued and building permits
cannot be issued by operation of this chapter then the expiration
period shall be tolled until the facilities management plan is
approved,, .but in no event shall the time period of tolling exceed
two years.
21.90.100 Development status categories.
(a) To assist in the orderly provision of public
facilities and to implement the urban land reserve policies of
the general plan the City Council shall by resolution adopt
general development status categories for all areas of the City.
In order to encourage infill development, and to reduce the
growth inducing impact of premature extension of public
facilities to undeveloped areas, the priority for determining
City involvement in providing facilities through its capital
improvement budget, capital facilities preplanning, assessment
district formation, and public facilities management shall be
according to development status category.
The development status categories shall also be used in
establishing appropriate facilities management zones pursuant to
Section 21.90.110.
The development categories shall be ranked according to
level of urbanization, the existing capacity of public facilities
and services to accommodate additional development, the
feasibility of reauiring additional services and facilities for
new development within the category without depriving other areas
of facilities or service capacity, on a determination of
whether new development within the category will have a growth
inducing impact on other development status categories and on
prior investments in public facilities which have been approved
by the City and made by property owner.
(b) The development status categories are as follows:
(1) Category I. This category has highest
priority and generally includes already urbanized areas.
(2) Category II. This category has second
priority and generally includes areas which are undergoing
urbanization.
(3) Category III. This category has third
priority and generally includes areas which may be urbanized in
the future.
(c) Facilities management zones shall be correlated to
development status categories. As development occurs or
facilities management plans are implemented, a facilities
management zone may be assigned to a higher development status
category.
(d) Property shall be assigned to a development status
category based upon a determination of whether the property
predominantly has the characteristics identified for a category
by subsection (e). If property is identified on the general plan
for urban land reserve it shall be assigned to Category III
unless prior development has occurred or unless the property has
6.
t he characteristics of Category I or Category II in which event
it may be assigned to a higher category.
(e) The characteristics to be used as a guide for
determining development status categories shall be as follows:
(1) Category I
(A) The public facilities intrastructure has
been substantially installed.
(B) New development is principally infill in
nature because the developable area is immediately contiguous to
or surrounded by already developed areas such that development
may be served by existing public improvement facilities.
(C) Public facilities and services are
adeguate for anticipated new development although some upgrading
may be reguired.
(D) Public facilities infrastructure
generally can be completed by upgrading existing facilities or
installing minor additions to existing facilities. Improvements
to be installed are generally infill in character.
(2) Category II
(A) Public facilities infrastructure has been
partially installed, but the part not installed may be planned.
(B) Some development in the area but planning
has occurred in the form of development approvals or master
plans. Adjacent to or a logical extension of Category I
development.
(C) New development will reguire new onsite
improvements and may reguire the installation or major
improvement of circulation network streets as shown on the
circulation element, or the installation of major water or sewer
lines.
(D) Development could be accomplished without
overburdening the facililties existing for Category I development
if all services and facilities needed for Category II are
provided and provided that certain Category I facilities are
upgraded.
(3) Category III
(A) Generally no public facility
infrastructure has been constructed.
(B) Separated from existing development or
not a logical extension of existing development. No tentative
maps have been approved.
(C) New development will reguire installation
of major public improvements and facilities such as streets,
water trunk lines, major effluent disposal or sewer lines, major
drainage facilities and other improvement identified on the
general plan.
(D) No detailed public facilities planning
has occurred. Development could not occur without providing
facilities for Category II development.
(f) The initial assignment of property and facilities
management zones to development status shall be made by City
Council. A Development Status Review Committee consisting of the
Assistant City Managers and the Community Development Director is
established. Reguests for reassignment of property for
7.
facilities management zones to a different development status
category shall be made in writing to the committee. The
committee shall meet with the applicant and make a recommendation
to the City Council regarding the reassignment. After receiving
a recommendation from the Committee, the City Council may
reassign.-property or facilities zones without a hearing.
21.90.110 Facilities management zones.
(a) The City Council shall divide the City into
facilities management zones correlated to the development status
categories. A facilities management plan shall be adopted for
each facilities management zone.
(b) The boundaries of the zones shall be established
based upon logical facilities and improvements planning,
construction and service relationships to ensure the economically
efficient and timely installation of reguired facilities and
improvements. In establishing zone boundaries the City Council
shall also be guided by the following considerations:
(1) Service areas or drainage basins.
(2) Extent to which facilities or improvements are
in place or available.
(3) Ownership of property.
(4) Development status category.
(5) Boundaries of existing zoning master plans.
(6) Boundaries of pending zoning master plans.
(7) Boundaries of potential future zoning master
plan areas.
(8) Boundaries of approved tentative maps.
(9) Public facilities relationships especially to
the City's planned major circulation network.
(10) Special district service territories.
(11) Approved fire, drainage, sewer, or other
facilities or improvement master plans.
21.90.120 Contents of Development and Community
Facility Management Plans.
(a) A facilities management plan shall be prepared for
each facility zone and shall cover the entire zone. The plan
shall consist of maps, graphs, tables, and narrative text and
shall be based upon the general plan and zoning applicable to the
project at the time of the approval of the plan.
(b) The facilities management plan shall show how and
when the following facilities and improvements will be installed
or financed as specified in subsection (c).
(1) Sewer systems and sewage treatment
(2) Water
(3) Drainage
(4) Circulation
(5) Fire facilities
(6) Governmental administration facilities
(7) Parks and other recreational facilities
(8) Libraries
(9) Schools
(10) Open space
8.
(c) The plan shall include the following information
with regard to each public facility listed in subsection (b):
(1) An inventory of present and future
requirements for each facility based upon the performance
standard established for each facility. Because improvement
requirements for certain facilities and services may overlap zone
boundaries a discussion of the need for coordination and a
proposed coordination plan for facilities extending from one zone
to another shall be included. Cost estimates shall be included.
It must be shown that development in the zone will not reduce the
public facilities capabilities or create facilities shortages in
zones with a higher development status priority. With regard to
fire facilities it must be shown that development will not reduce
service capability in any zone below the performance standard
which is established pursuant to subsection (e)
The inventory shall be consistent with the general
plan and zoning for the area.
(2) A phasing schedule establishing the timing for
installation or provisions of public facilities or services in
relationship to the amount of development activity (e.g. number
of dwelling units, number of square feet of commercial space,
etc.) for the facilities management zone. The phasing schedule
shall include a schedule of development within the zone and a
market data and cash flow analysis for financing of facilities
and improvements for the zone. The phasing schedule shall
identify periods where the demand for facilities and services may
exceed the capacity and provide a plan for eliminating the
shortfall. In those situations when demand exceeds capacity and
it is not feasible to increase the capacity prior to development,
no development shall occur unless a time schedule for and a means
of increasing the capacity is established in the plan.
(3) A financing plan establishing various methods
of funding the public facilities identified in the plan. The
plan shall identify those facilities and services which would
otherwise be provided as a requirement of processing a
development project (i.e. requirements imposed as a condition of
a development permit) or provided by the developer in order to
establish consistency with the general plan or Titles 18, 20 or
21 of this Code, and those facilities for which new funding
methods which shall be sufficient to ensure sufficient funds are
available to construct or provide a public facility or service
when required by the phasing schedule. Where facilities or
services are required for more than one zone, the phasing plan
shall identify those other zones and the plan for each zone shall
be coordinated. Coordination, however, shall not require
identical funding methods. If a facilities management plan
identifies facilities which are needed to serve development
within a zone but which will be located either entirely or
partially within another zone which has a lower development
status priority then the phasing plan shall also assess the
growth inducing impact of the out of zone improvements.
(4) A list or schedule of facilities reguirements
correlated to individual development projects within the zone.
9.
(d) The City Council may adopt a model
facilities management plan.
21.90.130 Performance standard.
The City Council shall adopt general performance
standards.-for each public facility or service listed in Section
21.90.120(b). Specific performance standards for each zone shall
be adopted as part of the facilities management plan. If at any
time after preparation of a facilities management plan the
performance standards established by a plan are not met then no
development permits or building permits shall be issued until an
amendment to the plan addressing the deficiency is approved and
the performance standard is met.
21.90.140 Facilities management plan preparation.
(a)A facilities management plan may be prepared by
the City or by the property owners within the zone according to
the procedures established by this section.
(b) The City Council, upon its own initiative, may by
resolution of intention direct the City Manager to prepare a
facilities management plan for any zone. The City Council may
assess the cost of preparing the plan to the owners within the
zone after a hearing ten days written notice of which is given
to the property owners within the zone. The cost shall be
spread prorata according to acreage and development potential.
(c) All owners within the zone may jointly submit a
facilities management plan.
(d) For zones in which joint submission of a facilities
management plan is shown to be not feasible any owner or group of
cooperating owners within the zone may petition the City Council
to allow the owner or group of owners to prepare the plan. After
a meeting for which ten days prior written notice has been given
to the property owners within the zone, the City Council may
permit the owner or group of owners to submit a plan. The cost
of the plan shall be determined at the time of the hearing and
shall be assessed prorata to all property within the phasing zone
and reimbursed to the preparers. The cost shall be collected by
the City at the time any application for a development project
within the zone is submitted to the City and reimbursed to the
owner or owners who prepared the plan. No assessment shall be
made unless the planis approved. Cost of approval shall not
include interest.
(e) As an option to preparation by the owner or group
of owners as provided in subsection (d) the City Council may
decide to direct the City Manager to prepare the facilities
management plan. The cost of preparation shall be advanced to
the City by the requesting ownre or owners and assessed to the
remaining owners as provided in subsection (d).
21.90.145 Facilities management plan processing.
(a)Facilities management plans shall be reviewed
according to the following procedure:
(1) A completed facilities management plan may be
submitted to the Planning Director for processing. If the
10.
=23
Planning Director determines that the plan complies with the
provisions of Section 21.90.130 the director shall set a
facilities management plan for public hearing before the Planning
Commission within sixty days of receipt of a complete
application.
(2) The hearing shall be noticed according to the
provisions of Section 21.54.060(2). A staff report containing
recommendation on the plan shall be prepared and furnished to
the public, the applicant, and the Planning Commission prior to
the hearing.
(3) The Planning Commission shall hear and
consider the application for a facilities management plan and
shall by resolution prepare recommendations and findings for the
City Council. The action of the Commission shall be filed with
the City Clerk, and a copy shall be mailed to the owners within
the facility zone.
(4) When the Planning Commission action is filed
with the City Clerk, the Clerk shall set the matter for public
hearing before the City Council. The hearing shall be noticed
according to the provisions of Section 21.54.060(2).
(5) The City Council shall hear the matter, and
after considering the findings and recommendations of the
Planning Commission, may by ordinance approve a facilities
management plan. The City Council may include in the ordinance
adopting the facilities management plan any fees or facilities
inprovement requirements which it deems necessary to impose on
development projects and building permits within the zone in
order to implement the facilities management plan. The adoption
of a facilities management plan shall be an exercise of the
legislative power of the City Council.
(c) A facilities management plan may be amended
following the same procedures for the original adoption.
21.90.150 Implementation of facilities managemant
plans.
(a) To insure that the provisions of this chapter and
the general plan are met the following shall apply:
(1) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter no
development permit shall be approved unless the map or permit is
consistent with the facilities management plan and unless
provision for all facilities and services related to the
development project are provided or funded.
(2) No building permit shall be issued unless all
applicable fees, including but not limited to, public facilities
fees, bridge and thoroughfare fees, traffic impact fees,
facilities management fees, school fees, park-in-lieu fees, sewer
fees, water fees, or other development fees identified in the
facilities management plan and adopted by the City Council have
first been paid or provision for their payment has been made to
the satisfaction of the City Council.
(b) Facility management plan process is part of the
City's ongoing planning effort. It is anticipated that
amendments to a facilities management plan may be necessary.
Adoption of a facilities management plan does not establish any
11.
entitlement or right to any particular general plan or zoning
designation or any particular development proposal. A facilities
management plan is a guide to ensure that no development occurs
unless adequate public facilities or services will be available
to meet demands created by development. The City Council may
initiate .an amendment to a facilities management plan at any
time if in its discretion it determines that an amendment is
necessary to ensure adequate facilities and services.
(c) If at any time it appears to the satisfaction of
the City Manager that public facilities or services within a
facilities management zone or zones are inadequate to accommodate
any further development within that zone or that the performance
standards adopted pursuant to Section 21.90.130 are not being met
he shall immediately report the deficiency to the Council. If
the Council determines that a deficiency exists then no further
building or development permits shall be issued within that zone
or zones shall cease until an amendment to the facilities
management plan which addresses the deficiency is approved by the
City Council and the performance standard is met.
(d) The Planning Director shall monitor the development
activity for each facilities management zone and shall prepare an
annual report to the City Council consisting of maps, graphs,
charts, tables and text and which includes a developmental
activity analysis, a facilities and services adequacy analysis, a
facility revenue/expenditure analysis and recommendation for any
amendments to the facilities management plan. The content of the
annual report shall be established by the City Council.
21.90.160 Obligation to pay fees or install
improvements required by any other law. Nothing in this chapter
shall be construed as relieving a builder, developer or
subdivider from any public improvement requirement, dedication
requirement or fee requirement which is imposed pursuant to Title
18, 20, or 21 of this code or pursuant to any City Council
policy.
21.90.170 Implementing guidelines.
The City Council may adopt any guidelines it deems
necessary to implement this chapter.
21.90.180 Exclusion for Government facilities.
Development proposals which consist of facilities,
or structures constructed by a city, county, special district,
state, or federal government or any agency, department, or
subsidiary therof for governmental purposes are excluded from
the provisions of this chapter. This exclusion shall not apply
to development proposals to which a possessory interest tax
would be applicable.
21.90.190 Exemption for redevelopment permits.
Notwithstanding anything in this chapter to the
contrary, redevelopment permits and building permits may be
processed and approved prior to the preparation of a facilities
management plan for the redevelopment area. Such permits shall
12.
be conditioned upon approval of any fees established pursuant to
the facilities management plan.
21.90.200 Exemption for single family lots and
developing projects.
.Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
chapter, building permits for projects identified in Section 2(F)
of Ordinance No. 9791 (projects for which construction had
commended and were designated on the map marked Exhibit A to
Ordinance No. 9791 as developing) or for single family dwellings
on lots owned by the person intending to occupy the dwelling may
be issued before the preparation of a facilities management plan
if the applicant agrees to pay the fee established by Section
21.90.050 and any additional fees established as a result of the
plan.
21.90.210 Exemption for City initiated zone changes or
general plan amendments.
Notwithstanding anything in this chapter to the
contrary, zone changes, or general plan amendments necessary to
accomplish consistency between the general plan and zoning, to
implement the provisions of the Local Coastal Plan or which the
City Council finds will not increase the public facilities or
services needs within a zone and which are initiated by the City
Council may be processed before preparation of a facilities
management plan.
21.90.220 Council actions, fees, notice.
(a) Whenever this chapter requires or permits an
action or decision of the City Council, that action or decision
shall be accomplished by a resolution.
(b) The City Council shall establish application and
processing fees for the submission and processing of facililties
management plans and for any other request made under Section
21.90.100, 21.90.120 or 21.90.140.
(c) Whenever written notice is required to be given
to property owners under this section the notice shall be mailed
by first class mail to the owners shown on the last equalized
assessment roll.
21.90.230 Severability. If any section, subsection,
sentence, clause or phrase of the ordinance codified in this
chapter is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional
by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions
of the ordinance codified in this chapter. The City Council
declares that it would have passed the ordinance codified in this
chapter and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase
thereof, irrespective of the fact that any part thereof be
declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 2: The City Council makes the following
findings:
13.
1. Since January 1985, the City of Carlsbad has been
undertaking a comprehensive review of the Land Use Element of its
General Plan. As part of that review a Council appointed
Citizens Committee prepared a comprehensive report and
recommendation to the City Council. That report was subject to
public hearings by both the Planning Commission and City Council.
Included "in the recommendations of the Citizens Committee were
recommendations that no new development should occur unless
adequate public facilities exist to serve the new development.
2. On August 6, 1985, the City Council adopted Interim
Ordinance No. 9766, imposing certain temporary land use controls
on property within the City, consistent with the recommendation
of the Citizens Committee. On September 3, 1985, the City
Council adopted Interim Ordinance No. 9771 which extended the
restrictions of Ordinance No. 9766 until July 20, 1986. On
December 10, 1985, the City Council approved in concept several
land use proposals not contained in the Citizens Committee
report. On January 21, 1986 the City Council adopted Urgency
Ordinance No. 9791 imposing a temporary moratorium on development
approvals based on the findings contained in that ordinance. On
April 22, 1986 the City Council revised City Council Policy No.
17, based on the findings contained therein. On May 6, 1986 the
City Council adopted Ordinance No. 8107 establishing a traffic
impact fee for the La Costa Area of the City. The City Council
finds that all of these actions plus the adoption of Chapter
21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code are necessary to ensure
adequate public facilities are available to serve any new
development in the City. Without Chapter No. 21.90 and the
requirements imposed by it, adequate public facilities may not be
available to serve new development or building. Development on
building without public facilities is contrary to the City
General Plan and would be dangerous to the public health and
safety.
3. This action of the City Council is consistent with
long standing policies and objectives of the City to ensure
adequate public facilities within Carlsbad. This action will
protect the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of
Carlsbad by ensuring safe streets, adequate water, sewer and
drainage facilities, sufficient fire protection and recreation
facilities.
4. This action is consistent with the City's policy to
provide housing opportunities for all economic sectors of the
community, because sufficient opportunities for new housing
continue to exist within the City and Chapter 21.90 does not
affect the number of houses which may be built. In addition,
development of housing for low and moderate income persons and
families would most likely occur in areas of the City which are
designated for highest development priority. By encouraging
development of infill areas first, where the infrastructure is
already existing, the cost of housing may be reduced.
14.
5. Because any new development affects public facility
availability it is necessary to impose the fees and charges which
will be used to provide public facilities on any new building in
the City. The Council finds that failure to impose the fees and
charges on any new building in the City will adversely affect the
public health and safety by reducing the safety of its City's
streets, increasing the burden on water, sewer, drainage and fire
facilities, and by overcrowding existing schools, parks and
recreational facilities.
6. Adoption of Chapter 21.90 will enhance the regional
welfare by ensuring that adequate and safe public facilities will
exist in Carlsbad because many of these facilities are used by
persons residing in neighboring areas and cities their safety and
welfare is enhanced.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective
thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify
to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published at
least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after its
adoption. The fees created by Section 21.90.050 of this
ordinance shall be effective as to building permits for single or
multifamily residential projects 60 days after the adoption of
this ordinance.
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the
Carlsbad City Council held on the day of ,
1986 and thereafter
15,
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City
Council held on the day of , 1986, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
VINCENT F. BIONDO, JR., City Attorney
MARY H. CASLER, Mayor
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk
16.
JUNE 3, 1986
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: City Manager
GROWTH MANAGEMENT
The purpose of this memorandum is to clarify Council's intent
on Growth Management.
January 21, 1986 - Council adopted Ordinance 9791 which did
the following:
1. - stopped acceptance of new applications
2. - stopped issuing building permits except for:
a) final maps
b) developing projects
c) minor subdivisions
d) redevelopment area
e) northwest quadrant
f) commercial/industrial
4-f
O
^ Ordinance 9791 expires July 20, 1986.
•H
c May 27, 1986 - Council adopted the follwing motion -
ou "Council directed staff to apply available staff time
o to the Growth Management Program as a high priority,
^ and directed staff to cease processing other projects
•5 which do not have a final map subject to the other
§ exceptions in the draft Growth Management Ordinance,
< and directed staff to include the appropriate provisions
<u of implementation in the Growth Management Ordinance."
ao
•H
Staff's interpretation of that action is that all projects
oo are stopped except :
a) government
b) single family dwelling•
c) projects with final map
June 3, 1986
City Council
GROWTH MANAGEMENT
Page 2
During Council discussion May 27, the staff presentation dealt
with residential projects only. In order to provide staff
time for finishing the Growth Management Plan, we proposed
that processing be stopped on 8500 units in the pipeline and
that 3500 units be allowed to build out. The 3500 were projects
with final maps.
We have further reviewed projects in the pipeline and recommend
that Council exempt additional projects which have already
cleared Planning Department and would not take staff time
away from growth management.
Those projects are listed on a June 2 report from Marty Orenyak
(attached).
Basically, we recommend exempting:
1. - approved commercial/industrial projects
2. - approved projects in the northwest quadrant
This action would be more restrictive than Ordinance 9791,
but not as tough as the May 27 action.
If Council concurs, thses provisions would be incorporated
in the new ordinance now before Planning Commission. It is
further suggested that Council consider exempting:
non-profit institutions (Scripps Hospital, Boys and
Girls Club)
Staff would not devote any time to the Scripps Hospital
Plans until their EIR has been certified.
Council might want to also consider including a special
exemption procedure in the ordinance to allow processing of
the Sammis and Hunt Master Plans. By stopping the processing
of these two plans, the Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Plan
may be jeopardized. Most of the staff work is completed on
the Sammis project and allowing this to proceed would not
impact the staff workload. A significant amount of staff
work is still involved in processing of the Hunt project.
Before a decision is made to continue processing the Hunt
project, staff needs at least 30 days of uninterrupted time
to develop the scope of work for the citywide Facilities
Management Plan. At the end of this period, staff would be
better prepared to address this project in conjunction with
staffing requirements necessary to complete the Growth
Management Plan.
IANK ALE SHI RE
Attachment >
JUNE 2, 1986
TO: FRANK ALtSHJRE, CITY MANAGER
FROM: MARTY MC&YAK, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
COUNCIL ACTION - MAY 27, 1986
At the meeting of May 27th, the City Council provided directions
to staff which will critically affect the application of staff
time to development projects. The Council also directed staff to
make changes to the Draft Growth Management Ordinance affecting
the Facility Management Plan. This memorandum provides a brief
analysis regarding the results and implementation of this Council
action.
The first part of the Council's action was to stop the processing
of development projects unless they had completed all City
requirements and were actively pursuing building permits. This
basically means that only projects with final maps can continue
to process. In halting the processing of development projects,
the Council did provide for several exemptions:
1) Projects with final maps (as mentioned)
2) Redevelopment Projects
3) Developing projects (listed as developing on Exhibit
"A" to Ordinance 9791)
4) Government projects
5) Owner occupied single family residences
In addition to these exemptions, staff feels that 3 additional
exemptions would be appropriate:
6) Commercial/industrial projects where all discretionary
permits have been granted.
7) Commercial/industrial projects tentatively scheduled for
Planning Commission as of May 23, 1986 where all staff
work has been completed.
8) Projects returned to staff for revision by the Planning
Commission or City Council (the residential ones would
not be allowed to obtain building permits until a City-
wide facility management plan has been approved by the
City Council ).
9) Projects in the northwest quadrant which had the right
under existing Ordinance 9791 to get a final map before
July 20, 1986. Staff believes that allowing these
projects to get final maps will in no way effect staff's
ability to continue working on the Growth Management
Program. These projects were shown on Exhibit A to
Ordinance 9791 and would account for a maximum of 748
units although only a portion of these would be able to
final their maps before July 20, 1986.
A list of all projects exempted under the above provisions are
attached as Exhibit "X". The projects exempted account for 2,474
units.
The second major aspect of the Council's action was to apply
staff time no longer used for development processing to the
implementation of the Growth Management Plan. This includes the
development of a Facilities Management Plan for the entire City
prior to the continuation of development processing. Staff is
moving to implement this direction as soon as possible by taking
the following steps:
1)Evaluate the remaining projects in
Department, which still need to be
i nclude:
the Planning
completed. These
A) Growth Management Plan
B) Citizen's Committee projects (most of which are
nearing completion)
C) Special Projects
i) LCP/related coastal implementation
ii) Review of Hosp Grove MP/EIR
111) Review of La Costa Master Plan
D) Continuation of EIR and special projects processing
where a consultant is already under contract with
the City.
2)Analyze staff time
be utilized on the
Management Plan.
in terms of
development
days-per-week which
of the Facility
can
3) Hold a workshop (Thursday, June 5) involving key staff
personnel to provide task - identification for the City-
wide Facilities Management Plan.
4) Hire Consultants - This would be based on staff time
allocated to the Facilities Management Plan and on the
tasks identified. Consultants would be hired for those
portions of the plan which could not be completed by
staff.
In summary, the City Council has directed staff to cease the
processing of development projects, with several exemptions, so
that staff time can be utilized to develop a Facilities
Management Plan for the entire City. Staff is currently
analyzing available time so that decisions regarding the hiring
of consultants may be made at our workshop on June 5.
MO/CG/ar
Attachment: Exhibit "X"
-2-
EXHIBIT "X1
CITY OF CARLSBAD
I. EXEMPTIONS
PR
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
OJECT
NO.
72-20
73-24
77-2
81-23
81-29
82-6
82-7
82-18
83-1
83-2
83-4
83-16
83-21
83-23
83-29
84-6
84-13
84-18
FINAL MAP ON ENTIRE PROJECT
PROJECT
NAME
Sea Point Apartments
Sea Cliff
Los Arboles
Yuki Limited
Alicante Hills
Laguna Del Mar
Laguna Riviera Apartments
Batiquitos Point
Snapel 1
Vista Pacifica/Las Playas
Wind Song Snores
Santa Fe Ridge
Pacific Scene - Knolls
Trai 1 s
Oak Tree Concepts
Warmi ngton
3001 Carlsbad Boulevard
Bearman Condos
Sequoi a
continued on
PERMITS
AVAILABLE
190
92
34
3
22
79
46
354
120
142
131
37
44
128
22
228
72
10
8
next page
- 1 -
PROJECT PROJECT PERMITS
NO. NAME AVAILABLE
CT 84-23 Brook Field 85
CT 84-42 . Von Packard 4
CT 85-5 Santa Fe Knol1s 70
CUP-239 Pacific Riveria 121
PCD-76 Jefferson 1_2_
Total Permits Available 2,054
FINAL MAP ON PORTION OF PROJECT
PROJECT PROJECT PERMITS
NO. NAME AVAILABLE
CT 84-7 La Costa Racquet Club 176
CT 84-14 Tamarack Pointe Phase III 244
420
APPROVED COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL
PROJECT PROJECT
NO. NAME
CT 74-21 Carlsbad Oaks
CT 81-46 Signal Landmark
CT 82-25 Granam International
CT 83-10 Graham International
CT 83-12 Soutners
CT 83-36 Carlsbad Gateway
CT 84-17 Carlsbad Office Center
PUD-17(D) Meister
SOP 83-11 Marie Calendar's &
Hotel Restaurant
CT 85-24 Koll Carlsbad Research Center
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS SCHEDULED
AS OF MAY 23, 1986
PROJECT . PROJECT
NO. NAME
PCO-90/CUP-293 Jim Finney Pontiac
CT 85-32/PUO-93 Koll Series 10,000
- 3 -
II. STAFF WORKLOAD
REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT NO. PROJECT NAME
RP 84-7 Town Square
RP 85-22 Trautman
RP 86-6 Chandler
RP/V 86-8 Magtira
RP 86-9 Willis
RP 86-10 Robinson
RP 86-11 Boys & Girls Club (Pool Cover)
RP 86-12 7-Eleven/Pepi's Pizza
PROJECTS RETURNED TO STAFF BY
PLANNING COMMISSION FOR REDESIGN
PROJECT NO. PROJECT NAME
CUP-291 Hale
SOP 85-17/V-373 Brodine
CT 85-16/PUD-85 Lancaster Townhomes
CT 85-43/CP-302 Casa Loma Condos
CT 85-28/CP-321 La Costa Valley Terrace
- 4 -
SPECIAL PROJECTS
Growth Management Program
Revise Land Use Element
Zoning Consistency
City of Carlsbad R/R ROW
Planned Development Ordinance
Hillside Ordinance
Noise Ordinance
Architectural Review
Scenic Corridors Standards
Open Space Inventory
General Plan Consistency and Compatibility
Economic Impact Analysis of General Plan
Agricultural Policy
LCP Implementing Ordinance
Facilities Adequacy Zones 1-6
Planning/Traffic Analysis - North Beach Area
Traffic Impact Fee
Ponto Drive Specific Plan
Day Care Element
EIR1s - Evan's Point
Hosp Grove
La Costa Master Pla
P aci fi c Rim
Rancho Del Cerro
Scripp's Hospital
South Coast Asphalt
Master Plans under Review
Hosp Grove
La Costa
- 5 -