The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1986-07-01; City Council; 8684; APPEAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL FOR AN ADDITION TO A DUPLEX AT 2643 OCEAN STREET (SDP 85-17|V 373|BRODINE)' M c -d u c (d h bD 2 0 U -d a U *d g al td U *d !4 a 0 )-I a a (d u *rl s 3 $ 5 m u U 0 a aJ. hrn ah am aJI )-I> 04 @I a\ r. ln a, UP4 ua QJm h -d M m> (do 3k a ha CJa Ea 06 ua 4d (d ha) ua *d a v(d ala sdc 2 MU 0 Q - I- a2 0 I rl I aw a .z u a -I 2 3 0 0 r-. 5 CITWF CARLSBAD - AGENDmILL 1 A6#- TITLE: APPEAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DEPl DENIAL FOR AN ADDITION TO A DUPLEX AT C,TY 2643 OCEAN STREET. MTG. DEPT.- SDP 85-17/V-373 - BRODINE CITY 7/1/86 RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Planning Commission is recommending that the City Counci 1 SDP 85-17/V-373 back to staff for redesign. ITEM EXPLANATION The request is for approval of a site development plan to ren and add to an existing duplex located at 2643 Ocean Street. development plan is needed because this project is within the addition to the existing two bedroom unit (of a bedroom and 1 the second story), a one bedroom unit on the second story, tk new parking spaces, and the transformation of the existing be on the lower level to a recreation room. The application als includes a request for variances to permit tandem and compact visitor parking spaces. An engineering variance for a driveki width increase is also requested. This item was heard by the Planning Commission on May 28, 198 The Planning Commission was not as concerned with the varianc requests as they were with the project design. Because of th topography and age of the buildings in this area many varianc have been issued for projects on the west side of Ocean Stref The Commission was more concerned about the height and desigr the building. They felt that the appearance of the building too massive and that the height, although technically meeting 25' requirement of the Beach Overlay Zone, did not meet the i of that zone to reduce height and mass. AS a result the ~Lar Commission voted to return the project to staff for redesign, The applicant requested a reconsideration at the June 4th PIE Commission meeting and asked for the Planning Commission to c the project so that the decision could be appealed to the Cit Council. The Planning Commission granted this request. The Planning Commission is recommending that the City Council return this item to staff for redesign. For further informat please see the attached report to the Planning Commission. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This project was determined to be a CLass I exemption under t California Environmental Quality Act. boundaries of the Beach Area Overlay Zone. The remodel inch II) e Page 2 of Agenda Bill No. 810 &Ll FISCAL IMPACT The increased need for city capital facilities resulting fror development will be offset by the payment of the public faci: fee. Any capital facilities related directly to this develoi will be constructed and paid for by the developer. Increased operating expenses related to this development wil: offset to some extent from increased tax or fee revenue genei by the development. No detailed economic impact analysis of development has been conducted at this time so predictions 0: portion of operating expenses covered by additional operatinc revenue created as a result of this project cannot be made. PUBLIC FACILITY ADEQUACY STATUS Traffic Impact Fee Not Re uire;i Bridge & Thorou hfare District Not Re uired z- Develo ent Categor 1 Develo ment Zone Phasing Pro ram Not Re uired EXHIBITS 1. Location Map 2. Vicinity Map 3. Planning Commission Resolution Nos: 2553 & 2554 4. Planning Commission Staff Report dated May 28, 1986 w/attachments WGAIIWN MA@ 1 ARMY/NAVY ACADEMY 11 , I BEECH ST -- R E D E V E L( BOUNDAR City of Garlsbad V- I BRODINE SDP 85 @VICINITY Me I city of carlsbad \ 'RMH) R-3 RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM HIGH 8 -15 du/ac (0s) Os OPEN SPACE / (RH) RESIDENTIAL HIGH 15-23 dulac TS TRAVEL SERVl VR VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT V BRODINE SDP E > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 0 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2553 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF "BE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 85-17, A REMODEL AND ADDITION TO AN EXISTING DUPLEX LOCATED AT 2643 OCEAN STREET WITHIN THE BEACH AREA OVERLAY ZONE. APPLICANT: BRODINE CASE NO: SDP 85-17 CITY OF CARLSBADI CALIFORNIA1 DENYING A SITE WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed w City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; q WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal code; an WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Munici the Planning Commission did, on the 28th day of May, 1986, said request on property described as: Lots 11 and 12 of Block A of Hayes Land Company Ac Map No. 2, Map 1221 on file with the County of Sal I I Diego; WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considl testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring tc heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to : 1 ~ Development Plan NO. 85-17. ' 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 (A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. (B) That based on the evidence presented at the public he, the Commission DENIES SDP 85-17, based on the followii findings: Findings: 1 1) The project does not meet the intent of the Beach Are2 Overlay Zone to reduce building mass and the amount oj building coverage on site. //// 1 2 3 4 5 6 I 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2o 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e e 2) The project as proposed does not meet the intent of th Area Overlay Zone to create buildings that appear to t stories or less in height. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, he the 28th day of May, 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners: Marc McFadden, Schramm, Holmes & Hall. NOES: Commissioner McBane. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. CLARENCE SCHLEHUBER, Chaii CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMI SS I ATTEST: MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER PLANNING DIRECTOR ~ 1 I PC RES0 NO. 2553 -6- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 l2 13 14 l5 16 17 l8 19 e 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2554 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CI' PARKING, COMPACT PARKING AND A STANDARDS VARIANCE FOR A DRIVEWAY CUT GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST I APPLICANT: BRODINE CASE NO.: V-373 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain prope CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW OCEAN STREET BETWEEN BEECH AND CYPRESS. wit: Lots 11 and 12, Block A of Map 1221, Hayes Land C Addition X2, has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to 1 Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal code; an( WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 28th May, 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribe( to consider said request: and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all pe said Commission considered all facto ~ desiring to be heard, 11 relating to V-373. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 l6 17 e 0 2) That the granting of such variance could be material11 detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which thc property is located, since the proposed variance will greater building coverage on site. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, hc the 28th day of May, 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners: Marc McFadden, Schramm, Holmes & Hall. NOES : Commissioner McBane. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. CLARENCE SCHLEHUBER, Cha CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISI ATTEST: MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER PLANNING DIRECTOR 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 /I I I PC RES0 NO. 2554 -2- I'IULI\ LL, I3U.J 0 STAFF REPORT a - DATE: MAY 28, 1986 T 0: P LA-NN f NG COMM I S S I ON FROM: P LAN N I NG DE PAR TME NT SUBJECT: SOP 85-17/V-373 - BROOINE - Remodel and addition to existing duplex located at 2643 Ocean Street within t Beach Area Overlay Zone. RE COMME N DAT I ON I. It is recommended that the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolutic Nos. 2553 and 2554, APPROVING SDP 85-17/V-373 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. 11. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting approval of a site development pli remodel an existing duplex located at 2643 Ocean Street withir Beach Area Overlay Zone. The Beach Area Overlay Zone require: approval of a site development plan prior to issuance of any flew parking spaces, a two-car garage, a one-bedroom unit at tt second story, an addition to the existing two-bedroom unit of second story bedroom and bath, and the transformation of the existing one-bedroom unit at the lower level into a recreatior area. Variances are requested for tandem parking, compact parking, and an engineering standards variance for the drivel cut. 111. ANALYSIS P1 anning Issues 1) Does tne development meet the requirements of the Beach Area Overlay Zone, as well as the underlying zoning and General P1 an? building permits in the beach area. Tne remodel includes tnrf 2) Can all the findings required for approval of a variance mad e? Spec i f i c a1 1 y : a) That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumst or conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the othe property or class of use in the same vicinity and zo e 0 b) That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possess by otner property in the same vicinity and zone but HMCh is denied to the property in 4uestidn: c) That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to tne property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in Which the property is located; d) That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan. DISCUSS ION The issues apparent upon review of the project focused on the requirements of the Beach Area Overlay Zone. Specifically, building height and parking were the immediate concern. The Beach Area Overlay limits height to twenty-five feet or two stories, Whichever is less. This buildinq complies with the t\ story, 25 foot height limit of tne Beacn Area Overlay Zone, Ti proposed remodel of this structure will not increase the neign. of the building over the tWO-StOry, 25 foot height limit. While the applicant is providing the proper number of parking spaces to comply with the Beacn Area Overlay standards, their size and spatial arrangements do not meet ordinance requiremen'. Tne ordinance requires all dwellings to have two full sized resident parking spaces. The two dwelling units have three full sized and one compact space. Twenty percent of the visitc parking spaces may be provided as tandem parking if the garage! are set back at least twenty feet from the front property line! Fifty-five percent of the visitor parking may be provided as compact spaces. The applicant is requestinq a variance to allc one hundred percent of the visitor parking to be tandem and compact (one space), as well as, allowing one compact residenti space. The applicant is also requesting a standards variance for a driveway cut. Staff believes all of tne necessary findings can be made for approval of the variance requests. The coastal bluff location an exceptional constraint to the buildable area of this lot, making it difficult to comply witn the requirements of the zoni ordinance. This request does not increase tne number of dwelli units, rather it brings the existing unit count into conformanc With the development standards of the Beach Area Overlay to the extent possible. Precedence for the approval of this variance has already been established, since a number of variances nave already been granted on Ocean Street to allow setback reduction parking reductions, and driveway width increases. The Engineering Department has reviewed the standards variance request (see attached memo) and is able to support the application of a variance in this situation. -2- 0 e The project is in conformance with the General Plan, since thc General Plan calls for residential development on this site. Staff believes- that approval of this action would serve to materially benefit the property in the vicinity, and, therefoi recommends approval of SDP 85-17/V-373 . .- ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that this project qualifi for a Class 1 categorical exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act. ATTACHMENTS 1) Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2553 and 2554 3) Background Data Sheet 4) Disclosure Form 5) Memo from Engineering Department, dated May 5, 1986 6) Exhibits "A" - "E", dated November 26, 1985 BWH : ad 4/11/86 2) Vicinity Map -3- e e BACKGROUND DATA SHEGT - CASE NO: SDP 85-17n-373 APPLICANT: - BRODINE REQUEST AND UXATION: Remodel and addition to existing duplex at 2643 Ocean Street. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: hts 11 and 12, Block A of Map 1221, Hayes Land Conpany Addition #2. APN: 203-140-09 Acres .16 Proposed No. of Lotsfinits 2 GENERAI, PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation RH Density Allowed 15 - 23 du/ac Density Proposed 12.5 du/ac Existing Zone R3 Proposed Zone R3 Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: Zoning Land Use Site R3 Duplex North R3 Mul t i -Fami 1 y south El3 SFR East R3 Multi & Single Family West Pacific Ocean Pacific Ocean PUBLIC FACILITIES School District Carlsbad Water Carlsbad Sewr Carlsbad EDU's 2 Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated November 22, 1986 ENVIRO"lXL ImACT ASSESSMEKT Negative Declaration, issued - E.I.R. Certified, dated Other , Categorically Exempt e DISCLOSURB FORH e David H. and Gail R. Brodine APPLICANT: me (individual, prtnership, jaht venture, carparatian, syndic - 2643 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, California 92008 -- (61 9) 434-7663 Telephone Nurtber AGENT: Roy R. Blackford A.I.A. Name 2942 Hardinq Street, Suite E, Carlsbad, California 92008 Business Pddress (61 9) 729-0553 Telephone Nunber MEMBERS: Name ( individual , partner, joint venture, corporation, syndication) Business Pddress Haw Address Telewne Nunber Wlephone Nmber Name Heme Address Business Pddress Telephone Nunber Telephone Nurnber (Attach mre sheets if necessary) The applicant is required to apply for Coastal Commission Approw if located in the Coastal Zone, I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this disclosure is true and oorrect and that it will remain true and correct and I relied upon as being true and correct mtil merde$. 3r ‘k,iluT/!; b\& L APPLIcAEJr BY Agent, Owner, Par 0 e MAY 5, 1986 - TO : PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SDP 85-17/V-373 - BRODINE Engineering staff has reviewed the above mentioned applicatio including the proposed 36' wide driveway. The proposed drive width of 36' includes (2) transitions which provides a 30' wi opening. The current standard opening is 30' maximum, the proposed driveway meets this requirement. The current standard frontage of driveway is 40%, this projec proposes 72%. Staff could support a variance to this standar based on the following: 1) That there are extraordinary or unusual circumstance conditions applicable to the situation of surroudinG property necessitating a variance of the standards. The lot widths in the vicinity of this project are irregular and the driveway frontages vary from 30% t 92%. 2) That the granting of such variance will not cause substantial drainage problems. 3) That the granting of such variance will not conflicl with existing or future traffic and parking demands pedestrian or bicycle use. detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to tl property or improvements in the vicinity in which tl variance is granted. 5) That the granting of such variance will not adverse: If you have any questions concerning this variance please COI the Engineering Department at (619) 438-5591. 4) That the granting of such variance will not be affect the comprehensive General Plan. CW:bn xzoz-; cularly described ai: CARLSBAD CITT CO1:NCIL ................................. t LOCATION MAP .11.11.*. LCAOllV ................................. \ RL\ ................................. ................................. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoi and correct, Executed at Carlsbad, County of S State of California on - day of ~ - .IT fi ,/. f <&&L//-\ slTEj))):\e Clerk of tl :r.=c ji ', I i- i4 L - - I Dl1511 DI , --. so I" I L 0. I .. , .e".*.". 6IqrGrur v-373 BRODINE SDP 85-17 CJ 4138 June 21 1986 A ANT: Nicholas C. Banche (for Brodine) CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL LOCATION MAP 1 ARYl/NAVV i__ BEECH ST -- R E 0 E v E LO P Y CNT 8OUnDARY ci II C&kd rv-373 BRODINE 1 SDP 85-17 v APPELLANT: Nicholas C. Banche (for Brodine) CARLSBm CITY COUNCIL LOCATION MAP 1 AIYIINAVY ACADIYY \ ‘.-..,_/IL-, L;:? -*I 1 Le \ _i:L1_i SITE mi \ I i c’ OEECH ai 4 \ I t --.. m E OS VLLOCYINT ‘\, *OUNDA~V ci d w rv-373 BRODINE 1 SOP 85-17 i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad k California, at 6:OO p.m. on Wednesday, May 28, 1986, to consider approval to remodel and add an addition to existing duplex on property located at 2643 Oc Street with the Beach Area Overlay Zone and more particularly described as: hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbac Lots 11 and 12 of Block A of Hayes Land Company Addition Map No. 2, Map 1221 on file with the County of San Diego. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordial 1 y invited to attc the public hearing. If flu have any questions please call the Planning Uepartment at 438-5591. If flu challenge the Site Development Plan and Variance in court, pu may be limited to raising only those issues flu or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: SDP 85-17/V-373 APPLICANT: BRODINE PUBLISH: May 3, 1986 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION a 0 J, 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 Office of the City Clerk Citp of Carlsbab TO : Bobbie Hoder, Planning Dept. FROM : Deputy City Clerk DATE : June 5, 1986 RE : Appeal - SDP 85-17/V-373 The above item has been appealed to the City Council. Please detei when the item will go to Council and complete the form below and rt it to the City Clerk's Office. According to the Municipal Code, appeals must be heard by the City Council within 30 days of the dal that the appeal was filed. Please consider this when setting the date for the hearing. Thank you. The appeal of the above matter should be scheduled for the City Council Meeting of Signature Date 7 0 c"3"L-v- * LAW OFFICES OF DAUBNEY AND BANCHE PROFESS O\PL CORPORATIONS 'YILLIAM H DAUBNEY NICHOLAS C BANCHE 810 WISS ON AVENUE SUITE 201 POST OFFICZ BOX 390 OCEANSIDE CALIFORNIA 92054 June 5, 1986 City Clerk City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 RE: SDP 85-17/V-373 - Brodine APPEAL Dear Madam Clerk : On behalf of the above referenced applicant, appeal is her taken from the adverse decision of the Planning Commission occurring on June 4, 1986. The basis of the appeal is generally that the administrati record contains no evidence which would support the denial of t site development plan. My check in the amount of $275.00 is enclosed satisfying t fee on appeal, and I would ask that you would advise me as to t hearing date before the City Council. Respectfully submitted, eL BANCHE CL NCB: jp encl. cc: Planning Director Assistant City Attorney ACCOUNT NO. DESCRl PTl ON RECEIPT NO. TOTAL Al\i m e 203-041-01 Army and Navy Academy 203-140-14 William F. & Ann 203-043-06 P, 0, OX 3000 31811-B Colegio Dana Point, Cali 203-1'41-02 Carlsbad, California 92008 20 3-1U-23 20 3-142 - 06 203-140-15 Mary L. Sixby r 203-141-10 2141 E, Vine Ave West Covina, Cal 203-140-20 Nancy F. Johnson C/O Robert G, Jo Harrison E, a2aJ. Ethel 14, Silver Raymond S, and Barbara Hullen Suite 3320 941 Grand Avenue Riverside, California 92504 tos Angeles, Cal 203-140-04 Raymorid S, and Barbara B, Mullen 203-140-23 Robert M.Bqant 2110 Arroyo Drive Elizabeth F, Bry Riverside, California 92506 2731 Ocean Streel P, 0. Box 101 203-140-05 Raymond Mullen Carlsbad , Calif 01 2110 Arroyo Drive Riverside, California 92506 203-140-24 Fred 2. Havens, t 2O3-lW-Ol Barbara J. Haven! 203-140-06 David S. Easterbrooks, Jr. 2139 Archdale St] Riverside, Califc 203-140-26 James T. ad Dorc 203-140-02 Richard K. and Carol A. Dickey 1311 Rodeo Road Arcadia, California 91006 611 West Sixth S 203-140-03 1211 South Pacific Street Oceanside, Calif ornh 920% 203-140-07 Douglas G, and Marilyn J, Burchfield Hawthorne 1250 Idaho Avenuc Esc onlido, Calif f 203-140-27 Robert W. arrl Jec 2729 Ocean Stree Carlsbad, Calif01 1481 South De Wolf Fresno, California 93727 Watson 203-140-08 Edwin F. an3 Joyan A. Illsley 203-141-03 Mark Illsley %28 North Circle Road San Bernardino , California 92405 203-140-28 Puesta Del Sol C/O Gordon A. Klc 960 Avordak Tern Glendale , Calif 01 203-140-29 Alvin a& Jayne E 74 Country Club I Las Vegas, Neveda 203-140-30 Ronald G. ad Phj 203-140-09 David H. and Gail R. &dine 20931 Mesa Rica Road Covina , California 91724 203-lLkO-lO Fdward Hubbard 2649 Ocean Street Carlsbad, California 92008 203-ll-cO-ll Phyllis Peckham 203-140-12 5707 West Sixth Street 203-140-31 Steinhart P, 0, Box 83205 Dallas, Texas 752 Los Angeles, California 90036 203-140-13 Jack D. Phillips 3702 Ingram Street San Diego, California 92109 m 0 203-111.0-32 Lori Adelson 203-141-14 Jennie B. Neely Debora L, Neely P. 0, Box 295 Gore, Oklahoma 74435 2683 Ocean Street Carlsbad, California 92008 Bobbie L, Neely r ‘203-140-33 Neil J. and Christina D, Graham 2687 Ocean Street Carlsbad, California 92008 203-141-15 A. M. and Sigrid V. Str 1565 Hillcrest Avenue Carlsbad, California 921 Glendale, California 91208 203-141-16 William K, and Catherin 203-11-CO-9 Edward ad Joanne Klosterman 2669 Garfield Street 203-140-35 J, Richard Kunkel FulLner P. 0, Box 26048 825 SW Fifth Quartz, California 9353 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73126 203-141-17 Richard and June J. Gro 2600 Ocean Street Carlsbad, California 92 P, 0. Box 172 Carlsbad, California 92008 203-141-18 ERhd H. Bliss 1150 Beverly Way 4643 W Avenue M #I4 203-141-01 Raymond C, ad Dorothy J, Ede 2651 Garfield Street P, 0, Box 32 203-1111-04 Norman G. Schakel Mentone, California 923 Escordido, Califorda 92026 203-141-19 Joyce R. TOY 2501 E. Commonwealth St 203-141-05 Albert A, and Jamie G. Polhamus Fullerton, California 9 2642 Ocean Street Carlsbad, California 92008 203-141-27-01 Netherlards West Gen Partnership C/O McGrath 2685 Garfield Street Carlsbad, California 203-141727-02 Robert E. Wailes and Jackuelyn M. Harris 2687 Garfield Street 203-141-06 Irma Algover 2650 Ocean Street Carlsbad, California 92008 203-141-07 Patrick D. ard Laduska Biller P. 0. Box 2303 Vista, California 92083 Carlsbad , California 454.5 Collwood Boule 203-141-08 Gloria A. Hoffer 203-141-27-03 John B. NcGrath 518 Fernleaf Avenue Corona Del Mar, Califorb 92625 Irving J. ad Dorfs A. Gordon 10952 Rathborne Avenue IJorthridge, California 91324 San Diego, Californ 203-111.1-09 203-142-02 Glenn D. Castens 2424 Jefferson Street Carlsbad, California 92 Jess and Carol A. McLau P. 0. Box 233 Carlsbad, California 92 203-141-11 Joanne 14. Eady P. 0. Box 3074 Carlsbad , California 92008 203-1422-03 e 0 203-142-04 City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 203-143-01 Parish of St, Michaeld3Y- 203-143-07 The-Sea Episcopal Church P. 0. Box 127 Carlsbad, California 92008 r 203-144-03 Tobo 1mrestrnent.s 278 5 Roosevelt Street Carlsbad, California 92008 .$ e 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 ( Office of the City Clerk Cltp of Carl&fiab TO : Bobbie Hoder, Planning Dept. FROM: Deputy City Clerk DATE : June 5, 1986 RE : Appeal - SDP 85-17IV-373 The above item has been appealed to the City Council. Please deter when the item will go to Council and complete the form below and re it to the City Clerk's Office. appeals must be heard by the City Council within 30 days of the dat that the appeal was filed. date for the hearing. According to the Municipal Code, Please consider this when setting the Thank you. The appeal of the ab d for the City Council Meeting of /&& C/. 56 * Signa ure Date Q /d.?&.Y.r " ,. LAW OFFICES OF DAUBNEY AND BANCHE PROFESSIOYAL CORDORArlOYS WILLIAM ti DAUBNEY NICHOLAS C BANCHE 810 MISSION AVENUE SUITE 201 POST OFFICE BOX 390 OCEANSIDE CALIFORNIA 92054 June 5, 1986 City Clerk City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 RE: SDP 85-17/V-373 - Brodine APPEAL Dear Madam Clerk: On behalf of the above referenced applicant, appeal is her taken from the adverse decision of the Planning Commission occurring on June 4, 1986. The basis of the appeal is generally that the administrati record contains no evidence which would support the denial of t site development plan. My check in the amount of $275.00 is enclosed satisfying 1 fee on appeal, and I would ask that you would advise me as to t hearing date before the City Council. Respectfully submitted, c\ ? NI HOLAS C. BANCHE NCB: jp encl. cc: Planning Director Assistant City Attorney