Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-07-08; City Council; 7099-4; Public Facilities Fees Monitoring Report 1986!z 0 tx 5 . . p 2 g z / 4B# TITLE: HTG. 7/g/86 PUBLIC FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DEPT. WAG MONITORING REPORT, APRIL 1986 RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council accept report for public distribution after staff presentation. ITEM EXPLANATION: Since the City Council adoption of the Public Facilities Management System in 1982, semi-annual monitoring reports have been presented to the City Council. This monitoring Report contains graphics and charts to better illustrate the various public facilities. The second section of this report monitors various City services, quality of life and identifiable trends over a five-year period. FISCAL IMPACT: Staff time. EXHIBITS : 1. Public Facilities Management System Monitoring Report, April 1986. P-y,, \ 1 F M -l, I MONITORING REPORT APRIL 1986 City of Carlsbad California TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 - Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Population/Housing Projections . . . . . . 2 Water e.............................. 3 Sewers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Parks ............................... 7 Library ............................. 12 Fire ................................ 13 Circulation ......................... 14 City Hall Facilities ................ 15 ., SECTION 2 - Air Quality ......................... 16 Police Department Activities ........ 17 Fire Department Activities .......... 19 Library Activities .................. 20 Revenues ............................ 21 Operation/Maintenance Budget ........ 22 (per capita expenditures) PUBLIC FAI"LITIES MWAGE#ENT 'YSTEH M%'% The City Council adopted the Public Facilities Management System in 1982. Since then, semi-annual monitorins reoorts have been presented to the City Council and staff on the current status of the public facilities being monitored by the Research/Analysis -Group. - Section 2 is a response to the Land Use Element Review Commit- tee's recommendation. for City staff to prepare an annual report focusing on the impacts of growth on City services and the quality of life in Carlsbad. Section 2 presents data on air quality, Police and Fire Department activities, Library activi- ties, revenues and the Operation/Maintenance Budget, Population figures were provided by the State of California Department of Finance, with the exception of the December 1986 estimate which was calculated by the Research/Analysis Group. Facility/Service Water - Design Capacity - Storage Capacity Sewers I Parks - Special Resource Areas - Special Use Facilities - Community Parks Library Fire Stations Circulation Current Proposed 1986 1991 Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Benchmark I Adequate Adequate Benchmark II Adequate Adequate Benchmark I I Benchmark II Benchmark II Adequate Benchmark II* i ** ._ -1. APRIL 6888 City Hall Facilities Benchmark II *See report for specific stations. **See report for list of arterial sections and their status. Adequate - The standard will be satisfied beyond five years. Benchmark I - The standard will be reached within five years.. Benchmark II - The standard will be exceeded this year. Benchmark II POPULATION DWELLING UNITS PERSONS/DWELLING UNIT OCCUPANCY RATE Current - April 1986 50,000 21,100 2.47 94.35% Projected- April 1991 65,000 29,000 2.40 Change 15,000 7,900 94 .OO% POPULATION ACTUAL SANDAG SERIES V . , . . . . . 100000 r 75000 i 50000- : .’ . : . .* . . . : : .* (PFMS ;ST. 25000- 1950 1960 1970 1980 1983 1985 1986 1991 1995 2000 YEAR 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 I w-w------- I ----e--w-- --------v I I ---------- I POPULATION GROVTH 2,290 5,691 19,866 23,590 33% 62% 133% 68% -2- lRPRR$ MEI8 IiTM 7’ MTER - DESIGN nPACITY STANDARD: The overall design capacity of the water system c meet the standard of 197 gallons per capita per c . ADEQUATE: The standard will be satisfied beyond five years. BENCHMARK I: The standard will be rdached in five years. BENCHMARK II: The standard will be exceeded this year. jhould \ lia Current Projected 1986 1991 Population 42,750 55,000 System Deskgn Capacity* 37.5 MGD 37.5 14GD System Demand** 8.4 MGD 10.8 MGD Status of Standard ADEQUATE ADEQUATE *Source: Draft Costa Real Municipal Water District Master . _. Plan for Public Water System, p.lv. **Figure based on the standard of 197 gallons per Capita . per day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I WATER: DESIGN CAPACITY DES I CN CAPACIlY v/-////1 DEMAND STANDARD: The Costa Real Municipal Water District is designed to 1 provide 10 days of water storage to meet peak loads and for emergency purposes. _' ADEQUATE: The standard will be satisfied beyond five years, BENCHMARK I: The standard will be reached in five years. BENCHMARK II: The standard will be exceeded this year. Population Storage Capacity Average Daily Demand Days of Storage Current 1986 42,750 235.5.MG 11.4 MGD 20 days Projected 1991 55,000 258 MG 14.7 MGD 17.55 days Status of Standard ADEQUATE ADEQUATE *Source: Draft CIUSWD Master Plan for Public Water System, p. 42. WATER: STORAGE CAPACITY 301 i 201 I= g E E 101 I STORAGE CAPACI;Y e////.4 1 .?FNS: IMER - 8UPI-l.Y The supply of water to the City of Carlsbad through the Metropolitan Water District (MWD) has been an area of concern to the City. The MWD is the current single source of our water, therefore, the City has a valid concern for the ability of the MWD to meet our future needs. The following infor- mation has been obtained from Costa Real Municipal Water District: FEATHER RIVER AQUEDUCT (State Water Project) Design Capacity Current Maximum Flow w/o the Peripheral Cana 4.2 million acre feet/year i 1 2.3 million acre feet/year ~ Current MWD Entitlement w/o the Peripheral Canal 1.1 million acre feet/year COLORADO RIVER AQUEDUCT Design Capacity Future Flow Based on the Arizona Decision 1.2 million acre feet/year .55 million acre feet/year (1 acre foot = 325,852 gallons) Based on a dryer than normal year MWD can provide 1.65 million acre feet/- year with its current constraints. While MWD has contracts with the State water project to supply 2.1 million acre feet/year, the State project cannot deliver without the peripheral canal, or some other alte.rnative. Currently MWD is using its Colorado River Aqueduct much higher than the ultimate usage. This will change over time, There are a number of alternative additional sources of water supplies being analyzed which, if implemented, will better utilize the two aqueducts, such as eliminating leakage in the Imperial Irrigation District and storage of water in underground basins when there is a surplus during a wetter than normal season. The following chart indicates actual water sales of CRMWD and MWD over the last five years in acre feet per year: 1980/81 1981/82 X982/83 1983/84 1984/85 CRMWD 13,307 12,715 11,878 12,894 12,826 MWD 1,463,598 1,504,299 1,226,569 1,427,945 1,573,934 Source: CRMWD Based on this information, MWD is selling approximately 1.58 million acre feet/year and the current constrained capacity of the aqueducts is 1.65 million acre feet/year , indicating an unsold volume of approximately 77,000 acre feet/year. The current ability to serve is based on the ability to utilize the Colorado Aqueduct beyond future limits. -5. APRIL Jl%%, dwelling unit (EDU) in the sewer service area. ADEQUATE: The standard will be satisfied beyond five years. BENCHMARK I: - The standard will be reached in five years'. BENCHMARK II: The standard will be exceeded this year. r FHiii: SEYERS - STANDARD: The Encina Sewer Plant should have the capacity to treat 246 gallons of sewage per day for each equivalent Population for Carlsbad sewer service area Plant capacity (standard) Flows Current 1986 35,760 23,252 EDU 18,090 EDU Projected 1991 45,260 23,252 EDU 22,903 EDU (estimated flows) SUPPLY ; ,m 2 10000’ yz,y:jy+y, DEMAND - EDU’S - Equivalent Dwelling Units (one EDU - 246 gollonr) . . . . ..~..~.*.~*.*~*....*.*...~~..~..~.~~...~~...*~~..m~...~.*.*~~.............~~~ Growth Options Potential Capacity Increase a. Activate Calavera Hills Plant 6,000 EDU b. Encina Plant, Phase IV (CIP) 8,500 EDU C. Reduce 246 gallons per EDU to reflect actual usage: - 236 gallons (10 :gal. adjustment) 985 EDU - 226 gallons (20 gal. adjustment) 2,050 EDU - 216 gallons (30 gal. adjustment) 3,230 EDU d. Purchase plant capacity from other agencies Unknown e. Rerating of capacity of plant from existing _ - 22.5 MGD to a theoretical 30 MGD, if regional water quality standards are met.(Carlsbad's have) 8,800 EDU -6- IF’@?5 3RUS - SPECIAL REST-YRCE AREM r STANDARD: 2.5 acres of Special Resource Areas per 1,000 people. ADEQUATE: The standard will be satisfied beyond five years. BENCHMARK I: The standard will be reached in five years. BENCHMARK II: The standard will be exceeded this year. Special Resource Areas: Areas of unique character - Carillo Ranch, lagoons, beaches. Population Current- Projected 19 86 1991 50,000 65,000 SUPPlY $84.0 AC. 984.0 AC. Standard Status 125.0 AC. 162.5 AC. ADEQUATE ADEQUATE PARKS - SPECIAL RESOURCE AREAS SUPPLY OEMANO 750 s i 500 250 0 1966 1991 STANDARD: 0.5 acres of Special Use Facilities per 1,000 people. \ ADEQUATE: The standard will be satisfied beyond five years, BENCHMARK I: The standard will be reached in five years. BENCHMARK II: The standard will be exceeded this year. Special Use Facilities (Areas): Areas providing one or two specific recreational functions or uses - e.g., school playgrounds and ball- fields, swimming complex, community centers, senior center, tennis, and picnic facilities. Current 1986 Projected 1991 Population SUPPlY Standard Status 50,000 61.8 AC. 25.0 AC. ADEQUAT;.- 65,000 62.1 AC. 32.5 AC. ADEQUATE PARKS - SPECIAL USE FACILITIES _ f iii 25 0 1966 1991 i -89 APMb MEi 0, PRil : f- PARKS - CO#lUNIY’-Y PRRKS I STANDARD:- 2.5 acres of Community Parks per 1,000 people. ~ ADEQUATE: The standard will be satisfied beyond five years.' BENCHMARK I: The standard will be reached in five years. I BENCHMARK II: The standard will be exceeded this year. 1 Community Parks: Areas providing a multitude of recreational services and ,F )rograms. Population Supply (developed parks) Standard Supply (undeveloped City land) Status (developed parkland only) Current 1986 50,000 117.5 AC. 125.0 AC. 150.0 AC. Benchmark II Pro, J 65,1 157, 162 160 Bent PARKS - COMMUNlTY PARKS SUPPLY OEa4NO ( I I VI 2 : 1991 Ii -9. ifRut ME Ct. Imark II xted 11 IO i AC. i AC 1 AC. 1 POPULATION POPULATION - 21,850 26,000 \ 7,000 10,000 \ COMMUNITY PARKS n-a 1011 1001 -lo- ABWHb 1988 7 SPECIAL USE FACILITIES POPULATION. COMMUNITY PARKS SPECIAL USE FACILITIES COMMUNITY: PARKS \ SPECIAL USE PAC~LITIC$ r 1 1 DEV. FACILITIES \‘1 STANDARD q ’ lm?l- Lm PiiRKS - INVEN7UZY NW SW NE SE I Specf'al Resource-Area n/a '. n/a n/a n/a 984.00 Special Use Area 36.4 2.7 4.0 18.7 6'.80 Community Park (dev.) 42.2 12.0 26.3 37.0 117.50 I Community Park (undev.) 31.7 25.0 35,0 58.3 150.00 jL313.30 j ~ Special Resource Areas Comnunity Parks (Oeveloped) Aqua Hedionda Lagoon (SDG&E) Batiquitos Lagoon (State) Beaches Buena Vista (State) Hub (SDG8E) Macario 254.0 135.0 113.0 202.0 92.0 188.0 Holiday Hosp Grove Laguna Riviera Magee Altamira I Special Use Areas* Calavera Hills Phase Latwin Buena Vista Chase Field CHS Tennis Courts Harding Coimnunity Center Jefferson Elementary Kelly Elementary Magnolia Maxton Brown Maxton Brown Extension Oak Pine Elementary Pi0 Pica Rotary Swim Complex Valley Jr. High School ii It NW NW Ii NW NW NW NW NW NW NW $2 3.0 1.0 La Costa Canyon Stagecoach 2.6 2; :-; 0:4 E l:o Community Parks (Undeveloppd) Macario Canyon (credited to all quadrants) Cannon Lake Calavera Hills Phase II Alga Norte Carrillo Ranch Car Country Cannon Park 36.4 1.0 1.7 2.7 Larwin NE Cadencia Fuerte Fuerte Elementary Levante St. Elizabeth 4.0 4.0 4.1 232 8.0 1.0 18.7 puad- rant Acres *The Park Comnission has recommended that Mini-Parks be included in Special Use Areas and will be amended in the Park Element. Guad- rant NW NW ii SW N"EE SE SE NW E SE 2:*: 6:8 3.0 42.2 12.0 12.0 '$ 26.3 37.0 117.5 100.0 Z-07 23:0 10.3 150.0 STANDARD:' The City Library should provide 0.8 gross square feet of floor space per capita. ADEQUATE: The standard will be satisfied beyond five years. BENCHMARK I: The standard will be reached in five years. BENCHMARK II: The standard will be exceeded this year. Current 1986 Projected . 1991 Population 50,000 65,000 Library sq.footag& 32,000 32,000 Standard demand 40,000 52,000 Status Benchmark II Benchmark II LIBRARY SUPPLY DEMAND 25OOOi t t 01 iaa6 1991 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..*............................................ Growth Options A. Civic Center Library Expansion (25,000 square feet). INVENTORY: Civic Center Library Adult Learning Center Audio/Visual office La Costa Area Library Warehouse Owned s . q Ft. 24,600 B. La Costa-Area Library (55,000 square feet). 24,600 Leased Sq. Ft. 400 500 4,500 2,000 7,400 -12- aPWIb 11ms FF’M: FIRE STANDARD: The PFMS uses the standard that when 1,500 additional residential units (units built since adoption of the PFMS) are built within a five-minute resbonse time of a future station and beyond the five-minute response time of existing stations, then a proposed station should be built. ADEQUATE: Less than 750 additional units within the five- minute response time of existing stations. BENCHMARK I: 750-800 additional units within the five-minute response time of existing stations. BENCHMARK II: When 1,500 additional units are within the five-mjnute response time of a future station and beyond the five- minute response time of existing stations. FUTURE STATIONS CURRENT PROJECTED 1986 19i91 Poinsettia/I-5 Ranch0 Santa Fe/Cadencia' Palomar Airport Road/ * El Camino Real ' under construction 600 Adequate _m..- Adeqluate 1500+ Benchmark II -*- ' The proposed fire station at Ranch0 Santa Fe and Cadencia should be I opened in 1990 based on the City's standard. 2 The Fire Chief is recommending that the Public Safety & Service Center station be constructed in 1989-90. Industrial areas.) (No specific standard exists for -13- APWrSb %988 not exceed the design capacity of the roadway based on traffic formulas of the Highway Design Manual. \ ADEQUATE: - Traffic volume (ADT) is less than 70% of road capacity; BENCHMARK I: Traffic volume (ADT) reaches 70% of road'capacity. BENCHMARK II: Traffic volume (ADT) exceeds 90% of road capacity, TARGETED ARTERIALS Current Volume (ADT) Current Capacity (ROT) Percent of Capacity Benchmark II: **a) Tamarack (Pio Pica/Highland) 15,105 10,000 151% *b) Elm Ave. (Jefferson/I-5) 22,258 16,000 139% *c) La Costa Ave. (I-5/ECR) 21,000 18,000 117% *d) Elm Ave. (State/Jefferson) 16,596 16,000 104% e) ECR (Marron/Route 78). *f) PAR (ECR/Linda Vista) 37,600 40,000 16,551 18,000 Benchmark I: g) Tamarack (Highland/Park) 7,627 10,000 *h) Tamarack (Carlsbad/Jefferson) 7,492 10,000 *Improvements are in proposed 1986-91 Capital Improvement Program. **Construction to begin soon. 94% 92% 76% 75% liT’/S: CIRCULATI(r Traffic volume A.D.T. (Average Daily Traffic) should I I b, ELM AVE (Jefferson/l-51 I I b 1 cv LA COSTA AM: (I-S/ECR) I I I d, ELM AVE (State/Jefferson) I I I 4 OVERCAPAC I TY i I I e 1 EC (Ma on/Route 78) R rr 0 50 100 percent capacity 150 The PFMS is not designed to produce detailed traffic studies. therefore, it cannot predict the impacts of development on intersections or individual blocks. -. Tne areas of greatest development (i.e., La Costa, Palomar Airport and Lake lavera Hills) need to be monitored frequently to determine actual traffic flo -14- FT--%: CITY HALL FW-VIES I Standard: Based on the preliminary draft findings of the "City IHall Space Needs and Staffing Summary" study now being conjduc- ted, 1.3 square feet of City Hall space per capita should be provided. Adequate: * The standard will be satisfied beyond five years. ( Benchmark I: The standard will be reached in five years. Benchmark II: The standard will be exceeded this year. * Includes all administrative offices with the exception of those housed in the Public Safety and Service Center (e.g., Police, Fire and Utilities & Maintenance). t here is no standard covering Utilities & Maintenance administrative facilities. Therefore, the Utilities & Maintenance administrative facilities should be constructed when deemed appropriate and when the capital funds are available for this project.' Current 1986 Population 50,000 City Hall facilities 42,559 Standard 65,000 Status Benchmark II CITY HALL FACILITIES SUPRY 75000 b: e 5 00000 B 21ooo 0 CITY HALL FACILlTIEC Buildings* Modulars: Finance Purchasing/Personnel Leased Space: R/A Group Public Relations Redevelopment Las Palmas Facility PUBLIC SAFETY & SERVICE~CENTER Phase I: Police and Fire Vehicle Maintenance Phase II: Yard offices, maint shops, purchasing warehouse for U&M, parks I ret maint, str maint, and p rch. Construction scheduled for x 19 9-90. 12,899 2,700 1,800 960 200 2,000 22,000 42,559 53,700 10,358 64,058 64,000 This report has not attempted to analyze individual department b 1 needs -15- APRDk 1988 SECTION 2 Air Quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..a...... 16 Police Department Activities . . . . l . . . 17 Fire Department Activities . . . . . . . . . . 19 Library Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Revenues . ..*........................ 21 Operation/Maintenance Budget . . . . . . . . 22 (per capita expenditures) ,? MR QMLITY -J The Air Pollution Control District's progress report of June 1985 indicates that steady progress is being made toward attaining healthier air quality in San Diego County. Charts A and B below (Reactive Hydrocarbon Emissions and Carbon Monoxide Emissions) indicate that attainment levels as required by the Federal Clean Air Act have been achieved. The motor vehicle inspec- tion and maintenance "smog check" program is credited with additional pro- gress since its implementation in 1984. REXCTI'JE !+T'~ROCAR~~N EMISSIONS 300r A -- i \A,\ . . . . . . . . ..*............*...*........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..a.. . i 15oi-J ‘30 I 81 : I .L-I--.* _-.____ .A 02 03 84 a5 a6 YEAR ATTAINblENT EMISSION LEVEL = 215 CARBON MONOXIDE EM1ISS:ONS AlTAINHENT EMISSION LEVEL - 1.050 -169 RRIIL KIBB B I 1200; i 1100; 3 z \ “r 1000; 3 c 900’ i 800, .,............................ ..,....................... ----L t- I-I------J-.--L- ..--. --J-d 80 81 82 83 84 a5 66 YEAR Crime statistics indicate that the major FBI indexed crimes (homicide, rape, robbery, assault, bubglary and auto theft) have fallen for the second year in a row, as the City continues to grow. The table below details the decrease in the number of crimes per 1,000 population. CRIME STATISTICS CARLSBAD SAtOf.@ , . , . . . . . . . . . . . POPULATION (x10) 3000 L----l -i F.B.I. INDEXED MAJOR PRIMES i 2000’ t . . . . . ..,.,.....,**,.........~~*~8*~....... POPULATI ON (xl 000) 1 F.B.I. INDEXED MAJOR GRIM ‘.*.*~~~..***......*............,...,..... I3 (xl 00) 1000 I I I , I I I 79 80 81 ‘. 02 83 84 a5 86 Motor vehicle.accidents have remained relatively constant over the last three years. Annual citations for moving violations have approximately doubled since the creation of the Traffic Division in 1984. TRAFF 1 C STAT PO?(Jx.fJJ ON MOV I NG Vl.OLATIONS -I--. I ST 1 cs ACC i DENTS . . . . . . . ,oooo I------‘--. ---- ---- -.--.--- * ‘-7 : 8000 1 i SOOOf ---I-* I I 5 1 I 2 1 I I , I 1 I -1 1 Iv--I-,--- --- ----A 79 80 81 a2 83 82 85 86 J I Fire calls have remained fairly constant over the last five years. First Aid/Rescue calls, on the other hand, have been increasing for the last four years. POrkA;; ON FIRE DE?ARTMENT STATISTICS FIRST AID RESC. CALL FIRE CALLS m-w-. . . . . . . . 2000 t .-- .-.--~ - -.-- -... _.. _--_ ~- 1 ,c-? d 7 j ,500: cc H- #c@- i t ---w~cc c- 1 f t ; 4 1000 1 1 i t. 1 5oo ,* 1 . . . . . . ..a... . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..*a**** 01--I-l I I I I I 1 79 80 81 82 a3 04 85 06 -lQ- APASL 1988 . e r - LIBRARY ACTIVITIE: The trend for library circulation exhibits a steady increase over the last seven years and is projected to maintain the trend. The circulation per capita also showed an increase last year. 70000 ‘r I 7 i 6OOOc1 IL I i 50000 I- 40000 i- 30000 LIBRARY STAT iSTICS POPULAT I ON c !LdcaR iTI> P -I--. 1 0 i 0 / 1 H 1 1 0 0 j 80 ., 81 a2 83 a4 a5 86 CIRCULATION/ CAPITA 8.8 10.5 11.4 12.0 12.0 12.0 13.0 -20, fwb lM% ? REVENUES - The three significant tax revenue sources charted below indicate a constant increase over recent time : REVENUE STAT I ST 1 cs a c H’ a de c .__ L .=c c- cc@ T3 c- *m--- m- *I- 4 0. V- ..@* E *HC N H-- ec 2 - l ..,.................. l ,.,.............. . . . . . ..a.......-- 0. ‘I I I’ I I I I 80/81 al/a2 82/83 83184 84/85 85/86 86/87 -21- APAHk 11986 The chart below indicates the expenditure per capita over the last five years plus next year's projection. The City's General Fund is shown first, then a breakdown of the General Fund into categories of functions is shown: . 86187 81/82 82/83 83/84 84/85 85/86 Preliminary Budget GENERAL FUND $ 322 $ 317 $ 327 $ 376 8 439 $ 440 General Government 35 37 43 42 43 46 Public Safety Policy/Fire 123 123 731 138 155 162 Development Services - Building/Engineering/ Planning 43 31 41 48 63 72 Public Works - Maintenance 38 46 32 65 85 64 Leisure Services - Library Parks L Recreation 64 65 65 68 75 85 Non-Departmental (City Hall, Building Authority, Parking 21 15 14 15 18 13 Authority, Chamber of Commerce) Population 36,172 39,037 40,500 44,566 48,872 53,400 (est.) Total General Fund 11,603,457 12,358,269 13,230,002 16,743,423 21,448,694 23,548,260 -22. mab 1888