HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-07-08; City Council; 7099-4; Public Facilities Fees Monitoring Report 1986!z 0 tx 5
. . p 2 g
z
/
4B# TITLE:
HTG. 7/g/86 PUBLIC FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
DEPT. WAG MONITORING REPORT, APRIL 1986
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
City Council accept report for public distribution after staff presentation.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
Since the City Council adoption of the Public Facilities Management System in 1982,
semi-annual monitoring reports have been presented to the City Council. This
monitoring Report contains graphics and charts to better illustrate the various
public facilities.
The second section of this report monitors various City services, quality of
life and identifiable trends over a five-year period.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Staff time.
EXHIBITS :
1. Public Facilities Management System Monitoring Report, April 1986.
P-y,, \ 1 F
M -l, I
MONITORING REPORT
APRIL 1986
City of Carlsbad California
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1 -
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Population/Housing Projections . . . . . . 2
Water e.............................. 3
Sewers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Parks ............................... 7
Library ............................. 12
Fire ................................ 13
Circulation ......................... 14
City Hall Facilities ................ 15
., SECTION 2 -
Air Quality ......................... 16
Police Department Activities ........ 17
Fire Department Activities .......... 19
Library Activities .................. 20
Revenues ............................ 21
Operation/Maintenance Budget ........ 22 (per capita expenditures)
PUBLIC FAI"LITIES MWAGE#ENT 'YSTEH M%'%
The City Council adopted the Public Facilities Management System
in 1982. Since then, semi-annual monitorins reoorts have been
presented to the City Council and staff on the current status of
the public facilities being monitored by the Research/Analysis
-Group. -
Section 2 is a response to the Land Use Element Review Commit-
tee's recommendation. for City staff to prepare an annual report
focusing on the impacts of growth on City services and the
quality of life in Carlsbad. Section 2 presents data on air
quality, Police and Fire Department activities, Library activi-
ties, revenues and the Operation/Maintenance Budget, Population
figures were provided by the State of California Department of
Finance, with the exception of the December 1986 estimate which
was calculated by the Research/Analysis Group.
Facility/Service
Water - Design Capacity
- Storage Capacity
Sewers I
Parks - Special Resource Areas
- Special Use Facilities
- Community Parks
Library
Fire Stations
Circulation
Current Proposed 1986 1991
Adequate
Adequate
Adequate
Adequate
Adequate Benchmark I
Adequate
Adequate
Benchmark II
Adequate
Adequate
Benchmark I I
Benchmark II Benchmark II
Adequate Benchmark II*
i ** ._
-1. APRIL 6888
City Hall Facilities Benchmark II
*See report for specific stations.
**See report for list of arterial sections and their status.
Adequate - The standard will be satisfied beyond five years.
Benchmark I - The standard will be reached within five years..
Benchmark II - The standard will be exceeded this year.
Benchmark II
POPULATION
DWELLING UNITS
PERSONS/DWELLING UNIT
OCCUPANCY RATE
Current -
April 1986
50,000
21,100
2.47
94.35%
Projected- April 1991
65,000
29,000
2.40
Change
15,000
7,900
94 .OO%
POPULATION
ACTUAL SANDAG SERIES V
. , . . . . . 100000 r 75000 i
50000-
: .’ . : . .* . . . : : .*
(PFMS ;ST.
25000-
1950 1960 1970 1980 1983 1985 1986 1991 1995 2000
YEAR
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 I w-w------- I ----e--w-- --------v I I ---------- I
POPULATION GROVTH 2,290 5,691 19,866 23,590
33% 62% 133% 68%
-2- lRPRR$ MEI8
IiTM 7’ MTER - DESIGN nPACITY
STANDARD: The overall design capacity of the water system c
meet the standard of 197 gallons per capita per c
.
ADEQUATE: The standard will be satisfied beyond five years.
BENCHMARK I: The standard will be rdached in five years.
BENCHMARK II: The standard will be exceeded this year.
jhould \ lia
Current Projected
1986 1991
Population 42,750 55,000
System Deskgn Capacity* 37.5 MGD 37.5 14GD
System Demand** 8.4 MGD 10.8 MGD
Status of Standard ADEQUATE ADEQUATE
*Source: Draft Costa Real Municipal Water District Master . _. Plan for Public Water System, p.lv.
**Figure based on the standard of 197 gallons per Capita
. per day
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I
WATER: DESIGN CAPACITY
DES I CN CAPACIlY
v/-////1
DEMAND
STANDARD: The Costa Real Municipal Water District is designed to 1
provide 10 days of water storage to meet peak loads and
for emergency purposes. _'
ADEQUATE: The standard will be satisfied beyond five years,
BENCHMARK I: The standard will be reached in five years.
BENCHMARK II: The standard will be exceeded this year.
Population
Storage Capacity
Average Daily Demand
Days of Storage
Current 1986
42,750
235.5.MG
11.4 MGD
20 days
Projected 1991
55,000
258 MG
14.7 MGD
17.55 days
Status of Standard ADEQUATE ADEQUATE
*Source: Draft CIUSWD Master Plan for Public Water System, p. 42.
WATER: STORAGE CAPACITY
301
i
201
I= g
E
E 101
I
STORAGE CAPACI;Y
e////.4
1
.?FNS: IMER - 8UPI-l.Y
The supply of water to the City of Carlsbad through the Metropolitan Water
District (MWD) has been an area of concern to the City. The MWD is the
current single source of our water, therefore, the City has a valid concern
for the ability of the MWD to meet our future needs. The following infor-
mation has been obtained from Costa Real Municipal Water District:
FEATHER RIVER AQUEDUCT (State Water Project)
Design Capacity
Current Maximum Flow
w/o the Peripheral Cana
4.2 million acre feet/year i
1 2.3 million acre feet/year ~
Current MWD Entitlement
w/o the Peripheral Canal 1.1 million acre feet/year
COLORADO RIVER AQUEDUCT
Design Capacity
Future Flow Based on the
Arizona Decision
1.2 million acre feet/year
.55 million acre feet/year
(1 acre foot = 325,852 gallons)
Based on a dryer than normal year MWD can provide 1.65 million acre feet/-
year with its current constraints. While MWD has contracts with the State
water project to supply 2.1 million acre feet/year, the State project
cannot deliver without the peripheral canal, or some other alte.rnative.
Currently MWD is using its Colorado River Aqueduct much higher than the
ultimate usage. This will change over time, There are a number of
alternative additional sources of water supplies being analyzed which,
if implemented, will better utilize the two aqueducts, such as eliminating
leakage in the Imperial Irrigation District and storage of water in
underground basins when there is a surplus during a wetter than normal
season. The following chart indicates actual water sales of CRMWD and
MWD over the last five years in acre feet per year:
1980/81 1981/82 X982/83 1983/84 1984/85
CRMWD 13,307 12,715 11,878 12,894 12,826
MWD 1,463,598 1,504,299 1,226,569 1,427,945 1,573,934
Source: CRMWD
Based on this information, MWD is selling approximately 1.58 million acre
feet/year and the current constrained capacity of the aqueducts is 1.65
million acre feet/year , indicating an unsold volume of approximately
77,000 acre feet/year. The current ability to serve is based on the
ability to utilize the Colorado Aqueduct beyond future limits.
-5. APRIL Jl%%,
dwelling unit (EDU) in the sewer service area.
ADEQUATE: The standard will be satisfied beyond five years.
BENCHMARK I: - The standard will be reached in five years'.
BENCHMARK II: The standard will be exceeded this year.
r FHiii: SEYERS -
STANDARD: The Encina Sewer Plant should have the capacity to
treat 246 gallons of sewage per day for each equivalent
Population for Carlsbad
sewer service area
Plant capacity
(standard)
Flows
Current
1986
35,760
23,252 EDU
18,090 EDU
Projected
1991
45,260
23,252 EDU
22,903 EDU (estimated flows)
SUPPLY
; ,m
2 10000’ yz,y:jy+y, DEMAND
-
EDU’S - Equivalent Dwelling Units (one EDU - 246 gollonr)
. . . . ..~..~.*.~*.*~*....*.*...~~..~..~.~~...~~...*~~..m~...~.*.*~~.............~~~
Growth Options Potential Capacity Increase
a. Activate Calavera Hills Plant 6,000 EDU
b. Encina Plant, Phase IV (CIP) 8,500 EDU
C. Reduce 246 gallons per EDU to reflect actual usage:
- 236 gallons (10 :gal. adjustment) 985 EDU - 226 gallons (20 gal. adjustment) 2,050 EDU - 216 gallons (30 gal. adjustment) 3,230 EDU
d. Purchase plant capacity from other agencies Unknown
e. Rerating of capacity of plant from existing _ - 22.5 MGD to a theoretical 30 MGD, if regional water quality standards are met.(Carlsbad's have) 8,800 EDU
-6-
IF’@?5 3RUS - SPECIAL REST-YRCE AREM
r
STANDARD: 2.5 acres of Special Resource Areas per 1,000 people.
ADEQUATE: The standard will be satisfied beyond five years.
BENCHMARK I: The standard will be reached in five years.
BENCHMARK II: The standard will be exceeded this year.
Special Resource Areas: Areas of unique character - Carillo Ranch, lagoons, beaches.
Population
Current- Projected
19 86 1991
50,000 65,000
SUPPlY $84.0 AC. 984.0 AC.
Standard
Status
125.0 AC. 162.5 AC.
ADEQUATE ADEQUATE
PARKS - SPECIAL RESOURCE AREAS
SUPPLY OEMANO
750
s
i 500
250
0 1966 1991
STANDARD: 0.5 acres of Special Use Facilities per 1,000 people. \
ADEQUATE: The standard will be satisfied beyond five years,
BENCHMARK I: The standard will be reached in five years.
BENCHMARK II: The standard will be exceeded this year.
Special Use Facilities (Areas): Areas providing one or two specific recreational functions or uses - e.g., school playgrounds and ball- fields, swimming complex, community centers, senior center, tennis,
and picnic facilities.
Current
1986
Projected
1991
Population
SUPPlY
Standard
Status
50,000
61.8 AC.
25.0 AC.
ADEQUAT;.-
65,000
62.1 AC.
32.5 AC.
ADEQUATE
PARKS - SPECIAL USE FACILITIES _
f
iii
25
0 1966 1991
i
-89 APMb MEi
0, PRil : f- PARKS - CO#lUNIY’-Y PRRKS
I STANDARD:- 2.5 acres of Community Parks per 1,000 people. ~
ADEQUATE: The standard will be satisfied beyond five years.'
BENCHMARK I: The standard will be reached in five years.
I BENCHMARK II: The standard will be exceeded this year.
1
Community Parks: Areas providing a multitude of recreational services and ,F )rograms.
Population
Supply (developed parks)
Standard
Supply (undeveloped City land)
Status (developed parkland only)
Current
1986
50,000
117.5 AC.
125.0 AC.
150.0 AC.
Benchmark II
Pro,
J
65,1
157,
162
160
Bent
PARKS - COMMUNlTY PARKS
SUPPLY OEa4NO
( I
I VI
2
:
1991
Ii
-9. ifRut ME
Ct. Imark II
xted
11
IO
i AC.
i AC
1 AC.
1
POPULATION POPULATION
- 21,850 26,000
\
7,000 10,000
\
COMMUNITY PARKS
n-a
1011 1001
-lo- ABWHb 1988
7
SPECIAL USE FACILITIES
POPULATION.
COMMUNITY PARKS
SPECIAL USE FACILITIES COMMUNITY: PARKS
\ SPECIAL USE PAC~LITIC$ r
1 1 DEV. FACILITIES
\‘1 STANDARD
q ’ lm?l- Lm PiiRKS - INVEN7UZY
NW SW NE SE I
Specf'al Resource-Area n/a '. n/a n/a n/a 984.00
Special Use Area 36.4 2.7 4.0 18.7 6'.80
Community Park (dev.) 42.2 12.0 26.3 37.0 117.50
I Community Park (undev.) 31.7 25.0 35,0 58.3 150.00
jL313.30 j
~
Special Resource Areas Comnunity Parks (Oeveloped)
Aqua Hedionda Lagoon (SDG&E) Batiquitos Lagoon (State) Beaches Buena Vista (State)
Hub (SDG8E)
Macario
254.0 135.0
113.0
202.0
92.0
188.0
Holiday
Hosp Grove
Laguna Riviera
Magee
Altamira
I Special Use Areas* Calavera Hills Phase
Latwin
Buena Vista
Chase Field
CHS Tennis Courts
Harding Coimnunity Center
Jefferson Elementary
Kelly Elementary
Magnolia
Maxton Brown
Maxton Brown Extension
Oak
Pine Elementary
Pi0 Pica
Rotary Swim Complex
Valley Jr. High School
ii
It
NW
NW
Ii
NW
NW NW NW NW NW
NW
$2
3.0 1.0
La Costa Canyon
Stagecoach
2.6
2;
:-; 0:4
E l:o
Community Parks (Undeveloppd)
Macario Canyon (credited to
all quadrants)
Cannon Lake
Calavera Hills Phase II
Alga Norte Carrillo Ranch
Car Country
Cannon Park
36.4
1.0
1.7
2.7
Larwin NE
Cadencia
Fuerte Fuerte Elementary
Levante
St. Elizabeth
4.0 4.0
4.1
232
8.0
1.0 18.7
puad- rant Acres
*The Park Comnission has recommended that Mini-Parks be included in Special Use Areas and will be
amended in the Park Element.
Guad-
rant
NW
NW
ii
SW
N"EE
SE SE
NW
E
SE
2:*:
6:8
3.0 42.2
12.0 12.0
'$
26.3
37.0
117.5
100.0
Z-07
23:0
10.3
150.0
STANDARD:' The City Library should provide 0.8 gross square feet
of floor space per capita.
ADEQUATE: The standard will be satisfied beyond five years.
BENCHMARK I: The standard will be reached in five years.
BENCHMARK II: The standard will be exceeded this year.
Current
1986 Projected . 1991
Population 50,000 65,000
Library sq.footag& 32,000 32,000
Standard demand 40,000 52,000
Status Benchmark II Benchmark II
LIBRARY
SUPPLY DEMAND
25OOOi
t
t 01 iaa6 1991
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..*............................................
Growth Options
A. Civic Center Library Expansion (25,000 square feet).
INVENTORY:
Civic Center Library
Adult Learning Center
Audio/Visual office
La Costa Area Library
Warehouse
Owned s . q Ft.
24,600
B. La Costa-Area Library (55,000 square feet).
24,600
Leased Sq. Ft.
400
500
4,500
2,000
7,400
-12- aPWIb 11ms
FF’M: FIRE
STANDARD: The PFMS uses the standard that when 1,500 additional
residential units (units built since adoption of the
PFMS) are built within a five-minute resbonse time of
a future station and beyond the five-minute response
time of existing stations, then a proposed station
should be built.
ADEQUATE: Less than 750 additional units within the five-
minute response time of existing stations.
BENCHMARK I: 750-800 additional units within the five-minute
response time of existing stations.
BENCHMARK II: When 1,500 additional units are within the five-mjnute
response time of a future station and beyond the five-
minute response time of existing stations.
FUTURE STATIONS CURRENT PROJECTED 1986 19i91
Poinsettia/I-5
Ranch0 Santa Fe/Cadencia'
Palomar Airport Road/ *
El Camino Real
' under
construction
600
Adequate
_m..-
Adeqluate
1500+
Benchmark II
-*-
' The proposed fire station at Ranch0 Santa Fe and Cadencia should be
I
opened in 1990 based on the City's standard.
2 The Fire Chief is recommending that the Public Safety & Service Center
station be constructed in 1989-90. Industrial areas.) (No specific standard exists for
-13- APWrSb %988
not exceed the design capacity of the roadway based on
traffic formulas of the Highway Design Manual. \
ADEQUATE: - Traffic volume (ADT) is less than 70% of road capacity;
BENCHMARK I: Traffic volume (ADT) reaches 70% of road'capacity.
BENCHMARK II: Traffic volume (ADT) exceeds 90% of road capacity,
TARGETED ARTERIALS
Current
Volume
(ADT)
Current
Capacity
(ROT)
Percent
of
Capacity
Benchmark II:
**a) Tamarack (Pio Pica/Highland) 15,105 10,000 151%
*b) Elm Ave. (Jefferson/I-5) 22,258 16,000 139%
*c) La Costa Ave. (I-5/ECR) 21,000 18,000 117%
*d) Elm Ave. (State/Jefferson) 16,596 16,000 104%
e) ECR (Marron/Route 78).
*f) PAR (ECR/Linda Vista)
37,600 40,000
16,551 18,000
Benchmark I:
g) Tamarack (Highland/Park) 7,627 10,000
*h) Tamarack (Carlsbad/Jefferson) 7,492 10,000
*Improvements are in proposed 1986-91 Capital Improvement Program.
**Construction to begin soon.
94% 92%
76%
75%
liT’/S: CIRCULATI(r
Traffic volume A.D.T. (Average Daily Traffic) should
I I
b, ELM AVE (Jefferson/l-51
I I b 1
cv LA COSTA AM: (I-S/ECR)
I I I
d, ELM AVE (State/Jefferson)
I
I I
4 OVERCAPAC I TY
i I I
e 1 EC (Ma on/Route 78) R rr
0 50 100
percent capacity
150
The PFMS is not designed to produce detailed traffic studies. therefore, it cannot predict the impacts of development on intersections or individual blocks. -. Tne areas of greatest development (i.e., La Costa, Palomar Airport and Lake lavera Hills) need to be monitored frequently to determine actual traffic flo
-14-
FT--%: CITY HALL FW-VIES I
Standard: Based on the preliminary draft findings of the "City IHall
Space Needs and Staffing Summary" study now being conjduc-
ted, 1.3 square feet of City Hall space per capita should
be provided.
Adequate: * The standard will be satisfied beyond five years. (
Benchmark I: The standard will be reached in five years.
Benchmark II: The standard will be exceeded this year.
* Includes all administrative offices with the exception of those housed in the Public
Safety and Service Center (e.g., Police, Fire and Utilities & Maintenance). t here
is no standard covering Utilities & Maintenance administrative facilities. Therefore,
the Utilities & Maintenance administrative facilities should be constructed when
deemed appropriate and when the capital funds are available for this project.'
Current
1986
Population 50,000
City Hall facilities 42,559
Standard 65,000 Status Benchmark II
CITY HALL FACILITIES
SUPRY
75000
b: e
5
00000
B
21ooo
0
CITY HALL FACILlTIEC
Buildings*
Modulars: Finance
Purchasing/Personnel
Leased Space: R/A Group
Public Relations
Redevelopment Las Palmas Facility
PUBLIC SAFETY & SERVICE~CENTER
Phase I: Police and Fire
Vehicle Maintenance
Phase II: Yard offices, maint shops, purchasing warehouse for U&M, parks I ret maint, str maint, and p rch. Construction scheduled for x 19 9-90.
12,899 2,700 1,800
960
200
2,000
22,000
42,559
53,700
10,358
64,058
64,000
This report has not attempted to analyze individual department b 1 needs
-15- APRDk 1988
SECTION 2
Air Quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..a...... 16
Police Department Activities . . . . l . . . 17
Fire Department Activities . . . . . . . . . . 19
Library Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Revenues . ..*........................ 21
Operation/Maintenance Budget . . . . . . . . 22
(per capita expenditures)
,? MR QMLITY -J
The Air Pollution Control District's progress report of June 1985 indicates
that steady progress is being made toward attaining healthier air quality
in San Diego County. Charts A and B below (Reactive Hydrocarbon Emissions
and Carbon Monoxide Emissions) indicate that attainment levels as required
by the Federal Clean Air Act have been achieved. The motor vehicle inspec-
tion and maintenance "smog check" program is credited with additional pro-
gress since its implementation in 1984.
REXCTI'JE !+T'~ROCAR~~N EMISSIONS
300r A --
i
\A,\
. . . . . . . . ..*............*...*........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..a..
.
i
15oi-J ‘30 I
81
: I
.L-I--.* _-.____ .A 02 03 84 a5 a6
YEAR
ATTAINblENT EMISSION LEVEL = 215
CARBON MONOXIDE EM1ISS:ONS
AlTAINHENT EMISSION LEVEL - 1.050
-169 RRIIL KIBB
B I
1200;
i
1100;
3
z
\
“r 1000;
3 c
900’
i 800,
.,............................ ..,.......................
----L
t- I-I------J-.--L- ..--. --J-d 80 81 82 83 84 a5 66
YEAR
Crime statistics indicate that the major FBI indexed crimes
(homicide, rape, robbery, assault, bubglary and auto theft)
have fallen for the second year in a row, as the City
continues to grow. The table below details the decrease
in the number of crimes per 1,000 population.
CRIME STATISTICS
CARLSBAD SAtOf.@
, . , . . . . . . . . . . .
POPULATION (x10)
3000
L----l
-i
F.B.I. INDEXED MAJOR PRIMES i
2000’
t
. . . . . ..,.,.....,**,.........~~*~8*~.......
POPULATI ON (xl 000) 1
F.B.I. INDEXED MAJOR GRIM ‘.*.*~~~..***......*............,...,..... I3
(xl 00)
1000 I I I , I I I
79 80 81 ‘. 02 83 84 a5 86
Motor vehicle.accidents have remained relatively constant over the last
three years. Annual citations for moving violations have approximately
doubled since the creation of the Traffic Division in 1984.
TRAFF 1 C STAT
PO?(Jx.fJJ ON MOV I NG Vl.OLATIONS
-I--.
I ST 1 cs
ACC i DENTS
. . . . . . .
,oooo I------‘--. ---- ---- -.--.--- * ‘-7 : 8000 1 i SOOOf
---I-*
I I 5
1 I 2 1 I
I , I
1 I -1 1
Iv--I-,--- --- ----A 79 80 81 a2 83 82 85 86
J
I
Fire calls have remained fairly constant over the last five years. First Aid/Rescue calls, on the other hand, have been increasing for the last four years.
POrkA;; ON
FIRE DE?ARTMENT STATISTICS
FIRST AID RESC. CALL FIRE CALLS
m-w-. . . . . . . .
2000
t
.-- .-.--~ - -.-- -... _.. _--_ ~-
1 ,c-? d 7 j
,500: cc H- #c@- i
t
---w~cc c-
1 f t ; 4
1000
1
1 i
t.
1
5oo ,* 1
. . . . . . ..a... . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..*a****
01--I-l I I I I I 1
79 80 81 82 a3 04 85 06
-lQ- APASL 1988
.
e
r
- LIBRARY ACTIVITIE:
The trend for library circulation exhibits a steady increase over the last seven years and is projected to maintain the trend. The circulation per capita also showed an increase last year.
70000 ‘r I 7
i
6OOOc1 IL I
i
50000 I-
40000 i-
30000
LIBRARY STAT iSTICS
POPULAT I ON c !LdcaR iTI> P
-I--.
1
0 i
0 / 1
H 1 1 0 0 j
80 ., 81 a2 83 a4 a5 86
CIRCULATION/ CAPITA 8.8 10.5 11.4 12.0 12.0 12.0 13.0
-20, fwb lM%
? REVENUES -
The three significant tax revenue sources charted below indicate
a constant increase over recent time :
REVENUE STAT I ST 1 cs
a
c H’ a de c
.__ L
.=c c- cc@
T3 c- *m--- m-
*I- 4 0.
V- ..@* E *HC
N H-- ec
2 -
l ..,.................. l ,.,.............. . . . . . ..a.......--
0. ‘I I I’ I I I I
80/81 al/a2 82/83 83184 84/85 85/86 86/87
-21- APAHk 11986
The chart below indicates the expenditure per capita over the last five years plus
next year's projection. The City's General Fund is shown first, then a breakdown
of the General Fund into categories of functions is shown:
.
86187 81/82 82/83 83/84 84/85 85/86 Preliminary
Budget
GENERAL FUND $ 322 $ 317 $ 327 $ 376 8 439 $ 440
General Government 35 37 43 42 43 46
Public Safety
Policy/Fire 123 123 731 138 155 162
Development Services -
Building/Engineering/ Planning 43 31 41 48 63 72
Public Works -
Maintenance 38 46 32 65 85 64
Leisure Services - Library Parks L Recreation 64 65 65 68 75 85
Non-Departmental (City Hall, Building Authority, Parking 21 15 14 15 18 13
Authority, Chamber of
Commerce)
Population 36,172 39,037 40,500 44,566 48,872 53,400 (est.)
Total General Fund 11,603,457 12,358,269 13,230,002 16,743,423 21,448,694 23,548,260
-22. mab 1888