Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-08-19; City Council; 8734; APPLICATION TO CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOR A GRANT TO RESTORE CARRILLO RANCHa > W 0 CT a, a. a z 0 F 0 a G .. 4 z 3 0 0 ClmOF CARLSBAD - AGEN-BILL / ,L i i AB# 873 s/ !TITLE: APPLICATION TO CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF IDEPT. I MTG. 8-19-86 HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOR A GRANT TO C~TYP RESTORE CARRILLQ RANCH DEPT. RED I CITY m ~~- RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council adopt Resolution No. 87x3- approving the aPPlica for historic preservation grant funds for Carrillo Ranch from the California Parks and Recreation Facilities Act Of 1984 and appointing the Redevelopment Manager as agent in processcing th application. ITEM EXPLANATION The California Park and Recreation Facilities Act of 1984 provides grants to units of local government for historic reso preservation. Carrillo Ranch meets all of the criteria for th grant program. It is in dire need of restoration. Staff want to ask for between $150,000 - $200,000 from the program for ro repairs, termite fumigation, adobe repair and sealing, drainagc system for basement and architectural feature repairs. Staff in the process of developing a work list with actual cost estimates. In-kind contributions from community groups for la and funds will total 10% of the total request. This is the first State-funded grant program specifically designed to preserve California's historical resources, Grant July 1, 1987. Historic Preservation Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission recommend applying for the grant. Council is asked to adopt a resolution authorizing application for this grant and appointment the Redevelopment Manager as ag for the City to process the application. FISCAL IMPACT The City could receive $150,000-$200,000 from the State Parks ' Recreation Historic Preservation Grant Program if the Grant is approved. will be selected by March 1, 1987 with funds to be allocated EXHIBITS 1 - Historic Preservation Grant Program description 2 - Resolution No. r 7~~5- 3 - Location Map 0 e GRANT APPLICAl Historic Preservation ,Grant Pro I (California Park 6 Recreational .FBcilities Ac MA1 i CMi- I I :L .fL- a- 0 7\ - 1 Slllta“ &my,... - 9. rrYI.(;.U++6wdfSY”S f bulqr CMcr OfWm ctxarn “ CGURTMIUS~L OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRES DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & REI STATE OF CA 0 0 APPLICATION DEADLINE; OCTOBER lst, 1986 1987 GRANT APPLICATION HISTORIC PRESERVATION GRANT PROGRAM California Park & Recreational Facilities Act of 1984 STATE OF CALIFORNIA George Deukme j ian Governor RESOURCES AGENCE Gordon K. Van VlecC Secretart, DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & UCWTIO! m. S. arinel Direct01 Kathryn Gualtier: State Historic Preservation Office1 OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATIOI Department of Parks & Recreatior PO BOX 2390 (830 "S" Street Sacrainento, California 4581 (916) 445-800 Cover drawing : Orange County Courthouse 0 e TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WHO IS ELIGIBLE? PROPERTIES ELIGIBLE FOR GRANT-FUNDED PROJECTS NATIONAL REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION KINDS OF PROJECTS ELIGIBLE FOR FUNDING PROTECTION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES Ground disturbance Building and safety codes Fire detection and suppression REVIEW STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS HISTORIC STRUCTURE REPORTS PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS ACQUISITION PROJECTS CEQA COMPLIANCE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, HANDICAPPED ACCESS LAWS FUNDING CONSIDERATIONS Annual allocation Geographical distribution Project definition Proportion of development and acquisition Match requirements Grant amounts Date funds are available Long-term responsibilities Length of projects Payment process QUALIFYING CRITERIA COMPETETIVE CRITERIA APPLICATION FORM SAMPLE RESOLUTION grant allocations 1 2 2 3 4 6 7 8 8 8 8 8 9 10 10 12 19 0 1987 0 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GRANT PROGRAM CALIFORNIA PARK AND PXCREATIONAL FACILITIES ACT OF 1984 Cities, counties, and districts must exercise constant vigilance to see that the...historical resources they now have are not lost to other uses: they should acquire additional lands as those lands become available; they should take steps to improve the facilities they now have: and they should adequately operate and maintain their existing and proposed systems for the enjoyment of present and future generations of persons of all income levels, all ages, and all social groups. --California Park and Recreationa Facilities Act of 198 The California Park and Recreational Facilities Act of 1984 (California Pu Resources Code, Division 5, Chapter 1.691) provides $10 million for grants units of local government for "acquisition, development, rehabilitation, o restoration of historical resources and for historical resources preservat projects and costs of planning and interpretation," to be administered by the Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) in the California Department of Parks and Recreation. This is the first state-funded grant program specif ically designed to preserve California's historical resources. Of the $10 million, the first-year distribution of $4 million was awarded 1985 to 44 projects. The second-year distribution of $3 million was awarde 1986 to 32 projects. Grants averaged $94,000; only six were higher than $1 APPLICATIONS ARE DUE OCTOBER kt, 1986, for the funds to be allocated Jul 1987 ($3 million total). Any applications that arrive at OHP after that d unless they are postmarked no later than that date, will not be considered Grants will be selected by ?larch 1, 1987, for inclusion in the legislative budget. Grants are not approved until the budget is ?assed, effective Jul 1987. Grant-funded work may not begin until OHP obtains a project agreeme and approves project work. Please feel free to contact OHP for further information as YOU ?repare YOU grant application. You may submit more than one grant request. Each aPPl being able to fund less than half of the applications received. Your abi! to complete the official application, and the inforrnation YOU provide on i and its required attachments, will be the oasis of OHP'S vOJeCt rankincj- Grant selection criteria were approved by the Secretary for Resources in I according to legislative requirements, following review and corrment by the public and two public hearings before the State Historical Resources Comm: sion. (Two chanqes were made in 1985, following two public hearings: see "integrity" footnote at the bottom of page 3 for new eligibility for restc inadequate site integrity, and note on page 9, "Xatch Requirements ," that minimum grant share is now 305 of project costs, not 453.) tion will be ranked competitively with all others submitted. OH? anticia; 0 0 WHO IS ELIGIBLE? Grant funds are only available to units of local government, having adequc ownership control over the historic properties for which fQnds are requesj The following units of local government are eligible: cities; counties; a1 special districts (other than school districts) that are authorized to prc park, recreational, or open-space services. ~n individual jurisdiction may enter into an agreement with a non-profit organization having a non-restrictive membership policy, for the purpose c carrying out a grant, if the local government can demonstrate that the gr, will provide benefits commensurate with the type and duration of interest land held by the local-government applicant. If the property is not ownec the applicant, but by a non-profit organization, the applicant must have sufficient ownership control over the property to be able to guarantee thc continuing preservation and the ongoing upkeep and maintenance of the his. toric resources. Easements, long-term leases, joint powers agreements, a1 operating agreements, for instance, may meet this requirement. Non-profil organizations should be sure that any such arrangements meet their own go< and interests, keeping in mind the possibility that less than half of the applicants for grant funds may receive grants. Applicants for development projects must have adequate site control in ef by December 20, 1986, for consideration for funding in the 1987 year. Ap cants who do not own the properties for which they plan to apply for deve ment funds are encouraged to send a copy of their draft or final document OKP for early review and possible modification to meet program requiremen Where the applicant is not both the owner and operator of the property fol which development grant funds are requested, the application must include copy of the formal document establishing the applicant's ability to meet property control requirements. A copy of the non-profit organization's membership policy must also be included. PROPERTIES ELIGIBLE FOR GRANT-FUNDED PROJECTS Funds are available for the preservation of real property (land and pernat improvements) determined to have historical significance, as follows: 1. Properties designated as California Aistorical Landmarks or Points of Historical Interest, or listed on the National Register of Historic Places. If a property has a state designation, it must meet the National Register standards for integrity of historical following) . appearance (see "National Register Criteria for Evaluation" section 2. Any building, structure, site, area, or place which is historically or archeologically significant, or is significant in the architec- tural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational social, political, military, or cultural. annals of California. Suck properties will be assessed according to the National Register cri- teria for evaluation (see following section). The State Elistorical Resources Commission will review staff recommendations in conslderlr the potential eligibility of these properties no later than its December 1986 spec i a1 meeting . Applicants must ensure that sufficient information on the Significance snc integrity of properties not listed on the National Register, including CUI and historic photographs of the properties, accompanies the applications i is received by October I, 1986. 7 - e e NATIONAL REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION me National Register's standards for evaluating the significance of prope were adopted for this grant program. The criteria, both for integrity and significance, are as follows: The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, struct and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, rnaterials workmanshi?, feeling, and association: and: a. that are associated with events that have made a significant contri- b. that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our c. that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or bution to the broad patterns of our history; or past: or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master , OK that possess high artistic values, or that represent a signifi- cant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or in prehistory or history. d. that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important Criteria considerations: Ordinarily, cemeteries, birthplaces, or graves of historical figures, properties owned by religious institutions or used for religious purposes, structures that have been moved from their original IC tions, reconstructed historic buildings, properties primarily commemoratit nature, and properties that have achieved significance within the past 50 years shall not be considered eligible for the National Register. However such properties will qualify if they are integral parts of districts that meet the criteria or if they fall within the following categories: a. a religious property deriving primary significance from archi- tectural or artistic distinction or historical importance; or which is significant primarily for architectural value, or which is the surviving structure most importantly associated with a historic person or event: or importance if there is no other appropriate site or building directly associated with his productive life; or d. a cemetery that derives its primary significance from graves of persons of transcendent importance, from age, from distinc- tive design features, or from association with historic events; or e. a reconstructed building when accurately executed in 3 suitable environment and presented in a dignified manner as part of a restoration master plan, and when no other building or struc- ture with the same association has survived; OK f. a property primarily commemorative in intent if design, age, tradition, or symbolic value has invested it with its own historical siqnificance; or it is of exceptional importance. b. a building or structure removed from its original location aut c. a birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstanding g. a property achieving siqnificance within the past 55 years if *The integrity of a property must be such that it.conveys an accurate sen the appearance of the property during its period of historic significance California Historical Landmarks and Points of Historical Interest may k~av designated without retaining this integrity, grant funds are only availab properties that do retain integrity of historical appearance, E where ad documentation of historical appearance is available, AND the pra?Osed gra funded work will restore sufficient integrity to meet these Standards. KINDS OF ?ROJECT!LIGIaLE - FOR FUNDING Grants will cover ha kinds af arajects on existing historical resources: develogment and acquisition. Grant funds are not available f9r t:?e constructlon of new strzctureg, including acczrate reconstructions. Grant funds are not available for the preservation of historic artifacts t are not real 2roperty (land and permanent irnprovemencs), except as a minor component of historic real property. Development grants fall into the following categories: Protection is generally of a temporary nature, and implies future historic preservation work. Before 2rotective measures are applied, an analysls of the actual or antici?ated threats to the property shall be made. If any historical material or architectural features are removed, they shall be properly recorded and, if possible, stored for future study or reuse. ?rc tection must safeguard the physical condition or environment of a 2roperty or archeological site from further deterioration or damage. Stabilization is the application of measures designed to sustain the form extent of a historic resource essentially 3s it now stands. Stabilization aimed at halting further deterioration and enhancing safety, rather than attempting to rebuild or recreate lost historic features. Stabilization includes techniques to arrest or slow deterioration of a sit structure, or object. Improvements in physical ccnditions to make the prc erty safe, habitable, or otherwise useful can be ?art of stabilization, as minor repairs that do cot change or adversely affect the fabric, appearanc or historic value of the property. Preservation is the process of applying measures to sustain the existing f integrity, and material of a building or structure, and the existing form vegetation of the adjacent environment. It may include initial stabilizat work, where necessary, as well as ongoing maintenance of the historic pro^ Rehabilitation is the process of returning the property, through repair OK alteration, to an appropriate, compatible, contemporary use, while preserv restoring those portions or features of the property that are significant historic, architectural, and cultural values. Restoration is the process of accurately recovering the for3 and details c historic resource and its setting, as they appeared at some ?oint in nistc Restoration can include a full restoration (exterior and interior) or 3 partial restoration of the historically and/or architecturally significmt parts of a structure. Sufficient photo documentation from the period nust provided to establish historic forn and detail. (Reconstruction is the prccess of accurately reproducing, from well-docume research and by new construction, the forn and details of a vanished histo resource as it appeared at some point in history. While not funded in th; grant program-in order to preserve existing resources--rec3nstruc=ion Of understanding and interpreting t.ie value of 3 historic discrict, OK when n other structure, object, or landscape feature with the same value has sur- vived, and sufficient historical documentation exists to insure an accurat reproduction of the criginal.) or a part of a hiscoric property would 5e appropriate wnen essential for 4 0 0 Selecting the appropriate treatment for a historic structure requires much thought; each structure must be judged on an individual basis. The data from the historic structure report (see following section) ,.archeological reports, the needs of the sponsors and the local community, and the advice of appropriate professionals should be part of this thought process. Not priate at first, while restoration work can be done during a later phase. This grant program will consider one phase of the overall work as a "project for application purposes. Planning costs for preconstruction work such as historical research, archi- tectural plans, structural engineering assessments, and archeological assess ments, and interpretive costs for permanent interpretive display panels, signs, and shelving are allowable as minor components of development proj- ects, as are administrative costs. The relocation of structures, or work on relocated structures, will general: not be funded unless such relocation meets the National Register criteria: 1. In order to be eligible, a moved property significant for archi- all the work need be accomplished at once; stabilization may be more appro- tectural value must retain sufficient historic features to retain integrity of design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and associa- tion, and therefore to convey its architectural significance 2. A moved property associated with a significant historic event or person must be demonstrated to be the surviving structure most importantly associated with that event or with an important aspect of that person's life. The phrase "most importantly associated" means that the structure must be the surving property that is most closely associated with the event or with the part of the person's life for which the person is significant. setting, and general environment of a moved property are impor- tant factors to consider in determining whether the property is able to convey its architectural qualities or historic associations following a move. 4. For a property with design values or historical associations that are directly dependent on the site, any move may cause the loss of integrity. As a result of such a move, the property would not be able to convey its significance and therefore would not be eligible. architectural or historical significance if it meets the guide- lines listed above, or it may have become significant during the period of time following its move to the new site. 6. A property designed to move or a property frequently moved during its historic use must be located in a historically appropriate setting in order to qualify. objects is not eligible unless it has achieved significance since the time of its creation. 8. A moved portion of a building, structure, or object is not eligible because, as simply a fragment, it has lost integrity of design, setting, materials, and workmanship as well as location. 3. The historic and present (or proposed) orientation, immediate 5. A property moved fifty or more years ago may have retained its 7. An artificially created grouping of buildings, structures, or In addition, the applicant must show that the building to be moved cannot remain on its original site, and that the new site will not have historic resources adversely affected by the relocation. 5 ~RoTECTION SF arSJo2rC ?ROP32TIZ.S Gr;ound disturbance- en treatment of any historic property may involoe grc disturbing activities, such as foundation work, landscaping, grading, or IJI ground plumbing, a qualified archeologist's preliminary assessment of the archeological potential of the area to be disturbed is required. Adverse effects on cultural resources are a common result of ground-disturjmg restoration/preservation projects. These effects should be fully identifi# and avoided when possible. If adverse effects cannot be avoided, they BUS' be mitigated in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act a1 the US Department of the Interior's "?rofessional Standards for Data Xecovc Programs and Treatment of Recovered Xaterials" (36 CFR ?art 66, available OHP). The mitigation plan shall be forwarded to OH? for review and accopt before the ground is disturbed. Before any ground-disturbing activity in a known Native American archeoloq or ethnographic site, you aust be in contact with the local Native America community. Indicate in the grant application that this contact has been r; If cultural materials are uncovered, the project will be halted until aiti tion erocedures can be developed in consultation with the Native American comun i ty . Building and safety codes--In preserving historic properties, every effort must be made to comply with local building and safety codes, and to cooper ate with local building officials. While the "life safety factor" is alwz important, several significant building code amendments now provide alterr tive requirements for: qualified historic structures: 0 I. Title 241 Section 8, State Historic Building Code--provides alter- native building regulations for the rehabilitation, preservation, restoration (including related reconstruction), or relocation of buildings or structures designated as historic buildings. Such alternative building regulations are intended to facilitate the restoration or change of occupancy so as to preserve the buildings' original or restored architectural elements and features, to encourage energy conservation and a cost-effective aporoach to preservation, and to provide for the safety of the building occupants. bcal building cede review is mandated to allow for t$e provisions of the Historic Building Code. 2. Health and Safety Code: Part 1.5, Section 17958.8--allOWS Original materials and methods of construction for alterations and repairs of dwellings. 3. Uniform Building Code: 1976 Edition, Section ~o~(J)--allows repairs to historic structures without full conformance to the caie. For further information on how these codes can apply to your ?rojectr con the State Historic Suilding Code Advisory Board, cio Office a€ the State Architect, 1500 5th Street, Sacramento, California 95814 (916)445-2163. of the Historic Building Cocfe can be obtained from the Office of the Stat tect. Fire detection and suppression-where warranted by the value of a proper' its historic content, adequate fire detection warning and/or sappression terns should be installed. When an operating fire station exists near th< efty, a detection system providing a direct signal should be inscalled. personnel should be made aware of inherent dangers or special Eeak~~reS 0. property that should receive particular attention. 6 e 0 Warning and detection systems are ordinarily preferable to suppression systems, which can cause as much damage as fire. When a suppression system is advisable, freon and fog systems are recommended. Sprinklers should be used only in cases where fabric and contents are unlikely to be irreparably damaged by the water. Foam systems should be used only if the area can be evacuated swiftly. In installing detection or suppression systems, his- toric integrity and the requirements of authentic interpretation must be carefully considered. REVIEW STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS OHp reviews and approves projects according to "The Secretary of the Interio Standards and Guidelines for Historic Preservation Projects." ~ll plans and specifications applicable to the grant program must meet these standards. plans and specifications must be based on adequate historic documentation (See Historic Structure Report section, below) and must indicate whether existing fabric, both historic and more recent, is to be retained, altered, or replaced. Copies of the standards are available from OHP. The eight bas standards are as follows: 1. Every reasonable effort shall be made to use a structure for its originally intended purpose, or to provide a compatible use that Will require minimum alteration to the structure and its environ- ment. 2. Rehabilitation work shall not destroy the distinguishing qualities or character of the structure and its environment. The removal or alteration of any historic material or architectural features should be held to a minimum. 3. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, wherever possible. In the event replacement is necessaryl the new material should match the material being replaced in its composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of original features, substantiated by physical or pictorial evidence, rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural features from other buildings. ship that characterize historic structures, and often predate the mass production of building materials, shall be treated with sen- sitivity. 5. Changes that may have taken place in the course of time are evi- dence of the history and development of the structure and its envirol ment. These changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and respected. 6. All structures shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged. 7. Contemporary design, rather than a reproduction of an earlier Style, shall be encouraged for additions to existing structures or land- scaping, with such design to be compatible with the size, scale, color, material, and character of the neighborhood, structures, or project environment. 8. Wherever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that if they were to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the original Structure would be unimpaired. 4. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsman- 7 0 0 HISTORIC STRUCT'JRE REPORTS Architectural plans for deveiopment 2rojects nust be based on informatio] the building's history. what changes that have been made to it ana when, rent conditian, and proposed restoration work must be 2rovided. OHP nust verify that project work results in a property retaining or regaining it: historical appearance as of a specific point in tine that would result i; the least possible damage to existing historic fabric. A historic struc, ture report will be required for OH? review of plans Defore constructlon work can begin. Outlines for such reports will be nailed to successful grant applicants in 1987; for those projects where architectural work is already under way, contact OHP for a copy of the outline. PROFESSIONAL QUALIBTCATIONS Architectural plans and specifications for development 2rojects should be prepared by licensed architects with at least two years of experience in the sensitive preservation of historic properties according to the Secret of the Interior's Standards for Historic Preservation Projects (see above When ground disturbance is involved, or for acquisition projects involvir archeological resources not already designated on the National Register, archeologists with requisite degrees and experience should evaluate the sites for potential damage or evaluation of significance of the resources Contact OHP for detailed qualifications. ACQUISITION PROJECTS Local government units may acquire full title to ?roperties or less-than- fee-simple control of the historic features of Froperties, througn gifts, purchases, leases, easements, the exercise of eminent domain (if express1 value, and purchases of development rights and other interests. authorized) I the transfer or exchanqe of property for other property of 1 ir Acquisition grant projects must follow applicable state laws. ?lease con GHP for additional information on these requirements if you plan to apply an acquisition grant. icable state laws. ?lease con GHP for additional information on these requirements if you plan to apply an acquisition grant. " CEQA COMPLIANCE All applications must follow California Znvironmental 2uality Act require Most preservation projects are exempt under Class I. Copies of the mbt-ice Exemption, stamped by the County Clerk, OR of fully completed environrenr review documents, must accompany the grant applications. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, HANDICAPPED ACCESS LAWS Grant recipients must comply with applicable state requirements an affim action and access for the handicapped. Copies of these requirements will distributed to recipients in 1987. a e FUNDING CONSIDERATIONS 0 Annual allocation--The $10 million total historic preservation allocation was divided into three annual gorcions: $4 million distributed July 1, 1,985 and $3 million for each of the next two fiscal years. Each year will have separate competetive application processing. Geographical distribution--Funds will be distributed between Northern and Southern California (divided at the northern boundaries of San Bernardino, Kern, and San Luis Obispo Counties) so that each half of the state receives at least 408 and at most 60'3 of available funds. Project Definition--A project, for grant application pur:F)oSeS, may be one phase of a long-term overall preservation project for a property. Proportion of development and acquisition grant zdlocations--Development 91 (restoration, rehabilitation, or stabilization construction) will receive i least 85% of the available funds, and acquisition projects will receive no than 153, to meet legislative intent. Match requirements-For development projects, the grant may provide no les: 30% and no more than 90% of project costs. The applicant's matching share least 10% and no more than 70%) may include donations of labor and materia Larger projects will require larger matching shares. Applicants will stat detailed cost estimates, amount of local funds available, and mount of gr funds requested. Acquisition grants may provide no less than 45%, and no more than 353, of project's costs. The applicant may use donated value of property ta match the grant in completing the acquisition. The applicant's matching share must come from sources other than state fun Grant amounts--The minimum grant is $10,000: the maximum is $3OO,OOO. (Nc only one grant awarded in 1985 and five grants awarded in 1986 that exceed $1 50,000.) Date grant funds avail.able--Funds for grants are available after they are cially awarded in the Legislative Budqet (July I, 1987) and a project agre between the grant recipient and the state has been fully executed. Grant will not reimburse costs incurred before the groject period starting on A 1987. However allowable project planning costs (such as architectural ple structural engineering. studies, archeological assessments, or acquisition incurred since July 1, 1984, may be considered as matching share. Long-term responsibilities--Grant recipients must sign a project agreemen! specifying grant provisions. Grantees are responsible for the ongoing prt vation, upkeep, and maintenance of funded historic properties. Satisfact maintenance requires that the historical integrity of the features, mter appearance, workmanship, and environment of an assisted property be prote and preserved, Legislative approval is required for a change in use of t property ("use" being the preservation of historic resources). Also, for change in use, the recieient must return.either the grant funds OK t:?e equivalent of the fair market value of the property, whichever is qreater the state, or must expend the same amount on another approved historic pr vation project in its jurisdiction. Length of projects--Project plans must be approved by June 3C, 1988: grar must encumber the funds by June 30, 1990; and project work nust be cornplc June 30 , 1992, for funds allocated as of July 1, 1987. 9 0 pavment process--Generally, grant recipients may re 9 ive payment only fol work done after OHP officially approves the project. Cnly actual cash expenditures nay oy reimbursed; recipients may not Sill for the YJalue of donations. 2ayrnent is nade primarily by reimbursement, but also by advar if necessary after the project has started. The Department of Parks and Recreation Will reixlburse d qrant recipient, through OHP, for work completed on a project after it has been initiated after specified project conditions nave been met. Such reimbursement rial exceed the state's share of allowable reported project costs. Reimbursen requests take up to two months to process through the Office of the Contr the recipient's finances must cover the project during that time. The st will not reimburse more than 90% of allocated grant funds until completic and fiscal reports are submitted and the state has verified projsct com- pletion. QUALIFYING CRITERIA Projects must meet all of the following criteria to be considered for fur 1. Property must be historically significant (see "Properties Eligible 2. Applicant must be a unit of local government (see "Who Is Eligible: 3. Applicants must have adequate tenure to ?roperties to be developed, ability to meet state acquisition requirements for ?roperties to 5~ acquired with grant funds, before grant selections are made (by December 20, 1986 ) . 4. Development grants must meet the Secretary of the Interior's Stand? and Guidelines for Historic Preservation Projects in preserving a property's integrity (see "Review Standards for Development 2roject 5. Planning or interpretive costs are only allowable as part of develc or acquisition projects, not as entire pro:ects. 6. Applicants must submit a completed application forin, as supplied by OHP, with a copy of a resolution from the applicant's governing bod authorizing the application and guaranteeing compliance with progrs requirements (see "Sample Resolution"), by the app1;cation deadline (Qctober lst, 1986). The application form has a checklist of the required documents and information to rnake it complete. (Note: do retype the application. Use the official application for3 on1X.j for Grant-Funded Projects"). - COMPETETIVE CRITERIA Applications will be ranked according to the following criteria, with the selection of grant awards based on the resulting scores to ensure 3 fair impartial selection process. Significance of property (2C points)--Degree to which a 2roperty is histo or archeologically significant, or is significant in the architectural engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, cal, military, or cultural annals of California, according to the eval criteria for the National Register of sistoric ?Laces; degree af slqn~ locally or at the regional, statewide, or national level; degree of s1( cance as first, last remaining, or oest example of its klnd. 10 e 0 Integrity of a project's Location, design, settanq, materials, Workmanshj feeling, and association: degree to which a property retains its historic features and setting. proposed project scope (30 points)--Degree of urgency, including irnmediate threat of collapse or demolition (by public or private action other than by the applicant; to be prevented by 2roposed grant project); notice of violations; deterioration requiring stabilization. Quality of project: degree of compliance with "The Secretary of the Inte ior's Standards and Guidelines for Historic Preservation Projects": ?re: vation experience of project staff: Low percentage of project costs €OK planning, interpretation, or administration costs. Level of resource protection, including prevention of deterioration or damage; bringinq overall 9roper;ty preservation to a state of completion Administrative ability (15 points)--Applicant's ability to meet grant proc ing requirements and to administer the property; nature and degree of o ship control. Amount of available match. Benefit to community and preservation field (25 points)--Project impact or community, including ability to serve as a catalyst for further presert of historic resources, increased public access, importance of the prope in the context of the community * Project impact on preservation concerns, including technological (such seismic safety retrofit, access for handicapped, energy conservation r' fit) and programmatic (such as skills training, creative solutions to 1 preservation problems). For acquisition projects, degree to which acquisition is less-than-fee simple while providing sufficient ability of applicant to protect the historic resources. Community support (5 points)--Property has Seen designated significant Sy official local review body or as California Historical Landmark or ?o. Historical Intersst, or listed on the National Registsr of iiistoric P: at the local, statewide, or national level of significance. Level of legislative and local organization support. (Letters are an indication of such support.) Ineligibility of Droject for other funds available in the California Par Recreational Facilities Act of 1984 (5 points)--projects not providin or recreational services or other eligibility factors in the legislat 11 I/ ii 0 0 , 1 2 3 4 5 6 RESOLUTION NO. 8755 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE APPLICATION AND FOR CARRILLO RANCH PROJECT FROM THE CALIFORNIA PARK AI RECREATION FACILITIES ACT OF 1984 AND APPOINTING THE REDEVELOPMENT MANAGER AS AGENT. PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION GRANT FUN1 WHEREAS, the Legislature under the California Park an( 7 Recreational Act of 1984 has authorized the establishment o 8 the political subdivisions of the State for historic preser 9 Historic Preservation Grant Program, providing matching fun 10 projects: and ' 11 WHEREAS, the California Office of Historic Preservati 12 13 the Department of Parks and Recreation is responsible for t to the State; 20 local matching funds prior to submission of said applicatic 19,l by resolution the approval of applications and availabilitJ 18' Department of Parks and Recreation require the applicant tc 17 WHEREAS, said adopted procedures established by the 16 agencies under the program; and 15 necessary rules and procedures governing application by loc 14 administration of the program within the State, setting up I 21 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council 22 25 Preservation assistance for project; and 24 1. Approves the filing of an application for the Hi! 23 City of Carlsbad hereby: deputy as agent of the City to coordinate, process, and ex1 26 2. Appoints the Redevelopment Manager or his/her au all contracts, agreements, amendments and ancillary docume 27 I I 28 within the scope of the attached application; and II 0 a 3. Agrees that all required local matching funds will provided for the project. 3 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of t 4 6 day of August , 1986, by the following vote, to wit: 5 Council of the City of Carlsbad, California held on the 19th - AYES: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin and Pettine 7 NOES: None 8 I) ABSENT: Council Member Chick 9 ABSTAIN : None 10 11 ATTEST : 12 +d@& MARY H. CASLER, Ma 1s jJ 14 15 ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City clerk ( SEAL 1 16 ///I 17 ///I 18 1 I ///I 1911 /I// li 2o I 21 22 23 ' 24 25 26 " 27 28 e LOCATION MAP e v 1 I I I I AGUA HEDIONDA PACIFIC OCEAN \”” - - --- - 4“ CARRILLO RANCH - GRANT APPLICATION city of carlsbad