The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1986-08-19; City Council; 8738; Growth Management Program-Progress ReportGIF .OF CARLSBAD — AGEND SILL AB# ^73 f MTG 8/19/86 DEPT. PLN TITLE: Growth Management Program Progress Report nFPT HO. 1^\MA CITY ATTYVf'S CITY MGR.^2^± 2Os O z O O OO RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and File. ITEM EXPLANATION: The purpose of this item is to provide the City Council with a brief update on the Growth Management Program. Staff will be expanding on this information by making a presentation at the Council meeting. Attached for your review is an updated Work Schedule which indicates the current status of each specific task to be accomplished. Work Schedule Highlights Staff is continuing to proceed on schedule with the implementation of the Growth Management Program. During the past few weeks several important tasks have been accomplished: 1. Initial meetings have been conducted with each of the special districts. 2. The base data has been obtained to determine what future facilities will be needed to adequately service the City, assess the impacts of existing, pending and future development, and will be used to measure compliance with the adopted performance standards. 3. The automated computer system is being tested with actual data and specific data bases are being established for each of the Local Facilities Management Zones. 4. A first draft of the model format and/or guidelines for the Local Facilities Management Zones has been prepared and will be available for review and comments. 5. All of the information necessary to prepare the descriptive maps has been obtained and the first maps will be available for review in the next few days. 6. The process of identifying the financial options available to accomplish funding for future public facilities is underway as well as establishing cost estimates for these improvements. 7. Work is in process to develop an informational overview and summary of the Growth Management Plan which will be presented to the Council in September. Page 2 of Agenda Bill No. These items are the highlights of the progress being made on the Growth Management Program. During the presentation given by staff, Fay Round - Automated Systems Consultant, and Paul Zucker - Planning Consultant, the Council will be given a more detailed report. FISCAL IMPACT; None ATTACHMENTS; 1. Growth Management Program Work Schedule. EH 03 « I 01aa .-iO -H•H J3 £ O. 6 -H •Hj=Oi IB O O rHID -H H .C O O. M.XaIBEH •u eo o cc oIB -H-H 4Ja IBt> J^ 4)ki n§<!)MQi IB i-l COM -H <J>a o <-a ca> a -n o i~ Ok U «- 01 SIBC•H 1 S1 Uft0 OH *0a i M§01o I 4->IB D^M C^4 -H -H CO Oe No g-S« a ?s•H r-lC (X C IB IBV4 Oo ou i4 1i i O 4J '«M 01 ? §• RJH Q4 O•H 3 VIS in a aIB 1 3m at a.a §•S en 4-1 n § § 4J 4->•H a | & o MO 01sa> aM§u C >iO 13 4 S 8.•H E=m -H 4J U ao•a < IB 4-1C 0 a Xt, Z o.01 T3-•4 >i 01 4Ji»a01 klIH Ocu IM Ifl IB -H 4-1 •i-l -H t) 'HtJ O C. S•M (15 4-1C Qi•H w « S'I'Se ^H -H s OSr-l T3 > *>IB lj --I M IB 0 e •H14 - 01 £ - 4JOis 0>cfcl -H O <a01 Vj 1-1 -H 01 O -H IB 0) VI 01 rH $a 4-1 4-1 3 m >,0> 4J tn B1 > 4-1VI 4) -H V 0> -H 04 ^H *O Vl »O U "c c•H H OO € o >-H » O C Cu O S O)a4JIB •8jj <D1-4 I •8 1 01p-Ha 4J01 4J0)4Jt Iy o "S 'S 0)r-(a 4J01fu 14 Ox 4J 0)r-la u sDa | osS "^s"EH §3 CO« _ inN 00 EH *~ 1 00CN r- CN ^ - o m 5 vo IT. 4J•HrH•H XI•rlnca0141 oi pecific Task(n na4JIfl4-> CO § | 1 X I 1 XI§ 4) •H IH !c1-3 O O*publicy existt - bothrH B4J nc nJJ HI T310 M 10 etermineacilitiesitywide, byQ IH U CM s41 "ag5u x x XXX * X XXX s •rl 1-5 districtpublicrH10 4J•H 10U 4?4) *ity andacilitiesetermineU «H Q 0101 O0M PU BM 4)O rH(0 -H O PU essary tobuildoutt - bothU 4-1 Bi"SJO U S•H & rH UrH acilities wiervice theitywide, by«H 01 U a u•H 301 * 3•HU 1 >14J O M § *O g 1 i rH4110 U g•rl -rlS ID existingng units•H>«H rH0 rH rl 'O 4> g T)etermine nand conunittea a ^ ! r-fa Q 0 rH•H £ CU by zonedistrictC^rH Ifl 10kl -HT3 oIS- *i41 41•O•HS B>,-HJ-J •H O >» X1 X g a ^o g v •H rl X!^ O PU acres byincludingywide by•H4J >1 O4) 14 ^&01 4) 01 O O -H etermine grand use cean densita H g 2 ISJJ4> rHa 0u O XI <uM T] 0 -H^» 1^3 O 41 4) OC 4J N0 0 H -rl >l V4 XI uadrant, bypecial distuadrant andO" 01 O1 X g g X1 g ^J 1 X1 8 I 1 1 1 s ^1 1 i 4)U Hg Ifl -H •H rl £^ u o<mappingpublicto futureJS41 O O*> <8 C •rl 4) -rl 4J -POl 01 -H -rl 0 M (U repare desystems foacility -acilities(X 01 »w MH 010141B rl 111 CH 01BO•rl 10 01•HB•H 1 41 « tl -H -rl OW S Q U Cu O vo r^ co eft o «-'-'-'-•- CM M EH EM COcn •- inCM CO - 00Ol a" r- o CO m U 5 « 1-3 •- cn 4J •Hr-l•H XI•r-tm 110 Specific TasksCO 4J(04Jin 1 X§ 1 1 B. § | XX I X 1 1 x 1 IdxX e tH•H£a.1 Parks1 Library1 Schools1 Density1 Enivornmental Constraints1 Open SpaceI Develop an automated system tooj PO ^* m vc o co CS CM CM CM CM M CS U)in<O §H0. C H Co i? Qfc. O maintain current growthmanagement information. Assuresystem compatibility with theCity's current computerhardware, and work concurrentlywith the Information SystemsDirector. Information formattedso it can be used for localplansX X <a<e Is 1 Provide the City Council with aprogress report and review anysuggested modifications to theplan.30 day Progress ReportsJuly 22Aug 19Sept 23CM |U CXrH —0) 3 X. « -g CO •O £ MC 0 OCM in XH Bs X 1 a** 0) •H S1-3 O 1 Schedule all meetings andobtain information on current0m I(Ui-la §u Aa.facilities citywide and meetwith district and provideinformation necessary toproject specific facilitiesnecessary to service the Cityat buildout citywide and byquadrant 1 01Im0) 01 a18EH o•HU-l •Hus CO <a34JIBJJ Cfl iH iHB -H S -H-H.fi -H .e^3 fc ID Oi Ll01"O•H OLia. LI m H n B0) 0 IB 0 -Htji IB O 0> O IB Li>i 01 O JJ > 6 O•UOI3B 0) E -rl 0> rH••H Li 0> -f MQ) (U 1 I . , "~ M «- CMM m rH •H Xhi cu 01 M <001 Og1* 0^ Llx, IH a>, a> mJJ ID p•H Ll 18U U S3 0) S"B-H IB a , rn M PO i« Si rH0 -rl £ Pk B 1 B MC IBO S >iJJ -C JJt! o wa n 1803 < £ „ BO•HJJ18i-H3OIH•H U t <* •4< ro 0) 0)O O O C5 B0)B B IB 8 s !4H Q« X 01 g B•HO IBC C LlU EH b e •H •• S °>•rt 0) < -HJJ• -H • • JJ rH 0) - -H .rl § S h U Cu • •m vr> in vcm n S § Ll LlU O 01« g1 01 IB JJn UHo) -g u-i> IB -Ha LI HQ 03 U ,, Lln IBX L!L| J^ « J . , p. 00 r^ oom ro <U a ^•H Ll badarcosm £1-1Ll Ca ao w „n iH00 u to\ <y\n o •H3 01Oi 18a jj•H 'H0 B B'5IB Bca u OS rTEH PiB ooCO r- in(N 00 1o „ 00 M £ * " OM m(N h on •r4 rH •H .fl•H0CIm HIOS 01X01IBEH •3 VH Os01 III34-1IB4-1w X rH0>IB •C rHIO E -H•H -H £SI ITD 04 and thresholdeach publicimprovementes for adding01 onO -H 01 C 14 r4 > -r(id O O 5 4J S I4J n -H C rH O -rl U4 ffl OLi c IBJ) 73 >i -H «H IB -rl 01 O a c 'H o> I-HIO IB O -rt £>13 4J <B r4 3< « <4H 4J a o •004J01 a§u X -.IB .C rHo e -H S £ 04 hearing andity ManagementO -H •ri •rt fj Si TJ01 H 01 •H "a, o 56 u *o o o oH IB 14-1 U CM »n Oua, e x x | XX X d x g | X Xq Wg | | | | xX 1 8 | ^ ^ IB X rH £ 04 rH gs M nss rH4J a,IBg^O 01"ii! ? Q K) a 4J1 0 -H ai -H m n010> Q 04 BHH >< g X1gX X 1 X x 1 1 x X XX 1 1 1 1 s g Xs 1 ^ 0) U J= U 04 support anderialsl\a IS rHr4 IB O•H 0,30 g 01 O> UH0) CQ -H S III01 Q r< 04 e M X '3 'aIS Q u o c•H -H (B£ £ Q TJ tJ 4J 01 rl V4 01£ c c c 01 o <U(B (B Q) IS XI *44 -fH O> CP tTl 4J C rHc c IB in a ai -H•H -H C 1> 01 SOU L4 IS -rl rn 0) IBIB IS £ 4J (1) fc0) 0) -H 14 t4 J3 Si >, rH 4) CPC JJ 01 -H 4-> SIB -r* 01 U I4H H rH rH frj IB )4 IBO Q. O-H Cn — 4-> O •H -H O O> O OrHOI rHIBC rHto 01 J 01o >rl j3 Pti -H IS 1 Tl 01 3-rl 3 01 Or- Oh O, > O.rH 01 O M I4J>, iso) J « a o 4J4J o o 01 C•H o O C T) 01 4JCJ 4Jr5r4 OIO «t!^O o a, Vj N jJ c 5)34J 34J IS CUO)CTi '§§' '§§'§ §*,,— § li BOTJ O'OO MOm XIBIBO>B rj!Btt 04MHCS UQ,£ in vo r^ oo 1>4->0)rHa %u 7 GUIDELINE FOR PREPARATION OP LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT PLANS City of Carlsbad Preliminary Draft August 19, 1986 TABLE OP CONTENTS PAGE I. Growth Management Plan Background 1 II. Reasons for Guidelines 1 III. Overall Format 1 IV. Editorial Guidelines 2 V. Contents Overview 2 VI. Specific Outline 3 1. Title Page 4 2. Table of Contents 4 3. Introduction 4 4. Build-Out Assumptions 4 5. Phasing Assumptions 5 6. Facilities Having City-Wide Impact 6 7. Parks and Recreation 8 8. Circulation 10 9. Drainage 13 10. Fire 15 11. Open Space 17 12. Schools 19 13. Sewer Collection System 21 14. Water Distribution System 24 VII. Environmental Review 27 VIII. Plan Preparation Options 27 IX. Plan Processing 29 Table of Exhibits (Note Exhibits to be added In final package) 1. Local Facility Management Zone Map 2. Methodology For Build-Out Projections 3. Facilities Having City-Wide Impact Analysis 4. City Circulation Element Map I. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN BACKGROUND (to be inserted) II. REASONS FOR GUIDELINES These guidelines have been prepared to: 1. Develop a consistent format for each of the twenty- five facility management zones which will facilitate review by decision makers and the public alike and, 2. Provide clear directions to property owners, consul- tants, and developers who may prepare management plans, with the aim of reducing the costs or time delays associated with the process. 3. Assume that the Local Facility Management Plan will be consistent with and implement the City-Wide Facilities and Improvement Plan. in. OVERALL FORMAT 1. 8 1/2" by 11" All documents to be 8V2IT by 11" with a vertical format, Where larger maps or tables are needed, provide them on 11" by 17" fold-out pages. 2. Print One Side Only To facilitate review and notation of documents, please print on one side of paper only. 3. Page Numbers Page number the entire document sequentially, rather than by section to facilitate easy review. 4. Exhibits, Figures and Tables Label exhibits, figures and tables numerically or alphabetically and include in the Table of Contents. 5. Appendixes Any lengthy documentation, felt necessary such as traffic studies, lengthy calculations, large maps, etc., should be included in an appendix section, or separate appendix document. IV. EDITORIAL GUIDELINES 1. Adequate Avoid using words like "adequate," instead, always quantify in specific numerical terms. 2. Sources When using or referring to secondary sources of data, be specific, i.e., report names, dates, authors, page numbers, etc. 3. Methodology Be specific about the methodology used for analysis, cite all secondary sources. V. CONTENTS OVERVIEW 1. Entire Zone The plan should cover the entire zone. Plans submitted for only a portion of the zone will not be processed. 2. General Plan and Zoning The Local Facility Management Plan shall be based upon the general plan and zoning applicable within the local zone at the time of approval. 3. City-Wide Facilities and Improvement Plan The Local Facility Management Plan shall be consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvement Plan and shall implement this plan within the specific zone. Any proposals for deviation must be specifically docu- mented and Justified along with recommendations for amendment to the city-wide plan and an analysis of how such amendments would impact the other twenty-four zones. 4. Facilities Covered The Local Facility Management Plan shall discuss eleven separate facilities. Three of these shall be reviewed on a city-wide basis, one on a district basis, and seven shall be reviewed on a zone basis as follows: City-Wide 1. City Administrative Facilities 2. Library 3. Wastewater Treatment Capacity District Basis 4. Parks and Recreation Zone Basis 5. Circulation 6. Drainage 7. Fire 8. Open Space 9. Schools 10. Sewer Collection Systems 11. Water Distribution System VI. SPECIFIC OUTLINE The Local Facility Management Plan should follow the out- line and must include the contents listed below: 1. Title Page Include zone number, name, address, and telephone number of sponsor of zone plan, all consultants, and date of preparation. 2. Table of Contents The table of contents should be comprehensive and Include a list of exhibits, figures, tables and appen- dices . 3. Introduction Include, here, a brief description of the zone and background maps. Maps should include the following: A. City-Wide Local Facility Management Zone Map (see Exhibit ); please highlight the specific zone under consideration with a graphic pattern. B. Latest general plan map of the zone. C. Latest city zoning map of the zone. D. Map and table indicating the major (25 acres or larger) property owners in the zone and acres of property owned by each. For smaller holdings list the number of owners and acres in aggregate. Also list popularly known names of development projects included in the zone. Where a specific project has been filed with or approved by the City include City's official reference number. 4. Build-Out Assumptions A projection of the build-out for the zone shall be provided including dwelling units, non-residential land use acreage and environmentally-constrained land. A land use map showing how dwelling units and acreage projections were determined shall be provided. The map shall also show the location of all constrained lands including beaches, permanent bodies of water, floodways, wetlands, riparian or woodland habitats, major power transmission lines, major roadways, railroad tracks, slopes with an inclination of 25 per- cent to 40 percent and those greater than 40 percent, open space areas previously designated on the City's Land Use Map and other land upon which significant environmental features are located as determined by the environmental review process for the local faci- lity management plan. Also include population projec- tions based on 2.471 persons per household. The build-out projection shall be checked and verified by City staff using projections made by the City as part of the preparation of the City-wide Facilities and Improvements Plan (see Exhibit for the methodology used by the City). Any deviation from these numbers must be fully documented and justified and be discussed with City staff prior to completing the remainder of the plan as this is a critical step in developing a plan for required public facilities. Should the City Council's Referendum or the Citizen Initiative be passed on the November ballot, addi- tional instructions may be issued for this section. 5. Phasing Assumptions The primary goal of the zone plan is to provide more up front, longer term planning for public facilities. The phasing analysis and schedules are for planning and "early alert" purposes only and are not for speci- fic policy adoption. It is recognized that when development will actually take place relates to many variables that change over time. Nevertheless, it is necessary to prepare phasing assumptions in order to analyze facility phasing, construction and financing plans. The decision as to whether a specific project may proceed will be made in relation to both the Zone Plan and the actual project approval. In both cases analysis will relate directly to assurances that the Performance Standards can be met. Both dwelling unit and non-residential land usage should be projected on a year-by-year basis over a twenty year time line. Development projected beyond the 20 year period should be shown in one remainder number. A table for the specific zone should be included as part of the plan. Specific facility phasing for each of the eleven facilities should relate directly to these projec- tions. When considered helpful, alternative phasing schedules may be submitted. For example, such sched- ules might document that facilities will be adequate for variable rates of development within the specific zone. 6. Facilities Having City-Wide Impact Facilities for City Administration, Library and Waste- water Treatment Capacity have been analyzed as part of the City-Wide Facilities and Improvement Plan and are monitored as part of the City's public facility manage- ment systems, semi-annual monitoring report. City standards for these three facilities are as follows: City Administration 1500 square feet/1000 population must be scheduled for construction within a five year time period. Library .8 square feet/person must be scheduled for construction within a five year time period. Wastewater Treatment Capacity Sewer plant capacity is adequate for at least a five year period. Current and future requirements for each of these facilities along with the timing and funding schedule for future improvements are included in attached Exhibit . To the extent that the preparers of the Local Facility Management Plan feel that these city- wide facilities will be constructed on a timely and adequate basis for appropriate development within the local zone, no further analysis is required within the local zone plan. Analysis should be included only if recommendations are made to modify the city-wide facility plan for these facilities including plans, standards, phasing or funding. Additionally, any wastewater treatment that is proposed to be handled at other than the Encina Plant should be discussed in detail in this section. If the city-wide analysis is acceptable, include in this section a statement indicating that the city-wide plan has been reviewed for these three facilities and indicate that it is acceptable for zone development. 7. Parks and Recreation A. City Standards The plan for parks should be designated to meet the following standards: Three acres of community or special use park per 1,000 population within the Park District, must be scheduled for con- struction within a five year time period. B. Inventory The plan shall include: i. A map of the Park District within which the zone is located. If a zone lies in more than one Park District, a map shall be shown for each Park District. ii. A map and list of all existing and proposed community or special use parks within the related Park District. C. Phasing A phasing schedule for the entire Park District shall be included. The build-out projections used for this schedule shall be the same as that pre- pared by the City, or specific documentation and justification for a different schedule shall be included. Time periods where the demand for facilities and improvements may exceed this capacity shall be indicated, and the plan shall either: 0 Provide a plan for eliminating the shortfall, or 0 Indicate the intent to suspend development in the zone for a period of time, until the necessary facilities are constructed. D. Financing Plan The financing plan establishing proposed methods to fund all needed facilities shall be included. The plan shall specifically indicate: i. Which facilities are proposed to be funded and built as an integral requirement of the development project. If reimbursement features are anticipated, they should be so indicated. ii. Which facilities are proposed to be built by the City as part of its normal capital improvement program, and funded from park fees or other revenue sources. The facili- ties should either be shown on an approved capital facilities program or it should be indicated why it is reasonable to assume that the facility will be included in a future capital facilities program. ill. Other funding sources, such as assessment districts or grants shall be discussed in detail along with rationale as to why this source is considered workable and reason- able . 8. Circulation A. City Standard The plan for the circulation system should be designed to meet the following standard: No road segment or Intersection in the zone nor any road segment or intersec- tion out of the zone which is impacted by development in the zone shall be projected to exceed a service level C* during off-peak hours, nor service level D* during peak hours. Impacted means where 20% or more of the traffic generated by the local facility manage- ment zone will use the road segment or intersection. * service levels C and D are defined as follows: (to be Inserted) 10 B. Inventory The plan shall include: 1. A map of the existing and proposed street system categorizing streets by the City Circulation Element criteria (see Exhibit ) All existing prime arterials, major arter- ials, secondary arterials and collector streets shall be shown. For the proposed street system new collector streets that will be built and entirely funded by the developers as part of an individual develop- ment need not be shown. For ease of analysis it is suggested that existing streets be shown with a solid line and proposed streets with a dotted line. Use a wider line width for the prime arterial scaling down to a narrow line for collector streets. The map should normally include land outside of the zone which is necessary to analyze how the circulation system works for the entire zone and also to indicate "impacted" road segments or intersections. ii. A table and/or map indicating existing street capacities, traffic volumes and ser- vice levels during off-peak and peak hours for all road segments and intersections. ill. A table and/or map indicating projected street capacities, traffic volumes and level of service during off-peak and peak hours for all road segments and intersections at build-out. 11 iv. A list of technical assumptions or method- ology used in the analysis such as trip gen- eration rates by land use, traffic modeling systems used, etc. If City studies are used for the analysis simply reference the City studies. C. Phasing A phasing schedule shall project the timing for provision of road improvements in relation to existing and projected development and any cir- culation deficiencies. Periods where standards cannot be met shall be indicated and the plan shall either: i. Provide a plan for constructing improvements to bring the facility to standard or, ii. Indicate the intent to suspend development in the zone for a period of time until the necessary facilities are constructed. D. Financing Plan A financing plan establishing proposed methods to fund all needed facilities shall be included. The plan shall specifically indicate: i. Which facilities are proposed to be funded and built as an Integral requirement of the development project. If reimbursement features are anticipated they should be so indicated. 12 11. Which facilities are proposed to be built by the City OP State as part of their normal capital improvement program and funded from traffic fees, taxes or other revenue sources. The facility should either be shown on an approved capital facilities program or it should be Indicated why it is reasonable to assume that the facility will be Included on a future capital improvement program. ill. Any other funding sources such as assessment districts shall be discussed in detail along with rational as to why these sources are considered workable and reasonable. 9. Drainage A. City Standard The plan for the drainage system should be designed to meet the following standard: Drainage facilities must be provided for as required by the City prior to any development. Standards for improvements should meet or exceed those shown in the City's Master Drainage Plan. For areas not yet covered by the City's Master Drainage Plan, facilities shall be designed using standards and methodology as developed in the City's Master Drainage Plan. B. Inventory The plan should include: i. Map of natural drainage areas in relation to topography. 13 ii. Map and listing of existing and proposed facilities including: Pipes Desiltation basins Retention basins Open channels (earth OP concrete) Headwalls Clean Outs ill. Include adjoining areas outside the zone boundary when necessary. Because facilities and improvements may overlap zone boundaries, a discussion of the need for coordination and a proposed coordination plan for facili- ties extending from one zone to another shall be included. It must be shown that development in the zone will not create problems in other zones. iv. For any facility not shown in the City's Master Drainage Plan or recommended changes to the City's plan, list specific assump- tions and calculations used in the analysis such as expected flows (cfs) and capacities for each facility. C. Phasing A phasing schedule shall project the timing for provision of facilities in relation to projected development activity. It should be shown that the proposed phasing schedules will not create any on site or downstream problems in relation to ero- sion, flooding, or siltation. D. Financing Plan A financing plan establishing proposed methods to fund all needed facilities shall be included. The plan shall specifically indicate: 1. Which facilities are proposed to be funded and build as an integral requirement of the development project. If reimbursement features are anticipated they should be so indicated. Reimbursement might be from another developer or as a credit against fees . ii. Which facilities are proposed to be built by the City as part of its normal capital improvements program and funded from drain- age fees or other revenue sources. The facility should either be shown on an approved capital facilities program or it should be indicated why it is reasonable to assume that the facility will be included on a future capital improvement program. ill. Other funding sources such as assessment districts or grants shall be discussed in detail along with rationale as to why this source is considered workable and reason- able. 10. Fire This section should be completed only for zones 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 24, and 25. All other zones currently meet the standard. 15 A. City Standard The plan for fire service should be designed to meet the following standard: No more than 1,500 dwelling units outside a five minute response time. B. Inventory The plan should include: i. A map of existing and proposed fire stations serving the zone. For each station show the five minute response time. ii. A table and/or map indicating the number of existing and proposed dwelling units outside the five minute response time. C. Phasing A phasing schedule shall project the timing for construction of new fire stations in relation to projected development activity outside of existing five minute response time. Periods where more than 1,500 dwelling units are outside a five minute response time shall be indicated, and the plan shall either: i. Provide a plan for constructing a new sta- tion to eliminate the shortfall, or ii. Indicate the intent to suspend development in the zone for a period of time, until the necessary fire stations are constructed. D. Financing Plan A financing plan establishing proposed methods to fund all needed fire stations and station sites 16 shall be included. The plan shall specifically indicate: i. Which fire stations are proposed to be funded and built as an integral requirement of the development project. If reimbursement features are anticipated they should be so indicated. ii. Which facilities are proposed to be built by the City as part of its normal capital improvements program and funded from taxes or other revenue sources. The facility should either be shown on an approved capi- tal facilities program or it should be indi- cated why it is reasonable to assume that the facility will be included on a future capital improvement program. ill. Any other funding sources such as assessment districts shall be discussed in detail along with rational as to why these sources are considered workable and reasonable. 11. Open Space This section should be completed only for zones 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 and 25. All other zones currently meet the standard. A. Standard The plan for open space should be designed to meet the following standard: Fifteen percent of the total land area in the zone exclusive of environmentally- constrained non-developable land must be set aside for permanent open space. 17 B. Inventory The .plan should include: i. A map and table (acres) showing all existing land to be considered as open space. Such areas might include pocket parks, homeowners ball fields, environmental areas not included in constrained lands, planned residential development (PRD) common areas, golf courses, etc. Specific definition as to what areas qualify for this category are included in Exhibit ii. When known, a map and table indicating all proposed future open spaces. If possible relate these spaces to specific property ownerships or developments. Where feasible, the plan should inventory any sites within the zone that are particularly suited to open space use and that will enhance the overall livability within the zone. C. Phasing The intent is that open space shall be provided at the fifteen percent level at or before the time that either residential or non-residential devel- opment takes place (i.e., for every 100 acres of residential or non-residential development in the zone, 15 acres should be dedicated to permanent open space). A phasing schedule shall project the timing for open space reservation in relation to projected development activity. Periods where open space to development area ratios may be less than the fif- teen percent level should be indicated and the plan shall either: 18 i. Provide a plan for eliminating the short- fall or, ii. Indicate the intent to suspend development in the zone for a period of time until the necessary facilities are constructed. D. Financing Plan A financing plan establishing proposed methods to fund all needed open spaces shall be included. The plan shall specifically indicate: i. Which facilities are proposed to be funded and built as an integral requirement of the development project. If reimbursement features are anticipated they should be indicated. ii. Which facilities are proposed to be built by the City as part of its normal capital improvements program. The facility should either be shown on an approved capital facilities program or it should be indicated why it is reasonable to assume that the facility will be Included on a future capi- tal facilities program. It should be noted that open space will normally be required as part of the development. Any proposal to include open space in the City's capital improvements program will require extraor- dinary justification. 12. Schools A. City Standards The plan for schools should be designed to meet the following standard: 19 School capacity to meet projected enroll- ment within the zone as determined by the appropriate school district must be pro- vided prior to projected occupancy. B. Inventory List the name of the service agency(s) for the zone. If more than one agency serves the zone, list each agency, and include a map showing each agency's service area. Service agencies include San Dieguito Union High School District, Encinitas Union School District, San Marcos School District and, Carlsbad School District. The plan should include a map of existing and pro- posed elementary, junior high and high schools serving the zone. For each school show current and projected enrollment and rated capacity. Indicate assumptions used such as students per household. C. Phasing A phasing schedule for the schools related to the specific zone shall be included. The populations projections used for this schedule shall be based on the build-out projections prepared by the City, or specific documentation and Justification for a different schedule shall be included. Time periods where the demand for schools may exceed this capacity shall be indicated, and the plan shall either: 1. Provide a plan for eliminating the short- fall, or 20 ii. Indicate the intent to suspend development in the zone for a period of time, until the necessary schools are constructed. D. Financing Please discuss here an understanding of the school districts funding plan, particularly in relation to developer agreements for development approvals within the zone. 13. Sewer Collection System A. City Standard The plan for the sewer collection system should be designed to meet the following standard: Trunk line capacity to meet demand as determined by the appropriate sewer district must be provided prior to any development. B. Inventory List the name of the service agency(s) for the zone. Service agencies include Leucadia, San Marcos, and Carlsbad. If more than one agency serves the zone, list each agency and include a map showing areas served. The plan should include: i. Map of the natural drainage areas in rela- tion to topography. ii. Map and list of existing and proposed trunk lines (normally 12 inches and larger), force mains, and pump stations. 21 ill. Include adjoining areas outside the zone boundary when necessary. Because facilities and improvements may overlap zone boundaries, a discussion of the need for coordination, and a proposed coordination plan for facili- ties extending from one zone to another shall be included. It must be shown that development in the zone will not reduce the facilities or improvement capabilities, or create shortages in other zones. iv. List of technical assumptions used in analy- sis such as: 0 Gallons per day for residential uses. 0 Gallons per acre per day for non- residential uses. 0 Build-out assumptions by drainage area. If figures are used that differ from those provided by the city the reasons for change and detailed methodology must be included. v. For each facility indicate size, capacity in cubic feet per second, current utilization in cubic feet per second, projected build out utilization in cubic feet per second, cost estimates. vi. A discussion of how the proposed system relates to water reclamation plans within the zone or other zones should be included. If golf courses or large park and open spaces are included, the plan shall include a specific discussion of the reclamation potential, and indicate if the facility will agree to use reclaimed water, if available. 22 C. Phasing A phasing schedule shall project the timing for provision of facilities in relation to projected development activity. Periods where the demand for facility and improvements may exceed the capacity shall be indicated, and the plan shall either: i. Provide a plan for eliminating the short- fall, or ii. Indicate the intent to suspend development in the zone for a period of time, until the necessary facilities are constructed. Any temporary pump stations required, due to phasing of facilities shall be clearly iden- tified. Future development proposals requir- ing pump stations that are not identified in the zone plan will not be approved without amendments to the zone plan. D. Financing Plan A financing plan establishing proposed methods to fund all needed facilities shall be included. The plan shall specifically indicate: i. Which facilities are proposed to be funded and built as an integral requirement of the development project. If reimbursement features are anticipated, they should be so indicated. ii. Which facilities are proposed to be built by the serving agency as part of their normal capital improvements program, and funded from hook up fees, taxes, or other revenue 23 sources. The facility should either be shown in an improved capital facilities program, or the serving agency should indicate that the proposed funding method is reasonable, and it can be anticipated that the facility will be included in a future capital improve- ments program. iii. Other funding sources such as assessment districts, or grants shall be discussed in detail along with rational as to why this source is considered workable and reason- able. iv. If temporary pump stations are proposed, a financing plan covering the operations of the pump stations during the temporary per- iod shall be included. It will normally be assumed that this operations will be funded by the related development. 14. Water Distribution System A. City Standard The plan for the water distribution system should be designed to meet the following standard: Line capacity to meet demand as deter- mined by the appropriate water district must be provided prior to any development. A minimum 10 average day storage capacity as determined by the appropriate water district, must be provided prior to any development. B. Inventory List the name of the service agencies for the zone. Service Agencies include Olivenhain Municipal Water District, San Marcos Water District, and Costa Real Municipal Water District. If more than one agency serves the zone, list each agency and include a map showing each area served. The inventory should include: i. Map and list of existing and proposed facil- ities including major transmission lines, storage facilities, water treatment and pump- ing facilities, and local water resources. ii. Include adjoining areas outside the zone boundary when necessary. Because facility improvements may overlap some boundaries, a discussion of the need for coordination and a proposed coordination plan for facilities extending from one zone to another shall be included. It must be shown that development in the zone will not reduce the facilities or improvement capabilities, or create short- ages in other zones. iii. List of technical assumptions used in analy- sis such as: 0 Gallons per day for residential uses. 0 Gallons per acre per day for non- residential uses. 0 All golf courses or proposed large open spaces, or parks to be watered shall be identified. 25 0 Fire flows. iv. For each facility indicate size, capacity, current utilization, projected build-out utilization, cost estimates. v. A discussion of how the proposed system relates to water reclamation plans within this zone or other zones should be included. If golf courses or large parks and open spaces are included, the plan shall include a specific discussion of the reclamation potential and indicate if the facility will agree to use reclaimed water, if available. C. Phasing A phasing schedule shall project the timing for provision of facilities in relation to projected development activity. Periods where the demand for facilities and improvements may exceed the capa- city shall be indicated, and the plan shall either : 1. Provide a plan for eliminating the short- fall, or ii. Indicate the intent to suspend development in the zone for a period of time until the necessary facilities are constructed. D. Financing Plan A financing plan establishing proposed methods to fund all needed facilities shall be included. The plan shall specifically indicate: i. Which facilities are proposed to be funded and built as an integral requirement of the 26 development project. If reimbursement features are anticipated, they should be so indicated. ii. Which facilities are proposed to be built by the serving agency as part of their normal capital facilities improvement program, and funded from hook-up fees, taxes or other revenue sources. The facilities should either be shown on an approved capital facil- ities program or the serving agency should indicate that the proposed funding method is reasonable, and that it can be anticipated that the facility will be included on a future capital improvements program. iii. Other funding sources such as assessment districts or grants shall be discussed in detail along with rational as to why this source is considered workable and reason- able. VII. Environmental Review A local Facilities Management Plan shall be considered a project for the purposes of Title 19 of the City Code. Environmental documents should be processed concurrently with the plan. (more to be added) VIII. Plan Preparation Options 1. Single Owner Zones A. Owner Prepares The owner may prepare the plan at the owner's expense. 27 B. City Prepares The-City Council by resolution may direct the City Manager to prepare the plan and assess the cost to the owner within the zone after a hearing ten days written notice of which is given to the property owner. 2. Multi Owner Zones (All Owners in Agreement) A. Owner Prepares All owners may prepare a plan at the owner's expense. B. City Prepares The City Council by resolution may direct the City Manager to prepare the plan and assess the cost to the owners within the zone after a hearing ten days written notice of which is given to the pro- perty owners. 3. Multi Owner Zones (All Owners do not Agree) A. Owner Prepares Any owner or group of cooperating owners within a zone may petition the City Council to allow the owner or group of owners to prepare the plan. After a meeting from which ten days prior written notice has been given to the property owners within the zone, the City Council may permit the owner or group of owners to prepare and submit the plan. A limit based on the estimated cost of the plan shall be determined at the time of the hearing. The actual cost shall be determined when the plan is adopted and shall be assessed pro rata based on acreage and development potential to pro- 28 perty within the Facilities Management Zone. The assessment shall be collected by the City at the time any application for a development project within the zone is submitted. The owner or owners who prepare the plan shall be reimbursed for the cost of the plan, less the owner or owners pro rata share. No reimbursement shall be made unless the plan is approved. Cost of preparation shall not include interest. B. City Prepares The City Council may direct the City Manager to prepare the Facilities Management plan after a hearing ten days written notice of which is given to the property owners. The cost of preparation shall be advanced to the City by the requesting owner or owners. A limit based on the estimated cost of the plan shall be determined at the time of the hearing. The actual cost shall be deter- mined when the plan is adopted and shall be as- sessed pro rata based on acreage and development potential to property within the Facilities Man- agement zone. The assessment shall be collected by the City at the time any application for a development project within the zone is submitted. The owner or owners who requested the plan shall be reimbursed for the cost of the plan, less the owner or owners pro rata share. The cost of pre- paration shall be advanced to the City by the requesting owner or owners. IX. Plan Processing Facility Management Plans shall be reviewed according to the following procedures: 29 1. A completed Facilities Management Plan complying with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and accompanied by necessary environmental documents and a processing fee in an amount established by City Council Resolution, may be submitted to the Planning Director for pro- cessing. If the Planning Director determines that the plan complies with the provision of Section 21.90.110 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, the Director shall set the Facilities Management Plan for public hearing before the Planning Commission within 60 days of receipt of a complete application. 2. The hearing shall be noticed according to the provi- sions of Section 21.54.060(2) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. A staff report containing recommen- dations on the plan shall be prepared and furnished to the public, the applicant, and the Planning Commission prior to the hearing. 3. The Planning Commission shall hear and consider the application for a Facilities Management Plan and shall by resolution prepare recommendations and findings for the City Council. The action of the Commission shall be filed with the City Clerk, a copy shall be mailed to the owners within the facility zone. 4. When the Planning Commission action is filed with the City Clerk, the Clerk shall set the matter for public hearing before the City Council. The hearing shall be noticed according to the provisions of Section 21.54.060(2) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 5. The City Council shall hear the matter, and after con- sidering the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, may approve, conditionally approve or deny a Facilities Management Plan. The City Council may include in the resolution adopting the 30 Facilities Management Plan any fees or facilities improvement requirements which it deems necessary to impose on development projects within the zone in order to implement the City-wide Facilities and Impro- vement plan and the Local Facilities Management Plan. A Facilities Management Plan may be amended following the same procedures for the original adoption. The City Council may initiate an amendment to any of the plans at any time if in its discretion it determines that an amendment is necessary to insure adequate facilities and improvements. JHOO/City of Carlsbad/1-13 31 EXHIBIT METHODOLOGY FOR BUILD-OUT PROJECTIONS The process used to estimate the total number of dwelling units in the City at ultimate build-out is relatively straightforward. Using the City's General Plan map as a basis, all of the land uses shown were entered into a computer by the San Diego Associa- tion of Governments (SANDAG) using a process known as "digitiz- ing." The computer converted this digitized information into gross acres for each land use designation. Environmentally constrained areas were also digitized and converted into acreage figures in the same way. Constrained areas included slopes greater than 25 percent; beaches, wetlands, floodways, other water bodies, major roadways, railroad tracks, major power line easements and raparian and woodland habitats. The primary sources used in identifying these areas included previous environmental impact reports prepared for projects throughout the City and a citywide slope analysis map. To obtain net developable acres, all of the 100 percent constrained acres and one-half of the areas shown as 25-40 percent slopes were subtracted from the gross acreage figure for each land use category. In this way, a net developable acreage figure could be established for the overall City, for each quadrant of the City, and for each of the 25 Growth Management Zones. The net developable acreage figure was then multiplied by the number of dwelling units allowed per acre using the City's "Con- trol Yield" density ranges, which are listed below: Residential Land Use Control Yield RL 1.0 RLM 3.2 RM 6.0 RMH 11.5 RH 19.0 The Control Yield densities represent either the midpoint of the City's adopted density ranges or actual experience using existing developments within each land use category. By applying the Control Yield densities to the net developable acreage figures, an estimate of the total number of dwelling units at full build-out can be derived. To carry the process one step further, the per capita household size data provided by the State Department of Finance can be used to estimate build-out population. These data indicate that the City of Carlsbad had an average household size of 2.471 persons on January 1, 1986, which is considerably less than the nationwide average. The same types of calculations were used to estimate the total number of square feet of industrial and commercial land uses at build-out. However, instead of residential density ranges, a set of assumptions regarding site coverage for industrial and commer- cial development was applied to the net developable acreage figures. The methodology described in the previous paragraphs was used to provide a basis for determining the amount and types of public facilities that will be needed to adequately serve the City at build-out. However, it has a number of acknowledged short- comings. For example, the digitizing process itself is not 100 percent accurate, and when applied to small geographical areas, such as Management Zones, some inaccuracies can occur. A much more accurate means of providing the same information would be via a parcel-level Geobase system, however, such systems are very complex and require a substantially longer time frame to imple- ment. Therefore, concurrent with the development of the Growth Management Program, the City has begun work on developing such a Geobase system, which, at some point in time will supplant the methodology described in the previous paragraphs. Likewise, the dwelling unit estimates at build-out represent a straight conversion of acres to units, with no regard to the number of units already existing throughout the City. This may result in Inequities within certain zones where development has previously occurred under less constraining conditions or using higher density ranges than those represented by the Control Yield. In those cases, remaining development will have to occur at densities lower than the Control Yield in order to achieve the desired densities at full build-out. Of course, the opposite may also occur where development within a certain Zone has taken place at a density lower than the Control Yield figure. Despite these recognized shortcomings, the approach and methodology used within the Growth Management Program has been found to be quite adequate for the purpose to which it was intended, namely long- range facility planning. Therefore, until the parcel-level Geobase system described earlier is implemented, this approach will be used to provide the baseline estimates needed for both mid-term and long-term facilities planning. Other planning assumptions used in preparing the citywide projec- tions included: 1. Pending applications to change the city's land use plan from a residential to non-residential use. 2. Dwelling unit projections do not include any density increases for special housing projects such as senior or low Income projects. 3. Hotel, motel, health care, other housing units without individual kitchen facilities which do not qualify as dwelling units by the building code were not considered as units for the purpose of dwelling unit calculations. JHOO/City of Carlsbad/lH i\ 4 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Carlsbad City Council will hold a public hearing on September 16, 1986 at 6:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue to consider the following items pertaining to the implementation of the Growth Management Ordinance: 1 ) Adoption of a Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan; 2) Adoption of Guidelines for Preparation of Local Facility Management Plan; 3) Minor revisions to previously adopted Public Facility Performance Standards; and 4) Adoption of a Local Facility Management Plan processing fee. A Negative Environmental Declaration was previously approved by the City Council for the Growth Management Ordinance and a Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance has been filed with respect to the implementation items being considered at this time. APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD PUBLISH DATE: September 6, 1986 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL B-4 ^eganAtepltaion Saturday, September 6,1986 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Carlsbad City Council will hold a public hearing on September 16,1986 at 6:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue to consider the following items pertaining to the implementation of the Growth Management Ordinance: 1) Adoption of a City wide Facilities and Improvements Plan; 2) Adoption of Guidelines for Preparation of Local Facility Management Plan; 3) Minor revisions to previously adopted Public Facility Performance Standards; and 4) Adoption of a Local Facility Management Plan processing fee. A Negative Environmental Declaration was previously approved by the City Council for the Growth Management Ordinance and a Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance has been filed with respect to the implementation items being considered at this time. APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad City Council PUBLISH: September 6,1986 Cjtj> o{