HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-11-04; City Council; 8809; REQUEST FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, ZONE CHANGE AND LOCAL COASTAL PLAN AMENDMENTS IN SOUTHWEST QUADRANT OF THE CITY, WEST OF I-5.REQU
Y AB# f? 07 . TITLE: ZONE CHANGE AND LCP AMENDMENTS IN
MTG. 11/4/86
DEPT. CARLSBAD - SEAPOINTE CARLSBAD
SOUTWEST QUADRANT OF THE CITY, WEST OF 1-5.
PLN GPA/LU 85--9/ZC--338/LCPA 86-2 - CITY OF
DEPT.
c\Ty 1
CITY 1
4
P Id-*
a, b cdd a *rl QJu bC a3 Od OUO c, .rl au hb cd QJcdh E E 0 0 *rl u4-I v) uc
h ua k .rl F: -4 VcdQJ s QJ nU sa ulh
aww
uplo QJ u .rl
-rl v)
9:
GO
2-4 F:
h4 v)
a - -4 -7- i2 dm 0 cdwu
034 c-4 cd co\u m4 m pla .a 0 V
ocd +I .rl ac hl-l h ocdo 3w a 0 -ri a, br( u acd 3 au acd OQJ bWS uou C .rl v) 0 uu dC *rl a, c 2 5 .: sou oou ward
G
I
l-l
!&
co I e
l-l
.. 2 0 E : a
2 3 0 0
L/ I' / ! . ..Lx
d a J - CI~OF CARLSBAD - AGEN~BILL **
EST FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT,
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Both the Planning Commission and staff are recommending that t
City Council direct the City Attorney's Office to prepare
documents APPROVING GPA/LU 85-7, introduce Ordinance No. ?a0
APPROVING ZC-338 and direct the City Attorney's Office to prep
documents APPROVING LCPA 86-2 amending the Mello I1 Local Coas
Plan and forward the Council action to the California Coastal
Commission for their consideration.
ITEM EXPLANATION
This proposal consists of seven amendments to the General Plan
and seven zone changes on land within a 340 acre area located
generally as described above and shown on the attached locatio
map. The proposed General Plan Amendments and zone changes ar
shown on Exhibits "B" and "C" of the attached staff report.
Exhibit I'D" lists all of the proposed General Plan Amendments,
zone changes and Local Coastal Plan Amendments.
This project was originated by a request from Community Partne
(Seapointe Carlsbad) for a General Plan Amendment from RMH,
Residential Medium High 8-15 du/ac to 0, Office for a 10 acre
parcel within the above-mentioned area. Staff had concerns ab
making a recommendation on this request because of the
uncertainty of future land uses in this portion of town and
staffs concerns with the existing General Plan. To aid staff
making decisions on this project as well as other properties i
the area, the applicant was willing to provide the City with
funds to hire a consultant to prepare a detailed land use stud
of the area shown on Exhibit "A".
The consultant studied the constraints and opportunities of th
site and made a number of recommendations for General Plan
Amendments, zone changes and Local Coastal Plan Amendments. T
also made many recommendations for access points and developme
standards which will aid staff in evaluating future developmen
proposals for this area.
The Seapointe Carlsbad land use study divided this area into
eight subareas. General Plan Amendments, zone changes and Lot<
Coastal Plan Amendments were recommended in four of the subare
Details of the proposed changes are provided in the attached
staff report of August 13, 1986 and the attached Seapointe
Carlsbad land use study.
r
I
f \' 0 0
Y *
Page 2 of Agenda Bill No. G(f-07
Based on the constraints and opportunities of the site the
recommendations resulted in an overall reduction in the amount
residential development and an increase in the amount of trave
service and office uses. The study also recommends split Gene
Plan designations on a number of sites. Split General Plan
designations require the approval of a detailed Specific Plan
before any development can occur on the site.
The Planning Commission supported all of staff and the land US
study's recommendations except for the portion of Subarea P-3
owned by Community Partners. Staff recommended that this
property retain its RMH, 8-15 du's/ac General Plan, designatic
Due to its proximity to the Encina Treatment Plant the Plannin
Commission felt that the land use study's alternative of 0,
Office was a more appropriate use.
Overall staff believes that proposed changes will create land
uses which are more compatible with existing and future land c
and with coastal policies. For more details see the attached
staff report, land use study and traffic study.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Planning Director has determined that this project will no
cause any significant environmental impacts and, therefore, ha
issued a Negative Declaration, dated July 5, 1986, which was
recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on August
1986. A copy of the environmental documents is on file in the
Planning Department.
FISCAL IMPACT
The increased need for City capital facilities resulting from
development allowed by the proposed General Plan Amendments, z
changes and Local Coastal Plan Amendments will be offset by th
payment of the public facilities fee and traffic impact fees.
Any capital facilities related directly to the development of
these properties will be constructed and paid for by the
developers of the site. Overall. the replacement of residentia
development by planned industrial, office and travel service u
should increase the amount of revenue brought into the City by
this area.
EXHIBITS
1. Location map
3. Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2587, 2588 6i 2589
4. Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 13, 1986
5. Seapointe Carlsbad Land Use Study
6. Traffic Study dated July 11, 1986
2. City Council Ordinance No. 9r 20
w/attachments
e VICINITY MAP
6 7
EXHI
6-3
,
',
\.
,
STUDY
AREA
I
1
City of Carlsbad
SEAPOINTE CARLSBAD IGPAILU
1 ~~
(P-2) Change to CT-Q
Change to OS
(P-3) Change to 0
NO CHANGE
CHANGE TO PM/O
CHANGE TO RDM-Q
CHANGE TO RDM-Q
Change to CT-Q/R
PU-PUBLIC UTILI7
M-INDUSTRIAL
C-1-COMMERCIAL-I
CT-Q-COMMERCIAL
C-2-COMMERCIAL-F
RDM-RESIDENTIAL-
RMHP-MOBILE HOME
i 1
b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a,
9
10,
11
12
13
0 e
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2587
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CIT' OF CAKLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, KECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERA1 PLAN AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "Bll DATED JULY 30, 1986 FOR PROPERTIES GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE AREA COVERED BY THE SEAPOINTE-CARLSBAD LAND USE STUDY
APPLICANT: SEAPOINTE-CARLSBAD CASE NO. : GPA/LU 8s-9
WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment tc
Jeneral Plan designation for certain property located, as sl
Lxhibit "B", dated July 30, 1986, attached and incorporated
nerein, has been filed with the Planning Commission; and
._
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a r1
€or amendment as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Munic
Jode; and .
16 ::I 17
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 13th
ugust, 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescri
aw to consider said request;
WHEKEAS, at said public 'hearing, upon hearing and i
24
27 281
) That the above recitations are true and correct.
) That based on the evidence presented at the public hea
the Commission recommends APPROVAL of GPA/LU 85-9, as
on Exhibit "B" dated July 30, 1986 attached hereto and part hereof based on the following findings:
indings:
The subject properties are physically suitable for
development permitted by the respective land use desig as discussed in the attached staff report and expanded the Seapointe-Carlsbad Land Use Study.
I
I
v
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
16
17
18
19
2o
21
22
23
24
25
1_
27 26
28
0 e
2) The uses allowed in the proposed land use designations 3 compatible with existing and future surrounding land USI discussed in the attached staff report and the Seapoint Carlsbad Land Use Study.
3) A detailed traffic study has revealed that the proposed
General Plan Amendments will not adversely impact
circulation in this portion of Carlsbad.
4) This action will not cause any significant environmenta impact and a Negative Declaration has been issued by th
Planning Director on July 5, 1986 and recommended for
approval by the Planning Commission on August 13, 1986.
PASSED, APPKOVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting c
7lanning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, he3
the 13th day of August, 1986, by the following vote, to wit:
:SUBAREA P-1 :
AYES : Commissioners: Marcus, Schramm, Holmes I
NOES : Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners: McFac
Hall.
McBane.
UBAREA P-2:
AYES : Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners: McBa Marcus, McFadden, Schramm, Holmes &Hall
'UBAREA P-3:
1 AYES : Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners: McBa
i Marcus, McFadden, Schramm, Holmes & Hall
PUB,EA P-4: /I
I I I I
AYES: Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners: Mar
Schramm, Holmes & Hall.
hOES : Commissioners: McFadden & McBane.
Plme- %. AAb F&j
CLARENCE SCHLEHUBER, Chaii
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSl b ICHAEL J. HOLZMILLE LA"1NG DIRECTOR
C RES0 NO. 2587 -2- I
I
(P-2) Change to-
Change to P!/o
PI-PLANND IMX;STRIAL
u-UTILITY
MFFICE
TS/C-TRA& SERVICES/CC~
RMH-RES1DENTIA.L LEDIWH
I
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
lo
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e e
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2588
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGES AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "C" DATED JULY 30, 1986 FOR PROPERTIES GENEKALLY LOCATED WITHIN THE AREA COVERED BY THE
SEAPOINTE CARLSBAD LAND USE STUDY. APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD
CASE NO: ZC-338
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain propert
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to tk
Planning Commission; and
tJHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as
provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 13th dE
August, 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescriI
law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all pert
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Zone Change; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plannj
Commission as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
€3)
I
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearj Commission recommends APPROVAL of 26-338, as shown on E> "C" dated July 30, 1986 attached hereto and made a part based on the following findings and subject to the folk conditions:
Findings :
1) The proposed zone changes will bring the subject proper1
zoning into conformance with their proposed General Plai designations.
I
1
5
) The uses allowed in the proposed zones will be compatil with uses allowed on the surrounding properties for tht reasons discussed in the attached staff report and the Seapointe-Carlsbad Land Use Study.
The proposed zone changes are in conformance with the recommendations for changes to the subject properties 1 Coastal Plan designations as discussed in the attached
This action will not cause any significant environments impact and a Negative Declaration has been issued by tk
Planning Director on July 5, 1986 and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on August 13, 1986.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting c
lanning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, he1
he 13th day of August, 1986, by the following vote, to wit:
)
)
BAREA P-1:
Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners: McFad McBane.
Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners: McBanc Marcus, McFadden, Schramm, Holmes Sr Hall.
UBAREA P-3:
Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners: McBanl Marcus, NcFadden, Schramm, Holmes Sr Hall.
Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners: Marci
Schramm, Holmes & Hall.
Commissioners: McFadden b McBane.
C RES0 NO. 2588 -2-
/
\
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 'I.
l2
l3
I.4
15
I.6
17
.i ... 18
l9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6- -_
0 e
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2589
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CARLSBAD LOCAL COi
PLAN DESIGNATIONS FOR CERTAIN PKOPERTIES T.N THE PJ
COVERED BY THE SEAPOINTE-CARLSBAD LAND USE STUDY ,
SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN CARLS- THIS AMENDMENT WOULD ALSO ADD AN OFFICE CATEGORY 1 LOCAL COASTAL PLAN. APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD
CASE NO. : LCPA 86-2
WHEREAS, California State law requires that the LC
Coastal Plan, General Plan and Zoning designations for pro]
in the Coastal Zone be in conformance;
WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment i
Local Coastal Plan designations for certain property locate
shown on Exhibit "Btr, dated July 30, 1986, attached and
incorporated herein, has been filed with the Planning Commi
and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a I
for amendment as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Munic
Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 13th
I August, 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescri
law to consider said request;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all per
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factor
relating to the Local Coastal Plan Amendment.
WHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines requires a six w
public review period for any amendment to the Local Coastal
Program. .
I
\
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
l2
13
l4
15
16
I'
l8
l9
2o
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plan1
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hec the Commission recommends APPROVAL of LCPA 86-2, as SI
Exhibit %I1, dated July 30, 1986 attached hereto and I
part hereof based on the following findings:
At the end of the State mandated six week review peric starting on August 13, 1986 and ending on September 21 1986, staff shall present to the City Council a summa] the comments received.
C)
Findings :
1) The proposed changes to the designations on the Local Coastal Plan will allow the subject properties to dew
in accordance with their General Plan designations as detailed in the attached staff report.
The proposed changes to the designations on the Local Coastal Plan represent more appropriate land use designations for the reasons stated in the staff repor
3) The recommmended Local Coastal Plan Amendments to brin Local Coastal Plan designations into conformance with Carlsbad General Plan are exempt from environmental re per Section 15265A1 of the California Environmental Qu
Act.
2)
///I
1/11
I ///I
////
///I
/;//I
/I//
///I
//I/
1/11
//I/
PC RES0 NO. 2589 -2-
I
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e e
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, hl
the 13th day of August, 1986, by the following vote, to wi
SUBAREA P-1:
AYES : Commissioners: Marcus, Schramm, Holmes
NOES : Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners: McF
Hall.
McBane.
SUBAREA P-2:
AYES : Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners: McB Marcus, McFadden, Schramm, Holmes & Hal
SUBAREA P-3:
AYES : Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners: McB Marcus, McFadden, Schramm, Holmes & Hal
SUBAREA P-4:
AYES : Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners: Mal Schramm, Holmes b Hall.
NOES : Commissioners: McFadden & McBane.
hw.&&
CLARENCE SCHLEHUBER, Chaii CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISS.
ATTEST : lgl&n& -&
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLEW PLANNING DIRECTOR
P -3- PC RESO NO. 2589
1
(P-2) Change to.-
Change to PI/o
PI-PLAmED IMX'STRIAL
U-UTILITY
C-OFFTICE
WC-TFAV~L SEKVICES/CCP.
RMH-RESIDEXXAL MED1W-f.
e
ci?+',x*x
STAFF REPORT
i. 1'
Ly L
DATE : AUGUST 13, 1986
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: GPA/LU 85-9/ZC-338/LCPA 86-2- SEAPOINTE CARLSBAD (CIT
OF CARLSBAD - Request for General Plan Amendments, 20
Changes and Local Coastal Plan Amendments for an area
bounded by Palomar Airport Road, Interstate 5,
Poinsettia Lane and Carlsbad Boulevard, plus that are
bounded by Poinsettia Lane, Ponto Road, Carlsbad
Boulevard and the AT&SF Railroad.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution Nos. 2587, 2588
2589 recommending APPROVAL of GPA/LU 85-9, ZC-338 and LCPA 86-
per staff's recommendations to the City Council based on the
findings contained therein.
11. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This report recommends six amendments to the General Plan and
seven zone changes on land within a 340 acre area located as
described above. The existing and proposed General Plan
designations are shown on Exhibit "B" and the existing and
proposed zoning designations on Exhibit "C". Exhibit "D" list
all of the proposed changes.
This project was originated by a request from Community Partne
for a General Plan Amendment from RMH, Residential Medium High
8-15 du/ac to 0, Office for a 10 acre parcel within the above-
mentioned area. Staff had concerns about making a recommendat
on this request because of the uncertainty of future land uses
this portion of town. To aid staff in making decisions on thi
project as well as other properties in the area, the applicant
was willing to provide the City with funds to hire a consultan
to prepare a detailed land use study of the area shown on Exhi
"A".
The firm of Austin-Hansen-Fehlman was hired by the City to
complete this study which was known as the Seapointe Carlsbad
Study. The consultant examined the constraints and opportunit
of this area and made a number of recommendations for General.
Plan Amendments, Zone Changes and Local Coastal Plan Amendment
This study also makes numerous recommendations for setbacks,
access points, landscape requirements and other development ant
design criteria that will aid in future decision-making when
these properties are developed.
1 0 e
The discussion section of this report will examine the Subareas
(Pl-P4) (as shown on Exhibit B) that the Seapointe Carlsbad stc
recommended for either General Plan Amendments, Zone changes 01
Local Coastal Plan Amendments. In some areas, there were no
changes recommended.
111. ANALYSIS
Planning Issues
1) Are the proposed land uses appropriate for the sites?
2) Is the proposed zoning consistent with the General P1z
and Local Coastal Plan designations on the property?
3) Are the proposed land use and zoning designations
consistent with surrounding land uses and zoning?
Discussion f rnIN5E-rrlA LPJ
SUBAREA P1
KEY MAP
This study area is divided into two major sections, the
Bankers/Life parcel to the north and the Lusk property to the
south. The Bankers/Life parcel, approximately 36 acres in sizt
is located south of the sewer plant. The Lusk property is
located north of Poinsettia, east of the railroad, and west of
Avenida Encinas.
BANKERS/LIFE
Existing Proposed
General Plan RM PI/O
Zoning R-1-10000 PM/O
Local Coastal Plan Medium Density Planned
Residential Industri,
Office
Staff is recommending a zoning of PM/O on this property. The
area adjacent to the waste treatment plant is proposed for
industrial development and will serve as a buffer between this
use and residential/commercial uses to the south. Through a
specific plan, office uses will also be permitted on the site ,
will function as a transition between the industrial and
residential uses.
At the present time, the alignment of Avenida Encinas has not
been established. If it is located through the western portio
of the site, staff could support the use of planned industrial
uses on the west side of the street. This use would function
a further buffer from the railroad.
-2-
I 0 0
I .
The proposed changes would also require an LCP amendment from t
present Medium Density Residential designation to Planned
Industrial/Office. The Local Coastal Plan is being amended to
add a separate category for office uses. There are no coastal
resource issues on this site and the proposed designation PI10
consistent with Coastal policies.
LUSK
Staff is recommending the following changes on this property:
Existing Proposed
General Plan RM RM/O
Zoning R- 1- 10 0 0 0 RD-M/O
Local Coastal Plan Medium Medium Re
Residential Off ice
Office uses are proposed at the north end of the site and to wr,
around the east property line along existing Avenida Encinas.
This would create a balanced street scene with property to the
north and provide a buffer from the approved car dealerships to
the east. Multi-family residences are recommended for the
remaining area to keep community character with commercial uses
and also to support these uses. This type of housing is also
designated for the beach area by the Land Use Element of the
General Plan. Staff believes that clustered multi-family
residences would be most appropriate in this area so that noise
impacts from both the railroad and Poinsettia Lane could be
reduced by locating the dwelling units away from these noise
sources.
The zone change and General Plan amendment will necessitate a
Local Coastal Plan amendment from Medium Density Residential (4-
du's/ac) to Medium Density Residential/Office. General
Commercial is the most appropriate designation for an office USE
The present agricultural overlay will remain on the property and
will require mitigation by the property owner prior to
d ev e 1 o pmen t .
For more details see Section P-1 of the Seapointe study.
SUBAREA P-2
A w-
This is a 3.4 acre parcel at the southeast corner of Palomar
Airport Road and Carlsbad Boulevard. It is bounded on the east
by the AT&SF Railroad and on the south by the Solamar Mobile
Home Park.
-3-
I 0 0 .
Staff is recommending the following changes on this property.
Existing Proposed
General Plan RMH TS
Zoning RD-M CT-Q
Local Coastal Plan Open Space/Parks Visitor C
Staff is proposing a General Plan designation of Travel Service
(TS) and a zoning designation of Commercial Tourist with a Q
Overlay (CT-Q) to be placed on this property. The use of these
classifications would allow the site to be developed with a
hotel, motel, or restaurant use and possible accessory uses whi
would be integrated with the overall project. The area is
proposed to have a Q Overlay which requires that a comprehensiv
cohesive site development plan be approved prior to development
of the property. Due to the close proximity to both the freewa
and the beach, this site is an appropriate location for Travel
Service types of uses.
The above-mentioned changes will also require an amendment to tl
Local Coastal Plan. The present designation is for Open
Space/Parks and calls for 800 RV parking spaces. There are no
sensitive coastal resources on this parcel. The beach at this
location is mainly cobblestones and accessed only by a dirt pat1
For this reason, as well as the attendant traffic congestion
which would be created, an RV park site is an inappropriate use
at this location. Preliminary talks with the Coastal Commissior
have indicated they would agree to tourist serving commercial
uses at this site.
For more details, see Section P-2 of the Seapointe study.
SUBAREA P-3 PFDtrJ%WflA d.
KEY MAP
This subarea consists of two sections known as the Community
Partners property at the north and the La Costa Downs subdivisio
to the south.
community Partners
This 9.4 acre site, long and narrow in shape, is bordered by
Carlsbad Boulevard on the west, Solamar Mobile Home Park on the
north, the AT&SF Railroad tracks on the east, and the substandarc
La Costa Downs subdivision to the south. Approximately 3.0 acre!
of the site is considered buildable and is presently under
agriculture. The remaining acreage consists of the Canyon de La!
Encinas River channel, wetlands, and steep slopes.
-4-
I 0 0
Staff is recommending the following changes on this property:
Existing Proposed
General Plan RMH OS and RI
Zoning R- 1 - 10000 OS and RL'
Open Spac Local Coastal Plan Medium Hiqh
Medium Hi Residential
Resident i
Staff has proposed that the northern salt water marsh/river
channel have both a General Plan and zoning designation of Open
Space (OS). The southern section would retain the RMH
classification but be zoned RD-M.
Staff is recommending RMH/RD-M on the southern portion of the
site to maintain compatibility with the two mobile home parks a
the unbuilt, small lot subdivision, La Costa Downs. Staff feel
if the site were zoned for Office use, it would constitute "spc
zoning" and would not be as compatible as RMH/RD-M would be wit
the surrounding residential uses. This land use designation
presently extends south to Poinsettia Lane.
The change in zoning and General Plan designation to OS on the
northern portion of the site will also necessitate an amendment
to the Local Coastal Plan. This change would be from Medium Hi
Density Residential (10-20 du/acl to Open Space/Parks. This is
in keeping with coastal policies for preserving sensitive coast
resource areas which include wetlands and other environmentally
sensitive resources found on the adjacent slope areas. The
southern section of the site will maintain its existing LCP
designation of Medium High Residential.
For more details, see Section P-3 of the Seapointe study.
La Costa Downs Subdivision
Staff is recommending the following changes on this property:
Existing Proposed
General Plan RMH RM
Zoning R-1-10000 No Change
Local Coastal Plan Medium High Medium
Residential Residenti
The present zoning on this site is R-1-10000 and the General Pli
designation is RMH (8-15 du/ac). Staff is proposing the zoning
to remain as it is and the General Plan designation to be lowert
to RM (4-8 du/ac). Staff realizes the two designations of R-l-
10000 and RM do not appear to be compatible; however, the
situation that exists is unusual. The small lot (6,000 sa. ft.
-5-
I 0 0
configuration necessitates an R-1 designation; however, the sma
lot size would make it impossible to stay within the General p1
category of RLM (0-4 du's/ac). A 6,000 square foot lot would
mean a density of 7.2 du/ac. For this reason, staff proposes t1
next designation of RM (4-8 du's/ac).
This change will necessitate a corresponding Local Coastal Plan
amendment from Medium High Density (8-15 du/ac) to Medium
Density (4-8 du/ac). The reduction in density will still
maintain consistency with present coastal policies, will not
have any damaging affects on coastal resources and will still
allow the existing lots to be developed with single family
homes.
For more details, see Section P-3 of the Seapointe study.
+rnt&Em4 L*I -2 SUBAREA P-4
Pacific Ocean A
KEY MAP
This site is 43 acres in size and divided approximately into
thirds. The northerly property, owned by Lusk, is divided from
the southern areas by Poinsettia Lane.
Northern Third
Staff is proposing the following change to this property:
Existing Proposed
General Plan RMH RMH
Zoning PC RD-M-Q
Local Coastal Plan Medium High Medium Hig
Residential Residentia
Staff is proposing to rezone the property to RD-M-Q and leave th
land use designation at RMH. Basically, this is just a "cleanup'
zone change due to the fact that the area was previously a part
of the old Occidental Master Plan which is no longer applicable.
The proposed zone change will not affect the land use nor the
density, but will ensure that when the property is developed, a
comprehensive plan will be implemented and approved for the
entire site prior to development.
Informal requests for an RH land use designation have been
discussed between staff and the property owner. Staff cannot
support a request for higher density due to the fact that higher
density, by its very nature, means larger building masses which
would obstruct views of the ocean.
No LCP amendments will be required with the above-mentioned zone
change.
-6-
1 , 0 0
Southern Two-Thirds
This subarea is presently vacant and relatively level on the
northerly section of the site. The southerly one-third (known
"Ponto" 1 consists of mixed housing and industrial uses.
Staff is recommending the following changes on this property:
Existing Proposed
RMH TS/RMH General Plan
Zoning PC CT-Q/RD-M
Local Coastal Plan Medium High Visitor C
Medium Hi
Resident i
Residential
Staff is proposing a combination zone of CT-Q/RD-M-Q and a splii
General Plan designation of TS/RMH. The major reason why staff
assigned a combination zone and split General Plan designation
for this site was because of the uncertainty over what type of
development will take place in the immediate area. The
Batiquitos Educational Park Master Plan has an approved
commercial site of 6.8 acres which wraps around the "Ponto" arec
The uses on this site will be "directed toward the neighborhood
commercial needs of the residents and employees of the Master
Plan area". A maximum of 44 residential units will be permittei
above the ground floor of these commercial uses. Staff believes
similar land uses in the Ponto area would promote compatibility
between the two areas. The two project areas would also
compliment each other by providing more moderate accommodations,
more customers for nearby restaurants and other commercial uses
and also more support for beach-oriented vacationers. This woul
be the only commercial beach area between Palomar Airport Road
(if that site is approved) and Encinitas.
The proposed General Plan amendment and zone change would also
require a Local Coastal Plan amendment from the present Medium
High Density Residential to Visistor Commercial/Medium High
Density Residential. This is consistent with the Coastal Act by
providing visitor commercial areas at a site which is close to
the beach and the State beach campgrounds, as well as located at
the terminus of a freeway beach exit. The Local Coastal Plan
recreation policy calls €or mixed use residential and recreation
commercial across from the State park. Carlsbad's recreation
commercial designations includes golf courses, horse stables and
other uses not appropriate on this site. The tourist commercial
designation is more appropriate at this location but will
require a further amendment to the text of the Local Coastal
Plan. The present Agricultural Overlay will remain on the
property and will require mitigation by the property owner prior
to development.
For further details, see Section P-4 of the Seapointe study.
-7-
e e
Circulation
Seapointe Carlsbad has extremely favorable external access sinc
it is bounded on the west and south by major arterials, on the
north by a prime arterial and on the east by an eight lane
interstate freeway.
The traffic analysis demonstrates some future capacity problems
at intersections along the arterial streets and at the freeway
ramps. Such problems will exist with or without the uses
proposed in the land use study. Mitigation of the problem
locations has been suggested in the land use study, and is
deemed to be reasonable and practical.
As projects are approved, there should be conditions imposed
which will give assurance that in the proper phasing and at
proper time, the project will be required to implement its fair
share of the needed mitigation.
LCP
If the Planning Commission determines that the above LCP
amendments are warranted and, therefore, necessary to implement
the City's Local Coastal Program, it should establish the State
mandated six week review period. During the period which would
begin on August 13, 1986 and end September 24, 1986 all
interested parties including other agencies would have the
opportunity to comment on the merits of the proposed amendments
Staff would then return to the Planning Cornmission on October 1
1986 with a summary of the comments received. The Commission
would determine whether modifications to any of the proposed LC
amendments are warranted and forward its recommendations to the
City Council for final action.
Overall, staff believes the proposed changes will create land
uses which are more compatible with existing land uses and with
coastal policies. Safeguards have been incorporated into the
zoning and General Plan designations to ensure that development
will be compatible and well integrated with surrounding
projects.
-
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Planning Director has determined that this project will not
have a significant impact on the environment and, therefore, has
issued a Negative Declaration on July 5, 1986.
-8-
e 0
ATTACHMENTS
1) Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2587, 2589 and 2589
2) Vicinity Map and Study Area
3. Exhibits "B" - "D" dated June 30, 1986
4. Environmental Document, dated July 5, 1986
5. Seapointe Carlsbad Land Use Study
6. Traffic Study
-9-
6-3C
6 GIllGER AV.
7 BU~~ERCUP
EXHIE
(P-2) Change to CT-Q
Change to OS
(P-3) Change to 0
NO CHANGE
CHANGE TO PM/O
CHANGE TO RDM-Q
CHANGE TO RDM-Q
Change to CT-Q/R
PU-PUBLIC UTILI
M-INDUSTRIAL
C-~-COMMERCIAL-
C-2-COMMERCIAL-
CT-Q-COMMERCIAL
RDM-RESIDENTIAL
RMHP-MOBILE HOM
R-I-IO-SINGLE F
BIT "D" ,e JL * E 30, 1986
REQUESTED ACTIONS
I. General Plan Amendments
Subarea P-1 North RM to PI/O
South RM to RM/O
Subarea P-2 RMH to TS
Subarea P-3 North RMH to os
Middle RMH to No Change
South RMH to RM
Subarea P-4 North RMH to No Change
Area South RMH to TS/RMH
11. Zone Changes
Subarea P-1 North R-1-10000 to PM/O
Subarea P-2 RD-M to CT-Q
Subarea P-3 North R-1-10000 to os
Middle R-1-10000 to RD-M
South R-1-10000 to RD-M-Q
South R-1-10000 to No Change
South PC to CT-Q/RD-M
Subarea P-4 North PC to RD-M-Q
111. Local Coastal Plan Amendments
Subarea P-1 North Medium Residential to Planned Industrial/
General Commercial * South Medium Residential to Medium Residential/
General Commercial
Subarea P-2 Open Space/Parks to Visitor Commercial
Subarea P-3 - North Medium High Res. to open Space/Parks
Middle Medium High Res. to No Change
South Medium High Res. to Medium Residential * Subarea P-4 North Medium High Res. to No Change
South Medium High Res. to Visitor Commercial/
Medium High Res.
IV. Off ice
The addition of an office category to the Local Coastal Plan as follows:
This classification designates areas which are compatible and
environmentally suited to office and professional uses, including some
compatible and supportive related commercial uses. This land use could bc
placed along major arterials without creating adverse conditions which art
associated with strip development, and can be used as buffers between
commercial areas and residential uses.
* Keep Coastal Agricultural Overlay
0 0
DEVELOPMENTAL 1200 ELM SERVICES CARLSBAD, C
(619) 43 LAND USE PLANNlNG OFflCE
Citp of Carls’ttab
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: South of Palomar Airport Road, west of
Interstate 5, north of Poinsettia Lane, including the Ponto area.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Six General Plan Amendments and seven zone
changes for the area as described above.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the
above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation
of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental
Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not
have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the
subject project.
Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on
file in the Planning Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad,
CA., 92008, Comments from the public are invited. Please submit
comments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (101 days of
date of issuance.
Justification for this action is on file in the
4%%&& ‘ $&&&& L
____i
DATED: July 5, 1986
CASE NO: GPA/LU 85-9/2C-338 Planning Director
APPLICANT: Seapointe Carlsbad
PUBLISH DATE: July 5, 1986
MICHAEL J. RB~ZMILCE’R
ND 4
11/85
0 0 k.’ --
6
GEmULPLANrnN
GPAhU 85-9
AUSTlECHCINS EISFEHLMANK3R SAN Dl1
0 0
SEAPOINTE CARLSBAD
. . GPAAU85.9 . .
TABLE OF C0"TS
I . Executive Summary 1 ........................................................ Exhibit 1 Land Use Plan (and Summary Chart) .. .4
Background ......................................................................... 6 A . Locstion ....................................................................... B . Purpo ......................................................................... Exhibit 2 Existing Conditions .................................. 7 C . Sib Orgsnitstion ....................................................... 8 D . Existing Setting ..........................................................9 E . Historg ....................................................................... 11 F . Methodolo gp ............................................................. 12
Opportunities and Coastraints ................................. 14 Exhibit 3 Opportunitiw &Con stmints ................. 17 Exhibit 4 Wind Charts ............................................. 1%
Existing Land Use Regulations ................................. 19
A . Su .................................................................... 19 B . Local Coastal Plan .................................................... 20 C . South Carlsbad State Beach hfastor Plan ............. 22
Discussion and Recommendations .......................... 24
A . Concsp ts .................................................................... 24 B . Community Chstscter ............................................ 25 C . Ph UasMcstions to be Ussd ............................. 25 D . Recommendstions ................................................... 27
Exhibit 6 Subarea P2 ............................................... 32 Exhibit 7 Subarea P3 .............................................. -36 Exhibit 8 Subarea P4 ............................................... 41
A . Present Circulation Syst4m ................................... 32 B . Findings of the Traffic Stuw ................................ 32 C . Recommendations ................................................... 53 Exhibit 9 Circulation .............................................. 34
VI1 . Conformance with the General Plan ...................... 55
I I .
111 .
IV .
V .
.. Exhibit 5 Subarea Pl ............................................... 28
VI . circulation ......................................................................... 52
.. prsOvsd by:
Awtin-Haawn-Fehlmm/Croup
9605 Scmton Rd .. Suite 202
Sa Diego, CA 9212-1
(619) 458-1361
e 0
SEAPOINTE CARLSBAD
- - GPAAU 85-9
TABLE OF CCNIWI"TENT
I.
6 I I. Background .........................................................................
Executive Summary .......,,...... *. ....... ..... ....... * ..... ~~oI,oaouau t
Exhibit 1 had Us Ph (aad Summary Chart)...4
A. Loc~on ....................................................................... 8. Purpose .............,..... . ...... q ..................................,......... 6 Erhibit 2 Existing Conditions ............................... ...7 C. Sib Orgmitstion ..................................................... 8 D. Existing Setting ........................................................ ..9 E. ~ig.........................................,......,..................,..ll F. Methodology ........ . . . , .. . . ..... . ..... ....... .... ..... .......... . .... .. .12
Opportunities and Constraints ................................. 14
Exhibit 3 Opportuaities6rConstraints .... .............17 Exhibit 4 Wind Chm ................... , ......................... 18
Existing Land Use Regulations ................................. 19
A. Su ........................................................................... B. Local Cod P1.n..................................................20 C. South Carlsbad State RIch Masbt Plan...... ....... 22
Discussion and Recommendations .......................... 24
A. Concep ................................................................... B. Community Churctsr ............................................ ZS c. Ph ~~CaionS to be Ud ........,....................I 2s D. Reco~endrtions ..............................,......,............ 27 Exbibit 5 subvsr P1 ................................................ 2% =bit 6 Subue8 p2 ........... . ,, ,. .... . ... . .. . .,. ,. .. . .. ,. . . . . . . .32 Mibit7 SubvsrP3 ............ . ..... ............ ..... ............ 36 wit8 Subsma P4 .................................... . ....... ...41
Circulation ........................................................... . ............. 52
A. Pmwnt Ckcuhtbn Sysbm ................................... 52 B. Findings of the Trrffic SUre ................................ 52 C. Recommendrtiont .............................................. S3 mait 9 Cj,rcu&ion ...... ... , . ... .... , . .... . , . . . . .... . . .... . . .. .. 54
I I I.
IV.
V.
..
VI.
1/11. Conformme with the General Plan ...................... 5s
.. preOrrab by:
A wdn- Hmsm-Fehl WGroug
Sm Diego, CA 92121
960) scfaatoa Rb., suite 202
(619) 456-1361
8 e 0
- -
"he Smpointo Cubbd GPA Study h csa be located by referring to Exhibit 2, Exi&
Area Msp. Comptissd of about 340 acm, it is bum4 generally in the southvc
qwdrrat of the city. The purpos of this report is to provide recommendations to t
Plrtlning Commission md the City Council reguding the appropriate laad u31~ for t
Study Area at the Gonerd Ptrn level.
The mothodologg utiLizsd includod a review of the Study ha's planning history,
mqursbd dbctstioauy actions rod opportunities md constmints .nalpis, intervi~
with property owners, and discussion3 rith City staff.
Conclusions mehad by this report 8re as fobm bo orhibit 1, following):
1) he to the cow loc8tion of the Site, and easy frsearp access lo the m
htemctions (P8lom8r Airport Rod/Car&bad Boulev8rd sad PoinssUir LUrdCrrl:
Boulovud), the arm between Poimeuir Lane/cUlsbd Boulevard and Sau
Prope~es' BatiquitM 4oon Educrtionrl Prrt (which is Noighborhd Commei
dong Carisbad Boulaud) should bo d for visitor-wsrrring commercid. For the I
sccess rmmn, the arm at Palomu Airport Rord/CYMad Boulevard should ah
visitorcmning commercial.
2) Ebhrwn these commercial arms, dong CuW Boulevard should be reside
(md as UI .Itematits mu the me treatment pht, office).
3) Ptmaed Industrial should be placed around the Encina Vabr Pollution Conttol
as a buffer.
m w
win& Cultbad General Plm Ammdmmt study
4) The area bema tho nilrord and the e*g commercial uwa dong the freeway,
on tho norlh si& of Poinsettia Lane, should b howing (Modium Donsity Residentid)
and office to create 8 balance of wos within the study b Tho office uw should be
implemented along the northern and emtern property lines to buffer tho residential
-from the nowby commercial and indusrrirl uw3.
5) The area betwoon the Phnd Industrial muth of tho Encina Water Pollution Control
Plrat and tho housing mentiomd above should be office to furthur providu a transition
from the msnufrcturio~hdustrirl usos to the north md the residential usas to the
South.
6) Along the crrlsbrd Boulwud Scenic Corridor tho City, in conjunction with the
mnors, should drrslop - guicklinos to hop appoamace md development
consistent dong CarM Boulwud. The elements to be included within the Design
Guidelines should bo: Scale and building mraing, landscaping, signago, material and
color plottos, rad mrinbnurce or creation of viw corridors whom nev doveloprnent
occurs in front of n#ds or other development, or where them uw vim opportunititus.
Tho ahwe recommendations (p.rticu&rly dong the Cvlsbd Boulsvard Scenic
Corridor) ~fd ma& with 8 concern for owd quality of hlopment. These
rscommondstions are ma& 30 thrt m mod &sign program will be developed for tho
Scenic Corridor. Otherrho, the existing fmgmonted ownership will develop in a
hsphazd manor.
The Local Cod Pb (LB) will ham to be amended to accomplish the=
recommendations, since the entire arm to be rmended is in the bbllo I1 area.
c e
ssl;oointe Carltbrd Gemd Plan Amendmat hudv
I) ne m Mn the rriln#d md the etiding commercial area dong the frww87
on tho north si& of Poinmuir he, should k housing (Medium Density Residentid
md office to cm a bhce of uss within tho SUd7 b The office ~pb. should b
implemented along the northern sad essUrn property ha to buffer the residenth
area fmm the n- commercial ad indusrrirl uwu.
3) T~O 11p(n betvma the Phnd Industrial muth of the Encinr Vwr Pollution bntr
Pht md the howhag auntionmi above should be Wicr to furthor pmvida a tranitia
from the ~ufacturhg/h~ wes to tho north md tho residential uses to tl
#Uth.
61 hng tho culrbd bhud scenic COrriQr th8 city, in conjunction with t
morn, should -lop a guiblina to bop rppeuaace sad dwolopmc
consistent dong clltlsbad Boulovd. The elements to be included rithin the Desi
Guidelinw should be: Sale aad building mraing, hdscaping, signage, mrtsrid a
color pdettm. 8ad mrintunance or chon of via corridors where nw developma
occurs in front of maris or ot&et development. or vhem them am via opportunitir
The rbm, rocommomhtions tputiculrrfy dong the CuMd Boulrvard Scs
Corridor) are m& with 8 concam for otsd qdty of development. Th
rscommendrtions are mado so tbt aa wedl a program rill be duvaiopod for I
Scenic Corridor. Othenim, tho existing fragmented ownership will develop i!
haphazard arianet.
The Lo4 C0rut.l P1.n UP) rill haw to bo amended to accomplish th
rocomnaendrtions, since tho entirs sroa to ba rmonded is in the hllo iI area.
t e e
Sapotnte Cvltbrd Gensnl Ptrn Ansnbmmt Study
Conflicts bstmon-fho LB urd the South brlsbad stab kh Mn&f Plaa (Stat
Dspurtment of patlts aad Recrestion) caa be ml~ed and =me possibio solutions a.r
SUggOSlsd.
Additional information aad details am included in the bodp of the text, in section 11
Discussion and Recommendations.
!RES' = 0 ,%a 0
pqp q : izg 2 g. ; 5 $2 == ;g gg FK
-g -gaq101u A w h)
D 2,s.
u) rn 5: x B I? qmao m
E
V ? vv m ? '? ul 'r - * -g Dl .) d i. u - u::; rg =: 1 m2 ow 2 ? i3 E;
HZ $og;g: * * a .D 25< $: 5
V
- =-Riah .> - - w vv VP
nm A. u IO LL
:?= f. -. c 2 = 5z - $$ & 5 i gz j:r $ 5 !.fn 2 5- pi .IJS =
- P w = =z - {:$ Z2.B ii nn n pr-
> *- * z. ?fa - -%$ p -5. - +H Ij& f
x
2- E: E= .I __ -- = a 5 -. -. - -.
i 2. I- r; -- - - - -
N & L - :?.:
0 - 0 5:; -2z - f-. - 3- I- wf
- f 23 :rT E5 ;
;;& = 4 P E@: 22 O= 0: o
E -3 a* z-q ZI wz o -r p' 3 ,a
w i- 3:A G: u pacu
u :g* p z$$i
- n ; - .. : eg x -3
n rn 6 E i .-E=: 5 ; 5 i a =t gEg I 2: z 8
: ,??E $ $ $ ; ti: %F 2: 4 $ e 0 :i s 0
f g 53 - ox
Q 01 sv
10
..':!a I "3
(1
-9 uu
¶ ¶
-
¶3¶ 000
I. e u. c g :.a .- r
z .) z
3
0 92.. 2 gxz
s e *
z *3
A P
5 Dog xz
a ¶
C
s 0 9. iD 9
Ea :a '.2F == .* 2; I$ - == s 2; 1-- is 7
Ha
3 ¶ 7 f T !5 <: - * _. - =.-I 2z, ;: 5 54
0 i- a a a pg zg =; * j :; =*
* 2 2 s; $: f ;$ a i
¶ 3 3 3 3 0; 52:: k:k 5 :5
0 - * - ... 2.,; ;s $; 1 =,
; p g z e-02 ?? 5: 1 :j * 0 n -'=i __ =.. i" z -- 0:
a = ;: 5: ; 2; g g 2' -= - -- ??n = 0 g o ,z Pi = -3 !I* 0 =n ~02 i 3; n 04 gl Y1 2 ;: a=
z gz iDa 5, * 41 mz f I ;Q ; 3 : ;, ; E.$. $Z 2; j ;! - r; -. g; ;? . CI.
zz- g
2. P. * :< t' i 5: : g¶ s. 3 ;a E. ! f f n p*F sag L :Is "
< n ,L 33 T 2: a5- =2 0 ;= 1*
Ow == 0: ;: ; :$ r :g 5.2 -2 2: Le 0 = = 29 f? 21 i; P 25 ;.; 3 ;E
4mLn 'X O$ go" OZ? h IC
x 5;: 52 !$ ..x5 ;zz g:
:z =$ 9 =.
-a DO f -> * -. ;; '-f F Iz PE ?:= --. 4 2: s, -a 82 ;:
x1 g= :T 5 :; ;a <$ : 25 55 03 12: i 2; $5 z :.z 1:; :: qs
o= 3% kEz ::3 $; ;X '8
-.,a 28 E F q 5s p' St =$ ,LF
0 :z ; :I a- {e ., pg
$5: %:, q i; -:: = -. -. a. ?:$ !$. n- - ?. 3: :. a- 3 t := -.
13 2 I -- =~ - .T :: - -f -if
;% 2 5 ;: $ 55 ?? I 2 %= a-
p3 ;a qu; -z= gi 5:: e 1; ?' i:t : E2
f p 57 a $1 = - ;; ;g g: 4'3 z=. 2 f. ;.!.$ I 2:
39 -- ; $ n Po : q QO :g s;r z.1 D, .-- B 50- 0, 3a ssi 4R ?.? 2 :E -a?-. ; 22 5; 2 g 5 5.2 - 2 ;i7 2:; st. f -, Hrr VR L
D 3: 5z; =E H8 92 E;
3_g;. g= 3 x't 5.SP
e :$ ; I iFF x: = 6 ;= 2fg !Q :E *: i, g; 9'81 9':
Q 7 E. '1 5
f 2; 725 9 2: SK3 Sa 1g -.I ea -* 3 q;'z ??
u a BSm 1.0- ;T -0 $E ;g 5
:%; 1:
2" ~ 5; : 2 3% 5$ q ¶* : i; $98 =:;: :x 52" bz
Qj 2a cg p?; ;'a 1 H s fl -. 8 3
*p $I 5 1' 5i
"li -3: $5 $1
01
1 fl 03 - 01 -c 2::
.D1)¶> = 1 z;; znra - m 3% 2 3 7 3. =
0 ? ga - C
==
00
QOOO
4 . . z 5 5 5 En. -' ..I 0.-
u N u gi (c WN Pr .. uw
On 0
20 0
n Fn n
- z z ;.; a=
n a= 1 7 3 =.: 2- 2- 9 "7"
2.
?? f! 3 z-
2s
.I- -. - m ¶ -. g 2F -% ;=
0- OJ
0, -0
o c- s z: 2; e *- 0% n 0'1
- 3e
'z BJ a -.
i; 21
7 *z 1-0 c F; 2-
30 a- * J* = , z> -0-
-. - - 3: -" 2:
;e -
'1 ;; I:: *
n- ::p am a3 s ga, ZZ- 2 e=
zQ
-" e
e-
- n rn * 9 :: a
'm
'c 2 3; L mm 3 0-
;; 3 9' E"? x'c 8%; =
-. . . . - . .___.._ .. -
0
b
v) Ill Pa Q --0 om m 2:: +r
00 PC 'Ibv, rrn (I) CXI D U
mD
4: 9
r c
0,
VI I
(D
.
I \q '. I
I ,-I 1"; i
I ):I
It'::!! lis=$l ;@ \
I 1- I
6 Ii I
, '2
I
I;'
I8
3- :E: I<;-;! e.< I
IZl 1
e 3;
0- ZEj
z
5
* pj
2
Lp 0,
D.' 0 a z 9 : ?!
3 z
cn 0
(D -. - -.
m -
D) < 3,
0
D)
0 w
Ssrpointe Cyltbrd Camfal Plan Amendment Study
- II.BAcgGRouND
The Study Arm is appmxinmtely 340 acres and is bounded by Momv Airport Rod,
Into- 5, PoinseUi8 he, and Crrlsbd Bouluvard, plus the are8 bounded by
PoinsSttir he, Ponto Rwd, CrrMld Boulevstd rad the ATUF railmd right-of-my
(see exhibit 2).
LPluma
In early 1986, Community Partaen initiated a Gonod Plan Amendment for a 10-acm
sits lo& in the southmstorly portion of the City of WIs&ud. The applicant i~
proposing the had we element be changed from RMH midentid (8-15 DUIAc) to
Office/Commercirl. It vu determined by the City Planning Department that a large1
arm should be comprehensiveiy dusted becurm of a concern the cumnt land ust
designation surrounding the Community Partners' property my be incomprtibb with
it md other propod deveiopmenf The purpose of the study is to pmvidc
rocommondstions to the Plrnnina Commissions and City Council rugding spptoprh
bad uses for the ares.
m a
broainc Carlsbrd Gbnenl Plm A#abosnt Study
- -
kld2dm
Tho Study Arsr, is 8ppro.imrtrly 340 SIWS md h bouncbd by Palomu Airport Rod
Intentab 5, Poinsettia he, md Culsbui Boulevd, plus that sres bounded
PoinsoUirr bo, Ponb bad, CUM Boulevud urd tho AI= rrilrod right-of-r
(so0 exhibit 2).
hbBisn=
In oariy 1%. Community Pwtaers initiated 8 Gonod Plrn bondmen& for 8 10-1
site lo& in the smthrssbrfp portion of the City of Cubbad. Tho spplicsa
proposing the laad wo rlomont bo chmgod from RMH midontirf (8-15 DWAc
Offico/Commorcirl. It ru tietetminod by the city Phming bputmont th8t 8 h
IVW should bo compmhensirsiy evaluated becawe of a concorn tho cumnt lrsd
*on surrounding tho Commuaitp Putaors' property mry be incomprlible 1
it aad other propomd developmoat. The putposs of the study is to pm
rscommondrtions to tho PtmOip8 Commissions urd Cit~ Council rsgsrding rppmp~
hd iubs for tho m
......
::v):: 'm1:.
... "W
: : v :-: :Yo:; : .z- ,,+" .:m..
"0:: ..
.:.a:: ':r:: ,,w:: .. : a:: p::
: 0: :
::
......
ID::
,.....
......
..._..
......
3' .'
' ' '*. . . ' . . .. . . . . r
' 'C. ' ' ' . .a. . . . U
(0-
. .,. . . .
.,....
......
.... ..
, .....
......
.......
,.....
......
... .. @! 1-
s '2 .' .I .- ..
1" . ' I:j: ## .. ..
.. .. .. .. ;B i .. es,r as1 . . lie! if$ ' .. '
..
0 -.
mz %i -4 W" I 5 G)
0 0 z
0 0
8 z
v)
d
I
i
0 b
8 7
5:m
c3m-
m,- -'-' L
w w
minte Carlsbrd General Plan Amendment Study
For purposss of this report, the Study h has been divided into hro luger areas
locrbd on either side of the trilrod right-of-my, herorftsr referred to as the 81st and
vest "hdvu". Theso are shovn belov:
s
south CItlSbrd sus Bwch g
Conceptual Sib Organization
w e
Winto Cultbad bed Plra Amndrrwt Study
For putp03s~ of thU nport, the Study Arms hu beon dividad into ho larger vd
lo& on either side of tho railroad right-of-my, honrftsr nferd to as the w u
wwst “hahod’. Thw sra born boior:
8
Stab Beach 8
Concsptud Site OrgWon
m
win& Carltbad General Plaa Amendment Study
These two hdves have been further broken down into eight smder subareas f(
purposes of providing'hhividud area analysis and recommendations as shova beb
The subareas are prefixed "E for "Existing" and "P for "Planned".
-
--
Basic Subareas
Some of the subareas am broken dovn further due to multiple ownerships within
subareas. These are designrtsd by lover-case suffixes (e g. P-la, P-lb, etc.)
Being approximately 34 acrus, the sits is of relatively flat terrain with areas of sc
rolling hills located at tho overcrossings onto Carlsbad Boulevard at Anacapa Road
Ponto Road. The developed portions of tho Study Area consist of one gas statio]
. relatively nev office/industrial area, the Encina Water Pollution Control P
(Subarea El), taro mobile home parks (Subareas E3 and E4), some non-confora
m w
Seapoinu wised ~anerrl ~lrn Ansadmat study
hdustrWcommerc-id - urns at the southern tip of the sit4 (Subarea P4), two hotel
projects, a medid clinic, two auto dealerships under construction (Subrrslr €2) and
five housw (also in Subare8 P4). Adjacent to the property on the vest is the South
CUW Beach St& PUL. On the suthoast is another mobile home part md some
commer~irl property. South of the parcels is the Sam& Properth' Batiquitos
Moon Educrtiond Park project. An appmod m8s&er plan permits 8 mixed-use project
consisting of owf 1.1 million squus feet of much md ckvslopment, commercial urd
executive conference space, 220,oOO square feet of graduate ducakiond institute, '123
residentid uah, 8 roUeybrll gymnuium and other rec&nrl amenities. Across
Intsntrb S to the emtam pd~min~tly residential was with some commercWretril
dvity. North of the dts b 8 fa-food rsstutmt, 8 Sit-down restrumt, ad 29
industrid put very recently developed.
Major components of the circulation systum within the Study Ares include Interstate S,
Poin3euiO he, Pdomrr Airport Rod, Carlsbd Boulevard, dl of which am W in the
Scenic Highway Element of the General Plan. Awnid. Encinw is a secondary arterial
running the length of the sib in the amst 'half."
1-5 currently culries about 77,000 vehicles per day in the vicinity of tho Study Area.
Culsbrd Bould (old US. 101 1 b fourhe, divided @or mad, currently carrying
spprori~mteIy 10,OOO trip per day, Poinattb Lane is 8 two-he, major TOIL1 carrying
3,000 which per day. Another two lures aru slatad for development as the build-out 01
the area occurs. Palomrr Airport Rod is a mo-tme major mad. Another tro &nos,
inbmction realignment at CarW Bould, and rrmp chmges at 1-5 will be
needed. AveniQEncinu, currently carrging lW trips pr dry, is sla&d for
development to four lures u 8 sscondary ribrid. Currently, all intersections in the
Study Arm are at an "A (best) level of service except Pdomu Airport Road/Carlsbad
9 a
ssloointe Cubed Gimemi Ptrn Amendment study
indwttirl/commercirl - usb3 rt tho wuthom tip Of tho site (Subua8 P41, tvo botr
projects, (L medical clinic, two rub dodenhip under con-ction (Subarea E21 an
five housss (rl;ro in Subuaa PI). Adjrcent to tho props* on tho xost is the Sout
WlsbuJ Beach Sw Park. On tho southblsL is another mobile home put md 3091
commercirl prop6rtp. south of thm parcels is a8 smnb Propactiw' Mquirc
f.8g-n Education.( Park project. h rgpd mr.trt ph permits 8 Isixsd-w pmje
consisrin8 of wor 1.1 million square foot of mearch and development, comm0rci.l u
emcuti~e coafeisncs sprco, 220,oOO square fwt of gmduata ducation4 institub, 7
rwidsnrirl units. 8 roUeybdl gymnasium sad othar rscrsrti0n.l rmenitios. Acr
In&- 5 b the wtuo predominantly ddontirt wm with 5om commerti.yro~
activity. North of tho site is 8 fut-food -mat, a sit-down mtaurmt, urd
industrirt park, wry mcontly developed.
Major components of tho circulrtio% system within tho Study h includo Intaw
Poinsttia he, Pdop~u Airport Rod. Carisbad Boulevard, 4 of which uw listed in
Sconic Highpry Element of tho Gened Plm. Amnib Encinu is a seconduy srte
running the Length of the sib in the e 'half.'
1-5 cumntlp carrim hut n,@O vehicles par by in the vicinity of the Study Ares
C8rlsb8d Bouluvud (old US. 101) is fourbe, divided major pod, currently carryin
approximately 10,ooO trips per dsy. Pohmttb bao is a tm-bo, &or 4 cvryl
3,000 vshich pr w. Anothor ho hos are slrtsd for dmolopment as tho build-
the u11)occurs. Momrr AirpofiRod b a tro-he nujot 4. Another ho turei
iabnsction rsrlignment at Cubbad Bould, and rrmp chwgss at I-) rill be
noodd. Avenida Encirru, currently nrtying IS00 trip per dry, is Wd for
development to four hos u 8 mcondrrp arterial. Currently, dl intamections in t
Study Area 1f0 at ut "A" (host) level of ssrpice except Pdomar Airport RodICarW
8 0
minte Cubbad Gsrrsstl Plm Amendment Study
Boulwud in the mhg, when it is 3 level of service “c“. The hbrchrnges aith 1-5,
which u^d st levels of ssrvice “B”, “C, sad “D” u follows:
el of Serv=
(AM) (PM) Jak&MUQ
Momu. Airport Rod / 1-3 Northbound D D Pdo~ AirportRord / 1-5 Southbound B C Poiil~ttirLme / I-5Northbound A A PoinssttirLane / I-SNorthbound A A
nom portions of the Sit. vhich am not currmtly developed have in the past been use
for rgricultuiwl purpss; however, most of those amm now lie fallor. Carisba
Bould, which runs all dong the rest si& of the Study Are8 is the old US. Bighwa
101 (Pacific Coa& &hr8y) md is built as a piece of (outQtsd) ftssv8y. TI
configudon of the roIid offers both problems and opportunities 1s rill be erplainc
lotsr.
Csrisbrd Boulevard, which runs all along the vest si& of the Study h is the old U
Urry 101(Plcific Coast Highvsy) and is built as 8 piece of (outcht4d) frsany. TI
configuration of the rod offers both probbms sad opportunities as will be erplrin
Irtsr.
EJiimz
Historidy, the Study Arw has been utilized mostly for agricultural purpom OI
though it is not rated as prime qricultunl hd..
The rrilt0.d vas built through the area in 1881 on ld dgnmeat closet to the ba
with awn approtimrrrly where the Strts Park hdriatenmce Station is now.
In the 1920‘s. tvo La costrr Dmns subdivisions were mapped and sold with the east
one (subuw Plr) baing rotrind in one mnership and the nup baing sbsndoneo
- w
Winu Culrbd Gsasnl Plan Arendmt Study
court odor rhon-hbrstate 3 right-of-rry vss rcquirad. The vestern one (subarea
P3b) vas sold as individual parcels but novor cbveloped due to utility limitations.
(Currently, them are 17 ovnen of 29 subshadud-swd parcels them, mury of whom
am nm uriow b build on their lots.)
Mobile homo parks worn added around 1970, aad excopt for 1, Limitsd amount of
dowlopmont (industrirl, utility, aad gas station), the Study h has changed little
from tho mi619fO's until fscentiy.
Incd dmelopmont activity is nw widont throughout tho area with the
dwelopment of hotel urd Kabr clinic situs md car ddorships (subares E2).
Additionally, thoro hu boen tho completion of Poinmttia he to CulskI Roulevard,
and tho 8pPrOvd of tho tmmi?r Proportios' Mquitos Lagoon Educational Park south of
the stufiy Area
Tho rwiew of the entire Study Area 1;s a single cooFdinatod plan rusults from the
submittal of 8 gonsrd plur amendment and a propod for commercid development (in
subrrsrP3.) by the cumnt mner, Community Partners. Prior to this, an application
vu cbniod for 1, d&nthf project by the pmvious owner, Sa hvelopmont.
This report was prepared in clotm coopomtion vith affected property ownem and City
staff. Tho study vss dividd into men disrinct sbps which sre noted belov urd am
discussrd in mors &tail throughout tho fsport.
o Field mrk - to ascertain conditions in the Study ha, to collect data, sad to wrify conclusions. This infordon vas used 8s a bash for nwly dl decisions in the study. These trips involved many trips to the site, to City officos, to various agoncies, and considoiable tulephone work in addition.
w @
Seroolnte Culsbd Gmd Plrn Amendment Study
court odor when Jnterstata 5 right-of-rry vm =quid. The vestem one (subare
P3b) wa sold u individual parcels but n'df beloped due to utiliw limitrtion
(Currently, them sre 17 owners of 29 sumd8d-aifd prrc~h them, -y of vhoi
~fb nm rarious b build on their lots.)
Mobilo homo parks voro rkbrl around 1970, and orcopt for 1) Limited mount c
ckvslopment (inQsrrirl. uW, md gas station), tho Study Area has chrngd liW
from tho dd-1970'~ until ncentlp.
Increased development activity is nw midont throughout the (vw wit& tl
dwelopnwnt of hob1 aad Khr clinic sites uld car dadenhips (subusr E
Additio~ll~, them hu been tho completion of Poinmuia -0 to hAdmd Boulm
uld tho 8ppd of the hnmb Proporths' Wquitos 4wn Educational Park south
&e study h
Tho faiw of the entin Study Ares as a tingle coordintbd pian results from tl
submittal of 8 gmed ph raaeadment md 1) proposal for commercial development (
arbrrsr P3r) by the current wnor. Community Partners. Prior to this, m applicatic
v13 denid for a residentid project by tho previous ovnor, SoCd Dewlopment.
"hh nport ru proparod in ciom coopontion with aff'ectd property ovnen rad CiQ
Ilrff. The study vu diridod into swon dirtiact sbps which am notod below urd ~pd
Cihcud in nom dstril throughout tho nport:
0 Field wrk - to ascertain conditions in the Study ha, to collect du rad to vatifp conclusions. "his infordon vu used 8s 1) basis for neuly dl decisions in the study. Those trips involved mrny ttips t the site, to Citp offices, to various rgonciw, aad considerable telephone work in addition.
m
Ssrgointe Carlrbd General Pian Amendment Study
o Prspurtion of rn Opportunities mdConstraints Andy~iS - to map the conditions which should ba avoided or utili& - to be combined with the rsseuch above to yield prrttsrns rod contextual clues tu dimctions which should be taken.
o Mlish submas based on ovnenhip patterns md the boundaries of current laad we dssigna4ions. The ownerships mwt lie vhofly vithin subamas in order to durt8 and then implement plaa
o Discuss preliminary findings and ovners' wishes vith property
owners and City Staff in a wries of meetings. Any unique attributes or problems COMSC~O~ with a site wm rir# requested at these meetings.
o Dnft rscommendrtions for revia by trdfic consultant and City strff md discusdons regarding chsages md additions required
o Submittal of misod draft with aU conunenb incorporated; further discussions md changes ifnodd, and
o Find recommendations to the Phning hmmission urd Cig Couac
Chrn#eS.
W .)
minu Culsbtd Gefnml Plm Ansndnent Stu4Y
-
(See dieit 3 for oppmdtim aad Coatvrinu Map)
Opportunities and Constminu have beon determined by sib visits md rsvh of some
existing environmental documentation. Constmints include:
o rsrltmvsh 3000 feet south of hlomu AirportRard on the east side of
o tho AT= rrilr0.d right-of-way
o the odor from the Eacinr Vsbr Pollution Contra1 Plant
o limited act- due to stmet designations (major rod md secondary
0 Agticulturrl prs3srves (Localcorstrl Ph)
o Noh from Frsasy md Railrod
Whbd Boulev8rd
arterial) md State Psrk
Opportunities include:
0 Proxilnitytotoe8n
o Accesstobeach
o Vim
o ReU~ely flat terrain
Comments:
Along the vest lids of the ATW trilrod right-of-way from Anaupr Road south to
Ponto Rod, the had rim above the roadbed, offering an opportunity for um of this
nrJuraI sound burior with proper grrding. Consequently, the nohe contours on the
West side of Crtlsbd Boulevard uw closer to the ttrcks than on the east.
The Encina War Pollution Control Pht on occasion produces objectionable odon
(according to plat manylei Rick Gdf, once or mice 1) par a noticeable problem
p e
Winu Cltltbrd G8amI Plrn APbadmemt Study
-
(W dibtt 3 for Og-th rab ~U8hbU m)
Opportunitbs uld COnSttrints hrve beon &tormined b sib vhib md mh of sm
existing environmental Qcumentrtion. Constraints include:
0 rdtmvsh 3000 foot south of WmarhportRodon the &side a hrlsbd Boul.vud
0 tho AT= rriltord tight-of-m
o the odor from tho Encinr, Watar Pollution Contra1 Pht
o limited acorn duo to street designations (major rod and sscondrrg
0 AQricultud pmsmes (Lad coutrl Ph)
o Noh fmmFmy md R.ilrorrd
arbrial) rod Strts Park
Opportunitios inclub:
0 Pforimitytoocerp
o Accosstobasch
0 vim
o Rehtimtyfhttortrin
Comments:
Along tho vest sbh of the AT&SF railroad right-of-way from hacaps Road sutl
Ponto Road, the land rism &ma the rordbed, offering an oppoitunitg for we of
nrLurrlloundhdorrith pioper~g. Conmquently,the noise contours on
Wmt side of &hbd Boulevd uw closrr to the tncb thrn on tho east.
The EncioS Wmr Pollutioa Control Plmt on occuion produces objectionrble o
(rccordiog to pht maayler Rick GnM, once or trice I, yw I, noticeable pml
e m
seapoinu Clibbrb Gsasnl Plm Amendment St*
producm compW from Uta Mira midents duo to mrlfunctions exposing rar swage
to tho air at the inlot. A musty smoU is routinely produced by tho secondary tmatment,
and CUI colloct on still bp). Tho distribution of thm odors gsnody goes to tho east-
north- in the ch.0 and =st-southrost rt night with prsVriting rinds, the
distribution of which CUI be swn in the accompanying rind chub (Mibik 4); during
Srnta An8 rind conditions, this mvemes to hod approrily rest-southrost. Future
phs for this facility rill mcnn ia new-trobling of its Wity ovor currant sorvicc
levoh. Currently, appmfimltrly 163 million gallons of sovsgo ~fd treated each dr.
(MGD), capacity at uAthnaZ8 build-out rill be 43 MGD. 'This mums that tho ptobiom maq
extend further out than pmontly when &he expaasion occurs.
A summary by su- follows opposite the map (next prge).
m v
Seamfnte Carltbd General Plan Aaendaasnt Study
- .. 00- limited RR noise impact
some frwvay noh
Viev from West side (Developed) a2 edge of propofty of AwnidaEnch
rt PIfOMT Airport Rord
s.wtm El
E2 freary noise vim to aut mewlopad)
(Developed)
(Dovel0p.d 1
E3 bluffs on south side vim from sits
E4 none none
P1 odor. north end Freevsy exposum RR noise Elem. School Site
P2 RR nois Berch proximity
P3a Odor, north end View from RR nobe Salt hh. north end
Subdivision Map
north end of sits
P3b Existing none
PI RR noise View Proximity to beach
e 0
wince Carltbd Gsnd Plin A.sndaeat studv
-
Limited RR noh imprct
some fmmy nois
Viw from Wost si& (Developed) rt *@ of ProPortp of Avenida Encinu
8t PIilOmrr Airport Rod
subaraa El
E2 freeway noise Vht008St
E3 bluffs on south si& vias from sits
E4 nono nono
P1 odor. north end Fmovsy exposure
(Dmioped)
(Dwelopd 1
(Dmlopod)
RR nob Elm. School Sib
Pz RR noise Beach proximity
P38 Odor, north end Vim from RR noiso
Salt Mush, north end north end of sits
P3b -8 none
P4 RR &Oh view
Subdivision M.p
Proximity to berch
.. ..
:v)::
*..
.Q. T- .o:: "-;:p .z.. -+:: :m..
0': : .p:: : .=:: : r: :
.. (I): : : a: : : >: : : a::
'
-B.-:v,
..
"
..
......
.:....
... ..
...... ....
.G)....
' '>' . ' '
P
. ,. . . . . E.. . . (D.. . .
u1 . . , . . . .
CD .....
,. . .
.. ...
..
......
. ....
,. ..
,....
!@ I... ': ,.
'Z '= . ' .; .= . .
lo . .
..
.. , :I: '- ..
I I I
..
is; i tffi I : [io $1 !!fP ' .. , ' ,
0
ODQg ,ozw!l zoua 0 z + 111 + c z z - -I +
v)
-
v) E
< :
1
: ?
,hm-
a,irm
w W
N
0
270
N
0
180
Average Wind Speed
vs. Direction
270
N
0
180
Hours of Wind
vs. Direction
GPA/LU 85-9 270 90
Exhibit 4
Wind Charts
Seapoi n te Car 1 s bi
These charts were formulated fro
a study performed at Palomar Airu
based on hourly wind data from
1968- 1977, a total of 73,200 recor
180
Hours of Wind x Speed
vs. Direction (Area of Probable Impact)
0 e
N
0
6
270 90
78
N
0
180
Average Wind Speed
vs. Direction
270
N
0
180
Hours of Wind
v s . Direction
GPAILU 85-9 270 90
Exhibit 4
Seapointe Cark
Wind Chart:
These charts were formulated
a study perfotmed at Palomar 1
bud on hourly wind data I
1968- 1977. a total of 73,200 r
180
Hours of Wind x Speed
vs. Direction
(Area of Probable impact)
e 0
%mint4 Cubbd GeocuW Plrp Amamlowat Study
- - Use Rslulrtions:
AAmmx
Tho Study Arm is comprised of numerous Gonenl Ph, Zoning md Local COW Plu
Designations. The uua includes Industrial, Tourist Commercial, Residential md Uti&
categories. Thao am summvitbd by subrrw bdor:
Gonod Ph Zoning w Plan w2ama
El Ts c- 1 6 (Trrvsl Service 1 (Visitor Commercial)
PI M 7 (Planned Industrial) (Planned Industrial)
U P-u 11 (Utility) (Public Utility) (Utility)
E2 TS/C C-2 516' (Ttrvel Service/ (General Commercial/ Commercirl, specific-plmnsd) Visitor Commercial 1
E3 RMH RMHP 3 (Modium-High (Mobile Homo (10-20 DU1Ac) Residential 8-15 DU/Ac) PuF)
E4 RMH RMBP 3
Plr RM R-1-10 2-PA (Medium Density 4.1-8 DU/Ac . (Medium Density 4-10 DU/Ac.
Pmssrve) Rosidentiri) with Agricultural
Plb RM R-1-10 2-PA
e
minte CItlsbwl Generrl Plan Amendmaat Study
- P2 .RMH RDM 8 (Open Space) for RV Puking
CtP r* GsmdBMl
P3r RMH R-1-10 3
P3b RMH R- 1- 10 3
P48 RbcB P-c 3
P4b RMH P-c 3
P4C RME RDM 3
*Mustbe 35% minimum Visitor-=ming Commercid -
The coastal designstions in subarea E2 rere impomd by the Strto legislrtura's Mello I
bill and a fee was p8id to be mld from an agricultural pmmve. Since no change is
intended to be recommended to this uea, no mors mention rill be nude of this.
The cod pfanning cdssigndons on the balance of the Study Are8 vera imposed by
the s48 logblaturs in June 1981, by a bill known as Mello I1 and amended by the City
in October 1985 (to chmge Agricultural Overlay policies, chmge gnding policy on
slopes over a%, and to &bta dl references to inclusionsry housing). Since the Cits
does not yet have discretionary authority over the Local Corstrl Plan, my change!
rrnulthg from thj3 Gonod Ph bendment rill have to be changed by assent of thc
Coastal &&on, From discussions with Civ Staff (Schulte and Wayne), the Moll0 I1
Policies which pertain SIW summrriad belor:
a)
b)
Ddagu facilities must be installed concurrent with grading
10% msge capacity must be resomod for coutrl-dependent uses
e 0
%apointe Clrltbd Guzwr8l P!M Alenbmmt St*
- P2 RMH RDM 8 (Open Sprrcr) for RV Puking tsv& !j!wruw
P3r RMH R-1-10 3
P3b RME R-1-10 3
P4 RXH P-c 3
P4b RMB P-c 3
P4C RMB RDM 3
*Mud be 35% minimum Visitor-wrving Commercial
&&Euwuk
The c"l dssignrtions in subues-E2 vers imposed by the State legisrtum't Moll
bill md 8 fee vas pdd to be rsld from an ylricultuml ptdame. Since no chmgc
hnbndsd b be recommended to this srm, no mors mention rill be nu& of this.
The cod plaaning dnignations on the brlrnce of the Study kea were impojsd
the st@ le&htum in June 1981, by 8 bill horn as Mello I1 md mended by the (
in October 1985 (to change Agricultud Owrky policies, chrnge gnding policy
slopes over a%, md to blot, dl references to inclusionmy housing). Since the (
does not yot have dbcirtionug authority over the Local Cod Ph, my chm
msulting from this General Plaa Amendment rill have to be changed by assent of
C0ut.l hamission. From discussions with City Staff (Schulta md Vayne), the Moll
balm: Policies which portaia are sumnumad *
8)
b)
Drainwe frcilities must be inWd concurmnt with grading
10% swage capscity must be rosemod for cout.l-dependeat uws
0
minb Cultbad &moral Pttn Ammdaasat Study
e)
dl
e)
Numbered policies:
PolicrrSumaarP
C3A Construction of nustor drainage improvements shall be nudo per Corutrl Poliq
6-4
6-9
10 5-m of hotdl/motel is to be built h the she h8
Vegetation is to =main on north-facing slop unless dl environmenQ
hprcU h8W bo dtig8!8d
Runoff control ph md maiatenr;nco urmpments are required for
dwdopment
CMping f8cilitiesus to be provided
Camping armsue to be shifted off beach to the outside of &Mad Boulwarc
Mired-wo development (msi&ntirYmcmtionai commercirl) shall be allows by right along CrrW Boulevud (ICIOSS from Cufsb.d Stab Boach. This applies only where not in conflict with rg+icuitud policies of the LCP.
City VU coopent4 with State to (usurn Wed beach (ICC~SS
Additional bh 8cces at Falomu Airport Rod and Cvlsbd Boulvrrd is to b provided. Evidence of poorly and ill-defined pathways along bmch shall be pi of the Wr Plan for C4sbad State Beach.
20 SCIW of beach parking at (State-ovnd site at Palomar Airport Road and Crrlsbrrd Boulevard shall be heloped for lW psrking spacss. Jitney =mice shdl be provided vhon havily utilitd.
Vbud mxss - No future public improvements to obstruct vievs
The upland area at South Cdstmd Stat8 Beach shall be used for future parug md wcbss to lwer beach.
Scenic Prwerprtion Overky Zonm shd be applied to prsssme individud vie and prnorrmu
berch iS to bOCOme 8 W-WO m
9-3
7-4
7-9
7-13
7-15
8-1
8-5 S~WO: euh busin- to get 1 fd dun shopping centers get 1 dhctional sign, less thm 1) feet high uwof face shd be per City stmd8rds Monument signs may be wed for 3 or fever commercial establishmen
No tall fm-standing, tooftop, off-premb signs, or billbods allowe on one site
e e
smpoiate hrl8bad @nad Ptro Aasndneat Study
- -
Agriculture Overlay Mitigation:
Ownen rishin6 to ham their property removed from the Agriculture Overlay Zone
may mitigau this by:
f 1 Replacement with other qyiculturrl lands
2) Purchasing replacement dcultunl property in northern California
3) Paying tll in-lieu frr of f3-10,000 per acre
Vhile phpidy nkostiy outshb th6 Skdy he8 for this General Ph Amendment, the
South Carlsbrd Stab Beach Masbr Plan (SU Dept. of Parks and Recreation) overlap:
in its discussions of crrlsbrd Boulevlrsd right-of-way acquisition. Accordingly a briel
discussion of the Beach Master Plan is included as part of this report. The Mastar Plan
also ha some hphtions on the future of the ma in thrt in some cases it conflict4
with the intent of the Local C0u;trl Ph. In: the cub of carlsbad Boulevard, it asks foi
chaagas in right-of-way 8s 8 moas of rcqukbg more property. Specificdy, it calk
for retention of eristing campgrounds aad expaasion of them by moving an'
developing the southbound has of hrlsbrd Boulevud. This vouM mesd elimination o
the conversion to dsy-uss dud for in the LCP (policy 6-91. The Master Plan pmpo~
also to add sonu cky-use parking md =cos pints, plus some structural amenities.
With a taenty-.cia parcel just north of Psloarsr Airport Road (outside of the stud
area) on the east side of Culsbad Boulevard, the Beach Master Plan propm a variel
of uss including a hotrl, a parking -a, urd orpandod park ndminMve facilitie
I 0 m
Wiate Whbrd Gtmd Pl8n Alrsad-t Study
-
Agriculture bethy h&ti&on:
ownom wishing to ham their property rummod from the Agriculture &why Zone
m8y mitigrtr this by:
1) Ropircomont with other .gricultunl lands
2) Purchasing mplrcemont rgricultud property in nodorn California
3) wing 110 in-liou foo of SS-10,OOO pot acre
G souu
Vhile physically mostly outsi& the Study llssr for this Genenl Ph Amondment,
South Cubbad Stab Beach Mrrtrr Plur (Strt, Dept. of Parks and Rocdon) over
in its discussions of bdsbad Boulw8rd right-of-vrp acquisition. Accordingly a b
discussion of tho Reach Master Plan is included as part of this report. The M1ut4r 1
llso has same implications on the future of tho uw in that in wmo cases it con1
with tho intent of tha Loul CoaW Plm. In the CUI of klsbad Bould, it ask
chmgos in tiat-of-- as a mesas of acquiring mor0 pmporty. Spocificsily, it
for retention of existha crmpgtounds and expansion of them by moving
developing tho muthbound Ira- of CulsW Boulevud. This vouM mom sliminati
the convanion to day-use callod for in tha LB (policy 6-91. Tho Mussr Plan pm
also to add mmo thy-- puking and accesa paints, plus somo SLNctural emenitios.
With a twonty-scm puce1 just nod of Pdomu Airport Rod (outside of the
ares) on tho esst si& of Culsbrd Boulevard, the Bosh Mssbr Plan propom a VI
of uas hcludhg a hotrl, s puking war aad mxp8ndd park ndminbtrativo fac
0 0
*in@ Cvltbd Geaenl Ptrn Amendment Study
Within this sune tirea the LCP provisions call for 1500 parking spaces there and Jitne
SS~V~C~ to bewh *-US ar~m (policy 7-91.
The condition of the bath (rocky1 makes it more suitable for camping than W-us
and limited dsy-uw would be better wmed by adjacent parking. Therefore, tl
follwing should be done:
a. When Momar Airport Rod urd CUMad Boulward am maligned at thc
intomction, provido sprce on the vast side for erpupdod day-uso plrting
b. Allm the Strb Department of Path and Recreation to develop the 20 ac
parcel north of Palomnr Airport Rord ad east of Gwlsb8d Boulevard
dd for.
Keep camping on the west si& of Crrlsbad Boulevard, but create via
through and some day-um areas with parking,
Explore parking betreen the lanw of Carisbad Boulward as part of the r(
realignment (Subarea P3).
Ikloto or modify LB Policim 6-9 and 7-9 where they conflict with
above.
c.
d.
e.
W
Seaoointe Carltbad Geaenl Plan Amendment Study
- Y. Dkk
In formulrting the recommendations for this study, the folloring rationale rom usod:
1) Tho vestera portions of this site vhich are ¢ to Monur Airport Road urd
PoinseUi8Lane am best suited to visitor-serving uses. 2) Further sway from fmy
access and/or beach, office urd residential become dosirodle (since the usom of these
wpss of fucntions am funiliv with the -8, they cu1 be erpoctsd to negotiate a longer
path to their destination, 3) in vdu where nok urd/or odor occur, non-residential is
rulmted, md finally, 4) the existing mobile home pub rill remain for aa indefinite
period of the.
From the folloving contacts rith 104 serving qencios (urd a ttrffic study conducted
by Buton-Aschmm AssochCm u a p.rt of thb report), there appsu to be no
infnstnrcttlnl conslrrinb. hceptions to this vould be the videning of Aveaib
Encinru from Palomu Airport Rod to the south side of the Vs&r Pollution Treatment
Plant, and 1 question of storm drainage at rods, especially Carlsbad Boulevard.
uEa€!L contrct GQamsw
cityof cvlsbrd Roger Gmr mer capacity ample
CrrM School District X.C. Dunlrp school site orob.bh VU not be used; other sibs outside the Study Arsr (east of 1-51
~fb more central
in place soon (Public Safety Center due
to be compluted Fall 1986)
new frcilitbs under construction at 6885 Batiquitos Rd. (Fire Station No. 4, due to be completed Fall 1986)
Carlsbad Police Chief Vinca Jimno new facilities will be
Carlsbd Fire Ikpt. Chief VaWn
e 0
Win@ Cultbrd Gmed Ptrn Ameadaent kudv
-
In formulating the recommendations for thir SMY, the folioring mtioarle vera us
1) The vdsbm portions of this sita vhich am adjacent to Palomu Airport Rord p1
Pohsettb be are best suited to visitor-swing uses. 2) FuiCher 8-y from fmm
wcoa sadlor beach. office and rusidentirl become desimble (sinco the worn of the
types of fucntions are frmiliv rith the ares, they CUI be expocud to negotiate 8 lonq
patla to their destination, 31 in ~fbu vhem nois and/or odor occur, non-midentirl
r~mt~d, ad fii, 4) the Srisring mobile home pub rill mmdn for W i&fm
priod of time.
From the followhg contacts rith loul *wing agenciss (md 8 Wic study conduc
by Buton-Aschmm hcirtrS 8s I) put of thb report), there appear to bo
infrrstnrcturrl conrlnints. Exceptions to this would bo tho viddng of Avea
Encinu from Palomu Airport Rord to the south side of the Va&r Pollution Tmtm
Pht, urd 8 question of sbrm dtrinsgo at rods, especially Carisba Boulm8rd. - rontrct sfmmnk
Citpof CarM Roger Gmor mr capacity ample
CITW School Disttict K.C. Dunlap school site e rill not be used; othor sibs outside the
~zd more central
in place soon (Public Safety bnter due to be completed Fall 1986)
nm frcilitirs under construction at 688 Wquitos Rd. (Fire Station No. 4. due to be completed Fall 1986)
Studp h (OW of 1-51
crrlsbd Police Chief vinca Jim0 nm facilities vili be
Carlsbd Fire Ibpt. Chief Vmn
@ 0
Seapoints clrlsbd Gsnsnl Plm Amendmat Study
-
The recommendstions of this study (pUticul8rly along the Carlsbd Boulevard Scsni
Corridor) aw rmck with a concern for OYO~ quality of dovelopment. Development a
this area should be controlled b keep the qdty high, md it is therefore suggesl
that 8 "9" (b&ty) overlay be, rppliod to tho enth VW "half" to accomplish thi
Unified guidelines should be dsvslopod in conjuction vith City staff. The critstir fi
judging should be do, ataterirls and colors, urd lurdscrpiag. "has recommendstio
are made for the Scenic Corridor. so the existing fragmented ovaorship viU a
develop in 8 haphazard m8aner.
The eut "he, due to its lodon next to tho freeway, should be developed as visit0
serving uses md IHOS enhanced by froway exposure (in this cas office), and 1
multi-family rosidentirl rhich vould be of more compatible chuactm vi
surmunding usas thm singlo-fmnily. Residential uss am rocommended on the v
Sida of Avonida Encinrt since accm is very good, and since introducing a midon1
we instead of more commsrchl rill help to balance dry-night activity in the ST
Tho portion visible from the freevay should havo tao "fronts": on the access side @
on tho frwny Ada. Guibhas should be tbvolopod for character and landscaping
part of thw development plans as veil. A 30-foot setback along PoinsoUia Lane vo
have boon rdpisprble u recommended for Sub-ub. P1 to the vest.
bbeUsodv- Arsp; ..
In order to cmata the community character desired, be compatible vith
development occurring (and existing), and to respond to market demands, the follow
w e
-ate Carltbd Gsrrsnl Plrn Allendrsnt study
rmge of had we - categories is rpproprU for the S&e h (Each of them rill bc
applied by Subamas un&r sction D., "Recommendrtions" rhich follow):
IiWmwlLExblrnrtion Exanmu=
RM Medium Density Apartments Residential Condominiums
4-8 DU/Ac Single-fdy horn-
Density Residentid ConQminiums
8-13 DU/Ac. Smrll-lot Single-Fdy
(vas 10-20 DWAc.1 Homes
RMH Medium-High Mobilo-Home pub
Zero lot-line homes
Ts Trawl Somice Commercirl Mota& Sanics Stations
ROSWlWB
0 Pmfesionrl md Relrtsd Offices & Ptofasional Commercial & compatible related commercial areas
PI PWod Industrial Mmufacturing V8dLOUSS
Sbrrgo Research & Dwelopmont Utility Inbrim uses (ovor 1 Ac.): Agricultural Recreational
* 0
Samoinu Carltbrd Gam'8l Plta A#ndmt SWY
rmge of laad um - cateuorh is rppr~pi.irtr for the Stue h (kh of them rill
rppu Q Sum && ~ctioo D,, "Rocommendrtions" which follors):
EamhUuk
Agucmenb RM Medium Iknsitp Rwi&nti.l condonriniums 4-8 DU/Ac Single-f@y homes
Medium-High Mobile-Homo pub bnsity Resibntiri ConQminiuPPt
8-15 DU/Ac. SParrll-lot Single-Family
(vas 10-20 DU/Ac.) Homn
RME
Zm lot-lino homes
Ts Trrvsl Somce Commetcirl Mot& Sorrico SWions ROSbUrmtS
0 ProfsJsiond md Relrtsd Offim CPrufosiond Comnurcirl C compstibb mlJ commercial vdu
PI Pbod Industrial bdrnufrcturiag
Vwuhoww Storage Rmch & Development UUg Interim uses (owr 1 Ac.1 Agricultural Recmrtiond
* 0
eapointe Carisbad General Plan Amendment Study
-
Utilities.
U Public Utilities Electrical Energy Generating Plants Waste water Treatment Plant Public Agency Maintenance Storage &Operations
Doen Soace;
os (Secured or Unsecured Open Sprrce for various uses. Prime) Open Space
w
(none) Special Trestment Ares
D* Recommend8tions-
Belov are detailed recommendations by Subarea. Each subarea includes the folloaring
information: description, acteage, existing conditions and regulations, proposed
regulations. recommended uses, recommended development standards, required
discretionary actions to implement the proposed uses and standards, a discussion, and
comments on circulation and access.
For the subareas El, €2, E3, and E4, no change is recommended. This is due to their
recent construction and appropriatcr use, and in the case of E3 and E4, partially due to
the difficulty of making a change happen (these are mobile home parks). The subareas
designated by a "P" prefix an recommended for changes as follov on the succeeding
pages*
The consolidated LUP is presentsd 8s Exhibit 1, page 5.
Consistent with the purpose of this study, which is to make General P1a
recommendations, lhis studv does nat - mcommendations,
zoneare shown =le -
W e tAHlBl1 3
SUBAREA
PI -_
KEY MAP
NOTES. _,-c ' -a .#a c ?y 2 c i : ,; L ' *r - - - ' - - " __I, ., <i 312~; :j?wzc? :;??:.??*
?c;jS;;:ai [g ocffer :EX ?PC :';t?:CCk at j?,vZCt 1-23;
.- -
Proom Iine/+,warei oounaary
50 x: a I fx2 acK
---- f
2
5
7
3
9 2ailwav 3veTcass
1 c
-- &?n,;.,-'?$[ !Zr,.:z<z:e 5::': aiq ir?e,Nav . -CC.^ - "I, ice :eve'~cCe?: :?<e5 .cvantq,. 9i f7?t.V2', ?.(2c:, --------
"a!f-acFe jzeciai recreazlon within aeveloomeni
C3r'iy-fcmt !mascx!e str:: along fc~nic rctc
';a ,ienic:iar ?Ct?Sj '.-:IT 2s:rse:::a Lane
------..--- ?rOoosx! r02a extension 5 -wen[v-foo[ iancsetce siTi[j :: ouff?? c:m?erC:ai Z4n(
3 0 0 0 0 0 o o o 5ouna at:tnuat;on rwuirng
Major access Joint (minimum ssac;nq
?IGX-~?. r:ip-:tit :nincr XTDSS :tint:
Sc ec: a 1 ;eve!ocmex smoarcs
(5oec:al :;?anent area)
view comaor
Corty-fcct !ancjcaoe jt:'c :eiwe?n ;f::c? arc -?s;c??
jt:cngiv reccmrerc ,se 3: ;z?csiaoec e?r:?,en :e3
'or acoearam frcm 5;??!!c S:rr:cor
?r/e5[ na!f of Avenica E?c:.aj :a -e c;m:e:?c :: SZ~C:
(3.300 feet). Distriauce ccscj aver aii :ew <eveiOCn
:1,E2,ancP:
C:us:?r aeveiccrnent awav :xm ra!lwzv
Tooeka h Santa ie 2ailwav
: : Scecia! c:ns:r,x::cn :: ?::??CB:? -cis? 6
n
* 12
13
id ,f Aven!da Encrcas Pe?iipa, Diacz cff::? ac]act
15 Provide mrdinatirq viev mrridort
V 5
...... .. .......... ..................... .. ..................... ..... - ..... - D .... 800 2 ',--% SEApolN'TE. CARLSBAD.:..::" GPA I LU 85-0 5 O- - ,m
EXHIBIT 5 e a
SUBAREA
PI -_
KEY MAP
NOTEL
;
.- m : _-~.?,a ~a[?? ::;:.-:::- I:-:::, 2;zpc :.~?.N?C? ::.??' ---- 2r;jy:a, [J ",f'er :x7 ECC :';tT:S:K 3: 5t.VdCt :' Proem line/~wam oounaary --
\ k~.n:.,-inl:[ :2r,iz.~z:? :;,-': 31cr(; fr??.,qF, . -,<.- - ", , ,Le .:t',e':cc::t?: :3.s 3cvznc3;t of 'r??n.,, ?.( 5oec:al ;+sac:< --------
5
7
5
3 Jailwav overcass :c
-a!f-acf? 5:eclai -etr?x!cn within aeve!comeni
F3r:y-root Ianascxe ztr': along zc?nic rz
',a ,i?niC:iar 2C:?Sj ff:r :s,?st:r;a Lxe
'gr[y-!CCt !anCSi.xe jr'c ;erHveen sf:':? arc -15
Z[:cngi*{ :eC:z-erG ..s? :: :zrcxxv?c c2r:r?c 3 'or 2gee3rt(?C? ;T~T S:?-:: :;r-:xr
$west >a!f Of ~vonica E?c:ras :: :e C:TC;~!~C. :> :
(3,300 ieeo. DIsLi-iDutt SCSC: SVPC 21i ?e" :elC E:, E', anc 9;
---------- 9rooosez roza extension .s -~ec[v-f$ct !2nC%aCe 5;::~ X mf:?? ::Zmtrt'3
5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Sauna ar;muat;on rmrw
nayr access Joint (minimum ssacxai r\ ' : Ssecia! C:nz:f,:::Cr 1: 2'.:.?1;8:2 'S:5<
9. ~ipt-'?, r:gnt-?u: :-mr xco53 :CIX;
:cec:al :eve!cczent :;ai~ar:s
:i;ec:ai ;;?atinent areal
View csmaor : 3 C:us:er ;eveicerent awav Ir:m railwzv
n
1: : 2
id :: r\ven!da Encir.as r?aiiZneg, Siac? sf:::? 3' + Tooeka h Sam Fe ?ailwav v
15 Prow& emrdinstinp vier corridors
... .... .......... .... ....... .. .. ................ ... .... 0 - ... q a 200 801 SEAPOINTE. CARLSBAD: I . . Ul,LuI.-s w -00 L
0 0
Swointc Clulsbad Genenl Plrn Amendment Study
-
Sub-8 P-1
Backnround:
: genedy flat parcel betwwn Poinsettia Lane aad the Encina Water ..
mntrol Pbt, east of hihad Eght-of-WILy, vest of 1-5
A€nus: approximately 95 acres
Q&&gd&&: Odor, north silk
Elementary School Site designated. south side of subarea Railroad noise, vest side
Proximity to freeway, fllrt topography
RM (Medium-Density Residential)
(4-8 DU/Acl
w: Gonerd Plan Designation:
Zoning : R- 1- 10
Local Coastal Plan Designation: 2 (Medium d6nsity Residential)
(4-10 DU/Ac)
ProPosed General Plan hignation Parcel P-la: PI (Planned Industrial) (zone: PM) &Zoning: northerly 300'+/, (adjacent to Wastearate Treatment Plant) (zone- 0) (Office Commt cial) b-ce of property
Parcel P-lb: 0 (Office Commercial) northerly 250' koi
0) RM (zone: RM) (Medium-High Resides tiall bbce of property
Local C0ut.l Plan Puol P-la: 7 (Planned Industrial) northerly 300'*/. Designation: 5 (General Commercisl)baJaQce of propc
kcel P-lb: 3 (Genemi bmmercd) northerly 250' 3 (Medium-High Residential) balance of
property
Clean Industry (P-la) Office (both) Residential (P- 1 b)
Double-fronted buildings against freeai (guidelines to be developed by the City 1
Recommendtd:
d b vt -~tsndatds:
W W
Seapointe Catlsbad General Plan Amendment Study
-
20' landscape buffer on Ave. Encinas and
40' between office and residential on parcel
Parking lot landscaping needs to be enhanced. Buffer can from street.
Parking or special structures to buffer railroad noise (mounding, VU, package structures)
10' landscape buffer with tall trees to screen viev from Poinsettia Lane to roofs
Amend Local Coastal Plan Sib Plan and design review
Parcel P-lb: Re-Determination by School Board of School Situ selection
P-lb.
umd Discretiow actrow
Discuh.
This is a large flat area in the middle of the Study Area which can support a variety 01 uses. Beginning at the north end and working south, the first parcel at the northern end of this site is less visible from 1-5 and Carisbad Boulevard than any othei undeveloped property in the Study Area, Since it is adjacent to the wastevatei treatment plant, Planned Industrial is recommended to serve as a buffer. This type 01 development exists nov on the north side of the plant and has been a very compatible
Office commercial adjacent tu the Planned Industrial offers a transition to residential is closer to freeway access, aad takes advantage of excellent visibility from thr freearay. The development of this freeway-adjacent area calls for attractkc architectural treatment on sides facing both street and freevay
An Office/Residential specific plan is recommended on parcel P1-b, with Office desirec
at the north end of the parcel to cresb a balanced street scene on Avenida Encrnas around the bend from the housing area.
The residential area recommended on parcel P-lb is a use conforming to the Housin, and Land Use Elements of the General Plan, (higher density downtown and ma beaches) and helps to increase the housing supply near the coast without resorting tr mired-use. It will alsu help b balance the da+e activity of the office/industrial Ubi with more nighttime uses. Additionally, it will help support adjacent commercia activities. Multiple-famiiy units are recommended for this area to keep communit- character with commercial uses. Buildings should be spaced to ailow views through tfr~ project (to the Ocean where appropriate) and keep the area's appearance open.
USe.
0 0
Seapointe Carltbad General Plan Amendment Study
-
20' landscape buffer on Ave. Encinas and
40' bemeen office and residential on parc
Parking lot landscaping needs to be enhanced. Buffer cam from street.
Parking or special structures to buffer railroad noise (mounding, walk, package
StrUCtUtsl)
40' landscape buffer vith tall trees to screen viw from Poinssuia Lane to roof
Amend Local Corstrl Plan Sits Plan and design review
Parcel P- 1 b: Re-Iktrrmination by School Board of School sib selection
P-lb.
d Discratio-:
-.
This is a large flat ares in the middle of the Study Ares vhich can support a variet uses. Beginning at the north end and vorking south, the first parcel at the north end of this site is less visible from 1-5 and Carisbad Boulevard than any 01
undeveloped property in the Study Area. Since it is adjacent to the vaste~v treatment plant, Planned Industrial is recommended to serve aa a buffer. This typ development exists nov on the north side of the plant and has been a very compaf
Office commercial adjacentto the Planned Industrial offors a transition to residoa is closer to freeway access, and takes advantage of excellent visibifity from freeway. The development of this freway-adjacent area calls for aurar architectural treatment on sides facing both street and freeway
An OfficdResidentid rprcific plan is recommended on parcel P1-b, with Office des at the north end of the puce1 to create a balanced street scene on Avenida Enci around the bend from the housing area.
The residential area recommended on parcel P-lb is a use conforming to the Hot and Land Use Elements of the General Plaa. (higher density downtown and beaches) and helps to increrss the housing supply near the coast without resortb mixed-use. It rill also help to balance the daytime activity of the office/industrial with more nighttime uses. Additionally, it viU help support adjacent comme activities. Multiple-family units am recommended for this area to keep cornmi character with commercial uses. Buildings should be spaced to allow vievs thmugl project (to the Ocean where appropriate) and keep the area's appearance open,
Use.
0 e
wointe CYlsbd Gend Ptm Amendmeat Study
-
Residentjal across street from office t& parcel P-lb), instead of breaking uses 01 parcel.
Poinsettia is to become four lane road as development progresses (a bridge an thoroughfm district is in place).
Access into the residential area should align with existing cul-de-sacs into the Trav~ Service area. Drives can be spaced at 600' (major) 300' (minor) due to secondar arterial designation of Avenida Encinas.
Avenidr Enchas will have to be widened; it is recommended that any furthc development in Subareas E- 1, E-2 and P- 1 be assessed on a per-trip basis for this cost.
m e bt-1 llYl I -
SUBAREA
P2 -
KEY MAP
LSBENO: HOTES: Proom Iine/suaarea aounaa~ l&2 Palomar Airport Road at 1-5 Northbound widened to orc
eacn way on east-west roaaway, ana an ootional left
3 Palomar Alrport Roaa at 1-5 SoutnbOund widened to prc
eacn way, east-west, and douole ;eft-hand turn I;
South-oound off-ramo's last 250-300 feet
4 Palomar Airport Road at Avenida Encinas adds two i
east-west alreaq wide enougn on east side of intersi
side gets reconscructea 5 Assure some view through develooment to west n Qlgnt-in. ngnt-wt (minor access noint) 6 Screen mecnanicai sewice areas from view corridor; P constructton or 3arrier to attenuate railway noise
7 worn wlth state Dams to resolve use of parcel (LC? co
8 Estaollsn dm-use Darkrng In conjunctton vm state
9 Palomar Alruort Road at Carlsoad Blvd adds double lef
Southbound and Westbound aooroacnes, In addition to (
at-graae, signalized intersection
IO Take Carlsoaa Blva tntougn; terminate Palomar AirOOf
intersection; worn wltn state to create Dark entry an(
to ocean
1 I Create pedestrian crossing
I2 Relocate soumbouna lanes 31 Carlsbad Blvd. 13 Vacate Solamar Street in exchange for Clote
reconstruction of Palomar AifUOft Road intersection
Dark entrance
14 Create tnirtWoot ouildlng setback ana landscaoe set
feet along Carlsoad alvd, :!fty feet along Palomar Air
along Scenic nignwav
15 Create new entrance to mobile nome Dam ana U-turn
-e--
-------- Soeciar semack turn lane added for the ~ortnbound off-ramp
--------0- hoow roaa exension
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Sauna attenuation reuuireO
<%!or access joint (minimum soacing) 0
Soecral develocirnent ftanaaras
(soecral treatment ma) master ~lan)
view cmw of aOandoneO ROW
*
%
.. .. .. - ml - CI .. SEAPOiNTE CARLSBAD: I. ' OPA : J LU OS4 \- - 0 200 800 -
u 100 400
0 0 Cnnlol I w
SUBAREA
P2 -
KEY MAP
LEtENO: WTES: Prooerry Itnetsunarea oounaary I h2 9alomar Alrport Roaa at 1-5 NorthDouna w iaenea ti eacn way on east-west roaaway, ana an ODtiOnal -------- Soeccral setnack turn lane aaaea for tne NortnDouna off-ram 3 Palomar Airport Roaa at 1-5 soutnbouna wiaenea t
----=----- 2rooosco mad extension eacn way, east-west, ana aouole left-hana tu Soutn-oouna off-ramo's last 250-300 feet
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 4 Palomar Airport ?oaa at Avenida Encinas aaas t east-west alreaav wiae enougn on east side of in side gets reconstructea 5 Assure some view tnrougn aevelooment to west n Wjnt-in. rignt-~ (minor access oointf 6 Screen mecnanical semice areas from view corn( construct!on or 3arr:er to attenuate railway noisi
7 WOR wltn state Darns to resolve use of parcel :L(
8 Estaollsn aav-use iar~lng In conjunctlon witn SI
9 Palomar Almort aoaa at Carlsoaa Blvd aaas aouol Soutnoouna ana WestDouna aooroacnes, In aaai ti0 at-graae. signalizea intersection
IO Take Carlsoaa Biva tnrougn; terminate Palomar A Intersection; worn witn state to create Dark entr
to ocean
1 1 Create oedestrian crcssing
12 Relocate soucnbouna lanes 31 Carlsoaa 5lva.
13 vacate Solamar Street in excnange for ~ reconstruct:on sf Palomar AirDort Roaa interSec Dam entrance
I 4 Create tnirtv-foot ouilding setback ana iandfcac
:eet along CarlsDaa alva, :!f:v feet along Paiom; along scmc nignwav
15 Create new entrance io mooi Iz nome Dam ana u-
----
Sounu attenuation rmim
%!or access Joint (minimum soacing) -0
Soeciat aevcloornmt stanaaras (soec1al tieatment ma) master glan)
Vlcw CrnOoT of aoanaonea ROW
Ir
v 5
.. .. ..
L - - .. . .. - 0 200 e 5- SEAPOINTE CARLSBAD ' oi I W 86-9
0 e
moiate Cuised mmi plan Amendment study
-
Subarea P-2
Backaround:
Vacant parcel at intersection of Palomar Airport Road aad Catlsbad Boulevard; generally low-lying
3.34 acres; a pmpossd acquisition of land from the existing right of way of Carlsbad Boulevard (in exchange for realignment of Carlsbd Boulevstd) vill expand the sits to approximately 5.3 acres if completed
Some Railrod ad street nobe
Intersection distmce from Palomat Airport Rod (600 feet for right-in, right-out; 1200 feet for 2direction drive)
Catlsbad Boulevard must be crosud to get to beach
Location on Scenic Highway
Beach proximity and views
Acteans:
w: General Plan Designation: RMH Zoning : RDM
Local Coastal Plan Designation: 8 (Open Space/Parks) described as
Recrestional Vehicle Parking
TS (Travel Service) (zone. Cr-Q)
6 (Visitor Commercial)
Proposed: Genenl Plan Designation: Local Coastal Plan Designation: - Motsl/Hotel. restaurant
-d bv- Conform to Development Guidelines along crrlsbad Boubvad
Increased Landscape (40' 1 and Building Setbacks (30') from Carisbad Boulevard
SO' Landscape setback from Palomar
Airport Road
Crests a strong entry statement at Carlsbad Boulevard and Palomar Airport Road concurrent with the development of the parcel
m W
bointe Cvlrbd Genml Plan Amendment Study
-
6' high masonry wall at property line, plus Landscape buffer 20' wide at mobile home park boundary
Site "Q" overlay review Development Plan Amend Local Coastal Ph General Plan Amendment
uwd DrscreW acbnns:
Discussion:
Conflicts curtently exist between the LCP and the General Plan for this parcel. The LCP calls for an RV (recreational vehicle) parking area on this parcel and the General Plan calls for RMH Residentid. Current RV parking included in the Local Coastal Plan may not be economically viable for the private sector, and the need for 800 RV parking spaces is questionable considering the small mount of beach and the available alternative (a State-ovned twenty-acre parcel across Palomar Airport Road) vhich also needs to be resolved (sue IV., C., South Crtfsbad State BMch Master Plan),. Funding sources for purchasing tho property for the Public could be usad elsewhem.
Due to the prime location at the intersection of tvo major mads and its adjacency to the beach, this prrcel is recommended to be usad for a hob1 or motui development. This is reinforced by the planned addition of a future beach park enttance and development of beach access facilities. Also, vims from such facilities make it an excellent appropriation of resources for visitor-serving uses. Adjacent existing commercd development would help support a hotel/motel us (IS well.
The Local Coastal Plan calls for 40 acres of Hotel/Motd within the Study Area.
Landscape setbacks between Carlsbad Boulevard and Palomst Airport Road vill provide an attractive entra.nce into the Carlsbad Boulevard Scenic Corridor. It is critical that this property conform to design guidelines as relate to landscaping, architecture and signage, The desiga guidelines must be formulated prior to development of plms for this project.
mVeS:
None are recommended.
Due to the length of this parcel, access vill have to be by right-in, right-out drive, 600' minimum from the intersection, with a U-turn/left turn pocket being added at the entrance to Solamar Mobile Home Park (and direct access from Carlsbad Boulevard into the Park).
Other parts of the development of the circulation around this parcel are:
Carlsbad Boulevard now, and at I-S in the future. ' 1) Widening of Palomar Airport Road to 4 lutes. The bridge must be widened a
e 0
Wointe Carlrbad General Plan Amendamt Study
-
6' high masonry wall at property line, pius Inndscape buffer 20' vide at mobile home put boundary
Sib "0" overlay review Development Plan
General Plan Amendment
d Discre-. Amend LocalCoW Plan
m:
Conflicts currently exist betwwa the LCP and the Guneta P1.a for this parcel. The LC calls for aa RV (rscrs8tional vehicle) parking area on this prrwl and the General Pla calls for Iuda Rosidentirl. Current RV parking included in the Local Coastal Plan mr not be economicilly viable for the privata sector, aad tho need for 800 RV pukh spaces is questionable considering the spull mount of beach and the aW alturn8tive (8 State-owned Wenty-acre parcel across Palow Airport Road) which ai needs to be resolved (see IV., C,, South Culsbrd Strts Beach Mastor Plaa).. Fundi sources for purchuing the property for the Public could be uswd ahwhere.
Due to the prime location at the intersection of tvo major roads and its adjrcency to t. beach. this parcel is recommended to be used for a hotd or motel development. This reinforced by tho piaaned addition of a future beach park entrance and developme of beach access facilities. Also, vims from such facilities make it an excella approprson of resources for visitor-serving uses. Adjacent existing commcrc development would help support a hotul/motd us as well.
The Local Coastal Plan calls for 4 acres of HotsUMotel vithin the Study Arts.
Landscape setbacks bemeen Carlsbrd Boulevard and Palomar Airport Road will prov an aUractivo entrance into the Catisbad Boulevard Scenic Corridor. It is critical C
this property coaforar to design guidelines as re&& to landscaping, architecture a signage: The design guidelines must be formulatsd prior to development of plans this project.
myus:
None sre recommended.
Due to the length of this parcel. access rill have to be by right-in, right-out drive, I minimum from the intersection, vith a U-turdleft turn pocket being added at entrance to Solamar Mobile Homo Park (and dhct access from Carlsbad Boulevad i the Park).
Other puts of the development of the circulation around this psrrcel are:
Carisbad Boulevard now. and at I-S in the future. ' 1) Widening of Palomar Airport Road to 4 hes. The bridge must be aridene
e e
Sapointe Culsbd Genenl Plan Amendment Study
2) Rebuilding d-Palomar Airport Road/Carlsbad Boulevard interchange to an a
grade signrlizbd intersection. Provide double left turn lanes for suuthbound and we
bound approaches.
3)
4) lanes.
Restriping of 1-5 northbound ramp to craats a left-or-right turn lane.
Widening of 1-3 southbound off-ramp to 2 lanes and provision of double left-tur!
w w -... ._-- -
SUBAREA
P3 - -
KEY MAP
NOTES.
1 Preserve salt narsn
2
3
LEGEND: ---- Prooerty Iine/suoaraa DoundW
Keeo runoff f:om aevelwment :u: ~f -arsn
Place aay-use :unct:on Rear Ncr:n s:ce 3f s::?. 31 -------- Soeclal setaack create views from Socitn s:ae ---------- Prooosca road extcnslon 4 Berm or sDec:aI :onsmc!:on 10 a[:?nuate raiiwa
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o
5 Preserve Monterev P!nes
6 New JOX culvert to carry i 00-year flood
7 Forty-foot lanascaoe str1D ana thirry-loot 3ullCli
8 Create airect access :o subdivision
9 High Dolnt will create view from road
IO Set buiidings oaclc from bluff aaecuareiv to ac
natural bluff features
soma attcnuatlon reatred
mjor access pomt (minimum soactng)
Ript-in. rtgnt-out (minor access ootnt)
Soeclal develooment standards
(soecial treatment area)
view comaor
4L
n
* sr
.. .. .. .. .... . . - ...
* -
800 1 .. SEAPOlNfE CARLSBAD A I w r~ -s a- io0 400 -
0 0 tAlllBlI (
SUBAREA
P3 -
KEY MAP
..
Parcel ~3al Parcel P3bl
NOTES. i ;reserve 3111. -ann
2
LEEm ---- Prooerry Ilnc/sUOarea 00una;rY -------- Socclal setoacK 3 ?!ace cay-t&? f:m::m near hcc::'. 5'oe if 5': ---------- Praoosea road cxtcnStOn 4 Berm or soecai :ons:ruc::an :o at;?ruace '3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
KeeD runoff frm aeveicorrent x: 2' -am
create views ::m Sam s:ce
5 PreserJe llonterev Pines
5 New itox culvert to carry 100-year '1006
7 Forty-foot lanascaDe striD ana rn!r:y-:ao: 3:
9 Create airect access :a suoaivrs;on
9 Hlgh Dolnt will create view from road
!O Set Duilaings Dack from bluff aaealiateiv :
natural OW features
Souna attenuation reautrea
major accns ootnt tmlnlmum soaclng)
Rtpt-in. rlgnt-out (minor acCCU 001nt)
Soectal eevcloornent standards
(soccial treatment area)
vlcw corrtaof
a
n
*
%
.. . ... ..
.. - -
.I SEAPOINTE CARLSBAD w* f u) n6-e -q 0-200- 80
4 a a
woifirc Cyltbd Gad Plan Amendment SW
- Subarea P-3:
Sait marsh and agricultural land
approx 20.5 acres vithin current boundaries. including the marsh area.
bvelopabb am8 vould be approximately 1S acres with proposed acquisition of righ of-vay from intersection reconstruction
A!xmu:
m:
Psrcel P-3% Salt Mwh Odor potential at north end of site, especially at night
limited RR noise
IocaLion on Scenic Highway
Parcel P-3b: Existing subdivision map
Parcei P-3a:
Parcel P-3b: none
View, especially at north end of site
m:
General Ph Designation: RMH Zoning : R-1-10 Local Coastal Plan Designation: 3 (Medium-High Density Residential)
-
Prooosed: Geneml Plan Designation: Parcel P-3a: OS (Open Space) on salt marsh and 100 fee back from edge of marsh vegetation
RMH Residential (tone. RD-MI on birfanci of parcel with alternative of 0, Office (zone: 0)
Parcel P-3b: RM on La Costa Doarns subdivision (tone 1-10], with a SpecialTreatment Area (p~cel P-3b)
w w
Wointe Cvlsbrd General Plan Amendment Study
- wad Dgrctlonar~ actropS: Situ Development Plan reviev
General Plan Amendment
Amend Local Coastal Plan to change designations, and also to remove provision that Recreational Commercial and Residential mired-use be allowed by right.
Location of this property away from the freeway accesses (at Palomar Airport Road and Poinsettia Lane) make it less competitive as a visitor or recreation-oriented location. The views, however, are very desirable for residential or premium office space.
Parcel P-3a:
No change. Allov residential development. With the adjacent residential uses being well-established and permanent, the most appropriate use of this property would be residential, creating a solid block of housing from Poinsettia he to just south of Palomar Airport Road (to the hotel/motel site, Subarea P2). Due to the proximity to the wastewater treatment plant, prospective purchasers would have to be Prrarned of occasional odor problems (which could later cause problems vith planned expansion of the treatment plant). Drainage structures should be provided to prevent runoff into salt marsh. Allow terracing of site.
Subarea P-3b:
The sub-standard site lots and streets represent an opportunity to develop an exclusive housing area and at the same time add character to an area ripe for visitor-oriented uses. The zoning will remain R-1-10.000, but the General Pian Designation should be changed to RM to accurately reflect the possible density.
Special Development Standards should propose style- (or at least scale-) seUing guidelines, so the look of the area will be a real asset to adjacent uses proposed. Several possible "looks" could be those reminiscent of St. Malo, Beach Bungalows of the 1930'~~ shingled cottages, etc. Scale can be prescribed vith masimum heights and unbroken wail lengths, courtyards, roof pitches, etc. Color and material palettes and landscape
standards should as0 be prescribed and should be compatible with those of the Carlsbad Boulevard Scenic Corridor. Guidelines should be in place prior to development.
The LCP and General Plan call for RMH Residential use on this parcel. Views would be good, but aa al&rn&ive is suggested which would mitigate odor problems by placing r primarily daytime use next to the salt marsh. Creation of an Office area would give thr area a use which uses its good features and avoids its bad. Terrace grading would creatt views further south on lot than nov exist (and would not block any views) Restaurants are not suggested on site due to the odor problem, which is, as previousl! mentioned, expected to worsen in the future.
'
\
0 a
hpointe Cvlsbrd General Plan Amendment Study
-
a€-: Site Development Plan review
General Plan Amendment
Amend Local Coastal Plan to change designations, and also to remove provision
thst Recreational Commercial and Residential mixed-use be alloared by right.
m.
Location of this property away from the freeway accesses (at Palomar Airport Rod a Poiasouir Lane) make it less competitive as a visitor or recrestion-oriented locatio~ The views, however. am very desirabb for residential or pmmium office space.
Parcel P-3a:
No change. Allow residential development. With the adjacerrt residential usus beh well-established and permanent, the most appropriats us of this property vould residential, creating a solid block of housing from Poinsettia Lane to just south Palomar Airport Rod (to the hotul/motul situ, Subarm P2). Due to the proximity to t vastevabr treatment plant. prospective purchasers would have to be warned occasional odor problems (which could later cause problems vith planned expansion the treatment plant). Drainage structures should be provided to prevent runoff ic salt marsh. Allow terracing of site.
Subarea P-3b:
The sub-standard size lots and streets represent an opportunity to develop an exclusi housing area and at the same time add character to an area ripe for visitor-orien usos. The zoning will remain R-1-10.000, but the General Plan Designation should changed to Rh4 to rccutatsly reflect the possible density.
Special Development Standards should propose style- (or at least scale-) seU guidelines, so the look of the arurvill be a red asset to adjacent uses proposed. Seve possible "loots" could be those reminiscent of St. Malo, Beash Bungalow of the 193 shingled cottages, etc. Scale can be prescribed with marimum heights and unbrol wall lengths, courtyards, roof pitches, etc. Color and rmterral palettes and landsc
standards should also be prescribed and should be compatible with those of the Carls Boulevard Scenic Corridor. Guidelines should be in place prior to development.
The LCP and General Plan call for RME Residential use on this parcel. Views would
good, but an alternative is suggested vhich would mitigats odor problems by placir primarily daytime use next to the salt marsh. Creation of an Office area would give area a use which usos its good features and avoids its bad. Terrace grading would crI
views further south on lot than nov exist (and would not block any vie Restaurants are not suggested on site due to the odor problem. which is, as previo mentioned, expected to worsen in the future.
'
0 0
eapointe Culsbrrd General P!m Amendment Study
- Access: .
Parcel P-3a:
Eliminate frontage mad and erchauge property for road construction. This will create a new at-grade intersection for access to this parcel, and better views from it, and a less massive and obtrusive roadway.
Parcel P-3b:
Access to the La Costa Downs subdivision from Carlsbad Boulevard cas be direct with
elimination of the frontage road. The City aril1 have surne extra property in doing this and has several options for its disposal (sell for more subdivision development, relocate Carlsbad Boulevard and deed land to State for coopemion on the Beach Park, or landscape for better appearance).
W W bt,, llY, I "
SUBAREA
P4 -_
KEY MAP
L'5Ef.cI-J; NOTES;
A-cCer'l ;:ne/ suoaro3 C3URCzT'I ; .hrKir,g or s;reciai c3ns;;uc:;sn !3 acrencat? '31
re3iCecti:ai ma nocei -------- S?e~:t, zt'.;ac~ 2 CsntriDute !3 trailic jtgnal ts assii?? :esesL-'zr
3 tc;;'j-::oc :ancxz:e s;i;o ara:n!r! j ':ct XI~C;I ---------- ;rCiaStg ;;aa exC3SiJn Carlsoaa Slva ana 2oinseci:a idne
d Coorainare !sncs;as2 scec:25 w!z s;2!? WKS 2
C C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 c-?aLe larasitsea ccrrccr ana ~13;?s :?rccgn 2; 5 '.+'ow. wi:? stat? ts create view tnrcq s:zre 3;
Po!ns2ctia Ln
6 Remove Ponts Aoaa. create cirett Xtesj :a Cx
a ~f2~: ;2ry ?C;----.L ^I --
9 Prowdo omrdineonq wev cornbrs
t?reraI: Amem :Y to :ernwe s::cuiac;on :"a: 7:;
.. ----
5ouna at;?nuaGcn W.IlTtd
najor ~CCCSS aoint :mintmum scacinqj a
;icn:-8n, YT,:-%c :?:nor xcss :c:nt; 7 Install cross;?g ii;?: A
* 5cec:al :eveiosre?C f;TtOaTCS
(5;ec:aI :;eaL;;;enr Y?3J
Vlew c:rf:COf ailawea * ..I
........ ............................................. ............. - .. .............................
... .- Q w
800 - . '.oC 200 .. ....
'27 777 - I
SEAPOlN'TE: CARLSBAD:: '." GFi i LU .' 85-9 '
..
0 0 tAHll3ll U
SUBAREA
P4 - ..
KEY MAP
I"s;yo; NOTES;
I-i ----. . 3r$cer:i ::ne/ 5~x03 CCuXzTr -miry or f5eC:ai c3nf;:x:::n :: at:ma:? -esicert:ai ana 3o:ei -------- ::ec:21 3?c:ac:< 2 Csnt::ol;it. !J ai!:^ ji$nal !? ajzii? ZPS?~! 3 ;,.--~,-rnC- -I. ,.. L . ,ancsczse S;CD arc:n!rr., '::::I; ---------- ;rc;osog ;;aa ?xcenSisn CJrijoaa 3lvc mc :r):n5ec::a Czne
c: 0 0 3 0 c 0 0 0
2 C:crs;nart !zncs;ase zcec'es '~1,:: 5;~:' :a:
;'?3i? !mcsitCec :x::cr tna 'YI:;~ :?:cL:
5 'Nom WI:? 5iaie !3 c;em v!ew r~cicn 5:a:
Do'ns?!'.:a ~n
6 Remove ?mu 2oao. n3te C:X: 2Cc:Sj :3
7 install ci3ss::g i:;::
9 Prwrdecmrdimringnwcorndors
!3!nef3l: menc ::> t~ rernwe s;:xai:m :-a:
founa at;tnuat;cn r?9iiT?g
mpr 3~~05s joint :?inimcrn scac:;lq A
=ic>:-'n, :"*'-"': _,.. .J I7.m xc~s~ mnt:
a :?a,:?, :zrq +':-;;-? c.
* :cec:al GeveicFvt 5;&-GWCS
3::yec:al :;eai;;ent IrtB)
Vlew c:rr:Cor ailwed
, -- +- ..v
........ .. .. .................................. ... .. ... ............................. .. ....... 9 * ..... - .o 200 80 ,> r-- I00 4cc
SEAPOIN'TE ' CARISBAD: ' ' CPrILVd5-0
m 0
Seapointe Cultbad General Plan Amendment study
- Su bares P-4 -
scant land and Existing mixed-use area (housing and industrial uses)
kmiE: 43 Acres (appmx.)
Qnstr& All: Adjacent planned commercial developmen (Retail area) to the south
Some RR noise
Location on Scenic Highway
E~sting housing; residents wish to stay
Access should be rebuilt
Coastal Agricultural Preserve
Beach closuby
Ocean View from site south of Poinsettia Laae
RMH (8-15 DU/ac)
Parcel P-4c:
-: General Plan Designation:
Zoning : RDM
Local Coastal Plan Designation: 3 (Medium-High density 10-20 DU/ac)
Pr ODoSed ;
General Plan Designation: Parcel P-48: RMR (tone: RD-M)
Parcel P-4b: TS/RMH (zone: CT-Q/RDM-O)
Parcel P-4c: TS/RMH (zone. CT-WRDM-Q)
Local coastal Plan ParcelP-4a: 3
Parcel p-4b: Parcel P-4c:
Parcel P-4a:
6/3 (Visitor CommerciaUMedium High D 6/3 (Visitor CommerciaUMedium High D
Residential Condominiums, tovnhouse, c
possibly zero lot-line. -:
w w
Wointe miSerb General Plan Amendment Study
Parcel P-rC, and P-4c:
Mid-level quality (or higher) hotel/motels, restaurants, meeting facilities assoclatsd with hotsl/motel and/or Specialty retail, restaurants, banks, visitor- ssrvlng businesses
Owners should be required to abide by development sfandrrrds for massing, and vim, landscape, and marials developed for the entire &Mad Boulevard area.
Suggestion: development should be built in small units of face width (Le., no long straight unbroken expanses of facade) hdscaping should approw that proposod for South Gulsbad State Beach to enhance the scenic highway corridors (drought tolerrnt species)
Buildings should be placed to mitimite views on site, and through the project where appropriate.
Entry statement into Carlsbad Boulevard Scenic Corridor
20' hdscape buffers between rusidential and commercial
Increased Landscape and Building Setbacks (20' and 30') from Carlsbd Boulevard
Open view into commercial from Carisbad Boulevard
geep pedestrian crossing at Poinsettia he and Carlsbad Boulevard
Possible vacation of portions of Ponto Drive
to simplify access, depending on specific
Pb.
Development of design guidelines by City
Site and design approvals as part of "Q' overiay
-
sd Dovelo-
Reau* D- =€ims:
e e
s#oointe Qmbrd Gead Plan Amendment StW
parcel P-4b snd P-4c:
Mid-level quality (or higher) hotei/motsla restoumts, meeting facilities assocud with hotsl/motd urd/or Spscirlty nu, nstrurant~, banks, visitor: srvmg businesms
Ownen should bo required to abide by development staadudr for massing, and vias, laadscape, and materials developed for the entire Carisbad Boulevard area.
Suggestion: development should be built in smdl units of face ridth (Le., no long aght unbroken expaasas of facad Laadxsping should approrimltr that propod for South Carbbd Stotb kch b enhaace the scenic highway cordon (drought tobrut spocies)
Buildings should be placed to maximhe views on si&, and through the project where appropriate.
Entry statement into Carlsbad Boulevard Scenic Corridor
20' landscape buffers between residential and commercial
Increased Landscape and Building Setbac (20' and 30') from Cailsbad Boulevard
Open viev into commercial from Carlsbac Boulevard
Keep pedestrian crossing at Poinsettia he and Carlsbad Boulevard
Possible vacation of portions of Ponto Dr
to simplify access, depending on specific
Ph.
Development of design guidelines by City
Site and design approvals as part of "Q" overlay
-
d hveio~
D-acW:
* e
'3ergointe Carlsbrd Gencnl Plan Amendment Study
- -
Amendment to Local Cod Plan to change designations and remove provision (policy
6-91 that mixed-use Recreational Commercial and Residential be ailoared by right
Determination of mitigation of Coastal Agriculture Overlay to allov development
piscussinn:
The commercial portion of this Subarea is adjacent to the Batiquitos Lagoon Educational Park retail ma to the south and lies south of one of the two major intersections in the Study Area (PoinssUir LaneKarlsbad Boulevard). For continuity with Batiquito: boon EdUCatiOd Park, create a vaitof-serving are8 vith a consistent theme at thc intersection.
North of Carlsbad Boulevard/PoinseUia Lane, a large consistent block of midentid j envisioned, and stmtches almost to Carbbad Boulevard/Palomar Airport Road.
The development of this am8 is intended to complement the beach park. The City i encouraged to work with the State Department of Parks and Recreation to rssolv differences betareen the LCP and the Beach Master Plan and to create mom day-us opportunities with parking and day-use facilities on the vest side of Carlsba Boulevard, such as picnic areas and sunning areas (possibly grassy areas on the hig. bluffs or artificially-maintained sandy areas).
Parcel P-*:
Access is restricted to this si@, and creation of a large block of housing is one way make this less difficult to accommodate: an internal circulation system and serve fc
The closest &way turn allowed is 1200' north of the intersection of Poinsettia Lane ai Carlsbad Boulevard (a right-in, right-out drive will be allowed 600' from tl intersection). There will be no access on the south side, due to the railroad overps!
Laadscape setback of 30' vith tall trees along this side is recommended to screen vie of roofs from overpass.
The style, massing, etc. of this development should also be consistent vith the Desir Guidelines to be developed.
Parcel P-4b:
Presently only limited commercial exists along Carlsbad Boulevard, yet the area anjc excellent access, pleasing views and access to the beaches, vhich will draw visit0 They should be accomodaud by both retail and guest facilities. The approved Batiqui Lagoon Educational Park will complete and complement this block of Travel Sew Commercial along Carlsbad Boulevard with Neighborhood Commercial. Hotel/rnc
local ~CSSS.
w m
Wotnte CYlsbrd Gend Plaa Ammdmenr Study
facilities will cemplement the Sammis project by providing more moderate accomodations, customers for the nearby commercial and restaurants. and support for beach-oriented vacationers.
Parcel P-4c:
Vievs and access make this area good for residential or visitor-serving commercial. Land is in many srmll parcels and will be difficult to assemble, but since the Sammis (Batiquitos Lagoon Educational Park) property to the south is commercial, it is logical to plan this entire area as continuous commercial, and allow market forces to creata the incentive for hd assembly. Development standards should be of low-rise and small- scale massing.
Alternative no. 1: (Entire Subarea P-4)
Recreational Commercial (Coastal area 6)/Resi&ntial (Coastal area 1 or 2) mired use as called for in the Local Cod Plan. There may be difficulty in maintaining this type of development to a sufficient level of quality,
Alterna,tive no. 2:
Leave Residsntid RMH on Parcel P-4c if land assembly deemed too difficult or impad on residents too onerous. Use for motel or time-shares to take advantage of vievs Railroad noise will have to be shielded. Some City assistance might be needed tr assemble properties.
Frontage road and Ponto Road should be rebuilt as development occurs to Free mort property to be sold or re-allocated to better uses, and to gain &-grade intersections anc to create reasonable street prtbrns.
A pedestrian access should be created south of Poinsettia Lane to give guests direc access to the beach.
0 a
%@ointe CultEd Gencill Plan Amendment Study
facilities vill cempbment the $4 project by providing more modem rccomodrtions. customers for the nearby commercial and restaurants, and support for beach-oriented vacationers.
Parcel P-4c:
Viovs and access make this area good for residentid or visitor-serving commercial Land is in many small parcels and will be difficult to rsssmble, but since the Sammi (Igrtiquibs 4oon Educational Park) property to the south b commercial, it is logical tc plan this entire are18 8s continuous commercial, and allov market forces to cmrts th~ incentive for hd assembly. Development standards should be of low-rise and small.
scde mssjing*
Altsrnrtive no. 1: (hth Sub-. P-4)
Recreational Commercial (Coastal are8 6)/Residentirl (Coastal uw 1 or 2) mixed us4 caiied for in the Locrl C0ut.l P1.n. There may bo difficulty in nuinwining this type development to a sufficient level of quality.
Albrnrtive no. 2:
Leave Resicbntial RMH on Parcel P-4c if land assembly deemed too difficult or imp( on residents too onerous. Use for motel or time-shares to take advantage of vie7 Railroad noise will have to be shielded. Some City assistance might be needed assemble properties.
Frontage road and Ponb Road should be rebuilt as development occurs to free mi property to be sold or m-allocrtsd to better uses, aad to gain at-grade intersections a
to crerts rsrsonable atmet prtbms.
A podastriur access should be c-d south of Poinsettia Lane to give guests dL access to the beach.
1 m 0
SarQointe Carbbd Geaenl Plan Amendment Study
-
SU b-8 E- 1:
Note: no illustmtion is included of this ares done since no chaages are proposed; see Exhibit 1
-: Existing Service Station site, Planned Industrial development (officdindustrial buildings), Encina Watut Pollution Control Plant
Acresne. 30.62 acres
..
Odor generated by swage trsatment
Ocean view from west side across Avenida
EnChS
Visibility from Fmewry
Fisevay access
TS (Trave1 Service), PI, U
6 (Visitor Commercial)
w General Plan Designation: Zoning : c- 1 Local coutal Plan Designation:
(No change) (No change)
Probosed. General Plan Designation: Local Coastal Plan Designation:
Recommendad. Continue current uses
Recommended Dm- None (due to built-out condition of Subarec
limited opportunity exists for nev development standards)
One possible exception: creation of an entry statement at Palomar Airport Road and 1-5 in conjunction with the CalTrans.
Site plan approval for any further development d Dis-
DiscusJion:
This subarea is almost fuliy developed. Therefore, limited opportunity exists to cre significant changes to land usu or appesrpnce.
W w
Smgointc Ctrltbd Gcnstrl Plan Amendment Study
The existing uss-vhich iaclude a semice stdon. Industrial and Office, and Encina Water Pollution Control Plant, are of recent constnrction and am likely to remain for
the f0-h future.
Recently-built facilities sad access to and from fmy and Palomar Airport Rod nuke the gervice station an approprd us. Mixed industrirl and office could b4 upgraded as they are replacod or expaaded. Pvticulu attention should be paid to providing a didactive entrance to the Study Am. This should include hdscaping and architectunl treatment along the I-) exposum and creation of a ''#&ovay" at the
The Encina Wstsr Pollution Control Plant is scheduled for expansion in S to 10 years (to double current capacity). At thrt time, misv for co-cs with currv.sq1
MO~U &port R0rdA-3 int8ichange. -
Ice sm Other travel-related Commercial (such IS restaurant), vhich vould not require Genenl Pian chutge.
ares None recommended
None fersibb - As part of the improvements needed on Palomar Airport Rod off-nmps near this sib urd Palomar kport Road itself will have to be upgraded. Se Subarea P-2. Avenidr Encinu vill have to be videned; it is recommended that this art be assosod its fair sham of the cost on any future development, on a per-trip buis wit
the development occurring in Subareas P-1 and E-2.
With the improvements to Nomar Airport Road and Carlsbad Boulevard and Avenic Encinas, levels of service in tho Study Area should be adequ-. See the bar to^ Aschmrn traffic report for further Cbstds.
6 @
Winta Clrltbd Gsnenl Plrn Amdment Study
The ewg usssrhich include a service station. hdusUiaJ and Office, and Encis 9-r Pollution Control brit, am of recent construction lad am likely to Fsmain fo
the fo~le future.
Recently-built facilities and accm to urd from fmy md Palomu Airport Ror
-0 tho =mica stlition an appropiis& us. Mixed industrial md office could b upgraded as they ~fd replaced or expaadd. Pvticulu rttsntion should be paid t providing 8 disrinctivr entrance to tho St~e Arrr. This should include Imdscapin and architectural tre8tment dong the 1-5 exposum md crsrtion of a ''gabwry" at th
The hch8 war Pollution Control Pht b scheduled for erpm3ion in f to 10 pean (' double current capacity). At thu time. mim force vith curmi
MOW Ahport RoWI-) interchmgo. -
Ice - Other trwel-rel.rsd Commercial (such u restauraat), which vould not requits Gonod Ph chsage. - None rscommonded - None feasible - As put of the improvements needed on Palomar Airport Roi off-ramps mar this sib md Pdomar Airport Rod itsolf vill have to be upgdd. S Subam8 P-2. Annida Eacinu rill have to bo videnod; it is mommended that this a~
be asma its fair sham of the cost on aay future dovelopmuat, on a per-trip basis v tho clavelopment occurring in Subuess P- 1 and E-2.
Vith the impruvemenb to Pdomsr Airport Rad and culsbad Boulevard and kea Encinm, lweb of smicr in tho Study Area should be adoquate. See the kt% Aschma traffic report for further &tails.
0 0
Sapointe Carlsbd Gend Plan Amendment Study
- -
Subarsr,E-2 (no chmgesmcommended; no subarea map; see exhibit 3 for overall ares)
-: ha north of Poinsettia Lane between fmvay and Avenida Encinrrs, containing hotels and medic4 chic (contains 16 puceb, must ba 35% vkitar-sctving per the Local Coastal Plm, Mello I atsd
ksaiw 18.94 Acres
..
Fmvay noise
Fmewsy exposum aad aecm
TS/C (Travel Seipice/Commercisl mixed) w.
Zoning : c-2
General Plan Designation:
Local Coutri Plan Designation: 516 (General Commercial/Vtibr Commercial)
No chaage General Plan Designation 6c Zoning: Local Coastal Plan Designation: No change - No change
vela-
ProPosed:
Implement existing City standards for C-2 zone. Specific attention should be given I create an attractive atchituctural matme along both freeway and Avenida Encinas.
If visible from freeway, upede parking lot landscaping to a minimum of 10% laadscrping within lot, with special attention to screening cars from stnet u freeway.
Require that a consistent sign program a design guidelines be implemented for thc remaining parcels prior to further development
rts~ac~ Sib plan review
m:
This subma is in the ptocess of developing. Land uses am consistent with both LCP ad the General Plan and appear to be of recent construction, appropriate to
w w
Ser0oint.e Cultbd General Plan Amendment Study
area. Currently, four developments have taken place which constitutes in excess 01 half of the sube.- From inspection, the landscaping appears inconsistent and sparse, and the architecture tovard the freeway is less studied than it should be. New development should focus on creating attractive buildings from both street and freeway, screening puking and mating signage consistent to improve the overall results and crsate a more appealing landmark for the traveling public and clientele.
None proposed
Ace=
Poinsettia he is scheduled to be videned to 4 lanes across 1-5 aad west to Carlsbd Boulevard as development occurs. Widening of Avenib Encinas from the wastearater treatment plant to Plrlomar Airport Road should be contributed to by this atea’r development on a per-trip basis.
With the above mitigations, levels of =mice will be within acceptable Limits. See thc Brrton-Aschmm ruport for further detail.
0 0
Seapoinu Cultbrd General Plan Amendment Study
m. Currently, four developments have *en place which consfikrtes in excess o half of the subb. From inspection, the ladscapbg appeug inconsistent and sparse and the uchi&ctum tovrrd ho fmV87 b 1- -died thm it should bo. Ne1
development should focus on cresting rttnctive buildhe, from both street an(
resuits ssd create a nom appealing lutdmu’t for the tr8veling public aad clientale, fm8p, 3Cmnin8 PU-8 ud &g Signwe COnShbnt & &f’OVe the Oved
None proposed
PoinseUh he irr scheduled to be videned to 4 hes across 1-3 snd vest to klsbs Boulevard u doveiopmont occum. Widening of Avenida Enciaas from the arssteoatc
meat pht to Pdo~ Airport Rod should be contributed to by this ma development on 8 par-trip basis.
With the above mitigations, levels of ssrvice will be within acceptabb limits. See t Bu-ton-AschmrP report for further detail.
0 e
%amlnte Cultbd General Plrn Amendment Study
Subareas E-3 and E4 (no changes recommended; no rmp)
-: Existine Mobile Home Parks - Sollmlr Mobile Home kt (subarea E-3) m( Lanikai Mobile Home Park (subarea E4
Au3uU: 12.84 Ac. (E-3) 10.0 Ac. (E-4)
nono
same ocem viws to west - General Plan Dosignation: RDM
Zoning :
Local coutat Plan Designation:
RMHP (Mobile Home Park)
3 IMdium Density Rssiidsntirl)
PTODOSed: Gunerrl Plan Designation: no change
Locd Coastal Plan Designation: no change - no change
d hvelo-: should be inciuded in design guidelines mentioned below for Scenic corridor -
d Dism acw. none, already developed, limited opportunity to improve
m:
Both of heso parks hrve been in existence for a number of years, and all indicatic are that this VU continue to be the cw. They provide "moderate income housing" z VU contribute balance b proposed laad urns. This use will be difficult to change a should co-uxitt well with proposed adjacent uses.
SubamaE-4: If an opportunity vere encountered to replrco this us, RMH Residen would be suggested due to adjacent uses.
Subwr E-3: This could bocome office as a link between the proposed motel and of - occupurcies.
w 0
Saoointe CYltbd Gerrml Plm Amendment Study
-ads and crests direct access to Carlsbad Boulevard, as rebuilding
allows. Current City staadards for intemctions will allov elimination of frontage road and wiil give City options for seiiing, arousing Carlsbrd b c& more beach propew, or landscaping I
0 0
wointe Carlrbd Cencnl Plm Amendment Study wads and create dhct UC~S to Cubbad Boulo~ard, as rebuilding
~llovs. Curtent City staack~ for intemcti~n~ dl ~OV elimination of frontage ~at and will give City options for selling, mush# Cvlsbrd to c& mom beach property,
b or landscaping.
c
x, e e
Wointe Carlsbrd Genmi Plan Amendment Study
- Vm
A. Pmssp3CkcWn Svm
The Study ha is adjacent tu and served by lnbtstob Highway 5. Connection to I
(and circulation to the north and southerly ends of the Study Ares) is provided 1
Palomar Airport Road (a prime arterial, 126' right-of-way) and Poinsettia Lane (a mail
road, 102' right-of-way). These connect to Carlsbd Boulevard on the vest side of u
Study ha. Carlsbad Boulsvard (also a major road with a 102 right-of-way) serves
access the entire vest "half" of the Study Area. Avenida Encinas, a secondary colleci
(84' right-of-way) will connect Palomar Airport Road vith Poinsettia he east of
ATUF Railroad and is the only access to the interior parcels in the east "half' of
Study Area.
B. -ofthe-
With the proposed General Plaa Amendments all roads will have the capacirp tu ca
the imposed tdfic loads with current or planned improvements with the excrptioi
Palomar Airport Road and its associated off-ramps from 1-5, and Avenida Encinas. '
"plan& improvements" are specifically the videning of Poinsettia Lane to four la
when a bridge and thoroughfare district is activakd as the area develops.
w m
Wointe Cvlrbd ccmnl Plan Amendaent Study
c. -
The following pages contain a map and comments which show the current and ultimate
build-out for the roads. Some comments mgarding scenic treatment and
implementation are incorpora,ted.
The alignments of Palomar Airport Road at Carlsbad Boulevard, realignment of Carlsbsrd
Boulevard at Subarea P-3, and completion of Avenida Encinas sre based on phs
proposed by the owners of the properties in question, but which appear to have merit
(in the case of the realignment in Subarea P-3, it has been considered and neithe;
rejectsd or approved by the City Council). The rework of Crrlsbrd Boulevard at thc
Ponto ma is conceptual only and will requiru an engineering study to dobrmine iQ
best placement, hopefully in conjunction with 8 grading study in the Ponto arer
(raising portions of the area on the east side of Carisbad Bouievard will cresLe somi
view parcels and will put land at grade).
0 0
wointe cdsead Gemnl Ptaa Amendment Study
c. -
The fofiovhg pqps contain a mq md comments which show the curtent ad ulW
build-out for the roads. Some comments regrrdiag scenic treatment ani
implementation are incorporated.
)
The alignments of Palomar Airport Road a& Carlsbd Boulevard, Wgnment of Carlrba
Boulevard at Sub- P-3, and completion of Aveoida Encinu are based on ph
proposed by the ovnefs of the properties in question, but which appear to hrve mol
(in the cas of the dgament in nrbuw P-3, it has beon considered and neith
rejected or approved by the Gty Council). The Mort of Csrlsbd Boulevard at t
Ponto area is conceptual only aod VU require an engineering study to determine
bod placement, hopefully in conjunction vith a grading study in the Ponto a~
(mising portions of the -8 on the ast Side of Carlsbad Boulevard vu create 901
view parcels and will put Lrnd at grade).
-a' rn
0:. z +:: m:.
c) :
b: -a
Ilb. D,
D.'
'b.'
..
G- I
0: ..
B '*
. ... .
'C' r ' .
.cD ' VI 1 a
..
.....
.. . .
..
\ q :
I iji m
i ; L,
..
I .;( - . . I I. '$"
i 11 j I!i;.
!"
d$ :a $2 1
;I i,i I! 2- zlp $5 pg (i i !
I
1
\ \
'\
e
Q$ '\ m 0" c 6 4 5 z
,"f I $-*Po;:'
?nefd%@ 8 g% : P F i g .: 8 TI
23 'm; a s_ =
et ; 2 ig
01
;i i
01
s-gzz 2
-n - I
:;-gg;;
2;: 3 "x, 9% -
%* L. .- L, - -- - ooo-r z
2zp~~y>~~m~an <% :npeG~as4gf!q =u-f3
;gg$-%4~Wag+pg$ ?a ?5~Lz?na.m--
L!2~atz:zz~~;~:gz2 i:i =:mr.o,n7S- = - r: s f z ;; z ;; 9 $: ;& > 7 f;;;:::=zsgfga$ -- -3-x g:z j:'z*6g;$g$3 <E -+,. 0..-1,. %$?.E :z
2?2 $zgSsyl;; ;p- G- ;;; E'? &Jg$ r-' -a$ -3 ;G?l<f %e,-; f ";z c;l-o *>gg qzg; g
=z: 8.JE33eh !%'" 3 g:? Z$;:'t: zxE: e-%:. u 5. yl 222: I= =Sp$ :2z zznm 3 ey. ILo :$ ?an,! -* 3 -:. 3" %Z2m -_ -0 z C .p;a
._
&% ;-z 2; % 3"1 Oi? 31 Zf,:
<? - --
0-
w Q
Sapointe Cultbd General Plrn Amendment Study
- VII. -ce with the Gene-
The dove recommendations have been compd vith the elements of the Gener;
Plan and have been found to be in conformance nith them.
ICI 0
Wointe Carltbd General Plan Amendmat Wudy
- VII. -e WAW ha
The above mommeaddons have been compd vith the dements of the Genel:
Ph md have been found to be in conformance vith them.
i
a @
TRAFFIC STUDY
FOR
SEAPOINTE CARLSBAD
IN
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
PREPARED FOR
AUSTIN-HANSEN-FEHLMAN GROUP
San Diego, California
PREPARED BY
BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Pasadena, California
c e 4B
-
FTN7sJRDoKr
TRAFFTc SIUDY
m'ME
SEApoINllEcAIUsBAD
IN
CARLSBAD, c2Glmmu
prepared-
2!IBrm---- GmJP
SANDEKD, -
preparea%
ESKmN-m-, INC.
PaSadeM, California
July ll, I986
e 4B
-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTNE SUMMARY iv
1. INTRODCTCI?ON 1
1 project Lccation and Study krea Proposed Developllent Plan 3 Methodology 3
2. EXISTING TRAFFIC CDNDITIONS 7
Site Access 7 Exist- Traffic Volumes 9 LEV& of Service concept 9
Existing Level of service Analyses 13
3. PRCUECT-RELXETl ?DAFF'IC IMFACI'S 15
Traffic Generation 15 Trip Distribution 17 Trip Assignment 17
Backgmund Traffic Grclwth Rates 17 Future Traffic Volumes 23 Project-Related Traffic linpcts 23
curdative Traffic conditions 24
ii
e m
-
LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES
TABL;Es
1. ProposedDwelopmentPlan 5
2. Intersection Level of Service Definitions 12
3. Existing Level of Service 14
4. Trip Generation Analysis 16
5. Level of Sewice Analyses for Future conditions 27
FIGURES
1. Regional Ibcation 2
2. melopment Plan 4
3. AM peak Hour Traffic 1c
4. FM pedk Hour Traffic 11
5. Trip Distribution - Areas El, E2 an5 P1 1E
6. Trip Distribution - Areas E3, E4 d P3 15
7. Trip Distribution - Area p2 2(
8. Trip Distribution - Areas P4 21
9. Trip Assigments (AM/R?) 2;
10. Ba- Plus FTo-jezt Traffic - A.M. Peak Hour 2E
11. Backgraurd Plus Project Traffic - P.M. Peak Hour 2c
iii
-s 0 0
t
-
EwcvrrvE~
Barton-Aschman Associates has conducted a traffic study for the props
Wrt Raad ard La casta A- 'Ihe praposal development will cansist inctustridl, office, residential and travel related uses.
US* the year 2000 aa a design yeir and an annual baclqnxmd Qrowthrats 3 per cent, a number of traffic impact mitigation measures are requirc 'IhEsse measures includa widening of Palomar Airport M to a minimum of t lanes in each direction, signalization of the urtsigmdized intersectians the study ared ard prwision of double left turn lanes at several locatia
The Fraposed dwelopment will generab 30,125 trip on a typical w- IXudq the mornhg peak harr 3,040 trips will be generaw, of Which 1,
are mbcrund.
aZe trip generated by the prcpsed development can be accommodated by * exiStirg madway network of the mitigation measures requhd to aaxmuod baclagrand traffic grvwth are implementea with the exception of the carlsl
Blvd - Palmar Airport Road intersection. At this location, an additia
SQuthbCllud left-tuxn lane will be a
SeapOinte Qrlsbad develapment whi& kt located west of 1-5 between &don
iv
0 0
-
1.
l3ammcnm
Bartan-Aschman Associates, Inc., was retained by the Austin-Hansen-Fehln
Grap to come a traffic study for the proposed Seapohte Carlsbad mul
use development in Carlsbad, California. This report documents the prop0
development, studies and analyses which were conducted, and results
conclusions of the study.
The prpse of this chapter is to discuss the project location, the prapc
development, ard the study methodology.
PRXEXTIfX2YTIONANDSIUDYAREA
The location of the project within the region is shown in Figure 1.
project is in the City of Carlsbad, which is located approxhnately 35 m.
north of San Diego ard 90 miles south of Lm Angel-.
1
0 v
Snntcr Catalina
SourceCalifornia Dept. of Transportation
. REGIONAL LOCATION
BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES. INC.
0 0
-
Figure 2 is a schematic of the proposed development and shows the boundaric
of the site: Interstate 5 on the east, Carlsbad Boulevard on the west, tl
area south of Poinsettia ?me on the south, and Palomar Airport Road on tl
north. Both Poinsettia Lane, to the south, ad Palomaz: Airport Nd, ttj f
north, have full a-s to and from Interstate 5. Santa Fe Railroad nort:
south tracks extend through the project site.
mm-m
The proposed development is smrnarized in Table 1.
divided int0 eight planning areas,
ard assignment of traffic projections further in the study.
PIEmolmm
?"ne 1a-W have be
This facilitated distributi as shown.
The follow- studies ard analyses were performed in determining the si
traffic impacts:
1. Data Collection. A thorough field reconnaissance of the site .?
surrounding roadways was corktucted. Traffic counts from previc
studies were used where possible. Otherwise, peak-hour &
movement c0unt-S were conducted by Barton-Aschman Associates, Ir:
in April and May, 1985. Traffic information for other planr
projects in the area and details of planned roadway improve me^
were gathered from local, regional, ad stab agencies.
Analysis of Existing Traffic Conditions. Using the collect
data, existing traffic conditions in the vicinity of the projc
were determined. Critical movement analyses were used
determine the level of sewice of intersections that will
2.
3
0 e -,
-
NOT TO SCALE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN ARTO ON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES. INC.
0 6
-
TAELE1
mosEDmmpLAN
~R?rEcARIsBAD~CSNDy
Use Area -
El 9.1 Acres Travel Sezwices
-
9.2 Acres Planned Industrial
12.2 Acres public Utilities
E2 9.5 Acres Travel Services
9.5 Acres Envizormenel
E3
E4
Pl(a) 10.0 Acres Planned Industrial
12.8 Acres Residential (Xobil Homes)
10.0 Acres Residential (Mobil Homes)
30.0 Acres Office (low rise)
5.0 Acres Office (low rise)
50.0 Acres Residential (4-8 du/acre) p1 (b)
p2 500 Room Hotel
= (4
P3 (b)
P4(a)
P4 (b) 15.0 Acres RecreatiowComaid
P4(c)
Notes: (1) Office development is an alternative to residentid use on 1
9.0 Acres Residential (l) (8-15 du/acre)
6.0 Acres Residential (8-15 du/acre)
15.0 Acres Residential (8-15 du/acre)
13.0 Acres Residential (8-15 du/acre)
parcel-
5
@ 0
-
impacted by the proposed development. Results of the level of semi
analyses are presented in Chapter 2.
3. Analysis of Project-Related Traffic Impacts. The fkt step
the analysis of t&e project-related traffic impacts was
estimate the daily and peak-hour (AM arB PM) traffic that will
generated by the proposed project. These estimates we
determined us- trip generation rates from Trip Generation (~k
Edition, 1982), an informational report prepared by the Xnstitr
of Transportation Engineers (TIE).
Secondly, project-generated traffic was distributed by direct
of approach and departure based on area population densities
approach-mute information contained in previous traffic stud
for the area. These traffic volumes were then assigned
individual traffic movements at ea& study intersection.
Finally, project-related traffic was superimposed on fut
background traffic volumes at the adjacent interseCtions. &
of service analyses were conducted and compared to those
&sting conditions and future background cofitions to deterrn
the impact of this project on area traffic operations.
6
-, 0 0
-
2.
I2xETmG ?RAFFIc al"s
This chapter presents the existing traffic volumes on roadways in tl
vicinity of the proposed project, the level of sewice concept, and t'
results of the level of service analysis for existing conditions. T
purpose of this analysis is to establish the base condition for t
determination of the project's traffic impacts.
SlcTE ACCESS
Key roads serviq the site are:
Interstate 5 is a limited access, north-south interstate freeway connect
the Los Angels and San Diego metropolitan area. 1-5 Carries approximatr
77,000 vehicles per day in the vicinity of the project. Interchanges
Poinsettia Lane and at Palomar Airport Road are in the project study w
7
<* 0 e
-
Carlsbad Boulevard (old State Route 101) is a four-lane, divided, north-
south arterial with limited access. A partial grade separation exists a'
the access road on the wesc bomdary of the project site. Currently
Carlsbad Boulevard carries approximately 10,000 vehicles per day.
Poinsettia Lane is a two-lar.e, east-west arterial north of the project sit
carrying approximately 3,000 vehicles per day. Poinsettia Lane,'i +
e a full diamond interchange with Interstate 5. The 1-5 north- ar
southbound off-ramps at Poinsettia Lane are currently STOP controller
A grade separation bridge over the Santa Fe Railroad tracks has recent:
been cmstructed.
Poinsettia Lane has been widened east of the 1-5 Freeway in the westbou
direction. However, due to the existing two-lane bridge constriction ov
1-5, this widening currently only provides a wider right-turn lane fl
westbaund to northbound freeway traffic. Plans are to eventually constxu
a semrd bridge over 1-5, aligning with a four-lane build-out of Poinsett Lane.
PalOXnZUZ Wrt Road is a two-lane east-west arterial. The madway lh
Carlsbad Boulevard on the west and the airport to the east. It k
determined during this study that this roadway is to be widened to fc
lanes in the future. As part of the improvements, the intersection
Palomar Airport Road at Carlsbad Boulevard would be modified tc
signalized, at-grade intersection.
Avdda mcinas is a two-lane street connecting the north project bound
with Poinsettia Lane. Avenida Encinas is planned to be widened to f
lanes between Poinsettia Lane and Carlhd Boulevard, through the prof
8
-I 0 e
-
site. Currently, Avdda EncLms carries approximately 1,500 vehicles 1
daY
EXISITE-CWm
Exist- mornkg and evening peak-hour traffic volumes were obtained fi
traffic counts conducted by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. in Novembc
1985. These traffic volumes are summarized in Figures 3 and 4.
LEVELOF SERVICE a"
%eve1 of service1* denotes any of an infinite number of traffic operat.
conditions which may exist on a given lane or roadway when it is subjec
to various traffic volumes. Level of service is a qualitative measure
the effects of a number of factors, including speed, travel time, trafj
interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving comfort, cornden
and operating cost.
There are six levels of service, A through F, which relate to driv:
conditions from best to worst, respectively. me characteristics of traf
operations for each level of service are listed in Table 2. In gener,
level of service A indicates free-flow conditions with no congestion, wh
level of service F represents total breakdown with stop-&-go corditic
and long delays. Many communities have adopted level of service D a:
criterion for amptable levels of service during the peak hours of aver
days.
Corresprding to each level of service is a volume-to-capacity ratio.
is the ratio of existing or projected traffic volumes to the capacity of
intersection.
T
capacity is defined as Ithe maximum number of vehicles t
9
a A a a 0
0% 3
$8 ti' .
w 9* 1 I
1L>2 .. SETTIA LANE
%% . v) a
PONTO w
9
5 z
*a
5
0 $2
5, I,
a
0'
a t,% a- * LA COSTA AVE.
ti' Sh z9
-I m m
NOT TO SCALE
P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
PRTON - ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES INC
J e 0
-
-2
-a LEVEL OF SERVICE DIENtTIGNS(l)
sE"EcARIsBADTRAFFIcsruM
Volme/capacity(
Level of saxice Interpretation Ratio
A, B L'ncongested operations; all vehicles 0.00-0.70
clear in a single signal cycle.
C Light congestion; occasional backups 0.71-0.8 0
on critical approaches.
D congestion on critical approaches, 0.81-0.90
but intersection functional. Vehicles
required to wait through more than
one cycle during short peaks. No
long-standing lines formd.
E Severe congestion with sunk= long- 0.91-1.00
stardirg lines on critical approach- es. Blockage of intersection may occur if traffic signal does not provide for protected turning me- mats .
F Total breakdown with stop-&-go op-
1.01+
eration.
NUITS:
(1) Source: Highway Capacity Iv?anual, 1985.
(2) Volune/Level of Service E capacity.
12
I. m e
-
can be handled by the roadway during a specified period of time.11(’)
capcity of a roadway depends on its physical characteristics:
lanes, operating characteristics (one-way, two-way, turn restrictions, L
stops, etc.), and the traffic using the roadway (number of turni
movements, percents of trucks and buses). In this study, the maxim
capacity, or saturation flow, used is 1,600 vehicles per hour green.
T
rnunber
EXLWING LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSES
For purposes of analysis, it was assumed that all intersections WE
signalized. This facilitates comparison of future corditions since Palon
Airport Road would be widened in the future, and most likely th~
intersections would be signalized at that time.
Results of the level of service analyses for existing traffic conditions
intersections in the study area are shown in Table 3. Currently, ?
intersections operate at Level of Service C or better except for t
intersection of Palomar Airport Road at 1-5 Northbound, which operates at
(1) Highway Capacity Manual, 1965.
13
0 -*
-
TABLE3
IiXEXUG LEVEL OF SERVICE
SEAWm CARLsmmcSNDy
Existing
AM PM
v/c Los v/c I
0.44
0.90
0.75
0.41
0.33
0.37
0.32
0.29
A
D
B
A
C
A
A
A
Palmar Airport Rd. at Paseo del Norte
palmar Airport Rd. at 1-5 Northbund
Palamar Airport Rd. at 1-5 SouLWund
Palmar Airport Rd. at Avdda Eslcinas
Palmar Airport Rd. at Carlsbad Blvd.
Poinsettia Rd. at 1-5 Northbou.?.?
Poinsettia Rd. at 1-5 Southband
Poinsettia Rd. at 1-5 Carlsbad Blvd.
0.50
0.82
0.66
0.33
0.80
0.37
0.33
0.22
NOTES:
(1) (2) Level of Service.
Volume/Level of Sewice E capacity.
14
... 0 0
-
1
3.
FROJXT-RELX’ED TEWF’FIC IMPACTS
This chapter discusses the methods used to identify the traffic-relat
hpactS of the proposed project. Cenerally, the process involves determh
weekday and peak-hour trips that would be generated by the propos
development, distribution and assignment of these trips among the appro;
mutes, and changes in intersection levels of service due to the addition
project traffic.
T!RAFFTc GENEmrIoN
Future traffic volumes of the proposed project were estimated using tj
generation rates contained in an informational report, Trip Generat.
(Third Edition, 1982), prepared by the Institute of Transportation Engine
(1TE)and trip rates from SANDAG. Table 4 presents a schedule of t.
generation rates and the resulting peak-hour and average weekday and p
hour traffic volumes.
15
..a 0 0
-4
sEAFo~cARIsBAD~cszuM - TRlp~~ANAI;ysIs
TEUP E7ATFs TRIPS
AM - m - Trips AM
Day (1n:out) (1n:out) Daily In cut Total
-
In
El TS 9.2 Ac 40 3% (6:4) 9% (5:5) 370 5 5 10 E
PI 9.2 Ac 80 20% (9:l) 20% (1:9) 735 130 15 145 15
- -- - Area L.U. --
- \- - - - - - -
E2 TS 9.5 Ac 40 3% (6:4) 9% (5:s) 380 5 5 10 15
C 9.5 Ac 40 3% (6:4) 9% (5:5) 380 5 5 10 15
-- 1 u 12.2 Ac
E3 FtR4 12.8 Ac 40 9% (3:7) 11% (6:4) 510 15 30 45 35
E4 RCM 10.0 Ac 40 9% (3:7) 11% (6:4) 400 10 25 35 25
Pl(a) PI 10.0 Ac 80 20% (9:l) 20% (1:9) 800 145 15 160 15
0 30.0 Ac 300 14% (9:l) 13% (2:8) 9,000 1,135 125 1,260 235
Pl(b) 0 5.0 Ac 300 14% (9:l) 13% (2:8) 1,500 190 20 210 40
RM 50.0 Ac 80 8% (2:8) 10% (7:3) 4,000 65 255 320 280
€2 TS 500 Rcxrm 10 6% (6:4) 8% (5:5) 5,000 180 120 3 00 200
P3(a) RMH 9.O’Ac 150 8% (2:8) 10% (7.3) 1,350 20 90 110 95
P3(b) RMH 6.0 Ac 150 8% (2:8) 10% (7:3) 900 15 55 70 65
P4(a) RMH 15.0 Ac 150 8% (2:8) 10% (7.3) 2,250 35 145 18 0 160
P4(b) RC 15.0 Ac 40 3% (6:4) 9% (5:5) 600 10 10 20 30
P4(c) FMH 13.0 Ac 150 8% (2:8) 10% (7:3) 1,950 -- 30 125 - 155 -- 135
mAL5 30,125 1,995 1,045 3,040 1,375 3,
16
-1 0 0
-
A tatal of 3,040 trips will be generated by the project in the mo- p~
hour, with 1,995 trips inhar~I ard 1,045 trips outbourd Ixu=h-q the eveni
peak hour, 1,375 inbound trips and 2,000 outbourd trips will be generat?
for a total of 3,375 trips. It is e>q=ected that the project will genen
30,125 trips on an average weekday.
=-ON
The distribution of trips to and from the project site was based on t
projected population distribution within a ten-mile radius of the sii
'Ilsis analysis included an account- of trips generated within the pmjc
itself.
Separate distributions were developed for each planning area, even tha
several areas had the Same approach patterns. The patterns used are sho
in Figures 5, 6, 7, and 8.
'IRIP AssI(;NMEKT
Using the trip generation and trip distribution data described abov
project-generated traffic was assigned to the study area roadway network f
ea& development phase. The trip assignments for the AM ard PM peak ha
are shown in Figure 9.
MC==JND=c-RAlES
Evaluating traffic impacts of the proposed project requires estimati
future background traffic volumes. This is typically done by applying
growth rate to existing traffic volumes.
17
I -A e *
-
d
m
a a m
a
> -I
v> A ET
0
0 5 > aT
5.. I
a U
0”
z a., LA COSTA AVE. * dz lo%+ v) 6 & -,
NOT TO SCALE
TRIP DISTRIBUTION-AREAS El, E2, & P1
BART ON. ASCHMAN ASSOCl AT ES. INC.
-
.. 8 0 r
d
a
> A
\PALOMAR. AIRPORT RD.
F 13%* a 0 2
J W n
0 0 (13 a n
n
m
a a
a
(13 J
0
+t+
tp \ POINSETTIA LANE
12%+
(13 a
PONTO w
5
f
z
Qa
w >Y n a- 8- 5.. z a., LA COSTA AVE.
ap \ (8 Lo 1 O%+ 6 -’ &
8
v) r
P2
d
m
> A
ALOMAR AIRPORT RD.
? 25%*
2
d UJ n
0 0
v) a n
8
-
n a m
a a
CJY A
0
9
\ POINSETTIA LANE J
m U 5
P
z PONTO w
'a
w n i?
5,
4:
0'
z u., LA COSTA AVE. s
v) 6
8
v) r
d 3 m
ALOMAR AIRPORT RD.
? a 13%*
0 z
A W a
a
0 0 cn
a
-
0
CI) J
a m
a a 0
5
*
I
\ POINSETTIA LANE 1 12%+
Cn < 5
8
Z PONTO w
Qa
w >? 0 a- < 0"
z a., LA COSTA AVE.
5. *
\ (8 0 5%+ & .. PA ::
- 2s - I\ ~WrbO LWo -.
2'0 7:;3"7 3- G K x-0 N
0
a 5
8 \ d
lB%Ir\ -240/130 *Zao/l30
*&PALOMAR AIRPORT RD.
'l( & h- -W I- g
NC ) 4s z
340 J
:%Z842,., ' 8 2
w Q
0 0 cn a 0
. $g
0 4 m II: a a
$9 $8
0
1 I,
tT
QQ a0 \\ $8
4s
$8
J \
\'
tf 00
2'1 a$ -
0
0 9 FI
0 8 - rgo/rzo \ POINSETTIA LANE L30/Jo :: rzo/o - "lr 0%
Oh
e* $3
8%
z PONTO w
B 'a
5 n 212
5..
a 0"
T -/sua., LA COSTA AVE.
\I -
t
rb t m
I 4
-
For this project, it is assumed that traffic growth will be approximate$
3.0 percent per year until 2000. The design year and growth rate wa<
selected based on discussions with the City of ~arlsbad.
FvIuHElRAFFICvDLlJMEs
Future traffic volumes were determined by superimposing the project
generated traffic onto the estimated future background traffic volumes. ~h
resulting traffic volumes at each intersection in the study area are i
Figures 10 an3 11 for the morning and afternoon peak hours, respectively.
FRmECF-mc IKPilcIs
Traffic impacts of the prop& project are summarized in Table 5. Volum~
capacity ratios and levels of service are shown for existing condition:
year 2000 without the project, year 2000 with the project and year 200
curmilative(10).
As shown, capacity problems will result at certain locations unles
mitigation measures are implemented, with the exception of the southh.~
left turns required at Palomar Airport Road - Carlsbad Blvd. intersectioi
the mitigation measures are required as a result of background traff:
growth and not the project.
(1) cumdative refers to year 2000 plus project plus other born projects
the vicinity.
23
v) 2 a a 0
$2 Ti
11' OCI 62
s
t
0
t/rc ., J~>~T~SETT~A L+O LANE -//O I /"
5
/or - Lja 7 oa $% v) a
!PONTO w
OK
z
a z w
0 22
- 5,
K C'
a l!,ks~.l \ LA COSTA AVE.
00 tf \{
I,-, 0 'CY
m
a 3
4 0
00 a\)
P- 11 tl' a? ?-
aa
m-
J\
cn
00
El70
ti70 j$>%NSETTIA LANE -140 a.
100 -
GO-4 /*
5
ao hQ a ht-4 a
z PONTO w
0 'a
n 2 9'
5.
z w
a 0"
s;oz; LA COSTA AVE.
tf
OQ m0 wm
,
/
v) E 5 !
"4
8
A!
5qi
ttf
8 $
i y mau
w ww ww ww ww u uu uu ou uu z z;L ZLI zz Z;L-
-J
n c n c
w >
,LE 2 2; 99 22 9s z v. v uu uu uu 0. 0. .o +2 u 'o?? 00 3; A p PP o,2 Po, Po, d U L
Y ow
m+
mu am4
ww wu ww ww
n n
V " g $?g 2g 22 PP- c aa 2 55 aa ua uu- .- -- =x Tr xr v uu uu uu uu ln h 9
m./z!l w
m 1.
m ??4 I ,:I ; sg 52s PB PS 0 0 0
el -I
$ :I u
ml :I 5 -0 00 00 $0 0 0 0
E 3 *
Y ZI m uw wn nu aa 4 4 a Y-
"10: ?? ?Y ?7 y: 5 -t; .-
1- E w ;
a, d
n m - w w >
rrr m
n - v v
nn nn nn -n n
vu VY vu "Y v .-N t-wl .-wl -u - aJI .--i a
ON Q- be0 m a 0.
-0 00 00 00 0 0 0 !:I .- $d
uo wu w un a m 4
Y 0
Y
n-
F Y .- v
nn n- ncI nn n -04 -m -wl .-u - vv vu vv V" Y
YI u4 0,
e ;? %? F? S? q 3 : Q
121 m uw om a au a a 4 m
m
m
a, C
d U 7 a* fE a "10: 99 y: -rr! y! Y "1
\ ZY
n
7 u
n c nn A dE/ ZG vv Z,^ vw Z v rrln YY F Y v 0, - am m- - 910 ln a N
YI 0 I:! 2 -0 00 0 00 0 0 0
3 mu Y- I-w Lz-
~m m um um u un u m 4 pv) 21 0 ln.
3 E3 .. F; q k3 .. -3 . q 9 P/ .
m n c wa,
F -J .z5 ;sa- 5.;-5 'Z g-2 a g.5 a 2 ugu
ma, a
n .- Y w
nn nn n nn n -In c riN .-Wl - Y
vv VY WY v
> 0 -0 00 0 -0 0 0 0
mc cc alum- c m- - zm
ouuauua 1%l4 i a mauuau
m 31 4
MLNE -m I El",? 150 5 0 t? 0 s 0 p? 0 ? 0 p? 0 d ?$a5 USLL 925 e
YY 2
I dm 'u~~s~s~~w ==u
.-
UNTM
0 0;L
0 ox a, s
::&&E E
Ya*YU g L L'CV- E 8-2 ae 82 ad - CI Y
a, 8 $52
md d mm m33 cna ;; ig 8; &$ gm LU gl 25 =B =m $ .LO .-= .-m .-.- .-m a'* a5 m-
L a$ am 4 45 4; ';b ';a ';2 %€SFiZ 2 Lm L. L'" L> LCJ uz YV) rm .. '2 P, P, a a
m m CJ m 00 0 o, zN_M_zfv'c
;io 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 YU --
.- g ? x x yg rm 3-g i-g 2z
- dm gu -10 g:: -m g: dm g: -.a $: .-- :? .-- z'" .-u Zk
.LLm
,-LLJ3 L .- .- Y u u u '0-u
CJ. E.- ~3 m
ala, ._
v) wz3na w- ca w + nn-nn
annn m nn
,;>\,s
r e: :m 1 ..e
ALL RECEIVED
Honorable h-lary Casler October 30, 1986
MAYOR
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA. 92008
93: FrnINTE/C~
General Pian Amendment
City Council Hearing
November 4, 1986
CSA/LU 85-9
Dear Mayor Casler:
Ws letter is being sent on behalf of the owners of the Banker's Life
pro-perty which is a part of the above-referenced application.
Over the past several years, the owners of the Banker's Life property
have questioned the appropriateness of a residential land use adjacent to the sewer treatment plant. to submit a request for discretionary approvals for residential develop- ment for a number of years.
An application for a General Plan Amendment was prepared by the Owners earlier this year. was not submitted with the understanding that the property was being
considered as an incompatible land use. of recomnendations de by the Land Use Elmnt Cornnittee that incompatible
land uses be reviewed.
of other land uses in the same general area, this property was placed under
the SsapointeKarlsbad land use study as opposed to being a part of the
incompatible land use study. The Owners had no problem with staff's logic.
The Owners of the property had suggested a '"mixed" use of industrial, office
and comnercial planning in their GPA application in order to be consistent
with surrounding land uses.
recomnended planned industrial and office uses similar to those uses north
of the sewer treatment plant. like to further point out that the acreage north of the plant devoted to
industrial/office use is the sarne acreage as the l3anker's Life property, south of the plant.
Because of that, they have been hesitant
At the suggestion of the city staff the application
This consideration was a result
Because of staff's concern as to the appropriateness
The staff eliminated the comnercial uses and
The owners concur with the staff and would
-4 *w a!
We would respectfully like to make one recomnendation to the City Council
as they review the Seapointe/Carlsbad application.
Banker's Life property ( a portion of SljBAREA PI) be reviewed independent
of the Lusk property to the ~0~1th ( also a portion of SUBAREA Pl).
these properties has its own characteristics and reasonings for land use and therefore should be considered independent of each other.
We would also like to support the reccmrendation of the Staff and the Planning Conission for the split General Plan designations which will give the Council a chance to review a detailed Specific Plan before any development can occur on the site.
The owners of the hiller's Life property have waited my years for a direction from the Staff as to the mst appropriate land use on their property.
that the City Council is in agreemnt with their thinking.
That is, that the
Each of
We concur with the recamxdation of the Staff and trust
Respectfully submitted,
-- --- --- .----
James M. Hi&>
Representative for the
Banker's Life property.
c---
Attachrent
. .. '
..
Y* qf!:~ J J' 5
.qi
:
.
w m 3
Q
J z a
mu n
52 l-* .
IO XtX ula
-.-. . . ..
.. ,]# q$ 4 I I
-.I 1 I
il 1-1 ..
..
.. .. .. . . I_. g. . . If. 3. ..
.. .. .. * @I I . . 18. . .
::I k '
....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .?. , . m ... .= . . . . . .3. . . J . . . .\. . . . . ..e.. . . . .(3.. Q . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......
.. *.'O : :' ::a:: ::a::
.. -'a:: **A:: -K:: ..
. .c). .
::w:: -+:: -z:: ..
. .. *o. : :
.. -.PI::
. .. --a : :
.. * *.Ill : :
* .. *.w. : :
..
..a:: ..
.. .. . . . . . . .
..
. .-. . .
......
LYlltG .rvlWU~IIc - -.- - - - . el of ho
11kL
-. - . _- . - _. r. c1) ---- --.*-._--- - *._ -_.r
.e.= I i .i‘ tunnel of horrors and be a r qc&ens mth su&tanc~
hat befell - center.
. nize early symptoms o
and her family%-StruggIe with press their feelings, tcl
Robin’s drug and alcohol To take a democratic:+ sponsibleforthemselvt
I - .-u I I. -- --rr - ---u -.-Tuesday; tht class-w4H---epr.wea& in 4bhm-i- -take respomWty €OF see 8 videotape of Robin, now that one is dealing with mature’ Youths are started 1
lege in Florida, telling her own “There conies a point when; dually shift to more ’res
story. the parent has to take the re<^ lities and more freedor “I’m always willing to talk to sponsibility and the rap.” ’ tually they.work their u a position equirdtm
There gie limita”
. 19 and attending a. junior col- individuals, ‘she said. t absolutk~no~
f,. .. ~ .
1I schools in th
,, ..< 1 , P. 0 Earl Warren Janil
School: Special prog regular Life Education ..n 7. ’
, . ---r*- ‘
:, : ..;- -
.! ., - 5 > . I,. :‘ ’ ’tr
c *>:: .. :E-- . .* _*_
I, ;a:::: ;.;9 -? *.-..PC-
L q
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
GPA/LU 85-9/ZC-338/LCPA 86-2
rn I_.
D
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a PU
hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California? at 6:O
on Tuesday, November 4, 1986, to consider an application for General Plan Amendme
Zone Changesand Local Coastal Plan Amendmentsfor the area bounded by Palomar Airpor
Road, Interstate 5, Poinsettia Lane and Carlsbad Boulevard+ plus that area bounded t Lane, Ponto Road, Carlsbad %oalevard and the AT&SF Railroad.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call the Planning Departmenl
at 438-1161.
If you challenge the General Plan Amendments, Zone Changesor Local Coastal Plan Amenc
in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raisec
the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered
the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
APPLICANT: City of Carlsbad
PUBLISH: October 25, 1986 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
1c ,*' < , :'
P.
.+/ /J/+
e
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
GPA/LU 85-9/ZC-338/LCPA 86-2
.. '.> @
, 1
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a pu
hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:O
on Tuesday, November 4, 1986, to consider an application for General Plan Amendme
Zone Changesand Local Coastal Plan Amendmentsfor the area bounded by Palomar Airpor
Road, Interstate 5, Poinsettia Lane and Carlsbad Boulevard$ plus that area bounded .
Lane, P'onto Road, Carlsbad Bodevard and the ATSrSF Ratlroad.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call the Planning Departmen
at 438-1161.
If you challenge the General Plan Amendments Zone Changesor Local Coastal Plan Ament
in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raise1
the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered
the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
APPLICANT: City of Carlsbad
PUBLISH: October 25, 1986 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
- . ~~~ - ~~ ~
f
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad wi
hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad,
California, at 6:OO p.m. on Wednesday, August 13, 1986, to consider approval o
General Plan Amendments, Zone Changes and Local Coastal Plan Amendments for th
area bounded by Palmar Airport Road, Interstate 5, Poinsettia Lane and Carlsb
Boulevard, plus that area bounded by Poinsettia Lane, Ponto Road, Carlsbad
Boulevard and the AT&SF Railroad. dt-that time, a sirX week public review Fri ..- will- be established for the Local Coastal PIaii mendments, a&L?, j ?e
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attenc
the public hearing. If you have any questions please call the Planning
Department at 438-5591.
If you challenge the General Plan Amendments, Zone Changes, Local Coastal Plan
Amendments in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in
written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the
public hearing.
CASE FILE: GPA/LU 85-9/ZC-338/LCPA 86-2
APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD
PUBLISH: August 2, 1986
CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
.- --
$+A A&@
fi ya?& d
(@L+.d+ d-49. ")
a-
8 (Form A)
4’ *. % m V
TO: CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
Planning Department FROM:
R€: PUBLIC HEARIHG REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice
GPA/LU 85-9/ZC-338/LCPA 86-2 - CITY OF CARLSBAD - SEAPOINTE CP
for a public hearing before the City Council.
Please notice the item for the Council meeting of
NOVEMBER 4, 1986
Thank you.
October 14, 1986 i Assistant City Manager Date
-15-