Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-11-12; City Council; 8809-1; APPROVING A LOCAL COASTAL PLAN AND GENGERAL PLAN AMENDMENT LCPA 86-2 | GPA 85-9 - SEAPOINTE CARLSBADAB# 8809-#1 MTG31/1 ') !& i LCPA 86-2/GPA 85-9 - SEAPOINTE APPROVING A LOCAL COASTAL PLAN AND TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CARLSBAD DEPT.C~ 0 +I DEPT. CITY A CITY N a a, a d i m 0 hl 00 Q\ w. co :g (4-2 NO b; QU 5E UQ a,a (=cJ +c 0a AFL; f$.5$ Q, am za 3 QJa +E*-* L +r.- o ow" 4- +la= -0-0 mU 2 222 .la+ .x 0 €2 a, a,gz s rp s s&g v) UlZcH" .- .- m a4J * 3 rm L a, La acd-pl I +I .w.w u4- z 2-22 Q, a,s2 I- +"a wa ' CON m 'hl 'N - Nd t,COQ) co uq -71 -- .. z 0 e i 0 z 3 0 0 E c CI'T/SOF CARLSBAD - AGEN~IILL RECOMMENDED ACTION: If Council concurs your action is to: Adopt Resolution No. 8874 approving GPA/LU 85-9 Adopt Resolution No. 8875 approving LCPA 86-2 Adopt Ordinance No. 9820 ITEM EXPLANATION The City Council at your meeting of November 4, 1986 directed City Attorney to prepare documents approving Local Coastal Plai and General Plan Amendments. Those documents are attached. 0 November 12, when these documents were returned to the City Council for final action, the Solamar Mobile Home Park request a continuance so they could have more time to study the propos land use and zoning amendments. Staff met with the residents the Solamar and Lanakai Parks on November 20 to explain the proposal. The major concern was the land use for the property just to the north of the park which is proposed for hotel uses (Other resident concerns are addressed in the attached memo tc the City Manager.) Also attached is the results of a vote by Solamar residents for land uses they wished to see on propertj the north. Council may wish to consider the results of this I (supporting office or mobile home type use) and reanalyze stal recommendation for this property. EXHIBITS 1. Resolution No. 8874 approving GPA/LU 85-9 2. Resolution No. 8875 approving LCPA 86-2 3. Ordinance No. 9820 4. Agenda Bill No. 8809 5. Solamar Vote Tally 6. Memorandum to City Manager dated 11/20/86 '\ a 1) Vote- tally sheet Dear Solamar 8esident, lcr . Charles Grim,. Sarlsbad City planning Dept., has asked we reach s conciuslon on what type of land use we would suppor the property at the entrance LO Solamar.. At our GSIqOL meeting night (Tuesday), tne alternatives listed below were suggested discussed. Will you please look them over carefully and mark - one choice you woula prefer. & Kedical Offices - r GZZsionaL Ofr'ices eondominiurns 5 Hotel (Without cocKtail lounge or restaurant) -=== %- GTT Mobile Home Park - Resident Ownea A - fl Retirement Community ( 1.e.. a mini-Leisure World) Please deposit tnis survey in the clubhouse PailOt box no I have promised to dell= than 1O:OO A.K. Friday, Dec. 12th. response to NLT. Grim on that day. Chuck French, President Solamar Chapter GSKOL II) e 1- MEMO DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1986 TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: MICHAEL HOLZMILLER, PLANNING DIRECTOR w SUBJECT? SEAPOINTE CARLSBAD MEETING AT SOLAMAR MOBILE HOME PAI In response to concerns expressed by residents of the solamar Mobi1.e Home Park, regarding the Seapointe project, several members of the Planning Department attended a citizens' meetii at the park on November 20th. In attendance from City staff were Charles Grimm, Mike Howes, and Adrienne Landers. Mayor Buddy Lewis was also there, representing the City Council. Mr. Grimm began the meeting by explaining staff was there to _provide the residents with information regarding the proposed Seapointe Carlsbad project and to relay their comments to the City Council. Adrienne Landers continued the meeting by explaining why the Seapointe Land Use Study was initiated and why the various recommendations were proposed by the consultant for subareas P4. Subarea P-2, the site located north of Solamar, was discussed in greater detail, as was a summation of Mr. Blonsk preliminary proposal for a hotel. The presentation was concl by explaining the difficulty a developer would have in removi the RMBP (Residential Mobile Home Park) designation from the site. The meeting was then opened for questions and comments Comments included the following: 1. Concern was expressed regarding the length of time the F designation would last. Residents want to see it last forever. Staff explained the law and property rights, t again, stressed the difficulties in getting a general pl amendment or a zone change approved by the City Council, 2. Negative concern was expressed over the number of hotel units proposed by Blonski - approximately 300 units. 3. Concern was expressed over noise created at cocktail 101 included in the proposed hotel. Staff explained that ar development on this site would require approval of a sit plan at a public hearing. Residents of Solamar would bt notified and encouraged to provide input. In addition, soon as the applicant brought in development plans, stal would direct him to meet with the residents of Solamar 1 explain the plans to them and get their input prior to I '0 -6 having the project scheduled for a public hearing. ~f the applicant would not meet with the residents, staff would bring the plans to them as soon as we had a formal submit tal. 4. Residents want to see Carlsbad Boulevard preserved as a scenic corridor. The ocean is very valuable to them. 5. Residents want to see specific restrictions put on Blonski's site, now, prior to development. 6. Residents want to know who is financially responsible for their moving costs. In addition, some of the homes couldn't be moved, if a zone change was approved. 7. Questions arose regarding a new state law which supposedly allows residents the first option to buy property when a mobile home park is sold. Staff will research this issue. 8. There was concern over a possible Amtrak station at the northeast corner of Palomar and Carlsbad Boulevard. One of the residents had read an article, in the San Diego Union, about the possibility of Amtrak establishing a station at -this location. Staff will research this. 9, Therle was concern over possible traffic congestion created by a hotel and the resulting security problem created by unauthorized vehicles entering the mobile home park. Staff informed the residents that this would be looked at when a definite development proposal was received for this site. It would be the developer's responsibility to resolve these issues as part of his development proposal. 10. Residents want the City to know they feel they are not tenants of the park, but are residents. They have a lot of monely invested in their homes, and want to stay where they are. 11. Concern was expressed over rising rents and possible rent control. Mayor Lewis responded to this question by asking the residents to contact the new Council and express their opin.ions to the Council (when five members have been seated) . Mr. Grimm concluded the meeting by thanking the residents for their interest and attendance. He asked them to come to a conclusion on what type of land use they would support on the Blonski property and notify the Planning Department of the results. Staff agreed to call them after he found out when the Seapointe project would go back to thee City Council for the second reading. This would probably occur around December 9th, 1986. AL:dm cc: Mayor Lewis Marty Orenyak Charlie Grimm Chuck French - Mike Howes -. r 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 lo l1 I.2 13 I.4 l5 I.6 I.7 18 I.g 2o 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e 0 OKDINANCE NO. 9820 AN OKDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 21 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 'IC" DATED JUNE 30, 1986 FOR PKOPERTY BOUNDED BY PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, INTERSTATE 5, POINSETTIA LANE AND CARLSBAD BOULEVARD, PLUS THE AKEA SOUTH OF POINSETTIA LANE GENERALLY KNOW AS PONTO. APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD CASE NO: zc-338 The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, Californ does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Cod1 amended by the amendment of a zoning map as shown on the ma marked ZC-338, Exhibit 'IC" attached hereto and made a part hereof. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall ce to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be publis least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days afte adoption. INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of I Carlsbad City Council held on the 4th day of November 1986, and thereafter /I// //I/ //I/ //I/ /I// I/// //I/ //I/ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said Cit Council held on the 22nd day of December , 1986, b] fol-lowing vote, to wit: -- AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine and Mamaux NOES: None ABSENT: None IO 11 l2 13 14 15 16 17 18 I/ Cc i.$*yy % T RANZ, City Clerk %IREN . KKTZ, Deputy City Clerk (SEAL) 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i -2- Chainge to (P-3) Challge to 0 NO CHANGE (P- 1) CHANGE TO- PM/O CHANGE TO RDM-Q CHANGE TO RDM-Q (P-4 1 Change to CT-Q/R PU-PUBLIC UTILI' M-INDUSTRIAL '2-1 -COMMERCIAL-] C-2 -COMMERC I AL-I: CT-Q-COMMERCIAL RD M-RE S I DENTIAL- RMHP-MOBILE HOMI R-1-10-SINGLE FI PC-PLANNED COMMl bty of Carlsbad SEAPOINTE CARLSBAD - $ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 n a m m 13 ow~ 141 '?E 5% 0) glL=z ZQWU e:<E 15 ;vzYi! I-ZU - z 00 16 $EaQ 20-: 55 $ 17 JO >-o I- 0 - RESOLUTION NO. 8874 A RELWLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSEAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMEh OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DEFIGNF TIONE FOR ONE AREA OF THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN GPA/LU 95-9 - ,SEAPOINTE CARLSBAD WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on August 13, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider an amendment to the Land Use Element of the Generi Gl?A/LU 85-9; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined tl this project will not have a significant impact on the environment and the City Council has concurred and a Negat Declaration was issued and approved in satisfaction of the requirements of the City of Carlsbad Environmental Protect Ordinance of 1980 and the California Environmental Quality and WHEREAS, the City Council did on November 4, 1986 duly advertised public hearing to consider said amendments that time received the recommendations, object ions, protes 221 23 24 25 26 directed the City Attorney to return with appropriate docu to allow the City Council to vote on the change individual part of one single amendment to the Land Use Element of tl ' General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counci 27 28 j the City of Carlsbad, California as follows: A. That the above recitations are true and corrt 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' m 13 2: vwa 14 %a 0, g-LL3z zoZa GEsg 15 ;:z< do zkg$ 16 orzm 17 gE 2 aa 0 >o k 0 m 0 B. That the findings of the Planning Commission 2 forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2587 (GPA/LU 85 constitute the findings of the City Council. C. That the Land Use Element of the General Plan amended as follows: 1. GPA/LU 85-9 SEAPOINTE CARLSBAD: To make a serj changes in the Land Use Element of the General Plan for approximately 340 acres of properties generally located in area covered by the Seapointe Carlsbad land use study as sE the map marked Exhibit B - June 30, 1986 attached hereto a1 a part hereof. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, held the 22nd day of December , 1986 by the follc vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine and Mamaux NOES: None ABSENT: None 25 26 27 28 1 i I INWPWPOSED GENmAL PLAf EXH (P-2) NO CHANG 6-3 CHANGE to 0 Change to PI10 NO CHANGE PI-PLANNED INDUSTRW; U-UTILITY METICE TS/C-TRAV& SEFWICES/~ RMH-RESIDEMCIAL MEDIWHIQ oS4PEN SPACE IINTE CARLSBAD 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 l1 l2 l3 14 l5 l6 17 l8 l9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 w 0 RESOLUTION NO. 8875 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM (LCP) AMENDMENT LCPA 86-2 (SEAPOINTE) WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad has received the cer Local Coastal Program (LC€') documents for that portion of tl Carlsbad Coastal Zone specified in California Public Resourl Code Section 30170(f) and 30171 (Mello Bills I and 11) from California Coastal Commission; and WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad has approved the cer LCP documents as amended in October, 1985; and WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad has considered a modification to the designated land uses in the area known q Seapointe, depicted on Exhibit A dated June 30, 1986 and at1 hereto; and WHEREAS, the proposed modifications to the LCP designated land uses are consistent with the provisions of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the amendmer found its provisions to be acceptable for administration as I policy; and WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad has determined that t proposed LCP amendment will not have any significant adverse impacts on the environment within the meaning of the Califor Environmental Quality Act. WHEREAS, the City is prepared to adopt necessary resolutions and ordinances to enable the City to receive LC1 "effective certification" pursuant to the LCP documents appr by the City; and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8 0 WHEREAS, the City intends and is prepared to issue Coastal Development Permits pursuant to the LCP documents wl amended as established herein and implemented by City resoli and ordinances; and WHEREAS, necessary public review of the proposed L( amendment has been provided by the City, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council the City of Carlsbad as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correc 2. That the City of Carlsbad is prepared to adopt appropriate local resolutions and ordinances the Local Coas Program Amendment which modifies the land use designations that portion'of the Coastal Zone specified in Exhibits B an1 dated June 30, 1986 attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. That subject to the approval of the California Coastal Commission the City of Carlsbad approves and is pre to administer and carry out the requirements and provisions the LCP as amended. 4. That the City Council directs the City Manager forward this resolution along with any other necessary docu as an application pursuant to Public Resources Code Section and 2 California Administrative Code Section 13551(b)(2) fo amendment to the Local Coastal Program for that portion of Coastal Zone specified in this resolution, and further, tha California Coastal Commission be requested to authorize certification, pursuant to California Administrative Code S 13544, of the Local Coastal Program as amended after the Ci adopted the necessary implementing ordinances and resolutio I -2- i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8 0 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California on the 22nd day of December , 1986 by the following vote to AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine and Mamaux NOES: None ABSENT: None ATTEST: AL THA L/RA&N&ANZ, City Clerk &EN R. KUNDTZ, Deputy City Clerk (SEAL) * I -3- EXH (P-2) NO CHANG 6-3 Change to PI10 NO CHANGE PI-PLANNED INDUSTRIAL U-VTILITY @OFFICE TS/C-TmV& SERVICES/~ M-EIDEMTIAL MEDIWHIG OS-oPrn SPACE EXHIE (p-2) NO CHANGE Change to OS (P-3) Change to 0 NO CHANGE CHANGE TO PM/O CHANGE TO RDM-Q CHANGE TO RDM-Q PU-PUBLIC UTILIT M- I-N D U S TR I AL C-2-COMMERCIAL-H RDM-RESIDENTIAL-] RMHP-MOBILE HOME R-1-10-SINGLE FAI PC-PLANNED COMMUI C-1-COMMERCIAL-L' CT-Q-COMMERCIAL Change to CT-Q/R 1 4 a \ 9 1. 1200 ELM AVENUE (( CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 Office of the City Clerk Qitp of Carlsbab December 31, 1986 Community Partners c/o O'Day Consultants 7750-28 El Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008 Enclosed for your records, please find a copy of the following , adopted by the Carlsbad City Council on Resolutions 8874 & 8875 and Ordinance 9820 December 22, 1986 dcee LEE RAUTENKRANZ fly City Clerk LR': IW Enclosures (3)