Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-02-17; City Council; 8893; 88934. I.. z I- o 0 Z El a .. z 0 5 a i 0 z 3 0 0 \~#m JITG. 02/17/87 I CIT'. 3F CARLSBAD - AGEND/-3ILL TITLE. RECOMMENDED PROJECTS FOR SANDAG'S 'LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SALES TAX, 1987 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, 1EPT.- I AND 1987 FEDERAL HIGHWAY ACT lcin MGR.~ RECOMMENDED ACTION: Review list of proposed projects for SANDAG's Local T r ansport at ion Sales Tax Proposal and 1987 Regional Transportation Improvement Program including FAU funded projects from the proposed 1987 Federal Highway Act. No formal Council action is required at this time. ITEM EXPLANATION: Staff submits for the City Council's review a status report on three (3) areas of potential funding sources for future City projects. SANDAG'S HALF-PERCENT (1/2X) SALES TAX PROPOSAL In a letter dated October 8, 1986, Mr. Lee F. Hultgren, Director of Transportation of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), requested a list of proposed Carlsbad projects to be funded by SANDAG's half percent (1/2%) sales tax proposal. The November, 1987 county-wide election will include a SANDAG sponsored half percent (1/2%) local sales tax ballot measure for local and regional transportation needs. Staff was requested to assemble a list of future Carlsbad projects qualified for this funding resource if available. Staff subsequently assembled and submitted on November 3, 1986 to SANDAG the following list of future projects: La Costa Avenue Widening, El Camino Real to 1-5 $ 6,000,000 Bridge over 1-5 at Palomar Airport Road 4,105,000 Bridge over 1-5 at La Costa Avenue 4,312,000 Bridge over 1-5 at Poinsettia Lane 4,000,000 Tamarack Avenue, Jefferson to Car lsb ad Boulevard Olivenhain Road Widening, Rancho Santa Fe Road to El Camino Real Bridge over ATSF Railroad at Palomar Ai rpo rt Road Bridge over ATSF Railroad at Poinsettia Lane 1,900,000 3,000,000 2,400,000 1,500,000 Total of Submitted Projects $27,217,000 Page Two of Agenda Bill No. SANDAG's estimate of Carlsbad's portion of the local street and road revenues generated by the proposed sales tax proposal for the twenty (20) year period through 2008 would be $17,570,000. This assumes a county-wide distribution formula of one-third (1/3) of all revenues designated for local streets and roads. Please reference attached Exhibit 1. SANDAG'S 1987 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM In a letter dated January 12, 1987 from Mr. Hultgren and Mr. Tom Larwin, General Manager of the Metropolitan Transit Development Board, SANDAG requested a list of proposed projects for the regional 1987 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Staff subsequently assembled and submitted on February 9, 1987 the following list of TIP projects: La Costa Avenue Widening, 1-5 to El Camino Real $6,000,000 - construction: $5,000,000 - engineering, inspection, right-of-way, environmental and administration: $1,000,000 Freeway Overpass at Palomar Airport Road and 1-5 4,105,000 - construction: $3,105,000 - engineering, inspection, environmental, City and CALTRANS administration: $1,000,000 Freeway Overpass at La Costa Avenue and 1-5 4,312,000 - construction: $3,312,000 - engineering, inspection, environmental, City and CALTRANS administration: $1,000,000 Freeway Overpass at Poinsettia Lane and 1-5 4,000,000 - construction: $3,000,000 - engineering, inspection, environmental, City and CALTRANS administration: $1,000,000 Tamarack Avenue, Jefferson to Carlsbad Boulevard 1,900,000 - construction: $1,500,000 - engineering, inspection, right-of-way, environmental and adminstration: $400,000 Railroad Overpass at Palomar Airport Road 2,400,000 - construction: $1,900,000 - engineering, inspection, right-of-way, environmental and administration: $500,000 Railroad Overpass at Poinsettia Lane 1,500,000 - construction: $1,000,000 - engineering, inspection, right-of-way, environmental and administration: $500,000 2 Page Three of Agenda Bill No. ggu The attached project description list (Exhibit 2, Table 1) for the 1987 regional TIP prioritizes the three (3) 1-5 freeway overpass projects and establishes the following recommended design and construction schedule: 1-5 and Palomar Airport Road - CALTRANS Project Study Report (PSR) and design engineering: 1987 - Begin Construction: 1988-89 1-5 and La Costa Avenue - CALTRANS Project Study Report (PSR) and design engineering: 1989 - Begin Construction: 1990-91 1-5 and Poinsettia Lane - CALTRANS Project Study Report (PSR) and design engineering: 1990 - Begin Construction: 1991-92 The above project lists have been assembled and were submitted to SANDAG for future planning purposes only. The freeway overpass project at 1-5 and Palomar Airport Road is currently being carried by both SANDAG for the regional TIP list and CALTRANS for the State TIP list. The City has the present ability to request CALTRANS begin the required Project Study Report (PSR) as a prelude to design and construction. Funding is the obligation of the City of Carlsbad. Staff is preparing a status report on this project to be reviewed by the City Council within thirty (30) days. 1987 FEDERAL HIGHWAY ACT (FAU FUNDED PROJECTS) The proposed four-year Federal Highway Act (1987 through 1990) is anticipated to be approved by Congress this Spring. Carlsbad is estimated to receive $112,992 of FAU funds per year for the next four (4) years yielding a total of $451,968. Additionally, Carlsbad's remaining uncommitted FAU fund balance from the 1982 Highway Act is $76,475. Therefore, Carlsbad's total allotment of available FAU funds is $528,443 at this time. Please reference attached Exhibit 2, Table 2. Carlsbad is obligated contractually with CALTRANS to complete Carlsbad Boulevard, Phase I1 from the bridge south to Cannon Road. This phase of the project is scheduled for construction immediately following the Labor Day holidays this coming S ep t ember. This project has been reviewed and approved by CALTRANS and has secured all necessary environmental agency permits. The City's commitment of its $528,443 FAU funds will 3 :- e Page Four of Agenda Bill No. 8893 complete this project with a minimum investment of other City funding sources. Staff is preparing a status report on this project to be reviewed by the Council within thirty (30) days. City Council directed changes, if any, to either the Local Transportation Sales Tax project list and the 1987 Transportation Improvement Program project list will be communicated to SANDAG by staff. FISCAL IMPACT: The submitted project lists were assembled for future planning purposes only. The City of Carlsbad retains the authority and obligation to prioritize, design, and secure funding sources for the future construction of these projects. The City Council has taken formal action on only one (1) future project submitted to SANDAG. The Council appropriated funds for the design of the La Costa Avenue Widening project in the 1985-86 fiscal budget which is nearj-ng completion of design. Funding for the construction of this project has not as yet been appropriated. The City's Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District is accumulating funds for the future construction of the 1-5 freeway overpasses at Palomar Airport Road, La Costa Avenue, and Poinsettia Lane, EXHIBITS: 1. SANDAG letter of October 8, 1986. 2. SANDAG letter of January 12, 1987. Y .... . ,. San Diego ASSOCHTIOX OF GOVERSILIESTS Suite 524, Security Pacific Plaza 1200 Third Avenue San Diego, California 92101 (61 91 236-5300 EXHIBIT 1 October 8, 1986 TO: Directors of Public Works - FAU Committee Members SUBJECT: List of Street and Road Projects for Sales Tax Proposal In July 1986, the SANDAG Board, acting as the San Diego County Regional Trans- portation Commission, approved the schedule for a November 1987 election on a local sales tax ballot measure for transportation. The schedule calls for the development of a draft Expenditure Plan and Ordinance by the end of November 1986. SANDAG staff is now working with CALTRANS and the transit agencies to refine the list of major state highway and transit projects to be included in the draft Expenditure Plan. Last June each jurisdiction was requested to identify those key local street and road projects having broad public support that could be identified for sales tax funding. We are now asking each agency to refine the local project lists for inclusion in the draft Expenditure Plan. The SANDAG Board has previously endorsed a 1/2% sales tan for twenty years with approximately 1/3 of the revenues for each of the three general categories of public transit, state highways, and local streets and roads. The attached table identifies the estimated amount of revenues each jurisdiction would receive for the local street and road category during the first year of the tax (FY 1989) and over a 5, 10, 15, and 20 year period. The present concept is to include in the Ex- penditure Plan a specific list of local street and road projects for each jurisdiction totaling as a minimum, the first five years of sales tax funding (5 Year Total, FY89-93). This five-year project listing would be used to help gain public support for the ballot measure by letting the voters know what projects will be built if the measure passes. There will be an implied commitment to construct those projects identified in the Expenditure Plan with sales tax revenues unless other revenue sources are subsequently identified for those projects or for some extraordinary reason (e.g., environmental, legal, etc.) the projects cannot proceed. In those cases the Sales Tax Ordinance will identify a process whereby local jurisdictions and the SANDAG Board can amend the Expenditure Plan following a public notifi- cationbearing process. The Ordinance will also specify how local projects will be identified for the remaining duration of the ballot measure (e.g., years 6 through 20 for a 20 year measure). That process will utilize the annual updates of each agency's 5- or 6-year Capital Improvement Program and SANDAG's 5-year Regional Transportation Improvement Program. provide a project list totaling up to the 20-year revenue estimate. The projects should be listed in priority order and identify each funding source separately for MEMBER AGENCIES: Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, ADVlSORY/LIAISON MEMBERS: California Department of Transportation, U.S.Department of Defense and Tijuana/Baja California Norte. National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Vista and County of San Diego. .c- multiple funded projects. The sales tax revenues are intended to be used for new projects that are not currently funded through other sources. To that extent do not include projects that are now part of an approved and funded capital improvement program or projects with other secured funding commitments. IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE PROJECT INFORMATION FORMS (FORM A) BE RETURNED TO SANDAG BY NOVEMBER 5,1986. The SANDAG Board is scheduled to accept a draft Expenditure Plan in December which will then undergo a public review period. Each City Council will likely consider and act on the draft Expenditure Plan at that time. If you have any questions, please call me or Bill Tuomi or Craig Scott of my staff at 236-5300. Sincerely, LEE F. HULT Director of Transportation LFH/BT/r w Attachments cc: City Manager M N * 8-l -m U .i E h v) eo t 4 I 4 Y ? d h m m 1 4 1 d Y 0 0 0 m e 4+ 0 0 8 m m * 0 0 0 m m €9 0, 0 0 In v) l-l # 0 0 0 m # =?? *i 2 QI 9 *- 6 9 l+ 9- Ni 9 4 M c, Id H Id E 0 M .r( 2 3 z 0 VI W VI 0 a & 3 PI a z z 4 a d 0 k * W E 2 E * W W 3 z w p: 3w .. Id 1 & 0 w W r: 0 0 h P a Q, Id U 0 Id & E! -5 04 d w U d " s E 4 2 2 $ 0 3 0 & a +I e, c, In " Id ii hi 2 CI Id a e, M Id e, d 3 a e, c Id E .C c, .- El a B c 0 Id 3 a .r( c, m !? c, & & 5 9 M E .r( h Id 7 H m 5 a e, Id a P4 5 e, P c, 2 B .- c, 3 P .r( h c, fn z z E e, 5 3 ; m d 0 8 .-( 69 e, 5 w 0 M c c 7 z 2 0 c, s a a a Id 0 G c, 2 E fn 4 U Id .. e, U z 7 San Diego ASSOCIATION OF Suite 524, Security Pacific Plaza 1200 Third Avenue San Diego, California 92101 (619) 236-5300 EXHIBIT 2 January 12, 1987 TO: City Managers/CAO SANDAG and PATDB Transportation Committees SUBJECT: 1987 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Project Submittals The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a five-year program of proposed major freeway and expressway, arterial, transit, bikeway, and aviation projects. Development of a Regional TIP and an MTDB area TIP is a requirement for t5e continued receipt of federal and state transportation funding. This letter describes the process for local agencies and transportation operators to submit projects into the draft 1957 Regional TI? and the FY88-92 MTDB area TIP. THE DEADLINE MAINING PROJECT SUBMITTALS TO SANDAG IS FEBRUAQY 13, 1987. FORTANSIT PROJECT SUBMITTALS TO SANDAG AND MTDB AND ALL PE- The 1987 TIP will contain a detailed listing describing major projects anticipated to be initiated between July 1, 1987 and June 30, 1989 and a priority program of projects for the succeeding three-year period from FY90 to FY92. Projects using the following categories of state and federal funding must be included in the TI?: Federal Highway Funds 1. Interstate (FAI, FIR) 2. Primary (FAP) 3. 85% Return 4. Urban (FAU) 5. Secondary (FAS) 6. Bridge Replacement (BR) 7. Hazard Elimination Safety Federal Transit Funds 8. UMTA Section 3 9. UhlTA Section 9 10. UMTA Section 16(b)(2) 11. UMTA Section 18 Bicvcle Funds 12. TDA Article 3 State Highway Account Funds 13. State Revenue (State Hwy. 14. Toll Bridge (SD-Coronado) 15. Projects only) Art. XIX Guideways (Prop. 5) State Transit Funds 16. 17. State Transit Assistance Fund 18. TP&D Transit Capital Improve m en t s ( T CI) TDA Articles 4, 4.5, and 8 (STA) Aviation Funds 19. Federal AIP Funds 20. State CAAP-A&D Funds MEMBER AGENCIES: Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach, Vista and County of San Diego. ADVISORY/LIAISON MEMBERS: California Department of Transportation, US. Department of Defense and TijuandBaja California Norte. F- It is also requested that any transportation project with a total construction cost of $250,000 or more be included in the TIP for information purposes. These would include locally funded projects as well as state and federally funded projects. Local Agency Projects Each local agency is responsible for the submittal of local highway projects and transit-related Federal .4id Urban (FAU) projects within its area. Local highway projects must be submitted on the attached Table 1 (TI? - Project Information Form). FAU transit projects must be submitted on the Transit Capital Project Form (Table 6) as described in the transit projects section. Send the completed project forms for all projects to SANDAG (-4ttention: Bill ruomi) and for the transit projects to MTDB (Attention: Dave Schumacher). The Transit General Managers Group will review all FAU transit project submittals and develop the final FAU transit program. Table 2 is the Federal Aid Urban (FAU) fund estimate for use in preparing t5e 1987 TIP. Each agency may submit FA'J projects up to the total amount shown on Table 2. The table includes each agency's FAU balance through the 1982 FIighway -4ct with an estimated annual funding for fiscal years FY87, 88, 89, 90, 91 & 92. Each agency may also "overprogram" FAU projects by up to 25% to account for project slippages and delays; however, the FAU funds may not exceed the TIP project ceiling shown on Table 2. All FAU funds will be identified as "Minor "rejects" unless an agency identifies specific projects for the funds. Transit Projects Each transit operator is responsible for completing the attached Operating Program form (Table 3). In addition to listing total TDA operating and capital funding (Lines 11 and 50, respectively), all operators should provide a breakdown of TDA funds %y jurisdiction. Use Lines 12-26 and 52-66 for this purpose. The capital funding section of Table 3 is also organized to indicate capital reserve account balances. Please keep in mind that capital reserve accounts can only be set up for specific projects. Funds not programmed for a specific project are consi3ered unallocated. Lines 50-86 should be used to indicate the funding sources of capital monies re- ceived during that particular fiscal year, the total of which is then reflected in Line 90. me sum total of all capital funds available for a given fiscal year should then be indicated in Line 93. Past year reserve monies should be shown in Line 91. To assist in the development of the TIP programs, Table 4 provides a list of improvements for the FY88-92 period discussed at the recent Short Range Dlan Workshop. These improvements are listed by priority using the 1-4 through 23 ranking scale. Table 4 will be mailed to all transit operators within the next week. Tables 5 and 6 reflect specific details regarding the operating and capital programs. Table 5 provides MTDR and SANDAG staffs with information regarding the major service change assumptions used for development of the operating program. ?hose operators planning capital expenditures during the FY 88-92 period should also complete the Transit Capital Program form (Table 6). If the purchase or rehahili- tation of buses is plhned, please also specify the bus size (number of seats), the presence or lack of air conditioning, wheelchair lift, farebox, and radio. Both the Operating and Capital Program forms should be submitted to MTDB and SAYDAG by Friday, February 13, 1987. 2 .. . Estimates of Transportation Development Act (TDA) fund availability by jurisdic- tion are shown in Table 7. These figures are based on projections of total taxable sales by SANDAG's Demographic and Economic Forecasting model (DEFM). The estimates should be used for planning purposes in developing submittals for the TIP. Each jurisdiction's assessment for funding of the regional transit system in the MTDB area has been incorporated into Table 7, so that the jurisdictional TDA estimates reflect the remaining funds available for local services. It should be noted that the FY88 estimate includes $2.1 million in surplus funds from FY86. These additional funds are due to actual sales tax receipts and interest earnings being higher than previous estimates. Estimates of State Transit Assistance (STA) funding are shown in Table 7. These figures are derived from the CTC's fund estimate which is based on projections of revenues from the sales tax on diesel fuel as the primary funding source for the STA program. UMTA Section 9 transit block grants fund estimates are given in Table 8. The estimates are based on the current FY87 appropriations bill which provided a total apportionment to the San 3iego region of $20,673,000 for operating and capital programs. Given the lack of policy direction at the federal level regarding future federal transit funding, a freeze on total Section 9 program appropriations has been assumed for the FY88-92 period. The current regional cap on operating funds of $8,236,000 is assumed to continue. Fixed-route transit operators are also requested to provide route-by-route infor- mation on various items as shown on Table 10. The information should be based on the first six months (or as many months as available) of FY87. This table should be filled out by all operators who do not provide all of this route-5y-route information in their monthly operating reports to MTDS. As a reminder, Urban Mass Transportation Administration policy states that there should be private sector participation in the transit planning and TIP development process. The policy requires that private operators have their views considered during the early stages of the planning process and in development of the TIP. Each operator expecting to receive federal transit operating or capital funds must ensure that the private sector is given the opportunity to participate in the TIP develop- ment process. Aviation and Bikeway Projects All aviation projects must be submitted to SANDAG (Attention: 3ill Tuomi) on the Division of Aeronautics - Project Evaluation Information Forms (DA-706, DA-706a, and DA-706b). Each airport operator has been provided detailed information for completing these forms. The TIP includes all Lindbergh Field projects as well as all general aviation airport projects. The bikeway projects are being separately developed by the SANDAG Bicycle Facilities Subcommittee. The bicycle committee includes a representative from each local agency. No separate submittal of bicycle projects is required for the draft TIP. 3 Local Transportation Sales Tax SANDAG, acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission, is proceeding with a November 1987 local sales tax ballot measure for transportation purposes. The proposed l/2% countywide sales tax would be allocated’for public transit, highway, and local street and road purposes. If approved by a majority vote in November 1987, the sales tax increase would take effect in April 1988. SAND.4G is currently developing an Expenditure Plan identifying specific transportation projects to be funded with sales tax revenues. Each local jurisdiction has been requested to prepare a list of local street and road improvements for sales tax funding. The 1987 TIP will - not include the proposed local transportation sales tax projects. The sales tax projects are being developed separately as the Expenditure Plan. If the sales tax ballot measure is approved in November 1987, the sales tax projects will be included in the 1988 TIP. TIP Review and Adoption Schedule The TIP must be adopted by May 1, 1987. As a result, the draft TIP will be distri- buted in March with adoption of the final TIP by MTDB and SANDAG scheduled during April. If you have any questions concerning the TIP procedures or project submittal forms, contact either Bill Tuomi (SANDAG) at 236-5369 or Dave Schumacher (MTDS) at 23 1-1466. Sincerely, LEE F. HULTGREN Director of Transportation, SAYDAG TOM LARWIN General Manager, MTDB Attachments 4 r-l W 2 4 I- - z c r- W> om x xx xx x xx x xx x 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 om ON 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 00 00 00 00 00 Od om 00 bLn mm Lno %on onon on? ?on o,o, ?on %on uu vu uu uu v- -- - -- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .. 00 om ON 00 00 00 00 00 00 Od 00 00 00 00 On? 0, 0, ma m ma Ln on wu WO wu wu wu wu uu d w w e4 u) 4 4 Jurisdiction Carlsbad Chula Vista Cor onado Del Mar El Cajon Enc i ni tas Escondido Imperial Beach La Mesa Lemon Grove National City Oceanside Poway San Diego San Harcos Santee Solana Beach Vista County (Uninc.) ------------ TABLE 2 1987 TRANSPORTATXON IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FEDERAL AID URBAN (FAU) FUND ESTIMATE San Diego Urbanized Area October 24, 1986 FAU Balance (1) 1982 FAU Act , .- 0 ----------- $76,475 $1,077,230 $84,435 $949 $7,986 $539,829 $95,397 $57,403 $28,228 $15,706 $233,996 $362,262 $6,461,131 $219,169 $268,571 $9,557 $1,454,641 --- --- FY87-92 Annual Estimate (2) ~ $112,992 $234,438 $60,041 $34,177 $172,191 $106,021 $168,326 $69,864 $118,237 $64,246 $124,760 $198,840 $93,322 $1,830,671 $62,633 $113,687 $50,206 $109,164 $561,184 1987 RTIP Project Ceiling (3) $943,034 $3,104,823 $555,851 $257,514 $1,301,415 $795,158 $1,937,231 $643,226 $958,531 $517,130 $955,333 $1,783,795 $1,152,743 $21,806,446 $743,709 $1,188,366 $376,545 $830,676 $6,027,181 Transit (15%) $1,352,637 $1,102,500 $7,967,637 CALTRANS (25%) --- $1,837,500 $11,025,000 Regional Carpool --- $125,000 $750,000 TOTAL : $12,345,602 $7,350,000 $65,621,343 ---------_-- NOTES: (1) FAU Fund Balances are the remaining unobligated (FNM Form 76 approved) FAU funds as of October 24, 1986. (2) Estimated future year FAU annual allocations. The FY86 actual FAU apportionment ($7,840,781) was reduced to $7,350,000 for FY87 and beyond to reflect the 6.25% reduction in nationwide FAU funding as proposed by Congress. (3) Haximum amount of FAU projects that may be submitted for the 1987 RTIP. Includes the FAU balance as of October 24, 1986, annual estimates for FY87,88,89,90,91,92, and a 25% over- programing limitation. The 25% overprogramming does not apply to CALTRANS, transit, or carpool allocations. (4) FAU fund distribution formula as approved by the FAU Advisory Committee on January 10, 1985. (5) Local agency fund distribution based on January 1, 1986 populatlon estimates. Encinitas and Solana Beach based on population estimates (1/1/85) from LAFCO. - vycracur I uate wmpiereo: rreparea uy: TABLE 3 .. __ FY 88-92 TRANSPORTATION IWROVEMENT PaQGRAn OPERATING PROGW (Page 1 of 2 IOPERATINC REVENUE ($000'~): I I I I10 Passenger Fares I I I I I I I operator: Date Completed: Prepared By: FY 88-92 TRANSPORTATION IHPROVEUENT PROGRAU OPERATING PROGRAU (Page 2 of 2) /CAPITAL FUNDING (SOOO'S) I 1st Year I 2nd Year 1 3rd Year I 4th Year 1 5th Year 1 I I FY 88 I FY 89 1 FY 90 I FY 91 1 FY 92 I J 3' TABLE 4 M88-92 Short Range Plan Workshop Transit Improvements NOTE: TO BE SEiNT OUT WOER SEPERAE COVER .. .. .. * e 0 & a a 0 & a m .. a Q, u Q, E 0 u a U m P clw e- --- d --- --- --- --- a c r( C L 0 U 2 u a 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 3 I -- I -- ......................... 31 I I n.1 .I u1 01 -31 I > I -- I -- --------_-_-_---_-_------ -1 I Id1 I I 4m I L,I VI In1 WI I ni I I I I I I I I 1 I I OD0 du) d VI 0 m (v cn 9 - 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 to Q) 9 9 0 0 0 0 4 N v) m v, . II 0 0 0 0 W a0 0 Y) v, - 0 0 0 0 w N OD cy W 0 0 0 0 43 4 W w v, 0 0 0 0 0 m rg w v) d a: C.l 0 m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ir3 la 14 I ma I am I *- I =-I I I CQ I om wo QD 4 (v 4 N v, 00004a 000mWm OO4ONa m ll 0 N 0 N v) 4 10 w U : -d U In W ooo-~m ooocoooI oo-ImLnm I I I I 001 COI I *I LsI I 1 I I I I I I I hl a1 I *I Ll I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I el 01 .d I UI VI -4 I VI tnl -41 &I 31 I I I I I I I 1 "1 ooomhb OOOOOrn oommm~ - LE to. m Q) W P; 0 a a 4 .. .. s 2 0 5 o V h u H -4 m I 3 2 cn I 0 d m P I 4 E i 0 V I Q C 3 Lk M m 0 Q Q E 0 & 0 U I sl Y c 1 0 V 1s hC EO 3V 0 V U ua d m C 0 -4 Y (d z Q, Q) Y C a VJ I a n CI X .. TABLE 8 STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE (STA) FORMULA FUND ESTIMATE* (0 00's) FY88 FY89 FY 90 FY91 FY 92 Regional Discretionary Monies - SANDAG - MTDB Operator Formula Monies County El Cajon La Mesa Lemon Grove National City NCTD San Diego Transit San Diego Trolley SCOOT Strand Express $461 $495 $545 $604 $697 1,394 1,495 1,648 1,825 2,106 6 1 1 .3 3 45 144 52 6 6 6 2 2 .3 3 48 154 56 7 7 7 2 2 .3 3 53 170 62 8 8 8 2 2 .4 3 58 188 68 8 8 9 2 2 .5 4 67 217 79 10 10 *Estimates based on CALTRANS, Proposed Fund Estimate for Developing the 1987 STIP, October 1986. TABLE 9 UMTA SECTION 9 PROGRAM FUND ESTIMATES* (00 0 'SI Operatinp Funds - San Diego Transit $5,765 $5,765 $5,765 $5,765 $5,765 - North County Transit 2,47 1 2,471 2,471 * 2,471 2,471 District Capital Funds 12,437 12,437 12,437 12,437 12,437 TOTAL $20,673 $20,673 $20,673 $20,673 $20,673 *Based on FY87 appropriations bill. Operating fund cap of $8,236,000 assumed to con- tinue through the five-year period - SDTC/NCTD split based on FY87 Section 9 operating fund distribution (70%/30%). Total Section 9 funding levels assumed to remain at FY87 levels. L, 0 Y 51 m c Y E: 0 E I, 0 W a Y 2 CTI CI 4- I auu I Umml OLOl *OV I a1 01 I I I I Q)I CUI WH I >-, I ox I --- 3m1