HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-02-17; City Council; 8893; 88934.
I..
z
I- o
0 Z
El
a
.. z 0 5 a
i 0 z 3 0 0
\~#m
JITG. 02/17/87
I
CIT'. 3F CARLSBAD - AGEND/-3ILL
TITLE. RECOMMENDED PROJECTS FOR SANDAG'S
'LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SALES TAX, 1987
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM,
1EPT.- I AND 1987 FEDERAL HIGHWAY ACT lcin MGR.~
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Review list of proposed projects for SANDAG's Local
T r ansport at ion Sales Tax Proposal and 1987 Regional
Transportation Improvement Program including FAU funded projects
from the proposed 1987 Federal Highway Act. No formal Council
action is required at this time.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
Staff submits for the City Council's review a status report on
three (3) areas of potential funding sources for future City
projects.
SANDAG'S HALF-PERCENT (1/2X) SALES TAX PROPOSAL
In a letter dated October 8, 1986, Mr. Lee F. Hultgren, Director
of Transportation of the San Diego Association of Governments
(SANDAG), requested a list of proposed Carlsbad projects to be
funded by SANDAG's half percent (1/2%) sales tax proposal. The
November, 1987 county-wide election will include a SANDAG
sponsored half percent (1/2%) local sales tax ballot measure for
local and regional transportation needs. Staff was requested to
assemble a list of future Carlsbad projects qualified for this
funding resource if available. Staff subsequently assembled and
submitted on November 3, 1986 to SANDAG the following list of
future projects:
La Costa Avenue Widening,
El Camino Real to 1-5
$ 6,000,000
Bridge over 1-5 at Palomar Airport Road 4,105,000
Bridge over 1-5 at La Costa Avenue 4,312,000
Bridge over 1-5 at Poinsettia Lane 4,000,000
Tamarack Avenue, Jefferson to
Car lsb ad Boulevard
Olivenhain Road Widening, Rancho Santa
Fe Road to El Camino Real
Bridge over ATSF Railroad at Palomar Ai rpo rt Road
Bridge over ATSF Railroad at Poinsettia Lane
1,900,000
3,000,000
2,400,000
1,500,000
Total of Submitted Projects $27,217,000
Page Two of Agenda Bill No.
SANDAG's estimate of Carlsbad's portion of the local street and
road revenues generated by the proposed sales tax proposal for
the twenty (20) year period through 2008 would be $17,570,000.
This assumes a county-wide distribution formula of one-third
(1/3) of all revenues designated for local streets and roads.
Please reference attached Exhibit 1.
SANDAG'S 1987 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
In a letter dated January 12, 1987 from Mr. Hultgren and Mr. Tom
Larwin, General Manager of the Metropolitan Transit Development
Board, SANDAG requested a list of proposed projects for the
regional 1987 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Staff
subsequently assembled and submitted on February 9, 1987 the
following list of TIP projects:
La Costa Avenue Widening, 1-5 to El Camino Real $6,000,000 - construction: $5,000,000 - engineering, inspection, right-of-way,
environmental and administration: $1,000,000
Freeway Overpass at Palomar Airport Road and 1-5 4,105,000 - construction: $3,105,000 - engineering, inspection, environmental,
City and CALTRANS administration: $1,000,000
Freeway Overpass at La Costa Avenue and 1-5 4,312,000 - construction: $3,312,000 - engineering, inspection, environmental,
City and CALTRANS administration: $1,000,000
Freeway Overpass at Poinsettia Lane and 1-5 4,000,000 - construction: $3,000,000 - engineering, inspection, environmental,
City and CALTRANS administration: $1,000,000
Tamarack Avenue, Jefferson to Carlsbad Boulevard 1,900,000 - construction: $1,500,000 - engineering, inspection, right-of-way,
environmental and adminstration: $400,000
Railroad Overpass at Palomar Airport Road 2,400,000 - construction: $1,900,000 - engineering, inspection, right-of-way,
environmental and administration: $500,000
Railroad Overpass at Poinsettia Lane 1,500,000 - construction: $1,000,000 - engineering, inspection, right-of-way,
environmental and administration: $500,000
2
Page Three of Agenda Bill No. ggu
The attached project description list (Exhibit 2, Table 1) for
the 1987 regional TIP prioritizes the three (3) 1-5 freeway
overpass projects and establishes the following recommended
design and construction schedule:
1-5 and Palomar Airport Road
- CALTRANS Project Study Report (PSR) and design engineering: 1987 - Begin Construction: 1988-89
1-5 and La Costa Avenue
- CALTRANS Project Study Report (PSR) and design engineering: 1989 - Begin Construction: 1990-91
1-5 and Poinsettia Lane
- CALTRANS Project Study Report (PSR) and design engineering: 1990 - Begin Construction: 1991-92
The above project lists have been assembled and were submitted to
SANDAG for future planning purposes only.
The freeway overpass project at 1-5 and Palomar Airport Road is
currently being carried by both SANDAG for the regional TIP list
and CALTRANS for the State TIP list. The City has the present
ability to request CALTRANS begin the required Project Study
Report (PSR) as a prelude to design and construction. Funding is
the obligation of the City of Carlsbad. Staff is preparing a
status report on this project to be reviewed by the City Council
within thirty (30) days.
1987 FEDERAL HIGHWAY ACT (FAU FUNDED PROJECTS)
The proposed four-year Federal Highway Act (1987 through 1990) is
anticipated to be approved by Congress this Spring. Carlsbad is
estimated to receive $112,992 of FAU funds per year for the next
four (4) years yielding a total of $451,968. Additionally,
Carlsbad's remaining uncommitted FAU fund balance from the 1982
Highway Act is $76,475. Therefore, Carlsbad's total allotment of
available FAU funds is $528,443 at this time. Please reference
attached Exhibit 2, Table 2.
Carlsbad is obligated contractually with CALTRANS to complete
Carlsbad Boulevard, Phase I1 from the bridge south to Cannon
Road. This phase of the project is scheduled for construction
immediately following the Labor Day holidays this coming S ep t ember. This project has been reviewed and approved by
CALTRANS and has secured all necessary environmental agency
permits. The City's commitment of its $528,443 FAU funds will
3
:-
e
Page Four of Agenda Bill No. 8893
complete this project with a minimum investment of other City
funding sources. Staff is preparing a status report on this
project to be reviewed by the Council within thirty (30) days.
City Council directed changes, if any, to either the Local
Transportation Sales Tax project list and the 1987 Transportation
Improvement Program project list will be communicated to SANDAG
by staff.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The submitted project lists were assembled for future planning
purposes only. The City of Carlsbad retains the authority and
obligation to prioritize, design, and secure funding sources for
the future construction of these projects. The City Council has
taken formal action on only one (1) future project submitted to
SANDAG. The Council appropriated funds for the design of the La
Costa Avenue Widening project in the 1985-86 fiscal budget which
is nearj-ng completion of design. Funding for the construction of
this project has not as yet been appropriated.
The City's Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District is
accumulating funds for the future construction of the 1-5 freeway
overpasses at Palomar Airport Road, La Costa Avenue, and
Poinsettia Lane,
EXHIBITS:
1. SANDAG letter of October 8, 1986.
2. SANDAG letter of January 12, 1987.
Y
.... . ,.
San Diego
ASSOCHTIOX OF
GOVERSILIESTS
Suite 524, Security Pacific Plaza
1200 Third Avenue
San Diego, California 92101
(61 91 236-5300
EXHIBIT 1
October 8, 1986
TO: Directors of Public Works - FAU Committee Members
SUBJECT: List of Street and Road Projects for Sales Tax Proposal
In July 1986, the SANDAG Board, acting as the San Diego County Regional Trans-
portation Commission, approved the schedule for a November 1987 election on a
local sales tax ballot measure for transportation. The schedule calls for the
development of a draft Expenditure Plan and Ordinance by the end of November 1986. SANDAG staff is now working with CALTRANS and the transit agencies to
refine the list of major state highway and transit projects to be included in the
draft Expenditure Plan. Last June each jurisdiction was requested to identify
those key local street and road projects having broad public support that could be
identified for sales tax funding. We are now asking each agency to refine the
local project lists for inclusion in the draft Expenditure Plan.
The SANDAG Board has previously endorsed a 1/2% sales tan for twenty years
with approximately 1/3 of the revenues for each of the three general categories of
public transit, state highways, and local streets and roads. The attached table
identifies the estimated amount of revenues each jurisdiction would receive for
the local street and road category during the first year of the tax (FY 1989) and
over a 5, 10, 15, and 20 year period. The present concept is to include in the Ex-
penditure Plan a specific list of local street and road projects for each jurisdiction
totaling as a minimum, the first five years of sales tax funding (5 Year Total, FY89-93). This five-year project listing would be used to help gain public support
for the ballot measure by letting the voters know what projects will be built if the
measure passes. There will be an implied commitment to construct those projects
identified in the Expenditure Plan with sales tax revenues unless other revenue
sources are subsequently identified for those projects or for some extraordinary
reason (e.g., environmental, legal, etc.) the projects cannot proceed. In those
cases the Sales Tax Ordinance will identify a process whereby local jurisdictions
and the SANDAG Board can amend the Expenditure Plan following a public notifi-
cationbearing process. The Ordinance will also specify how local projects will be
identified for the remaining duration of the ballot measure (e.g., years 6 through
20 for a 20 year measure). That process will utilize the annual updates of each
agency's 5- or 6-year Capital Improvement Program and SANDAG's 5-year
Regional Transportation Improvement Program.
provide a project list totaling up to the 20-year revenue estimate. The projects
should be listed in priority order and identify each funding source separately for
MEMBER AGENCIES: Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, Lemon Grove,
ADVlSORY/LIAISON MEMBERS: California Department of Transportation, U.S.Department of Defense and Tijuana/Baja California Norte. National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Vista and County of San Diego.
.c-
multiple funded projects. The sales tax revenues are intended to be used for new
projects that are not currently funded through other sources. To that extent do
not include projects that are now part of an approved and funded capital improvement program or projects with other secured funding commitments. IT IS
IMPORTANT THAT THE PROJECT INFORMATION FORMS (FORM A) BE
RETURNED TO SANDAG BY NOVEMBER 5,1986.
The SANDAG Board is scheduled to accept a draft Expenditure Plan in December
which will then undergo a public review period. Each City Council will likely
consider and act on the draft Expenditure Plan at that time.
If you have any questions, please call me or Bill Tuomi or Craig Scott of my staff
at 236-5300.
Sincerely,
LEE F. HULT
Director of Transportation
LFH/BT/r w
Attachments
cc: City Manager
M
N * 8-l
-m U
.i E
h v) eo t 4 I 4 Y
? d
h m m 1 4 1 d Y
0 0
0 m e 4+
0 0 8 m m *
0 0
0 m m €9
0,
0 0
In
v) l-l #
0 0
0 m #
=??
*i
2 QI
9 *-
6 9 l+
9-
Ni
9 4
M
c, Id
H Id E 0
M .r(
2
3 z 0
VI W VI 0 a & 3 PI a
z z 4
a
d 0 k * W
E
2 E *
W
W 3 z w
p: 3w
.. Id
1
& 0 w
W r:
0
0
h P a Q,
Id U 0
Id
&
E!
-5
04 d
w
U
d "
s E
4 2
2
$
0 3 0 &
a
+I e,
c, In " Id ii
hi
2 CI Id a
e, M Id e, d 3 a e, c
Id
E
.C
c, .- El a B c 0
Id
3
a
.r( c,
m
!?
c,
& & 5
9
M E .r(
h
Id 7
H m
5 a e,
Id a
P4 5
e, P
c,
2
B
.- c, 3 P .r( h c, fn z
z
E
e, 5
3
;
m
d 0 8
.-( 69
e, 5
w 0
M c
c 7
z
2
0 c, s a a a Id
0 G
c,
2 E
fn 4
U Id
.. e, U z
7
San Diego
ASSOCIATION OF
Suite 524, Security Pacific Plaza
1200 Third Avenue
San Diego, California 92101
(619) 236-5300
EXHIBIT 2
January 12, 1987
TO: City Managers/CAO
SANDAG and PATDB Transportation Committees
SUBJECT: 1987 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Project Submittals
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a five-year program of proposed
major freeway and expressway, arterial, transit, bikeway, and aviation projects.
Development of a Regional TIP and an MTDB area TIP is a requirement for t5e
continued receipt of federal and state transportation funding. This letter describes
the process for local agencies and transportation operators to submit projects into
the draft 1957 Regional TI? and the FY88-92 MTDB area TIP. THE DEADLINE
MAINING PROJECT SUBMITTALS TO SANDAG IS FEBRUAQY 13, 1987.
FORTANSIT PROJECT SUBMITTALS TO SANDAG AND MTDB AND ALL PE-
The 1987 TIP will contain a detailed listing describing major projects anticipated to
be initiated between July 1, 1987 and June 30, 1989 and a priority program of
projects for the succeeding three-year period from FY90 to FY92. Projects using
the following categories of state and federal funding must be included in the TI?:
Federal Highway Funds
1. Interstate (FAI, FIR)
2. Primary (FAP)
3. 85% Return
4. Urban (FAU)
5. Secondary (FAS) 6. Bridge Replacement (BR) 7. Hazard Elimination Safety
Federal Transit Funds
8. UMTA Section 3
9. UhlTA Section 9
10. UMTA Section 16(b)(2)
11. UMTA Section 18
Bicvcle Funds
12. TDA Article 3
State Highway Account Funds
13. State Revenue (State Hwy.
14. Toll Bridge (SD-Coronado)
15.
Projects only)
Art. XIX Guideways (Prop. 5)
State Transit Funds
16. 17. State Transit Assistance Fund
18. TP&D Transit Capital
Improve m en t s ( T CI)
TDA Articles 4, 4.5, and 8
(STA)
Aviation Funds
19. Federal AIP Funds
20. State CAAP-A&D Funds
MEMBER AGENCIES: Cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa,
Lemon Grove, National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach, Vista and County of San Diego.
ADVISORY/LIAISON MEMBERS: California Department of Transportation, US. Department of Defense and TijuandBaja California Norte. F-
It is also requested that any transportation project with a total construction cost of
$250,000 or more be included in the TIP for information purposes. These would include locally funded projects as well as state and federally funded projects.
Local Agency Projects
Each local agency is responsible for the submittal of local highway projects and
transit-related Federal .4id Urban (FAU) projects within its area. Local highway
projects must be submitted on the attached Table 1 (TI? - Project Information
Form). FAU transit projects must be submitted on the Transit Capital Project
Form (Table 6) as described in the transit projects section. Send the completed
project forms for all projects to SANDAG (-4ttention: Bill ruomi) and for the
transit projects to MTDB (Attention: Dave Schumacher). The Transit General
Managers Group will review all FAU transit project submittals and develop the final
FAU transit program.
Table 2 is the Federal Aid Urban (FAU) fund estimate for use in preparing t5e 1987
TIP. Each agency may submit FA'J projects up to the total amount shown on Table
2. The table includes each agency's FAU balance through the 1982 FIighway -4ct
with an estimated annual funding for fiscal years FY87, 88, 89, 90, 91 & 92. Each
agency may also "overprogram" FAU projects by up to 25% to account for project
slippages and delays; however, the FAU funds may not exceed the TIP project
ceiling shown on Table 2. All FAU funds will be identified as "Minor "rejects"
unless an agency identifies specific projects for the funds.
Transit Projects
Each transit operator is responsible for completing the attached Operating Program
form (Table 3). In addition to listing total TDA operating and capital funding (Lines
11 and 50, respectively), all operators should provide a breakdown of TDA funds %y
jurisdiction. Use Lines 12-26 and 52-66 for this purpose. The capital funding
section of Table 3 is also organized to indicate capital reserve account balances.
Please keep in mind that capital reserve accounts can only be set up for specific
projects. Funds not programmed for a specific project are consi3ered unallocated.
Lines 50-86 should be used to indicate the funding sources of capital monies re-
ceived during that particular fiscal year, the total of which is then reflected in Line
90. me sum total of all
capital funds available for a given fiscal year should then be indicated in Line 93.
Past year reserve monies should be shown in Line 91.
To assist in the development of the TIP programs, Table 4 provides a list of
improvements for the FY88-92 period discussed at the recent Short Range Dlan
Workshop. These improvements are listed by priority using the 1-4 through 23
ranking scale. Table 4 will be mailed to all transit operators within the next week.
Tables 5 and 6 reflect specific details regarding the operating and capital programs.
Table 5 provides MTDR and SANDAG staffs with information regarding the major
service change assumptions used for development of the operating program. ?hose
operators planning capital expenditures during the FY 88-92 period should also
complete the Transit Capital Program form (Table 6). If the purchase or rehahili-
tation of buses is plhned, please also specify the bus size (number of seats), the
presence or lack of air conditioning, wheelchair lift, farebox, and radio. Both the
Operating and Capital Program forms should be submitted to MTDB and SAYDAG
by Friday, February 13, 1987.
2
.. .
Estimates of Transportation Development Act (TDA) fund availability by jurisdic- tion are shown in Table 7. These figures are based on projections of total taxable
sales by SANDAG's Demographic and Economic Forecasting model (DEFM). The
estimates should be used for planning purposes in developing submittals for the
TIP. Each jurisdiction's assessment for funding of the regional transit system in the
MTDB area has been incorporated into Table 7, so that the jurisdictional TDA
estimates reflect the remaining funds available for local services. It should be
noted that the FY88 estimate includes $2.1 million in surplus funds from FY86.
These additional funds are due to actual sales tax receipts and interest earnings
being higher than previous estimates.
Estimates of State Transit Assistance (STA) funding are shown in Table 7. These
figures are derived from the CTC's fund estimate which is based on projections of
revenues from the sales tax on diesel fuel as the primary funding source for the
STA program.
UMTA Section 9 transit block grants fund estimates are given in Table 8. The estimates are based on the current FY87 appropriations bill which provided a total
apportionment to the San 3iego region of $20,673,000 for operating and capital
programs. Given the lack of policy direction at the federal level regarding future
federal transit funding, a freeze on total Section 9 program appropriations has been
assumed for the FY88-92 period. The current regional cap on operating funds of
$8,236,000 is assumed to continue.
Fixed-route transit operators are also requested to provide route-by-route infor-
mation on various items as shown on Table 10. The information should be based on
the first six months (or as many months as available) of FY87. This table should be
filled out by all operators who do not provide all of this route-5y-route information
in their monthly operating reports to MTDS.
As a reminder, Urban Mass Transportation Administration policy states that there
should be private sector participation in the transit planning and TIP development
process. The policy requires that private operators have their views considered
during the early stages of the planning process and in development of the TIP. Each
operator expecting to receive federal transit operating or capital funds must ensure
that the private sector is given the opportunity to participate in the TIP develop-
ment process.
Aviation and Bikeway Projects
All aviation projects must be submitted to SANDAG (Attention: 3ill Tuomi) on the
Division of Aeronautics - Project Evaluation Information Forms (DA-706, DA-706a,
and DA-706b). Each airport operator has been provided detailed information for
completing these forms. The TIP includes all Lindbergh Field projects as well as all
general aviation airport projects.
The bikeway projects are being separately developed by the SANDAG Bicycle
Facilities Subcommittee. The bicycle committee includes a representative from
each local agency. No separate submittal of bicycle projects is required for the
draft TIP.
3
Local Transportation Sales Tax
SANDAG, acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission, is
proceeding with a November 1987 local sales tax ballot measure for transportation
purposes. The proposed l/2% countywide sales tax would be allocated’for public
transit, highway, and local street and road purposes. If approved by a majority vote
in November 1987, the sales tax increase would take effect in April 1988. SAND.4G
is currently developing an Expenditure Plan identifying specific transportation
projects to be funded with sales tax revenues. Each local jurisdiction has been
requested to prepare a list of local street and road improvements for sales tax
funding.
The 1987 TIP will - not include the proposed local transportation sales tax projects.
The sales tax projects are being developed separately as the Expenditure Plan. If
the sales tax ballot measure is approved in November 1987, the sales tax projects
will be included in the 1988 TIP.
TIP Review and Adoption Schedule
The TIP must be adopted by May 1, 1987. As a result, the draft TIP will be distri-
buted in March with adoption of the final TIP by MTDB and SANDAG scheduled
during April.
If you have any questions concerning the TIP procedures or project submittal forms,
contact either Bill Tuomi (SANDAG) at 236-5369 or Dave Schumacher (MTDS) at
23 1-1466.
Sincerely,
LEE F. HULTGREN
Director of Transportation, SAYDAG
TOM LARWIN
General Manager, MTDB
Attachments
4
r-l
W 2
4 I-
-
z
c
r-
W> om
x xx
xx x
xx x
xx x
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00 om ON 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 00 00 00 00 00 Od om 00 bLn mm Lno
%on onon on? ?on o,o, ?on %on
uu vu uu uu v- -- - --
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ..
00 om ON 00 00 00 00 00 00 Od 00 00 00 00
On? 0, 0, ma m ma Ln on
wu WO wu wu wu wu uu
d w w e4 u) 4 4
Jurisdiction
Carlsbad Chula Vista Cor onado Del Mar El Cajon
Enc i ni tas
Escondido
Imperial Beach
La Mesa Lemon Grove National City Oceanside Poway
San Diego
San Harcos
Santee
Solana Beach Vista County (Uninc.)
------------
TABLE 2
1987 TRANSPORTATXON IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FEDERAL AID URBAN (FAU) FUND ESTIMATE
San Diego Urbanized Area
October 24, 1986
FAU Balance (1)
1982 FAU Act
, .- 0
-----------
$76,475 $1,077,230
$84,435 $949
$7,986
$539,829
$95,397
$57,403
$28,228
$15,706
$233,996 $362,262
$6,461,131
$219,169
$268,571
$9,557 $1,454,641
---
---
FY87-92
Annual Estimate (2)
~
$112,992 $234,438 $60,041
$34,177
$172,191
$106,021
$168,326
$69,864
$118,237
$64,246
$124,760
$198,840 $93,322 $1,830,671
$62,633 $113,687
$50,206
$109,164 $561,184
1987 RTIP
Project
Ceiling (3)
$943,034 $3,104,823 $555,851 $257,514 $1,301,415
$795,158 $1,937,231 $643,226
$958,531 $517,130 $955,333 $1,783,795 $1,152,743 $21,806,446
$743,709
$1,188,366
$376,545
$830,676
$6,027,181
Transit (15%) $1,352,637 $1,102,500 $7,967,637 CALTRANS (25%) --- $1,837,500 $11,025,000 Regional Carpool --- $125,000 $750,000
TOTAL : $12,345,602 $7,350,000 $65,621,343
---------_--
NOTES: (1) FAU Fund Balances are the remaining unobligated (FNM Form 76
approved) FAU funds as of October 24, 1986.
(2) Estimated future year FAU annual allocations. The FY86 actual FAU apportionment ($7,840,781) was reduced to
$7,350,000 for FY87 and beyond to reflect the 6.25% reduction
in nationwide FAU funding as proposed by Congress.
(3) Haximum amount of FAU projects that may be submitted for the
1987 RTIP. Includes the FAU balance as of October 24, 1986,
annual estimates for FY87,88,89,90,91,92, and a 25% over- programing limitation. The 25% overprogramming does not
apply to CALTRANS, transit, or carpool allocations.
(4) FAU fund distribution formula as approved by the FAU Advisory
Committee on January 10, 1985.
(5) Local agency fund distribution based on January 1, 1986
populatlon estimates. Encinitas and Solana Beach based on
population estimates (1/1/85) from LAFCO.
- vycracur I uate wmpiereo: rreparea uy:
TABLE 3 .. __ FY 88-92 TRANSPORTATION IWROVEMENT PaQGRAn OPERATING PROGW (Page 1 of 2
IOPERATINC REVENUE ($000'~): I I I I10 Passenger Fares I
I I I I I I
operator: Date Completed: Prepared By:
FY 88-92 TRANSPORTATION IHPROVEUENT PROGRAU OPERATING PROGRAU (Page 2 of 2)
/CAPITAL FUNDING (SOOO'S) I 1st Year I 2nd Year 1 3rd Year I 4th Year 1 5th Year 1 I I FY 88 I FY 89 1 FY 90 I FY 91 1 FY 92 I
J 3'
TABLE 4
M88-92 Short Range Plan Workshop
Transit Improvements
NOTE: TO BE SEiNT OUT WOER SEPERAE COVER
..
.. .. *
e 0 & a a 0 & a
m
.. a Q, u
Q,
E 0 u
a U m P
clw
e-
---
d ---
---
---
---
a c
r( C
L 0 U 2 u a 0
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
1 I
I I 3 I -- I -- ......................... 31 I I n.1 .I
u1 01 -31 I > I -- I -- --------_-_-_---_-_------ -1 I Id1 I I 4m I
L,I VI In1 WI
I ni
I I I I I I I I 1 I I
OD0 du) d
VI 0 m
(v cn
9
-
0 0 0
0 N 0
0 to
Q)
9
9
0 0 0
0 4 N
v) m v,
.
II
0 0 0
0 W a0
0
Y) v,
-
0 0 0
0 w N
OD cy W
0 0 0
0 43 4
W w v,
0 0 0
0 0 m
rg w v)
d a: C.l 0 m
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ir3 la 14
I ma I am I *- I =-I I I CQ I om
wo
QD
4
(v 4
N v,
00004a 000mWm OO4ONa
m
ll 0
N
0
N
v)
4
10 w U : -d U In W
ooo-~m ooocoooI oo-ImLnm
I I I I 001 COI I *I LsI I 1 I I I I I I I
hl a1 I *I Ll I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I el 01 .d I UI VI -4 I VI tnl -41 &I 31
I I I I I I I 1
"1
ooomhb OOOOOrn oommm~
- LE to. m
Q) W
P; 0 a a 4
..
.. s 2 0 5
o
V h u
H
-4 m
I
3 2 cn
I
0 d
m P
I
4 E i 0
V
I
Q C 3 Lk
M m
0 Q Q E 0 & 0 U
I
sl Y c 1 0 V
1s
hC
EO 3V 0 V
U
ua
d m C 0 -4 Y
(d z
Q, Q) Y C a VJ
I
a n CI X
..
TABLE 8
STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE (STA) FORMULA FUND ESTIMATE*
(0 00's)
FY88 FY89 FY 90 FY91 FY 92
Regional Discretionary Monies
- SANDAG - MTDB
Operator Formula Monies
County
El Cajon
La Mesa
Lemon Grove
National City
NCTD
San Diego Transit
San Diego Trolley
SCOOT
Strand Express
$461 $495 $545 $604 $697
1,394 1,495 1,648 1,825 2,106
6
1
1
.3
3
45
144
52
6
6
6
2
2
.3
3
48
154
56
7
7
7
2
2
.3
3
53
170
62
8
8
8
2
2
.4
3
58
188 68
8
8
9
2
2
.5
4
67
217
79
10
10
*Estimates based on CALTRANS, Proposed Fund Estimate for Developing the 1987 STIP,
October 1986.
TABLE 9
UMTA SECTION 9 PROGRAM FUND ESTIMATES*
(00 0 'SI
Operatinp Funds
- San Diego Transit $5,765 $5,765 $5,765 $5,765 $5,765 - North County Transit 2,47 1 2,471 2,471 * 2,471 2,471
District
Capital Funds 12,437 12,437 12,437 12,437 12,437
TOTAL $20,673 $20,673 $20,673 $20,673 $20,673
*Based on FY87 appropriations bill. Operating fund cap of $8,236,000 assumed to con-
tinue through the five-year period - SDTC/NCTD split based on FY87 Section 9 operating
fund distribution (70%/30%). Total Section 9 funding levels assumed to remain at FY87
levels.
L, 0 Y 51
m c Y E: 0 E
I, 0 W
a Y 2
CTI CI
4- I auu I Umml OLOl *OV I a1 01 I I I I Q)I
CUI WH I >-, I ox I
---
3m1