HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-04-14; City Council; 8961; Batiquitos LagoonOF CARLSBAD — AGENt 3ILL 7 3
4/14/87
PEPT CM
FITLE:
BATIQUITOS LAGOON
DEPT. HP. ^
CITY AT
CITY MGR.
Oa:o_O.
<C
Og<
_J
O
OO
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt Resolution No. 7Pel 3. approving agreement with City of
Los Angeles for preparation of preliminary engineering studies for
Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Plan.
BACKGROUND:
Port of Los Angeles has agreed to pay $450,000 for preliminary
engineering and environmental studies to determine the feasibility
of constructing the Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Plan.
Under the agreement, the City of Carlsbad will hire an engineering
firm to conduct the studies and the City of Los Angeles will pay for
the work.
The L.A. Board of Harbor Commissioners approved the agreement
on April 8.
Following approval by Carlsbad, the following actions will take place:
1) Coastal permit to open the mouth of the lagoon will be
considered by Coastal Commission on Wednesday, April 22
at Marina del Rey.
2) Agreement with engineering firm (CH.M Hill) will be on
Council agenda April 14.
3) Engineering studies will take 9 months to complete.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Engineering contract will cost $392,200. Carlsbad will be allowed
$50,000 for administrative costs.
Invoices will be sent to Port of Los Angeles for payment.
EXHIBITS:
1. Letter from Port of Los Angeles, dated April 8, 1987.
2. Resolution No.
1986 WORLDPORT LA Annual Report
FlL-b
5,, > * -
CONTENTS
Letter from the President 2
Los Angeles City Officials 3
Board of Harbor Commissioners 3
Executive Director's Report 5
Financial Review 21
Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants 21
Balance Sheets 22
Statements of Operations 23
Statements of Changes in Contributions/Land
Valuation Equity and Retained Earnings 24
Notes to Financial Statements 25
Financial Overview 29
Ten Year Highlights 1977-1986 30
Capita/ Deue/opment Program 30
Operating Reuenue 1982-1986 31
Reuenue Tons 1982-1986 31
Vessel Arrivals by Type of Vessel 1985-1986 32
Cash Flow from Operation 1982-1986 32
Net income 1982-1986 32
Certificate of Conformance in Financial Reporting 33
Revenue Tonnage Billed 33
Tonnage by Trade Route 33
Harbor Department Staff 34
The Honorable Tom Bradley, Mayor
and the Honorable City Council
City of Los Angeles
^ rJ
/ his annual report of the progress and accomplishments of
_1 WORLDPORT LA for the fiscal year 1986 is forwarded in com-
pliance with Article IV, Section 64, of the Los Angeles City Charter.
With increasing emphasis, the Board of Harbor Commissioners
has established a high priority for preserving the diversification of this
world-class facility. Certainly, the success of our harbor is and must be
measured in terms of tonnage and dollars. Yet no longer can the sole
impetus be monetary and industrial gains.
We also place high value on the people of our port community —
on the small businessperson, the minority "newcomers" in the field and, of
course, on the public for whom our recreational areas are planned. No
where else in the world is the bustle of a premier international harbor in
harmony with the community as it is in Los Angeles. We have a stake in
the local area and a responsibility to be a good neighbor.
We have but to look around these 7,300 acres to see the maritime
community at its best as it proceeds into the next decade as a major
force for the economic well-being of the Southern California region.
In meeting the demands placed upon us by this ever-growing in-
dustry, we are grateful for the support and far-sighted guidance of the
Mayor and City Council.
Respectfully submitted,
Jun Mori
President
Board of Harbor Commissioners
BOARD OF HARBOR COMMISSIONERS
Tom Bradley
CITY OFFICIALS
Tom Bradley
Mayor
James Kenneth Hahn
City Attorney
Rick TurtleController
CITY COUNCIL
Pat Russell
President
Councilwoman, 6th District
Joan Milke FloresPresident Pro Tempore
Councilwoman,
15th (Harbor) District
Joel Wachs
2nd District
Joy Picus
3rd District
John Ferraro4th District
Zev Yaroslavsky
5th District
Ernani Bernard!7th District
Robert C. Farrell
8th District
Gilbert W. Lindsay9th District
Marvin Braude
11th District
Hal Bernson
12th District
Michael Woo13th District
Richard Alatorre
14th District
Jun Mori, Esq.
President
Joseph J. Zaninovich
Vice President
Michael W. Schwab
Commissioner
E. Grace Payne, LL.D.
Commissioner
Robert G. Rados Sr.
Commissioner
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Ezunial Burts
Attracting cargo is not the
biggest challenge the Port
faces today.
e have the geographic advan-
tage. We have the economic
strength. We have the proximity
to Southern California's resources
and population. We have ultra-
modern facilities.
It's for all of those reasons that
WORLDPORT LA finds itself in the
forefront of West Coast ports.
The responsibility for keeping the
Port of Los Angeles there is awesome.
And our Harbor Department team of
700 employees, led by our Harbor
Commission of five, has accepted the
challenge with enthusiasm.
Attracting cargo is not the biggest
challenge the Port faces today. We are
more immediately charged with the
development of land, channels and an
infrastructure which will accommodate
—. the additional commerce we
know is coming our way. This
onslaught of new cargo and
shipping activity cannot be
handled reactively.
Thus the Board of Harbor
Commissioners in 1986 launched a
Strategic Plan, the first published
by any West Coast port, which Har-
bor Department staff designed to pro-
vide critical advance planning for
growth. The plan describes a sys-
tematic way of making today's deci-
sions for tomorrow's results. It goes
beyond just facilities planning to a
mission statement and management
philosophy which will prevail for
years to come.
A "bottom up" planning process
provided input for the Strategic Plan.
The kinds of businesses the Port is
involved in and the services offered
within this maritime business enuiron-
ment mere reviewed at all Department
staff levels to develop the ultimate plan.
In so doing, management clarified the
objectives to be pursued in attaining
the overall goal of better service to
the public.
" I 'he impact of WORLDPORT LA
_/ has gone far beyond the local
economic environment to the entire
global community. More than just
a gateway to the Far East, we
have become partners with our Pacif-
ic Rim neighbors.
Over the last four years, the Port of
Los Angeles has grown at a faster rate
than any of its major competitors.
Total tonnage in fiscal year 1986
reached 51.1 million metric revenue
tons, a 13.4% increase over the previ-
ous year and a 45.6% growth in five
years. Contrary to the general export
orientation of West Coast ports, the
Port of Los Angeles has historically
been an importing port, accounting/or
more than 20% of all West Coast in-
bound traffic and approximately 10%
of its exports.
WORLDPORT LA counts among its
trading partners some 140 nations,
iw'th Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Indonesia
and the Netherlands as its major mar-
kets. These five countries account for
62% of all tonnage and almost 70% of
its total dollar value.
Japan alone was responsible for
approximately 30% of all Port traffic,
followed by Korea and Taiwan.
This surge of Pacific Rim traffic has
made WORLDPORT LA the leading
West Coast port for automobiles, gas-
oline and jet fuel, lube oils, motor vehi-
cle parts, iron and steel scrap, coal
and cotton.
\ / fore than 58% of total Pacific Rim
_ _1 foreign import cargo arrives
through San Pedro Bay ports
destined for U.S. markets. Some 60%
of those goods are bound for the
local market.
The greater Los Angeles area is now
recognized as the nation's #1 manufac-
turing center. In the last 10 years more
than 177,000 manufacturing jobs have
been added here, compared with sig-
nificant decreases in other metropolitan
areas of the country.
The need for imported goods by the
12 million Southern California popu-
lace combines iw'th a recent demand
for some 47% of U.S. domestically
produced cargo to find markets here.
West Coast exports tend to be agri-
cultural and bulk products bound for
Far Eastern markets for consumption
in those countries or for manufacture
into finished goods for export back to
the West Coast. Commodities which
follow this trend include cotton which
is woven into fabric or apparel for re-
export, scrap for recycling intoU.S.-
bound automobiles and components
for manufacturing into small electronic
goods for American retailers.
r, xperts have projected that by the
_L_j year 2010, Pacific Rim coun-
tries will account for 4.5 billion
people, 60% of the world's consumers
and half of the world's largest cities.
As the focus of international
trade continues to shift to West Coast
dominance, WORLDPORT LA —-
is well placed to increase its
share of that world market.
The Los Angeles Customs
District, with the Port of Los
Angeles strategically located
at its hub, has outpaced all
The greater Los Angeles
area is now recognized as
the nation's #1 manufactur
ing center.
other U.S. Customs districts in tuorfd
trade growth.
The greater Los Angeles area with
its large and growing population,
coupled with high per capita personal
income, provides a dual thrust to local
demand for goods and services.
The manufacturing concentration
and consumer market of Southern
California create another favorable
situation for WORLDPORT LA as
shippers recognize the two-way po-
tential for intermodal traffic. Not
Far Eastern fabric for U.S.-bound apparel.
Hi
>>
*v-
t?
*
: <•>>.•.<*'a
, «* «
IW
^X
- ' -
-
.^i
«,
f - -4, VI
STRA%:^
• k. Tl^r-_ :i
\*fi-.. v
*%.
Crackers and biscuits from Australia/1
Zealand grains. • * '
->• -•»>
"F provides a critically
tded San Pedro Bay-based
yard...
only does the Southern California
intermodal system provide interna-
tional shippers with efficient, cost
effective transportation, but west-
bound rail systems carry cargo
back to a thriving retail market.
The available intermodal system
brings a full 50% of discretionary cargo
through Southern California. Shippers'
access to all types of intermodal ship-
ping services, year-round clear weath-
er for uninterrupted movements and
substantial two-way markets for con-
tainer traffic join to make Southern
California the most advantageous
immui West Coast load center.
Between 70% to 80% of con-
tainers return to Southern
California with domestic cargo
destined for local consumers.
^ T he Port of Los Angeles' intermo-
( dal capabilities were enhanced
in late 1986 with the opening of the
165-acre Intermodal Container
Transfer Facility (ICTF), a joint project
with the neighboring Port of Long
Beach and operated by Southern Pa-
cific Transportation Company.
Located on Port of Los Angeles
property, the ICTF provides a critically
needed San Pedro Bay-based rail yard
within five miles of any container ter-
minal in either harbor. Throughput in
the first year is estimated at 360,000
containers. As a second phase is
completed, handling capability will
reach 500,000 containers, and will
ultimately grow to 700,000 with the
third phase.
Development of the ICTF and other
intermodal transportation systems is
not without impact in areas other than
consumer supply.
It is acknowledged that rail and high-
way access to and from theSanPedro
Bay ports must be developed to ac-
commodate future expansion. The
effects of increased cargo movements
on the communities near the transpor-
tation corridors are of substantial
concern. To address these issues in a
constructive manner, the Alameda
Corridor Task Force was formed in late
1984 as an outgrowth of a Port funded
access study by the Southern California
Association of Governments (SCAG).
The task force focuses on such issues
as prioritization of street and rail
improvements, operation of a consoli-
dated rail corridor and mitigation of
adverse economic and enuironmen-
tal impacts.
"
Lumber from Huropc, Ga|ada and the
Pacific Northwest for LoJSfMgcles area
newspaper production. ./»^j£.* C
f;
led landfill, terminal
and ship channel
lion respond to accel-
Pacific Rim trade...
he adequacy of intermodal trans-
I portation links comes under ad-
ded scrutiny as the San Pedro Bay
ports look toward the cargo handling
projections for the year 2020. In line
with the philosophy that the future
must be planned now, the ports, with
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
have developed the 2020 Plan. The pro-
posed landfill, terminal facilities and
ship channel expansion respond to
accelerated Pacific Rim trade to the
West Coast and to recent advances in
shipping and port technology.
Phase one of the 2020 Plan
mmm includes creation of the 350-acre
Pier 400 landfill by dredging
deepwater of up to 75 feet to the
190-acres from the Port's 1983
deepening project. Phase one
also calls for a 63-acre trans-
^^^ portation corridor proposed for
^^m construction beginning in 1989.
Anchoring Pier 400 will be the Pacific
Texas Pipeline (PacTex) Project, a
1,030-mile pipeline from the Port of
Los Angeles to Midland, Texas, where
the Alaskan crude oil can be further
distributed. A 106-acre landfill island
will be created by the dredging of a
75-foot channel to the two-berth marine
oil terminal.An estimated $15 million facelift of
Batiquitos Lagoon in Carlsbad, Cali-
fornia, is under consideration as off-site
mitigation for this PacTex Project.
This is the first time WORLDPORTLA
has selected a project outside its
boundaries to secure the necessary
environmental credits for a construction
project.
Restoration of the 600-acre lagoon
involves the opening of the lagoon
mouth to the ocean to restore tidal
action while improving natural wildlife
habitats. Thus, winter flooding of the
surrounding area will be alleviated, an
adjacent stretch of sandy beach will
be replenished and the lagoon's ap-
pearance in the summer will be en-
hanced. This planned restoration has
brought together a team of eight local,
state, federal and private agencies. It
is slated to begin in early 1988 for
completion by year's end.
/\s WORLDPORT LA maintains
J~_ipromrnence in the international
shipping community, it is recognized
that port management is only one
part of an overall international
transportation system. Open com-
munication with various segments of
the maritime industry, including labor,
steamship lines, tenants, customers
and government agencies, is also
readily sought. With the Port looking
toward the future and the next decade's
shipping needs, it is critical that a co-
hesiveness and sense of cooperation
prevail throughout the system.
11
ii£
if?-'
he teamivork of all these seg-
ments of the industry is more
vital as the Port searches out and uitro-
duces new market opportunities into
the system. Most recently, in addition
to the traditional markets in the Far
/East and Europe, this Port has investi-4 gated South American andlndian sub-
continent areas for potential increases
in trade.
South American produce has
become more commonplace in
American supermarkets in normally
off-season months. The use of thePprt
of Los Angeles as a transshipment
center for traffic from South America
and to the Far East is proving advan-
tageous to shippers. Fruits and steel
slabs from our southern neighbors are
now shipped to Southern California to
join other goods being loaded for trans-
pacific destinations.
The discovery of still other worldwide
cargo trends has resulted from Port
.business development trips to investi-
gate trade potentials.
/ \ fations of the Indian Ocean pro-
J. J vide textile imports. All-water
routes from Europe, more traditionally
to East Coast ports for westbound
landbridging, are currently under
consideration to the West Coast.
A newly acquired line, Associated
Container Transportation/PACE
Line, has selected Los Angeles as one
of four West Coast ports of call in its
West Coast-to-Australia service Also re-
cently initiating cafls to WORLDPORT
LA is the Transportacion Maritima
Mexicana container service.
As cargo throughput increases, fr
nancial diversification is seen in import/
export balance and revenue producing
sources. Aside from strict cargo consi-
derations, sources of revenue include
non-trade related income such as rent-
als and royalties. In fiscal year 1986,
rental income provided$27,6 mfljfon to
the Port, an increase of 16.9% due m
some measure to the addition of the
Cabrillo Marina and manage-
ment of property such as par-
cels in the Wilmington Acquisi-
tion Area.
Yet it is commodity diversifi-
cation ivhich provides revenue
stability for the Port as almost
160 different types of cargo
pass over these tuharves annu-
ally. Petroleum, the Port's major
commodity in terms of tonnage
but a lotv wharfage item, ac-
counts for less than 10% of
total revenue.
Substantial net income has allowed
the Port to build reserves to insulate
it from adverse economic situations.
As the nation's leader in retained
earnings, WORLDPORTLA reported
$58 million in the last year, continuing
its long history of demonstrated finan-
cial strength and stability. It is this
strength that makes subsidizing of the
Port by public taxes unnecessary.
^ {~ he Port's leadership role isfur-
_! thered by its implementation of a
diverse $500 million capital develop-
ment program and the utilization of
previously unused properties. As the
12
can fruit gra.
premier auto import harbor in America,
the Port last year sought to streamline
vehicle processing by storing autos at
locations away from the wharf.
Los Angeles'24% increase in import
auto traffic, from 420,000 units in 1985
to 520,000 in 1986, has created the
demand for other improved facilities.
Late 1986 saw the opening of the new
Distribution and Auto Services (DAS)
terminal in an area formerly used for
passenger vessels. The terminal will
be used exdusiue/y/or Nissan products,
the single largest auto importer through
Los Angeles. This 83-acre terminal at
Berths 195-199 was built at a cost of
$16 million.
The property vacated by DAS at
Berths 136-139 will by mid-1987 be the
first exclusive U.S. container terminal
for Mitsui-O.S.K. Lines in joint service
with East Asiatic Company. The new
container facility is being completed at
a cost of more than $30 million and
covers 70 acres.
The Port's capital development pro-
gram includes other container facilities
to accommodate a continuing rise in
container trqffic. Fiscal year 1986 saw
an increase in TEUs (twenty-/oot equi-
valent units, maritime terminology for
measuring container traffic) to 1,182,000
TEUs, a 13.9% growth rate/or the year.
) eve/opment continues at
' Berths 142-46 and 174-181 where
container-strength wharves have been
completed and future utilization of
gantry cranes is under consideration.
In addition, the /filing of Slip 228 at the
northern end of the Seaside Container
Terminal Complex adds still more
acreage to the Overseas Container
Terminal, home to major Pacific Rim
and European steamship lines.
WORLDPORTLA is also a major
West Coast bulk port. Liquid bulk
commodities, with petroleum
as a major component, increased
21.7% last year. Scrap exports to
the Pacific Rim rose 28.4%, leading
dry bulk commodities which added
35.5% overall.
An innovative silo ship, Falcon
Pacific's Muscat Cement, made its
debut in America at its permanent
mooring in the Port's West Basin.
With a 600-/oot horizontal silo, the
vessel is capable of receiving cement
from bulk carriers for storage, bagging
and delivery in bulk or bagged form to
trucks at whar/side. The ship, however,
will not be involved in bagging opera-
tions in Los Angeles. This facility is the
Port's first for handling the finished
cement product.
Adding to the diversification of
WORLDPORTLA is the recent devel-
opment of new public ac-
cess facilities for visitors
and tourists. Beyond its
economic impact on the
San Pedro -Wilmington
areas, the Port /irmly be-
lieves itself a good neighbor,
one having a stake and a «•«
responsibility in the welfare of its
harbor communities.
...the Port firmly believes
itself a good neighbor, one]
having a stake and a respoi
sibility in the welfare of its
harbor communities.
14
From foreign aulo assembly lines to Los
Angeles dealerships.
4T <*T
Steel girders fabricated overseas in
powered by U.S. raw materials.
(^"^ uch concern was shown in the
d^ Port's participation in the Wil-
mington Community Task Force.
The Wilmington District of the Port
has been an area of largely industrial
growth. Planning for future devel-
opment of the area brought together
representatives of the 15th Council-
manic District, Harbor Department,
City Planning Department, Community
Redevelopment Agency and com-
munity leaders. Their task is to share
ideas, identify community concerns
and develop recommendations to re-
spond to those voiced concerns.
As approved by the Board of Harbor
Commissioners for final consideration
by the Planning Department, the task
force report provided proposals for
community and recreation oriented
areas to buffer Wilmington households
and small businesses from harbor
industrial development and traffic
increases. Also considered were im-
provements in public access to the
waterfront through recreational devel-
opment after current oil extraction
activities in the Cerritos Channel
have ceased.
The Port's ongoing capita/ devel-
opment program also takes into
consideration the need for other non-
shipping facilities, including the West
Channel/Cabrillo Beach Recreational
Complex and its multi-use acreage for
the enjoyment of the public.
Completion of the early phases of
this 370-acre complex was celebrated
in October when a Citizens Advisory
Committee was lauded for its part in
the planning of this entire area "The
Cabrillo Dream," as the celebration
was titled, paid tribute to these indi-
viduals whose planning insured that
the complex would include a youth
camp, an environmental salt marsh,
an improved beach and parking area,
commercial properties, a 1,137-slip
marina (phase one), sportfishing, pe-
destrian and bicycling paths, andother
amenities for the casual stroller, the
sports enthusiast, youngsters and
senior citizens.
Currently under construction within
the showcase complex are the 250-room
Doubletree Compri Hotel, the Cabrillo
Beach Yacht Club, a sportfishing land-
ing and a youth camp operated by the
Boy Scouts of America. Mike's Marine,
a fuel dock/restaurant/marine hard-
ware facility, opened in late 1986. A
Marina Operations Building for the
Cabrillo Marina will be completed by
summer 1987. With the first slips of the
marina already fully occupied, plans
are now proceeding for the second
phase to add another 1,900 slips.
^~ P his entire area will be visually
' and in some cases architecturally
linked in the future with a proposed
fishermen's wharf complex, the
popular Ports O' Call Village and the
World Cruise Center, all along the
western bank of the Main Channel.
The fishermen's wharf area, as pro-
posed, will provide a much-needed
17
freezer warehouse, retail
and wholesale outlets and
other facilities for the pubKc
: within a festive European
marketplace atmosphere.
^pte Port «/ Los Angeles,;
jfnce Consistently the second
-tijsrskmg commercialfishjteg
- port in the country, is now the
homeof ordy one tuna cannery^
PanPacific Fisheries, However,
local fishermen
operate despite
of tuna fishing and canning
activities to other areas of
the world. ;
- he Los Angeles World/
Cruise Center, operated
by LA. Cruise Ship Template,
Inc., a consortium of passenger
lines, is home to America's secorid
^busiest cruise business. Passenger traf-
fic in Los Angeles increased 30% in
1986to488,000,or419%sincel979.The
massive population pool of Southern
California has a direct impact on the
marketing of cruises.
The summer of 1987 wOl see com-
pletion of a new passenger terminal
building at Berth 91 and a refurbished
Berth 93AB facility. Proposals are still
under consideration for the com-
mercial site in the Cruise Center and
for a third passenger embarkation/
debarkation area at Berth 93DE. Other
facilities and parking restructuring for
the $100 million project will be ready
in 1988.
Passenger traffic in Los
Angeles increased 30% in
1986 to 488,000, or 419%
since 1979.
requirements for man-
agement of these non-shipping facilities
are recognized in a recently announced
reorganization of the Harbor Depart-
ment staff which calls for creation of a
Property Management Section for
Commercial/Retail. The new organi-
zation plan, which will not take full
effect for several months, proposed a
departure from the one-over-one struc-
ture in which almost all managers
have reported to the Executive Direc-
tor through a Chief Deputy Executive
Director. In the restructuring, all four
senior managers will report directly to
the Executive Director, "flattening out"
the chain of command.
18
/ s:the Port develops, ifa bustle of
'iTT,^ construction and mcwiteriance
and the §rou«nff oe^d for
arid service contracts
iel$|ar-- stepped-up equal «pporfemSy
"'''"' |« Snewith other City de-
IMinorfly afltf lffe|Nl3S
Enterprise fl^W^godk
o> 12% and 2% for contracts w excess
. o/SJOCl(300..sr T«S^ • ;
wan
i^^pyii^iKimiiiiJiiyii
l^*<*^£;;^ ^•'^'^^^rinr-^Hs"- QJiiiWf'>*«• y"l^@p|^^^ffjfe^^RPW.io«is'
fii^Wt .._„«,,..
dB cori-
com-
Vparfici*
ihaf --the Departm^if «bes
thispafe ft has set. Pfe re-
are firm, yet maxmm
spportunfty is afforded to everyone to
^Sfce part in the performance of the
1I^% contracts, subcontracts, permits
dn<f leases.
T^iese standards clearty reject the
concern WORLDPORTLA has/or the
community.
Coupled tuith our geographic posi-
tion and economic stability, our con-
cern for the community completes the
circle of strength necessary for the
Port to carry out its strategic planning
mission of sewice to our worldwide
public.
...maximum opportunity is
afforded to everyone to take
part in the performance of
the Port's contracts...
20
;iAL REVIEW
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
725 S. Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, California
(213) 972-4000
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
Gilbert Vasquez and Company
A joint venture
The Board of Harbor Commissioners
Port of Los Angeles (Harbor Department of
the City of Los Angeles, California):
We have examined the balance sheets of the Port of Los Angeles
(Harbor Department of the City of Los Angeles, California)
as of June 30,1986 and 1985 and the related statements of opera-
tions, changes in contributions/land valuation equity and retained
earnings and changes in financial position for the years then ended.
Our examinations were made in accordance with generally ac-
cepted auditing standards and, accordingly, included such tests of
the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we con-
sidered necessary in the circumstances.
In our opinion, the aforementioned financial statements present fair-
ly the financial position of the Port of Los Angeles (Harbor Depart-
ment of the City of Los Angeles, California) at June 30, 1986 and
1985 and the results of its operations and the changes in its financial
position for the years then ended, in conformity with generally ac-
cepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis.
August 15, 1986
21
Port of Los Angeles (Harbor Department of the City of Los Angeles, California)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, 1986 and 1985 (In thousands of dollars)
Assets 1986 1985
Current assets:
Cash on hand and on deposit with City Treasurer (note 2)
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of
$1,660 in 1986 and $631 in 1985
Materials and supplies
Prepaid and deferred expenses
Accrued interest receivable
Other receivables
Total current assets
Cash and cash equivalents, restricted as to use:
Bond funds
Certificates of participation
Properties:
Land
Harbor facilities and equipment, less accumulated depre-
ciation of $139,946 in 1986 and $127,562 in 1985
Construction in progress
Preliminary costs — capital projects
Net properties
Notes receivable (note 7)
Investment in Intermodal Container Transfer Facility (note 8)
Other assets
Total assets
$ 57,570
16,551
1,182
741
4,258
1,702
82,004
34,929
117,266
151,837
289,586
95,738
3,867
541,028
12,839
2,859
2,070
$ 792,995
49,162
13,484
1,356
601
377
64,980
128,463
142,647
256,145
81,966
1,673
482,431
12,470
2,859
601
691,804
Liabilities, Equity and Retained Earnings
Current liabilities:
Trade accounts payable
Accrued construction costs payable
Current installments of notes payable — bond indebtedness
Bonds and coupons due but not yet presented for payment
Accrued interest
Accrued employee benefits
Deferred interest income
Total current liabilities
Long-term liabilities:
Notes payable, net of current installments (note 3)
Certificates of participation (note 3)
Bond indebtedness — Harbor Revenue Bonds, net of amounts
to be paid within one year (note 3)
Other liabilities
Total long-term liabilities
Total liabilities
Equity and retained earnings:
Contributions/land valuation equity
Retained earnings
Total equity and retained earnings
Commitments and contingencies (notes 4, 5 and 6) '
Total liabilities, equity and retained earnings
1986
$5,807
9,394
12,785
278
3,290
3,231
1,979
36,764
6,915
140,000
34,800
2,394
184,109
220,873
92,314
479,808
572,122
$ 792,995
1985
7,963
7,160
3,436
264
2,453
3,407
802
25,485
11,184
140,000
9%
152,180
177,665
92,314
421,825
514,139
691,804
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Lo* Angeles (Harbor Department of the City of Los Angeles, California)
ATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
*ndtd June 30, 1986 and 1985 (In thousands of dollars)
1986 1985
•rating revenues:
Shipping services:
Dockage
Wharfage
Storage
Demurrage
Pilotage
Assignment charges
Cranes
Total shipping services
Rentals (note 6):
Land
Buildings
Warehouses
Wharf and shed revenue
Cabrillo Beach recreational complex
Total rentals
• Royalties, fees and other operating revenues:
rtts, concessions and royalties
. Oil royalties
; Othe?
r Total royalties, fees and other operating revenues
1 Total operating revenues
Irtttrtfl and administrative expenses
•, Income from operations before depreciation
prton (or depreciation
1 Income from operations
•Moating revenues (expenses):
fPtntr Income and expenses, net
•MtfMt income from investments
pnitrwt expense on bond indebtedness and notes payable
H^E Net nonoperating revenues
t1 Net incomeIk
$ 7,717
60,378
367
3,091
3,138
1,282
7,933
83,906
23,174
1,163
2,375
577
342
27,631
870
1,233
1,830
3,933
115,470
47,516
67,954
13,673
54,281
(1,245)
5,428
(481)
3,702
$57,983
6,764
45,215
574
2,060
2,783
1,183
5,287
63,866
20,577
734
1,693
579
51
23,634
1,225
2,700
1,391
5316
92,816
37,742
55,074
13,192
41,882
745
6,294
(174)
6,865
48,747
/ing notes to financial statements.
Port of Los Angeles (Harbor Department of the City of Los Angeles, California)
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN CONTRIBUTIONS/LAND
VALUATION EQUITY AND RETAINED EARNINGS
Years ended June 30, 1986 and 1985 (In thousands of dollars)
Balance, July 1,1984
Donated land, at estimated fair value
Net income
Balance, June 30, 1985
Net income
Balance, June 30, 1986
Contributions/land
valuation equity
$ 78,314
14,000
92,314
$ 92,314
Retained
earnings
373,078
48,747
421,825
57,983
479,808
Total
451,392
14,000
48.747
514,139
57.983
572,122
Port of Los Angeles (Harbor Department of the City of Los Angeles, California)
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION
Years ended June 30, 1986 and 1985 (In thousands of dollars)
1986 1985
Sources (uses) of cash:
Operating activities:
Net income
Items not requiring (providing) cash:
Depreciation
Loss on sale of equipment
Cash provided by operations
Cash provided by (used for) changes in:
Accounts receivable
Accrued interest receivable
Materials and supplies and prepaid and deferred expenses
Other receivables
Accounts payable
Accrued construction expenditures
Accrued expenses and other
Net cash provided by operating activities
Financing activities:
Notes payable
Increase (reduction) of bond indebtedness outstanding
Issuance of certificates of participation
Donated capital — donated land
Investment transactions:
Additions to properties
Proceeds from sale of equipment
Notes receivable, net
Change in cash and cash equivalents restricted as to use
Investment in Intermodal Container Transfer Facility
Other, net
Net increase in cash
Cash on hand and on deposit with City Treasurer at beginning of year
Cash on hand and on deposit with City Treasurer at end of year
$57,983
13,673
925
72,581
(3,067)
(3,881)
34
(1,702)
(2,156)
2,234
3,250
67,293
4,880
35,000
39,880
(73,716)
221
(369)
(23,432)
(1,469)
(98,765)
8,408
49,162
$ 57,570
48,747
13,192
61,939
(1,795)
(523)
(203)
4,310
1,306
65,034
6,620
(15,651)
140,000
130,969
14,000
(79,589)
31
(123,392)
(2,859)
(601)
(206,410)
3,593
45,569
49,162
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
*- - ,'.*-•»
Port of Los Angeles (Harbor Department of the City of Los Angeles, California)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Jura 30, 1986 and 1985
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization
The Port of Los Angeles (Harbor Department of the City of Los Angeles, California) (Port) is an independent
Mif-supporting department of the City of Los Angeles, and is under the control of a five-member Board of
Harbor Commissioners and is administered by an Executive Director. The Port is granted control of tidelands
Under trust from the State of California. The Port prepares and controls its own budget, administers and
controls its fiscal activities, and is responsible for all Port construction and operations.
THc Port operates as principal landlord for the purpose of assigning or leasing Port facilities and land areas.
Tht Port's principal source of revenue is from shipping services under tariffs (dockage, wharfage), rentals of
land and facilities and royalties (oil wells) and other fees. No part of its income is derived from taxes. Capital
Construction is financed from operations, bonded debt and loans secured by future revenues and Federal
grants. Daily operation of the Port facilities and regular maintenance are performed by the Port's permanent
force. Generally, major maintenance and new construction projects are assigned to commercial con-
praetors.
immary of Significant Accounting Policies
Following are the significant accounting policies followed by the Port of Los Angeles:
Method of Accounting — The Port is accounted for as an enterprise fund, and as such, its financial
statements are presented on the full-accrual method of accounting. Accordingly, unbilled service re-
ceivables are included in the determination of the year-end balance of accounts receivable in the
accompanying financial statements.
Materials and Supplies — Inventories of materials and supplies are stated at average cost on a first-in,
first-out basis.
Properties — Properties are carried at cost or at appraised fair market value at the date received in the
case of properties acquired by donation or by termination of leases, less allowance for accumulated
depreciation.
Depreciation — Depreciation is computed by use of the straight-line method over the estimated useful
lives of the assets. The useful lives of all properties are systematically reviewed every five years by the
Port's Engineer and management and revised as deemed appropriate. The last revision was made in
1983.
Current ranges of useful lives for depreciable assets are as follows:
Wharves and sheds 10 to 40 years
Buildings and facilities 10 to 40 years
Equipment 4 to 25 years
* Accrued Employee Benefits — The Port records all accrued employee benefits, including accumulated
vacation and sick pay, as a liability in the period benefits are earned.
Preliminary Costs — Proposed Capital Projects — Development costs for proposed capital projects
that are incurred prior to the finalization of formal construction contracts are capitalized. When
reasonable assurance is obtained that construction contracts will begin, such preliminary costs are
transferred to the Port's construction-in-progress account. In the event that proposed capital projects
are abandoned, the associated preliminary costs are charged to expense in the year of abandonment.
Indirect Project Costs — The Port capitalizes indirect project costs associated with the acquisition,
development and construction of new capital projects used in the Port's operations. Approximately
$2,092,000 and $2,700,000 of such indirect project costs were allocated to construction projects for
years 1986 and 1985, respectively.
Interest Costs — The Port capitalizes interest expense for real estate projects during development and
construction. During 1986 and 1985, interest income on borrowings to construct real estate projects
exceeded interest expense by approximately $2,430,000 and $991,000, respectively, and those projects
were adjusted accordingly.
Rtclassifications — Certain ^classifications of amounts reported in prior periods have been made
to conform to the 1986 presentation.
(Notes to Financial Statements, continued)
2. Cash on Deposit with the City Treasurer
The Port participates in a pooled investment program with the City of Los Angeles, where funds on deposit
are pooled with other City departments and invested in time deposits and short-term government securities.
The Port receives a monthly interest allocation based on the average daily balance on deposit and the earnings
of the fund.
3. Bonded Debt
A summary of the Port's long-term indebtedness at June 30, 1986 is as follows.
Harbor Revenue Bond Issue of 1985
During 1986, the Port issued harbor revenue bonds in the amount of $35,000,000. Payments are to begin in
1987 and run through 2015 with interest rates ranging from 8.40% to 11.25%. This bond issue is payable solely
from revenues of the Port and does not constitute a general obligation of the City of Los Angeles.
Debt Defeasance
I In December 1984, the Port defeased its outstanding Harbor Revenue Bonded indebtedness issues of 1960,
1965 and 1971, aggregating $14,875,000 as follows (in thousands of dollars):
I1 Amount
t Description Rates outstanding
t 1st issue of 1960
2nd issue of 1960
Issue of 1965
Issue of 1971
3.90%
3.50
3.10 - 3.45
4.30 - 5.90
$ 890
1,760
2,445
9,780
$14,875
*
I ] j Such debt was defeased through the establishment of an irrevocable escrow fund with a major financial insti-
' t | tution, whereby monies placed in trust which, when considered with interest to be earned thereon, would be
| I | sufficient to make required debt service payments through the earliest possible debt retirement dates. The
resulting gain from the defeasance transaction is not considered significant to Port's operations and therefore
was not included in the Port's 1985 Statement of Operations as nonoperating other income.
\ Certificates of Participation
During 1985, the Port formed the Los Angeles Harbor Improvements Corporation, a nonprofit corporation
(Corporation). The purpose of the Corporation is to finance various major capital improvements for the
benefit of the Port and its tenants through the issuance of indebtedness. In this regard, the Corporation has
issued $140,000,000 in certificates of participation.
ij The $140,000,000 of indebtedness is payable solely from payments by the Port under a long-term lease
agreement for the use of the facilities so constructed between the Port and the Corporation. Such lease pay-
26 ments approximate the annual debt service on the outstanding certificates of participation. The certificates
of participation do not constitute a general obligation of either the Port of Los Angeles or the City of Los
Angeles. The certificates of participation bear interest at rates which are adjusted weekly, subject to a maxi
mum annual rate of 15%. Interest rates ranged from 3.75% to 8.625% and from 4.38% to 6.38% in 1986 and 1985,
respectively. Payments on such debt are scheduled to begin on December 31, 1988 and run through
December 1, 2014 at varying amounts.
In addition, from time to time, the Corporation intends to issue other long-term indebtedness to finance
specific capital facilities improvements on behalf of Port's tenants. The nature of these financings is such that
the long-term indebtedness is that of the Port tenant and not the Port or the Corporation. The Corporation
, . issued $29,185,000 and $4,185,000 in certificates of participation on behalf of specific Port's tenants in 1986
* and 1985, respectively.
1
>posit
rities.
•nings
yn in
solely
1960,
lease
;pay-
icates
f Los
maxi-
1985,
rough
lance
\ that
•ation
1986
(Notes to Financial Statements, continued)
Other Long-Term Debt
The Port has obtained loans aggregating $11,000,000 from the California Department of Boating and Water-
ways for use in the financing of the Port's Cabrillo Beach Project. These loans consist of the following at
June 30, 1985 (in thousands of dollars):
Year of loan
1983
1984
1985
Interest rate
7.90%
10.75
7.90
Original issue
$ 4,000
4,000
3,000
$11,000
First payment due
August 1, 1985
August 1, 1986
August 1, 1987
During 1986, the Port paid off the $4,000,000 loan bearing interest at 10.75%.
These notes are secured by the future revenues of the Harbor Department and do not constitute a general
obligation of either the Port of Los Angeles or the City of Los Angeles. The first of 30 annual installments of
principal and interest on such notes will begin as outlined in the table below; however, payments will not begin
to reduce such liability until 1990.
The Port also secured a loan from the Community Development Department of the City of Los Angeles. At
June 30, 1985, the loan balance was $3,163,000. In addition, the Port has several installment purchases aggre-
gating $457,000, which are payable in varying amounts through 1986.
During 1986, the loan balance was increased to $12,278,000 and the maturity date was extended to 1987.
Following is a summary of maturities of the Port's indebtedness (in thousands of dollars):
insti- 1
ild be I
The I
•efore I
ration I
r the I
n has I
•HI fiscal yearKin?•pswHi969
ifiwoHaPHpFrWreafter
HP®'*1
California
boat loan
$85
91
98
106
114
6,506
$7,000
1985 Harbor
Revenue Bond
200
200
400
400
600
33,200
35,000
Community
development
loan
12,278
12,278
Installment
purchases
222
222
Certificate
of
participation
800
900
1,000
137,300
140,000
Total
12,785
291
1,298
1,406
1,714
177,006
194,500
Retirement Plan
jbitantially all of the Port's employees participate in the City of Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement
Item (System), administered by the City of Los Angeles. Such plan is solely the obligation of the City of Los
eles, which is responsible for the funding of the System and for the determination and resolution of any
fllunded Retirement System liabilities. Under requirements of the City Charter, the Port makes annual
itributions to the System, based upon determinations made by the City of Los Angeles and is not responsi-
lor further funding requirements. Such contributions for the years ended June 30, 1986 and 1985 aggregated
aximately $4,392,000 and $3,500,000, respectively.
|i Leases, Rentals and Revenue Sharing Agreements
•ubstantial portion of the harbor lands and some of the facilities are leased to others. The majority of these
provide for cancelation on a 30-day notice by either party and for retention of ownership by the Port at
expiration of the agreement; accordingly, no leases are considered capital leases for purposes of financial
arting.
aforementioned agreements are intended to be long term in nature (as long as 20 years) and to provide
Port with a firm tenant commitment for a minimum fixed income stream into future years. The properties
facilities under lease to others are generally structured to provide the Port with a minimum fixed annual
it. Many agreements also provide for additional payments beyond the fixed portion, based upon tenant
or volume. Such agreements are also generally subject to periodic inflationary escalations in base
jnts due the Port. For years ended June 30, 1986 and 1985, such revenues, from all operating sources,
legated approximately $56,443,000 and $43,526,000, respectively.
27
(Notes to Financial Statements, continued)
5. Leasing, Rentals and Revenue Sharing Agreements (continued)
Assuming that the aforementioned agreements run their full course, minimum tenant commitments due the
Port over the next five years are expected to aggregate approximately (in thousands of dollars):
Year ending
June 30 Amount
1987 $ 81,313
1988 88,098
1989 92,758
1990 96,835
1991 99,360
1 '! =====
6. Commitments
Open purchase orders and uncompleted construction contracts amounted to approximately $73,493,000 on
l June 30, 1986 and $36,249,000 on June 30, 1985. Such open commitments do not lapse at the end of the Port's
J fiscal year and are carried forth to succeeding periods until fulfilled.
j In 1985, the Port received a parcel of land, with an estimated value of $14,000,000, from the Federal Govern-
ment for the purpose of construction of a marina. The Port has agreed to reimburse the Federal Government
up to $14,000,000 from excess revenues generated from marina operations, if any, after the Port has recovered
all costs of construction.
7. Notes Receivable
In the normal course of business, the Port has several notes receivable consisting of the following at June 30,
1986 and 1985 (in thousands of dollars):
1986 1985
Note receivable relating to the sale of equipment bearing interest at an
effective rate over the term of the note of 10%, annual payments of ap-
proximately $1,604 through 1991 $12,200 12,200
Note receivable bearing interest at 8%, annual payments of approximately.
$40 through 1993 240 270
Note receivable bearing interest at 15.25%, monthly payments of approxi-
mately $14 through 1991 399 —
$12,839 12,470
8. Investment in Intermodal Container Transfer Facility (ICTF)no
The Port has entered into a joint venture with the Port of Long Beach to construct a facility to transfer con-
tainers between trucks and railroad cars. The facility is in the construction phase and has not started operations.
The Project will be fully developed by Southern Pacific Transportation Company, which will operate the facil-
ity.
The ICTF investment of $2,859,000 represents the total investment required of the Port.
9. Related Party Transactions
During the normal course of business, the Port is charged a fee for services provided by the City of Los
Angeles, the most significant of which relates to fire protection. The fees charged by the Los Angeles Fire
Department were $7,223,000 (including retroactive adjustments) and $6,200,000 for 1986 and 1985, respectively.
Port of Los Angeles (Harbor Department of the City of Los Angeles, California)
FINANCIAL OVERVIEW
The Port achieved record levels in operating revenues and net income in /iscolytw 1*^6, A iWt»
stantial increase in shipping activity, coupled with a modest increase in the tanffrufr retwe$mt#ti
key factors in this realization of this achievement. Key indices of activity, i. e., conjo ft rtmoft**, f«w
senger activity, auto unit throughput, and container equivalent units expanded (Jrumcilkuffv-
A/so contributing to this year's performance was the opening of the new marina and cx/xtmion
of rental revenues.
Comparison Between FY 1986 and FY 1985 Financial Performance
Operating Revenue
Gross operating revenue of $115.5 million represents a $22.7 million or 24.4% improvement over 1985. This is primarily
attributable to higher revenues from wharfage and other shipping services and to an increase in rental revenues,
Shipping Services
Shipping services revenue increased 31.4% from $63.9 million in 1985 to $83.9 million this year. This improvement is
due to an increase in the revenue tonnage throughput of 13.4% and an increase in tariff rates implemented during the
ytar, averaging approximately 13%.
Shipping services revenue per ton increased 22% from $1.42 per ton last year to $1.64 per ton this year. This is pri-
marily due to the increase in tariff rate changes in commodity mix.
Rental Revenue
Rental revenue increased 16.9% from $23.6 million to $27.6 million. This increase is due primarily to the addition of 25
raw buildings this year and to renegotiation of expiring land rental agreements.
The shortfall in royalties, fees, and other revenues of $1.4 million is primarily due to a reduction in production reve-
nues resulting from the decline in oil prices and unsold inventory.
: Operating Expenses
• Operating and administrative expenses reflected an increase of $9.8 million or 25.8% over last year.
Net Income
[ Nf I income increased from $48.7 million in 1985 to $58.0 million this year. This is due to the improvement in income
-from operations of 32.3% or $13.5 million which offset the $4.2 million deterioration in non-operating income.
| Accounts Receivable
lAccounts receivable increased by $3.1 million from $13.5 million to $16.6 million due primarily to higher operating
Mrtivity and slower payment by customers. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities decreased from 2.5 in 1985
.2 this year. This deterioration is due to the movement of loan obligations to the Community Development Depart-
and California Department of Boating, to current liabilities from long term.
ih Flow
? Port's available cash balance increased from $49.2 million to $57.6 million. This improvement is due primarily to a
crease in spending on capital projects resulting from a lower level of construction than anticipated and to drawing
i financing programs. During the year, $2.4 million of net interest income and $2.0 million of construction overhead
re capitalized in the construction fund.
rgo Movement
ff»lal revenue tonnage billed this year of 51.1 million tons represents a 13.4% of 6.0 million ton improvement in through-
tit volume over 1985. This improvement is primarily attributable to significant increases in Domestic, Far East and
i?titern European trade activity.
Domestic tonnage increased 32.1% from 17.6 million tons in 1985 to 23.3 million tons this year due to an increase
in outbound shipments of 60.4% or 6.6 million tons.
Far East Trade Tonnage increased by 9.1% or 1.8 million tons and is attributable to an increase in inbound ship-
ments of 16.7% or 2.1 million tons.
Trade tonnage to and from Western Europe increased 60.5% or .7 million tons, as improvements in both inbound
and outbound volume increased 48.5% and 88.1%, respectively.
1 with moderate improvements in other trade route categories, trade tonnage increases more than offset short-
itn Australia/New Zealand of 25.7% or .3 million tons, and inWestern Mexico, Central and South America of 20.7%
,2 million tons.
Port of Los Angeles (Harbor Department of the City of Los Angeles, California)
TEN YEAR HIGHLIGHTS
(In millions of dollars)
1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 19771
Cash
Cash Balance—Rev Fund
Cash Balance—Restricted
Property
Total Property
Allowances for Depreciation
Net Property
Replacement Cost New
Construction & Maintenance
Additions to Properties
Maintenance Expenses
Employees
Salaries Paid
Number of Employees
Rates
General Cargo Tariff Rate
Basic Dockage (600')Required Rate of Return
Bonds
Bonding Capacity*
Bond Coverage Ratio**
56.8
152.2
49.2
128.5
45.6
5.1
74.0
4.3
91.04.4 68.7
4.2
72.0
5.0
62.8
5.4
50.5
8.0
33.C
7.91
680.8
139.8
541.0
N/A
610.0
127.6482.4
1,185.5
530.7
114.7
416.0
1,023.7
452.9
92.7
360.2
892.4
373.9
83.9
290.0
792.0
344.6
78.6
266.0
696.1
313.0
72.6
240.4
649.1
282.9
68.5
214.4
591.3
259.2
63.9
195.3
563.3
70.9
3.7
79.6
3.0
78.9
4.1
79.4
6.0
32.0
3.9
30.5
4.2
30.0
4.6
24.6
4.2
11.5
2.3
23.2
697
22.0
650
20.3
672
19.4
672
17.6
677 14.8654
12.5
614
11.4
601 11.4
598
10.315851
44.0
1,62310%
3.90
1,395
10%
3.90
1,395
10%
3.90
1,395
10%
3.55
1,268
10%
3.55
1,15810%
3.25
961
10%
3.00
7009%
2.60
620
9%
548
6.6
359
19.0
286
14.6
173
6.2
218
8.4
250
14.9
336
11.0
285
9.6
225
7.9
*Assumes 1.5 coverage ratio, 9% 30-year bonds for 1981 thru 1985 and 6% 30-year bonds for 1975 thru 1980
"Adjusted defeasance of bonded bond
Port of Los Angeles (Harbor Department of the City of Los Angeles, California)
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Fiscal Years 1986/87 and 1987/88 (In thousands of dollars)
Project Description Estimated Expenditure
Berths 49-54 Dolphin & Fender System 1,7
West Channel Recreation Complex and Street Improvements 4,1
Cranes 9
Berths 195-199 Automobile Terminal 7,1
Berths 200B & H Lumber Depot 6,!
Berths 174-181 Container Terminal 20,1<Pier 400 - South Landfill 1,
West Basin Widening 2,.
Berths 171-173 Wharf 6,:
on Reeves Field Improvements
Seaside Avenue Improvements 4,i
Seaside Terminal Improvements 5,1'
Berths 91-93D/E World Cruise Center 19,711
Berths 225-229 Seaside Container Terminal 23,4'
Berths 136-139 Mitsui O.S.K. Container Terminal 24,0Fire Boat Station 3,5
Berths 212-214 Bulk/Container Handling Facility 5,
Pier "A" Street Improvements 1,
Pier 300 - Terminal Island 9,1Parcel J-l and J-2 Development 6,'
Miscellaneous Projects .' 20,2i
Total....
Land Acquisition 35,
Total for FY 1986/87 and 1987/88
Projects to be completed in FY 1988/89 thru FY 1990/91 309,Land Acquisition - 60,i
Total Five Year Capital 589,37
v^Mp•* "* *t fty.LV t,r~~&'*! ">',
Port of Los Angeles (Harbor Department of the
City of Los Angeles, California)
OPERATING REVENUE
Fiscal Years 1982 to 1986 (In $ millions)
Port of Los Angeles (Harbor Department of the
City of Los Angeles, California)
REVENUE TONS
Fiscal Years 1982 to 1986 (In millions of tons)
item)
120
110
L
»-,.,
:
1
t
l» n
HnH
oo
£
f
t-
eo
;
H
ri
H
00?
Cg
CO
Tj!
COs
3j
VD
g
Ms
2
3
3
3
inli-t—it^
oosi
os
vO
CM
co
(In millions of tons}
1--#-
CM
CO
qa
31
1982 1983 1984 1985 1986
1 Rental • Shipping IOtherTotal
1982 1983 1984 1985 1986
Dry Bulk I General Cargo I Liquid Bulk I Total
Port of Los Angeles (Harbor Department of the City of Los Angeles, California)
VESSEL ARRIVALS BY TYPE OF VESSEL
Fiscal Years 1986 and 1985
Totals
1985/86
Type of Vessel
Cargo
Cargo Passenger
Tanker
Bunker Only
Lumber
Number of
Vessels
1,869
315
571
747
58
Vessel
Tonnage
216,073
39,786
93,056
83,944
1,264
1984/85
Number of
Vessels
1,842
326
533
690
67
Vessel
Tonnage
205,832
30,045
85,278
73,981
1,129
3,560 434,123 3,458 396,265
Port of Los Angeles (Harbor Department of the
City of Los Angeles, California)
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATION
Fiscal Years 1982 to 1986 (In $ millions)
Port of Los Angeles (Harbor Department of the
City of Los Angeles, California)
NET INCOME
Fiscal Years 1982 to 1986 (In $ millions)
(J millions)
60 -
50
40
30
20
10
36.2
57.6
44.9
30.1
1982 1983 1984 1985 1986
<$ mittm)
5&0
42.9 41.7
31.2
1982 1983 1984 1985 1986
Port of Los Angeles (Harbor Department of the City of Los Angeles, California)
REVENUE TONNAGE BILLED
Fiscal Years 1986 and 1985 (In thousands)
I. Cargo Billed Under Port of Los Angeles Tariff
Metric Revenue Tons Metric Revenue Tons
General Cargo
Merchandise, NOS
Merchandise, NOS, OCP
Merchandise, NOS, Wt in vans
Merchandise, NOS, OCP in vans
Merchandise, NOS, Bulk in vans
Merchandise, NOS, Bulk in OCP
Merchandise, NOS, Bulk not
in vans
Bulk, Coal, Coke, etc.
Scrap Metal — Bulk
Bananas
Beer/Malt Liq. in Bottles/Cans
Bldg. Modules— Others
Cargo Vans, Merchandise
Cargo Vans, Empty
Coffee— Green in Bags
Fresh Fish
Fresh Fruit & Vegetables
Metals — Loose in Bundles
Pipe, Iron or Steel
Liquids (Excluding Petroleum)
Lumber
Military Articles
Paper & Paper Products
U.S. Mail
Motor Vehicles
Vessel Stores
C ff t f
Achievement
for Excellence
in Financial
Reporting
Presented to
Port of
1985/86
280
11
2,933
1,311
18
2
40
2,683
1,388
189
246
4
7,320
435
9
61
891
1,001
7
351
64
-0-
147
3
1,351
10
Los Angeles, California
For its Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report
(or the Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 1985
A Certificate d Achievement for Excellence in Financial
Reporting it presented by the Government finance Officers
Atsociation of lh« United Slate* and Canada 10
governmental units and public employee retirement
system* whose comprehensive annual financial
conform to program standard >
t j££
Executive Dtoedor
^u
?
-*
1984/85
470
5
3,004
1,951
8
1
27
1,744
1,075
230
163
36
4,503
320
10
72
208
1,039
3
464
69
1
108
-0-
1,334
11
General Cargo
Antiques, Bric/Brac
Appliances
Bicycles
Clothing, New NOS Wt/Eb
Food or Food Prep. Cans/Bottles
Elec. Equip. LCL
Food or Food Prep. Dry/Deh.
Footwear
Furniture NOS wt/eb off.
Household Goods & Personal Eff.
Motorcycles
Resins
Tires & Tubes
Specified Merchandise in Vans
Subtotal
Advance Wharfage
& Accruals
Total General Cargo
(Includes Dry Bulk)
Petroleum
Bulk Oil
Bunkers
Total Petroleum
Total Revenue Tons Billed
II. Tonnage By Trade Route
Foreign Tonnage
Mediterranean
Far East
Africa
Caribbean
Eastern South America
Mexico & South America
Western Europe
Australia & New Zealand
Persian Gulf & Red Sea
Total Foreign Tonnage
Domestic Tonnage
Bunkers in Port
Total Revenue Tonnage
1985/86
15
44
178
1,131
-0-
1,105
90
783
677
442
1%
159
351
1,158
27,084
589
27,673
15,798
7,661
23,459
51,132
1985/86
440
21,190
151
185
159
725
1,979
732
2,050
27,611
23,521
-0-
51,132
1984/85
3
58
114
967
180
1,106
70
503
428
251
177
86
350
1,648
22,797
3,013
25,810
12,791
6,487
19,278
45,088
1984/85
225
20,502
65
153
155
971
1,307
1,047
1,806
26,231
12,370
6,487
45,088
PORT OF LOS ANGELES
Headquarters Office
425 South Palos Verdes Street
San Pedro, CA 90731
Mailing Address
Post Office Box 151
San Pedro, CA 90733-0151
Telephone
(213) 519-3400
Telex
18-2387 POLA SPRO
HARBOR DEPARTMENT
STAFF
ADMINISTRATIVE
Ezunial "Eze" Burts
Executive Director
Jack L. Wells
Chief Deputy Executive Director
Donald L. Mosman
Deputy Executive Director
Bill Stein
Director of Port Administration
Sid Robinson
Director of Planning & Research
Charles T. Gibson
Director of Govt. & Community
Relations
Lee Zitko
Director of Advertising &
Marketing Promotions
Richard Root
Director of Personnel
Ronald W. Kennedy
Director of Property Management
W. Calvin Hurst
Harbor Environmental Scientist
Arnie Netka
Purchasing Officer
FINANCE
Rami Furman
Chief Financial Officer
William A. Gonzales
Controller
ENGINEERING &
OPERATIONS
Edward L. Gorman
Chief Harbor Engineer
Earl K. Clark
Director of Construction
Management
Roy J. Cootes
Director of Port Construction &
Maintenance
Capt. Edward C. Henry
Port Warden
Edward J. Hill
Chief Wharfinger
Capt. Jackson Pearson
Chief Pilot
LEGAL
Winston F. Tyler
Senior Assistant City Attorney
Raymond P. Bender
Assistant City Attorney
INTERNATIONAL
MARKETING NETWORK
Steven Paul Resnick
Director of Marketing
Albert B. Fierstine
Assistant Director of Marketing
Paul St. Onge
General Manager
Special Commodities Group
Arthur B. Goodwin
Internal Marketing Manager
National & International Accounts Group
Masashi Morimoto
International Marketing Manager
National & International Accounts Group
William Grindrod
General Manager
Pricing Group
Ralph Staunton
Pricing Specialist
Pricing Group
Wendy Hill
General Manager
Marketing Services Group
DOMESTIC
Andrew Corbett Jr.
A.J. Corbett & Sons
(New York)
OVERSEAS
Shuji Nomura
Port of Los Angeles Office
(Tokyo, Japan)
Shin-I Lin
Port of Los Angeles Office
(Taipei, Taiwan)
William Mortson
Port of Los Angeles Office
(Hong Kong)
T.E. Wang
Hyopsung Shipping Corporation
(Seoul, Korea)
Hans Andersen
Eurolist, Limited
(London, U.K. and
Copenhagen, Denmark)
Bob Bell
L.N. Shipping Pte., Ltd.
(Singapore)
Dick Dundas
Dundas Maritime Services, Ltd.
(Wellington, New Zealand)
Frank Williamson
Thompson, Clarke, Williamson
(Melbourne, Australia)
Is
f
Editorial
Lee Zitko
Julia Nagano
Design
Graphic Services
._.._.. n i ,^i.j owi .j-t.^y -? i<4Q6y;tt
04/03/1987 09=40 coRT'OF Lfi 213 83^^439 P. 02
Executive Director's Report to the Board of Harbor Commissioners
Dare: April 8, 1987
Subject: REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF LOS ANGELES AND CITY OF
CARLSBAD FOR THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING STUDY OF THE BATIQUITOS
LAGOON ENHANCEMENT PROJECT
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is recommended that the Board resolve to:
1. Approve the attached Agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the
City of Los Angeles for the preparation of preliminary engineering
design and related technical studies for the Batiquitos Lagoon
Enhancement Project; and
2. Authorize the Executive Director to execute said Agreement for and on
behalf of the Board in an amount not to exceed the sum of $450,000.
DISCUSSION;
1. As previously discussed with the Board relative to the Pacific Texas
and 2020 Phase 1 projects, the enhancement of Batiquitos Lagoon in the
City of Carlsbad, San Diego County, will produce a significant number
of "habitat unit" credits which will serve to mitigate the loss of
biological habitat from the proposed fills in the Port's outer harbor.
These habitat credits will be obtained from the establishment of new
saltwater tidal and intertidal habitat by: dredging and excavation
within the currently deteriorated wetlands boundary of the lagoon;
maintaining an open mouth to the ocean; and controlling freshwater
sedimentation while preserving existing bird habitat values within the
lagoon, including least tern sites.
2. To date, the Batiquitos project has been conceptually described in a
draft enhancement plan prepared by the California Coastal
Conservancy. However, a number of critical questions remain on the
feasibility of the project which must be answered before the Port can
commit to final design, construction and maintenance of the
enhancement/mitigation project. Of particular concern are the: cost
of construction, cost of annual (long-term) maintenance of the
completed lagoon, technical feasibility of controlling sedimentation,
technical feasibility of maintaining an open lagoon mouth for tidal
flushing, suitability of dredged material for adjacent beach
enhancement, and the number of habitat units anticipated to be
available, based on final lagoon contours. The proposed scope of work
included as Exhibit B to Transmittal No. 1 is intended to answer these
questions within a six to eight month period. Other questions of
project feasibility (property acquisition, environmental impacts) will
be addressed in subsequent implementation steps based on the resultsof the preliminary englneerina work.
04/03/1987 09:30 PORT OF LA 213 831 0439 P.03
Date: April 8, 1987 Page 2 of 3
SUBJECT: REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF LOS ANGELES AND CITY OF
CARLSBAD FOR THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING STUDY OF THE BATIQUITOS
LAGOON ENHANCEMENT PROJECT
3. In order to achieve the schedule contained 1n the joint work plan
developed by the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach and the Corps'
Los Angeles District Engineer's Office, for implementation of Phase 1
of the 2020 Plan, 1t is mandatory to determine the feasibility of
Batiquitos as the principal mitigation site for the Port's 2020
landfills, whether or not the Pacific Texas project 1s undertaken.
This feasibility determination is needed for the specific Phase 1 2020
project description scheduled to be announced publicly in
September 1987 when we anticipate initiating the EIR/EIS process.
4. Transmlttal No. 2 1s the draft contract between Carlsbad and the
selected consulting team headed by CH2M Hill. Port staff fully
participated 1n the selection and negotiation processes and reviewed
the Carlsbad/CH2M H111 agreement for consistency with the
reimbursement agreement. Under the provisions of the reimbursement
agreement, the Port will be providing a Project Manager to work with
Carlsbad's staff and to direct the efforts of the consulting team.
5. The approval to reimburse the City of Carlsbad, which will be the
lead agency for Implementation of the Batiquitos project is being
sought prior to either: the approval of a Memorandum of Agreement
(MOA) with various state and federal agencies covering all phases of
implementing the Batiquitos project; or the deposit by Pacific Texas
of $15 million to fund the enhancement project as required by Coastal
Permit No. 5-85-623-A. The reimbursement agreement is an interim
agreement that will be effectively superseded by the MOA. In order to
maintain the 2020 schedule, the feasibility work should be started
during April 1987. Once the MOA is approved by all parties, the Port
Itself will be reimbursed for monies advanced from the escrow account
established by Pacific Texas.
6. Until approval of the MOA and the Pacific Texas deposit has been
made, the Port's financial exposure upon approval of the reimbursement
agreement will be the CH2M H111 contract amount of $392,200 and
reimbursement for Carlsbad expenses, not to exceed $57,800; a total of
$450,000. Although not required by Carlsbad policies, the consulting
team includes the firm of TekmaMne, a certified MBE, which will be
accomplishing Tasks PI, P5, P7 and P15 representing approximately 31%
of the lump sum $392,200 contract.
7. Under the provisions of the 1986 "Dills Bill", Public Resources
Code 6306.1, the City of Los Angeles "...acting by and through its
Board of Harbor Commissioners, may take all action which are necessary
for mitigation of expansion of the Port of Los Angeles by the
enhancement, restoration and management of Batiquitos Lagoon in the
County of San Diego." The determination of the Batiquitos project's
feasibility to achieve the required mitigation is the first step in
the process.
iti_t'.-.ui itiK Ytuti ; *4- o,-ay oi^yHi'i ;ii^ toi tw^y -?
04/03/1987 09:30 PORT OF Lfl . 213 831-0439 P.04
Date: April 8, 1987 Page 3 of 3
SUBJECT: REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF LOS ANGELES AND CITY OF
CARLSBAD FOR THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING STUDY OF THE BATIQUITOS
LAGOON ENHANCEMENT PROJECT _
8. The proposed reimbursement agreement and the agreement with CH2M H111
is scheduled to be considered by the Carlsbad City Council at its
regular meeting of April 14, 1987, following Board approval, The
preliminary engineering work would begin the week following Carlsbad's
approval of these two agreements.
9. The proposed reimbursement agreement has been approved as to form by
the City Attorney's office.
10. Funds are available under Item 856, Object No. 048.
11. The Environmental Scientist has determined that approval of the
reimbursement agreement is exempt from the requirements of CEQA as set
forth in Article III, Sections 2 d and 2 f of the Los Angeles City
CEQA Guidelines.
12. The proposed action has been reviewed with and 1s acceptable to the
Council's Industry and Economic Development Committee members and the
Mayor's office under Executive Order No. 39 .
TRANSMITTALS:
1, Reimbursement Agreement between City of Carlsbad and the City of
Los Angeles with:
Exhibit A: Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Plan
Exhibit B: Scope of Work, Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Plan
Predesign
2. Engineering Agreement between City of Carlsbad and CH2M Hill (without
exhibits).
VEH:py VERNON E. HALL
csc3-548B 2020 Project Manager
APPROVED:
UUMALU L. MUbMAN
Deputy Executive Director
EZUNIAL BURTS ^-
Executive Director
1 RESOLUTION NO. 9022
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
3 REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF
LOS ANGELES AND CITY OF CARLSBAD FOR THE
4 PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE BATIQUITOS LAGOON
ENHANCEMENT PLAN.
5
6 WHEREAS, City of Los Angeles acting by and through the
7 Board of Harbor Commissioners (BOARD) and the City of Carlsbad
8 (CITY) intend to pursue a proposed project identified as the enhancement
9 of Batiquitos Lagoon (PROJECT) as mitigation for Los Angeles harbor
10 fills requiring an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Environmental
11 Impact Statement (EIS); and
12 WHEREAS, in order to adequately scope the EIR/EIS and to
13 determine whether the lagoon enhancement project is feasible, preliminary
14 i engineering design and related technical studies and cost estimates must
15 be completed, and
16 WHEREAS, BOARD and CITY will be parties to an Agreement
17 ("MOA") with various federal and state agencies which will establish
18 procedures and responsibilities for design, construction and maintenance
19 | of the Project; and
20 WHEREAS, BOARD desires to fund the amount necessary to
21 carry out the preliminary engineering studies prior to and until said
22 MOA has become effective;
23 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
24 1. The above recitations are true and correct.
25 2. The attached agreement entitled "REIMBURSEMENT
26 AGREEMENT" between the City of Los Angeles and City of Carlsbad
27 is hereby approved.
28
1 3. Mayor is hereby directed to sign agreement on behalf
2 of City of Carlsbad.
3 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
4 the Carlsbad City Council held on the 14th day of April , 1987
5 by the following vote, to wit:
6 AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux, and Larson
7 NOES: None
8 ABSENT: None
9
10 >
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor
12 ATTEST:
13 fj^^at^ J. &
14 ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clefck
15 (SEAL)
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CARLSB/
AND THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES FOR THE
PREPARATION OF THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
DESIGN AND RELATED TECHNICAL STUDIES FOR THE
BATIQUITOS LAGOON ENHANCEMENT PROJECT
day of QdNJ 1987,THIS AGREEMENT is made this
between the CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal corporation of the 'State of
California, hereinafter referred to as CITY, and the City of Los Angeles
acting by and through the Board of Harbor Commissioners hereinafter referred
to as BOARD.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, BOARD and CITY intend to pursue a proposed project
identified as the enhancement of Batiquitos Lagoon (Project) as mitigation for
Los Angeles harbor fills requiring an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS); and
WHEREAS, in order to adequately scope the EIR/EIS and to determine
whether the lagoon enhancement project is feasible, preliminary engineering
design and related technical studies and cost estimates must be completed; and
WHEREAS, BOARD and CITY will be parties to an Agreement ("MOA") with
various federal and state agencies which will establish procedures and
responsibilities for design, construction and maintenance of the Project; and
WHEREAS, BOARD desires to fund the amount necessary to carry out the
preliminary engineering studies prior to and until said MOA has become
effective;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions, it
is agreed as follows:
1. CITY will engage the firm of CH2M Hill hereinafter referred to
as CONSULTANT to perform the necessary preliminary engineering
for that area more particularly depicted upon a site map attached
as Exhibit "A" - Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Plan.
2. It is understood that CONSULTANT'S services shall conform to the
eighteen tasks specified in the Scope of Work attached as
Exhibit B and made a part of this agreement. To carry out these
tasks, Consultant shall:
(a) Conduct field explorations;
(b) Communicate weekly with the CITY staff;
(c) Write reports; and
(d) Perform such other work as necessary to properly evaluate
the proposed Project.
3. It is understood that Exhibit B - Scope of Work pertains only to
the preliminary engineering and related technical studies
necessary to determine the estimated project costs and
engineering feasibility and to adequately scope the work required
for an EIR/EIS. Separate agreements may be entered into by
BOARD, CITY and CONSULTANT for the preparation of the EIR/EIS.
4. BOARD shall pay to CITY the actual cost of CONSULTANT'S services
provided these costs shall not exceed $392,000.00 without prior
written approval of BOARD plus actual CITY administrative costs,
not to exceed $50,000.00. Such cost shall be based on the fees
set forth in Exhibit B and shall be payable as Consultant
completes and bills for work performed on each of the eighteen
tasks.
CONSULTANT'S invoices, in accordance with Section 5 of the
engineering agreement between CITY and CONSULTANT, shall be
forwarded monthly to BOARD for direct payment to CONSULTANT by
BOARD in a timely manner. Monthly invoices for actual CITY
administrative costs, shall be paid by BOARD in a like manner.
Said invoices shall be fully documented by CITY.
5. It is understood that CONSULTANT shall be an independent
contractor of CITY.
6. It is understood that BOARD shall provide CITY with a Project
Manager to assist CITY in carrying out the preliminary
engineering studies. The Project Manager shall report to and
take direction from CITY, through the City Manager or his
designee, provided however, that CITY agrees that it will at all
times consult with BOARD if BOARD expresses any concerns
regarding the Project and will implement all requests of BOARD
unless it expressly finds such requests are unreasonable. The
Project Manager shall comply with all laws, rules and policies of
CITY and may be removed by BOARD or the CITY, after consultation
with BOARD, if his/her performance is in any respect
unsatisfactory. The Project Manager shall be provided
appropriate office space and facilities, if available, (phone,
copier, files, etc.) by CITY.
7. It is understood that, since BOARD is advancing funds for
preliminary engineering work which may be accomplished and paid
for in accordance with Sections 5 and 9 of said MOA, BOARD shall
be reimbursed for the actual amount of its payments to CONSULTANT
and CITY from the Escrow Account established under the terms of
the MOA, upon written request by BOARD. BOARD shall have the
right to terminate the work of CONSULTANT at anytime for any
reason as long as BOARD reimburses the CONSULTANT and CITY for
costs incurred to date. Such termination shall be accomplished
by BOARD providing CITY a written notice and CITY terminating the
CONSULTANT'S Agreement as provided in that Agreement.
8. The work product of CONSULTANT shall be owned jointly by CITY
and BOARD. CITY and BOARD agree that the plans developed by
CONSULTANT are proprietary information which have an economic
value to a person restoring the lagoon. If for any reason BOARD
does not proceed with the project, it agrees that CITY may use
the plans developed by CONSULTANT to itself restore the lagoon.
CITY agrees that if any other person wishes to restore the lagoon
and use such plans, that BOARD shall be entitled to be reimbursed
from such person the value of the plan to the extent BOARD funds
have paid for the work of the CONSULTANT.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement
on the day and year first above written.
CITY OF CARLSBAD, a Municipal
Corporation of the State of
California
".LEWIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a Municipal
Corporation of the State of
California
L BURTSi-Exe'cutivV Director
for Board of Harbor Commissioners
ALETHARAUTENI^Z/ISUyctelrk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ll-fr&O Ql
LL,( CornltrrssTon Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Assistant City Attorney
VEH:lm
csc3-5387
3/24/87
JAMES KyflAHN
City Attorney
Assistant
3
<
3
H
00
I
X
LLI
EXHIBIT B
III. SCOPE OF WORK
CH2M HILL
BATIQUITOS LAGOON ENHANCEMENT PLAN PREDESIGN
Revised August 13, 1986
Revised February 5, 1987
Revised February 18, 1987
Revised February 22, 1987
TASK PI—LAGOON INSTRUMENTATION TO CALIBRATE MODEL
OBJECTIVE
Determine the water levels and current speeds and directions
in each of the three Batiquitos Lagoon basins under the
influence of real ocean tides and to ascertain the friction
factor at the three choke points and the east basin to
calibrate the hydrodynamic computer model and observe the
sediment transport process at the entrance.
METHODOLOGY
The east, central, and west basins of the lagoon will be
instrumented with four current meters and four tide gages.
The mouth of the lagoon will be opened by bulldozing the
sand and gravel sill aside. The instruments will record
water levels and circulation currents in the deeper parts of
the three basins for 10 days. A cross-section at the opened
inlet will be surveyed three times in the 10 days.
The client will arrange for any permits needed to conduct
this task. Consultant will furnish a description of the
planned opening and instrumentation.
III-l
PRODUCT
Tabulation of tides, water levels, current speeds and
directions as a function of time to be used as input into
RMA2.
TASK P2--MODEL CIRCULATION OF PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
OBJECTIVE
Using water elevation records and current data from the
lagoon instrumentation task, and lagoon geometry from
the fathometer survey task and digitizing map task,
model RMA2 will be run to evaluate circulation, mixing,
flushing, and tidal prism propagation in the lagoon assuming
implementation of the preferred alternative.
METHODOLOGY
The hydraulic analysis will be done using the Corps of Engi-
neers' two-dimensional flow model called RMA2 (or TABS2,
which is an integrated combination of RMA2, RMA4 and SED4).
This model will be run for the preferred alternative (Plan 1)
The results will be compared to the established goal and
objectives for compliance.
PRODUCTS
A calibrated hydrodynamic model of Batiquitos Lagoon and a
series of maps (figures) showing circulation patterns in
Batiquitos Lagoon for the Preferred Alternative. Also,
input data for RMA4 will be generated.
III-2
TASK P3—MODEL CIRCULATION OF TWO DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS
OBJECTIVE
The circulation, mixing, flushing, and tidal prism
propagation in Batiquitos Lagoon for Plans 2 and 3 will be
evaluated.
METHODOLOGY
Lagoon geometry for Batiquitos Lagoon conforming to Plans 2
and 3 will be developed and modeled. RMA2 will be run to
evaluate circulation, mixing, flushing, and tidal prism
propagation•in the lagoon. The results will be compared to
the project goals and objectives for compliance.'
PRODUCT
A series of maps (figures) showing circulation patterns in
Batiquitos Lagoon and input data for RMA4 will be generated
for Plans 2 and 3.
TASK P4—EXISTING DATA
OBJECTIVE
Obtain all pertinent information and data on Batiquitos
Lagoon to assist in engineering design aspects and prevent a
duplication of study efforts.
METHODOLOGY
Existing data will be gathered on such items as:
o Bridge plans from CalTrans
III-3
o Contour maps of lagoon
o Bench mark identification and horizontal and ver-
tical coordinates
o Right-of-way surveys
o Easements
o Upland erosion and sedimentation rates
o Plans for existing utilities and gas line
o Test holes data from bridge investigations and
other studies
o Stream flow hydrographs
o Tide and tidal current data
o Littoral drift
o Previous modelling efforts
o Previous beach profiles
o Traffic counts and traffic patterns
o Noise measurements
o Dredging records of other California tidal inlets
o Air quality analyses
o Water quality data
III-4
o Copies of city, state, and federal engineering
standards
The data will be reviewed to identify gaps in the required
information. Copies of the data will be assembled and sent
to project engineers and preparers of the EIR/EIS.
PRODUCT
Sets of information and data to assist in initiating such
activities as computer modeling, preparation of master map,
grading plans, inlet design, and dredging and disposal plan.
TASK PS—BATHYMETRIC SURVEY
OBJECTIVE
There are no survey data for the deeper sections of
Batiquitos Lagoon west of 1-5. A bathymetrie survey will
provide data to fill this gap in the lagoon geometry.
METHODOLOGY
A bathymetrie survey consisting of a series of tracklines
on a 100-foot grid across the lagoon west of 1-5 will be
conducted. Bathymetric records will be reduced and contours
generated for the unmapped sections of the lagoon.
PRODUCT
A contour map at 1"»100' scale, with 1-foot contour
intervals will be produced to supplement the existing
contour map.
III-5
TASK P6—SOILS AND LABORATORY ANALYSIS
OBJECTIVE
The soil/sediment analysis will be undertaken to resolve the
question of whether the soils in the east end of the lagoon
are contaminated with pesticide residues or toxic materials
identified in the testing described below. The information
resulting from the analysis may be used to apply for permits
for dredging, Section 404 inwater disposal, and ocean dumping.
METHODOLOGY
Soils conditions in the western portions of the lagoon have
been evaluated for structural purposes to some extent, but
soils in the eastern portion require additional sampling and
mechanical analyses. There appear to be anomalies in the
lagoon depositions, which will require analysis sufficient
for engineering dredging and disposal, grading designs, cost
estimating, and structural uses on- and offsite. No chemi-
cal testing of soils has been done. We have not had access
to any of the boring logs or test results from previous
sampling efforts; therefore, our proposed sampling/testing
effort contains a degree of uncertainty.
From a recent conversation with a representative of the
Corps of Engineers, South Coast District, it appears than an
accurate estimate of bioassay/bioaccumulation studies neces-
sary for the Enhancement Plan design cannot be made without
knowledge of the chemical characteristics of the lagoon
sediments. For ocean disposal, the Corps requires bioassays
on three particular species (zooplankton and invertebrates)
in both the solid phase and the liquid phase. According to
the Corps representative, a proposed bioassay program must
be submitted to the Corps for approval; the proposed program
III-6
should be based on knowledge of the sediment chemical char-
acteristics. Our proposed chemical sampling program will
provide enough information to develop a bioassay program for
Corps approval. However, a bioassay is not included in this
scope.
Sampling for potential contamination and permitting purposes
will be required. Possible contamination from offsite activ-
ities has been raised as a concern, due to agriculture and
other upland uses. Potential contamination must be deter-
mined for construction purposes (health and safety, air
quality, etc.) and for disposal options analysis (i.e., will
there be limitations to disposal siting).
There will be soil samples taken from five locations for
chemical and physical sampling, and 20 locations for physical
sampling throughout the lagoon. Samples will be taken with
either hand-driven coring or float mounted vibra-core equip-
ment. Each hole will be cored to a maximum depth below
mudline of 10 feet, or an elevation of -8 feet (MSL).
The samples for the chemical testing will be taken adjacent
to the creek mouths and the nursery area and at certain
drainage points around the lagoon. Samples will be composited
and undergo elutriate tests for the following: metals, cya-
nide, total phenol, acid extractables, base/neutral extract-
ables, pesticides/PCB's, chlordphenoxy herbicides, and
volatiles. In addition, each will undergo a bulk sediment
analysis to meet the Corps of Engineers criteria. The
sampling program is designed to resolve the issue of contami-
nated soils and to provide the information necessary for
dredging permits and development of a bioassay program for
Corps approval. A two-page summary of the methods proposed
will be submitted to the client for their coordination with
EPA and the Corps of Engineers.
III-7
Twenty test holes will be cored for determination of physical
characteristics of the proposed dredged material. Samples
taken would be subjected to laboratory classification
(including grain size analysis). The cores will be from
throughout the lagoon and we propose using coring equipment
as mentioned above. Samples from each test hole will be
placed into plastic jars for grain size laboratory analysis.
CH2M HILL will conduct both the sampling and the laboratory
analyses unless another local EPA certified laboratory
demonstrates it can be as expeditious. CH2M HILL has two
EPA certified labs in Redding, California and Corvallis,
Oregon.
Any permits required and/or access permission needed will be
acquired or arranged by the client.
PRODUCT
Results of soil sampling and testing will be included in a
Forty Percent Predesign Report. Maps of test hole sites,
boring logs, and physical and chemical laboratory test re-
sults will be included in the Preliminary Design Report.
TASK P7—TIDAL INLET ANALYSIS
AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this task is to develop the preliminary design
of a self-maintaining tidal entrance to the Batiquitos Lagoon.
III-8
METHODOLOGY
This task will be performed in the following manner:
o Collect and analyze current and historical data on
the physical and geological processes relating to
the lagoon outlet and its adjacent coastal and
nearshore region. Relevant literature will also
be reviewed including the Coastal Conservancy's
Enhancement Plan, the previous reports by the
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, comments by
Waterways Experiment Station (WES) and local
interests.
o Perform a bathymetrie and sub-bottom profile survey
of the offshore sea bed surrounding the lagoon
outlet in order to obtain high-resolution informa-
tion of the site-specific boundary condition in
support of the entrance design. A total of seven
survey transects will be deployed within 300 feet
upcoast and downcoast of the outlet, extending to
a depth of 30 feet.
o Perform a conceptual, functional design of the
tidal entrance. The design will be accompanied by
the supporting rationales as well as estimates of
silting rates in the lagoon and closure frequencies
in consideration of tidal fluctuations, storm
frequencies and regional coastal sediment budget.
o Perform a preliminary, structural design of the
tidal entrance, accompanied by the provisions for
jetties or no jetties, channel dimensions and
configurations, specification or armor types for
the channel and the jetty, and preliminary design
drawings.
III-9
Analyze potential impacts of the proposed entrance
design, with special reference to possible disrup-
tion to the longshore sediment transport, and alter-
ation of water circulation and quality in the
adjacent oceanfront area which might adversely
affect surfers, swimmers and other beach users.
Evaluate construction methodologies, construction
scenarios, schedules, and costs, and provide pre-
liminary estimates and specs on labor, material
and -equipment.
Develop maintenance methodologies, schedules and
costs.
PRODUCTS
The Preliminary Design Report will summarize the rationale,
the preliminary design, the construction methods, the esti-
mated costs for construction and maintenance, and the main-
tenance procedures.
TASK P8— WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this task is to examine how the lagoon cir-
culation of the preferred alternative affects water quality,
specifically salinity and temperature. The hydrodynamic
analysis is assumed to provide sufficient circulation data
for water quality assessment in the lagoon on a seasonal
basis.
111-10
METHODOLOGY
The sensitivity of the preferred alternative lagoon config-
uration will be examined for its impact on lagoon water
quality. This evaluation will provide assessments of the
design to maintain acceptable water quality and habitats for
each of four seasonal conditions. Seasonal projections are
necessary due to the physical, habitat, environmental, and
climatological changes experienced throughout the year.
The specific tidal hydraulic information developed during
the Enhancement Plan studies will be used to provide the
data required to evaluate water quality characteristics.
The results of RMA-2 circulation model will feed into a sec-
ond Corps model (also two-dimensional) called RMA-4, which
models water quality. With RMA-4, we can model dissolved
oxygen, temperature, biological oxygen demand, and salinity
in the lagoon assuming a purely advection-dispersion mass
transport without detailed kinetic relationship. RMA-4 has
the potential to handle one or two conservative substances
in addition to the parameters listed above; we will
determine which, if any, should be modeled based on input
from our biologists.
The sensitivity of Batiquitos Lagoon to climatological con-
ditions, circulation patterns, and runoff water quality is
integrated into the water quality analysis. We will permit
examination the seasonal variations of water quality.
Existing data and analytical techniques will be utilized for
this effort, and are assumed to be sufficient for the
required analysis.
III-ll
PRODUCTS
The water quality assessment of the Enhancement Plan will be
summarized in the Preliminary Design Report complete with
data, assumptions, methods, results, and conclusions.
The product will include a recommendation and/or confirma-
tion of continued water quality monitoring and analysis,
sedimentation monitoring, and closure/erosion process data
near the mouth. Because certain estuarine processes are
difficult to project accurately, this data collection and
monitoring program concept may be necessary for reevaluation
of lagoon operations in the future.
TASK P9—PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
OBJECTIVE
The objective is to review early design concepts to
determine if the resulting enhancement project will provide
suitable habitat for biota.
An important aspect of the engineering program is inter-
action between engineers and biologists to ensure that the
project design fulfills the biological goals of the concep-
tual plan considering the data already developed as part of
the HEP. Our approach involves an iterative feedback pro-
cess. The results of the circulation and water quality
model are reviewed by biologists to determine how well they
meet the criteria for fisheries and bird habitat. If
necessary, the biologists suggest modifications which can be
used to refine the grading plan and remodel circulation and
water quality. The process may require up to three adjust-
ments to achieve a good fit between engineering design and
biological requirements.
111-12
PRODUCT
Minor adjustments will be made in design concepts to better
accommodate biological needs.
TASK P10—DIGITIZE MAPPING
OBJECTIVE
Contour maps of the existing and proposed topography of
Batiquitos Lagoon will be prepared to provide base maps,
develop the grading plan, and determine the volume of
material to be dredged.
METHODOLOGY
Topography for the existing lagoon, the recommended
(preferred) plan and one alternative, will be digitized
using CADD. Maps will be prepared at a scale of 1"=100'
with 1-foot contour intervals in the areas to be dredged.
Topographic and bathymetrie data collected under the fathom-
eter survey task will be digitized to complete the existing-
condition and preferred-plan maps. Volume differences will
be computed.
PRODUCT
Three contour maps will be produced. The dredge volumes
will be summarized in the Preliminary Design Report.
111-13
TASK PI 1—DREDGING AND DISPOSAL PLAN
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this task is to prepare:
o A lagoon dredging plan to create 220 acres of sub-
tidal habitat, 170 acres of intertidal habitat,
and 135 acres of supertidal habitat.
o An alternative dredging plan to the one above.
o A plan, schedule, and cost estimate to properly
dispose of approximately 3 million cubic yards of
sand and mud (wet silts and clays).
METHODOLOGY
The conceptual plans for the dredged configuration will be
coordinated with the circulation studies to optimize flush-
ing and conform to the Enhancement Plan. Design criteria
will be supplied by the client.
Results of the soil testing will be reviewed to determine if
any contaminated sediments are present. If contaminants are
present, those areas will be delineated for special handling
procedures. This could include locating approved disposal
site(s), surveying potential haulers, and initiating the
permitting process for dredging, hauling, and disposing of
toxic materials. If no contaminated soils are found, the
entire dredging process is simplified.
Grain size results will be reviewed to delineate homogeneous
soil types. A list of potential dredging contractors and
disposal sites will be developed. A telephone survey will
be conducted to assess contractor interest, equipment
111-14
available, equipment rates, and scheduling. Disposal site
operators will be queried as to ability to take 3 million
yards of material, site location, transportation available,
and costs.
Reasonable and proven methods of excavation will be ex-
plored. Proper sizes and types of dredging equipment will
be identified, work capacities estimated, handling require-
ments catalogued, and costs estimated. Adequate dredging
schemes and techniques will be documented.
A set of dredging plans (contours and/or slope grades) will
be drawn up for each of the alternatives using our CADD sys-
tem. The dredging plans will be compared to the existing
ground contours and dredging quantities computed.
The amount and character of sediments to be removed will be
reviewed to schedule when and from what part of the lagoon
the different soil types will be removed. Sand will be eas-
ier to handle and will be more valuable (as commercial
aggregate, for beach nourishment, or as structural fill)
than the muds. Once the various layers have been identified
and tagged as to haul method and destination, a schedule (in
flow chart fashion, similar to CPM) will be drawn up to
optimize the disposal, avoid delays due to traffic
conflicts, and put the disposal site facilities on notice to
receive the material.
Habitat requirements of the least tern will be supplied by
the client. Provisions for protection of least tern nesting
and foraging will be included in the Preliminary Design
Report.
A cost estimate will be prepared which will include engi-
neering and administrative costs, hauling of the material to
the disposal site (whether by truck, slurry pipeline, Charge,
111-15
ship, or train), spreading of the material at the disposal
site, and any post-disposal costs (such as grading or plant-
ing the disposal site(s), marking and/or fencing the
disposal site(s), renting the disposal site(s) for a number
of years, or turning the disposal site(s) into special habi-
tats) .
Beach nourishment as a means of disposal is discussed else-
where .
PRODUCTS
A set of preliminary dredging plans consisting of new con-
tours (dark.) for each of the preferred plan and Phase I
superimposed on the existing contours (screened). A dredge
disposal plan consisting of schedule, locations, haul
methods and routes, flow charts, and cost estimates. All
will be included in the Preliminary Design Report.
TASK PI2—GAS LINE RELOCATION
OBJECTIVE
At least one gas line is known to cross the lagoon and will
require relocation. The existing line will be located and a
relocation scheme developed.
METHODOLOGY
The Southern Cities Gas Company will be queried as to the
exact location of their gas pipeline across Batiquitas
Lagoon. Relocation schemes will be developed, discussed
with Southern Cities Gas Company and Caltrans, and a pre-
ferred relocation scheme selected. Conceptual drawings of
the preferred relocation scheme will be prepared.
. 111-16
PRODUCT
A discussion of the relocation scheme and drawings will
appear in the Preliminary Design Report.
' TASK PI3—SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this task .will be to examine and evaluate the
proposed sediment control plan and to integrate the resul-
tant net sedimentation to the Batiquitos Lagoon with a sedi-
ment transpo'rt model of the lagoon. This will be performed
for the preferred plan and one alternative. Estimates of
net sediment movement to the lagoon area from both upland
loadings and ocean loadings will be developed to evaluate
potential maintenance requirements.
These analyses will be determined for the hydrologic condi-
tions used in the Preferred Plan.
METHODOLOGY
The upland erosion and sedimentation rates for the drainage
areas surrounding Batiquitos Lagoon will be examined using
the available data. Where data on sediment yield in the
basins are lacking, correlation estimates will be used for
similar drainages nearby which have sediment load data. The
design storm used will be the one anticipated to yield the
greatest sediment deposition.
Grain size distributions of both suspended sediment data and
bed material data in the study area will be used to estimate
the effectiveness of the proposed sediment basins. Sample
streambed sediment data will be collected in the major
111-17
loads defined at the boundaries of the lagoon. These data
will provide information to better assess lagoon design
configurations, areas of excessive sediment build-up, and
general estimates of maintenance that may be required.
A prediction of when the lagoon would fill up with sediment,
assuming no control, will be made for use in the EIR/EIS No
Action Alternative. This will be based on sedimentation
rates; no modeling will be done.
The integration of the basin runoff hydrology, sedimentation
characteristics and yield, lagoon hydrodynamics, and pro-
posed control facilities will best address the overall
Sediment Control Plan. The resultant analysis and evalu-
ations will then be used to develop a complete impact
assessment of the proposed Sediment Control Plan including
possible changes.
PRODUCT
The Preliminary Design Report will include the data used to
confirm and develop sediment loading rates for the drainages
to the lagoon, trapping efficiencies for the sediment
control facilities, assumptions, baseline hydrology,
estimated maintenance requirements, and schedules.
In addition, the sediment transport analysis of the Bati-
quitos Lagoon will be included to show the expected nature
of material movement throughout the area. Estimated quan-
tities of sediment build-up or depletion will be shown along
with bottom contours for the design hydrologic condition.
Model assumptions and data will be presented for complete
understanding of the details and limitation of the analysis.
Sediment control traps will be designed for the two creeks
111-19
and upland drainage paths. The traps will conform to the
City of Carlsbad and Caltrans standards.
TASK P14— (TASK DELETED)
TASK PI5—BEACH NOURISHMENT
OBJECTIVES
The objectives of this task are to prepare preliminary
design data for the preferred plan as follows:
o Prepare background information on site-specific
coastal processes to support evaluation of beach
nourishment options.
o Develop optional schemes and compare their rela-
tive merits and demerits.
o Assess possible adverse impacts of the beach nour-
ishment work on the adjacent shorelines.
o Determine a feasible beach nourishment scheme with
the optimum combination of technical and economic
merits and minimum adverse impacts.
METHODOLOGY
To develop the background information, we will conduct the
following tasks:
o Interview the engineers at the SG&E Encino plant
to assess and reappraise their biannual beach
111-20
nourishment records since 1954 (thus far at Least
13 nourishment operations).
o Interview local and adjacent coastal residents on
factual information on the behavior (namely,
seasonal changes, extreme events) and history of
the beaches.
o Investigate factual data from literature and ar-
chives on the history of shoreline and beach pro-
file, their changes and equilibrium conditions,
seasonal and extreme events.
Using the background information described above, we will
develop various schemes for sand placement strategy and will
evaluate innovative concepts which will .enhance the local
residence tine of the placed sand to the maximum possible
extent. The concepts to be evaluated will include: (a) soft-
armor (geotextile fabric material) mattresses containing
cobbles to serve as stationary permeable underlayer to arrest
the placed sand against wave agitation? (b) "perched" or
terraced beach configuration using retained cobble deploy-
ment with soft-armor technology (i.e., to minimize offshore
loss); (c) horizontal soft-armor retention devices made with
geotextile tailored mattresses containing cobbles or sand
(i.e., to minimize longshore loss); (d) graded cobble dis-
tribution to serve as permeable underlayer for the placed
sand, with no structural retention; (e) "headland" shoreline
concept using redistributed cobble piles with soft-armor
retention. We will conduct the following tasks:
o Determine volumetric allocation of sand placement
along the shoreline.
111-21
o Investigate timing and schedule of the nourishment
operations to maximize the project benefits while
minimizing possible adverse impacts.
o Evaluate the useful project life of each alterna-
tive scheme, with and without maintenance.
o Derive preliminary cost estimates.
All of this information will be used to evaluate and compare
the technical merits and disadvantages of the alternative
schemes.
Potential adverse effects will be assessed, including the
following:
o The implications of an increased presence of beach
sand on the silting potential at the Batiquitos
entrance.
o The enhanced turbidity and its spatial distribu-
tion during the nourishment operation as a func-
tion of timing, duration, and placement methods.
o Possible enhancement of sediment entrainment into
the Agua Hedionda lagoon.
o Possible adverse local recreational and aesthetic
impacts.
From this information, we will synthesize the technical mer-
its and impacts of the various schemes and will determine
the best alternative in light of the significance of the
technical merits and adverse impacts, regulatory constraints
and permit requirements, and desires of the City of
Carlsbad, the Port of Los Angeles, and the general public.
111-22
PRODUCTS
The Preliminary Design Report will discuss the various
beach nourishment schemes evaluated, their technical merits,
and their adverse impacts. The report will recommend the
best plan and present reasons for the recommendations.
TASK PI6—PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORTS
1. FORTY PERCENT PREDESIGN REPORT
Fifteen copies of a Forty Percent Predesign Report will
be delivered to the client. This report will summarize
the results of preliminary investigations and modeling.
The intent of the 40 percent Predesign Report is to
allow an early review of initial design concepts and
the overall direction of the project. Consequently,
the report will be terse and will include rough graphic
illustrations. Much of the material may be presented
as tables rather than text.
The report will cover these topics:
o Results of Initial field work and testing
Sediment quality by grain size class
Sediment quality (contaminants found)
Elutriate test results
Offshore survey data
111-23
o Suitable excavation method
o Dredging depths and boundaries
o Tidal Inlet
Tidal hydraulics
Inlet design options
o Lagoon circulation and flushing (RMA-2 Model-
ing results)
o Lagoon Water Quality (RMA-4 Modeling results)
o Resulting habitats
o Revisions to grading plan/inlet desian to
improve habitats
2. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT
Ten copies of a Draft Preliminary Design Report (PDR)
will be submitted for client review.
We will revise the Draft and deliver 20 copies of the
Final PDR.
The PDR will expand the Forty Percent Predesign Report
to include:
o Results of soil borings
o Volume of dredged materials by type
o Dredged materials disposal sites
o Dredged materials disposal methods
111-24
o Beach nourishment
o Final grading plan
o Utilities relocation
o Sediment traps
o Cost estimates
TASK" P17 — PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MEETINGS
The consultant will attend and participate in meetings and
other meetings during the course of the preliminary engi-
neering, as requested by the client, up to a total of
16 man-meetings. It is anticipated that these meetings will
include:
o Two periodic progress and coordination meetings
with the client to present interim findings.
o One agency meeting to present/discuss the
alternatives and the Forty Percent Predesign
Report.
o Two city council meetings; one to present/discuss
the alternatives and the Forty Percent Predesign
Report, and one to present a summary of the
Predesign Report.
TASK PI8—MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
CH2M HILL will provide a Project Director who will be
responsible directly to the client and will manage the
overall activities of the consulting and subconsulting
staff. He will also be responsible for project
administration.
111-25
Day-to-day engineering tasks will be directed by the lead
engineer.
Management and administration will extend over the 5-month
period of active project work.
TASK PI9—AVIFAUNA SURVEYS
OBJECTIVE
Document avifaunal activity within the lagoon.
METHODOLOGY '
Conduct monthly, 1-day field surveys of Batiquitos Lagoon
for five consecutive months. The field surveys will record
species numbers and abundance, habitat utilization and acti-
vities of birds present in and immediately adjacent to
Batiquitos Lagoon.
PRODUCT
Data compilation will consist of transcribing recorded notes
onto a master species list, with abundance, activity
(e.g., feeding, nesting, resting) and habitat (e.g., open
water, nearshore vegetation, mudflat, etc.) recorded for
each taxon.
BC/001
111-26
BATIQUITOS LAGOON ENHANCEMENT PLAN PREDESIGN
SCHEDULE
Calendar
Days Milestone
0 Notice to Proceed (including permitting to
open lagoon mouth)
25 From notice to proceed, completion of
Task PI, lagoon instrumentation to calibrate
model
45 From completion of Task PI (or from
permission to access property, if later),
completion of field work and data collection
45 From completion of previous milestone, submit
Forty.Percent Predesign Report
(21) Completion of client review of Forty Percent
Predesign Report
75 Following receipt of client comments, submit
Draft Predesign Report (DPDR)
(21) Client review of DPDR
21 Following receipt of client review of DPDR,
submit Predesign Report
( ) Numbers in parenthesis designate client review time.
BC/002
LJ
<Q
—I LJ
CLX
LJ ^
LJ <
CJH-
LJ
O^U
OD LJ-o:
Q_
or*
CN
O
•*CM
O
?j
O00
(/}
<
Q
UJ
O
o<o
TASKS• *iu o:
•IS*/_! UJ•j 0<E
'111
_ \ _J UJ•y O (T
•
4
r^
3 Q
t—c/iUJ
»
_ r
L Q
0 ft
L Q
-\ »
L C
f- if
L C
-) (/
L C
5 r*
L QL Q
O r
L Q
n _
L C
D -
L Q
- C
L Q
-
si f
L C
'DELETED") -^- U
L CL Q
1
•
•
*
* .
• •
•
•> to Is*- co o
L Cu Q. Q_ CL
*
EXHIBIT 8
SCOPE COST
BATIQUITOS LAGOON PRaiMINARY ENGINEERING
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
FEBRUARY 22, 1987
Approx.
Days toTask Fee Finish
P1 Lagoon Instrumentation $37,000 30
P2 Model Circulation 42,000 180
P3 Model Circulation 26,000 180
P4 Existing Data 6,000 30
P5 Bathymetric Survey 12,000 30
P6 Soils Analysis • 44,000 60
P7 Tidal Inlet 43,500 200
P8 Water Quality 22,000 200
P9 Environmental 4,000 190
P10 Mapping 10,000 45
P11 Dredging 30,000 100
P12 Gasline 4,200 200
P13 Sediments 41,000 270
P15 Beach Nourishment 29,000 'MV1
P16 Engineering 16.000 200
P17 M-eeUn-gT1* }*'™ f«j
P18 Administration JJgg 230
5,500 130
AL: $392,200 270