HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-04-21; City Council; 8972; Highway 78CIT OF CARLSBAD - AGEND;~3ILL
MTQ. 4/21/87
DEPT CM.
TITLE:
HIGHWAY 78
nPPT HD
CITY ATTYjU-
CITY
O
O
o
Oo
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That Council adopt motion to participate in funding for the widening
of Highway 78 and endorse Option 3-Table D, Cost Allocation Percentage.
BACKGROUND:
Congressman Packard was able to obtain a $15 million Federal allocation
for widening Highway 78 from 4 to 6 lanes. The project is contingent
upon raising matching funds from State and local government.
The current proposal is for the State to provide $12 million and the
5 North County cities, plus the County to provide $5 million.
SANDAG has proposed four options for cost sharing. Carlsbad's share
under the options would be:
OPTION
3
4
PERCENT
11%
11%
10%
17%
DOLLARS FORMULA
$550,000 Vehicle Miles Travelled
and Population
$550,000 VMT, Population,
and Employment
$500,000 VMT, Employment
$850,000 Population, Employment
Option 3 takes the population plus civilian employment within a 4 mile
corridor along Highway 78 in 1980 and the year 2000 and calculate each
city's average percent.
North County Mayors and Supervisor MacDonald will work out the final
cost formula when each agency has taken a position.
If the 1/2% gasoline sales tax issue passes in November, funds would
be provided from that tax to pay for Highway 78 widening.
If the voters reject that tax, then Carlsbad would be required to come
up with its share in 3 years.
EXHIBIT:
1. SANDAG Tables
OJ
p*'o<*
ooo
o"oro
O0O
o"000
0o
0
0o
0oo
0
oo
0
o
vO
0o
0
0om
o
0
0
o
o
0
0
0
00m
0o
0
0ini— i
0o
0
0
oo
0
o
00
o oo oo o
o o
r- r-
00 mPO•w-
00 1-1 t-H
r--ooiCTl
&
O
PS
&^
o oo o o .
**! *%"" "^fj. ^ ^7,.f4r" oo o^" in PO
PO i-1
*» -w-
m
PO"i—i*»
<
W
M
H
Ou
fH
U
rt to
u(CW
o
ooo
*s
O
O
PO
oo
o"o
00
06"
f—I•w-
000o o oo o o
cTcTcf
o^ m po
ooo•toom
PO"t—i•w-
PH
00r-
W
H
11
^ U
o oo oo o
V* *tin ovO O
Tf 00
o oo
PO '->
v$ UJ
000o o oo o o
o"o"o"o •* so
oo
m
vO
u0)
"o"
>4
•aQ)T3
it
•J
13•M
OH
W
•oO
IM
PH
§
• fH
4-1a
fH
•(-•soe
0)p
13>4a)•o<ufe
O^ WOo o^^ ff)
W K^
1^
•SjlC £ ro
O Q) — ''•« h -13
n) ^ u
DemonstrFHWA DiiState Mat<L>
<L)
Pi
•M
U0)
'??.ditional Pr<o>t<rt
{S
V•M
Itf-Wto
13uof-H
<4H
O
g
t— 4
•— 1
Carlsbad (§POj\j
Escondido$vO
PO
Oceanside$i— i
co0U1*rt
2
§to
-— *Smi— i
a+->
(O
>
O000)p§tf>
UHO
>,•+J
fi
g
O
0)rH ro NO rH m ini— i ro ro i— i >— i i— i oo
CQ
W
PQ
H
rH
<^r
OhH
PH
0
1
inWO
^H
Z
OPiw
PHz,
0P
oo
pj
H
OO
00
IN-
w
Po
PH
(U
cS
o•f-i
u
^CO
3
»-3
13
o
rJ
OHO
COfllU/
2
(Ui— i(J*PH
rflV
OT)
'SOU
-H•I-l
2
OOr-
CP4-1
Q
PH
O
rH2^n£
ao•*^
13r— 1
|
PH
3
O
in ™o u
ro fcO
rH
O3pq
000ON
rH
NO
O COO (U
O •£ro 5
co
0 3OO =4
rH~ 4>
W
^V^V^VOV^^ V^ro r* in ro I-H I-H o
rH f— C^- i— t ^ OO O
^^
^ e^ ^ ^ o^ j£ ^O NO ON rH T+1 O O
rH ON ^O ON f^* ^O C^3
rH rH rO t— 1 rH O
i— 1
vO vO vO vO vO vO vO
in o ro co oo ro o
ro rH TJ< ro ro o O
rH (Nj rO rH rH rH O
rH
000000 0
I-H ON ro ro o NO o
o oo m ON vo o o
rH fsj rO i-H rH O
rH
(d
PQ
Co
JurisdictiCarlsbado
Escondidi0)OceansidCOou3
r§
510
R)4-*co•ft
•d0)
^«*rt14O
UnincorpTOTALi—i m in ro in roi—i ro ro I-H i—i i—i
t--
00I
ro
J20
P
PH
0
1
If}W0
E""1 Q)
§|U w
ffi^ fH
W 0
PH •£
!Z H
0 £bi wP 'C;<« 3
SrZO 13
d3< J
Ht/3
0
U
00t-
wH
P
O
PH
00
° 0>
CO *>(U 3*H 0
jiPH
.2 0(J ,_•3 (U
* a
H
-MC
•1 B
'£ r2
0 PU 6
£ w
*^3 rt«2 .rl4< T
u
h Co o-d '13
'£ ~o ^u §•
V PH
§13r« 4-1
1 O
m ™o uo gjM o
fe
0)
(o
PQ
0
OO
rH~
NO
O COo eu0 -rjro g
to
CO
0 3
00 in
"3
O COO 0)0 •£ro 0
w
CO0 ?oo 2°* s^u
CO t* *t) CO i-* rH
,— ( (w f- ^H Tj* OO
^X )^ iS J^ ?^ J^O vO O^ i^ ^f O
,— ( rH <NJ i-H »— (
f"» ^O ^^ ^^ O^ ^J^
oo oo t- •* m in
rO CO rH rH
Vg VO VO J^ VO VO
o tN- ro oo o ro
ON xO i-H ^ in COrO rO rH rH
in o ro co oo ro
ro rH r4i m ro NO
rH rO rO rH rH rH
rH ON ro ro o NO
^^ oo 10 o^ ^o ^^
rH rO rO rH rH
0
0
t— t
ts
0
o
0
c>0i— i
t§o
o0rH
0
0orH
O
0orH
•8
ao• |H4->y
•8CO•c
1-3
CO
0) O
R)s&O_, U-, o ro *" ™ Sa § 8 g SIOtSo w> P
•s^s "sa s a2,3
o ON •* co m ONI-H ro ro 1-1 t-i t>- ""> O CO COro ro I-H I-H
oo
o>i
w
tt
H
*• t
OC~
oi
wo
H 4,
£ SM 2U w
« aW oa, •£
z °o *3'"•' (A
P|
0^o «
J 8
Ht/3
0
U
oo
'""M
£*
O
o•o•c
oU
«s«E
o
•Jj
£4oU
4)
1
^
0)PM
J3
"p.
E
«>
•|MO
.2
rt••H
3
§•
OH
"53
o
§ £O •£CO g
(A
§ 1O1^ "
^ u
NO
O (AO 6)0 -JJ
mk/J
CA
—^ ^g i0s* ti-6
ON Ox Ox 0s ON ON ON
oo oo r- ^< m in oro ro I-H i-i o
1-H
O Is- CO OO O CO O
G* ^2 ^^ "^ lO cO ^^ro ro rH I-H o
jO ^D vp vO vp jO vO
in o ro co oo ro o
ro I-H ^j< ro ro NO Oi— i ro ro i— i i— i i— i o
J^N ^? ^N ^ SN ^ ^I-H ON ro ro o NO O
O oo m 0s NO O OI-H ro ro I-H I-H o
1-H
NJ'
2
OCSo
o
EH
0
M W
PH3 S^•^ ^|7(Q O
2 §
UO
*I-JhJ
fH
t^
0o
00
**"
Otf
s^3
c
.2
t3
•3(A
"3
13y
0
m |
^^ B
"-!
ll
1-3 0H
SL *^*
I-H rtt— iT* 3^^ fi^^ O
rt .
S **
"^ EH
f» ^3 ^< fo ^j* ro
ON O O CO «-• inI-H ro co »-i I-H
1 1 l l l 1
^ p- ^J* ro o ro
co in ^ in co NOro co ro I-H rH
t^ O^ o co I-H O
•^ co ON NO ^< roI-H ro co I-H i— i
l i i i i i
ro in co ro oo rj<(N- o m o ij< oooo NO m ON t^ oo
00 ON NO O NO ON^< r- ON ro ij< co
o
oo
1-H
|
ON
00
001-H
1-H
O
oo
1-H
NOin
cvT
COco
oo
P
1
Op
&rrtcti
rt
e3
rt -HP boO fl>
P ^Hf-\
Cj P
•H
P^ ^H
•rH rt1)rtrt d)
to rt
rt a)p P
o• |H
4-1
U
3• r*h3>-3
»
S
1
,U W O
rthO
frO
«a •% £S -2 Cw > p
J<
H
O
H
C_o
4-1u^(A•IHM
•-3
w
TOTAL•vj M
v> CL,
<1) H•H•P
0)4J
Sglisfg: •f.S.cUl.S
oo
•H
I
Bfil liHS'.iia lli*J
i*i:«iJ«!gfHtr-ii i
oor~
0)I
V)
1
(+•4
s
Itir
r>-oo
%os SONfH VMHd
OaiVDOTIVHH %0£
DNIHDJLVNaivis %oz
JOINT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT OF THE COMMITTEE O*
CONFERENCE
PROJECT*
House bill
Subsection (a) describes projects authorized under this section.
Paragraph (53) authorizes a highway project to expand a high-
way which connects with an Interstate route in the vicinity of
Oceanside, California, with another interstate route in the vicinity
of Escondido, California, to demonstrate methods of reducing traffic
congestion and accidents.
Conference substitute
The conference substitute establishes a combined Federal and
State funding level for demonstration projects of
year for fiv(
funds outside the obligation limit. 30%
real
five years with 50% (8178 million)
ocations of Federal funds provided from discretionary pro-
grams (with pbligational authority reserved) and the remaining
20% ($71 million) to be provided by state or local funds. Local gov-
ernments cannoTbe required to contribute funds to the project The
projects include projects from both the House and Senate.
The provision also includes a guarantee for each state that it will
receive at least V4 of 1% of the new funds provided.
The $107 million is drawn down from the Interstate construction
discretionary program, the Interstate 4R discretionary program,
the Interstate transfer discretionary program, and the discretion-
ary portion of the bridge program. Each discretionary program will
provide funds on a pro rata basis. Funds drawn from the discretion-
ary programs would not be subject-to the requirements of the dis-
cretionary programs, but would instead be subject to the require-
ments that are necessary for these projects.
The Secretary is required to provide a brief annual status report
to Congress beginning in 1988 on all of the projects.