HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-05-12; City Council; 8998; Solids Management RecommendationsCIVSOF CARLSBAD — AGENCQBILL
AR« <T??<T
MTG. 05/12/87
DEPT. KNG
TITLE:
NORTH COUNTY SEWAGE
SOLIDS MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
'-ZMLL'DFPT. HtyKpP
CITY ATTY ^/^O
riTY MGR^*^-
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt Resolution No.
Advisory Committee
^
idal
approving the Encina Joint
recommendations for implementation of
O
§j
O
OO
North County Sewage Solids Management alternatives.
ITEM EXPLANATION
In 1985 several North County agencies contracted with John
S. Murk Engineers to study long range alternatives to deal
with sewage solids (sludge) generated by North County area
sewage treatment plants. Phase II of that study was recently
completed outlining a spectrum of alternatives to deal both
regionally and locally with the disposal of sewage solids.
The Encina Joint Advisory Committee (JAC) has reviewed these
alternatives and adopted the following recommended concepts:
1. That the Encina Joint Powers pursue a regional
sludge management solution with other interested
North County agencies;
2. That the regional alternative include composting
(Alternative 4G) rather than only air-drying
(Alternative IB);
3. That one of the "Encina-only" composting alter-
natives be selected as a fallback if a regional
solution is not available; and
4. That the 37-acre site adjacent to the Encina
Treatment Plant be considered as a fallback
site for an "Encina-only" project, subject to
completion of an EIR and site approval from
the City of Carlsbad.
Regional Alternatives
The JAC recommendations authorize the Encina staff to explore
further with other agencies joining in the construction of a
regional solids processing facility to dry sludge to acceptable
levels for disposal in landfills or to compost the material
for marketing as a soil amendment. Contributing agencies
and capital costs are outlined in Table 1. The JAC is recom-
mending the compost option which doubles the capital costs
and adds an estimated $.25 cents per month to the average
sewer bill to construct and maintain (see Table 3).
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. f 9 9 <T
The advantages of composting are resource optimization and
independence from landfill regulation. The JAC views com-
posting as a worthwhile investment for future independence
from potential increased costs due to restrictive solid waste
expenses.
Encina-Onlv Alternatives
Should Encina be unable to join with other agencies in a
regional solution, a series of smaller scale "Encina-only"
options would be pursued at a somewhat increased cost. These
alternatives, outlined in Table 2, vary in cost depending on
land values and hauling distance - the more remote the site
the lower the land costs and the higher the operational costs
involved in hauling sludge to the site.
The Encina 6 alternative involves development of a processing
facility on the 37-acre site adjacent to existing Encina
Treatment Plant. This option is not only the most expensive
but would involve potential environmental impacts on City
residents. In order to further explore this alternative,
JAC would like to authorize an environmental report to be
prepared by the environmental consultant selected to review
the Phase IV expansion. Cost of the EIR is estimated in the
range of $40,000.00 to $50,000.00. Based on the results of
the environmental study, Encina could make application to
the City for approval of the in-vessel composting plant.
The General Manager of Encina will be available at the meeting
to further describe the Encina 6 alternative.
FISCAL IMPACT
All of the alternatives being developed will involve capital
development financing and increased operational costs to
sewer users. The study assumes total user increases ranging
from $ .32 to $ 2.20 for the average monthly cost per house-
hold. Cost ranges are summarized on Tables 3 and 4.
As costs become better known, the Council will be required
to adopt a financing program to fund the increased cost.
The JAC recommendation, if approved, would also involve pre-
paration of the Encina 6 environmental document estimated
at $40,000.00 to $50,000.00.
PAGE 3 OF AGENDA BILL NO
EXHIBITS
Resolution No. foe* y approving the Encina Joint Ad-
visory Committee recommendations for implementation of
North County Sewage Solids Management alternatives.
2. Table 1
3. Table 2
4. Table 3
5. Table 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 9064
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENCINA JOINT
ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NORTH
COUNTY SEWAGE SOLIDS MANAGEMENT.
WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad recognizes the need to deal
with the long-term management of sewage solids; and
WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad has reviewed the March 1987
North County Sewage Solids Management Study Phase II Project Report
and the recommendation of the Joint Advisory Committee.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Carlsbad that the following Joint Advisory Committee
recommendations are approved in concept and authorizes appropriate
action to proceed towards implementation:
1. That the Encina Joint Powers pursue a regional sludge
management solution with other interested North County agencies;
2. That the regional alternative include composting
(Alternative 4G) rather than only air-drying (Alternative IB);
3. That one of the "Encina-only" composting alternatives
be selected as a fallback if a regional solution is not available;
and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4. That staff is directed to review available 13 to 21
acre parcels within the City appropriate for in-vessel or open-
air sludge processing.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Carlsbad City Council held on the 12th day of May , 1987,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Larson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
KJDE A. LEtflS, Mayor
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANzT City)Clerk
(SEAL)
TABLE 1
DISTRIBUTION OF ESTIMATED CAPITAL COSTS
AMONG PARTICIPATING AGENCIES
(1987 Dollars)
AIR DRY COMPOST
AGENCY TOTAL COST TOTAL COST
Escondido 4,201,700 7,980,000
Encina 5,332,500 10,129,300
Oceanside 2,642,600 5,016,300
San Elijo 612,900 1,164,000
Fallbrook 431,600 819,700
Rainbow 290,800 552,200
Valley Center 186,900 354,900
County District 246.100 469.200
TOTAL: 13,945,100 26,485.300
TABLE 2
NCSSNS
ENCIHA ALTERNATIVES SUNNARY
ALTERNATIVE DESCRIPTION AREA (Ac)
ENCINA-1 1-B Air-Dry 39-50
Hwy. 76
CAPITAL ANNUAL TOTAL UNIT
COST OX106) OMIffXIO6) COST (t/DT)
5.4-8.0 1.4-2.0 240-280
ENCINA-2 1-B Air-Dry
San Pasqual
39-50 6.0-8.5 1.3-2.0 233-274
ENCINA-3 4-G Compost
San Pasqual
16-21 9.8-14.6 2.3-3.4 346-477
ENCINA-4 4-G Compost
Escondido
16-21 10.6-15.3 2.3-3.4 352-481
ENCINA-5 4-G Compost
Encina
16-21 11.7-17.1 2.4-3.5 356-493
ENCINA-6 4-D Compost
Encina
12.6 16.3-22.1 2.8-4.1 517-670
TABLE 3
NCSSMS
ENCINA ALTERNATIVES
ANNUAL COST DATA StMURY
(16X T.S. WITHOUT IHIVER EXCEPT AS NOTED)
ALTERNATIVE AMENDMENT COST
ENCINA: 1-B 0
Regional
ENCINA: 1-B 0
Regional with
Waiver
ENCINA: 4-G 245,700
Regional without
Waiver
ENCINA- 1 80,800
ENCINA-2 0
ENCINA-3 476,300
ENCINA-4 476,300
ENCINA-5 476,300
ENCINA-6 405,280
HAULING COST
$ 474,700
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
233
315
474
354
232
184
50
50
.700
.200
,700
,900
,900
,900
,600
,600
TIPPING FEES
213,300
158,100
0
213,300
213,300
0
0
0
0
COMPOST SALE
0
0
(131,000)
0
0
(251,200)
(251,200)
(251,200)
(222,500)
Ot
232,
172.
357.
311.
311,
1,062,
1,062,
1,062,
1,210.
N
300
700
100
500
500
000
000
000
400
ANNUAL
CAPITAL
713,500
556,
1,260,
1,049,
1,124,
1,891,
1,966,
2,155,
2,648,
000
150
500
000
500
400
400
660
TOTAL
ANNUAL
1,633,800
1,238,800
2,047,150
2,129,800
2,003,700
3,411,500
3,438,400
3,493,100
4,092,440
MONTHLY C
PER HOUSE!
$1.02
$0.77
$1.27
$1.32
$1.25
$2.12
$2.14
$2.17
$2.55
Based on 2010 population projection of 335,000 in Encina service area
(includes existing $0.35 charges).C& K?IS£BFDEw I
^^^^^ ^BEK. I Of »!• «•& ^11C
TABLE 4
ENCINA ALTERNATIVES
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE BREAKDOWN
ALTERNATIVE 1991 1997 2010
ANNUAL
REGIONAL AIR $ 670,450
DRY (1-B)
REGIONAL
COMPOSTING
(4-G)
ENCINA-6
$ 574,500
MONTHLY ANNUAL MONTHLY ANNUAL MONTHLY1
$0.63 $ 749,400 $0.59 $ 920,300 $0.57
$0.54 $ 673,500 $0.50 $ 787,000 $0.49
$1,051,800 $1.00 $1,175,600 $0.92
1 Cost per EDU (includes existing $0.35 charge)
2 88,000 EDU'S
3 106,000 EDU'S
4 134,000 EDU'S
$1,443,800 $0.90