Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-05-19; City Council; 9012; ZONE 3 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN LFMP 3I t m 00 G .ri 71 so u!4 M a TI cs u g: acu rd *d eu 03c ow cnWd rd .u @PI 0 vlrl za2 a, a, aJu uwa, a*ri s C * 0 *rl a)c)a, Uii3 & ac3 M 'd -d a, sac uu aa 0 cw a *U 2- E .o,a,E 34; 416 a uo a, c -ri nrdu dm a)&8 >r-l .d u u rd ad 2 s ala Md a,G rdcd sam; WE& G 5rncQh kd s ? .rl aha rd bl-IdCCy oua)=1 ardo UCaJ ME ad u a .rl u CduaJul rdma, d-r-rl3 TI ? Ud GCdkQ a42 =lu 0000 !4 u4uz b a3 .. I z 0 6 5 z cn 4 I rn a J s 0 c1-F CARLSBAD - AGEN*ILL '1 ZONE 3 LOCAL FACILITIES DEPT. 1 CITY P TITLE: MANAGEMENT PLAN AB# 9Q/2 DEPT. PLN CITY II MTG. 5-/7- p7 RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the Council ADOPT the Negative Declaration issued by the Plannin DirectorxADOPT Resolution No. ?QP~ , APPROVING Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone 3. ITEM EXPLANATION In June of 1986, the City Council passed a Growth Management Ordinance to ensure that necessary public facilities would 1 available concurrent with need. Eleven facilities were identified by Council as being the major components on whicl development should be analyzed. Performance standards for c facility were also adopted. The major facilities are as follows: City Administration Fire Service Circulation Libraries Open Space Sewer Collectic Wastewater Treatment Schools Drainage Parks Water Distribution The Ordinance set up the Growth Management Program as two m2 phases. The first phase was the preparation of the Citywidl which Council adopted last September. The second phase of Growth Management Program was the Local Facilities Managemel Plan. Both the Citywide and local plans had to be complete1 each of the Council adopted facilities management zones pril new development occuring in those zones. Zones 1 through 6 included the existing or highly developed areas of the City local plans for these zones would be drafted by staff. Zon through 25 would be prepared by the property owners. In addition, when individual development projects are subrnitte review, they will be analyzed for facility adequacy and compliance with the citywide and local plan. Zone 3 Zone 3 is the first Local Facilities Management Plan to rea Planning Commission and City Council, and was prepared by s Zone 3 is generally the area from Agua Hedionda Lagoon on t north, to the Encina Treatment Plant on the south, and fron Country west to the Pacific Ocean. The Planning Commission held public hearings for this zone April 1st and April 15th. They made a number of changes ar improvements to the Plan. In addition, they identified sea policy issues. These issues are discussed in the attached memorandum to the City Manager dated April 17, 1987. The Planning Commission voted 4-2 to recommend approval of the , 0 0 L 2t I. Page Two of Agenda Bill No. 90/a The two dissenting Commissioners supported basic content of Local Facilities Plan but felt they couldn't make the findin that it was consistent with the General Plan particularly wi respect to the Parks and Recreation Element. This issue is discussed in the attached memorandum previously mentioned. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A Negative Declaration was issued by the Planning Director ( April 22, 1987 indicating that the Local Facilities Manageme Plan for Zone 3 is not anticipated to have any significant adverse impact on the environment. FISCAL IMPACT Staff time has already been utilized in preparation of this It is anticipated that further staff time will be necessary monitor this, and other zone plans, on a yearly basis. The implementation of this plan, however, should help future fi, planning for the City by listing future facilities and thei costs. EXHIBITS 1) Memo to City Manager, dated April 17, 1987 2) Planning Commission Resolution No. 2650 3) Planning Commission Minutes dated, April 15, 1987 4) Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone 3 5) Kesolution No. 9oP.1 (previously distributed) t * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 e RESOLUTION NO. 9084 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 3. WHEREAS, a local facilities management plan has be prepared for local facilities management zone 3 in accordan Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on March 18, April 15, 1987 hold duly notice public hearings as requirec to consider said plan and at the conclusion of the hearing Resolution No. 2650 making findings and recommending that t Council adopt a plan; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was issued by the Director on April 22, 1987 and approved by the Planning Con on April 15, 1987 indicating that the local facilities manc plan is not anticipated to have any significant adverse imI the environment; and WHEREAS, the City Council at their meeting of May held a duly noticed public hearing and considered all the 1 1 and arguments of anyone desiring to be heard, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counci: I I City of Carlsbad, California as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correc 2, That the findings of the Planning Commission Planning Commission Resolution No. 2650 constitute the finc the City Council. 3. That the local facilities management plan for dated March 4, 1987 on file with the City Clerk and incorp( 1 herein by reference is hereby approved. Any development 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 occurring within the boundaries of zone 3 shall comply wit1 terms and conditions of said plan, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting Carlsbad City Council held on the 19th day of May by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and NOES: None ABSENT: None ATTEST: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (SEAL) I -2- I , 0 APRIL 17, 1987 TO: FRANK ALESHIRE, CITY MANAGER FROM : PLANNING DIKECTOR LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 3 The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 3 is relatively straight forward, because of its size and minimal future potential for development. The plan does, however, contain a few issues which need further discussion. Several of these issues were identified by the Planning Commission during their review of the Plan. Library The Zone 3 plan indicates that the Library performance standard (800 sq. ft. per 1,000 population) is not being met at this time, If the standard is not met prior to the adoption of the Local Plan for Zone 3, no residential development will be allowed. The plan does provide alternatives to be considered by the City Council when reviewing the plan for Zone 3. These include: 1) Amending the current five year CIY to include funding for a 2) Putting a measure on the ballot that could raise the new library facility. necessary money to fund the building of a new library facility through the use of general obligation bonds or som other financing mechanism. 3) Directing staff to attempt to bring the City's library spac into conformance with the adopted standard based on the Local Facilities Management Plans which will be received fo zones other than 1 through 6. Parks A concern was raised at the Planning Commission public hearing dealing with the parks inventory presented in the plan. Zone 3 lies in two park districts, Park District 1 and Park District 3. Because there are no residential units existing in Park District 3, and therefore no impact, the analysis in the Local Plan only deals with the northwest quadrant or Park District 1. I 0 0 The issue of concern dealt with whether or not the park inventory listed in the Local Plan is consistent with the Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan. The inventory presented in the Local Plan was prepared by the Parks and Recreation Department and forwarded to Planning. Following the April 1 Planning Commission public hearing, the Parks and Recreation Director was asked to provide the Planning Department with clarification of the inventory for Park District 1. The clarification came in the form of a memorandum explaining the Park and Recreation Commission's prior actions and interpretatior of the Parks and Recreation Element in regards to the specific parks inventory. This information was forwarded to the Planning Commission, and the Local Plan inventory was updated to include ownership and type of facility. Because of the difference between what's in the General Plan and what's in the Local Facilities Plan several of the Commissioners felt they couldn't make a consistency finding. Specifically, the issue is that the Parks & Recreation Element indicates a need for a community park in the northwest quadrant of the City. Because the northwest quadrant was developed when the City was allowing smaller neighborhood parks they have been accepted in lieu of a larger community park. This issue may need further discussion during the City Council public hearing, if the Council has a concern regarding the inventory. Circulation This section of the Local Plan is one of the more complicated. As part of the plan, all future development including residentia and non-residential land uses were phased out to develop over a number of years. For example, there are twenty-one remaining or potentially developable residential units left within Zone 3 and they have been phased to develop through the year 1995. remaining non-residential land was phased out to 1996. The analysis of Circulation includes a discussion of existing plus committed traffic as analyzed in the draft report by Bartor Aschman Associates. In doing so, the plan identified three intersections which would fall below the adopted performance standards when all of the existing plus committed traffic in thi area of the City was analyzed. These intersections include: The 1) Palomar Airport Road and 1-5 northbound 2) Palomar Airport Road and 1-5 southbound 3) Palomar Airport Road and Paseo del Norte As a result of these intersections failing to meet the adopted performance standards, staff has included in the plan the mitigation and the cost estimates necessary to improve these intersections to allow them to comply with the adopted performance standards when existing plus committed traffic is generated. -2- 1 e 0 The phasing schedule for both residential and non-residential land uses was presented in the Plan to provide an example of how larger zones, with more development potential, will be presented for review. The phasing schedule is presented in the Plan more for format because Zone 3 could potentially buildout in the next year or two years, If this were to happen, staff believes that these three intersections would not fall below the adopted performance standards. Zone 3 has the potential for generating a little over 39,000 more trips per day as a result of it completely building out. Therefore, the Circulation section does not include the specific timing of when these improvements will be needed at the three intersections identified. This specific timing of these improvements will be included when the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 5, which is being prepared by staff, is presented to the Planning Commission and the City Council. 5 MJH: POC :bn -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2650 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CIT CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 3 ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON, N AND INCLUDING THE ENCINA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLAN OF THE PACIFIC OCEAN TO A POINT JUST EAST OF PASEO NORTE. APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD CASE NO.: LOCAL FACILIITES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZON WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed wit City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission, a WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No. 87 adopting the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan establishing facility zones and performance standards for p facilities, and WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No. 98 requiring the processing of a Local Facilities Management P and WEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 18th March, 1987, and on the 15th day of April, 1987, hold a dul noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider sai request; and I WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all per desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factor relating to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 3 NOW, TREREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plann Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the above recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hea the Commission APPROVES Local Facilities Management P1 Zone 3, based on the following findings and subject to f ol lowing conditions : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 a 9 Findings: 1) That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 3 i consistent with the Land Use Element, the Public Facil Element, and the other Elements contained in Carlsbad' General Plan. 2) That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 3 i consistent with Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipa (Growth Management), and with the adopted Citywide Fac and Improvements Plan. 3) That the Local Facilities Management Plan and the cond contained therein will promote the public safety and w by ensuring that public facilities will be provided in conformance with the adopted performance standards, and locations of growth by tying the pace of developme the provision of public facilities and improvements. services are available in conformance with the adopted performance standards. 4) The Local Facilities Management Plan will control the 5) The Plan will prevent growth unless public facilities Conditions : 1) Approval is granted for Local Facilities Management P Zone 3 as contained in the Plan titled Local Facilitie Management Plan Zone 3, dated March 4, 1987, attached and incorporated herein by reference. ///I I/// 1 /I// /I// /I// I/// 1/11 ///I ///I //// //I/ PC RES0 NO. 2650 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 I.3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 e PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, he the 15th day of April, 1987, by the following vote, to wit: AYES : Chairperson Marcus, Hall, Schramm & Schl, NOES : Commissioners: McFadden & McBane. ABSENT: Commissioner Holmes, ABSTAIN : None. * B.2da 2 CUS, Chairman PLANNING COMMISS ATTEST : 1 ,d t - 4v ,( ,/ /)?f>,&! i u,'.,-?,- I 4W4L 'MICHAEL J. HOLZMILL~R PLANNING DIRECTOR. '1 L/' I PC RES0 NO. 2650 -3- 0 MINUTES 0 COMMISSIONERS April 15, 1987 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 10 RECESS: Chairperson Marcus declared a recess at 7:ll p.m. and the Planning Commission reconvened at 7:21 p.m., with six members present. CONrINUED PUBLIC HEARING: 1) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 3 - On - property generally located south of Agua Hedionda Lagoon, north of and including the Encina Wastewater Treatment Plant, east of the Pacific Ocean to point just east of Paseo del Norte. Dee Landers gave the staff presentation, stating this item was heard on March 18 and April 1. At that time, the item was referred back to staff for addftional information. This information and minor revisions made are included in the packet. Primarily, these were text changes and also the Parks and RecreatIon inventory was expanded to include the type of parks, active or passive, and the owner. A glossary and a list of references were also added. another revision of page 3, and Phil Carter will explain that. Ms. Landers stated a number of policy issues were brought up by the Plannfng Commission, including whether certain adopted performance standards would stop only residential development, If not met, or did they preclude all development. Charles Grimm will address that issue. Other issues concerned parks and circulation. Phil Carter will address those issues. Charles Grim stated at the last Planning Commission meeting the issue was brought up whether the Growth Management Plan was clear on the adopted performance standards when there was an inadequacy in city-wide or quadrant-wide facilities as to whether non-residential development would shut down as well as residential. felt although there was some impact from non-residential development on libraries, parks, schools, fire and City administration, they were being measured against resldenttal unlts in the ordinance and would only shut down residential developments if found to he inadequate. Tonight there is Staff This issue was taken to Council last night for a policy decision. Council confirmed staff's interpretation and made no changes to the existing policy. Council also pointed out other aspects of the Growth Management Plan that do apply to non-residential development, such as circulation and sewer standards. Phil Carter stated staff has taken the Parks Inventory and expanded it to show the ownership of the acreage, whether it is owned by the City, school district, or, for example, one area in the northwest district that is leased by SDG&E. That has been included in the inventory, and also the type of park. Mr. Carter called attention to a typographical error on page 48, stating they had called the Harding Street Center a "commercial" center. This should be community center, and the two places where that appeared should be corrected. I e MINUTES 0 April 15, 1987 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 11 Secondly, Mr. Carter stated he wanted to discuss whether or not the parks inventory presented for zone three was General Pian. He stated the Planning Department had been provided this information for the zone three plan by the Parks and Recreation Department, based on their interpretation of what their Commission has done with the Parks Element. If the Planning Commission still had concerns with the inventory as presented in Zone 3, staff suggested the City Council take a look at that when it is presented to them to make a determination whether the inventory is correct and consistent with the Parks Element of the General Plan. Mr. Carter next spoke about circulation, stating the issue intersections identified that would fall below the adopted performance standards when the existing traffic and the committed traffic were added together. Mr. Carter stated the development for zone three had been phased out over a ten-year period but only to show the Planning Commission how the format would be on larger zones and how the evaluation was to be made. The actual amount of development in Zone 3 is minimal, and on page 3 of the revision handed to the Commissioners tonight, staff has indicated that all development would be minimal in this zone, not just residential. This would include the 21 units of residential, and all of the commercial and industrial land left for development. Staff felt this development in Zone 3 could occur within the next year or the following year, and that development of 39,000 more trips would not cause the intersections to fall below performance standards. For that reason, there is no specific timing when the improvements would be needed at those intersections. place to mitlgate those intersections, and the cost to fix the intersections, was included for these intersections to conform with the adopted performance standards. consistent with the Parks and Recreation Element of the brought up at the last meeting concerned the three A description of what needs to take Mr. Carter indicated when the zone plan for Zone 5 comes in, that will specifically indicate when those intersections will need to be improved. Mr. Carter stated circulation will be monitored at each intersection, to make certain they are conforming with the performance standards at all times. If, after Zone 3 is adopted, and individual projects come in; for example, if all of tourist service land use came in and generated another 32,000 trips, in that individual project analysis, staff would tell the Planning Commission those trips would not cause the intersections to fall below the adopted performance standards. standards, all development would be stopped until they were brought up to the standards. If they did fall below those 0 MINUTES 0 Page l2 COMMISSIONERS April 15, 1987 PLANNING COMMISSION Commissioner McFadden stated on page 3 of the materlal distributed tonight where it states the specific timing of mitigation of these intersections will be included in the local plan for Zone 5, she wondered if this then would cause the Resolutlon to be changed. stated finding number four in the Resolution states "The Local Facilities Management Plan will control the timing and locations of growth by tying the pace of development to the provision of public facilities and improvements.". felt they could not make this finding at this time. Mr. Commissioner McFadden 5he stated inasmuch as they do not know the timing, she Crirnrn stated the Commission could alter that finding. Commissioner McFadden stated her other concern was with the park inventory. This was apparently approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission and it makes it inconsistent with the Parks and Recreation Element. She agreed with adding a recommendation to the City Council that they consider this, because the finding cannot be made. She added the first finding, "that the Local Facilittes Management Plan for Zone 3 is consistent with the Land Use Element, the Public Facilities Element, and the other elements contained in Carlsbad's General Plan.", makes either the Public Facilities Element or the Parks and Recreation Element out, because they are not consistent with each other. Commissioner Schlehuber stated he had no problem with finding number four, and felt they were doing that, but asked for staff's comments on Commissioner McFadden's question. Staff stated they could make the number four finding because based on the performance standard and potential development in Zone 3, all of the public library They have made a recommendation how to mitigate the library issue by recommending that be added to the CIP. Commissioner McBane asked for a clarification on the pollcy as confirmed by Council last night. He understood the recommendation that those standards which are defined by residential growth should be considered as to adequacy in each zone, and whether industrial and commercial developments have any impact on fire and parks. Commissloner McBane repeated his question, stating was it not recommended by Council that the adequacy of the residential pre-defined standards be verified in each of the zone management plans with respect to the non- residential development. For example, is the defined fire protection standard adequate in a zone that is primarily industrial. Mike Holzmiller stated the Council discussion of the standards, as presently adopted, certain ones applied to residential development and certain ones applied to all types of development. the City does have the ability to require more than what facilities needed were there, with the exception of the In any particular zone in the City, the performaice standard indicates. You cannot go below the service level, but the City can 90 above that level. The Council could say for some particular zone that even though it was residential, they might want the industrial and commerical development to do something about a certain facility, and fire might be one good example. 0 MINUTES e La 1 COMMISSIONERS April 15, 1987 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 13 There are two facilities that are residentially determined that the department has said in particular zones they want to look at making an increase in that standards, and those two are Parks and Fire. That is principally with respect to Zone 5, which is commercia!.. Mr. Holzmiller stated if Commissioner McBane's question was, did Council decide that in specific zones, they may require something different from the residential performance standards as far as commerical and industrial development is concerned, yes, the City will be looking at that. Commissloner McBane commented that in a zone such as this one, where most of the development that remains to be done is non-residential, he felt it would be reasonable to verify the adequacy of the parks and fire standards which the Commission would be applying to the buildout of the zone. Mike Holzmiller answered, for this zone, staff did riot feel they needed to address additional park and fire standards. There may be a different recommendation on Zone 5, but not on this one. The industrial and commercial development that is left in this zone does not require the City to go over and above the standard that is already there for parks and fire. Commissioner Schramm stated that on page 10, on the buildout projection, and page 19, the residential phasing, she wondered whether they should riot indicate these zones where it was possible to rectify this overage, so it would refer back to those zones when they are brought forward. Staff indlcated this would possibly be Zones 1, 8, 24 or 13. A motion was made by Commissioner Schlehuber to adopt Resolution 2615, recommending approval of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 3. condition or finding be made to indicate since this zone is over its growth control, it will be rectified somewhere else In the first quadrant, possibly Zones 1, 8, 24 or 13. It should be noted to look at that when zone plans are submitted. Also, Zone 5 should be in this zone for traffic circulation is concerned. Commissioner Hall stated Commissioner Schramm's condition should be a finding and/or a condition that Zone 3 is over the control point in residential building and condition that to be reduced in other zones. There was a discussion whether to include the park inventory question in the this in the motion. had the information. Commissioner McRane stated he did not see how they could make the first finding, when they did not even know what they were finding a consistency with. McFadden stated the motIon should be to accept the Resolution, except for the first finding, and Council should address that to achieve consistency with the Parks and Recreation Facility and the Public Facility Element, as one or the other is not correct. He suggested a motion, and staff indicated they did not particularly need They just wanted to make certain they Commissioner Page l4 April 15, 1987 PLANNING COMMISSION Commissioner McFadden stated she could not vote for the resolution when she could not make the first finding. Planning Commission adopted the following Resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2651, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL FACILIrIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE THREE ON PROPERTY GENEALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON, AND INCLUDING THE ENCINA WASTEWATER TREArMENT PLANT, EAST OF THE PACIFIC OCEAN TO A POINT JUST EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE. The condition/finding to be added since this zone is over its growth control limit, that this will be rectified somewhere else in the first quadrant, possibly in the zone plans for Zones 1, 8, 24 or 13. The traffic circulation should be tied in with the Zone 5 plan. Commissioner McFadden stated she voted "no" because she could not make the finding regarding the consistency with the Parks and Recreation Element and the Public Facility Fee of the parks portlon of it. Commissioner McBane also voted "nott for the same reason. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: NORTH OF The Minutes of the meeting held April 1, 1987, were approved as presented. STAFF ITEMS TO BE ADDED: The next meeting will be held at the Council Chambers. The traffic workshop with the Planning Commission and Council in a joint meeting, will be held either May 12 or May 19. ADJOURNMENT By proper motion, the Meeting of April 15, was adjourned at 7:45 P.M. Respectfully submitted, MICHAEL HOLZMILLER Planning Director Harriett Babbitt Minutes Clerk dP MEETINGS ARE ALSO TAPED AND KEPT ON FILE UNTIL THE MINUTES ARE APPROVED. COMMISSIONERS Marcus X Hal 1 X McEane X McFadden X Schlehuber X X Schramm X Marcus X Hall X McBane X McFadden X Schlehuber X X Schr amm X w Dl I' 1 -3 6- PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015 5 C.C P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the The Blade Tribune a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published daily except Saturdays and holidays, in the City of Oceanside and quali- fied for the City of Oceanside and the North County Judicial district with substantial cir- culation in Bonsall, Fallbrook, Leucadia, En- cinitas, Solana Beach, Cardiff, Vista, and Carlsbad, County of San Diego, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, under the date of March 19, 1952, Case Number 171349; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspa- following dates, to-wit: per and not in any supplement thereof on the May 8 .................................... all in the year 1987. I certify (or declare) under penatly of per- jury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Oceanside, California, this 8 day of May , 1987. .................................. &-c4 Signature THE BLADE TRIBUNE Legal Advertising 1722 South Hill Street P.O. Box 90 Oceanside, CA 92054 (6 1 9) 433-7333 e This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stan Proof Of Publication Of Public Hearing Notice ...................................... ...................................... Paste Clipping of Notice S ECu,R E LY In 'This Space ~ I ,. a 1)1( ,k-, &\-" G 4 <I i? >+ I' ._