HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-07-21; City Council; 9102; Appeal of Planning Commission denial of Drive-ThruCIT DF CARLSBAD - AGEND/ 3ILL
AR* ^/^Z,
MTG 7/21/87
n.=PT PLN
TITLE- APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION
DENIAL FOR A DRIVE-THROUGH
FINANCIAL BUILDING - SP-187(A)/
CUP-304 - LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAN
DEPT. HP. ftW
CITY ATTY j;/gB
CITY MGRS^V*
Zo
u
8
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Both the Planning Commission and the staff are recommending that
the City Council direct the City Attorney's Office to prepare
documents DENYING the appeal of SP-187(A) and CUP-304.
ITEM EXPLANATION
The applicant is requesting that the City Council grant an appeal
approving a conditional use permit and a specific plan amendment
to provide for a drive through financial institution located on
the Hughes property just west of Sears. The proposal is part of
a large shopping complex approved in 1983 that is currently under
construction.
The major issue concerning the proposal is traffic. The shopping
area is part of a regional shopping center complex and is
designated for regional commercial uses on the General Plan.
Regional center commercial complexes are designed for multi-
purpose trips by shoppers where they will frequent more than one
store/shop during a visit to the center. Both the Planning
Commission and staff feel that a drive through bank is a single
purpose traffic generator, meaning that some people would visit
the center just to go to the bank. This would increase onsite
congestion and defeat the purpose of a regional type facility. A
drive through facility is more appropriate in the smaller
community commercial centers.
If the City Council denies the proposed project as recommended
the applicant may still develop the bank but without the drive
through facility. For further information please see the
attached staff reports to the Planning Commission.
FICAL IMPACT
There will be no direct fiscal impact on the City. As part of
the original approval the applicant has been required to pay the
public facilities and other applicable fees.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
A Negative Declaration was issued by the Planning Director on
March 14, 1987.
EXHIBITS
1) Location Map
2) Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2647 and 2648
3) Planning Commission Staff Report with attachments
SP-187(A)
LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAN CUP-304
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
20
21
22
23
26
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2647
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
DEVELOP A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION WITH A DRIVE-THROUGH
FACILITY ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF THE NORTH COUNTY PLAZA.
APPLICANT: LINCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN
CASE NO; CUP-304-
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the
City of Carlsbad, and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request
as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal
Code, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of June, 1987,
hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider said application on
property described as:
That portion of Lots 32 to 36 inclusive, Map 1136 (Hosp
Eucalyptus Forest) June 8, 1908.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
16 considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
17 I desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
18 relating to CUP-304.
19 M
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing.,
the Commission DENIES CUP-304-, based on the following
findings:
24 Findings;
pe
1) A drive-through use is more appropriate in a community
commercial shopping center than in a regional center such as
the one proposed.
27
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2) A drive- through financial facility is generally a single
vehicle trip generator and could create additional traffic
congestion in the center.
3) The proposed
compatible wi
staff report.
financial drive- through facility is not
th adjacent land uses for reasons stated in the
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on
the 3rd day of dune, 1987, by the following vote, to wit:d
AYES: Ch
&
airman Marcus, Commissioners McFadden, Holmes,
Schramm .
NOES: Commissioners McBane & Hall.
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
^JtvMte
Commissioner Schlehuber.
None.
<2%~ % ^, „„
MARY MAJ&JHJS, Chairman ^J^L-£-
CARLSBA0 PLANNING COMMISSION
4lAA^U2?~-x
MICHAEL 3. HOL^MILLeR
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 2647 -2-
1
2
3
4
25
26
27
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2648
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF SPECIFIC
PLAN 187(A), TO AMEND AN APPROVED SITE PLAN FOR THE NORTH
COUNTY PLAZA TO ALLOW A DRIVE- THROUGH FACILITY WITHIN THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY.
APPLICANT: LINCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN
CASE NO; SP-187(A) _
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to
wit:
That portion of Lots 32 to 36 inclusive, Map 1136 (Hosp
Eucalyptus Forest) 3une 8, 1908,8
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the9
_ Planning Commission; and
_ WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request
as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of
Dune, 1987, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law, to consider said request; and15
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and16
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
18
relating to the Specific Plan Amendment; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing,
the Commission recommends DENIAL of SP-187(A), based on the
following findings:
<WTt
Findings ;
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
1) A drive-through use is more appropriate in a community
commercial shopping center than in a regional center such as
the one proposed.
„ IHI
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2) A drive-through financial facility is generally a single
vehicle trip generator and could create additional traffic
congestion in the center.
3) The proposed financial drive-through facility is not
compatible with adjacent land uses for reasons stated in the
staff report.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on
the 3rd day of June, 1987, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairman Marcus, Commissioners McFadden, Holmes, &
Schramm.
NOES: Commissioners McBane & Hall.
ABSENT: Commissioner Schlehuber.
ABSTAIN: None.
^
ATTEST:
MARY M
CARLSB
US, Chairman
PLANNING COMMISSION
MICHAEL 0. HOLZMILLER-
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO NO. 2648 -2-
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DATE:
DECEMBER . 1 1986
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 3, 1987
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
PROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: SP-187(A)/CUP-304 - LINCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN - Request
for a Specific Plan Amendment and a Conditional Use
Permit to develop a Lincoln Savings and Loan financial
institution with a drive-through facility at the
northwest corner of the North County Plaza
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution Nos. 2647 and 2648
APPROVING SP-187(A)/CUP-304 , based on the findings contained
therein.
DISCUSSION
On April 1, 1987, this project, SP-187{A)/CUP-304, was heard
before the Planning Commission. At that time, staff was
reommending denial of the project because: (1) the proposed
drive-through facility, being single trip oriented, is not a
compatible use within a regional shopping center, and (2) the
proposal reduces the width of a driveway and parking aisle below
that which is deemed adequate for safe circulation.
The Planning Commission had a lengthy discussion concerning the
appropriateness of a drive-through facility in a regional
shopping center, with no apparent conclusion being reached.
However, a motion was made to send the project back to staff for
revisions to the parking and driveway layout, so that the
project complies with the City's circulation standards.
As shown on Exhibits "A" - "B", the project's circulation system
has been redesigned. It is noted, that these proposed
circulation revisions have been accomplished without having to
reduce any of the project landscaping. The specific revisions
include the following:
(1) Narrowing the project's parking aisles from 21 feet to 20
feet and redesigning them for one way directional flow.
This revision reduces potential traffic conflicts at the
southern entryway to the project, and creates a more
efficient circulation pattern on site. The 20 foot parking
aisle width is more than adequate for one way parking
aisles with 60" parking.
However, even with these revisions, the project still does not
technically comply with the City's amended Parking Ordinance.
The City's Parking Ordinance indicates that for one way 60°
parking aisles, the width of a parking section, including two
parking stalls plus the aisle should equal 61 feet and eight
inches. The redesigned project as proposed does not comply with
this standard. As a matter of fact, none of the parking for the
North County Plaza, approved as part of Specific Plan 187, is in
compliance with this standard. However, staff believes that the
redesigned parking layout is still minimally acceptable even
though it does not comply with the City's amended parking
standards. This conclusion is based upon the following reasons:
(1) The parking layout as proposed is consistent in terms
of standards applicable at the time Specific Plan 187
was approved.
(2) The City's Parking Standard for 60° one way aisles is
conservative. Other agencies utilize lesser standards
which would be consistent with the design as proposed.
Staff also has added condition 20 which stipulates that the
northernmost access drive be increased in width from 18 feet to
20 feet in order to satisfy fire department driveway
requirements. This revision can be accommodated by reducing the
width of both 60" parking aisles to 19 feet each. The one way
19 foot wide aisles are still adequate for 60° parking.
Overall, the project has been redesigned to respond to the
Planning Commission concerns over project circulation. Although
the redesigned parking still does not technically comply with the
City's amended Parking Standards, staff believes that the
proposed parking layout is minimally acceptable. If the Planning
Commission decides to recommend approval of this project, staff
has included a resolution of approval with attached conditions.
However, staff still believes that the proposed drive-through is
an incompatible use within the context of a regional shopping
center.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2647 and 2648
2. Staff Report, dated April 1, 1987
3. Exhibits "A" - "B", dated April 27, 1987
COD:dm
4/30/87
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DATE;
DECEMB, 1', 1986
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBOECT
I.
APRIL 1, 1987
PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SP-187(A)/CUP-304 - LINCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN - Request
for a Specific Plan Amendment and a Conditional Use
Permit to develop a Lincoln Savings and Loan financial
institution with a drive-through facility at the
northwest corner of the North County Plaza.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution Nos. 2647 and 2648
DENYING SP-187(A)/CUP-304, based on the findings contained
therein.
II.PROOECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
On 3uly 5, 1983, the City Council approved Specific Plan - 187
and its associated site plan for the North County Plaza. At that
time, the project site plan included a 111,800 square foot
commercial building core (composed of four anchor department
stores) with ten individual commercial buildings (total of 60,012
square feet) located generally along the Marron Road frontage of
the site. As proposed, this project met the intent of the RRI
(Intensive Regional Retail) General Plan designation over the
property.
Subsequent the approval of this project, the project applicants
have processed a number of site plan amendments through the
Planning Department. The most notable of these amendments
included revisions to the core commercial area. These revisions
entailed, the deletion of two of the approved anchor stores and
the redistribution of the associated square footage, within
smaller specialty stores located along the eastern boundary of
the site. According to the project applicant, these changes were
requested because of the difficulty in attracting potential
anchor stores to this site.
The project applicants contend that because of the aforementioned
site plan revisions, the project no longer can technically be
classified as a "regional shopping center", but instead is more
closely associated with a "community commercial center". Staff,
however, believes that this shopping center even with the
approved revisions, still qualifies as a regional shopping center
for the following reasons:
1) The General Plan definition for an "Intensive Regional
Retail Center" (RRI) includes the following criteria:
a) That a department store is typically the major
magnet of a regional shopping center, while other
stores supplement and compliment the department
store.
b) A group of convenience stores, service facilities,
business and professional offices are often
associated with the center. Some of these may be
incorporated in the center itself, or arranged at
the periphery in the immediate area.
c) Such centers should have orderly and functional
store arrangement and adequate and convenient off-
street parking.
As approved and revised the project still meets these
General Plan criteria.
2) Because of the projects close proximity to Plaza Camino
Real (a "regional shopping center") and the fact it
shares the same basic "block" of property, it clearly
benefits from and contributes to the agglomeration of
people at these centers, thereby reinforcing the
"economies of scale" typically associated with regional
shopping centers.
Based upon these reasons, staff believes that the North County
Plaza, should continue to be regarded as a "Regional Shopping
Center". In accordance, the requested specific plan amendment
(SP-187(A)) and conditional use permit (CUP-304) have been
reviewed relative to this consideration.
The applicant is requesting a specific plan amendment and a
conditional use permit to develop a financial institution with a
drive-through facility located as described above. As shown on
Exhibits "A" and "B", the financial institution as proposed
(Building "T", 5,820 SF) would replace a 9,000 square foot
commercial building (Building "T") originally shown on the
approved site plan for Specific Plan 187 (See Reduced Exhibit
"C"). The remainder of the 3,180 square feet of commercial use
approved as part of Building "T" on the original site plan will
be distributed over buildings "S" and "Q". According to Specific
Plan 187, these site plan changes are regarded as minor in nature
and are approvable by the Planning Director.
-2-
However, per Specific Plan 187, the proposed drive-through
facility requires both a specific plan amendment and a
conditional use permit. As shown on Exhibits "A" and "C", the
drive-through facility would be located along the North County
Plaza's northern most driveway, adjacent to Buena Vista Creek.
The proposed drive-through would require a 10-foot wide driveway.
To accommodate this additional 10-foot wide driveway and drive-
through facility, the northernmost North County Plaza driveway
would have to be reduced from 24 feet to 16 feet. In addition, a
row of parking spaces would have to be deleted and the nearest
adjacent parking aisle to the south would also have to be reduced
in width from 24 to 21 feet.
With these revisions, the parking ratio for the shopping center
still remains in excess of 4.7 spaces/1,000 square feet as
required by the existing Specific Plan 187 and the City's amended
Parking Ordinance.
The architecture of the proposed Lincoln Savings Bank will be
composed of light colored stucco with a red tile roof,
clerestory windows with mullions will be incorporated into the
structure to enhance its appearance. The proposed drive-through
facility will include an automatic teller machine and will be
composed of similar stucco with architectural features as the
bank.
The project site is currently in the process of being developed
with the North County Plaza. The project site is surrounded by
Buena Vista Creek to the north, Jefferson Street to the west and
other portions of the North County Plaza to the south and east.
Ill ANALYSIS
Planning Issues
1)
2)
3)
4)
Is the proposed drive-through facility a compatible use
within this regional shopping center?
Will the proposed specific plan amendment, to Specific Plan
187, which amends the approved site plan, result in
unacceptable parking ratios or circulation problems?
Will the requested use adversely affect the viability of use
of the area as a commercial district or adversely affect
nearby uses or traffic movements?
Can the four findings required for the granting of a
conditional use permit be made, which are as follows:
a) That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the
development of the community, is essentially in harmony
-3-
with the various elements and objectives of the General
Plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses
specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed
use is to be located.
b) That the site for the intended use is adequate in size
and shape to accommodate the use.
c) That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences,
landscaping and other features necessary to adjust the
requested use to existing or permitted future uses in
the neighborhood will be provided and maintained.
d) That the street system serving the proposed use is
adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the
proposed use.
Discussion
As discussed within the staff report for Specific Plan 187 (North
County Plaza, December 8, 1982) drive-through facilities are not
regarded as compatible uses within this regional shopping center.
This finding is associated with the general philosophy that
regional shopping centers are not designed for or meant to
accommodate single purpose drive-through traffic, which drive-
through banking facilities tend to generate. To the contrary,
regional shopping centers are designed with large parking lots
and variety of commercial uses, whereby consumers can park their
cars at one location, and complete pedestrian oriented multiple
task shopping trips. Within the context of a regional shopping
center, drive-through traffic would inevitably be introduced into
designated parking areas, thereby resulting in additional
conflicting traffic movements. For reference, this drive-through
facility would generate approximately 1,464- average daily trips
or 300 more trips than a savings bank without a drive-through
(San Diego Traffic Generators, March 1985). In view of this
inherent incompatibility of a drive-through facility within a
regional shopping center and the potential conflicting traffic
movements that would result, staff cannot recommend support of
this drive-through facility at the North County Plaza.
As discussed earlier, implementation of the proposed project
would not result in unacceptable parking ratios. However,
implementation of the proposed drive-through facility will
necessitate other revisions to the approved North County Plaza
site plan. These revisions include: (1) reduction in the width
of the plazas northernmost driveway from 24 to 16 feet, and (2)
reduction in the width of the nearest adjacent parking aisle to
the south from 24 to 21 feet. As proposed, the 21 foot wide
parking aisle is neither in conformance with the City's amended
Parking Ordinance (which requires a 24 foot minimum width), nor
the approved site plan, which requires a minimum 24 foot wide
aisle within this portion of the site. It is staffs opinion that
-4-
in order to ensure safe circulation and adequate manueverability
within this parking lot, the required 24 foot wide parking aisles
should be maintained. The existing site plan for the North
County Plaza also includes a note which allows two specific
driveway aisles located in the southeast corner of the property
to be constructed at a width of 20 feet. Staff recommends that
the site plan be amended to require that these aisles be
developed at a minimum width of 24 feet.
Overall, staff cannot recommend support of the proposed specific
plan amendment to allow a drive-through facility because of; (1)
a drive-through facility's inherent incompatibility within the
context of a regional shopping center and the potential
conflicting traffic movement that would result, and (2) the
proposal reduces the width of the nearest parking aisle below
that which is deemed adequate for safe circulation.
With regard to the conditional use permit requested, it is
concluded that, since the requested drive-through facility is not
a compatible use within a regional shopping center, because of
the potentially adverse circulation impacts that could result,
staff is unable to make the necessary findings to support the
requested conditional use permit. Staff would also like to
mention that the site for the intended use is not adequate in
size to accommodate the use since it would require that the
nearest adjacent parking aisle be reduced to a width deemed
inadequate for safe circulation. Based upon these findings,
staff recommends denial of SP-187(A)/CUP-304.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Planning Director has determined that this project will not
have a significant impact on the environment and, therefore, has
issued a Negative Declaration on March 14, 1987.
ATTACHMENTS
1) Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2647 and 2648
2) Location Map
3) Background Data Sheet
4) Disclosure Form
5) Environmental Document
6) Reduced Exhibits
7) Exhibits "A" - "F", dated December 11, 1986
CDD:bn
3/9/87
-5-
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: SP-187(A)/CUP-304
APPLICANT: LINCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for a specific plan amendment and a conditional
use permit to develop a financial institution with a drive-thru facility at
the northwest corner of the North County Plaza.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of Lots 32 to 36 inclusive, Map 1136 (Hosp
Eucalyptus Forest) June 8, 1908 APN; 154-160-27
Acres 16.9 Proposed No. of Lots/Units
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation RRI
Density Allowed Density Proposed
Existing Zone C-2-Q Proposed Zone C-2-Q
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoning Land Use
Site C-2-Q North County Plaza
North OS Buena Vista Creek
South C-2-Q North County Plaza
East C-2-Q North County Plaza
West PC Jefferson Street
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District Carlsbad Water Carlsbad Sewer Carlsbad EDU's
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated December 5, 1986
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
x Negative Declaration, issued March 14, 1987
E.I.R. Certified, dated
Other,
™ DISCLOSURE FORM ~
APPLICANT:
AGENT:
MEMBERS:
Lincoln Savings & Loan Association, A California Corporation
Name (individual/ partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication)
18200 Von Karman, Irvine California 92715 ._
Business Address~~~
(714) 553-0200
Telephone Number
SGPA Planning & Architecture
Name
1565 Hotel Circle South, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92108
Business Address
(619) 297-0131
Telephone Number
ThomaS V. Hott, Vice President 26852 Via Victoria, Mission Viejo
Name (individual, partner, joint
venture, corporation, syndication)
Home Address
18200 Von Karman, Irvine California 92715
Business Address
(714) 553-0200
Telephone Nunber Telephone Number
Name Home Address
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
(Attach more sheets if necessary)
The applicant is required to apply for Coastal Commission Approval
if located in the Coastal Zone.
I/Vfe declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this
disclosure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be
relied upon as being true and correct until amended.
LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION
APPLICANT
BY
Agent, Owner, Partner
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859
(619)438-1161
Cttp of Cartebab
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: This project is located at the northwest
corner of the North County Plaza.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project, SP-187(A)/CUP-304, will include a
Lincoln Savings and Loan financial institution with a drive-through
facility.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the
above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation
of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental
Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not
have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the
subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the
Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on
file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA.,
92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments
in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of
issuance.
DATED: March 14, 1987
CASE NO: SP-187(A)/CUP-304
APPLICANT: Lincoln Savings and Loan
PUBLISH DATE: March 1*, 1987
MICHAEL J. HOLTMILLE
Planning Director
ND4
11/85
DO
I-
ffi
X
lU
Q CO ^
UJ Z <
00
O >
Q.
Ul
I-
co
Carlsbad Journal
Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to
North Coast Publishers, Inc. corporate offices: P.O. Box 878, Encinitas, CA 92024
(619) 753-6543
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation,
published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which
newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and
which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in
the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next
preceding the date of publication of the notice
hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of
which the annexed is a printed copy, has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
NOTK.I OF PUBLIC
HEARING ,
APPEAL SP-187(AVCUP-3<M
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that
the City Council of the City «f Carls-
bad will hold a public hearing at
the City Council Chambers, 1200
Elm AT
I "of a
Planning Commission Hula! of an
application for a Specific plan
Amendment and » Conditional Use_ i a jingir
with a.property generally located at the
northwest corner of the North
A..**
County Plata and more particularlydescribed as: ,
that portion of Lot* 32 to Minchi-
sive. Map 1!M (Hosp Eucalyptus
Forest) June 8,1906.
If you have any questions regard-
ing this matter, please call the
Planning Department at 438-1WL
If you challenge the Specific Plan
Amendment and/or Conditional
Use Permit in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues
you at someone els* raised at the
public hearing described in this no-
tice, or in written correspondence
to the CHjr of Carlsbad atprior to the public hearing.
Appellant: Lincoln Savings and
Loan -
. CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
July 10 ! 9 87
19
19
19.
19.
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California on Tho IQth
day of July, T987
Clerk of the Printer
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL SP-187(A)/CUP-304
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public
hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M.,
on Tuesday, July 21, 1987, to consider an appeal of a Planning Commission denial of an
application for a Specific Plan Amendment and a Conditional Use Permit to develop a
Lincoln Savings and Loan financial institution with a drive-through facility on property
generally located at the northwest corner of the North County Plaza and more particularly
described as:
That portion of Lots 32 to 36 inclusive, Map 1136 (Hosp
Eucalyptus Forest) June 8, 1908.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call the Planning Department at
438-1161.
If you challenge the Specific Plan Amendment and/or Conditional Use Permit in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public
haring described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of
Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
APPELLANT: Lincoln Savings and Loan
PUBLISH: July 10, 1987 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
SP-187(A)
LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAN CUP-304
WRITE IT - DON'T SA^ <T!
To
Date i*J ' JL A -- 19 & 7
D Reply Wanted
HNo Reply Necessary
AIGNER FORM NO. 56-032 PRINTED IN USA
•- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will
hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad,
California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, June 3j 1987, to consider approval of
a Specific Plan Amendment and a Conditional Use Permit to develop a Lincoln
Savings and Loan financial institution with a drive-through facility on
property generally located at the northwest corner of the North County Plaza and
more particularly described as:
That portion of Lots 32 to 36 inclusive, Map 1136 (Hosp Eucalyptus
Forest) June 8, 1908.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend
the public hearing, if you have any questions please call the Planning
Department at 438-1161.
If you challenge the Specific Plan Amendment and/or Conditional Use Permit in
court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else
raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public
hearing.
CASE FILE: SP-187(A)/CUP-304
APPLICANT: LINCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN
PUBLISH: May 22, 1987
CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
December 4, 1986
Owner
Medical Group Laboratory
c/o Tremont Corporation
321 Cassidy Street
Oceanside, CA 92054
Valley Home Furniture
c/o B. D. Laramy
2333 Nicklaus Drive
Oceanside, CA 92056
HFH Ltd., et. al.
c/o Fred A. Barman
9601 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 810
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
State of California
Department of Fish and Game
245 West Broadway
Suite 350
Long Beach, CA 90802
Robert and Dorothy Blumenshine
and Karen Blumenshine
2202 Highland Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Ave.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Grove Apartments Investment Co.
10738 West Tico Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90064
Clayton and Arnetta McAndrew
1790 Ratcliff Road
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Kuniko Johnson
1800 Ratcliff Road
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Kenneth and Susan Roush
1810 Ratcliff Road
Carlsbad, CA 92008
William and Aileen Baker
1821 Ratcliff Road
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Page 1
8533-87-20
Assessors Parcel No.(s)
154-140-19
154-140-25
154-140-29
154-140-30
156-301-04
154-140-32
156-051-17
156-270-55
156-080-10
156-080-11
156-301-01-02
156-301-02
156-080-18
156-080-19
156-270-04
156-270-05
156-270-06
156-270-07
Page 2
December 4, 1986 8533-87-20
Owner Assessor's Parcel No.(s)
Donna Stevens 156-270-08
1811 Ratcliff Road
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Mary and Rudy Moreno 156-270-16
1810 Guevara Road
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Timothy Emerson 156-270-17
1812 Guevara Road
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Joseph and Joan Martin 156-270-18
1814 Guevara Road
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Teresa and Peter Fry 156-270-19
1831 Guevara Road
Carlsbad, CA 92008
City of Vista 156-301-01-01
600 Eucalyptus Avenue
Vista, CA 92083
Hughes North County Associates. 156-301-03
Two Corporate Plaza, Suite 250 156-301-05
Newport Beach, CA 92660 165-120-56
City of Carlsbad Parking Authority 156-301-11
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Plaza Camino Real 156-301-13
c/o May Stores Shopping Centers, Inc.
1555 Railway Exc. Blvd.
611 Olive Street
St. Louis, MO 63101
City of Oceanside 165-120-17
704 3rd Street
Attn: City Clerk
Oceanside, CA 92054
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
' Office of the City Cleric
TELEPHONE:
(714) 438-5535
Citp of Carlsbab
APPEAL FORM
I (We) appeal the following decision of the
PLANNING COMMISSION to the City Council:
Project name and number (or subject of appeal); SP-187(A)/
CUP 304 - LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAN
Date of decision:JUNE 3, 1987
Reason for appeal; The Application was denied loy Commission on the
basis of use, which appears to be in conflict with the City's
General Plan Description of "Intensive Regional Commercial" (RRI ) .
In addition, the recorded Specific Plan (SP-187) for this project
clearly states that "Drive-Through Facilities for Financial Insti-
tutions only" ARE PERMITTED with a Conditional U Permit.
6-5-87
Date
Geoffrey B. Reeslund
Name(Please print)
SGPA Planning and Architecture
1565 Hotel Circle South, #200
Address
San Diego, CA 92108
619/297-0131
Telephone Number
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989
Office of the City Clerk
TELEPHONE
(619) 438-5535
Citp of Cartebab
TO:Bobbie Hoder, Planning Dept.
FROM: Karen Kundtz, Deputy City Clerk
DATE: June 9, 1987
RE:CUP-304/SP-187(A) - Lincoln Savings & Loan
The above item has been appealed to the City Council. Please determine
when the item will go to Council and complete the form below and return
it to the City Clerk's Office. According to the Municipal Code,
appeals must be heard by the City Council within 30 days of the date
that the appeal was filed. Please consider this when setting the
date for the hearing.
Thank you.
The appeal of the above matter should be scheduled for the City
Council Meeting of .
Signature Date
CITY OF CARLSBAD
1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92003
438-5621
REC'D FROM DATE.i'l V7
ACCOUNT NO.
.:>-/ ,-•/, ;,; ^- ^"^
RICWTNO. 70774
DESCRIPTION
A r'/^ fi /- ^/- /:> ;v / j / ^c-
^.---::^"::rv::v
,/#^ /"•;..
,(?" S Jll '
\'\ ^ 5*1*1 ;;
° . ' '.
"':;^:H;:.- "'x
torn
AMOUNT
d'l~*V'J
1 " 0 ^
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989
Office of the City Clerk
TO:
City of Cartefoab
Bobbie Hoder, Planning Dept.
FROM: Karen Kundtz, Deputy City Clerk
To
TELEPHONE
(619) 438-5535
DATE: June 9, 1987
RE:CUP-304/SP-187(A) - Lincoln Savings & Loan
The above item has been appealed to the City Council. Please determine
when the item will go to Council and complete the form below and return
it to the City Clerk's Office. According to the Municipal Code,
appeals must be heard by the City Council within 30 days of the date
that the appeal was filed. Please consider this when setting the
date for the hearing.
Thank you.
The appeal of the above matter should be scheduled for the City
Council Meeting of f)g.t<4 1
7
Signature Date
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
' Office of the City Cleric
TELEPHONE.
(714) 438-5535
Citp of Carlsbab
APPEAL FORM
I (We) appeal the following decision of the
PLANNING COMMISSION to the City Council:
Project name and number (or subject of appeal); SP-187(A)/
CUP 304 - LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAN
Date of decision:JUNE 3, 1987
Reason for appeal: The Application was denied by Commission on the
basis of use, which appears to be in conflict with the City's
General Plan Description of "Intensive Regional Commercial" (RRI).
In addition, the recorded Specific Plan (5P-187) for this project
clearly states that "Drive-Through Facilities for Financial Insti-
tutions only" ARE PERMITTED with a Conditional U/w^ Permit.
6-5-87
Date
Geoffrey B. Reeslund
Name (Please print)
SGPA Planning and Architecture
1565 Hotel Circle South, #200
Address
San Diego, CA 92108
619/297-0131
Telephone Number
CITY OF CARLSBAD
1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
-.- ..:>.,, /• 438-562i:;v '* • ;-^376,yu ;i'
REC'D FROM..DATE.
RECEIPT NO. 70774