HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-08-04; City Council; 9119; Appeal City Engineer's Decision Constantino MedianCIT!f OF CARLSBAD - AGEN
APPEAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S DECISION MINOR SUBDIVISION 746 (coNSTA~~TINO mmm)
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
City Council deny the appeal and uphold the decision of the City Engineer.
ITEM EWLANATION
On June 5, 1987, the City Engineer made a final decision to disapprove the tentative parcel map for Minor Subdivision 746. On July 7, 1987, an appeal of this decision was filed by Mr. Medina with the City Clerk. The reason for the appeal is that the applicant feels the proposed minor subdivision should be exempted from the application of resolution No. 8703 (established growth management controls points for the land use density ranges), due to the fact that this property is in the Cynthia Lane Assessment District (A.D. 86-3).
Prior to the approval of resolution No. 8703, Mr. Medina could have subdivided his property into the 4 lots as proposed by Minor Subdivision 746. When the growth management control point, is applied to Mr. Medina's
property, it results in a subdivision of only 2 lots.
Per Resolution No. 8703:
"The City shall not approve any residential development at a density that exceeds the growth management control point for the applicable density range without making the following findings:
1. That the project will provide sufficient additional public facilities for the density in excess of the control point to ensure that the adequacy of the City's public facilities plans will not be adversely impacted.
2. That there have been sufficient developments approved in the quadrant at densities below the control point to cover the units in the project above the control point so the approval will not result in exceeding the quadrant limit."
PAGE 2 OF AGENDA BILL NO. 9119
The above findings cannot be evaluated until the Local Public Facilities Plans are completed for the quadrant (northwest) and accepted by the City Council.
Though staff feels that special considerations by the City Council may be in order in this case, the only finding we are able to make based on Resolution No. 8703 is that of denying the appeal.
FISCAL IMPACT
The appellant has paid the required $275.00 appeal fee. The fee covers the expenses for required staff time to prepare an answer to the appeal.
EXHIBITS
1. Preliminary decision to disapprove MS 746.
2. Resolution No. 8703.
3. Appeal Form.
4. Plat of project (proposed MS 746).
‘1 ’ 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE
. . CARLSBAD, CALlFORNlA92009-4959
OIlice of the City Engineer
Exhib- 1
TELEPHONE
(619)438-1161
r
-ce Ij
May 5,:X987
Constantine Medina Jr. 1655 Buena Vista Way Carlsbad, CA 92008
PROPOSED
A preliminary decision has been made, pursuant to Section 20.24.120 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, to disapprove the tentative map of the proposed minor subdivision for the following reason:
Resolution No. 8703 established growth management control points for the Land Use Element density ranges. This project is in the RLM density range which has a control point of 3.2 dwelling units per acre. Your property, calculated at 3.2 dwelling units per acre, is only able to be split into two (2) lots.
Per Resolution No. 8703:
"The City shall not approve any residential development at a denisty that exceeds the growth management control point for the ap- plicable density range without making the following findings:
1. That theprojectwillprovide sufficient additional public facilities for the density in excess of the control point to ensure that the adequacy of the City's public facilities plans will not be adversely impacted.
Constantino Medina Jr. Proposed Minor Subdivision No. 746 May 5, 1987 Page: 2
2. Thattherehavebeen sufficientdevelop- ments approved in the quadrant at den- sities below the control point to cover the units in the project above the control point so the approval will not result in exceeding the guadrantlimit.V1
The above mentioned findings cannotbemade until the local public facility plans are completed for the quadrant and accepted by the City Council.
The applicant may request a review of the preliminary decision in writing within ten (10) days of the date of this disapproval.
LBH:JM:lch
’
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ExhiFt z
RESOLUTION NO. 8703
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 0670 CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING .OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN 'SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1986, TO INCLUDE THE SIB- MISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SAID CITY AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A LIMIT ON RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY AND GUARANTEEING PUBLIC FACILITIES WILL BE AVAILABLE MR ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT IN ACCORD WITH THE 1986 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN.
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 8670
a calling a General Municipal Election to be held in said City on
'9 Tuesday, November, 4, 1986 in order to elect a mayor and two
10 members of the City Council; and 11 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad has
12
9 determined to submit an ordinance to,the qualified voters of the
1 2 13 $5 2 City of Carlsbad at the General Municipal Election being held on , _ p; 14' -
$b$S November 4, 1986, 56;; 15
:;iQ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of $SS$ 16 gg"s
s-t 2 17 the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby declare, determine ., - ;.; -~
5 and order as follows: 18
19,j 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That Resolution No. 0670 is hereby amended to
include the submission to the qualified voters of said City an
ordinance amending the general plan and the zoning map to 22 establish a limit on residential development in the City and to 23
24 guarantee that public facilities will be available for all new
development.
25 I 3. The ordinance submitted to the vOters shall be as
26 . follows: 27
I: 28 II The People of the'city of Carlsbad do ordain as follows:
I!
II
.
I
i
:
4
E
e
:
z
c
1C
II
li
j g 1:
$.$,z O,Ii 14 go=.: 0-T: zzei 1: ;;$I? ZSS$ 1E ggz?@J '5 2
g 3 l'i
1E
1s
2c
21
22
2:
24
25
26
27
28
A. That the Carlsbad general plan shall be amended by the amendment of the Public Facilities and Land Use Elements to add the following:
"The City of Carlsbad in implementing its public facilities element and growth management plan has ..rade an estimate of the number of dwelling units that will be built as a result of the application of the density ranges in the Land Use Element to individual projects. The City's Capital Improvement Budget, growth management plan, and public facilities plans are all based on this estimate. In order to ensure that all necessary public facilities will be available concurrent with need to serve new development it is necessary to limit the number of residential dwelling units which can be constructed in the City to that estimate. For that purpose the City has been divided into four quadrants along El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Road. The maximum number of residential dwelling units to be constructed or approved in the City after November 4, 1986 is as follows: Northwest Quadrant 5,844: Northeast Quadrant 6,166: Southwest Quadrant 10,667: Southeast Quadrant 10,801.
The City shall not approve any General Plan amendment, zone change, tentative subdivision map or other discretionary approval for a development which could result in development above the limit in any quadrant. In order to ensure that development does not exceed the limit the following growth management control points are established for the Land Use Element density ranges.
ALLOWED DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE
General Plan Growth Management Density Ranges Control Point
RL 0 - 1.5 1 RLM o-4 3.2 RM 4-a 6 RMH 8 - 15 11.5 RH 15 - 23 19
The City shall,not approve any residential development at a density that exceeds the growth management control point for the applicable density range without making the following findings:
1. That the project will provide sufficient additional public facilities for the density in excess of the control point
to ensure that the adequacy of the City's public facilities plans will not be adversely impacted.
2. That there have been sufficient developments
approved in the quadrant at densities below the control point to cover the units in the project above the control Point so the approval will not result in exceeding the quadrant limit.
-2-
-_
The City Manager shall monitor all approvals and report to the Planning Commission and City Council on an annual basis to ensure that the construction of residential units within each quadrant, on a cumulative basis, will be at or below the growth management control points and that the overall -quadrant limits are being maintained. If the annual report indicates in any way that it is likely that the limit may be exceeded, the Council shall take appropriate action by revising the growth management plan and the City's zoning code to ensure that the ceilings will be maintained.
The City Council or the Planning Commission shall not find that all necessary public facilities will be available concurrent with need as required by the Public Facilities Element and the City's 1986 growth management plan unless the provision of such facilities is guaranteed. In guaranteeing that the facilities will be provided emphasis shall be given to ensuring good traffic circulation, schools, parks, libraries, open space and recreational amenities. Public facilities may be added. The City Council shall not materially reduce public facilities without making corresponding reductions in residential densities.
Nothing in this section shall be construed as changing the requirement that any specific residential density above the minimum allowed by the Land Use Element density ranges and the applicable zoning shall be justified according to the requirements of the appropriate General Plan and zoning provisions.
8. The zoning map of the City of Carlsbad shall be amended to provide that building permits issued or approved for residential dwelling units in the City after November 4, 1986 shall not exceed the limits established in the map in this section. The numbers on the map shall not be increased without an affirmative vote of the people.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
5 18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2a
hereinbefore provided shall be counted against the adoption of
the
d'es i
ordinance.
6. The ordinance submitted by this resolution shall be
gnated on the ballot by a letter printed on the Left margin
C. The City Council shal .l adopt amendments to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Growth Management) as necessary to implement the General Plan amendment of Section A and the Map of Section B.
D. This ordinance is inconsistent with and intended as an alternative to any initiative ordinance which wouLd place an annual numerical limitation on the rate of residential construction. If this ordinance and any such initiative ordinance are both passed by a majority voting thereon then the one with the most votes shall prevail."
4. That on the ballots to be used at said general
election, in addition to any other matters required by law, and
in addition to any other matters specified in Resolution No.
8670, there shall be printed substantially the following:
Sh 11 an ordinance be adopted to provide as a part I ofathe 1986 orowth management plan that 1) NO DEVELOPMENT &ALL BE APPROVED by the City of I I I Carlsbad unless it is guaranteed that concurrent I YES I with need all necessary public facilities be I I provided as required by said plan with emphasis on 1 ensuring good traffic circulation, schools, parks, I libraries, open space and recreational amenities: I and 2) the City Council shall not approve I residential development which would increase the I number of dwelling units beyond the Limit in said I ordinance WITHOUT AN AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF THE I NO CITIZENS. The City may add additional public I facilities. The City shall not reduce public faci-I lities without a corresponding reduction in the I I residential dwelling unit Limit. I I
5. That a cross (+) placed in the voting square after
the word 'YES" in the manner hereinbefore provided shall be
counted in favor of the adoption of the ordinance. A cross (+)
placed in the voting square after the word "NO" in the manner
of the square containing the description of the measure, as
-4-
I
1
2
3
4
5.
6~
7!
a
9
19 ,I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 1
~ provided in Section 10219 of the Elections Code. This measure
shall be listed first on the ballot.
7. That the City Clerk shall certify 'to..the passage
and adoption of this resolution: shall enter the same in the
book of original resolutions of said City: and shall rake a
minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the record of the
proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of
the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
said City Council held on the 22nd day of JUlY ,
1986 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Cabler, Lewis, Kulchin and Pectine
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Chick
ATTESP:
-5-
2075 LAS bALMAS DRIVE
CA~LSSAD,CALIFORNIA92009-4859
Ollice 01 the City Engineer
Exhit ^ 3
TELEPHONE
(619)438-1161
Citp of G3rIB’bab
June 5, 1987
Constantino Medina Jr. 1655 Buena Vista Way Carlsbad, CA 92008
PROPOSED MINOR SWDMSION NO. 746
Whereas a review of the preliminary decision to disapprove the tentative map was requested by the appropriate date and a review meeting was held; and whereas negative findings delineated by Section 20.24.130 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code have been made: and whereas this minor subdivision is found to not be in con- formity with the General Plan of the City of Car&bad; therefore, en made to disapprove the subject tentative
LBH:JM:lch
c: Kevin McCann
.
TELEPHONE:
C,T~Q@@&gpJ~4’ 438-5535
&itp of 4hhbaO CITY OF CARLSBAD
APPEAL FORM
I kPrsrt appeal the following decision of the
City Engineer to the City Council:
Project name and number (or subject of appeal):
Proposed (APN 156-23-49)
Date of decision: June 29, 1987
Reason for appeal:, Minor subdivision should be exempted from
aoulication of resolution #8703 because of status of development
inmediately prior to resolution, representations made by staff .I
concerning the then contemplated development of neighborhood and
-Ie-l-)---l--s see y7
of then reasonable
Julv 7. 1987 Date Signature
Constantino Medina, Jr.
Name (Please print)
c/o Kevin E. McCann, Applicant's Attorney Xdaress
1905 Apple Street, Ste. 5 Oceanside, CA 92054 (619) 433-7270 Telephone Number
aooMwl3
I ‘bCI Ati
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
PROJECT NAME
PR6P05E0 MINOR SUt3DlVISlON 746
~CONSTANTfNO MEDINA)
PROJ. EXHIBI’ NO.
MS 746 5
.- I
.
.
MlCnnEL 7. PINES
KEVIN E. MCCANN
MICHAEL GOLDSTEIN
c. DANIEL CARROLL
July 30, 1987
z?/w: pL@nJL
Of;/J, Pqfz
PINES. MCCANN 8 GOLDSTEIN
ATTORNEYS c,\T LAW ,905 PPrnLE STREET. SUITE 5
OCEANSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92054-4480 v ,619) 433.7270 < 4 .‘$.<X
‘I;~\
‘.,r,
The Honorable Claude A. Lewis, Mayor City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008
Re: Appeal of City Engineer's Decision Denying Minor Subdivision No. 746 Public Hearing Date: August 4, 1987, 6:00 p.m.
Dear Mayor Lewis:
Please allow me to introduce myself as legal counsel to Constantino Medina, Jr. who shall appear before you on August 4. Mr. Medina is the owner of an approximately -92 acre lot between Knowles Avenue and Cynthia Lane. Mr. Medina has applied for a minor subdivision to divide this parcel four ways. The City Engineer has informed Mr. Medina that the project is currently barred by application of your Resolution Number 8703 which established a growth management and control point of 3.2 dwelling units/acre for this quadrant.
While Mr. Medina understands that the City is in the process of making studies prior to approving projects beyond the control point established for the various quadrants of the City, there are exceptional circumstances to Mr. Medina's case. These exceptional circumstances should make the effect of Resolution No. 8703 inapplicable to this particular project. Please allow me to outline these circumstances:
(1) For your ease in understanding these statements please refer to Exhibit "A", describing the property and the Cynthia Lane imrpovements.
(2) On November 5, 1985 Mr. Medina owned a .92 acre parcel of raw land which he intended to divide into four, large residential lots of approximately 10,000 + sq. ft. each.
(3) On November 5, 1985 the City Engineer invited Mr. Medina to attend a meeting on November 14 at Council Chambers to discuss the improvements to Cynthia Lane which were being proposed by the City.
Mayor Lewis July 30, 1987 Page 2
(4) At that meeting, attended by City Counsel, Mr. Medina was informed that the Cynthia Lane improvements would make his property more valuable, would provide access to the lots he intended to create in this parcel, and would provide necessary utility services to the property. Mr. Medina was invited to participate in the improvement district by (a) granting the City 3,665 square feet of property for the cul-de-sac at no cost to the City; and (b) joining in an assessment district, lien-hz properties in the amount of approximately $29,000.00 to $30,000.00, or $lS,OOO.OO each for the two parcels contiguous to Cynthia Lane.
(51 Mr. Medina was told that he could either voluntarily participate in this plan or, alternatively, the City would condemn the property for this public use. He was also told that the improvement would make his property more valuable and divisible into the four way plan he intended.
(6) Negotiations with the City continued through March of 1986. Thereafter, on approximately March 25, 1986 Mr. Medina granted to the City that portion of his land needed for the City's cul-de-sac and voluntarily joined in the formation of the assessment district.
(7) The Cynthia Lane improvements included sewer and water connections to the proposed parcels 3 and 4, existing on the northerly one half of the parcel. Similar sewer and water was available to parcels 1 and 2 from the existing Knowles Avenue.
(8) In making these City dedications and committments in reliance upon the City's representations as to the divisibility of his parcel, Mr. Medina gave the City property worth approximately $36,650.00 (3,665 sq.ft. x $lO/sq. ft.), and incurred liens in the amount of approximately $29,142.00, for his total expense of nearly $66,000.00.
(9) Under the proposed parcel map created by Mr. Medina after the Cynthia Lane improvement the lot sizes were reduced slightly, such that the smallest lot, parcel 4, would be 7,800 square feet, and the largest lot, parcel 1, would be 9,342 square feet. Needless to say, these lots are larger than the majority of the 7,500 sq.ft. residential lots in Carlsbad containing single family residences.
A review of these circumstances shows that Mr. Medina relied to his detriment on the City's representations in committing himself to the $66,000.00 expenditure. The Applicant certainly does not
. 1 -
. .
,
., ’
-.
Mayor Lewis July 30, 1987 Page 3
contend that the staff mislead him. In fact, the City Staff has been exceptional in the assistance and information they have provided to Mr. Medina.
On the other hand, the imposition of Resolution 8703 radically changes the rules on this project which is, in effect, in progress. Ordinarily one would not make off-site committments for the parcellation of property or dedicate easements until a tentative parcel map had been approved. In Mr. Medina's case, however, the circumstances were different because the City initiated the improvement effort. Therefore, it was the acts of the City in completing Cynthia Lane and inviting the dedication of property for street and utility improvements which actually began the development process for Mr. Medina's property.
The Applicant respectfully submits to this Council that, for these reasons, Resolution 8703 should not have application to his project. It would be an unfair application of a law ex post facto if the development of his parcel was so limited after he has been invited to, and has made such a large committment to the City.
Therefore, will you please consider this appeal from the decision of the City Engineer to stop the processing of this application, and will you please find that this project should be an exception to Resolution 8703 because of the substantial progress towards the development which occurred prior to the adoption of your resolution?
Thank you very much for your consideration. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
PINES, MCCANN & GOLDSTEIN
By: Kevin E. McCann Attorneys for the Applicant, Constantino Medina, Jr.
cc: MayorPrO-tern,, Ann Kulchin Councilman John Mamaux Councilman Eric Larson Councilman Mark Pettine Constantino Medina, Jr.
. :
.
B-L- --
c
w-t-- --
MEDINA - - ~-~~~
‘LOT ;
/(j)Okd!! rot, . . . .,r r_
0&I ~.
: 9362s; k-? ! c, I’ t \ ,, \ so- l
- --’ Ii:- I.‘/ j /-sy ,&a
L - ,’
‘L a~ & ;
-w
-----
c \ \
I* h h \
\
\ -& O-
\ --- -ic-
\
\
/22? z \ /w Skrc’ /‘!
\o
,:J----- i -A- >y- I’VCF Sewr- *-
‘.
PINES. MCCANN 8 GOLDSTEIN P.TTORNEIS AT LAW MICHAEL T. PINES ,905 APPLE STREET. SUITE 5 KE"lN E. MCCANN OCEANSIDE. CALlFORNlA 92054-4480 MlCWAEL GOLDSTElN c. DPNlEL CARROLL ,619, 433.7270
July 6, 1987
City of Carlsbad, City Clerk's Office Attn: Karen Kunts, Deputy City Clerk 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008
Re: Appeal of Engineer's Decision Pertaining to Proposed Minor Subdivision No. 746
Dear Ms. Kuntz:
In accordance with our conversation of July 6, 1987 enclosed please find an appeal form pertaining to the above-referenced matter. As you requested I am accompanying this Appeal with a filing fee in the amount of $275.00.
During our conversation today I inquired as to whether the Applicant or the City is required to give notice to the surrounding property owners of the noticed hearing. You informed me that you were unsure because appeals from the City Engineer's decision were extremely rare in your past experience with the City of Carlsbad. You informed me that you would advise me once you were able to determine who is responsible for giving this notice and I gave you my business card so that you would be able to contact me.
I also inquired as to when I would be advised of the scheduling of the City Council hearing. You were able to advise me that the hearings were conducted on Tuesday evenings at 6:00 p.m., but you were unsure of when I would be given notice of the hearing. YOU also informed me that you would advise me of this when you could determine the same.
Thank you very much for your assistance. Will you please be so kind as to contact me once you have determined (1) the notification to neighboring property owners procedure: and (2) the scheduled date of the public hearing?
Very truly yours,
PINES, MCCANN & GOLDSTEIN
By: Kevin E. McCann
cc: Constantino Medina, Jr.
‘- Cadsbad Journal
Decreed A Legal Newrpoper by the Superior Court of Son Diego County
Mail ~111 correspondence regarding public notice advertising fo
North Coast Publishers, Inc. corporate offices: P.O. Box 878, Encinitor, CA 92024
(619) 753-6543
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am o citizen of the United States ond o resident of the county aforesaid;
I ornoverthecqeof eighteen years, and nota portytoorinterested in theaboveentitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal o newspaper of general circulation,
published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which
newspaperispublishedforthedisseminotionof local newsand intelligenceof o general choracter,and
which newspaper at 011 times herein mentioned hod and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper hos been established, printed and published at regular intervals in
the said City of Curlsbad, County of Son Diego, Stateof Colifornio, for o period exceeding one yeor next
preceding the date of publication of the notice
NOTICE OF PUBLIC Cyn,hiaLa”esnd KnowlesAvenue. If yw have my q”estio”l rams hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of
HEARING APPEAL rd,NOR S”BDI”ISION NO. 148 ing Olin matter. p,eaIle Cdl the En- which the annexed is o printed copy, has been gineering mpartment at 4381161. published in each regular and entire issueof said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dotes, to-wit:
-. NOTICE IS~HERELIY GWEN that *ryoy challenge the minor s”bdi-
,heCih/Co”nri,of,heCityofCarls- vision in EOUIZ. you may be limited
bad Will hold a pblic Fearing 8, to raising only those ismes wu 9’ the city Cau”e,, Chamberr, 1m someone else railed at the PublIe
mm Avenue. Carlsbsd. Calirornia. healing described in tm notice. (IT
at mm P.M.. on Tuesday, *“gust 1. in written cO,rerpOndenee deli”.
1981.IOcod.ideranaPpealorsCitY ered to the city or Ce.ll.bd at GI
Engineer’rdecisionc ,fde”ialroran pliol m &e,p”b,ir hearing.
appLiestion rora Ini”- ~. nr.l>hdi”i.io” *pPELL,ANT: Conrtantino akdi-
,M.S. *x6, 0” mm.ertu Bena ‘ally ns. Jr.
,nr.t..i hctw.en the cur-de-s CARLSBAD CITY CO”NClr. _~ ____ - ...~~ . .._ ~~~~ se Of
PLAT OF, PROJECT
1s a--3 i ! / ; /, ./.!: Ir---
July 24 19.87.
19
19
19
19
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California on -Thep24th
day of
Clerk of the Printer
” .
.- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL
MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. 746
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing
at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M., on
Tuesday, August 4, 1987, to consider an appeal of a City Engineer's decision of denial for
an application for a minor subdivision (M.S. $746) on property generally located between
the cul-de-sac of Cynthia Lane and Knowles Avenue.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call the Engineering Department
at 438-1161.
If you challenge the minor subdivision in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someme else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in
written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
APPELLANT: Constantine Medina, Jr.
PUBLISH: July 24, 1987 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
PLA? OF* PROJECT
PROJECT NAME PROJ. EXHlBl
PmPOSED MlNDR S”BDWSION 746 NO.
(coNxaNTINo HrolNn) MS746 5
Constantine Medina, Jr.
c/o Kevin E. McCann, Atty
1905 Apple St, Suite 5
Oceanside, CA 92054
Rhonda R. Moffitt
2727 Elmwood St.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
June h. Barrett
10550 Dunlop Crossing Rd. #82
Whittier, CA 90606
Steven G. & Jullie 1. Sypher
2805 Elmwood St.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Kenneth E. & Carol M. Laidlaw
2815 Elmwood St.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Cecil M. & Iola D. Oathout
1453 Buena Vista Ave.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Roy H. Gastelum Jr.
665 Walnut St.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Consuelo Miller
2816 Highland Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Kimberly J. Hunter
920 Avenida De San Clemente
Encinitas, CA 92024
Wallace & Gladys Schrock
2828 Highland Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Benigno & Nicosia Ruiz
1395 Buena Vista Ave.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Wilda F. Simpson
2850 Elmwood Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dwight & Linda &inland
1319 Knowles Ave.
Car&bad, CA 92008
Robert & Linda Snyder
3655 Highland Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Richard & Marcella Gilbert
2810 Elmwood Ave.
CArlsbad, CA 92008
John & Kathy Marlin
1274 Stratford Lane
Car&bad, CA 92008
Eldon h Thalia Cutler
30171 Silver Spur Rd.
San Juan Capistrano, CA
92675
Gino Burnette
2870 Elmwood St.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Russell & Amelia Erickson
2860 Elmwood St.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Heinz K. Kuhn
2880 Elmwood St.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Richard & Edna Strain
1301 Knowles Ave.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Theodore & Patricia Switzer
233 N. Sparks St.
Burbank, CA 91506
Archie & Mildred Larson
2869 Elmwood St.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Arthur Ennis
1339 Knowles Ave.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
William & Eva Couty
2883 Elmwood St.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Helen Lacey
2889 Elmwood St.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Frank & Mary Azmann
1270 Stratford Lane
Carlsbad, CA 92008
William & Susan Bernard
1266 Stratford Lane
Car&bad, CA
Robert & Jacalyn Hoover
1250 Stratford Lane
Carlsbad, CA
Marion & Veronica Steen
1240 Stratford Lane
Carlsbad, CA
John & Kathy Marlin
1274 Stratford Lane
Carlsbad
Jonathan & Linda Lee
2885 Highland Dr.
Carlsbad, CA
Larry Doan 2873 Highland Dr.
Carlsbad, CA
Rose Barone
2884 Elmwood St.
Carlsbad, CA
Clyde Wickham & Julie Mennen
1320 Knowles Ave.
Carlsbad, CA
Hshing & Cheng Lin
1320 Knowles Ave.
Carlsbad, CA
Geronimo & Emelia Sanchez
1375 Buena Vista Ave.
CArlsbad, CA 92008
Buena Properties
608 San Luis Rey Dr.
Oceanside, CA
Harold & Betty Smerdu
1310 Knowles Ave.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Albert Devega
1306 Knowles St.
Carlsbad, CA
Donald & Lucy Dominguez
1288 Knowles Ave.
Carlsbad, CA
Roy H. Gastelum Jr.
665 Walnut St.
Carlsbad, CA
Constantino Medina, Jr.
1677 Buena Vista Way
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Louise Williams
1394 Knowles Ave.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Bernice Cooper
2831 Elmwood St.
Car&bad, CA
PLAT OF< PROJECT
‘IS OOOMW73
: * i i
;. a.
. . . . *....,... . . . . .
. . . . . ...*...*.*.<
f
4 3
k t
1
i %a uo933t19
, ICh
PROJECT NAME PROJ. EXHIBI
PROPOSED MINOR SUBDIVISION 746 NO.
(CoNSTANtIN MEOWA) MS 746 5
. . .
,.
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989
Oillce 01 Ihe Clfy Clerk
TO:
FROM:
&itp of CarMa lb
David Hauser, Asst. City Engineer
Karen Kundtz, Deputy City Clerk
DATE:
RE:
July 8, 1987
Minor Subdivision No. 746
TELEPHONE
(619) 438.5535
The above item has been appealed to the City Council. Please determine
when the item will go to Council and complete the form below and return
it to the City Clerk's Office. According to the Municipal Code,
appeals must be heard by the City Council within 30 days of the date
that the appeal was filed. Please consider this when setting the
date for the hearing.
Thank you.
*** If this matter is to be a noticuipublic hearing, I need to
know ASAP, and need to be provided with envelopes for
mailing to any affected property owners in the area.
The appeal of the for the City
Council Meeting of
.
TELEPHONE:
'RECEIVEO (714) 438.5535
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
87JUL-7 PII I+:SO
CITYOF CARLSBAD
6p37
APPEAL FORM
I KPIat appeal the following decision of the
City Engineer to the City Council:
Project name and number (or subject of appeal):
Proposed Minor Subdivision No. 746 (APN 156-23-49)
Date of decision: June 29, 1987
Reason for appeal: Minor subdivision should be exempted from
application of resolution #8703 because of status of development
immediately prior to resolution, representations made by staff ")
concerninq the then contemplated development of neighborhood and
f~<-‘L~~~.Ly--F y&e by
of then reasonable
Julv 7. 1987 Date
Constantino Medina, Jr.
Name (Please print)
c/o Kevin E. McCann, Applicant's Attorney xddress
1905 Apple Street, Ste. 5 Oceanside, CA Y2054 (619) 433-7270 Telephone Number
I * I I
iWXlJNT NO. DESCRIPTION i .$ ,& AMQUNT -,,,_ ~.“.---- ~~~,~~,.~~~....--------‘ ”
12W ELM AVENUE
CARLSSAD, CA 92008-1989
Office of the City Clerk
TELEPHONE
(619) 438-5535
4Citp of &arWab
TO: David Hauser, Asst. City Engineer
FROM: Karen Kundtz, Deputy City Clerk
DATE: July 8, 1987
RE: Minor Subdivision No. 746
The above item has been appealed to the City Council. Please determine
when the item will go to Council and complete the form below and return
it to the City Clerk's Office. According to the Municipal Code,
appeals must be heard by the City Council within 30 days of the date
that the appeal was filed. Please consider this when'setting the
date for the hearing.
Thank you.
*** If this matter is to be a noticedpublic hearing, I need to
know ASAP, and need to be provided with envelopes for
mailing to any affected property owners in the area.
The appeal of the above matter should be scheduled for the City
Council Meeting of
Signature Date
’ ,. - ’ 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
Office of the City Cferb
Qitp of Qhrle’bdl
TELEPHONE:
'RECEIVED (714) 43&5535
WY CLERK'S OF:/CE
87JUL-7 PM 4:50
VW OFCARLSBAD
APPEAL FORM
I msrt appeal the following decision of the
City Engineer to the City Council:
Project name and number (or subject of appeal):
Proposed Minor Subdivision No. 746 (APN 156-23-49)
Date of decision: June 29, 1987
Reason for appeal: Minor subdivision should be exempted from
aunlication of resolution #8703 because of status of development
immediately prior to resolution, representations made by staff ,I
concerning the then contemplated development of neighborhood and
Julv 7. 1987 Date
Constantino Medina, Jr. Name (Please print)
c/o Kevin E. McCann, Applicant's Attorney Address
1905 Apple Street, Ste. 5 Oceansrde, CA 92054 (619) 433-7270 Telephone Number