HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-10-13; City Council; 9184; Rancho La Costa PlazaCl”--.OF CARLSBAD - AGENVBILL l/3 @
ii# ?WY TITLE: A OF A Sm DEmLoFMENr PLAN - -*-
MTP 1o/13/87 RANCID LA COSTA PIAZA - SDP 86-3
DE;;.-
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
. That both the Plan&q capcanission amI staff are mccmm&q that the City Council APPR0VE the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and UFHOLD the decision of the Planning Cmanission to APPR0VE SDP 86-3 as conditioned.
This is an al?peal by the La CostaTWnCouncil of a sitedevel~tplan for a 46,800 square fout retail cmmmrcial aenterlocatedatthesouthz& comer of I&mhoSantaFeF&adandLaCostaAvenue. TheaIJpellantlsarepmposingthatthe
followingcoMitionsbeaddedtotheproject:
1) A wall be constructed to shield the develqxnent frcm residentially zonedland;
2) Relocate the trash containers fropn the parking lot and sides of the buildhgstotherearofthestmchms;
3) Require the applicant to reaffirm the type and location ofthemdian on La Costa Avenue; and,
4) Prohibit the applicant frcm including fast food drive-thmughs or conveniencestozswithintheproject.
ithout these added conditions,
1
the La Costa Town Cmncil feels the project shouldbedenied(appealletterattadxd).
The proposed project is cmtprised of four retail commcial buildings, a drive- z&Eant, e a semice station. Theprojectwouldbe accessed fmn
La Cc&a Avenue: a rqhtturn only onPancho Santa FeFbad and twodriveways on The firstdrivewayon La Costa Avenuewouldberightturnonly with the secoml driveway being a full service driveway. !lbzse driveways were
appmvedaspartofapamelmppmcessed through the City a number of years
ago.
Themajorissues in process ingthepmjectwerether&ucedsetbackalongRan&o Santa Fe Read, the appropriateness of a drive-through restaurant and sexvice station, and the architectmal treatment of the rear elevations which face surmx&qresidentialuses. Thereducedsetbackwasaresultofaupgmdeof Rancho Santa Fe Road frcm a major arterial to a prim arterial and also, the Barton-Aschman Study done for this area indicated anotherlaIEwaSIB2dedto
make this htemection work at buildout. As a result, an additional eighteen
feetwasneededonRanchoSantaFe~dandninefeetonLacoStaAvenue. Staff
felt that the reduced setback was mitigated by screahgtheparkedcarsinthe
developmnt entirely froan the madway. This pmvides visual relief frm seeing
flat parking lots with rows of cars. Also, a specialplantertypewallwasused
along La Costa Avenue with the same type of effect. Staff feels that the
appropriateness of the drive-thmqh and service station were made possible by
the redesign of the project whil puts the service station and the restaurant
away frmthemainflowoftrafficthmughthecenter. Thesiteistriangular in ~tureandthe~~in~ldingsarelocatedonthesauthernportionofthis
.
Pa+hmofAgeMaBillNo. 9/8t/
triangle and that is whem the main traffic circulation occurs. since the drive-through and service station am pit in the nortkm end of the triangle, thereislittleornoimpactmtherestofthecenter. Withregardtothefinal issue of aesthetics, staff feltthatmre architectural treamtwas~ on the south side and has addeda conditionrequiringtheapplicanttoaddmre ~~an~rearofthe~~ard~themtothePlanningDirector
for a3?prcxral.
Inaddn?ssingthewncerns oftheLaCcstaTbwnCmncil,staff feelsthatthe additional conditiononar&itectum previmslydisaxs&eliminatesthene&for thewallalongthe Smuthrnbornofthepraperty. Intemsofthetrash wntainers,~arenot mcessarily agpruved wfiere they are shown on the site plan, Omdition 13 of the Planning C!J ',&II Resolution indicates that precise locationswillhavetObeappravedbythePl~Director. Withregardtothe median, theCity~i.neem indicatedthatthemedianonIaCbstaAvenuewouldrun fram~~ionwithRandroSantaFe~dbacktoapoirrtjust~tofthe most easterly driveway on La Costa Avenue. Thispennits full access onthe easterndrivewaywiththeideathat~thep~darelapesa~thestreet this driveway may be signalized. Prohibiting fast food restaurants and . conve.niencesto~is~ that the Council maydobyconditioniftheyso desire. The ordinance does allow drive-~ at this location and because aaxssandstackbqpmblemwere solvedbyrevisionstothe siteplan, staff&
thePlanning~ion feltthisusewasapprcpriate forthis site.
. In sunmary, bath the Planning Cmunission andstaffarer=mm&mg that the
wil uphold the appmval of the Planning Cmunission as conditioned. For
further information please see the attached staff mport to the Planning cI!cm.ission.
on Aucl=t 19, 1987 the Planning Cmmission approved the Negative Declaration
issued by the Planning Dim&or dated August 5, 1987.
The hcmased need for city capital facilities resultimj frm this develqanent
will be offset by the payment of the @lit facilities fee. Any capim facilities related directly to this develapnent will be constructed and paid for
by the developar.
-apefating- related to this develcrpaent will be offset to sme
extent fram lnrreased tax or fee lwenuegeneratedbythedevelapnent. No
detailed econcmic~~andlysisofthisdevelapnenthasbeenconctuctedatthis timesop~~ionsoftheportianofaperatingexpenses cove by additional aperatirrg~erruec=reatedasresultofthisproject~bemade.
1) LocationMap
2) PlarmirqcarmissionResolutionNo. 2675
3) Plannixq Ccmission Staff Repcrt, dated August 19, 1987 4) AppealfrcantheLaCostaTcmCouncil
4 u4rEf or= COrrlz~PW~aJC~ RECEWED,,
QENERAL PLAN ZONINQ
RA ml Lh4H RH
E
A P
RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY (0. t S) LOW~MEDIUM DENSITY(O4) MEDICS4 DENSIP((4.8) MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY (8-15) HIGH DENSITY (lS.23)
COMMIRCIAL INTENSIM REGIONAL RETAIL (es EXTENSlYE REGIONAL RETAIL (cl REGIONAL SERVICE COMMLNI~ COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TRAVEL SERVICl COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL REUTED CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRKT PLANNED INDUSTRIAL COVl3lNMEM FACIUTlE5 PL’BLIC UTILITIES RECREATION COMMERCW SCnOOls ELEMENTARY JUNIOR HIGH HIGH SCHOOL PRlvATE
Plaza CamhO Real) Cu Country Carlsbad)
OS OPEN SPACE NRR NON RESIDENTLAL llESERVE
RfSIDRNTlAL P-C PUNNED COMMVNITY ZONE R.A RESIDENIUL AGRlCL’Jl%AL ZONE R.E RLXU RE5IDEKFL4I. ESTATE ZONE P.. I ONE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE It.2 lWO.FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LONE R.3 YL’LTIPLE FAMILY RESIDFNTIAL ZONE R.3i LIMITED ML’LTbFAMILY RESIDENi%ZONE RD.M RESID- DENSIIYMLZTIPLE LONE RDH MSID- DENSmHIGH LOM RMHP RESID- .MOBILE HOME PAIUC ZOM R-P RESID- PKOFESSIONAL ZONE RT IIFSID- TObUST ZONE RW WID- WATERWAY ZONE
C.? C.2 C-T C-M
P.E
COMMIRCIAL OrnCE ZOM NZIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZOM COMMuIcLALlroLNST ZONE HEAVY COMMEKW-LlMIfED INDUSTRLU INDLW ZONE PLANNED IMnmNAL ZONE OTHER F-P FLOODPLUN OVEIUAY ZONE Lx uMrrmcoN-rmJL OS OPENSPACE P-U PUBUC InlLIN ZONE
ZONE
RANCH0 LA tOSTii PLAZA
city of garlsbad
SDP 86-3
3
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2675
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
NO. 86-3, TO CONSTRUCT A SHOPPING CENTER, INCLUDING A
GAS STATION AND DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT ON PROPERTY
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF RANCH0 SANTA FE
ROAD AND LA COSTA AVENUE
APPLICANT: RANCH0 LA COSTA PLAZA
CASE NO.: SDP 86-3
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the
City of Carlsbad, and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request
as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code
the Planning Commission on the 19th day of August, 1987, considere
said request on property described as:
Parcel 1 and 2 of Parcel Map No. 12586 in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California.
WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering
all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons. desiring to be
heard, said Commission considered all factors relating- to Site
Development Plan No. 86-3.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
9) That based on the evidence presented at the hearing, the
Commission APPROVES SDP 86-3, based on the following
findings:
Findings:
1) The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan since
the proposed commercial land use complies with the
designation on the General Plan as well as the La Costa
Master Plan.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
The site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed since the site is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate commercial development at the intensity
proposed.
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate
condition to this project, ensured building permits will not
be issued for the project unless the City Engineer
determines that sewer service is available, and building
cannot occur within the project unless sewer service remains
available, and the Planning Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the General
Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service
for this project.
School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school
facilities in the Encinitas Union School District and the Sar
Dieguito Union High School District.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will
be required as conditions of approval.
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of
an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee.
Performance of that contract and payment of the fee will
enable this body to find that public facilities will be
available concurrent with need as required by the General
Plan.
Assurances have been given that adequate sewer for the
project will be provided by Leucadia County Water District.
The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding
future land uses since surrounding properties are
designated for commercial, open space, or arterial roadways
on the General Plan. Future and existing residential is
buffered by open space and slopes.
This project will not cause any significant environmental
impacts and a Negative Declaration has been issued by the
Planning Director on August 5, 1987 and approved by the
Planning Commission on August 19, 1987.
This project requires the construction of the improvements
or facilities listed in the conditions of approval or the
payment of fees in lieu of construction. This project
creates a direct need for the improvements or facilities for
the reasons stated in the staff report. If the improvements
or facilities are not provided the project will create an
unmitigated burden on existing improvements and facilities.
Further, the improvements and facilities are necessary to
provide safe, adequate and appropriate service to future
residents of the project consistent with City goals,
policies and plans.
PC RESO NO. 2675 -2-
5-
i
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JO The applicant is by condition,, required to pay any increase
in public facility fee, ‘or new construction tax, or
development fees, and.has agreed to abide by any additional
requirements established by a development management or
public facility program ultimately adopted by the City of
Carlsbad. This will ensure continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created
by the project.
12) The project is consistent with the provisions of Chapter
21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the plans adopted
pursuant of this Chapter or has signed an agreement to be
subject to such plans when they are adopted.
13) This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management
Ordinance as it has been conditioned to comply with any
requirements approved as part of the Local Facilities
Management Plan for Zone 11.
Conditions:
1) Approval is granted for SDP 86-3 , as shown on Exhibit(s) A
- E, dated August 7, 1987, incorporated by reference and on
file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur
substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these
conditions.
2) This project is approved upon the express condition that
building permits will not be issued for development of the
subject property unless assurances have been given by the
Leucadia County Water District .in writing, if sewer
facilities are located in the Leucadia County Water
District.
3) This project is also approved under the express condition
that the applicant pay the public facilities fee adopted by
the City Council on July 28, 1987 and any development fees
established by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of
the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance adopted to
implement a growth management system or facilities and
improvement plan and to fulfil1 the subdivider’s agreement to
pay the public facilities fee dated February 26, 1986 and the
agreement to pay the Growth Management Fee dated ruLf 3
1987 , copies of which are on file with the City Clr#k
and are incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not
paid this application will not be consistent with the General
Plan and approval for this project shall be void.
4) The applicant shall provide school fees to mitigate
conditions of overcrowding as part of building permit
application. These fees shall be based on the fee schedule in
effect at the time of building permit application.
5) Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning.Ordinance and all other app1icab.l.e City ordinances in effect at time of building permit
issuance.
PC RESO NO. 2675 -3- 61
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
I.8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
.
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
.
This approval shall become null and void if building permits
are not issued for this project within one year from the date
of project approval.
Water shall be provided by the Olivenhain Municipal Water
District.
The applicant shall prepare a 24” x 36” reproducible mylar of
the final site plan incorporating the conditions contained
herein. Said site plan shall be submitted to and approved by
the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building
permits.
The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irriga-
tion plan which shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Director prior to the issuance of grading or building
permits, whichever occurs first. The preliminary landscape
plan as submitted shall be changed to reflect the following:
the theme trees and support-theme trees along Ranch0 Santa Fe
Road shall be as described in the Landscape Guidelines Manual;
landscape plan shall include median planting along property
frontage of Ranch0 Santa Fe Road per specifications in the
Manual; landscaped areas shall include not only zone one
landscape material, but also zone two, and the slope to the
south shall use zone three materials; proposed hydroseed mix
is not sufficient to meet standards for erosion control so
supplemental planting per the Manual shall be included; the
pedestrian area in front of Buildings A, B and C shall
incorporate more landscaping in the form of planters, flower
boxes, trees, etc... to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director; the landscaping along Ranch0 Santa Fe Road and the
intersection corner shall use specimen-size trees; berming and
lush plant materials shall be used along the retaining walls;
special treatment shall be given to the setback area behind
Buildings A, 8, and C because of the future residential units
to the south; landscaping shall be provided, in the form of
tall trees, in front of the retaining wall in the corner, or
to the west of the service station to prevent visual impacts.
The center aisle of the parking lot shall incorporate tree
planters in the center of the two rows of spaces, at an
interval of every five spaces. All parking lot trees shall be
a minimum of 15 gallons in size.
All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and
thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris.
A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted
to the Planning Director for his review and approval prior to
occupancy of any building. No pole signs shall be allowed.
///I
//I/ PC RESO NO. 2675 -4-
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
*I 3 )
14)
15)
Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a six-foot high
masonry wall with gates pursuant to City standards. Location
of said receptacles shall be approved by the Planning
Director. A trash enclosure for the drive-thru shall be
provided. All trash enclosures shall be the same color and
represent the same architecture style as the major onsite
buildings.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be
architecturally integrated and concealed from view and the
sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets, pursuant
to Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of
the Directors of Planning and Building. The roof of the
service station shall be visually pleasing since it will be
close to grade level of Ranch0 Santa Fe Road.
Approval of the service station and the drive-thru under this
site development plan shall be considered to constitute the
approval of a conditional use permit pursuant to Section 21.42
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The service station and drive-thru facility shall be granted for a period of 30 years.
They shall be reviewed by the Planning Director on a yearly
basis to determine if all conditions of this site development
plan have been met and that the use does not have a
significant detrimental impact on surrounding properties or
the public health and welfare. If the Planning Director
determines that these have such significant adverse impacts,
the Planning Director shall recommend that the Planning
Commission, after providing the permittee the opportunity to
be heard, add additional conditions to mitigate the
significant adverse impacts. These uses may be revoked at any
time after a public hearing, if it is found that they have a
significant detrimental affect on surrounding land uses and
the public’s health and welfare, or the conditions imposed
herein have not been met. These uses may be extended under
this permit for a reasonable period of time not to exceed five
years upon written application of the permittee made not less
than 90 days prior to the expiration date. In granting such
extension, the Planning Commission shall find that no
substantial adverse affect on surrounding land uses or the
public’s health and welfare will result because of the
continuation of the permitted use. If a substantial adverse
affect on surrounding land uses or the public’s health and
welfare is found, the extension shall be considered as an
original application for these uses. There is no limit to the
number of extensions the Planning Commission may grant.
//I/
///I
///I
PC RESO NO. 2675 -5-
Y
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
.
16)
17)
18)
19)
20)
21)
22)
23)
24)
25)
If any-condition for construction of any public improvements
or facilities, or the payment of any fees in lieu thereof,
imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this project are
challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in
Government Code Section 65913.5. If any such condition is
determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid unless
the City Council determines that the project without the
condition complies with all requirements of law.
No outdoor storage of material shall occur onsite unless
required by the Fire Chief. In such instance a storage plan will be submitted for approval by the Fire Chief and the
Planning Director.
Elevations for the drive-thru facility and Building D on the
site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning
Director prior to issuance of building permits.
Union Oil shall agree to scheduling gas deliveries between 10
p.m. and 7 a.m. An agreement shall be prepared by the
Planning Department and signed by Union Oil prior to issuance
of building permits.
The building footprint for the service station shall not
change from what is shown on the site plan. The north wall of
the building shall be constructed as a retaining wall.
All retaining walls and planter walls less than 10 feet in
height in the project shall use slump block or other similar
decorative wall material for aesthetic purposes. Walls
higher than 10 feet shall be crib walls. ‘The exception is
the 4 foot retaining wall on the southern slope (off-site)
which also shall be crib.
The railing to be placed on top of the retaining and planter
walls along Ranch0 Santa Fe Road shall be compatible with the
site architecture and landscaping and shall be approved by the
Planning Director.
Parking lot light fixtures shall be of a decorative nature,
the exact style and specifications to be approved by the
Planning Department. These fixtures shall be designed to
cast light downward and not impact adjacent streets or .
property.
The building facades of the three towers and the main
entrance shall incorporate tile around the archways.
All sidewalks or walkways within the center shall be a
decorative stamped concrete.
Illi
PC RESO NO. 2675 -6-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
.
6)
7)
8)
9)
The applicant shall submit a revised southern elevation
showing further enhancement of the rear portions of buildings
A - C for Planning Director approval prior to the issuance
of any building permits.
Additional handicapped parking spaces shall be added in front
of buildings A - C to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
A rack for bicycle parking shall be added in a size and
location to be approved by the Planning Director prior to
occupancy.
Prior to occupancy the applicant shall designate a block of
parking as employee parking to the satisfaction of the
Planning Director. Those spaces will be as far away from the
main building as possible.
ngineering Department:
0)
I)
2)
3)
This project is approved upon the express condition that
sewer capacity is available at the time of application for
such permits and will continue to be available until time of
occupancy.
The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the
commencement of any clearing or grading of the site. The
grading volumes as shown on Exhibit C dated August 7, 1987
represent the maximum allowed earthwork by this approval.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for this project,
the developer shall execute a hold harmless agreement
regarding any damage and/or claims that may arise through any
geological failure and subsequent damage that may occur on,
or adjacent to, this subdivision due to its construction,
operation or maintenance.
Upon completion of grading, the developer shall ensure that an
“as-graded” geologic plan shall be submitted to the City
Engineer. The plan shall clearly show all the geology as
exposed by the grading operation, all geologic corrective
measures as actually constructed and must be based on a con-
tour map which represents both the pre and post site grading.
This plan shall be signed by both the soils engineer and the
engineering geologist. The plan shall be prepared on a mylar
or similar drafting film and shall become a permanent record.
/I/
//I
J/J
C RESO NO. 2675 -7-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
.
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
,O)
No grading shall occur outside the limits of the project
unless a letter of permission is obtained from the owners of
the affected properties. The applicant has requested a
l-1/2:1 slope along the southen slope of this project, in
lieu of the crib wall design. Should the applicant wish to
pursue this request, a third party, geo-technical review of
the soils/geologic report, will be required. The final
approval of the third party review shall be made by the City
Engineer. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs
incurred by this review.
The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining and
irrigating the offsite southern slope.
A separate grading plan shall be submitted and approved and a
separate grading permit issued for the borrow or disposal site
if located within the city limits.
All slopes within this project shall be no steeper than 2:1,
except as noted above.
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any
proposed construction site within this project the developer
shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer
for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with
all conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose
with regards to the hauling operation.
The developer shall exercise special care during the
construction phase of this project to prevent any offsite
siltation. The developer shall provide erosion control
measures and shall construct temporary desiltationidetention
basins of type, size and location as approved by the City
Engineer. The basins and erosion control measures shall be
shown and specified on the grading plan and shall be
constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to
the start of any other grading operations. Prior to the
removal of any basins or facilities so constructed the area
served shall be protected by additional drainage facilities,
slope erosion control me,asures and other methods required or
approved by the City Engineer. The developer shall maintain
the temporary basins and erosion control measures for a period
of time satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall guarantee
their maintenance and satisfactory performance through cash
deposit and bonding in amounts and types suitable to the City Engineer.
Additional drainage easements and drainage structures shall be
provided or installed as may be required by the City
Engineer. Prior to the issuance of grading or building
permits, the applicant shall complete a hydrology study of
this project and the drainage basin affected by this
development. The study and proposed improvements shall be
approved by the City Engineer.
‘C RESO NO. 2675 -8-
II
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
.
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
The owner of the subject property shall execute a hold
harmless agreement regarding drainage across the adjacent
property prior to approval of any grading or building permit
for this project.
Runoff from this project is conveyed to environmentally
sensitive areas. The subdivider shall provide adequate means
of eliminating grease and oils from drainage prior to
discharge. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by
the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building
permits.
Prior to the issuance of any permit for this project the
applicant shall dedicate to the public and improve the
remaining portions of Ranch0 Santa Fe Road and La Costa Avenue
in accordance with the typical section shown on Exhibit C
dated August 7, 1987 and current City of Carlsbad design
criteria. This condition is required by default of
improvement agreement for minor subdivision No. 574 dated
March 3, 1983.
The developer shall obtain the City Engineer’s approval of the
project improvement plans and enter into a secured agreement
with the City for completion of said improvements. The
improvements shall be constructed and accepted for maintenance
by the City Council prior to issuance of a building permit for
this project. The improvements are:
A. Ranch0 Santa Fe Road (including median)
8. La Costa Avenue (including median)
C. Relocation/upgrades of traffic signal at La Costa
Avenue and Ranch0 Santa Fe Road.
D. Storm drain system in Ranch0 Santa Fe Road.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit for this project, a
landscape and irrigation maintainance agreement/bond shall be
posted with the City of Carlsbad. This agreement shall run
with the property in perpetuity.
Onsite improvements shall be designed on the grading plan for
this development. Plan check and inspection fees shall be
required. Private drainage, landscaping, irrigation, and
paving shall be subject to review and inspection.
The applicant shall provide for the design and construction of
a traffic signal at the most southern access on La Costa
Avenue. In the event that the adjacent property (Big Bear)
aligns access to this southerly access, and when directed by
the City Engineer, the traffic signal shall be installed. The
developer of this project may request a reimbursement
agreement not to exceed 50% of the cost of installation and
materials.
C RESO NO. 2675 -Y-
Id
-.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8)
9)
0)
I)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
71
8)
Unless a standard variance has been issued, no variance from
City Standards is authorized by virtue of approval of this
site plan.
The developer shall install street trees at the equivalent of
40-foot intervals along all public street frontages in
conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards. The trees shall
be of a variety selected from the approved Street Tree List.
The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and
design requirements of the respective sewer and water agencies
regarding services to the project.
This project is approved specifically as 1 (single) phase.
The northern access on La Costa Avenue shall be right in/right
out only. A 2-foot wide raised median shall be required in
La Costa Avenue and proper signage shall be incorporated into
the design of this arterial, as required by the City
Engineer.
The developer shall be responsible for coordination with
S.D.G.&E., Pacific Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
The applicant shall agree to utilize reclaimed water, in Type
I form, on the subject property in all common areas as
approved by the City Engineer.
Irrigation systems to accommodate future reclaimed water shall
be designed consistent with Title 17 of the California State
Administrative Code. Offsite future reclaimed water
distribution systems should be anticipated by the installation
of adequately sized sleeves at crossing points to minimize
street excavation.
The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible mylar
copy of the site plan as approved by the Planning Commission.
The site plan shall reflect the conditions of approval by the
city. The plan copy shall be submitted to the City Engineer
prior to improvement plan submittal.
Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, the owner shall give written consent to the
annexation of the area shown within the boundaries of the site
plan into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and
Landscaping District No. 1.
Prior to the issuance of any building permits the property
owners shall:
a) Pay the bridge and major thoroughfare fee for the area of
the district in which this development is located.
b) Pay the traffic impact fee established for the area of
the City in which the development is located.
C RESO NO. 2675 -lO-
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9)
0)
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation
required by the Zone 11 Local Facilities Management Plan and
any future amendment to that plan made prior to construction
of this project.
The City of Carlsbad is considering a revision to the
existing horizontal and vertical alignment of Ranch0 Santa Fe
Road adjacent to this project. If the City Council adopts a
new alignment which in the opinion of the City Engineer
adversely affects the proposed development of the project
then no development permits shall be issued for the project until the project plans are revised to reflect the
new alignment. Any such revisions shall be made to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Planning Director.
ire Department:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
Prior to the issuance of building permits, complete building
plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire
Department.
Additional public and/or onsite fire hydrants shall be
provided if deemed necessary by the Fire Marshal.
The applicant shall submit two (2) copies of a site plan
showing locations of existing and proposed fire hydrants and
onsite roads and drives to the Fire Marshal for approval.
An all-weather access road shall be maintained throughout
construction,
All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances
shall be operational prior to combustible building materials
being located on the project site.
Brush clearance shall be maintained according to the
specifications contained in the City of Carlsbad Landscape
Guidelines Manual.
All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems,
automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent to the
project shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval
prior to construction.
All roof-top appurtenances shall be architecturally integrated
into the design of the building and shielding to prevent noise
and visual impacts, subject to approval before issuance of
permit.
Building exceeding 10,000 sq.ft. aggregate floor area shall be
sprinklered or have four-hour fire walls with no openings
therein which shall split the building into 10,000 sq.ft. (or
less) areas.
C RESO NO. 2675 -ll-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
lanning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on
he 19th day of August, 1987, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairman Marcus, Commissioners Schlehuber,
Schramm, Holmes and Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioners McBane and McFadden.
ABSTAIN: None.
*myB, p&Q&&! i 1 CUS, Chairman B PLANNING C,QMB
TTEST:
LANNING DIRECTOR
‘C RESO NO. 2675 -12-
-
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
AUGUST 19, 1987
PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DIRECTOR
SDP 86-3 RANCH0 LA COSTA PLAZA - Site Development Plan
for a 46,800 square foot retail commercial center.
including a service station and drive-thru restaurant,
to be located at the southeast corner of Ranch0 Santa
Fe Road and La Costa Avenue.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission APPROVE the Negative Declaration
issued by the Planning Director and ADOPT Planning Commission
Resolution No. 2675, APPROVING SOP a-based on the findings
and subject to the conditions contained therein.
APPLICATlc SUBMITTAL DATE:
APRIL 2, 1986 0
STAFF REPORT 0 3
II. PR03ECT DESCRIPTION
The joint applicants, in this case, Commonwealth Companies and
Union Oil, are requesting approval of a site development plan
for a retail commercial center on an approximate five-acre site
located as described above. The property is governed by the
development regulations of the La Costa Master Plan and
comprises Area SE-15, which has a Community Commercial General
Plan designation and C-Z zoning. The proposed project is
comprised of the following: four retail commercial buildings
which will house tenants such as a dry cleaners, florist, video
store, veterinarian, tanning salon, convenience market; a drive-
thru restaurant (no tenant yet, but expected to be similar to
3ack-in-the-Box); and, a Union 76 service station which would
have two islands of gas pumps and a repair station to
accommodate four work bays. Building locations are shown on
Exhibit A.
Three driveways would provide access to the center, one on
Ranch0 Santa Fe Road and two on La Costa Avenue. These
driveways were created as part of an approved parcel map (PM
12586) in 1983. By today’s standards, only the second drive on
La Costa Avenue meets intersection spacing policies.
’ The proposed architecture is a Spanish design, one-story building
with a red tile roof, and archways and towers providing covered -
sidewalks. The color scheme would be off-white stucco, with
hunter green trim.
The property is located at one of the City’s major intersections,
Ranch0 Santa Fe Road and La Costa Avenue. At this time, multi-
family housing exists to the east (separated by an open space
corridor), and single family across Ranch0 Santa Fe Road to the
west and northwest. A major commercial center is designated for
the north side of La Costa Avenue across from this site. To the
south, a small lot single family residential tentative map has
been approved- -that development is separated from the commercial
site by a 40-foot slope. On the opposite corner to the west, a
commercial project was denied and the property redesignated RMH
residential.
The existing site has sloping topography. It slopes down from
the intersection corner to the southern property line, for a
total of 40 feet in elevational difference. The grading scheme
therefore is to cut the corner elevation lower and fill the
southern elevation higher to achieve an overall 6 percent grade
across the proposed parking lot. Earth work involved will
require 10,000 cubic yards of imported dirt.
This application was heard at a February, 1987 Planning
Commission meeting. At that time, staff recommended denial
without prejudice because the project was not moving forward and
the processing deadlines were approaching. The Planning
Commission allowed the project to continue processing but had the
applicant concur with several conditions to be added to the
project relating to Growth Management. The application is being
processed as a site development plan. Included as a separate
discussion in the staff report are the issues related to
conditional use permit findings for a drive-thru and a service
station. Any special conditions required for these uses have
been included in the conditions of approval for the site
development plan.
III. ANALYSIS
1)
2)
3)
4)
Does the proposed site development plan comply with the
requirements of the La Costa Master Plan and the Carlsbad
Zoning Ordinance?
Are the development and design standards proposed by the
project adequate to ensure high quality commercial
development?
Is the project consistent with the Growth Management
Planning?
Will traffic from this project adversely impact the
intersection of Ranch0 Santa Fe Road and La Costa Avenue?
-2-
Discussion
La Costa Master Plan
The subject property is referred to as neiqhborhood SE-15 in the
La Costa Master Plan. As such, it is designated for community
commercial land use, C-2 zoning, and required to prepare a
development plan which shows circulation on and offsite, a
landscape plan, building location, height and architecture and
signing. These items will be discussed in the sections which
follow. The Master Plan also sets an overall standard of being
compatible with adjacent neighborhoods with regard to open space,
landscape materials, walkways and bikepaths, and architecuture.
The project complies with this standard. The project basically is isolated from other land uses in that two major streets front
the property on the west and north, a slope lies to the south,
and an open space easement is to the east. The landscaping will
follow the tree theme for Ranch0 Santa Fe Road, as defined in the
City’s Landscape Guidelines Manual, thus being compatible with
existing and future landscape projects. Required improvements to the roadways will include provision of sidewalks and bikeways
where there are presently none. Finally, the architecture is
Spanish, a common theme in La Costa.
For the Commission’s information, the La Costa Master Plan is
in the process of being updated. However, it will be many
months before that plan is finalized or brought to public
hearing. This portion of La Costa has not been looked at yet in
terms of possible land use revisions, partly because of the
alignment studies occurring on Ranch0 Santa Fe Road (see last
section of staff report for more discussion on traffic issues).
Carlsbad Zonina Ordinance
The project site is zoned P-C and as a result most of the
standards are found in the Master Plan. The parking, permitted
uses, and conditional use permit (CUP) section of the zoning
ordinance are applicable. Staff finds that these requirements
have been met. The center is parked at I:200 overall, with the
drive-thru at 1:lOO. The required number of spaces, based on
proposed square footage, is 249, which is being provided. The
breakdown is shown on the site plan (Exhibit A).
Permitted uses in the Master Plan are those in the C-2 and C-l
zones, which is primarily general retail, including restaurants.
Drive-thru restaurants and service stations are permitted with a
CUP. The findings for the conditional uses, will be analyzed
briefly even though the CUP will actually be issued as part of
the site development plan. Basically, the findings relate to the
use being necessary or desirable in the community and not
-3-
conflicting with the General Plan or existing uses, the site
being of adequate size to accommodate the use, the provision of
required setbacks, fencing, landscaping, etc., and the street
system being able to handle the traffic generated by the use.
Drive-thru
The proposed drive-thru restaurant would not conflict with the
community commercial designation of the General Plan or with
existing or future uses at that location. It also will provide a
convenience to residents of the area who patronize such
restaurants. The restaurant has been accommodated on the site so
that it is located out of the main circulation corridor (see
Exhibit D) and has allocated a stacking area for approximately
eight cars from the service window back to the drive-thru entry.
Parking has been provided at I:100 to ensure adequate spaces.
The restaurant, since it is part of the commercial center, will
have similar architecture and will incorporate landscaping around
the facility. Regarding the adequacy of the street system, it is
acknowledged that a drive-thru restaurant is a high traffic
generator. It is anticipated that many of the trips to the
restaurant will be combined with the use of the other stores. In
addition, the applicant is dedicating and improving additional
right-of-way along both Ranch0 Santa Fe Road (18 feet) and La
Costa Avenue (9 feet) to provide the turn lanes ultimately needed
for buildout. In summary, staff finds that the drive-thru
facility will not cause adverse impacts if the site development
plan is approved.
Gas Station
The proposed gas station, like the drive-thru, also would not
cause adverse impacts to the community or to the functioning of
the shopping center. With only one existing gas station in the
La Costa area (El Camino Real at La Costa Avenue), another
station would be desirable to serve this part of town. The
station is located in a corner of the triangular lot, is out of
the main circulation corridor, and will be below the grade of the
intersection--in fact, only the roof of the building will be
visible from the intersection (see Service Station North
Elevation, Exhibit B). No pole signs will be allowed so the
building and use will be visually unobtrusive to the surrounding .
area. Adequate parking has been provided in close proximity to
the station; the architecture is Spanish and is compatible with
the shopping center. An important facet in the design of the
building is that the north wall actually will be a retaining
wall, thus reducing the visual impact of a 17-foot high wall.
(The wall height became necessary in order to reduce grading
quantities on the rest of the site.) The traffic discussion is
the same as for the drive-thru. One of the conditions of
-4-
19
approval requires the Union Oil gas suppliers to make deliveries
during the night so that traffic circulation through the site
is not congested by large trucks during the day. The truck
route through the site is shown on Exhibit D.
Develobment and Desian Standards
Other standards which are not part of the zone code, but which
are important to review on a site develoment plan are the overall
site design, architecture, setbacks and landscaping. The site
layout, as proposed, works well for the triangular lot by placing
the buildings away from the two streets, creating a more visually
open corner. The architecture, as described earlier, is Spanish,
with tile and stucco, corner towers, covered walkways, Spanish
arches and decorative awnings. The buildings have a lot of
articulation, both in the roofline and the facade.
The setbacks for this project are slightly unusual from other
commercial projects. Typically, commercial developments provide from 25-40 feet of landscaped setbacks off of fronting streets.
Because the roadway was upgraded to a prime arterial, additional
dedications of 18 feet on Ranch0 Santa Fe Road were needed. Nine
(9) feet on La Costa Avenue is needed. La Costa Avenue has a 20-
foot setback along the length of the property with a 50-foot
setback in one section. The setback slopes gently into the site
from the street. Ranch0 Santa Fe Road has an average of 30-feet
of landscaped setback in one section and a retaining
wall/berm/landscaping treatment on the rest of the street
frontage. The retaining wall ranges from 5 to 8 feet high.
Although the distance from the sidewalk to the end of the
retaining wall may seem small, 13 feet, this treatment mitigates
the distance as much as possible by screening the parked cars
entirely from the roadway, providing visual relief from seeing a
flat parking lot with rows of cars along the 6-lane prime
arterial roadway. The intersection corner will have a 32-foot
setback with a built-in planter area in addition to bermed
landscaping. As mentioned earlier, the service station will be
minimally visible from the corner so the landscaping will be the
dominant feature.
Landscaping within the setbacks will be comprised partially of
specimen-sized trees, as will some of the plantings next to the
buildings. A number of planter boxes also will be located next
to the buildings. The slope to the south will be planted with
California pepper trees and eucalyptus species. In summary,
staff believes the ingredients have been provided for an
aesthetically-pleasing, high-quality center.
Growth Management Program
The proposed project is located within Zone 11, for which a Local
Facilities Management Plan currently is under review. Under the
City’s Growth Management Ordinance, this project is allowed to be
processed because it is a commercial development which has a
previously approved plan (La Costa Master Plan) for
-5-
such use. The project applicants are required to pay their
proportional share of any facility fees or comply with any
conditions resulting from the Zone 11 plan. For the reasons
discussed above, the project complies with the Growth Management
Program.
Traffic Issues
There are several considerations related to traffic in the
vicinity: the Ranch0 Santa Fe Road realignment study; the Zone
11 Local Facilities Management Plan; and, the Barton-Aschman
Traffic study. At this time, a Council-appointed committee is
studying possible alignment alternatives for Ranch0 Santa Fe
Road --this project has been conditioned to comply with any
changes that could affect the property, meaning potential
redesign. Both the Zone 11 plan and the Barton-Aschman Study
identify the intersection as failing at buildout, without certain
improvements. This project has been conditioned to provide the
necessary right-of-way dedications and construction improvements
along its frontage as recommended in the Barton-Aschman study.
Zone II’s circulation analysis has not been thoroughly reviewed
yet; however, a cursory review shows substantial agreement as to
what mitigation is necessary to achieve at least a C and D Level
of Service at morning and afternoon peak hours, respectively, in
terms of the responsibility of the subject property. The
recommendations of the Barton-Aschman study wer.e considered
appropriate, because the assumptions used were more conservative
than the Zone 11 traffic analysis, and also SANDAG projections,
for this particular intersection.
Regarding the driveway locations, staff acknowledges that two of
the three access points do not meet present intersection spacing
policies. Only the second access on La Costa Avenue complies.
Due to a previously approved legal parcel map (PM 12586) and a
renegotiation by the Engineering Department two years ago, the
planning staff in conjunction with the attorney’s office does not
feel that a retraction at this time is possible. The two drives
that are closest to the intersection are right in/right out only
and will be able to be enforced by medians.
Other Issues
One other issue arose in the review of this application. The
slope to the south of the property will be affected by the
project. The slope is offsite, and thus a letter of permission
for offsite grading must be obtained from Christopher Homes,
Inc. the developer of the adjacent, approved C.T, 85-15. The
applicant’s original proposal showed a different scenario than
what was approved on C.T. 85-15, mainly, that site was lowered
about 10 feet necessitating several high retaining walls (15 ft.)
in the residential project. Staff did not accept this proposal
and required the applicant to do a slope plan according to the
approved tentative map, which is what will be approved as part of
SDP 86-3.
-6-
c
Summary
The proposed site development plan complies with the zoning
ordinance, the La Costa Master Plan, and the Growth Management
Program. It also incorporates by design or by condition,
standards and details that will ensure a high quality commercial
development. Finally, the project will make its share of
improvements to the intersection, in concert with buildout
traffic conditions. Staff recommends approval of SDP 86-3.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Planning Director has determined this project will have no
significant impacts to the environment and therefore, has issued
a Negative Declaration on 8-5-87.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2675
2. Location Map
3. Background Data Sheet
4. Disclosure Form
5. Environmental Document
6. Exhibits “A” - “E” dated 8-7-87
NR:af
7/28/87
-7-
GENERAL PLAN
RISIDRNTIAL RI. LOW DENSITY (O- I S ) RLM LOW.MEDIL’M DENSIlY(O.4) RM MEDICM DENSIN(4d3) RMH MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY (8. IS) RH HlCHDENSIN(lS.23) .
COMMIRCIAL RRI INTENSM REGIONAL RETAIL (w Plaza CMino till) RRE EXTENSIVE REGIONAL RETAIL (es. CU Country Carlrbad) I’S REGIONAL SERVICE C COMMLWIN COMMERCLAL N NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL T5 TRAVEL SERVICES COMMERCLAL 0 PROFESSIONAL llELATED CBD CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT PI PLANNED INDUSTR‘AL C GOVERNMENT FACIL‘TIES U PL’BUC UTILITIES RC RECREATION COMMERCW
sCNOOLs E ELEMENTARY J JUNIOR HIGH H HIGH SCHOOL P PRIVATZ
OS OPEN SPACE NRR NON RESIDENTIAL RESERVE
ZONINQ
P-C Fl.A SE lb I R.2 It.3 R. 3L RD.M RD.H RMHP IbP RT P.w
0 (I.1 c.2 C.T GM
PI
F-P L-C
P?
RRSIWNTIAL PUNNED COMMUNlN ZONE Fd%SIDENllAL AGRICL’LTLRAL ZONE RLILU WIDEFiTW E5TATE ZOM ONE.FAMILY RESID- ZONE TWO.FAhiILY RESID- ZONE HL’LTlPLE FAMILY RESID- ZONE LLWITED MULTI.FAMILY WID- ZOI RESID- DENSIlYMLZTIPLE ZONE WID- DENSFIYHIGH ZONE lIESID- MOBILE HOME PARK ZOM RBID- PROFESSIONAL ZONE RESID- TOURIST ZONE RESID- WATERWAY ZONE
COMMCICIAL OFFICE ZONE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCLU ZONE GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZOhT COMMEKW-TDLWT ZONE HE4VYCOMMERCW.LLMlTED IMKISIUI tNmmxhL ZONE F%ANNED [NwsTIIlAL ZONY!
mm FLOODPLUN OVENAY ZOM LtMrTEDCONrmL OPEN SPACE PuauC UTluN ZOM
YE
U ZONE
RAMi LA cOSTi PLAZA
4
City of I)arlsbad
SDP 86-3
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: SDP 86-3
APPLICANT : Rick Engineering
REQUEST AND LOCATION: 46,885 sq. ft. of community commercial buildings to be
built on 5.21 acres southeast corner of La Costa Blvd. and Ranch0 Santa Fe Rd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 1 and 2 of Parcel Map No. 12586 in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of CA. APN:223 -060-29
Acres 5.21 Proposed No. of Lots/Units N/A
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation (C) Community Commercial
Density Al lowed
Existing Zone PC
-- Density Proposed --
Proposed Zone PC
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoninq Land Use
Site PC VACANT
North PC RESIDENTIAL, VACANT
South PC APPROVED SF, PARK
East PC OS, MF
West PC, C-2, RD-M CHURCH, VACANT, RESIDENTIAL
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: SAN DIEGUITO H.S. & ENCINITAS UNION Water: OLIVENHAIN M.W.D.
Sewer: LEUCADIA CO. W.D. EDU’s
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated 2126 /86
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
X Negative Declaration, issued August 7, 1987
E.I.R. Certified, dated
Other.
1f after the informat :-? you have surtted has been -v).ewea, 1.t 1s cieternnnm
! .ihat further infomat- s required, you will be SO 3ed.
. t
t* APPLICANT: The Commonwealth Companies
Nanu (indixidual, pattnershipr joint venture, cor~zktion, syndication) / I, 10675 Sorrent'o Valley Road, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92121
Business Address
(619) 455-7900
Telephone Numbu
AGENT: Rick Engineering .Company
Name
; .
5620 Friars Road, San Diego, California 92110 . '
Business Address . .
(619) i91-0707
Telephmm Number .'
.
.-m: Franklvn DeFoe; President 1720 Zarso De1 Mar 92014 Mane -(individual, partnar e joint. .Rbme- . venture, coqoration, syndication)
10675 Sorrento Valley Road, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92121
B-miness Address
(619) 455-7900
Telephone Nuder Telephone Xumber
Donald J. Perrotta, Vice President 540 Tewa, De1 Mar 92014
:iaae Borne Address
-. F Dieuo. CA 92121 Xsiness ibtidress
(619) 455-7900 Ttie$hora N&ct ._ TelepSone Suzber
_-
- . (Attach more sheets if necessary)
Ifire dec1zre ur.der per.alty Of perjury that the infonzation contained in this dis-
closure is tme and correct and that it will remain true and correct and nay be*
relied upon as bei. tN- - and correct until znended. r
The Commonwealth Companies . Applicant
I . J&g&Q&~ , _ ,’ [,i 2Lf
C.:nez, HStnqr ’ Csc
C,lLLL LUL LAlCL .l.I.L.“LI.LJ\ 4 AC~Ll’L”‘“, YUti WALL IJtZ 50 Lied.
*t
AJ?PLIcANT: Union (X.1 Company of California, dba Unoca1, a California corporation
Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corpration, syndication)
1450 Frazee goad, Suite 615, (P. 0. Box 7600, 92138), San Diego, CA 92108
Business Address
. (619) 291-7600
AGENT:
Telephona Number
_ Rick Engineer-ing Company
Name
5620 Friars l&ad;'-San Diego, California- -92110
.
: ,.-
. . Business Address . . .' A. 'V
‘(6x9) 2Cj+O,&.: ' . _
_ . ._ . . .
Telephone Number
_:
KEMBERS : Name -(individual, partner, joint. venture, corporation, syndication)
_ Home AcZdress
Business Address ,
Telephone Number Telephone Surnber
:ia.ne I----It_- - S:ome A:lclxcss
33siness Address ------
Telephone Namber ._
---_ Ttlephcmcz Xictber I_--
-- - -w”
. -.-- --
. . . (Attach more sheets if necessary)
I/We declxe under penalty of perjury that the infomacion contained in this itis--
closure is true and correct and that it will remain true ;;~.d correct. and may be-
relied upon as being true and Correct until amended.
. Union Oil Company of California, dba Unocal ApJJlicant
PLAN’NING’DEPARTMENT
QEitp of (ICarIs’ba’b
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859
(619) 438-l 161
PR03ECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: Southeast corner of Ranch0 Santa Fe Road
and La Costa Avenue.
PR03ECT DESCRIPTION: Shopping center on 5 acres, to include gas
station, drive-thru restaurant, and retail commercial, totalling 46,885 sq. ft.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not
have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the
subject project. Sustification for this action is on file in the
Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative DeclaFation with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA.,
9 2009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments
in writing to the Planning Department within ten (IO) days of date of
issuance .
DATED: August 5, 1987 MICHAEL 3. HCWMILLXR
CASE NO: SDP 86-3 Planning Director
APPLICANT: Ranch0 La Costa Plaza
PUBLISH DATE: August 5, 1987
ND4 II/85
City city 1200 - -
Clerk Of Carlsbad Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008
REI Ranch0 LaCosta Plaza - City Council Hearing
Dear City Clerk,
I am a working parent who's time is constantly in demand. To be able to purchase many of my day to day retail needs within a mile of my home would certainly conserve my time.
I realize the scope of the center is small but it's cloeness will make it easy to buy those items which my family runs short on during the week. It will also be nice to have a fast food restaurant for quick meals when time does not permit for a sit down dinner.
Please distribute copies of this letter to the apporpriate people and make it a part of the official record.
---~,,,~yvd
Karen A. king 2814 Atadero Court Carlsbad, CA 92009
3/
f--e. L.. ii5 o= CL:
- --
.October 4, 1987
Dear Mayor Lewis and Council Members:
At the last meeting of the Spinnaker Hill Homeowner's Group on September 17, a discussion was held and a vote taken on the placement of convenience stores in South Carlsbad. It was unanimously decided that convenience . stores (i.e. Seven-Eleven, Circle K) are not wanted in our area. These stores generate litter, attract undocu- mented aliens, become teenage hangouts, and are sources for beer and wine for juv.eniles. We feel that the one (soon to be enlarged) store on the corner of Palomar Air- port Road and Paseo de1 Norte is adequate for our area. Furthermore, we do not wish to see restaurants which are drive-thrus in our area due to litter and parking probE We would 1ike:to see a moratorium established by the City Council on these types of businesses until public hearings can be held. We would appreciate your considera- tion in this matter.
Sincerely,
3 -4&iIfyon!jy-
President Spinnaker Hill Homeowners
cc: Carlsbad City Council Lewis Kulchin Pettine Larson Mamaux
City Clerk City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009
RE: Public Hearing For Ranch0 La Costa Plaza - 10/13/87
Dear City Clerk:
I wish you and the City Counsel to know that I am in favor of Ranch0 La Costa Plaza.
The south end of Carlsbad has expanded rapidly in the last few years and the existing retail services are limited for the existing population base. The proximity of the potential location will make shopping more covenient for my family and the daily needs they require.
Respectfully,
City Clerk City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009
RE: Public Hearing For Ranch0 La Costa Plaza - 10/13/87
Dear City Clerk:
I wish you and the City Counsel to know that I am in favor of Ranch0 La Costa Plaza.
The south end of Carlsbad has expanded rapidly in the last few years and the existing retail services are limited for the existing population base. The proximity of the potential location will make shopping more covenient for my family and the daily needs they require.
Respectfully,
$.&* s'. crxLk
302y c.c,dcrcc‘h
co-r- 1.j LA, CA cj'z,a "i
City Clerk City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009
RE: Public Hearing For Ranch0 La Costa Plaza - 10/13/87
Dear City Clerk:
I wish you and the City Counsel to know that I am in favor of Ranch0 La Costa Plaza.
The south end of Carlsbad has expanded rapidly in the last few years and the existing retail services are limited for the existing population base. The proximity of the potential location will make shopping more covenient for my family and the daily needs they require.
Respectfully,
City Clerk City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009
RE: Public Hearing For Ranch0 La Costa Plaza - 10/13/87
Dear City Clerk:
I wish you and the City Counsel to know that I am in favor of Ranch0 La Costa Plaza.
The south end of Carlsbad has expanded rapidly in the last few years and the existing retail services are limited for the existing population base. The proximity of the potential location will make shopping more covenient for my family and the daily needs they require.
CITY OF CARLSBAD
1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFOknJlA 92008
438-5621
i
REC’D FROM L f’ ‘\ :/t // ‘\ 1 1 \ ; -: ,j /Lt(- - DATE ’ .j/ ; ’ -,A / ;,. 7
ACCOUNT NO. I DESCRIPTION I AMOUNT I I
_ \ i;-\(. f :- (- I-....’ ,rr ‘. / ! f, ( .f 1’ !‘, ,f., ., I‘ \ ,c ,< i I .-. ;.. , ,* ‘, 1 I I
RECEIPT NO. 7 ;:f , TOTAL ] ,’ j;
- . . .._... I__.“. _.._, _. I” ..,. ~________
City Clerk City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009
RE: Public Hearing For Ranch0 La Costa Plaza - 10/13/87
Dear City Clerk:
I wish you and the City Counsel to know that I am in favor of Ranch0 La Costa Plaza.
The south end of Carlsbad has expanded rapidly in the last few years and the existing retail services are limited for the existing population base. The proximity of the potential location will make shopping more covenient for my family and the daily needs they require.
Respectfully,
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CA 9iOO8-1989
Office of the CIly Clerk
QCitp of Qhrls’bab
TO: Bobbie Hoder
FROM: Karen Kundtz
DATE: August 28, 1987
TELEPHONE
(819) 438-5535
RE: SDP 86-3 - Ranch0 La Costa Plaza
The above item has been appealed to the City Council. Please determine
when the item will go to Council and complete the form below and return
it to the City Clerk's Office. According to the Municipal Code,
appeals must be heard by the City Council within 30 days of the date
that the appeal was filed. Please consider this when setting the
date for the hearing.
Thank you.
The appeal of the above matter should be scheduled for the City
Council Meeting of .
Signature Date
1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, (TALIFORNIA 92008
. Office of the City Clerk
C
.
Citp of Carls’bsb
APPEAL FORM
.
8MUG28 Pfl 24I
CITY OF CA!%3380
f (We) appeal the following decision of the P k%Jtil'NG co r4&&lr3 to the City Council:
Project name and number (or subject of appeal): SDP 86-3
Date of decision:
Reason for appeal:
28AQuS, 1987 Date
Name (Please print)
704-3 ~owTC ILL Address
4-s+ 2314-- Telephone Number
iieason for Appeal:
We the.la Costa Town Council request that the Carl&ad City Council
consider the decision of the Planning Commission .of lF.August, 1987, r-e.
SDP 85-3, snd either deny tha approval or approve the application with the following conditions: 1) A wall be conStructed on the south/southeast border of the
property to shield t‘ne plaza from residentially.zoned land.
2) Relocate trash containers from the parking lot and sides of
buildings to the rear of the structures. 3) Require the applicant to reaffirm type and location of the median on La Costa Avenue. 4) AProhibit t?le ap$icant from including fast food restaurants
(drive-thrus) or convenience stores(?dEleven type)-within the project or
a) Place restrictions on the shopping center developer so as to
negate profitable operation of such establishments.
Discussion: . There are presently no fast food drive-thru restaurants now located in or littering south Carlsbad., There is one T-Eleven Store in south Carlsbad relocating from Paseo de1 Norte to Palomar road. There are several development sites in south Carlsbad that are prime prospects for fast food drive-thrus ,and convenience stores, Cne is located on the southwest corner of Alga Road and El Fuerte within about 300 yards of the La Costa Mesdous school and adjacent to a church, The other is the
planned shoppin, v center near El Camino Real and Alga Road where a
City Library is contemplated. Also, if these establishments are approved
the Big Bear shpping center across the street will probably contain a
couple more. Icitny other locations will surface in the future's11 along
the El Camino Real Corridor, on Ranch0 Santa Fe and on the Palomar
Airport Road Corridor.
These stores, which are prohibited in many cities, do not make
good neighbors to residential areas or schools. Before such restaurants
or stares are apprtived the citizenry of south Carlsbad should be allowed to expr-ess their opinion. Placing the question tc the votersin the
next election would be preferable. In the near term; a questionaire
in the cityIs newsletter would reveal a preliminary estimate of the
views of the residents.
AGENDA
City of Gxrlsbad PlannirqC!amission
Wednesday, August 19, 1987 6:00 P.M. Cumcil Chambem
Il.200 Elm Avenue **********************************************************************************
Tl-lEITEMs~uNDER aXSENTQUND?SARE~IlXRED RXTTINEANDWILLE~CIED BYoNEEaYrroNAs~~. ?HEE(EWILLBENOSEPAR?UEDISaJSSIONONTHESEI'B'SR?IOR mTmTIMEmEax+ms1ONvurEs,uNIEssANITEMIs FGMWEDBYAMIMBEROFTHE -ION, PlMWDJGDIRECIOR,CRBYA~~A~OF?HEHJBT;T%. IFYOU ~IRETOADLXESSlHE0SMIS!XoN F?KARDINGANITEM,AWIU!REN -mmm ADmEssmE CXBMISSIONRM;ARDINGAN=,A~ REQuEsTFmMMusTEFILEDwITH THE--PRIoRm'IHETlME'IHE ozxmIss1mm.
IFA~OFTHEHJBLICWISHB~AIXRESS'IHE (XMISSI~ONA~-~C~
-, A wRITrEN~~McJsTEFIIEDm'ME r@¶INmmcIERKmmmTHE TIMJ?lTm o=pIpIIIssION~I~'ME~ ?HEPRFSID~OFFIcERMAY,INlHEABTENcE
OFOBlECI'I~BYAI"J7UOF?I'IYOFTXECXBMSSIONEPSPRESEWT, DEcL;INETOPERMlTSUCX PREEtvrATToN.
ITIsNm NECESARYlOFII%A- REQuEsrmspEAKm~cHEARING~.
wHmYaJAFEcALLEDmspEAK, -m Fmw24RDANDsTATEYaJR~,-,AND ITEMNLJMBER. **********************************************************************************
Q4TLmoEuml ABsmT: McFADmN PL?mQioF- IK!E?mE mILcAu
Pleaselimityour CUItEIhtO~lhllUkS. (A total of four speakem will be
m.1
1) CUP 87-4 - HAWKINS - Request for appruval of a
conditional usepennittoallowadelicatessen
attheso&hea&cornerofElCaminoFbalard FaradayAvenueintheM-Qmne. Theproject is located within Idcal Facilities v zone 5.
RESO No: 2673 '
ACTION: APPROWD
with-es VZYIE: 5-O
2) CUP 87-6 -NESJS0iOOLOFARcHITEcIuRE:-
F&quest for a corditional use permit
fortheNewS&oolofArchitecbreto
lo&e and hold classes at the Ocean
F&rtTechCenterat5431AvenidaEWinas. Theproject islomtedwithinM Faciltiies ManageEntzone3.
aammercialcenter,inclMingasemice station and drive-thru restaurant, to helocatedatthe saMEastcornerofLa CostaAvenue. Thepmjectislmted within Ucal Facilities Mnagement Zone 11.
4) ZCA~~-~-RMHP~~NE-CITYOFCPIRTSBAD AZoTE?codeamencbnent amending Title 21, chapter 21.37 to clarify and regulate m&ilehaPneparkconvemionsto . I COMaNlUW.
5) ZONE6 BOUNBSY XUUSMWT - Discussion
itemonmquesttoamrdtheboum%ries
of Lpcal Facilities Mamgmmt Plan
Zone 6.
6) GRADING FOR CT 85-18 - PANNONIA Substantial ~liance. The project is located within Imal Facilities Management zone 1.
August 5, 1987
Fzmo No: 2674
AcrIoN: AppwxlED withC%anues VOTE: 5-O
withChames VUIE: 5-o
RESO No: 2677 ACCION: AFmovED withChanues VUIE: 5-o
AWON: seeBela@ VOTE: 5-o
*LeaveBour&riesas
Drawn
ACTION: see Belaw*
WIE: 5-o
*AcceptsblffF&cm-
mendation.
ACTION: AFTFOED
VUIE: 3-O-2
&c.osr + jLi Fp‘7 RECEIVEU CITY CtERK'S OFFICE
87MJG21 PH 3:39
CfTY OF CARLSBAD
*. c L, Dt-,. ; k
k-h, 0’ Q’fL@ n;cT y-g-g- /J-4-LC.4 E-JGd ’ c -t-H-U< A A 4 0 F 621 i
VtiP ,;_1 ~c~.VA’ilGh’ nci=p~& L&i 7-tjk ?Zc’@ 5& .
4
T)‘l&4 CL. 4-
. P ’ ‘.
? ” ‘Carlsbad Journal
Decreed A legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of Son Diego County
Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to
North Coast Publishers, Inc. corporate offices: P.O. Box 878, Encinitas, CA 92024
(619) 753-6543
Proof of .Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party toor interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation,
published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which
newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and
which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in
the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next
Fr’ uc”i’r I ‘v-8? T. I_*C. . ‘“i, .” y,,+Fw*.q+s T’V *x”llu+* preceding the date of publication of the notice
NOTICE OF PUBLIC andLa osta venuean morepar- titularly described as: hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of HEARING Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map No. APPEAL 12586 in the City of Carlsbad, Coun- which the annexed is a printed copy, has been
SDP 86-3 ty of San Diego. State of California. If you have any questions regard- published in each rebular and entire issueof said
ing this matter, please call the- newspaper and not in anv suoolement thereof on NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council ofthe City ofcarls- bad will hold a public hearing at the City Council .Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California. at6:08P.M..onTuesday.October13. 1987. to consider the appeal of a Planning Commission approval of a site development plan for a 46.800
Planning Department at 438-1161.
If you challenge the s!te develop- the following dates, to-wit: ’ ’
ment plan in court, you may be lim- lted to twsing only those issues you or someone else raised at the pub- lic hearlngdescribed in this notice, October 2 19E!!. . or rn written corresaondence deli- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
vered to the City of earlsbad’s City CMlWs Office at or prior to the pub- lic hearing
square foot retall commercial cen- ter. including a service station and drive-thou r&want on property generally located at the southeast corner of Ranch0 Santa Fe Road . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CARLSCAD CIT
....................
....................
........ . .......... .
............ 19 ....
............ 19 ....
............ 19 ....
............ 19 ....
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct. Executed at Carlsbad County of San Diego, State of
California on The 2nd n n
day of October, 1987 / //I <,
Clerk of the Printer
NOTICE OF PUBLIC REARING
NOTICE IS BEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will
hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad,
California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 19, 1987, to consider approval of a site development plan for a 46,800 square foot retail commercial center,
including a service station and drive-thru restaurant on property generally
located at the southeast corner of Ranch0 Santa Fe Road and La Costa Avenue and
more particularly described as:
Parcel 1 and 2 of Parcel Map No. 12586 in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. If you have any guestions please call the Planning Department at 438-l 161.
If you challenge the side development plan in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of
Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: SDP 86-3 APPLICANT: RANCH0 LA COSTA PLAZA PUBLISH: AUGUST 7, 1987
CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
*WRITE IT-DON’T SAY IT INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO File DATE 9-4
A.M.
IQ 87 P. M.
Re: Appeal of Ranch0 La Costa Plaza
Jack Peek, the developer, project manager of the project called
us on g/2/87, and indicated that the date, g/22/87 which had
been selected for the public hearing on the appeal was a
problem for him because he would be out of town from 9/11 thru 10/5.
Lee spoke to Charlie, who contacted Mr. Adams regarding the
date of the public hearing.
Charlie has indicated that Mr. Adams has no problem with holding
the hearing at a later date, and tha as been selected
for the hearing.
I called Mr. Peek with this information. He indicated approval
with the date and inidcated he will furnish us with a letter
regarding his request for the hearing to be held on a later
date.
K.
REPLY ON THIS SHEET FROM
WILMER Jeavlcz- lpdr STANDIRD ,NTCR DEPT. MEMO FORM I,--24-m --.-~ . - _ -- ______..._ ._ _.__.-. -..
,
1200 ELM AVENUE ’
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989
Offlce of the City Clerk
TO: Bobbie Hoder
FROM: Karen Kundtz
DATE: August 28, 1987
RE: SDP 86-3 - Ranch0 La Costa Plaza
TELEPHONE
(619) 438-5535
The above item has been appealed to the City Council. Please determine
when the item will go to Council and complete the form below and return
it to the City Clerk's Office. According to the Municipal Code,
appeals must be heard by the City Council within 30 days of the date
that the appeal was filed. Please consider this when setting the
date for the hearing.
Thank you.
The appeal of the above matter should be scheduled for the City
Council Meeting .
Signature
* .
1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
’ * Office of the City Clerk
C
Citg of CLarIs’bab
APPEAL FORM
87AUG2E3 PW51
CITY OF CARLSRAD
,& (We) appeal the following decision of the P k%'h)lib
co r-l w ; 5s Ii3 E3 to the City Council:
Project name and number (or subject of appeal):.SDP 86-3
hi,+w+o &A &TA f~&%4 . GmQLSEC3ROr3 R-MO s&n4 f;hl, L
/4kn & L4dlwtn AJ,L-+J
Date of decision: IT tL &OS-p. 19 0 '7
Reason for appeal:
Date Simhtur'e
6. iwJdM+4s Name (Please print)
Address
4=;a+- 33 I 4- Telephone Number
l
c
Reason for Appeal:
He the.La Costa Town Council request that the Car&bad City Council
consider the decision of the Planning Commission .of 19 .August, 138'7, TO. SDP 85-3, znd either deny tha approval or approve the application with
the following conditions :
1) A wall be constructed on the south/southeast border of the property to shield the plaza from residentially, zoned land.
2) Relocate trash containers from the parking lot and sides of
buildings to the rear of the structures. 3) Require the applicant to reaffirm type and location of the
median on La Costa Avenue, 4) Prohibit the applicant from including fast food restaurants (drive-thrus) ~1. cor&nience storos(?GZeven type).within the project or a) Place restrictions on the shopping center developer so as to .ncgate profitable operation of such establishments.
Discussion: . There are presently no fast food drive-thru restaurants non located in or littering south Carlsbad., There is one 'T-Eleven Store in south Carlsbnd relocating from Pasoo de1 Norte to Palomar road. There are several development sites in south Carlsbad that are prime prospects ,
for fast food drive-thrus and convenience stores. Cne is located on the southwest corner of Alga Road and El Fuerte within about 300 yards of the La Costa Meadotis school and adjacent to a church, The other is the
planned shoppin g center near El Camino Real and Alga Road where a
City Library is contemplated. Also, if these establishments are approved
the Big Bear shpping center across the street will probably contain a
couple more. Many other locations will surface in the future's11 along
the El Camino Real Corridor, on Ranch0 Santa Fe and on the Palomar
Airport Road Corridor. These stores, which are prohibited in many cities, do not make good neighbors to residential areas or schools. Before such restaurants
or stares are apprbved the citizenry of south Carlsbad should be allowed
to exp:ess their opinion. Placing the question tc the votersin the
next election would be preferable. In the near term; a questionaire
in the cityys newsletter would reveal a preliminary estimate of the
views of the residents.
1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
Office of the City Clerk
TELEPHONE (619) 434-2808
September 14, 1987
Mr. 0. B. Adams
7043 Alicante Rd.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Re: Appeal of SDP 86-3 - Ranch0 La Costa Plaza
I have just learned that there will not be a City Council Meeting
on Tuesday, October 6, 1987. Therefore, items scheduled for that
meeting, including your appeal of SDP 86-3, will be re-scheduled
for the Meeting of Tuesday, October 13, 1987.
You will still receive a public hearing notice for this matter,
however, since the date of the hearing has been changed we wanted
to give you as much advance notice as possible.
LEE RAUTENKRANZ
City Clerk
LR:kk
cc: Mr. Jack Peek
Jack H. Peek
jy-yf g-Jlf Q?~.~~,.~&y~ Vice President
September 4, 1987
Ms. Karen Kuntz City Clerk's Office CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008
Re: Ranch0 La Costa Plaza
Dear Ms. Kuntz:
This letter is a formal request to postpone the appeal hearing on Ranch0 La Costa Plaza until after October 5, 1987. I am the developer of this project and will be out of the country from September 11th until October 5th.
It is my understanding that the appealant, Mr. Adams, has no objection to this delay.
Thank you for your consideration.
the commonwealth companies, inc.
10180 telesis court, suite 300, san diego, ca 92121 619 455 7900
.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL
SDP 86-3
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public
hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 P.M.,
on Tuesday, October 13, 1987, to consider the appeal of a Planning Commission approval
of a site development plan for a 46,800 square foot retail commercial center, including
a service station and drive-thru restaurant on property generally located at the southeast
corner of Ranch0 Santa Fe Road and La Costa Avenue and more particularly described as:
Parcels land 2 of Parcel Map NO. 12586 in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call the Planning Department at
438-1161.
If you challenge the site development plan in court, you may be limited to raising only
those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,
or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad's City Clerk's Office
at or prior to the public hearing.
APPELLANT: 0. B. Adams
PUBLISH: October 2, 1987 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
RANMO LA COSTii PLAZA 1 SDP 86-3
,
No. Parcel No, Address
1
2
3
Assessors's Owner's
223-060-29 The Commonwealth Companies ilda-6awtm ynr\aa (O&5, yrSth SORrPENl-0
San Diego, CA 92121 PYWV, z,-. Loo
223-060-28 Union Oil Co. of CA P. 0. Box 7600 Los Angeles, CA 90051
223-060-32 Mag Properties c/o M. A. Benowitz 7682 El Camino Real Suite 204 Carlsbad, CA 92008
223-060-41
223-060-40
255-062-16
7 255-062-15
8 255-062-14
. 9 255-062-13 .
10 255-062-20
11 255-062-25
George A. Fermani'an Rodney F. Stone 11300 Sorrento Valley Rd. Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92121
DAON Corp. P. 0. Box 7080 Newport Beach, CA 92660
Roy A. & Barbara A. Rainville 7822 Quebrada Circle Carlsbad, CA 92008
Po-Yun 61 Li L. Tang 7820 Quebrada Circle Carlsbad, CA 92008
Edward N. & Laura R. Ketchum 7818 Quebrada Circle Carlsbad, CA 92008
Louis H. & Dolores J. Sapien 7815 Quebrada Circle Carlsbad, CA 92008
James A. & Barbara L. Stokes 7817 Quebrada Circle Carlsbad, CA 92008
Presbytery of San Diego (Carp 8825 Aero Drive #220 San Diego, CA 92123
.
!
. ‘.
’ .
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
. . 21.3
21.4
255-062-07
255-062-06
255-062-05
255-062-04
255-062-03
255-062-02
255-062-24
255-062-17
223-170-24
John & Julie Bryars 7818 Estancia St. Carlsbad, CA 92008 1
Myer C. & Elizabeth E. Sterling 7816 Estancia St. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Albert F. & Debra A. Mack P. 0. Box 608 i 'Ranch0 Santa Fe, CA 92067 :.I
Richard A. & Eve D. Salony ,/
7812 Estancia St. )
Carlsbad, CA 92008 ?.J
William M. & Mercedes A. TokorchecK 7810 Estancia St. Carlsbad, CA 92008
David J. & Doris N. Kerr 7808 Estancia St. Carlsbad, CA 92008
John & Jeanne P. Wright 7806 Estancia St. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Presbytery of San Diego (Corp.) 8825 Aero Drive #220 San Diego, CA 92123
Robert V. & Joann Helmuth 6696 Avenida Andorra La Jolla, CA 92037
223-170-25-01 John F. D. Hegstrom 233 S. Helix Ave. #B Solana Beach, CA 92075
233-170-25-02 Mary M. Gortmaker 7801 Centella St. #2
Carlsbad, CA 92008
233-170-25-03 Poser Investment, Inc. 150 N. Santa Anita Ave. #300 Arcadia, CA 91006
223-170-25-04 Poser Investment, Inc. 150 N. Santa Anita Ave.. #30i Arcadia, CA 91006
’ .
i ;
21.5 '
21;6
21.7
21.8
21,.9
21.10.
22. .
23
24
25.
26.1
26.2.
26.3
223-170-25-05
223-170-25-06
223-170-25-07
223-170-25-08'
223-170-25-09
223-170-25-10
223-170-33
223-170-20
223-170-21
223-170-22
223-200-15-01
223-200-15-02
223-200-15-03
James M. & Jasmine Harmon 7801 Centella St. #5 Carlsbad, CA 92008
Western State Bank 1750 E. Huntington Dr. Duarte, CA 91010
Poser Investment, Inc. 150 N. Santa Anita Ave. #300 Arcadia, CA 91006
C. Thieman & C. Thieman 150 S. Monaco Parkway #SO2 Denver, co 90224
Poser Investment, Inc. 150 N. Santa Anita Ave. #300 Arcadia, CA 91006
John F. Hegstrom 233 S. Helix Ave. #B Solana Beach, CA '92075
Levante Properties 7220 Arena1 Lane Carlsbad, CA 92008
The Myer Solovy Revocable Trust b Aaron N. Gidow c/o Goldberg & Solovy Foods P. 0. Box 58007 Los Angeles, CA 90058
Levante Associates 1457 Highland Dr. Solana Beach, CA 92075
Levante Associates 1457 Highland Dr. Solana Beach, CA 92075
John H. & Jere K. Blair 7599 Dehesa Ct. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Andrew H. & Frances J. Oddi 7597 Dehesa Ct. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Bernard L. b Sonia B. Pollack 7595 Dehesa Court Carlsbad, CA 92008
.
. .
\ - 1* .
26.4 k23-200-15-04
26.5 223-200-15-05
26.6 223-200-15-06
26.7 223-200-15-07
26.8. 223-200-15-08
26.9
26.10
223-200-15-09
223-200-15-10
26.11 223-200-15-11
26.12 223-200-15-12
26.13 223-200-15-13
26.14 223-200-15-14
. . . .
26.15 223-200-15-15
26.16 223-200-15-16
.-.
Donna Deering (AKA Simps 7593 Dehesa Ct. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Charles L. McCord 7591 Dehesa Ct. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Ralph J. & Margarete H. Dominski Russell Dominski 7589 Dehesa Ct. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Jon W. Malte 7587 Dehesa Ct. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Anthony J. & Mary F. Peterman 7585 Dehesa Ct. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Joseph b Agnes S. Miller 7583 Dehesa Ct. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Bonnie M. McBride 7581 Dehesa Ct. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Joe & Leslie J. Corona 7579 Dehesa Ct. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Bernard M. Ogara 7577 Dehesa Ct. Carlsbad, CA 92008
William E. & Pearl A. Drubert 7580 Dehesa Ct. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Jay B. & Joan C. Woods 7582 Dehesa Ct. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Robert W. & Wana J. Ladd 7584 Dehesa Ct. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Genevieve R. Young 7586 Dehesa Ct. Carlsbad, CA 92008
.
26.;17
26;18
26.19
26.20
26.21
26.22
26.23.
26.24
.I 26.25
. . W.L ,~?-.~ * -
26.26
26.27
26.28
26.29
223-200-15-17
223-200-15-18
223-200-15-19
223-200-15-20
223-200-15-21
223-200-15-22
223-200-15-23
223-200-15-24
223-200-15-2s
223-200-15-26
223-200-15-27
223-200-15-28
.l23-200-15-29
.
Glenn P. Ambra 7588 Dehesa Ct. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Douglas J. & Pamela L. Hayes 4330 Tyrol Crest Golden Valley, MN 55416
Arthur A. & Janice A. Balog 2210 Silver Peak Pl. Encinitas, CA 92024
Wayne A. & Betty A. Ferrell 1021 Memory Lane Escondido, CA 92026
Judith A. Bondie 3338 Cuesta Place Carlsbad, CA 92008
Wayne & Josephine M. Cox 1141 Luneta Dr. De1 Mar, CA 92014
Bernard M. & Frances I. Hommel 16256 Mayfair #202 South Field, MI 48075
Carol S. Husted Brian Cortright 3344 Cuesta Pl. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Bill & Shirley A. Artz 5303 Chelsea St. La Jolla, CA 92037
Ernie & Denise Fiorentino 3347 Cuesta Pl. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Roger J. & Eleanor E. Ellis 3345 Cuesta Pl. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Ida M. Brinegar 3343 Cuesta Pl. Carlsbad, CA 92008
Sue L. Mertens Deanna Hungerford 3341 Cuesta Pl. Carlsbad, CA 92008
. ’
‘. c 26.30 ' 223-200-15-30 Douglas D. Miller c/o A. Co., Inc. 11436 Sorrento Valley Rd. San Diego, CA 92121
26.31 223-200-15-31 Katherine & E. Dominick 3337 Cuesta Pl. Carlsbad, CA 92008
26.32 223-200-15-32 Robert W. b Linda J. MacKay 3335 Cuesta Pl. % Carlsbad, CA 92008
27 223-060-31 Mag Properties c/o M. A. Benowitz 7682 El Camino Real Suite 204 Carlsbad, CA 92008
,- ,>,’ ,’ ./’ /.’ ,/’ ,/’ /’ i, c ^ I
i
, -. -
. Xl.. . m.
0 w
I”..
s* cht 0
% v 5 :: 1 ig z
8” E
f ZG
-I I it
f i s
i I I I I I I ig I I8 I k&f i :
l&W 1 y is.’
I&g I 0
IW Ivr
iEl lsy
:a 4 I&
IF :z&
ig 1;
It- ig ’ IZ 01 Im 81 3 IP s;i is is I lo-n IL I 0 I ,I-+?- IM I In 2 1 o I% IZ cm IZ I-l i
100 I
14 i
0
ig 1
I z.z? I 0 1" 2'
1;
I$
I
z
IA 2 I
.
i '
I
5
2, co I
.
9"lxs wx, '7
SEi I$
5, SA Tn 3 Yz 3 zg
gv
I 4 iFi H z
I
I
i
I.0
I"
IS
IP
IWJ
ik:c;'
izo
I-
IPiP
1-1
129
ILvl
IT
Is'
I2
la
IA s
,m G
I"
:zT
is;
Iis-&
i% Ia IP
I& Iv1
12 IN
I-
f Ear
/E
IWW
iz n
i-
i 2
30
nt
,w W =J;'p
!z,g
i
I 0
I ,-
i
I
s .
2
I
i I ‘Z
k IP
i”r I&y ITO
1%
IE, I-
iIW
I?
:Y
IA
I* I2 Q
Ip” tG
I&
IF;0
Ix
i &j
,I--4 ‘40)
I 8-n.
i%
In
I%0
i&j
ID-
I “Y
IA?
I4 2
1:
I-
2,
.F
2, I
.
s,< t3,< 2
D 0. z G'r"
BIX k,dJ k,$
%I %.I
3
‘OP
3 x”g
aw
8 z
3 7 w 2 2
E
I
i
I
i21
b
It?
/g
IO
IA0
I-
IiF
I"1
129
IL*
I'?
Ik'
la ,m& 0
i& 8
p""
ix
I z"
I EC
I
r-
if IO
I % 0 IZ m 0-
E
=?+
1
IJ
0,8
I 8
OP OQ WL
x08
4
5
!
s
-% CA 38n -z w $ Es
g”
I 4 w
I E 1:
i r
i I
1 i
I
--\
& 1
b 1 /gf I
iz0 I I I- I lm”o I In) I I- ‘I It* I 1;s 1 +
I * I2 Hi I8
iE -“I -J IY I
t-0 I I-
1% I
,vl-Cl
i +H 1
I ‘Cl
i ‘I
I 21
i 0 I
I I _ I
I l 0 I
i 2x
I I l ; c; k cm
I
$a$
k,6
0
0
I i
0 I 0 I
I
I
i ;
I
0 I
oiij
x “I Ei I I I E
G D
I I 61
.
'r" lr" Z:,F
z IW g Glz! I'
. . J, I 1,) :,: n
m ! 1--.. ! CI- , o , o In-* 10 ,,-Y--’ ,- ,h-, (_ ,_, , I
L”.“lOS ’ \ c q
b
Di
/
-l
0
i w
e
ry h) W
+A
z I
2
,
,
1
1
i
I
f
I I I I
I I I I I
,i
I ‘I
]
I I
i I I I : I
I
ii
. >
: * I !
i 71 - : ~ i
i
1 3
I
i
I
1.
ii
I’ I: ‘1 I’ 1:
ii I
i;
I’
I j
I :
II
I’
II II<
:I1
I !
I!
;;
I I
I :
;j;
I 1
) i'
, I'
:i, f , ; I'
i
i
I
t
;
:
i
.
1
,
: i
. 8, * ,I :: I. .- _.~
,,
,
CI
3
%
n-9 z
ii
s
ru
h)
W
I 0
m
50
:’ !F
Fi-
::
2
Q s
0
0
0
0
2
I
I<
‘P
i
j
I
i I I I I I I I I I I I I I
i
I i I I I I I i I i I I I
,
;
I
I I’ 1: I I I I’ I I’ I I I I
i
I I I
i
i
i
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I 1; I I I: I( 1: I 1: i: Id
i!
I.
I’ ‘!
I’
1:
j;
I-
I: I* 1: ;I
I! I! 1; I
I'
I,
I'
II
i;
I
i'
1
I
1
I
I I
i
f
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
i
i
I
1
i I
i
i
i
/
i
I/
i
f i i I i i i I2 i8 ic 17-W
!;I
icg
l-0
i$jl
ic lo '24 I-4 ID I< 0
iz 8
I* is
1:
I so2 I-l -w I WY I is* 2 I I 2% m I Vlcn I .“’
i 2
.X2 83
I
I 2 g$
I “2
kl
Ino) I<
I I 14:
Iv= I-
l&VP
!‘-‘-! I
1% j
I xl I ml
irni
I-m IS I CI 10 lo- Ifi-. ,h 173 to--r In--r *q, ,_, ,^ I ,_ ,_ - 1
---~.
-
_. -
.
I
i t-4 I i&t /NI i&t _ 1 i5 , ‘I 1st 18, I&, I&, I&, I&. I,SiciJ-j,,,_,, L”,-,.Ay ‘4 L
i t P
la
IH IN lu
1 TP ILW 1%’ 1 AZ
1-3 ‘5,
k I- 18 15
is Q IG P I* m
i-es 12’ II- I- IS 12
k= I<’ II-
i” IO
1% I:,
ic 0
tP 8 Irn *
I2
1:
IF
i-z 0
iiZ 8
122 vl I: 1T
is?% I 5 I m I i 5
i\ *in u
Icoosl’oa !-I -4,-d ul
INaT
IF2
1 82
m I
I Y
I
1 0
I 4
! 21
I i
I?! ,21=
0 I 0 1 s
i 0. i ,”
I Elr: I
I .F i 8 .X? s 55 2 =a
WI= 2
<,E .p
wl . 2 -O'S
Sl b Nl
2
3%
Zl<
k,%
, ! t: . 6, / 1 a,
, --_._
I
19
Ii3
!=I
1g
ITW
i&
i A<
i-0
!?I
ig IO IE:
I;:
I< 0
IF 8 tm 6
is
I: ‘00
I’
IEZ’
’ -$j I
I m
I s?
I
i O
I .?
i SW
I
.gg
fGl
It&&
I-
IF
1:'
II-N
I-
I"o'
IF !- !E Q 1: G
I 4-J
I s&j
*NO C-W
I -0
i Yi
IF2
I +,
i 12-l
&
I i.Fw
is *
i
i
hl!h)
0’
8
i
Q
c i%
0 i I 0
I 3
I z
0 02
I I 2
I
I ;r ‘r II II I. 1; ir i: 1: II I f: 1; I.
1:
Ii 1: ’ I I 1; I I I iI I i
I
1 : I
0 i
I 0
Oal O,o
i i I N .
2
2 I I- 8
IW IX
2 $: x I I
i g ig
-ru ; hJ h) ’ h) w;w
1; I A I A
-0 ! e
” giFj 3 *GakC ;v ITI “7 so I so l=N : 0-Q-Q 0 = -4,-z l-4
NW> N x
g ;“g %oE I I >
$1 2
I
z I 0
I i i i :; ii iI I’ ir 1: I I
1:
I’
I’
Ii
II
I i
i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I: II I: ii
I: ‘I i
ii
!
i
;I
I I
1 I I I I , I
i
2 19
E 1% ‘8 Ara ! fu
. i
;
i .
I
i
I I I I- IF
I2
I I
i 1: I: lc I: 1: iz
I;
ii I” If 1; ‘r lr IS I I I I I
/
I
I
55 -I W;: s;J1 1P’. Z? z i s
WjN W!W
I i I d I A
-ii
P I=;0
zi' '2" 30 '00
p Is= ,r a 1%
: I,'
h)
N w
I
.
Ii I I I ii II 1: iI I 1 1, 1; II I 1: I! II I ii Ii I iii II'
jl
11
Ii
I
;r
1 I:
I ,
I
I'
:/
i
ij .. 1‘ I 8
i
i
I
I
I I I I I I
5” lP I w I- I
;o IF I
S’ I<’ I -w IrW I - I- I ? ii IG I
: is i
i g/z z
I I
“I= v, I 15 I > 21: Ir: I 20% ’ yo 9 I i ~YT i F-S- I ..- . ! %?2
I I 1; 2 ir: I<
I- IC l- 12 I- I: I- IS lc 1:
Ii
I* 1;
I ,i I- !.
i %z” I w--l
i
m
- :*. 8 34 I:! L
I- I c. I‘- In In- Is-3 ,,?-A I-l ,_ ,_ _
-. d- 1 -- r
I I
1 I I I I I I i I I I I I
1 I i i
i
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
i
I’
I. I! 1‘:
i!
I I I
i I - 1: Ii If I: I- i’
I!
i: f: I i;
1: II I 1 I. I! I: 1; I. ;J
I! I.
Ii
I
i
I
i i I I i
I I
I :w” I ON0
, (
I
I
!
’ 1
t I s
,
,
1 . 1;
I’
I I I I I-
‘:
II
II
I:
I.
1:
iI
ir
I:
1;
I:
1:
p
I; 1.
':
ii
1:
1; I < I -
i: I .
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
i ,i ,
; ! , , I
55; OU
w:
5’ wz
2s
5’
d”
2
r”
s
s
. NW
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
i
1
I I
i I i I I I I I I I I I
i i I I I I I I i I I t
! I I I I I I I I I I i f
i I- I I I I I I I I
i I I I I I I
i I I I
i I I I I I I I I I I I
i I I I I I I I I I i
e-8 w ::
s Q
$z 8’ %
i
I
I
i
I
I
I
I I
I
:
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
&5
ONS
=5 w-4 . w
z .
8 0. 2
.? iit I
61, . s,
. I ,
-- -
_- , , , I a , _- 7 .
EP . v)w
iz ZF
zz *-4 ZK- i
I 3’ I ?I IQ %I ,g 2, l$J iti- i I&+ I IX’ I I&W 1 I- I IF I IZ’ I Iv, A I IF I lx I
I- ’ ‘=A\” I
i i S%Et
i ZLSI .-+ I I N 2 I I I Ki I .P i
%+
E”’ I I I
LLw I -1 PI 5’ I A I s I z I z I z -1 I 2 81 * 2, z I 041 :lv E;‘;=z i
,“-I I I B :
I
gp
;;:
SD
I = I
IW 1% I ‘0.
i$
ig
ImP
1s
‘8’ ItLW I- IS I%’ Ifn 1%’ Im 1% Ig Iv, - I-l 8 12 2 1-a IN -
1 O$
t so2
I l
I 3
2
I O % I l
i Z I \n
1 F
I 22 I E I
i : I -
I $ I Y I E I x
I 2i
I P
i zi I- t-w Ia 1%
bJ I&W
IS’ ILW
I-
I?
1%’
Ifi 0
IZP IS
,g
I-l 0 IZ 8 Iat zi
12
I L I= , zzs l-da-4 I=tLIo Nrn
I’l z! ir zu
'2 8
I- IcrU I” I I .?
I 3
I 2
i I I
i
I+ 0. Ia IN 4 I 0-Q -a I’=~
Pi
Yl’ I A v, I
5 I
P I
=: i E: 2 4 -4 2’ I 2-5,
l=N “I ~000 I Y;: ’
33 I 0’
&I
.?-’ I
$ I Yl I
2 I
l I
3 si
!
im irr 1% 1% ,g I:: -,v) A
I;: 5i2 2 i-4 -1-i e-
ia i*
i. w i
i. B j
I. 2 I vl I is I k I sl i I
i
2; t z4 I I ,” I i E .P .F , ,w iir\ iirj z,, E., =I XI I I ‘1 = I I (A . sl 5 2 gi % 2 > n -n
F’ ,S’ JP p’
5’2 ;I2 p-+ g’s
iILK B 8 dy7 Iv, WIV, I-
I I G I . i sr j ‘I I
g i Gi f; I
i l I 8 1 l -s
k >
F’ 5%
kLK
i
L 0 I . .
im i iy I 1x1 iw/
i I ,. % I I I. 2 j
/-. .-
_. --
, - J.
!2 zrnj
mm Qz:
-a I)zvor
5
ggj
,W’
ER > ‘ He.
“2;
22:
; '00: wo.
%:B .
527s -&4C
OWr -nc 2 -I<
I%”
q
zs
ilk
72
s:E
z5
;;oY
z!
153
I i i I 1 I i i i
I I .? 1 .F I % I I 1 .?
1 Xl ’ 5 21 lx 52
1 i i , I I ,
1 1 i
I I I i
I 1 i i I I I I I zl ri z yJl% $$I< WI-= ;c tint<
k2
x.*g*a
cz k,A id
t
I w E”5 kd
t) : ,.’ I :.I 111 6 G, 1% g 4-n +s
ry ‘n h, 3 w s,” I w s -
-
I ii
* : TJ
I 5
I$ i
i 5
I
- I E I
I B I
I z2 I
1% I
18 I
I
1% I
Ip I
l&W i
is' ILW I
I- I
isy i
1-m I
i ng I
i& I
I IZ I I-4 01 12 $1 I* %I
IZ i iha 1 IS
IEE!
lzic!~
I-t-0 12 WI 1;l itj >I I
I ccb I
I" i
I 2:
I l
5 / I I
I F&l
! I
i
iw
k$
I&W
18’
!LW
i2: Ia I “p bP I&W iw ’ ‘W .d
is= jsg 18 18 I> ;> 1% is 1%’ is’ !LW !LW +N i- i- i- i- i- i- I I I I I I I I I I ‘I I I I I I I I I
i
I IW 1% In *
I%- !&
IS I+ 0 I2 8 122 i% Is
i&O i(D I- I CNV)
t 5!!Z I -4uJu NO I-2
I? a3 5 is *
lul i
20 IN0 IEO
I i
.; i .t I .:
9 i % i %
“i 21 x
i in Iv, C-0 lb-lo
I
2 I * I .F
s i 5
21 z!
IP % loo0 I z I ‘2 I .P z 041 2 I I I I
i
I
i
I f I 1 i
I
i
I i
i I
I
I
I
1 I
I
’ 1 ’ w e p-g y,c * cr- . w *lx G
1 r .
1 I
t 1
I t i i I I
I t E i3 &II< F’S
kl% k2
1
I t 4 I *.. I * 3 8”)
I (i
I
i I I
1
i:
ii
i: I I I<
p
I’ I- i;
lc I3 I: ;;
I- I:
i:
I
,
:
1:
iz
i!
f;
I
I
i
I
I I
: t
!
:
i
i :
i : , I
I I
!
t I i I: ii i:: I’ IC
12
1. I4
i:
I:
lc
I3
I::
is c
,jI
#Ia
1:
1;
15
I'
i: I‘
i:
I-
I:
I
I
I
I
I
i
1
I I
i:
i! II I: I< I: l- I’ I. I- ;: I< I: I: 1;
I- 1:
i!
1: ‘l I- I’ 1:
i: I‘
ii
I-
I;
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I I
I
I i I I I I I.
Ii I: IF I: I< I$ I- I’ 1: IL I. I: I: 1: I: I- I< I - Ia I< 1; I; I; I-
i: I’
IS
I-
I:
I
I
I
I
I
I i I i
i
i: ii I i[ Ic is Ii I* 1: lc 1: IZ i; I- 1: 1. I< I* ig if l- i: I-
i!
Ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I I
/:
I: II II II I: I. I, I‘
ii
I
II
fi
i!
I 4
I. I4
I:
ii
I.
1; 1; ii
;;
1; I (
1: I(
/-
i
f
I i
i
i I I I: ii 11 1: I‘ I: I i:
I‘
i<
i: I :
1:
IZ
j1
1:
I‘ I*
1:
I;
I: I-
i: I -
i!
I- i) I I
1
i
i
1 I I I I 1; II I: Ic is
Ii
I.
4 ,
, I
I I I
I I
I
,
1
,
1 1
i I
I I
I I
i I
I
I I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I I I
i* I! lc I: I: i: I t ; :I- ‘I! I‘ 1: I2 IS I; I-
i: I‘
i!
.a
;O
I-
;z”
l-
llG0
?
I
I .F
I E
2 I 9 I gj%
2’i 41 2
i i
I i
I I I
3 H s
S’-= ?I< ZlZ
$2 k?,% k,j:
1
1
i I I I i: i! lr I: Ic 1: I4 i: I: It 13 I: is
i; I- I
I!
I‘ I-
I: I-
if
I- I
I:
ii
I-
l.
I’
I
i
I
I
I i
I I
I I
i
I
I
fi
If
I:
I‘
I: l- I’ 1: I!
i! II 1: 13 I- i’
it
I* ‘l
ii l-
I: 1; 12 I\ I’
!
i
f i
i I I / I I I I'
I:
1:
I'
I:
I:
I.
I' I‘
Ii
I:
l- !!
I.
1’
1;
I: I’
i i I I I I
It I3 I:
i; I-
I- I: I
i I I
i
I
II
I I I :
II I : Ii
I 1 I.
i :
I'
ii
I
I.
II
I
I
I
/
i
I I
j
I I ‘I
II
I I I
I, I
I !
I’
I I :
Ii
I!
I
I I I
i I I
I
I I. I: f :
i:
ii
I!
i; I I I I I
i I
i
I‘
,
i I
i i
I
i i :
j i 1
i ! I I 1
I
i
I
i
I
i i
i I i I
I I I I I I I I I I
i
j
I
i I I I I I I I I
i I I
i
I I
i I I
i
!
I I
I
I I
I I
i I *
1:
1:: IL
IC
it
ii
1:
I:
lc
I:
IC
1: I<
81.
:I<
lla
1;
I*
I; I.
N/i
I!
I .;
'1; c
I
I
I
II
I I
i I
I
, I : \ . , i ,
I I I I I
i
I:
Ii It
i: I ’ II II
i:
1: I!
i;
ti i!
I’ ~1;
,;I t;
1;
I
i/
‘I I’ I I I
:i
I
I
. > ,
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ‘I : I II I I I I ~1
:i I
II
I
I
I
I
i
I I
i
i
I
. >
I
I I I I I I 1; If IC
IC
I2
ti
i: I:
i: I: 1;
I’ II- llZ +
,j
;I: :I-
ii!
ii: .
I-
i !i I i
I : 1 ; ; , :
I I
$ :r , !?‘a bcI 1) ‘l3 ;‘, !ii! ‘2x23 E ’ ,I% E ! Ia 1 IP : I” 1% : Ir :-p F I!2 FL Pls F” i j=i =I
WJI ml w;
i 2
:?A :%” 4 1V : I ; s AZ :1 a ‘0”: ? - I 4-l I 3 I
aj -37 I FI < I PI bJ m
CL ?I
?I I ED-I
# c--r
;sqs
g-
Z” 2: !i2
i’
: .
: :
:
: 1
; :
. * I
!
: 0
I, ;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
1
i
1
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
i
j
/
I
I
: 3
I i I. ii
It I
Ii
ii I.
i’ 1:
Ii
i;
I :
1;
Ii
I-
I!
I:
i;
I -
Ii
1; Ii I . I:
I: I! I .
I. I(
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
1
;
3
I I I
! I I i I I I I I
1
I I I I I I I
1
i I i i
I I I
i i I I I _I : 4
i I
j
1;
It I: I( is Ii I. Ii
I: II Ii Ii I- I, I- Ia 1; I. I{ 1: I /~
1:
j-
i I I I
i
i I
i
I
i I I I
1
I
i
I I
I
I
I
‘I
:I
‘I
I
I
i
1
I I
I
‘1 ‘I I I i
i
I
i
I
I
i
i
i
I
i I I
I
I
I
i
I I
i
I
I
I
i
I I I
I I I
I
I i I i
i .I I i I
i
I
f
I
I I
I
11
/
I
i
I ‘i I ‘I I i I
I
I
I
I
i
I
j
I
i
I
I
i i II
i i i I I
i
I I
I
I
i
i
1
I
!
i
i I I I I I ‘I i
I I I
I I
1 I I
i i i i
i
I I
I
I
i
i
I I I I
i
i
I
11
:i
I
‘I
i ‘1 I ,I
i I ’ I I i I
i* I*
I:
It
1;
I:
IZ
I-
1:
Ia
1;
I.
;{
ii
1:
1:
I;
I i
g.4 i
C’
70
7% 1
?
I =I
B
+Di
: lml
I SZJI
I: O IS -I 8 1% 2
Ia vl cm-0 I
2 ,m. w-4
I=G”
ko OS! P 1071
Ia I
=wo ICI z rvlu 1-I) ”
z.2 Is? a t$g Esq 1 2 z 1.’ I
-og j:
24 .
3 z
I w
d,C
H’Z
I -*
-. .
4 : 4. * ‘4 ! , .
0 * 0
2; cn I E
i B I I c 3: 18 iG IbW ial ILW
1; IS’ 1 h) 1 ho I? IZ IS
is t-. i
I. z I
2 I I. c t I I i z ‘A . I ,” 1
z-1 s,i
“I ^I I
- .: * 4
I
I I I
I I
I
I
i
I I I
i I
j
I I
I I I
I I I I I
i I I I
I
I I
I
‘c 0
9 m
A
I i I i I
i
i I I I
i I I
1
1
I I
i
I I
I
I I I i
i 2 I
i
i g I I i Id
ig
I&
IW
I+’
lz?’
IAW
I- ‘W 125’
Is3 1% I
i s= 8 I >I PI I g ) LW I -!
2’= 8, i ^ri
E I L.w i )Nj
L w
I z
I . s I 2
.f 1
%! i
I
E
?‘g
$,A
i ,u I w
!
,o .
2
G: .
3 2
‘t/l 12
I 3 I b I I -2 .W pi
WI
I
x
2’5
k2
5
b 4-l-z
X
‘. . ,
s ;Dv*n la- yn I%“” 33 k -p g I2 I4 l-l I2 1-u 1% Ii g pg tr; gg y’ iv b-+ctA lo+4 IP I”- 25 L, E ~~~ t4l-n I IO”, E I E 2 la IT I:, z ‘1” I 1% E I, si i,w ’ KP” I-P I- IF Is IF P ,- I i i im i
i%g 1
1x1
!uJi
. --
I- ‘--“I’ ‘- 1
! ! b , I
1 I
I
i I I I
i;:
i5
i!
Ii
1:
I- j;
i; 1;
I: 1:
1;:
I- 'I
I:
I2 I- ll-
I!:
I’
i!
I 1.
I’:
IT
1:
1;
I-
i;
jr
I
I I ’ I II I I k ,c 2 ; >
: I : i , ! , , I
i
i 1 I I I I I I i;l 13 1:
IC
1;
I’
IC
ji
I=
I:
1;
t
I:
‘I‘
~ I 2 I-
i!
I4
1;
1:
1;
i:
II
1;
i;
Ir
15
lr
I‘
IF
I-
i:
I4
11:
I I ib < 5 - $
: i 1 I I 1 ,
i I I I I I I I I I 1; tr 1; I Q ir I’ 1: It II II ii i. 1; ‘I’ I’ I : I: II I! II I 1; I. i{ I. ii I I 1 I: f! 1:
I I *
I
I ’
,/
t .
Ii
i i
I I I I i i I I I I I I. I I I 1 I 1, I ! I: Ii ii I I I I I I I I I I I
j I I I
1 I I I I I I
i
‘i / /
0 I 0 I
i
0 I 0
i
i
I i I I I I I I t 1: IC
if
1:
is l-
i:
lc
t:
IP
:-
I\
I:
IL
I:
1;
1:
1:
i:
I; I :
I-
I:
I7
I:
I-
1:
it .
I:
1”
19
I
I I I I ‘ ;
i . :
I
j I I I I I- i; I- I? I: i: I- is I i; IP l- I’ 1: I: ,‘ ;r 1; i: I- i: I’ I’ I: l- '
1;
1;
1;
15
I
I
I I
I I
i i ‘ ; \ i
I , , I b I
I I I I I I I’ 1: I I’ I ir I II I’ I ~ I, I I 1 4 I II I I I I ~ I’ I i I’ IN I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I
i
i i I I I I I I‘ 1;
I-
II
1:
i: I -
/r
Ic
I:
II
I- I\
i:
11.
I:
i:
ii
I:
I’
1:
I’
I5
I: I -
I-
II
1:
1;
I ; !
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I i 4 . ‘ ;
1
I
I
i
I
I
I
I-
;:
I - I
I: I\
i: I -
il
Ic
I:
ir
I;
i:
i: I -
I- I I<
1: I -
I:
i;
1;
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
( . ,
I I I I I I I
il
I
I: II
IC
': I i: 13 It i; ii It I: I- ;r 1: I: ;; 1; 1: I I I I I I I I i I
i
i I
, i 1
- ~~.- ._ -.- ~~~ ^_
t
-_ , 1 II. I is,,_ 1 ,'I', , ..A-' I , .I, t I.' , 1 ,L' , i 81, 4 I I\, I I’\*, I(:_s, t,, I a.y 1
5z:,, i?A;nll WC= ‘%
00
0 P
L5.l
"2 -13
8
$
*J -I
\‘7 x i = I IE I I I I I I I9 I2 I8 IlJu IV i&y 122 lo, I& A 1x8 IF*’ IB IO I
IE; IVI 0
Im 8
IZ EG
IP
lrs; I ‘PO
IC II-e
I SW
125 ITU
i z
I Ia 1% 1% I# I u- I&P 1%’ ILO I- IP I&
I I-J ig IF Im g
I> IV
130 I w-3 ‘0 6-l I WNV) I :a= Ir $2 I” I? 2 I z 00 i ;:
I l
i g
I 2 i
I
I
I
/ g
I D
i tm I I I 0 ! *
i u9 I I I 0 I E
i-i
: t I
fol
!*I
I tx IO
II-
IZ -4
Im 2
is s
Ir:
I-
I? 1-o
; T&
0-m is* I
lo 5
I:
I rnog
I- 0
1% * I-
1% IO*
I” s
I EZ”
igi
I”
I % -.
i-ad jp
/$‘ I"
I-
12 1%
izt
IZJ"
i i
IF-
IT I-J
12 IO
IZ 1% Ir
Isi OlR 01% 0
II- 8 ,I-
I-J El=
p2 g
I% 1%
"1; w
Is:
1%" $0 i;;o id i- i7 < 1% $2’1$rz;;.? I-J ZIVo-~l~~ IO nlONull -
1~00;~ 01 II.wulnJ,*
I;P :I” z12
1-J z,- El”
I II *I B isI*
I 0;: “ZtF
I I PI I
- /E / gik
0 I $4 15
i 2; 212 2
I I lr
I I 13
I Is i I !??‘I IS
i > 51 21 g
i 1 I q D
2’ 2 I_
I% .c*
‘m” SIC in PI< m w D
Iad ihi:
.
1% i
21 Im -I
IT
15
s6’j
I
l-o I
I? I
1;;;G:rol
lz-szl
igq
Ic $1
I2 I
iss,gi
1" 01
iA i t-U-4 Ia I lZ% I - I
lo z2l ‘-%-I 1 n$ p i + 41 I 1x4 i p NI SI
-8
i I
+<
L z
00' 47
. . -- -- - ~---_- --- - __ ------7----- ----- --
-
E i ;I
I 2 : c ~ 5 : 0 i : 1 I
<
1: I I I I I 8’ I: II II I: I( 1:
i! II 1: I .
i; I: I: I; I II; !I- ‘I? ‘- llc :IP I‘ ;i
lr I I I I I I I
i
I
I
I
;
- ,
i
4
s !
i
;
i c
I 1 I I I I I I;:
i! Ih I::
I$
ii
1:
lc- I= IL 1: IC I yc
;I- te ii: Ill-! 1: 15 IP I I I I I I I I I
1 , I
I
I 2
i . e
1
I ; 1
! I I I I I I I I- I: I: 1, 1: I< I: i: i; ,I lc I: 1: iz i; I- I- .p I- i; I‘ IE t- I- I;; I I I I I I I I i ! I
I Y C- x
*- iis -U I; E !
i
i I
t c 2
f
E
5
5 .
I
I
i
D
r: I
; 9 * I’ ;I 5 if
iI ci
I II II II 11 II 1:
i!
II 1: I * I!
11
ii I iii . I 1,; I’ II,
!I:
ii:
; I’ . I t ii
) I I I I I I I I
I
;
12
, , ; , i
F
! :
: : i
i 1 I I i;
13 I;
IC
1:
I -
IG
I: I*
lr
I:
IZ
i;
I-
I
II
I-
IE
I-
i;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
i
I
Y
;
.
2
:
i
! r
1
I
i
i
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I 1 ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
1
i
I
<
.
i .
;
2 ;
?? - *
% 5
3
1: I I I I I 1; ii IP I: I< I: iz
1: I- It I3 I: i; >I- 5 tc I- ;:- IE , - !IL
iI- il I :I ! 1 ;I I I I i !I
I I
[Ii
p m ’
;I
J I 1 i 1’
: I’ ;if ,I I I I I * 1: p
ii
I‘
1;
ii ,‘ lc I: 1: ;;
>I- 3 ;I- I2 :I< :ir
:I: !I-
:I , II I I I I
i r( I I
I
I
I
I
2 I I,.
5
I
1 I I I I I I. I: I: If 1: I< 1: 15 Ic I: I. i: ,: I: ii I- i’ I< I- II. I- i! I- I I I I I I i I I I I
I i
I
Y \A c . 15
i
I
I I
I
':
f i
iE
IC
1;
ig
I'
15
Ii
ii
I
c
!j
z
i- i.1 ';
'1:
! 1 2
ii-
;I' w
I
; I
I 1
II
I
j
I
1
- , I ,..
~-
- - r
I_
i-~,~ib,~ix,~i~,~ik- .;,~i~,~i~,~i~,~lk,~i~,~~ ~}k,p.& g@& ‘zi;
-.
, Ii ;Fvlvl I.%Yi3 I”’ lZ$ w I m ‘2 F S j”$ g IX 14
ww s;P IwIn u-b;:
3
“f grn f+
as E I
5’ I 0’ I
r; m I
i E I I i
i - I w
I 2
I
I 2
I =:
I .F
1 s”
% 5 2 * 2 s . In
8
i w I .
I
is I
HI
gl$ .
$I
i
Id WI . F’Z
2,
.
,
r
/i
Ir
I
I
I
I
I I’
II
i:
I:
I.
I:
ii
i
II
1'
I I
I
I
I'
I
I
1
I
I
i
I
i
1
I’
i
d , . Ir -
I c ! . c -
~ j .
i 3
i I I ir: I? 12 iz iE l- ::: Ii i:
I-
Ic
is
i:
1;
i;
I-
1: I
‘li
I-
I’
1:
i!
I-
1’1
I
i
I
I
I
I
I I
I
i
I
II
;’
I 1
4
;
: ‘
: i
I I I I
1
4
/ t ; , I
I
I:
I: I I
i I I. II I: II 1:
i: I( I I ( I’ ii I 1 i; Ii I t ;;
I. i’
‘II I !I, :I, I; i’ I. i! I I I II I I I I :i
I I I
i
I
, 1 ,
I I i
I
I
I I-
I:
I:
11
I:
I: I< i: I< 1: iI I i
1;
ii
i;
I 1:
I- 14
I!
ii
I.
1:
I
I
i
I
I
1
I
I
I
i
I
!I
ii
, I 1
t
:
I
1;
ii
I *
I
I
I
I
1.
f:
I:
Ir
I:
II
I:
i!
I<
it
If
II
I!
1;
I.
1;
I- II
I!
i!
I.
I;
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
i
I
1.
/I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I I
i
I
I.
I:
I:
ff
I:
I<
I:
i!
fc
p
Id
; j
I:
II
I’
i{
I:
I’ I .
I’ II
I;
I:
I.
I:
I
I
i I
I
I
I
I
I
i
i
4
I t I< i:
1: I I
i I 1. 1: I! II I: I‘
if
I’
It
I: I‘ )! Ii I: I : I(
t-
i!
ii
1;
If
I;
I!
i:
I‘
I
I
I
:
t
I
i
I
I
i
i
I
1
, . : i
i 2
I
j
. ;
I
:
.
1; 1: I I I I I I
lf
1:
I:
I’
I!
ir
1:
i!
I i
1;
Ii
I- ;!
I:
I’
I;
I!
p
I I:
I’
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
1 I ,
3 D
B
: 4 0
2%
> ~2,
‘u’ ci
z
4 in .
.P
I
MI
ka 5’:
ir
1:
ii
ii
‘! I;
I-
i’
ti
I- I(
I!
1:
I’ I-
1:
i-4 i-w
13 1%
‘l-r”’ mu ID
.
i
d 4
h) ul ul
A a nJ I nJ w
1
1
I
I’ I
I I I I I ;: I’ I I’ I I I I I I I I I; I I I I I I
j,
I I I iI
I I
i: I I I I
i I I
i
I
I
I
I
I!
i
.!
, I
I 1
I
I I I
i I I 1 I: I: II 1: 1c I:
i!
1;
I‘
i: I :
ii
I : I’
I. I#
ii
I-
I‘ ,r
1;
1;
I:
I
I
I I
I
I
i
I
I
I I
I I
Y
s
;
2
i -
!’
Zlv, 9’ $1, ‘Iv, a -7 w -7 ZJ . ;;: 21
2:’ Gl h 0.1
+os! I +&Is! -Qz I NWZ s:“^- i lv*-r)
‘1 F:
&I XL
.' I ‘Q'
s i sf
2 I
. I
E” I 2 00 I 0
u . .Z
o/I I I ’ I I
I
I*
I
I
I I'
I
I
I
t
I
I
t
I
1
I I
I
I
I
I
t
f
;I
4
'I I
fi
'I
I I
I f
;I!
I
I
: I
I
I
I
I
I I
I :
I
I
‘
i
: .
;
- i w ;: - I ,* .
z i E4
=:I
.F 1 G
8 122
;
i
c
i
I
I
: ’
I
\
1
: t
i
! ;
; I
i ,
;
! I
i i
I 1 I I I I I I
i I I I I I ‘I
ii I II ;I . I I
iI
:I
;I I
: I
I I
(
I
;I
I
I
I!
1
i
I
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
1;
ii
It
I:
I<
1:
il
I{
I *
It I’ ,
ii
Ii
I-
i’
li
i;
ir
p
l-
I: It I: 1; I- I: I: I’ I’
1
Y <
2
k
i ;:
I
I
i
I
iz I
I 2’ .
IW b+
I E k12
I
i
I t I I I I I; :: I’ Ii I 1 I 1;
:I I’ tr i:
I’ I , ( ;I I 1
1’
i’
I’
II
II
I
I
i
1
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
i
i
i
2
c : 1
I
\
i
I I
i
i 1. IV
i$ I
i;
I IC
1;
I‘
I< I: I.
It
I:
I:
ii
t-
!!
1:
I
c
It
:: l-
ii II
i
I
I
i
I
I
I
1
i
I
I
<
1
Ii
-_ .- -.. ----. - _ _.-______.. -.._ - -_ --. -.- --.- ___ ---._-- ~---- ..__....
- .
L,
F 0
2 ul
,0;21 WI.4
L* i O‘OCI
-0a I
&Z$ i
%I 'I
l 01
gzj t
I
z I
2 i
2:
z f .
I
s” 1
i
.s ’ 2 I 1
2 . z x .? P
.”
8 I
.-
8 I
WI E’ 1s’: I?&”
. w lf”m
Bl
%
cl -1G-l I-,
k-l
s