Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-02-23; City Council; 9303; ZONES 11 AND 12 - LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLANS - CITY OF CARLSBAD LFMP 87-11 AND LFMP 87-12v fl ** *E -"I ' r3 !$ (3 cr LL CL =c .. z 0 F: 0 a s 8 z 3 CI'cy OF CARLSBAD - AGENP BILL 1' 1 L ZONES 11 A?!TD 12 - IACAL-FACILITIES DEpT. AB# 9363 &' MANAGEMENT PLANS - CITY OF CARLSBAD MTG. 2waa LFMP 87-11 AND LFKP 87-12 CITY A DEPT. PLN CITY k RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Planning Commission and staff are recommendinq that City Council approve the Negative Declaration issued by Planning Director and adopt Resolution No. f8-4Lb and ff- 4 approving the Local Facilities Management Plans for Zone; and 12. ITEW EXPLANATION Zones 11 and 12 are the second and third property o initiated and privately prepared Local Facilities Manage Plans to be heard by the City Council. These plans were h by the Planning Commission on January 20, 1988. The Planning Commission is unanimously recommending approval of both plans, however, is conditionally recommen approval of the dwelling unit transfer of 206 units fro1 Costa Ranch Property in Zone 10 to their property in Zon until such time that the local plan is approved for Zone The Commission is also recommending that special wordinc placed on the deed of the property in Zone 10 to notify perspective buyers of this dwelling unit transfer. Exhibit No. 2 shows the location of Zones 11 and 12. zones are primarily residential and are located in southeast quadrant of the City. Both plans analyze the eleven public facilities to deter whether they conform with the City's adopted perform standards. City Administrative, Library, Wastewater Treat Capacity, Open Space, Sewer Collection, and Water Distribu Drainage, Circulation, Fire, and Schools (within the San Ma District of Zone 11 only) currently do not meet the ado performance standards. Both plans for Zones 11 and 12 are proposing to mitigate current shortfalls in parks, drainage, fire and scho however, the plans do not propose an immediate solution for 1-5/La Costa Interchange. Exhibit No. 3 is a memorandum to City Manager dated February 8, 1988 which provides a summar the major issues regarding the plans and an explanation of proposed financial mitigation presented in the plans. attached as Exhibit No. 4 is the Executive Summary from plans. currently meek the adopted performance standards. Pa t * 1 .) e 0 t Page 2 of Agenda Bill No. q30,3 -1 ENVIRONWENTAL REVIEW Negative Declarations were issued by the Planning Direct01 December 11, 1987 indicating that the Local Facili. Management Plans for Zones 11 and 12 are not anticipatec have any adverse impacts on the environment. The Nega Declarations were recommended for approval by the Plan Commission on January 20, 1988. The Local Facilities Management Plans for Zone 11 and Zonl will not cause any significant environmental impacts. plans are public facilities planning documents that imple Carlsbad's General Plan. The plans make general projections as to the demand for and supply of pu facilities, and outline the provision of adequate pu facilities concurrent with estimated demands. The p recognize that CEQA review will be required prior initialization of any public or private project that generally discussed in the plans. FISCAL IMPACT Staff time has been utilized in the preparation of this for which these costs will be recovered through the proces fee established by the City Council. It is anticipated further staff time will be necessary to monitor this plan other zone plans on a yearly basis. The implementation of plan, however, should help future fiscal planning by estime the timing of future public facilities and their costs. EXHIBITS 1. 2. Location Map - Facilities Management Zones 11 and 1: 3. Memorandum to the City Manager dated February 8, 191 4. Executive Summaries - Zones 11 & 12 5. PC Resolution Nos. 2710 and 2711 City Council Resolution Nos. yr-4 b and f& -y 7 b 1 *\- - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7w gh 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 > 0 e RESOLUTION NO. 88-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 11. WHEREAS, a Local Facilities Management Plan has prepared for Local Facilities Management Zone 11 in accoi ith Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code: and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on January 20, old a duly noticed public hearing as required by 1( onsider said plan and at the conclusion of the hearing ac c esolution No. 2710 making findings and recommending tha R ity Council adopt a plan; and c WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was issued bj lanning Director on December 11, 1987 indicating that the p acilities Management Plan is not anticipated to haw F ignificant adverse impact on the environment; and Is WHEREAS, the City Council at their meeting of Fel 3, 1988 held a duly noticed public hearing and considert 2 estimony and arguments of anyone desiring to be heard: it 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 :I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the ouncil of the City of Carlsbad, California as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correc 2. That the findings and conditions of the P1; Commission in Resolution No. 2710 also constitute the fii and conditions of the City Council. 3. That the .Local Facilities Management Plan foi 11 dated January 20, 1988 on file with the City Cler incorporated herein by reference is hereby approved. < t - 1 2 3‘ 4 5 development occurring within the boundaries of Zone 11 comply with all the terms and conditions of said plan. I PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting c Carlsbad City Council held on the 23rd day of FebruarY 1988 by the following vote, to wit: 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. > &,- 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 'J A 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 88-47 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 12. WHEREAS, a Local Facilities Management Plan has prepared for Local Facilities Management Zone 12 in accor with Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on January 20, old a duly noticed public hearing as required by 1z onsider said plan and at the conclusion of the hearing ad esolution No. 2711 making findings and recommending tha R City Council adopt a plan; and 9h c WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was issued by Planning Director on December 11, 1987 indicating that the Facilities Management Plan is not anticipated to have significant adverse impact on the environment; and WHEREAS, the City Council at their meeting of Feb 23, 1988 held a duly noticed public hearing and considere 'testimony and aryuments of anyone desirinq to be heard; I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Carlsbad, California as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correc 2. That the findings and conditions of the Pla Commission in Resolution No. 2711 also constitute the fin and condtions of the City Council. 3. That the Local Facilities Management Plan for 12 dated January 20, 1988 on file with the City ClerN incorporated herein by reference is hereby approved. 2 4 5 evelopment occurring within the boundaries of Zone 12 comply with all the terms and conditions of said plan. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting c Carlsbad City Council held on the 23rd day of FebrDaIY 1988 by the following vote, to wit: 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ~ I I I 2. > e e >,d - ' LFMP 87-12 LFMP 87-1 1 LFMP 87-11 LFMP 87-12 - LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLANS I J e 0 ,* FEBRUARY 8, 1988 TO: RAYMOND R. PATCHETT, CITY MANAGER FROM: Philip 0. Carter, Senior Management Analyst SUMMARY OF ISSUES AND EXPLANATION OF FINANCIAL MITIGATION PIAN - LFWP FOR ZONES 11 AND 12 The purpose of this memorandum is to provide a summary of the major issue areas contained in the Local Facilities Management Plans for Zones 11 and 12. A. Summary of Issues 1. Dwellincr Unit Transfer The Plans for Zones 11 and 12 are both proposing to modify the original buildout projections by transferring residential units from La Costa Ranch Property out of Zones 10 (206 units) and 12 (179 units) onto La Costa Ranch Property in Zone 11. The Carlsbad General Plan allows "density transfernf incentives to encourage the dedication of significant areas of open space. As a result of this transfer an additional 30 to 70 acres of open space will be retained within Zone 10 above that required by the existing performance standard. The Growth Management Program anticipated dwelling unit transfers and these may be allowed within a quadrant so long as the transfer does not violate the provisions of Proposition E. In recommending this transfer staff has confirmed buildout numbers for Management Zones 10, 11 and 12. These buildout projections are consistent with Proposition E. 2. Parks The parks analysis for Park District 4 (southeast quadrant) shows a current shortfall of 28.18 acres. The proposed mitigation presented in these plans would bring the City's park acreage into compliance with the adopted performance standard by entering into an amended parks agreement with the La Costa Ranch Company. This is further explained in the section of this memorandum dealing with the financial mitigation Plan. This agreement will also be considered by the City Council at the same time as the zone plans. 1 \ I b e 0 ,* - -9 3. Drainaqe The drainage analysis determined that in certain basins a more detailed hydrology study must be prepared before development may occur. 4. Circulation The circulation analysis again showed the 1-5 La Costa Avenue interchange is currently operating below the adopted performance standard. In addition, both plans identify road segments and intersections that without proposed mitigation would not be able to operate at the adopted performance standard. These future improvements are identified in 5 year increments beginning in 1990. The plan requires that a detailed financing plan guaranteeing these improvements including the realignment of Rancho Santa Fe road be approved prior to allowing any development to occur. 5. Fire The fire analysis showed that there are currently more than 1500 units outside of a 5 minute response time. The construction and opening of fire station no. 6 will bring fire into conformance with the adopted performance standard. 6. Schools The San Marcos District has indicated that their district within Zone 11 does not currently meet the adopted performance standard. The developers in this area have been conditioned to help provide a future school site and guarantee funding. B. Financial Mitisation Plan Both zone plans provide a complete financial summary which identifies what facilities are needed as development occurs. This summary is contained in a comprehensive financial matrix that includes the amount of facility needed, cost estimate, projected timing for construction, and proposed financing options. Of the three facilities identified which currently do not conform with the adopted performance standard, the plans provide mitigation to bring parks and fire into conformance, however, the plans do not provide an immediate solution to the 1-5 La Costa Avenue interchange. During the preparation of these plans, Staff finished the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 6 which was adopted on November 10, 1987 by the City Council. 2 \ 1 b a e - This plan identified the same three facilities as Zones 11 and 12 to be currently non-conforming with the adopted standard. As directed by the City Council, staff had been pursuing an alternative plan which would mitigate these three facility shortfalls at the same time the plans for Zones 11 and 12 were being finished. Staff has developed a proposed plan to mitigate these three facility shortfalls. This proposal was developed with assistance from the La Costa Ranch Company. Briefly the proposal consists of the following components: (1) The City resolving the 1-5 La Costa Avenue Interchange by guaranteeing the allocation of Bridge and Thoroughfare District fees while continuing to explore other available long-term financing options; (2) The City re-prioritizing the existing Capital Improvements Budget to move construction of Fire Station No. 6 up one year; (3) The City and the La Costa Ranch Company modifying the existing 1982 Parks Agreement to guarantee the dedication of 35 acres of park land and a portion of the financing to construct this park. The alternative also contains a mechanism for the City to recover operating costs for both the park and fire station. Staff will be recommending that a local facilities management fee be created for Zones 6, 11 and 12 to pay for the operating costs necessary to provide these facilities ahead of the City's scheduled C.I.P. This proposed mitigation plan will be presented to the City Council at the same meeting as the hearings for Zones 11 and 12. Finally, both Zones 11 and 12 are required to provide a method to guarantee the financing of the circulation improvements identified in the plan including Rancho Santa Fe Road from La Costa Avenue to Melrose prior to allowing any development to occur. arb a : summary. mem (MJH DISK) 3 J 0 0 ,- k ‘I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) for Zone 11 prepared pursuant to the City’s Growth Management Program, Chapter 21.90. of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The incorporates and implements the 1986 Citywide Facilities Improvements Plan. 1 The plan begins with the assumptions used to generate the k out projections for residential and non-residential develop within Zone 11. Build out is the type and amount of land planned for by the City‘s General Plan. The plan then phase estimates the zone’s development on a yearly basis until b out is reached. Phasing is done to predict future faci demands. The adequacy of public facilities is analyzed accor to this demand. The analysis includes an inventory of exis and proposed facilities, a phasing schedule that establishes timing for the provision of facilities in relationship to dem and a financing plan that establishes methods of funding ne( facility section contains conditions to ensure that facili. will conform to the adopted performance standards. Manda, compliance with the plan and conditions will assure the adeq of facilities within Zone 11. FINANCE OVERVIEW The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 11 identifies tf facilities which currently do not conform with the ado1 performance standards without special mitigation measures: facilities, Since the plan is a regulatory document, Circulation- 1-5 at La Costa Avenue ($3,300,000) Parks- A shortfall of 28.18 acres in southeast quadrant or Park District ($3,240,000) Fire Station No. 6- Is needed now. ($650,000) These three facility shortfalls were also identified during preparation of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone t As part of this Local Facilities Management Plan, an attempt been made to bring these facilities into conformance with adopted performance standards. During this process it has bec clear that no one financing mechanism can satisfy the comF infrastructure requirements of this zone and of the southe 1 The 1986 CFIP was adopted by City Council on 9-23 (CC Resolution No. 8797). 1 I + 0 0 I- *' quadrant. However, a combination of financing techniques address both the need for upgrading facilities enabling then conform with the adopted performance standards and ensui conformance of future facilities a development occurs. A corn set of goals for the financing of the major facilities can stated as follows: 1. Provide feasible financing techniques to ensure that all facilities are provided in conformance with the adopted performance standards. 2. Provide for the implementation of financing techniq which consider the financial limitations associa with the high costs of infrastructure construction. 3. Provide for financing options which consider both needs of the city and the property owners. The adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan identif the various ways that capital improvements could be financi The capital facilities necessary to support the City of Carls: generally fall into two categories -- those provided developers as a condition of development approvals, and thl provided by the City through a system of fees, taxes, or ot: financing sources. It is the City's responsibility to plan for the construction . maintenance of City projects and to finance these projects in 1 best possible way. The following describes some of the financ: options available. A. Cash/Pav-as-you-cro financinq. The City has used tl method of financing to pay for most capit improvements constructed to date. In concept, the City charges the development communj a series of fees which provide the source of income pay for capital projects. When enough cash has bE assembled, the City constructs the next capital pro]€ in order of priority. This method forces the City delay construction of various projects until funds hz been collected. These fees include: 1. Public Facilities Fee 2. Park-In-Lieu Fees 3. Planned Local Drainage Fees 4. Traffic Impact Fees 5. Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District Fee 6. Sewer Fees 7. Water Fees Special Districts collect their own various fees. 2 b , 0 0 a- I' b B. Reimbursement Aureements. In certain instances developer may ask the City to move a project forwar time and to construct a facility before funds have policy of having the interested developer construct project based on a reimbursement agreement. The would pay the developer back for the portion of project that was to be funded by City resources ov period of time. Payments would commence at the the City had originally scheduled the constructioi the facility in the Capital Improvement Prog Moving the project forward in time is for the ben. of the developer. Therefore, the City's repay would be limited to the cost of the public portio1 the project and no interest would accrue to developer. The use of this method of project finan1 does not eliminate the developer's obligation to City fees. The developer must still pay all City associated with a development. C. Credit for City Fees. When it is in the pul interest to construct certain public facilities earl than would be possible under a pay-as-you-go progi the City can consider giving a developer credit fees that would otherwise be paid, up to the cost the public improvement. These credits would reduce development. Fee credits must be used carefully to avoid eliminal of income from capital fees necessary to finance ot projects. Two alternatives exist for fee credits: -- Full fee credit immediately: Under this option, the developer who builds a public improvement would be eligible to deduct 100% of the cost of the improvement from fees payable. Once the fee credit is exhausted, the developer begins paying fees as normally assessed by the City. Under this option the developer gets immediate credit for the total cost of a project. -- Partial Fee Credit - credit over time: In public improvement receives a credit for the cost of a public improvement. However, the use of that credit is spread over a series of years. This allows the City to continue to receive at least a portion of fees designated for other capital projects while giving the collected. when this occurs, the City could adopt amount of fees payable in future years from a cerl this option, the developer who builds a 3 I 8 0 0 .% c developer credit for the construction of public improvements that would have otherwise been paid for by the City. No interest would accrue to the developer as a part of this arrangement. 'D, Debt Financina. A range of debt financing alternatives available to the city. If it is in the public interesi push a project ahead and to construct an improvement be funds are on hand, debt financing may be the answer. If project is being pushed forward for the convenience benefit of a developer, that developer should bear the 1 of issuance and interest over the life of the debt is: The actual mechanics of a debt issue and how to deten the developer's responsibility to support these costs wc be defined as the method of debt financing was chosen. Some of the debt financing vehicles available are SI below: Assessment Districts: Under Council Policy No. 33, the City may assist a develc be financed through the use of assessment districts if tl is significant public benefit from the improvement. cases where a City contribution may ask a developer to the City contribution. The developer could then reimbursed at a later date (i.e., in the year that capital project has been originally scheduled construction) or through a system of credits as descr: earlier. Special Benefit Districts: State law allows the formation of a variety of spec benefit districts. construction of parks, libraries, police or fire faciliti and street lighting systems to name a few. These distrj may be formed by a vote of the property owners who t assess themselves for the cost of improvements. The developer and/or land owner bears the burden Of C service payments. City participation in a district of t type is possible to the extent of public improvements t would have otherwise been the responsibility of the Cj However, the movement of capital improvements forward- time would require some concession from the developer offsetting interest, debt issue, or other additional cost in the construction of various public improvements that These districts may be used to fund 4 J e 0 1- ., - Community Facility District: (Mello-Roos) Under Council Policy No. 38, the City may assist thr Mello-Roos financing the construction of public facili in conjunction with development. Mello-Roos Commu Facility Districts (CFD's) operate similar to assess districts, but provide a more flexible tool for governme entities to finance a wider range of public infrastruct again through the issuance of tax exempt bonds. Facili which may be financed by a Mello-Roos District inc parks, parkways, open space, schools, libraries, pipelines, telephone lines and can be used to elimi special assessment liens. These districts may also operating costs to the extent the services are in addi to those already being provided prior to the formatio the district. Revenue Bonds: The City may elect to issue revenue bonds to fin improvements related to utility functions or other services that generate a fee for service, although c City functions could support the use of revenue bonds. public improvements are being installed ahead of schedul accommodate a developer, the City would expect the devel to offset many of the costs of such an issue as descr above. Tax Increment Bonds: Public improvements in the City's redevelopment area ca financed through the use of tax increment bonds. Redevelopment Agency has developed a plan for construction of public improvements using this methoc financing. A developer asking for public improvements t ability and willingness to defer other projects. Certificates of Participation: Certain public facilities such as buildings can be fina through Certificates of Participation. This is in effe lease agreement between the City and another agency. developer wishing to push projects forward might cons constructing facilities such as a library or fire sta using this financing tool. The developer may be aske bear certain costs or to accept credit in lieu of pay for certain improvements. constructed ahead of schedule must consider the agen 5 L 0 -b 0 ,- - General Obligation Bonds: The City has the ability to issue General Obligation B to fund the construction of public improvements. This only be done with the approval of 2/3 of the voters ii election. It is unlikely that the City will have ability to use this method of funding public projects wl benefit specific developments. The adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan conk the following financing policies: 1. Recognize that those projects identified in the Pul Facilities Fee Calculation are the ultin responsibility of the City to fund, however, priority for funding projects is at the discretior the City Council. 2. Recognize that the Capital Improvements Program h play a significant role in helping to establ compliance with the adopted performance standai Priority for the funding of projects should go to fill areas or areas of the City where exist deficiencies exist. 3. Agree to consider assisting developers with crec against future fees, reimbursement agreements, forn assessment districts, etc. only when it is clearly the public interest to do so or to rectify pub facility deficiencies and not to induce growth prematurely upgrading public facilities. Recognize that all credit or reimbursement arrangeme will be made based upon the City's plans for timing certain public facilities. For example, if a develo wanted to put in an improvement that the City had planned for 5 years and was not necessary to rectify existing deficiency, the City would not consi, beginning to provide credits or reimbursement until f 5th year, if at all. front or ahead of City plans by developers must prov the funds necessary to cover annual operating costs . the facility until the time the City had previou: planned to provide the facility. 6. With the recent reduction in residential densities t overall restriction on residential developmei fees to commercial and industrial land uses in Cas where they are not presently assessed. For exampl 4. 5. Recognize that public facility improvements made recognize that it may be necessary to start chargi 6 0 e L. commercial and industrial developments do not pay fees although they will increasingly impact t facilities. With the reduction in residential uses and density, it may be necessary to ch commercial and industrial to make up the deficit. Financinu Summarv This Local Facilities Management Plan has identified tl facilities to currently be below the adopted perfom; standards! 1. Circulation 1-5 at La Costa Avenue 2. Parks 28.18 Acres in District 4 3. Fire More than 1500 units outside of a minute response time. Of these three facility shortfalls, the developers in Zone 12 Zone 11 are proposing to provide mitigation to bring Parks Fire into conformance with the adopted performance standa The specific mitigation for these two facilities is shown in corresponding facility sections of this plan. This plan does not provide an immediate solution for interchange of 1-5 and La Costa Avenue. The developers of t plan will be proposing a Mello-Roos district to provide for up front funding of the interchange improvements. The timing the implementation of this type of mitigation is not known- This plan also identifies when future public facilities needed as growth occurs to ensure compliance with the ado1 performance standards. A complete financing section is prov: at the end of this plan which provides a description of facility improvements to be made, timing of improvements, c estimates, and funding priorities. Exhibit 1 on page 8 indicates where Zone 11 is within the Ci Exhibit 2 beginning on page 9 provides a brief synopsis of Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 11. Exhibit 3 on F 11 provides a one page highlight of the synopsis. 7 e 0 L. -* Local FaciRy Management Zone 11 CITY OF mAS - __ GROwTH-- -- __ _. -_ __ 6: Cb c a t ic Z .ip-tty __- -/r.- MAN~~-E-M E-N-T~ ____ EXt - phm/&- PROGRAM- ~-- -. __ __ NO SCALE 8 I. 0 e * EXHIBIT 2: ZONE 11 Public Facilities AS OF 2 Summary Chart City Administrative Existing facilities meet adopted performance standard u 2005. Library Existing facilities meet adopted performance standard u 2002. Wastewater Existing facilities meet Treatment Facilities adopted performance standard. Parks Park District 4 (southeast) I not 'meet the adopted perform standard without mitigat measures. Drainage Drainage facilities will meet adopted performance standard i the proposed mitigation measure Circulation Circulation facilities will .I the adopted performance stanc with the proposed mitigat measures. Fire Fire facilities do not meed adopted performance stand without the proposed mitigation Open Space Existing open space meets adopted performance standard. ongoing work program will as' is maintained through build out Schools For areas of Zone 11 wit Encinitas Union Elementary Scl District and San Dieguito 1 School District, the ado1 performance standard is being I The area of Zone 11 within the Marcos Unified School District I not meet the adopted perform( standard without propo mitigation measures. the open space performance stan 2 Adoption date to be added. 9 1 0 0 4, 0 Sewer Collection Sewer facilities in Zone 11 the adopted performance stan until build out of the zone. Water service to Zone 11 meets adopted performance standard u build out of the zone. Water Distribution 10 1 0 0 16 EXHIBIT 3 ZONE 11 Public Facilities Summary Sheet As OF 3 LFMP 87-11 Facility Conformance with Ador Performance Standard Citvwide: 1) City Administrative Yes, until 2005. 2) Library Yes, until 2002. 3) Wastewater Treatment Yes, with Phase IV expansic Facilities Capacity Park District #4: 4) Parks Not currently (see propc mitigation on page 93). Zone 11: 5) Drainage Yes, with mitigat 6) Circulation Not currently (see propc 7) Fire Not currently (see prop( 8) Open Space Yes, with ongoing w 9) Schools confirmation. mitigation on page 120). mitigation on page 134). program. - Encinitas Union Yes - San Dieguito Union Yes - San Marcos Unified Not currently (see propc mitigation on page 163.) 10) Sewer Collection System Yes 11) Water Distribution System Yes 3 Adoption date to be inserted. 11 ', e 0 1. b* I' -1. EXErnrn SrnY The Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) for Zone 12 prepared pursuant to the City's Growth Management Program, Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal C0de.l The incorporates and implements the 1986 Citywide Facilities Improvements Plan. 2 The plan begins with the assumptions used to generate the k out pro] ections for residential and non-residential develox within Zone 12. Build out is the type and amount of land planned for by the City's General Plan. The plan then phase estimates the zone's development on a yearly basis until k out is reached. Phasing is done to predict future facj demands. The adequacy of public facilities is analyzed accoi to this demand. The analysis includes an inventory of exi: and proposed facilities, a phasing schedule that establishe5 timing for the provision of facilities in relationship to der and a financing plan that establishes methods of funding ne facilities. Since the plan is a regulatory document, facility section contains conditions to ensure that facili Will canfarm to the adopted performance standards. Manda compliance with the plan and conditions will assure the adec of facilities within Zone 12. FINANCE OVERVIEW The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 12 identifies t facilities which currently do not conform with the ado performance standards without special mitigation measures: Circulation- 1-5 at La Costa Avenue ($3,300,000) Parks- A shortfall of 28.18 acres in southeast quadrant or Park Distric. ($3,240,000) Fire Station No. 6- Is needed now. ($650,000) These three facility shortfalls were also identified during preparation of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone As part of this Local Facilities Management Plan, an attempt been made to bring these facilities into conformance with adopted performance standards. During this process it has bel clear that no one financing mechanism can satisfy the corn 1 2 The 1986 CFIP was adopted by City Council on 9-2: As amended by ZCA 199. (CC Resolution No. 8797). 1 'k e 0 ,. I' infrastructure requirements of this zone and of the soutf quadrant. However, a combination of financing techniques address both the need for upgrading facilities enabling thc conform with the adopted performance standards and enst conformance of future facilities a development occurs. A cc set of goals for the financing of the major facilities ca stated as follows: 1. Provide feasible financing techniques to ensure that all facilities are provided in conformance with the adopted performance standards. Provide for the implementation of financing technj which consider the financial limitations assocj with the high costs of infrastructure construction. 3. Provide for financing options which consider bott The adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan ident: the various ways that capital improvements could be final The capital facilities necessary to support the City of Carj generally fall into two categories -- those provided developers as a condition of development approvals, and t provided by the City through a system of fees, taxes, or c financing sources. It is the City's responsibility to plan for the constructior maintenance of City projects and to finance these projects ir best possible way. The following describes some of the finar options available. 2. needs of the city and the property owners. A. Cash/Pav-as-you-so financinq. The City has used method of financing to pay for most cap improvements constructed to date. In concept, the City charges the development commu a series of fees which provide the source of incon pay for capital projects. When enough cash has assembled, the City constructs the next capital prc in order of priority. This method forces the Cit delay construction of various projects until funds been collected. These fees include: 1. public Facilities Fee 2. Park-In-Lieu Fees 3. Planned Local Drainage Fees 4. Traffic Impact Fees 5. Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District FE 6. Sewer Fees 7. Water Fees Special Districts collect their own various fees. 2 c ., a 0 ,A .. I B. Reimbursement Asreements. In certain instance: developer may ask the City to move a project forwax time and to construct a facility before funds have collected. When this occurs, the City could adopt policy of having the interested developer construct project based on a reimbursement agreement. The would pay the developer back for the portion of project that was to be funded by City resources ov period of time. Payments would commence at the the facility in the Capital Improvement Pro9 Moving the project forward in time is for the ben of the developer. Therefore, the City's repay would be limited to the cost of the public portio the project and no interest would accrue to developer. The use of this method of project finan does not eliminate the developer's obligation to City fees. The developer must still pay all City associated with a development. C. Credit for City Fees. When it is in the pul interest to construct certain public facilities ear: than would be possible under a pay-as-you-go prog: the City can consider giving a developer credit fees that would otherwise be paid, up to the cost the public improvement. These credits would reduce amount of fees payable in future years from a cerl development. Fee credits must be used carefully to avoid eliminal of income from capital fees necessary to finance 01 projects. Two alternatives exist for fee credits: -- Full fee credit immediately: Under this option, the developer who builds a public improvement would be eligible to deduct 100% of the cost of the improvement from fees payable. Once the fee credit is exhausted, the developer begins paying fees as normally assessed by the City. Under this option the developer gets immediate credit for the total cost of a project. -- Partial Fee Credit - credit over time: In this option, the developer who builds a public improvement receives a credit for the cost of a public improvement. However, the use of that credit is spread over a series of years. This allows the City to continue to receive at least a portion of fees designated for other capital projects while giving the the city had originally scheduled the constructio: 3 * a 0 .A - developer credit for the construction of public improvements that would have otherwise been paid for by the City. No interest would accrue to the developer as a part of this arrangement. D. Debt Financinq. A range of debt financing alternatives available to the City. If it is in the public interesl push a project ahead and to construct an improvement be funds are on hand, debt financing may be the answer. If project is being pushed forward for the convenience benefit of a developer, that developer should bear the 1 of issuance and interest over the life of the debt is: The actual mechanics of a debt issue and how to deter the developer’s responsibility to support these costs WI be defined as the method of debt financing was chosen. Some of the debt financing vehicles available are s€ below: Assessment Districts: Under Council Policy No. 33, the City may assist a develc in the construction of various public improvements that be financed through the use of assessment districts if tf is significant public benefit from the improvement. cases where a City contribution may ask a developer to the City contribution. The developer could then reimbursed at a later date (i.e., in the year that capital project has been originally scheduled construction) or through a system of credits as descri earlier. Special Benefit Districts: State law allows the formation of a variety of spec benefit districts. construction of parks, libraries, police or fire faciliti and street lighting systems to name a few. These distri may be formed by a vote of the property owners who t assess themselves for the cost of improvements. The developer and/or land owner bears the burden of d service payments. City participation in a district of t type is possible to the extent of public improvements t would have otherwise been the responsibility of the Ci However, the movement of capital improvements forward- time would require some concession from the developer offsetting interest, debt issue, or other additional cost: These districts may be used to fund 4 , e .. 0 .. COmmUnity Facility District: (Mello-Roos) Under Council Policy No. 38, the City may assist th Mello-Roos financing the construction of public facil in conjunction with development. Mello-Roos Commi Facility Districts (CFD's) operate similar to asses! districts, but provide a more flexible tool for governmt entities to finance a wider range of public infrastruct again through the issuance of tax exempt bonds. Facilj which may be financed by a Mello-Roos District inc parks, parkways, open space, schools, libraries, pipelines, telephone lines and can be used to elimj special assessment liens. These districts may also operating costs to the extent the services are in addj to those already being provided prior to the formatio the district. Revenue Bonds: The City may elect to issue revenue bonds to fin improvements related to utility functions or other services that generate a fee for service, although c City functions could support the use of revenue bonds. public improvements are being installed ahead of schedul accommodate a developer, the City would expect the devel to offset many of the costs of such an issue as descr above. Tax Increment Bonds: Public improvements in the City's redevelopment area ca financed through the use of tax increment bonds. Redevelopment Agency has developed a plan for construction of public improvements using this methoc financing. A developer asking for public improvements t constructed ahead of schedule must consider the agen ability and willingness to defer other projects. Certificates of Participation: Certain public facilities such as buildings can be fina through Certificates of Participation. This is in effec lease agreement between the City and another agency. developer wishing to push projects forward might cons constructing facilities such as a library or fire sta using this financing tool. The developer may be asked bear certain costs or to accept credit in lieu of pay for certain improvements. 5 .. \I 0 e .\ General Obligatian Bands: The City has the ability to issue General Obligation E to fund the construction of public improvements. This only be done with the approval of 2/3 of the voters i election. It is unlikely that the City will have ability to use this method of funding public projects w benefit specific developments. The adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan cont the following financing policies: 1. Recognize that those projects identified in the Pul Facilities Fee Calculation are the ultin responsibility of the City to fund, however, priority for funding projects is at the discretior the City Council. 2. Recognize that the Capital Improvements Program T play a significant role in helping to estab: compliance with the adopted performance standai Priority for the funding of projects should go tc fill areas or areas of the City where exisi deficiencies exist. 3. Agree to consider assisting developers with crec against future fees, reimbursement agreements, fon assessment districts, etc. only when it is clearly the public interest to do so or to rectify put: facility deficiencies and not to induce growth prematurely upgrading public facilities. Recognize that all credit or reimbursement arrangemc will be made based upon the City’s plans for timing certain public facilities. For example, if a develc wanted to put in an improvement that the City had planned for 5 years and was not necessary to rectify existing deficiency, the City would not consi beginning to provide credits or reimbursement until 5th year, if at all. 5. Recognize that public facility improvements made front or ahead of City plans by developers must prov the funds necessary to cover annual operating costs the facility until the time the City had previou planned to provide the facility. overall restriction on residential developme fees to commercial and industrial land uses in Ca where they are not presently assessed. For examp 4. 6. With the recent reduction in residential densities recognize that it may be necessary to start charg 6 '. 0 0 .- .. commercial and industrial developments do not pay fees although they will increasingly impact t facilities. With the reduction in residential uses and density, it may be necessary to ch commercial and industrial to make up the deficit. Financincr Summary This Local Facilities Management Plan has identified t standards: facilities to currently be below the adopted perform 1. Circulation 1-5 at La Costa Avenue 2. Parks 28.18 Acres in District 4 3. Fire More than 1500 units outside of a minute response time. Of these three facility shortfalls, the developers in Zone 12 Zone 11 are proposing to provide mitigation to bring Parks Fire into conformance with the adopted performance standa The specific mitigation for these two facilities is shown in corresponding facility sections of this plan. This plan does not provide an immediate solution for interchange of 1-5 and La Costa Avenue. The developers of . plan will be proposing a Mello-Roos district to provide for the implementation of this type of mitigation is not known. This plan also identifies when future public facilities needed as growth occurs to ensure compliance with the ado performance standards. A complete financing section is prov at the end of this plan which provides a description of facility improvements to be made, timing of improvements, estimates, and funding priorities. Exhibit 1 on page 8 indicates where Zone 12 is within the C Exhibit 2 beginning on page 9 provides a brief synopsis of Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 12. Exhibit 3 on j 11 provides a one page highlight of the synopsis. UP front funding of the interchange improvements. The timing 7 -a 0 0 I. *’ LOCAL FACLJTES MANAGEMENT ~- 1R CmA RRflCH CR . .- - .-.__ -._.-._. . ~ . .~. -X?K;..- . w-mMENT Ex -.. Z( . .---- _____ ---- e --- LmAno -~ __ -..pl&Wflg--- ._._. ?Z PROG.RA.M-. ~- 8 .* 0 e ,I $ EXHIBIT 2: ZONE 12 PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY CHART AS OF ------.3 City Administrative Existing facilities meet adopted performance standard t the year 2005. Library Existing facilities meet adopted performance standard c the year 2002. Wastewater Treatment Existing facilities meet Facilities adopted performance standard. Parks Park District 4 (southeast) not meet the adopted perfom standard without propc mitigation measures. Drainage Drainage facilities will meet adopted performance standard the proposed mitigation measure Circulation Circulation facilities will the adopted performance stan with the proposed mitiga. measures. Fire Fire facilities do not meet adopted performance stanc without the proposed mitigation Open Space Existing open space meets adopted performance standard. ongoing work program will as the open space performance stan is maintained through build out Schools For areas of Zone 12 wil Encinitas Union Elementary Sc District and San Dieguito School District, the ado1 performance standard is being : 3 Adoption date to be inserted. 9 .> 0 a In Sewer Collection Sewer facilities in Zone 11 the adopted performance stanl until build out of the zone. Water Distribution Water service to Zone 12 meets adopted performance standard UI build out of the zone. 10 r' .-x 0 a .* a. EXHIBIT 3 ZONE 12 PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY SHEET LFMP 87-12 As OF 4 Facil itv Conformance with Ado Citwide : Performance Standard 1) City Administrative Yes, until 2005. Facilities 2) Library Yes, until 2002. 3) Wastewater Treatment Yes, with Phase IV expansj Capacity Park District 4: 4) Parks Not currently (see prog mitigation on page 86 and Zone 11: 5) Drainage Yes, with mitigat confirmation. 6) Circulation Not currently (see prop mitigation on page 117-122 7) Fire Not currently (see prop mitigation on page 133). 8) Open Space Yes 9) Schools - Encinitas Union Yes - San Dieguito Union Yes 10) Sewer Collection System Yes 11) Water Distribution System Yes 4 Adoption date to be inserted. 11 14 15 16 17 18 19 1 WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. ' requiring the processing of a Local Facilities Management and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 8110 anc implementing Proposition E approved on November 4, 1986 b citizens of Carlsbad, and 1 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consid all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desirii l be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating tl Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 11. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plai 1 Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: - $1 .\ .- c 1 2 3 4 6 5l 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 l7 l8 , a e 7) Local Facility Management Zone 11 has received a dt unit transfer in the amount of 179 units from Local Fe Management Zone 12. 8) Local Facility Management Zone 11 has been conditj approved to receive a dwelling unit transfer of 206 from Local Facility Management Zone 10 at the time thc Facilities Management Plan for Zone 10 is preparc approved, Conditions: 1) Approval is granted for Local Facilities Manayement Zone 11 as contained in the Plan titled Local Fac: Management Plan Zone 11, dated January 20, 1988, a1 hereto, and incorporated herein by reference. Approval is granted for Local Facilities Management PI Zone 11 provided that language shall be added which I all parties that dwelling units have been transferre this zone. 2, //// //// //// //// //I/ /I// ~ //// l9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I1 //// //// //// //// //// //// /I// //// p C RES0 NO. 2710 -3- *t I’ .I I 1, 2 3 4 5 6 7 e a 9 10 I’ 12 13 I.4 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28. I 1 e a PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, I the 20th day of January, 1988, by the following vote, to w AYES: Chairperson McFadden, Commissioners: McB, NOES : None. ABSENT: Commissioner Marcus. Hall, Schramm, Holmes and Schlehuber. JEANNE B. MCFADDEN, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: I MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER PLANNING DIRECTOR I I C RES0 NO. 2710 -4- m 1 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2711 - I, ' -3 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 l8 19 'A e a ' A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE LOC FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 12 ON PROPER GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMONO REAL, NORTH OF OLIVENHAIN ROAD, WEST OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD AND SOU OF THE DEVELOPED AREA AROUND LEVANTE STREET. CASE NO.: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 12 j APPLICANT: ZONE 12 PROPERTY OWNERS WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with th, of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission, and WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No. 8797 ad1 the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan establ facility zones and performance standards for public facil and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. requiring the processing of a Local Facilities Management and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 8110 an( implementing Proposition E approved on November 4, 1986 b I ,I citizens of Carlsbad, and 2o I 21 I 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 20th d January, 1988, hold a duly noticed public hearing as presc by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consid all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiri be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating t Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 12. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Pla Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: +.- - x' , 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 e ii A) That the above recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public ht the Commission recommends APPROVAL of Local Fac: Management Plan - Zone 12, based on the following f: and subject to the following conditions: Findinas: 1) That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone consistent with the Land Use Element, the Public Facj Element, and the other Elements contained in Carl General Plan. 2) That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone consistent with section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipa (Growth Management), as amended by Ordinance 9829 ant the adopted 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvement P1 3) That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 12 a conditions contained therein will promote the public and welfare by ensuring that public facilities wi provided in conformance with the adopted perfo standards. 4) The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 12 will c the timing and locations of growth by tying the pz development to the provision of public facilitiel improvements. The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 12 will p growth unless public facilities and services are availa conformance with the adapted performance standards. 5) 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 11 cause any significant environmental impacts. The plai Carlsbad's General Plan. The plan makes gener ~ projections as to the demand for and supply of 1 facilities, and outlines the provision of adequate I facilities concurrent with estimated demands. The recognizes that CEQA review will be required pric initialization of any public or private project th generally discussed in the plan. A Negative Declaratic been issued by the Planning Director on December 11, 191 recommended for approval by the Planning Commissic January 20, 1988. I public facilities planning document that implc I //// //// PC RESO. NO. 2711 -2- 5, t b’ - I 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 0 0 I( 7) Local Facility Management Zone 12 has transferred 179 Conditions: 1) Approval, is granted for Local Facilities Management Zone 12 as contained in the Plan titled Local Faci Management Plan Zone 12, dated January 20, 1988, at hereto, and incorporated herein by reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting c Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, h the 20th day of January, 1988, by the following vote, to wi AYES: Chairperson McFadden, Commissioners: McBan NOES : None. ABSENT: Commissioner Marcus. into Local Facility Management Zone 11. Hall, Schramm, Holmes and Schlehuber. JEANNE B. MCFADDEN, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: l8 19 ,I MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER PLANNING DIRECTOR 21 22 23 24! :: 25 28 I I 1 C RESO. NO. 2711 -3- e 0 .. .. . 7- -4 >. ' 1 4 a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 7 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN & FEE - ZONE 11 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO P.M. on Tuesday, February 23, 1988, to consider approva of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 11 on property generally located at the largely undeveloped easterly portion of the La Costa Master Plan and adjqining areas to the south and east and more particularly described as: East of Rancho Santa Fe to the City's limits and the undeveloped area to the east of El Fuerte Street, south of Alga Road, west of Melrose Avenue and Rancho Santa Fe Road and north of the SDG&E powerline easement north of Cadencia Street. As part of this Local Facilities Management Plan the City Council will be considering the implementation of a Local Facilities Management Fee in an amount not to exceed $1,000 as allowed under Section 21.90.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 438-1161. If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivei to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. CARLSBAD CXTY COW APPLICANT: THE BILL HOFFMAN COMPANY PUBLISH: FEBRUARY 12, 1988 RL -~ CITY OF CARLSBAD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FEE - ZONE East of Rancho Santa Fe to the City's limits and the undeveloped area to the east of El Fuerte Street, south of Alga Road, west of Melrose Avenue and Rancho Santa Fe Road and north of the SDG&E powerline easement north of Cadencia Street. As part of this Local Facilities Management Plan the City Council will be considering the implementation of a Local Facilities Management Fee in ar amount not to exceed $1,000 as allowed under Section 21.90.050 of thc Carlsbad Municipal Code. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 438-1161. CARLSBAD CIT Applicant THE BILL HOFMAN COMPANY Publish: FEBRUARY 12, 1988 - Corlsbad Journal Frday, February '2i '988 - A5 -? 434-4466 1 Feb 15 for Presidents Day and again on Feb. 16 in lieu of Ad- missions Day, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN & FEE - ZONE 11 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hear- ing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO P.M. on Tuesday, February 23,1988, to consider approval of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1 1 on property generally located at the largely undeveloped easterly portion of the La Costa Master Plan and adjoining areas to the south and east and more particularly described as: East of Rancho Santa Fe to the City’s Limits and the undeveloped area to the east of El Fuerte Street, south of Alga Road, west of Melrose Avenue and Rancho Fe Road and north of the SDG&E powerline easement north of Cadencia Street. I As part of this Local Facilities Management Plan the City Council will be considering the implementation of a Local Facilities Management Fee in an amount not to exceed $1,000 as allowed under Section 21.90.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Those persons wishing to speak on ?his proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hear- ing. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 438-1 161. If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan or Fee in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this to the public hearing. COMPANY -... NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 3 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN & FEE - ZONE 12' NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hear- ing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO P.M. on Tuesday, February 23,1988, to consider approval of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 12 on property generally located at the largely undeveloped southerly portion of the La Costa Master Plan and more particularly described as: Between El Camino Real and Rancho Santa Fe Road, north of Olivenhain Road and south of the developed area around Levante Street. As part of this Local Facilities Management Plan, the City Council will be considering the implementation of a Local Facilities Management Fee in an amount not to exceed $1,000 as allowed under Section 21.90.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hear- ing. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 438-1 161. If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan or Fee in court, you may be limited to rais- ing only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerks Office at or prior to the public hearing. APPLICANT: THE BILL HOFMAN COMPANY PUBLISH: FEBRUARY 12, 1988 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FEE - ZONE 12 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Av~ue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m. on Tuesday, February 23,1988, to consider approval of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 12 on property generally located at the largely undeveloped southerly portion of the La Costa Master Plan and more particularly described as: If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan or Fee in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad City Clerk's office at or prior to the public hearing. Between El Camino Real and Rancho Santa Fe Road, north of Olivenhain Road and south of the developed area around Levante Street. As part of this Local Facilities Management Plan, the City Council will be considering the implementation of a Local Facilities Management Fee in an amount not to exceed $1,000 as allowed under Section 21.90.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 438-1161. Applicant: THE BILL HOFMAN COMPANY Publish: FEBRUARY 12, 1988 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL