Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-05-24; City Council; 9450; AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CARLSBAD FIRE STATION NO. 5, PUBLIC SAFETY AND SERVICE CENTER, PHASE IIIn 9 0 2 e 4 -' z 0 I- 2 J 0 z 3 0 0 - i, Cl'i)OF CARLSBAD - AGENWBILL AB# 75' S-0 TITLE: DEPT. CITY A MTG. 05/24 /8E AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CARLSBAD FIRE STATION NO. 5, PUBLIC DEPT.- MP SAFETY AND SERVICE CENTER, PHASE I11 ClTYh - RECOMMENDED ACTION: - Adopt Resolution No. 88-/75c accepting bids and awardii contract for the construction of Carlsbad Fire Station No. Public Safety and Service Center, Phase 111, certifying Negative Declaration, and approving Amendment No. 1 to existing consultant agreement with the Danielson Design Group continuing architectural services during the construction p! of the project. ITEM EXPLANATION: On March 22, 1988 the City Council authorized the advertise of bids for the construction of Carlsbad Fire Station No. Public Safety and Service Center, Phase 111. Ten (10) se bids were received on April 28, 1988 as follows: 1. Kilgallon Construction Co. $1,597,928.00 2. J. A. Stewart Construction Co. 1,672,105.00 3. Net Enterprises, Inc. 1,698,892.00 4. Commercial Builders 1,754,700.00 5. Chamac Inc. 1,769,000.00 6. Frank Stall Co. 1,782,450.00 7. Bruce H. Conley 1,895,000.00 8. Pharaoh Construction Co. 1,905,702.00 9 Rainey Construction Co. 1,960.000.00 10. Western Summit Constructors, Inc. 1,993,000.00 References have been verified on the low bidder and s recommends award of the project to Kilgallon Construc Company. All project approvals and permits have been previo obtained for the project. The project includes extensive earth work required to prepare two (2) acre site designated within the Safety Center Complex the Fire Station as delineated in the attached exhibit. 12,700 square foot building is designed to house current future staff and equipment needs. Construction is anticipate be approximately nine (9) months in duration with tenta completion scheduled in mid-1989. The attached Amendment No. 1 to the existing City/Consul design agreement will enable the Danielson Design Group, pro] ect architects, to provide needed architectural sen will review and approve shop drawings and contractor submitt conduct weekly job site meetings, represent the City on the site with respect to architectural and building issues, generally assist the City in the supervision of the construc during the construction phase of the project. The archit rn 0 Page 2 of Agenda Bill No. 9q5'rB of the project and assure the contractor's conformance to plans and specifications. Staff recommends approval of attached Amendment No. 1 to the agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: The estimated project budget based upon submitted bids is follows: ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET: Construction $1,597,928 Construction contingency (10%) 160,000 Furnishings 40,000 Soils, concrete, and building construction Architectural design fees 89,633 Construction review by architect Fire truck with equipment 195,000 Miscellaneous project management and 15,000 administration during construction Total Estimated Project Budget $2,132,561 testing and geotechnical services 10,000 25 , 000 PROJECT FUNDS APPROPRIATED TO DATE: FY 1986 - 87: Design $ 80,000 FY 1987 - 88: Construction 1,680,000 Total Project Appropriations $1,760,000 PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY: Total estimated project budget $2,132,561 Total project appropriations to date 1,760,000 Additional project funds required $ 372,561 The three (3) phase Public Safety and Service Center ProjG which includes Fire Station No. 5, has been identified in City's Capital Improvement Program to be constructed entir with Public Facility Fee funds. However, there are currently m 0 Page 3 of Agenda Bill No. 94_S'o unappropriated Public Facility Fee funds available to transferred to this project account. Staff recommends Council consider utilizing available funding from savings f project number 3230, improvements to Elm Avenue east of El Cam Real, which will be completed shortly with an anticipated project balance of approximately $400,000. This funding sourc can be utilized as interim cash flow for the Public Facilit Fee funded construction of Fire Station No. 5. This can accomplished as follows: - In 1987, the City General Capital Construction F (GCC) loaned $850,000 to the Traffic Impact Fee F (TIF) for the widening of Elm Avenue, east of El Cam Real. - The TIF will repay the estimated $400,000 of proj savings, identified above, to the GCC. - The GCC will loan up to $400,000 to the Pub Facilities Fee Fund (PFF) upon the Council's award the bid for the construction of Fire Station No which will support the additional estimated proj costs outlined above. Staff recommends the City Council authorize the loan of Gene Capital Construction Funds in the amount of $400,000 identif above to the Public Facilities Fee Fund and appropriate t amount to the project account number 320-820-1810-3290. PROPOSITION H REOUIREMENTS: A previously voter approved ballot measure for the construct Complex fulfills the Proposition H (capital project spend limitations) requirements for this project. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY: The Planning Commission formally adopted Resolution No. 2696 October 21, 1987 determining the construction of Carlsbad F Station No. 5, Public Safety and Service Center Phase I11 was conformance with the City's General Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: A Negative Declaration for the project was issued by the Plann Director on March 23, 1988. It is recommended the City Coun formally certify the Negative Declaration for the project ba upon completed environmental review and the determination t the project will not have a significant impact on environment. Attached to the Resolution are copies of Environmental Impact Assessment Forms for the project. of Phases I, I1 and I11 of the Public Safety and Service Cen 0 0 Page 4 of Agenda Bill No. 4 q3-0 PROPOSITION E (1983) REQUIREMENTS In November of 1983, Carlsbad voters approved Proposition outlining a $15.2 million construction of a three (3) ph Public Safety and Service Center complex. Phase I of the proj was completed in 1986. Phase I1 of the project involving warehousing facilities for the Utilities and Maintenance, Par and Purchasing Departments is budgeted in the 1992 through 1 Capital Improvement Program. Phase I11 of the project is construction of Fire Station No. 5, the subject of this acti The original estimate of $1,760,000 to design and construct F Station No. 5 (Safety Center, Phase 111) was assembled in 19 With recently completed project programming, construct drawings and specifications, received project construction b geotechnical work, interior furnishings, fire truck w equipment, and related project administration, the estima total project cost for the construction of Fire Station No. 5 $2,132,561 in 1988 dollars. Cost increases in the estima total project budget are due primarily to the inflation impacts upon the construction cost index since 1983, the purch of the fire truck with equipment for this facility, additio soils work required for the site, and recently comple construction of maintenance r storage, administrative off ice, construction drawings and formal construction bids which are foundation for more precise project cost estimating. st wishes to bring to the attention of the City Council inflationary effects of the building industry and construct cost index upon the original Proposition E budget estimate $15.2 million for the entire three (3) phase Public Safety Service Center Complex. As Phases I1 and I11 are constructed time periods beyond the 1983 approval of Proposition E, th budgets will need to be adjusted to reflect current costs values. EXHIBITS : 1. Location map 1. 2. Location map 2. 3. Resolution No- 28--/7@ accepting bids and awarding a contr Safety and Service Center, Phase 111, certifying Negative Declaration, and approving Amendment No. 1 to existing consulting agreement with the Danielson Des Group for continuing architectural services during construction phase of the project. for the construction of Carlsbad Fire Station No. 5, Pub 4. Amendment No. 1 to Consultant Agreement with the Daniel Design Group. 5. Negative Declaration. LOCATION MAP L LEGEND SITE OF FUTURE FIRE STATION FIRE STATION NO. 5 3242 & L 1 LOCATION MAP FIRE STATION FIRE ENGINE - _. - FARADAY AVENUE PROJECTNAME FIRE STATION # 5 ' PROJ. NO. EX, PUBLIC SERVICE AND SAFETY CENTER PHASE 111 3242 . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 w 0 RESOLUTION NO. 88-174 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING BIDS, AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FIRE STATION NO. 5, CERTIFYING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION, AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING CITY/ CONSULTANT AGREEMENT WITH THE DANIELSON DESIGN GROUP FOR CONTINUING ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES - WHEREAS, bids have been received by the City of ( for construction of Fire Station No. 5, Project No. 3290; WHEREAS, the low bid received for the construction project was submitted by Kilgallon Construction Company, amount of $1,597,928; and WHEREAS, partial project funds are available account No. 320-820-1810-3290 for the construction c Station No. 5; and WHEREAS, additional project fundiny is required f project; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration for said project 1 issued by the Planning Director and requires City certification; and I WHEREAS, continuing architectural services by thc architect team are required during the construction phase project . I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counci: City of Carlsbad, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and ccirre 2. That the bid of $1,597,928 by Kilgallon Cons Company for Project No. 3290 for construction of Fire No. 5 is hereby accepted, and the Mayor and City Clerk: ar authorized and directed to execute a contract thereafter. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 a 0 3. That the Negative Declaration issued by the P1 Director for the project on March 23, 1988, is hereby cer by the City Council. The City Council of the City of Ca hereby declares the aforementioned project will not 1 significant impact on the environment with support mat justifying this determination on file in the Planning Depar Attached Exhibit IrArr are copies of the Environmental Assessment Forms for the project which are incorporat reference and made a part hereof. 4. That the City Council of the City of Carlsbad authorizes the repayment of $400,000 of previously General Capital Construction Funds to the Traffic Impact FE to facilitate the installation of improvements at Elm Aver El Camino Real, Project No. 3230 to be returned to the C Capital Construction Fund, the aforementioned amount currently appropriated and available in project account nc 820-1840-3230. 5. That the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, 20 21 22 23 25 2411 26 27 28 I Construction Funds be loaned to the Public Facilities Fc and appropriated to the Fire Station No. 5, Public SafG Service Center, Phase 111, project account no. 320-820-18 1 to enable construction of the aforementioned project. /// /// /// /// /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 l9 2o 21 22 23 25 24 26 27 28 0 0 6. That Amendment No. 1 to a City/Consultant A approved on November 11, 1986 is hereby approved and tl and City Clerk are authorized and directed to execu Amendment No. 1 attached hereto and incorporated by r herein. Upon execution by the Mayor of Amendment No. 1, Clerk is authorized and directed to forward a copy Amendment to the Danielson Design Group, 31732 Rancho Vie Suite D, San Juan Capistrano, California 92675. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting Carlsbad City Council held on the 24th day of May 1988 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, MamaL NOES: None ABSENT: None ATTEST : ' ALE* RAUTEmklerk 4. I (SEAL) ji I e 'I @HIBIT A FEE: $175.00 RECEIPT NO: - ENVIRONMENTAL IHPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I (To Be Completed by APPLICANT) ___. CASE NO: DATE : Applicant: CITY OF CARLSBAD Address of Applicant: 1200 ELM AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CA, 92008 Phone Number: ( 619 ) 438-1161 Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if othe PAT ENTEZARI (619) 438-1161, ext. 4385 Applicant): 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE, CARLSBAD, CA, 92009 GENERAL INFORMATION: Description of Project: FIRE STATION NO. 5 Project Location/Address; 2560 ORION WAY, CARLSBAD, CA, 92008 Assessor Parcel Number: 209 - 050 - 26 Zone of Subject Property: PM Proposed Use of Site: PM - List all other applicable applications related to this project: APPLICATION FILED FOR CARLSBAD PUBLIC SAFETY AND SERVICE CENTER 01 SEPTEMBER 5, 1984, 0 0 I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Answer the following questions by Placing a check in the appro1 space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional SI necessary4 YES 1 ) Could the project significantly change present land uses in the vicinity of the activity? 2) Could the activity affect the use of a recreational area, or area of important aesthetic value? 3) Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? 4) Could the activity result in the displacement of community residents? 5) Could the activity increase the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? 6) Could the activity decrease the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? 7) Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the county, state or nation? 8) Could the activity significantly affect an historical or archaeological site or its settings? 9) Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? 10) Does the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? 11) Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? 12) Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the activity area? 13) Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? 14) Could the activity change existing features of 15) Could the activity result in the erosion or 16) Could the activity serve to encourage development any of the city's beaches? elimination of agricultural lands? of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop- ment of already developed areas? X -3- 0 11. STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in I but you think the activity will have no significant envim effects, indicate your reasons below: 16. CONSTRUCTION OF FIRE STATION NO. 5 FACILITATES THE DEVE OF SURROUNDING AREA. 19. THE ACTIVITY REQUIRES A CUP APPLICATION WHICH IS ON FILE 24. FIRE TRUCK SIRENS WILL GENERATE SOME NOISE. 111. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION ' (If additional space is needed for answering any questions, ( additional sheets as needed.) Signature &7 /g (PFrson Completing iieport) Date Signed 343- Q -5- e 0 MAY BE mi 2. u - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? odors? moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? b. The creation of objectionable c. Alteration of air movement, 3. Water - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? drainage patters, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, b. Changes in absorption rates, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? -2- e 0 - YES MAYBE 9. Natural Remurc eg - Will the proposal have significant results in: natural resources? natural resource? Risk of UDset - Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous SubStanc@s (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Pomlation - Will the proposal signif- icantly alter the location, distribu- tion, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Housinq - Will the proposal signif- icantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Generation of additional vehicular b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or a. Increase in the rate of use of any b. Depletion of any nonrenewable 10. 11. X 12. movement? pedestrians? -4- e 0 YES MAY BE 18. Aesthetica - Will the proposal have significant results in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in creation of an aesthetically offensive public view? Recreation - Will the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Archeoloaical/Historical - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? Analyze viable alternatives to the sroDosed Droiect such as: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site desic C) alternate scale of development, d) alternate Uses for the e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter- nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. a) WA b) The project has been designed to minimize environmental impacts. c) This project has been scaled to meet the required standard for fire service. d) This site has been selected for a fire station as part of the City of Carlsbad Safety Center which is already partia developed. e) Per the Zone 5 Local Facilities Management Plan, the Fire Station is required now in order to ensure adequate fire service to currently unserviced central and eastern portions of the City. 19. 21. f) See d) above. 9) N/A -6- e 0 . DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued) With regard to noise, this impact is not regarded significant in that it is not continuous but rather a sir event impact. In addition, this noise intrusion is accepted society in that it is associated with a public serv emergency response. Since there are no residential uses in immediate vicinity of the project site, the long-term effe of single events noise intrusions are not regarded significant. Although the construction of this fire station will allow continued growth within the immediate vicinity, this growth not unplanned for and will not be allowed (per the Cit- Growth Management Program) unless all other public facil impacts are anticipated. Overall, the environmental analysis and field checks conduc by staff indicated that because the site has been previou distrubed and rough graded and no sensitive environmeni resources exist on the property, this negative declaration appropriate. There were no public comments received response to the notice for a Negative Declaration. standards are complied with. In accordance, no adverse proji -8- e m , MITIGATING MEASURES (Continued) VI. APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING ME1 AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature -10- w Exhibit 4 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF CARLSBAD AND THE DANIELSON DESIGN GROUP REGARDING ARCHITECTURAL SERVICE DURING THE BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF FIRE STATION NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 3242 THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1, made and entered into as of the day of a, 1988, by and between the CITY OF CARLSBP municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as rlCity,ll an DANIELSON DESIGN GROUP, hereinafter referred to as "Consults RECITALS WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad and the Danielson Design have previously entered into an agreement on November 11, for the design of the City of Carlsbad's Fire Station 1 project, Public Safety and Service Center, Phase 111; and WHEREAS, the parties to this agreement desire to e necessary architectural services required for the constructi the aforementioned project to include the bidding construction phases; and WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad has assembled a scope of for necessary services during the aforementioned phases of project to be performed by the Danielson Design Group; and WHEREAS, the Danielson Design Group has formally submit proposal to perform the aforementioned requested services; a WHEREAS, the Danielson Design Group possesses the nece skills, abilities, qualifications, personnel, business resou and professional background to provide said services to the of Carlsbad; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad fin necessary, desirable, and in the public interest to proceed w the construction of the aforementioned project thereby requi said services from the Danielson Design Group. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and mutual covenants contained herein, City and Consultant he agree as follows: 1. Consultant shall provide architectural services for during the construction of Fire Station No. 5, Public Safety Service Center, Phase 111, in accordance with the te conditions, and project scope of work as outlined in atta Exhibit A, dated February 1, 1988. 2. City shall pay Consultant in accordance with the and costs outlined in attached Exhibit A on an hourly basis, the attached fee schedule, not to exceed $22,500. City shall Consultant appropriate, reasonable, and customary miscellan reimbursable expenses required of Consultant to perform serv as contemplated by the parties to this agreement estimated t $2,000 as identified in attached Exhibit A. Consultants s use its best efforts to coordinate work of subconsultants s to minimize fees identified in attached Exhibit A. 3. Consultant shall act as City's representative during preconstruction, construction, and post-construction phases the project in accordance with the scope of work in atta Exhibit A. 4. All of the provisions of the aforementioned agree entered into on November 4, 1986, between City and Consul shall remain in force and effect. e W 5. This Amendment No. 1 to the aforementioned agrec between City and Consultant shall be effective on and from day first above written. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals. DANIE SON DE GN GROUP /l(J:>l$J - By , d Vi? C->\ OFPJ I Title Title ATTESTED: City Clerk W EXHIBIT A ', ARCH ITE CTU R E*P L A N N IN Gel N TE R IO R DES February 1, 1988 RECEIVED FEB 01 1388 Mr. John Cahill Municipal Projects Manager City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 DIVISION Regarding: MUNICIPAL PROJECTS Architectural Services for Bidding & Construction Phases of Carlsbad Fire Station No. 5 Dear John : Please find herein our proposal for architectural services during the Bidding i Construction Phases of Carlsbad Fire Station No. 5, in response to your Reques Proposal dated January 12, 1988. Danielson Design Group looks forward to rema involved in the construction phase of Carlsbad Fire Station No. 5, and are exc that this project is going to be moving forward into construction and become a reality for all of us. The following information is based on the scope of work outlined in your Januai 1988 letter. PRprcoNSTRUCI'ION PHASE 0 Danielson Design Group will attend the project's Pre-Bid and Pre- Construction Meetings in Carlsbad and be available during the bidding to address contractor questions, provide clarifications, issue addendz etc., as required. If required, assist the City in bid evaluation anc recommendation. Danielson Design Group will also be available for a City Council presentation if necessary. 0 CONSTRUCTION PHASE 0 e Review and process all required shop drawings and Contractor submittal Review and recommend approval of monthly progress payments to be administered by the City. 31732 RANCHO VIEJO ROAD SUITE 0. SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO. CALIFORNIA 92675 (714) 49: 0 W Mr. John Cahill/City of Carlsbad Arch. Services - Construction Phase, Fire Station No. 5 February 1, 1988 Page Two of Five 0 Perform semi-weekly job site visits. Note: The fee which follows is based upon the assumption of per- semi-weekly job site visits; approximatley two per month. We rea: that at certain tines the need for more or less meetings per moni be apparent, and that is acceptable. If for some reason it becom apparent that additional job site visits are required, as a rule than an exception, we would at that time need to come back to pot reevaluate our scope of services. We will provide a short written summary to the City regarding is: observations, suggestions, etc. in the form of Construction Site Minutes. I believe you will find these minutes very comprehensivc useful in the sense that they will be our written summary of job meetings and stand as a matter of project record. 0 0 Issue Bulletins as may be required. Assist the Construction Manager, City and inspectors in processing, administering and negotiating Change Orders, as required. Review and make recommendations on any issues or conflicts with regard workmanship and quality control. Assist in monitoring project progress. Review and comment on as-built drawings prepared by the Contractor. 0 0 POST-CONSTRUCTION PHASE Danielson Design Group will assist the City in any aspects of the project that required to settle/administer Contractor claims or other outstanding issues. We are assuming, John, that the scope of work during this Post-Construction Pha going to minimal. If for some reason a great deal of involvement by our office necessary in this phase, such as assisting in the placement of furniture, or ot items, this extra involvement will be considered an additional scope of work. Once again, we will be there to help you complete and close-out the project in dealings with the Contractor, and this has been included in our fee estimation. I w W ' Mr. John Cahill/City of Carlsbad Arch. Services - Construction Phase, Fire Station No. 5 February 1, 1988 Page Three of Five All in all, John, I do not have any other additional suggestions for this scope work; your outline of the different tasks in each of the phases was complete an exactly what we would propose to provide you in these construction phases. It be acceptable to us if this architectural services contract takes the form of a amendment to our existing design contract with you, for the reasons you stated your letter. Hiring a Construction Manager as soon as possible and establishing methods of construction administration with you and our office is also imperati. Therefore, Danielson Design Group will provide the above scope of services for following fee. SCHEDULE OF FEE FOR SERVICES PRB-CONSTRUCTION, CONSTRUCTION p AND POST-CONSI'RUCI?ON PHASES HOURLY NOT TO EXCEED $22,500.00 (Not including Reimbursable Expenses) Included within the above Hourly Fee is: A. Structural Engineer ................... Hourly not to exceed $ 1,50C * (Includes shop drawing review and three site visits and reports.) B. Mechanical/Plumbing Engineer .......... Hourly not to exceed $ 2,00( * (Includes shop drawing review and three site visits and reports.) C. Electrical Engineer ................... Hourly not to exceed $ 1,50( * (Includes shop drawing review and three site visits and reports.) D, Landscape Architect ................... Hourly not to exceed $ 1,5OC * (Includes shop drawings review and six site visits and reports.) * Note: We feel the number of site visits is minimal and appropriate to maintain control over the project in relation to our documents. some visits are mutually determined not to be required, they will not be charged. However, . e m Mr. John Cahill/City of Carlsbad Arch. Services - Construction Phase, Fire Station No. 5 February 1, 1988 Page Five of Five John, please accept this letter as our reponse to your Request for Proposal. I call if you have any questions regarding this proposal, the scope of work, or c fees, and I will provide you with any additional information you require. We look forward to the notification that we have been authorized for this scope work, and greatly appreciate this opportunity to continue our relationship with and the City of Carlsbad. This project, from its commencement, has been a much valued project, and everyone at the City of Carlsbad has been a pleasure to wor with. Sincerely, DANIFLSON DESIGN GROUP A Califor ‘a Corporation DXiT- Don Iler, AIA Associate D1:tb e EXHIBIT 5 , 2075 LAS PALMAS I CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 0 PLAN NlNG D €PA R TMEN T (619) 438-1161 Citp of CnrI$bab NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: 2560 Orion Way, Carlsbad, CA PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of Fire Station No. 5 (12, square feet) at the Carlsbad Safety and Service Center The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of above described proj ect pursuant to the Guidelines Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsk As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declarat that the project will not have a significant impact on environment) is hereby issued for the subject projc Justification for this action is on file in the Planr Department. A COPY of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drj Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Plann Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. DATED: March 23, 1988 CASE NO: CUP 88-6 Planning Director APPLICANT: City of Carlsbad PUBLISH DATE: March 23, 1988 MICHAEL J. ~T~LZMIYLER CDD: af