HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-06-28; City Council; 9500; SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A TWO UNIT CONDO AT 3376 GARFIELD AND VARIANCE TO PERMIT GUEST PARKING IN BEACH AREA OVERLAY ZONE (SDP 87-09|V 88-01|REISER-OKUN)..
.. I
, AND VARIANCE
PARKING IN B
RECOMMENDED ACTION: u
L) aJ
‘r; 0 Both the Planning Commission and staff are recommending that
s4 a City Council uphold the Planning Commission’s decision to
a, SDP 87-9/V 88-1.
A U
1cI ITEM EXPLANATION
4 (d The applicant is appealing a Planning Commission denial
-rl Site Development Plan and Variance for a two unit condom
a 5 project at 3376 Garfield Street in the Beach Area Overlay
C The Beach Area Overlay Zone requires a Site Development Pla
0 all new residences other than single family residences. Ti
10 111 proposed project is in conformance with its RMH General
designation and R-3 Zoning. However, it does not comply wit
0 requirements of the BAO Zone or the recommendations of the
Beach Study.
.rl The North Beach Study recommended that new development in s area be designed to reflect the small scale image rather
d PI larger monolithic buildings. The proposed building is 1
boxy, and utilizes almost all of the allowable bui
.c L1 footprint. The westerly facade is stark and does not rela pedestrian traffic on Garfield Street. A large mono1
rl a, structure like the one proposed is not compatible with exj
s residences in the area or the small scale type of image thz
=f recommended by the North Beach Study.
(d In addition, the applicant was requesting a variance to
rl the required guest parking space to be located as a tandem
a, in the front yard setback. It is Planning Department polic
to recommend approval of variances for new development bac a
a, the premise that new development should comply with all ord: 5 requirements.
.rl a, No one, other than the applicant, spoke in favor of
d a, opposition to the proposed project. The Commission unanir
a denied the project. For additional details, see the at1
d .rl staff reports and minutes of the May 18, 1988, P1:
c) Commission Meeting.
0
3
V
M G
C
aJ
a
a
a C
r6
a rd
a
G 3 0 u ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
co 00
03 I 15303(b) of the California Environmental Quality Act.
hl 1 Q
I
Q .. m 1 -.
.. I Page 2 of Agenda Bill No. ?X@&
FISCAL IMPACT
None, if the Council supports the Planning Commission's den
If the Council grants this appeal, the increased need for capital facilities resulting from this development will offset by the payment of the public facilities fee. Any cap facilities related directly to this development will
constructed and paid for by the developer.
Increased operating expenses related to this development wil
offset to some extent from increased tax or fee rev
generated by the development. No detailed economic im
analysis of this development has been conducted at this time predictions of the portion of operating expenses covered additional operating revenue created as a result of this pro cannot be made.
EXHIBITS
1. Location Map
2. Planning Commission Resolution No.'s 2734 and 2737
3. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated May 18, 1988
4. Excerpts from Planning Commission Minutes dated May 18, 1
5. Appeal from applicant
C.2 GEPIXIUL COMMERCLU ZOhE C-T COMMERCUL.TOCRlSTZONE
U PUBLIC UTILITIES RC RECREATION COMMERCIAL
SCHOOLS C-M HUW COMMERCLU.UMITED 1.WCSTRI.U ZONE E ELE.WENTARY M lNDLSTRI.UZONE J JC'NIOR HIGH P.M PLAPr'WXD LPIDLSW ZONE H HIGHSCHOOL
F.P FLOODPLW OMRUY ZONE P PRIVATE OTHER
OS OPENSPACE L-C LLWITED COhTROL SRR NON RESIDENTIAL RESERVE OS OPW SP.4CE P.U PCBUC LllLlTY ZONE
REISER-OKUN SDP 87.
L
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lo
11
12
l3
14
15
16
17
I.8
19
a .)
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2734
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CI'I
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING SITE DEVELOPMEb PLAN NO. SDP 87-9 TO CONSTRUCT A TWO UNI CONDOMINIUM ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 33:
GARFIELD STREET
APPLICANT: REISER-OWN
CASE NO: SDP 87-9
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed
City of Carlsbad and referred to the F'lanning Commission;
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a
as provided by Title 21 of the Car1sba.d Municipal Code: E
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the 1
Code, the Planning Commission did, on the 18th day of Mz
considered said request on property described as:
Southwesterly half of Tract No. 217 of THUM Land: City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, according 1 Map thereof No. 1681.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon heal
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
relating to SDP 87-9. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RE!
2o
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1 the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as folloi
~ A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public the Commission DENIES SDP 87-9, based on the
findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findinss:
1. The architecture of the proposed project compatible with surrounding development beci
building mass is large, boxy, and does not r
pedestrian traffic.
'
///
I I.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
l8
19
Q 0
2. The project design is not consistent with the Bea
Overlay Zone and the recommendations of the Nort Planning and Traffic Study because the proposed st
scale image. In addition, the building is not
back from the street and has little vertical, horj and roof articulation of the building face.
The proposed project does not comply with the recrc
area requirements of the planned development ordin;
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California,
the 18th day of May, 1988, by the following vote, to wit:
reflects a large, monolithic building rather than
3.
AYES : Chairperson McFadden, Commissioners: Hall, Hol
Marcus, Schlehuber and Schramm.
NOES : None.
ABSENT : None.
ABSTAIN : None.
g-6 y5E3i&
JI$”E B. MCFADDEN, Chairpe CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSIO
ATTEST:
201 21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 4vU5ML. 7
MICHAEL J. ~OLZ~LLER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO. 2734 -2-
, ..
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
m *
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2737
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A VARIANCE
TO ALLOW GUEST PARKING IN THE DRIVEWAY ON PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 3376 GARFIELD STREET.
APPLICANT! MISER-OWN
CASE NO.: V 88-1
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain prope
wit:
Southwesterly half of Tract No. 217 of THUM
Lands, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, according to Map thereof No. 1681.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a
as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code: a
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 18th
May, 1988, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescr
law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon heari
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
relating to V 88-1.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the E
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public k
the Commission DENIES V 88-1, based on the fc
findings and subject to the following conditions:
////
////
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
€3
9
10
11
12
l3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
a e
Findinas :
1. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circum that apply to this property and do not apply to ot the same vicinity.
The project is located in the Beach Area Overlay 2
must comply with the same parking requirements a!
pro j ects .
3. This property owner is not being denied a right
by other property owners because this and other
the area, similar in size, may be developed w: units if guest parking is located outside the fr
setback.
2.
3. The proposed project may be detrimental to the
Plan because implementing ordinance requirements being met.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meel
the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, Cali
held on the 18th day of May, 1988, by the following VI
wit:
AYES: Chairperson McFadden, Commissioners: Hall, Holn
Marcus, Schlehuber and Schramm.
None. NOES :
ABSENT : None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSIC
ATTEST:
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO. 2737 -2-
APPLIcm T SUBMITTAL DATE
NOVEMBER 30, 1987 4D
STAFF REPORT
DATE : MAY ia, igaa
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM : PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUEUECT: SDP 87-9/V 88-1 - REISER-OKUN - Request for a Site
Development Plan to construct a two unit
condominium at 3376 Garfield Street in the Beach
Overlay Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone No. 1. Also, a request for a variance to permit guest parking in the driveway.
e
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution N0.l~ 2734 and
2737 DENYING SDP 87-9/V 88-1, based on the findings contained therein.
11. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting two approvals:
1) A Site Development Plan to construct two airspace
2) A variance to permit guest parking in the driveway.
The subject site is located in the Beach Area Overlay Zone
which requires all new residences in the beach area, othei than single family, to process a Site Development Plan.
The project site is located in the R-3 Zone and has a General
Plan designation of RH (15-23 du/ac). The proposed project
has a density of 14.4 units per acre. The .14 acre site is
currently occupied by a one-story, single family dwelling anc
is located in a neighborhood with a variety of housing types
and building heights. As can be seen from Exhibit rlXtl, most
of the structures in the vicinity are one-story, singlc
family dwellings. Interspersed throughout the area are a fei two-story single family and multifamily dwellings.
The proposed units will have a combined floor area of 5,23:
square feet (units plus garages). Minimum setbacks have bee] provided and two visitor parking spaces are proposed in the common driveway. A building height of 25' has beel
condominiums at the above location; and
STAFF REPORT 3) m I.
SDP 87-9 - REIShh - OWN
Pase 2
maintained.
111. ANALYSIS
PLANNING ISSUES
1) Does the proposed project comply with the development
standards of the R-3 Zone, the Beach Area Overlay Zone
and the Planned Development Ordinance?
2) Can all the findings required for approval of a Variance be made? Specifically:
a) That there are exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions applicable to the
property or to the intended use that do not apply
generally to the other property or class of use ir
the same vicinity and zone:
b) That such variance is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied to the
property in question:
c) That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare 01 injurious to the property or improvements in suck vicinity and zone in which the property is located;
d) That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan.
Discussion SDP 87-9
Although the proposed project complies with the minimur standards of the R-3 Zone, many of the requirements of thc
Planned Development Ordinance and the Beach Area Overlay Zonf
have not been met. On numerous occasions staff has met 01
corresponded with the applicant to discuss issues related tc
the project. The applicant was made aware that a sit{
redesign would be required before staff could support tht
project; however, the applicant has not responded with an: significant design changes.
Staff is required to comply with State-mandated time line: which would require this project to be approved or denied b]
0 STAFF REPORT e SDP 87-9 - REISEk - OWN
Pase 3
May 30, 1988. Although informed of this requirement, the applicant has not responded.
The major issues which have not yet been addressed arc discussed below:
1. The architectural style of the proposed project is incompatible with the beach area. The building mass is
larye, boxy, and utilizes almost all of the auailablf
building footprint. The westerly facade is stark, anc
doesn't relate to pedestrian traffic:. Thirty-two feet
of the westerly elevation consists of garage doors
structure such as this does not integrate harmoniouslJ with the neighborhood. The North Beach Study states ox page 94:
comprising 48% of the 66.6' street frontage. I
"New development should be designed to reflect the small scale image rather than
large monolithic buildings. Apartment
and condominium buildings should
preferably be contained in smaller massed
buildings rather than large buildings;
where larger buildings are used they
horizontal and roof articulation of
building faces. Where two story buildings are proposed, the second story should often be stepped back."
should be designed with vertical,
The proposed structure does not implement these guidelines.
2. Recreational areas have been provided in the rearyard:
which do not meet the standards of the Plannec
Development ordinance. This section of the codt requires that private yards must not have any dimensioi less than 15l, therefore, the proposed 13' x 33 dimension does not comply. The balcony does serve as i passive recreational area; however, active recreationa. requirements have not been met.
Discussion V 88-1
The applicant has submitted a request for a variance to all01 guest parking in the driveway. Although two guest parkinc
spaces are indicated on the plan, only one space is require(
for two units. The Planned Development Ordinance does no.
allow credit for tandem parking in front of garages excep.
STAFF REPORT 0 0 SDP 87-9 - REISEH - OKUN Paae 4
for existing duplex lots, The Beach Area Overlay zone allows only 20% credit for tandem guest parking.
The proposed project cannot make the findings required for a variance. There are no exceptional or extraordinary
properties in the Beach Area Overlay zone must comply with
the same parking requirements. In addition, this property
owner is not being denied a right enjoyed by other property
owners. This and other lots similar in size may be developed
with two units if guest parking is located outside the
frontyard setback. Also, the project does not meet the
guidelines of the General Plan because parking in the frontyard setback would not preserve the neighborhood
atmosphere and identity of the existing residential area. It
is Planning Department policy not to grant variances for new
development based on the premise that new development should
comply with all ordinance requirements, especially if there
is room to do so on site.
111. SUMMARY
The proposed project is not compatible with the Beach Area Overlay Zone and does not comply with standards of this zone as well as the Planned Development Ordinance. In addition, the mandatory four findings for a variance cannot be made. Therefore, staff recommends denial of SDP 87-9.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This project is exempt from Environmental Review, per Sectior 15303(b) of California Environmental Quality Act.
circumstances which apply solely to this property. All
Attachments
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2734
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2737
3. Location Map
4. Background Data Sheet
5. Disclosure Form
6. Exhibit I1Xl1, dated May 18, 1988
7. Environmental Document
8. Exhibits rrA1l - ltE1l, dated April 4, 1988
AML: dm
4/25/88
0 0
BACK- IXTA SHEEr
CASE NO: SDP 87-9
APPLICANT: REIsm-oKuN
REQuEsr AND LXATION:
condominium at 3376 Garfield Street.
ILEAL DESCRIPTION: Southwesterly half of Tract No. 217 of ?IIzIM Lands, C
of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, according to Map thereof No. 1681
A site devel- t plan to construct a two unit
AEW: 204-131-08
Acres .139 I>roposed No. of Lots/units 2 Units
GENERAL PLAN AND zom
Land Use Designation RH
Density Allawed 15-23 (Control pt 19.0) Density Proposed 14.4
Esristhg Zone R-3, Beach Arm Overlay Pmpxed Zone N)A
Surrolxlding zoning and Land use:
Zoninq Land use
Site R-3 Sble Family Dwelling
North R-3 3 Units
South R-3 Sble Family Dwellhq
East R-3 Sble Family Dwellbq
west R-3 Sble Family Dwellinq
€UBLIC FACIm
School District Carlsbad Water Carlsbad/coSta Real Sewer carlsbac
EIXJ's 2 public Facilities Fee Agremmt, Date December 2, 1987
E"MENTAL IMPACT ASS-
Negative Declaration, issued
E.I.R. Certified, dated
Other, Catqorical Exempt pr section 15303(b), dated April 25, 1988
. a J
APPLICANT: Awn (3 &urd 44 c7 l-+t f\ I Rtlh‘r\: -bcy+7
--pq -773 -3&$ cl
..
DISCLOSURE FORM
Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, !
Business Address
Telephone Number
Name
Business Address
c “-4’; i7, (&:-e -\r L‘&\--pJC fy -I- ,A - b - q+GL ,Q /+-
AGENT: dkw? d uT;v/ 7;y t-dcfd f-F-kJ / /J(
5% d--G </-A 7€ r,- c4 ECJ &/?J
,
cr/q -z+ A?$/
c-pt’,? fi Lkb,% Telephone Number
MEMBERS: :%-I L& fi, gF\L ty‘, -b&”L 2pYj- F?.:f+ rfh
L&7$$/.1fi J(dtln Name (individual, partner, joint Home Address venture , corporation , syndication)
~qi\Pi /)~<CC BF \rMdc,iT +J-G~< LPL~PJ~ /+IC(
qi* 7-10 ?I\? s’
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
Name Home Address
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
(Attach more sheets if necessary)
I/We understand that if this project is located in the Coastal Zone, I/we
for Coastal Commission Approval prior to development.
I/We acknowledge that in the process of reviewing this application, I
necessary for members of City Staff, Planning Commissioners, Design Ret
members, or City Council members to inspect and enter the property t
subject of this application.
I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this
is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and
l/We consent to entry for this purpose.
as being true and correct until amended. &&
5hJ,$q$&:
Jt,
A PLI ANT
BY t\~ ~ L 1y.j
Agent, Owner,
EXHIBIT
5 I18 I88 . .. m e
m SINGLE ST0
TWO STOW
S F SINGLE FAMi
I
I
..
WALNUT AVE - --- . VACANT 1
~
0 > a
r 0
SYCAMORE 4
Y AVE
CHESTNUT AVE
cAe ZS PALMAS DRIVE
ALlFORNlA 920094859 i (619) 43aii6i
m
PLANNiNG DEPARTMENT
b ‘1
I N&J! 8J mg!$
April 25, 1988
County Clerk I
County of San Diego 220 West Broadway San Diego, CA 92101
Proiect Title
Proiect Location--SDecific 3376 Garfield Street
Proiect Location--City Carlsbad Project Location--Countv San Diego
DeSCriDtiOn of Nature, PurDose, and Beneficiaries of Proiect Two unit condominium project .
Name of Public Aaencv ADDrovins Proiect
Name of Person or Aaencv Carrvina Out Proiect Planning Department
Exempt Status (Check One)
SDP 87-9/V 88-1 Reiser-Okun
City of Carlsbad
- Ministerial (Sec. 15073) - Declared Emergency (Sec. 15071 (a)) - Emergency Project (Sec. 15071 (b) and (c)) - X Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: 15303 (b)
Reason Why Proiect Is EXemDt: Condominium project less than 4 units
Contact Persoq Adrieinne Landers (619) 438-1161
If filed by applicant:
1) Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2) Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public
agency approving the project? Yes - No -
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director
AML:af
i
e m
MINUTES
\
May 18, 1988 PLANNING COMMISSION
subject to a solid fence on the west side as approved by the
Planning Director, and that the color be restudied prior to
presentation to the City Council.
RECESS
The Planning Conmission recessed at 8:24 p.m. and reconvened
at 8:33 p.m.
3) SDP 87-9fV 88-1 REISER-OKUN - Request for a Site
Development Plan to construct a two unit condominium at
3376 Garfield Street in the Beach Overlay Zone and Local
Facilities Management Zone 1.
variance to permit guest parking in the driveway.
Mike Howes. Senior Planner, reviewed the background of the
request and stated that the applicant is requesting approval
of a Site Development Plan to construct two airspace
condominiums on a .14 acre lot within the Beach Overlay Zone
Also a request for a
and a variance to permit guest parking in the driveway. The project will have a density of 14.4 du/ac in e residential
high-density area which designates 15-23 dulac. currently occupied by a one-story single family home.
of the lots in the area are presently occupied by single
family dwellings. area of 5,233 sq. ft.
The project complies with the minimum standards of the R-3
Zone, however staff does not feel that it complies with the Beach Area Overlay. Staff is especially concerned about the
large, boxy appearance of the building and feel that it
doesn't relate well to pedestrian traffic. The North Beach
Study states that new development should reflect a small
scale rather than large monolithic buildings. Where two
stories are proposed, the second story should be set back.
Mr. Howes directed Commissioners to the elevations presented
on the west wall.
The applicant has also requested approval of a variance to
allow guest parking in the driveway which would be in the
front yard setback.
not allow tandem parking except in existing R-2 lots (this is
The site is
Many
The proposed units would have a combined
The Planned Development Ordinance does
an R-3 lot), Staff feels there is no justification for the
variance as other projects have been approved on similar size
lots which provided parking outside the front yard setback and since this is a new project, it could be redesigned to
comply with the requirements. Staff has met and corresponded
with the developer and the applicant a number of times in an
attempt to resolve these issues but, as of this time, no
progress has been made.
limits, this item must be approved or denied by May 30, 1988.
Staff is especially concerned about this project because they
feel it is incompatible with the area and similar
applications recently submitted Staff reconmends denial of this SDP.
Chairman McFadden declared the public hearing open and issued the invitation to speak.
Rodney Miles, 18300 Von Karmen Avenue, Imine, attorney for the applicant, addressed the Conmission and stated that a
similar parking variance was granted to Joyce James in
October 1987 and there is no substantive difference between the two variance requests. He submitted photographs of the
area and stated that the area is not entirely single family dwellings as staff suggests, He feels that the property is
To comply with State-mandated time
Page l3 Hay 18. 1988 PLANNING COMMISSION
too expensive to develop with single family homes.
that the Joyce James residence is 36 ft. high in some areas.
As to the suggestion regarding the second story being
recessed, he replied that the second story of the proposed
project is set back with a deck in front, although it does
not show up well on the elevations. He feels the findings
can be made and requested approval of the SDP.
Commissioner Holmes inquired if the structure to the north is a multi-family unit. Mr. Miles replied that there is a house
in the front and a duplex in the rear.
Ken Wyant, 214 So. Cedros, Solana Beach, architect for the
applicant, addressed the Commission and stated that when work first began on the project, site reviews were not being done.
He has requested information from staff on several occasions
which was never received. He did not understand the tandem parking prohibition and stated that the only way to provide
visitor parking is within the front setback.
Chairman McFadden inquired when the application was submitted and Mr. Wyant could not remember.
There being no other person to address the Commission on this
topic, Chairman McPadden declared the public hearing closed
and opened the item for discussion among the Commission
members.
Commissioner Holmes inquired about the Joyce James file.
Mike Howes replied that Joyce James house is an existing
older home which added a room addition. The variance was
based on the fact that it was an older home with only a one car garage. The project before the Commission tonight is a
new project where a single family home is being removed and
replaced with a duplex;
situations.
Chairman McFadden agrees with the staff recommendation.
feels the driveway is too much cement and is too bulky.
Unfortunately, sometimes people who have projects in the
pipeline get caught when guidelines change.
staff recomaandation.
Commissioner Marcus concurs with Chairman McPadden. The
Beach Overlay sets, the trend. She agrees with the staff
recommendation for denial of the SDP.
Commissioner Schlehuber concurs and does not feel this
application meets the requirements of the Beach Overlay Zone.
Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt
Resolution No. 2734 denying SDP 87-9 based on the findings
contained therein.
He stated
they are totally different
She
She supports the
Motion was duly.-made,. seconded, and carried to adopt
Resolution No, 2737 denying V 88-1 based on the findings contained therein.,
COMMISSIONERS
Hall Holmes
Marcus
McPadden
Schlehubet Schramm
Hall
Holmes Marcus
McFadden
Schlehubei Schramm
L
SIT
4
City 01 Ctri!il
-
REISER-OKUN SDP 87-9 ' CJ 5197: June 17, loas
...............................
...............................
..............................
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoi correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San D
California on _---The 17th
day of ---JllJl-e
..
(qljT& ~ ___.._- ~ Clerk
b 0 0 ..
('
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989
Office of the Clty Clerk
,." > '. Gitp of EarIhab "G' I
TO : Bobbie Hoder, Planning Dept.
FROM: Karen Kundtz, Clerk's Office
DATE; May 27, 1988
RE : APPEAL SDP 87-9/V 88-1 (REISER/OKUN)
The above item has been appealed to the City Council. Please detern
when the item will go to Council and complete the form below and ret
it to the City Clerk's Office. According to the Municipal Code,
appeals must be heard by the City Council within 30 days of the datc
that the appeal was filed. Please consider this when setting the
date for the hearing.
Thank you.
The appeal of the above matter should be scheduled for the City
Council Meeting of (7- 20, IyE8 /
/ Signature / &,
=+--#?- 0 -.
b
c-
1200 ELM AVENUE TELE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 (619) 4
Office of the City Clerk situ af (aftrlstra
APPEAL FORn
I (We) appeal the following decision of the .- -
to the City COI
Project Name and Number (or subject of appeal): -
-
Date of Decision:
Reason for Appeal:
I
..
q- ..I : ---u 55
Date
. ,, .I \ I,
/. I i i i i
Name (Please Print)
Add res s
Telephone Number
CITY OF CARLSBAD
1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
4384621
REC’D FROM DATE
DESC RI PTlO N
RECEIPT NO. TOTAL
-- -
-
-
? *
Ir
cs
"7 --z
-
-
- - -
-
-
I d
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEAR- ~
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the
of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chamb
1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m. on Wednes May 18, 1988, to consider approval of a Site Development Pla construct a two unit condominium and a Variance to permit g parking in the driveway on property generally located at Garfield Street in the Beach Overlay Zone and Local Facili
Management Zone 1, and more particularly described as:
The southwesterly half of Tract No. 217 of THUM Lands, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, according to Map thereof No. 1681.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordi
invited to attend the public hearing. If you have any questi
please call the Planning Department at 438-1161.
If you challenge the Site Development Plan and/or Varianct
court, you may be limited to raising only those issues yo1
someone else raised at the public hearing described in
notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Cit!
Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: SDP 87-9/V 88-1
APPLICANT : REISER-OKUN
PUBLISH: MAY 6, 1988
CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
Gay Rogers P.O. Box 181
Claremont, CA 917
e onn i'odd 0: 440 Garfield St.
+ J14bi C u vividii auiiiiciiicail
52 El Sereno Ct. ;m Francisco, CA 94127 Carlsbad, CA 92008 *
'hiliip & Theresa Reed Walter Sharp Richard E Beverly
3355 Lincoln Street 3375 Lincoln Street 9582 Dobson Street
Villa Park, CA 926 Zarlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008
Thelma Sowell Douglas & Bonnie Engberg David, Reiser, She1
;709 Clover Ct. 1345 Cynthia Lane 29571 Seahorse Cov
Zarlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Laguna Niguel, CA
3 E C, R & S Johnston Maurice & Yvette Tauzin Ralph C Loretta Mol 3288 Garfield St. 251 S. Bedford Drive 4145 La Portalada D Carlsbad, CA 92008 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Carlsbad, CA 9200
Leone DeMott Albert & Bonny Lam Patrick La Vallo
3259 Lincoln St. 1401 Via Andres 3267 Lincoln Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 Carlsbad, CA 9200
G&A Van Osdel, K & G Spencer Billy Burke H E S, .J 8 D Mellai
332 Walnut Avenue Carlse 9200%
1-
Daniel Espinoza M E S Patter Robert E Celeste Hz
2697 Tanoble Dr. c/o D. Countryman 320 Walnut Avenue Altadena, CA 91001 170 Juniper St., #1 Carlsbad, CA 9200 Leucadia, CA 92024
Lincoln Coastal Crlsbd Shrs Michael E Sharon Cafagna Stanley & Margaret
2550 Fifth Avenue, Suite 801 4275 Exec. Sq. Suite 1020 P.O. Box 1093
San Diego, CA 92103 La Jolla, CA 92037 Solana Beach, CA
Jay Swope Henry & Virginia Thompson Teresa Sanesi
340 Chestnut Avenue 330 Chestnut Avenue 350 Chestnut Avenu Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92001
David & Karen Thompson Scott Thompson Miles & Martha McCe P.O. Box 1487 3390 Lincoln Street 2545 Hanson Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Fullerton, CA 9263
Clyde Dillon Hazel Beckham C. Bacot
219 Chestnut Ave. 3416 Garfield St. c/o P. Swirsky Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008 P.O. Box 1185
Carlsbad. CA 9200t
Joseph c Carolyn ( 0 3154 Hillview Drive
_- A_.. uai uara wnire
825 .Maryhurst Dr
Claremont, CA 91711
3865 Skyline Road o Carlsbad, CA 92008 Chino, CA 91710 *
Jennine Capelouto Edward & Toni Lampe Paul E I<im Buzza
135 Chestnut Avenue 521 Iowa Street 710 E. Monroe Ave
Orange, CA 92667 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Fallbrook, CA 92028
Marshall Rice Janice Kaufman Karen Hartman
2418 Torrejon Place 165 Chestnut Avenue 176 Walnut Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 9200
t Joe E Charlotte Clvalleri
8263 Sewell St. 2043 Highland Oaks Drive 280 Chinquapin Ave
Fontana, CA 92335 Arcadia, CA 91006 Carlsbad, CA 9200
M & D Milazo & A. Caperna James E Lii Vine
Otis E Nellie Kilgort
155 Sycamore AvenL
Carlsbad, CA 9200
Willard & Mary Comer Nim, Ronald, Dottie Waldrop
1375 Muirlands Vista Way 644 Lado de Loma Drive
La Jolla, CA 92037 Vista, CA 92083
Sam Caito
2754 Auburn Ave.
Carlsbad, CA 9200t
Manuel Castorena Thomas Reedy
158 Chestnut Ave. 164 Chestnut Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008
Thomas & Barbara F
2527 E. Blueridge A
Orange, CA 92667
A E D Marcy E R. Straesser
2252 Fire Mountain Dr. 3363 Garfield Street
Oceanside, CA 92054 Carlsbad, CA 92008
Paul G Ida Trejo
Darrell E Deborah H
2223 Silver Peak Pla
Encinitas, CA 92021
A., K., T. Fiechter Elliott & Bertha Henkins
6574 N. Ruthlee Avenue 438 Tamarack Avenue
San Gabriel, CA 91775 Carlsbad, CA 92008
Clarence & Jean Fr, Grace Venis Charlotte Mclntyre
1543 Santanella Terr 26511 Calle San Luis 1545 Crest Drive Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Encinitas, CA 9202
C. Thatcher & R. Sonneman T. Mifsud & C & R Chow K & E Stowe E K.
P.O. Box 223 2415 Copper Cliff Ct. 601 Solna Glen Ct.
Carlsbad, CA 92008 El Toro, CA 92630 Solana Beach, CA
Arthur 4 Isabel Ammon Renee Gaitaud Eastwall Enterprises
1880 Del Amo, Suite 4070 Sunnyhill Drive 423 Daisy Lane
Torrance, CA 9050 Carlsbad, CA 92008 San Marcos, CA 92069
7 ni CIIUI iiiu . _. . -i . --. . .- -UI p. 0 9826 Paramount Blv
Downey, CA 90240
c/o Siaver
Del Mar, CA 92014
e 110 Stratford Ct. 545 Second-St., Suite 4
Encinitas, CA 92024
Sea Chase Inc. Robert E Edythe Merrill Torrey Pacific Corf 1050 Rosecrans Street Suite 8 3460 Garfield St.
San Diego, CA 92106 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Del Mar, CA 92011
110 Stratford Ct.
215 5, Highway 101, Suite 110 Helen Howland George E Maxine Shepard
129 Maple Avenue Solana Beach, CA 92075 3468 Garfield St.
Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 920(
Roger E Thea Garner Marvin E Royola Humphreys 325 Elm Avenue, SI
1727 Capistrano St. P.O. Box 1099 Carlsbad, CA 9201
Berkeley, CA 94707 Carlsbad, CA 92008
Marian Reedy Tlenn E Natilie Cheadle Frederick E Gina t
3405 Garfield St. P.O. Box 189 147 Maple Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 9201 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008
Cherie Bradley Bronia Hammond M. Grosse & C. Mo
5850 Sunny Creek 3451 Garfield Street 3423 Garfield St. Carlsbad, CA 9201 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008
Sybil Rice Stephen Speth Ralph E Frieda Cla
3449 Garfield St. 167 Cambridge St.
Carlsbad, CA 920 Orange, CA 92667 Carlsbad, CA 92008
168 Maple Ave.
Sandra Hangley Harry E Orpha Wagner Robert E Luella Fe
11839 Diamond Ct. 1013 Foxglove View 19805 NE 232nd Av
Battle Ground, WA Carlsbad, CA 92008 Fountain Valley, CA 92708
William E Sandra Nolan Lew K T Inc. Joseph E Kathleen
4677 La Canada Rd. 716 Azalea Drive 8323 Camino Sur
Cucamonga, CA 9 Fallbrook, CA 92028 Montebello, CA 90640
RED Langen, J. Fessenden Donald E Maxine MacDonald John E Peggie Seik
3418 Carlsbad Blvd. 70 Giralda Walk 3436 Carlsbad Blvc
Carlsbad, CA 920 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Long Beach, CA 90803
D & S, R E E Schlegel
Box 4506 155 Chestnut Ave. Kailua-Kona, HI 96740
Franklin E Mary Moravec
Carlsbad, CA 92008
R E H Jordan E J
3474 Carlsbad Blvc
Carlsbad, CA 920
0 0 nuiiaiu CI nay I JUrlg P. 0.. Box i 0429
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
J'& L Vine/D E R Buzza
c/o V Deve
280 Chinquapin Avenue, #A Carlsbad, CA 92008
D E R Buzza
c/o Vinedale Dev.
178 Walnut Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Richard & Sara Hill P.O. Box 385
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Ocean Pine Limited
690 Elm Avenue, Suite 204
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Edward & Mary Obeji
3650 E South Street, #212
Lakewood, CA 90712
Donald & Sarah Rogers
Encinitas, CA 92024
2214 Running Spring Place
Wave Crest TED Cordery
9353 El Cajon Blvd., Suite 200
Helm Mgmt.
, CA 92041
C. Goodman
c/o S. Rogers
2214 Running Springs Place
Encinitas, CA 92024
<I;-: T, .
i .-i
e -_ -pant 3319 Garfield Street ~arlsbad,, CA 92008
e ; J7,3
'-8- . q; 7 ..
'7
$9 ,- .% *I /'
&W._ 2
26. 33. 43.
-pant 151 Sycanrore Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 carisbad,, CA 29008 1 Carlsbad, CA 92008
Occupant Occupant
3305 Garfield Street 3393 Lincoln Street
--
h
.
) *I
, ., .., /- , ~
/ .?
-1 -
28. I 34. 44.
Clarence & Jean French t Occupant Q=wnt
154 Sycamre Avenue 165 Walnut Avenue 3388 Garfield Street
Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carl&&, CA 92008
/ I .. .
X6309
BRIAN SMITH mGINEzF >
, 2656 State Street /
,, ' Carlsbad, CA 92008
**
29. 35. Owner: David Okun
155 Walnut Avenue 18300 Von Kam X 7 OcCuFJnt 168 Sycamore Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008
-pant c/o Rodney c. Miles 1 Imine , CA 92715
I--
//
."
Jib
-A - --. __ -
I 3 ,-+ 9
30.
3341 Garfield Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 h;j
Occupant I
-
39. Occupant
, '1 3360 Garfield Street
1 Carlsbad, CA 92008 I
f -'* 31.
v Occupant 3325 Garfield Street -.
Carlsbd, CA 92008 I .I- -I
-pant 142 Chestnut Avent
CarlSbad, CA 9200€
0 C. . -
1
t *’ +’kbi 1 L -1 ~
& 1
r\ I -?, , i. . - 1.z- . -&? , -
10.
-pant 3410 Garfield Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 I
i I
-. .%
4. 20.
Occupant occupant
335 Pine Avenue ’a I 184 Chestnut Am Carlsbad, CA 92008 1 Carl~bad, CA 92001
<Fq t%
’-
..
J 5.
&cupant 333 Pine Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 2 +- ..
,, . 21.
Occupant 3385 Garfield Stri Carlsbad, CA 9200
J I
t_ ‘ < -.
’, 6. 1
Occupant
Carlsbad, CA 92008
’. c 325 Chestnut Avenue i
-_
?. -)-.
: %%.%
3 - ?.* t.
_,
7. 16. I 24.
307 Chestnut Avenue 145 Chestnut Avenue 165 Sycmre Aver
OccuDant Occupant occupant
Carlsbad, CA 92008 Carlsbad, CA 92008 carisbad, CA gzoa
9. occu ,- ’ , -/ ,/> Carlsbad, 295 &&ut CA Avenue 92000