HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-09-06; City Council; 9626; ZONE 20 - LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - CITY OF CARLSBAD LFMP 88-20i' 'I MTG. 9/6/88
DEPT. CDD
CITY A
CITY IC
PLAN - CITY OF CARLSBAD LFMP 88-20.
L y-
p g !5
.. z 2 ti 4 = 0 z 3 0 0
vr wmnL3m-u - nuLIr miLL ' ' L.. -' w
'AS# ?bpc TITLE: ZONE 20 - LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPT.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the C:
Council approve the Negative Declaration issued by the Plann.
Director and adopt Resolutions Nos. f83332 and @yd3 approv. the Negative Declaration and approving the Local Facilit. Management Plan for Zone 20.
ITEM EXPLANATION
Zone 20 is the fourth property owner initiated and privatc prepared Local Facilities Management Plan to be heard by the C
Council. This plan was heard by the Planning Commission August 3, 1988.
Planning Commission, with Chairperson McFadden abstaining, t
Management Plan for Zone 20.
Exhibit No. 3 shows the location of Zone 20. This zone located in the Southwest Quadrant of the City generally south Palomar Airport Road, east of Interstate 5 and west of El Cam
Real.
This local plan analyzes the 11 public facilities to determ whether they conform with the City's adopted performa: standards. With the exception of one public facility, parks, < remaining public facility performance standards are curren being met and will continue to be met as the zone builds o The parks performance standard is currently not being met. Th
is at present a 4.24 acre shortfall in the area of par Because parks are analyzed on a quadrant basis, this Facilit Management Plan makes certain assumptions dealing with how p acreage will be dedicated and built within the Southwest Quadr
Management Zone 20 have been conditioned to assist the City paying for the acquisition of land and the improvements of p acreage within the Southwest Quadrant. With this mitigation
the previous mitigation approved in the Local Facilit Management Plan for Zone 19 along with Parks funding in Capital Improvement Budget, it is anticipated that the P performance standard will be met.
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20 conta specific conditions which must be complied with prior to issuance of any development permits within this zone. Th include providing the City a detailed financing plan guarantee construction of all circulation improvements as identified in
unanimously recommending the approval of the Local Facilit
of the City. The property owners within Local Facilit
* 5&26 m L
'b
t Page 2 of Agenda Bill No.
&\
< plan. Until this financing mechanism has been approved by
City, no further development permits will be allowed in Zone Although, at the same time staff will begin process applications within this Local Facilities Management Zone c
the plan has been adopted by the City Council.
Attached as Exhibit No. 3 is the Executive Summary from the LC
Facilities Management Plan which provides a summary of the ent Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A Negative Declaration was issued by the Planning Director on
27, 1988 indicating that the Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20 is not anticipated to have any adverse impacts on environment. The Negative Declaration was recommended approval by the Planning Commission on August 3, 1988.
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20 will not ci any significant environmental impacts. The plan is a pul
facilities planning document that implements Carlsbad's Genc Plan. The plan makes generalized projections as to the del for and supply of public facilities, and outlines the provii of adequate public facilities concurrent with the estimi demands. The plan recognizes that CEQA review will be requ prior to the initialization of any public or private project . is generally discussed in this plan.
FISCAL IMPACI'
Staff time has been utilized in the preparation of this plan
which these costs will be recovered through the processing established by the City Council. It is anticipated that fur
staff time will be necessary to monitor this plan and other
plans on a yearly basis. The implementation of this p
however, should help future fiscal planning by estimating
timing of future public facilities and their costs.
EXHIBITS
1)
2) 3) Local Map - Facilities Management Zone 20.
4) Executive Summary - Zone 20.
5) Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2762 and 2763 .
6) Excerpt of Planning Commission minutes dated August 3, 1
City Council Resolution No 8fHygz
City Council Resolution No gf-3U:
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing
considering all testimony and arguments, examining the ir
study, analyzing the information submitted by s
considering any written comments received, the City Co
considered all factors relating to the Negative Declar
including Planning Commission Resolution No. 2762 gra
Planning Commission approval of said Negative Declaration;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council 0.
City of Carlsbad, California as follows:
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 1 'I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
the California Environmental Quality Act and Title 1 the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
That there is no substantial evidence that the projec
conditioned may have a significant effect on
environment.
That the City council of the City of Carl incorporates into this resolution Planning Commis Resolution No. 2762 including findings contained ther
3)
4)
...
...
...
a
9
-21d CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayo
lo
11
12
13
14
15
16
ATTEST: j
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11 1
1
-2- CC RES0 NO. 88-322
8
9
lo
I'
l2
13
l4
l5
l6
17
I.8
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on August
hold a duly noticed public hearing as required by law to c
said plan and at the conclusion of the hearing adopted Res
No. 2763 making findings and recommending that the City
adopt a plan: and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was issued
Planning Director on May 27, 1988 indicating that thc
Facilities Management Plan is not anticipated to ha
significant adverse impact on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council at their meeting of Sei
6, 1988 held a duly noticed public hearing and consider
7i
l9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code: and
1 testimony and arguments of anyone desiring to be heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
City of Carlsbad, California as follows:
A) That the above citations are true and correc'
B) That the findings and conditions of the PI
Commission in Resolution No. 2763 also constitute the findii
conditions of the City Council.
////
////
I
--
%
f -_ '1
.(
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
l5
16
* *
C) That the Local Facilities Management Plan fc
20 dated August 1988 on file with the City Clerk and incorr
herein by reference is hereby appro
within the boundaries of Zone 20
and conditions of said plan.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND AD
Carlsbad City Council held on the 6th day of
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewi
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
(SEAL)
-2- CC RES0 NO. 88-323
tXHlt3ll 3 . 3 e -<
3
,
-9 b -_ *
mu[ nms m
6urdc LCDGai F@GBOBm@ M@R@llmom~ POm Yom
0 EXHIBIT 4
I e -.
, - L
<
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Local Facilities Management Plan ILFMP) for Zone 20 was
prepared pursuant to the City's Growth Management Program, and
Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The plan
incorporates and implements the 1986 Citywide Facilities and
improvements Plan.
The plan begins with the assumptions used to generate the buildout
projections for residential and nonresidential development within Zonc
20. Buildout is the type and amount of land use planned for by the
City's General Plan. The plan then phases or estimates the zone's
development on a yearly basis until buildout is reached. Phasing is
done to predict future facility demands. The adequacy of public facilities is analyzed according to this demand. The analysis
includes an inventory of existing and proposed facilities, a phasing
schedule that establishes the timing for the provision of facilities in
relationship to demand, and a financing plan that establishes methoo
of funding needed facilities. Since the plan is a regulatory
document, each facility section contains conditions to ensure that
facilities will conform to the adopted performance standards.
Mandatory compliance with the plan and conditions will assure the
adequacy of facilities within Zone 20.
FINANCE OVERVIEW
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20 identifies the
following facilities which currently do not conform with the adopted
performance standards without spec ia I mi ti gat ion measures :
Parks - A shortfall of 4.24 acres exists in the southwest quadrant,
Park District 3.
As part of this Local Facilities Management Plan, an attempt has bee
made to bring these facilities into conformance with the adopted performance standards. During this process it has become clear thi
no one financing mechanism can satisfy the complex infrastructure
a combination of financing techniques can address both the need fo
upgrading facilities enabling them to conform with the adopted
performance standards and ensuring conformance of future facilities
as development occurs. A common set of goals for the financing of
the major facilities can be stated as follows:
reqUirementS of this zone and of the southwest quadrant, However
'The 1986 CFlP was adopted by City Council on 9/23/86 (CC Resolution
No. 8797).
1
t 0 e
3
% i
<
1. Provide feasible financing techniques to ensure that all facilities
are provided in conformance with the adopted performance
standards.
Provide for the implementation of financing techniques which
consider the financial limitations associated with the high costs
of infrastructure construction.
Provide for financing options which consider both the needs of
the city and the property owners.
2.
3.
The adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan identified the
various ways that capital improvements could be financed.
facilities necessary to support the City of Carlsbad generally fall into two
categories -- those provided by developers as a condition of development
approvals, and those provided by the City through a system of fees,
taxes, or other financing sources.
It is the City's responsibility to plan for the construction and maintenance
of City projects and to finance these projects in the best possible way.
The following describes some of the financing options available.
The capital
A. Cash/Pay-as-you-go financing. The City has used this method
of financing to pay for most capital improvements constructed to
date.
In concept, the City charges the development community a
series of fees which provide the source of income to pay for
capital projects. When enough cash has been assembled, the
City constructs the next capital project in order of priority.
This method forces the City to delay construction of various
projects until funds have been collected.
1. Public Facilities Fees
2. Park-In-Lieu Fees 3. Planned Local Drainage Fees
4. Traffic Impact Fees
5.
6. Sewer Fees
7. Water Fees
Special Districts collect their own various fees.
B. Reimbursement Agreements. In certain instances, a developer
may ask the City to move a project forward in time and to construct a facility before funds have been collected.
this occurs, the City could adopt the policy of having the
interested developer construct the project based on a
reimbursement agreement. The City would pay the developer
back for the portion of the project that was to be funded by
City resources over a period of time.
commence at the time the City had originally scheduled the
These fees include:
Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District Fees
When
Payments would
construction of the facility in the Capital Improvement Program.
2
a 0 -_
'*
i -. b
4
Moving the project forward in time is for the benefit of the
developer.. Therefore, the City's repayment would be limited tl
the cost of the public portion of the project and no interest
would accrue to the developer.
project financing does not eliminate the developer's obligation t
pay City fees.
associated with a development.
construct certain public facilities earlier than would be possiblc
under a pay-as-you-go program, the City can consider giving
developer credit for fees that would otherwise be paid, up to
reduce the amount of fees payable in future years from a
certain development.
Fee credits must be used carefully to avoid elimination of incon
from capital fees necessary to finance other projects.
alternatives exist for fee credits:
-- Full fee credit immediately: Under this option, the
The use of this method of
The developer must still pay all City fees
C. Credit for City Fees. When it is in the public interest to
the cost of the public improvement. These credits would
Two
developer who builds a public improvement would be
eligible to deduct 100% of the cost of the improvement frot
fees payable. Once the fee credit is exhausted, the
developer begins paying fees as normally assessed by the
City.
credit for the total cost of a project.
Under this option the developer gets immediate
-- Partial Fee Credit - credit over time: In this option, the
developer who builds a public improvement receives a
credit for the cost of a public improvement. Uowever, tb use of that credit is spread over a series of years. This
allows the City to continue to receive at least a portion o fees designated for other capital projects while giving the
developer credit for the construction of public improve-
ments that would have otherwise been paid for by the
City. No interest would accrue to the developer as a pat of this arrangement.
D. Debt Financing. A range of debt financing alternatives are available to the City. If it is in the public interest to push a
project ahead and to construct an improvement before funds ar
on hand, debt financing may be the answer. If the project is
being pushed forward for the convenience or benefit of a
developer, that developer should bear the cost of issuance anc
interest over the life of the debt issue. The actual mechanics
of a debt issue and how to determine the developer's
responsibility to support these costs would be defined as the
method of debt financing was chosen,
Some of the debt financing vehicles available are shown below:
3
0 -..
v
< - > ,
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS:
Under Council Policy No. 33, the City may assist a developer i
the construction of various public improvements that may be
financed through the use of assessment districts if there is
significant public benefit from the improvement. In cases whei
a City contribution is planned, the City may ask a developer t
bursed at a later date (i.e., in the year that the capital projet
has been originally scheduled for construction) or through a
system of credits as described earlier.
SPECIAL BENEFIT DISTRICTS:
State law allows the formation of a variety of special benefit
districts. These districts may be used to fund the constructic
of parks, libraries, police or fire facilities, and street lightinc
systems to name a few.
vote of the property owners who then assess themselves for tt
cost of improvements.
The developer and/or land owner bears the burden of debt
service payments. City participation in a district of this typf
is possible to the extent of public improvements that would hz
otherwise been the responsibility of the City.
movement of capital improvements forward-in-time would requil
some concession from the developer in offsetting interest, deb
issue, or other additional costs.
COMMU N ITY FACl LITY DISTRICT: (Mello-Roos)
Under Council Policy No. 38, the City may assist through
Mello-Roos financing the construction of public facilities in
conjunction with development. Mello-Roos Community Facility
Districts (CFD's) operate similar to assessment districts , but
provide a more flexible tool for governmental entities to finan
a wider range of public infrastructure, again through the
issuance of tax exempt bonds. Facilities which may be financ
by a Mello-Roos District include parks, parkways, open spacc
schools, libraries, gas pipelines, telephone lines and can be
used to eliminate special assessment liens. These districts m;
also pay operating costs to the extent the services are in
of the district.
REVENUE BONDS:
The City may elect to issue revenue bonds to finance improv
ments related to utility functions or other City services that
generate a fee for service, although other City functions cot
support the use of revenue bonds. If public improvements i
being installed ahead of schedule to accommodate a developer
the City would expect the developer to offset many of the c(
of such an issue as described above.
pay the City contribution, The developer could then be reirn-
These districts may be formed by a
However, the
addition to those already being provided prior to the formatic
4
* 0 c --
1 --
t
TAX INCREMENT BONDS:
Public improvements in the City's redevelopment area can be
financed through the use of tax increment bonds. The Rede-
velopment Agency has developed a plan for the construction of
public improvements using this method of financing. A devel-
oper asking for public improvements to be constructed ahead of
schedule must consider the agency's ability and willingness to
defer other projects.
CE RT I F I CATES 0 F PART I C I PAT IO N :
Certain public facilities such as buildings can be financed
through Certificates of Participation. This is in effect a lease
agreement between the City and another agency. A developer
wishing to push projects forward might consider constructing
facilities such as a library or fire station using this financing
tool. The developer may be asked to bear certain costs or to
accept credit in lieu of payment for certain improvements.
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS:
The City has the ability to issue General Obligation Bonds to
fund the construction of public improvements. This can only
be done with the approval of 2/3 of the voters in an election.
It is unlikely that the City will have the ability to use this
method of funding public projects which benefit specific
developments.
FI NAN C I NG POL1 C I ES
The adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan contains
the following financing policies:
1. Recognize that those projects identified in the Public
Facilities Fee Calculation are the ultimate responsibility of
the City to fund, however, the priority for funding
projects is at the discretion of the City Council,
2. Recognize that the Capital Improvements Program will pla
a significant role in helping to establish compliance with
the adopted performance standards.
funding of projects should go to in fill areas or areas of
the City where existing deficiencies exist.
Agree to consider assisting developers with credits again
future fees, reimbursement agreements, forming assessme
districts, etc. only when it is clearly in the public inter(
to do so or to rectify public facility deficiencies and not
induce growth by prematurely upgrading public facilities
Priority for the
3.
5
t 0 0
<
4. Recognize that all credit or reimbursement arrangements
certain public facilities.
wanted to put in an improvement that the City had not
planned for 5 years and was not necessary to rectify an
existing deficiency, the City would not consider beginning
to provide credits or reimbursement until the 5th year, if
at all.
Recognize that public facility improvements made up front
or ahead of City plans by developers must provide the
funds necessary to cover annual operating costs for the
facility until the time the City had previously planned to
provide the facility.
will be made based upsn the City's plans for timing of
For example, if a developer
5.
6. With the recent reduction in residential densities and
overall restriction on residential development , recognize
that it may be necessary to start charging fees to
commercial and industrial land uses in cases where they
are not presently assessed. With the reduction in
residential land uses and density, it may be necessary to
charge commercial and industrial to make up the deficit.
FINANCING SUMMARY
This Local Facilities Management Plan has identified the following facility
to currently be below the adopted performance standards:
Parks: A shortfall of 4.24 areas exists in the southwest quadrant.
The developers in Zone 20 are proposing to provide mitigation to bring it into conformance with the adopted performance standards. The specific
mitigation for each facility is shown in the corresponding facility sections
of this plan.
This plan also identifies when future public facilities are needed as
growth ocGurs to ensure compliance with the adopted performance
standards.
plan which provides a description of the facility improvements to be made
timing of improvements, cost estimates, and funding priorities.
Exhibit 5 on page 15 indicates where Zone 20 is within the City.
2 on page 8 provides a one page highlight of the summary.
A complete financing section is provided at the end of this
Exhibit
6
5 , *
< -
5
EXHIBIT 1
Zone 20 Public Facilities
Summary Chart
As of 8/3/88
City Administrative
Fac i I it ies Existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard until 2006.
Library Existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard until 2003.
Wastewater Existing facilities meet the adopted
Treatment Facilities performance standard with the proposed
mi tigat ion measures.
Parks Park District 3 (southwest quadrant) does
not meet the adopted performance standard
without mitigation measures.
Drainage facilities wil I meet the adopted
performance standard with the proposed
mi tigation measures.
Drainage
Circulation Circulation facilities will meet the adopted
performance standard with the proposed
mitigation measures.
Fire facilities meet the adopted performance
standard.
Existing open space meets the adopted
performance standard. An ongoing work
program will assure the open space
performance standard is maintained through
build out.
Schools The adopted performance standard is being
Fire
Open Space
met.
Sewer Cot lection Sewer facilities in Zone 20 meet the adopted
performance standard through build out of
the zone,
Water Distribution Water service to Zone 20 meets the adopted
performance standard through build out of the zone.
7
e 0 -c
L
1 -_ ,
EXHIBIT 2
Zone 20 Public Facilities Summary Sheet
LFMP 88-20
As of 8/3/88
Conformance with Adopted
Facility Performance Standard
Citywide
1, City Administrative Facilities Yes, until 2006.
2. Library Yes, until 2003.
3. Wastewater Treatment Capacity Yes, with Phase IV expansion.
Park District #3:
4. Parks Not currently (see proposed
mitigation on page 71).
Zone 20:
5. .Drainage Yes
6. Circulation Yes
7. Fire Yes, through buildout.
8. Open Space Yes, with ongoing work program.
9. Schools Yes
10. Sewer Collection System Yes
11. Water Distribution System Yes
(3) Adoption date to be inserted.
8
, e e -,..
1 _- ,
Exhibit 3
General Conditions for Zone 20
LFMP 20
1. All development within Zone 20 shall conform to the provisions of
Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and to the provisions
and conditions of this Local Facilities Management Plan.
All development within Zone 20 shall be required to pay a public facilities fee pursuant to the standards adopted by the City Council
on July 28, 1987, and as amended from time to time and all other
applicable fees.
any additional fees to be incorporated into this plan that are found
to be necessary to enable facilities to meet the adopted performance
standard .
The City of Carlsbad shall monitor all facilities in Zone 20 pursuant
to Subsections 21.90.130(~), (d) and (e] of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code.
2.
Development in Zone 20 shall also be responsible for
3.
4. All development in Zone 20 shall be in conformance with the adopted
Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan as adopted by City Counc’
Resolution 8797 on September 23, 1986.
5. Periodic amendment to the Zone 20 Local Facilities Management F’an i
anticipated to incorporate newly acquired data, to amend conditions
and upgrade standards as determined through the required monitor-
ing program, Amendment to this Plan may be initiated by action of
the Planning Commission, City Council or property owners at any
time.
If a public facility or service is found not to be in conformance wit
an adopted performance standard during the yearly monitoring, or
any other time, the matter will be immediately brought before the City COUnCil, If the City Council determines that a non-conformanc
does exist, then no future building or development permits shall bt
issued unless an amendment to the CFlP or the LFMP for this zone
approved by the City Council which addresses those facility short-
falls and brings those facilities into conformance with the adopted
performance standards,
After adoption of this Plan by the City Council, no building permi’
will be allowed unless the performance standards are complied with
This includes all projects which were exempt under Section
21.90.030(c) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
6.
7.
9
, a 0 --
< -_
8. Approval of this LFMP does not constitute prior environmental revie!
for projects within Zone 20. All future projects within Zone 20 shal
undergo environmental review per Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code. Any mitigation measures determined during a project's envirc
of overriding consideration are made by the City Council.
Approval of this plan does not constitute prior discretionary review
for projects within Zone 20.
review per Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
establishes the maximum allowable number of residential units for
facilities planning purposes only.
specific residential density.
mental review shall be complied with in their entirety unless finding
9.
All future projects shall undergo
The plan
The plan does not guarantee any
10
, 0 e _-
1
Exhibit 4
SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 20
CITY ADMl N I STRATIVE FACl LIT I ES
No special conditions are necessary at this time,
LIBRARY
NO special conditions are necessary at this time.
WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY
The following actions shall be pursued jointly by each sewer district to
ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity through a five year
period:
1. Monitor Encina Treatment Plant flows on a monthly basis to determin
actual flow rates and to have an early warning of capacity problems
Actively pursue acceleration and phasing of treatment plant Phase I'
expansion to provide adequate capacity. 2.
3. When Carlsbad's share of Encina flows reach 5.25 MGD, actively see
4. When Carlsbad Encina flows reach 5.45 MGD, proceed to activation (
the CaIavera Hills ReclamationlTreatment Facility.
activated when more cost effective treatment measures are no longer
feasible and Carlsbad capacity at Encina has been reached.
Permit to 27.45 MGD to allow full utilization of reclamation plant an(
ocean outfall.
The.six member agencies shall form an agreement to maximize the
utilization of available treatment capacity at Encina WPCF.
leased capacity from other Encina agencies.
Plant to be
5. Increase National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES)
6.
PARKS
1. Ail development shall pay Park-In-Lieu fees and Public Facility Fee:
for Park District 3.
Prior to the adoption of the first final map within Zone 20, a Parks 2. Agreement shall be required to include the following provisions,
a. The secured dedication of 5.0 acres of parkland at a location
be determined acceptable by the City.
11
0 c - ,.
, -_
b. Provide a letter of credit or some other secured financing
acceptable to the City in the amount of $575,000 guaranteeing
the construction of 5.0 acres of parkland, from a financial institution and upon terms and conditions acceptable to the Finance Director and City Attorney at the time this agreement is executed.
c. Provide for the operating expenses of the parks either througl-
a letter of credit or some other secured financing from a
financial institution and upon terms and conditions acceptable t
the Finance Director and City Attorney or the establishment of
a Park District 3 Growth Management Fee that would cover the
operating costs for the park. The amount of the costs and thi
time for which the developers in Park District 3 would be
responsible for these costs shall be provided for within the
Parks Agreement.
The Parks Agreement must be consistent with the requirements
of the City's Growth Management Program.
If any reimbursements and/or park-in-lieu fee credits are to b
given, the Parks Agreement shall provide a mechanism to do SI
d.
e.
NO residential development will be allowed after 1992 Unless actions have been taken to construct additional park facilities.
3.
DRAl NAGE
1. All development within the boundaries of Zone 20 will be required t
pay or enter into an agreement to pay the required drainage area
fee prior to issuance of a development permit.
All development within drainage basins B-1 and B-2 must conform
the guidelines and recommendations as identified in the forthcominc
Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Plan.
Prior to the approval of a final map within the respective drainage
sub-basin, a financial security guaranteeing the construction of th
necessary drainage facilities identified by drainage sub-basin must
be approved.
a. Basin E-4 - Development within sub-basin E-4 will be require to construct facility CE necessary to drain the proposed
development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Basin E-6 - Development within sub-basin E-6 will be require
to construct facility CF necessary to drain the proposed
development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Basin E-7 - Development within sub-basin E-7 will be requirc
to construct facility CJ necessary to drain the proposed
development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
2.
3.
The required drainage facilities are as follows:
b.
c.
12
0 0
,
d. Basin B-1 - No facilities required.
e. Basin 8-2 - Development within sub-basin B-2 will be required
to construct facility DC necessary to drain the proposed
development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
FIRE
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
CIRCULATION
1. Prior to the issuance of any development permit within Zone 20,
detailed intersection graphics depicting existing and buildout
conditions shall be submitted and approved to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer.
intersections identified as being impacted by 20% or more of traffic
generated from this zone.
The required intersection graphics are for those
2. Prior to the approval of any development permit within Zone 20, a
comprehensive financing program guaranteeing the construction of
the improvements identified under the mitigation provisions of the
Circulation section, page 101, must be adopted.
OPEN SPACE
1. All future development within this zone shall be required to show
how it contributes to meeting the open space performance standard
and that the development does not preclude the provision of
performance standard open space at buildout of Zone 20.
Prior to the issuance of any development permits within Zone 20,
authorization must be obtained from San Diego Gas and Electric
which would permit installation of open space improvements within
the major transmission line easement traversing Zone 20.
2.
3, Open space compliance will be monitored annually and as individual
projects are reviewed within this zone.
Prior to the approval of any development within this zone, the
Planning Director shall be required to find that the development doc
not preclude the provision of performance standard open space at
buildout of Zone 20.
4.
SCHOOLS
All development within Zone 20 shall pay school fees in effect at the time
building permits are issued.
13
, i 0 e .-
I ..
SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEMS
1. Sewer Sub Basin 20A and 20B
San Marcos Interceptor System - Prior to the approval of any final
map within sub-basins 20A and 20B, a financial security must be approved guaranteeing the construction of trunk line BSMT2 neces-
sary to serve the proposed development. The proposed development
must construct BSMT2 in a manner which would allow for the exten-
sion to serve adjacent upstream properties.
2. Sewer Sub Basin 20C
North Batiquitos Interceptor System - Prior to the first final map
improvements must be approved :
a. The installation of trunk line NBT3A must be extended from thc
within sub-basin 20L, a financial security guaranteeing the following
North Batiquitos Pump Station to the boundaries of Zone 20.
b. The North Batiquitos Pump Station must be upgraded in order
to provide adequate capacity for the buildout of the sewer basi
tributary to the North Batiquitos Pump Station.
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
All development within Zone 20 shall pay the required Costa Real
Municipal Water District fees.
14
1% .\ _- '1
2
3
4
5
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2762
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION FOR A LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, NORTH AND WEST OF THE PACIFIC RIM
MASTER PLAN AREA AND EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE.
7
8
9
10
I.1
I.2
l3
l4
15
16
I?
l8
APPLICANT: DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM
CASE NO.: LOCAL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN - ZONE 20
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 3rd d;
August, 1988, hold a duly noticed public hearing as presc
by law to consider said request, and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consic
all testimony and arguments, examining the initial s
analyzing the information submitted by staff, and consid
any written comments received, the Planning Commi
considered all factors relating to the Negative Declaration
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plai
Commission as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hea the Planning Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of
6 11
l9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1 1 Negative Declaration according to Exhibit lwNDtt and Ill dated May 27, 1988, attached hereto and made a part hei based on the following findings and conditions:
Findinas:
1. The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20 wil: cause any significant environmental impacts. The plt a public facilities planning document that implements
existing General Plan. The plan makes general projections as to the demand for and supply of pr facllltles, and outlines the provision of adequate pt facilities concurrent with estimated demands. The
recognizes that CEQA review will be required prio mitigation of any public or private project tha-
generally discussed in the plan. A Negative Declara has been issued on May 27, 1988 and recommended
approval by the Planning Commission on August 3, 1988
1
*,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
I.5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
a
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a reqular meetinq
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California,
the 3rd day of August, 1988, by the following vote, to w.
AYES: Commissioners: Marcus, Hall, Holmes, Erwin, Schraml
Sch leh u ber .
NOES : None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: Chairperson McFadden.
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMI5 ATTEST:
*
M*Z* PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO. 2762 -2-
EXHIBI' . 1. 0 0
a,
TEL
(619
2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859
caifb of @arlnbn8
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: College Avenue and Poinsettia Avc
intersection and surrounding 760 acres.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Local Facilities Management Plan Zonc which guarantees the adequacy of public facilities concur
with development to adopted performance standards.
The city of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of
above described project pursuant to the Guidelines
Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsl As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaral that the project will not have a significant impact on environment) is hereby issued for the subject projc Justification for this action is on file in the Planr
Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents
on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Dr: Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planr
Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance.
DATED: May 27 , 1988 4LLdfWQ4[ \E& LL LLL MICHAEL J. HOL~MILLER
CASE NO: LFMP 20 Planning Director
APPLICANT: Development Consultants Consortium
PUBLISH DATE: May 27, 1988
BH:af
W EXHIBIT "PI . a --
I\
#* ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMFNI! FORM - PART I1
(TO BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
-.
CASE NO. LFMP 20
DATE : 51 19 188
I. BACKGROUND
1. APPLICANT: DeveloDment Consultants Consortium
2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: P.O. Box 2143
Carlsbad. CA 92008
(619) 434-3135
3. DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: November 24, 1987
11. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written under Section I11 - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation)
YES MAY BE
1. Earth - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a. Unstable earth conditions
or in changes in geologic
substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements,
compaction or overcovering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground
surface relief features?
d. The destruction, covering of modification of any unique
geologic or physical features?
erosion of soils, either on or off the site?
e. Any increase in wind or water
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet olr lake?
IC e 0
- YES MAY BE
2. Air - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?
odors?
b. The creation of objectionable
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally
or regionally?
3. Water - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface
e. Discharge into surface waters,
water in any water body?
or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters?
g. Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies?
-2-
-_ 't 0
, _-
YES MAY BE
4. Plant Life - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species?
agricultural crop?
significant results in:
d. Reduction in acreage of any
5. Animal Life - Will the proposal have
a. Changes in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of anima 1 s?
d. Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly increase existing noise levels?
nificantly produce new light or glare? 7. Lisht and Glare - Will the proposal sig-
8. Land Use - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area?
-3-
* e 0
- YES MAY BE
' 9. Natural Resources - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
Risk of Upset - Does the proposal
involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident
or upset conditions?
11. Population - Will th8 proposal signif-
icantly alter the location, distribu-
10.
tion, density, or growth rate of the
human population of an area? X
12. Housinq - Will the proposal signif-
icantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing?
13. Transportation/Circulation - Will the proposal have significant results in:
movement?
a. Generation of additional vehicular
b. Effects on existing parking facili-
c. Impact upon existing transportation
'ties, or demand for new parking?
systems?
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people
and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or
f. Increase in traffic hazards to
air traffic?
motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
-4-
I* 0 0
- YES MAYBE
'14. Public Services - Will the proposal have
a significant effect upon, or have signif-
icant results in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e, Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
f. Other governmental services?
15. Enemy - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
16. Utilities - Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new
utilities:
b. Demand upon existing sources of
systems, or alterations to the following
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
17. Human Health - Will the proposal have significant results in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health) ?
-5-
I. 0 0
-_ YES MAY BE 1
'18. Aesthetics - Will the proposal have significant results in the obstruction
of any scenic vista or view open to the
public, or will the proposal result in creation of an aesthetically offensive
public view?
19. Recreation - Will the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities?
proposal have significant results in
the alteration of a significant archeological or historical site,
structure, object or building?
20. Archeoloaical/Historical - Will the
21. Analyze viable alternatives to the mogosed groiect such as:
a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site design c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the s e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter- nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative.
a) The project is a public facility information and plannin
study. Phased planning will not efficiently or adequate1 address the need for public facilities.
b) The project is a public facility information and plannin study.
c) The project is a public facility information and plannin study.
d) Uses for the area covered by the plan are based on th existing General Plan
e) The plan considers phased development.
f) The project is a public facility information and plannin
study.
g) As the project is a public facility information and plannin
study the no project alternative would not assure adequat public facilities to meet demand. The no project alternativ
would therefore cause the most detriment.
-6-
I. 0 0
-_ YES MAY BE
'22. Mandatorv findings of siqnificance -
a. Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, or curtail the diversity in the environment?
b. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.)
c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small,
but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. )
d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
111. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20 is
facilities planning document. The intent of the plan is t establish parameters and thresholds that assure publj facilities are available when needed as determined by tk
City's adopted performance standards. To accomplish thj purpose occasionally locations and costs of public facilit improvements are estimated for informational purposes. Thes estimates may result in increased development fees.
Traditionally the developer in maximizing their capital retui passes such fees on to the home buyer or tenant. This result in higher priced housing which affects the availability of 1c
and moderate income housing. However, as real estate value j determined primarily by location, without other markt incentives, it is unreasonable to assume the subject propert would be developed with either low or moderate income housir
due to its view proximity to the Pacific Ocean.
-7-
-- a 0
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued)
It is not the development fee that will force low and modera income families into other communities, but the existing natu of the market place.
It is recognized that CEQA review for these public facilitit estimates is general, and does not satisfy CEQA requiremen.
for the specific project. The Zone 20 Local Facilitic Management Plan requires complete CEQA review prior .
initialization of any public or private project discussed
the Local Facilities Management Plan.
-8-
0 0
IV. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect c
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significan effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect this case because the mitigation measures described on an attache
sheet have been added to the project. Declaration will be proposed.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
X
A Conditional Negative
Mav 19, 1988 Date Signature ’
Date Planniny DireHor
V. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable)
-9-
I’
__ .1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lo
I’
l2
13
l4
l5
16
I?
(I) 0
PLAWNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2763
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR ZONE 20 ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE, NORTH AND WEST OF THE
PACIFIC RIM MASTER PLAN AREA AND SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD. APPLICANT: DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM
CASE NO.: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with
City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission, an
WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No.
adopting the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvements
establishing facility zones and performance standards for pu
facilities, and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No.
requiring the processing of a Local Facilities Management P
and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 8110
9829 implementing Proposition E approved on November 4, 198
the citizens of Carlsbad, and
19 l8
2o
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd da
August, 1988, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescr
by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all per
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all fac
relating to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 2C
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plar
Commission as follows:
._
1,
-. 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
x'
12
13
I*
15
16
17
18
I'
Q 0
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public heal the Commission recommends APPROVAL of Local Facil.
Management Plan - Zone 20, based on the following fin(
and subject to the following conditions:
Findinss :
1) That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 2 consistent with the Land Use Element, the Public Facil
Element, and the other Elements contained in Carlsl
General Plan.
2) That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 2 consistent with Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal (Growth Management), as amended by Ordinance No. 811C Ordinance No. 9829 and with the adopted 1986 Cit: Facilities and Improvement Plan.
3) That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 2C
the conditions contained therein will promote the pi safety and welfare by ensuring that public facilities
be provided in conformance with the adopted perfon
standards.
4) The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20
control the timing and locations of growth by tying the of development to the provision of public facilities
improvements.
5) The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20 prevent growth unless public facilities and services
available in conformance with the adopted perfon
standards.
Conditions
2o
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11) Approval is granted for Local Facilities Management Zone 20 as contained in the Plan titled Local Facil Management Plan Zone 20, dated August 3, 1988, att(
hereto, and incorporated herein by reference.
////
/I//
////
////
I////
'PC RES0 NO. 2763 -2-
-. 1I -
\1 -.
2
3
4
5
61
7
a
9
10
11
l2
13
I*
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e e
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meetir
the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, Califo
held on the 3rd day of August,
wit:
1988, by the following votc
AYES :
NOES : None.
ABSENT : None.
ABSTAIN: Chairperson McFadden.
Commissioners: Marcus, Hall, Holmes, Erwin, Schr
Schlehuber.
&L*-s---3@x
ANNE B. MCFADDEN, Chairper,
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO. 2763 -3-
I
I
I' I
I
j-
1 t
I
I
i I
i
i
I I
$
COMMISSIONERS August 3, 1988 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 6
4)
Chairman McFadden disqualified herself from hearing this item
chair to Commissioner Hall.
Phil Carter, Assistant to the City Manager, began the staff
report and stated that the presentation would be given by
Brian Hunter and Steve Jantz who have been responsible for
the preparation of the plan.
report with the financing plan for Zone 20.
LFMP 20 - Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20.
due to a potential conflict of interest. She passed the
He will conclude the staff
Brian Hunter, Associate Planner, stated that Zone 20
completes the second phase of Carlsbad's Growth Management
Program. The applicant, Development Consultants Consortium,
was authorized on April 7, 1987 to prepare the plan; it was
accepted for technical review on December 18, 1987.
Management Zone 20 is located in the southwest quadrant of
Carlsbad and consists of a largely undeveloped land area
south of Palomar Airport Road easterly of Paseo del Norte.
The limit of the zone extends slightly more than half way to
El Camino Real, being bounded on the east and south by the
Hillman property's Pacific Rim Country Club and Resort area
in Zone 19. Zone 20 is bounded on the north by Zone 5 and on
the west by Zone 4. Zone 20 is primarily a residential zone
and comprises approximately 764 acres in 55 separate parcels
ranging from 112 acre to 85 acres in size. Developable
acreage, however, is only 555.5 acres due to constraints such
as power line easements, slopes, and two school sites which
are designated within the zone (a junior high school and an
elementary school).
determined by multiplying the net developable land by the growth management control point. Zone 20 was determined to be 2,491.
agricultural or undeveloped property with only 28 du's
currently in existence (19 of which are occupied by the Sudan
Interior Mission).
There is an approved tentative map for Cobblestone Sea
Village, CT 84-32, with 225 du's. The total du's of 2,491 is
in compliance with Proposition E and conforms to the buildout
cap by quadrant.
City Administrative Facilities
The potential dwelling units (du's) was
The potential du's for The zone is basically
The remaining 9 du's are single family.
Existing facilities meet the adopted performance
standard until the year 2006.
Library
Existing facilities meet the adopted performance
standard until the year 2003.
Wastewater Treatment Facilities
Existing facilities meet the adopted performance
standard with the proposed mitigation measures.
Steve Jantz, Associate Civil Engineer. reported that the
following actions were being taken to ensure adequate
treatment capacity:
j
1' t
I i
1 i
I- I i i 1 1
1 t
1
1.
I i
*
(1) The Encina Water Pollution Control Facility has been
given approval to increase the national pollutant
discharge elimination systems permit to allow full
utilization of reclamation facilities within the Encina
service area.
(2) Later this month the City Council will be considering approval of a lease agreement between the cities of
Carlsbad and Vista which will provide the Carlsbad sewer
service district with sufficient treatment capacity at
Encina so that the performance standard will be maintained.
Parks
Park District 3 (southwest) does not meet the adopted
performance standard without mitigation measures.
Brian Hunter reported that the following park lands have been
reserved for Park District 3: Alta Mira (10 acres), Sammis
Batiquitos Educational Park (10 acres), Pacific Rim (24.25
acres).
year 1991. In addition, Zone 20 has been conditioned that
all development shall pay park-in-lieu and public facility
fees for Park District 3.
final map, a parks agreement shall be required to include
provisions for:
(a)
This would ensure adequate park facilities until the
Prior to the adoption of the first
The secure dedication of five acres of park land at a
location acceptable to the City,
A letter of credit or other acceptable financing in the
amount of $575,000 guaranteeing the construction of the
five acres of park land, and
A letter of credit or other acceptable financing to
provide for the operating expenses of the park.
(b)
(c)
DrainaRe
Drainage facilities will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures.
Circulation
Circulation facilities will meet the adopted performance
standard with the proposed mitigation measures.
Steve Jantz reported that as development progresses within
Zone 20 and the City, two freeway overpasses are projected to
operate below the standard: Palomar Airport Road/I-5 in 1990
and Poinsettia Lane/I-5 in 1992, Mitigation will require
construction of two roadways which bisect the zone: College
Boulevard between Palomar Airport Road and Poinsettia, and
Poinsettia Lane between College Boulevard and El Camino Real.
It is estimated that in 1995 two lanes will be required along
the entire length of both roads, and that College Boulevard
will need to be built to major arterial status in 2000 and
Poinsettia to major arterial status in 2004. It is possible
that this construction scenario may need to be accelerated as
adjacent zones develop. Although the Zone plan does show
alignments for these two roads, the actual road alignments will be determined at a future public hearing.
! I
I
I
1
1'
I
i I
I i
i I
I
I
I
1 I i
!
i
I
I
I
I
August 3, 1988 PLANNING COMMISSION
Fire
Fire facilities meet the adopted performance standard
without the proposed mitigation.
Open Space
Existing open space meets the adopted performance
standard.
performance standard is maintained through build out.
Brian Hunter reported that a significant portion of the open
space for this zone is located in the transmission corridor
of the SDGEiE easements, which is permitted under the
guidelines of growth management.
Schoo 1 s
An ongoing work program will assure the open space
The adopted performance standard is being met.
Sewer Collection
Sewer facilities in Zone 20 meet the adopted performance
standard through build out of the zone.
Water Distribution
Water service to Zone 20 meets the adopted performance
standard through build out of the zone.
Financing
Phil Carter reviewed the financing mechanisms for Zone 20 and
stated that the specific financing of public facilities is
critical to the overall ability of the developers in this
zone to ensure that all facilities will maintain compliance
with the adopted performance standards as growth occurs. A
facility financing matrix is provided as Exhibit 55 which
identifies the specific facilities, estimated cost, timing
and funding options available. stated as 2.5% and that this should be corrected to 3.5%. He
reiterated that developers must provide a financing plan
before approvals will be granted.
Phil Carter concluded the staff presentation recommending
He noted that the PFF fee is
approval of the Zone 20 plan and Commissioner Hall opened the
floor to questions.
Commissioner Erwin requested clarification on the reference
to existing facilities meeting the standard until a specific
year. Brian Hunter replied that, for instance, there would
be no library deficiency until the year 2003.
added that the original zone plan identified a library
shortage and, as a result, the City Council appropriated
funds and a library was approved for the La Costa area which
will be on line in about four years. In the year 2003, the
demand is expected to exceed the available library facilities and an additional library will be needed.
Comissioner Erwin inquired about the drainage into the
Eiatiquitos Lagoon and if staff had requested input from the
State environmental agency or the Lagoon Foundation. Steve
Phil Carter
,
1
1
I
i
I !
I I
!
i 1
I
i
i
I i
I
I
COMMlSS\O NERS August 3, 1988 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 9
Jantz replied that he is unaware of any input from either
source.
Commissioner Erwin inquired about the 27% open space located
in SDG&E easements.
management guidelines allow easements to be used for open
space if the easements are improved.
Commissioner Holmes inquired about the arterial phasing plan and noted that five or six streets have two different names. He wondered how the fire and police departments manage this
problem in emergency situations.
the zone plans does not address street names and that the
fire and police departments have not indicated this to be a
problem.
roads.
Commissioner Hall opened the public testimony and issued the
Brian Hunter replied that growth
Phil Carter replied that
He feels the safety concern comes with smaller
invitation to speak.
Jack Henthorn, 2892 Jefferson Street, Carlsbad, addressed the
Commission and stated that he is representing Development
Consultants Consortium as the principal consultant to the
Zone 20 plan.
their cooperation and diligence in bringing the facilities
plan to fruition and staff for their assistance.
requested the Commission's approval of the Zone 20 plan.
Dwight Spires, Laurel Tree Investment Company, 17941 Mitchell
Street, Irvine, a property owner involved in preparation of
the plan, addressed the Commission and stated that a great
deal of work has gone into this plan by everyone involved,
including many evening workshops with property owners and staff. He noted that it is particularly cumbersome on the
first property owners of the zone who choose to develop their
property inasmuch as they will shoulder a significant portion of the financing burden. He commended the property owners,
Development Consultants Consortium, and Buccola Engineering
for their perseverance and patience, and staff for their
cooperation.
He commended the Zone 20 property owners for
He
Patricia Bryant, It45 So. Pacific, Oceanside, addressed the
Commission and stated that she owns seven acres in Zone 20.
She objects to the most recent proposed road alignment of
Poinsettia since it appears to go through the middle of her
property which is a relatively small parcel.
Phil Carter advised Ms. Bryant and the Commission that the
road alignments are not established in the Zone plan and that
property owners should submit their concerns to staff in
letter form so that consideration can be given to their ideas
and they can be notified of meetings which will be held
regarding the road alignments.
Ms. Bryant stated that she feels that a higher density or
commercial zoning designation should be given to properties
adjacent to a major roadway.
Commissioner Hall replied that those specifics will be
addressed at a public hearing when the time comes.
Phil Carter replied that once the Zone plan has been adopted,
a property owner can apply to the City for a zone change to
August 3, 1988 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 10
\
be considered through the normal planning process.
facility impacts would be considered.
Ms. Bryant inquired if a property owner would be compensated in the event their property is used for a public road.
discussion at this time.
George Bolton, 6519 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, addressed the
Commission and stated that the general plan for Zone 20 does
a lot for the west end and the north end but does not help
the density in the eastern portion.
Public
I'
I !
I Phil Carter replied that this question is not a subject for
!
I He does not see how he can support the facilities infrastructure with only
3.2 du's/acre.
~
I Brian Hunter replied that the growth management plan requires ! the zone plan to be based on the existing general plan.
the zone plan has been adopted, a property owner has the
right to apply for a general plan amendment. Proposition E
building caps would be considered as well as public facility
impacts.
Guy Moore, 6503 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, addressed the
Commission and stated that the general plan for Zone 20 is
residentially oriented and does not apply to agricultural.
He feels that Mello funds have been misused and he passed out
an Exhibit 3 with red pencil notations where he is concerned
about the road alignment through agricultural areas. He is
unhappy that Zone 20 was annexed into the City of Carlsbad
and also unhappy College Boulevard and Poinsettia Lane will
be routed directly through a 20 acre strawberry field because
about grading in the canyon/slope areas.
Steve Jantz replied that the excess material from the grading
in Zone 20 is being used on the Hillman property in Zone 19
Once
I
!
i
1 i
I
I
1
I
1 of the environmental impact. In addition, he is concerned
to balance the grading for the Pacific Rim project.
Phil Carter indicated he had previously directed Mr. Moore to contact the City Engineer to discuss his concerns and
reiterated that the Zone 20 plan does not establish any road
alignments. Phil Carter requested that Mr. Moore contact him
directly and he will investigate the allegation regarding the
misuse of Mello funds.
Commissioner Hall inquired when the Zone 20 parcel was annexed into the City. Michael Holzmiller replied that the
annexation of the county "islands" was done within the last
year and was initiated by the Board of Supervisors at the
request of LAFCO.
of LC (Limited Control).
Scott Parker, 1623 Pacific Ranch Drive, Encinitas,
representing McKeller Development of La Jolla, addressed the
Commission and stated that McKeller is the owner of the
property known as Cobblestone Sea Village, Tract 84-32.
McKeller has been involved in the Zone 20 plan since March
1988 and has reluctantly accepted the burden of providing
facilities as required by growth management.
staff and all other parties involved in preparation of the
plan and urged the Commission's approval.
I
I 1
All properties were brought in with a zone t I
They commended
COMMISSIONERS
, I
I
1
1
I
I
I L
i I
!
!
I
I
i
i i
I
i
August 3, 1988 PLANNING COMMISSION
Ronald McKinney, 6525 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, addressed the Commission and stated that he has a carnation business at
that address. Although he realizes that road alignments are
not under consideration at this meeting, he would like to go
on record that he objects to the road placement as it appears
on the current maps. He purchased his property in 1986 and
was not advised of any activity regarding his property until
July 10, 1988.
John Christ, 275 North El Cielo, Palm Springs, representing the Hadley Trust, addressed the Comission and stated that
they own 15 acres in the extreme east-southeast portion of
Zone 20.
reservoirs being planned and hopes that the property views
along the bluff will not be obliterated by the water containers.
staff and the Costa Real Water District and whether there is
room for further discussion regarding the road alignment.
He is concerned about the large water storage
He would like to know the relationship between
Phil Carter replied that the relationship between staff and
cooperative.
the Costa Real Water District are excellent; they are very
Steve Jantz addressed the water tower situation and stated that the Zone plan does not establish the location of the water storage facilities or the road alignment.
property ow-ners should submit their recommendations by letter
to staff and the water district;
the public hearing.
There being no other persons desiring to address the
Comission on this topic, Commissioner Hall declared the
public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion
among the Commission members.
Commissioner Schlehuber thinks the plan has been explained
well and it covers all the issues. He can support the
Zone 20 plan.
Commissioner Marcus agrees with Commissioner Schlehuber. She
feels the report is excellent and commends those involved in
preparation of the plan.
Commissioner Erwin is concerned about drainage on the
Batiquitos Lagoon;
authorities regarding whether it is a good or bad idea. He
is also concerned about using the SDG&E easements for open
space; he does not think it is in the best interests of the
City or SDGbrE to focus activity near those high tension
lines.
Steve Jantz replied that during the reviews for the first
phase of the Hillman property, the desiltation basin was
considered by both the engineering staff and the Coastal
Commission.
Interested
they will be notified of
She can support the plan.
he would like to hear from some
A permanent desiltation basin would allow maintenance of the silt carried through the storm drains to
be pulled out before it reaches the lagoon. This seems to be
the best situation to enable retention of the lagoon in its
natural state.
Commissioner Erwin Inquired if Steve Jantz' explanation means
that none of the runoff from the 54 inch pipe will ever enter
the lagoon. Steve Jantz replied that runoff will enter the
August 3, 1388 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 12
I
desiltation basin and by the time the water reaches the
lagoon it will be clear.
Phil Carter elaborated that the City is currently in the
process of revising their Master Drainage Plan. Commission desires, staff will bring these concerns to the
Engineering staff so that a determination can be made. The
Zone 20 plan merely proposes a way to meet the growth
management guidelines as they exist today.
projects are received, they will be required to show how
i'
If the
As development
i drainage will impact the facilities.
I
I Commissioner Erwin inquired if the Commission can come back in the future and amend the drainage plan for Zone 20. Phil
Carter replied that the drainage plan will be modified in the
future as each development occurs. If the City approves a
new Master Drainage Plan, all development in the City will
have to meet those requirements. The Commission will have
and condition them as deemed appropriate.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if the Commission can request an
opinion from the State of California and the Lagoon
Foundation.
direct this to be done.
Commissioner Hall referred to Exhibit 3, General Conditions
for Zone 20, item 5, it states that periodic amendment to the Zone 20 LFMP is anticipated to incorporate newly acquired
data to amend conditions and upgrade standards as determined through the required monitoring program.
plan may be initiated by action of the Planning Commission,
City Council, or property owners at any time.
Commissioner Erwin requested confirmation that approval of
this plan does not denote approval of the land use.
Carter replied to the affirmative.
close proximity of the residential development to the
airport's departure corridor.
Commissioner Holmes - no comment.
Commissioner Schramm commended staff and all involved with
the Zone 20 plan for their participation.
plan as presented and feels that most concerns will resolve
themselves as development occurs.
Commissioner Hall is very pleased with the plan.
concern on page 11, Exhibit 4, Special Conditions.
1
I the opportunity to consider the impacts of each development
I
Phil Carter replied that the Commission can I.
I I
I
i
I
I
Amendment to the
Phil I He is concerned about the t
I I I She can accept the
He had one
I
Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt
I
Resolution No. 2762 recommending approval of the Negative
Declaration issued by the Planning Director, adopt
Resolution No. 2763 recommending approval of Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20.
Commissioner Hall requested that interested parties be given
the address to write letters regarding their concerns on road
alignments. Phil Carter replied that he would stand out in the foyer and pass out business cards to those who desire
them.
COMMISSIONERS
Erwin
Hall
Holmes
Marcus
McFadden Schlehuber
Schramm
I
I ! i
\
i
,
I
I ,
I
I i I
I
I
I
i
I
I
1 !
1 I
I I I
COMMISSIONERS August 3, 1988 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 13
Commissioner Schrm inquired if all property owners are
required to be notified before a road alignment is approved.
Michael Holzmiller, Planning Director, replied that in the
past when a major development project was received, it keyed
input on the road alignment. The City Engineer is attempting
to revise the way this has been handled and would like to
have a public hearing to determine the entire road alignment
before any development projects are received. He would like
the input up front so it would be advantageous for citizens
to write letters sharing their concerns.
Commissioner Schlehuber thinks this would be a great
improvement over the present piecemeal system.
utility easements, he would like to see this covered in a
separate meeting or report.
this could be covered by the 15-member Citizen's Committee to
Study Growth.
included in open space is that they are potentially
Regarding the
Michael Holzmiller replied that
The reasons that utility easements were
developable property. By allowing the easements to be
included in the open space contingent, they could be groomed
with trail paths, grass, etc. rather than weeds.
Commissioner Schlehuber would still like to see this topic
covered in a report by the Citizen's Committee.
RECESS
The Planning Commission recessed at 8:OO p.m. and reconvened
at 8:lO p.m.
DISCUSSION ITEM:
5) PCDJGPC 88-2JPCDJGPC 88-3 CITY OF CARLSBAD - General
Plan Consistency Determination for Municipal Projects located at Ocean Street near Beech Avenue and the Buena
Vista Lagoon Nature Visitation Area in Local Facilities Management Zone 1.
Mike Howes, Senior Planner, reviewed the background of the
request and stated that Section 65401 of the California
Government Code requires that a General Plan Consistency
Determination be made for major public works projects. projects have been proposed: 1) complete reconstruction of a
dilapidated concrete stairway access to the beach that is now
rip-rap, and 2) placement of two to four inches of
decomposed granite on an existing graded lot to create a 20
car parking lot at the corner of Jefferson Street and Marron
Road near the duck feeding area at the Buena Vista Lagoon.
Staff feels that both projects are in conformance with the General Plan and recommends approval. Gary Kellison of
Municipal Projects is available to answer any technical
questions.
Chairman McFadden requested confirmation that the Commission
is not being asked to speak to the design, only that both
projects are consistent with the General Plan. Mike Howes
replied in the affirmative.
Chairman McFadden inquired what the City Council adopted last
night when they authorized hiring a consultant.
Kellison replied that the City Council hired a consultant to
design a visitation area and a bike lane along Jefferson
Two
overgrown with vegetation and blocked at the bottom by
Gary
0
(Form A)
' I8 I( 0 .. - *'
rn
TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
FROM: Community Development
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice
Zone 20 - Local Facilities Manaqement Plan - City of Carlsbad LFMP 88-20
for a public hearing before the City Council.
Please notice the item for the council meeting of
Thank you.
8- /8- 88 - Assistant City Man-- Date
THIS SHOULD BE NOTICED FOR A 1/8 PAGE AD IN TWO NEWSPAPERS
&b- <+ -* J! -
I' 'I- l Carlibad Jo'urnal ..
Decreed A legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of Sun Diego CoUtlty
Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to
North Coast Publishers, Inc corporate offices P 0 Box 878, Encinitas, CA 92024
(619) 753 6543 r,; <
I Proof of Publication lr
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid,
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitl
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general (
published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of Sun Diego, State of Caltfornia,
newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general cha
which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bono fide subscription Its
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular i
the said City of Carlsbad, County of Sail Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding otic
preceding the date of publication of
hereinafter referred to, and that the
'Y
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the PIanning Commission ofthe CityofCarIsbad will hold a public '1' hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m. on Wednesday, August 3,1988, to consider a Local Facilities Management Plan on property generally located south of Palomar Airport Road, east of Paseo del Norte, and north and west of the Pacific Rim Master Plan area and more particularly described as:
Those portions of Sections 21, 22, and 28, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, and
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 438-1161.
If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan in court, you may be limited to raising Only ' those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
Case File: LFMP 20 Applicant: DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS CONSORTIUM
CJ 5241: July 22, 1988
__---- 1 ---5"-T - r
IS
NOTICE OF PUBLICQEARING
t' .I
Rancho Agua Hedionda. 6
CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
1
-< 7
.' ,.
*
Q z
a w (9
b
!!i
au>ijj
o 4 8 ,; & Fa\ F" 4 n mzuu
N W C L am cia ~9- En o IL
5 a 2 4 'A 15:: i4 Y ln
z u) IL o yz GE G?* Pur 2 4
0 ii 0 u uij ;i lad Pi n" a"
w F 8 no 22 5c 54 zg k i
I 11 .; II I -I 3 I m(-', K K K 0 .*' II
. ,a I a w
r' *
-_
mu[ Z@D@ 2GI LmaJ F8GUD8tU08 Mamag@m@mt PUm yem
60rdc
*‘ c_ ’ ‘ . 0, ’ w
.%
* NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING -
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 20
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will
hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue,
Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m. on Tuesday, September 6, 1988, to
consider a Local Facilities Management Plan on property generally located
south of Palomar Airport Road, east of Paseo del Norte, and north and west
of the Pacific Rim Master Plan area and more particularly described as:
Those portions of Sections 21, 22, and 28, Township 12 South,
Range 4 West, and Rancho Agua Hedionda.
For convenience sake, the area is shown on the maps below.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to
attend the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 438-1161,
If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence
delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
Applicant: Development Consultants Consortium
Case : LFMP 20
CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
Publish: August 26, 1988
-
..“ -.- q allvl”“,,”
Z@m@ zo b@@& Bfi@[fl[Qfi@,o ~gl~@o@riiiiio~~ P,oa
,- .e 0 * .’ *
f . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
* LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 20
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will
hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue,
Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO p.m. on Tuesday, September 6, 1988, to
consider a Local Facilities Management Plan on property generally located
south of Palomar Airport Road, east of Paseo del Norte, and north and west
of the Pacific Rim Master Plan area and more particularly described as:
Those portions of Sections 21, 22, and 28, Township 12 South,
Range 4 West, and Rancho Agua Hedionda.
For convenience sake, the area is shown on the maps below.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to
attend the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the
Planning Department at 438-1161.
If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence
delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
Applicant: Development Consultants Consortium
Case : LFMP 20
CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
Publish: August 26, 1988
-
mr-
ZQLiilS 23
p.,@& ~@G.BOUQB@,O Mamaflsm@rQ me
August 26, 1988
Proof of Publication of:
Public Hearing
I declare under penalty of perjury, ti the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed this 26th day of
August , 19 88 , in the County of San Diego, State of California.
I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - 20'
NOTlCE 1s HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council Of Carisbad wlll hold a public hearing at the ClW Council C 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6 00 P m On September 6, 1988, to consider a Local Facilities Ma plan on property generally located south of Pa'omar A'r
east of pseo del Norte, and north and west Of Ihe F Master Plan area and more particularly described as Those portions of Sections 21, 22, and 28 To'
South, Range 4 West. and Rancho Agua Hedtonda F~~ convenience sake, the area IS shown On the mi Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal ai lnvlt& to attend the public hearing If You have any please call the Planning Department at 438-1161 If you challenge the Local Facilities Management p'
you may be limited to raising Only those IssueS You c else raised at the public hearing described in this not'C ten correspondence delivered to the clt?r of Carkbad '
the public hearing Applicant Development Consultants Co~3eIum
Case LFMP20 CARLSBAD CIT'
a 4 ,Y .? 0 w +
4
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION W
County of San Diego )
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) >ss.
" - being duly sworn, says she is the Yt buy
Legal Advertising Representative of the Citizen 6r La Costan,
semi-weekly newspapers of general circulation, printed in
the City of Oceanside, published in the City of Solana Beach
and Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and that
the notice, of which the annexed is a true copy, was published
one times in said newspapers, commencing on the
3fi,.. day of -, A.D., 19-. namely on the following
dates:
I
A- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN -
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Counc Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Cou 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6 00 p r September 6, 1988, to consider a Local Facilitie' Plan on property generally located south of Paloma
Those portions of Sections 21 22. and 28,
South, Range 4 West and Rancho Agua Hediond For convenience sake, the area is shown on tht Those persons wishing to speak on this propos invited to attend the public hearing !f you have please call the Planning Department at 438-1 161 If you challenge the Local Facilities Managemer you may be limited to raising only those issues yi else raised at the public hearing described in this r ten correspondence delivered to the Ct!y of Carlsb the public hearing Applicant Development Consultants Consortiun Case LFMP 20 CARLSBAD C
east of Paseo del Nolle, and nolth and west of t
Master Plan area and more particularly descrlbed
i
I
1-
c Proof of Publication of:
I declare under penalty of perjury, tha the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed this day of -in the
Counwf Sa; Dia State of
California.