HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-12-13; City Council; 9775; ZONE 22 - LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - CITY OF CARLSBAD LFMP 22'\ A6#_4tll2S__ TITLE: ZONE 22 - LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPT.1
c +$,pi. lallg lab
1DEPT. GMD
CITY A
CITY M
PLAN - CITY OF CARLSBAD LFMP 22,
Q u
Ix: a. Q-
5
4
.. z g 6 4
=! 0 5 0 0
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the C
Council adopt Resolution No. 88 -4a-7 approving the Negat Declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopt Resolut
No 88-%@ approving the Local Facilities Management Plan for Z
22.
ITEM EXPLANATION
Zone 22 is the fifth property owner-initiated and privately prepa
Local Facilities Management Plan to be heard by the City Counc This plan was heard by the Planning Commission on October 19, 19
The Planning Commission is unanimously recommending the appro of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 22.
Exhibit No. 3 shows the location of Zone 22. This zone is loca in the Southwest Quadrant of the City generally south of Palo, Airport Road, west of Interstate 5 and north of Batiquitos Lagoc
This local plan analyzes the 11 public facilities to determ. whether they conform with the City's adopted performance standarc With the exception of one public facility, parks, all remain public facility performance standards are currently being met i
will continue to be met as the zone builds out. The pal
performance standard is currently not being met. There is present a 4.24 acre shortfall in the area of parks. Because pal
are analyzed on a quadrant basis, this Facilities Management PI makes certain assumptions dealing with how park acreage will
dedicated and built within the Southwest Quadrant of the City. 1
property Owners within Local Facilities Management Zone 22 have be conditioned to assist the City in paying for the acquisition of li
and the improvements of park acreage within the Southwest Quadrar
With this mitigation and the previous mitigation approved in t
Local Facilities Management Plan for Zones 19 and 20 along wj
Parks funding in the Capital Improvement Budget, it is anticipat that the Park performance standard will be met.
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 22 contains specif conditions which must be complied with prior to the issuance of a development permits within this zone. These include providing t
City a detailed financing plan guaranteeing construction of a circulation improvements as identified in the plan. Until tl. financing mechanism has been approved by the City, no furtk development permits will be allowed in Zone 22. Although, at t same time, staff will begin processing applications within tk
Local Facilities Management Zone once the plan has been adopted
the City Council.
1 ? a< t @ * .Page 2 of Agenda Bill No. 9335 *,
4 Attached as Exhibit No. 3, is the Executive Summary from the Lo Facilities Management Plan which provides a summary of the ent
Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A Negative Declaration was issued by the Planning Director on
4, 1988 indicating that the Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 22 is not anticipated to have any adverse impacts on environment.
by the Planning Commission on October 19, 1988.
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 22 will not cause significant environmental impacts. The plan is a public facilit planning document that implements Carlsbad’s General Plan. The p makes generalized projections as to the demand for and supply public facilities, and outlines the provision of adequate pub
facilities concurrent with the estimated demands. The p recognizes that CEQA review will be required prior to initialization of any public or private project that is genera discussed in this plan.
FISCAL IMPACT
Staff time has been utilized in the preparation of this plan which these costs will be recovered through the processing established by the City Council. It is anticipated that furt staff time will be necessary to monitor this plan and other z plans on a yearly basis. The implementation of this plan, howev
future public facilities and their costs.
EXHIBITS
The Negative Declaration was recommended for appro
should help future fiscal planning by estimating the timing
1) City Council Resolution No &‘&-Yk? .
2) City Council Resolution No ,%R-Vag .
3) Local Map - Facilities Management Zone 22.
4) Executive Summary - Zone 22.
5) Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2780 and 2781.
6) Excerpt of Planning Commission minutes dated October 19, 19E
I r
L +a% t
a\ .
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
0 0
RESOLUTION NO. 88-427
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR LOCAL FACILITIES
MRNAGEMENT PLAN 22
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad d
December 13, 1988 , 1988, hold a duly noticed F
hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consid
all testimony and arguments, examining the initial s
analyzing the information submitted by staff, considerinc
written comments received, the City Council considered all fa
relating to the Negative Declaration including Planning Commi
Resolution No. 2780 granting Planning Commission approval of
Negative Declaration; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council 01
City of Carlsbad, California as follows:
1) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
2) That the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Din
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1 on May 4, 1988 was prepared in compliance with the Calif1 Environmental Quality Act and Title 19 of the Car Municipal Code.
3) That there is no substantial evidence that the projec conditioned may have a significant effect on the environi
That the City Council of the City of Carlsbad incorpo
into this resolution Planning Commission Resolution No. including findings contained therein.
I
4)
....
....
....
....
II
I 1
r'\
+ ,
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 8
9
10
I1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 W
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting o
Carlsbad City Council held on the 13thday of December
by the following vote, to wit:
I
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Lars
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
{'i f k/b)L(: C UDE A. LEWIS, Ma
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTEN-Z, City Clerk
(SEAL)
I
cc RESO NO. 38-Yg3 -2-
I *'
*
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I,
e e
RESOLUTION NO. 88-428
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LOCAL FACILITY
MANAGEMENT ZONE 22.
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A LOCAL
WHEREAS, a Local Facilities Management Plan ha:
prepared for Local Facility Management Zone 22 in accordanc
Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on October 19
hold a duly noticed public hearing as required by law to co
said plan and at the conclusion of the hearing adopted Reso
No. 2781 making findings and recommending that the City C
adopt a plan: and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was issued b
Planning Director on May 14, 1988 indicating that the
Facilities Management Plan is not anticipated to hav
significant adverse impact on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council at their meeting of &
, 1988 held a duly noticed public hearing and cons
all testimony and arguments of anyone desiring to be heard
13th
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
City of Carlsbad, California as follows:
A) That the above citations are true and correct
B) That the findings and conditions of the P1
Commission in Resolution No. 2781 also constitute the findin
conditions of the City Council.
....
....
1 ,I *,
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e
C) That the Local Facilities Management Plan fol
22 dated October 19, 1988 on file with the City Cler
incorporated herein by reference is hereby approved.
development occurring within the boundaries of Zone 22
comply with all the terms and conditions of said plan.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting
Carlsbad City Council held on the 13th day of December
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
fl
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, CitylClerk
(SEAL)
CC RES0 NO. 88-48 -2-
I
tXHl Bl I "5"
I 0 e 'I.
c
1
-_
v ITY GROWTH Ex /\m/\ MANAGEMENT Q LOCATIOCI p/dnfli!4q NO SCALE PROGRAM zc I
J 12
EXH'B'T "4" 1 1
Ti e
,
<
I. EXECUTIVESUIQGARY
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 22 was prepared pursuant to the City's Growth Management Program, Title 21, Chapter 21.90, of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The contents of the Plan follow the outline established by Section
21.90.110 of the Growth Management Ordinance. The Zone 22
Plan is consistent with the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan, and implements the Citywide Plan adopted September 23, 1986.
The Zone 22 Plan begins with the assumptions used to generate the buildout projections for residential and nonresidential
development within the Zone. The Plan then phases or estimates the Zone's development on a yearly basis until
buildout. The phasing is done to predict future facility demands. Each facility that is required to be addressed is
then analyzed. The analysis includes an inventory of existing and proposed facilities, a phasing schedule that establishes the timing for the provision of facilities in relationship to demand, and a financing plan that establishes various methods of funding facilities and improvements that are identified by the Plan as needed. Since this Zone Plan is a regulatory document, each facility section also contains conditions to
ensure that public facilities will conform to the adopted
performance standards. The conditions will be adopted as part of the Zone 22 approval, and mandatory compliance will regulate future development within the Zone.
1
1 I 0 0
7.
\ . FINANCxOVEBVIEn
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 22 identifies one facility which currently does not conform with the adopted
performance standards without special mitigation measures:
Parks - A shortfall of 4.24 acres in the southwest quadrant or
Park District 3.
AS part of this Local Facilities Management Plan, an attempt has
been made to bring these facilities into conformance with the adopted performance standards. During this process it has become
clear that no one financing mechanism can satisfy the complex infrastructure requirements of this zone and of the southwest quadrant. However, a combination of financing techniques can address both the need for upgrading facilities enabling them to
conform with the adopted performance standards and ensuring conformance of future facilities as development occurs. A common
set of goals for the financing of the major facilities can be
stated as follows:
1. Provide feasible financing techniques to ensure that all facilities are provided in conformance with the adopted performance standards.
2 Provide for the implementation of financing techniques which consider the financial limitations associated with the high
costs of infrastructure construction.
3. Provide for financing options which consider both the needs
The adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan identified the various ways that capital improvements could be financed.
The capital facilities necessary to support the City of Carlsbad
generally fall into two categories -- those provided by developers as a condition of development approvals, and those
provided by the City through a system of fees, taxes, or other financing sources.
It is the City's responsibility to plan for the construction and maintenance of City projects and to finance these projects in the best possible way. The following describes some of the financing
of the city and the property owners.
options available.
A. Cash/Pav-as-you-go - Financinq. The City has used this method of financing to pay for most capital improvements constructed to date.
In concept, the City charges the development community a series of fees which provide the source of income to pay for
2
I e 0
/\
L
4 capital projects. When enough cash has been assembled, the City constructs the next capital project in order of priority. This method forces the City to delay construction of various projects until funds have been collected. These fees included:
1. Public Facilities Fee
2. Park-In-Lieu Fees
4. Traffic Impact Fees
5. Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District Fee
6. Sewer Fees
7. Water Fees
Special Districts collect their own various fees.
B. Reimbursement Aareements. In certain instances, a developer may ask the City to move a project forward in time and to construct a facility before funds have been collected. When this occurs, the City could adopt the policy of having the interested developer construct the project based on a
reimbursement agreement. The City would pay the developer
back for the portion of the project that was to be funded by
City resources over a period of time. Payments would commence at the time the City had originally scheduled the construction of the facility in the Capital Improvement Program. Moving the project forward in time is for the benefit of the developer. Therefore, the City's repayment would be limited to the cost of the public portion of the project and no interest would accrue to the developer. The
use of this method of project financing does not eliminate
the developer's obligation to pay City fees. The developer
must still pay all City fees associated with a development.
C. Credit for Citv Fees. When it is in the public interest to construct certain public facilities earlier than would be possible under a pay-as-you-go program, the City can consider giving a developer credit for fees that would
otherwise be paid, up to the cost of the public improvement. These credits would reduce the amount of fees payable in
future years from a certain development.
Fee credits must be used carefully to avoid elimination of
income from capital fees necessary to finance other
projects. Two alternatives exist for fee credits:
Full fee credit immediately: Under this option, the developer who builds a public improvement would be eligible to deduct 100 percent of the cost of the improvement from fees payable. Once the fee credit is exhausted, the developer begins paying fees as normally
3. Planned Local Drainage Fees
3
1 I a m
4.
'r 1
4 assessed by the City. Under this option the developer
gets immediate credit for the total cost of a project.
Partial Fee Credit - credit over time: In this option, the developer who builds a public improvement receives a
credit for the cost of a public improvement. However,
This allows the City to continue to receive at least a portion of fees designated for other capital projects while giving the developer credit for the construction of public improvements that would have otherwise been paid
for by the City. No interest would accrue to the developer as a part of this arrangement.
D. Debt Financinq. A range of debt financing alternatives are available to the City. If it is in the public interest to push a project ahead and to construct an improvement before funds are on hand, debt financing may be the answer. If the project is being pushed forward for the convenience or
benefit of a developer, that developer should bear the cost of issuance and interest over the life of the debt issue. The actual mechanics of a debt issue and how to determine the developer's responsibility to support these costs would be defined as the method of debt financing was chosen.
Some of the debt financing vehicles available are shown below:
Assessment Districts:
Under Council Policy No. 33, the City may assist a developer
in the construction of various public improvements that may be financed through the use of assessment districts if there
is significant public benefit from the improvement. In cases where a City contribution is planned, the City may ask a developer to pay the City contribution. The developer could then be reimbursed at a later date (i.e. , in the year that the capital project has been originally scheduled for construction) or through a system of credits as described earlier.
SDecial Benefit Districts:
State law allows the formation of a variety of special
benefit districts. These districts may be used to fund the construction of parks, libraries, police or fire facilities, and street lighting systems to name a few. These districts may be formed by a vote of the property owners who then assess themselves for the cost of improvements.
The developer and/or landowner (s) bears the burden of debt
service payments. City participation in a district of this
the use of that credit is spread over a series of years.
4
5.. 0 m
-,
type is possible to the extent of public improvements that would have otherwise been the responsibility of the City. However, the movement of capital improvements forward-in- time would require some concession from the developer in
offsetting interest, debt issue, or other additional costs.
Community - Facility District: (Mello-Roos)
Under Council Policy No. 38, the City may assist through Mello-Roos financing the construction of public facilities
Facility Districts (CFD's) operate similar to assessment
districts, but provide a more flexible tool for governmental entities to finance a wider range of public infrastructure, again through the issuance of tax exempt bonds. Facilities whfch may be financed by a Mello-Roos District include parks, parkways, open space, schools, libraries, gas pipelines, telephone lines and can be used to eliminate special assessment liens. These districts may also pay operating costs to the extent the services are in addition
to those already being provided prior to the formation of the district.
Revenue Bonds:
The City may elect to issue revenue bonds to finance
improvements related to utility functions or other City
services that generate a fee for service, although other
City functions could support the use of revenue bonds. If public improvements are being installed ahead of schedule to accommodate a developer, the City would expect the developer to offset many of the costs of such an issue as described above.
Tax Increment Bonds:
Public improvements in the City's redevelopment area can be financed through the use of tax increment bonds. The
Redevelopment Agency has developed a plan for the construction of public improvements using this method of financing. A developer asking for public improvements to be constructed ahead of schedule must consider the agency's
ability and willingness to defer other projects.
Certificates of Participation:
in conjunction with development. Mello-Roos Community
Certain public facilities such as buildings can be financed
through Certificates of Participation. This is in effect a lease agreement between the City and another agency. P
developer wishing to push projects forward might consider constructing facilities such as a library or fire statior using this financing tool. The developer may be asked tc
5
I 0 0
1.
, bear certain costs or to accept credit in lieu of payment
for certain improvements.
General Obliaation Bonds:
The City has the ability to issue General Obligation Jj~nQs
to fund the construction of public improvements. This can
only be done with the approval of 2/3 of the voters in an election. It is unlikely that the City will have the ability to use this method of funding public projects which benefit specific developments.
Financkna Policies:
The adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan contains the following financing policies:
1. Recognize that those projects identified in the Public Facilities Fee Calculation are the ultimate
responsibility of the City to fund. However, the priority for funding projects is at the discretion of the
city Council.
2. Recognize that the Capital Improvements Program will play
a significant role in helping to establish compliance with the adopted performance standards. Priority for the funding of projects should go to in-fill areas or areas
of the City where existing deficiencies exist.
3. Agree to consider assisting developers with credits against future fees, reimbursement agreements, forming assessment districts, etc. only when it is clearly in the public interest to do so or to rectify public facility deficiencies and not to induce growth by prematurely upgrading public facilities.
4. Recognize that all credit or reimbursement arrangements will be made based upon the City's plans for timing of
certain public facilities. For example, if a developer wanted to put in an improvement that the City had not planned for five years and was not .necessary to rectify
an existing deficiency, the City would not consider
beginning to provide credits or reimbursement until the
fifth year, if at all.
6
. * e
c'.
bear certain costs or to accept credit in lieu of paymenl
for certain improvements.
General Obliaation Bonds:
The City has the ability to issue General Obligation Bond:
to fund the construction of public improvements. This cai
only be done with the approval of 2/3 of the voters in ai
election. It is unlikely that the City will have thc ability to use this method of funding public projects whicl benefit specific developments.
Financincr Policies:
The adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plai contains the following financing policies:
1. Recognize that those projects identified in the Public Facilities Fee Calculation are the ultimatc responsibility of the City to fund. However, thi priority for funding projects is at the discretion of thc
City Council.
2. Recognize that the Capital Improvements Program will pla; a significant role in helping to establish compliancl with the adopted performance standards. Priority for thc funding of projects should go to in fill areas or area:
of the City where existing deficiencies exist.
3. Agree to consider assisting developers with credit,
against future fees, reimbursement agreements, formint assessment districts, etc. only when it is clearly in thl
public interest to do so or to rectify public facilit deficiencies and not to induce growth by premature1 upgrading public facilities.
4. Recognize that all credit or reimbursement arrangement will be made based upon the City's plans for timing o certain public facilities. For example, if a develope wanted to put in an improvement that the City had no planned for five years and was not necessary to rectif an existing deficiency, the City would not conside beginning to provide credits or reimbursement until th fifth year, if at all.
6
I 0 0
k.
5. Recognize that public facility improvements made up front
or ahead of City plans by developers must provide the
funds necessary to cover annual operating costs for the
facility until the time the City had previously planned
to provide the facility.
6. With the recent reduction in residential densities and overall restriction on residential development, recognize that it may be necessary to start charging fees to commercial and industrial land uses in cases where they are not presently assessed. With the reduction in
residential land uses and density, it may be necessary to
charge commercial and industrial to make up the deficit.
7
e 0
L .
Financina Summarv
This Local Facilities Management Plan has identified one facility to currently be below the adopted performance standards:
Parks - 4.24 Acres in District 3
The developers in Zone 22 are proposing to provide mitigation tc bring Parks into conformance with the adopted perf ormancE standards. The specific mitigation for this facility is shown ir the Park Facility Section of this plan.
This plan also identifies when future public facilities are
needed as growth occurs to ensure compliance with the adoptec
performance standards. A complete financing section is providec
at the end of this plan which provides a description of the facility improvements to be made, timing of improvements, cost
estimates, and funding priorities.
Exhibit 3 on page 12 indicates where Zone 22 is within the City< Exhibit 1 beginning on page 9 provides a brief synopsis of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 22. Exhibit 2 on page
11 provides a one page highlight of the synopsis.
8
I e 0 ,.
1
SUMMARY CHART
City Administrative Existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard until the year
2006.
Librarv Existing facilities meet
the adopted performance
standards until 2003.
Waste'water Treatment Existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard to buildout of
Zone 22.
Parks Park District 3 (Southwest Quadrant) does & meet the adopted performance standard without mitigation measure.
Drainaue Existing facilities meet
the adopted performance standard to buildout of Zone 22.
Circulation The existing road segments
and intersections in Zone
22 currently meet the adopted performance standard.
- Fire Exist iny facilities meet
the adopted performancc
standard to buildout of Zone 22.
OPen SDace ' Existing open space and planned open space meet thE adopted performance standard to buildout of Zone 22.
EXHIBIT 1
9
I 0 e '.
Schools Existing school facilities currently have the capacit)
to meet the demand
generated by Zone 22. The
School District is
currently restudying its
School Location Plan.
sewer-Collection Existing sewer-collection
Svstem networks comply with the
adopted performance
standard to the ultimate
buildout of Zone 22.
Water Distribution Water service to Zone 22
Svstem meets the adoptec performance standard tc
buildout of the Zone.
10
, 0 0
b.
PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY SHEET
CONFORMANCE WITH ADOPTED STANDARD
CITYWIDE; PUADRANT mil
1) City Administrative Until 2006 N/A N/A Facilities
2) Library Yes - Until 2003
3) Wastewater Treatment Yes
4) Parks N/A No No**
5) Drainage N/A N/A To Bui
6) Circulation N/A N/A To Bui
7) Fire N/A N/A To Bui
Yes
Yes
Yes
8) Open Space N/A N/A To Bui
9) Schools N/A N/A To Bui
10) Sewer Collection N/A N/A To Bui
Yes
Yes
System Yes
System Yes
11) Water Distribution N/A N/A To Bui
N/A = Not Applicable
JrJr No residential development may occur in the Southwest Quadr; until the park shortage is rectified.
EXHI
11
+, e 0
-.
GROWTH Ex MANAGEMENT 0 LOCATION
NO SCALE PROGRAM zo
12
0 e ‘.
GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR ZOWB 22
I. INT’RODWCTION
A. All development within Zone 22 shall conform to the provisions of Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and to the provisions and conditions of this Local
Facilities Management Plan.
B, All development within Zone 22 shall be required to pay a
public facility fee pursuant to the standards adopted by
the, City Council on July 28, 1987, and as amended from
time to time and all other applicable fees.-- Development
in Zone 22 shall also be responsible for any additional fees to be incorporated into this plan that are found to be necessary to enable facilities to meet the adopted performance standard.
C. The City of Carlsbad shall monitor all facilities in Zone 22 pursuant to Subsections 21.90.130(c), (d) and (e) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
D. All development in Zone 22 shall be in conformance with
the adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan as adopted by City Council Resolution 8797 on September 23,
1986.
E. Periodic amendment to the Zone 22 Local Facilities
Management Plan is anticipated to incorporate newly acquired data, to add conditions and upgrade standards as determined through the required monitoring program.
Amendment to this Plan may be initiated by action of the property owners, Planning Commission or City Council at any time.
F. If a public facility is found not to be in conformance with an adopted performance standard during the year11 monitoring, or at any other time, the matter will be immediately brought before the City Council. If the Citi
Council determines that a non-conformance does exist, then no future building or development permits, whick
would impact the facility, shall be issued unless ar amendment to the Citywide Facilities Improvement Plan 01
the Local Facilities Improvement Plan for this Zone is
facility shortfalls and brings those facilities intc
conformance with the adopted performance standards.
G. After adoption of this Plan by the City Council, nc
building permits will be allowed unless the performance
standards are complied with. This includes all project:
which are exempt under Section 21.90.030(c) of the Cit]
Municipal Code.
approved by the City Council which addresses thosc
13
< . a a
H. Approval for this LFMP does not constitute prior
environmental review for projects within Zone 22. A11
environmental review per Title 19 of the Carlsbac Municipal Code. Any mitigation measures determined during a project's environmental review shall be complied with in their entirety unless findings of overridin<
consideration are made by the City Council.
I. Approval of this Plan does not constitute prioi
discretionary review for projects within Zone 22. All
future projects shall undergo review per Title 21 of thc Carlsbad Municipal Code. The Plan establishes thc
maximum allowable number of residential units foi
facilities planning purposes only. The Plan does no1
guarantee any specific residential density.
future projects within Zone 22 shall undergc
14
EXHIBIT 5 e '. 0
5 11. SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 22
The following Special Conditions apply specifically to
development in Zone 22 and must be complied with in addition
to the General Conditions for Zone 22. These conditions arc
also listed separately under the analysis discussion of each
facility.
A. Citv Administrative Facilities
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
B. Library
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
C. Wastewater Treatment CaDacitv
No special conditions are necessary. However, the following actions shall be pursued jointly by each sewer district to ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity through the year 2000:
1. Monitor Encina Treatment Plant flows on a monthly basis to determine actual flow rates and to have ar
early warning of capacity problems.
2. Actively pursue acceleration and phasing of treatment plant Phase IV expansion to provide adequate capacity.
3. The six member agencies shall form an agreement tc
maximize the utilization of available treatment at Encina WPCF.
D. Parks
1. All residential development shall pay Park-in-Liec
fees (unless exempt by prior agreement) and Public Facility Fees for Park District 3.
2. Prior to the approval of any residential final may within Zone 22, a Parks Agreement shall be required tc include the following provisions:
a. The secured dedication of 4.4 acres of parkland at
a location to be determined acceptable by the City.
b. Provide a letter of credit or some other securec
financing acceptable to the City in the amount of
$506,000 guaranteeing the construction of 4.4 acres of parkland, from a financial institution and upor terms and conditions acceptable to the Financc Director and City Attorney at the time this agreement is executed.
15
I- a a ..-
c. Provide for the operating expenses of the park: either through a letter of credit or some other secured financing from a financial institution anc upon terms and conditions acceptable to the Financc
Director and City Attorney or the establishment of
a Park District 3 Growth Management Fee that woulc cover the operating costs for the park. The amount
of the costs and the time for which the developers in Park District 3 would be responsible for thesc costs shall be provided for within the Park:
Agreement.
d. The Parks Agreement must be consistent I with thc requirements of the City's Growth - Managemeni Program.
e. If any reimbursements and/or Park-in-Lieu fec credits are to be given, the Parks Agreement shal: provide a mechanism to do so.
3. No residential development will be allowed after 199: unless actions have been taken by the City tc
construct additional park facilities.
E. Drainaye
Drainage facilities shall be provided at the time oj
development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuanct of a grading permit or issuance of a building permit whichever occurs first, for any development in Zone 22, i comprehensive financing program guaranteeing thc construction of the Phase B drainage facility must bc adopted.
F. Circulation
Prior to the issuance of any development permit withi; Zone 22, detailed intersection graphics depictin1
existing and buildout conditions shall be submitted ant
approved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Th
intersections identified as being impacted by 20 percen or more of traffic generated from this Zone.
Prior to the recordation of the first final map, issuanc
of a grading permit or issuance of a building permit
whichever occurs first, for any development in Zone 22,
comprehensive financing program guaranteeing th construction of the circulation improvements a identified in this Plan must be adopted.
required intersection graphics are for thos
16
I * 0 *.
G. Fire
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
H. ODen SDace
1. All future development within this Zone shall bc required to show how it contributes to meeting tht open space performance standard over and above meetinc
all other City standards and development regulation: and that the development does not preclude thf
provision of performance-standard open space ai buildout of Zone 22.
2. Open-space compliance will be monitored annually anc as individual projects are reviewed within this Zone.
3. Prior to the approval of any development within thii
Zone, the Planning Director shall be required to fin( that the development does not preclude the provisio-
of performance-standard open space at buildout of Zon
22.
I. Schools
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
J. Sewer Collection Svstem
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
K. Water Distribution Svstem
All development within Zone 22 shall pay the require Costa Real Municipal Water District fees. An
development requiring extension of future water line
will be responsible for the improvements subject t
potential partial reimbursement.
17
, L #.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 EXHIBIT "5" 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2780
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBI
CALIFORNIA APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A LOCAL FACILIT:
MANAGMENT PLAN FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF PALO!
APPLICANT: RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
AIRPORT ROAD, WEST OF 1-5, AND NORTH OF BATIQUITOS LAGOON.
CASE NO.: LOCAL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN - ZONE 22
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 19th day of Octobt
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to cons;
request, and,
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and conside
testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the in
submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, the
Commission considered all factors relating to the Negative Declarati
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commi
follows:
A)
B)
That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative Dec according to Exhibit "ND" dated May 4, 1988 and "PII", dated I
1988, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the
f i nd i ngs :
Fi ndi nqs :
1. The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 22 will not ( significant environmental impacts. The plan is a public f
planning document that implements the existing General Plan.
makes generalized projections as to the demand for and supply
facilities, and outlines the provision of adequate public f
concurrent with estimated demands. The plan recognizes that CE
will be required prior to mitigation of any public or privati
that is generally discussed in the plan. A Negative Declaration
issued on May 4, 1988 and recommended for approval by the
Commission on October 19, 1988.
////
////
////
I
L I'/
4
51
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: . Chairperson McFadden, Commissioners : Schrarnrn, Holmes
Erwin, Marcus and Schlehuber .
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
ABSENT: Commissioner Hall.
ABSTAIN : None.
-- - tf I ' e- I .< it %'&.3;. 7, <.. 7' ,'.- c c , . f. I, ./' r , ~ -
JEANNE MCFADDEN, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST :
1
1 , 7'
I* \
3
2
3'
4
5 ,
0 c
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2781
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 22 ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH
LAGOON. APPLICANT: RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY CASE NO.: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN - ZONE 22
OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, WEST OF 1-5, AND NORTH OF BATIQUITOS
I' :I
8
9
lo
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of (
and referred to the Planning Commission, and
WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No. 8797 adopting t
Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan establishing facility zo
performance standards for pub1 ic facilities, and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 9808 requir
processing of a Local Facilities Management Plan, and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 8110 ai
implementing Proposition E approved on November 4, 1986 by the citi
Carl sbad, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 19th day of Octobe
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consic
request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considei
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be hea
Commission considered all factors relating to the Local Facilities Mi
Plan for Zone 22.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commi
fol 1 ows :
A)
6) That based on the evidence presented at the public hear
That the above recitations are true and correct.
Commission recommends APPROVAL of Local Facil i ties Management P1 22, based on the following findings and subject to the conditions:
I 1
,
1'
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I< I e 0
7'
Findinqs:
That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 22 is consistent wit the Land Use Element, the Public Facilities Element, and the othe Elements contained in Carl sbad's General Plan.
That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 22 is consistent wit Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Growth Management), a amended by Ordinance No. 8110 and Ordinance No. 9829 and with the adoptec
1)
2)
1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan,
That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 22 and the condition:
contained therein will promote the public safety and welfare by ensurin!
that public facilities will be provided in conformance with the adoptec
performance standards.
4) The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 22 will control the timin!
and locations of growth by tying the pace of development to the provisioi
of public facilities and improvements.
5) The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 22 will provide public
facilities and services in conformance with the adopted performance standards, prior to allowing any development to occur.
3)
Condi ti ons
1) Approval is granted for Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone 22 as
dated October 19, 1988, attached hereto, and incorporated herein bj
reference.
contained in the Plan titled Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 22,
I///
////
////
/I//
I///
////
////
//I/
////
////
PC RES0 NO. 2781 -2-
11 , ’.* 1
I
-1
2
3
4
5 I,
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Plar
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of Octc
1988, by the following vote, to wit:
I
AYES:
NOES: None.
Chairperson McFadden, Commissions : Schramm, Holme
Erwin, Marcus and Schlehuber.
6 1;
7
8
9
10
11
12
l3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ABSENT : Commissioner Hall.
ABSTAIN : None. f- ----w
&e-*lc&d& -\
18..
JEANNE B. MCFADDEN, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST :
MICHAEL J. HOLmILLEY
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO. 2781 -3-
.\
I
I I
~-
i
i
I'
.I
I
I
1 t
I
!
i
I
i
I
i
1 I
I i
i
i
i ! I
! !
I
!
I
i
i
COMMlSSlONERS October 19, 198%: PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2
Thomas Notey, 1831 Deerhill Trail, Topanga, California,
applicant, addressed the Commission and stated that he is the
new owner of the property and, as such, needs additional time
to obtain financing and submit plans.
Chairman McFadden opened the public testimony and issued the
invitation to speak.
There being no persons desiring to address the Commission on
this topic, Chairman McFadden declared the public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion among the
Commission members.
Motion was duly made, seconded, and carried to adopt Ervin
Resolution No. 2778 approving the extension of SDP 87-5 Holmes for one year based on the findings and subject to the
conditions contained therein. McFadden
Marcus
Schlehuber
Schranrm
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
b) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGMENT PLAN ZONE 22 - Request
approval of the Local Facilities Management Plan for
Zone 22 on property generally located south of Palomar
hirport Road, West of 1-5, and north of Batiquitos
Lagoon.
Phil Carter, Assistant to the City Manager, began the staff
report and stated that the presentation would include a brief
introduction to the zone plan, the background and zone
overview, compliance with Proposition E. Somewhat different
than tha other zone plan presentations. this report will
primarily review those four facilities in Zone 22 which
require special attention. Assisting him will be Brian
preparation of the plan. He will conclude the staff report
with the financing plan for Zone 22.
Brian Hunter stated that tMP Zone 22 is located in the
southwest quadrant of Carlsbad as shown on the overhead
exhibit. It consists of a largely undeveloped land vest of
Interstate 5, south of Palomar Airport Road, east of the
Pacific Ocean, and north of Batiquitos Lagoon. The land uses
are mixed. Of the zone's 420 total acreage, 50.8 acres are
residential, 61.6 acres are mixed use residential/office,
33.1 acres are travel service/mixed use residential, and
residential General Plan uses include 52.1 acres of open
spaces, 32.8 acres of office, 22.7 acres of travel
service/commercial, 4.2 acres of travel service, and six
acres of planned industrial. The remainder of the zone is
circulation elements and railroad right-of-vay. The buildout
projection for this zone is consistent with the methodology
contained in the 1986 citywide facilities and improvements
plan and the provisions of Proposition E which was approved
by the citizens of Carlsbad on November 4, 1986.
The facilities analysis indicated that the only existing
Hunter and Steve Jantz who have been responsible for the
shortfall in this zone was Parks.
Parks
Similar to Zone 20, there is presently a 4.24 acre shortfall
of park facilities in the southwest quadrant of the city.
That shortfall is projected to be taken care of by the
Pacific Rim project's dedication of 24.25 acres and
j Y ..
October 19, 1988 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 3 COMMISSIONERS
I I
I
I' I
.I) 1 i I
I I
i
I
i
i
1
I
I I
I
I
I
I
i !
1
I I
1
i i I I 1
I
i I I
improvement of 15 acres along with a five acre improvement
which is required of Zone 20. In keeping with that same time
scenario which allows development to occur through 1992, then
a 4.4 acre dedication of park facilities in Zone 22 is required,
Steve Jantz continued the presentation.
Circulation
The existing circulation network which runs through Zone 22
currently meets the adopted performance standard. However,
as development occurs within the zone and adjacent to the zone, certain circulation facilities will require upgrading:
(a) In 1989. Avenida Encinas from Palomar Airport Road to
Poinsettia Lane, including intersection improvements at
Avenida Encinas/Palomar Airport Road and Avenida
Encinas/Poinsettia Lane. (b) In 1990, Palomar Airport Road
Overpass falls below the standard and needs mitigation.
(c) In 1993, the Poinsettia Lane interchange will be required
to be upgraded.
Poinsettia betveen the 1-5 and Avenida Encinas. (d) In 1995,
Palomar Airport Road between Avenida Encinas/Carlsbad
Boulevard and Poinsettia Lane between Avenida
Encinas/Carlsbad Boulevard. Prior to the recordation of the
first final map, or issuance of building permit or grading
permit, the developers are required to submit to the City a
facilities.
Drainage
Zone 22 is broken up into tvo drainage sub-basins.
the zone drains north and the other half drains south. A
drainage problem has been identified in the Ponto area. The
Plan proposes a series of storm drain facilities which will
pick up drainage from the zone and run parallel to the
along the north shore of the Batiquitos Lagoon. Prior to any
development within this drainage sub-basin, a financing
mechanism guaranteeing construction of the storm drain will
be required prior to development within the zone.
Brian Hunter continued the presentation.
Open Space
On August 9, 1988 the City Council adopted interim ordinance
/INS31 regarding open space. That ordinance creates a
15-member citizen's committee to reviev the current open
August 17, 1988, recomended that the criteria for
determining performance standard open space should be further
defined. Developrnenn projects will be reviewed for
conformance to current policies at the tme of discretionary
action. !4r. Hunter asked Commissioners to look at LMP 1122 using present day scenarios which will not lock exhibits into
place. The policies which exist at the tune of discretionary
action for site development plans, plat maps, etc. will be
applied at the tine discretionary permits are issued. LFMP
1122 has been conditioned so as not to adopt the open space
exhibits as they appear in the plan.
Phil Carter continued the presentation.
This will also include the road segment of
financing mechanism guaranteeing the construction of these
Half of
*railroad right-of-way through a proposed desiltation basin
space plan. The Planning Comission, by Hinute Motion on
\
L: . . October 19, 1988 PLANNING OXQUSSION Page 4 ! i I
I' i I
l .I i
i 1-
I
i
I I
i
I
i
i
i
!
I
1
I
I
I
!
I 1
I
L ,
COMMISSIONERS
Financing
This zone plan, like the previous plan, contains a specific
financing section which identifies funding options which are
available for each of the 11 facilities shown in the plan.
The zone plan does not lock in the specific financing since
it allows those options most appropriate to each one of the
facilities. This is the same financing matrix seen in
previous zone plans.
Recormended Modifications to LFMP 1\22
Mr. Carter reviewed a memo dated October 19, 1988 to the
Planning Commission recomending a revised condition to the
Circulation and Drainage sections of LFMP 1/22.
recommended revision states that "Prior to recordation of the
first final map, issuance of a grading permit or issuance of
a building permit, whichever occurs first, for any
development in Zone 22, a comprehensive financing
program.. . ."
This revised condition would replace the existing condition
on pages 16 and 103 of the Circulation section and page 06 of
the Drainage section which states that "Prior to the approval
(or issuance) of any development permit within Zone 22, a
comprehensive financing progr am...."
In addition. staff recommended deletion of a sentence on page
140 of the Phasing section which states that the projections
in LFMF' 1/22 are for planning purposes only.
Mr. Carter concluded the presentation by stating that LFHP 1/22 complies vith the growth management program and
staff recommends approval.
Commissioner Erwin inquired if there is a down side to the
revised condition contained in the October 19th memo. Hr. Carter replied that there vas none.
Commissioner Erwin referred to Exhibit 51 on page 116
regarding the 50 ft. landscape setback and inquired if this
The
was the example which was referred to which implies no
city.
acceptance on the part of the City. Mr. Humter replied that
this was correct and that it also implies no taking by the
Chairman McFadden opened the public testimony and issued the
invitation to speak.
Marv Stedman, 5897 Overland Drive. San Diego, Vice President
applicant, addressed the Commission and stated that they
concur with the staff presentation and recommendation.
of the Lusk Company and Yanager of the San Diego Division,
expressed appreciation to staff for their hard work on this
plan.
He
Chairman McPadden inquired hov many of the 40 property owners
in this zone participated in the input to LriP 1/22.
Hr. Stem replied that, to his knowledge, most of the
owners participated in the discussions. Hr. Carter added that at a meeting following the rough draft of the plan, all
of the property owners were present.
Pat O'Day. 7585 Navigator Circle, Carlsbad, addressed the
parcel in Zone 22 (Propercy fl2, Exhibit 51). He mentioned
Commission and stated that he is part owner of a nine acre
i !
!'
i
'. I
i
1
i
!
!
I
I 1. i
I
!
I
i
1
I
1
1
I
!
I i i I
I
1
..,
page 5 COMMISSIONERS October 19, 1988 PlANNING COMMISSION
-
the scheme for open space determination and the fact that
each individual project will be required to comply with
current requirements, per his letter to the Planning
Commission dated October 19, 1988. He expressed appreciation
to staff for their hard work on this plan,
Ted Blonski, 17065 West Bernard0 Drive, San Diego, addressed
the Commission and stated that he is in favor of the
Commission approval of LFHP 1/22. He has attended several of
the meetings which were held and commended staff on their
zone. just south of Palomar Airport Road.
There being no other persons desiring to address the
Commission on this topic, Chairman McFadden declared the
public testimony closed and opened the item for discussion
among the Commission members.
Commissioner Erwin stated that he can support the plan,
however he has a problem uith Finding (15. He does not like
the words "prevent growth" and would like the finding
reworded. Mr. Carter replied that the intent of Pinding 115 is that no growth will be allowed in Zone 22 unless the
performance standard is met. Staff can accept a rewording.
Mr. Carter suggested that the finding could read. "The Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 22 will ensure that the
public facilities and services are available in conformance
with the adopted performance standards prior to allowing any
growth to occur ."
Couunissioner Erwin was satisfied with the rewording.
hard work. His property is located at the north end of the
Commissioner Schlehuber referred to page 86. Drainage. and
stated that the staff memo dated October 19th contained a
typographical error on the actual wording of the existing
condition as it pertained to the Drainage section.
Chairman McFadden likes the plan.
Park prior agreement. technicalities in regard to that, she can accept the plan for
this zone because of Condition E (page 13) which states that
periodic adjustments will be made.
Motion was duly mada, seconded, and carried to adopt Erwin Resolution No. 2780 recornending approval of the Negative Holnes
Declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopt Yarcus Resolution No. 2781 recamending approval of Local XcFadden
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 22, with the change Schiehuber
on Resolution No. 2781 to reword Finding t5 as read Schramm
by Mr. Carter, and the modifications to page 16 and 103
(Circulation), page 86 (Drainage), and page 140 (Phasing)
per staff memo dated October 19, 1988.
RECESS
She has a question on the
Without understanding all of the
I
The Planning Gomission recessed at 6:37 p.m, and reconvened
2)
at 6:A2 p.m.
SDP 88-3 CARLTAS ALTO CEWER - Request for approval of a
Site Development Plan to COnStrECt an auto retail center in the C-2-Q Zone and also in Local Facilities
Hanagenent Plan Zone 3.
Charles Grim, Assistant Planning Director, reviewed the
background of the request and srated that the applicant is
*
(Form A)
I ., . 7 I, b 0
I' ~(d 3/:oo f
1 )* 2 2 -6 P
dll TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT
RE: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
Attached are the materials necessary for you to notice
Local Facilities Ejilji~d~jerner-tt Pldn Zone 22
for a public hearing before the City Council.
Please notice the item for the council meeting of December", 19
\p)+
4
P\ .
Thank you.
Novembei- i5, 198:
Date
This should be noticed with ll8 page ad in two newpapers.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hol a pub1 ic hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California at 6:OO p.m. on Tuesday, December 6, 1988, to consider approval of Loca Facilities Management Plan Zone 22 on property generally located west of 1-5 south of Palomar Airport Road, and north of Batiquitos Lagoon, and mor particularly described as:
Portion of sections 20, 28 and 29, Township 12S, Range 4W and portion of Rancho Agua Hedionda.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to atter the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Plannir Department at 438-1161.
If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 22 in court, you m:
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the publ' hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to t\ City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
CASE FILE: LFMP 88-22 APPLICANT: Rick Engineering Company PUBLISH : November 25, 1988
CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL \
0 a “I\
q r.. 1 1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
LFMP 88-22
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold
hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, a
6:OO P.M., on Tuesday, December 13, 1988 to consider a Local Facilities Manage
Plan for Zone 22, on property generally located west of 1-5, south of Palomar
Airport Road, and north of Batiquitos Lagoon, and more particularly described
Portion of sections 20, 28 and 29, Township 12S, Range 4W
and portion of Rancho Agua Hedionda.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call the Planning Depa
at 438-1161.
If you challenge the Local Facilities Managment Plan Zone 22 in court, you may
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public
hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the
City of Carlsbad, City Clerk’s Office at or prior to the public hearing.
APPLICANT: Rick Engineering Co.
PUBLISH: December 2, 1988 CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
City d CUW y
1,. r E'
1 CH R I ST,MAS FANTASY
The Antique Warehouse
d to the
212 So. Cedros
Solana Beach 755-51 56
VISIT - Santa's Vilsge SAMPLE - Our Sugar Plum Table
VIEW - Doll Fashion Show Contest
REAP - Fantastic Savings iv Exh Shop
INITAS 0 SUITE 1 10 Restaurant) 1
1st unsual gi#ts! Dec. 3&4, Sat. & Sun. I
+ A great assortment
+ Oriental Figurines + Costume Jewelry + Austrian Crystals
of Animals and Birds
+ Christmas Decorative GRAND PRIZE: $1 00 Gift Certificate 1 Pieces and Candles All dolls will be dora!ed to TOY S-FOR-TOTS i
I
1
$25 & $10 Gift Certificates for other categories. Prizes will be
11 i j
I
1,
I
I 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC I
I 1, HEARING LFMP 88-22
I
I I Zone 22, on property generally located west of 1-5, south of Palomar Airport Road, and north of Batiquitos Lagoon, and more particularly described as:
Portion of sections 20,28 and 29, Township 12S, Range 4W and portion of Rancho Agua Hedionda.
If you have questions regarding this matter, please call the Planning Department at 438-1 161. I If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 22 in
court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing described in
CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL
I I
suostan Ahe‘dca11 Indians and others? ‘We started the group in “YOU rut1 into lots of dead ends
30 twey play by the Same rules March, although we just held our as YOU try to trace back, which as white Anglo-Saxon Prates- first meeting this past makes it a detective story of tants’ with ties to colonial September,” said Dave Salazar, Sorts,” said Valeria Tanaka, a America? president of the group, also bas- search group member since 1985. “For 150 years, genealogy was ed in Denver. “The response has Barbara Sm~non began in- primarily the concern of white, been tremendous; people are vestigating her roots in 1975, and New England researchers,” said excited about what is happening to date she has traced her James Jeffrey, collection in ethnic genealogy. Hispanics great-great-grandmother, Millie, specialist with the Denver around here have not seen much back to 1824. Public Library. “Rut since the of their history taught in the “When you look at slave advent of Roots arid the Ameri- school system, so there Is a records, you find hundreds of can bicentennial there’s been a strong desire to learn about their Millies, Toms, Sams and Jerrys,” new consciousness that we all past. This is one way to do it.” she ohwwd “I had to ask,
*I.,_. YIU-IXV UISU ~~ruyou~~s, qerlca was Iormea.
Children’s gender influences their
By VINCENT BOZZI Lawrence Ganong and Marilyn their parenting repertoire. Coleman wanted to see if the sex Mothers, too, are influenced by for Psychology Today of children can also influence their child’s gender. One might
LOS Angeles Times Syndicate parents. Using a questionnaire expect mothers of sons to
A father with two sons and no that measured both masculine become more masculine, but in- daughters wrestles with the boys and feminine behavior, the stead, they become more femi- on the living room rug while the researchers tested 306 parents.
“One explanation is that sons dad down the street serves tea in
tiny CUPS to his three smiling “Fathers who have SonS are have a traditionalizing impact on daughters. By adjusting their significantly less feminine than parents’ gender roles, with fa- behavior to match their those who have daughters only,” thers becoming relatively mOre children’s gender. the fathers’ and own sex-role orientations are not the same as saying that fa- mothers relatively mOre femi- changing. thers without daughters are nine than masculine,,, the
more masculine. Fathers of girls researchers write in Journal of
fluence their children, but Uni- while picking up some positive versity of Missouri researchers feminine sensibilities to add to Why is femininity influenced
nine. What is happening?
Ganong and Co1eman say. That’s masculiIle than feminine
We know that parents in- retained their masculine side Family Issues.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 6:OO P.M., on Tuesday, December 13,1988 to consider a
Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 22, on property
generally located west of 1-5, south of Palomar Airpor!
Road, and north of Batiquitos Lagoon, and more particularly
described as:
Portion of sections 20,28 and 29, Township 12S, Range
4 W and portion of Rancho Agua Hedionda.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call
the Planning Department at 438-1 161.
If you challenge the Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 22 in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues
you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the
City of Carlsbad, City Clerk’s Office at or prior to the public
v’
APPLICANT Rick Engineering Co.
PUBLISH: CARLBAD CITY COUNCIL December 2, 1988